Abstract
Otitis media (OM) is the main reason for pediatric antibiotic prescriptions. The current treatment mandates a rigorous regimen of multidose antibiotics over 5-10 days. The systemic antibiotic exposure and often prematurely terminated treatment due to the challenge of drug administration to young patients are believed to breed antibiotic resistance. To address these challenges, we designed a local treatment that converted a metabolic product (H2O2) of an OM pathogen (Streptococcus pneumoniae) into a potent antiseptic (HOBr), a reaction catalyzed by locally administered vanadium pentoxide nanowires. The therapeutic, HOBr, was only synthesized in the presence of the pathogen, enabling on-demand generation of therapeutics for OM treatment. Hypohalous acids are broad-spectrum and have a long history in general disinfection applications without breeding substantial drug resistance. A single dose of the nanowire formulation eradicated OM in a standard chinchilla model in 7 days with no observable tissue toxicity or negative impact on hearing sensitivity.
Keywords: on-demand synthesis, antiseptics, Vanadium pentoxide nanowire, haloperoxidase-like activity, otitis media
1. Introduction
Every year, 12 million to 16 million physician visits in the United States (U.S.) are attributed to otitis media (OM), the most common specifically treated childhood disease [1]. Over 95% of children in the U.S. have at least 1 episode of acute OM, with one third of them experiencing 6 or more episodes by age 7 [2]. Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) and nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) are two of the most common OM pathogens worldwide, which are responsible for ~35% and ~23% of all OM cases respectively [3]. Other pathogens include Moraxella catarrhalis (accounting for ~14% of OM cases) and ones that are rare in OM such as pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1), alpha-hemolytic Streptococcus, group A Streptococcus (GAS), and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) each of which accounts for ~1-3% of all OM cases [3]. Unfortunately, current therapy for acute OM requires adherence to a rigorous outpatient regimen of multiple doses of antibiotics per day over 5-10 days, the adherence to which in young children remains challenging partially due to the severe side effects observed in over 50% of U.S. children [4]. As a result, treatments are often terminated once symptoms are resolved while pathogens may still be present, leading to recurrent OM and rapid development of antimicrobial resistance [5, 6]. For example, in S. pneumoniae, one of the major OM pathogens causing approximately 300 million OM cases annually worldwide (corresponding to 30-50% of all OM cases) [7], reduced susceptibility or resistance to ß-lactam and macrolide antibiotics has become prevalent among the clinical isolates [8–10]. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of S. pneumoniae is among the highest in OM pathogens. The MIC of ciprofloxacin against certain strains of S. pneumoniae is as high as 0.5-4 μg/mL, over 50 times that of NTHi (another common OM pathogen with MIC of less than 0.01 μg/mL for ciprofloxacin) [9, 11]. Furthermore, 30% of severe S. pneumoniae infections are untreatable by one or more antibiotics because of the rapid development of drug resistance [12], which is further exacerbated by the prevalence of OM. Responsible for 21% of all antibiotic prescriptions written to U.S. children [13], acute OM is believed to contribute substantially to the ongoing increase in antimicrobial resistance identified among nasopharynx pathogens in the general public [14].
In contrast to the rapid development of resistance to antibiotics, hypohalous acids are used extensively in healthcare and water disinfection since 1854 and without substantial resistance documented to date [15]. They have demonstrated broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects against viruses, bacteria, and fungi [16]. Tolerance of OM pathogens towards HOBr has not been reported to our best knowledge. Although hypohalous acids have negligible tissue toxicity at effective concentrations (10-100 μg/mL) [15], a fundamental challenge for their application as a therapeutic is the short half-life in vivo [16], which prevents the sustained antimicrobial effects required to treat conditions like OM. In this report, we address this challenge by generating hypohalous acids in situ using a catalytic nanozyme based on vanadium pentoxide nanowires (V2O5 NWs). The V2O5 NWs not only mimic the reactivities of vanadium haloperoxidases (V-HPOs) enzymes isolated from the marine algae Macrocystis Pyrifera [17], which has been discovered to have sustained antimicrobial activities. Furthermore, the cylindrical shape of the V2O5 NWs is highly desirable for achieving long retention time in the auditory bullae as such non-isotropic shape is known to increase the radius of gyration and thus decrease diffusivity in body fluids [17] (like middle ear fluid).
To treat infections caused by the OM pathogen, S. pneumoniae, we synthesized V2O5 NWs that convert a known metabolic product of S. pneumoniae, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), to hypohalous acid continuously and catalytically (i.e., without consumption of V2O5 NWs). While the basal level of H2O2 in human plasma is close to zero [18], S. pneumoniae produces up to 1 mM H2O2 per hour during log-phase growth due to its pyruvate oxidase activity [19], sufficiently fueling the production of hypohalous acid by V2O5 NWs. In addition, the inflammation caused by S. pneumoniae-induced OM could further promote that catalytic generation of antimicrobials by (i) generating the middle ear fluid, which in turn provides a liquid environment to enable the catalytic activity of V2O5 NWs; and (ii) supplies additional H2O2 generation sources like phagocytic cells [20, 21] which could generate nanomolar-levels of H2O2 [22]. As a result, the synthesis of hypohalous acid only occurs in the presence of S. pneumoniae, and stops upon cure of OM, thus ensuring the on-demand treatment of infections caused by S. pneumoniae while minimizing the tissue exposure to hypohalous acid and associated side effects [23]. That continuous generation of hypohalous acid in response to an active episode of OM potentially enables a single application of the V2O5 NWs formulation to cure recurrent infections.
Here, we demonstrate the successful treatment of S. pneumoniae OM in an established chinchilla animal model [24], using a single-dose formulation containing the V2O5 NWs. The formulation eradicated acute OM in chinchillas within 7 days and demonstrated excellent biocompatibility in the ear. Detailed studies on the catalytic reaction kinetics confirmed that the V2O5 NWs enabled the oxidation of bromide (Br−) into hypobromous acid (HOBr) leveraging the H2O2 produced by S. pneumoniae, the catalytic activity of which was captured by the Michaelis-Menten model. The in vitro antibacterial efficacy of the V2O5 NWs was assessed using a clinical isolate of S. pneumoniae, which demonstrated complete eradication of the bacteria in culture media in the presence of 1 mM Br−. Building upon these promising in vitro results, we proceeded to testing the nanozyme’s efficacy where chinchillas were infected with the S. pneumoniae and treated via a single intrabulla injection of a formulation containing 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs and 1 mM Br−. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) in the middle ear of the infected animals was reduced by more than 10,000 times, 7 days after the injection. Due to the primitive immune system of chinchillas, a 3-log reduction in the middle ear CFU count is commonly considered to translate to complete cure in human children [25, 26], which was far exceeded by the reported nanozyme formulation here. Furthermore, excellent biocompatibility of the nanozyme formulation was demonstrated via auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing, the results of which were identical in animals treated by the formulation and healthy, untreated animals. Auditory bullae harvested from treated animals also appeared histologically similar to untreated ones, further corroborating the biocompatibility of the treatment. The biocompatibility was likely a result of the on-demand generation of antiseptics, which was active only in the presence of S. pneumoniae, thus preventing potentially toxic overexposure to HOBr.
This design enabled on-demand synthesis of therapeutics at the site of infection, which represents a new paradigm in infectious disease treatment. The broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects of hypohalous acids against viruses (e.g., anti-HIV), bacteria, and fungi [16], their record of low probability of developing drug resistance, and the emerging health benefits (e.g., cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory effects [27]) point to the broad deployment of this strategy in the treatment of infections involving reactive oxygen species (ROS)-generating pathogens. It has the potential to curb the development of antimicrobial resistance, one of the greatest global public health concerns, and mitigate the 35,000 deaths, 2.8 millions hospitalizations, and $20-billion of additional medical expenditures associated with antibiotic resistant infections [28, 29].
2. Results
2.1. Single-crystalline V2O5 NWs were synthesized
V2O5 NWs were synthesized using a hydrothermal approach based on previous reports [30, 31]. The as-synthesized V2O5 NWs were characterized for detailed information on the particle geometry, crystallography, elemental composition, and bonding environments as described below.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) illustrated the elongated geometry of the V2O5 NWs, with an average length of 404.7 ± 166.6 nm and an average width of 35.6 ± 10.4 nm (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig.S1). These dimensions were consistent with previous reports that employed the hydrothermal synthesis approach [30]. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) imaging demonstrated the typical orthorhombic lattice structure of V2O5NWs with a distance of ~ 0.270 nm between the nearest neighboring plane (Fig. 1B), which is considered to enable the HPO-like activities of V2O5 NWs. This lattice parameter was consistent with the reported distance between the (040) planes of an orthorhombic lattice in V2O5, thus confirming that the nanowire grew along the [010] direction as described previously [32]. The [010] lattice plane of V2O5 NWs is important because it displays a vanadium coordination geometry similar to that of the active site of V-HPO (identified in Macrocystis pyrifera) [27]. The fast Fourier transform (FFT) of HRTEM (Fig. 1C) (taken from an individual nanowire) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns (Supplementary Fig. S2) revealed the single-crystalline nature of the V2O5 NWs.
Fig. 1. Characterization of the V2O5 NWs.

(A, B) TEM and HRTEM images of the V2O5 NWs. (C) FFT of the HRTEM image of a single V2O5 NW. (D-F) the STEM image (D) and the corresponding EDX elemental mapping of V (E) and O (F). (G) XPS survey scan of the V2O5 NWs. (H) High-resolution XPS spectra of the V2O5 NWs with deconvoluted core level spectra of O(1s) (blue peaks) and V(2p) (orange peaks). The black solid line corresponds to the envelope/fitting curve, and the black dots represent the raw data.
Scanning transmission electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM-EDX) provided the elemental mapping that further demonstrated uniform distributions of V and O in the V2O5 NWs (Fig. 1D, F), with the V:O ratio of ~2.5, as calculated from the EDX spectrum (Supplementary Fig. S3). The atomic percentage of O and V collected from the EDX spectrum were ~27.73% and ~68.08%, respectively, consistent with the theoretical atomic ratio in V2O5. That elemental composition was corroborated by a survey scan performed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Fig. 1G). To confirm that the correct bonding environment was obtained for the V2O5 NWs, XPS high-resolution scans on V (2p) and O (1s) were performed with the peaks deconvoluted using Lorentzian–Gaussian functions. The peaks at 517.2 eV and 524.9 eV corresponded to the spin-orbit split of V 2p3/2 and V 2p1/2 (Fig. 1H, orange peaks), respectively, indicative of the valence state of V(V) [33, 34]. The high-resolution XPS scan on O (1s) (Fig. 1H, blue peaks), revealed that the dominating oxygen species was the lattice oxygen, captured at ~ 530.1 eV, constituting 62.7% of the total oxygen. Other oxygen species mainly comprised (i) the -OH groups on the surface of the V2O5 NWs, with the binding energy of ~531 eV, constituting ~31.4% of the total oxygen, and (ii) surface-adsorbed water (~6.0% of the total oxygen), with the binding energy of ~532.8 eV [34]. These materials characterization results confirmed the geometry and chemical composition of the as-synthesized V2O5 NWs, proved their crystallinity, and quantified their lattice parameters, based on which the catalytic activities were characterized in detail as described below.
2.2. V2O5 NWs demonstrated catalytic activities comparable to the V-HPOs
The haloperoxidase-like catalytic activities of V2O5 NWs were quantified using a colorimetric assay, i.e., the phenol red (PR, phenolsulfonphthalein) bromination assay , which is commonly used to quantify the concentration of HOBr in an aqueous solution [35]. Generation of HOBr, via the haloperoxidase-like activities of V2O5 NWs, has been demonstrated to be the rate-limiting step in the colorimetric reaction cascade [36], which was confirmed by our observation that the bromination rate of PR was independent of the PR concentration (Supplementary Fig. S4). Using UV-vis spectrophotometer, the bromination of PR (using a 25 mM aqueous solution of PR, with light absorbance at 430 nm) to bromophenol blue (Br4PR, 3′,3″,5′,5″-tetrabromophenolsulfonphthalein, with light absorbance at 590 nm) was observed in the presence of V2O5 NWs, Br− and H2O2 (Fig. 2A), whereas no bromination occurred in the absence of V2O5 NWs, or Br− or H2O2 (Fig. 2B). The initial rate (v0) of the bromination reaction, which was indicative of the rate of HOBr generation, was quantified experimentally using the time-evolution of the absorbance of Br4PR at 590 nm (A590) (eq. 1), based on the Lambert-Beer equation (eq. 2).
Fig. 2. Catalytic activities of the V2O5 NWs.

(A) Scheme of the oxidative bromination reaction (converting PR to Br4PR), used to quantify the reaction kinetics of HOBr generation. (B) UV-vis spectra demonstrating the bromination reaction only in the presence of V2O5 NWs, Br−, and H2O2. The reaction mixtures contained 25 μM PR, and/or 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs, and/or 1 mM Br−, and/or 100 μM H2O2; the spectra were collected in triplicates after 12 hours of reaction time. (C) Dependence of the initial rate of the bromination reaction on the concentration of V2O5 NWs, collected at the Br− concentration of 1 mM and the H2O2 concentration of 10 μM. (D) Dependence of the initial rate of the bromination reaction on the concentration of Br−, collected at the V2O5 NWs concentration of 0.04 mg/mL and the H2O2 concentration of 10 μM. (E) Dependence of the initial rate of the bromination reaction on the concentration of H2O2, collected at the V2O5 NWs concentration of 0.04 mg/mL and the Br− concentration of 1 mM. The initial concentration of PR was kept at 25 μM for C, D, and E. (F) Dependence of the initial rate of the bromination reaction on pH, where the concentration of V2O5 NWs was 0.04 mg/mL, of Br− was 1 mM, and of H2O2 was 10 μM. (G) Stability of the V2O5 NWs over 12 hours, where the concentration of V2O5 NWs was 0.04 mg/mL, of Br− was 1 mM, and of H2O2 was 10 μM. Data are mean ± SD. n = 4.
| (1) |
| (2) |
Theoretically, the initial rate (v0) of this catalytic reaction follows the Michaelis-Menten equation (eq. 3) [35].
| (3) |
where [S] is the concentration of the substrate (i.e., Br− or H2O2) and [E] is the concentration of the nanozyme (V2O5 NWs). Indeed, the initial rate (v0) demonstrated a linear dependence on the concentration of V2O5 NWs (Fig. 2C), which is consistent with the predictions made in the Michaelis-Menten model with respect to the enzyme concentration (i.e., v0=kcat[E], when [S] is kept constant; kcat, the turnover frequency (TOF), the number of reacted molecules to that of an active site). To measure the Michaelis-Menten constant (Km), which describes the binding affinity of a substrate (i.e., Br− or H2O2) to the V2O5 NWs and the maximum reaction rate (Vmax) for a certain V2O5 NWs concentration, we individually varied the concentrations of the substrates, while keeping concentrations of V2O5 NWs and PR constant at 0.04 mg/mL and 25 mM, respectively. The values of Km and Vmax were obtained from the experimental data (Fig. 2D, E), using the Lineweaver-Burk linearization (eq. 4):
| (4) |
As such, the Km values were determined to be 30.4 μM for H2O2 and 10.2 mM for Br−, respectively, implying the concentration of H2O2 that was secreted by S. pneumoniae (up to 1 mM as reported [37] and based on our test) is enough to sustain the catalytic reaction. The Vmax value was determined to be 57.2-92.5×10−9 M min−1 for the V2O5 NWs at concentration of 0.04 mg/mL. The TOF (or kcat, reflecting the activity of a catalyst) was calculated to be 1.7×10−3 min−1 for the as-synthesized V2O5 NWs (where kcat was taken as the Vmax for the molar concentration of the catalyst).
The aforementioned kinetic parameters were consistent with those reported in the literature for V2O5 NWs (e.g., Km was reported to be 10 μM for H2O2 by F. Natalio and W. Tremel [30]). They were also consistent with the kinetic parameters reported for the biological enzyme, V-HPOs (e.g., vanadium chloroperoxidase found in Curvularia inaequalis was reported to have a Km value of 3.1 mM for Br− [38], and vanadium bromoperoxidase found in Ascophyllum nodosum was reported to have a Km value of 18.1 mM for Br−). The readers are referred to Supplementary table S1 for a detailed comparison with the literature values [39].
V2O5 NWs retained catalytic activity in the pH range relevant to OM treatment and over the course of at least 12 hours. Based on past research that demonstrated V-HPOs enzymes to have greater catalytic activities in acidic environments [40], the effect of pH on the V2O5 NWs was examined by varying the pH of the solution in the range of 5 to 9 while measuring the catalytic activities as described above. This pH range was chosen to cover (i) the range of pH for the culture of S. pneumoniae, which varies between 6.5 and 8.3 depending on the culture time [41] and (ii) the range of pH of the middle ear fluid (MEF) during an episode of OM, which has been reported to range between 7.0 and 8.5 [42]. Using a solution containing 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs, 1 mM Br−, and 10 μM H2O2, the pH under which the maximum catalytic activities were observed for the as-synthesized V2O5 NWs was measured to be ~6 (Fig. 2F), with a v0 value of 13.9 ± 2.5×10−9 M min−1. At the pH of 7, approximately 50.5 ± 8.6% of that maximum reactivity was retained, which further decreased to 23.9 ± 5.7% at the pH of 8.
The sustained catalytic behavior is required of V2O5 NWs to achieve complete eradication of OM. Therefore, we assessed performance of the V2O5 NWs over the course of 12 hours, using a solution containing 1 mM Br−, 100 μM H2O2, and 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs. The V2O5 NWs demonstrated unchanged catalytic activities throughout the monitored 12-hour period (Fig. 2G). These reaction kinetics studies demonstrated that the V2O5 NWs was able to retain catalytic activities over the pH range of 5 to 9, and over the course of 12 hours. Based on these results, we anticipated the V2O5 NWs to demonstrate catalytic activities under the conditions relevant to the in vitro and in vivo assessments for antibacterial efficacy and biocompatibility as described below.
2.3. V2O5 NWs/Br− formulation eradicated S. pneumoniae in vitro
To assess the effectiveness of the V2O5 NWs to convert the bacteria-produced H2O2 to HOBr and thus eradicate the bacteria, we used a clinically isolated OM pathogen, S. pneumoniae, which excretes H2O2 as a metabolic product. The concentration of H2O2 generated by S. pneumoniae after overnight culture (12-16 hours) was ~1mM in the supernatant, assessed using a fluorometric method based on an H2O2 probe (10-acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine, ADHP). In contrast, H2O2 cannot be detected in the culture treated with the formulation (i.e., V2O5 NWs and Br−) because the nanomaterials interfered with the reading of the ADHP assay. In addition, the catalytic reactions consume H2O2 while eradicating S. pneumoniae, which serves as the main generator of H2O2, thus further diminishing H2O2 in the treated culture (as shown in Fig. 3). Building upon the H2O2-generating capability of S. pneumoniae, we demonstrated that its growth was inhibited entirely in the presence of 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs and 1 mM Br−, without the need to introduce exogeneous H2O2 (Fig. 3A). The antimicrobial efficacy remained unchanged upon addition of H2O2 to the final concentration of 20 μM, (i.e., treating the culture with a combination of 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs, 1 mM Br−, and 20 μM H2O2). A suppression effect on the bacterial growth was also observed in the group containing 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs only, corresponding to a stationary-phase OD600 that is 25.8% that of the non-treated culture after 15 hours. For the group treated with 1 mM Br− and 20 μM H2O2, the stationary-phase OD600 was also mildly reduced to 94.5% that of the non-treated group after 15 hours. We note that growth curves based on OD600 may not reflect bacterial survival with complete fidelity as dead cells and cell debris could contribute to the OD600 readings via light scattering. Therefore, to confirm the viability of S. pneumoniae after the aforementioned treatments, an aliquot (100μL) of the liquid culture (at the end of the 15-hour incubation), was plated onto blood agar to assess the CFU count (Fig. 3B). Although the high densities of bacteria prevented a qualitative assessment of the CFU count under several treatment conditions, a clear difference was observed between the groups treated with 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs + 1 mM Br− or with 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs + 1 mM Br− + 20 μM H2O2, where no bacteria growth was observed, and those that were nontreated, or treated with 1 mM Br− + 20 μM H2O2, or with 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs alone, where colonies were too dense to quantify. Next, the antimicrobial effect of another HPO-mimicking nanomaterial, cerium oxide nanorods (CeO2-x NRs), was tested against S. pneumoniae as a comparison with the V2O5 NWs (Supplementary Fig. S5). Notably, the CeO2-x NRs only partially inhibited the growth of S. pneumoniae at 0.08 mg/mL, the maximum concentration of either nanoparticle tested, and complete inhibition was not observed. This can be understood through the greater catalytic activities demonstrated by CeO2-x NRs in acidic environments (than that in pH-neutral solution), as reported previously[30]. These results indicated that V2O5 NWs were optimal in this case and were effective at converting the H2O2 produced by S. pneumoniae, an OM pathogen that has been challenging to treat, into a potent antimicrobial, HOBr, which in turn eradicated the pathogen, in lieu of conventional antibiotics. Their catalytic activities compare favorably to those of another candidate in the class of catalytic transition metal oxides, i.e., CeO2-x NRs.
Fig. 3. Antibacterial effect of the V2O5 NWs.

(A) Bacterial growth curves of S. pneumoniae. The OD600 was monitored for 15 hours, where the initial concentration of V2O5 NWs was 0.04 mg/mL, of Br− was 1 mM, and of H2O2 was 20 μM. Data are mean ± SD. (n = 4). ns, not statistically significant, **p<0.01, ****p<0,0001; all comparisons were made with respect to the “Nontreated” group. (B) Images of the blood agar plates obtained by plating the S. pneumoniae cultures at the end of the incubation shown in (A).
2.4. V2O5 NWs/Br− formulation was biocompatible in the ear
The cytotoxicity of V2O5 NWs was assessed in two cell lines which are representative of the cell types present in the auditory system: human dermal fibroblasts (hFBs) and PC12 Adh (a pheochromocytoma cell line used for testing neurotoxicity). After 24 hours of incubation with the various formulations (as detailed below), the live and dead cells were stained and counted by the LIVE/DEAD staining kit (Fig. 4, A, B). No discernable cytotoxicity was captured in either hFBs or PC12 cells for the formulation containing 0.01 mg/mL V2O5 NWs (with 1 mM Br and 20 μM H2O2). Nevertheless, mild cytotoxicity was observed after increasing the concentration of V2O5 NWs to 0.04 mg/mL. The cell survival rate at 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs groups was reduced to 56.1 ± 6.7% for hFB and 78.4 ± 7.0 % for PC12.
Fig. 4. Biocompatibility assessments in vitro and in vivo.

(A) Confocal microscopy images of the LIVE/DEAD staining of hFBs and PC12. Green, live cells; red, dead cells. Cells were incubated with 0.01 mg/mL or 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs (as labeled in the figure), 1 mM Br−, and 10 μM H2O2 for 24 hours. (B) Cell survival rate (%), calculated by counting the live and dead cells in (A). Data are mean ± SD. n = 4. ns, not statistically significant, ****p<0.0001. (C) ABR thresholds in response to an acoustic click before and after the treatment with a formulation containing 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs and 1 mM Br−. The black dashed line indicated the hearing threshold of healthy chinchillas before the treatment. Data are mean ± SD. (n = 5). (D) The cross-section micrographs of the H&E-stained pristine and treated TMs. The treated TMs were exposed to 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs and 1 mM Br− for 7 days.
The in vivo biocompatibility of the V2O5 NWs formulation was examined through two approaches: the ABRs test and tissue histological analyses, both performed on chinchillas. Chinchillas have been used as the benchmark animal model in OM research because their hearing range largely overlaps with that of humans [43] and the pathogenicity of OM in chinchillas largely resembles that in human children [44]. The chinchillas have large, accessible tympanic bulla with the total volume between 1.52 and 2.09 mL [45]. Considering the concentration of V2O5 NWs that we demonstrated to be antimicrobial (i.e., >0.01mg/mL) and the concentration that showed no observable cytotoxicity (i.e., <0.04 mg/mL), we chose a formulation that contains 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs for in vivo experiments. That would lead to a V2O5 NWs concentration of ~0.013 mg/mL in the auditory bullae of infected animals (upon intrabulla administration of a formulation volume of 200 μL) due to dilution by MEF (assuming a MEF volume of ~1 mL[44, 45]). We predict that V2O5 NWs concentration in bullae to effectively eradicate in vivo bacterial growth, while maintaining optimum biocompatibility. Although a higher V2O5 NWs concentration (e.g., 0.16 mg/mL) would likely lead to greater antimicrobial effect (because v0 increases linearly with the V2O5 NWs concentration as shown in Fig. 2C), it would also entail greater cytotoxicity based on Fig. 4A&4B.
The value of ABR threshold reflects the hearing sensitivity, which is an important criterion for the assessment of ototoxicity [46]. To assess the effect of the V2O5 NWs treatment on hearing sensitivity, 200 μL of the formulation containing 0.08 mg/mL V2O5, 1mM Br−, and 100 μM H2O2 was administered through the dorsal side of the auditory bullae of a healthy chinchilla, and the ABR threshold was measured before the injection, and 20 mins, 1 day, 3 days and 6 days post-injection. The ABR threshold measured prior to the injection of V2O5 NWs for each animal was used as a baseline for the normalization of subsequent measurements.
After an initial minor increase of the click ABR threshold by 1.2 ± 1.5 dB at 20 minutes after the treatment, hearing sensitivity of the treated chinchillas remained unchanged over the course of the 6-day treatment at values comparable to those of healthy and untreated animals (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, wave II of the measured ABR response, the wave with the most obvious amplitude (among waves I, II, III, and IV) was examined to assess effect of the formulation on synchronous neural function from the auditory nerve to the mesencephalon (Supplementary Fig. S6A) [46]. The amplitude (defined as the difference between the peak and the succeeding trough of wave II) remained unchanged over the course of 6 days (Supplementary Fig. S6B, D). The absolute latency for wave II, which is defined as the time interval between the auditory stimulus and the peak of wave II, became slightly longer in treated animals at 20 mins after the injection (with an average increase of 0.35 ± 0.06 ms, Supplementary Fig. S6C, E), implying slightly decreased auditory nerve activities, which was likely caused by the physical dampening of tympanic membranes (TMs) vibration by the formulation. The absolute latency returned to the average value of untreated animals, i.e., ~ 2.8 ms, after one day post-injection. Overall, the ABR threshold, peak amplitude, and absolute latency of each animal did not exhibit large variations, suggesting that the treatment did not substantially alter the auditory functions of the chinchillas.
Potential tissue toxicity induced by the V2O5 NWs treatment was assessed with histological analysis of TMs. Bullae of animals treated with 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs and 1 mM Br− for 7-day were retrieved, the TMs of which were demonstrated to be histologically similar to pristine TMs (Fig. 4D), with the thickness of 25.2 ± 1.8 mm that is comparable to healthy TMs (18.2 ± 4.5 mm). No tissue injury, necrosis, or inflammatory cells were identified in the treated groups.
These results demonstrated the excellent biocompatibility of the nanozyme formulation, which, combined with the aforementioned antimicrobial efficacy, hints at a promising treatment for OM that enables on-demand synthesis of therapeutics and targeted eradication of pathogens at the site of infection. That excellent biocompatibility is also consistent with the recent study reporting cytoprotective effect of nanosized V2O5 via their glutathione-peroxidase (GPx)-like activities [27].
2.5. V2O5 NWs/Br− formulation cured OM in vivo in chinchillas
After confirming the in vitro antimicrobial activities and in vivo biocompatibility of the V2O5 NWs, a S. pneumoniae-induced chinchilla OM model was used to study the in vivo antimicrobial efficacy of V2O5 NWs. Timeline for the procedure used to establish the infection and to collect samples for the in vivo efficacy assessment is shown in Fig. 5A. In brief, the auditory bullae are dry and sterile under healthy conditions, into which S. pneumoniae was directly inoculated through the dorsal aspect of the bullae on day −3 (where the time of treatment administration was used as day 0). Daily otoscopy was performed to determine the presence of fluid in the auditory bullae and signs of infection, such as bulging TMs and erythema as shown in Fig. 5B (right). Once abnormality was identified, the MEF of the treated and nontreated animals was collected for serial dilution and culture to quantify the CFU of S. Pneumoniae in the middle ear, for which a value greater than 104 CFU was used as an indication of successful establishment of the infection [26]. That culture of MEF also served as a verification that S. Pneumoniae was the only bacteria identified in the auditory bullae. Identification of other pathogens (e.g., P. aeruginosa) would indicate contamination and thus the animal would be eliminated from the experimental group.
Fig. 5. In vivo therapeutic efficacy of the V2O5 NWs in a standard chinchilla OM model.

(A) The timeline of the in vivo procedures to induce and treat OM in chinchillas. (B) Otoscope images of the TMs of healthy (left) and infected (right) animals. The red arrows indicated the bulging TM and erythema observed during an OM episode. (C) Time course of the bacterial CFU count in the MEF of animals with OM. The formulations contained 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs and/or 1 mM Br−. Data are mean ± SD. n=8 for the nontreated group; n=5 for the group that received both V2O5 NWs and Br−; n=4 for the group that only received V2O5 NWs. Log10CFU for CFU ~0 was set to zero instead of minus infinity for the purpose of illustration. **p<0.01. (D) Vanadium content in the MEF of animals with OM, following a single intrabullae injection quantified using ICP-MS (normalized to Sulfur (S), a surrogate for total tissue quantity). Data are mean ± SD. n = 3-4 for each time point. (E) Representative H&E-stained sections of pristine, infected, and treated TMs. (F) Thicknesses of the TMs, quantified using the H&E-stained sections. Data are mean ± SD. n = 5. ns, not statistically significant, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001
Once infection was established, 200μL of a formulation containing a PBS-buffered solution of 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs with 1 mM Br− or 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 alone were injectead through the auditory bullae, which was considered day 0 of the treatment. V2O5 NWs were consistently detected in the MEF over the course of the 7-day treatment (Fig. 5D). That successful retention of the V2O5 NWs was likely a result of the clogged eustachian tube during (and sometimes following) an active episode of OM, which renders the auditory bulla a closed environment with no liquid drainage [47]. (Eustachian tube connects nasopharynx and auditory bulla, which ensures proper liquid drainage and keeps the bulla dry in healthy ears [48].) Furthermore, that liquid environment provided by the MEF is likely needed to sustain the catalytic reactions enabled by the V2O5 NWs, as discussed above. MEF was extracted from the dorsal aspect of the auditory bullae at day 1, 3 and 7 to monitor bacteria growth in the middle ear. The number of CFU in the middle ear of the infected animals was reduced by more than 10,000 times in the group that received the V2O5 NWs + Br− treatment (Fig. 5C), which far exceeded the common criteria for complete cure, i.e. 3-log reduction in the middle ear CFU count [25, 26]. Despite the in vitro antimicrobial effect of V2O5 NWs alone, the formulation only containing 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs did not eradicate S. Pneumoniae OM in vivo.
Substantial presence of V2O5 NWs was detected in the middle ear of the treated animals throughout the 7-day treatment via inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) at each time point. As shown in Fig. 5D, the level of vanadium in the MEF of treated animals was still detectable by day 7 in the group that received the V2O5 NWs + Br− treatment, suggesting that nanowires could be retained in the middle ear for at least 7 days after a single injection.
Histology confirmed the biocompatibility of the treatment in the treated or nontreated infected animals (Fig. 5E). Thickness of the infected and subsequently treated animals had their TMs return to levels close to the pristine TMs (40.2 ± 13.2 mm for V2O5 NWs + Br− vs 18.2 ± 7.0 mm for healthy TM) after the 7-day treatment. By comparison, the infected but not treated animals demonstrated TMs with a thickness of 175.7 ± 24.5 μm, nearly 10 folds that of the pristine TMs (Fig. 5F).
The 4-log reduction of CFUs in the MEF of infected and treated animals and their post-treatment TMs that appeared similar to the pristine ones, demonstrated that the V2O5 NWs + Br− formulation cured S. pneumoniae OM in chinchillas within 7 days without causing severe toxicity. Therefore, the haloperoxidase-mimicking V2O5 NWs could replace the conventional antibiotic therapies for OM treatment.
3. Discussion
We have developed an OM treatment that enabled the synthesis of an antiseptic, HOBr, in a middle ear infected by S. pneumoniae, which in turn eradicated the infection. HOBr was generated by oxidizing Br− using the H2O2 produced by the pathogen, catalyzed by V2O5 NWs. A single-dose formulation containing V2O5 NWs and Br− effectively cured S. pneumoniae OM in an established chinchilla animal model, without causing tissue damages in the ear or impacting on hearing sensitivity. This strategy of converting the metabolic products of pathogens into potent antimicrobials could be applicable to the treatment of other infections caused by S. pneumoniae, such as pneumonia and meningitis [28], as well as infections caused by a broad range of H2O2-generating pathogens [49], including Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus mitis.
The antiseptic, HOBr, was chosen based on the broad-spectrum efficacy of hypohalous acids [16] and their long history of application in healthcare and water disinfection without breeding substantial drug resistance [15]. Recently, a selection of antiseptics, including N-chlorotaurine [50], amylmetacresol [51], and thymol [52] has been used to treat topical infections including otitis externa, but few studies have attempted OM treatment with antiseptics due to their short half-life that requires frequent administration to the site of infection, which is challenging to access in the case of OM. That challenge was addressed in this study via the in situ generation of antiseptics.
The central point of this work was the on-demand and self-regulated synthesis of HOBr at the site of infection, enabled by the V2O5 NWs, turning the pathogen’s own metabolic products against itself. Upon administration of a formulation containing V2O5 NWs and Br− into the middle ear bullae of infected chinchillas, HOBr was generated continuously while consuming the H2O2 produced by S. pneumoniae. The HOBr synthesized in situ eradicated the pathogen over the course of 7 days, at which point the production of HOBr ceased automatically, avoiding potential side effects caused by overexposure to the antiseptic.
The treatment design leveraged a key characteristic of S. pneumoniae, i.e., the production of H2O2. During the log-phase growth, S. pneumoniae excretes H2O2 at a rate up to ~1 mM per hour, enabled by its pyruvate oxidase [19]. Its high tolerance for H2O2 thus endows S. pneumoniae with a significant survival advantage over other microbial inhabitants in the middle ear. Converting H2O2 to a more potent antiseptic, i.e., HOBr, could thus eradicate S. pneumoniae along with other pathogens. Furthermore, removing the H2O2 produced by S. pneumoniae catalytically could have the added benefit of alleviating the suppression of the host immune system. Immune suppression in the middle ear has been reported as a result of the H2O2 produced at the mM level, as a result of the inactivation of the inflammasomes in immune cells (e.g., macrophage) caused by H2O2 [53]. Although the effect of HOBr on the immunoactivities in the middle ear requires detailed future investigation, the excellent treatment efficacy reported here and the recent discovery of the cytoprotective effect of V2O5 nanoparticles [27] hint at potential positive effects on the host immune system.
The in situ conversion of H2O2 to HOBr was enabled by the nanozyme, V2O5 NWs. Although (per)oxidase-mimicking nanozymes, such as nanosilver, metal oxides, and carbon-based nanostructures have been utilized to replace conventional antibiotics in topical infections [54], most of the (per)oxidase reactions require an acidic environment that are rare in living systems [54]. Unlike the aforementioned nanozymes, the V2O5 NWs were chosen in this study based on its analogous catalytic activities as the biological enzyme, V-HPOs, which was identified in seawater (pH 8.3) [30]. Indeed, we demonstrated the high catalytic activities of the V2O5 NWs under neutral and alkaline conditions (e.g., the pH of MEF has been reported to be 7.0-8.5 [42]) and excellent antimicrobial efficacy. Despite the reported toxicity of bulk V2O5 materials to mammalian cells, biocompatibility has been established in the literature for nanosized particles, such as nanowires, nanospheres, nanoflowers, or nanosheets including V2O5 nanoparticles [27, 55]. No inflammation, necrosis, or other tissue damages were identified in our histological analysis on the animals treated with V2O5 NWs, in health or disease. The ABR tests further corroborated the biocompatibility of the V2O5 NWs, demonstrating nearly identical hearing sensitivity in non-treated and treated animals. Sustained presence of the V2O5 NWs throughout the 7-day treatment was demonstrated in animals that received V2O5 NWs and Br−, hinting at the potential prophylactic effects of this formulation for recurrent OM. This single-dose treatment has the potential to reduce antibiotic usage and mitigate the development of drug resistance during the treatment of OM.
Potential chronic effects of V2O5 NWs and avenues toward bioresorbable analogs remain to be explored in future work. Past reports on inorganic nanowires could provide key inspiration for future designs. For example, silicon nanowires have been shown to be biodegradable and their degradation products, e.g., Si(OH)4, to be highly biocompatible in cardiac experiments [56]. In one example, the cardiac patch scaffolds containing Si ions were found to stimulate the expression of cardiac-specific genes and the proliferation in primary cardiomyocytes, hinting at enhanced cardiac function upon exposure to silicon nanowires. Moreover, the silicon nanowire field-effect transistors are stable in the dry state but can undergo hydrolysis in aqueous solutions [57], which has been leveraged to achieve bioresorbable electronics. As such, one avenue forward to improve bioresorbability of the V2O5 NWs could be to leverage the reported biocompatibility of silicon nanowires and coat them with a thin layer of V2O5.
Recent clinical studies that surveyed the etiologic agents in pediatric OM concluded that S. pneumoniae and NTHi are the most prevalent bacterial pathogens [1]. Although this report addressed OM caused by S. pneumoniae, which is considered more challenging to treat due to its high MICs [26], future research should address the treatment of coinfections by S. pneumoniae and NTHi, where HOBr generated by S. pneumoniae could be sufficient for the simultaneous eradication of the two pathogens. As HOBr is quite a novel therapeutic when it comes to OM treatment, its potential resistance and resistance development mechanisms are not yet understood, which will undoubtedly become an important focus of our future research. To enable the non-invasive administration of the formulation, the permeation barrier of the TM, which is largely impermeable to all drugs (including small molecules, nanoparticles, and antibodies) [58], needs to be addressed. The previously demonstrated approach of using chemical permeation enhancer (CPEs) to increase the transtympanic drug flux across intact TMs [58, 59] or shrinking the size of the V2O5 NWs could be effective strategies to enable the non-invasive delivery. Although we did not observe piercing of tissue or cell membranes by the V2O5 NWs reported here, biosafety concerns have been raised about carbon nanotubes with similar particle morphologies [60, 61]. While not an acute issue in the current study, future research will dissect the individual effect of particle morphology and particle chemistry on their in vivo toxicity. In addition, long-term biocompatibility studies will also be an important focus of future research to unravel the clearance kinetics and mechanisms of V2O5 NWs from the middle ear of infected animals and the effect of HOBr on the host immunoactivities.
While the V2O5 NWs were designed to treat acute OM caused by S. pneumoniae, they could be useful in other OM-related indications. Below we briefly comment on purulent OM and suppurative OM as examples. Purulent OM entails an auditory bulla filled with MEF, which could be due to a bacterial infection or the inflammation reactions that linger after pathogens are eradicated. Based on their efficacy against acute OM, the V2O5 NWs could treat purulent OM caused by S. pneumoniae. They may have limited effect on non-infectious purulent OM as anti-inflammatory effects of the V2O5 NWs have not been studied. Suppurative OM entails TM perforation, which often occurs because of pressure buildup (e.g., from middle ear fluid) that bursts a tympanic membrane during active or recurring infections. We believe the V2O5 NWs could still function well against suppurative OM caused by S. pneumoniae. While it is possible that the V2O5 NWs could be carried out of the auditory bullae along with the bursting MEF, previous studies have shown that rod-shaped particles have unusually long retention time at the injection site due to their large radius of gyration and thus small diffusivity even under flow of body fluids. It is therefore also possible that the V2O5 NWs could remain in the auditory bullae during suppurative OM episodes. If that is the case, the V2O5 NWs could be hugely beneficial for the treatment of recurring suppurative OM as they could act as a prophylactic and a treatment measure simultaneously. A detailed investigation into the retention and efficacy of V2O5 NWs in other OM types and associated complications will be a central focus of our future work.
In conclusion, we have developed an effective local therapy that enabled on-demand synthesis of therapeutics that cured S. pneumoniae-induced OM in the standard chinchilla model. It was formulated for a convenient and single-dose local injection, which generates the antiseptic, HOBr, autonomously upon emergence of the pathogen S. pneumoniae and ceases that synthesis upon pathogen eradication, yielding excellent biocompatibility in the ear. This stand-alone nanomedicine was designed to replace conventional antibiotics in the treatment of OM, an extremely common pediatric condition, thereby reducing the exposure to antibiotics and associated side effects and curbing the development of drug resistance. The strategy of using nanozymes for the in situ and on-demand synthesis of antiseptics provides a new paradigm for the treatment of local infectious diseases.
4. Methods
4.1. Preparation of V2Os NWs
V2O5 NWs were synthesized through a hydrothermal method as previously described [30, 32]. VOSO4.nH2O (purity >99.9%), KBrO3 (purity >98%), and nitric acid (purity ≥65%) were used as received from Alfa Aesar, Sigma Aldrich, and Trace SELECT® Ultra respectively. In short, VOSO4.nH2O (8 mmol) and KBrO3 (5 mmol) were dissolved and stirred continuously in distilled water (30 mL) at room temperature for 30 minutes. Nitric acid was added to the stirring solution dropwise until a pH of 1-2 was reached. Then the solution was transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave for a reaction period of 24 h at 180 °C. After the autoclave was cooled down to room temperature naturally, the solution was filtered and washed with distilled water followed by ethanol for several times. The resulting dark-yellow nanomaterial was dried at 80 °C overnight under vacuum and then evaluated by the following characterization technique, as described in Supplementary Materials and Methods.
4.2. Bromination activity
The bromination activity was measured for 10 min at 37 °C in PBS buffer or Milli-Q water by varying the concentration of the V2O5 NWs (0-0.08 mg/mL) and with constant concentration of PR (25 μM), Br− (1 mM) and H2O2 (10 μM). Potassium bromide (KBr) was used to provide Br−. V2O5 NWs were added to the mixture immediately prior to the measurements to trigger the reaction. The concentration of Br4PR was calculated using the Lambert-Beer Law with an extinction coefficient (590 nm) of εBr4PR to be 72200 M−1CM−1. In order to measure the Michaelis-Menten kinetics, two independent set of experiments were performed: 1) Br− concentration was varied (0-20 mM) while keeping concentrations of V2O5 NWs (0.04 mg/mL), H2O2 (10 μM) and PR (25 μM) constant. 2) H2O2 concentration was varied (0-600 μM) while keeping the concentration of V2O5 NWs (0.04 mg/mL), Br− (1 mM) and PR (25 μM) constant. For each measurement, blank tests and controls were performed, each measurement was carried out 3 times. The values were fitted to the Michaelis–Menten model and kinetic parameters were determined by Lineweaver–Burk linearization.
4.3. Turnover frequency (TOF)
The turnover frequency (TOF = kcat) was calculated as the maximum formation rate per minute (vmax) of PR for molar concentrations of the catalyst and a concentration of 219.9 μM V2O5 NWs (0.04 mg·mL−1/181.88g·mol−1) and yield to 4.2×10−4 min−1. As the oxidative bromination of PR requires the oxidation of four Br−, the TOF with respect to the HOBr concentration is 1.7×10−3 min−1.
4.4. Stability assay
The stability assay was carried out by incubating 0.04 mg/mL V2O5 NWs with 1 mM Br−, 100 μM H2O2 in Milli-Q water at 37 °C. After each reaction time (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 hours), The reaction was terminated by centrifuging the suspension for 5 min at 10 000g, then the V2O5 NWs were collected, washed with Milli-Q-water and treated again with 1 mM Br−, 100 μM H2O2 in Milli-Q water under identical experimental conditions. 10 mins after each time point, 100 uL of aliquots were taken to calculated v0.
4.5. Antibacterial test
S. pneumoniae was incubated in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (BD biosciences) at 37 °C with 5% CO2 until the mid-log phase. Then the bacteria were treated with five different formulations for 15 hours: nontreated, Br−H2O2, V2O5 NWs, V2O5 NWs+Br− and V2O5 NWs+Br−+H2O2. The concentrations of various species in the formulations were V2O5 NWs (0.04 mg/ml), Br− (1 mM) and H2O2 (20μM). The optical density at 600 nm was measured as a function of time. Subsequently, S. pneumoniae was plated on blood agar (TSA with Sheep Blood, Thermo Scientific™ Remel™) plates, and left to grow for 15 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
4.6. Cytotoxicity analysis
Human primary dermal fibroblasts (hFBs, ATCC PCS-201-012) were maintained in Fibroblast Basal Medium (FBM, ATCC PCS-201-020) with Fibroblast Growth Kit – Low Serum (ATCC, PCS-201-041) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) at 37°C with 5 % CO2. The pheochromocytoma cell line (PC-12) was maintained in ATCC-formulated F-12K medium with 2.5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 15% horse serum (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco) at 37°C with 5 % CO2. Once seeded hFBs and PC12 were seed in 96 well plates (Corning Costar) at a density of 5000 cells/well, the V2O5 NWs were introduced into the cells above and then incubated for 24 hours. Cell survival rate was tested using a LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen). Cells were incubated with calcein-AM (acetoxymethyl) (1 mM) and ethidium homodimer-1 (2 mM) for 30 min at 37°C to label live and dead cells, respectively. Cell survival rate (%) was calculated as live cells/(live cells + dead cells) × 100.
4.7. Animal maintenance
Healthy adult male chinchillas from Mutation Chinchilla Breeder Association (NY) were used with weights between 500 and 650 g. The animals were kept in cages in a group of two with free access to water and food and cared according to the protocols approved institutionally and nationally. Experiments were conducted and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) in conjunction with the Cornell University Center of Animal Resources and Education (CARE) Animal Use Guidelines.
4.8. ABR measurements
A custom program written in LabView (Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench, National Instruments, Austin, Texas, USA) was used to control the auditory stimulus, and to acquire, filter, and store the ABR data. ABR response was collected via subdermally-placed platinum-iridium needle electrodes (Astro-Med Grass Instruments, West Warwick, Rhode Island, USA). The active electrode was placed at the cranial vertex, the reference electrode at the ventrolateral side of each ear, and the ground electrode at the dorsum of the animal. The auditory stimulus was delivered through a sealed headphone which was placed inside the external ear canal of the tested ear. A balanced click was delivered every second, with a duration of 0.2 milliseconds. Stimulus started at 0.1 mV and incremented at step size of 0.1 mV or more. ABR signals were passed to an amplifier (AC amplifer model CP511, Astro-Med Grass Instruments). The signals were amplified with a gain of 200,000 and filtered with low- and high-pass filters of 3000 Hz and 300- Hz, respectively. Measurements were taken at a stimulus frequency of 21 Hz and 1000 acquisitions cycles were averaged. Animals were anesthetized with vaporized isoflurane in oxygen for the duration of the ABR testing and monitored until recovery from anesthesia. Baseline measurements were obtained for each ear prior to the trans-bullar injection of 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs and 1 mM Br− in PBS buffer (200 μL). Subsequent ABR measurements were taken at the following timepoints: 20 minutes, 1 day, 3 days, and 6 days after formulation injection. Animals were euthanized on day 6 after the ABR test and the bullae were retrieved for histological analysis. ABR threshold was analyzed post-measurement and compared to the baseline measurement of each ear.
4.9. S. pneumoniae OM chinchilla model
All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Cornell University CARE and approved by the IACUC. Once grown to the mid-log phase, isolates of S. pneumoniae were diluted in Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS), and then the mixed solution (100 ml, 25 to 75 CFU) was inoculated directly into each middle ear through the bullae under aseptic conditions. The number of inoculated ears per chinchilla was based on experimental needs. Once pathogens were introduced, assessments of each middle ear were performed by using otoscopy daily, and body weights were recorded as well. Once the middle ear infection was established (usually after 4 days of inoculation), the drug containing nanowires (a PBS-buffered solution of 0.08 mg/mL V2O5 NWs and 1 mM Br−) were given through ear bullae under aseptic conditions. Direct samples of middle ear culture were collected with calcium alginate swabs and subsequently streaked onto blood agar plates. MEF samples for bacteria culture were collected with a 22-gauge angiocatheter connected to a tuberculin syringe during aseptically surgical procedures with painkillers (nalbuphine) at different time points (day 0, day1, day 3, day 7). The MEF (10 ml) of each ear was diluted 1:10 in HBSS, and 3 to 4 serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared as well. 10 ml of each dilution was pipetted onto the blood agar plates and the number of colonies was counted later to calculate CFU. The lower limit for detecting organisms by using this dilution method in the MEF was 100 CFU/ml.
4.10. Histopathology
7 days after formulations were administrated through the bullae, animals were euthanized. Following the sacrifice, TMs were excised and immediately fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin overnight, then decalcified, embedded in paraffin, sectioned (5-μm thick), and stained with H&E by the Section Anatomic Pathology Histology Laboratory at Cornell University (Ithaca, New York, USA; fee for service), using standard techniques. All stained specimens were evaluated under light microscopy. The thickness of TMs was measured by Image J software.
4.11. MEF collection for ICP-MS
Chinchilla’s MEF was extracted at 1 day, 3 days and 7 days after giving treatment, and all samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. The ICP-MS analysis was performed by Trace Element Research Group at UW-Madison & Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene. Samples for analysis by a magnetic sector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Thermo-Finnigan Element XR) were labeled only by a unique identifying number, so the investigators performing the analyses were blinded to the treatment group. Vanadium measurements were performed using an ICP-MS. For sample preparation, 20 or 40 μL of samples were digested by 100 μL Tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH) at 85 °C for 18 hours. Digested samples were then diluted with 10% nitric acid to a final volume of 1.2mL for ICP-MS analysis prior to running. A quantitative analysis method in standard mode measuring the vanadium 51 isotope was used to determine vanadium concentrations in MEF. Gallium 70 isotope was used as the internal standard. Each sample was run in triplicate and vanadium concentrations were normalized to major elements in the MEF (Na, Ca, Mg, P). Mean batch-specific analytical blank (with outlier detection) applied to all sample data. Propagated uncertainty estimates for each sample/element include: (a) ICP-MS analysis (standard deviation of triplicate analyses on each sample) and (b) blank subtraction (standard deviation of 4 method blanks from each batch). The comprehensive QA/QC ensures that robust data were produced, and all internal and external QA/QC was acceptable.
4.12. Detection of H2O2 production
After culturing S. pneumoniae for about 15 h, the suspension was collected and tested using a H2O2 fluorometric assay kit named Hydrogen Peroxide Assay Kit from Cayman Chemical. Briefly, H2O2 was detected using 10-acetyl-3,7-dihydroxyphenoxazine (ADHP), a highly sensitive and stable probe for H2O2. In a horseradish peroxidase catalyzed reaction, ADHP reacts with H2O2 with a 1:1 stoichiometry to produce highly fluorescent resorufin. The resorufin fluorescence can be detected using an excitation wavelength of 530 nm and an emission wavelength of 590 nm. The detected fluorescence was then compared with standard curve of H2O2 to get exact amount of H2O2 production.
4.13. Statistical analysis.
Data were analyzed using Graphpad Prism software (version 7.0) and presented as the mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test was applied for comparison between two groups or among multiple groups; ns, not statistically significant, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001.
4.14. Data Availability.
The authors declare that the main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials files. Extra data about this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Table S1. Kinetic parameters of different haloperoxidase.
Supplementary Fig. S1. Length and width distribution histogram of V2O5 NWs.
Supplementary Fig. S2. XRD patten of V2O5 NWs.
Supplementary Fig. S3. EDX spectrum of V2O5 NWs.
Supplementary Fig. S4. Dependence of the bromination activity of V2O5 NWs on phenol red (PR) concentration.
Supplementary Fig. S5. Bacterial growth curves of S. pneumoniae with HPOs-mimic nanomaterials.
Supplementary Fig. S6. Wave II analysis from ABR signal.
Fig. 6.

Schematic diagram of antimicrobial properties of the V2O5 NWs for the treatment of otitis media.
Highlights.
This design enabled on-demand synthesis of therapeutics at the site of infection, which represents a new paradigm in infectious disease treatment.
V2O5 NWs enabled the oxidation of bromide (Br−) into hypobromous acid (HOBr) leveraging the H2O2 produced by S. pneumoniae
An effective local therapy that enabled on-demand synthesis of HOBr that cured S. pneumoniae-induced otitis media in vivo
5. Acknowledgments
This work made use of the Cornell Center for Materials Research (CCMR) Shared Facilities which are supported through the NSF MRSEC program (DMR-1719875). We thank CCMR staff members J. Grazul for his assistance with acquiring TEM and HRTEM images and performing STEM-EDX measurements, and D. Johnson-McDaniel for her assistance during XPS data collection. We thank the Trace Element Research Group at University of Wisconsin-Madison for providing access to ICP-MS measurements. We thank S. Pelton at Boston University School of Medicine and Publica Health and Boston Medical Center for gifting us the clinical isolate of S. pneumoniae.
6. Funding
This work was supported by the Department of Defense, Office of Naval Research (ONR award N00014-20-1-2418); National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIHDC016644).
Abbreviation:
- OM
Otitis Media
- NTHi
Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae
- MIC
minimum inhibitory concentration
- NWs
nanowires
- ABR
auditory brainstem response
- ROS
reactive oxygen species
- TOF
turnover frequency
- K m
Michaelis-Menten constant
- V max
maximum reaction rate
- MEF
middle ear fluid
- TM
tympanic membrane
- CPE
chemical permeation enhancer
- BHI
brain heart infusion
- hFBs
Human primary dermal fibroblasts
- FBM
Fibroblast Basal Medium
- HBSS
Hanks’ balanced salt solution
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
CRediT Authorship Contribution Statement
J.L. and R.Y. conceived the idea and designed the experiments. J.L., M.S. and T.F. synthesized the nanoparticles. J.L.and X.M. conducted the nanoparticles characterization (XPS, TEM, XRD) and the in vitro experiments. J.L., X.M., S.L. and D.S. performed the in vivo experiments. E.L., J.L., S.L., and X.M. performed the ABR test. R.Y. supervised the study. The manuscript was prepared by J.L. X.M. and R.Y.. J.L. and X.M. contributed equally to this work.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- [1].Shirai N, Preciado D, Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg, 27 (2019) 495–498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Mittal R, Parrish JM, Soni M, Mittal J, Mathee K, J. Med. Microbiol, 67 (2018) 1417–1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Hullegie S, Venekamp RP, van Dongen TMA, Hay AD, Moore MV, Little P, Schilder AGM, Damoiseaux R, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J, 40 (2021) 756–762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Hoberman A, Paradise JL, Rockette HE, Kearney DH, Bhatnagar S, Shope TR, Martin JM, Kurs-Lasky M, Copelli SJ, Colborn DK, Block SL, Labella JJ, Lynch TG, Cohen NL, Haralam M, Pope MA, Nagg JP, Green MD, Shaikh N, N. Engl. J. Med, 375 (2016) 2446–2456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Ayukekbong JA, Ntemgwa M, Atabe AN, Antimicrob Resist Infect Control, 6 (2017) 47–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Davies J, Spiegelman GB, Yim G, Curr. Opin. Microbiol, 9 (2006) 445–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Bergenfelz C, Hakansson AP, Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep, 5 (2017) 115–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Van Dyke MK, Pirçon J-Y, Cohen R, Madhi SA, Rosenblüt A, Macias Parra M, Al-Mazrou K, Grevers G, Lopez P, Naranjo L, Pumarola F, Sonsuwan N, Hausdorff WP, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J, 36 (2017) 274–281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Hirakata Y, Ohmori K, Mikuriya M, Saika T, Matsuzaki K, Hasegawa M, Hatta M, Yamamoto N, Kunishima H, Yano H, Kitagawa M, Arai K, Kawakami K, Kobayashi I, Jones RN, Kohno S, Yamaguchi K, Kaku M, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 53 (2009) 4225–4230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Littorin N, Ahl J, Udden F, Resman F, Riesbeck K, BMC Infect. Dis, 16 (2016) 407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Patel SN, McGeer A, Melano R, Tyrrell GJ, Green K, Pillai DR, Low DE, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 55 (2011) 3703–3708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (2013) 1–114.
