Skip to main content
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics logoLink to Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
. 2024 Oct 15;22(5):qzae076. doi: 10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae076

DeOri 10.0: An Updated Database of Experimentally Identified Eukaryotic Replication Origins

Yu-Hao Zeng 1, Zhen-Ning Yin 2, Hao Luo 3,, Feng Gao 4,5,6,
Editor: Zhang Zhang
PMCID: PMC11652270  PMID: 39404857

Abstract

DNA replication is a complex and crucial biological process in eukaryotes. To facilitate the study of eukaryotic replication events, we present a database of eukaryotic DNA replication origins (DeOri), which collects genome-wide data on eukaryotic DNA replication origins currently available. With the rapid development of high-throughput experimental technology in recent years, the number of datasets in the new release of DeOri 10.0 increased from 10 to 151 and the number of sequences increased from 16,145 to 9,742,396. Besides nucleotide sequences and browser extensible data (BED) files, corresponding annotation files, such as coding sequences (CDSs), mRNAs, and other biological elements within replication origins, are also provided. The experimental techniques used for each dataset, as well as related statistical data, are also presented on web page. Differences in experimental methods, cell lines, and sequencing technologies have resulted in distinct replication origins, making it challenging to differentiate between cell-specific and non-specific replication origins. Based on multiple replication origin datasets at the species level, we scored and screened replication origins in Homo sapiens, Gallus gallus, Mus musculus, Drosophila melanogaster, and Caenorhabditis elegans. The screened regions with high scores were considered as species-conservative origins, which are integrated and presented as reference replication origins (rORIs). Additionally, we analyzed the distribution of relevant genomic elements associated with replication origins at the genome level, such as CpG island (CGI), transcription start site (TSS), and G-quadruplex (G4). These analysis results can be browsed and downloaded as needed at http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/deori/.

Keywords: Replication origin, Eukaryote, DeOri, Database, DNA replication

Introduction

In eukaryotes, errors arising from the DNA replication process can easily lead to a series of problems, including cell damage and cancerous changes. Therefore, the mechanisms underlying DNA replication initiation and regulation need to be better understood to explore cellular changes at the molecular level. In the three domains of life, all DNA replication is initiated from replication origins [1]. However, the diversity and complexity of eukaryotic replication origins make it challenging for researchers to study them in depth and comprehensively [2,3]. Based on numerous studies on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Xenopus laevis, a theoretical system of eukaryotic DNA replication initiation mechanisms and regulatory systems has been preliminarily established. Although the origin of replication varies widely between phyla and species, the pre-RC mechanism is conserved in eukaryotes [4–6]. Thus, several experimental methods for replication origins have been developed, including sequencing by short nascent strands (SNS-seq), sequencing by Okazaki fragments (OK-seq), sequencing by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP-seq), mapping the sequences of nascent DNA replication strands throughout the six cell cycle phases (Repli-seq), and sequencing by bubbles with restriction fragments containing replication initiation sites (Bubble-seq) [7–11]. However, the characteristics and definitions of replication origins differ slightly among species. For example, the origin of replication in budding yeast is a sequence-specific autonomously replicating sequence (ARS) consensus sequence (ACS) sequence with a length of 100–200 bp, whereas the origin of replication in metazoans is not sequence-specific, and its length can vary from 200 bp to a 1-Mb replication domain [12,13]. Although scientists have greatly promoted statistical analysis and data mining of replication origins, existing databases have not yet integrated massive amounts of data. Moreover, biases in samples and experimental methods, such as different protein conjugates, chromatin states, and different cell stages, have resulted in different replication origins obtained by sequencing. This complexity makes it difficult for researchers to integrate and extract the required data from numerous experimental results within a short timeframe.

To address these problems, DeOri database was developed a dozen years ago [14]. The initial version of DeOri provided 10 datasets and 16,145 sequences of replication origin. Henceforth, DeOri is constantly maintained and expanded. DeOri database has assisted experimental researchers in exploring eukaryotic replication mechanisms since its release [15], and many statistical and machine learning studies have used data from DeOri for related analysis and prediction [16–20]. Besides, DeOri has been considered as a landmark event in the study of eukaryotic replication origin [21]. Compared to the initial version, more data types, functions, and download files have been provided in the new version of DeOri 10.0 (Table 1). We not only increased the number of datasets to 151 and sequences to 9,742,396, but also counted the distributions of the transcription start sites (TSSs), CpG islands (CGIs), and G-quadruplex (G4) structures in the upstream and downstream 20 kb of sequences. The genomic features within the sequence regions in each dataset were also extracted. We then provided users with distribution curves, heatmaps, statistical information, and genome annotations of genomic elements in the sequence regions [e.g., coding sequence (CDS), exon, mRNA, and TSS]. The user-friendly search modules BLAST and genome browser JBrowse were added to DeOri 10.0, allowing users to browse, select, and compare multiple datasets more conveniently and comprehensively [22,23]. Finally, we determined reference replication origins (rORIs) for five species with relatively conservative origins in large datasets.

Table 1.

Comparison between DeOri 1.0 and DeOri 10.0

Feature Details DeOri 1.0 DeOri 10.0
Data type Origin
Zone
Site
Function Browse
Search
BLAST
JBrowse
Statistical analyses
Download file BED
FASTA
Basic information
mRNA annotation
CDS annotation
Exon annotation
TSS annotation
CGI annotation

Note: Type “Origin” refers to the replication origin with general definitions; type “Zone” refers to the region enriched with replication origins or a long replication initiation sequence obtained by OK-seq; type “Site” refers to the region that binds to specific replication-associated proteins (e.g., CDC6, MCM2-7, and ORC1-2). CDS, coding sequence; CGI, CpG island; TSS, transcription start site.

Database content and usage

Data source and database content

As of December 19, 2023, DeOri had collected approximately 9.7 million sequences (e.g., replication origins, replication zones, and protein-binding sites), which included 15 species, 60 cell types, and 151 datasets (Table 2). DeOri data were obtained from various experimental studies and publicly available databases. Most browser extensible data (BED) files and sequence data were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [24], and other data were derived from the databases such as Trypanosomatidae Database (TriTrypDB) [25] and The Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Consortium (ENCODE) [26]. Reference sequence (RefSeq) and annotations were downloaded from University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) [27], National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [28], WormBase [29], Database of Drosophila Genes & Genomes (Flybase) [30], and The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) [31]. Based on the RefSeq and annotations, DeOri 10.0 extracted the genome features for each dataset to provide annotation files that contain the features within each sequence. The annotations included CDS, exon, mRNA, TSS, and CGI, which are available on the download page as text files. DeOri also displays basic statistical information about the dataset, BED files, and FASTA files. For the data used for the analysis, TSS data were extracted from Reference Flat File Format (refFlat) files containing transcriptions in UCSC or General Feature Format (GFF) files containing reference annotations in NCBI; CGI data were predicted by the UCSC software cpg_lh (http://hgdownload.soe.ucsc.edu/admin/exe/linux.x86_64/cpg_lh), and G4 data were obtained from two databases: G4Bank [32] and EndoQuad [33]. Due to the differences in sequencing methods and experimental techniques in different literature, we followed several common bioinformatics software tools with parameters used in the original literature to process the raw data. The data processing flow is shown in Figure S1, which consists of four main procedures: (1) quality control; (2) RefSeq alignment; (3) processing Bam/Sam files; (4) peak calling. Additionally, we extracted FASTA files and genomic element annotations based on the BED files obtained from peak calling. The GC content, sequence length, and non-standard base content of sequences in the FASTA files were also calculated for users.

Table 2.

Contents of DeOri 10.0

Organism No. of cell types No. of datasets (Origin) No. of sequences (Origin) No. of datasets (Zone# or Site*) No. of sequences (Zone# or Site*)
Arabidopsis thaliana 3 5 12,744 1* 22,472*
Yeast 5 5 1448 0 0
Homo sapiens 30 54 4,074,391 31 (14#, 17*) 3,721,666 (108,040#, 3,613,626*)
Mus musculus 10 20 1,666,211 4# 43,761#
Drosophila melanogaster 4 4 22,294 1* 5135*
Nematode 7 22 67,359 1* 345*
Gallus gallus 1 2 101,557 1# 3013*

Note: Yeast in Organism contains five species including Pichia pastoris, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida glabrata, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and Kluyveromyces lactis; Nematode in Organism contains five species including Caenorhabditis elegans, Leishmania major, Leishmania mexicana, Trypanosoma brucei, and Trypanosoma cruzi. The numbers with # correspond to type Zone, and those with * correspond to type Site. Please refer to the note of Table 1 or the main text for the description of types Origin, Zone, and Site.

Reference replication origins

Despite the extensive data collection in DeOri, users still face challenges in filtering and utilizing such a vast and diverse dataset. Therefore, DeOri provides users with five relatively conservative rORIs for eukaryotic datasets. During data preparation for rORIs, multiple different genome versions were transformed into the same genome version using liftOver (https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgLiftOver). Subsequently, the overlapping regions were scored using multiinter in BEDTools [34]. For each chromosome, only regions with scores no less than half of the maximum overlap number (rounded up) were added to the reference dataset (Figure 1). Currently, reference datasets for Homo sapiens, Gallus gallus, Mus musculus, Drosophila melanogaster, and Caenorhabditis elegans are available in DeOri. Based on these criteria, rORIs are regarded conservative and non-species-specific. Therefore, the rORIs are recommended for consideration when researchers pay more attention to sequence conservation of replication origins. In addition, rORIs can be treated as non-specific, and the origins beyond rORIs are potentially cell-specific.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Extraction process of rORIs

Prepare data: converting datasets of multiple different genome versions in an organism into the same version. Process data: (1) input multiple files of the same genome version after conversion, and use multiinter of BEDTools to score the overlapping parts of multiple datasets; (2) get the scored file; (3) screen the regions that are no less than 1/2 of the maximum overlapping number in the chromosome (rounded up) as the conservative replication origin; (4) merge the adjacent fragments and output the BED file and sequences.

Statistics on replication-related genomic elements

The statistical analysis on the distributions of genomic elements, such as TSS, CGI, G4, and gene, was conducted at a broader scale (within the range of –20 kb to 20 kb from center of replication-related sequences) and a longer step size (1 kb), which would provide researchers with a landscape for further investigation. In data preparation, the files containing the location information of genomic elements are converted into bigwig format. In data calculation, the distribution matrix between each dataset and genomic elements is calculated by the computeMatrix of deepTools [35], and then the NaN value in the matrix is changed to zero. Subsequently, the columns of each matrix are averaged, and the obtained results are normalized with the scale of 0–5. Finally, the heatmap is drawn based on the calculation results mentioned above. In the statistical analysis of human replication origins, datasets are merged and compared using merge and intersect of BEDTools, and the correlation coefficient is calculated using jaccard of BEDTools.

Database implementation and recent updates

Database implementation

DeOri internal framework was built using MySQL (v8.0.35, http://www.mysql.com/) and Django (v4.2.5, https://www.djangoproject.com/). Jinja2 (v3.1.2), Bootstrap (v5.3.0, https://getbootstrap.com/), EChart (v5.4.3, https://echarts.apache.org/), jQuery (v3.7.1, https://jquery.com/), and DataTables (v1.13.6, https://datatables.net/) were used for page optimization and data visualization. The website was deployed and served by Nginx (v1.20.0) and Gunicorn (v21.2.0). Part of the picture material comes from Smart Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/).

Updated contents and functions

Compared with the initial version, DeOri 10.0 has greatly improved and changed in data and interface (Table 1). DeOri 10.0 has been redesigned as a user-friendly and intuitive web page using the Django framework (Figure S2). There are three types of standardized data in the latest release of DeOri: Origin, Zone, and Site. The data format is slightly different, and these data type descriptions follow the original styles in the literature. “Origin” refers to the replication origin with general definitions, whose longest sequence is about 30 kb and the average length is 0.2 kb to 5 kb in different datasets; “Zone” refers to the region enriched with replication origins or a long replication initiation sequence obtained by OK-seq, whose longest sequence is about 170 kb and the average length is 20 kb to 30 kb; “Site” refers to the region that binds to specific replication-associated proteins (e.g., CDC6, MCM2-7, ORC1-2). Besides the original data, DeOri also provides datasets of rORIs in five species for users, which are believed to be relatively conservative. Taking human rORIs as an example, to verify their conservation, we extracted and screened human replication origins from datasets with no less than 10,000 sequences and compared them with human rORIs. If the rORI overlaps with the replication origins in certain dataset, this rORI is considered as overlapping rORI. The average overlap ratio is about 60%. Consequently, the percentage of overlapping rORIs to the total rORIs could indicate the conservation of rORIs and the specificity of certain datasets to some extent (Table S1). For example, although both GR00030057 and GR00030058 are immortalized HMEC cell lines, differences in the mis-expression of genes cause significant differences in their shared percentages of rORIs.

Visualization of the dataset and sequences was presented in JBrowse. To improve the intuitiveness and convenience of DeOri, a simple home page and several modules for batch download, search, JBrowse, and BLAST are provided (Figure S3). Among these modules, JBrowse is a powerful genome browser that allows users to compare and contrast multiple datasets. It is embedded in the dataset page and the sequence page that demonstrates data in the JBrowse window. It can also be displayed for data browsing and comparison on a separate page. Furthermore, one concrete example is presented on the JBrowse page.

Data statistics

Statistical analysis results based on DeOri 10.0

The replication origins of eukaryotes are related to particular biological elements such as CGI, TSS, and G4 structure [36,37]. Therefore, the relevant statistical analyses were performed using DeOri 10.0. The statistical results of the relationships between these elements and the origins are presented on different pages. Users can gain an overview through the heatmap on the home page (Figure 2A) and view the data and features more intuitively on the dataset page (Figure 2B and C). Besides, these statistical results on dataset page can be used as one of the reference factors for selecting data. Take the record GR00030030 as an example [38], which is a replication-origin dataset of the human K562 cell line. The genomic elements of TSS, CGI, and G4 are highly concentrated within the 2-kb upstream and downstream regions from the center of replication origins in dataset GR00030030 (Figure 2B). These statistical results not only assist users in obtaining the differences between multiple datasets, but also help conduct further analysis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

General information on datasets in DeOri

A. Heatmap on the home page. Comparison of CGI distribution among different datasets. B. Charts of dataset. Visualization of statistics of GR00030030 dataset, such as the distributions of sequences and genomic elements. C. Statistical information. Basic information and statistical results on GR00030030 dataset. CGI, CpG island; TSS, transcription start site; G4, G-quadruplex.

Characteristic analysis in human replication origins

To demonstrate how DeOri can be used to enhance the understanding of eukaryotic replication origins, we conducted analysis of replication-related sequences in 85 human datasets, which have been categorized into three types: Origin, Zone, and Site in DeOri 10.0 (Figure 3A). It reveals that the GC content of type Origin is higher than that of types Site and Zone, with the latter exhibiting the lowest GC content (Figure 3B). In order to clarify the relationship among different types, the sequences of same type were merged together, which resulted in 451,639 sequences of type Origin, 1,513,990 sequences of type Site, and 25,116 sequences of type Zone. The number of shared sequences among the three types was counted, and the Jaccard correlation coefficients were calculated, respectively (Figure 3C). To explore the relationship between the replication-related sequences and other genomic elements, the distributions of the genomic elements, such as CGI, G4, TSS, and gene, were calculated within the range of –20 kb to 20 kb from the center of these sequences, respectively (Figure 3D). Consequently, there were highly concentrated distributions of CGI, G4, TSS, and gene within the range of –2 kb to 2 kb for type Origin, while there were discrete distributions at both ends for type Zone. As to type Site, there were highly concentrated distributions of CGI, G4, and TSS within the range of –2 kb to 2 kb, while there were no concentrated distribution of gene. Then, distributions on gene within each dataset were further calculated (Figure 3E). Consequently, there were still highly concentrated distributions of gene in different cell lines for ORC1, ORC2, and CDC6 binding sites, while there was only scattered distribution at both ends for MCM2-7 binding sites (Figure 3E). Furthermore, for all datasets, the cell lines were classified into five categories: immortal cells, differentiated cells, primary cells, multipotential stem cells, and others. It is evident that regardless of the cell lines, the majority of datasets demonstrate gene concentration within the range of –2 kb to 2kb from center of replication origins.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Characteristic analysis of human replication-related sequences

A. Statistic of human replication-related datasets in DeOri 10.0. B. GC content in three types of sequences. C. The Venn diagram of the three types of sequences. D. Distributions of four genomic elements around the replication-related sequences. E. Statistics on the distributions of genes around the replication-related sequences in each dataset.

Conclusion and perspective

Identifying the process underlying replication origins and regulatory mechanisms has been one of a focal point in replication origin research. The proposal and validation of pre-RC and CMG mechanisms have been reported [39]. However, several questions remain unanswered. On the one hand, with the explosive growth of origin-related datasets in eukaryotes, it has been a great impetus for researchers to explore the origin characterization, firing and regulatory mechanisms of replication origins through computational analysis and prediction. However, there have been only a few database studies on eukaryotic origins, such as OriDB [40], which summarizes the replication origins of yeast. To fill this gap, we constructed and developed DeOri, which not only provided a large amount of experimental data, but also presented the rORIs and statistical results. In practical application, researchers can compare the replication origins of different species or different cell lines based on data of DeOri, and explore their differences in sequence characteristics, chromatin distribution, etc. For computational science, sequence features can be extracted by machine learning to predict and distinguish the replication origins. For experimental science, the experimental methods and data processing shown in DeOri can be used as a reference. Additionally, based on the present analysis, there is highly concentrated distribution of genes around replication origins in human, which suggests a new analytical perspective for the researchers. Subsequent analysis could focus on the specific types and functions of genes enriched in replication origins. A deeper understanding of the human replication origins may reveal differences between normal and cancer cells, potentially leading to novel treatment methods and directions.

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence in recent years, the scientific research paradigm has been significantly promoted and changed [41]. In many studies on replication origins, machine learning has been used based on the available experimental data [42–45]. For example, replication origins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae genomes can be predicted using the support vector machine (SVM) method [46], and deep learning can be employed to identify replication origins in humans [47]. Large amounts of high-quality data are urgently required for high-quality computational science studies. We believe that DeOri will contribute to computational data mining and further understanding of the DNA replication process in eukaryotes. Furthermore, DeOri is expected to play a crucial role in experimental and computational studies of eukaryotic replication origins. In the future, we will continue to maintain and update DeOri timely, and further integrate latest experimental data to facilitate a comprehensive study of eukaryotic replication origins. With the development of experimental technology, we are expected to add more replication-related data, such as replication timing and epigenetic modification sites, and provide online service for data analysis in the next update.

Supplementary Material

qzae076_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 32270692, 31801104, and 31571358) and the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0903700). We thank Dr. Mei-Jing Dong for her technical help, and Prof. Chun-Ting Zhang for the invaluable assistance and inspiring discussions.

Contributor Information

Yu-Hao Zeng, Department of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.

Zhen-Ning Yin, Department of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.

Hao Luo, Department of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.

Feng Gao, Department of Physics, School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Frontiers Science Center for Synthetic Biology and Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Ministry of Education), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; SynBio Research Platform, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin 300072, China.

Data availability

DeOri is an open access database freely available at http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/deori/.

CRediT author statement

Yu-Hao Zeng: Data collection, Statistical analysis, Writing – original draft, Visualization. Zhen-Ning Yin: Software, Writing – original draft, Visualization. Hao Luo: Data review, Writing – original draft, Visualization. Feng Gao: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics online (https://doi.org/10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae076).

Competing interests

The authors have declared no competing interests.

ORCID

0009-0008-8543-6757 (Yu-Hao Zeng)

0009-0001-0715-717X (Zhen-Ning Yin)

0000-0003-2714-8817 (Hao Luo)

0000-0002-9563-3841 (Feng Gao)

References

  • [1]. Dong MJ, Luo H, Gao F.. Ori-Finder 2022: a comprehensive web server for prediction and analysis of bacterial replication origins. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2022;20:1207–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2]. Song S, Wang Y, Liu P.. DNA replication licensing factors: novel targets for cancer therapy via inhibiting the stemness of cancer cells. Int J Biol Sci 2022;18:1211–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3]. Böhly N, Schmidt AK, Zhang X, Slusarenko BO, Hennecke M, Kschischo M, et al. Increased replication origin firing links replication stress to whole chromosomal instability in human cancer. Cell Rep 2022;41:111836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4]. Foss M, McNally FJ, Laurenson P, Rine J.. Origin recognition complex (ORC) in transcriptional silencing and DNA replication in  S. cerevisiae. Science 1993;262:1838–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5]. Micklem G, Rowley A, Harwood J, Nasmyth K, Diffley JF.. Yeast origin recognition complex is involved in DNA replication and transcriptional silencing. Nature 1993;366:87–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6]. Gasser S. Once and only once. Cell 2019;177:495–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7]. Mesner LD, Valsakumar V, Cieslik M, Pickin R, Hamlin JL, Bekiranov S.. Bubble-seq analysis of the human genome reveals distinct chromatin-mediated mechanisms for regulating early- and late-firing origins. Genome Res 2013;23:1774–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8]. Petryk N, Kahli M, d'Aubenton-Carafa Y, Jaszczyszyn Y, Shen Y, Silvain M, et al. Replication landscape of the human genome. Nat Commun 2016;7:10208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9]. Marchal C, Sasaki T, Vera D, Wilson K, Sima J, Rivera-Mulia JC, et al. Genome-wide analysis of replication timing by next-generation sequencing with E/L Repli-seq. Nat Protoc 2018;13:819–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10]. Sugimoto N, Maehara K, Yoshida K, Ohkawa Y, Fujita M.. Genome-wide analysis of the spatiotemporal regulation of firing and dormant replication origins in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:6683–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11]. Sequeira-Mendes J, Vergara Z, Peiró R, Morata J, Aragüez I, Costas C, et al. Differences in firing efficiency, chromatin, and transcription underlie the developmental plasticity of the Arabidopsis DNA replication origins. Genome Res 2019;29:784–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12]. Vouzas AE, Gilbert DM.. Mammalian DNA replication timing. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2021;13:a040162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13]. Ekundayo B, Bleichert F.. Origins of DNA replication. PLoS Genet 2019;15:e1008320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14]. Gao F, Luo H, Zhang CT.. DeOri: a database of eukaryotic DNA replication origins. Bioinformatics 2012;28:1551–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15]. Comoglio F, Schlumpf T, Schmid V, Rohs R, Beisel C, Paro R.. High-resolution profiling of Drosophila replication start sites reveals a DNA shape and chromatin signature of metazoan origins. Cell Rep 2015;11:821–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16]. Lou C, Zhao J, Shi R, Wang Q, Zhou W, Wang Y, et al. sefOri: selecting the best-engineered sequence features to predict DNA replication origins. Bioinformatics 2020;36:49–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17]. Wei L, He W, Malik A, Su R, Cui L, Manavalan B.. Computational prediction and interpretation of cell-specific replication origin sites from multiple eukaryotes by exploiting stacking framework. Brief Bioinform 2021;22:bbaa275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18]. Dao FY, Lv H, Zhang D, Zhang ZM, Liu L, Lin H.. DeepYY1: a deep learning approach to identify YY1-mediated chromatin loops. Brief Bioinform 2021;22:bbaa356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19]. Liu B, Weng F, Huang DS, Chou KC.. iRO-3wPseKNC: identify DNA replication origins by three-window-based PseKNC. Bioinformatics 2018;34:3086–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20]. Dao FY, Lv H, Zulfiqar H, Yang H, Su W, Gao H, et al. A computational platform to identify origins of replication sites in eukaryotes. Brief Bioinform 2021;22:1940–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21]. Reinhart M, Cardoso MC.. A journey through the microscopic ages of DNA replication. Protoplasma 2017;254:1151–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22]. Boratyn GM, Camacho C, Cooper PS, Coulouris G, Fong A, Ma N, et al. BLAST: a more efficient report with usability improvements. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:W29–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23]. Diesh C, Stevens GJ, Xie P, De Jesus Martinez T, Hershberg EA, Leung A, et al. JBrowse 2: a modular genome browser with views of synteny and structural variation. Genome Biol 2023;24:74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24]. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:D991–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25]. Shanmugasundram A, Starns D, Böhme U, Amos B, Wilkinson PA, Harb OS, et al. TriTrypDB: an integrated functional genomics resource for kinetoplastida. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2023;17:e0011058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 2012;489:57–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27]. Nassar LR, Barber GP, Benet-Pagès A, Casper J, Clawson H, Diekhans M, et al. The UCSC Genome Browser database: 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2023;51:D1188–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28]. Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J, Comeau DC, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res 2023;51:D29–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29]. Davis P, Zarowiecki M, Arnaboldi V, Becerra A, Cain S, Chan J, et al. WormBase in 2022—data, processes, and tools for analyzing  Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2022;220:iyac003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30]. Gramates LS, Agapite J, Attrill H, Calvi BR, Crosby MA, dos Santos G, et al. FlyBase: a guided tour of highlighted features. Genetics 2022;220:iyac035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31]. Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Li D, Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Sasidharan R, et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D1202–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32]. Zhong HS, Dong MJ, Gao F.. G4Bank: a database of experimentally identified DNA G-quadruplex sequences. Interdiscip Sci 2023;15:515–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33]. Qian SH, Shi MW, Xiong YL, Zhang Y, Zhang ZH, Song XM, et al. EndoQuad: a comprehensive genome-wide experimentally validated endogenous G-quadruplex database. Nucleic Acids Res 2023;52:D72–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34]. Quinlan AR, Hall IM.. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 2010;26:841–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35]. Ramírez F, Ryan DP, Grüning B, Bhardwaj V, Kilpert F, Richter AS, et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:W160–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36]. Cadoret JC, Meisch F, Hassan-Zadeh V, Luyten I, Guillet C, Duret L, et al. Genome-wide studies highlight indirect links between human replication origins and gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:15837–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37]. Besnard E, Babled A, Lapasset L, Milhavet O, Parrinello H, Dantec C, et al. Unraveling cell type-specific and reprogrammable human replication origin signatures associated with G-quadruplex consensus motifs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012;19:837–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38]. Massip F, Laurent M, Brossas C, Fernández-Justel JM, Gómez M, Prioleau MN, et al. Evolution of replication origins in vertebrate genomes: rapid turnover despite selective constraints. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:5114–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39]. Costa A, Diffley JFX.. The initiation of eukaryotic DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem 2022;91:107–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40]. Siow CC, Nieduszynska SR, Müller CA, Nieduszynski CA.. OriDB, the DNA replication origin database updated and extended. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D682–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41]. Gao F, Huang K, Xing Y.. Artificial intelligence in omics. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2022;20:811–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42]. Shahid M, Ilyas M, Hussain W, Khan YD.. ORI-Deep: improving the accuracy for predicting origin of replication sites by using a blend of features and long short-term memory network. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43]. Jaksik R, Wheeler DA, Kimmel M.. Detection and characterization of constitutive replication origins defined by DNA polymerase epsilon. BMC Biol 2023;21:41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44]. Abbas Z, Rehman MU, Tayara H, Chong KT.. ORI-Explorer: a unified cell-specific tool for origin of replication sites prediction by feature fusion. Bioinformatics 2023;39:btad664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45]. Wang C, He Z, Jia R, Pan S, Coin LJ, Song J, et al. PLANNER: a multi-scale deep language model for the origins of replication site prediction. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2024;28:2445–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46]. Wang D, Lai FL, Gao F.. Ori-Finder 3: a web server for genome-wide prediction of replication origins in  Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Brief Bioinform 2021;22:bbaa182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47]. Yin ZN, Lai FL, Gao F.. Unveiling human origins of replication using deep learning: accurate prediction and comprehensive analysis. Brief Bioinform 2024;25:bbad432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

qzae076_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

DeOri is an open access database freely available at http://tubic.tju.edu.cn/deori/.


Articles from Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES