Abstract
In this issue, Abe et al1 report a novel mechanism by which RANKL stimulates osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption through non-coding RNAs that bind PGC-1β and convert the NCoR/HDAC3 co-repressor complex into a co-activator of AP-1- and NFκB-regulated genes.
The ability of cells to regulate the expression of specific genes at the right time and place is essential for developmental and physiological processes throughout life. Approximately 1,650 DNA-binding transcription factors are encoded in the human genome2 and control the specificity of gene expression in different cell types. Transcription factors provide a platform for macromolecular protein complexes (which do not bind DNA directly) to assemble and alter chromatin structure and RNA polymerase activity. Up to 2,500 chromatin-associated proteins are present in the human genome to fine-tune transcription factor activity and gene expression in response to a vast array of environmental cues.3 A question that has intrigued molecular biologists for decades is how a transcription factor or combination of transcription factors can differentially assemble activator or repressor complexes in response to various stimuli. Nuclear hormone receptors provide a relatively simple paradigm where a hormone ligand induces conformational changes in the transcription factor to displace nuclear receptor co-repressor (NCoR)-histone deacetylase (HDAC) complexes and promote the association of co-activators and histone acetyltransferases (HATs).4 Other molecular switches involving co-repressor displacement from ligand-independent transcription factors have been described, such as for the Notch-regulated transcription factor Rbpj5 and signal-dependent phosphorylation of c-Jun, part of the AP1 transcription factor family.6 In this issue, Abe et al.1 describe a new mechanistic switch in myeloid cells involving non-coding RNAs (e.g., Dancr, Rnu12) and PGC-1β that do not displace NCoR/HDAC3 co-repressors from gene regulatory regions, but rather subvert them into a co-activator/HAT complex in response to RANKL stimulation (Figure 1A).
Figure 1. RANKL promotes the association of PGC-1β and non-coding RNAs with NCoR/HDAC3 to activate gene expression and induce osteoclast maturation.
(A) NCoR/HDAC3 co-repressor complexes associate with NFκB and AP-1 transcription factors in myeloid cells within the bone marrow. RANKL induces PGC-1β expression and its association with non-coding RNAs, including Dancr and Rnu12, via its RRM domain. This complex then associates with NCoR/HDAC3. HDAC3 deacetylates PGC-1β, allowing for HAT recruitment and transcription of NFκB- and AP-1-regulated genes.
(B) M-CSF and RANKL induce the differentiation of myeloid progenitor cells into multinucleated osteoclasts that resorb bone and regulate bone homeostasis. Osteoclast differentiation is impeded by the inactivation or deletion of any component of the NCoR/HDAC3/PGC-1β/Dancr/Rnu12 complex. The figure was created with BioRender.
Osteoclasts are specialized multinucleated cells that resorb both the organic and inorganic components of bones to regulate calcium homeostasis, bone health, and other physiological processes. Increased osteoclast activity is associated with bone loss, frailty, and osteoporotic fractures, while reductions in osteoclast function may cause bones to become dense, brittle, and fracture prone. The combination of M-CSF (monocyte-colony stimulating factor) and RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand) induces the expression of genes regulated by NFκB, AP-1, and other transcription factors7 in myeloid progenitor cells and promotes their differentiation into osteoclasts. In this report, Abe et al. demonstrate that NCoR is required for RANKL-stimulated formation of multi-nucleated osteoclasts in vitro. They also show that conditional deletion of NCoR, or NCoR and SMRT (silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor; aka NCoR2) in myeloid progenitors and other LysM-Cre expressing cells suppresses bone resorption and causes a high-bone-mass phenotype in adult mice (Figure 1B). This is consistent with the report that HDAC3 deletion in LysM-Cre positive cells blocks RANKL-induced activation of NFκB, the formation of multi-nucleated osteoclasts, and cortical bone healing.8 Thus, NCoR/HDAC3 complexes are necessary for proper osteoclast differentiation.
NCoR and SMRT are well-studied co-repressors that bind transcription factors and recruit HDAC3, which removes acetyl groups from lysines in histones and other proteins.4 Displacement of this macromolecular complex from chromatin is often observed in genes that are derepressed in response to extracellular stimuli. However, Abe and colleagues found that NCoR and HDAC3 were paradoxically present at H3K27ac-enriched chromatin regions after RANKL exposure and were required for the expression of RANKL-induced genes.1 Binding sites for AP-1, NFκB-p65, and PU.1 were common in the NCOR/HDAC3-regulated genes. The authors hypothesizedthata PGC-1 (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptorgamma coactivator-1) protein may be involved in these events because HDAC3 was previously linked to PGC-1α-dependent gene activation in brown adipose tissue.9 PGC-1 family members are master regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis and cellular metabolism. Abe et al. find that osteoclasts express PGC-1β, not PGC-1α, and confirm previously reported data showing that PGC-1β expression increases during RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis.10 PGC-1β was found in macromolecular complexes (2MDa in size) containing NCoR and HDAC3 and co-located with NCoR, HDAC3, and H3K27ac at RANKL-upregulated genes with binding sites for AP-1 and NFκB-p65 transcription factors. These PGC-1β complexes contained histone acetyl transferase activity, but a specific HAT was not identified. Depletion of PGC-1β attenuated the expression of RANKL-induced and NCoR/HDAC3-dependent genes in bone marrow cells. Interestingly, PGC-1β switched the substrate specificity of NCoR/HDAC3 complexes from H3K27 to PGC-1β itself in a signal-dependent fashion. Consistent with phenotypes of NCoR and HDAC3 depleted mice, PGC-1β knockout mice have increased bone mass and impaired RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis.10
As interesting as these results are, it is not the end of this story. PGC1 proteins contain a conserved RNA-recognition motif (RRM) in their C termini. The authors found that removal of the RRM domain from PGC-1β or RNase treatment reduced RANKL-induced interactions of PGC-1β with NCoR/HDAC3, suggesting that RNAs are key to the transformation of NCoR/HDAC3 complexes from repressors to activators of gene transcription. Several non-coding RNAs were identified in PGC-1β-binding molecules. Dancr and Rnu12 piqued the interest of the authors because they had previously been linked to low bone mass and elevated osteoclast activity in humans. Abe and colleagues nicely show that Dancr and Rnu12 facilitate the association of PGC-1β with NCoR/HDAC3 and that deletion of both ncRNAs substantially reduces the formation of this complex on AP1/NFκB-dependent enhancers in response to RANKL. Deletion of Dancr and Rnu12 also impairs RANKL-induced bone resorption activity of osteoclasts. These results suggest that Dancr and Rnu12 are crucial mediators of RANKL induced differentiation of myeloid cells to osteoclasts.
The novel mechanisms revealed in this study should launch many new avenues of investigation. A broad question is how frequently PGC1/RNA complexes switch NCoR/HDAC3 from transcriptional co-repressors to co-activators in response to signals that regulate cellular growth and differentiation. RANKL is most likely stimulating RANK-dependent signaling in monocyte precursors to induce PGC-1β expression, and it will be of interest to determine how intermediate events in the signaling pathway occur and vary in different cell types that respond to RANKL. For bone biologists, this opens new avenues of research as to how RANKL and non-coding RNAs contribute to osteoclast formation and whether these pathways can be manipulated to treat diseases associated with high bone resorption.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AR078552, AR082134, DK007352).
Footnotes
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Abe Y, Kofman ER, Almeida M, Ouyang Z, Ponte F, Mueller JR, Cruz-Becerra G, Sakai M, Prohaska TA, Spann NJ, et al. (2023). RANK ligand converts the NCoR/HDAC3 co-repressor to a PGC1beta- and RNA-dependent co-activator of osteoclast gene expression. Mol. Cell 83. 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lambert SA, Jolma A, Campitelli LF, Das PK, Yin Y, Albu M, Chen X, Taipale J, Hughes TR, and Weirauch MT (2018). The Human Transcription Factors. Cell 172, 650–665. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Partridge EC, Chhetri SB, Prokop JW, Ramaker RC, Jansen CS, Goh ST, Mackiewicz M, Newberry KM, Brandsmeier LA, Meadows SK, et al. (2020). Occupancy maps of 208 chromatin-associated proteins in one human cell type. Nature 583, 720–728. 10.1038/s41586-020-2023-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Perissi V, Jepsen K, Glass CK, and Rosenfeld MG (2010). Deconstructing repression: evolving models of co-repressor action. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 109–123. 10.1038/nrg2736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Borggrefe T, and Oswald F (2009). The Notch signaling pathway: transcriptional regulation at Notch target genes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66, 1631–1646. 10.1007/s00018-009-8668-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ogawa S, Lozach J, Jepsen K, SawkaVerhelle D, Perissi V, Sasik R, Rose DW, Johnson RS, Rosenfeld MG, and Glass CK (2004). A nuclear receptor corepressor transcriptional checkpoint controlling activator protein 1-dependent gene networks required for macrophage activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14461–14466. 10.1073/pnas.0405786101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Inoue K, and Imai Y (2014). Identification of novel transcription factors in osteoclast differentiation using genome-wide analysis of open chromatin determined by DNase-seq. J. Bone Miner. Res. 29, 1823–1832. 10.1002/jbmr.2229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Molstad DHH, Zars E, Norton A, Mansky KC, Westendorf JJ, and Bradley EW (2020). Hdac3 deletion in myeloid progenitor cells enhances bone healing in females and limits osteoclast fusion via Pmepa1. Sci. Rep. 10, 21804. 10.1038/s41598-020-78364-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Emmett MJ, Lim HW, Jager J, Richter HJ, Adlanmerini M, Peed LC, Briggs ER, Steger DJ, Ma T, Sims CA, et al. (2017). Histone deacetylase 3 prepares brown adipose tissue for acute thermogenic challenge. Nature 546, 544–548. 10.1038/nature22819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ishii KA, Fumoto T, Iwai K, Takeshita S, Ito M, Shimohata N, Aburatani H, Taketani S, Lelliott CJ, Vidal-Puig A, and Ikeda K (2009). Coordination of PGC-1beta and iron uptake in mitochondrial biogenesis and osteoclast activation. Nat. Med. 15, 259–266. 10.1038/nm.1910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]