- [13].Halasa NB, Griffin MR, Zhu YW, Edwards KM, J. Pediatr, 144 (2004) 200–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Massa HM, Cripps AW, Lehmann D, Med. J. Aust, 191 (2009) S44–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Rutala WA, Weber DJ, Clin. Microbiol. Rev, 10 (1997) 597–610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Magee P, Side Eff. Drugs Annu, 33 (2011) 479–490. [Google Scholar]
- [17].Wever R, Tromp MGM, Krenn BE, Marjani A, Van Tol M, Environ. Sci. Technol, 25 (1991) 446–449. [Google Scholar]
- [18].Halliwell B, Clement MV, Long LH, FEBS Lett, 486 (2000) 10–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Lisher JP, Tsui H-CT, Ramos-Montañez S, Hentchel KL, Martin JE, Trinidad JC, Winkler ME, Giedroc DP, mSphere, 2 (2017) e00291–00216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Giorgio M, Trinei M, Migliaccio E, Pelicci PG, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol, 8 (2007) 722–728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Niethammer P, Grabher C, Look AT, Mitchison TJ, Nature, 459 (2009) 996–999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Yazdanbakhsh M, Eckmann CM, Roos D, J. Immunol, 135 (1985) 1378–1384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Hawkins Clare L., Essays Biochem., 64 (2019) 75–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Bakaletz LO, Expert Rev. Vaccines, 8 (2009) 1063–1082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Sabharwal V, Figueira M, Pelton SI, Pettigrew MM, Microbes Infect, 14 (2012) 712–718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Yang R, Sabharwal V, Shlykova N, Okonkwo OS, Pelton SI, Kohane DS, JCI Insight, 3 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Vernekar AA, Sinha D, Srivastava S, Paramasivam PU, D′Silva P, Mugesh G, Nat. Commun, 5 (2014)5301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (2019).
- [29].Cassini A, Högberg LD, Plachouras D, Quattrocchi A, Hoxha A, Simonsen GS, Colomb-Cotinat M, Kretzschmar ME, Devleesschauwer B, Cecchini M, Ouakrim DA, Oliveira TC, Struelens MJ, Suetens C, Monnet DL, Strauss R, Mertens K, Struyf T, Catry B, Latour K, Ivanov IN, Dobreva EG, Tambic Andraševic A, Soprek S, Budimir A, Paphitou N, Žemlicková H, Schytte Olsen S, Wolff Sönksen U, Märtin P, Ivanova M, Lyytikäinen O, Jalava J, Coignard B, Eckmanns T, Abu Sin M, Haller S, Daikos GL, Gikas A, Tsiodras S, Kontopidou F, Tóth Á, Hajdu Á, Guólaugsson Ó, Kristinsson KG, Murchan S, Burns K, Pezzotti P, Gagliotti C, Dumpis U, Liuimiene A, Perrin M, Borg MA, de Greeff SC, Monen JCM, Koek MBG, Elstrøm P, Zabicka D, Deptula A, Hryniewicz W, Caniça M, Nogueira PJ, Fernandes PA, Manageiro V, Popescu GA, Serban RI, Schréterová E, Litvová S, Štefkovicová M, Kolman J, Klavs I, Koroţec A, Aracil B, Asensio A, Pérez-Vázquez M, Billström H, Larsson S, Reilly JS, Johnson A, Hopkins S, Lancet Infect. Dis, 19 (2019) 56–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Natalio F, Andre R, Hartog AF, Stoll B, Jochum KP, Wever R, Tremel W, Nat. Nanotechnol, 7 (2012) 530–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].André R, Natálio F, Humanes M, Leppin J, Heinze K, Wever R, Schröder HC, Müller WEG, Tremel W, Adv. Funct. Mater, 21 (2011) 501–509. [Google Scholar]
- [32].Zhou F, Zhao X, Yuan C, Li L, Cryst. Growth Des, 8 (2008) 723–727. [Google Scholar]
- [33].Akande AA, Machatine AGJ, Masina B, Chimowa G, Matsoso B, Roro K, Duvenhage MM, Swart H, Bandyopadhyay J, Ray SS, Mwakikunga BW, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys, 51 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- [34].Goodacre D, Blum M, Buechner C, Hoek H, Gericke SM, Jovic V, Franklin JB, Kittiwatanakul S, Söhnel T, Bluhm H, Smith KE, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 152 (2020) 044715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Herget K, Hubach P, Pusch S, Deglmann P, Götz H, Gorelik TE, Gural′skiy I.y.A., Pfitzner F, Link T, Schenk S, Panthöfer M, Ksenofontov V, Kolb U, Opatz T, André R, Tremel W, Adv. Mater, 29 (2017) 1603823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Gallard H, Pellizzari F, Croue JP, Legube B, Water Res., 37 (2003) 2883–2892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Pericone CD, Park S, Imlay JA, Weiser JN, J. Bacteriol, 185 (2003) 6815–6825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Hasan Z, Renirie R, Kerkman R, Ruijssenaars HJ, Hartog AF, Wever R, J. Biol. Chem, 281 (2006) 9738–9744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].de Boer E, Wever R, J. Biol. Chem, 263 (1988) 12326–12332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Frank A, Seel CJ, Groll M, Gulder T, ChemBioChem, 17 (2016) 2028–2032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Restrepo AV, Salazar BE, Agudelo M, Rodriguez CA, Zuluaga AF, Vesga O, BMC Microbiol, 5 (2005) 34–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Osgood R, Salamone F, Diaz A, Casey JR, Bajorski P, Pichichero ME, Laryngoscope, 125 (2015) 2204–2208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Trevino M, Lobarinas E, Maulden AC, Heinz MG, J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 146 (2019) 3710–3710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Peters BM, Jabra-Rizk MA, O′May GA, Costerton JW, Shirtliff ME, Clin. Microbiol. Rev, 25 (2012)193–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Brown C, Lab Anim., 36 (2007) 22–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Bargen GA, Am. J. Audiol, 24 (2015) 573–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Margolis RH, Schachem PL, Hunter LL, Sutherland C, Audiology, 34 (1995) 232–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Fireman P, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol, 99 (1997) S787–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Redanz S, Cheng XQ, Giacaman RA, Pfeifer CS, Merritt J, Kreth J, Mol. Oral Microbiol, 33 (2018) 337–352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Neher A, Nagl M, Appenroth E, Gstottner M, Wischatta M, Reisigl F, Schindler M, Ulmer H, Stephan K, Laryngoscope, 114 (2004) 850–854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Oxford JS, Lambkin R, Gibb I, Balasingam S, Chan C, Catchpole A, Antivir. Chem. Chemother, 16 (2005) 129–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Sivropoulou A, Papanikolaou E, Nikolaou C, Kokkini S, Lanaras T, Arsenakis M, J. Agric. Food Chem, 44 (1996) 1202–1205. [Google Scholar]
- [53].Erttmann SF, Gekara NO, Nat. Commun, 10 (2019) 3493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Chen ZW, Wang ZZ, Ren JS, Qu XG, Acc. Chem. Res, 51 (2018) 789–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Ghosh S, Roy P, Karmodak N, Jemmis ED, Mugesh G, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 57 (2018) 4510–4515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Bolonduro OA, Duffy BM, Rao AA, Black LD, Timko BP, Nano Research, 13 (2020) 1253–1267. [Google Scholar]
- [57].Liu H, Haider B, Fried HR, Ju J, Bolonduro O, Raghuram V, Timko BP, Nano Research, 11 (2018) 5372–5399. [Google Scholar]
- [58].Yang R, Sabharwal V, Okonkwo OS, Shlykova N, Tong R, Lin LY, Wang W, Guo S, Rosowski JJ, Pelton SI, Kohane DS, Sci. Transl. Med, 8 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Khoo XJ, Simons EJ, Chiang HH, Hickey JM, Sabharwal V, Pelton SI, Rosowski JJ, Langer R, Kohane DS, Biomaterials, 34 (2013) 1281–1288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Liu X, Hurt RH, Kane AB, Carbon, 48 (2010) 1961–1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Thurnherr T, Brandenberger C, Fischer K, Diener L, Manser P, Maeder-Althaus X, Kaiser J-P, Krug HF, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Wick P, Toxicol. Lett, 200 (2011) 176–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Table S1. Kinetic parameters of different haloperoxidase.
Supplementary Fig. S1. Length and width distribution histogram of V2O5 NWs.
Supplementary Fig. S2. XRD patten of V2O5 NWs.
Supplementary Fig. S3. EDX spectrum of V2O5 NWs.
Supplementary Fig. S4. Dependence of the bromination activity of V2O5 NWs on phenol red (PR) concentration.
Supplementary Fig. S5. Bacterial growth curves of S. pneumoniae with HPOs-mimic nanomaterials.
Supplementary Fig. S6. Wave II analysis from ABR signal.
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that the main data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Materials files. Extra data about this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
