There are errors in Table 7. The values in vaginal births <24h and <12h under Membranes Intact are incorrect. The authors have provided corrected version here.
Table 7. Labor intervals to vaginal birth by membrane status.
Membranes Intact | Oral Misoprostol | Vaginal Misoprostol | Vaginal Dinoprostone | P | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parametric Analysis N |
103 |
106 |
111 |
|||||
Mean ±SD min | 1370±1067 | 1326±1619 | 1262±619 | 0.79 | ||||
Non-Parametric Analysis N |
155 |
155 |
155 |
|||||
Median (Q1-Q3) min | 1573 (881-CS) | 1385 (873-CS) | 1504 (945-CS) | 0.72 | ||||
Vaginal Births N |
<72h |
100 |
64.5% |
104 |
67.1% |
111 |
71.6% |
0.40 |
<48h | 98 | 63.2% | 104 | 67.1% | 108 | 69.7% | 0.48 | |
<24h | 69 | 44.5% | 81 | 52.3% | 69 | 44.5% | 0.29 | |
<12h | 21 | 13.5% | 24 | 15.5% | 21 | 13.5% | 0.85 | |
Caesareans | 52 | 33.5% | 49 | 31.6% | 44 | 28.4% | 0.61 | |
Membranes Ruptured | Oral Misoprostol | Vaginal Misoprostol | Vaginal Dinoprostone | P | ||||
Parametric Analysis N |
9 |
12 |
14 |
|||||
Mean ±SD min | 1184±514 | 3338±9126 | 776±341 | 0.46 | ||||
Non-Parametric Analysis N |
12 |
17 |
17 |
|||||
Median (Q1-Q3) min | 1435 (1213–37936) | 822 (687-CS) | 827 (601–1310) | 0.22 | ||||
Vaginal Births N |
<72h |
9 |
75.0% |
11 |
64.7% |
14 |
82.4% |
0.50 |
<48h | 9 | 75.0% | 11 | 64.7% | 14 | 82.4% | 0.50 | |
<24h | 6 | 50.0% | 11 | 64.7% | 13 | 76.5% | 0.34 | |
<12h | 2 | 16.7% | 6 | 35.3% | 5 | 29.4% | 0.54 | |
Caesareans | 3 | 25.0% | 5 | 29.4% | 3 | 17.6% | 0.72 |
Reference
- 1.Young DC, Delaney T, Armson BA, Fanning C (2020) Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 15(1): e0227245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]