Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2024 May 9;74(5):006379. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006379

Turicibacter faecis sp. nov., isolated from faeces of heart failure mouse model

Yuko Imamura 1,*, Daisuke Motooka 1,2,3,4, Yuri Nakajima 5, Shin Ito 5,6, Masafumi Kitakaze 7,8, Tetsuya Iida 1,3, Shota Nakamura 1,2,4
PMCID: PMC11165905  PMID: 38722758

Abstract

Strain TC023T, a Gram-positive, long, rod-shaped, spore-forming anaerobe, was isolated from the faeces of a heart failure mouse model. The strain formed greyish-white coloured colonies with a convex elevation on brain–heart infusion medium supplemented with 0.1 % sodium taurocholate, incubated at 37 °C for 2 days. Taxonomic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence showed that TC023T belonged to the genus Turicibacter, and was closely related to Turicibacter bilis MMM721T (97.6 %) and Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T (97.4 %). The whole genome of the strain has a G+C content of 37.3 mol%. The average nucleotide identity and genome-to-genome distance between TC023T and Turicibacter bilis MMM721T were 77.6 % and 24.3 %, respectively, and those with Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T were 75.4 % and 24.3 %, respectively. These genotypic, phenotypic, and biochemical analyses indicated that the isolate represents a novel species in the genus Turicibacter, and the name Turicibacter faecis sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is TC023T (RIMD 2002001T=TSD 372T).

Keywords: gut microbiota, new novel, Turicibacter

Introduction

The human gut microbiome plays an important role in cardiovascular health and disease [1,2]. The human intestine comprises 100–1000 bacterial species; however, many have not yet been isolated because they are unculturable [3,4]. Therefore, bacteria associated with cardiovascular diseases remain unclear. We previously compared the faecal microbiome between control mice and heart failure mice model developed using transverse aortic constriction (TAC) surgery [5]. Results of 16S rRNA metagenome sequencing showed that the genus Turicibacter was significantly increased in the faeces of TAC-treated mice compared to that in control mice. To isolate Turicibacter species, we screened for spore-forming bacteria from faecal samples of heart failure mice model [6,7], and subsequently isolated strain TC023T. Although the reference strain Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T is a non-spore-forming bacterium [8], Turicibacter bilis and some Turicibacter species are spore formers [6,9]. Recently, Turicibacter bilis MMM721T, Turicibacter sp. TA25 and 1E2 strains have been characterized as modulators of bile acids and host lipids [10,11]. In this study, we describe the phenotypic characteristics and phylogeny of the novel bacterial strain TC023T belonging to the genus Turicibacter, and the name Turicibacter faecis sp. nov. is proposed.

Isolation and culture conditions

TC023T was isolated from faeces of TAC-treated mice. Briefly, a part of the stool samples stored at −80 °C was diluted in PBS, homogenized, and then incubated in freshly prepared 70 % ethanol (1 : 1 ratio) at 25 °C for 4 h under aerobic conditions [6,7]. Subsequently, the sample was washed with PBS, diluted, and spread anaerobically on brain–heart infusion (BHI) medium supplemented with 0.1 % sodium taurocholate to stimulate spore germination [6]. After incubation at 37 °C for 2 days, single colonies were picked and maintained in chocolate–blood agar media (BD).

16s rRNA gene phylogeny

Genomic DNA was extracted from TC023T cells using a DNeasy PowerSoil kit (Qiagen). The bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the universal primers 27Fmod (5′-AGRGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′). PCR products were sequenced using a BigDye Terminator kit and an ABI PRISM 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies) [12]. Results from a blast search revealed that TC023T belongs to the genus Turicibacter.

The 16S rRNA gene sequence of TC023T was then compared with that of representative type strains belonging to the families Erysipelotrichaceae and Bacillaceae. Relative phylogenetic neighbours were identified using the EzTaxon database (www.ezbiocloud.net) [13]. A phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using the neighbour-joining (Fig. 1) [14], maximum-likelihood (Fig. S1, available in the online version of this article) [15], and maximum-parsimony (Fig. S2)[16] methods in mega-11 [17]. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura two-parameter method [18], and the stability of clustering was determined using a bootstrap test with 1000 replicates [19]. A total of 1300 positions were included in the final dataset. The neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree showed that TC023T clustered with T. sanguinis MOL361T (DSM 14220T, AF349724.1). These data indicate that TC023T belongs to the genus Turicibacter. For this comparative study, T. sanguinis MOL361T and T. bilis MMM721T were selected as the reference type strains. T. sanguinis MOL361T was purchased from DSMZ (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen).

