ABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cancer worldwide; incidence varies greatly by country and racial group. We compared 2018 American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) CRC incidence rates in Alaska to other Tribal, racial, and international population rates. AI/AN persons in Alaska had the highest CRC incidence rate among US Tribal and racial groups (61.9/100,000 in 2018). AI/AN persons in Alaska also had higher rates than those reported for any other country in the world in 2018 except for Hungary, where males had a higher CRC incidence rate than AI/AN males in Alaska (70.6/100,000 and 63.6/100,000 respectively). This review of CRC incidence rates from populations in the United States and worldwide showed that AI/AN persons in Alaska had the highest documented incidence rate of CRC in the world in 2018. It is important to inform health systems serving AI/AN persons in Alaska about policies and interventions that can support CRC screening to reduce the burden of this disease.
KEYWORDS: Native american, cancer surveillance, colorectal cancer, Alaska native, colon cancer, health disparities, American Indian
Previous reports have noted markedly higher colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence rates among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons residing in Alaska, compared to AI/AN populations residing in all other regions of the country, and compared to non-Native populations in the United States (US) [1–3]. CRC was the most commonly diagnosed cancer among Alaska Native men and women from 2014–2018 [3]. There has also been a steep increase in early onset colorectal cancer among AI/AN in Alaska ages 20–49, which increased 5.2% annually between 1996 and 2019 [4].
In 2020, there were an estimated 148,085 AI/AN persons living in Alaska, which was 19% of the total Alaskan population [5]. In this brief report, we present recent CRC incidence rates among AI/AN persons in Alaska, and compare them to rates among other racial groups in Alaska and AI/AN persons in other regions of the US, and to published CRC incidence rate estimates for other countries around the world.
Methods
To calculate CRC incidence in the US, we used U.S. Cancer Statistics [6] data, which includes cancer registry data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) [7] and the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) [8] Program. Cancer data for AI/AN persons in Alaska came from the Alaska Cancer Registry as well as the Alaska Native Tumor Registry, which is a member of the SEER program. This population-based central cancer registry records information on AI/AN persons who meet eligibility requirements for Indian Health Service benefits [9], who have been diagnosed with cancer in Alaska since 1969, and who resided in Alaska at the time of diagnosis.
CRC rates among AI/AN populations were calculated for six Indian Health Service regions in the US (Figure 1), and expressed per 100,000 population, using SEER*Stat software [10]. To examine rates by race in Alaska (Table 2), 5 years of data were aggregated because of the low number of cases in any single year for some racial groups. Rates were age-adjusted using the World Health Organization World Standard Population (2000–2025) [11], so that rates for AI/AN persons in the US could be compared with rates that have been estimated for countries around the world. Joinpoint [12] regression analysis was used to identify trends and quantify annual percent change in the CRC incidence rates among AI/AN and White persons in Alaska.
Figure 1.
Map of United StatesIndian health service regions.
Table 2.
Age-adjusted colorectal cancer incidence rates, counts, and population for American Indian/Alaska Native persons by race, Alaska, 2014–2018.
Sex | Racea | Rateb | Lower CI | Upper CI | Count | Population |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male and female | All races | 31.3 | 29.6 | 32.9 | 1,462 | 3,690,076 |
Male and female | White | 26.4 | 24.7 | 28.2 | 942 | 2,567,692 |
Male and female | Black | 17.1 | 10.7 | 25.7 | 24 | 178,375 |
Male and female | AI/AN | 67.1 | 60.8 | 73.9 | 420 | 636,660 |
Male and female | API | 20.3 | 15.8 | 25.7 | 71 | 307,349 |
Male | All races | 33.5 | 31.2 | 36 | 803 | 1,929,578 |
Male | White | 29.5 | 27 | 32.1 | 552 | 1,359,708 |
Male | Black | 19.9 | 10.2 | 34.5 | 14 | 98,791 |
Male | AI/AN | 67.2 | 58.1 | 77.3 | 200 | 322,706 |
Male | API | 23.0 | 15.8 | 32.5 | 34 | 148,373 |
Female | All races | 28.9 | 26.7 | 31.2 | 659 | 1,760,498 |
Female | White | 23.1 | 20.8 | 25.6 | 390 | 1,207,984 |
Female | Black | 14.4 | 6.8 | 26.5 | 10 | 79,584 |
Female | AI/AN | 66.7 | 58.1 | 76.2 | 220 | 313,954 |
Female | API | 19.0 | 13.3 | 26.3 | 37 | 158,976 |
aAll rates per 100,000 and age-adjusted using the World Health Organization’s World Standard Population (2000–2025).
bNon-Hispanic and Hispanic included.
AI/AN = American Indian/Alaska Native; API = Asian or Pacific Islander
Estimates of worldwide CRC incidence were from the International Agency for Research on Cancer Global Cancer Observatory GLOBOCAN 2018 database. GLOBOCAN provides estimates of incidence rates, mortality rates, and cancer prevalence in 185 countries or territories for 36 cancer types by sex and age group [13].
Institutional review board approval and informed consent were not required for the current study because all NPCR, SEER and GLOBOCAN data are publicly available and collected for surveillance purposes, and all data were de-identified. Tribal review and approval were obtained for publication of this report from the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, which is the statewide Tribal health organization serving all 229 federally recognised Tribes and all Alaska Native and American Indian individuals in Alaska.
Results
There was wide regional variation in CRC incidence rates among AI/AN populations within the US, with AI/AN persons in the Alaska region having a higher rate than all other US Indian Health Service regions (Table 1). The CRC incidence rate among AI/AN persons in the Alaska region in 2018 was 61.9 per 100,000 persons (63.6/100,000 among males, 59.8/100,000 among females) (Table 1). This rate was nearly twice the CRC incidence of the next highest group, the Southern Plains region (31.1/100,000), and over five times as high as the lowest group, the East region (11.3/100,000).
Table 1.
Age-adjusted colorectal cancer incidence rates,a counts, and population for American Indian/Alaska Native persons, by United States region, all counties, 2018.
Region | Rate | SE | Lower CI | Upper CI | Count | Population | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alaska | Male and female | 61.9 | 7.0 | 49.0 | 77.2 | 81 | 128,287 |
Alaska | Male | 63.6 | 10.2 | 45.2 | 87.0 | 40 | 64,917 |
Alaska | Female | 59.8 | 9.5 | 42.6 | 81.6 | 41 | 63,370 |
Southern Plains | Male and female | 31.1 | 1.9 | 27.4 | 35.1 | 265 | 789,140 |
Southern Plains | Male | 36.0 | 3.0 | 30.3 | 42.4 | 145 | 396,146 |
Southern Plains | Female | 26.9 | 2.5 | 22.3 | 32.3 | 120 | 392,994 |
Northern Plains | Male and female | 22.9 | 1.9 | 19.4 | 27.0 | 148 | 654,135 |
Northern Plains | Male | 27.6 | 3.1 | 21.9 | 34.3 | 84 | 326,219 |
Northern Plains | Female | 19.0 | 2.4 | 14.6 | 24.3 | 64 | 327,916 |
Southwest | Male and female | 18.2 | 1.5 | 15.4 | 21.3 | 152 | 813,988 |
Southwest | Male | 19.1 | 2.3 | 14.9 | 24.0 | 72 | 401,544 |
Southwest | Female | 17.4 | 2.0 | 13.8 | 21.7 | 80 | 412,444 |
Pacific Coast | Male and female | 15.0 | 1.2 | 12.8 | 17.5 | 172 | 1,082,582 |
Pacific Coast | Male | 15.9 | 1.7 | 12.7 | 19.7 | 85 | 546,143 |
Pacific Coast | Female | 14.4 | 1.6 | 11.6 | 17.9 | 87 | 536,439 |
East | Male and female | 11.3 | 0.9 | 9.7 | 13.2 | 166 | 1,208,075 |
East | Male | 11.8 | 1.3 | 9.4 | 14.7 | 84 | 609,562 |
East | Female | 10.9 | 1.2 | 8.7 | 13.6 | 82 | 598,513 |
All regions | Male and female | 19.3 | 0.6 | 18.1 | 20.5 | 984 | 4,676,207 |
All regions | Male | 21.2 | 0.9 | 19.4 | 23.2 | 510 | 2,344,531 |
All regions | Female | 17.7 | 0.8 | 16.1 | 19.4 | 474 | 2,331,676 |
aAll data age-adjusted using the World Health Organization’s World Standard Population (2000–2025).
The incidence rate among AI/AN persons in Alaska also exceeded rates for every other racial group in Alaska (Table 2). During 2014–2018, the AI/AN rate in Alaska (67.1/100,000) was over twice as high as the rate for the White population in Alaska (26.4/100,000), and over three times higher than the rate among Asian/Pacific Islander persons and Black persons in Alaska (20.3/100,000 and 17.1/100,000, respectively). Among every racial group in Alaska, males had higher CRC incidence rates than females.
From 1999 to 2018, the CRC incidence rate among AI/AN persons in Alaska did not decline significantly, whereas the White population in Alaska experienced a significant decrease in the CRC incidence rate during the same period (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Trends in colorectal cancer incidence rates, American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons and White persons, Alaska, 1999–2018.
Compared internationally, the CRC incidence rate among AI/AN persons in Alaska (61.9/100,000 in 2018) was higher than the rate for any country with known CRC incidence rates that year and 1.2 times higher than the highest ranked country, Hungary (51.2/100,000)(Table 3). The rate among AI/AN females in Alaska (59.8/100,000) was 1.5 times higher than females in Norway, the country with the highest rate for females (39.3/100,000) (Table 3). Among males, the CRC incidence rate in Hungary was the only rate higher than AI/AN males in Alaska (70.6/100,000 and 63.6/100,000 respectively)(Table 3).
Table 3.
Top 10 colorectal cancer incidence rates worldwide, by men and women, 2018*.
Rank | Country | Age-standardised rate per 100,000 |
---|---|---|
Men and Women, combined | ||
1 | Hungary | 51.2 |
2 | South Korea | 44.5 |
3 | Slovakia | 43.8 |
4 | Norway | 42.9 |
5 | Slovenia | 41.1 |
6 | Denmark | 41.0 |
6 | Portugal | 40.0 |
8 = | Barbados | 38.9 |
8 = | Japan | 38.9 |
10 | Netherlands | 37.8 |
Women | ||
1 | Norway | 39.3 |
2 | Hungary | 36.8 |
3 | Denmark | 36.6 |
4 | Singapore | 34.0 |
5 | Australia | 32.4 |
6 | South Korea | 31.3 |
7 | Slovakia | 31.2 |
8 | Netherlands | 31.1 |
9 | New Zealand | 30.8 |
10 | Japan | 29.6 |
Men | ||
1 | Hungary | 70.6 |
2 | Slovakia | 60.7 |
3 | South Korea | 59.5 |
4 | Slovenia | 58.9 |
5 | Portugal | 54.0 |
6 | Barbados | 50.3 |
7 | Japan | 49.1 |
8 | Serbia | 49.0 |
9 | Moldova | 47.3 |
10 | Norway | 46.9 |
*Data source: World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer, Global Cancer Observatory, GLOBOCAN 2018 database (https://gco.iarc.fr).
Discussion
This review of Tribal and non-Tribal populations in the US showed that AI/AN persons in Alaska had the highest documented CRC incidence rate compared with rates for AI/AN persons in any other region in the country in 2018, and the highest rate compared with all other racial groups in Alaska during 2014–2018. The high rate among AI/AN persons in Alaska has persisted over time, despite declining CRC incidence rates among Alaska non-Native populations and the overall US population [14]. In the US, there was a 3.3% annual decrease in CRC incidence in the late 2000s coinciding with increasing CRC screening with colonoscopy among adults aged 50 or older [1]. Our analyses and others [15] show that there has been no significant decrease in the CRC incidence rate among AI/AN in Alaska during the past 2 decades. Our comparison of CRC incidence rates among AI/AN persons in Alaska, compared with published country-level CRC incidence rates worldwide [16,17], showed that AI/AN persons in Alaska (males and females combined) had the highest documented CRC incidence rate in the world in 2018.
There have been notable declines in CRC incidence and mortality in countries with decreases in smoking and increased uptake of screening by colonoscopy with polypectomy [18–20]. Through screening, CRC can be detected early, when it is more treatable, and can be prevented if precancerous polyps are found and removed during screening [21]. Because of this, there has been an effort to increase screening for CRC among AI/AN persons in Alaska and screening is a covered service within the Alaska Tribal Health System [22,23]. According to Alaska Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, the percentage of Alaska Native persons in Alaska who were up-to-date with CRC screening in 2020 was 71.1% (95% CI: 62.4, 78.5) [24].
CRC incidence rates tend to rise in countries experiencing rapid socio-economic development and shifts in dietary behaviours and living conditions [25–27]. AI/AN persons in Alaska have experienced a shift from traditional diet and physical activity patterns to more reliance on store-bought foods, and they have a higher incidence of chronic diseases, including heart disease and cancer [28–30]. This health transition is similar to that experienced by other Arctic Indigenous populations [31,32].
Studies have shown CRC incidence rates to be higher among Indigenous persons than non-Indigenous populations in some places, such as Ontario, Canada [33], although lower than non-Indigenous populations in other locations, such as China [34] and Scandinavia [32,35]. However, many countries do not separate out CRC incidence among Indigenous groups in their national statistics; thus, it was not possible in this study to compare rates among AI/AN populations in Alaska to other Indigenous populations worldwide. This is an area of inquiry that would be helpful to explore, to discover if there are other Tribal populations that also experience higher CRC incidence rates than non-Tribal groups within their home country.
High-quality cancer registry data are not available in most low- and middle-income countries, which is another limitation of our comparison to CRC incidence rates in other countries [16]. Therefore, there may be populations that have higher rates and estimates than those included in this study. Racial misclassification can also contribute to inaccuracies in reported cancer incidence and mortality [36]. The validity and quality of national estimates depends upon the representativeness of the source information, which is important for planning and implementing evidence-based cancer control programs [13,16].
In addition, the rates among AI/AN persons in Alaska presented here are not comparable with previous publications in which rates were calculated using the 2000 US Standard Population [2,37]. For the purpose of being able to compare rates of other countries, we used the World Health Organization World Standard Population (2000–2025) [11] to calculate incidence rates. The age distribution of the World Standard Population reflects a much younger population than the 2000 US Standard Population [38], and this may have lessened the magnitude of the observed differences in rates between AI/AN persons in Alaska and other countries.
Reasons for the extremely high CRC incidence rate among AI/AN persons in Alaska are not well understood and may be related to behavioral factors known in other populations to be associated with CRC risk [20], including tobacco use, physical inactivity, low fruit and vegetable intake, and alcohol consumption [39]. There may be additional environmental factors associated with this higher risk, such as infection with Helicobacter pylori, which has been associated with development of CRC [40,41].
To help reduce the burden of this preventable and treatable disease, it is important to continue to inform AI/AN communities about the social and environmental factors that may limit healthy behaviours [42], and to guide health systems serving AI/AN persons about policies and interventions that can support CRC screening.
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC-RFA-DP22-2206 Tribal Epidemiology Centers Public Health Infrastructure under award no. NU58DP007220. We acknowledge the contributions and support of the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium tribal review committees for their review and approval of this article for publication; and the Alaska Native Tumor Registry, which is supported by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program, NCI contract no. HHSN2612018000014I, Task Order HHSN26100001.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Alaska Native Tumor Registry are supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Programme [NCI contract number HHSN2612018000014I, Task Order HHSN26100001.]; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under DP17-1704 Building Public Health Infrastructure in Tribal Communities [NU58DP006379].
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Abbreviations
CRC = colorectal cancer
AI/AN = American Indian/Alaska Native
CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
NCI = National Cancer Institute
NPCR = National Program of Cancer Registries
SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
Disclaimer
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
References
- [1].Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(3):145–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Haverkamp D, Melkonian SC, Jim MA.. Growing disparity in the incidence of colorectal cancer among non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska native populations-United States, 2013-2017. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(10):1799–1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Zimpelman GL, Miller KN, Carlo DD, et al. Cancer in Alaska native people: 1969–2018, the 50-year report. anchorage, AK: Alaska native tumor registry, Alaska native epidemiology center, Alaska native tribal health consortium. 2021
- [4].O’Brien D, Quinn J, Avila R, et al. Early onset colorectal cancer, by sex and race — Alaska, 1996–2019. Anchorage, AK2023.
- [5].State of Alaska department of labor and workforce development. Alaska population by age, sex, race (alone or in combination) and Hispanic origin 2010-2020 2020. Accessed 1 September 2022. https://live.laborstats.alaska.gov//pop/index.cfm.
- [6].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . U.S. Cancer Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/uscs Accessed 2022 Feb 18
- [7].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Program of Cancer Registries . https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/about Accessed February 12, 2022.
- [8].National Institutes of Health . Surveillance, epidemiology and end results program. https://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed February 18, 2022.
- [9].Indian Health Service Requirements: Eligibility . IHS Eligibility Requirements. Available at: https://www.ihs.gov/prc/eligibility/requirements-eligibility/. Accessed February 4, 2022.
- [10].Surveillance Research Program , National cancer institute SEER*stat software. www.seer.cancer.gov/seerstat Accessed February 18, 2022.
- [11].Ahmad OB, Boschi-Pinto C, Lopez AD, et al. Age standardization of rates: a new WHO standard. 2001. Accessed 28 February 2023. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/gho-documents/global-health-estimates/gpe_discussion_paper_series_paper31_2001_age_standardization_rates.pdf.
- [12].Surveillance Research Program , Joinpoint trend analysis software. https://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/. Accessed February 18, 2022.
- [13].Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019;144(8):1941–1953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Islami F, Ward EM, Sung H, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, part 1: national cancer statistics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- [15].Nash S, Britton C, Redwood D. Characteristics of colorectal cancers among Alaska Native people before and after implementing programs to promote screening. J Cancer Policy. 2021;29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Cancer trends: worldwide cancer data, colorectal cancer statistics. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/colorectal-cancer-statistics/. Accessed February 22, 2022.
- [18].Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1974-2013. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Cabilan CJ, Hines S. The short-term impact of colorectal cancer treatment on physical activity, functional status and quality of life: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017;15(2):517–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Colorectal cancer facts & figures 2020-2022. 2020. Accessed 1 September 2022. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/colorectal-cancer-facts-and-figures/colorectal-cancer-facts-and-figures-2020-2022.pdf.
- [21].Preventive Services US, Force T, Kw D, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19):1965–1977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Seeff LC, Major A, Townsend JS, et al. Comprehensive cancer control programs and coalitions: partnering to launch successful colorectal cancer screening initiatives. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(12):2023–2031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Redwood D, Provost E, Perdue D, et al. The last frontier: innovative efforts to reduce colorectal cancer disparities among the remote Alaska Native population. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(3):474–480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Alaska Department of Health and Social Services . Alaska behavioral risk factor surveillance system. 2020; https://alaska-dph.shinyapps.io/BRFSS/ Accessed Feb 15, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- [25].Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 2017;66(4):683–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Sharma R. An examination of colorectal cancer burden by socioeconomic status: evidence from GLOBOCAN 2018. EPMA J. 2020;11(1):95–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Bersamin A, Luick BR, King IB, et al. Westernizing diets influence fat intake, red blood cell fatty acid composition, and health in remote Alaskan Native communities in the center for Alaska Native health study. J Am Diet Assoc. 2008;108(2):266–273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].O’Brien DM, Thummel KE, Bulkow LR, et al. Declines in traditional marine food intake and vitamin D levels from the 1960s to present in young Alaska Native women. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(10):1738–1745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Redwood DG, Day GM, Beans JA, et al. Alaska native traditional food and harvesting activity patterns over 10 years of follow-up. Curr Dev Nutr. 2019;3(11):nzz114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Young TBP, editors. Health transitions in arctic populations. Toronto Canada: University of Toronto Press. 2008. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Hassler S, Soininen L, Sjolander P, et al. Cancer among the sami–a review on the Norwegian, Swedish and Finnish sami populations. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2008;67(5):421–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Young SW, Nishri ED, Candido E, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence in the Aboriginal population of Ontario, 1998 to 2009. Health Rep. 2015;26(4):3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Valan A, Najid F, Chandran P, et al. Distinctive clinico-pathological characteristics of colorectal cancer in sabahan indigenous populations. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(3):749–755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Young TK, Kelly JJ, Friborg J, et al. Cancer among circumpolar populations: an emerging public health concern. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2016;75:29787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Jim MA, Arias E, Seneca DS, et al. Racial misclassification of American Indians and Alaska Natives by Indian health service contract health service delivery area. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(Suppl 3):S295–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Perdue DG, Haverkamp D, Perkins C, et al. Geographic variation in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, age of onset, and stage at diagnosis among American Indian and Alaska Native people, 1990-2009. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(Suppl 3):S404–414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Use of the 2000 U.S . Standard population for age-adjustment. https://seer.cancer.gov/stdpopulations/2000stdpop-use.html. Accessed 2020 Feb 22
- [39].Redwood DG, Lanier AP, Johnston JM, et al. Chronic disease risk factors among Alaska Native and American Indian people, Alaska, 2004-2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(4):A85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Shmuely H, Melzer E, Braverman M, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with advanced colorectal neoplasia. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49(4):516–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Kim TJ, Kim ER, Chang DK, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection is an independent risk factor of early and advanced colorectal neoplasm. Helicobacter. 2017;22:3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].EA H. American Indians and Alaska Natives: resolving disparate cancer outcomes. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2020;24(1):107–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]