Skip to main content
Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research logoLink to Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research
. 2022 Nov 18;9(4):565–572. doi: 10.5455/javar.2022.i625

Genetic polymorphism of myostatin gene in Sumba Ongole (Bos indicus) cattle and its association with growth traits

Cynthia Dewi Gaina 1, Filphin Adolfin Amalo 2
PMCID: PMC9868797  PMID: 36714511

Abstract

Objective:

As one of the most valuable genetic resources of Ongole beef cattle globally, the Sumba Ongole (SO) cattle population is being studied in this investigation of myostatin (MSTN) gene polymorphism and its association with growth traits.

Materials and Methods:

Blood samples from 161 SO cattle were collected and analyzed. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was isolated. The DNA was electrophoresed and extracted, and finally, the annealing temperature was optimized, followed by amplification and sequencing. Next, we used a Basic local alignment search tool to assess the sequencing data.

Results:

The analysis revealed 22 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MSTN gene in this region that showed genetic variation. Two SNPs, c.424 G > A, and c.467 G > C, were found to be significantly associated with SO cattle phenotypes of wither height, heart girth, and hip height (p < 0.05) but not with body weight or body length (p > 0.05).

Conclusion:

As a result of our findings, the MSTN gene polymorphism and its correlation with growth traits in SO cattle may be employed as a candidate marker in SO cattle and other beef cattle breeds.

Keywords: Myostatin gene, polymorphism, Sumba Ongole cattle, Bos indicus, growth traits

Introduction

Skeletal muscle growth is controlled by myostatin (MSTN), sometimes called growth and differentiation factor 8 [14]. It has been mapped to bovine chromosome 2 and is composed of three exons and two introns [5,6]. The MSTN gene, which encodes a member of the transforming growth factor family, suppresses the accumulation of skeletal muscle [7,8]. In addition, it is essential for the pre-natal and post-natal development of muscle in animals, including myoblast proliferation, muscle precursors, and muscle cell differentiation [913]. Muscle hypertrophy is caused by the activation of the MSTN gene receptor, which also blocks the activity of Akt (protein kinase B), a key regulator of muscle protein synthesis and cell proliferation. MSTN expression occurs in bovine embryos when primary myoblasts unite to generate myofibers [1,9].

Some quantitative trait genetic investigations in animal populations focus on detecting single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and their polymorphisms [14,15]. It also includes an attempt to detect an association between these polymorphisms and their significance on specific species that contribute to livestock breeders’ economic growth [1618]. Some other domestic farm animals have also been studied for gene polymorphism concerning muscle hypertrophy and growth traits [10,19,20]. It is especially significant in farm breeding because the introduction of current genotyping technologies has offered a new source of information for selecting farm animals [15,16,18]. Several domestic farm animals’ MSTN gene expression has been studied for associations with performance and functional features [11,2123]. One of the most important factors in the cattle breeding industry is the MSTN gene and the beneficial traits it is associated with [11,24,25].

The role of the MSTN gene in economic production has been identified in various breeds of beef cattle, such as Belgian blue [26], Nellore cattle [25,27], Piemontese young bulls [23,28], Russian cattle [2], Marchigiana bulls [3], and, Chinese yellow cattle [29]. The trait can be found in Australian beef cattle [30] and in some breeds of Indonesian beef cattle, such as the Peranakan Ongole (PO), the Belgian Blue × PO hybrid, and the PO × Pegolo Bali cattle [31,32]. However, the result might probably be different from other Ongole beef cattle extensively grazed under a harsh environment in a tropical semi-arid region, such as Sumba Island [33]. The PO breed of cattle is a crossbreed of the Java and Sumba Ongole (SO) breeds [32], while the SO cattle are one of Indonesia’s native beef cattle breeds, brought originally from India by the Indonesian Government in the earliest of 18th century. The SO cattle have been extensively grazed on Sumba Island for genetic development [34]. Because of its benefits as a source of protein and its strong adaptability to harsh environmental conditions, this breed has been designated a nationally protected genetic resource [33,35].

The MSTN gene in beef cattle is polymorphic in previous studies [2,24,36]. Increased muscle mass and decreased fatness have both been linked to a shift in the amino acid position of leucine in the MSTN gene in European crossbreds such as Limousine and Charolais cattle [37], growing beef heifer [24], and Australian Limousine cattle [36]. European cattle breeds with heterozygous genotype variations, such as Limousine, exhibited better meat quality and growth performance than homozygous genotypes. However, it has been established that MSTN gene polymorphism and its association with growth traits in European cattle breeds [37], Angus cattle [11,12], Belgian Blue cattle [26], and Nellore cattle [25,27] and the association between the MSTN gene polymorphism and growth traits in SO cattle, one of the Bos indicus breed, have not been studied in depth. To date, the MSTN gene is considered polymorphic in other Ongole crossbred cattle, such as PO cattle, Bengali, or Zebu cattle (B. indicus) [32].

