Abstract
Cataract is the main cause of visual impairment and blindness worldwide while the only effective cure for cataract is still surgery. Consecutive phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia has been the routine procedure for cataract surgery. However, patients often grumbled that they felt more painful during the second-eye surgery compared to the first-eye surgery. The intraoperative pain experience has negative influence on satisfaction and willingness for second-eye cataract surgery of patients with bilateral cataracts. Intraoperative ocular pain is a complicated process induced by the nociceptors activation in the peripheral nervous system. Immunological, neuropsychological, and pharmacological factors work together in the enhancement of intraoperative pain. Accumulating published literatures have focused on the pain enhancement during the second-eye phacoemulsification surgeries. In this review, we searched PubMed database for articles associated with pain perception differences between consecutive cataract surgeries published up to Feb. 1, 2024. We summarized the recent research progress in mechanisms and interventions for pain perception enhancement in consecutive second-eye phacoemulsification cataract surgeries. This review aimed to provide novel insights into strategies for improving patients' intraoperative experience in second-eye cataract surgeries.
Keywords: ocular pain, cataract surgery, topical anesthesia, intraoperative experience, second-eye phacoemulsification
INTRODUCTION
Cataract is the main cause of global visual impairment and blindness, while the only effective cure for cataract is still surgical removal[1]. At present, phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia is a widely applied methodology for routine cataract surgery[2]. Although phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia has been relatively safe and mature after decades of improvement, challenges still remain.
Patients with bilateral cataracts need twice surgeries. However, there was a debate in the choice of surgery timing (simultaneous surgery or consecutive surgery)[3]. Simultaneous surgery showed similar outcomes with consecutive surgery for patients with bilateral cataracts[4]. However, due to the higher risk of simultaneous bilateral complications, especially endophthalmitis[5]–[6], consecutive surgery is still a mainstream mode in cataract surgery.
Intraoperative pain perception is a crucial factor influencing the satisfaction and willingness for re-operation of patients with bilateral cataracts. In clinical practice, patients generally grumbled that pain experience was enhanced during the second-eye surgery compared to the first-eye surgery[7]. A growing number of studies focusing on this phenomenon have been conducted. We searched PubMed database for papers associated with pain perception differences between consecutive cataract surgeries published up to Feb. 1, 2024. This review summarized the possible mechanism and intervention measures of pain enhancement in second-eye cataract surgery. We hope to provide novel insight into strategy of improving the intraoperative experience of patients in second-eye cataract surgery.
ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY FOR PAIN FORMATION IN CATARACT SURGERY
Physiological pain is a complicated process associated with the activation of nociceptors in the peripheral nervous system[8]–[9]. Peripheral ocular neurons are commonly evoked by two pathogenesis: 1) inflammation; 2) direct peripheral or central neuronal injury. Inflammation activates or sensitizes polymodal nociceptor fibers (inflammatory pain) while peripheral neuronal injury causes abnormal ectopic ongoing activities of nociceptor fibers (neuropathic pain)[10]. Although the lens is a transparent structure without nerves[11], there is a rich nerve innervation in surrounding tissues[12]–[13]. Thus, the intraoperative pain during cataract surgery should be mediated by surrounding sensory neuroreceptor, including corneal nerves, conjunctival nerves, etc. These ophthalmic sensory neurons are heterogeneous in functions and membrane properties[14]–[15].
Among ocular structures, cornea has the richest nociceptors[16]–[17]. Myelinated corneal nerves lose their myelin sheaths at about 1 mm from the limbus. Then, they penetrate into the cornea stroma radially from the periphery (mainly at 9 and 3 o'clock) and form the compact sub-basal nerve plexus in the anterior corneal stroma. Afterwards, the corneal nerve endings travel into corneal epithelium near the eye surface[18]. The corneal sensory nerve endings are highly sensitive to exogenous and endogenous stimulus. When mechanical stimulations applied to cornea, the corneal sensory nerves (as a part of the ophthalmic branch of trigeminal nerve) will transmit nociceptive impulses to the trigeminal ganglion and nucleus[19]. Sequentially, the nociceptive impulses transmitted by synapses in the thalamus (limbic) and ultimately reach the somatosensory cortex region of cerebrum[20]–[21] (Figure 1). The naked corneal nerve endings link to the medium or small neurons with myelinated Aδ type axons or unmyelinated C type axons, which also exist in the bulbar conjunctiva, uvea and sclera[12]. About 15% of the corneal nerve fibers are composed of Aδ type axons. Aδ type axon is the fastest conducting neuron in body which can adapt rapidly. Thus, the myelinated Aδ nerve fibers mainly transmit acute pain. The majority (about 70%) of corneal nerve fibers are polymodal. A minority of them are thin myelinated Aδ type axons, but most of polymodal nociceptors are composed of slow-conducting C type axons. The polymodal nociceptors can be activated by cold (<29°C), heat (>39°C), exogenous irritants or endogenous inflammatory cytokines. Therefore, this type of nociceptor can both perceive acute pain and chronic pain. Because neuropeptides can depolarize distant branches of the same neuron that is not directly activated by the original stimulations. The polymodal stimulation can spread not only centripetally but also peripherally. The polymodal nociceptors are also involved in tear reflex of cornea.
Figure 1. The pattern diagram of anatomical structure of ophthalmic sensory nerve and physiology for pain formation in cataract surgery.
The corneal/conjunctival sensory nerves are composed of Aδ type nerve fibers and C type nerve fibers. The surgery-related inflammatory, mechanical and chemical stimulations can activate corneal/conjunctival nerve endings and trigger impulses. The corneal sensory nerves are innervated from the first division of trigeminal nerve. The conjunctival nerve endings are innervated from first division and second division of trigeminal nerve. When a surgical stimulus occurs, the corneal/conjunctival sensory nerves transmit nociceptive impulses to the trigeminal ganglion and nucleus. Sequentially, the nociceptive impulses are transmitted by neurons synapse in thalamus, and finally reach the somatosensory cortex region of cerebrum.
Compared with corneal neurons, the density of conjunctival neurons is relatively low. The majority of conjunctival sensory neurons are innervated from the first division (ophthalmic branch) of the trigeminal nerve, while the minority of conjunctival sensory neurons are innervated from the second division (maxillary branch) of the trigeminal nerve (Figure 1). The receptive fields of polymodal nociceptor and mechano-nociceptor of corneal nerves, often extend into the perilimbal conjunctiva. Pure conjunctival polymodal nociceptors and mechano-nociceptors exist in the bulbar conjunctiva, which have similar features with corneal nociceptors[22]–[23]. Conjunctival sensory neurons are also composed of myelinated (Aδ type) and unmyelinated (C type) axons with peripheral endings (mostly unencapsulated). Conjunctival sensory neurons express markers of peptidergic sensory neurons, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide[24] and substance P[25]. The conjunctival peptidergic nerve endings commonly locate around the blood vessels in conjunctival stroma, and can also be found in conjunctival epithelium or around the acini of lymph follicles and meibomian glands.
MEASUREMENT OF PAIN PERCEPTION LEVEL IN CATARACT SURGERY
Accumulating researches focused on the pain perception difference between twice cataract surgeries. In 2009, a research from Poland reported that preoperatively declared pain perception did not significantly correlated with the sequence of operation[26]. However, the time intervals and operators of the surgeries were not controlled same, which weakened the scientific of Omulecki et al's[26] research.
In 2010, Mowatt et al[27] first reported that the pain perception of patients was higher in the 2nd cataract surgery. This research included 1835 patients and used the visual analogue pain scale (VAS), which ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain), to evaluate pain score[28]. Mowatt et al[27] found that average VAS was 0.85 for the second surgeries while mean VAS was 0.5 for the first surgeries, by topical anaesthesia. However, the deficiency of the research was that the two surgeries were operated by different ophthalmologists. The difference of the surgeons may affect the patients' pain perception.
Ursea et al[29] also revealed that pain perception slightly increased in the second-eye cataract surgery under topical anesthesia compared with the first-eye surgery. They additionally assessed the preoperative anxiety levels of patients using Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) and State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI). Results showed that APAIS and STAI scores decreased before second surgery. The decreased preoperative anxiety appeared to contribute to the enhanced pain perception during second-eye surgery. In 2011, a research conducted by Bardocci et al[30] indicated that mean VAS pain score was slightly increased from 2.35 (first-eye surgery) to 2.89 (second-eye surgery) with no significance. It's worth noting that the sample size of Bardocci et al's[30] research was relatively small (n=73).
In 2013, Aslan et al[31] reported that patients had worse cooperation and more pain during the second-eye phacoemulsification surgery. In 2015 Jiang et al[32] also compared VAS score and STAI between first-eye and second-eye cataract surgery. They reached similar conclusions with Ursea et al[29] that cataract patients were likely to perceive more pain during second-eye surgery, which had lower preoperative anxiety before second-eye surgery. In 2017, Akkaya et al[33] reported that patients had increased pain perception and worse cooperation during the second-eye phacoemulsification surgery under sub-Tenon's local anesthesia. From the above papers, the pain perception level seems to indeed increase in second-eye cataract surgery with specific time intervals.
MECHANISM OF PAIN DIVERSITY BETWEEN CONSECUTIVE FIRST-EYE AND SECOND-EYE CATARACT SURGERIES
Immune Microenvironment Change
Mechanisms of pain perception enhancement in second-eye ophthalmic surgical procedure were discussed by El Rami et al[34]. They proposed that local inflammation induced sensitization of the contralateral eye corneal nociceptors and contributed to the pain enhancement during second-eye procedures[34]. Luna et al[35] also reported that inflammation or nerve lesion in the unilateral corneal sensory nerves would activate and sensitize the activity of contralateral eye nerves. Zhu et al[36] investigated the preoperative cytokines expression levels in aqueous humor from first-eye and second-eye surgeries. Results showed that the expression level of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), also known as C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL-2), was significantly up-regulated in aqueous humor in the second-eye after first-eye surgery. Chen et al[37] included self-controlled patients to investigate the change of inflammatory cytokines levels between two consecutive cataract surgeries. The findings of this study showed several discrepancies with Zhu et al's[36] research. Although the expression level of MCP-1 was slightly higher in the second eye, the difference showed no significant. The differences in studies of Chen et al[37] and Zhu et al[36] may be attributed to discrepancies in subgroup design and time interval selection. Chen et al[37] and Yan et al[38] also found a higher level of preoperative transforming growth factor β2 (TGF-β2) expression in the second-eye aqueous humor two weeks after first-eye cataract surgery, especially in patients combined with high myopia.
Anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) is an immuno-tolerance mechanism of eyes by suppressing antigen-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity[39]–[40]. TGF-β2 in aqueous humor was reported to play a key role in ACAID by promoting antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to induce development of Forkhead-box-p3 (Foxp3)+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) in spleen[41]–[42]. The anti-inflammatory Tregs can secrete cytokines, including TGF-β, which inhibit APCs to activate naive T cells into Interferon-γ (IFN-γ)+ effector T helper 1 cells (Th1)[43]. Intravitreal-injected TGF-β2 reduced inflammatory cell infiltration in the animal model of ocular inflammation[44]. The above-mentioned studies indicated a protective mechanism of TGF-β mitigating the sympathetic immune reaction triggered by unilateral cataract surgery[37]–[38].
As a pain-associated cytokine, expression of MCP-1 was reported to be significantly correlated to the pain perception level of patient with fibromyalgia[45]. Intrathecal injection of MCP-1 induced painful reactions and mechanical hypersensitivity on mice[46]. Zhang et al[47] found that MCP-1 level in aqueous humor significantly correlated with pain perception during cataract surgery. Another function of MCP-1 is recruiting leukocytes migrate to injured or inflammatory tissue, and furtherly triggering the inflammatory reaction cascade[48]–[49]. The secretion of inflammatory cytokines, such as MCP-1 and colony-stimulating factor 3 (CSF3), from residual lens epithelial cells (LECs) in capsule bag was significantly enhanced after cataract surgery[50]. Elevated level of MCP-1 in aqueous humor from the contralateral eye after first-eye surgery pointed out a sympathetic eye condition. Sympathetic ophthalmia, which charactered as a type of bilateral diffuse granulomatous pan-uveitis, is one of the well-known sympathetic eye conditions. Sympathetic ophthalmia usually develops in bilateral eyes after penetrating injury to unilateral eye[51]. One of the molecular pathological mechanisms of sympathetic ophthalmia is T lymphocytes mediated delayed hypersensitivity (also known as type IV hypersensitivity)[52]–[54]. After recruited to injured ophthalmic tissue and activated by MCP-1 and interleukin (IL)-8, the infiltrating monocytes will release inflammatory mediators and present antigens (such as crystallin) to Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes. The Th lymphocytes differentiate into antigen-specific lymphocytes after stimulated by monocytes presented antigen and inflammatory cytokines. The activated Th1 and Th17 secrete proinflammatory cytokines (such as IFN-γ and IL-17) into the aqueous-blood circulation and furtherly amplify the inflammatory cascade. The activation of ocular anterior segment inflammation would induce iris vascular changes which manifested by the increase of vessel area density and vessel skeleton density[55]–[56]. Cui et al[57] reported that, for the second-eye surgery, patients' preoperative iris vessel area density significantly increased and was correlated with the perioperative pain. It indicated an upregulated anterior segment inflammatory state before second-eye cataract surgery compared to the first-eye surgery.
Serum immunoglobulins against crystallin proteins were also found in most cataract patients with active uveitis[58]. BetaB1-crystallin antigen was found in ciliary body tissue, which indicated a potential target for autoimmune reaction in anterior uveitis[59]. Crystallin proteins exposure and blood-aqueous barrier breakdown activating autoimmune reaction is a possible mechanism for the panuveitis after first-eye cataract surgery.
What is the origin of the up-regulated MCP-1 in aqueous humor after first-eye cataract surgery? Phacoemulsification induced oxidative stress of residual LECs in capsular bag[60]–[61]. Kawai et al[62] reported that the perioperative aqueous MCP-1 both increased in human and animal operated-eyes after phacoemulsification cataract surgery. In situ immunohistochemical staining showed MCP-1 expression significantly up-regulated in lens capsular (containing LECs) after cataract surgery. Expression of MCP-1 in LECs were significantly increased after TGF-β2 treatment in vitro. Therefore, proliferated LECs in capsule bag might be the main provenance of increased aqueous humor MCP-1 after phacoemulsification[62]. Similar results were reveals by Jiang et al[50] in their research that published in 2018. The data revealed that the up-regulated MCP-1 in anterior chamber may be secreted from the remnant LECs in capsular bag after phacoemulsification.
Recently, Fan et al[63] reported that CSF3 significantly increased in aqueous humor from second eye after the first eye surgery. In both patients and rabbit models, the expression level of CSF3 in second eye reached at maximum 1wk after the first-eye surgery. The up-regulated CSF3 in the second-eye aqueous humor could arouse nociception by directly interacting with neuroreceptor in the ciliary body and iris. Simultaneously, more neutrophils were recruited to the contralateral eye aqueous humor. Trigeminal ganglion electrophysiology pulse and corneal sensitivity of rat were significantly up regulated after one eye surgery. Superior cervical ganglionectomy could effectively suppress the trigeminal nerve pain and corneal high sensitivity. Results indicated that CSF3 regulated sympathetic activity alteration is a possible mechanism of pain-perception difference between twice consecutive cataract surgeries.
Tolerability to Anesthetic Drugs
Ocular topical anesthesia is achieved using eye drop or jelly. Almost all eye drops have local tolerance problems, but the frequency is variable. After prolonged use of eye drops, local drug tolerance would induce pain on instillation, delay healing, allergic reactions and disturbances of lacrimal secretion[64]. Resistance to local anaesthetics was reported to occur even after correctly performed anaesthetics administration[65]. Ursea et al[29] suggested a pharmacological hypothesis that the previous exposure to anesthetic drugs during the first eye surgery leads to drug tolerance, so the reaction to the same drug is reduced during the second eye surgery. However, Akkaya et al[33] disagreed with this opinion for the following reasons: 1) The dosage of anesthetic drugs applied during the first operation was quite small; 2) The interval time between consecutive phacoemulsification surgeries was relatively long. In summary, the drug tolerance hypothesis lacks evidence support.
Neuropsychological Factors
Mental and psychological factors (such as stress, depression, or anxiety) can greatly influence the perception of ocular pain[66]–[67]. Bardocci[68] considered that increased pain in second-eye cataract surgery should be attributed to the neuropathology of pain perception.
Short-term pain memory trace
Pain perception is associated with patients' changed expectations and raised awareness[69]. The memory traces of pain also contribute to the pain experience enhancement. Pervious research investigated the memory traces of pain in the cerebral cortex[70]. Distinctive regions in brain cortex handle sensory discriminative and components of pain. The pain-related areas in cerebral cortex include primary somatosensory cortex/posterior parietal cortex, anterior insular cortex, and secondary somatosensory cortex. The anterior insular cortex activation is associated with the integration of sensory and cognitive (salience, memory, attention, and awareness) components of pain perception. Absence of memory-specific anterior cingulate cortex activation is associated with pain-related suffering. It is noteworthy that the primary somatosensory cortex/posterior parietal cortex memory is involved in the short-term retention of intensity and spatial aspects of stimulation[70]. The short-term pain memory trace system is a potential explanation for the greater pain experienced in a second-eye phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
Preoperative anxiety
Preoperative anxiety has debatable influences on intraoperative pain experience in phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
On the one hand, Ursea et al[29] reported that decreased preoperative anxiety scores were negatively correlated to the incremental pain perception in the second-eye cataract surgery. Similarly, data from Jiang et al[32] showed that cataract patients were more sensitive to pain during second-eye surgery than during first-eye surgery. The increased pain during second-eye surgery was negatively correlated with decreased preoperative anxiety level. Among patients who reported more pain in second-eye surgery, the VAS pain scores were positively correlated with the intraoperative monitoring parameters, including diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate. Thus, the mean arterial pressure and heart rate during surgery are potential parameters for evaluating intraoperative pain risk[32].
On the other hand, some researches revealed that intraoperative pain experience during cataract surgery was positively correlated to preoperative anxiety level[71]. Socea et al[71] investigated anxiety of patients using visual analog scale for anxiety before cataract surgeries, simultaneously evaluated intraoperative pain perception using VAS. Results showed a significantly positive correlation between visual analog scale for anxiety and VAS. It indicated that the increased preoperative anxiety seems to contributed to the pain enhancement in second-eye surgery.
INTERVENTIONS ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING CONSECUTIVE SECOND-EYE CATARACT SURGERY
Interventions on Inflammatory Cytokines
Zhang et al[72] investigated the interventions on MCP-1 to control pain-increase in second cataract surgery. They found that the preoperative treatment of pranoprofen eye drops decreased the pain perception during second-eye cataract surgery, especially when the intervals time between the twice surgeries was 1-week or 6-week. The pain-relief mechanism of pranoprofen in second-eye surgery was associated with MCP-1 inhibition. In addition to non-specific anti-inflammatory drugs, MCP-1/CCL-2 specific inhibitors can precisely block the neuro-hypersensitivity and pain caused by MCP-1. Bindarit (a selective inhibitor of CCL2/CCL7/CCL8 protein family) effectively reduced neuropathic pain related behavior after peripheral nerve injury in mice model[46]. Besides that, blocking C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (the receptor of MCP-1) by specific antagonist (RS504393) can also effectively reduce pain-related behavior in neuropathic mice[73].
Fan et al[63] reported that superior cervical ganglionectomy could effectively suppress the secondary corneal sensitivity and trigeminal nerve pain of rats after one eye cataract surgery. Their results indicated that CSF3 and sympathetic activity were prospective targets on pain relief during ophthalmic surgeries. CSF3 monoclonal antibody and other specific inhibitors are worth further study.
Mental and Psychological Intervention
Appropriate preoperative publicizing and education is important. Forewarning the patient of pain perception enhancement during second-eye cataract surgery may improve the intraoperative cooperation and experience of patients[68]. Ursea et al[29] suggested ophthalmologists to offer sufficient preoperative education for patients before second-eye cataract surgery by reminding patients to prepare for the possible pain increase.
Medical intervention on psychology can help relieve anxiety and decrease pain perception. Sane et al[74] reported that sublingual administration of 3 mg melatonin before cataract surgery under topical anesthesia reduced pain level, anxiety level, and intraocular pressure of patients during surgeries.
Several researches also explored the anxiolytic roles of perioperative music intervention on patients undergoing cataract surgery. Preoperative music intervention was reported to be an effective method to inhibit anxiety and pain experience during cataract surgery[75]. Binaural beat embedded music intervention during cataract surgery has been proved to reduce perceived pain, anxiety, heart rate and blood pressures of patients[76].
Individualized Anesthesia Strategy
Singh et al[77] compared blood pressure of patients in phacoemulsification cataract surgery under topical and peribulbar anesthesia. The intraoperative blood pressure significant reduced in peribulbar anesthesia group versus topical anesthesia group. Conversely, topical anesthesia reported to cause less pain and discomfort than peribulbar anesthesia during phacoemulsification cataract surgery in a research performed by Maharjan et al[78].
Gombos et al[79] compared effectiveness of retrobulbar anesthesia and topical anesthesia in cataract phacoemulsification surgery. In the retrobulbar group, fewer patients experienced pain during surgery and fewer recalled any perioperative discomfort. With retrobulbar anesthesia the objective parameters were more stable than with topical anesthesia, and systolic blood pressure was significantly lower. The results suggested that retrobulbar anesthesia have better anesthetic effect than topical anesthesia during cataract surgeries.
Bardocci et al[30] explored pain perception between second eye cataract surgery and first eye cataract surgery under topical anesthesia using 2% lidocaine hydrochloride jelly, while most of other researchers performed topical anesthesia by eye drops. The pain experienced and cooperation did not differ between first and second eye procedures in Bardocci et al's[30] research. Another research from Bardocci et al[80] confirmed that lidocaine jelly gives significantly higher aqueous levels of lidocaine, better patient cooperation, better analgesia, and less need for intraoperative additional anesthesia than the same amount of lidocaine eye drops. The results indicated that lidocaine jelly may have better anesthetic effect than topical anesthesia eye drops.
Sharma et al[81] reported that there was no significant difference in levels of intraoperative pain perceptions between the first-eye and second-eye cataract surgeries under assisted topical anesthesia. Assisted topical anesthesia means topical anesthesia combined with sedative drugs (like midazolam, propofol, or fentanyl) intravenous infusion to help patients to achieve adequate relaxation. The results indicated that topical anesthesia combined with general sedation may be an effective strategy for reducing pain perception during second-eye cataract surgery.
Choosing Appropriate Timing for Surgery
Rational selection of operation time is conducive to reduce pain experience in cataract surgery. Zhu et al[82] reported that patients underwent cataract surgery in the afternoon showed increased preoperative anxiety level which may upregulate the secretion of relevant stress hormones. The patient's stressful emotional state and hormone level acted together to enhance intraoperative pain perception in the afternoon.
Time intervals between bilateral consecutive surgeries were significantly correlated with pain scores in second-eye cataract surgery[57]. Another research from Zhang et al[72] showed that the VAS scores during second-eye surgery were significantly higher in 1-week interval and 6-week interval subgroups compared with the first-eye surgery. When the extended the interval between twice surgeries to more than 6wk, the MCP-1 level in the second-eye preoperative aqueous humor was relatively low. It suggested that extending the operation interval (>6wk) between two consecutive cataract surgeries may help to reduce the pain perception of patients during second-eye surgery.
However, the time-point of inflammation peak after first-eye cataract surgery is still in dispute. Liu et al[83] reported that patients who accepted the second-eye surgery two weeks after first-eye surgery perceived most pain than patients choosing other time-interval. Hence, the time-internal selection between bilateral consecutive cataract surgeries still needs further research.
Lubricating the Eyelid Speculum
Eyelid speculum is also a trigger of conjunctival pain during ophthalmic surgery under topical anesthesia[84]–[85]. A research from Jha and Kurumkattil[86] indicated that previously lubricating the speculum by viscoelastic agents relieved conjunctival pain perceptions in first-eye and second-eye cataract surgeries under topical anesthesia. In dry-speculum group, 78.79% of patients felt that second-eye surgeries were more painful than first-eye surgeries. However, in lubricated-speculum group, only 12.5% of patients reported more pain in second-eye surgeries than first-eye surgeries[86]. Lubricating the speculum could reduce the friction and pressure on palpebral conjunctiva and reduce the pain perception in second-eye surgeries.
CONCLUSIONS
Pain perception enhancement during second-eye surgery of consecutive phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia is a tricky issue that has puzzled ophthalmologists for a long time. Second-eye surgical pain enhancement also greatly influenced satisfaction and willingness for re-operation of patients with bilateral cataracts. If patients hesitate to receive second-eye surgery, anisometropia induced by monocular cataract surgery may seriously reduce their visual function and quality of life[87]–[88]. Elucidating the pathology mechanisms of pain perception enhancement during second-eye cataract surgery is crucial for promotion of intervention.
According to present studies, individualized and comprehensive intervention strategy is essential to improve intraoperative experience and cooperation of patients underwent second-eye cataract surgery. Preventive measures should be considered on the following dimensions: 1) stabilizing inflammatory levels; 2) intensifying anesthesia protocols; 3) improving neuropsychological condition; 4) improving surgical procedures. For bilateral cataract patients, more precise examination and monitoring are needed before and during second-eye surgery. Preoperative serum and aqueous humor inflammatory cytokines levels detection is helpful in indicating the preoperative inflammation level of second-eye surgery. The preoperative inflammation level is related to the intraoperative perceived pain. Ophthalmologists should cooperate closely with anesthesiologists to improve intraoperative cooperation and pain experience of patients with high pain-risk. In addition, perioperative assessment of anxiety and pain scores helps ophthalmic nurses to adapt psychological care strategy. It is recommended to include perioperative anxiety and pain assessment into routine surgical examination.
Immunological, neuropsychological, and pharmacological factors work together in the enhancement of second-eye surgery intraoperative pain. Although some progress has been made focusing this issue, there are still numbers of questions remain to be answered. For example, why the inflammatory cytokines changed in the contralateral eye after first-eye surgery? How to explain the seemingly paradoxical relationship between ACAID and sympathetic ophthalmia? The mechanisms of pain strengthening in second-eye surgery need further exploration. With the development of molecular biology, we will achieve better understand on the enhancement of pain perception in second-eye cataract surgery and promote more targeted clinical interventions in future.
Footnotes
Authors' contributions: Luo JW searched literatures, coordinated information and wrote the manuscript. Chen YH, Yu JF, and Chen YX collected and coordinated information. Ji M and Guan HJ designed the work and reviewed the manuscript before submitting.
Foundations: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82171038; No.81974129); Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline (No.JSDW202245).
Conflicts of Interest: Luo JW, None; Chen YH, None; Yu JF, None; Chen YX, None; Ji M, None; Guan HJ, None.
REFERENCES
- 1.GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144–e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gurnani B, Kaur K. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Phacoemulsification. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Henderson BA, Schneider J. Same-day cataract surgery should not be the standard of care for patients with bilateral visually significant cataract. Surv Ophthalmol. 2012;57(6):580–583. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sarikkola AU, Uusitalo RJ, Hellstedt T, Ess SL, Leivo T, Kivelä T. Simultaneous bilateral versus sequential bilateral cataract surgery: Helsinki Simultaneous Bilateral Cataract Surgery Study Report 1. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(6):992–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kogawa S, Suzuki Y, Furukawa A, Kurosaka N, Nozuki N, Ueno S. Bilateral simultaneous endophthalmitis after immediately sequential bilateral cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2023;32:101886. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2023.101886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bjerager J, Leegaard Holm DM, Holm L, Faber C, Bate A, Christakopoulos C, Solborg Bjerrum S. Outbreak of bilateral endophthalmitis after immediate sequential bilateral cataract surgery. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023;141(11):1075–1078. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.4637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cioana M, Gupta RB, Tam ES, Chiu HH, Gold I, Somani S. Comparison of pain perception in patients undergoing manual cataract surgery versus refractive laser-assisted cataract surgery. Can J Ophthalmol. 2024;59(3):139–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2023.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.St John Smith E. Advances in understanding nociception and neuropathic pain. J Neurol. 2018;265(2):231–238. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8641-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miyamoto S, Kondo T, Maruyama K. Senso-immunology: the past, present, and future. J Biochem. 2023;174(4):305–315. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvad052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Belmonte C, Acosta MC, Merayo-Lloves J, Gallar J. What causes eye pain? Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2015;3(2):111–121. doi: 10.1007/s40135-015-0073-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hejtmancik JF, Shiels A. Overview of the lens. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2015;134:119–127. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2015.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Belmonte C, Aracil A, Acosta MC, Luna C, Gallar J. Nerves and sensations from the eye surface. Ocul Surf. 2004;2(4):248–253. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70112-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dikmetas O, Aygün O, Bolek EÇ, Kocabeyoglu S, Karadag O, Karakaya J, Kadayıfçılar S, Irkec M. Investigation of anterior segment structures of the eye in Behçet's disease using in vivo confocal microscopy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(12):3897–3902. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05846-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.López de Armentia M, Cabanes C, Belmonte C. Electrophysiological properties of identified trigeminal ganglion neurons innervating the cornea of the mouse. Neuroscience. 2000;101(4):1109–1115. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00440-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jones MA, Marfurt CF. Peptidergic innervation of the rat cornea. Exp Eye Res. 1998;66(4):421–435. doi: 10.1006/exer.1997.0446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barros A, Lozano-Sanroma J, Queiruga-Piñeiro J, Fernández-Vega Cueto L, Anitua E, Alcalde I, Merayo-Lloves J. Recovery of corneal innervation after treatment in dry eye disease: a confocal microscopy study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(5):1841. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guerrero-Moreno A, Baudouin C, Melik Parsadaniantz S, Réaux-Le Goazigo A. Morphological and functional changes of corneal nerves and their contribution to peripheral and central sensory abnormalities. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:610342. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.610342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Toh CJL, Liu C, Lee IXY, Yu Lin MT, Tong L, Liu YC. Clinical associations of corneal neuromas with ocular surface diseases. Neural Regen Res. 2024;19(1):140–147. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.375308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mehra D, Cohen NK, Galor A. Ocular surface pain: a narrative review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020;9(3):1–21. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00263-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rosenthal P, Borsook D, Moulton EA. Oculofacial pain: corneal nerve damage leading to pain beyond the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(13):5285–5287. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Terrier LM, Hadjikhani N, Destrieux C. The trigeminal pathways. J Neurol. 2022;269(7):3443–3460. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11002-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Belmonte C, Nichols JJ, Cox SM, Brock JA, Begley CG, Bereiter DA, Dartt DA, Galor A, Hamrah P, Ivanusic JJ, Jacobs DS, McNamara NA, Rosenblatt MI, Stapleton F, Wolffsohn JS. TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):404–437. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Comes N, Gasull X, Callejo G. Proton sensing on the ocular surface: implications in eye pain. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:773871. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.773871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Okano M, Hirahara K, Kiuchi M, Onoue M, Iwamura C, Kokubo K, Hishiya T, Morimoto Y, Ikehara Y, Murakami A, Ebihara N, Nakayama T. Interleukin-33-activated neuropeptide CGRP-producing memory Th2 cells cooperate with somatosensory neurons to induce conjunctival itch. Immunity. 2022;55(12):2352–2368.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2022.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.ten Tusscher MP, Klooster J, van der Want JJ, Lamers WP, Vrensen GF. The allocation of nerve fibres to the anterior eye segment and peripheral Ganglia of rats. I. The sensory innervation. Brain Res. 1989;494(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90147-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Omulecki W, Laudanska-Olszewska I, Synder A. Factors affecting patient cooperation and level of pain perception during phacoemulsification in topical and intracameral anesthesia. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009;19(6):977–983. doi: 10.1177/112067210901900613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mowatt L, Youseff E, Langford M. Anaesthesia for phacosemulsification surgery: is it as comfortable as we think? J Perioper Pract. 2010;20(1):30–33. doi: 10.1177/175045891002000105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kjeldsen HB, Klausen TW, Rosenberg J. Preferred presentation of the visual analog scale for measurement of postoperative pain. Pain Pract. 2016;16(8):980–984. doi: 10.1111/papr.12344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ursea R, Feng MT, Zhou M, Lien V, Loeb R. Pain perception in sequential cataract surgery: Comparison of first and second procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(6):1009–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bardocci A, Ciucci F, Lofoco G, Perdicaro S, Lischetti A. Pain during second eye cataract surgery under topical anesthesia: an intraindividual study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(10):1511–1514. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1803-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Aslan L, Aslankurt M, Cekic O, Aksoy A, Yildiz H. The pain experience and cooperation of patients in consecutive cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23(3):339–343. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jiang L, Zhang K, He W, Zhu X, Zhou P, Lu Y. Perceived pain during cataract surgery with topical anesthesia: a comparison between first-eye and second-eye surgery. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:383456. doi: 10.1155/2015/383456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Akkaya S, Özkurt YB, Aksoy S, Kökçen HK. Differences in pain experience and cooperation between consecutive surgeries in patients undergoing phacoemulsification. Int Ophthalmol. 2017;37(3):545–552. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0295-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.El Rami H, Fadlallah A, Fahd D, Fahed S. Patient-perceived pain during laser in situ keratomileusis: Comparison of fellow eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(3):453–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Luna C, Quirce S, Aracil-Marco A, Belmonte C, Gallar J, Acosta MC. Unilateral corneal insult also alters sensory nerve activity in the contralateral eye. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021;8:767967. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.767967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhu XJ, Wolff D, Zhang KK, He WW, Sun XH, Lu Y, Zhou P. Molecular inflammation in the contralateral eye after cataract surgery in the first eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(9):5566–5573. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-16531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen Y, Zhang Y, Sun K, Yan H. Higher TGF-β2 level in the aqueous humor of the second eye versus the first eye in the course of sequential cataract surgery. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2020;28(3):439–445. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1578888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yan WJ, Zhang YP, Cao JG, Yan H. TGF-β2 levels in the aqueous humor are elevated in the second eye of high myopia within two weeks after sequential cataract surgery. Sci Rep. 2022;12:17974. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22746-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Farooq SM, Ashour HM. Eye-mediated induction of specific immune tolerance to encephalitogenic antigens. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2013;19(7):503–510. doi: 10.1111/cns.12087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stepp MA, Menko AS. Immune responses to injury and their links to eye disease. Transl Res. 2021;236:52–71. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.05.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wilbanks GA, Mammolenti M, Streilein JW. Studies on the induction of anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID) III. Induction of ACAID depends upon intraocular transforming growth factor-Β. Eur J Immunol. 1992;22(1):165–173. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Keino H, Horie S, Sugita S. Immune privilege and eye-derived T-regulatory cells. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:1679197. doi: 10.1155/2018/1679197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen W. TGF-β regulation of T cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2023;41:483–512. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-101921-045939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Allen JB, McGahan MC, Ogawa Y, Sellon DC, Clark BD, Fleisher LN. Intravitreal transforming growth factor-beta 2 decreases cellular infiltration in endotoxin-induced ocular inflammation in rabbits. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15(1):95–103. doi: 10.3109/02713689609017616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ang DC, Moore MN, Hilligoss J, Tabbey R. MCP-1 and IL-8 as pain biomarkers in fibromyalgia: a pilot study. Pain Med. 2011;12(8):1154–1161. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01179.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pawlik K, Ciapała K, Ciechanowska A, Kwiatkowski K, Mika J. Pharmacological evidence of the important roles of CCR1 and CCR3 and their endogenous ligands CCL2/7/8 in hypersensitivity based on a murine model of neuropathic pain. Cells. 2022;12(1):98. doi: 10.3390/cells12010098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zhang F, Wang JH, Zhao MS. Dynamic monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 level as predictors of perceived pain during first and second phacoemulsification eye surgeries in patients with bilateral cataract. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01880-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Chen WL, Fang YL, Wang HH, Tan XW, Zhu XL, Xu Z, Jiang HF, Wu XM, Hong WM, Wang XM, Tu JJ, Wei W. Role of chemokine receptor 2 in rheumatoid arthritis: a research update. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;116:109755. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.109755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Singh S, Anshita D, Ravichandiran V. MCP-1: function, regulation, and involvement in disease. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;101:107598. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jiang J, Shihan MH, Wang Y, Duncan MK. Lens epithelial cells initiate an inflammatory response following cataract surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(12):4986–4997. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Parchand S, Agrawal D, Ayyadurai N, Agarwal A, Gangwe A, Behera S, Bhatia P, Mulkutkar S, Barwar G, Singh R, Sen A, Agarwal M. Sympathetic ophthalmia: a comprehensive update. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(6):1931–1944. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2363_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Albert DM, Diaz-Rohena R. A historical review of sympathetic ophthalmia and its epidemiology. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989;34(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(89)90125-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Krásný J, Eckchlager T, Smetana K, Šach J, Šubrtová H. The long-term monitoring of sympathetic ophthalmia in the diagnostic and terapeutic view. Review Department of Ophthalmology. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2019;75(5):235–248. doi: 10.31348/2019/5/1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhong ZY, Su GN, Kijlstra A, Yang PZ. Activation of the interleukin-23/interleukin-17 signalling pathway in autoinflammatory and autoimmune uveitis. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;80:100866. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2020.100866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ebrahimiadib N, Maleki A, Fadakar K, Manhapra A, Ghassemi F, Foster CS. Vascular abnormalities in uveitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66(4):653–667. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Xue W, Lin S, Chen X, Jia Y, Fang X, Suo Y, Ma Y, Wang Y, Zou H. In vivo noninvasive imaging and quantitative analysis of iris vessels. Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(5):754–761. doi: 10.1159/000516553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Cui L, Ma Y, Wang Y, Luo Q, Ding Q, Ge L, Lu S, Miao Y, Sun Q, Zou H, Jin H. Combination of iris vessel area density and surgery interval as the predictor of perceived pain during consecutive second-eye cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023;49(8):858–863. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chen L, Holland GN, Yu F, Levinson RD, Lampi KJ, Horwitz J, Gordon LK. Associations of seroreactivity against crystallin proteins with disease activity and cataract in patients with uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(10):4476–4481. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Stempel D, Sandusky H, Lampi K, Cilluffo M, Horwitz J, Braun J, Goodglick L, Gordon LK. BetaB1-crystallin: identification of a candidate ciliary body uveitis antigen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(1):203–209. doi: 10.1167/iovs.01-1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cameron MD, Poyer JF, Aust SD. Identification of free radicals produced during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(3):463–470. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00643-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu YC, Setiawan M, Ang M, Yam GHF, Mehta JS. Changes in aqueous oxidative stress, prostaglandins, and cytokines: Comparisons of low-energy femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(2):196–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kawai M, Inoue T, Inatani M, Tsuboi N, Shobayashi K, Matsukawa A, Yoshida A, Tanihara H. Elevated levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in the aqueous humor after phacoemulsification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(13):7951–7960. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fan Z, Fan C, Qi B, Zhang B, Li W, Qi X, Liu X, Zhang BN, Huang Y. Sympathetic nerve-mediated fellow eye pain during sequential cataract surgery by regulating granulocyte colony stimulating factor CSF3. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:841733. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.841733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hugues FC, Le Jeunne C. Systemic and local tolerability of ophthalmic drug formulations. Drug Saf. 1993;8(5):365–380. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199308050-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Marti F, Lindner G, Ravioli S. Resistance to local anaesthetics: a literature review. Br J Anaesth. 2022;129(2):e43–e45. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Soltani S, van Ryckeghem DML, Vervoort T, Heathcote LC, Yeates K, Sears C, Noel M. Attentional biases in pediatric chronic pain: an eye-tracking study assessing the nature of the bias and its relation to attentional control. Pain. 2020;161(10):2263–2273. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Sanchez V, Cohen NK, Felix E, Galor A. Factors affecting the prevalence, severity, and characteristics of ocular surface pain. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2023;18(1):19–32. doi: 10.1080/17469899.2023.2157813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bardocci A. Second-eye pain in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(9):1705; author reply 1705. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Pud D, Golan Y, Pesta R. Hand dominancy—a feature affecting sensitivity to pain. Neurosci Lett. 2009;467(3):237–240. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Albanese MC, Duerden EG, Rainville P, Duncan GH. Memory traces of pain in human cortex. J Neurosci. 2007;27(17):4612–4620. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0695-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Socea SD, Abualhasan H, Magen O, Zayit-Soudry S, Blumenthal EZ, Duvdevan N, Mimouni M. Preoperative anxiety levels and pain during cataract surgery. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(4):471–476. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1666996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhang Y, Du Y, Jiang Y, Zhu X, Lu Y. Effects of pranoprofen on aqueous humor monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 level and pain relief during second-eye cataract surgery. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:783. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kwiatkowski K, Ciapała K, Rojewska E, Makuch W, Mika J. Comparison of the beneficial effects of RS504393, maraviroc and cenicriviroc on neuropathic pain-related symptoms in rodents: behavioral and biochemical analyses. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;84:106540. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sane S, Motarjemizadeh Q, Komilzhonovich IN, Abdelbasset WK, Zaman GS, Suksatan W, Morwati S, Haki BK, Rahmani N, Golabi P, Mahmodi H. The effect of melatonin on analgesia, anxiety, and intraocular pressure (IOP) in cataract surgery under topical anesthesia. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs. 2023;38(2):253–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.05.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Guerrier G, Bernabei F, Lehmann M, Pellegrini M, Giannaccare G, Rothschild PR. Efficacy of preoperative music intervention on pain and anxiety in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:748296. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.748296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Dahshan D, Kuzbel J, Verma V. A role for music in cataract surgery: a systematic review. Int Ophthalmol. 2021;41(12):4209–4215. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01986-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Singh B, Kumar P, Moulick PS, Shankar S, Kaushik J, Sati A. Comparison of changes in blood pressure in phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed via topical and peribulbar anaesthesia: a cohort study. Med J Armed Forces Ind. 2023;79(1):34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Maharjan I, Shrestha E, Gurung B, Gurung HM, Adhikari HB, Baral P. Pain perception in cataract surgery: topical versus peribulbar anaesthesia. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2021;13(25):50–58. doi: 10.3126/nepjoph.v13i1.30574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gombos K, Jakubovits E, Kolos A, Salacz G, Németh J. Cataract surgery anaesthesia: is topical anaesthesia really better than retrobulbar? Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(3):309–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00924.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bardocci A, Lofoco G, Perdicaro S, Ciucci F, Manna L. Lidocaine 2% gel versus lidocaine 4% unpreserved drops for topical anesthesia in cataract surgery A randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(1):144–149. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01562-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Sharma NS, Ooi JL, Figueira EC, Rosenberg ML, Masselos K, Papalkar DP, Paramanathan N, Francis IC, Alexander SL, Ferch NI. Patient perceptions of second eye clear corneal cataract surgery using assisted topical anaesthesia. Eye (Lond) 2008;22(4):547–550. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Zhu X, Lu Q, Yao Y, Xu X, Lu Y. Intraoperative pain sensation during cataract surgery: why does timing matter? Curr Eye Res. 2021;46(7):971–977. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1857776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Liu P, Zhang SJ, Geng Z, Yuan RD, Ye J. Factors affecting pain in patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(2):297–303. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01178-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lam DSC, Law RWK, Ng ASY, Lam PTH, Jhanji V, Lee VYW, Fan AH, Rao SK. Randomized double-masked controlled trial comparing pain scores with and without the use of supplementary 2% lidocaine gel in LASIK. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(4):627–631.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wasser LM, Roditi E, Weiss AR, Weill Y, Koslowsky M, Zadok D, Hanhart J, Magal I. Anxiety and pain perception using a speculum-free eyelid retraction technique for intravitreal injection. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(6):2023–2028. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05422-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Jha RK, Kurumkattil R. Can lubrication of the eyelid speculum reduce overall pain perception associated with cataract surgery by phacoemulsification performed under topical anesthesia? Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022;70(5):1606–1611. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2963_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Stuart M, Mooney C, Hrabovsky M, Silvestri G, Stewart S. Surgical planning during a pandemic: Identifying patients at high risk of severe disease or death due to COVID-19 in a cohort of patients on a cataract surgery waiting list. Ulster Med J. 2022;91(1):19–25. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Spekreijse L, Simons R, Winkens B, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of immediate versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery in the Netherlands (BICAT-NL study): a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023;401(10392):1951–1962. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00525-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]