Skip to main content
European Heart Journal logoLink to European Heart Journal
. 2023 May 20;44(40):4284–4287. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad292

A randomized controlled trial of eplerenone in asymptomatic phospholamban p.Arg14del carriers

Remco de Brouwer 1,2,#, Wouter P te Rijdt 3,4,5,#,c, Edgar T Hoorntje 6,7, Ahmad Amin 8,9,c, Folkert W Asselbergs 10,11,12,13, Moniek G P J Cox 14, Jeroen F van der Heijden 15,16, Hans Hillege 17, Jacco C Karper 18, Belend Mahmoud 19, Peter van der Meer 20, Anton Oomen 21, Anneline S J M te Riele 22,c, Herman H W Silljé 23, Hanno L Tan 24,25,26,c, Jan Peter van Tintelen 27,28,c, Dirk J van Veldhuisen 29, Berend Daan Westenbrink 30, Ans C P Wiesfeld 31, Tineke P Willems 32, Paul A van der Zwaag 33, Arthur A M Wilde 34,35,c, Rudolf A de Boer 36,37,✉,d, Maarten P van den Berg 38
PMCID: PMC10590125  PMID: 37210081

Introduction

Phospholamban (PLN; p.Arg14del) cardiomyopathy is an inherited disease caused by the pathogenic p.Arg14del variant in the PLN gene. Clinically, it is characterized by malignant ventricular arrhythmias and progressive heart failure.1,2 Cardiac fibrotic tissue remodelling occurs early on in PLN p.Arg14del carriers.3,4 Eplerenone was deemed a treatment candidate because of its beneficial effects on ventricular remodelling and antifibrotic properties.5,6 We conducted the multicentre randomized trial ‘intervention in PHOspholamban RElated CArdiomyopathy STudy’ (i-PHORECAST) to assess whether treatment with eplerenone of asymptomatic PLN p.Arg14del carriers attenuates disease onset and progression.

Methods

Study design

The i-PHORECAST was a clinical trial following the prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint design7 and registered in the clinicaltrials.gov-register (registration number: NCT01857856). The i-PHORECAST design manuscript has been published previously.8 Carriers without symptoms were selected from the national PHOspholamban RElated CArdiomyopathy STudy (PHORECAST) registry (https://www.phorecast.nl/), which collected all PLN p.Arg14del carriers known at the time of study inception (n = 436). At an initial screening visit, asymptomatic status was verified.

Study population

Study participants were 18 to 65 years of age, genotype-confirmed PLN p.Arg14del carriers, and asymptomatic: no cardiac symptoms, New York Heart Association class I, a left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) measured with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) of ≥ 45%, no diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy or arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, no treatment with cardioactive medication at inclusion, no history of (non-)sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, ≤2500 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) during 24-h Holter monitoring, no evidence of ischaemic heart disease, and no history of hyperkalaemia, severe renal dysfunction, or hepatic impairment. Additionally, pregnant women, women pregnant during the 60 days before potential inclusion, and women planning on becoming pregnant were excluded from the trial.

Intervention and clinical evaluation

Study participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either 50 mg of eplerenone once daily or no treatment. The follow-up duration was 3 years. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), 24-h three-channel Holter registration, exercise testing, physical examination, medical history and event review, and venous blood analysis were performed yearly and assessed by experienced cardiologists. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and at the end of follow-up (3 years).

Composite primary endpoint

The composite primary endpoint consisted of: a ≥10% increase in left and/or right ventricular end-diastolic volume (L/RVEDV), a ≥5% decrease in left and/or right ventricular EF (L/RVEF), new development of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) as a measure of cardiac fibrosis, a ≥100% increase and absolute increase of ≥1000 PVCs on Holter registration, development of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, a decrease in QRS voltage on ECG of ≥25%, development of cardiac symptoms necessitating treatment, and cardiovascular death. New development of LGE was defined as LGE observed in participants whose initial CMR did not contain LGE. A blinded committee adjudicated the endpoints.

Statistical analyses

Continuous data are given as medians (interquartile range; IQR). Categorical values are given as absolute values (%). All percentages provided are calculated using a cohort size of n = 84 and a group size of n = 42 unless stated otherwise. Dichotomous variables were compared using the χ2 test. Continuous variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Sample size estimation was based on the prediction that 50% of asymptomatic PLN p.Arg14del carriers would reach the primary endpoint within 3 years and a predicted treatment effect of eplerenone of 50%. To ensure 80% power at a 0.05 significance level with an assumed 15% loss to follow-up during the study, a required cohort size of 150 study participants (75 in each group) was estimated.

Results

From May 2014 until January 2018, 84 carriers from the initial selection of 436 p.Arg14del PLN carriers were enrolled, which was markedly lower than the target number of participants (150), resulting in an underpowered sample size. In total, paired CMR data of sufficient quality was available of 74 out of 84 carriers, 37 in both the eplerenone group and the control group. Characteristics of the total cohort at baseline and at end of study are listed in Table 1. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups.

Table 1.

Baseline and end of study characteristics, endpoint distribution

Baseline characteristics Total (n = 84) Eplerenone (n = 42) Control (n = 42) Missing, n (%) P-value
Age at inclusion, years [IQR] 39 [27–50] 40 [29–49] 39 [24–51] - -
Male sex, n (%) 37 (44) 18 (43) 19 (45) - -
Body mass index, kg/m2 [IQR] 25 [23–28] 25 [23–29] 25 [22–27] - -
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg [IQR] 122 [110–134] 126 [115–136] 120 [110–130] - -
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg [IQR] 75 [66–80] 75 [70–80] 74 [65–84] - -
PVCs/24 h, n [IQR] 9 [1–61] 9 [1–30] 12 [0–77] - -
QRS amplitude, mV [IQR] 23 [18–28] 24 [18–31] 22 [17–27] - -
PR duration, ms [IQR] 142 [132–160] 142 [135–159] 143 [126–159] - -
QRS duration, ms [IQR] 85 [80–94] 85 [80–94] 86 [78–94] - -
Baseline CMR characteristicsa Total (n = 74) Eplerenone (n = 37) Control (n = 37) Missing, n (%) P-value
LVEDV, mL [IQR] 154 [136–175] 158 [139–171] 153 [132–181] - -
LVEF, % [IQR] 60 [56–62] 60 [57–62] 59 [56–61] - -
RVEDV, mL [IQR] 178 [151–204] 178 [159–188] 175 [146–207] - -
RVEF, % [IQR] 51 [49–55] 52 [50–55] 50 [48–55] - -
LGE, n (%) 14 (17) 9 (21) 5 (12) 4 (5) -
End of study characteristics Total (n = 84) Eplerenone (n = 42) Control (n = 42) Missing, n (%) P-value
Composite endpoint reached 56 (67) 27 (64) 29 (69) - 0.817
PVCs/24 h, n [IQR] 6 [1–123] 11 [2–91] 5 [1–131] 1 (1) 0.673
QRS amplitude, mV [IQR] 23 [17–29] 23 [19–29] 24 [16–29] 2 (2) 0.992
PR duration, ms [IQR] 144 [130–160] 144 [130–157] 146 [132–160] 2 (2) 0.606
QRS duration, ms [IQR] 88 [80–96] 88 [80–96] 86 [80–95] 2 (2) 0.723
End of study CMR characteristicsa Total (n = 74) Eplerenone (n = 37) Control (n = 37) Missing, n (%) P-value
LVEDV, mL [IQR] 150 [129–168] 146 [134–165] 153 [126–175] - 0.996
LVEF, % [IQR] 59 [55–61] 57 [55–60] 60 [55–62] - 0.171
RVEDV, mL [IQR] 169 [144–191] 167 [149–183] 174 [140–204] - 0.638
RVEF, % [IQR] 50 [49–54] 51 [49–53] 50 [49–54] - 0.709
LGE, n (%) 22 (26) 12 (29) 10 (24) 4 (5) 0.797

All percentages are calculated using a total cohort size of 84 and a group size of 42. PVCs, premature ventricular contractions.

Median age at inclusion was 39 years (Q1–Q3: 27–50 years), 37 (44%) people were male. After 3 years follow-up, 56/84 (67%) people showed evidence of disease progression by reaching the composite endpoint, 29/42 (69%) in the control group and 27/42 (64%) in the eplerenone group (P = 0.817). The two components of the primary endpoint that were most often reached were a decrease in left ventricular EF (29/84, 35%) and/or right ventricular EF by ≥5% (24/84, 29%), followed by the combination of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia and increase in PVC count on Holter monitoring (14/84, 17%).

In total, 14/84 (17%) people already showed some LGE at baseline despite their asymptomatic status, 9/42 (21%) in the eplerenone group and 5/42 (12%) in the control group (P = 0.520). Out of 10 carriers with newly observed LGE at the end of the study, a decrease in ventricular function or an increase in ventricular volume was observed in five.

No sustained ventricular tachycardia was observed during the trial. Sporadic QRS amplitude decrease was observed, but no newly developed low voltage ECGs were observed. Eplerenone was well-tolerated with no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse events between the groups.

Discussion

Within the 3-year duration of i-PHORECAST trial, disease progression, i.e. reaching the composite endpoint, was observed in two-thirds of participants, both in members of the eplerenone and control groups. Moreover, signs of PLN p.Arg14del cardiomyopathy were already present at baseline, in particular LGE, despite the asymptomatic status of participants. These findings provide a novel perspective regarding PLN p.Arg14del cardiomyopathy. Given the fact that the sample size was smaller than expected, conclusions from this study must be drawn with caution, particularly regarding the effect of eplerenone. Although no signal for such an effect was observed, we cannot exclude that with the intended sample size this might have been observed. There was no evidence of an effect of treatment with eplerenone based on this analysis. Eplerenone itself was safe and well-tolerated. Future research into PLN p.Arg14del cardiomyopathy disease progression or modification—and more broadly, research into asymptomatic carriers of pathogenic variations associated with genetic cardiomyopathies—may be better designed using the knowledge obtained in this study.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank cardiologists A.J. Perez-Matos and P.L. van Haelst from the St. Antonius medical centre in Sneek, the Netherlands for their assistance in acquiring necessary study data.

Contributor Information

Remco de Brouwer, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Wouter P te Rijdt, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Edgar T Hoorntje, Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Ahmad Amin, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Folkert W Asselbergs, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Institute of Cardiovascular Science and Institute of Health Informatics, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

Moniek G P J Cox, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Jeroen F van der Heijden, Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands.

Hans Hillege, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Jacco C Karper, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Belend Mahmoud, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Peter van der Meer, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Anton Oomen, Department of Cardiology, Antonius Hospital, Sneek, the Netherlands.

Anneline S J M te Riele, Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Herman H W Silljé, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Hanno L Tan, Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Jan Peter van Tintelen, Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Genetics, University of Utrecht, Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Dirk J van Veldhuisen, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Berend Daan Westenbrink, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Ans C P Wiesfeld, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Tineke P Willems, Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Paul A van der Zwaag, Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Arthur A M Wilde, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Rudolf A de Boer, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Maarten P van den Berg, Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Data availability

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to concerns regarding the privacy of individuals who participated in the study. The data, or a subset thereof, will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative, an initiative supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation (The Hague, Netherlands): PREDICT 1 (CVON2012-10) and 2 (CVON 2018-30), DOSIS (CVON 2014-40) and eDETECT (CVON 2015-30). Furthermore, this study was supported by a grant (836011002) from ZonMW and the Leducq Foundation (CURE-PLaN). Eplerenone was provided by Pfizer. W.P.t.R. is supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation (Young Talent Program CVON PREDICT) and the Leducq Foundation (Postdoctoral Fellowship CURE-PLaN; Netherlands Heart Institute). B.D.W is supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO VENI grant 016.176.147) and the Netherlands Heart Foundation Senior Clinical Scientist Grant (2019T064). P.vd.M. is supported by a grant from the European research Council (ERC CoG 101045236, DISSECT-HF) H.L.T. has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under acronym ESCAPE-NET, registered under grant agreement No 733381. F.W.A. is supported by UCL Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. R.A.d.B. is supported by a grant from the European Research Council (ERC CoG 818715, SECRETE-HF).

References

  • 1. van der Zwaag PA, van Rijsingen IAW, Asimaki A, Jongbloed JDH, van Veldhuisen DJ, Wiesfeld ACP, et al. Phospholamban R14del mutation in patients diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy or arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: evidence supporting the concept of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:1199–1207. 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. van Rijsingen IAW, van der Zwaag PA, Groeneweg JA, Nannenberg EA, Jongbloed JDH, Zwinderman AH, et al. Outcome in phospholamban R14del carriers: results of a large multicentre cohort study. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2014;7:455–465. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.113.000374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Eijgenraam TR, Boukens BJ, Boogerd CJ, Schouten EM, van de Kolk CWA, Stege NM, et al. The phospholamban p.(Arg14del) pathogenic variant leads to cardiomyopathy with heart failure and is unresponsive to standard heart failure therapy. Sci Rep 2020;10:9819. 10.1038/s41598-020-66656-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Eijgenraam TR, Boogerd CJ, Stege NM, Oliveira Nunes Teixeira V, Dokter MM, Schmidt LE, et al. Protein aggregation is an early manifestation of phospholamban p.(Arg14del)-related cardiomyopathy: development of PLN-R14del-related cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail 2021;14:e008532. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zannad F, Alla F, Dousset B, Perez A, Pitt B. Limitation of excessive extracellular matrix turnover may contribute to survival benefit of spironolactone therapy in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation 2000;102:2700–2706. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.22.2700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Iraqi W, Rossignol P, Angioi M, Fay R, Nuée J, Ketelslegers JM, et al. Extracellular cardiac matrix biomarkers in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. Circulation 2009;119:2471–2479. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.809194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hansson L, Hedner T, Dahlöf B. Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Prospective randomized open blinded end-point. Blood Press 1992;1:113–119. 10.3109/08037059209077502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. te Rijdt WP, Hoorntje ET, de Brouwer R, Oomen A, Amin A, van der Heijden JF, et al. Rationale and design of the PHOspholamban RElated CArdiomyopathy intervention STudy (i-PHORECAST). Neth Heart J 2022;30:84–95. 10.1007/s12471-021-01584-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article cannot be shared publicly due to concerns regarding the privacy of individuals who participated in the study. The data, or a subset thereof, will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.


Articles from European Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES