Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2023 Sep 12;74(17):4896–4898. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad257

Femaleness for improving grain yield potential and hybrid production in barley

Yongyu Huang 1, Thorsten Schnurbusch 2,3,
PMCID: PMC10498018  PMID: 37702015

Abstract

This article comments on:

Selva C, Yang X, Shirley NJ, Whitford R, Baumann U, Tucker MR. 2023. HvSL1 and HvMADS16 promote stamen identity to restrict multiple ovary formation in barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 74, 5039–5057.

Keywords: Allocation, barley, carpel, grain yield, homeotic, sex determination, stamen


Homeotic genes have been known for decades to affect floral organ identity. Studying their functions in cereal crops is of particular importance because it is directly relevant for grain yield formation. Selva et al. (2023) identified two homeotic genes in barley whose mutations give rise to multiple ovary phenotypes due to homeotic conversions of stamens into carpels, one encodes a C2H2 zinc-finger protein (HvSL1) and the other encodes a B-class MADS-box protein (HvMADS16). Importantly, the supernumerary carpels in the hvsl1 mutants remain fertile when cross-pollinated, representing a promising gateway for hybrid grain production and increased grain yield.

Insights from the ABCDE model

Flowers are key reproductive units for most plant species (angiosperms). They are typically composed of four whorls of floral organs sequentially arranged from the outside to the center of a flower, including sepals, petals, stamens (androecium), and carpels (gynoecium). Each type of floral organ has a distinct role during reproduction. For example, sepals can protect and support the inner floral organs; petals can attract pollinators (or humans); and stamens and carpels are male and female sex organs, respectively, which determine the ultimate reproduction. The spatiotemporal arrangements of these four floral organs are specified by the genetic hierarchy of certain groups of proteins referred to as the A-, B-, C-, D-, and E-class proteins according to the popular ABCDE model (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991; Zahn et al., 2006). Yet the proteins responsible for the identity of each floral organ are not simple homologous conversions among different plant species (Hirano et al., 2014).

In the Triticeae cereal crop barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), the sex floral organs contain three stamens (male part) and three fused carpels that enclose a single ovule (female part) (Fig. 1). The single ovary phenotype is maintained by at least three independent genetic loci termed mov1, mov2, and mov5; mutations in any of them give rise to a multiovary (mov) phenotype. Previous research by Selva et al. (2021) identified the barley LEAFY (HvLFY) homolog as the causal gene underlying the mov5 locus. Now, Selva et al. (2023) focused on the mov1 and mov2 mutants, both of which showed homeotic conversions of the three stamens into additional carpels. In addition, lodicules (petal homologs) in the mov1 mutant were converted into leaf-like structures but remained normal in the mov2.g mutant. Interestingly, ectopic carpels could be observed in the mov2.g mutant, but not in mov1, indicating that MOV2 might also control carpel determinacy. Through map-based cloning and functional characterization, Selva et al. (2023) showed that the mov2 locus was due to a deletion in the STAMENLESS1 homolog (HvSL1) encoding a C2H2 zinc-finger protein, and the mov1 locus was most probably due to a gene deletion in the B-class gene MADS16 (HvMADS16), a barley homolog of rice SUPERWOMAN1 (SPW1) and Arabidopsis APETALA3 (AP3). They further showed that the SL1MADS16 regulatory module for the specification of stamen identity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) (Xiao et al., 2009) was conserved in barley.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Two floral meristem identity/determinacy signals potentially leading to more grains in barley. A schematic representation of a wild-type spikelet morphology is shown on the left. Each floral organ is highlighted with different colors. Two proposed molecular pathways resulting in multispikelet or multiovary phenotypes are shown on the top right and bottom right, respectively. In barley, at least four loci have been shown to negatively affect spikelet number via the meristem identity/determinacy signals. Mutations in the SIX-ROWED SPIKE4 (VRS4) gene encoding an ortholog of maize RAMOSA2 (RA2) results in a multispikelet phenotype due to the loss of spikelet determinacy (Koppolu et al., 2013). COMPOSITUM1 (COM1) and COM2 encode TCP and AP2/ERF (ortholog of rice FRIZZY PANICLE) transcription factors, respectively, and determine inflorescence branching via the meristem identity signals (Poursarebani et al., 2015, 2020). The multiflorus2.b (mul2.b) mutant also displayed a multispikelet phenotype, but the candidate gene is still not known (Koppolu et al., 2022). In all cases, an extended outgrowth of the spikelet axis (rachilla) is observed, which potentially defines the extra spikelet formation. The regulatory relationships among the three cloned genes are based on Poursarebani et al. (2020). The ABCDE model is drawn according to Zahn et al. (2006). To improve visualization, the extra spikelet is shown in gray. The regulatory model for the formation of the multiovary phenotype is drawn according to Selva et al. (2021). Dashed arrows indicate insignificant or not major changes of the transcripts. Mutations in any of the three genes, namely HvLFY, HvSL1, and HvSPW1 (HvMADS16), all give rise to a multiovary phenotype due to the homeotic conversions of stamens into carpels. Only the extra ovaries from hvlfy and hvsl1 mutants remain fertile, but not those in hvspw1. In hvlfy mutants, an incomplete conversion of stamens into carpels was observed; we therefore indicate the dispensable stamens with gray dashed lines.

Some divergences, however, also existed. In rice, the ossl1 mutant exhibited homeotic conversions of both lodicules and stamens into palea/lemma-like organs and carpels, resembling the spw1/osmads16 mutant (Xiao et al., 2009). Selva et al. (2023) clearly showed that lodicules were unaffected in the barley mov2.g/hvsl1 mutant. Perhaps most striking are the additional carpels in hvsl1 mutants that remain fertile when cross-pollinated, which was not known in rice. The work by Selva et al. (2023) thus not only provides insights into how floral architecture is controlled in a Triticeae crop—barley—but also demonstrates a promising way in which homeotic gene mutations can increase grain yield potential.

The quest for more grains: a way forward

The broad implications for studying homeotic genes can be well demonstrated by the horticultural selection of many garden ornamental flowers such as roses and tulips (Bendahmane et al., 2013). In these species, genetic manipulations on the ABCDE program may push the outward shift of the expression of B-class genes, thereby altering the organization of outward whorls of floral organs (e.g. sepals and petals) to provide aesthetic benefits for humans. In terms of plants for food purposes, such as many of the cereal crops, selections may tend to focus on the direction of more harvestable grains for human diets. Prominent examples are the genetic modifications of the meristem determinacy/identity signaling pathways leading to the increase of the final spikelet/floret number (Koppolu et al., 2013, 2022; Poursarebani et al., 2015, 2020; Dixon et al., 2018), which often require a de novo assembly of the ABCDE program to establish the spikelet/floret identity (Fig. 1). An undesired trade-off commonly observed when more spikelets/florets are produced is the reduction in grain size or fertility because extra spikelets/florets would mean extra costs, among others the synthesis of new floral organs (e.g. lemmas and paleas) and vasculatures. This suggests that additional assimilation from the source side is required to achieve an improved source–sink balance. At a broader scale, the number of ovules per flower can span over several orders of magnitude among angiosperms (Burd et al., 2009). In an evolutionary context, a female-biased allocation is more likely to emerge in self-pollinating hermaphrodites when flower size is increased (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1981). In this regard, the multiovary in one floret reported by Selva et al. (2023) appears to be a resource-conserving strategy for increasing grain number, if fertilization can be secured for barley. Intriguingly, a well-known yet unidentified dominant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mutant, called Three Pistils (TP) per floret (Peng, 2003), has already solved this fertility problem. The TP trait appears specifically interesting because it also offers a greater grain yield potential per se. Considering the prominent TP phenotype, it is quite likely that genes involved in ovule initiation and development, such as the BSister-class genes MADS29, MADS30, and MADS31 (Callens et al., 2018; Wilkinson, 2019), may be affected in this mutant. By aligning the known genomic locations of all MADS-box genes from hexaploid wheat (Schilling et al., 2020) with the TP mapping locus on the long arm of chromosome 2D (Peng et al., 2008), only MADS31/TaBS-D2 remains as the best candidate gene. In any case, only future work will be able to show whether this postulated candidate gene can be confirmed.

The male-to-female sex transition in the mov2.g mutant may raise another layer of research interest for hybrid breeding. Barley is a strictly self-pollinating crop that would require the generation of male-sterile plants for hybrid production. However, available approaches such as cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) and chemical gametocides remain a major challenge, in particular for temperate cereals crops such as barley (Fernández-Gómez et al., 2020). For floral sex determination, homeotic genes, especially those from the B-, C-, and D-class and their upstream regulators, have been studied in a considerable number of plant species (Feng et al., 2020) and are continuing to emerge in less exploited crop species such as barley. Genetic approaches such as genome editing may enable a targeted cessation (or conversion) of male or female floral organ development at an unprecedented precision, thereby maximizing cross-pollination efficiency and ultimately grain set in an F1 grain production context. The study by Selva et al. (2023) therefore demonstrates a ‘kill two birds with one stone’ approach whereby mutations of homeotic genes can simultaneously promote outbreeding efficiency and capture the benefits from heterotic yield potential and stability.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the PBP group members for fruitful discussions.

Contributor Information

Yongyu Huang, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Seeland, Germany.

Thorsten Schnurbusch, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstr. 3, OT Gatersleben, D-06466 Seeland, Germany; Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Faculty of Natural Sciences III, Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional Sciences, D-06120 Halle, Germany.

Funding

TS received financial support from the IPK core budget.

References

  1. Bendahmane M, Dubois A, Raymond O, Bris ML.. 2013. Genetics and genomics of flower initiation and development in roses. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 847–857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burd M, Ashman TL, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Knight TM, Mazer SJ, Mitchell RJ, Steets JA, Vamosi JC.. 2009. Ovule number per flower in a world of unpredictable pollination. American Journal of Botany 96, 1159–1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Callens C, Tucker MR, Zhang D, Wilson ZA.. 2018. Dissecting the role of MADS-box genes in monocot floral development and diversity. Journal of Experimental Botany 69, 2435–2459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B.. 1981. Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 15, 57–74. [Google Scholar]
  5. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM.. 1991. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353, 31–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dixon LE, Greenwood JR, Bencivenga S, Zhang P, Cockram J, Mellers G, Ramm K, Cavanagh C, Swain SM, Boden SA.. 2018. TEOSINTE BRANCHED1 regulates inflorescence architecture and development in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). The Plant Cell 30, 563–581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Feng G, Sanderson B, Keefover-Ring K, Liu J, Ma T, Yin T, Smart L, DiFazio S, Olson M.. 2020. Pathways to sex determination in plants: how many roads lead to Rome? Current Opinion in Plant Biology 54, 61–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fernández-Gómez J, Talle B, Wilson ZA.. 2020. Increased expression of the MALE STERILITY1 transcription factor gene results in temperature-sensitive male sterility in barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 71, 6328–6339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirano HY, Tanaka W, Toriba T.. 2014. Grass flower development. Methods in Molecular Biology 1110, 57–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koppolu R, Anwar N, Sakuma S, et al. 2013. Six-rowed spike4 (Vrs4) controls spikelet determinacy and row-type in barley. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110, 13198–13203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koppolu R, Jiang G, Milner SG, Muqaddasi QH, Rutten T, Himmelbach A, Guo Y, Stein N, Mascher M, Schnurbusch T.. 2022. The barley mutant multiflorus2.b reveals quantitative genetic variation for new spikelet architecture. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 135, 571–590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Peng ZS. 2003. A new mutation in wheat producing three pistils in a floret. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189, 270–272. [Google Scholar]
  13. Peng Z-S, Martinek P, Kosuge K, Kuboyama T, Watanabe N.. 2008. Genetic mapping of a mutant gene producing three pistils per floret in common wheat. Journal of Applied Genetics 49, 135–139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Poursarebani N, Seidensticker T, Koppolu R, et al. 2015. The genetic basis of composite spike form in barley and ‘Miracle-Wheat’. Genetics 201, 155–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Poursarebani N, Trautewig C, Melzer M, et al. 2020. COMPOSITUM 1 contributes to the architectural simplification of barley inflorescence via meristem identity signals. Nature Communications 11, 5138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schilling S, Kennedy A, Pan S, Jermiin LS, Melzer R.. 2020. Genome-wide analysis of MIKC-type MADS-box genes in wheat: pervasive duplications, functional conservation and putative neofunctionalization. New Phytologist 225, 511–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Selva C, Shirley NJ, Houston K, Whitford R, Baumann U, Li G, Tucker MR.. 2021. HvLEAFY controls the early stages of floral organ specification and inhibits the formation of multiple ovaries in barley. The Plant Journal 108, 509–527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Selva C, Yang X, Shirley NJ, Whitford RM, Baumann U, Tucker MR.. 2023. HvSL1 and HvMADS16 promote stamen identity to restrict multiple ovary formation in barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 74, 5039–5057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilkinson LG. 2019. Molecular and genetic cues influencing ovule development in barley (Hordeum vulgare). PhD Thesis, University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xiao H, Tang J, Li Y, et al. 2009. STAMENLESS 1, encoding a single C2H2 zinc finger protein, regulates floral organ identity in rice. The Plant Journal 59, 789–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zahn LM, Feng B, Ma H.. 2006. Beyond the ABC-model: regulation of floral homeotic genes. Advances in Botanical Research 44, 163–207. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES