Abstract
Purpose
The aim of the present study was to identify risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity and major morbidity, with a prolonged length of hospital stay and with the need of readmission in patients undergoing appendectomy due to acute appendicitis.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 1638 adult patients who underwent emergency appendectomy for preoperatively suspected acute appendicitis from 2010 to 2020 at the University Hospital Erlangen. Data including patient demographics, pre-, intra-, and postoperative findings were collected and compared between different outcome groups (morbidity, major morbidity, prolonged length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) and readmission) from those patients with verified acute appendicitis (n = 1570).
Results
Rate of negative appendectomies was 4%. In patients with verified acute appendicitis, morbidity, major morbidity and readmission occurred in 6%, 3% and 2%, respectively. Mean LOS was 3.9 days. Independent risk factors for morbidity were higher age, higher preoperative WBC-count and CRP, lower preoperative hemoglobin, longer time to surgery and longer duration of surgery. As independent risk factors for major morbidity could be identified higher age, higher preoperative CRP, lower preoperative hemoglobin and longer time to surgery. Eight parameters were independent risk factors for a prolonged LOS: higher age, higher preoperative WBC-count and CRP, lower preoperative hemoglobin, need for conversion, longer surgery duration, presence of intraoperative complicated appendicitis and of postoperative morbidity. Presence of malignancy and higher preoperative WBC-count were independent risk factors for readmission.
Conclusion
Among patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis, there are relevant risk factors predicting postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stays and readmission. Patients with the presence of the identified risk factors should receive special attention in the postoperative course and may benefit from a more individualized therapy.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-023-02225-9.
Keywords: Acute appendicitis, Appendectomy, Risk factors, Morbidity, Readmission
Introduction
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common diseases in visceral surgery, worldwide. Analyses of the last years show a consistently high incidence in western countries. Moreover, data from newly industrialized countries suggests that appendicitis is rising rapidly in these regions. During the twenty-first century, the incidence of acute appendicitis in Western Europe was 151/100,000 person-years [1]. In Germany, this rate was slightly lower (123/100,000 person-years in 2017) [2].
The treatment of acute appendicitis is subject of a continuing debate about the best practice of therapeutic management. There are several studies, which suggest a non-operative management of acute appendicitis by antibiotic therapy [3–7]. Proponents of conservative treatment argue with the risk of surgical complications in favor of conservative therapy.
However, until now prompt appendectomy may be still the therapy of choice for most patients with acute appendicitis [8, 9]. Moreover, previous studies show moderate morbidity rates after appendectomy between six and nine percent [10–14].
Nevertheless, knowledge of risk factors, that could affect negatively the surgical outcome, can help to improve the quality of treatment through differentiated treatment and individual postoperative measures for at-risk patients. Perioperative complication rate as well as length of postoperative stay and readmission rate represent important universal indicators of surgical treatment quality.
The primary objective of the present study was to identify risk factors associated with the development of morbidity and major morbidity, with a prolonged length of hospital stay and with the need of readmission in patients undergoing appendectomy due to acute appendicitis.
Methods
This retrospective analysis includes 1638 consecutive patients (age ≥ 18 years), who underwent an emergency appendectomy for preoperatively suspected acute appendicitis at the Department of General and Visceral Surgery of the University Hospital of Erlangen between January 2010 and December 2020. Patients with one of the following criteria were excluded: (1) patients with age younger than 18 years; (2) appendectomies without preoperatively suspected acute appendicitis.
Patients were stratified into two groups: (1) patients with intraoperatively or histopathologically verified acute appendicitis and (2) patients with negative appendectomies. Postoperative outcome parameters (morbidity, major morbidity, length of hospital stays and readmission) were compared between these two groups.
Further analysis was performed using only patients with intraoperatively or histopathologically verified acute appendicitis. Therefore, data about patients demographics, comorbidities, preoperative findings (blood results, ultrasound, CT scan), intraoperative findings, histopathological findings and postoperative course were obtained and analyzed. The time interval between the first clinical examination of the patients and the first incision for the operation was defined as the time to appendectomy. Gangrenous or perforated appendicitis and/or presence of perithyphilitic abscess were defined as complicated appendicitis.
Primary aim of this study was to identify risk factors for morbidity, major morbidity, prolonged length of hospital stays and readmission after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Therefore, we stratified our acute appendicitis study cohort according to these four parameters into comparison groups: No postoperative morbidity versus postoperative morbidity, no major postoperative morbidity versus major postoperative morbidity, no prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) versus prolonged LOS and no readmission versus readmission. Morbidity was defined as any deviation from the normal postoperative course and was classified according to the Clavien–Dindo classification [15]. Morbidity ≥ grade III according to Clavien–Dindo was considered as major morbidity. A postoperative hospital stay > 5 days was recognized as prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). All readmissions within three months after surgery, which were related to appendectomy, were considered.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of FAU Erlangen (22-157-Br).
Diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm of patients with acute appendicitis
At first admission, all patients received a blood test including hemogram, inflammatory and coagulation parameters as well as an abdominal ultrasound preoperatively. If diagnosis was still unclear an abdominal CT-scan was indicated. Intraoperative findings were documented by the surgeons in their surgical report. The intraoperative collection of material for microbiological examination was made depending on the surgeon’s decision. All appendectomy specimens were examined histopathologically. In the postoperative course, blood examinations were carried out depending on the clinical status of the patients.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Statistic (Version 28.0, IBM). Comparisons of ordinal and metric data were calculated with Mann–Whitney U test or Student’s t test. For categorical data, the chi-square test was used. Statistical significance was set a p < 0.05. Multivariate analysis was performed with in univariate analysis identified risk factors for at least one of the outcome parameter (morbidity, major morbidity, prolonged LOS or readmission). Parameter with incomplete data and postoperative parameters, which represent sequelae and not risk factors of outcome parameters were excluded from the multivariate analysis. Cutoffs for metric risk factors were calculated using ROC analysis. Independent risk factors in the multivariate analysis were included in analysis of risk factor score.
Results
A total of 1638 patients, who underwent emergency appendectomy during study period, were included.
Negative appendectomy vs. appendectomy for acute appendicitis
Negative appendectomies were performed in 68 patients (4%). Patients with negative appendectomy had a significantly shorter length of postoperative stay compared to those with verified acute appendicitis (3.4 vs. 3.9 days, p = 0.003). Morbidity, major morbidity and readmission occurred in 3%, 3% and 0%, respectively, and did not differ compared to patients with appendicitis.
Outcome parameter after appendectomy for acute appendicitis
In 1570 patients, acute appendicitis was verified intraoperatively and/or histopathologically. Mean age of these patients was 39 ± 17 years. 48% of patients were female. In 99 patients (6%) postoperative morbidity occurred. The most common complications were wound infections (19%), followed by intra-abdominal abscesses (13%) and non-surgical cardiopulmonary complications (12%) (Table 1). 49% of patients with postoperative complications suffered from minor morbidity (Clavien–Dindo I and II), whereas 51% had major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo III to V). Two cases of in-hospital-mortality (0.13%) were observed: One 80-year-old man with myelodysplastic syndrome and advanced appendicitis underwent an appendectomy by conversion and developed postoperative intestinal ischemia. The second patient was a 60-year-old male, who underwent an uncomplicated open appendectomy and who was found dead on the 2nd postoperative day after an uncomplicated postoperative course. The cause of death remained unclear as no autopsy was performed. Mean length of postoperative hospital stay (LOS) amount 3.9 ± 4.5 days. In 21 patients (1%), a reoperation was necessary. There were 30 patients requiring appendectomy-related readmission (2%) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Outcome parameter (morbidity, length of hospital stay and hospital readmission) after appendectomy for acute appendicitis (n = 1570) and negative appendicitis (n = 68)
| Outcome parameter | Intraoperative and/or pathological appendicitis | Negative appendectomies | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 1570 (96) | 68 (4) | ||
| In-hospital | Clavien–Dindo | 0.317 | ||
| 0 | 1471 (94) | 66 (97) | ||
| I | 25 (2) | 0 (0) | ||
| II | 24 (1) | 0 (0) | ||
| III | 38 (2) | 2 (3) | ||
| IV | 10 (1) | 0 (0) | ||
| V | 2 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Cause for morbidity | – | |||
| Surgical causes | ||||
| Wound infection | 19 (19) | 0 (0) | ||
| Intra-abdominal abscess | 13 (13) | 0 (0) | ||
| Paralysis/ileus | 6 (6) | 0 (0) | ||
| Bleeding | 4 (4) | 0 (0) | ||
| Appendiceal stump insufficiency | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Non-surgical causes | 12 (12) | 1 (50) | ||
| Cardio-pulmonary complication | 12 (12) | 1 (50) | ||
| Uro-genital complication | 7 (7) | 0 (0) | ||
| Others | 38 (38) | 1 (50) | ||
| Re-surgery | 21 (1) | 1 (1) | 1.000 | |
| Length of postoperative hospital stay (in days) | 3.9 ± 4.5 | 3.4 ± 3.6 | 0.003 | |
| After discharge | Appendectomy-related readmission | 30 (2) | 0 (0) | 0.269 |
| Reasons for readmission | – | – | ||
| Paralysis/ileus | 9 (30) | |||
| Intra-abdominal abscess | 5 (17) | |||
| Malignancy | 5 (17) | |||
| Wound infection | 4 (13) | |||
| Abdominal pain | 4 (13) | |||
| Others | 3 (10) | |||
Significant p values are in bold
Baseline patient characteristics of patients with acute appendicitis
Demographics characteristic of patients stratified to the subgroups morbidity, major morbidity, prolonged LOS and readmission are shown in Table 2. Risk factors for at least one of the outcome parameter were age, BMI, ASA, Diabetes. Gender, smoking, Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis did not differ between the groups.
Table 2.
Baseline patient characteristics and preoperative findings
| No morbidity | Morbidity | p value | No major morbidity | Major morbidity | p value | No prolonged LOS | Prolonged LOS | p value | No | Re-admission | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (≤ 5 days) | (> 5 days) | readmission | ||||||||||
| Number | 1471 | 99 | 1520 | 50 | 1361 | 209 | 1540 | 30 | ||||
| Age (years) | 38 ± 17 | 57 ± 18 | < 0.001 | 39 ± 17 | 58 ± 18 | < 0.001 | 37 ± 16 | 54 ± 19 | < 0.001 | 39 ± 17 | 41 ± 17 | 0.357 |
| Gender | 1.000 | 0.886 | 0.824 | 1.000 | ||||||||
| Female | 700 (48) | 47 (48) | 724 (48) | 23 (46) | 646 (48) | 101 (48) | 733 (48) | 14 (47) | ||||
| Male | 771 (52) | 52 (52) | 796 (52) | 27 (54) | 715 (52) | 108 (52) | 807 (52) | 16 (53) | ||||
| BMI* (kg/m2) | 25.2 ± 4.8 | 27.1 ± 506 | 00009 | 2504 ± 409 | 2503 ± 5.0 | 0.825 | 25.1 ± 4.8 | 27.0 ± 5.5 | < 0.001 | 25.3 ± 4.8 | 27.1 ± 6.1 | 0.155 |
| ASA* | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.694 | ||||||||
| I | 846 (62) | 26 (29) | 861 (61) | 11 (25) | 812 (65) | 60 (31) | 859 (60) | 13 (52) | ||||
| II | 443 (33) | 36 (40) | 463 (33) | 16 (36) | 405 (32) | 74 (38) | 469 (33) | 10 (40) | ||||
| III | 66 (5) | 26 (29) | 78 (6) | 14 (32) | 35 (3) | 57 (29) | 90 (6) | 2 (8) | ||||
| IV | 2 (0) | 3 (3) | 2 (0) | 3 (7) | 1 (0) | 4 (2) | 5 (0) | 0 (0) | ||||
| Smoker* | 312 (26) | 18 (21) | 0.652 | 318 (25) | 12 (30) | 0.704 | 292 (26) | 38 (22) | 0.092 | 324 (25) | 6 (22) | 0.847 |
| Diabetes | 54 (4) | 15 (15) | < 0.001 | 60 (4) | 9 (18) | < 0.001 | 44 (3) | 25 (12) | < 0.001 | 67 (4) | 2 (7) | 0.640 |
| Crohn’s disease | 10 (1) | 1 (1) | 1.000 | 10 (1) | 1 (2) | 0.300 | 10 (1) | 1 (1) | 1.000 | 10 (1) | 1 (3) | 0.192 |
| Ulcerative colitis | 8 (1) | 0 (0) | 0.679 | 8 (1) | 0 (0) | 1.000 | 5 (0) | 3 (1) | 0.078 | 8 (1) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
| Preop. blood results | ||||||||||||
| WBC count (× 109/l) | 13.0 ± 4.4 | 13.8 ± 5.9 | 0.209 | 13.1 ± 4.4 | 14.0 ± 6.5 | 0.265 | 12.9 ± 4.3 | 14.4 ± 5.1 | < 0.001 | 13.0 ± 4.5 | 14.9 ± 5.3 | 0.041 |
| CRP (mg/l) | 60 ± 71 | 143 ± 108 | < 0.001 | 63 ± 74 | 149 ± 101 | < 0.001 | 53 ± 63 | 146 ± 105 | < 0.001 | 65 ± 76 | 109 ± 105 | 0.010 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 14.3 ± 1.5 | 13.4 ± 1.9 | < 0.001 | 14.3 ± 1.5 | 13.1 ± 2.2 | < 0.001 | 14.3 ± 1.5 | 13.7 ± 1.8 | < 0.001 | 14.2 ± 1.5 | 14.2 ± 1.7 | 0.615 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 0.003 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | < 0.001 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 0.700 |
| Preop. radiological diagnostics | ||||||||||||
| App. diameter (mm) | 11 ± 4 | 11 ± 4 | 0.532 | 11 ± 4 | 12 ± 6 | 0.379 | 11 ± 30 | 11 ± 4 | 0.111 | 11 ± 4 | 11 ± 4 | 0.418 |
| Intraabdominal fluid | 527 (36) | 52 (53) | 0.001 | 550 (36) | 29 (58) | 0.002 | 477 (35) | 102 (49) | < 0.001 | 570 (37) | 9 (30) | 0.454 |
Significant p values are in bold
Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%)
LOS length of postoperative stay, BMI body mass index, ASA score (ASA) American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Preop. Preoperative, WBC white blood cell, App. Appendiceal
*Incomplete data: BMI: n = 1137; ASA: n = 1448; smoker: n = 1306
Preoperative, intraoperative, histopathological and postoperative findings of patients with acute appendicitis
Regarding the perioperative data following parameter were identified to be significantly associated for at least one of the outcome parameter (morbidity, major morbidity, prolonged LOS, readmission): preoperative blood results including WBC count, CRP, hemoglobin and creatinine, intraabdominal fluid in preoperative diagnostic, time to appendectomy, surgical experience, surgical approach, duration of surgery, appendix stump closure in laparoscopic surgery, necessity of coecum resection, intraoperative findings including perforation, gangrene, perithyphilitic abscess presence of complicated appendicitis, presence of complicated appendicitis or malignancy in histopathology, postoperative blood results on postoperative day 1 including WBC count, CRP, hemoglobin and creatinine, microbiological detection of bacteria as well postoperative radiological diagnostic, postoperative abdominal CT and postoperative use of antibiotics (Tables 2, 3, 4). There were no significant difference for appendiceal diameter in preoperative radiological diagnostics among the groups (Table 5).
Table 3.
Surgical parameters
| No morbidity | Morbidity | p value | No major morbidity | Major morbidity | p value | No prolonged LOS | Prolonged LOS | p value | No readmission | Readmission | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 1471) | (n = 99) | (n = 1520) | (n = 50) | (≤ 5 days) | (> 5 days) | (n = 1540) | ||||||
| (n = 1361) | (n = 209) | (n = 30) | ||||||||||
| Time to appendectomy | 0.122 | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.574 | ||||||||
| ≤ 6 h | 656 (45) | 37 (37) | 676 (45) | 17 (34) | 618 (45) | 75 (36) | 676 (44) | 17 (57) | ||||
| > 6 h–≤ 12 h | 426 (29) | 31 (31) | 442 (29) | 15 (30) | 382 (28) | 75 (36) | 450 (29) | 7 (23) | ||||
| > 12 h–≤ 24 h | 262 (18) | 16 (16) | 272 (18) | 6 (12) | 246 (18) | 32 (15) | 274 (18) | 4 (13) | ||||
| > 24 h | 127 (9) | 15 (15) | 130 (9) | 12 (24) | 115 (8) | 27 (13) | 140 (9) | 2 (7) | ||||
| Surgical experience | 0.079 | 0.077 | 0.001 | 0.687 | ||||||||
| Resident | 406 (28) | 19 (19) | 417 (27) | 8 (16) | 388 (29) | 37 (18) | 418 (27) | 7 (23) | ||||
| Specialist | 1065 (72) | 80 (81) | 1103 (73) | 42 (84) | 973 (71) | 172 (82) | 1122 (73) | 23 (77) | ||||
| Surgical approach | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Laparoscopic | 1104 (75) | 49 (50) | 1129 (74) | 24 (48) | 1051 (77) | 102 (49) | 1136 (74) | 17 (57) | ||||
| Open | 316 (21) | 34 (34) | 332 (22) | 17 (36) | 286 (21) | 64 (31) | 343 (22) | 7 (23) | ||||
| Conversion | 51 (4) | 16 (16) | 59 (4) | 8 (16) | 24 (2) | 43 (21) | 61 (4) | 6 (20) | ||||
| Duration of surgery (min) | 66 ± 27 | 90 ± 40 | < 0.001 | 66 ± 28 | 90 ± 47 | < 0.001 | 64 ± 25 | 90 ± 39 | < 0.001 | 67 ± 28 | 81 ± 46 | 0.074 |
| Appendix stump closure (in laparoscopic surgery) | 0.235 | 0.542 | 0.036 | 0.241 | ||||||||
| Stapler | 920 (83) | 45 (92) | 943 (84) | 22 (92) | 872 (83) | 93 (91) | 948 (84) | 17 (100) | ||||
| Endoloop | 172 (16) | 4 (8) | 174 (15) | 2 (8) | 169 (16) | 7 (7) | 176 (16) | 0 (0) | ||||
| Other | 12 (1) | 0 (0) | 12 (1) | 0 (0) | 10 (1) | 2 (2) | 12 (1) | 0 (0) | ||||
| Coecum resection | 57 (4) | 12 (12) | 0.001 | 64 (4) | 5 (10) | 0.065 | 38 (3) | 31 (15) | < 0.001 | 67 (4) | 2 (7) | 0.640 |
| Intraoperative findings | ||||||||||||
| Perforation | 280 (19) | 60 (61) | < 0.001 | 309 (20) | 31 (62) | < 0.001 | 207 (15) | 133 (64) | < 0.001 | 333 (22) | 7 (23) | 0.823 |
| Necrosis or gangrene | 106 (7) | 23 (23) | < 0.001 | 118 (8) | 11 (22) | 0.002 | 82 (6) | 47 (23) | < 0.001 | 128 (8) | 1 (3) | 0.507 |
| Perithyphilitic abscess | 128 (9) | 33 (33) | < 0.001 | 146 (10) | 15 (30) | < 0.001 | 86 (6) | 75 (36) | < 0.001 | 154 (10) | 7 (23) | 0.028 |
| Complicated appendicitis | 330 (22) | 66 (67) | < 0.001 | 362 (24) | 34 (68) | < 0.001 | 244 (18) | 152 (73) | < 0.001 | 383 (25) | 13 (43) | 0.031 |
Significant p values are in bold
Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%)
LOS length of postoperative stay
Table 4.
Histopathological and postoperative parameters
| No morbidity | Morbidity | p value | No major morbidity | Major morbidity | p value | No prolonged LOS | Prolonged LOS | p value | No readmission | Readmission | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n = 1471) | (n = 99) | (n = 1520) | (n = 50) | (≤ 5 days) | (> 5 days) | (n = 1540) | ||||||
| (n = 1361) | (n = 209) | (n = 30) | ||||||||||
| Histopathological findings | ||||||||||||
| Complicated appendicitis | 500 (34) | 67 (68) | < 0.001 | 531 (35) | 36 (74) | < 0.001 | 425 (31) | 142 (68) | < 0.001 | 555 (36) | 12 (40) | 0.703 |
| Malignancy | 20 (1) | 1 (1) | 1.000 | 20 (1) | 1 (2) | 1.000 | 15 (1) | 6 (3) | 0.049 | 16 (1) | 5 (17) | < 0.001 |
| Blood results on POD 1* | ||||||||||||
| WBC count (× 109/l) | 9.2 ± 3.2 | 12.2 ± 7.0 | < 0.001 | 9.3 ± 3.4 | 12.1 ± 7.7 | 0.010 | 9.0 ± 3.0 | 12.0 ± 5.5 | < 0.001 | 9.4 ± 3.6 | 11.7 ± 5.4 | 0.003 |
| CRP (mg/l) | 114 ± 86 | 217 ± 98 | < 0.001 | 117 ± 88 | 222 ± 103 | < 0.001 | 103 ± 78 | 227 ± 90 | < 0.001 | 120 ± 90 | 177 ± 101 | 0.002 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dl) | 12.6 ± 1.5 | 11.7 ± 1.9 | < 0.001 | 12.6 ± 1.5 | 11.1 ± 2.1 | < 0.001 | 12.7 ± 1.5 | 12.0 ± 1.8 | < 0.001 | 12.6 ± 1.5 | 12.1 ± 1.8 | 0.118 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | < 0.001 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 0.023 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 0.152 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.731 |
| Microbiol. detection of bacteria** | 200 (48) | 31 (91) | < 0.001 | 214 (49) | 17 (90) | 0.001 | 159 (42) | 72 (94) | < 0.001 | 225 (50) | 6 (67) | 0.504 |
| Postop. any radiol. diagnostic necessary | 2 (0) | 53 (54) | < 0.001 | 19 (1) | 36 (72) | < 0.001 | 3 (0) | 52 (25) | < 0.001 | 54 (4) | 1 (3) | 1.000 |
| Postop. abdominal CT | 1 (0) | 35 (35) | < 0.001 | 6 (0) | 30 (60) | < 0.001 | 1 (0) | 35 (17) | < 0.001 | 36 (2) | 0 (0) | 0.645 |
| Postop. antibiotics | 747 (51) | 86 (87) | < 0.001 | 793 (52) | 40 (80) | < 0.001 | 646 (48) | 187 (90) | < 0.001 | 815 (53) | 18 (60) | 0.467 |
Significant p values are in bold
Data are presented as mean [range] or n (%)
LOS length of postoperative stay, WBC white blood cell, Postop. Postoperative, radiol. Radiological, POD postoperative day, Microbiol. Microbiological
*Postoperative blood examination not done in all patients: n = 1388
**Microbiological examination in 455 (29%) patients done
Table 5.
Multivariate analysis of risk factors for morbidity, major morbidity, prolonged postoperative hospital stay and readmission
| Morbidity | Major morbidity | Prolonged LOS | Readmission | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | CI | p value | OR | CI | p value | OR | CI | p value | OR | CI | p value | |
| Age (high vs. low)* | 3.79 | 2.22–6.49 | < 0.001 | 2.90 | 1.37–6.10 | 0.005 | 2.41 | 1.55–3.75 | < 0.001 | 0.72 | 0.29–1.81 | 0.485 |
| Gender (male vs. female) | 0.81 | 0.46–1.44 | 0.482 | 0.64 | 0.30–1.37 | 0.249 | 0.73 | 0.44–1.22 | 0.231 | 0.96 | 0.39–2.36 | 0.955 |
| Diabetes (yes vs. no) | 1.44 | 0.67–3.09 | 0.355 | 1.66 | 0.63–4.42 | 0.309 | 1.42 | 0.61–3.31 | 0.411 | 1.42 | 0.30–6.75 | 0.662 |
| Preop. WBC count (high vs. low)** | 2.01 | 1.22–3.30 | 0.006 | 1.82 | 0.91–3.63 | 0.091 | 2.19 | 1.43–3.36 | < 0.001 | 2.28 | 1.01–5.18 | 0.049 |
| Preop. CRP (high vs. low)*** | 2.45 | 1.40–4.28 | 0.002 | 2.56 | 1.16–5.65 | 0.020 | 2.23 | 1.42–3.52 | < 0.001 | 2.04 | 0.78–5.36 | 0.149 |
| Preop. hemoglobin (high vs. low)**** | 0.45 | 0.25–0.78 | 0.005 | 0.28 | 0.13–0.61 | 0.001 | 0.57 | 0.34–0.94 | 0.029 | 6.48 | 0.92–37.53 | 0.067 |
| Preop. creatinine (high vs. low)***** | 1.74 | 0.98–3.11 | 0.061 | 1.66 | 0.76–3.63 | 0.205 | 0.98 | 0.52–1.85 | 0.958 | 1.17 | 0.44–3.10 | 0.756 |
| Intraabdominal fluid in radiological diagnostic (yes vs. no) | 1.28 | 0.78–2.09 | 0.329 | 1.61 | 0.83–3.12 | 0.159 | 0.98 | 0.64–1.52 | 0.943 | 0.67 | 0.28–1.61 | 0.373 |
| Time to appendectomy (high vs. low)****** | 1.90 | 1.17–3.08 | 0.009 | 2.48 | 1.26–4.85 | 0.008 | 1.52 | 0.98–2.35 | 0.060 | 4.55 | 0.87–23.32 | 0.069 |
| Surgical experience (resident vs. specialist) | 0.97 | 0.53–1.77 | 0.914 | 1.19 | 0.50–2.82 | 0.695 | 1.15 | 0.68–1.93 | 0.610 | 0.95 | 0.37–2.43 | 0.906 |
| Surgical approach | 0.373 | 0.773 | < 0.001 | 0.187 | ||||||||
| Open vs. laparoscopic | 1.37 | 0.79–2.39 | 0.263 | 1.21 | 0.57–2.57 | 0.617 | 1.41 | 0.86–2.32 | 0.176 | 1.27 | 0.48–3.33 | 0.632 |
| Conversion vs. laparoscopic | 1.57 | 0.72–3.42 | 0.262 | 1.43 | 0.48–4.30 | 0.525 | 4.91 | 2.39–10.07 | < 0.001 | 3.24 | 0.92–11.37 | 0.067 |
| Duration of surgery (high vs. low)******* | 2.67 | 1.53–4.68 | < 0.001 | 1.27 | 0.63–2.59 | 0.506 | 1.90 | 1.21–2.98 | 0.005 | 2.07 | 0.87–4.92 | 0.100 |
| Coecum resection (yes vs. no) | 0.74 | 0.32–1.70 | 0.472 | 0.47 | 0.14–1.57 | 0.219 | 1.54 | 0.74–3.18 | 0.245 | 0.65 | 0.12–3.53 | 0.622 |
| Intraoperative complicated app (yes vs. no) | 1.70 | 0.94–3.07 | 0.079 | 1.63 | 0.72–3.66 | 0.238 | 4.00 | 2.39–6.70 | < 0.001 | 1.30 | 0.42–4.01 | 0.649 |
| Histopathological complicated app (yes vs. no) | 1.33 | 0.76–2.31 | 0.316 | 1.86 | 0.86–4.06 | 0.117 | 1.06 | 0.66–1.71 | 0.812 | 0.62 | 0.23–1.68 | 0.345 |
| Malignancy (yes vs. no) | 0.29 | 0.04–2.44 | 0.257 | 0.83 | 0.10–7.00 | 0.864 | 1.43 | 0.42–4.81 | 0.565 | 15.27 | 4.47–52.12 | < 0.001 |
| Morbidity (yes vs. no) | 23.38 | 12.16–44.94 | < 0.001 | 0.69 | 0.16–3.02 | 0.626 | ||||||
| Prolonged LOS (yes vs. no) | 1.50 | 0.46–4.93 | 0.504 | |||||||||
Significant p values are in bold
Appendiceal stump closure (only laparoscopic appendectomies) as well as BMI, ASA, postoperative blood results and microbiological detection of bacteria (incomplete data) were excluded
LOS length of postoperative stay, Preop. Preoperative, WBC white blood cell, app. appendicitis
*Cut-offs for age assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1): Morbidity: 50 years, Major morbidity: 52 years, Prolonged LOS: 50 years, Readmission: 29 years
**Cut-offs for WBC count assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1): Morbidity: 14.7 × 109/l, Major morbidity: 15.2 × 109/l, Prolonged LOS: 13.8 × 109/l, Readmission: 13.9 × 109/l
***Cut-offs for CRP assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1): Morbidity: 71 mg/l, Major morbidity: 74 mg/l, Prolonged LOS: 83 mg/l, Readmission: 70 mg/l
****Cut-offs for hemoglobin assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1): Morbidity: 13.7 g/dl, Major morbidity: 13.7 g/dl, Prolonged LOS: 13.7 g/dl, Readmission: 17.4 g/dl
*****Cut-offs for creatinine assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1): Morbidity: 1.0 mg/dl, Major morbidity: 1.0 mg/dl, Prolonged LOS: 1,1 mg/dl, Readmission: 1.0 mg/dl
******Cut-offs for time to appendectomy assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1): Morbidity: 442 min, Major morbidity: 442 min, Prolonged LOS: 345 min, Readmission: 2846 min
*******Cut-offs for duration of surgery assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1): Morbidity: 64 min, Major morbidity: 81 min, Prolonged LOS: 64 min, Readmission: 75 min
Multivariate analysis of patients with acute appendicitis
Sixteen (morbidity and major morbidity) respectively seventeen (prolonged LOS) respectively eighteen (readmission) identified risk factors were included to multivariate analysis (Table 5), whereby the cutoffs of the metric risk factors were previously determined using ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1):
Table 6.
Risk for morbidity, major morbidity, prolonged hospital stay and readmission depending on the number of independent pre- and intraoperative risk factors
| Number of risk factors | Morbidity* | Major morbidity** | Prolonged hospital stay*** | Readmission**** | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | Risk | n | Risk | n | Risk | n | Risk | |
| All patients | 1570 | 1570 | 1570 | 1570 | ||||
| 0 | 188 | 0.0% | 410 | 0.3% | 237 | 1.1% | 1550 | 1.1% |
| 1 | 363 | 0.6% | 546 | 0.7% | 438 | 0.9% | 17 | 3.3% |
| 2 | 437 | 3.0% | 365 | 3.3% | 393 | 4.3% | 3 | 33.3% |
| 3 | 334 | 6.6% | 201 | 9.5% | 205 | 11.2% | ||
| 4 | 177 | 16.4% | 46 | 23.9% | 147 | 39.5% | ||
| 5 | 62 | 37.1% | 83 | 50.6% | ||||
| 6 | 9 | 77.8% | 49 | 79.6% | ||||
| 7 | 16 | 87.5% | ||||||
| 8 | 2 | 100% | ||||||
*Six independent risk factors for morbidity: age > 50 years, preoperative WBC count > 14.7 × 109/l, preoperative CRP > 71 mg/l, preoperative hemoglobin ≤ 13.7 g/dl, time to appendectomy > 442 min, duration of surgery > 64 min. Cut-offs for metric parameters assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1)
**Four independent risk factors for major morbidity: age > 52 years, preoperative CRP > 74 mg/l, preoperative hemoglobin ≤ 13.7 g/dl, time to appendectomy > 442 min. Cut-offs for metric parameters assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1)
***Eight independent risk factors for a prolonged hospital stay: age > 50 years, preoperative white blood cells > 13.8 (× 109/l), preoperative CRP > 83 mg/l, preoperative hemoglobin ≤ 13.7 g/dl, conversion, duration of surgery > 64 min, intraoperative complicated appendicitis, morbidity. Cut-offs for metric parameters assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1)
****Two independent risk factors for readmission: preoperative WBC count > 13.9 × 109/l, malignancy. Cut-offs for metric parameters assessed by ROC analysis (Supplementary Table 1)
There were six independent risk factors for morbidity: age > 50 years (OR 3.79 (2.22–6.49); p < 0.001), preoperative WBC count > 14.7 × 109/l (OR 2.01 (1.22–3.30); p = 0,006), preoperative CRP > 71 mg/l (OR 2.45 (1.40–4.28); p = 0.002), preoperative hemoglobin ≤ 13.7 g/dl (OR 0.45 (0.25–0.78); p = 0,005), time to appendectomy > 442 min (OR 1.90 (1.17–3.08); p = 0.009) and duration of surgery > 64 min (OR 2.67 (1.53–4.68); p < 0.001).
Four independent risk factors could be identified for major morbidity: age > 52 years (OR 2.90 (1.37–6.10); p = 0.005), preoperative CRP > 74 mg/l (OR 2.56 (1.16–5.65); p = 0.020), preoperative hemoglobin ≤ 13.7 g/dl (OR 0.28 (0.13–0.61); p = 0.001) and time to appendectomy > 442 min (OR 2.48 (1.26–4.85); p = 0.008).
Eight parameters were independent risk factors for a prolonged hospital stay: age > 50 years (OR 2.41 (1.55–3.75); p < 0.001), preoperative WBC count > 13.8 × 109/l (OR 2.19 (1.43–3.36); p < 0.001), preoperative CRP > 83 mg/l (OR 2.23 (1.42–3.52); p < 0.001), preoperative hemoglobin ≤ 13.7 g/dl (OR 0.57 (0.34–0.94); p = 0.029), need for conversion (OR 4.91 (2.39–10.07); p < 0.001), surgery duration > 64 min (OR 1.90 (1.21–2.98); p = 0.005), presence of intraoperative complicated appendicitis (OR 4.00 (2.39–6.70; p < 0.001) and presence of postoperative morbidity (OR 23.38 (12.16–44.94); p < 0.001).
Multivariate analysis revealed two independent risk factors for readmission: preoperative WBC count > 13.9 × 109/l (OR 2.28 (1.01–5.18); p = 0.049) and presence of malignancy (OR 15.27 (4.47–52.12); p < 0.001).
Absolute risk values for morbidity, major morbidity, prolonged LOS and readmission according to presence of the identified independent risk factors in patients with acute appendicitis
Table 6 shows the absolute risk values for morbidity, major morbidity, prolonged LOS and readmission according to the number of present identified independent risk factors.
Discussion
Appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis is one of the most common emergency surgeries and is usually associated with moderate morbidity. However, particularly in the context of the ongoing discussion about non-operative management of acute appendicitis, advocates of the conservative therapy use negative appendectomies and especially surgical morbidity as an argument. The aim of the present study was to analyze risk factors associated with the development of morbidity and major morbidity, with a prolonged length of hospital stay and with the need of readmission in patients undergoing appendectomy due to acute appendicitis.
In our cohort, the rate of negative appendectomies was low (4%), which underlines a differentiated indication for surgery. In literature, rates of negative appendectomy vary enormously and are usually higher than ours [16–18]. Negative appendectomies were associated with a shorter hospital stay compared to appendectomies for acute appendicitis and with a low morbidity (3%) in our study. These results are consistent with previous data from Lee et al., although a longer LOS was only observed comparing complicated appendicitis and negative appendectomy [18].
The overall complication rate after appendectomy for acute appendicitis in our study was 6% and therefore consistent with previous data from literature [10–14]. We could identify six independent risk factors for morbidity: higher age, higher preoperative WBC count, higher preoperative CRP, lower preoperative hemoglobin, longer time to surgery and longer duration of surgery. All these associations are supported by previous studies [11, 19–22]. Particularly high WBC counts and high CRP values as well as indirectly a longer surgical time are indicators of severe appendicitis, which per se are likely to be associated with higher morbidity. In literature, higher creatinine levels at admission could be identified as further risk factor, but preoperative creatinine failed to be significant in our results [11, 21].
In our cohort, about half of patients with postoperative complications had major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo III–V). This rate was slightly higher than those reported in literature [11, 12, 14, 21, 23]. On the other side, mortality was 0.13% in our study group, which is lower than reported by two big European analysis with over 100,000 patients (mean mortality of 2.1–2.4 per 1000 patients) [24, 25]. Our results revealed higher age, higher preoperative CRP, lower preoperative hemoglobin and longer time to surgery as independent risk factors for major morbidity. Comparable data for the outcome of major morbidity are limited. A polish analysis with over 4000 laparoscopic appendectomies showed an association between complicated appendicitis and intraoperative adverse events with major morbidity, which could not be confirmed by our data [14].
Our data support the importance of timely surgery after diagnosis to reduce the risk of morbidity and major morbidity. The best timing of surgery for acute appendicitis is a frequently discussed aspect—especially in the face of limited surgical capacity and different competing emergency surgeries. Previous studies show controversial results [11, 26–33]. A Dutch meta-analysis from 2018 show that delaying appendectomy up to 24 h after admission does not appear to be a risk factor for complicated appendicitis, postoperative surgical-site infection or morbidity, when an uncomplicated appendicitis is presumed at admission [34]. Li et al. demonstrated no significant difference in complicated appendicitis incidence by delayed appendectomy over 12 h; however the risk of wound infection was slightly increased [35]. Moreover, the risk of complicated appendicitis was more strongly associated with overall elapsed time from symptoms presentation [35]. However, our study did not include the delay from symptoms presentation until the incision time. In our collective, the ROC analysis showed a cut-off of 442 min as the best differentiation for the presence of an increased risk of morbidity after appendectomy for acute appendicitis. A similar cut-off were observed in another study by Teixeira et al., that showed an increased incidence of wound infections and intra-abdominal abscess after a delay of more than 6 h for performing appendectomy [32]. According to a subgroup analysis in our collective, early surgery is particularly important in the presence of complicated appendicitis, which is in line with existing data [11].
Our data confirm that occurrence of morbidity and major-morbidity result in further sequelae for the affected patients—especially further radiological diagnostics and higher need of postoperative antibiotics. However, based on these associations, our data cannot provide further evidence to an ongoing debated issue of the need of postoperative antibiotics. A recent Dutch meta-analysis found no clear evidence about the duration of antibiotic therapy and the incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses, which underlines the need for further high-quality studies to make adequate recommendations on this topic [36].
In our study, the occurrence of a complication also represented the most important risk factor for a longer hospital stay. Patients with postoperative complications had a 23-fold increased risk of prolonged hospital stay. In addition, other risk factors could also be identified—most of them were again indicator of severe appendicitis: age, preoperative laboratories (CRP, WBC count and hemoglobin) as well as conversions rate, duration of surgery and presence of an intraoperative complicated appendicitis. These results are in line with previous studies, which could reveal a correlation between complicated appendicitis, age, postoperative morbidity and converted appendectomy with more extended hospital stay [14, 37–41]. Moreover, Zhang et al. demonstrated an association between duration of surgery, preoperative WBC count, and CRP levels with a prolonged hospital stay [40].
Our readmission rate was low (2%) compared to a current meta-analysis (readmission rate of 4.8%) [42]. Our identified risk factors for readmission were high preoperative WBC count and malignancy. Malignancy requires a high probability of further therapy, which explains a renewed hospitalization. The association between high WBC counts and readmission may be explained again by the causal chain of more severe appendicitis and the resulting higher morbidity. However, the already mentioned meta-analysis including over 800,000 appendectomies identified the presence of complicated appendicitis and diabetes mellitus as risk factors, which was not confirmed in our study [42].
As a consequence, the identified risk factors of the surgical outcome parameters morbidity, major morbidity, length of hospital stay and readmission can be used to take early preventive measures in patients at risk and to identify complications early on through intensified postoperative monitoring to alleviate the extent of the complication. However, the risk factors identified are less suitable for the indication for surgery, since only preoperative risk parameters can be used and some of the preoperative risk factors (age, high CRP values) represent also risk factors for the presence of appendix malignancy [43].
Several limitations exist regarding our data: first, the retrospective nature of this study and single-center design can incur some bias. Second, there is a selections bias, as patients with signs of complicated appendicitis were operated more quickly and by more experienced surgeons. Moreover, inclusion of open and minimal-invasive approach for appendectomy could bias results, but has the advantage to reflect a real-world scenario. Third, there is a lack of established protocols used in the University Hospital Erlangen to treat patients with acute appendicitis potentially affecting the results of our study. Fourth, there are always some interferences between parameters, e.g. duration of surgery and conversion rate depends on experience of surgeons.
Conclusion
Among patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis, accurate risk assessment can help to identify patients with a higher risk for worse surgical outcome. Especially modifiable risk factors, such as time to appendectomy and preoperative hemoglobin, should be addressed. Anyway, risk classification can be useful as patients at risk may benefit from special attention in the postoperative course and from a more customized therapy.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The present work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. med” for B. Bancke Laverde.
Author contributions
BBL and MB designed the study, collected the data, performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript. MM, ML, SK, AD, CK, GFW, RG and MB critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Availability of data and materials
All relevant data supporting the conclusions are included within the manuscript, the tables and the supplemental table.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Informed consent
This retrospective study contains no information that would enable individual patient identity. Therefore, informed consent was waived.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the declaration of Helsinki from 1964 and its later amendments. The Ethics Committee of FAU Erlangen approved this retrospective study (22-157-Br).
References
- 1.Ferris M, Quan S, Kaplan BS, et al. The global incidence of appendicitis. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):237–241. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Stöß C, Nitsche U, Neumann PA, et al. Acute appendicitis: trends in surgical treatment—a population-based study of over 800 000 patients. Deutsches Aerzteblatt International. 2021;118(14):244–249. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appendicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2012;344:e2156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hansson J, Körner U, Khorram-Manesh A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg. 2009;96(5):473–481. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McCutcheon BA, Chang DC, Marcus LP, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with nonsurgically managed uncomplicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(5):905–913. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, et al. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9777):1573–1579. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60410-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: the APPAC randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(23):2340–2348. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology. 2000;215:337–348. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma24337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wilms IM, de Hoog DE, de Visser DC, Janzing HM. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;11:CD008359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Angeramo CA, Dreifuss NH, Olivero AA, et al. Risk factors for readmission after short-hospital-stay laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Surg. 2020;44(12):4006–4011. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05730-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Andert A, Alizai HP, Klink CD, et al. Risk factors for morbidity after appendectomy. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2017;402(6):987–993. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1608-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kostov K. Risk factors and outcomes for septic complications after laparoscopic appendectomy. J IMAB Ann Proc (Sci Papers) 2021;27(4):4084–4086. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Minutolo V, Licciardello A, di Stefano B, et al. Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital. BMC Surg. 2014 doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Walędziak M, Lasek A, Wysocki M, et al. Risk factors for serious Morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after laparoscopic appendectomy—results from Pol-LA (Polish Laparoscopic Appendectomy) multicenter large cohort study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51172-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Seetahal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC, Oyetunji TA, Greene WR, Frederick W, Cornwell EE, 3rd, Chang DC, Siram SM. Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J Surg. 2011;201(4):433–437. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tamini N, Santurro L, Chiappetta MF, Gattuso I, Barbieri C, Fattori L, Gianotti L. Morbidity after negative appendectomy: a single-centre experience on 627 cases. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46(4):859–864. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01138-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee M, Paavana T, Mazari F, Wilson TR. The morbidity of negative appendicectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(7):517–520. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13946184903801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Patel SV, Nanji S, Brogly SB, et al. High complication rate among patients undergoing appendectomy in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Can J Surg. 2018;61(6):412–417. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pereira BM, Mendes CA, Ruano RM, et al. Acute appendicitis may no longer be a predominant disease of the young population. Anaesthesiol Intensive Therapy. 2019;51(4):283–288. doi: 10.5114/ait.2019.87332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim JY, Kim JW, Park JH, et al. Early versus late surgical management for complicated appendicitis in adults: a multicenter propensity score matching study. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;97(2):103–111. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.2.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.de Wijkerslooth EML, de Jonge J, van den Boom AL, et al. Postoperative outcomes of patients with nonperforated gangrenous appendicitis: a national multicenter prospective cohort analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(11):1363–1370. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sood A, Meyer CP, Abdollah F, et al. Minimally invasive surgery and its impact on 30-day postoperative complications, unplanned readmissions and mortality. Br J Surg. 2017;104(10):1372–1381. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kotaluoto S, Ukkonen M, Pauniaho SL, et al. Mortality related to appendectomy; a population based analysis over two decades in Finland. World J Surg. 2017;41(1):64–69. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3688-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Blomqvist PG, Andersson RE, Granath F, et al. Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987–1996. Ann Surg. 2001;233(4):455–460. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200104000-00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Abou-Nukta F, Bakhos C, Arroyo K, et al. Effects of delaying appendectomy for acute appendicitis for 12 to 24 hours. Arch Surg. 2006;141:504–506. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.5.504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.United Kingdom National Surgical Research Collaborative. Bhangu A. Safety of short, in-hospital delays before surgery for acute appendicitis: multicentre cohort study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2014;259:894–903. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim HK, Kim YS, Lee SH, et al. Impact of a delayed laparoscopic appendectomy on the risk of complications in acute appendicitis: a retrospective study of 4,065 patients. Dig Surg. 2017;34:25–29. doi: 10.1159/000447724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fair BA, Kubasiak JC, Janssen I, et al. The impact of operative timing on outcomes of appendicitis: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Project analysis. Am J Surg. 2015;209:498–502. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.March B, Gillies D, Gani J. Appendicectomies performed >48 hours after admission to a dedicated acute general surgical unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96:614–617. doi: 10.1308/003588414X14055925058832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Teixeira PG, Sivrikoz E, Inaba K, et al. Appendectomy timing: waiting until the next morning increases the risk of surgical site infections. Ann Surg. 2012;256:538–543. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318265ea13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Giraudo G, Baracchi F, Pellegrino L, et al. Prompt or delayed appendectomy? Influence of timing of surgery for acute appendicitis. Surg Today. 2013;43:392–396. doi: 10.1007/s00595-012-0250-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andert A, Alizai HP, Klink CD, et al. Risk factors for morbidity after appendectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017;402(6):987–993. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1608-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.van Dijk ST, van Dijk AH, Dijkgraaf MG, Boermeester MA. Meta-analysis of in-hospital delay before surgery as a risk factor for complications in patients with acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2018;105(8):933–945. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li J, Xu R, Hu DM, Zhang Y, Gong TP, Wu XL. Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in patients with acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23(1):210–223. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3866-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.van den Boom AL, de Wijkerslooth EML, Wijnhoven BPL. Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative antibiotics for patients with a complex appendicitis. Dig Surg. 2020;37(2):101–110. doi: 10.1159/000497482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pedziwiatr M, Lasek A, Wysocki M, et al. Complicated appendicitis: risk factors and outcomes of laparoscopic appendectomy—polish laparoscopic appendectomy results from a multicenter, large-cohort study. Ulus Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019;25(2):129–136. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2018.80103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ward NT, Ramamoorthy SL, Chang DC, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy is safer than open appendectomy in an elderly population. J Soc Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2014;18(3):e2014.00322. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Moreira LF, Garbin HI, Da-Natividade GR, et al. Predicting factors of postoperative complications in appendectomies. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2018;45(5):e19. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20181920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang P, Zhang Q, Zhao H, et al. Factors affecting the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy: a single center study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12 December):e0243575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Demir C, Çelik Y, Gider Ö, et al. The factors affecting length of stay of the patients undergoing appendectomy surgery in a military teaching hospital. Military Med. 2007;172(6):634–639. doi: 10.7205/milmed.172.6.634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bailey K, Choynowski M, Kabir SMU, et al. Meta-analysis of unplanned readmission to hospital post-appendectomy: an opportunity for a new benchmark. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(11):1386–1391. doi: 10.1111/ans.15362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brunner M, Lapins P, Langheinrich M, et al. Risk factors for appendiceal neoplasm and malignancy among patients with acute appendicitis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35(1):157–163. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03453-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data supporting the conclusions are included within the manuscript, the tables and the supplemental table.