Fig. 1. Neighbour-joining tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences of TC023T and representative type strains belonging to the family Erysipelotrichaceae and Bacillaceae. The numbers (values>50 %) show the percentages of bootstrap derived from 1000 replications. Bar, 0.02 nt substitutions per position.

Fig. 1.

Genome features

The whole genome sequence of TC023T was sequenced. Briefly, a genomic library was prepared using a Nextera DNA Flex Library Prep Kit (Illumina) and sequenced with 250 bp pair-end reads using the HiSeq2500 system (Illumina) [12]. Furthermore, a genomic library for Nanopore sequencing was prepared using a Ligation Sequencing Kit (ONT) and then sequenced using the MinION device, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Draft genome sequences were assembled using the Assembly Method Flye version 2.7. The whole genome of TC023T was 2 431 147 bp long, with G+C content of 37.3 mol%. The assembled genome was annotated with the DDBJ Fast Annotation and Submission Tool version 1.2.6 [20]. As the results, the genome of TC023T contained 2399 coding sequences (CDS) including 51 rRNA and 161 tRNA. Three gene families, vanY, vanW, and vanT, were predicted to be involved in resistance to glycopeptide antibiotics using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (https://card.mcmaster.ca/analyze/rgi). The functional annotations of the genome of strain TC023T were assigned to a COG category using eggNOG-mapper version 2.1.12 (http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de/) [21] and kegg Orthology Search, KofamKOALA (www.genome.jp/tools/kofamkoala/) [22].

As shown in Fig. 2, 1684 CDS of strain TC023T allocated to a COG category were concerned with classes such as replication, recombination and repair (L; 12.6 %), translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (J; 9.20 %), and transcription (K; 7.84 %). Furthermore, 1166 CDS of strain TC023T assigned with kegg Orthologs by KofamKOALA were involved in pathways such as carbohydrate metabolism (118 CDS), translation (77 CDS), replication and repair (66 CDS), nucleotide metabolism (59 CDS), membrane transport (55 CDS), amino acid metabolism (53 CDS), and energy metabolism (52 CDS), as shown in Fig. S3. Interestingly, the genome of TC023T contained a putative cbh gene encoding the choloylglycine hydrolase (EC:3.5.1.24), similar to T. sanguinis MOL361T. The presence of the cbh gene indicates that strain TC023T also metabolizes bile acids.

Fig. 2. COG functional classification of the genome of TC023T.

Fig. 2.

Genome phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the automated multi-locus species tree (autoMLST) online server (https://automlst.ziemertlab.com/) [23]. The phylogenetic tree based on 64 core genes was reconstructed using maximum-likelihood methods. As shown in Fig. 3, TC023T was located in a different cluster from the species belonging to the genus Turicibacter.

Fig. 3. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on genome sequences of TC023T and strains belonging to the genus Turicibacter. Phylogeny is based on 64 concatenated gene sequences assembled using the autoMLST pipeline. Alteracholeplasma palmae J233T (GCA_000968055.1) was used as the outgroup. The numbers (values >70 %) show the percentages of bootstrap derived from 1000 replications with iq-tree ultrafast boostrap analysis.

Fig. 3.

To assess their identities, the whole genome sequence of TC023T was compared with that of six other strains: T. sanguinis MOL361T (CP053187.1: 2 999 687 bp, with 34.4 mol% G+C content), T. bilis MMM721T (CP071249.1: 2 786 784 bp, with 34.6 mol% G+C content), T. bilis PIG517 (CP071251.1: 2 663 111 bp, with 34.6 mol% G+C content), T. bilis ISU324 (CP071250.1: 2 751 004 bp, with 34.5 mol% G+C content), Turicibacter sp. H121 (CP013476.1: 2 622 031 bp, 34.8 mol% G+C content), and Turicibacter sp. TJ11 (CP069349.1: 2 651 593 bp, with 34.0 mol% G+C content) [24,25]. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) values were analysed using the JSpeciesWS Online Service (http://jspecies.ribohost.com/jspeciesws/) [26], orthologous ANI (OrthoANI) values were calculated using the EzBioCloud web service (www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani) [27], and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) with in silico methods was estimated using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator 2.1 web service (http://ggdc.dsmz.de/me.php) [28]. As shown in Table 1, the ANIb and ANIm values of TC023T with reference to the other Turicibacter strains were 74.6–77.1 % and 85.6–86.2 %, respectively. Moreover, the orthoANI and dDDH values were 75.4–77.8 % and 24.3–25.0 %, respectively. These data confirm that strain TC023T represents a novel species in the genus Turicibacter.

Table 1. Genome-based comparison between TC023T and its closely related strains from the genus Turicibacter.

Strain 1, Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T (CP053187.1); 2, Turicibacter bilis MMM721T (CP071249.1); 3, Turicibacter bilis PIG517 (CP071251.1); 4, Turicibacter bilis ISU324 (CP071250.1); 5, Turicibacter sp. H121 (CP013476.1); 6, Turicibacter sp. TJ11(CP069349.1).

Characteristic 1 2 3 4 5 6
ANIb (%) 74.6 76.8 77 76.9 77.1 76.4
ANIm (%) 85.6 85.7 85.7 85.9 85.7 86.2
Tetra 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.95
OrthoANI (%) 75.4 77.6 77.4 77.6 77.8 77.0
G+C content difference (mol%) 2.85 2.63 2.63 2.71 2.39 2.96
dDDH (%) 24.3 [22.0–26.8] 24.3 [22.0–26.8] 24.0 [21.7–26.5] 24.4 [22.1–26.9] 24.4 [22.1–26.8] 25.0 [22.7–27.5]

Morphology, physiology and chemotaxonomy

TC023T cell morphology was observed under light and transmission electron microscopes (Fig. S4). Cells were propagated on chocolate–blood agar medium at 37 °C for 24 h. Gram staining was performed using a it (Muto Pure Chemicals Co.). Bacterial growth at different temperatures (25, 28, 32, 37, 42, or 45 °C) was examined using chocolate–blood agar medium for 7 days. The effect of pH was determined on BHI agar plates using the pH range 6.0–9.0 with 0.5 pH unit intervals (adjusted with 1 M HCl or NaOH). Growth on different media (BHI, BHI with 0.1 % sodium taurocholate, chocolate blood, sheep blood, MacConkey, or Reasoner's 2A) was also monitored for 7 days at 37 °C.

Oxidase activity was evaluated using a cytochrome oxidase test strip (Nissui), and catalase activity was assessed by observing bubble production after dropping a 3 % hydrogen peroxide solution. Both oxidase activity and catalase activity of strain TC023T were negative, similar to T. sanguinis DSM 14220T and T. bilis MMM721T. Other physiological properties and enzyme activities were explored using the API ZYM, API 50CH, API 20A, and API rapid ID 32A systems, following the manufacturer’s instructions (bioMérieux). The results showed that TC023T harboured α-glucosidase and α-galactosidase, and fermented aesculin, maltose, and 5-ketogluconate, similar to T. sanguinis DSM 14220T (Tables 2 and S1). In contrast, TC023T showed physiological characteristics different from thosr T. bilis MMM721T.

Table 2. Biochemical characteristics of TC023T and its closely related type strains.

Strain 1, TC023T; 2, Turicibacter sanguinis DSM 14220T; 3, Turicibacter bilis MMM721T. +, Positive; –, negative; ±, variable reaction. The characteristics of T. bilis MMM721T were obtained from a study by Maki et al. [9].

Characteristic 1 2 3
Isolation source Mice faeces Human blood Chicken eggshell
Morphology Bacilli chains Bacilli chains Bacilli chains, coccoid cluster
Spore forming + +
Optimum growth temperature (°C) 37 37 42
Optimum growth pH 7.5 7.5 7.5
Motility
Catalase activity
Enzyme activities:
α-Glucosidase + +
α-Galactosidase + +
Arginine arylamidase +
Glycine arylamidase +
Serine arylamidase +
Carbon utilization:
Gelatin + +
Aesculin + ± ±
Maltose + +
5-Keto-gluconate + ±
Genome length (Kb) 2431 2999 2717
DNA G+C content (mol%) 37.3 34.4 34.4

Fatty acids were prepared and analysed by Techno Suruga Laboratory Co., Ltd. (Shizuoka, Japan) using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System with the moore6 database (version 6.0, midi), as previously described [29]. The major fatty acids (>10 %) in strain TC023T were C16 : 0 and C18 : 0, and the minor fatty acids were C14 : 0, C17 : 0, and C18 : 1 ω9c, similar to T. sanguinis DSM 14220T and T. bilis MMM721T (Table 3). Summed feature 10 (C18 : 1 ω7c and/or unknown 17.834) was the major fatty acid in strain TC023T and T. sanguinis DSM 14220T, but not in T. bilis MMM721T.

Table 3. Cellular fatty acid composition of TC023T and its closely related type strains.

Strain 1, TC023T, 2, Turicibacter sanguinis DSM 14220T, 3, Turicibacter bilis MMM721T. Fatty acids (>1 %) are shown, and total fatty acid content >10 % is highlighted with bold text. The bar indicates not detected. The component values for T. bilis MMM721T were obtained from Maki et al. [9].

Fatty acids (%) 1 2 3
C14 : 0 2.94 1.70 2.84
C16 : 1 ω7c 3.35 0.85 1.41
C16 : 0 48.1 39.6 54.1
C17 : 0 1.66 5.45 1.80
C18:1 ω9c 6.22 2.80 5.78
C18:1 ω5c 1.12 0.97 1.00
C18 : 0 10.6 14.7 11.8
Summed feature:
C18:1 ω7c and/or unknown 17.834 19.1 27.6

Description of Turicibacter faecis sp. nov.

Turicibacter faecis (fae’cis. L. gen. n. faecis, of faeces, the isolated source of the strain).

Cells are Gram-positive, catalase-negative, oxidase-negative, anaerobic, spore-forming, non-motile, and irregularly rod-shaped (0.5–1.5×0.7–5.0 µm). Colonies on chocolate–blood agar media appear greyish-white with convex elevations. The type strain grows at 32–42 °C (optimal at 37 °C) and pH 6.5–8.0 (optimal at pH 7.5). Cells grow well on BHI medium with 0.1 % sodium taurocholate, chocolate, and sheep blood agar media, but not in BHI, MacConkey, or Reasoner's 2A media. C16 : 0, C18 : 0, and summed feature 10 (C18 : 1 ω7c) are the major fatty acids. In the API ZYM assays, the strain is positive for esterase (C4), acid phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI phosphohydrolase, α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, alkaline phosphatase, esterase lipase (C8), and β-glucosidase; and negative for lipase (C14), leucine arylamidase, valine arylamidase, cystine arylamidase, trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, β-glucuronidase, α-glucosidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase, and α-fucosidase. Further, it is positive for α-galactosidase, β-galactosidase, α-glucosidase, glutamic acid decarboxylase, alkaline phosphatase, and pyroglutamic acid allyl amidase in the API rapid 32A strips, but is negative for β-glucuronidase. Glucose, lactose, sucrose, maltose, and raffinose are acidified, whereas d-mannitol, d-xylose, l-arabinose, glycerol, d-mannose, melezitose, d-sorbitol, l-rhamnose, and trehalose are not acidified in the API20A tests. The type strain is also positive for aesculin hydrolysis, but negative for gelatin hydrolysis, arginine hydrolysis, nitrate reduction, indole production, and urea activity. In the API 50CH tests, cells assimilate only d-ribose, aesculin ferric citrate, d-tagatose, and 5-ketogluconate.

The type strain, TC023T (=RIMD 2002001T=TSD 372T), was isolated from a faecal sample of heart failure model mice. The genome has a G+C content of 37.3 mol%. The 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequence of TC023T are deposited with GenBank accession numbers LC719463 and AP028127, respectively.

supplementary material

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
ijsem-74-06379-s001.pdf (628.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006379

Abbreviations

ANI

average nucleotide identity

BHI

brain–heart infusion

CDS

coding sequences

dDDH

digital DNA–DNA hybridization

DMA

dimethyl acetals

TAC

transverse aortic constriction

Footnotes

Funding: This work was supported by grants from JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 23KJ1536, 18K08431, and JST Grant Number JPMJPF2115.

Ethical statement: All animal experiments were performed according to the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular CenterCenter.

Author contributions: Y.I. and D.M. was involved in data collection and analysis. D.M., T.I. and S.N. provided funding and supervised the projects. Y.N., S.I. and M.K. contributed to collect the fecalfaecal sample.

Accession No: The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ for the complete genome and 16S rRNA sequences of strain TC023T are AP028127 and LC719463. The BioProject accession number is PRJDB13917.

Contributor Information

Yuko Imamura, Email: ydoiguchi@gen-info.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Daisuke Motooka, Email: daisukem@gen-info.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Yuri Nakajima, Email: bq55yuri@gmail.com.

Shin Ito, Email: itoshin@ncvc.go.jp.

Masafumi Kitakaze, Email: kitakaze@zf6.so-net.ne.jp.

Tetsuya Iida, Email: iida@biken.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Shota Nakamura, Email: nshota@gen-info.osaka-u.ac.jp.

References

  • 1.Witkowski M, Weeks TL, Hazen SL. Gut microbiota and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2020;127:553–570. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.316242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jie Z, Xia H, Zhong S-L, Feng Q, Li S, et al. The gut microbiome in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat Commun. 2017;8:845. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00900-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59–65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weinstock GM. Genomic approaches to studying the human microbiota. Nature. 2012;489:250–256. doi: 10.1038/nature11553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liao Y, Ishikura F, Beppu S, Asakura M, Takashima S, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of LV hypertrophy and function in aortic-banded mice: necropsy validation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;282:H1703–H1708. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00238.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Browne HP, Forster SC, Anonye BO, Kumar N, Neville BA, et al. Culturing of “unculturable” human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature. 2016;533:543–546. doi: 10.1038/nature17645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Avershina E, Larsen MG, Aspholm M, Lindback T, Storrø O, et al. Culture dependent and independent analyses suggest a low level of sharing of endospore-forming species between mothers and their children. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1832. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58858-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bosshard PP, Zbinden R, Altwegg M. Turicibacter sanguinis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel anaerobic, Gram-positive bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1263–1266. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-4-1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maki JJ, Looft T. Turicibacter bilis sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from the chicken eggshell and swine ileum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72:005153. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maki JJ, Lippolis JD, Looft T. Proteomic response of Turicibacter bilis MMM721 to chicken bile and its bile acids. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15:236. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06127-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lynch JB, Gonzalez EL, Choy K, Faull KF, Jewell T, et al. Gut microbiota Turicibacter strains differentially modify bile acids and host lipids. Nat Commun. 2023;14:3669. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39403-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Matsumoto Y, Kinjo T, Motooka D, Nabeya D, Jung N, et al. Comprehensive subspecies identification of 175 Nontuberculous mycobacteria species based on 7547 genomic profiles. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:1043–1053. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1637702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y, et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17:368–376. doi: 10.1007/BF01734359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kolaczkowski B, Thornton JW. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature. 2004;431:980–984. doi: 10.1038/nature02917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:1037–1039. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cantalapiedra CP, Hernández-Plaza A, Letunic I, Bork P, Huerta-Cepas J. eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:5825–5829. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:2251–2252. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Alanjary M, Steinke K, Ziemert N. AutoMLST: an automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W276–W282. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Maki JJ, Nielsen DW, Looft T. Complete genome sequence and annotation for Turicibacter sanguinis MOL361T (DSM 14220) Microbiol Resour Announc. 2020;9:e00475-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00475-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Auchtung TA, Holder ME, Gesell JR, Ajami NJ, Duarte RTD, et al. Complete genome sequence of Turicibacter sp. strain H121, isolated from the feces of a contaminated germ-free mouse. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e00114-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00114-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids. 101, MIDI Technical Note; 1990. pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
ijsem-74-06379-s001.pdf (628.2KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006379

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES