Skip to main content
eClinicalMedicine logoLink to eClinicalMedicine
letter
. 2023 Mar 16;58:101904. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101904

Data reproducibility issues on evidence synthesis of adverse events associated with HER2-targeted antibody–drug conjugates

Dan-Na Wu a, Ai-Jia Guan b, Guo-Fu Li c,d,
PMCID: PMC10031027  PMID: 36969342

Approximately 85% systematic reviews and meta-analyses of adverse events have been shown to have serious data reproducibility issues in terms of reproducibility of data extraction,1 making the corresponding meta-analytical results and associated conclusions questionable and unreliable. Therefore, it is important to figure out whether or not there are also data extraction errors in a new published systematic review and meta-analysis on adverse events (AEs), such as the meta-analysis of AEs of HER2-targeted antibody–drug conjugates (ACDs) presented recently.2

After careful scrutiny of the original data sources of all 13 randomized controlled trials involved, we found numerous data extraction errors in Fu's meta-analysis,2 rendering their meta-analysis less reliable.

First, there are many numerical errors in Fu's Table 1.2 To name only a few, the correct number of all-grade AEs, grade ≥3 AEs, and serious AEs in Verma 20123 were 470, 200, and 76, respectively, rather than 474, 233, and 91 used for Fu's meta-analysis.2 Furthermore, the correct number of discontinuation due to AEs in Thungappa et al.4 was zero rather than 3 used for Fu's meta-analysis.2 Also, the accurate number of grade ≥3 AEs in Tolaney 20215 should be 61 rather than 62 used.

Second, Fu and colleagues2 failed to distinguish between treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and drug-related TEAEs in their Table 1. In the study by Cortés 2022 (Cortés’ Table S5),6 in trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) group, TEAEs for all-grade AEs, grade ≥3 AEs, serious AEs were reported to be 256, 134, 49, respectively, and drug-related TEAEs for all-grade AEs, drug-related grade ≥3 AEs, drug-related serious AEs were 252, 116, 28, respectively; however, the authors of the systematic review extracted the number 252 (drug-related TEAE), 134 (TEAE), 49 (TEAE). Moreover, in trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) group in the Cortés’ Table S5,6 TEAEs for all-grade AEs, grade ≥3 AEs, serious AEs, discontinuation due to AEs were reported to be 249, 126, 47, 19, respectively, and drug-related TEAEs for all-grade AEs, drug-related grade ≥3 AEs, drug related serious AEs, discontinuation due to drug-related AEs were 226, 104, 16, 13; however, the authors of the systematic review extracted the data of drug-related TEAEs instead of TEAEs, making the data of TEAEs extracted from the study by Cortés 20226 inconsistent highly with those abstracted from the other randomized controlled trials included.

Third, many of their extracted data (in their Table 1)2 cannot be reproduced from all original sources of corresponding references. For example, the number of serious AEs in Perez 20197 and number of all-grade AEs in Krop 20178 cannot be found in all available sources of original literature7,8; however, Fu et al.2 used 164 and 371, respectively, in their meta-analysis. Moreover, there was no information on grade ≥3 AEs in the original report of Thungappa et al.4; however, Fu et al.2 claimed the number to be 20. Also, the number of all-grade AEs in Tolaney et al.5 was not reported; however, Fu et al.2 claimed the number to be 383.

Other than these data extraction errors identified in the extraction of adverse events from randomized controlled trials included in the systematic review, a lot of information pertaining to study types in Fu's Table 12 was wrong, which should be specified to be a randomized controlled trial, a single-arm trial, or others rather than a “Yes” or “No”. Overall, we have examined all the 13 randomized controlled trials involved in their systematic review and found remarkable data reproducibility issues, necessitating clarifications and a further self-scrutiny of the other data obtained from the 24 single-arm trials included.

Contributors

Conceptualisation: GFL; analysis and interpretation: GFL, DNW, AJG; writing – original draft: GFL; writing – review & editing: GFL, DNW, AJG; supervision: GFL.

Declaration of interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Xu C., Yu T., Furuya-Kanamori L., et al. Validity of data extraction in evidence synthesis practice of adverse events: reproducibility study. BMJ. 2022;377 doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fu Z., Liu J., Li S., et al. Treatment-related adverse events associated with HER2-Targeted antibody-drug conjugates in clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Verma S., Miles D., Gianni L., et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1783–1791. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thungappa S.C., Maksud T., Raut N., et al. Comparison of the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic and Immunogenicity of UJVIRA (ZRC-3256, trastuzumab emtansine) with the kadcyla (trastuzumab emtansine) in the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a randomized, open-label, multicenter study in India. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022;22(4):300–307. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tolaney S.M., Tayob N., Dang C., et al. Adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine versus paclitaxel in combination with trastuzumab for stage I HER2-positive breast cancer (ATEMPT): a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(21):2375–2385. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cortés J., Kim S.B., Chung W.P., et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(12):1143–1154. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2115022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Perez E.A., Barrios C., Eiermann W., et al. Trastuzumab emtansine with or without pertuzumab versus trastuzumab with taxane for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: final results from MARIANNE. Cancer. 2019;125(22):3974–3984. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krop I.E., Kim S.-B., Martin A.G., et al. Trastuzumab emtansine versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with previously treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (TH3RESA): final overall survival results from a randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(6):743–754. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30313-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from eClinicalMedicine are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES