Abstract
Salmonella is the main bacterial pathogen that causes foodborne disease, particularly in developing countries. Nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) include Enteritidis and Typhimurium as the most prevalent strains which are one of the significant causes of acute gastroenteritis in children. Therefore, identifying the most predominant serovars, types of common contaminated food, and paying attention to their antibiotic resistance are the main factors in the prevention and control strategy of salmonellosis. This study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence rate of serovars, the biofilm formation, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) status, and phenotypic virulence factors of Salmonella strains isolated from diarrhea samples in some cities of Iran. A total of 40 (10.41%) Salmonella isolates were recovered from 384 diarrhea samples processed and the most common serovar was Salmonella serovar Typhimurium (82.5). Also, all isolates belonging to serovar Typhimurium showed more virulence factors compared to other serovars. The isolates showed a high resistance rate to ampicillin (95%) and nalidixic acid (87.5%), while a low resistance rate was found for chloramphenicol (2.5%). Moreover, significant variances in the capacity of biofilm formation were found between different Salmonella serotypes. The resistance of NTS to extant choice drugs is a potential public health problem. Constant monitoring of AMR pattern and virulence profile of NTS serovars is suggested for the prevention of salmonellosis in humans.
1. Introduction
Salmonella enterica serovars is the main cause of foodborne outbreaks which has led to global public health concerns [1]. This bacterium is annually involved in approximately 94 million cases of salmonellosis and 155,000 deaths worldwide [2]. In terms of epidemiology, a variety of food products have been described as the major source of Salmonella infections. Nontyphoidal Salmonella (NTS) is the main zoonotic pathogen described in children, transmitted through contaminated food or water ingestion or exposure to polluted animals or poultry [3, 4]. In addition, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. Enteritidis are the most predominant serotypes related to NTS gastroenteritis in children worldwide which is usually self-limiting [4]. NTS gastroenteritis is described with abdominal cramps, fever, nausea, and vomiting, where hospitalization may be essential for severe cases including susceptible and immunocompromised individuals (such as children and HIV-positive, or diabetics cases) [5].
Invasive NTS infections are life-threatening infections particularly for infants and young children, as well as those stressed with malnutrition, the elderly, and immunocompromised individuals [6]. The 2017 Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) assessed that Salmonella enterocolitis causes approximately 95.1 million cases, 50771 deaths, and 3.10 million DALYs [7]. In addition to causing diarrheal disease, nontyphoidal Salmonella infections can cause bacteremia, meningitis, and other focal infections by invading normally sterile sites [8]. These infections, referred to as invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease, usually do not cause diarrhea, but present as nonspecific febrile illnesses with clinical symptoms similar to and indistinguishable from other febrile illnesses, and with higher mortality cases than is seen in noninvasive infections [8].
The presence of Salmonella pathogenicity island (SPI) can be characterized as a benefit for bacteria that cause the infection. Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI1) exists in approximately all Salmonella, which is a genetic element on the chromosome comprising virulence genes, which encode factors involved in invasion [3]. Moreover, SopB is an effector protein that is involved in prompting fluid secretion, encoded by Salmonella pathogenicity island 5 (SPI5) [9]. Salmonella invades host cells and survives in the Peyer's patches via the expression of two genes, sopE and gipA, which are transferred through phages [10, 11]. Another phage-related gene is sodCI which preserves Salmonella against oxidative degradation [12]. Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 (SPI2) is a preserved chromosomic element that permits it to endure the conditions inside the macrophage and spread in the host body [3]. Finally, Salmonella pathogenicity island 3 (SPI3) and SPI5 encode some effector factors that alter the macrophage conditions [3].
The widespread use of antimicrobial agents in clinics and farming has caused the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in NTS, which is a global concern [13, 14]. Moreover, the increase of multidrug resistance (MDR) has been reported for Salmonella obtained from food products [15]. Hence, high antibiotic resistance has been reported for Salmonella, especially to ampicillin, sulfonamides/sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline in Europe [16]. In addition, the development of quinolone resistance is the main concern for the effective control and management of salmonellosis [17]. Antibiotic resistance genes can be carried on mobile elements such as plasmids and integrons [18]. In particular, several antibiotic resistance cassettes, carrying diverse combinations of resistance genes, were described in Salmonella integrons [19]. Meanwhile, the level of resistance in NTS differs with various serotypes and in diverse geographical regions, knowledge of common serovars and their AMR patterns is valuable in developing empirical treatment guidelines and monitoring the spread of this pathogen in the community [4, 20]. Recently, a new type of multidrug-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium, ST 34, was described in Vietnam, which was associated with invasive disease in immunocompromised patients [21]. Antimicrobial-resistant infections cause poorer clinical results and higher mortality rates [22].
The ability of bacteria to form biofilms as well as the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is the main cause of therapeutic problems in humans [23, 24]. The biofilm formation ability is variable in Salmonella and influenced by various sources or serotypes of the isolates [25]. Salmonella enterica serovars include Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium, which cause the most cases of salmonellosis with a noticeable enhancement in the biofilm formation ability [25].
This study aims to characterize some virulence traits in Salmonella spp. isolates from humans. Particularly, the isolates have been assessed for (i) the presence of several virulence genes: invA, spvB, prgH, sopB, mgtC, pipB, rhuM, and gipA; (ii) resistance profiles against six antibiotics; and (iii) the ability to produce biofilm.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection, Bacterial Isolation, and Characterization
Annually, numerous foodborne diseases are reported by NTS strains in Iran. Hence, it is worth noting that in the period between 2013 and 2019, among the 2098 cases reported about foodborne outbreaks in Iran, 350 cases (16.7%) were associated with Salmonella [26]. From September 2021 to June 2022, 384 diarrhea samples were collected from patients afflicted with gastroenteritis-detected Salmonella spp. The age range of the patients was between 3 and 70 years old, moreover, 216 (56.25) and 168 (43.75) of them were males and females, respectively. Sampling was performed on patients who had watery, loose, or bloody stools more than 3 times per day. Isolates were detected as Salmonella using conventional biochemical and serological assays. In brief, the stool samples were transported into selenite-F broth and within 4 h at 4°C to the bacteriology laboratory of the department of pathobiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. In the following, subculturing was performed on MacConkey agar and suspected colonies were identified by standard biochemical assays including oxidase, methyl red-Voges–Proskauer (MRVP), catalase, citrate consumption, TSI agar, and urease production [27].
2.2. Serotyping of Positive Samples
The slide agglutination assay, using Difco antisera, was performed for Salmonella serotyping and then interpreted based on the Popoff method [28]. After confirming the isolates as Salmonella by biochemical tests, serotyping with antisera O (B, D, E, and C) and H was performed to characterize O and H antigens.
2.3. Molecular Detection of Virulence Genes
Salmonella isolates were subjected to DNA extraction by the boiling method as described previously [27] and to a panel of PCR assay to assess the presence of some virulence-associated genes: invA, spvB, prgH, sopB, mgtC, pipB, rhuM, and gipA. Primers used for the present study are described in Table 1. The PCR assay was performed in a final volume of 20 μl containing 10 μl PCR Master Mix (SinaClon Bioscience, Iran), 1 μl of forward and reverse primers, and 1 μl of template DNA. The PCR reaction conditions are shown in Table 1. The amplification products were subjected to electrophoresis in a 1.5% agarose gel with the 100 bp DNA Ladder (Fermentas, Lithuania) and stained with GelRed™ (Biotium).
Table 1.
Primers used for detection of virulence genes in Salmonella isolates.
Genes | Sequence 5′ ⟶ 3′ | Amplicon size (bp) | Tm | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
spvB | F: CTATCAGCCCCGCACGGAGAGCAGTTTTTA R: GGAGGAGGCGGTGGCGGTGGCATCATA |
717 | 56 | [29] |
| ||||
invA | F: CTGGCGGTGGGTTTTGTTGTCTTCTCTATT R: AGTTTCTCCCCCTCTTCATGCGTTACCC |
1070 | 53 | [29] |
| ||||
prgH | F: GCCCGAGCAGCCTGAGAAGTTAGAAA R: TGAAATGAGCGCCCCTTGAGCCAGTC |
756 | 66 | [29] |
| ||||
sopB | F: CGGACCGGCCAGCAACAAAACAAGAAGAAG R: TAGTGATGCCCGTTATGCGTGAGTGTATT |
220 | 53 | [29] |
| ||||
mgtC | F: GGCAGGAGTTTCGCACTAAC R: GCGTACCCACAATGGATTTC |
444 | 59 | [30] |
| ||||
pipB | F: AATATCGGATGGGGGAAAAG R: AACCTGACTCACGCAGACCT |
230 | 55 | [31] |
| ||||
rhuM | F: CATCGGCTGTACCCGACTAT R: CAGCACGCTGATGAATGAGT |
222 | 55 | [31] |
| ||||
gipA | F: ACGACTGAGCAGGCTGAG R: TTGGAAATGGTGACGGTAGAC |
422 | 59 | [32] |
| ||||
Primary denaturation | Denaturation | Annealing | Extension | No. of cycles |
| ||||
94°C 5 min |
94°C 30 s |
59°C 30 s |
72°C 60 s |
35 |
2.4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test
The antibiotics were selected according to their common use in the prevention and treatment of Salmonella infections in humans. Susceptibility to antimicrobials was determined with the disc diffusion test according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's (CLSI) manual [33]. Eleven antibiotics were examined including ampicillin (AMP), tetracycline (TE), ceftriaxone (CRO), ciprofloxacin (CIP), imipenem (IPM), gentamycin (GEN), cefotaxime (CTX), cefoxitin (FOX), nalidixic acid (NA), chloramphenicol (CHL), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT). The resistance profiles were categorized into three following patterns: MDR, XDR, and PDR which were established by Magiorakos et al. [34]. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, which is susceptible to all of the antimicrobials, was used as quality control.
2.5. Biofilm Formation Assay
To evaluate the formation of bacterial biofilm, the crystal violet protocol was applied as previously described [35]. After conventional biochemical confirmation, a single Salmonella colony was selected and inoculated in trypticase soy broth (TSB, Merck, Germany). After overnight incubation at 37°C, Salmonella cultures were diluted 1 : 10 in TSB with 0.5% glucose.
Next, 100 μl of this diluted bacterial culture was transferred to a 96-well, flat-bottomed microtiter plate. The plates were then placed at 37°C for 48 h and washed three times with 200 μl of sterile PBS 1X to discard nonadherent bacterial cells. Crystal Violet stain (1%) was added to each well and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Each well was then washed with PBS three times as before to remove the extra dye. Finally, 100 μL of 95% ethanol was added to dissolve crystal violet dye bound to the adherent cells and the plates were evaluated at 620 nm with a spectrophotometer. The cut-off value (ODc) is specified as three standard deviations (SDs) above the mean OD of the negative controls. The isolates were classified into the following four groups based on the ODs obtained: OD ≤ ODc: nonadherent; ODc < OD ≤ 2 × ODc: weak biofilm producer; 2 × ODc < OD ≤ 4 × ODc, moderate biofilm producer; and 4 × ODc < OD, strong biofilm producer. It is worth mentioning that a well with only medium and one with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 were considered as negative and positive controls, respectively. Also, the assay for each isolate was performed three times.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
The results of biofilm formation were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to assess the differences in biofilm formation capacity between the different Salmonella serotypes by GraphPad Prism software 8 (GraphPad Software Inc.). The level of significance was P value < 0.05.
3. Result
3.1. Prevalence and Identification of Salmonella Isolates
Overall, 112 Salmonella-associated foodborne outbreaks occurred between 2021 and 2022 in Iran. Out of the 384 diarrhea samples examined, 40 (10.41%) Salmonella isolates were recovered. As shown in Table 2, the details such as the age and gender of each patient from whom Salmonella was isolated were recorded.
Table 2.
Demographic status (age and gender distribution) of the patients along with the city of isolation for each Salmonella isolate.
Salmonella isolates | Patients | ||
---|---|---|---|
ID | City | Gender | Age |
K1 | Karaj | Female | 21 |
K2 | Karaj | Male | 19 |
K3 | Karaj | Male | 45 |
K4 | Karaj | Female | 13 |
K5 | Karaj | Male | 54 |
K6 | Karaj | Male | 60 |
K7 | Karaj | Male | 7 |
K8 | Karaj | Female | 5 |
K9 | Karaj | Male | 68 |
K10 | Karaj | Male | 4 |
K11 | Karaj | Male | 49 |
K12 | Karaj | Male | 25 |
K13 | Karaj | Male | 10 |
K14 | Karaj | Female | 55 |
K15 | Karaj | Male | 14 |
T1 | Tehran | Male | 66 |
T2 | Tehran | Male | 65 |
T3 | Tehran | Female | 40 |
T4 | Tehran | Male | 38 |
T5 | Tehran | Female | 18 |
T6 | Tehran | Male | 6 |
T7 | Tehran | Female | 17 |
T8 | Tehran | Male | 36 |
T9 | Tehran | Female | 7 |
T10 | Tehran | Male | 20 |
T11 | Tehran | Male | 42 |
T12 | Tehran | Female | 5 |
T13 | Tehran | Male | 43 |
T14 | Tehran | Male | 59 |
S1 | Semnan | Male | 61 |
S2 | Semnan | Female | 62 |
S3 | Semnan | Male | 3 |
S4 | Semnan | Male | 21 |
S5 | Semnan | Female | 12 |
S6 | Semnan | Male | 4 |
S7 | Semnan | Male | 63 |
S8 | Semnan | Male | 10 |
S9 | Semnan | Female | 56 |
S10 | Semnan | Male | 18 |
S11 | Semnan | Female | 16 |
3.2. Salmonella Serovar Identification
Among the forty Salmonella isolates, four different serovars were identified including Typhimurium, Infantis, Paratyphi B, and Choleraesuis. Moreover, S. ser. Typhimurium was the most detected serovar with 33 isolates, and two isolates were detected for each of the following serovars: Paratyphi B and Infantis. Only one isolate belonged to S. ser. Choleraesuis. Finally, further two isolates were found belonging to the genus Salmonella, but they were not typable.
3.3. The Molecular Identification of Virulence Genes
Virulence-associated genes were detected in all 40 studied isolates, consistent with what was expected for pathogenic S. enterica strains. In addition to the identification of the Salmonella genus, the invA gene is involved in enterocyte invasion and is a virulence-related gene [13] that was found in all investigated isolates. Regarding the presence of virulence-related genes, the most detected genes were mgtC, pipB, and sopB, with 34/40 (85%), 36/40 (90%), and 38/40 (93%) positive isolates, respectively. As shown in Table 3, two genes rhuM and spvB were detected in less than approximately 70% of the isolates, while the gipA gene was identified only in one isolate and none of the Salmonella isolates had the prgH gene. The detection of sopB, mgtC, rhuM, pipB, and spvB genes along with invA was detected in S. Typhimurium isolates. The majority of isolates (33/40, 82.5%) could amplify these gene fragments (Table 4). Only one isolate was confirmed as S. choleraesuis by identifying genes sopB and gipA. In the case of two strains (5%), genes sopB and pipB were detected and confirmed as S. infantis. Three genes sopB, pipB, and mgtC resulted in association to S. paratyphi in two isolates. Finally, regarding genetic characteristics, two isolates were classified as Salmonella spp due to only the invA gene being detected in them.
Table 3.
Frequencies of virulence genes screened by PCR assay in Salmonella isolates.
Gene function | Gene | Absolute frequencies (n = 40) | Relative frequencies (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Growth within host | spvB | 24 | 60 |
Host recognition/invasion | invA | 40 | 100 |
Host recognition/invasion | prgH | 0 | 0 |
Host recognition/invasion | sopB | 38 | 95 |
Survival within macrophage | mgtC | 34 | 85 |
Survival within host cells | pipB | 36 | 90 |
Involved in systemic dissemination | rhuM | 27 | 67 |
Survival in Peyer's patches | gipA | 1 | 2 |
Table 4.
Virulence genes' profile of Salmonella isolates.
Virulence profile | Serotype | Virulence genes | N (%) |
---|---|---|---|
VP1 | invA | 2 | |
VP2 | Typhimurium | invA-sopB-mgtC-rhuM-pipB-spvRBC | 33 |
VP3 | Choleraesuis | InvA-sopB-gipA | 1 |
VP4 | Infantis | InvA-sopB-pipB | 2 |
VP5 | Paratyphi | InvA-sopB-pipB-mgtC | 2 |
3.4. Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles
All Salmonella isolates (100%) were susceptible to imipenem, and only one isolate was resistant to chloramphenicol. The Salmonella isolates showed a high antimicrobial resistance rate to some tested antibiotics, so 38 isolates were resistant to ampicillin (95%). Also, a high percentage of isolates (87.5%) resulted in resistance to nalidixic acid. The percentage of resistance to used antibiotics is shown in Table 5. MDR was found in 18/40 (45%) of the studied isolates. A detailed consideration of the Typhimurium serotype and comparison with other serotypes resulted in the association of MDR to these serotypes with a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05). The most common MDR profile was AMP FOX NA SXT and included ten isolates with nine isolates belonging to the Typhimurium serotype and one to the Infantis serotype. The CRO AMP GEN SXT profile was characteristic of the two isolates belonging to the Typhimurium serotype, and the AMP GEN NA SXT profile for the four isolates was also obtained from this serotype. The AMP TE NA SXT profile involved two isolates from Typhimurium (one isolate) and Paratyphi B (one isolate).
Table 5.
Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. isolates.
Antimicrobial | Susceptible | Intermediate | Resistant | Nonsusceptible | % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No | No | No | No | ||
SXT | 19 | 0 | 21 | 21 | 52.5 |
CIP | 37 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7.5 |
IPM | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
CHL | 39 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.5 |
AMP | 2 | 14 | 24 | 38 | 95 |
TE | 38 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
GEN | 31 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.5 |
CTX | 37 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7.5 |
CRO | 38 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
FOX | 26 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 35 |
NA | 5 | 11 | 24 | 35 | 87.5 |
Antimicrobials: SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; CIP, ciprofloxacin; IMI, imipenem; CHL, chloramphenicol; AMP, ampicillin; TE, tetracycline; GEN, gentamicin; CTX, cefotaxime; CRO, ceftriaxone; FOX, cefoxitin; NA, nalidixic acid.
3.5. Biofilm Formation
The microtiter plate method was used to evaluate the biofilm formation capacity of Salmonella isolates. All 40 tested Salmonella isolates could form biofilm on polystyrene surfaces after 48 h. The mean OD value for all 40 Salmonella isolates was 0.6 ± 0.02, whereas 32.5% of all isolates were categorized as strong biofilm producers. Moreover, the results showed that 15 (37.5%) isolates were weak biofilm producers while 12 isolates (30%) had moderate capacity for biofilm formation. Significant variances in the capacity to produce biofilm were found between different Salmonella serotypes (p < 0.05) (Table 6). S. ser. Infantis (OD620 nm = 0.36 ± 0.01) and S. ser. Paratyphi B (OD620 nm = 0.48 ± 0.12) were all categorized as moderate biofilm producers. The capacity of S. ser. Choleraesuis and 11 isolates of S. ser. Typhimurium to produce biofilm was significantly higher than other serotypes, so classified as a strong biofilm producer. Also, among 33 isolates of S. ser. Typhimurium, 7 (17.5%) were moderate biofilm producers and 15 (37.5%) were weak biofilm producers. Regarding two isolates that could not be typeable by serotyping, it was determined that one strain could produce strong biofilm (OD620 = 1.24 ± 0.01) and the other strain could produce moderate biofilm (OD620 = 0.56 ± 0.01).
Table 6.
Biofilm formation capacity of different Salmonella serotypes.
Biofilm formation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Salmonella serotypes | Weak biofilm producer | Moderate biofilm producer | Strong biofilm producer | |||
No. (%) | Average OD ± SD | No. (%) | Average OD ± SD | No. (%) | Average OD ± SD | |
Salmonella Typhimurium (N = 33) | 15 (37.5) | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 7 (17.5) | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 11 (27.5) | 0.96 ± 0.01 |
Salmonella Choleraesuis (N = 1) | 1 (100) | 1.26 ± 0.08 | ||||
Salmonella Infantis (N = 2) | 2 (5) | 0.36 ± 0.01 | ||||
Salmonella Paratyphi B (N = 2) | 2 (5) | 0.48 ± 0.12 | ||||
Salmonella spp | 1 (2.5) | 0.56 ± 0.01 | 1 (2.5) | 1.24 ± 0.01 | ||
Total | 15 (37.5%) | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 12 (30%) | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 13 (32.5%) | 1.15 ± 0.03 |
OD, optical density; SD, standard deviation.
4. Discussion
Despite public health promotion, the CDC reported that the Salmonellosis prevalence and the morbidity rate subsequent to its infections are also still high [36]. Salmonella remains the second most common foodborne pathogen in the United States and Europe [37, 38]. Its infections are self-limiting with no need for antibiotic treatment except in antibiotic-resistant cases that have affected public health [39]. Therefore, continuous monitoring of Salmonella isolates is necessary not only to investigate the prevalence but also to consider their virulence profile.
The WHO Global Network of Foodborne Infections about NTS surveillance has reported that S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium are the prevalent serovars obtained from humans in both developed and developing countries [4]. The presence of animal reservoirs or local food plays an important role in the dominance of certain serotypes in some geographical areas. Remarkably, Salmonella serotype distribution in a certain region may differ over a period of time [4]. Hence, the results indicated that the most common serovars were S. ser. Typhimurium (33/40, 82.5%) which was involved in Salmonella outbreaks in Iran. While, our group previously reported that two serovars S. ser. Enteritidis and S. ser. Senftenberg were the most recorded serovars in Iran, particularly in foodborne outbreaks [5]. Similar to the results of the present study, among 990 Salmonella foodborne outbreaks that occurred in Australia, S. ser. Typhimurium with a frequency of 84% was the most prevalent serovar [40]. However, another study in the United States indicated that S. ser. Enteritidis (24.4%) was the most prevalent serovar identified from foodborne outbreaks between 2009 and 2014 [41].
Regarding pathogenic features, the presence of several genes related to virulence, located on SPI3 and SPI5, prophages/plasmids, was considered. It is broadly confirmed that the presence of these genes or the induction of their expression confers some advantages for bacteria [29]. The invA gene was detected in all Salmonella isolates which is associated with host recognition and invasion of intestinal cells [29]. This gene is located on Salmonella pathogenicity islands and is related to the structure of the type three secretion system (TTSS III) and is the key target gene for the recognition of strains belonging to the genus Salmonella [29]. The invA gene detection in all the analyzed isolates is in agreement with former studies worldwide [29, 42, 43]. A percentage of 95% of the studied strains possessed the sopB gene. This gene is located on SPI5 and participates in invasion and prompting fluid secretion and it is often found in Salmonella clinical isolates [44]. Another gene located in SPI5 is pipB, which is involved in bacterial survival in the host cell and systemic dissemination [45]. The pipB gene was detected in 36 (90%) analyzed isolates. Another most identified gene was mgtC (34/40, 85%) which is usually detected in clinical isolates. The mgtC gene is located in SPI3 and allows the bacterium to enter the phosphate into the bacterial cell within the host's macrophage [46]. This protein can target the histidine-kinase PhoR system independently of the presence of phosphate and deletion of this gene disrupts phosphate absorption and inhibits hypervirulent Salmonella [46]. The gipA genes may be carried by phages, involved in M cell invasion in the Peyer's patches, which will meaningfully enhance Salmonella toxicity. This gene is not commonly detected in Salmonella strains. Similarly, in the present study, the presence of this gene was positive only in one isolate (2%). The rhuM gene located on SPI3 that participated in systemic dissemination was found in 27 isolates (67%). Finally, 24 isolates had the spvB gene (60%) which has plasmid origin and is related to the Salmonella virulence plasmid and involved in the bacterial maintenance and survival inside the host cell [29].
Based on the results, most isolates had at least three virulence genes invA, sopB, and pipB which the high frequency of these virulence genes indicates their ubiquity and conserved structure. Previously, it was confirmed that the three following genes: invA, mgtC, and sopB are highly conserved and used as genetic markers for the detection of Salmonella pathogenicity island [47]. Our results proposed that more virulence-related genes are often related to the serotype Typhimurium, which shows more pathogenicity and virulence of Salmonella belonging to this serovar. Moreover, other serotypes had a low frequency in our study and the rare reports about other serovars in humans can reflect their low pathogenicity. In fact, without a control system, only clinical isolates are identified that are associated with human infections and require care and hospitalization, while infections may be caused by low-frequency strains that have not resulted in clinical disease.
Antibiotic resistance is a concerning public health problem in Salmonella. The results indicated that all isolates were susceptible to imipenem, while there was a high percentage of resistance (≥80%) to some tested antibacterial drugs (Table 5). Although carbapenem resistance is increasingly reported in Enterobacteriaceae, it is still very rare in Salmonella [48]. Carbapenems are usually used as the last choice for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections [48]. Salmonella strains are usually susceptible to carbapenems and this antibiotic is used as the last choice in salmonellosis treatment [48]. The susceptibility of all isolates to imipenem in the present study can be an indicator for public health in the treatment of Salmonella infections that this antibiotic is still effective. The third/fourth-generation cephalosporins are mostly recognized as crucial antimicrobials for the treatment of Salmonella severe infections [49]. In the present study, only two isolates (5%) were resistant to ceftriaxone. In another study, the amount of resistance to ciprofloxacin in Salmonella isolates was reported to be negligible, in accordance with our results [50]. Although aminoglycosides are commonly administered as growth promoters in animals, these agents are not recommended for the treatment of salmonellosis [51]. The results of the present work showed that 22.5% of Salmonella isolates were resistant to gentamicin. In contrast to our findings, other surveys showed a much higher resistance to aminoglycoside [52, 53].
The results displayed a high-level MDR (45%), which was similar to a previous study by Nguyen Thi et al. [3]. The simultaneous resistance to cefoxitin, ampicillin, nalidixic acid, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was the most common pattern, presented by ten isolates belonging to serovars Typhimurium (nine isolates) and Infantis (one isolate). Therefore, evaluation of antimicrobial resistance confirmed that resistant strains and MDR patterns were more associated with serotypes Typhimurium. These results may help to explain why infection by these serotypes requires specific treatment and occasionally hospitalization, and it confirms that they can be more dangerous for human health.
Salmonella as well as other Enterobacteriaceae species can adhere and form biofilm on the surface of various materials during their life cycle [54]. Biofilms may be critical for the survival of Salmonella in adverse conditions [23]. The data of the present study displayed that the ability of biofilm formation was affected by the serotype of Salmonella strains, which is consistent with previous reports [25, 55].
5. Conclusions
The results showed great variability among Salmonella serovars and strains circulating in humans. Although ranking is not possible, some serovars were more virulent than others, S. ser. Typhimurium particularly displayed several studied pathogenic characteristics and this evidence verified Typhimurium as the most important virulent serovar. In the present study, resistance to fluoroquinolones and ciprofloxacin was observed in some NTS serovars, which can cause concern and threat to public health. Unnecessary use of antibiotics for treating NTS infection should be limited. On the other hand, the isolation of MDR Salmonella isolates is worrying and supports the importance of monitoring Salmonella serovars and their AMR pattern to prevent the spread of resistant isolates.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services no. 54953.
Contributor Information
Mohammad Mehdi Soltan Dallal, Email: msoltandallal@gmail.com.
Samira Karimaei, Email: samiraka796@gmail.com.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethical Approval
This study has the ethics code IR.TUMS.SPH.REC.1400.351.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Authors' Contributions
Mohammad Mehdi Soltan Dallal conceptualised the study and administered the project. Samira Karimaei investigated the study, wrote the original draft, performed the formal analysis, and wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. Ahmad Nasser conceptualised and investigated the study.
References
- 1.Soltan Dallal M. M., Karimaei S., Hajighasem M., et al. Evaluation of zinc oxide nanocomposite with Aloe vera gel for packaging of chicken fillet against Salmonella typhi and Salmonella para typhi A. Food Science and Nutrition . 2023;11 doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yang J., Zhang Z., Zhou X., Cui Y., Shi C., Shi X. Prevalence and characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica isolates from retail foods in Shanghai, China. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease . 2020;17(1):35–43. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2019.2671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nguyen Thi H., Pham T.-T.-T., Turchi B., et al. Characterization of Salmonella spp. isolates from swine: virulence and antimicrobial resistance. Animals . 2020;10(12):p. 2418. doi: 10.3390/ani10122418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jain P., Chowdhury G., Samajpati S., et al. Characterization of non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates from children with acute gastroenteritis, Kolkata, India, during 2000–2016. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology . 2020;51(2):613–627. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00213-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nadi Z. R., Salehi T. Z., Tamai I. A., Foroushani A. R., Sillanpaa M., Dallal M. M. S. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance and prevalence of common Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from foodborne outbreaks. Microchemical Journal . 2020;155 doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104660.104660 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Balasubramanian R., Im J., Lee J.-S., et al. The global burden and epidemiology of invasive non-typhoidal Salmonella infections. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics . 2019;15(6):1421–1426. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1504717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ausloos M., Collaborators G. C. O. D. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017. A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 . 2019;392 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crump J. A., SjöLUND-Karlsson M., Gordon M. A., Parry C. M. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive Salmonella infections. Clinical Microbiology Reviews . 2015;28(4):901–937. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00002-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gerlach R. G., Hensel M. Salmonella pathogenicity islands in host specificity, host pathogen-interactions and antibiotics resistance of Salmonella enterica. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift . 2007;120(7-8):317–327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stanley T. L., Ellermeier C. D., Slauch J. M. Tissue-specific gene expression identifies a gene in the lysogenic phage Gifsy-1 that affects Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium survival in Peyer’s patches. Journal of Bacteriology . 2000;182(16):4406–4413. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.16.4406-4413.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Karimaei S., Shabestari A. N., Mirzaei A., Fatahi B. Apoptosis, cytotoxicity and expression of metastatic suppressor genes increased in human bladder and renal carcinoma cells by Nisin. Translational Research in Urology . 2022;4:83–88. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rushing M. D., Slauch J. M. Either periplasmic tethering or protease resistance is sufficient to allow a SodC to protect Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium from phagocytic superoxide. Molecular Microbiology . 2011;82(4):952–963. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07884.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Viana C., Sereno M. J., Pegoraro K., et al. Distribution, diversity, virulence genotypes and antibiotic resistance for Salmonella isolated from a Brazilian pork production chain. International Journal of Food Microbiology . 2019;310 doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108310.108310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lohrasbi V., Karimaei S., Abdi M., Noohi N., Hassannejad M., Talebi M. Comprehensive analysis of Enterococcus strains isolated from human microbiome and evaluation of their benefits for digestive system. Meta Gene . 2020;25 doi: 10.1016/j.mgene.2020.100726.100726 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hu Y., He Y., Wang Y., et al. Serovar diversity and antimicrobial resistance of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica recovered from retail chicken carcasses for sale in different regions of China. Food Control . 2017;81:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.05.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.European Food Safety Authority. The European Union Summary Report on Antimicrobial Resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2018/2019. EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority . 2021;19(4) doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6490.e06490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kuang D., Zhang J., Xu X., et al. Emerging high-level ciprofloxacin resistance and molecular basis of resistance in Salmonella enterica from humans, food and animals. International Journal of Food Microbiology . 2018;280:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Karimaei S., Aghamir S. M. K., Pourmand M. R. Comparative analysis of genes expression involved in type II toxin-antitoxin system in Staphylococcus aureus following persister cell formation. Molecular Biology Reports . 2024;51(1):p. 324. doi: 10.1007/s11033-023-09179-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mcmillan E. A., Gupta S. K., Williams L. E., et al. Antimicrobial resistance genes, cassettes, and plasmids present in Salmonella enterica associated with United States food animals. Frontiers in Microbiology . 2019;10:p. 832. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Aleyasin N., Karimaei S., Talebi M., Kashanian M., Irajian G. R. Rapid detection of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from clinical and non-clinical samples by loop-mediated isothermal amplification method (LAMP) Infection Epidemiology and Microbiology . 2018;4:87–92. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mather A. E., Phuong T. L. T., Gao Y., et al. New variant of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium associated with invasive disease in immunocompromised patients in Vietnam. mBio . 2018;9(5) doi: 10.1128/mbio.01056-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Parisi A., Crump J. A., Glass K., et al. Health outcomes from multidrug-resistant Salmonella infections in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease . 2018;15(7):428–436. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2017.2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ćwiek K., Korzekwa K., Tabiś A., Bania J., Bugla-Płoskońska G., Wieliczko A. Antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation capacity of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis strains isolated from poultry and humans in Poland. Pathogens . 2020;9(8):p. 643. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9080643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Karimaei S., Mashhadi R., Mirzaei A., Deyhimfar R., Shabestari A. N., Rahimnia R. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activities of nisin from Lactococcus lactis and alteration of the bacteria-induced pro-inflammatory responses on kidney and bladder tumor cell lines. Translational Research in Urology . 2022;4:47–53. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yin B., Zhu L., Zhang Y., et al. The characterization of biofilm formation and detection of biofilm-related genes in Salmonella isolated from beef processing plants. Foodborne pathogens and disease . 2018;15(10):660–667. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Manzari M., Fani F., Alebouyeh M., et al. Multidrug-resistant Salmonella strains from food animals as a potential source for human infection in Iran. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases . 2022;90 doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101898.101898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fardsanei F., Soltan Dallal M. M., Zahraei Salehi T., Douraghi M., Memariani M., Memariani H. Antimicrobial resistance patterns, virulence gene profiles, and genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis isolated from patients with gastroenteritis in various Iranian cities. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences . 2021;24(7):914–921. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2021.54019.12142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Popoff M. Y. Antigenic Formulas of the Salmonella Serovars . Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Webber B., Borges K. A., Furian T. Q., et al. Detection of virulence genes in Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from chicken carcasses. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo . 2019;61 doi: 10.1590/s1678-9946201961036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Parvathi A., Vijayan J., Murali G., Chandran P. Comparative virulence genotyping and antimicrobial susceptibility profiling of environmental and clinical Salmonella enterica from Cochin, India. Current Microbiology . 2011;62(1):21–26. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9665-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bhowmick P. P., Devegowda D., Karunasagar I., Veterinary K. Virulotyping of seafood associated Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolated from Southwest coast of India. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering . 2011;1:63–69. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huehn S., La Ragione R. M., Anjum M., et al. Virulotyping and antimicrobial resistance typing of Salmonella enterica serovars relevant to human health in Europe. Foodborne pathogens and disease . 2010;7(5):523–535. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2009.0447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Clinical, Institute L. S. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing . Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Magiorakos A.-P., Srinivasan A., Carey R. B., et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clinical Microbiology and Infection . 2012;18(3):268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Karimaei S., Kazem Aghamir S. M., Foroushani A. R., Pourmand M. R. Antibiotic tolerance in biofilm persister cells of Staphylococcus aureus and expression of toxin-antitoxin system genes. Microbial Pathogenesis . 2021;159 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105126.105126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dewey-Mattia D., Manikonda K., Hall A. J., Wise M. E., Crowe S. J. Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks—United States, 2009–2015. MMWR Surveillance Summaries . 2018;67(10):1–11. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6710a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control Ecdc, European Food Safety Authority Efsa, European Medicines Agency Ema, Agency E. M. ECDC/EFSA/EMA second joint report on the integrated analysis of the consumption of antimicrobial agents and occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from humans and food‐producing animals: joint interagency antimicrobial consumption and resistance analysis (JIACRA) report. EFSA Journal. European Food Safety Authority . 2017;15(7) doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4872.e04872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Scallan E., Hoekstra R. M., Angulo F. J., et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases . 2011;17(1):7–15. doi: 10.3201/eid1701.p11101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ahmed H. A., El-Hofy F. I., Shafik S. M., Abdelrahman M. A., Elsaid G. A. Characterization of virulence-associated genes, antimicrobial resistance genes, and class 1 integrons in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium isolates from chicken meat and humans in Egypt. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease . 2016;13(6):281–288. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2015.2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ford L., Moffatt C. R., Fearnley E., et al. The epidemiology of Salmonella enterica outbreaks in Australia, 2001–2016. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems . 2018;2:p. 86. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2018.00086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marus J. R., Magee M. J., Manikonda K., Nichols M. C. Outbreaks of Salmonella enterica infections linked to animal contact: demographic and outbreak characteristics and comparison to foodborne outbreaks—United States, 2009–2014. Zoonoses and Public Health . 2019;66(4):370–376. doi: 10.1111/zph.12569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rowlands R. E. G., Ristori C. A., Ikuno A. A., Barbosa M. L., Jakabi M., Franco B. D. G. D. M. Prevalence of drug resistance and virulence features in Salmonella spp. isolated from foods associated or not with salmonellosis in Brazil. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo . 2014;56(6):461–467. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652014000600001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Capuano F., Mancusi A., Capparelli R., Esposito S., Proroga Y. T. Characterization of drug resistance and virulotypes of Salmonella strains isolated from food and humans. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease . 2013;10(11):963–968. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rahman H. Prevalence and phenotypic expression of sopB gene among clinical isolates of Salmonella enterica. Indian Journal of Medical Research . 2006;123(1):83–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.NúñEZ-HernáNDEZ C., Alonso A., Pucciarelli M. G., CasadesúS J., GarcíA-Del Portillo F. Dormant intracellular Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium discriminates among Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 effectors to persist inside fibroblasts. Infection and Immunity . 2014;82(1):221–232. doi: 10.1128/iai.01304-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Choi S., Choi E., Cho Y.-J., Nam D., Lee J., Lee E.-J. The Salmonella virulence protein MgtC promotes phosphate uptake inside macrophages. Nature Communications . 2019;10(1):p. 3326. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11318-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Xu L., Zhou X., Xu X., et al. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes and molecular subtypes of S. Enteritidis isolated from children in Shanghai. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries . 2018;12(07):573–580. doi: 10.3855/jidc.9733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.FernáNDEZ J., Guerra B., Rodicio M. R. Resistance to carbapenems in non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars from humans, animals and food. Veterinary Sciences . 2018;5(2):p. 40. doi: 10.3390/vetsci5020040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Long L., You L., Wang D., et al. Highly prevalent MDR, frequently carrying virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance genes in Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5], 12: i:-isolates from Guizhou Province, China. PLoS One . 2022;17(5) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266443.e0266443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Firoozeh F., Shahcheraghi F., Zahraei Salehi T., Karimi V., Aslani M. Antimicrobial resistance profile and presence of class I integrongs among Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from human clinical specimens in Tehran, Iran. Iranian Journal of Microbiology . 2011;3:112–117. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Marshall B. M., Levy S. B. Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clinical Microbiology Reviews . 2011;24(4):718–733. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00002-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.El-Tayeb M. A., Ibrahim A. S., Al-Salamah A. A., Almaary K. S., Elbadawi Y. B. Prevalence, serotyping and antimicrobials resistance mechanism of Salmonella enterica isolated from clinical and environmental samples in Saudi Arabia. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology . 2017;48(3):499–508. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Qu M., Lv B., Zhang X., et al. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated from childhood diarrhea in Beijing, China (2010–2014) Gut Pathogens . 2016;8:31–39. doi: 10.1186/s13099-016-0116-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ćwiek K., Bugla-Płoskońska G., Wieliczko A. Salmonella biofilm development: structure and significance. Postępy Higieny I Medycyny Doświadczalnej . 2019;73:937–943. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0013.7866. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.DíEZ-GarcíA M., Capita R., Alonso-Calleja C. Influence of serotype on the growth kinetics and the ability to form biofilms of Salmonella isolates from poultry. Food Microbiology . 2012;31(2):173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.