Error in Figure/Table
In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. The Value: meaning at Locus 2 (i.e., second column from left, third row below header) was erroneously listed as “r: wild-type”. Instead, it should have been listed as “p: wild-type“. The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.
Table 1.
Description of the possible alphabetical values and their meaning for each position in the 7-digit alphabetical code representing possible genotypes in the agent-based model.
Locus | Value: meaning | Value: meaning | Value: meaning | |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | b: wild-type | B: engineered promoter mutant | c: natural resistant SNP | |
1 | d: wild-type | D: PTA targeting locus 0 | ||
2 | p: wild-type | P: engineered promoter mutant | r: natural resistant SNP | |
3 | t: wild – type | T: PTA targeting locus 2 | ||
4 | 1: wild-type | L: female lethal linked to locus 1 | ||
5 | W: wild-type | F: female lethal linked to locus 3 | ||
6 | X: recessive female phenotype | Y: dominant male phenotype |
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.