Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2023 Oct 11;11:e16270. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16270

Physical activity, problematic smartphone use, and burnout among Chinese college students

Lianghao Zhu 1,#, Junli Hou 1,#, Bojun Zhou 2, Xi Xiao 1, Jingqiang Wang 1, Wanping Jia 3,
Editor: Mohsen Khosravi
PMCID: PMC10576493  PMID: 37842034

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between physical activity (PA), problematic smartphone use (PSU), and burnout, as well as to identify whether there is a mediating role for PSU. We recruited 823 college students (Mage = 18.55, SD = 0.83) from Wuhan, China, in December 2022, including 499 males and 324 females. Demographic information, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version (SAS-SV), and the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS) were used for assessments. Pearson correlation analysis showed that PA was significantly associated with PSU (r = −0.151, p < 0.001), PSU was significantly associated with burnout (r = 0.421, p < 0.001), and the association between PA and burnout was not statistically significant (r = −0.046, p > 0.05). The results of the mediation model test showed that PA could not predict burnout directly; it instead predicted burnout entirely indirectly through PSU. Furthermore, PSU mediated the predictive effect of PA on exhaustion and cynicism. In conclusion, there is no direct connection between PA levels and burnout. PA indirectly affects burnout through PSU, but does not fully apply to the three different dimensions of exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy.

Keywords: Burnout, Problematic smartphone use, Physical activity, Exhaustion, Cynicism, Professional efficacy

Introduction

Burnout was described as the experience of exhaustion in which individuals become cynical about the worth of their occupation and doubt their capacity to function (Maslach, Jackson & Leiter, 1996). Physical and behavioral signs of burnout, according to the definition of Maslach, Jackson & Leiter (1996), involve three dimensions: exhaustion, cynicism, and lack of professional efficacy. Although students are neither officially employed nor hold employment, it is possible that burnout also affects them. However, their primary activities can be seen as “work” from a psychological standpoint (Jacobs & Dodd, 2003; Ye, Huang & Liu, 2021). The admittance to high schools and universities, and consequently pupils’ job prospects, is determined by extremely competitive exams used in the rigorous Chinese educational system. At the same time, the quality of teaching is assessed by students’ examination results, so teachers put enormous pressure on students (Hu & Schaufeli, 2009). A cross-sectional study of 22,983 Chinese university students showed that more than half of the students suffered from academic burnout: mild burnout, severe burnout, and very severe burnout accounted for 55.16%, 3.55%, and 1.28%, respectively (Liu et al., 2023). Previous studies showed that higher levels of burnout are associated with lower academic achievement (Madigan & Curran, 2021) and an increased risk of withdrawal intentions (Williams, Dziurawiec & Heritage, 2018), emotional dysregulation, perpetration (Cooper et al., 2017), sleep disorders (Pagnin et al., 2014), depression (Peterka-Bonetta et al., 2019), and suicide (Bitran et al., 2019). Simultaneously, the quality of work, professionalism, ethical behavior, and empathy were negatively impacted (Bitran et al., 2019). Therefore, given the many potential hazards of burnout on physical and mental health as well as daily routines, the main triggers of burnout in college students need more consideration in order to alleviate it.

As of June 2022, the scale of China’s mobile phone Internet users was 1.047 billion, the user scale of short videos reached 962 million, and the user scale of instant messaging reached 1.027 billion. The tendency of these three sorts of users tending to be more youthful is particularly pronounced (China Internet Network Information Center, 2023). While the popularity of smartphones has fueled the development of productivity in society, overuse of smartphones can also have some negative effects (Wu et al., 2021). Researchers from mainland China found that problematic smartphone use (PSU) may be an antecedent to burnout in school settings, which provides some insight into future interventions to deal with burnout in college students (Zhang et al., 2021a, 2021b; Meng et al., 2023). On the other hand, physical activity (PA) has the advantages of being accessible, low-cost, and effective in alleviating burnout, driving researchers to explore it (Li et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2020). Concurrently, an increasing number of people have begun to pay attention to PA as a protective effect against PSU (Xiao et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2021). To our knowledge, few studies have combined PA with PSU in dealing with burnout-related issues, although this approach has been applied in observational studies of irrational procrastination (Shi et al., 2021), sleep quality (Gao et al., 2023), suicidality (Xie et al., 2020), and depression (Xie et al., 2019). In response to the aforementioned needs of the cultural context and the limitations of the available evidence, the purpose of this study was to explore the association between PA, PSU, and burnout, as well as the mediating role of PSU, providing an empirical profile from a sample of Chinese college students.

Physical activity as a predictor of burnout

Physical activity is any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure (Bull et al., 2020). Naczenski et al. (2017) and Dreher, Dößereck & Lachtermann (2020) synthesized evidence regarding the relationship between PA and burnout, with PA negatively associated with burnout in longitudinal studies and somewhat mitigating the threat of burnout in intervention studies. In particular, quantification of this evidence by the standardized index of convergence (SIC; Wielenga-Meijer et al., 2010) provided moderately strong evidence for a negative relationship. Despite the lack of high quality studies, PA was considered to be an effective medium for reducing burnout.

Regarding psychological operating mechanisms, regular PA could reduce the risk of chronic stress by mentally disengaging from work during leisure time (Sonnentag, 2012). For people who perform sedentary jobs, strenuous leisure time PA once or twice a week was associated with a low risk of future exhaustion (Bernaards et al., 2006). De Vries et al. (2016) found that an increase in moderate intensity physical activity (MPA) was associated with a reduction in fatigue related to work. The changes in PA were negatively correlated with changes in physical fatigue, emotional exhaustion, and cognitive weariness (Lindwall et al., 2014), and individuals who performed PA were less likely to be diagnosed with burnout (Jonsdottir et al., 2010). Consequently, PA can be effective against the key component of burnout (i.e., exhaustion).

According to Ahola et al. (2012), insufficient PA was linked not only to the exhaustion dimension but also to the cynicism dimension and worse occupational efficacy. The reason may have been the result of a long-term mismatch between work demands and available resources (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007; Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004), in other words, the failure to meet career expectations. Cynicism, also known as depersonalization, is characterized by an indifferent or detached attitude toward work in general and the people with whom one works, resulting in a lack of interest in work and a sense that work has lost its significance (Koutsimani, Montgomery & Georganta, 2019; Maslach, Jackson & Leiter, 1996). Conceptually, cynicism and dedication (one of the subdimensions of work engagement) are the opposites of each other (Schaufeli & Bakker, 2004). Kara, Gürbüz & Öncü (2019) discovered that physically active individuals showed greater commitment to the importance, willingness, pride, and challenge of their work.

Furthermore, regular participation in PA can enhance people’s self-efficacy, which can even “spill over” into work areas, resulting in greater self-approval. In accordance with the effort-recovery model (Meijman & Mulder, 1998), leisure-time physical activities (even if they require energy expenditure) afford an opportunity to replenish stress resources and acquire new ones. For example, PA outside of work could provide a recovery through physical self-perception and self-esteem to counteract the harmful future effects of stress and fatigue at work on physical and mental health (Feuerhahn, Sonnentag & Woll, 2014; Rook & Zijlstra, 2006).

In summary, the available evidence supports the negative association between PA and burnout, but the participants were mainly employees of the health and social security systems or medical students, and it is impossible to determine whether the results of previous studies are heterogeneous between college students of different majors. Thus, a hypothesis is proposed. Hypothesis 1: There will be a negative correlation between PA and burnout.

Problematic smartphone use as a predictor of burnout

Problematic smartphone use is broadly described as a recurring desire to use a smartphone in an uncontrollable manner that alters daily functioning (Busch & McCarthy, 2021; Horwood & Anglim, 2018). This uncontrolled usage manifests itself in two ways: a maladaptive dependency (Chen et al., 2017) and a proclivity to use the smartphone without being removed from it (Cho & Lee, 2017). Busch & McCarthy (2021) proposed that emotional health issues (e.g., anger, stress, anxiety, depression, loneliness, self-esteem, and happiness) are the most typical consequence of PSU and that adolescents are especially at risk for them. Similarly, it is vital to comprehend how PSU, as an antecedent, might lead to burnout.

A large body of research has shown that PSU is positively related to burnout in school contexts (Hao et al., 2021, 2022; Li et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021a, 2021b). First, according to resource depletion theory, individuals have finite mental resources for information processing, and the preservation of attention is dependent on the coupling of those available resources. In particular, cognitive resources deplete faster than they can be replenished (i.e., cognitive load accumulation) as the duration of the task increases, resulting in difficulty concentrating (Head & Helton, 2014; Helton & Russell, 2011). PSU occupies a significant amount of the time and cognitive resources of adolescents, which should be used for thoughtful consideration of relevant curriculum and academics in the school setting. Adolescents who use their smartphones excessively are likely to fall behind in their studies, creating feelings of stress (Zhang et al., 2021a).

Second, smartphone usage could be divided into two types based on process and content gratification (Song et al., 2004). “Process usage” focuses on recreational functions such as news consumption, entertainment, and leisure (Hao et al., 2022; Van Deursen et al., 2015). Since pleasant experiences act as a reward, the likelihood of habitual use of smartphones increases (Yang & Tung, 2007), while personal interest in learning and working diminishes. This is a manifestation of entertainment or escapism (Wang et al., 2015). “Social usage” describes the use of social communication channels such as Facebook, text messaging, and phone calls (Hao et al., 2022; Van Deursen et al., 2015). Walburg, Mialhes & Moncla (2016) discovered that levels of school-related burnout were strongly associated with a higher frequency of Facebook use.

Third, there was sufficient evidence that PSU is negatively associated with academic performance (Bai, Chen & Han, 2020; Grant, Lust & Chamberlain, 2019; Hawi & Samaha, 2016; Lepp, Barkley & Karpinski, 2015; Samaha & Hawi, 2016; Troll, Friese & Loschelder, 2021). Excessive smartphone use resulting in a decline in academic performance (Grant, Lust & Chamberlain, 2019) is a negative feedback message for students, as it opposes the desired goals originally intended to be achieved and may even affect subsequent professional efficacy (Adams et al., 2020). In summary, PSU is a key cause of burnout. Hypothesis 2: There will be a positive correlation between PSU and burnout.

Association between PA and PSU

In the past, several studies have noted that high-risk smartphone users tend to exhibit less PA (Kim, Kim & Jee, 2015; Pereira et al., 2020). The explanation for this was that sedentary behavior could encompass many usage situations for smartphone functions (Mansoubi et al., 2014; Rosenberg et al., 2010) and that PSU had a positive correlation with sedentary behavior (Barkley, Lepp & Salehi-Esfahani, 2016; Barkley & Lepp, 2016; Xiang et al., 2020). High-frequency users were more likely to forego opportunities for PA in favor of using their smartphones (Lepp et al., 2013), and even the intensity of the exercise they were performing would be disturbed (Barkley & Lepp, 2016), compared to low-frequency users. The above investigations on the connection between PSU and PA virtually invariably support the thesis that PA levels can be adversely affected by PSU.

In fact, there was a bidirectional relationship between PSU and PA, with moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) effective in preventing smartphone overuse (Kim & Lee, 2022). A study on 24-h movement behavior conducted by Ren et al. (2022) demonstrated that the more time spent on the MVPA, the less the PSU phenomenon occurred. On the other hand, reduction of individual inhibitory control caused a decrease in motivational seeking and suppression of desire, which resulted in excessive addictive behavior, according to the Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors (Brand et al., 2016, 2019). Exercise was one way to enhance inhibitory control (Fan et al., 2021), and Zeng et al. (2022) and Zhang et al. (2022) found that exercise could indirectly affect PSU through self-control. It was practicable to move away from the immediate hedonism of PSU by using capacity-enhancing strategies targeted at improving individuals’ self-discipline and rational management (Busch & McCarthy, 2021). Individuals have limited willpower to maintain self-regulation and can benefit from encouraging smartphone users to engage in more physical activities such as sports, outdoor activities, dance, and yoga (Mahapatra, 2019). Thus, a hypothesis is proposed: Hypothesis 3: There will be a negative correlation between PA and PSU.

PSU as a mediator in the association between PA and burnout

In a literature review of the antecedents of PSU, deficits in personal self-regulation and distraction from negative emotions provide important explanations for our understanding of the emergence of PSU (Busch & McCarthy, 2021). Self-control is the ability to resist temptations, break habits, and override urges (Hagger et al., 2019). Zou et al. (2016) found that aerobic exercise could be a potentially effective intervention to enhance self-control in individuals. According to the self-control strength model (Baumeister et al., 1998), individuals who take actions that call for self-control resources temporarily spend certain finite resources that are not instantly regenerated. The recovery of self-control can surpass the ceiling of the initial self-control resources after restricted resources have been exhausted when both PA and PSU are perceived as stable behaviors over time. Self-control as an individual trait increases as a result of this process, which lessens reliance on smartphones (Zhong, Wang & Zhang, 2021). In addition, PA and exercise can be used to treat depression, anxiety, and panic disorders in a process that involves complex neurobiological mechanisms (Ströhle, 2009). We believe that physical activity engagement may undermine one of the triggers for PSU, and that this trigger is motivated by the avoidance of negative emotions.

As far as the consequences of the PSU are concerned, it may affect the professional performance of the user (Busch & McCarthy, 2021). When high-risk smartphone users are without access to their smartphones, they become impatient, and the resulting tendency towards boredom is exacerbated (Ruiz-Palmero et al., 2019). It further makes them uninterested and even unenthusiastic about learning. For individuals with higher levels of boredom proneness, they may pause, delay, or terminate necessary tasks they are working on (e.g., school-related tasks) after experiencing interruptions from smartphone interruption notifications (Elhai et al., 2021). The suspension of such tasks is a drag because of the need to convert costs into productivity when trying to resume (Salvucci & Taatgen, 2008). It may bring forward the psychological reaction of exhaustion in the course of their work engagement. Furthermore, there is evidence that PSU influences students’ achievement motivation and academic performance (Arefin et al., 2018), which may lead to an attenuation of professional efficacy. In conclusion, the antecedents and consequences of PSU can provide a novel explanatory mechanism for the association between PA and burnout (including its three dimensions). To be further verified, the following hypothesis is proposed: Hypothesis 4: PSU mediates the relationship between PA and burnout, which would extend to exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy.

Materials and Methods

Research design

Using the stratified cluster random sampling technique, we distinguished eight mutually independent strata based on differences in faculties, and then natural classes were used as clusters. A sample of three classes from each of the eight different faculties was randomly taken, and a total of 24 classes were invited to participate in the survey. This study employed a cross-sectional design in which participant demographic information, IPAQ-SF, SAS-SV, and MBI-SS measures were collected at a single point in time. With PA as the independent variable, PSU as the mediator, and burnout and its three dimensions as the dependent variables, we examined the intrinsic associations between the variables.

Participants

The participants were 823 college students (60.6% male) ranging from 16 to 21 years old, with a mean age of 18.55 years old and a standard deviation of 0.83. They were retained from a sample of 866 college students due to the fact that 43 participants did not successfully submit their data, as well as the fact that the submitted answers were invalid. In the Chinese educational system, the training length for undergraduate education is 4 to 5 years and 3 years for vocational education. The majority of participants (78.7%) were receiving vocational education. In terms of family situation, 69.7% of these students are not only children; 55.9% live in the countryside; and 74.1% have an annual household income between RMB 10,000 and 150,000.

Procedures

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hubei University of Medicine (NO: 2022-TH-068) and was conducted at a college in Wuhan, Central China. In December 2022, with the opportunity for an all-school faculty meeting, we provided intensive training for teachers involved in data collection during the final phase of the meeting. During the first 10 min of regular class, each participant was notified about the purpose of the study, and written informed consent was provided. Then, while using multimedia equipment to display the QR code of the online questionnaire on the screen, the teacher told the students to read the instructions of the questionnaire carefully and start answering. Students completed the questionnaire online by scanning the code on their own smartphones. They submitted their answers anonymously and received no compensation at the end of the study.

Measures

Demographic information

Gender, age, educational qualification, type of household residence, annual family income, and “only child or not” were among the demographic data sought.

International physical activity questionnaire-short form (IPAQ-SF)

PA was measured with the Chinese version of the IPAQ-SF (Macfarlane et al., 2007). The questionnaire was self-reported with reference to PA recollections of the past 7 days. The IPAQ-SF inquired about three specific types of activity that were performed in the four domains (i.e., leisure-time physical activity, domestic and gardening activities, work-related physical activity, and transport-related physical activity). Walking, moderate-intensity activity (MPA), and vigorous-intensity activity (VPA) were the specific types of activities evaluated. According to guidelines for data processing and analysis of the IPAQ, we used MET-minutes/week as a measure of the volume of activity. Total physical activity MET-minutes/week = sum of Walking + Moderate + Vigorous MET-minutes/week scores. The sitting item was excluded from the PA summary score since it represents a supplementary indicator variable of sedentary behavior. For more details on IPAQ scoring see the Supplemental Material. Furthermore, with reference to the three levels of physical activity proposed in the Supplemental Material, a combination of various types of physical activity of at least 600 MET minutes/week (category 2) for the medium level and at least 3000 MET minutes/week (category 3) for the high level. The PARS-3 actually catches more leisure-time physical activity, whereas the IPAQ captures a wider range.

Smartphone addiction scale-short version (SAS-SV)

PSU was measured with the 10-item SAS-SV (Kwon et al., 2013), whose content includes health and social disorders, withdrawal, and tolerance related to smartphone use. It is important to note that in the eighth item, “Twitter or Facebook” was replaced with the more conceptual “social networking platforms” because Twitter and Facebook were not the mainstream tools for Chinese smartphone users. Each item is presented on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from “1 = Strongly disagree” to “6 = Strongly agree.” The cut-off values of 31 (males) and 33 (females) were derived from ROC analyses. In our sample, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) results, after establishing residual correlations by modification indices, were as follows: CFI = 0.946, GFI = 0.931, RMSEA = 0.098, and SRMR = 0.057, indicating an acceptable model fit. The Cronbach alpha was 0.908.

Maslach burnout inventory-student survey (MBI-SS)

Burnout was measured with the 15-item MBI-SS (Schaufeli et al., 2002) in three dimensions: exhaustion (EX), cynicism (CY), and professional efficacy (PE). Its original version was the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (Schaufeli et al., 1996), for which we obtained a license to use from the publisher, Mind Garden. Hu & Schaufeli’s (2009) study showed that the scale was applicable to Chinese students. All items are scored on a 7-point frequency rating scale ranging from “0 = Never” to “6 = Always.” High scores on EX and CY and low scores in PE are indicative of burnout (i.e., all items of professional efficacy are reverse scored). The EX, CY, and rPE subscale scores had clinically verified cut-off values of 12.5, 7.5, and 10.5 for each, respectively (Wickramasinghe, Dissanayake & Abeywardena, 2018). After establishing residual correlations by modification indices, the results of the second-order validation factor analysis were as follows: CFI = 0.951, GFI = 0.911, RMSEA = 0.083, and SRMR = 0.052, indicating an acceptable model fit. The Cronbach alpha for the entire scale in our sample was 0.837.

Statistical approach

Means and standard deviations for continuous variables were calculated by SPSS 26.0, as were frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. First, independent sample t-tests and one-way ANOVA were used to explore whether the sample of various social characteristics differed in the scores reported on the PA, PSU, and burnout. Meanwhile, we supplemented the corresponding effect sizes. According to Ferguson (2009), the small, medium, and large effect sizes for Cohen’s d were 0.41, 1.15, and 2.70, respectively, while for η2, they were 0.04, 0.25, and 0.64. Subsequently, Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between the variables. Finally, using the PROCESS macro in Hayes (2013) SPSS 26.0, “Model 4” was selected to test whether PSU plays a mediating role in the relationship between PA and burnout when controlling for gender. As suggested by MacKinnon, Krull & Lockwood (2000) and Zhao, Lynch & Chen (2010), the test procedure for indirect effects was continued even if the total effect was not significant. The test level α was 0.05.

Results

Descriptive statistics

Scores were reported for the three main instruments IPAQ-SF, SAS-SV, and MBI-SS in Table 1. We found that 318 (38.6%) students reached the moderate level and 379 (46.1%) students reached the high level. A total of 241 (48.3%) male and 134 (41.4%) female students had problems with smartphone use, respectively. The reality was that there was exhaustion in 253 (30.7%) students, cynicism in 380 (46.2%) students, and a lack of professional efficacy in 633 (76.9%) students.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for all continuous and categorical variables.

Variables n (%) or M ± SD
Age 18.55 ± 0.83
Gender
Male 499 (60.6)
Female 324 (39.4)
Education level
Vocational education 648 (78.7)
Undergraduate education 175 (21.3)
Only child or not
Yes 249 (30.3)
No 574 (69.7)
Type of residence
Countryside 460 (55.9)
City or town 363 (44.1)
Annual family income
RMB 10,000 to 150,000 610 (74.1)
RMB 150,001 to 300,000 147 (17.9)
RMB 300,001 or more 66 (8.0)
IPAQ-SF
Vigorous MET-minutes/week 1,618.030 ± 2,302.092
Moderate MET-minutes/week 834.280 ± 1,097.699
Walking MET-minutes/week 1,389.500 ± 1,709.041
PA 3,841.810 ± 3,907.981
SAS-SV
PSU 30.170 ± 9.605
MBI-SS
EX 10.110 ± 5.742
CY 6.940 ± 4.773
PE 20.860 ± 6.957
rPE 15.140 ± 6.957

Notes:

Vigorous MET-minutes/week = 8.0 * vigorous-intensity activity minutes * vigorous-intensity days; Moderate MET-minutes/week = 4.0 * moderate-intensity activity minutes * moderate-intensity days; walking MET-minutes/week = 3.3 * walking minutes * walking days; PA (Total physical activity MET-minutes/week) = sum of walking + moderate + vigorous MET-minutes/week scores.

Independent samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA

Table 2 showed the results of the independent sample t-test, with male students scoring significantly higher on PA (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.436) and burnout (p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.175) than female students, so we subsequently brought gender into the regression analysis as a control variable. There were no significant differences in scores on PA, PSU, or burnout between students with various levels of education, types of residence, or “only child or not” (all p > 0.05, all Cohen’s d < 0.41). In addition, the results of the one-way ANOVA revealed no significant differences in PA (p > 0.05, η2 = 0.004), PSU (p > 0.05, η2 = 0.005), or burnout (p > 0.05, η2 = 0.004) scores between students from the three levels of annual household income.

Table 2. Differences in the mean of scores on PA, PSU and burnout for samples with various characteristics.

Categories PA t or F Cohen’s d
or η2
PSU t or F Cohen’s d
or η2
Burnout t or F Cohen’s d
or η2
Gender Male 4,480.450 ± 4,193.067 6.287*** 0.436 30.300 ± 9.757 0.473 0.034 33.060 ± 12.763 2.445* 0.175
Female 2,858.220 ± 3,187.204 29.970 ± 9.378 30.860 ± 12.386
Education level Vocational education 3,845.660 ± 3,932.313 0.054 0.005 30.170 ± 9.490 −0.004 0.000 32.320 ± 12.485 0.560 0.047
Undergraduate education 3,827.540 ± 3,827.593 30.170 ± 10.050 31.720 ± 13.289
Only child or not Yes 3,950.130 ± 4,034.654 0.524 0.039 30.390 ± 10.067 0.434 0.033 32.220 ± 13.188 0.038 0.003
No 3,794.810 ± 3,854.374 30.070 ± 9.405 32.180 ± 12.427
Type of residence Countryside 3,923.520 ± 4,031.380 0.675 0.048 29.840 ± 8.844 −1.087 −0.077 32.590 ± 12.186 1.004 0.070
City or town 3,738.260 ± 3,748.738 30.590 ± 10.489 31.700 ± 13.223
Annual family income RMB 10,000 to 150,000 3,708.990 ± 3,828.226 1.653 0.004 30.140 ± 9.297 1.946 0.005 32.360 ± 12.177 1.448 0.004
RMB 150,001 to 300,000 4,085.750 ± 3,614.016 31.120 ± 9.854 32.650 ± 13.263
RMB 300,001 or more 4,525.990 ± 5,070.924 28.320 ± 11.548 29.680 ± 15.280

Notes:

*

p < 0.05.

***

p < 0.001.

Burnout = EX + CY + rPE.

Correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, and tests for mediating effects

The results of the correlation analysis in Table 3 showed that PA was significantly negatively associated with PSU (r = −0.151, p < 0.001), PSU was significantly positively associated with burnout (r = 0.421, p < 0.001), while the negative association between PA and burnout was not statistically significant (r = −0.046, p > 0.05). Similarly, PA did not have statistically significant associations with EX and PE (all p > 0.05) on any of the three dimensions of burnout. PSU was positively associated with EX (r = 0.526, p < 0.001) and CY (r = 0.451, p < 0.001).

Table 3. Results of Pearson correlation analysis.

M SD PA PSU Burnout EX CY PE
PA 3,841.810 3,907.981 1
PSU 30.170 9.605 −0.151*** 1
Burnout 32.200 12.654 −0.046 0.421*** 1
EX 10.110 5.742 −0.061 0.526*** 0.770*** 1
CY 6.940 4.773 –0.079* 0.451*** 0.797*** 0.744*** 1
PE 20.860 6.957 −0.020 −0.023 −0.636*** −0.065 −0.151*** 1

Notes:

*

p < 0.05.

***

p < 0.001.

“Model 4” of the PROCESS macro in SPSS 26.0 was used to examine the relationships between the variables, with gender as the control variable, PA as the independent variable, PSU as the mediator, and burnout, EX, CY, and PE as the dependent variables, respectively. The results of multiple linear regression analysis in Fig. 1 found that PA had a significant predictive effect on PSU (β = −0.161, p < 0.001, 95% CI [−0.230 to −0.092]), but no statistically significant direct effects on burnout, EX, CY, or PE (all p > 0.05, 0 was contained within LLCI and ULCI). PSU had a significant predictive effect on burnout, EX, and CY with β of 0.420, 0.527, and 0.446, respectively, all with p-values less than 0.001.

Figure 1. Results of multiple linear regression analysis.

Figure 1

Notes: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Regression coefficients were standardized. The parameters of the control variable (i.e., gender) were not shown in the model. Level of confidence for all confidence intervals in output: 95%.

With respect to gender (male = 1, female = 0), we found that it did not significantly predict PSU (β = 0.101, p > 0.05, 95% CI [−0.041 to 0.242]). Gender significantly predicted burnout (β = 0.159, p < 0.05, 95% CI [0.030–0.289]) and CY (β = 0.168, p < 0.05, 95% CI [0.040–0.295]) in mediation models 1 and 3, and gender did not significantly predict EX (β = 0.075, p > 0.05, 95% CI [−0.047 to 0.197]) and PE (β = −0.112, p > 0.05, 95% CI [−0.255 to 0.031]) in mediation models 2 and 4.

Furthermore, the bootstrap estimates in Table 4 revealed that the indirect effects of PSU were statistically significant in mediation models 1, 2, and 3, and PA can negatively predict burnout, EX, and CY through PSU.

Table 4. Results of bootstrap estimation of indirect effects of PSU.

Effect SE LLCI ULCI
Mediation model 1: PA→PSU→Burnout −0.068 0.017 −0.103 −0.037
Mediation model 2: PA→PSU→EX −0.085 0.021 −0.129 −0.045
Mediation model 3: PA→PSU→CY −0.072 0.018 −0.108 −0.038
Mediation model 4: PA→PSU→PE 0.004 0.007 −0.010 0.020

Notes:

Level of confidence for all confidence intervals in output: 95%.

Number of bootstrap samples for percentile bootstrap confidence intervals: 5,000.

Discussion

This study investigated the association between PA, PSU, and burnout with a cross-sectional survey to examine the mediating role of PSU. The findings confirmed that PSU is not only an essential contributor to burnout, but also a mechanism that mediates the impacts of PA, which will help researchers understand how to apply PA to cope with burnout.

Physical activity and burnout

Self-reported data from Chinese college students illustrated that PA in the last 7 days was significantly uncorrelated with burnout, so Hypothesis 1 was not supported. That is, an enhanced level of PA does not directly lead to a reduction in burnout, and in order to prevent individual burnout, we cannot focus solely on how to achieve higher “activity levels.” Of course, this is not in conflict with the fact that lack of PA is a potential threat factor for burnout (Cheung & Li, 2019; Naczenski et al., 2017). Students may need to find a specific amount of activity that "feels good" rather than thinking “more is better” (Ladwig, Hartman & Ekkekakis, 2017). The reason for this is that vigorous physical activity relies on intentional behavior and requires hard work that also consumes cognitive resources, while high intensity can be perceived as aversive (Phillips & Mullan, 2022). Intensity above the ventilatory threshold decreases pleasure, produces a bad affective response (Ekkekakis, Hall & Petruzzello, 2008), and to some extent hinders students from self-regulation after burnout has occurred. Nevertheless, one study showed that physical activity negatively predicted academic burnout, with the high physical activity group having lower levels of academic burnout than the moderate and low physical activity groups (Chen et al., 2022). We believed that the difference in results might be due to the differing measurement instruments. The Learning Burnout Scale for College Students was similarly not identical to the sub-dimensions of the MBI-SS. Therefore, to ensure that the interventions are effective emphasize differences between specific physical activities and whether the intervention outcome is a change in the exogenous or endogenous component of burnout.

Problematic smartphone use and burnout

The results of the study showed that there was a significant positive correlation between PSU and burnout, which was consistent with Hypothesis 2. As previously stated, students with serious PSU tend to fall behind their peers in academic achievement (Hawi & Samaha, 2016), whether they use their smartphones excessively to socialize or for leisure (Ekkekakis, Hall & Petruzzello, 2008; Van Deursen et al., 2015). A decline in academic performance is a form of adversity for students, and the stress that comes with it means that making progress requires greater work engagement than before. Therefore, vigor, devotion, and the ability to derive new meaning and inspiration from work are essential to reducing burnout levels (Schaufeli et al., 2002). However, uncontrolled gaming, social media use, and short video binges have been associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Pluhar et al., 2019), which can be a distraction from academics (Feng et al., 2019). Students who are not interested in the course are more likely to be attracted to the content offered by smartphones, leading to a decreased enthusiasm and motivation for learning (Wang, Qiao & Wang, 2023). Overall, reasonable control of students smartphone usage in terms of duration and frequency should be positive in reducing school-related burnout.

Physical activity and problematic smartphone use

Our results demonstrated that there was a significant negative correlation between PA and PSU, and Hypothesis 3 was supported. A study by Grimaldi-Puyana et al. (2020) found that students with low levels of PA were three times more likely than others to increase their smartphone usage based on a subjective measuring instrument. Less PA was noted to be strongly associated with prolonged screen time and sedentary behavior, specifically talking through phone calls, texting, instant messaging, and video services (Leatherdale, 2010; Rasmussen et al., 2020). On the contrary, increased physical activity can be an effective intervention, and some randomized controlled trials have shown that exercise such as running, basketball, Baduanjin, and Qigong can reduce addiction levels in smartphone users, for instance in studies conducted by Xiao et al. (2021) and Lu et al. (2020). The primary benefit of exercise is that it allows individuals to detach themselves from the online environment and engage in dynamic activities in the real world, shifting the focus of their attention and facilitating face-to-face social interactions with others. Furthermore, exercise can enhance self-control as a way to reduce dependence on smartphones (Zhong, Wang & Zhang, 2021; Zeng et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022), while contributing to the treatment of a range of physical and psychological symptoms caused by excessive smartphone use. Unfortunately, the current literature gap revealed that we know little about the impact of PA on PSU in other domains, except for physical exercise in leisure time, which can be a good entry point for intervention. For example, changes in the form of transport-related physical activity may also largely reduce the use of smartphones, with a tendency to choose cycling and walking instead of taking the subway or private car when travelling to school.

Mediating role of problematic smartphone use

For the first time, we discovered that PSU entirely mediated the relationship between PA and burnout and that PSU also mediated the effects of PA on exhaustion and cynicism, with Hypothesis 4 partially supported. In real-world 24-h movement behavior, PA and PSU maintain moment-to-moment competition in time allocation, which does not include PA interventions based on smartphone-related technology support. If there is more time invested in PA, less time will be taken up by smartphones (Fan et al., 2021). With this, the negative consequences of excessive smartphone use are reduced, helping to further alleviate burnout syndrome.

In the physiological operating mechanism, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is important in interfering with control tasks in brain regions (Nigg, 2000) that are activated in stressful situations, but acute psychological stress can cause structural and functional changes in the DLPFC that affect cognitive inhibition in individuals. However, regular exercise can promote inhibitory control and counteract the harmful effects of stress on specific areas of the brain (Mücke et al., 2020). For students with excessive use of smartphones, acute aerobic exercise can also be effective in inducing changes in response inhibition and reducing PSU (Fan et al., 2021). We believe that this is the coping mechanism of PA for exhaustion through PSU, as stress is the main source of exhaustion.

Similarly, the results of the present study showed that cynicism is influenced by PSU and PA. For students, cynicism manifests itself specifically as a loss of interest and doubt towards their academic pursuits. As described by Yang & Tung (2007), using the entertainment features of smartphones produces a pleasant experience, which in turn can contribute to an increase in behavioral frequency and deprive students of the desire to engage in learning. We were inspired by several studies around institutional employees, where researchers found a positive association between employees’ participation in activity and job satisfaction (Hutchinson & Wilson, 2012; Van Berkel et al., 2013). It is appropriate to state that emotional and physical states, such as energy, inspiration, enthusiasm, dedication, struggle, and the desire to put effort, which can be regarded as reflecting the nature of sports, illustrate that students fully acclimate to these positive features.

Previous studies have shown that cardiovascular, resistance, and relaxation exercises can improve professional efficacy (Bretland & Thorsteinsson, 2015; Van Rhenen et al., 2005), but the findings of the present study contradict them, and PA did not significantly predict professional efficacy. The difference arises due to the highly purposeful nature of the complex, multistructured longitudinal intervention for company employees, where the effect of the intervention directly affects the magnitude of their productivity. However, students’ self-reported PA levels cover a wide range, with only a small proportion affecting on course-related efficacy. This may mean that the “spillover” phenomenon of self-efficacy generated by PA has boundaries. Our study found that PSU did not significantly predict professional efficacy, which is different from previous related studies.

According to Zhu et al. (2011) and Li, Gao & Xu (2020), PSU negatively predicted academic self-efficacy, and students who were addicted to smartphones were likely to be less academically competent. The explanation given was that uncontrolled smartphone use can lead to a tendency to procrastinate engaging in academic activities, which can ultimately affect learning-related confidence. However, our results contradict this, and PSU was only a important contributor to exhaustion and cynicism. As reported by Brubaker & Beverly (2020) there is no correlation between PSU and professional efficacy.

Gender difference

In addition, male students were found to score higher in PA and burnout compared to female students. Most studies have confirmed that males are more active than females (Pearson et al., 2009; Fan et al., 2019), and the gender differences are mainly related to the physical education activities offered in schools, with males preferring high-intensity forms of sports (Vašíčková et al., 2013). In fact, male students often show more lack of interest in learning and engage in negative behaviors such as skipping class, not listening to lectures, being late, leaving early, and not turning in assignments, while female students are the majority of the class with good grades and better overall performance. This is the reason why male students are more susceptible to burnout than female students, which is consistent with the latest survey results (Liu et al., 2023). However, previous studies have shown that the issue of gender differences in burnout is still highly variable (Herrmann, Koeppen & Kessels, 2019; Worly et al., 2019; Walburg, Mialhes & Moncla, 2016). Perhaps in the future, consistency tests for groups in cross-cultural contexts could be conducted to balance out some of the potential confounding factors.

The current study found that gender was a significant predictor of cynicism but not of exhaustion or professional efficacy. Previous studies showed that male students are more likely to exhibit cynicism and have lower professional efficacy scores, while female students report higher emotional exhaustion scores (Worly et al., 2019). A possible explanation for the consistency of male students’ cynicism across cultures is that they tend to be more prominent in the classroom for their lack of concentration and lack of seriousness about learning. In terms of emotional exhaustion, it is a long-standing stereotype in traditional Chinese culture that women should suppress their emotions (Hu & Schaufeli, 2009). Gender inequality does not appear to be supported by current findings in the school setting. Female students have lower self-efficacy than male students in the learning process and are more likely to be academically compliant (Xiao & Song, 2022). These conflicts remain to be verified by transferring to a larger heterogeneous sample.

Limitations and prospects

The fact that the assessments of PA, PSU, and burnout were based on self-report is a limitation of this study. Recall and social-desirability bias may impact the collection of relevant data. The cross-sectional design of the current study did not provide strong corroboration for inferences of causality, and there may be potential bidirectional effects between variables. In their investigation, Hao et al. (2022) noted that academic burnout leads to more process smartphone use and indirectly generates more PSU. Unver & Buke (2022) found that PSU negatively impacts PA levels and exacerbates musculoskeletal pain. Such results all indicate that future experimental studies with stronger evidence are needed to test the intrinsic relationships between variables.

Conclusions

In conclusion, by investigating the association between PA, PSU, and burnout, the current study supports the perspective that PA can indirectly predict burnout through PSU. This finding provides some valuable references for developing interventions to combat burnout syndrome. To decrease possible risks to college students’ health and daily routines, rationally promoting engagement with PA and cutting back on smartphone use are helpful strategies. There is no direct correlation between higher levels of PA and a lower incidence of burnout. This may imply that we should not only focus on how to achieve higher activity levels in mitigating burnout. Blindly pursuing interventions on how to enable higher levels of PA would defeat the original purpose. PA indirectly influences burnout through PSU, but does not fully apply to the three different dimensions of exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy. This is an interesting finding from the present study and has inspired more detailed insights. Only two targets of burnout (i.e., EX and CY) are impacted by the indirect effects of PA through PSU. From a practical standpoint, it may be difficult for interventions through PA and PSU to be efficacious if students report burnout scores that are only worse on the professional efficacy dimension.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. The criteria and methods used to score physical activity (PA).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16270/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Raw data to support the results of the data analysis, including all categorical and continuous variables for the 823 samples.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16270/supp-2

Acknowledgments

We sincerely appreciate that this team chose to persevere rather than give up in the most difficult time. Meanwhile, the manuscript could not have been completed without the help of Prof. Yanmin Tan.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Special Project for Science and Technology Achievement Transformation of Qinghai Province (2023-SF-116). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Lianghao Zhu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Junli Hou conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Bojun Zhou analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Xi Xiao analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Jingqiang Wang analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Wanping Jia conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hubei University of Medicine (NO: 2022-TH-068).

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in the Supplemental Files.

References

  • Adams et al. (2020).Adams AM, Wilson H, Money J, Palmer-Conn S, Fearn J. Student engagement with feedback and attainment: the role of academic self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2020;45(2):317–329. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1640184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ahola et al. (2012).Ahola K, Pulkki-Råback L, Kouvonen A, Rossi H, Aromaa A, Lönnqvist J. Burnout and behavior-related health risk factors: results from the population-based Finnish health 2000 study. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 2012;54(1):17–22. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31823ea9d9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Arefin et al. (2018).Arefin M, Islam M, Mustafi M, Afrin S, Islam N. Impact of smartphone addiction on academic performance of business students: a case study. Independent Journal of Management & Production. 2018;8(3):955–975. doi: 10.14807/ijmp.v8i3.629. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bai, Chen & Han (2020).Bai C, Chen X, Han K. Mobile phone addiction and school performance among Chinese adolescents from low-income families: a moderated mediation model. Children and Youth Services Review. 2020;118(6):105406. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bakker & Demerouti (2007).Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: state of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22(3):309–328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Barkley & Lepp (2016).Barkley JE, Lepp A. Mobile phone use among college students is a sedentary leisure behavior which may interfere with exercise. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;56(5):29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Barkley, Lepp & Salehi-Esfahani (2016).Barkley JE, Lepp A, Salehi-Esfahani S. College students’ mobile telephone use is positively associated with sedentary behavior. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2016;10(6):437–441. doi: 10.1177/1559827615594338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Baumeister et al. (1998).Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM. Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;74(5):1252–1265. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernaards et al. (2006).Bernaards CM, Jans MP, Van den Heuvel SG, Hendriksen IJ, Houtman IL, Bongers PM. Can strenuous leisure time physical activity prevent psychological complaints in a working population? Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2006;63(1):10–16. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.017541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bitran et al. (2019).Bitran M, Zúñiga D, Pedrals N, Echeverría G, Vergara C, Rigotti A, Puschel K. Burnout in students of health-care professions. Risk and protection factors. Revista Medica de Chile. 2019;147:510–517. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872019000400510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brand et al. (2019).Brand M, Wegmann E, Stark R, Müller A, Wölfling K, Robbins TW, Potenza MN. The interaction of person-affect-cognition-execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019;104(4):1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brand et al. (2016).Brand M, Young KS, Laier C, Wölfling K, Potenza MN. Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: an interaction of person-affect-cognition-execution (I-PACE) model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2016;71(2):252–266. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bretland & Thorsteinsson (2015).Bretland RJ, Thorsteinsson EB. Reducing workplace burnout: the relative benefits of cardiovascular and resistance exercise. PeerJ. 2015;3(1):e891. doi: 10.7717/peerj.891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brubaker & Beverly (2020).Brubaker JR, Beverly EA. Burnout, perceived stress, sleep quality, and smartphone use: a survey of osteopathic medical students. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2020;120(1):6–17. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bull et al. (2020).Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, Carty C, Chaput JP, Chastin S, Chou R, Dempsey PC, DiPietro L, Ekelund U, Firth J, Friedenreich CM, Garcia L, Gichu M, Jago R, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert E, Leitzmann M, Milton K, Ortega FB, Ranasinghe C, Stamatakis E, Tiedemann A, Troiano RP, Van Der Ploeg HP, Wari V, Willumsen JF. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020;54(24):1451–1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Busch & McCarthy (2021).Busch PA, McCarthy S. Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: a systematic literature review of an emerging research area. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021;114(1):106414. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2017).Chen B, Liu F, Ding S, Ying X, Wang L, Wen Y. Gender differences in factors associated with smartphone addiction: a cross-sectional study among medical college students. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1503-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2022).Chen K, Liu F, Mou L, Zhao P, Guo L. How physical exercise impacts academic burnout in college students: the mediating effects of self-efficacy and resilience. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:964169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cheung & Li (2019).Cheung P, Li C. Physical activity and mental toughness as antecedents of academic burnout among school students: a latent profile approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(11):2024. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • China Internet Network Information Center (2023).China Internet Network Information Center The 50th statistical report on China’s internet development. 2023. https://bit.ly/3UVIEF9. [28 July 2023]. https://bit.ly/3UVIEF9
  • Cho & Lee (2017).Cho KS, Lee JM. Influence of smartphone addiction proneness of young children on problematic behaviors and emotional intelligence: mediating self-assessment effects of parents using smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;66(1):303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooper et al. (2017).Cooper AN, Seibert GS, May RW, Fitzgerald MC, Fincham FD. School burnout and intimate partner violence: the role of self-control. Personality and Individual Differences. 2017;112(6):18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • De Vries et al. (2016).De Vries JD, Claessens BJ, Van Hooff ML, Geurts SA, Van den Bossche SN, Kompier MA. Disentangling longitudinal relations between physical activity, work-related fatigue, and task demands. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2016;89(1):89–101. doi: 10.1007/s00420-015-1054-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dreher, Dößereck & Lachtermann (2020).Dreher M, Dößereck N, Lachtermann E. Physical activity and its effects on burnout syndrome-a systematic review. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 2020;99(02):85–95. doi: 10.1055/a-1071-1905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ekkekakis, Hall & Petruzzello (2008).Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified: to crack the 40-year-old nut, replace the 40-year-old nutcracker! Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2008;35(2):136–149. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9025-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Elhai et al. (2021).Elhai JD, Rozgonjuk D, Alghraibeh AM, Yang H. Disrupted daily activities from interruptive smartphone notifications: relations with depression and anxiety severity and the mediating role of boredom proneness. Social Science Computer Review. 2021;39(1):20–37. doi: 10.1177/0894439319858008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Fan et al. (2021).Fan H, Qi S, Huang G, Xu Z. Effect of acute aerobic exercise on inhibitory control of college students with smartphone addiction. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021;2021:5530126. doi: 10.1155/2021/5530126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fan et al. (2019).Fan X, Zhu Z, Zhuang J, Liu Y, Tang Y, Chen P, Cao ZB. Gender and age differences in the association between living arrangement and physical activity levels among youth aged 9-19 years in Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional questionnaire study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1030. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7383-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Feng et al. (2019).Feng S, Wong YK, Wong LY, Hossain L. The internet and Facebook usage on academic distraction of college students. Computers & Education. 2019;134(4):41–49. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferguson (2009).Ferguson CJ. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2009;40(5):532–538. doi: 10.1037/a0015808. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Feuerhahn, Sonnentag & Woll (2014).Feuerhahn N, Sonnentag S, Woll A. Exercise after work, psychological mediators, and affect: a day-level study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2014;23(1):62–79. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.709965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gao et al. (2023).Gao X, Li C, Han B, Xu P, Qu C. The relationship between health belief and sleep quality of Chinese college students: the mediating role of physical activity and moderating effect of mobile phone addiction. Frontiers in Public Health. 2023;11:1108911. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1108911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grant, Lust & Chamberlain (2019).Grant JE, Lust K, Chamberlain SR. Problematic smartphone use associated with greater alcohol consumption, mental health issues, poorer academic performance, and impulsivity. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2019;8(2):335–342. doi: 10.1556/2006.8.2019.32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grimaldi-Puyana et al. (2020).Grimaldi-Puyana M, Fernández-Batanero JM, Fennell C, Sañudo B. Associations of objectively-assessed smartphone use with physical activity, sedentary behavior, mood, and sleep quality in young adults: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(10):3499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hagger et al. (2019).Hagger MS, Gucciardi DF, Turrell AS, Hamilton K. Self-control and health-related behaviour: the role of implicit self-control, trait self-control, and lay beliefs in self-control. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2019;24(4):764–786. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hao et al. (2021).Hao Z, Jin L, Huang J, Lyu R, Cui Q. Academic burnout and problematic smartphone use during the covid-19 pandemic: the effects of anxiety and resilience. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021;12:725740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.725740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hao et al. (2022).Hao Z, Jin L, Huang J, Wu H. Stress, academic burnout, smartphone use types and problematic smartphone use: the moderation effects of resilience. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2022;150:324–331. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hawi & Samaha (2016).Hawi NS, Samaha M. To excel or not to excel: strong evidence on the adverse effect of smartphone addiction on academic performance. Computers & Education. 2016;98(2):81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hayes (2013).Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • Head & Helton (2014).Head J, Helton WS. Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony. Acta Psychologica. 2014;153(3):87–94. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Helton & Russell (2011).Helton WS, Russell PN. Feature absence-presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention. Psychological Research Psychological Forschung. 2011;75(5):384–392. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0316-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Herrmann, Koeppen & Kessels (2019).Herrmann J, Koeppen K, Kessels U. Do girls take school too seriously? Investigating gender differences in school burnout from a self-worth perspective. Learning and Individual Differences. 2019;69(2):150–161. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.11.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Horwood & Anglim (2018).Horwood S, Anglim J. Personality and problematic smartphone use: a facet-level analysis using the five factor model and HEXACO frameworks. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018;85(1):349–359. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hu & Schaufeli (2009).Hu Q, Schaufeli WB. The factorial validity of the Maslach burnout inventory-student survey in China. Psychological Reports. 2009;105(2):394–408. doi: 10.2466/PR0.105.2.394-408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchinson & Wilson (2012).Hutchinson AD, Wilson C. Improving nutrition and physical activity in the workplace: a meta-analysis of intervention studies. Health Promotion International. 2012;27(2):238–249. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dar035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobs & Dodd (2003).Jacobs SR, Dodd D. Student burnout as a function of personality, social support, and workload. Journal of College Student Development. 2003;44(3):291–303. doi: 10.1353/csd.2003.0028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Jonsdottir et al. (2010).Jonsdottir IH, Rödjer L, Hadzibajramovic E, Börjesson M, Ahlborg G., Jr A prospective study of leisure-time physical activity and mental health in Swedish health care workers and social insurance officers. Preventive Medicine. 2010;51(5):373–377. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kara, Gürbüz & Öncü (2019).Kara FM, Gürbüz B, Öncü E. Work hard, play hard: leisure satisfaction and work engagement among Turkish women. Work. 2019;64(2):177–185. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim, Kim & Jee (2015).Kim SE, Kim JW, Jee YS. Relationship between smartphone addiction and physical activity in Chinese international students in Korea. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2015;4(3):200–205. doi: 10.1556/2006.4.2015.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim & Lee (2022).Kim J, Lee K. The association between physical activity and smartphone addiction in Korean adolescents: the 16th Korea youth risk behavior web-based survey, 2020. Healthcare. 2022;10(4):702. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Koutsimani, Montgomery & Georganta (2019).Koutsimani P, Montgomery A, Georganta K. The relationship between burnout, depression, and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:284. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kwon et al. (2013).Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(12):e83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ladwig, Hartman & Ekkekakis (2017).Ladwig MA, Hartman ME, Ekkekakis P. Affect-based exercise prescription: an idea whose time has come? ACSM’s Health & Fitness Journal. 2017;21(5):10–15. doi: 10.1249/FIT.0000000000000332. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Leatherdale (2010).Leatherdale ST. Factors associated with communication-based sedentary behaviors among youth: are talking on the phone, texting, and instant messaging new sedentary behaviors to be concerned about? Journal of Adolescent Health. 2010;47(3):315–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee et al. (2020).Lee KP, Yeung N, Wong C, Yip B, Luk LHF, Wong S. Prevalence of medical students’ burnout and its associated demographics and lifestyle factors in Hong Kong. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0235154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lepp, Barkley & Karpinski (2015).Lepp A, Barkley JE, Karpinski AC. The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of US college students. SAGE Open. 2015;5(1):2158244015573169. doi: 10.1177/2158244015573169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Lepp et al. (2013).Lepp A, Barkley JE, Sanders GJ, Rebold M, Gates P. The relationship between cell phone use, physical and sedentary activity, and cardiorespiratory fitness in a sample of US college students. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2013;10(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li, Gao & Xu (2020).Li L, Gao H, Xu Y. The mediating and buffering effect of academic self-efficacy on the relationship between smartphone addiction and academic procrastination. Computers & Education. 2020;159(3):104001. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Li et al. (2021).Li Y, Sun Q, Sun M, Sun P, Sun Q, Xia X. Physical exercise and psychological distress: the mediating roles of problematic mobile phone use and learning burnout among adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(17):9261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lindwall et al. (2014).Lindwall M, Gerber M, Jonsdottir IH, Börjesson M, Ahlborg G., Jr The relationships of change in physical activity with change in depression, anxiety, and burnout: a longitudinal study of Swedish healthcare workers. Health Psychology. 2014;33(11):1309–1318. doi: 10.1037/a0034402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu et al. (2023).Liu Z, Xie Y, Sun Z, Liu D, Yin H, Shi L. Factors associated with academic burnout and its prevalence among university students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education. 2023;23(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04316-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lu et al. (2020).Lu C, Zou L, Becker B, Griffiths MD, Yu Q, Chen ST, Demetrovics Z, Jiao C, Chi X, Chen A, Yeung A, Liu S, Zhang Y. Comparative effectiveness of mind-body exercise versus cognitive behavioral therapy for college students with problematic smartphone use: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion. 2020;22(4):271–282. doi: 10.32604/IJMHP.2020.014419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Macfarlane et al. (2007).Macfarlane DJ, Lee CC, Ho EY, Chan KL, Chan DT. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days) Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2007;10(1):45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2006.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • MacKinnon, Krull & Lockwood (2000).MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science. 2000;1(4):173–181. doi: 10.1023/A:1026595011371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Madigan & Curran (2021).Madigan DJ, Curran T. Does burnout affect academic achievement? A meta-analysis of over 100,000 students. Educational Psychology Review. 2021;33(2):387–405. doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09533-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mahapatra (2019).Mahapatra S. Smartphone addiction and associated consequences: role of loneliness and self-regulation. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2019;38(8):833–844. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1560499. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mansoubi et al. (2014).Mansoubi M, Pearson N, Biddle SJ, Clemes S. The relationship between sedentary behaviour and physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Preventive Medicine. 2014;69(2):28–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Maslach, Jackson & Leiter (1996).Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. MBI: maslach burnout inventory. Sunnyvale, CA: CPP, Incorporated; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • Meijman & Mulder (1998).Meijman T, Mulder G. Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology. Second Edition. Vol. 2. Hove, UK: Work psychology; 1998. Psychological aspects of workload; pp. 5–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Meng et al. (2023).Meng Y, Huang L, Zhang H, Song J, Yu X, Xu XX. Mobile phone addiction and relationship with negative emotion, learning burnout, physical activity, and family functionality among Chinese nursing undergraduates: a structural equation model. Acta Medica Mediterranea. 2023;39(2):325–334. doi: 10.19193/0393-6384_2023_2_48. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Mücke et al. (2020).Mücke M, Ludyga S, Colledge F, Pühse U, Gerber M. Association of exercise with inhibitory control and prefrontal brain activity under acute psychosocial stress. Brain Sciences. 2020;10(7):439. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10070439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naczenski et al. (2017).Naczenski LM, De Vries JD, Van Hooff ML, Kompier MA. Systematic review of the association between physical activity and burnout. Journal of Occupational Health. 2017;59(6):477–494. doi: 10.1539/joh.17-0050-RA. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nigg (2000).Nigg JT. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin. 2000;126(2):220–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pagnin et al. (2014).Pagnin D, De Queiroz V, Carvalho YTMS, Dutra ASS, Amaral MB, Queiroz TT. The relation between burnout and sleep disorders in medical students. Academic Psychiatry. 2014;38(12):438–444. doi: 10.1007/s40596-014-0093-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pearson et al. (2009).Pearson N, Atkin AJ, Biddle SJ, Gorely T, Edwardson C. Patterns of adolescent physical activity and dietary behaviours. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2009;6(1):45. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pereira et al. (2020).Pereira FS, Bevilacqua GG, Coimbra DR, Andrade A. Impact of problematic smartphone use on mental health of adolescent students: association with mood, symptoms of depression, and physical activity. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2020;23(9):619–626. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Peterka-Bonetta et al. (2019).Peterka-Bonetta J, Sindermann C, Sha P, Zhou M, Montag C. The relationship between Internet Use Disorder, depression and burnout among Chinese and German college students. Addictive Behaviors. 2019;89(1):188–199. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Phillips & Mullan (2022).Phillips LA, Mullan BA. Ramifications of behavioural complexity for habit conceptualisation, promotion, and measurement. Health Psychology Review. 2022;Rev(3):1–14. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2060849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pluhar et al. (2019).Pluhar E, Kavanaugh JR, Levinson JA, Rich M. Problematic interactive media use in teens: comorbidities, assessment, and treatment. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2019;12:447–455. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S208968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rasmussen et al. (2020).Rasmussen MGB, Pedersen J, Olesen LG, Brage S, Klakk H, Kristensen PL, Brønd JC, Grøntved A. Short-term efficacy of reducing screen media use on physical activity, sleep, and physiological stress in families with children aged 4-14: study protocol for the SCREENS randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–18. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8458-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ren et al. (2022).Ren Z, Tan J, Huang B, Cheng J, Huang Y, Xu P, Fang X, Li H, Zhang D, Gao Y. Association between 24-hour movement behaviors and smartphone addiction among adolescents in Foshan City, southern China: compositional data analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(16):9942. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rook & Zijlstra (2006).Rook JW, Zijlstra FR. The contribution of various types of activities to recovery. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2006;15(2):218–240. doi: 10.1080/13594320500513962. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenberg et al. (2010).Rosenberg DE, Norman GJ, Wagner N, Patrick K, Calfas KJ, Sallis JF. Reliability and validity of the sedentary behavior questionnaire (SBQ) for adults. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2010;7(6):697–705. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.6.697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz-Palmero et al. (2019).Ruiz-Palmero J, Sánchez-Rivas E, Gómez-García M, Sánchez Vega E. Future teachers’ smartphone uses and dependence. Education Sciences. 2019;9(3):194. doi: 10.3390/educsci9030194. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Salvucci & Taatgen (2008).Salvucci DD, Taatgen NA. Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review. 2008;115(1):101–130. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Samaha & Hawi (2016).Samaha M, Hawi NS. Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;57(1):321–325. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Schaufeli & Bakker (2004).Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2004;25:293–315. doi: 10.1002/job.248. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Schaufeli et al. (1996).Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C, Jackson SE. Maslach burnout inventory-general survey. In: Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP, editors. The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Test manual. Third Edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • Schaufeli et al. (2002).Schaufeli WB, Martinez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB. Burnout and engagement in university students: a cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2002;33(5):464–481. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033005003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi et al. (2021).Shi M, Zhai X, Li S, Shi Y, Fan X. The relationship between physical activity, mobile phone addiction, and irrational procrastination in Chinese college students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(10):5325. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Song et al. (2004).Song I, Larose R, Eastin MS, Lin CA. Internet gratifications and Internet addiction: on the uses and abuses of new media. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2004;7(4):384–394. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sonnentag (2012).Sonnentag S. Psychological detachment from work during leisure time: the benefits of mentally disengaging from work. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2012;21(2):114–118. doi: 10.1177/0963721411434979. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ströhle (2009).Ströhle A. Physical activity, exercise, depression and anxiety disorders. Journal of Neural Transmission. 2009;116(6):777–784. doi: 10.1007/s00702-008-0092-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Troll, Friese & Loschelder (2021).Troll ES, Friese M, Loschelder DD. How students’ self-control and smartphone-use explain their academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021;117(1):106624. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Unver & Buke (2022).Unver F, Buke M. The effect of problematic smartphone use on physical activity level and musculoskeletal pain. Physikalische Medizin, Rehabilitationsmedizin, Kurortmedizin. 2022;33(2):87–92. doi: 10.1055/a-1936-3691. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Berkel et al. (2013).Van Berkel J, Proper KI, Van Dam A, Boot CR, Bongers PM, Van der Beek AJ. An exploratory study of associations of physical activity with mental health and work engagement. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Deursen et al. (2015).Van Deursen AJ, Bolle CL, Hegner SM, Kommers PA. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: the role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;45(2):411–420. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Rhenen et al. (2005).Van Rhenen W, Blonk RW, Van der Klink JJ, Van Dijk FJ, Schaufeli WB. The effect of a cognitive and a physical stress-reducing programme on psychological complaints. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. 2005;78(2):139–148. doi: 10.1007/s00420-004-0566-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vašíčková et al. (2013).Vašíčková J, Groffik D, Frömel K, Chmelík F, Wasowicz W. Determining gender differences in adolescent physical activity levels using IPAQ long form and pedometers. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine. 2013;20(2):749–755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Walburg, Mialhes & Moncla (2016).Walburg V, Mialhes A, Moncla D. Does school-related burnout influence problematic Facebook use? Children and Youth Services Review. 2016;61:327–331. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.01.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang, Qiao & Wang (2023).Wang X, Qiao Y, Wang S. Parental phubbing, problematic smartphone use, and adolescents’ learning burnout: a cross-lagged panel analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2023;320(5):442–449. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2015).Wang JL, Wang HZ, Gaskin J, Wang LH. The role of stress and motivation in problematic smartphone use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;53(4):181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Wickramasinghe, Dissanayake & Abeywardena (2018).Wickramasinghe ND, Dissanayake DS, Abeywardena GS. Clinical validity and diagnostic accuracy of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey in Sri Lanka. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1048-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wielenga-Meijer et al. (2010).Wielenga-Meijer EG, Taris TW, Kompier MA, Wigboldus DH. From task characteristics to learning: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2010;51(5):363–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams, Dziurawiec & Heritage (2018).Williams CJ, Dziurawiec S, Heritage B. More pain than gain: effort-reward imbalance, burnout, and withdrawal intentions within a university student population. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2018;110(3):378–394. doi: 10.1037/edu0000212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Worly et al. (2019).Worly B, Verbeck N, Walker C, Clinchot DM. Burnout, perceived stress, and empathic concern: differences in female and male Millennial medical students. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2019;24(4):429–438. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2018.1529329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu et al. (2021).Wu C, Zhang Y, Huang S, Yuan Q. Does enterprise social media usage make the employee more productive? A meta-analysis. Telematics and Informatics. 2021;60(2):101578. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2021.101578. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xiang et al. (2020).Xiang MQ, Lin L, Wang ZR, Li J, Xu Z, Hu M. Sedentary behavior and problematic smartphone use in Chinese adolescents: the moderating role of self-control. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020;10:3032. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xiao et al. (2021).Xiao T, Jiao C, Yao J, Yang L, Zhang Y, Liu S, Grabovac I, Yu Q, Kong Z, Yu JJ, Zhang J. Effects of basketball and Baduanjin exercise interventions on problematic smartphone use and mental health among college students: a randomized controlled trial. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021;2021:8880716. doi: 10.1155/2021/8880716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xiao & Song (2022).Xiao B, Song G. Association between self-efficacy and learning conformity among Chinese University students: differences by gender. Sustainability. 2022;14(14):8725. doi: 10.3390/su14148725. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Xiao et al. (2022).Xiao W, Wu J, Yip J, Shi Q, Peng L, Lei QE, Ren Z. The relationship between physical activity and mobile phone addiction among adolescents and young adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 2022;8(12):e41606. doi: 10.2196/41606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xie et al. (2019).Xie H, Tao S, Zhang Y, Tao F, Wu X. Impact of problematic mobile phone use and insufficient physical activity on depression symptoms: a college-based follow-up study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1640. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7873-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xie et al. (2020).Xie Y, Zhu M, Wu X, Tao S, Yang Y, Li T, Zou L, Xu H, Tao F. Interaction between physical activity and problematic mobile phone use on suicidality in Chinese college students. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02920-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang et al. (2021).Yang G, Li Y, Liu S, Liu C, Jia C, Wang S. Physical activity influences the mobile phone addiction among Chinese undergraduates: the moderating effect of exercise type. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2021;10(3):799–810. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang & Tung (2007).Yang SC, Tung CJ. Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. Computers in Human Behavior. 2007;23(1):79–96. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ye, Huang & Liu (2021).Ye Y, Huang X, Liu Y. Social support and academic burnout among university students: a moderated mediation model. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2021;14:335–344. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S300797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zeng et al. (2022).Zeng M, Chen S, Zhou X, Zhang J, Chen X, Sun J. The relationship between physical exercise and mobile phone addiction among Chinese college students: testing mediation and moderation effects. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:1000109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2021a).Zhang CH, Li G, Fan ZY, Tang XJ, Zhang F. Mobile phone addiction mediates the relationship between alexithymia and learning burnout in Chinese medical students: a structural equation model analysis. Psychology Research and Behavior Management. 2021a;14:455–465. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S304635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2021b).Zhang C, Li G, Fan Z, Tang X, Zhang F. Psychological capital mediates the relationship between problematic smartphone use and learning burnout in Chinese medical undergraduates and postgraduates: a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021b;12:600352. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.600352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang et al. (2022).Zhang D, Su T, Lyu B, Yang Y, Zhuo X. The effects of adolescent physical activity participation on cell phone dependence: the mediating role of self-control. Work. 2022;72(4):1289–1298. doi: 10.3233/WOR-210702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao, Lynch & Chen (2010).Zhao X, Lynch JG, Jr, Chen Q. Reconsidering baron and kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research. 2010;37(2):197–206. doi: 10.1086/651257. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhong, Wang & Zhang (2021).Zhong W, Wang Y, Zhang G. The impact of physical activity on college students’ mobile phone dependence: the mediating role of self-control. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2021;19(6):2144–2159. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00308-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu et al. (2011).Zhu YQ, Chen LY, Chen HG, Chern CC. How does Internet information seeking help academic performance?–The moderating and mediating roles of academic self-efficacy. Computers & Education. 2011;57(4):2476–2484. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Zou et al. (2016).Zou Z, Liu Y, Xie J, Huang X. Aerobic exercise as a potential way to improve self-control after ego-depletion in healthy female college students. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7:501. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. The criteria and methods used to score physical activity (PA).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16270/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Raw data to support the results of the data analysis, including all categorical and continuous variables for the 823 samples.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16270/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in the Supplemental Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES