Abstract
Novel scaffolds for broad-spectrum antibiotics are rare and in strong demand because of the increase in antimicrobial resistance. The cystobactamids, discovered from myxobacterial sources, have a unique hexapeptidic scaffold with five arylamides and possess potent, resistance-breaking properties. This study investigates the role of the central D-ring pharmacophore in cystobactamids, a para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) moiety that is additionally substituted by hydroxy and isopropoxy functions. We varied the two oxygenated substituents and replaced both amide connectors with bioisosteres. Synthetic routes were developed that included metal-mediated aromatic functionalization or heterocycle formations, leading to 19 novel analogues. The antibiotic efficacy of all analogues was determined against bacteria from the ESKAPE pathogen panel. While the replacement and the repositioning of hydroxy and isopropoxy substituents was not advantageous, exchanging PABA by terephthalic acid amides led to the highly potent analogue 42 with broad-spectrum activity, insensitivity towards AlbD-mediated degradation and promising pharmacokinetic properties in mice. The study highlights the steep structure-activity relationships in the tetrasubstituted D-ring and a surprisingly favorable reversion of the amide connecting C and D.
Subject terms: Lead optimization, Natural product synthesis, Natural product synthesis
Novel scaffolds for broad-spectrum antibiotics are rare and in strong demand because of the increase in antimicrobial resistance. Here, the authors assess the role of the central D ring pharmacophore in cystobactamids, and develop a potent broad-spectrum antibiotic by exchanging a para-aminobenzoic acid with a terephthalic acid amide.
Introduction
Bacterial resistance is omnipresent and expected to be a major future problem as warned by national and global organizations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO)1–3, or the European Centre of Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)4. Novel scaffolds for broad-spectrum antibiotics that can displace major current classes such as β-lactams or quinolones are rare and their development is slow5; however, innovative approaches for antibiotic discovery exist6. The cystobactamids and the structurally similar albicidins have an unusual oligoarylamide structure, containing one aliphatic α-amino acid (Fig. 1)7,8. Both compound classes proved to exert potent antibiotic activities through the inhibition of bacterial gyrase and topoisomerase IV. The unique binding mode of the oligoarylamides, featuring interactions of its Eastern part with gyrase amino acids, while its Western part binds to DNA, explains why the compounds break resistance towards existing classes of gyrase inhibitors9. In first structural optimization studies7,10–18, the ring D substructure was found to be highly relevant for antimicrobial activity. For example, an elongation of the isopropoxy to an isobutoxy residue, as well as the removal of the hydroxy function proved to be disadvantageous. However, establishing structure-activity relationships (SAR) in this part of the molecule has been limited by the higher synthetic challenges associated with the tetrasubstituted arene. In this work, we focused on D-ring analogues starting with the current lead-scaffolds CN861 (1) and CNCC-861 (2)19 (Fig. 1). The effects of the re- or displacement of the hydroxy- and isopropoxy functions were assumed to deliver important information about the role of this aromatic ring. In addition, various isosteric groups for the amide bonds were introduced between rings C and D and rings D and E to probe and alter the intramolecular hydrogen bonding network. The in vitro efficacy of the new analogues was determined against various bacteria of the ESKAPE panel, and selected compounds were profiled in specific resistance and pharmacokinetic assays, highlighting their promising antibiotic potential.
Results
We started with the highly potent compound 2 to introduce variations to ring D. Conspicuously, variations of the alkoxy moiety on ring D frequently occurred for the cystobactamids found in nature, while the hydroxy group on ring D remains unaltered7,14,20. For that reason, modifications of the isopropoxy- and hydroxy groups were targeted first. The phenol function can act both as hydrogen bond donor (HBD) and hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) and may contribute to metabolic stability and solubility21. Furthermore it can assume two possible charge states, which influence the interaction with cell membranes and the target itself. The targeted cystobactamid analogues with varied hydroxy and alkoxy residues are depicted in Fig. 2, and the synthesis of the corresponding ring D precursors is shown in Fig. 3.
In hydrochinone 3, the type of substituents and the electron density of ring D were largely preserved, but the topology of hydroxy as an HBD was rearranged. This was expected to result in a switched conformation of the DE-amide bond and thereby a relocation of the terminal E ring. The protected precursor of ring D 14 was accessed by adapting known protocols (Fig. 3)22,23. Starting with commercially available material 12a, an Elbs-oxidation introduced the hydroxy group para to the isopropoxy group. The salicylic acid function was protected as an acetonide, that allowed a selective alkylation of the free hydroxyl group by a Mitsunobu reaction to give 13. After deprotection and allylation of the 6-hydroxy group, p-nitrobenzoic acid 14 was obtained.
Next, the hydroxy group was replaced by halogen atoms as in compounds 4, 5 and 6, in order to probe the effect of removing the protic function at this position. The commercially available aldehydes 15a–c served as substrates for the introduction of the nitro group as fourth substituent. The nitration was sufficiently selective for the desired regioisomers 16a–c, delivering yields of 38–47%. The site of nitration was verified by 2D-NMR (see the Supporting Information). Pinnick oxidation of the aldehydes, followed by Mitsunobu reactions to introduce the isopropyl groups and subsequent saponifications delivered 17a–c. This route avoided side reactions of the aldehydes during the Mitsunobu reactions.
To contrast these non-protic phenol isosteres as weak HBA, an amino function as a replacement of the hydroxyl group was targeted, as it is an HBD and a strong +I/ + M substituent. Such anilines are weak bases and known isosteric groups for phenols24,25. To obtain cystobactamid 7, the methyl ester of commercially available 18 was prepared first. An acetyl group was introduced to protect the amino function and to reduce its directing effect during nitration to give 19. A solution of nitric acid in acetone or DCM turned out to be optimal for nitration, although the yield of up to 27% for this step remained moderate. Compound 19 was isopropylated via a Mitsunobu protocol to give 20, followed again by mild saponification to 21. As the removal of the acetyl function was anticipated to require harsh conditions, the formyl-protected intermediate 22 was synthesized as well. Here, the nitration was performed without methyl-protection of the carboxylic acid to give 22 in a yield of 31%. Interestingly, the desired regioisomer was easily obtained by precipitation, while the isolation of 19 required chromatography. After isopropylation of the hydroxy and carboxyl functions, the formyl group and intermediate isopropyl ester were easily cleaved under mild basic conditions to give 24. Again, the correct site of nitration was verified by 2D-NMR of the products or the final cystobactamids. From this compound the final cystobactamid 7 was obtained. Building block 20 later served as a substrate in the synthesis of a rigidified DE-amide bond in cystobactamids 45a and 45b.
We were also interested in the effects of other weak bases as isosteres for the phenol group, such as pyridines. Pyridines as ring D substitutes were recently synthesized26 and reported to have high activity in albicidins13. To test a pyridine on ring D as part of our reference scaffold 2, compound 8 was targeted next. For this purpose 27 was synthesized according to the literature26. Here the Stille coupling of 26 with a vinyl reagent was successfully replaced by applying less toxic Suzuki coupling conditions. Oxidation of the vinyl pyridine by KMnO4 gave carboxylic acid 27.
Analogue 9 bears a difluoromethyl group that is isosteric for the hydroxy function and is an HBD as well27. To obtain its ring D fragment 32 starting from 2-methyl-3-hydroxybenzoic acid 28, the methyl ester was prepared first, followed by isopropylation of the hydroxy function. A radical monobromination of the benzylic methyl group gave 29. To introduce the difluoromethyl function, the benzyl bromide was first oxidized to the aldehyde using N-methylmorpholine N-oxide. Subsequent conversion with the fluorinating agent DAST gave 30. The direct nitration with this material was unfortunately unsuccessful. However, after reducing the ester to aldehyde 31, the nitration worked and gave the desired regioisomer in 23% yield. After oxidation of the aldehyde under Pinnick conditions, 32 was obtained.
In addition to the presented isosteres for the hydroxy group, substitutions of the isopropoxy function on ring D were investigated. In our previous work, the replacement of isopropoxy by isobutoxy led to a decrease in activity10. However, methoxy as a substituent displayed activity in some naturally occurring cystobactamids and in albicidins8,14. We were interested how this substructure would perform when combined with our reference scaffold 2. Targeting cystobactamid 10, compound 34 was obtained from 33, which in turn was prepared according to literature15.
As another modification the formal substitution of the ethereal oxygen of 2 by methylene as in 11 was targeted. This replacement would shed light on the role of the oxygen atom as an HBA and thus its interaction with the adjacent amide and hydroxy functions; it would also reduce electron density in the D-ring. The synthesis of the corresponding building block 39 was attempted via a directed ortho-metalation of 36. The latter was synthesized from 35 by adapting known protocols that however used carboxy functions such as dimethylformamide and chloroformate as electrophiles28,29. In order to introduce an alkyl chain instead, we adjusted the reaction conditions and used methallyl bromide as electrophile and a cyano cuprate as co-reactant. Such cuprates are known to facilitate the conversion of alkyl and alkenyl halides in lithiation reactions30–33. Indeed, the turnover to the desired product was increased by 50% compared to cuprate-free conditions. Isobutyl bromide, was replaced by methallyl bromide in order to avoid elimination reactions obtained with the former.
After hydrogenation of the isobutenyl group, the MOM protecting group was removed to give 37. Unfortunately, the Moc protecting group turned out to be resistant towards removal using strong nucleophiles as propane thiolate and TMS-iodide at a later synthetic stage. Therefore, a de-/reprotection with Boc became necessary. The last ring D-substituent was then introduced by a Skattebol-formylation ortho-selective to hydroxy. By systematic optimization of the reaction conditions, aldehyde 38 was obtained in an acceptable yield of 39% over three steps. After allyl protection and a Pinnick oxidation of the aldehyde, carboxylic acid 39 was obtained. In the latter, the oxidation protocol was improved by substituting the usual scavenger 2-Me-2-butene with H2O2, thus circumventing hardly removable organic residues in the product.
Synthesis of amide isosteres attached to ring D
The second set of analogues featured eight modifications of the amide groups attached to ring D (Fig. 4).
A benzylamine function between rings C and D as in 40 was targeted, because it adds rotational flexibility to the amide backbone and removes oxygen as an HBA. The synthesis started from 4-nitrobenzaldehyde 49 and the previously prepared DE fragment 50 (Fig. 5). Sodium triacetoxyborohydride, a mild reducing reagent that was prepared in situ, was used for the reductive amination. The coupling proceeded slowly, however, the conversion was finally increased by repeatedly working up the reaction solution, isolating the reactant/product mixture and adding reagents again. The obtained product mixture was subjected to Boc-protection, which led to a product mixture. CDE-fragment 51 was finally obtained in a yield of 9.2% over three steps.
The benzylamine moiety was also introduced between rings D and E to give cystobactamid 41. The applied conditions were similar to those applied for 51, but the amination reaction was faster and gave significantly higher yield.
Next, the synthesis of cystobactamid 42 was targeted, a terephthalic acid analogue formally obtained by a reversion of the CD-amide linker. This change was expected to increase the H-bond strength between the amide and the adjacent isopropoxy function and can thus stabilize alternative conformations (see SAR discussion for details). The synthesis was established from commercially available 2,3-dihydroxyterephthalic acid 56, which was converted to the dimethyl ester under acidic conditions in methanol. After monoisopropylation using Mitsunobu conditions, the ester groups were differentiated by a regiospecific demethylation with nicotinic acid and potassium carbonate in DMF to give 57. The free carboxylic acid was amidated with tert-butyl 4-aminobenzoate using triphenyl phosphite at higher temperature. After allyl protection and saponification of the methyl ester, 58 was obtained as a free carboxylic acid. Amide coupling with 4-nitroaniline, facilitated by T3P, and subsequent reduction of the nitro group by Zn/AcOH afforded 59.
We now concentrated on the amide bond between ring D and E, which was ascribed an important role in conformer stabilization26. Since the adjacent hydroxy group is both an HBD and an HBA, at least two conformations were found to be energetically possible. In order to identify the conformation relevant for bioactivity, we introduced amide isosteres and bicyclic systems with fixed conformations. Cystobactamid 43 replaced the amide with a triazole group. The amide was completely omitted in 44 to give a non-planar biaryl function of rings D and E. We expected that this change would reduce the π-π stacking and therefore increase solubility. Both analogues were accessible by cross coupling reactions with arylbromide 62. This compound was obtained after regioselective bromination of commercially available 60. Acetylation and a regioselective nitration gave 62 in a yield of 78% over two steps. Again, the correct regioisomer was identified via 2D-NMR. Compound 62 was first converted to alkyne 63 under Sonogashira conditions, followed by basic hydrolysis and copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) with 4-azidobenzoic acid as ring E building block. After global protection with allyl bromide and reduction of the nitro group, 64 was obtained. The full CDE-fragment 65 was obtained after amide coupling with 4-nitrobenzoic acid, followed by reduction under the known conditions.
The biphenyl system of 44 was introduced from 62 by a Suzuki-coupling with pinacol borane 72. Hydrolysis of the acetate protecting group followed, giving 66 in 39% yield over two steps. After protection of the hydroxy group with MOM and reduction of the nitro group, 67 was obtained. 68 was then prepared via two steps analogously as seen before.
As mentioned above, N-acetylated compound 69 was originally prepared as an intermediate towards an amino substituted ring D. However, the amide coupling between 69 and 4-amino tBu-benzoate, facilitated by (COCl)2 and pyridine, gave 70 through a heterocyclization. After nitro reduction, coupling with 4-nitrobenzoyl chloride and renewed nitro reduction, CDE fragment 71 was obtained. The methyl oxoquinazoline structure was identified via LCMS and NMR, and regarded as a welcome addition for the SAR investigation with its rigidified DE-system, giving cystobactamid 45a as the final compound.
To determine the effect of the methyl group in the oxoquinazoline ring of 45a, desmethyl analogue 45b was prepared. The corresponding CDE fragment 75 was prepared starting from the formylation of already available 73 and coupling of the product with 4-amino tBu-benzoate under similar heterocyclization conditions as described before. Interestingly, the cyclization did not occur with DiPEA, but required pyridine as activating base. Nitro reduction gave compound 74, which was further assembled to the final cystobactamid via 75.
The rigidifications of 45a and 45b were placed between ring D and the DE-amide bond. We now expanded this to rigidified structures between the DE-amide bond and ring E: The quinazoline system of cystobactamid 47 would introduce two HBAs that allow interaction with the hydroxy substituent at ring D as HBD. This in turn would lead to the stabilization of two conformers with coplanar rings D and E.
To obtain DE-fragment 78, synthesis started from commercially available 76. After nitro reduction to the corresponding amine, the reaction with aldehyde 52 followed. This ammonium acetate-facilitated reaction produced the quinazoline ring after oxidation under air in aqueous medium. The desired product 78 was obtained from 77 in 14% yield, which was due to unavoidable side reactions of the reducing reagent with the quinazoline.
We also considered introducing a rigidification between the DE-amide bond and ring E that, in contrast to 47, would offer both HBA and HBD functionalities. Therefore, benzimidazole 48 was chosen as the next target, whose synthesis started with a condensation of aldehyde 52 with methyl 3,4-diaminobenzoate 81. The oxidative formation of imidazole 79 proceeded under air. Alloc-protection of the imidazole and nitro reduction followed, producing two regioisomers 80 in good yield. In contrast to 78, the heterocycle was inert during the reduction, reflecting the higher electron density of benzimidazoles compared to quinazolines.
With the last derivative 46 we wanted to find out the effects of removing the HBD-properties of the DE amide by methylating it. The N-Me PABA 82 was first tBu-protected via an EDC/DMAP mediated esterification. Amide coupling of the secondary amine with 85 and subsequent nitro reduction gave 83. The CDE-fragment 84 was obtained analogously as seen before.
Assembly strategy
The CDE-fragments shown in Fig. 5 had to be assembled to the full cystobactamids. Several total syntheses of cystobactamids were reported that differ in the order of assembling the ring elements10,14,16,17. In our recent work, the last disconnection was made between ring B and the central amino acid (Fig. 6, method 1)19.
However, for synthetically valuable ring D analogues, a further reduction of steps to the final cystobactamids was considered important. Therefore, we have set the last disconnection between the central amino acid (CAA) and ring C (method 2). This allows direct amide coupling of Western and Eastern fragments. By switching to this updated synthetic strategy, two reaction steps involving fragments with elaborated ring D building blocks were saved.
The synthesis of the corresponding AB-fragment and the followi ng assembling of 5 as an example cystobactamid is depicted in Fig. 6. AB-fragment 89 was synthesized as reported34. Coupling with CAA 94 required the protection of the carboxylic acid by the formation of methyl ester 95 under mild conditions with TMSCl in methanol. After HATU-facilitated amide coupling, the methyl ester was cleaved under basic conditions, and fragment 92 was obtained. Assembly of this fragment with the CDE-fragments was established by T3P-mediated amide coupling. A global deprotection concluded the synthesis of the full cystobactamids. The overall yields are mentioned in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1.
CN-CC-861 2 | CN861 1 | Cmpd. 3 | Cmpd. 4 | Cmpd. 5 | Cmpd. 6 | Cmpd. 7 | Cmpd. 8 | Cmpd. 9 | Cmpd. 10 | Cmpd. 11 | CIP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall yield | - | - | 1.6% 15 steps | 6.6% 9 steps | 5.9% 9 steps | 3.6% 9 steps | 2.9% 10 steps | 27% 8 steps | 17 steps | 15% 8 steps | 2.8% 16 steps | - |
A. baum. DSM-30008a) | 0.02–0.03 | 1 | 1 | 0.06 | >8 | > 8 | n.d. | n.d. | > 8 | n.d. | 1 | 0.05–0.25 |
A. baum. ATCC BAA-1710 | 0.06–0.25 | 8 | >64 | >8 | >8 | > 8 | > 64 | > 64 | > 8 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 32 |
A. baum. CIP-105742 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 2 | 0.25–0.5 | >8 | > 8 | n.d. | n.d. | > 8 | n.d. | <0.03 | <0.03–0.25 |
A. baum. CIP-107292 | 0.5–1 | >64 | >64 | >8 | >8 | > 8 | > 64 | 8 | > 8 | 4 | >64 | 64 |
A. baum. R835 | 1 | 64 | >64 | >8 | >8 | >8 | >64 | >64 | >8 | 4 | >64 | 32 |
E. ae. CIP 106754 | 0.125–4 | 4 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 4 | >64 | >6.4 |
E. cloacae ATCC BAA-2468 | 0.06–0.5 | 32 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 16 | >64 | >6.4 |
E. coli ATCC-25922 a) | 0.03–0.06 | 0.25 | 1 | 4 | >64 | >64 | 0.005 | ≤0.03 | >8 | <0.03 | <0.03 | 0.01–0.03 |
E. coli LM705 | <0.03–0.2 | 0.64 | >64 | > 64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | <0.03 | >64 | >6.4 |
K. pneum. CIP-104298 a) | 8 | 16 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | n.d | n.d. | >64 | n.d. | >64 | 0.025–0.05 |
K. pneum. KP10581 | 0.06–0.25 | 2 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 1 | 8 | >6.4 |
K. pneum. R-1525 | 16- > 64 | 16 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 32 | >64 | >64 |
P. ae. PA14 a) | 0.5–16 | 16 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | n.d. | n.d. | >64 | n.d. | >64 | 0.025–0.2 |
P. ae. PA14ΔmexAB | 0.03–0.5 | 1 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | n.d. | n.d. | >64 | n.d. | >64 | 0.006–0.1 |
E. faec. DSM-17050 (VRE) | <0.03 | n.d. | >64 | 4 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 0.25 | >64 | n.d. | <0.03 | 0.05–4 |
S. aur. ATCC-29213 a) | 0.02 | 0.125 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 0.5 | 16–32 | 0.2–1 |
S. pneum. DSM-11865 (PRSP) | 0.125 | n.d. | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 0.2 | n.d. | >64 | <0.03 | >64 | >6.4 |
Reference compounds: CN-CC-861 2, CN 861 1, CIP ( = ciprofloxacin).
A. baum. = Acinetobacter baumannii; E. ae. = Enterobacter aerogenes; E. cloacae = Enterobacter cloacae; E. coli = Escherichia coli; K. pneum. = Klebsiella pneumoniae; P. ae. = Pseudomonas aeruginosa; E. faec. = Enterococcus faecium; S. aur. = Staphylococcus aureus; S. pneum. = Streptococcus pneumoniae. a) reference strain, CIP = Ciprofloxacin, n.d. = not determined.
Table 2.
CN-CC-861 2 | CN861 1 | Cmpd. 40 | Cmpd. 41 | Cmpd. 42 | Cmpd. 43 | Cmpd. 44 | Cmpd. 45a | Cmpd. 45b | Cmpd. 47 | Cmpd. 48 | Cmpd. 46 | CIP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall yield | - | - | 6.4% 6 steps | 20% 10 steps | 7.7% 11 steps | 5.0% 12 steps | 2.1% 13 steps | 11 steps | 3.9% 10 steps | 6 steps | 12 steps | 10 steps | - |
A. baum. DSM 30008 a) | 0.02–0.03 | 1 | 0.5 | >8 | 0.125 | >8 | >64 | 8 | 1–2 | >64 | 8 | >8 | 0.05–0.25 |
A. baum. ATCC BAA-1710 | 0.06–0.25 | 8 | 0.5 | 1–2 | <0.03–0.05 | >8 | >64 | 0.5–1 | >8 | n.d. | >8 | >8 | 32 |
A. baum. CIP-105742 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.25 | >8 | <0.03 | >8 | >64 | 4 | 2 | >64 | >8 | >8 | < 0.03–0.25 |
A. baum. CIP-107292 | 0.5–1 | >64 | >8 | >8 | 0.05 | >8 | >64 | > 8 | >8 | >64 | >8 | >8 | 64 |
A. baum. R835 | 1 | 64 | >8 | >8 | 0.5 | >8 | >64 | > 8 | >8 | >64 | >8 | >8 | 32 |
E. ae. CIP 106754 | 0.125–4 | 4 | >64 | >64 | 1 | >64 | >64 | > 64 | >64 | n.d. | >64 | >64 | >6.4 |
E. cloacae ATCC BAA-2468 | 0.06–0.5 | 32 | >64 | >64 | 0.25 | >64 | >64 | > 64 | >64 | n.d. | >64 | >64 | >6.4 |
E. coli ATCC 25922 a) | 0.03–0.06 | 0.25 | 0.5–1 | >64 | <0.03 | >64 | >64 | 2–4 | 1 | n.d. | 64 | <0.03 | 0.01–0.03 |
E. coli LM705 | <0.03–0.2 | 0.64 | >64 | >64 | 0.06 | >64 | >64 | > 64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >6.4 |
K. pneum. CIP-104298 a) | 8 | 16 | >64 | >64 | <0.03 | >64 | >64 | > 64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 0.025–0.05 |
K. pneum. KP10581 | 0.06–0.25 | 2 | 1 | >64 | <0.03 | >64 | >64 | 4 | 16 | >64 | 16 | >64 | >6.4 |
K. pneum. R-1525 | 16- > 64 | 16 | >64 | >64 | <0.03 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | n.d. | >64 | >64 | >64 |
P. ae. PA14 a) | 0.5–16 | 16 | >64 | >64 | 4 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 0.025–0.2 |
P. ae. PA14ΔmexAB | 0.03–0.5 | 1 | 2 | >64 | <0.03 | >64 | >64 | 16–32 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | 0.006–0.1 |
E. faec. DSM 17050 (VRE) | <0.03 | n.d. | 0.25 | 16–32 | <0.03 | >64 | <0.03 | 2–4 | 1 | n.d. | 2 | >64 | 0.05–4 |
S. aur. ATCC 29213 a) | 0.02 | 0.125 | 0.5–1 | 16–32 | 0.06 | >64 | >64 | 4 | 8 | >64 | 4 | >64 | 0.2–1 |
S. pneum. DSM 11865 (PRSP) | 0.125 | n.d. | >64 | >64 | <0.03 | >64 | >64 | >64 | >64 | n.d. | >64 | >64 | >6.4 |
Reference compounds: CN-CC-861 2, CN 861 1, CIP ( = ciprofloxacin).
A. baum. = Acinetobacter baumannii; E. ae. = Enterobacter aerogenes; E. cloacae = Enterobacter cloacae; E. coli = Escherichia coli; K. pneum = Klebsiella pneumoniae; P. ae. = Pseudomonas aeruginosa; E. faec. = Enterococcus faecium; S. aur. = Staphylococcus aureus; S. pneum. = Streptococcus pneumoniae. a) reference strain, CIP = Ciprofloxacin, n.d. = not determined.
Evaluation of antibacterial properties
All cystobactamids were evaluated in MIC-assays on a panel of representative ESKAPE strains with focus on A. baumannii (Tables 1 and 2). Compared to our previous work10,17,18, we specifically included more challenging test strains with known resistances against gyrase inhibitors.
In summary, substitutions of the hydroxy group at ring D were consistently associated with a severe loss of activity. The shift of the hydroxy group from the 2- to the 6-position of ring D led to an almost complete loss of activity in 3, with residual activity against E. coli and A. baumannii strains. The substitution of the hydroxy group by fluorine in 4 led to a similar activity pattern, while substitutions with chlorine and bromine as in 5 and 6, respectively, abolished the activity in all tested strains. The amino-substituted cystobactamid 7 showed only residual activity against the E. coli reference strain and a clinical isolate of S. pneumoniae. The pyridine derivative 8 exhibited a comparably low activity, which is in some contrast to the reported significant activity towards selected bacterial strains of albicidins with comparable nitrogen insertions13. Also a difluoromethyl substitution for hydroxy as in 9 led to complete elimination of activity. One can conclude that (1) the substitution of the hydroxy group with groups that are exclusively HBAs is not tolerated, (2) an HBD as a hydroxy-substitute is not sufficient on its own and (3) a phenolic hydroxy group is probably not interchangeable here due to its unique H-bonding pattern and acidic properties.
The substitution of the isopropoxy group of 2 with a methoxy function as in 10 mostly decreased the activity, with potency being retained against some A. baumannii, E. coli and S. aureus and S. pneumoniae strains. However, the isopropoxy replacement had a smaller effect on activity than the substitutions of the hydroxyl group. The substitution of oxygen as an HBA in the isopropoxy group chain with methylene as in 11 strongly decreased activity against several species. Residual activity was observed for some A. baumannii strains, the E. coli reference strain and E. faecium.
To investigate the SAR on the amide isosteres flanking ring D (Fig. 4), the MICs were determined on the same pathogen panel as seen before (Table 2). The insertion of methyleneamine as linker between ring C and D as in 40 reduced activity compared to 2, although some A. baumannii, E. coli and E. faecium strains remained sensitive, in a pattern that was similar to the pattern of the isobutyl derivative 11.
In contrast to this, a reversion of the amide between rings C and D was beneficial: The terephthalic acid derivative 42 showed exceptional activity that even exceeded that of the reference 2. It also had higher activity than ciprofloxacin against K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii in particular.
Compounds 41, 43, and 44, which contain isosteres for the DE-amide, were all inactive. Similar to the hydroxy function, any isosteric substitutions of the DE-amide do not appear to be tolerated. This is a pronounced contrast to the CD-amide, where the corresponding methyleneamine 40 and triazol substitutions were tolerated10.
Residual activities, limited to some non-fluoroquinolone resistant A. baumannii strains, the E. coli reference strain, as well as the gram-positive species E. faecium and the S. aureus reference strain, were seen for the two oxaquinazoline derivatives 45a and 45b, without a recognizable influence of the methyl group. The loss of activity for 47 and 48 was explicit. The aimed-for stabilizing effect of a nitrogen heterocycle as isostere for the DE-amide could not be shown.
Also the methylated analogue 46 was inactive, with the exception of the sensitive E. coli type strain ATCC 25922. These findings underline the high relevance of an amide with HBD capability connecting rings D and E.
Conclusions for SAR
For all discussions of the SAR, it must be taken into account that gyrase sequences may differ substantially between bacterial species and thus the molecular target interactions may not be the same across species. This makes it difficult to predict broad spectrum activity only based on ligand data. Irrespective of this, the possible conformations that are relevant for activity can be discussed from the obtained MIC data. These conformations are stabilized by intramolecular H-bonds (IMHBs) as they occur frequently in ring D.
In the following discussion, a coplanar orientation of the aryl units in the cystobactamid Eastern fragment is assumed. The corresponding conformers are stabilized by IMHBs as shown in Fig. 7 and Fig. 8. With respect to the Eastern fragment and especially ring D, we propose a differentiation in antiperiplanar (a-d and d-a) and synperiplanar (a-a and d-d) conformations.
For the reference cystobactamid 2 the d-d and d-a conformations are most relevant with regard to H-bonding. The assumed 3D-structure of the d-a conformation is depicted, featuring tetrahedral coordination of the isopropoxy oxygen with the CD-amide and the hydroxy proton. This conformation has the highest number of H-bonds of all possible conformers with coplanar benzene rings. The result is a rotation of the alkyl chain out of the aromatic plane. The same conformeric description is also valid for compound 10 with a methoxy substituent on ring D. Cryo-EM structures of the albicidin Albi-1 in complex with E. coli gyrase reproduce this antiperiplanar d-a conformation, but show partial non-coplanar orientation of the aryl units in the Eastern fragment9. In the hydroquinone derivative 3, the d-d conformation now corresponds to the d-a conformation in 2 and vice versa. However, the H-bond between the hydroxy and isopropoxy functions in 2 is missing in 3 due to the para-substitution pattern. This destabilization might contribute to the inactivity of 3. It also implies a reduced relevance of the d-d conformation.
By replacing the hydroxy group with halogens as fluorine in compounds 4, 5 and 6, the HBD and with it a possible H-bond with the ethereal oxygen is removed. An interaction of fluorine with the adjacent amide proton of the DE-linker is still possible (resulting in the d-a conformation) but is assumed to be weak compared to oxygen35. For chlorine and bromine, this conformation is less stable.
The amino substitution of the hydroxy function in compound 7 is assumed to result in the d-d conformation. A population of the d-a conformation is not expected due to sterical hindrance, even if the geometry of the amino function in aniline is slightly pyramidalized and not planar36.
The most relevant conformation of the pyridine derivative 8 bear an IMHB that forms a five-membered cycle. Compared to the H-bond in the corresponding six-membered cycle of the previously seen derivatives, the H-bond is probably weaker here. A five-membered ring can also be formed with a protonated pyridine that donates an H-bond to the amide oxygen, leading to the d-d conformation.
In compound 9 an HBD is available27, but due to steric repulsions only the d-d conformation seems reasonable. Together with the results found for 7, this conformation appears to be disfavored.
Since the elimination of the hydroxy function affects many different bacteria, this molecular site seems to be part of a common mechanism of action shared by many species. In cryo-EM structural data of a DNA gyrase complex with the albicidins and cystobactamids (resolution: 2.6 Å), H-bond interactions of the hydroxy group with the gyrase binding site are not visible, as the phenolic hydroxy group and the nearby α-helices of the gyrase subunits are too far apart to enable an interaction9. This would imply that the hydroxy group is not primarily important for the interaction with the target, but for intramolecular H-bonding. It may also play a role in permeation into the bacterial cell.
In compound 11 the hydroxy group is present, but there is no ethereal HBA. Therefore, the number of possible H-bonds is reduced. In principle, all coplanar conformers are possible here. Sterical hindrance between the isobutyl residue and the oxygen of the CD-linker occur with the a-a and a-d-, but not with the d-d and d-a conformers. It can be concluded that replacing the isopropoxy oxygen as HBA with a methylene group considerably enlarges the conformational space, and that the ethereal hydrogen bonds contribute to bioactivity.
A similar argumentation is possible for compound 40 which has a rotatable bond in the connection between ring C and D. Even if the H-bond pattern corresponds to that of 2, the DE-fragment can now adopt many more conformations. The benzylamine is expected to be a weaker HBD than amide, according to reported structural group constants37.
In previously discussed compounds, the IMHB between the proton of the CD-linker and the isopropoxy oxygen led to a five-membered ring geometry. In 42, a six-membered ring geometry can be established, which would result in an increased angle between donor-hydrogen and acceptor of ~120°. With known H-bonds, such angles are usually greater than 150°, although ethers as HBA also allow smaller angles38. For this reason the H-bond in 42 might be stronger than in 2.
The most relevant conformers are therefore the a-d- or the a-a conformation, with three H-bonds formed in the latter. Compared to the d-a conformation of reference compound 2, this conformation results in a different orientation of ring C relative to ring D. The superior activity of 42 compared to all other compounds suggests that stabilization of these conformations is highly beneficial for activity. Interestingly, the a-a conformation was not observed yet in the albicidin-gyrase-DNA complex9 or in a conformational analysis of the cystobactamid CDE-fragment26. Another aspect is that the aromatic system on ring D is more electron-deficient in 42 than in the natural cystobactamids and albicidins. This in turn may substantially lower the pKA of the phenol group and thus influence bonding interactions.
Due to the missing oxygen in the DE-linker of compound 41, stabilization of a d-d conformation is not expected here. Moreover, the HBD strength is lower, and the rotational flexibility is higher compared to 2. These factors at the pharmacophoric hotspot of the molecule probably contribute to the observed loss of activity. The d-d conformation is also the most stabilized conformation for compound 43. A second topological feature of 43 concerns the central axis of ring E, that is not parallel to the central axis of ring D, as in natural analogues. This will result in a different positioning of the terminal carboxylic acid function. The lack of bioactivity suggests that any of the two factors are unfavorable.
The rigidification between rings D and E by introducing oxoquinazolines in compounds 45a and 45b replaced the hydroxy group as HBD by a nitrogen substituent, which acts only as an HBA here. This now fixed d-a conformation, implied as being important by comparing 2 and 3, is obviously not sufficient to confer activity.
The N-methylated amide group between rings D and E in compound 46 cannot act as HBD, so that only the d-d conformation is reasonably stabilized. Together with the results from 3, 7 and 9, the data suggest that this conformation is not relevant for activity.
The direct connection of ring D to E with a biphenyl system in compound 44 was not tolerated and led to a complete loss of activity. This might result from the loss of coplanarity of both aromatic systems39, but also the shortened distance from ring E to the carboxylic acid of ring E might contribute. A hint is given by 47, where coplanarity of the biaryl system is favored by a hydrogen bond between the phenol and the nitrogen of the quinazoline. The absence of bioactivity in 47 and in 48 suggest that coplanarity alone is not sufficient for activity.
In earlier studies computational structural analysis of the eastern fragments was conducted for cystobactamids and albicidins in solvent without target interaction. Some of these data suggest the d-d conformation13,26, some the d-a conformation40 as the most stabilized. The latter was also observed in the earlier mentioned cryo-EM structure9. However, the energy difference between the conformations is not large. It is therefore conceivable that alterations in gyrase structures of different bacterial species, or structural differences between the two targets - gyrase and topoisomerase IV – induce a switch of the preferred conformation. Both factors may contribute to the pronounced differences in the antibiotic activities between cystobactamid analogues, with potency landscapes across the bacterial spectrum that differ in shape rather than just in magnitude.
In summary, the following conclusions can be drawn for the SAR at ring D (Fig. 9). The natural 2-hydroxy-3-alkoxy substitution of the D-ring turned out to be optimal. In contrast, the amide linking rings C and D was amenable to modifications, e.g., with triazols (reported before), amines, or preferably with a reversed amide as in compound 42. The unique salicylamide structure on ring D is essential for the broad-spectrum activity of cystobactamids, and optimization efforts at ring D should focus on the CD-amide and the ether group.
AlbD resistance
A prominent principal resistance mechanism for antibiotics is detoxification of the active substance by enzymatic degradation to inactive metabolites. With regard to oligoarylamides, the amidase AlbD has been found to confer bacterial resistance against albicidins41 by cleaving the CD-amide42. AlbD was also found to inactivate cystobactamids43–45. The incorporation of a triazol as an isosteric group for the CD-amide could prevent degradation, though10. Additionally, metagenome-studies revealed that introduction of a hydroxy function at ring C in ortho position to its carbonyl function might decrease susceptibility against endopeptidases such as AlbD20.
We were interested whether a mere reversion of the CD-amide as in 42 would be sufficient to break AlbD resistance. In addition, we wondered whether the reduction of electron density in ring D, as realized by replacing the oxygen in the isopropoxy group by a methylene group as in 11, might increase the propensity of the molecule towards proteolytic degradation by AlbD. This was tested with an in vitro assay with recombinant AlbD using our previously established protocol. We included 96 (previously named CN-DM-861) as a validated positive control for the enzymatic reaction10,42. This compound is a demethoxy derivative of 1, has a comparable activity pattern in the MIC assay and was available in sufficient quantities for the assay.
While 96 was degraded after incubation overnight, 42 remained fully stable (Fig. 10). Thus, a reverse amide is no longer recognized as a substrate by the enzyme. Surprisingly, the substitution of the isopropoxy moiety with isobutyl in compound 11 reduced cleavage by AlbD. This suggests that oxygen as HBA might play a role in the active site of AlbD. However, the residual sensitivity of 11 to AlbD indicates that the AlbD insensitivity of 42 is not due to the altered CAA.
ADME assessment
To get a first understanding of potential ADME-structure properties, we assessed a selection of active as well as inactive derivatives, such as 4, 7, 8, 11 and 42 for their plasma protein binding, plasma stability and metabolic stability. All tested derivatives exhibited a very high plasma protein binding (PPB) in both tested species (mouse and human, Table S4). Although only the free fraction is thought to be bioactive, previously tested analogs such as CN-DM-861 with similar PPB (98.5%) exhibited high in vivo efficacy10. Next, we determined the metabolic stability using mouse and human microsomes and found that all tested compounds were fully stable. Finally, the stability in mouse and human plasma was assessed. Again, no liability was observed, because all compounds had half-lifes >240 min (Table S4).
Pharmacokinetic characterization of 42
As cystobactamid 42 was the most potent derivative and showed favourable ADME in vitro properties, its pharmacokinetic properties were assessed in CD-1 mice after intravenous administration of 1 mg/kg. Compound 42 had a plasma half-life of 0.88 h in mice (Table 3 and Fig. S1).
Table 3.
42 | |
---|---|
t1/2 [h] | 0.88 ± 0.1 |
C0 [µg/mL] | 2.2 ± 1.5 |
AUC 0-t [ng/mL*h] | 1207 ± 832 |
Vz [L/kg] | 1.39 ± 1.0 |
Cl [mL/min/kg] | 17.90 ± 12.3 |
Pharmacokinetic parameters after 1 mg/kg IV dose of 42. T1/2: half-life, C0: concentration at t = 0 h, AUC 0-t: exposure from 0-t; