Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate age as a prognostic factor and develop a comprehensive prognostic model for patients undergoing clipping surgery for World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade I/II aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). We retrospectively investigated 188 patients with WFNS grade I/II SAH who underwent microsurgical clipping at our institute between December 2010 and January 2020. The data of 176 patients (75 with grade I and 101 with grade II) were analysed. Data on patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, SAH factors, surgical details, and clinical outcomes were collected. Prognostic factors were assessed using bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and recursive partitioning analysis. Favourable outcomes (mRS 0–2) were observed in 76% of patients. Age, a significant negative prognostic factor in multivariable analysis (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.40–0.76, p < 0.001), was cutoff at 70 years by the receiver operating characteristic curve. Patients aged ≤ 70 years had significantly better outcomes than those aged > 70 years (84% vs. 46%, respectively; p < 0.001). Epileptic seizures were significantly associated with poor outcomes in older adults (p < 0.001). A prognostic model (favourable, intermediate, and poor) based on age and postoperative adverse events showed significantly different outcomes between age groups (p < 0.001). Age was a stronger prognostic factor than WFNS grading for patients with grade I/II SAH undergoing microsurgical clipping. For patients aged ≤ 70 years, precise microsurgeries with fewer complications were associated with favourable outcomes beyond WFNS grade. For older patients, postoperative intensive seizure management may prevent poor outcomes.
Keywords: Aneurysm, Age-dependent, Microsurgical clipping, Recursive partitioning analysis, Subarachnoid haemorrhage, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grade
Introduction
Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) has an incidence of 1–20 cases per 100,000 population, with approximately 85% of cases caused by ruptured aneurysms [21, 28]. Rerupture of aneurysms leading to SAH has a mortality rate of 50–60%. Therefore, surgical intervention to prevent rerupture is the primary step for SAH treatment [15, 18, 33]. Treatment approaches can be broadly divided into microsurgery, such as clipping or trapping with bypass, and endovascular treatments, primarily coiling [16, 24, 26]. The frequency of clipping for SAH has decreased with advances in endovascular devices [17, 37], but the rate of recurrence of aneurysms after clipping is lower than that after coiling [2, 5, 9, 40]. Therefore, our institution actively performs microsurgical clipping for aneurysmal SAH from a curative standpoint. However, less invasive endovascular treatments may be selected for older adults or those with poor surgical tolerance, depending on their general condition.
The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) classification evaluates severity based on the level of consciousness and the presence of neurological symptoms and is widely used as the gold standard due to its correlation with prognosis [34]. While low-grade SAH (WFNS grade I and II) generally has a better prognosis than higher-grade SAH (WFNS grade III-V), outcomes are not always favourable due to factors such as patient background, surgical complications, and adverse events arising from the management of vasospasm or systemic complications [3, 7, 10, 20, 22, 30, 35, 45]. Although various factors influencing prognosis in low-grade SAH have been examined, the evidence remains insufficient. The age at onset has been reported as a prognostic factor for SAH and is simple to evaluate [4, 6, 23, 31, 43]. However, few studies have investigated the effects of age on low-grade SAH outcomes.
Hence, in this study, we aimed to explore the prognostic factors of patients who underwent microsurgical clipping for WFNS grade I and II SAH and develop a simple prognostic model mainly based on patient age of onset.
Methods
Participant selection
We collected data on patients who developed SAH from ruptured cerebral aneurysms (including dissecting aneurysms) between December 2010 and January 2020 and underwent open surgery, using an institutional SAH database. Patients whose modified Rankin scores (mRS) were ≥ 3 were excluded. Data regarding patient-, aneurysm-, SAH-, and surgery-related factors and clinical outcomes that were prospectively collected and recorded in the database were retrospectively evaluated. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and the study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Showa General Hospital (approval number REC-328).
Procedures and techniques of SAH management
The treatment protocol for low-grade SAH via microsurgical clipping at our institution was as follows: Initially, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed under sedation and analgesia to determine the treatment strategy. If patients visited within three days of SAH onset, surgery was performed on the same day or the following day. For patients arriving after the fourth day of onset, the timing of surgery depends on the initial DSA findings of vasospasm and the patient’s general condition. Ventricular and cisternal or lumbar drainage is employed postoperatively for ventriculo-cisternal irrigation and intracranial pressure control therapy. Postoperative management of SAH has been described in detail in previous studies [36]. Imaging evaluation primarily involved CT scans to assess SAH distribution until day 3. On day 4, an MRI is performed to evaluate early ischaemic lesions and vascular conditions before the vasospasm. On day 7, DSA was performed to detect cerebral vasospasm and aneurysms. MRI is repeated on day 14 to detect late-stage vasospasms and ischaemic lesions. Additionally, shunt surgery was performed if symptomatic post-SAH hydrocephalus occurred, and appropriate general medical treatment was performed if needed throughout the time course.
Treatment outcomes and statistical analyses
The median and interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated for each factor. The primary outcome was the mRS at discharge, with a favourable outcome defined as mRS 0–2. The following complications were assessed in the safety evaluation: emergent additional surgery, vasospasm, delayed cerebral infarction (DCI), epileptic seizures, secondary hydrocephalus (shunt placement excluded from additional surgery), meningitis, and systemic medical complications. Vasospasm was defined as any angiographical vasospasm detected by DSA or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with a decrease of ≥ 50% in the cerebral artery diameter relative to the preoperative value. This was judged solely on radiological findings, regardless of symptoms [10]. DCI was defined as symptomatic infarction identified on CT or MRI after excluding surgery-related infarction with any angiographical vasospasm [39].
To create a prognostic model for favourable outcomes, bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for the patient background factors, including age and WFNS grade, SAH factors, and surgical factors. Factors showing significance in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariable analysis along with age and WFNS grade. Further analysis using factors related to postoperative adverse events was conducted to assess their association with favourable outcomes. In this analysis, factors for multivariable analysis were selected using a stepwise forward selection method with a P-value threshold of < 0.10. A cutoff value for age as a continuous variable was calculated from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using the Youden index, creating a two-group division for age. Finally, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) used patient background, including dichotomised age and other significant factors from the bivariate analysis, to develop a three-group prognostic model (favourable, intermediate, poor) for favourable outcomes. P-values of < 0.05 denoted statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 17 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Participant selection
We obtained data on 373 patients who developed SAH due to ruptured cerebral aneurysms (including dissecting aneurysms) between December 2010 and January 2020 and underwent open surgery from an institutional SAH database. Of them, 188 with WFNS grades I and II SAH were identified. After excluding 12 patients whose modified Rankin scores (mRS) were 3 or more, 176 (75 patients with WFNS grade I and 101 with grade II) were included in this study.
Participant baseline characteristics and surgery for SAH
The median age of the 176 patients with low-grade aneurysmal SAH included in this study was 57 years (IQR, 47–70 years), and females were predominant (68%, Table 1). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (52%), while diabetes mellitus was rare (4%). Fifteen patients (9%) already had mRS scores of 1 or 2 before SAH onset. For 93% of the patients, the aneurysm type was saccular, with the distribution of the aneurysm locations consistent with that of the general population. Surgical indications were determined independently by two neurosurgeons. The pterional approach was the most frequent surgical approach, and bypass was used in 7% of surgeries involving clipping or trapping. Aneurysms in the C2 segment of the internal carotid artery were frequently of the blister-like type, and posterior circulation aneurysms often involved arterial branches, leading to the decision that open surgery with bypass was necessary. Surgery was basically performed on the day of onset or the following day (80%), although surgery was performed on day 2–4 with delayed hospital visit due to mild symptom in 22 patients (13%) and delayed surgery on day 5 or later was performed due to vasospasm at the time of referral in 13 patients (7%).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and surgical procedures
Number (%)/Median [IQR] | |
---|---|
Patient factor | |
Age, years | 57 [47–70] |
Female sex | 120 (68%) |
Comorbidities | |
Hypertension | 92 (52%) |
Dyslipidaemia | 33 (19%) |
Diabetes mellitus | 7 (4%) |
History of malignancy | 20 (11%) |
Active smoking | 57 (32%) |
Concomitant unruptured aneurysm | 38 (22%) |
Use of antithrombotic | 7 (4%) |
mRS 1 or 2 before SAH onset | 15 (9%) |
SAH factor | |
WFNS grading | |
I | 75 (43%) |
II | 101 (57%) |
GCS | |
15 | 75 (43%) |
14 | 75 (43%) |
13 | 26 (15%) |
Aneurysm type | |
Saccular | 163 (93%) |
Maximum dome diameter, mm | 5.0 [3.9–7.0] |
Dissecting | 13 (7%) |
Maximum length, mm | 6.3 [3.2–9.9] |
Location of aneurysm | |
Acom | 46 (26%) |
IC-Pcom | 44 (25%) |
MCA | 38 (22%) |
IC-Ach | 12 (7%) |
IC C2 | 11 (6%) |
Distal ACA | 6 (3%) |
VA | 8 (5%) |
BA | 7 (4%) |
Other posterior circulation | 4 (2%) |
Fisher group 3 | 157 (89%) |
Concomitant ICH | 11 (6%) |
Surgical factor | |
Approach | |
Pterional | 143 (81%) |
Interhemispheric | 22 (13%) |
Suboccipital | 11 (6%) |
Bypass | 14 (7%) |
High-flow bypass | 7 (50%) |
Low-flow bypass | 7 (50%) |
Day of surgery from onset | |
Day 0,1 | 141 (80%) |
Day 2–4 | 22 (13%) |
Day 5 or later | 13 (7%) |
ACA, anterior cerebral artery; Acom, anterior communicating artery; BA, basilar artery; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; IC-Pcom, internal carotid artery-posterior communicating artery; IQR, interquartile range; MCA, middle cerebral artery; VA, vertebral artery; WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies
Variables are indicated as number (%) and median [interquartile range]
Primary outcome and postoperative adverse events
At discharge, the mRS score was 0 for 65 (37%), 1 for 30 (17%), 2 for 39 (22%), 3 for 19 (11%), 4 for 19 (11%), 5 for 2 (1%), and 6 for 2 (1%) patients. The overall rate of favourable outcomes was 76%, with 22% of the patients having mRS of 3 or 4 and 2% having mRS of 5 or 6. Among the patients who died, one was an 83-year-old man who experienced postoperative rerupture of a 15-mm internal carotid artery-anterior choroidal artery aneurysm, considered as rapid growth of neck remnant, and his family opted to withdraw from further treatment due to his advanced age. The other patient was a 60-year-old woman undergoing active treatment for breast cancer who experienced severe SAH from a newly ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm after clipping for an anterior communicating artery aneurysm.
All the postoperative adverse events are summarised in Table 2. Symptomatic cerebral infarction due to surgery occurred in 5% of the patients. Emergent additional surgery for postoperative haemorrhage, cerebral swelling, or aneurysm rerupture was performed for 10 patients (6%). Only 9% of the patients developed DCI, despite 49% having confirmed vasospasm. Epileptic seizures occurred in 21 patients (12%), all of which required antiepileptic drug treatment. Meningitis (requiring extended antibiotic therapy) affected 32 patients (18%). Symptomatic secondary hydrocephalus requiring shunt placement occurred in 43 patients (19%). Pneumonia and electrolyte abnormalities due to cerebral salt-wasting syndrome, diabetes insipidus, and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion were the most common systemic complications. Each occurred in 15 patients (9%) with no associated deaths.
Table 2.
Details of postoperative and systemic complications after surgery for low-grade SAH
Total (N = 176) |
Favourable outcome (mRS 0–2, N = 134) |
Unfavourable outcome (mRS 3–6, N = 42) |
P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Postoperative complication | ||||
Symptomatic infarction by surgery | 9 (5%) | 0 | 9 (5%) | < 0.001* |
Oculomotor nerve palsy by surgery | 6 (3%) | 1 (2%) | 5 (4%) | 0.674 |
Postoperative rupture | 4 (2%) | 1 (1%) | 3 (7%) | 0.015* |
Postoperative additional surgery | 10 (6%) | 3 (2%) | 7 (17%) | < 0.001* |
Total vasospasm | 87 (49%) | 63 (47%) | 24 (57%) | 0.252 |
Delayed cerebral infarction | 15 (9%) | 9 (6.7%) | 6 (14%) | 0.125 |
Epileptic seizure | 21 (12%) | 8 (6%) | 13 (31%) | < 0.001* |
Meningitis | 32 (18%) | 18 (13%) | 14 (33%) | 0.004* |
Secondary hydrocephalus | 43 (19%) | 14 (11%) | 20 (48%) | < 0.001* |
Systemic complication | ||||
Pneumonia | 15 (9%) | 7 (5%) | 8 (19%) | 0.005* |
CSWS, DI, SIADH | 15 (9%) | 9 (7%) | 6 (14%) | 0.125 |
Liver failure/ cholecystitis | 13 (7%) | 8 (6%) | 5 (12%) | 0.200 |
Heart failure | 9 (5%) | 5 (4%) | 4 (10%) | 0.137 |
Gastrointestinal bleeding | 8 (5%) | 3 (2%) | 5 (12%) | 0.009* |
Urinary tract infection | 4 (2%) | 2 (1%) | 2 (5%) | 0.215 |
Pulmonary embolisation | 2 (1%) | 1 (1%) | 1 (2%) | 0.383 |
CSWS, cerebral salt-wasting syndrome; DI, diabetes insipidus; N, number; SIADH, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion
Values are indicated as number (%)
These complications were compared between the favourable outcome group and the unfavorable outcome group at discharge (Table 2). In the unfavorable outcome group, surgery-related complications, including symptomatic infarction, oculomotor nerve palsy, postoperative rerupture, postoperative additional surgery, epileptic seizures, meningitis, and secondary hydrocephalus, were significantly more frequent. Additionally, medical complications, including pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding, were also significantly more frequent.
Analyses of favourable outcomes using background factors and adverse events
In the bivariate analysis, significant negative correlations with favourable outcomes were found for age (continuous, per increasing decade, odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.69, p < 0.001) and mRS 1 or 2 before SAH onset (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11–0.94, p = 0.038). WFNS grade II against grade I did not show statistical significance (p = 0.083, Table 3). In the multivariable analysis, age (per increasing decade, OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.40–0.76, p < 0.001) was the only significant negative factor for favourable outcomes, making it a key result of this study. ROC curve analysis for age and favourable outcomes showed an area under the curve of 0.737, with the age of 70 years having a sensitivity of 0.866, specificity of 0.500, positive predictive value of 0.847, and negative predictive value of 0.538. Patients aged ≤ 70 years had significantly better outcomes than those aged > 70 years (favourable outcome: 84% vs. 46%, respectively; p < 0.001).
Table 3.
Analysis of baseline factors related to favourable outcomes after surgery for low-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage
Bivariate | Multivariable | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR [95% CI] | P-value | OR [95% CI] | P-value | |
Patient factor | ||||
Age (continuous, per increasing decade) | 0.51 [0.38–0.69] | < 0.001* | 0.55 [0.40–0.76] | < 0.001* |
Dichotomised | ||||
Age > 70 years (vs. ≤70 years) | 0.16 [0.07–0.34] | < 0.001* | ||
Stratified | ||||
Age > 80 years (vs. <65 years) | 0.08 [0.02–0.33] | < 0.001* | ||
Age > 80 years (vs. 65–80 years) | 0.23 [0.05–1.00] | 0.049* | ||
Age 65–80 years (vs. <65 years) | 0.34 [0.16–0.74] | 0.007* | ||
Female sex | 0.70 [0.32–1.52] | 0.371 | ||
Hypertension | 0.77 [0.38–1.55] | 0.470 | ||
Dyslipidaemia | 0.55 [0.24–1.26] | 0.161 | ||
Diabetes mellitus | 0.22 [0.05–1.01] | 0.052 | 0.35 [0.06–1.93] | 0.289 |
History of malignancy | 0.42 [0.16–1.10] | 0.079 | ||
Active smoking | 2.05 [0.90–4.63] | 0.086 | ||
Concomitant unruptured aneurysm | 0.85 [0.37–1.93] | 0.689 | ||
Use of antithrombotic | 0.78 [0.14–4.15] | 0.766 | ||
mRS 1 or 2 before SAH onset (vs. mRS 0) | 0.32 [0.11–0.94] | 0.038* | 0.52 [0.15–1.84] | 0.311 |
SAH factor | ||||
WFNS grade II (vs. grade I) | 0.52 [0.25–1.09] | 0.083 | 0.46 [0.20–1.03] | 0.060 |
GCS | 0.095 | |||
GCS 13 (vs. GCS 15) | 0.36 [0.12–0.90] | 0.031* | ||
GCS 14 (vs. GCS 15) | 0.62 [0.28–1.37] | 0.234 | ||
Fisher group 3 (vs. 1,2) | 1.16 [0.39–3.43] | 0.791 | ||
Anterior circulation (vs. posterior) | 0.16 [0.02–1.21] | 0.076 | 0.16 [0.02–1.45] | 0.104 |
With ICH (vs. without ICH) | 0.83 [0.21–3.26] | 0.784 | ||
Maximum diameter of aneurysm, mm | 1.02 [0.91–1.15] | 0.710 | ||
Operative factor | ||||
Bypass surgery | 0.38 [0.12–1.17] | 0.092 | ||
Early surgery at day 0, 1 (vs. delayed surgery after day 2) | 0.78 [0.20–1.88] | 0.550 |
CI, confidence interval; GCS, Glasgow coma scale; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; OR, odds ratio; SAH, subarachnoid haemorrhage; WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies
*P values < 0.05 are considered significant
The associations between the postoperative adverse events and outcomes are shown in Table 4. In the bivariate analysis, the postoperative events negatively correlated with favourable outcomes, including symptomatic infarction by surgery (p = 0.002), postoperative rupture (p = 0.047), postoperative additional surgery (p = 0.003), epileptic seizure (p < 0.001), meningitis (p = 0.005), and secondary hydrocephalus (p < 0.001). The systemic complications included pneumonia (p = 0.009), gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.019), and urinary tract infection (p = 0.047). The development of DCI was not significantly correlated to favourable outcomes. Multivariable analysis identified symptomatic infarction caused by surgery (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01–0.27, p < 0.001), epileptic seizure (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.03–0.36, p < 0.001), secondary hydrocephalus (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.04–0.27, p < 0.001), and urinary tract infection (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.74, p = 0.028) as significant negative factors.
Table 4.
Risk analysis of complication factors related to favourable outcomes after surgery for low-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage
Bivariate | Multivariable | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR [95% CI] | P-value | OR [95% CI] | P-value | |
Postoperative surgical complications | ||||
Symptomatic infarction by surgery | 0.08 [0.02–0.38] | 0.002* | 0.04 [0.01–0.27] | < 0.001* |
Oculomotor nerve palsy by surgery | 1.59 [0.18–14.00] | 0.677 | ||
Postoperative rupture | 0.10 [0.01–0.97] | 0.047* | ||
Postoperative additional surgery | 0.11 [0.03–0.47] | 0.003* | 0.19 [0.03–1.10] | 0.064 |
Total vasospasm | 0.67 [0.33–1.34] | 0.253 | ||
Delayed cerebral infarction | 0.43 [0.14–1.29] | 0.134 | ||
Epileptic seizure | 0.14 [0.05–0.37] | < 0.001* | 0.11 [0.03–0.36] | < 0.001* |
Meningitis | 0.31 [0.14–0.70] | 0.005* | ||
Secondary hydrocephalus | 0.13 [0.06–0.29] | < 0.001* | 0.10 [0.04–0.27] | < 0.001* |
Systemic complications | ||||
Pneumonia | 0.23 [0.08–0.69] | 0.009* | ||
CSWS, DI, SIADH | 0.54 [0.19–1.55] | 0.251 | ||
Liver failure/ cholecystitis | 0.47 [0.14–1.52] | 0.208 | ||
Heart failure | 0.37 [0.09–1.44] | 0.151 | ||
Gastrointestinal bleeding | 0.17 [0.04–0.74] | 0.019* | ||
Urinary tract infection | 0.10 [0.01–0.97] | 0.047* | 0.06 [0.01–0.74] | 0.028* |
Pulmonary embolisation | 0.31 [0.02–5.04] | 0.409 |
CI, confidence interval; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; OR, odds ratio; PA, pterional approach; WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies
*P values < 0.05 are considered significant
Prognostic risk classification by recursive partitioning analysis
Starting with the age of 70 years as a significant partitioning factor, further optimal partitioning created the risk classification using RPA as shown in Fig. 1. The favourable prognosis group included patients aged ≤ 70 years who did not require additional surgery or did not have secondary hydrocephalus and had a favourable outcome probability of 0.913. The intermediate prognosis group included patients aged ≤ 70 years who did not require additional surgery but had secondary hydrocephalus and patients aged > 70 years without epileptic seizures (favourable outcome probabilities of 0.599 and 0.572, respectively). The poor prognosis group included patients aged ≤ 70 years requiring additional surgery and those aged > 70 years with epileptic seizures (favourable outcome probabilities of 0.377 and 0.173, respectively). Nominal logistic regression for favourable outcomes across these groups showed significant differences, with ORs (95% CI) for favourable vs. intermediate, intermediate vs. poor, and favourable vs. poor of 7.95 (3.26–19.38, p < 0.001), 4.67 (1.31–16.59, p = 0.017), and 37.10 (10.25–134.31, p < 0.001), respectively (Table 5).
Fig. 1.
Recursive partitioning analysis of favourable outcomes (mRS 0–2 at discharge) in a predictive model with three outcomes based on age dichotomisation using the Youden index for 70 years
Table 5.
Prognostic model for predicts favourable outcomes after surgery for low-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage
Prognosis group | OR [95% CI] | P-value |
---|---|---|
Favourable (vs. intermediate) | 7.95 [3.26–19.38] | < 0.001* |
Intermediate (vs. poor) | 4.67 [1.31–16.59] | 0.017* |
Favourable (vs. poor) | 37.10 [10.25–134.31] | < 0.001* |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio
*P values < 0.05 are considered significant
Discussion
This study demonstrated that age was a stronger prognostic factor than WFNS grading for patients with low-grade SAH (WFNS grade I/II) undergoing microsurgical clipping. Using 70 years as a cutoff, the study developed a clinically applicable risk evaluation method, dividing the patients into three groups (favourable, intermediate, and poor) based on age and postoperative adverse events.
Initially, this study investigated the association between background factors related to patients, disease, and surgery with favourable outcomes (mRS 0–2 at discharge). The age at onset was the sole prognostic predictor, highlighting its importance in the prognosis of low-grade SAH. The WFNS grading system has been widely used since its introduction in 1988 to classify prognoses based on the level of consciousness at SAH onset [34], but some studies have reported no significant prognostic difference between WFNS grades [27, 32, 38]. Low-grade SAH (WFNS grades I and II) is generally considered to have a favourable prognosis, but distinguishing between grades can be challenging in older patients with pre-existing cognitive decline. Zijlmans et al. identified age as a background factor associated with unfavourable outcomes (mRS 3–6) at 6 months after treatment in 132 patients with WFNS grade I aneurysmal SAH [45]. Conversely, Hori et al. found no background factors, including age, associated with unfavourable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1–3) at discharge in 171 patients with WFNS grade I and II SAH, making the findings controversial [13]. These studies included both surgical and endovascular treatments and had heterogeneous cohorts. In our study, age was a stronger prognostic factor for the surgical cohort, suggesting that the higher invasiveness of open surgery may be more impactful on the outcomes of older patients.
Using the age of 70 years as a partitioning factor, the RPA in this study showed optimal partitioning based on surgical-related complications in patients younger than 70 years and post-surgical epileptic seizures in those older than 70 years for the prediction of favourable outcomes. In the elderly group, postoperative seizures were particularly detrimental, significantly increasing the likelihood of unfavourable outcomes at discharge. This suggests that controlling seizures in older patients is more difficult, possibly due to underlying age-related neurological changes that make seizure management less effective. Moreover, the elderly population tends to experience faster declines in activities of daily living (ADL) following complications like seizures, further compounding the negative impact on recovery. The association between poor outcomes and epilepsy at discharge has been reported, suggesting the need for careful surgical techniques to minimise complications [3, 8, 11, 12, 14, 19, 25, 35]. Therefore, more intensive postoperative seizure monitoring and management should be prioritized in older patients to minimize this risk. Although the use of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs in patients without preoperative seizures is debated [44], our findings suggest that it might be worth considering their use in elderly patients, given the significant impact of postoperative seizures on outcomes.
In contrast, younger patients were less affected by seizures but were more vulnerable to unfavourable outcomes if additional surgeries were required. The need for additional procedures, typically due to postoperative haemorrhage, brain swelling, or aneurysm rerupture, directly contributed to poor outcome group. Needless to say, these findings highlight the critical importance of meticulous surgical technique to prevent such complications. Additionally, in cases where significant brain swelling is anticipated, early decompressive craniotomy should be considered as a proactive measure to reduce the risk of further complications and improve recovery prospects. While surgical precision is crucial for all patients, our findings suggest that it may be particularly essential in preventing reoperation-related complications in younger patients.
Secondary hydrocephalus is a known predictor of poor outcomes for aneurysmal SAH, and this study confirmed its significance in patients under 70 years with low-grade SAH [1, 29, 42]. Previous studies have identified age as a risk factor for shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and its correlation with poor outcomes and quality of life [1, 29, 41]. The association between hydrocephalus and prognosis in younger patients in this study is noteworthy, although the outcome measurement was mRS at discharge, which may not fully capture long-term recovery.
This study has a few limitations. Firstly, it was a single-centre retrospective study, and selection bias may have occurred. Secondly, the outcome measurement was mRS at discharge, and long-term follow-up could not be conducted. Thirdly, the classification model has not been validated in a separate cohort. Multicentre prospective studies with long-term follow-up data are needed for further validation.
Conclusion
Age was a more significant prognostic factor than WFNS grading in patients with WFNS grade I/II aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage undergoing microsurgical clipping. The developed prognostic model with an age cut-off of 70 years and postoperative complications provides a practical tool for predicting outcomes and guiding treatment strategies. In that model, precise microsurgeries with fewer complications determined favourable outcomes beyond the WFNS grade for younger patients, while postoperative intensive seizure management could be meaningful to avoid poor outcomes for older patients.
Acknowledgements
None.
Author contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by Motoyuki Umekawa. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Motoyuki Umekawa and Gakushi Yoshikawa commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
None.
Open Access funding provided by The University of Tokyo.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethical approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Showa General Hospital (approval number REC-328).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Adams H, Ban VS, Leinonen V, Aoun SG, Huttunen J, Saavalainen T, Lindgren A, Frosen J, Fraunberg M, Koivisto T, Hernesniemi J, Welch BG, Jaaskelainen JE, Huttunen TJ (2016) Risk of shunting after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: a collaborative study and initiation of a Consortium. Stroke 47:2488–2496. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson IA, Kailaya-Vasan A, Nelson RJ, Tolias CM (2018) Clipping aneurysms improves outcomes for patients undergoing coiling. J Neurosurg 1–7. 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172759 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.Baldvinsdottir B, Kronvall E, Ronne-Engstrom E, Enblad P, Lindvall P, Aineskog H, Friethriksson S, Klurfan P, Svensson M, Alpkvist P, Hillman J, Eneling J, Nilsson OG (2023) Adverse events associated with microsurgial treatment for ruptured intracerebral aneurysms: a prospective nationwide study on subarachnoid haemorrhage in Sweden. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 94:575–580. 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brawanski N, Kunze F, Bruder M, Tritt S, Senft C, Berkefeld J, Seifert V, Konczalla J (2017) Subarachnoid hemorrhage in Advanced Age: comparison of patients aged 70–79 years and 80 years and older. World Neurosurg 106:139–144. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, Summers PE, Kerr RS, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Rischmiller J, Byrne JV (2007) Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 38:1538–1544. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.466987 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chiang VL, Claus EB, Awad IA (2000) Toward more rational prediction of outcome in patients with high-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 46:28–35 discussion 35 – 26 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Daou BJ, Koduri S, Thompson BG, Chaudhary N, Pandey AS (2019) Clinical and experimental aspects of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. CNS Neurosci Ther 25:1096–1112. 10.1111/cns.13222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Darkwah Oppong M, Lohrer L, Wrede KH, Chihi M, Santos AN, Dammann P, Michel A, Rauschenbach L, Said M, Li Y, Frank B, Sure U, Jabbarli R (2023) Reevaluation of risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage associated epilepsy. J Neurol Sci 444:120519. 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Davies JM, Lawton MT (2014) Advances in open microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg 74 Suppl 1S7–16. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000193 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 10.Frontera JA, Fernandez A, Schmidt JM, Claassen J, Wartenberg KE, Badjatia N, Connolly ES, Mayer SA (2009) Defining vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: what is the most clinically relevant definition? Stroke 40:1963–1968. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hart Y, Sneade M, Birks J, Rischmiller J, Kerr R, Molyneux A (2011) Epilepsy after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the frequency of seizures after clip occlusion or coil embolization of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm: results from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 115:1159–1168. 10.3171/2011.6.JNS101836 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hirano T, Enatsu R, Iihoshi S, Mikami T, Honma T, Ohnishi H, Mikuni N (2019) Effects of Hemosiderosis on Epilepsy following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 59:27–32. 10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hori S, Masuoka T, Hamada H, Okamoto S, Kubo M, Horie Y, Kuroda S (2023) Walk-In hospital admission of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical presentation and outcome. World Neurosurg 179:e421–e427. 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huttunen J, Kurki MI, Fraunberg MVZ, Koivisto T, Ronkainen A, Rinne J, Jääskeläinen JE, Kälviäinen R, Immonen A (2015) Epilepsy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage a population-based, long-term follow-up study. Neurology 84:2229–2237. 10.1212/Wnl.0000000000001643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Inagawa T, Kamiya K, Ogasawara H, Yano T (1987) Rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the acute stage. Surg Neurol 28:93–99. 10.1016/0090-3019(87)90079-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kurogi R, Kada A, Ogasawara K, Kitazono T, Sakai N, Hashimoto Y, Shiokawa Y, Miyachi S, Matsumaru Y, Iwama T, Tominaga T, Onozuka D, Nishimura A, Arimura K, Kurogi A, Ren N, Hagihara A, Nakaoku Y, Arai H, Miyamoto S, Nishimura K, Iihara K (2020) Effects of case volume and comprehensive stroke center capabilities on patient outcomes of clipping and coiling for subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 134:929–939. 10.3171/2019.12.JNS192584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kurogi R, Kada A, Ogasawara K, Nishimura K, Kitazono T, Iwama T, Matsumaru Y, Sakai N, Shiokawa Y, Miyachi S, Kuroda S, Shimizu H, Yoshimura S, Osato T, Horie N, Nagata I, Nozaki K, Date I, Hashimoto Y, Hoshino H, Nakase H, Kataoka H, Ohta T, Fukuda H, Tamiya N, Kurogi AI, Ren N, Nishimura A, Arimura K, Shimogawa T, Yoshimoto K, Onozuka D, Ogata S, Hagihara A, Saito N, Arai H, Miyamoto S, Tominaga T, Iihara K, Collaborators JAS (2023) National trends in the outcomes of subarachnoid haemorrhage and the prognostic influence of stroke centre capability in Japan: retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 13:e068642. 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lantigua H, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Schmidt JM, Lee K, Badjatia N, Agarwal S, Claassen J, Connolly ES, Mayer SA (2015) Subarachnoid hemorrhage: who dies, and why? Crit Care 19. 10.1186/s13054-015-1036-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Le VT, Nguyen AM, Nguyen PL (2024) Risk factors for In-Hospital seizure and New-Onset Epilepsy in Coiling and Clipping Treatment of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 184:e460–e467. 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Macdonald RL, Pluta RM, Zhang JH (2007) Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the emerging revolution. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 3:256–263. 10.1038/ncpneuro0490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mayberg MR, Batjer HH, Dacey R, Diringer M, Haley EC, Heros RC, Sternau LL, Torner J, Adams HP Jr., Feinberg W et al (1994) Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 25:2315–2328. 10.1161/01.str.25.11.2315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mijiti M, Mijiti P, Axier A, Amuti M, Guohua Z, Xiaojiang C, Kadeer K, Xixian W, Geng D, Maimaitili A (2016) Incidence and predictors of Angiographic Vasospasm, symptomatic vasospasm and cerebral infarction in Chinese patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. PLoS ONE 11:e0168657. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mocco J, Ransom ER, Komotar RJ, Schmidt JM, Sciacca RR, Mayer SA, Connolly ES Jr (2006) Preoperative prediction of long-term outcome in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 59:529–538; discussion 529–538. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000228680.22550.A2 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 24.Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R, International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial Collaborative G (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274. 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11314-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nakashima S, Nishibayashi H, Yako R, Ishii M, Toki N, Tomobuchi M, Nakai T, Yamoto H, Nakanishi Y, Nakao N (2024) Factors Associated with early and late seizure related to Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 64:123–130. 10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Ghodke B, Britz GW, Bhagawati D, Temkin N (2008) Outcomes of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling in a high-volume center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:753–759. 10.3174/ajnr.A0895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nguyen TA, Vu LD, Mai TD, Dao CX, Ngo HM, Hoang HB, Do SN, Nguyen HT, Pham DT, Nguyen MH, Nguyen DN, Vuong HTT, Vu HD, Nguyen DD, Nguyen LQ, Dao PV, Vu TD, Nguyen DT, Tran TA, Pham TQ, Van Nguyen C, Nguyen AD, Luong CQ (2023) Predictive validity of the prognosis on admission aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage scale for the outcome of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Sci Rep 13:6721. 10.1038/s41598-023-33798-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Oka F, Sadeghian H, Yaseen MA, Fu B, Kura S, Qin T, Sakadzic S, Sugimoto K, Inoue T, Ishihara H, Nomura S, Suzuki M, Ayata C (2022) Intracranial pressure spikes trigger spreading depolarizations. Brain 145:194–207. 10.1093/brain/awab256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Paisan GM, Ding D, Starke RM, Crowley RW, Liu KC (2018) Shunt-Dependent Hydrocephalus after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: predictors and long-term functional outcomes. Neurosurgery 83:393–402. 10.1093/neuros/nyx393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pluta RM, Hansen-Schwartz J, Dreier J, Vajkoczy P, Macdonald RL, Nishizawa S, Kasuya H, Wellman G, Keller E, Zauner A, Dorsch N, Clark J, Ono S, Kiris T, Leroux P, Zhang JH (2009) Cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage: time for a new world of thought. Neurol Res 31:151–158. 10.1179/174313209X393564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rosen DS, Macdonald RL (2005) Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care 2:110–118. 10.1385/NCC:2:2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sano H, Satoh A, Murayama Y, Kato Y, Origasa H, Inamasu J, Nouri M, Cherian I, Saito N, members of the 38 registered i, Disease WC, Treatment C (2015) Modified World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies subarachnoid hemorrhage grading system. World Neurosurg 83:801–807. 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.032 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 33.Tanno Y, Homma M, Oinuma M, Kodama N, Ymamoto T (2007) Rebleeding from ruptured intracranial aneurysms in North Eastern Province of Japan. A cooperative study. J Neurol Sci 258:11–16. 10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Teasdale GM, Drake CG, Hunt W, Kassell N, Sano K, Pertuiset B, De Villiers JC (1988) A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:1457. 10.1136/jnnp.51.11.1457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Todd MM (2020) Erratum. Acute postoperative neurological deterioration associated with surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysm: incidence, predictors, and outcomes. J Neurosurg 132:2009. 10.3171/2020.1.JNS111277a [DOI] [PubMed]
- 36.Umekawa M, Yoshikawa G (2023) Impact of ventriculo-cisternal irrigation on prevention of delayed cerebral infarction in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a single-center retrospective study and literature review. Neurosurg Rev 47:6. 10.1007/s10143-023-02241-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.van der Schaaf I, Algra A, Wermer M, Molyneux A, Clarke M, van Gijn J, Rinkel G (2005) Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD003085. 10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.van Donkelaar CE, Bakker NA, Veeger NJ, Uyttenboogaart M, Metzemaekers JD, Eshghi O, Mazuri A, Foumani M, Luijckx GJ, Groen RJ, van Dijk JM (2017) Prediction of outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: timing of clinical assessment. J Neurosurg 126:52–59. 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vergouwen MDI, Vermeulen M, van Gijn J, Rinkel GJE, Wijdicks EF, Muizelaar JP, Mendelow AD, Juvela S, Yonas H, Terbrugge KG, Macdonald RL, Diringer MN, Broderick JP, Dreier JP, Roos YBWEM (2010) Definition of delayed cerebral ischemia after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies proposal of a Multidisciplinary Research Group. Stroke 41:2391–2395. 10.1161/Strokeaha.110.589275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Waldron JS, Halbach VV, Lawton MT (2009) Microsurgical management of incompletely coiled and recurrent aneurysms: trends, techniques, and observations on coil extrusion. Neurosurgery 64:301–315 discussion 315 – 307. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000335178.15274.B4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wong GK, Poon WS, Boet R, Chan MT, Gin T, Ng SC, Zee BC (2011) Health-related quality of life after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: profile and clinical factors. Neurosurgery 68:1556–1561 discussion 1561. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820cd40d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Xie Z, Hu X, Zan X, Lin S, Li H, You C (2017) Predictors of Shunt-dependent Hydrocephalus after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage? A systematic review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 106:844–860e846. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yue Q, Liu Y, Leng B, Xu B, Gu Y, Chen L, Zhu W, Mao Y (2016) A prognostic model for early post-treatment outcome of Elderly patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 95:253–261. 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.08.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zafar SF, Rosenthal ES, Postma EN, Sanches P, Ayub MA, Rajan S, Kim JA, Rubin DB, Lee H, Patel AB, Hsu J, Patorno E, Westover MB (2022) Antiseizure Medication Treatment and outcomes in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage undergoing continuous EEG monitoring. Neurocrit Care 36:857–867. 10.1007/s12028-021-01387-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zijlmans JL, Coert BA, van den Berg R, Sprengers MES, Majoie C, Vandertop WP, Verbaan D (2018) Unfavorable outcome in patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage WFNS Grade I. World Neurosurg 118:e217–e222. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.