Skip to main content
Fundamental Research logoLink to Fundamental Research
. 2021 Jul 21;2(1):74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.07.002

An origin of ultraslow spreading ridges for the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites

Chuan-Zhou Liu a,b,c,, Fu-Yuan Wu a,c, Tong Liu a, Chang Zhang a, Wei-Qi Zhang a,c, Zhen-Yu Zhang a,c, Zhen Zhang a,c, Wu Wei a,c, Yin-Zheng Lin a,c
PMCID: PMC11197761  PMID: 38933911

Abstract

As relics of ancient ocean lithosphere, ophiolites are the most important petrological evidence for marking the sutures and also play a key role in reconstructing plate configuration. They also provide valuable windows for studying crustal accretion and mantle processes occurring at modern ocean ridges. Abundant ophiolites are distributed along the Yarlung-Tsangpo suture and represent the relics of ocean lithosphere of the Neo-Tethys. They are characterized by an incomplete litho-stratigraphy, of which the mantle section is much thicker than the crustal section. Ocean crustal rocks outcropped in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites are much thinner than normal ocean crusts (~ 7 km) or even absent. Tectonic settings from which the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites originated remain highly controversial, although an origin of the supra-subduction zone is prevailing. Moreover, their incomplete litho-stratigraphy has been commonly attributed to tectonic dismemberment during the late-stage emplacement after their formation. Nevertheless, such an incompleteness resembles the ocean lithosphere generated at modern ultraslow spreading ridges, such as the Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR). In this paper, we present several lines of evidence that support the formation of the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites at ultraslow spreading ridges, during which detachment faults were developed. This suggests that the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites might represent the ocean core complexes (OCC) in the Neo-Tethys Ocean. The OCC with high topography in the seafloor were clogged in the trench and preserved as ophiolites through Indo-Eurasia collision. The clogging resulted in the demise of an old subduction and a new subduction was re-initiated beneath the clogged OCC.

Keywords: Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites, Tibetan plateau, Ultraslow spreading ridges, Subduction re-initiation

1. Introduction

Ophiolites have been termed as a suite of ultramafic-mafic complexes widely outcropped in global orogenic belts, which have been regarded as relics of ancient ocean lithosphere formed through seafloor spreading at ocean ridges in the plate tectonics theory. According to the definition of the Penrose Conference [1], ophiolites are constituted of two lithological sequences, i.e., the mantle sequence consisting of mantle peridotites and the crustal sequence including, from bottom to top, gabbros, sheeted dykes and pillowed basalts. An ideal ophiolite should have a crustal thickness of ~ 7 km, which has been proved to be comparable to ocean crusts generated in modern ocean ridges [2], e.g., the East Pacific Rise. At the dawn of the plate tectonic revolution, ophiolites have been suggested to form at mid-ocean ridges [3]. Nevertheless, later abundant studies have shown that ophiolites could be generated at different tectonic settings [4, 5]; in particular, most (> 90%) global ophiolites have a genetical relationship with subduction zones [6]. Tectonic settings under which ophiolites were generated remain controversial and are still a topic of debate [7].

Moreover, numerous studies have shown that only a very few of global ophiolites show similarities in litho-stratigraphy to the Penrose definition, e.g., the Oman and Troodos ophiolites. Most of global ophiolites (> 90%) have incomplete litho-stratigraphic sequences, i.e., one or several lithological components are missing; in particular, their crustal rocks have much thinner thickness compared to the Penrose-type ophiolite [3]. Their incompleteness has been commonly attributed to tectonic dismemberment during their emplacement from oceans to continents [3]. Nevertheless, it is well known that the thickness of ocean crust is highly dependent on the spreading rates of ocean ridges [8], according to which the global ocean ridges can be classified into three types, i.e., fast-, slow- and ultraslow spreading ridges [9]. Compared to fast- and slow-spreading ridges, ocean crusts generated at ultraslow spreading ridges have much thinner thickness. Without enough magma supplies, detachment faults are developed at ultraslow spreading ridges, which exhume the lower ocean crust and/or mantle peridotites at the seafloors as ocean core complexes [10, 11]. In the American Geophysical Union Chapman Conference [12], a new model has been proposed for ocean lithospheres formed at ultraslow spreading ridges through detachment faults, i.e., the Chapman model. Compared to the Penrose-type ophiolites, the Chapman-type ophiolites should be characterized by incomplete sequences of lithological units [13].

In the past decade, several studies have recognized Chapman-type ophiolites using various evidence including structural geology, paleomagnetism and petrology [13], [14], [15], [16]. Abundant ophiolitic massifs crop out along the Yarlung-Tsangpo Suture (YTS) in the Tibetan Plateau, which is commonly regarded as marking the locus of collision between the Indian and Asian plates [17], [18], [19]. The Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites have been extensively studied for more than fifty years [6, 18, [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42]], but their formation settings remain highly controversial, and different models have been proposed. In recent years, discovery of ultra-high pressure and ultra-reducing minerals in both chromitites and mantle peridotites of the Yarlung-Tsangpo has stimulated a new round of studies, as they might represent the very few windows to the mantle transition zone [43]. In this study, we present petrological and geological evidence to support that the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites originated at ultraslow spreading ridges.

2. Geological background

The Tibetan Plateau is an orogenic collage composed of various terranes [44], which are separated by several well-established sutures, e.g., the Yarlung-Tsangpo Suture (YTS), the Bangong-Nujiang Suture and the Jingsha River Suture (Fig. 1(a)). The YTS is the southernmost one, which separates the Eurasia plate to the north from the India plate to the south. Ophiolitic massifs are discontinuously distributed along the YTS (Fig. 1(b)) and have been commonly regarded as relics of the Neo-Tethys Ocean, which opened during the Middle-Late Triassic [45] and closed at the end of the Cretaceous [46]. The Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites have been geographically divided into three segments (Fig. 1(b)), i.e., the western, central and eastern segments. Geochronological studies have suggested that the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites were formed coevally at ~130–120 Ma (Fig. 1(b); and also see the compilation in [47]), although a few older ages have been also reported [20, 48, 49].

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

Sketch map of the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites, modified after Dai et al.[21]. Zircon U-Pb ages of representative ophiolites are compiled in [47], and hornblende Ar-Ar ages of metamorphic soles are from [23,25].

The Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites overall are characterized by the predominance of mantle peridotites over ocean crustal rocks, and mantle peridotites are mainly composed of refractory harzburgites, with minor lherzolites and dunites [18, 29, 33, 35, 39, 40]. Ocean crustal rocks are volumetrically small [30, 32], or even absent in some ophiolites (e.g., the Purang ophiolite; [29]). Sheeted dykes have not been discovered in any Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites. In contrast, diabases occur as sheeted sills intruding into both mantle peridotites and pillowed basalts [18]. In the crust-mantle transition zones, intrusions of sheeted sills into serpentinized mantle peridotites are very common in the central segment of the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites, i.e., the Xigaze ophiolites (Fig. 2(a)). Chilled margins can be observed at the boundaries of these sills (Fig. 2(b, c)). On the other hand, mafic rocks also occur as dykes intruding into mantle peridotites in the lower mantle section or as blocks in the mélanges with a matrix of serpentinites (Fig. 2(d, e)). Locally, patches of pegmatitic gabbronorites can also be seen near the crust-mantle transition zones, which connect to gabbronoritic veinlets (Fig. 3(a, b)). Lower crustal gabbros are not developed in almost all Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites but a few, such as Jidding, Dazhuqu and Baigang [30]. Pillow basalts are widely distributed in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites, in particular in the Xigaze ophiolites, which are interbedded with radiolarian cherts [50].

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Field photos of mafic dykes intruding mantle peridotites of the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites. (a-b) Sheeted diabase sills intruding mantle peridotites, with development of chilled margins (c). (d-e) Mafic dykes have been transformed to rodingites.

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

Field photos of gabbronorites in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites. (a-b) gabbronorite patches and (c-d) gabbronorite veins in the peridotites.

The Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites have been extensively studied and different models have been proposed regarding their original tectonic settings [18, 21, 26, 27, 35, 42, 51, 52]. Early Sino-French studies have suggested that the Xigaze ophiolites in the central segment were generated at slow spreading ridges, as they have much thinner crustal sections compared to the Penrose-type ocean lithosphere [18, 53, 54]. Pearce and Deng [52] demonstrated that the pillow lavas in the Xigaze ophiolites show affinities to mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) and suggested that they were produced at the ridge transform intersection. Later studies, mainly based on geochemical compositions of both ultramafic and mafic rocks, have commonly suggested that the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites were produced under subduction-related settings, either in forearc [21, 35, 42]or in back-arc [26] basins. More recently, nevertheless, several studies have proposed that the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites represent the ocean core complex generated through detachment faults [27, 34, 41, 51, 55], probably at ultraslow spreading ridges [27, 34, 41].

3. Discussions

3.1. Ultra-refractory mantle domains in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites

Abundant studies have revealed that refractory harzburgites are predominated over relatively fertile lherzolites in mantle sections of the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites [18, 29, 33, 35, 39, 40]. The harzburgites are characterized by high whole rock MgO contents but low contents of both Al2O3 and CaO, indicating they are mantle residues after high degrees of partial melting (Fig. 4(a)). Moreover, the spinel Cr# value has also been regarded as a proxy for melt depletion of mantle peridotites, which increases along with the degree of partial melting [56, 57]. The Yarlung-Tsangpo mantle peridotites have a large variation in spinel Cr# (Fig. 4(b)); in particular, mantle peridotites from several ophiolitic massifs (e.g., Luqu and Luobusa) have spinel Cr# higher than 0.6, which has been suggested as the upper limit for abyssal peridotites experienced anhydrous melting beneath mid-ocean ridges [56], [57], [58]. Harzburgites with spinel Cr# values > 0.6 can result from hydrous melting of mantle peridotites and thus have been commonly interpreted to originate from a forearc setting [59]. This has led to a supra-subduction zone (SSZ) origin for the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites [20]. Nevertheless, refractory harzburgites with similarly high spinel Cr# (i.e., >0.6) have been also discovered at modern ocean ridges (e.g., the Mid-Atlantic Ridge), which might represent the recycled mantle wedge peridotites [60]. Moreover, abyssal peridotites with compositions as refractory as cratonic mantle peridotites have also been discovered in the Southwest Indian Ridge (Liu CZ, unpublished data). Therefore, fertility of mantle peridotites cannot be arbitrarily applied to discriminate their tectonic settings.

Fig. 4.

Fig 4

Major elements of mantle peridotites from the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites. (a) Whole rock MgO vs Al2O3 contents; (b) Spinel Mg# vs Cr# values. Data of the Yarlung-Tsangpo mantle peridotites are from [20,27,28,31,33,[35], [36], [37], [38], [39],42,58,95], abyssal peridotites are from [58], and forearc peridotites are from [59].

Ages of the Yarlung-Tsangpo mantle peridotites have been constrained using Re-Os isotopes (Fig. 5). Although most Yarlung-Tsangpo mantle peridotites have relatively juvenile ages less than 1 Ga, some refractory harzburgites from different ophiolitic massifs have highly unradiogenic 187Os/188Os ratios, yielding old Os model ages up to 2 Ga [28, 31, 37, 38, 61]. This suggests that some mantle domains within the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites have experienced ancient partial melting that was much older than spreading-related magmatism at the Neo-Tethys Ocean [47]. They should represent ancient refractory mantle domains within the asthenosphere, as inferred by studies on modern abyssal peridotites [62], [63], [64], [65], [66]. Therefore, some portions of the Yarlung-Tsangpo mantle peridotites represent recycled mantle within the asthenosphere [28, 31, 37, 38], which might act as the hosting ‘tanker’ for the ultra-high pressure and ultra-reducing minerals recently discovered [43].

Fig. 5.

Fig 5

Whole rock Os isotopes of mantle peridotites from the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites. Data of the Yarlung-Tsangpo mantle peridotites are from [28,31,37,38,61] and abyssal peridotites are from [62], [63], [64], [65], [66].

3.2. Low magma supply during formation of the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites

Chemical compositions of mantle peridotites in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites suggest that they have experienced relatively high degrees of partial melting. Therefore, thick ocean crusts are expected for the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites. Nevertheless, ocean crusts in all the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites are much thinner than the normal ocean crusts with a thickness of ~ 7 km [18, 67]. In particular, several ophiolitic massifs (e.g., the Purang ophiolite) do not contain any ocean crustal rocks at all and only mantle peridotites are outcropped [27], [28], [29]. Plutonic gabbros on a scale of kilometers have only discovered in a few ophiolitic massifs (i.e., Jiding, Dazhuqu and Baigang) at the central segment of the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites [30].

In the Jiding massif, plutonic gabbros representing the lower ocean crust with a thickness of ~ 350 m are exposed, which are intruded by numerous diabase dykes [30]. Their microtextures clearly show that plagioclase is in a euhedral to subhedral shape and crystallized earlier than clinopyroxene. Such a crystallization order is consistent with low-pressure crystallization of dry basaltic magmas [68], but distinctly different from fractionation of subduction-related basalts, of which high water contents result in earlier crystallization of clinopyroxene than plagioclase [69,70]. This implies a mid-ocean ridge origin of the Xigaze ophiolites, although anhydrous magmas (e.g., forearc basalts) could also occur in the forearc during subduction initiation [71]. A detailed mapping and systematic sampling of the Jiding gabbro section have revealed cyclic chemical variations (Fig. 6(a)), which highly resemble the gabbroic ocean core complexes at modern ultraslow-spreading ridges, e.g., the Atlantis Bank at the SWIR (Fig. 6(b); [72]). Plagioclase in the Jiding gabbros are almost completely altered and thus rarely record petrogenetic information. Based on clinopyroxene compositions (Fig. 6(a)), the Jiding gabbro section exhibits episodic chemical variations and clearly breaks down-section [30]. Such features can be explained as multiple magmatic intrusions, with upward differentiation from more primitive to more evolved liquids in each sub-unit (Fig. 6). A similar explanation has previously been proposed to account for the mineral stratigraphy of Hole 735B gabbros representing the upper 1508 m of the gabbro massif exhumed at the Atlantis Bank Ocean Core Complex (OCC), Southwest Indian Ridge [72]. Such cyclic variations in compositions of gabbros reflect low magma supplies at ultraslow spreading ridges and the controlling of detachment faults on the evolution of magmas [72, 73].

Fig. 6.

Fig 6

Chemical variations of gabbros from the Jiding ophiolite[30](a) and the Atlantis Bank, Southwest Indian Ridge[72](b).

3.3. Hydrous melting and hydrated magmas

Although the plutonic gabbros in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites were derived from anhydrous basalts, occurrence of gabbronorites points to relatively high contents of water in their parental magmas. Gabbronorites have been widely reported in ophiolites, e.g., Oman [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], Troodos [79], Bay of Islands [80] and the Alpine–Apennine ophiolites [81], occurring either as cumulates in plutonic sequences or as dykes intruding into the mantle. They are characterized by the early crystallization of pyroxenes, in particular orthopyroxene, relative to plagioclase. Plagioclases commonly have extremely high anorthite contents (An) and pyroxenes have very high Mg# and Cr abundances, which are coupled with low Na and Ti in high-Ca pyroxenes. Such features cannot be explained easily by fractional crystallization of melts with compositions of MORB. It has been suggested that they are cumulative products of melts more water- and silica-rich than MORB [74], [75], [76], [77], [78]. Such water- and silica-rich melts have been commonly inferred to originate in subduction zones.

Two types of gabbronorites crop out in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites; they occur either as coarse-grained dykes intruding fresh mantle peridotites (Fig. 3(c, d)) or as pegmatitic patches within heavily serpentinized peridotites near the crust-mantle transition zones (Fig. 3(a, b)). Our previous studies on the gabbronorite dykes in both Purang and Xiugugabu ophiolites have revealed that they have remarkably high clinopyroxene Mg# and plagioclase An contents (Fig. 7). We have proposed that they were derived from hydrous basalts through partial melting of serpentinized mantle peridotites, as a result of seawater infiltration through the detachment faults [27]. Therefore, an origin of ocean core complex at an ultraslow spreading ridge has been inferred for the Purang ophiolite [27]. Compared to the gabbronorite dykes, the patched gabbronorites have lower Mg# values of both orthopyroxene and clinopyroxene, but similar plagioclase An contents (Fig. 7). As they follow the wet fractionation trends (Fig. 7), their parental magmas should have high water contents, which is also consistent with their pegmatitic texture. A likely scenario is that the anhydrous basalts were extracted from the asthenosphere and migrated upwards. Along the migration, some basalts crystallized and gave rise to gabbros following the dry fractionation trajectory (Fig. 7). Some of them were transported to the crust-mantle transition zone, where they achieved exotic waters through assimilation of the serpentinized mantle or addition of hydrous fluids circulation along the detachment faults [82, 83]. Therefore, both types of gabbronorites bear the evidence for the development of detachment faults in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites.

Fig. 7.

Fig 7

Clinopyroxene Mg# vs plagioclase An of gabbronorites and gabbros in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites. The fractionation trajectories are from [96]. Data of the Purang gabbronorite dykes are from [27]. Data of gabbronorite patches and gabbro dykes are unpublished.

3.4. Rapid exhumation of mantle by a detachment fault

Other than gabbros and gabbronorites, diabase is another type of mafic dykes extensively intruding into mantle peridotites (Fig. 2). At the crust-mantle transition zone, the diabase dykes occur as sheeted sills intruding into the serpentinized peridotites, with consistent strikes (Fig. 2(a, b)). They are very fresh in the interiors and display chilled margins (Fig. 2(c)). This suggests that the mantle peridotites have been already altered and thus cooled to low temperature before the intrusion of the diabase sills. Moreover, diabase dykes occur as singular intrusions in the lower part of the mantle section (Fig. 2(d, e)) and have been almost completely transformed to rodingites [84, 85]. Rodingite is a calcsilicate rock characterized by hydrogarnet, grossular, diopside and prehnite; minerals such as vesuvianite, titanite, chlorite and zeolite may also be present. Its formation has been explained by Ca-metasomatism of rocks with mafic compositions through reacting with Ca-rich fluids released during serpentinization of mantle peridotites [86]. This indicates that the mantle peridotites were still fresh when the mafic dykes, i.e., protoliths of the rodingites, intruded. Therefore, the rodingites and diabase sills are mafic intrusions before and after serpentinization of mantle peridotites, respectively.

Abundant zircon U-Pb dating have been conducted for ocean crustal rocks (including gabbros and plagiogranites) and the mafic intrusions in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites (Fig. 8). The results revealed that both rodingites and diabase sills have identical zircon U-Pb ages within analytical uncertainties, which are also identical to the ocean crustal rocks [34, 84]. Such a geochronological simultaneity supports that the mantle peridotites were exhumed very rapidly from the deep mantle to the shallow seafloor. During the exhumation, mantle peridotites were serpentinized by the circulating seawater or hydrothermal fluids, which were accompanied by intrusions of mafic magmas [34]. The synchronism between rapid exhumation of the mantle and magmatism can only be achieved through the development of detachment faults, which are commonly developed at ultraslow spreading ridges.

Fig. 8.

Fig 8

Zircon U-Pb ages of ocean crustal rocks of the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites. Data are compiled in [47].

3.5. Ocean core complex and subduction re-initiation

As discussed above, different lines of evidence for mafic rocks in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites, including structures, compositions and geochronology, suggest that they were produced through detachment faults at ultraslow spreading ridges [27, 51, 55]. Therefore, the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites represent relics of ocean core complexes in the Neo-Tethys Ocean [27]. Previous paleomagnetism studies have constrained the paleo-latitudes of the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites, which were very close to the southern margin of the Lhasa terrane [87]. This implies that the ocean ridges, at which the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites were generated, were also proximal to the trench to the north side (Fig. 9(a)). A remarkable feature of modern ocean core complexes is that they are topographically high relative to the ambient ocean crust, with a difference in elevation up to 4 km [10,88]. In particular, recovery of oolitic limestones from the Atlantis Bank ocean core complex suggests that it occurred as an island with a 1200 m peak above sea level [72]. Once entering the trench, the elevated ocean core complexes cannot be subducted and thus clogged in the trench, which were preserved and emplaced as the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites during the Indo-Eurasian collision.

Fig. 9.

Fig 9

Cartoon for the subduction re-initiation model. (a) At ~ 130 Ma, ocean ridges in the Neo-Tethys Ocean were proximal to the Eurasian continental margins and have been slowed down to an ultraslow spreading rate. Detachment faults were developed at the ocean ridges, which resulted in the exhumation of mantle peridotites and occasionally the gabbros at the seafloor as ocean core complexes (OCC). (b) The ocean core complexes, with incomplete ocean lithospheres, were transported into the trench due to the northward subduction. They cannot be subducted due to their higher topography relative to the ambient ocean crust, and thus clogged in the trench. The clogging led to the demise of the old subduction to the north and a new subduction was re-initiated in the south of the ocean core complexes. A metamorphic sole with high temperature metamorphism was produced beneath at the bottom of the mantle section. Meanwhile, mantle peridotites of the clogged ocean core complexes might have been modified by fluids or melts released from the slabs, giving rise to the SSZ-like geochemical features.

Clogging of an ocean core complex in the trench would result in the demise of an old subduction on one hand. On the other hand, the far-field compressional strength caused by the northward drifting of the Indian continent will initiate a new subduction in the south of the clogged ocean core complex. This is the so-called “subduction re-initiation” at the ultraslow spreading ridges [41]. Numerical modeling studies have demonstrated that detachment faults can act as weak zones during compression, which is conducive to subduction initiating [89, 90]. The subduction re-initiation processes were witnessed by the metamorphic soles occurring within the mélange at the bottom of the ophiolites, which consist of a suite of metamorphic rocks from greenschists, amphibolites to granulite-facies garnet clinopyroxenites [[23], [24], [25],41]. They were transformed from mafic protoliths with compositions similar to nascent ocean crust after metamorphism at relatively high geothermal gradients (25–30 °C/km; [41]). Subduction re-initiation due to clogging of ocean core complex is, mechanically, compression-induced, which is similar to subduction zone transference [91]. A corollary of starting a new subduction beneath the clogged ocean core complex is the modification of the mantle peridotites by the slab-released fluids/melts, which were recorded by geochemical compositions of mantle peridotites in the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites [92]. In addition, subduction-related magmatism could also be superimposed on the original ridge-type rocks (Fig. 9(b)). In this sense, both SSZ- and MOR-type geochemical features are not exclusive in the subduction re-initiation model, which might also provide a potential solution to the ophiolite conundrum [93].

4. Conclusion

Ophiolite is an important term in Earth sciences and has a research history for more than 200 years, since first defined by the French mineralogist Alexandre Brongniart in 1813. The ophiolite concept went through several phases of evolution, among which the Penrose Conference was a milestone and the Penrose definition has been far-reaching in the ophiolite community [1]. Since then, it has become a consensus that the overwhelming majority of global ophiolites have litho-stratigraphic structures unlike the Penrose definition. Such a structural incompleteness has been attributed to tectonic dismemberment. A few ophiolites (i.e., Oman and Troodos) consistent with the Penrose definition have been regarded as the stereotype of ophiolites. Nevertheless, the orthodoxy of the Penrose definition has been strongly challenged by the research progress in the modern ocean lithosphere. In particular, studies on the ultraslow spreading ridges (with a full spreading rate < 20 mm/yr) have shown that ocean lithospheres generated by detachment faults have incomplete structures [88]. The American Geophysical Union Chapman Conference on ‘Detachments in Oceanic Lithosphere’ was held in May 2010 [12, 94], which should hallmark the paradigm shift in ophiolite studies. Our group studies on the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites have proved that they are Chapman-type ophiolites and their litho-stratigraphical incompleteness is a genuine characteristic during formation rather than resulting from the late-stage tectonic dismemberment. In this sense, the Yarlung-Tsangpo ophiolites, in particular the Xigaze ophiolites, are ideal objects for studying magmatic accretion and seafloor spreading at ultraslow spreading ridges, and thus, their significance should be on a par with the Oman ophiolites [67].

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. 42025201). We thank Liang-Liang Zhang, Wei-Qiang Ji, Wen-Bin Ji, and Yang Xu for their participation in the field trips.

Biography

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Chuan-Zhou Liu is a professor at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IGGCAS) and the vice director of the State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution. He obtained his BSc in 2001 from Henan Polytechnic University and Ph.D in 2007 from IGGCAS. He was a visiting student at Max-Plank Institute for Chemistry during 2004–2007, and a visiting scholar at Macquarie University during 2010–2011. He has been studying mantle peridotites from different tectonic settings, but mainly focuses on ophiolites in the Tibetan Plateau and ocean lithosphere of the Southwest Indian Ridge. He has published 70 peer-reviewed papers, which have been cited for 3800 times, yielding a H-index of 38. He obtained the National Science Fund for Excellent Young Scholars in 2012 and for Distinguished Young Scholars of China in 2020. He has been awarded the ‘Hou Defeng’ Medal in 2014 by the Society of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, and the ‘Shen-su Sun’ Medal in 2019. He currently serves as the associate editor of Ofioliti, and editorial board members of another two journals.

References

  • 1.Anonymous. Penrose field conference on ophiolites. Geotimes. 1972;17:24–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.J.A. Karson. From ophiolites to oceanic crust: sheeted dike complexes and seafloor spreading. In: R.K. Srivastava et al. (Eds). Springer Geology, 2019, pp. 459–492.
  • 3.Coleman R.G. Springer-Verlag; 1977. Ophiolites. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alabaster T., Pearce J.A., Malpas J. The volcanic stratigraphy and petrogenesis of the Oman ophiolite complex. Contri. Miner. Petrol. 1982;81:168–183. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Miyashiro A. The Troodos complex was probably formed in an island arc. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1973;19:218–224. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.J.A. Pearce, S.J. Lippard, S. Roberts, Characteristics and tectonic significance of supra-subduction zone ophiolites, 16 (1984) 77–94.
  • 7.Dilek Y., Furnes H. Ophiolites and their origins. Elements. 2014;10:93–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bown J.W., White R.S. Variation with spreading rate of oceanic crustal thickness and geochemistry. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1994;121:435–449. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dick H.J.B., Lin J., Schouten H. An ultraslow-spreading class of ocean ridge. Nature. 2003;426:405–412. doi: 10.1038/nature02128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cann J.R., Blackman D.K., Smith D.K., et al. Corrugated slip surfaces formed at ridge–transform intersections on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Nature. 1997;385:329–332. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tucholke B.E., Lin J. A geological model for the structure of ridge segments in slow spreading ocean crust. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 1994;99:11937–11958. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Escartín J., Canales J.P. Detachments in oceanic lithosphere: deformation, magmatism, fluid flow, and ecosystems. Eos (Washington DC) 2011;92:25. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maffione M., Morris A., Anderson M.W. Recognizing detachment-mode seafloor spreading in the deep geological past. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:2336. doi: 10.1038/srep02336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Manatschal G., Sauter D., Karpoff A.M., et al. The Chenaillet ophiolite in the French/Italian Alps: an ancient analogue for an Oceanic core complex? Lithos. 2011;124:169–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nicolas A., Meshi A., Boudier F., Jousselin D., Muceku B. Mylonites in ophiolite of Mirdita (Albania): oceanic detachment shear zone. Geosphere. 2017;13:136–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tremblay A., Meshi A., Bédard J.H. Oceanic core complexes and ancient oceanic lithosphere: insights from Iapetan and Tethyan ophiolites (Canada and Albania) Tectonophysics. 2009;473:36–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chang C.F., Zheng X.L. Tectonic features of the Mount Jolmo Lungma region in southern Tibet. China, Sci. Geol. Sin. 1973;8:1–12. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nicolas A., Girardeau J., Marcoux J., et al. The Xigaze ophiolite: a peculiar oceanic lithosphere. Nature. 1981;294:414–417. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang X.B., Cao Y.G., Zheng H.X., NIcolas A., Girardeau J. A complete ophiolite sequence in southern Xizang (Tibet): the discovery of cumulates and sheeted dyke and sill swarms. Geol. Rev. 1981;27:457–459. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dai J.G., Wang C.S., Hébert R., et al. Petrology and geochemistry of peridotites in the Zhongba ophiolite, Yarlung Zangbo Suture Zone: implications for the Early Cretaceous intra-oceanic subduction zone within the Neo-Tethys. Chem. Geol. 2011;288:133–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dai J.G., Wang C.S., Polat A., et al. Rapid forearc spreading between 130 and 120 Ma: evidence from geochronology and geochemistry of the Xigaze ophiolite, southern Tibet. Lithos. 2013;172-173:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Girardeau J., Mercier J.-.C. Petrology and texture of the ultramafic rocks of the Xigaze ophiolite (Tibet): constraints for mantle structure beneath slow-spreading ridges. Tectonophysics. 1988;147:33–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guilmette C., Hébert R., Dostal J., et al. Discovery of a dismembered metamorphic sole in the Saga ophiolitic mélange, South Tibet: assessing an early cretaceous disruption of the Neo-Tethyan supra-subduction zone and consequences on basin closing. Gondwana Res. 2012;22:398–414. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guilmette C., Hébert R., Dupuis C., Wang C., Li Z. Metamorphic history and geodynamic significance of high-grade metabasites from the ophiolitic mélange beneath the Yarlung Zangbo ophiolites, Xigaze area, Tibet. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2008;32:423–437. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guilmette C., Hébert R., Wang C., Villeneuve M. Geochemistry and geochronology of the metamorphic sole underlying the Xigaze Ophiolite, Yarlung Zangbo Suture Zone, South Tibet. Lithos. 2009;112:149–162. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hébert R., Bezard R., Guilmette C., et al. The Indus-Yarlung Zangbo ophiolites from Nanga Parbat to Namche Barwa syntaxes, southern Tibet: first synthesis of petrology, geochemistry, and geochronology with incidences on geodynamic reconstructions of Neo-Tethys. Gondwana Res. 2012;22:377–397. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liu C.-.Z., Zhang C., Yang L.-.Y., et al. Formation of gabbronorites in the Purang ophiolite (SW Tibet) through melting of hydrothermally altered mantle along a detachment fault. Lithos. 2014;205:127–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu C.Z., Wu F.Y., Chu Z.Y., et al. Preservation of ancient Os isotope signatures in the Yungbwa ophiolite (southwestern Tibet) after subduction modification. J. Asian. Earth Sci. 2012;53:38–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu C.Z., Wu F.Y., Wilde S.A., Yu L.J., Li J.L. Anorthitic plagioclase and pargasitic amphibole in mantle peridotites from Yungbwa ophiolite (southern Tibetan Plateau) formed by hydrous melt metasomatism. Lithos. 2010;114:413–422. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu T., Liu C.Z., Wu F.Y., et al. The Xigaze ophiolite: fossil ultraslow-spreading ocean lithosphere in the Tibetan Plateau. J. Geol. Soc. London. 2021;178 [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Liu T., Wu F.Y., Liu C.Z., et al. Testing oceanic crust–mantle decoupling by Sr–Nd–Hf–Os isotopes of Neo-Tethyan ophiolites. Lithos. 2020;376-377 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu T., Wu F.Y., Liu C.Z., et al. Variably evolved gabbroic intrusions within the Xigaze ophiolite (Tibet): new insights into the origin of ophiolite diversity. Contri. Mineral. Petrol. 2018;173:91. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liu T., Wu F.Y., Liu C.Z., et al. Reconsideration of Neo-Tethys evolution constrained from the nature of the Dazhuqu ophiolitic mantle, southern Tibet. Contri. Mineral. Petrol. 2019;174:23. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.T. Liu, F.-.Y. Wu, L.-.L. Zhang et al., Zircon U-Pb geochronological constraints on rapid exhumation of the mantle peridotite of the Xigaze ophiolite, southern Tibet, 443 (2016) 67–86.
  • 35.Xiong Q., Griffin W.L., Zheng J.-.P., et al. Southward trench migration at ~130–120 Ma caused accretion of the Neo-Tethyan forearc lithosphere in Tibetan ophiolites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2016;438:57–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xiong Q., Griffin W.L., Zheng J.-.P., Pearson N.J., O'Reilly S.Y. Two-layered oceanic lithospheric mantle in a Tibetan ophiolite produced by episodic subduction of Tethyan slabs. Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 2017;18:1189–1213. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang C., Liu C.Z., Ji W.B., Liu T., Wu F.Y. Heterogeneous sub-ridge mantle of the Neo-Tethys: constraints from Re-Os isotope and HSE compositions of the Xigaze ophiolites. Lithos. 2020;105819:378–379. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang C., Liu C.Z., Liu T., Wu F.Y. Evolution of mantle peridotites from the Luobusa ophiolite in the Tibetan Plateau: Sr-Nd-Hf-Os isotope constraints. Lithos. 2020;362-363 [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhang C., Liu C.Z., Wu F.Y., et al. Ultra-refractory mantle domains in the Luqu ophiolite (Tibet): petrology and tectonic setting. Lithos. 2017;286-287:252–263. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang C., Liu C.Z., Wu F.Y., Zhang L.L., Ji W.Q. Geochemistry and geochronology of mafic rocks from the Luobusa ophiolite, South Tibet. Lithos. 2016;245:93–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang C., Liu C.Z., Xu Y., et al. Subduction re-initiation at dying ridge of Neo-Tethys: insights from mafic and metamafic rocks in Lhaze ophiolitic mélange, Yarlung-Tsangbo Suture Zone. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2019;523 [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhou M.F., Robinson P.T., Malpas J., Li Z.J. Podiform chromitites in the Luobusa ophiolite (southern Tibet): implications for melt-rock interaction and chromite segregation in the upper mantle. J. Petrol. 1996;37:3–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yang J., Wu W., Lian D., Rui H. Peridotites, chromitites and diamonds in ophiolites. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2021;2:198–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yin A., Harrison T.M. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2000;28:211–280. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen D.S., Luo H., Wang X.H., Xu B., Matsuoka A. Late Anisian radiolarian assemblages from the Yarlung-Tsangpo Suture Zone in the Jinlu area, Zedong, southern Tibet: implications for the evolution of Neotethys. Isl. Arc. 2019;28:e12302. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hu X., Garzanti E., Moore T., Raffi I. Direct stratigraphic dating of India-Asia collision onset at the Selandian (middle Paleocene, 59 ± 1 Ma) Geology. 2015;43:859–862. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Liu C.Z., Chung S.L., Wu F.Y., et al. Tethyan suturing in Southeast Asia: zircon U-Pb and Hf-O isotopic constraints from Myanmar ophiolites. Geology. 2016;44:311–314. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chan G.H.N., Aitchison J.C., Crowley Q.G., et al. U–Pb zircon ages for Yarlung Tsangpo suture zone ophiolites, southwestern Tibet and their tectonic implications. Gondwana Res. 2015;27:719–732. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.McDermid I.R.C., Aitchison J.C., Davis A.M., Harrison T.M., Grove M. The Zedong terrane: a Late Jurassic intra-oceanic magmatic arc within the Yarlung–Tsangpo suture zone, southeastern Tibet. Chem. Geol. 2002;187:267–277. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ziabrev S.V., Aitchison J.C., Abrajevitch A.V., et al. Precise radiolarian age constraints on the timing of ophiolite generation and sedimentation in the Dazhuqu terrane, Yarlung–Tsangpo suture zone, Tibet. J. Geol. Soc. 2003;160:591–599. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Maffione M., van Hinsbergen D.J.J., Koornneef L.M.T., et al. Forearc hyperextension dismembered the south Tibetan ophiolites. Geology. 2015;43:475–478. https:doi.org/10.1130/g36472.1. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pearce J.A., Deng W.M. The ophiolites of the Tibetan Geotraverses, Lhasa to Golmud (1985) and Lhasa to Kathmandu (1986) Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1988;327:215–238. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Girardeau J., Mercier J.-.C., Yougong Z. Origin of the Xigaze ophiolite, Yarlung Zangbo suture zone, southern Tibet. Tectonophysics. 1985;119:407–433. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.X.B. Wang, P.S. Bao, X.C. Xiao. Ophiolites of the Yarlung Zangbo (Tsangpo) River, Xizang (Tibet). Surveying and mapping publishing house, 1987.
  • 55.Li Y., Li R.B., Dong T.C., Yang S.B., Pei L. Structure of the Baimarang massif in the Xigaze ophiolite, Yarlung Zangbo Suture Zone, southern Tibet, China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2016;61:2823–2833. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dick H.J.B., Bullen T. Chromian spinel as a petrogenetic indicator in abyssal and Alpine-type peridotites and spatially associated lavas. Contri. Mineral. Petrol. 1984;86:54–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hellebrand E., Snow J.E., Dick H.J.B., Hofmann A.W. Coupled major and trace elements as indicators of the extent of melting in mid-ocean-ridge peridotites. Nature. 2001;410:677–681. doi: 10.1038/35070546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Warren J.M. Global variations in abyssal peridotite compositions. Lithos. 2016;248-251:193–219. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Parkinson I.J., Pearce J.A. Peridotites from the Izu-Bonin-Mariana forearc (ODP Leg 125): evidence for mantle melting and melt-mantle interaction in a supra-subduction zone setting. J. Petrol. 1998;39:1577–1618. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Urann B.M., Dick H.J.B., Parnell-Turner R., Casey J.F. Recycled arc mantle recovered from the Mid-Atlantic ridge. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3887. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17604-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xu Y., Liu J., Xiong Q., et al. The complex life cycle of oceanic lithosphere: a study of Yarlung-Zangbo ophiolitic peridotites, Tibet. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2020;277:175–191. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Brandon A.D., Snow J.E., Walker R.J., Morgan J.W., Mock T.D. 190Pt–186Os and 187Re–187Os systematics of abyssal peridotites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2000;177:319–335. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Day J.M.D., Walker R.J., Warren J.M. 186Os–187Os and highly siderophile element abundance systematics of the mantle revealed by abyssal peridotites and Os-rich alloys. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2017;200:232–254. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Harvey J., Gannoun A., Burton K.W., et al. Ancient melt extraction from the oceanic upper mantle revealed by Re–Os isotopes in abyssal peridotites from the Mid-Atlantic ridge. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006;244:606–621. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lassiter J.C., Byerly B.L., Snow J.E., Hellebrand E. Constraints from Os-isotope variations on the origin of Lena Trough abyssal peridotites and implications for the composition and evolution of the depleted upper mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2014;403:178–187. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Liu C.Z., Snow J.E., Hellebrand E., et al. Ancient, highly heterogeneous mantle beneath Gakkel ridge, Arctic Ocean. Nature. 2008;452:311–316. doi: 10.1038/nature06688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wu F.Y., Liu C.Z., Zhang L.L., et al. Yarlung Zangbo ophiolite: a critical updated view. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2014;30:293–325. (in Chinese with English abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Grove T.L., Kinzler R.J., Bryan W.B. In: Phipps Morgan J., Blackman D.K., Sinton J.M., editors. Vol. 71. 1992. Fractionation of mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) pp. 281–310. (Mantle Flow and Melt Generation at Mid-Ocean Ridges, American Geophysical Union Monograph). [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Berndt J., Koepke J., Holtz F. An experimental investigation of the influence of water and oxygen fugacity on differentiation of MORB at 200MPa. J. Petrol. 2005;46:135–167. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sisson T.W., Grove T.L. Experimental investigations of the role of H2O in calc-alkaline differentiation and subduction zone magmatism. Contri. Mineral. Petrol. 1993;113:143–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Stern R.J., Reagan M., Ishizuka O., Ohara Y., Whattam S. To understand subduction initiation, study forearc crust: to understand forearc crust, study ophiolites, Lithosphere. 4. 2012:469–483. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Dick H.J.B., Kvassnes A.J.S., Robinson P.T., MacLeod C.J., Kinoshita H. The Atlantis Bank Gabbro Massif, Southwest Indian Ridge. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2019;6:64. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhang W.Q., Liu C.Z., Dick H.J.B. Evidence for multi-stage melt transport in the lower ocean crust: the Atlantis Bank gabbroic massif (IODP Hole U1473A, SW Indian Ridge) J. Petrol. 2020;61 egaa082. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Benoit M., Ceuleneer G., Polvé M. The remelting of hydrothermally altered peridotite at mid-ocean ridges by intruding mantle diapirs. Nature. 1999;402:514–519. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Boudier F., Godard M., Armbruster C. Significance of gabbronorite occurrence in the crustal section of the Semail ophiolite. Mar. Geophys. Res. 2000;21:307–326. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Juteau T., Beurrier M., Dahl R., Nehlig P. Segmentation at a fossil spreading axis: the plutonic sequence of the Wadi Haymiliyah area (Haylayn block, Sumail Nappe, Oman) Tectonophysics. 1988;151:167–197. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lachize M., Lorand J.P., Juteau T. Calc-alkaline differentiation trend in the plutonic sequence of the Wadi Haymiliyah section, Haylayn massif, Semail ophiolite, Oman. Lithos. 1996;38:207–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yamasaki T., Maeda J., Mizuta T. Geochemical evidence in clinopyroxenes from gabbroic sequence for two distinct magmatism in the Oman ophiolite. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2006;251:52–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gillis K.M., Roberts M.D. Cracking at the magma-hydrothermal transition: evidence from the Troodos Ophiolite. Cyprus, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 1999;169:227–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bédard J.H. Cumulate recycling and crustal evolution in the Bay of Islands ophiolite. J. Geol. 1991;99:225–249. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Piccardo G.B., Guarnieri L. Gabbro-norite cumulates from strongly depleted MORB melts in the Alpine-Apennine ophiolites. Lithos. 2011;124:200–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.deMartin B.J., Sohn R.A., Canales J.Pablo, Humphris S.E. Kinematics and geometry of active detachment faulting beneath the Trans-Atlantic Geotraverse (TAG) hydrothermal field on the Mid-Atlantic ridge. Geology. 2007;35:711–714. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tao C., Seyfried W.E., Jr., Lowell R.P., et al. Deep high-temperature hydrothermal circulation in a detachment faulting system on the ultra-slow spreading ridge. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1300. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15062-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zhang L.L., Liu C.Z., Wu F.Y., et al. Sr–Nd–Hf isotopes of the intrusive rocks in the Cretaceous Xigaze ophiolite, southern Tibet: constraints on its formation setting. Lithos. 2016;258-259:133–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhang Y.C., Li X.P., Sun G.M., Wang Z.L., Duan W.Y. Metamorphic Petrology of Clinopyroxene Amphibolite from the Xigaze Ophiolite, Southern Tibet: P-T Constraints and Phase Equilibrium Modeling. J. Earth Sci. 2019;30:549–562. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Austrheim H., Prestvik T. Rodingitization and hydration of the oceanic lithosphere as developed in the Leka ophiolite, north–central Norway. Lithos. 2008;104:177–198. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Huang W., van Hinsbergen D.J.J., Maffione M., et al. Lower Cretaceous Xigaze ophiolites formed in the Gangdese forearc: evidence from paleomagnetism, sediment provenance, and stratigraphy. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2015;415:142–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tucholke B.E., Behn M.D., Buck R.W., Lin J. Role of melt supply in oceanic detachment faulting and formation of megamullions. Geology. 2007;36:455–458. [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Beaussier S.J., Gerya T.V., Burg J.-.P. Near-ridge initiation of intraoceanic subduction: effects of inheritance in 3D numerical models of the Wilson cycle. Tectonophysics. 2019;763:1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gülcher A.J.P., Beaussier S.J., Gerya T.V. On the formation of oceanic detachment faults and their influence on intra-oceanic subduction initiation: 3D thermomechanical modeling. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2019;506:195–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Stern R.J., Gerya T. Subduction initiation in nature and models: a review. Tectonophysics. 2018;746:173–198. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhao M.S., Chen Y.X., Zheng Y.F. Geochemical evidence for forearc metasomatism of peridotite in the Xigaze ophiolite during subduction initiation in Neo-Tethyan Ocean, south to Tibet. Lithos. 2021;380-381 [Google Scholar]
  • 93.E.M. Moores, L.H. Kellogg, Y. Dilek, Tethyan ophiolites, mantle convection, and tectonic "historical contingency": a resolution of the "ophiolite conundrum", In: Y. Dilek, E.M. Moores, D. Elthon, A. Nicolas (Eds). Ophiolites and Oceanic Crust: New Insights from Field Studies and the Ocean Drilling Program, Geological Society of America Special Paper 349, Boulder, Colorado, 2000, pp. 3–12.
  • 94.Cheadle M., Grimes C. To fault or not to fault. Nat. Geosci. 2010;3:454–456. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Miller C., Thöni M., Frank W., et al. Geochemistry and tectonomagmatic affinity of the Yungbwa ophiolite, SW Tibet. Lithos. 2003;66:155–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kvassnes A.J.S., Strand A.H., Moen-Eikeland H., Pedersen R.B. The Lyngen gabbro: the lower crust of an Ordovician incipient arc. Contri. Miner. Petrol. 2004;148:358–379. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Fundamental Research are provided here courtesy of The Science Foundation of China Publication Department, The National Natural Science Foundation of China

RESOURCES