Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2023 Apr 26;12(5):e01342-22. doi: 10.1128/mra.01342-22

Metagenomic and Genomic Sequences from a Methanogenic Benzene-Degrading Consortium

Courtney R A Toth a, Olivia Molenda a, Camilla Nesbø a, Fei Luo a,*, Cheryl Devine a, Shen Guo a, Xu Chen a, Elizabeth A Edwards a,
Editor: J Cameron Thrashb
PMCID: PMC10190668  PMID: 37098916

ABSTRACT

Draft and complete metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs) were created from multiple metagenomic assemblies of DGG-B, a strictly anaerobic, stable mixed microbial consortium that degrades benzene completely to methane and CO2. Our objective was to obtain closed genome sequences of benzene-fermenting bacteria to enable the elucidation of their elusive anaerobic benzene degradation pathway.

ANNOUNCEMENT

DGG-B refers to a scaled-up lineage (>100 L) of a methanogenic benzene-degrading enrichment culture called “OR” derived from microcosms constructed in 1995 with sediments from an oil refinery (1, 2). OR and DGG-B cultures are grown routinely in a minimal medium amended monthly with 25 mg/L benzene. In 2010, preliminary metagenomic sequencing (3) indicated that OR was composed primarily of two uncultured strains of benzene-fermenting Deltaproteobacteria (now Desulfobacterota), namely, ORM2a and ORM2b; a candidate phylum bacterium (OD1, later reclassified as Candidatus Nealsonbacteria); and two methanogens (Methanothrix and Methanoregula). OR and DGG-B also contain >100 low-abundance microorganisms that are not well characterized (24). To learn more about these complex microbial communities and to shed light on their unknown mechanism of benzene degradation, metagenomic assemblies were used to reconstruct draft and complete genome sequences.

DNA was extracted from aliquots of two subcultures of DGG-B in 2016 (DGG1A, 15 mL) and in 2017 (DGG0, 200 mL) using the Qiagen DNeasy PowerSoil kit. At the time of sampling, the total volumes of DGG1A and DGG0 were 15.9 L and 9.0 L, respectively, and degraded benzene at a rate of 0.8 to 1.5 mg/L/day. Metagenomic sequencing was performed using long-read (PacBio) and/or short-read (Illumina) methods summarized in Fig. 1. Following the metagenomics workflow illustrated in Fig. 1, raw reads were trimmed and filtered (5), assembled into contigs (68), and binned (912). Default parameters were used for all software; for MEGAHIT assemblies, we also used the “sensitive” preset option. Bins with a pairwise average nucleotide identity of ≥99%, genome completeness of >50%, and contamination of <25% were compared and dereplicated (13). Taxonomy was assigned to the resulting draft MAGs using the GTDB-tk tool kit (14). Three draft MAGs were selected for further refinement (Table 1). In ABySS v.1.3.7 (15), new assemblies were created using a coverage of ≥80 (for ORM2a only) and/or k-mer of 96. ABySS contigs were then mapped onto the existing contigs, and gaps were resolved using a perl script published in Text S1 of Tang et al. (16). Finished genomes were polished by read mapping raw reads onto circular genomes using the Bowtie v.7.2.1 plugin within Geneious v.8.1.8 (17). Assembly information and MAG statistics were generated in CheckM v.1.0.18 (18) and using the anvi-summarize command within Anvi’o v.6.2 (19).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Metagenomics workflow used for (hybrid) assembly, binning, and curation of draft DGG-B MAGs. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. PE, paired-end.

TABLE 1.

Summary of two metagenomes and three closed MAGs reported in this studya

Name Genome affiliation (GTDB-tk) Genome affiliation (NCBI) (Meta) genome length (Mb) No. of contigs GC content (%) Avg coverage depth (×) Genome completeness (%) Genome contamination (%) GenBank accession no. IMG ID
DGG-1A metagenome N/Ab N/A 256 191,164 51.2 56 N/A N/A JARDUI000000000 3300019861
DGG0 metagenome (PE + PacBio hybrid assembly) N/A N/A 231 355,455 49.6 28 N/A N/A JARDUJ000000000 3300028923
Desulfobacterota candidate ORM2a Desulfobacterota; BSN033; UBA8473 Desulfobacterota 3.30 1 44.1 1,765 (DGG1A); 979 (DGG0) 100 0 CP113000.1 2795385393
Candidatus Nealsonbacteria DGGOD1 Patescibacteria; Paceibacterales; UBA5738 Patescibacteria; Candidatus Nealsonbacteria 1.16 1 45.8 278 (DGG1A); 113 (DGG0) 100 0 CP092821.1 2791354853
Methanoregula sp. strain DGG0 Methanoregulaceae Methanoregula 2.17 1 52.0 169 (DGG1A); 78 (DGG0) 100 0 CP112999.1 2799112206
a

A table summarizing all other (draft) MAGs created in this study is available in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21663302.v1).

b

N/A, not available.

Seventy-four draft MAGs were recovered from DGG-B metagenomes, representing 71 to 73% of total microorganisms as determined by relative abundance estimates in Anvi’o (19). Further refinement enabled us to close the genomes of ORM2a, a Candidatus Nealsonbacteria (designated DGGOD1a), and a Methanoregula sp. strain (Table 1). Other MAGs recovered included members of the Bacteroidales (n = 10), Anaerolineales (n = 6), Syntrophales (n = 5), and Methanothrix (n = 8). Our laboratory is currently analyzing the genomes of ORM2a (C. R. A. Toth, O. Molenda, C. Nesbo, F. Luo, C. Devine, R. Flick, and E. A. Edwards, unpublished data) and Ca. Nealsonbacteria (20).

Data availability.

Nucleotide accession numbers for reported metagenomes and refined MAGs are provided in Table 1. FASTA files and relevant statistics for all other draft MAGs are available in FigShare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21663302.v1). An assembly of the original OR metagenome and a draft ORM2 bin are also available in the US DOE Joint Genome Institute Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system (identifiers [IDs] 3300001389 and 2739367767, respectively).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding of the metagenome sequencing projects was made possible by Genome Application Partnership Program (GAPP) grants awarded to E.A.E. (project IDs OGI-102 and OGI-173), which were supported by Genome Canada, Ontario Genomics, the Government of Ontario, Mitacs Canada, SiREM, Alberta Innovates, Federated Co-operatives Limited, and Imperial Oil.

Footnotes

For a companion article on this topic, see https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00025-23.

Contributor Information

Elizabeth A. Edwards, Email: elizabeth.edwards@utoronto.ca.

J. Cameron Thrash, University of Southern California.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Nales M, Butler BJ, Edwards EA. 1998. Anaerobic benzene biodegradation: a microcosm survey. Bioremediat J 2:125–144. doi: 10.1080/10889869891214268. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Toth CRA, Luo F, Bawa N, Webb J, Guo S, Dworatzek S, Edwards EA. 2021. Anaerobic benzene biodegradation linked to the growth of highly specific bacterial clades. Environ Sci Technol 55:7970–7980. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c00508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Devine CE. 2013. Identification of key organisms, genes and pathways in benzene-degrading methanogenic cultures. PhD dissertation. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luo F, Devine CE, Edwards EA. 2016. Cultivating microbial dark matter in benzene-degrading methanogenic consortia. Environ Microbiol 18:2923–2936. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. 2017. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 27:824–834. doi: 10.1101/gr.213959.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li D, Luo R, Liu CM, Leung CM, Ting HF, Sadakane K, Yamashita H, Lam TW. 2016. MEGAHIT v1.0: a fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods 102:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wu YW, Simmons BA, Singer SW. 2016. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32:605–607. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Graham ED, Heidelberg JF, Tully BJ. 2017. BinSanity: unsupervised clustering of environmental microbial assemblies using coverage and affinity propagation. PeerJ 5:e3035. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, Banfield JF. 2018. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol 3:836–843. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. 2017. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J 11:2864–2868. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJ, Birol I. 2009. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res 19:1117–1123. doi: 10.1101/gr.089532.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tang S, Gong Y, Edwards EA. 2012. Semi-automatic in silico gap closure enabled de novo assembly of two Dehalobacter genomes from metagenomic data. PLoS One 7:e52038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Eren AM, Kiefl E, Shaiber A, Veseli I, Miller SE, Schechter MS, Fink I, Pan JN, Yousef M, Fogarty EC, Trigodet F, Watson AR, Esen ÖC, Moore RM, Clayssen Q, Lee MD, Kivenson V, Graham ED, Merrill BD, Karkman A, Blankenberg D, Eppley JM, Sjödin A, Scott JJ, Vázquez-Campos X, McKay LJ, McDaniel EA, Stevens SLR, Anderson RE, Fuessel J, Fernandez-Guerra A, Maignien L, Delmont TO, Willis AD. 2021. Community-led, integrated, reproducible multi-omics with anvi'o. Nat Microbiol 6:3–6. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00834-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chen X, Molenda O, Brown CT, Toth CRA, Guo S, Luo F, Howe J, Nesbø CL, He C, Montabana EA, Cate JHD, Banfield JF, Edwards EA. 2023. “Candidatus Nealsonbacteria” are likely biomass recycling ectosymbionts of methanogenic archaea in a stable benzene-degrading enrichment culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 89:e00025-23. doi: 10.1128/aem.00025-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Nucleotide accession numbers for reported metagenomes and refined MAGs are provided in Table 1. FASTA files and relevant statistics for all other draft MAGs are available in FigShare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21663302.v1). An assembly of the original OR metagenome and a draft ORM2 bin are also available in the US DOE Joint Genome Institute Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system (identifiers [IDs] 3300001389 and 2739367767, respectively).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES