In the original publication [1], there was a mistake in Figure 1 as published. Panels d and e were not soybean, but rather a second plant species that was being studied simultaneously. The corrected Figure 1 appears below.
Figure 1.
In vitro development of temperature-stressed soybean microspores. (a–c) Microgametogenesis, denoted by cell enlargement and the presence of starch granules; (d–f) microspore embryogenesis in soybean. (d) Embryogenic microspore with evident cytoskeletal fibers fragmenting the cytoplasm; (e) rapidly dividing pro-embryo; (f) microspore-derived embryo with established polarity; (g,h) pollen mitosis 1 (g) and 2 (h) observed in noninduced microspores; (i–k) cytological markers associated with an embryogenic culture. (i) Symmetrical division during pollen mitosis 1 observed via DAPI staining; (j,k) secretion of intrinsic molecules from nonisodiametric cells into the induction medium, forming a matrix. VC = vegetative cell; GC = generative cell; SC = sperm cell; Sym = symmetrical mitotic division; Asym = asymmetrical mitotic division. (a–c) bars = 15 μm; (d) 5 μm; (e) 100 μm; (f) 1 mm; (g,h) 10 μm; (i,j) 15 μm; (k) 100 μm.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Reference
- 1.Hale B., Phipps C., Rao N., Wijeratne A., Phillips G.C. Differential expression profiling reveals stress-induced cell fate divergence in soybean microspores. Plants. 2020;9:1510. doi: 10.3390/plants9111510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]