As it is known that the MSTN gene is related to productive qualities in other breeds of cattle, it is necessary to analyze in detail the role of the MSTN gene in SO cattle. The biological aspects of the gene have yet to be completely understood, despite its importance in beef cattle muscle development, carcass, and meat quality [25,26,30,38]. As one of the valuable genetic resources of Ongole beef cattle, this study seeks to evaluate the genetic variation of the MSTN gene and its association with growth traits in a population of SO cattle. The results are expected to be a potential source for molecular markers in other Ongole cattle. Hence, this study provides exciting new opportunities as an initial investigation of the MSTN gene in Ongole cattle.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

The Animal Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Nusa Cendana, approved this study (KEH/FKH/NEPH/2019/003).

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and sample collecting

The blood of 161 free-ranged SO cattle on Sumba Island, NTT was collected. Each venoject needle was attached to a vacutainer ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) tube, and it was applied to collect blood samples from the jugular and coccygeal veins. About 3–5 ml of blood was collected and stored at 4°C until further study, such as DNA extraction, amplification, and data analysis, could be performed. This extracted DNA was assessed with a spectrophotometer and electrophoresed in agarose gel.

Traits measurements

Some of the direct measurements of growth traits were based on [39,40]. This includes assessment variables like height, weight, chest circumference, hip circumference, and length. This assessment was performed using a measuring tape and a modified caliper.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers and amplification

PCR, electrophoresis, and DNA sequencing were the methods employed. Following a 1 min pre-denaturation step at 95°C, the samples were subjected to 35 cycles of denaturation for 15 sec at 95°C, annealing for 15 sec at 58°C, and extension for 10 sec at 72°C. The final period of the extension was conducted for 1 min at 72°C. The MSTN gene primer was used to amplify the DNA in each sample for 35 cycles. Afterward, it was analyzed using a 1.5% agarose gel in a 0.5 Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer and a 100-bp ladder to determine its molecular weight. About 2 μl of DNA template, 10 μl of nuclease-free water, 0.5 μl of each forward and reverse primer, and 12.5 μl of MyTaq HS red Mix 2x were used in a 25 μl reaction. A piece of the MSTN gene was amplified using the primers. Based on the sequence of the bovine MSTN gene, we designed the forward primer 5’-GATTGATATGTAGGTGTTCG-3’ and the reverse primer 5’-AGGGCTACCACTGGGG-3’ (GenBank Acc. No. AY794986.1).

Analysis of sequencing

1st Malaysia sequenced PCR products encoding various genotypes for each gene. BioEdit was used to analyze the sequencing results. Meanwhile, the final step in identifying the amplified nucleotide is sequencing. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0 was applied to discover whether nucleotide mutations occurred [23]. Then, the software Basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) was used to scan the GenBank database from National center for biotechnology information (NCBI) for reference and homologous sequences.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). To examine the MSTN gene variants in the SO cattle population, the genetic parameters were measured. The MSTN gene shows the variance in the SO cattle population as indicated by the genotype and allele frequencies. Using methods based on those developed by Nei [41], population genetic diversity indices such as heterozygosity, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, and the polymorphism information content (PIC) were constructed. PIC is a polymorphism indicator. Genetic variants have low, medium, and high genetic diversity based on PIC values of < 0.25, 0.5 > PIC > 0.25, and PIC > 0.5, respectively [42]. The association between MSTN and growth traits was also modeled using the general linear model.

Results

DNA amplification

The coding region of the MSTN gene was designed to amplify by PCR. Sequencing cannot begin until the DNA tube is cut up and amplified. The data suggested that the DNA fragment that was amplified was 585 bp in length. The MSTN gene PCR products were amplified in a thermocycler at a temperature of 58°C for 15 sec, and then they were identified on a 1.5% TBE agarose gel. This result confirmed the high specificity of the amplified fragment, which was then made available for sequencing. Figure 1 is a graphical representation of the PCR results.

Figure 1. PCR amplification of MSTN gene of Sumba Ongole (B. indicus) cattle. +, positive control, −, Negative control.

Figure 1.

The primers are specific to the MSTN gene, with just one DNA band produced in all samples (Fig. 1). The primers used in PCR were two oligonucleotides that had the same sequence as the DNA template. Furthermore, the sequencing results were evaluated on NCBI using the BLAST nucleotide software. The BLAST program’s main step is to identify and align the DNA sequences in GenBank that are most similar to the sample’s sequences.

For all samples, the annealing temperature of 58°C for 15 sec significantly affects the success of the amplification process. The annealing temperature is the temperature at which the primers will connect to the amplified target DNA with the highest efficiency during the PCR. This diversity is due to differences in PCR machine parameters and reagent composition. Primers attenuate at temperatures between 36°C and 72°C, with 50°C–60°C being more typical [43]. The concentrations of the primer and the gene being targeted, as well as the volume of the PCR reaction, determine how long the annealing time must be for the primer to bind to its complementary target [43]. Primer extension at 72°Cfor 15 sec lengthens the primer linked to the subsequent target. Final elongation lasted 2 min at a steady state. Denaturation, annealing, and elongation are the three steps of PCR that constitute 1 thermal cycle, and in this study, a total of 35 cycles were conducted. According to [44], when the length of the target molecule reaches 1.0 × 103, the required cycles are 35–40.

MSTN gene genotype distribution, allelic abundance, heterozygosity, and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium

Sequencing analysis of the MSTN gene in SO cattle produced 22 polymorphic SNPs, namely, c.52 A > C, c.351 C > T, c.357 C > A, c.377 T > C, c.424 G > A, c.428 A > G, c.435 G > C, c.442 G > A, c.455 G > C, c.457 A > G, c.460 C > G, c.467 G > C, c.490 C > G, c.491 A > G, c.495 T > C, c.500 T > C, c.503 C > A, c.508 C > G, c.531 G > A, c.576 A > G, and c.583 G > A. To be considered polymorphic, a SNP must have an allele frequency of ≤ 0.99 in big populations and ≤ 0.95 in small populations [41]. A molecular selection marker in cattle is required for assessing genetic diversity. Following the criteria of [42], the PIC value 0.5 > PIC > 0.25 was reached from low (0.04) to high (0.68). A total of 3 SNPs in the MSTN gene with a high PIC value was c.351 C > T, c.457 A > G, and c.500 T > C as recapitulated in Table 1.

Table 1. Polymorphism of MSTN gene in SO cattle (B. indicus).

SNPs Genotype frequencies Allele frequencies He Ho X2 Pic
c.351 C>T CC CT TT C T
0.574 0.064 0.362 0.61 0.39 0.48 0.06 0.155 0.63
c.457 A>G AA AG GG A G
0.553 0.064 0.383 0.59 0.41 0.49 0.06 0.172 0.66
c.500 T>C TT TC CC T C
0.532 0.064 0.404 0.56 0.44 0.04 0.06 0.190 0.68

Note: He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosis; χ2 = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; not significant (ns) at α 5% (χ2 obs ≤ 5.59); n = 161 heads.

Association MSTN gene with growth traits

Table 2 shows that the SO cattle’s wither height, heart girth, and hip height were significantly (p < 0.05) related to two polymorphic SNPs in the MSTN gene: c.424 G > A and c.467 G > C. In contrast, there was no statistically significant correlation between MSTN and body weight and body length (p > 0.05).

Table 2. Association of SNPs MTSN gene with growth traits in SO cattle (B. indicus).

SNPs G n Body length (cm) Wither height (cm) Heart girth (cm) Hip height (cm) Body weight (kg)
c.424 G>A GG 45 129.91 ± 7.88 124.39 ± 5.32 153.87a ± 11.12 132.85 b ± 5.27 113.55 ± 2.45
GA 2 125.5 ± 13.44 119.5 ± 3.54 144.00 ± 7.07 128.00 ± 2.83 112.00 ± 4.24
AA 0 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00
c.467 G>C GG 42 129.6 ± 8.01 123.93 ± 4.79 152.98 ± 10.72 132.29 ± 4.68 113.45 ± 2.48
GC 0 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00
CC 5 133.6 ± 5.5 127.8 ± 8.23 160.40 b ± 13.54 137.00 a ± 8.09 114.70 ± 1.89

Note: cells with different letters. a,b differed significantly (p < 0.05); G: Genotype; n: total numbers of SO cattle.

Discussion

The association between MSTN gene polymorphism and growth traits in SO cattle, one of the Ongole Breeds, has never before been studied as it is stated that the polymorphisms discovered to offer the possibility of genetic variation and productive traits that might be utilized for breed differentiation [38,45]. A polymorphism is a change in the DNA sequence that occurs in 1% or more of a population [46]. Polymorphism is induced by one or more changes in the order of nucleotides in a gene [24,47]. Mutation, migration, and selection are all variables that influence nucleotide composition [38,45]. These alterations have an impact on an organism’s phenotype [48]. The most common form of mutation in the mammalian genome is known as an SNP, which is a DNA sequence polymorphism that occurs at significant levels in a population [9,20,49,50].

A SNP is termed polymorphic when the frequency of at least one of its alleles is less than 0.99 in large populations and less than 0.95 in small groups [41]. How often a certain allele occurs in a certain population is expressed as a percentage of the total number of alleles [48]. Meanwhile, the genotype frequency demonstrates the genotype frequency distribution by calculating the frequency distribution of a set of genotypes across populations [14]. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms are helpful as genetic markers in populations for studying their susceptibility to specific features, especially in animal production [41,46,51]. A polymorphism may have spontaneously developed with a neutral or advantageous impact if its prevalence is higher in the population [13,16,19,37].

Considering the importance of this gene, investigation of the biological roles of the MSTN gene in Ongole cattle is required because mutations in some of the other beef cattle, including European cattle [23,27,28], Australian breeds [30], and Indonesian beef cattle [31,32,35] are associated with growth traits. The literature search revealed that there is no prior research examining the allelic and genotypic frequencies of the MSTN gene in SO cattle, making direct comparisons with other studies in Ongole cow breeds worldwide difficult. Multiple MSTN gene polymorphisms were identified in SO cattle, however, according to this investigation (Table 1). The MSTN gene in SO cattle was sequenced, and the results revealed 22 SNPs with variable frequencies, namely c.52 A > C, c.351 C > T, c.357 C > A, c.377 T > C, c.424 G > A, c.428 A > G, c.435 G > C, c.442 G > A, c.455 G > C, c.457 A > G, c.460 C > G, c.467 G > C, c.490 C > G, c.491 A > G, c.495 T > C, c.500 T > C, c.503 C > A, c.508 C > G, c.531 G > A, c.576 A > G, and c.583 G > A. The SNPs in this study had an allele frequency of less than 0.99 or greater than 0.01. In addition, this finding investigated that the highest allele frequency namely 0.98 was found in SNP c.52 A > C, c.357 C > A, c.377 T > C, c.424 G > A, c.428 A > G, c.435 G > C, c.442 G > A, c.455 G > C, c.490 C > G, c.508 C > G, and c.583 G > A.

Based on the results, mutations of the MSTN gene provide potential opportunities as a molecular marker for improving productivity performance in SO cattle breeding as in other beef cattle [24]. Thus, the polymorphism in SO cattle in this study might contribute to the differences in the composition of the MSTN gene, as indicated by the size of the DNA fragment. The mutation of MSTN in other cattle breeds is related to the double muscling trait, but mutation in SO cattle in this study might contribute to the growth and hypertrophy of muscles [3,29,38]. Further investigation is required to determine whether this mutation affects the phenotype of Ongole cattle. However, the gene polymorphism might be related to the species-specific type of animals [52,53]. A previous study discovered that the MSTN gene mutation in Bali cattle is most likely caused by their ability to adapt to a range of harsh environmental situations [54]. Point mutations are DNA alterations that occur when a single nucleotide is inserted, deleted, or replaced [14]. As a result, the whole structure of a chromosome is changed, either by flipping, deleting, duplicating, or translocating it [55]. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium is affected by selection, non-random mating, mutation, genetic drift, and migration [53].

It is clear from Table 1 that there was a strong selective pressure at work in this population since the observed heterozygosis (Ho) was lower than the expected heterozygosis (He). Furthermore, it demonstrated that genotype imbalance in observed SO cattle may be measured by comparing the Ho value to the He value for heterozygosis. Possible implications of this finding include the existence of a selection activity and the lack of random mating. Since an SNP is regarded to have high diversity when the heterozygosis value is > 0.50 [52,53]. The heterozygosity value in the SO cattle indicates that all SNPs are under low diversity circumstances with Ho ≤0.5. Heterozygosity levels are a useful indicator of a population’s genetic variation, which aids the selection process [56]. It is also a potential referral source for selecting breeding programs when diverse populations and crosses are well performed in a uniform population [18].

Evaluation of genetic diversity in cattle requires using a molecular selection marker [18,27,38,45]. Following the criteria of [41], the PIC value of 0.25 ≤ PIC ≤ 0.5 in this study was reached from low (0.04) to high (0.68). A total of 3 SNPs in the MSTN gene had high PIC values of c.351 C > T, c.457 A > G, and c.500 T > C (Table 1). PIC can be used to identify genetic markers and the presence or absence of polymorphic alleles (along with the heterozygosity value, of course). Results indicated variation in the MSTN gene, indicating promising utility for molecular selection in breeding. Investigation of candidate gene association is the initial step toward understanding the genetic basis of economically relevant characteristics [18,27,38,45]. An important reason for assessing the effects of SNP associations in the beef industry is that the connections within diverse interactions will culminate in significant genotypic or phenotypic alterations [18,24].

The relationship between polymorphisms and the efficiency of growth traits in SO cattle has never before been studied. Consistently, this investigation’s results pointed toward the sheep MSTN sequence being most analogous to the cattle MSTN sequence [10,57,58] and goats [7,10,21]. Researchers found no evidence that the MSTN gene played a role in the weight of SO cattle (p > 0.05) (Table 2).

Similar to other studies, this one demonstrated that the MSTN gene was not significantly associated with body weight (p > 0.05) in Friesian cattle [16], in growing beef heifers [24], and Shaanbei White Cashmere goat [10] during pre- and post-natal muscle development. Conversely, birth weight, corrected weaning weight, and different age weights are significantly impacted by MSTN gene mutations in European cattle breeds such as Piedmont, Angus, and Hayford [6].

One of the Chinese cow breeds, Qinchuan, had its MSTN gene found to be significantly (p < 0.05) linked to total body length [59]. However, SO cattle did not show a statistically significant difference in body length (p > 0.05). These results imply that the MSTN gene is essential for regulating muscle development but that several other genes (polygenes) are also involved. These include calpastatin, leptin, growth hormone, growth hormone receptor, pituitary transcription factor (Pit-1) [16,47], and Heat Shock Protein 70-1 gene [60] also influence growth traits which are primarily influenced by environmental factor[58].

Based on the results, two polymorphic SNPs, c.424 G > A, and c.467 G > C, were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with wither height, heart girth, and hip height in SO cattle, as demonstrated in Table 2. Our results were consistent with previous studies that showed the mutation of the MSTN gene was significantly (p < 0.05) related to body height, heart girth, and hip height in Shaanbei White Cashmere goat kids [10] in Chinese Dabieshan cattle [29,61], and Nanyang cattle (B. indicus) as one of the best Chinese cattle breeds [59]. It suggested that this mutation is a potentially useful genetic marker for other domestic farm animals. Since the MSTN gene’s major role is to regulate skeletal muscle development [14,27]. There is a correlation between growth features and a polymorphism that alters the amino acid sequence of MSTN in SO cattle. The findings suggest that MSTN is a key regulator of growth in Ongole beef cattle and could serve as a benchmark for other cattle breeds. This association can become a candidate marker for improving productivity in Ongole cattle.

Conclusion

For the first time, the MSTN gene was isolated and characterized in SO cattle. A total of 22 polymorphic SNPs were obtained in which two namely c.424 G > A and c.467 G > C were significantly associated with wither height, heart girth, and hip height in the SO cattle population. Studying the gene related to growth traits in Ongole beef cattle is crucial to support breeding programs for improving production efficiency, reducing time and cost, and leading to optimal genetic selection. With these findings, we may take the first step in improving productivity in SO cattle by pinpointing the role played by the MSTN gene. That conclusion has to be confirmed by larger-scale studies since the MSTN gene’s whole genomic structure, which was identified by SNPs, may be more important for production in SO cattle and other Ongole beef cattle.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Anbiocore Project for the financial support with Grant Number 07/IT3.2/KsP/2018-01-UN15.17/PP and the Animal Husbandry Department, East Sumba, Indonesia for the support given during the data collection process.

List of abbreviations

BLAST, Basic local alignment search tool; DNA, Deoxyribonucleic acid; EDTA, Ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid; NCBI, National center for biotechnology information; PCR, Polymerase chain reaction; PIC, polymorphism information content.

Conflict of interests

There is no conflict of interest to be declared.

Author’s contributions

CDG and FAA participated in the development of the research and in the writing of the manuscript. CDG and FAA supervised the analysis and contributed to the translation of the manuscript.

References

  • [1].Jennings TD, Gonda MG, Underwood KR, Wertz-Lutz AE, Blair AD. The influence of maternal nutrition on expression of genes responsible for adipogenesis and myogenesis in the bovine fetus. Animal. 2016;10(10):1697–705. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116000665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116000665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Konovalova E, Romanenkova O, Zimina A, Volkova V, Sermyagin A. Genetic variations and haplotypic diversity in the myostatin gene of different cattle breeds in Russia. Animals. 2021;11(10):2810. doi: 10.3390/ani11102810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Ceccobelli S, Perini F, Trombetta MF, Tavoletti S, Lasagna E, Pasquini M. Effect of myostatin gene mutation on slaughtering performance and meat quality in Marchigiana bulls. Animals. 2022;12(518):1–11. doi: 10.3390/ani12040518. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12040518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Wen T, Mao C, Gao LI. Analysis of the gut microbiota composition of myostatin mutant cattle prepared using CRISPR/Cas9. PloS One. 2022;17(3):e0264849. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264849. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Li W, Li R, Wei Y, Meng X, Wang B, Zhang Z, et al. Effect of MSTN mutation on growth and carcass performance in duroc x meishan hybrid population. Animals. 2020;10(6):932. doi: 10.3390/ani10060932. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10060932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Liu CL, E GX, Ni WW, Wang X, Cheng SZ, Guo ZH, et al. Advances of MSTN genetic markers in domesticated animals. Indian J Anim Res. 2020;1(6):B–1166. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.B-1166. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Archana PR, Sejian V, Ruban W, Bagath M, Krishnan G, Aleena J, et al. Comparative assessment of heat stress induced changes in carcass traits, plasma leptin profile and skeletal muscle myostatin and HSP70 gene expression patterns between indigenous Osmanabadi and Salem Black goat breeds. Meat Sci. 2018;1(141):66–80. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Xuan MF, Luo ZB, Han SZ, Li ZY, Gao K, Liu XY, et al. Skeletal muscle-secreted myokine interleukin-6 induces white adipose tissue conversion into beige adipose tissue in myostatin gene knockout pigs. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2022;78(1):106679. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2021.106679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2021.106679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Aiello D, Patel K, Lasagna E. The myostatin gene: an overview of mechanisms of action and its relevance to livestock animals. Anim Genet. 2018;49(6):505–19. doi: 10.1111/age.12696. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Bi Y, Feng B, Wang Z, Zhu H, Qu L, Lan X, et al. Myostatin (MSTN) gene indel variation and its associations with body traits in shaanbei white cashmere goat. Animals. 2020;10(1):168. doi: 10.3390/ani10010168. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10010168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Haruna IL, Ekegbu UJ, Ullah F, Amirpour-Najafabadi H, Zhou H, Hickford JGH. Genetic variations and haplotypic diversity in the Myostatin gene of New Zealand cattle breeds. Gene. 2020;25(740):144400. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.144400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Haruna IL, Li Y, Ekegbu UJ, Amirpour-Najafabadi H, Zhou H, Hickford JGH. Associations between the bovine myostatin gene and milk fatty acid composition in New Zealand Holstein-Friesian × Jersey-cross cows. Animals. 2020;10(9):1–10. doi: 10.3390/ani10091447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Fadhil M, Zülkadir U. Association between polymorphisms of Myf5, MSTN and CAST genes and fattening performance in brown Swiss and Holstein cattle breeds. Anim Biotechnol. 2021;32(1):121–9. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2020.1781148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2020.1781148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Singh U, Deb R, Alyethodi RR, Alex R, Kumar S, Chakraborty S, et al. Molecular markers and their applications in cattle genetic research: a review. Biomark Genom Med. 2014;6(2):49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bgm.2014.03.001. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Yang YL, Zhou R, Li K. Future livestock breeding: precision breeding based on multi-omics information and population personalization. J Integr Agric. 2017;16(12):2784–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61780-5 . [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Nasr SM, Ateya AI, Sadek KM, Radwan HA. Effect of genetic polymorphisms in GH/HpaII and MSTN/DraI loci on body weight in friesian bull calves. Pak J Biol Sci. 2016;19(8):338–44. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2016.338.344. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2016.338.344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Yang Y, Lan Z, Shu H, Zhou H, Jiang X, Hou L, et al. Association between expression levels and growth trait-related SNPs located in promoters of the MC4R and MSTN genes in Spinibarbus hollandi. Genes Genomics. 2018;40(11):1119–25. doi: 10.1007/s13258-018-0666-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-018-0666-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Al-Khudhair A, VanRaden PM, Null DJ, Li B. Marker selection and genomic prediction of economically important traits using imputed high-density genotypes for 5 breeds of dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2021;104(4):4478–85. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19260. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Weglarz A, Balakowska A, Kułaj D, Makulska J. Associations of CAST, CAPN1 and MSTN genes polymorphism with slaughter value and beef quality-a review. Ann Anim Sci. 2020;20(3):757–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2020-0006. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Thompson RP, Nilsson E, Skinner MK. Environmental epigenetics and epigenetic inheritance in domestic farm animals. Anim Reprod Sci. 2020;220:106316. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Dowidar YA, El-Sayed MA, Elrefy AM, Shoura HE. Detection of myostatin gene MSTN in some goat breeds (Capra hircus) J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2018;16(2):507–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.04.002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Nisztuk S, Ślaska B, Zięba G, Rozempolska-Ruciłska I. Association of MSTN gene polymorphism (C354T) with performance traits in raccoon dogs. Can J Anim Sci. 2018;98(2):341–6. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0070. [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Pegolo S, Cecchinato A, Savoia S, di Stasio L, Pauciullo A, Brugiapaglia A, et al. Genome-wide association and pathway analysis of carcass and meat quality traits in Piemontese young bulls. Animal. 2020;14(2):243–52. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119001812. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Hales KE, Tait RG, Lindholm-Perry AK, Cushman RA, Freetly HC, Brown-Brandl TM, et al. Effects of the F94L Limousin associated myostatin gene marker on metabolic index in growing beef heifers. Appl Anim Sci. 2020;36(6):851–6. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2020-02046. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Ferrinho AM, de Moura GV, da SilvaMartins T, Muñoz J, Mueller LF, Garbossa PLM, et al. Rubia Gallega x Nelore crossbred cattle improve beef tenderness through changes in protein abundance and gene expression. Livest Sci. 2021;251:104634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104634. [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Meyermans R, Janssens S, Coussé A, Gorssen W, Hubin X, Mayeres P, et al. Myostatin mutation causing double muscling could affect increased psoroptic mange sensitivity in dual purpose Belgian Blue cattle. Animal. 2022;16(3):100460. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2022.100460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Terakado APN, Costa RB, de Camargo GMF, Irano N, Bresolin T, Takada L, et al. Genome-wide association study for growth traits in Nelore cattle. Animal. 2018;12(7):1358–62. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117003068. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Savoia S, Albera A, Brugiapaglia A, di Stasio L, Cecchinato A, Bittante G. Heritability and genetic correlations of carcass and meat quality traits in Piemontese young bulls. Meat Sci. 2019;156:111–7. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.05.024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Zhao Y, Yang L, Su G, Wei Z, Liu X, Song L, et al. Growth traits and sperm proteomics analyses of myostatin gene-edited chinese yellow cattle. Life. 2022;12(5):627. doi: 10.3390/life12050627. https://doi.org/10.3390/life. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].McGilchrist P, Polkinghorne RJ, Ball AJ, Thompson JM. The meat standards Australia index indicates beef carcass quality. Animal. 2019;13(8):1750–7. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003713. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118003713 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Prihandini PW, Hariyono DNH, Tribudi YA. Myostatin gene as a genetic marker for growth and carcass traits in beef cattle. Indones Bull Anim Vet Sci. 2021;31(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.14334/wartazoa.v31i1.2530. [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Prihandini PW, Primasari A, Aryogi A, Efendy J, Luthfi M, Pamungkas D, et al. Genetic variation in the first intron and exon of the myostatin gene in several Indonesian cattle populations. Vet World. 2021;14(5):1197–201. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1197-1201. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.1197-1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Gaina CD, Sanam MUE, Nalley WMM, Benu I, Saputra A. Hematological profile of sumba ongole cattle extensively reared in semiarid land, Sumba, NTT based on age and sex. IOP Conf Ser Earth Env Sci. 2019;387(1):012–22. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/387/1/012022. [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Gaina CD, Sanam MUE, Nalley WMM, Benu I, Saputra A. Blood AST and ALT profile of Sumba Ongole cattle. ARSHI Vet Lett. 2020;4(1):17–8. https://doi.org/10.29244/avl.4.1.17-18. [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Sutarno , Setyawan AD. Review: genetic diversity of local and exotic cattle and their crossbreeding impact on the quality of Indonesian cattle. Biodiversitas Soc Indonesian Biodiv. 2015;16(2):327–54. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d160230. [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Vankan DM, Waine DR, Fortes MRS. Real-time PCR genotyping and frequency of the myostatin F94L mutation in beef cattle breeds. Animal. 2010;4(4):530–4. doi: 10.1017/S175173110999139X. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173110999139X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Bennett GL, Tait RG, Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, King DA, Casas E, et al. Enhanced estimates of carcass and meat quality effects for polymorphisms in myostatin and μ-calpain genes. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(2):569–7. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky451. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Clinquart A, Ellies-Oury MP, Hocquette JF, Guillier L, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Prache S. Review: on-farm and processing factors affecting bovine carcass and meat quality. Animal. 2022;16:100426. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Rashid MM, Hoque MA, Huque KS, Bhuiyan AKFH. Prediction of live weight for Brahman crossbred cattle using linear body measurements in rural area. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2016;4(2):99–106. https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2016/4.2.99.106. [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Lyu S, Yang P, Liu Y, Song T, Zhang Z, Shi Q, et al. Genetic effects of MOGAT1 gene SNP in growth traits of Chinese cattle. Gene. 2021;769:145201. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.145201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.145201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Nei M, Kumar S. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics; pp. 1–100. [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis4 RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 1980; 32(3):314–31. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].van Pelt-Verkuil E, van Belkum A, Hays JP. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media; 2008. Principles and technical aspects of PCR amplification; pp. 1–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6241-4. [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Schaefer BC. Revolutions in rapid amplification of cDNA ends: new strategies for polymerase chain reaction cloning of full-length cDNA ends. Anal Biochem. 1995;227(2):255–73. doi: 10.1006/abio.1995.1279. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1995.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Baptista M, Cunha JT, Domingues L. DNA-based approaches for dairy products authentication: a review and perspectives. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2021;109(1):386–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.043. [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Brookes AJ. The essence of SNPs. Gene. 1999;234(2):177–86. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00219-x. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00219-X . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Sakar ÇM, Zülkadir U. Determination of the relationship between Anatolian black cattle growth properties and myostatin, GHR and Pit-1 gene. Anim Biotechnol. 2022;33(3):536–45. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2021.1884566. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2021.1884566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Frankham R. Where are we in conservation genetics and where do we need to go? Conserv Gene. 2010;11(2):661–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0010-2. [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Berry DP. Invited review: beef-on-dairy-the generation of crossbred beef × dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 2021;104(4):3789–819. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19519. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Jones HE, Wilson PB. Progress and opportunities through use of genomics in animal production. Trends Genet. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.06.014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2022.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Karki R, Pandya D, Elston RC, Ferlini C. Defining “mutation” and “polymorphism” in the era of personal genomics. BMC Med Genet. 2015;8(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12920-015-0115-z. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-015-0115-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Negrini R, Nicoloso L, Crepaldi P, Milanesi E, Colli L, Chegdani F, et al. Assessing SNP markers for assigning individuals to cattle populations. Anim Genet. 2009;40(1):18–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01800.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G. Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(10):697–709. doi: 10.1038/nrg2844. https://doi:10.1038/nrg2844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Khasanah H, Gunawan A, Priyanto R, Ulum MF, Jakaria. Polymorphism of Myostatin (MSTN) promoter gene and its association with growth and muscling traits in Bali cattle. Media Peternakan. 2016;39(2):95–103. https://doi.org/10.5398/medpet.2016.39.2.95. [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Vissers LELM, de Vries BBA, Osoegawa K, Janssen IM, Feuth T, Choy CO, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the genomewide detection of submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73(6):1261–70. doi: 10.1086/379977. https://doi.org/10.1086/379977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Marson E, Bento Sterman Ferraz J, Vieira Meirelles F, César de Carvalho Balieiro J, Pereira Eler J, Gustavo Girardi Figueiredo L, et al. Genetic characterization of European-Zebu composite bovine using RFLP markers. Genet Mol Res. 2005; 4(3):496–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Agrawal VK, Gahlot GC, Ashraf M, Dhakad G, Thakur S, Gupta SR. Study on genetic polymorphism of myostatin gene in Magra sheep. Vet Pract. 2018; 19(1):9–11. [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Grochowska E, Borys B, Mroczkowski S. Effects of intronic SNPs in the myostatin gene on growth and carcass traits in colored polish merino sheep. Genes. 2020;11(1):1–18. doi: 10.3390/genes11010002. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11010002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Zhang L, Zhang AL, Zhang LZ, Zhang Q, Zhang CL, Lan XY, et al. Association analysis between variants in bovine NPY gene and growth traits in Nanyang cattle (Bos taurus) Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011;170(1):189–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.10.004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2010.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Badri T, Alsiddig M, Lian L, Cai Y, Wang G. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in HSP70–1 gene associated with cellular heat tolerance in Chinese Holstein cows. Anim Gene. 2021;20:200114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.angen.2021.200114. [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Zhao S, Jin H, Xu L, Jia Y. Genetic variants of the growth differentiation factor 8 affect body conformation traits in Chinese Dabieshan cattle. Anim Biosci. 2022;35(4):517–26. doi: 10.5713/ab.21.0166. https://doi.org/10.3390/life. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research are provided here courtesy of Network for the Veterinarians of Bangladesh

RESOURCES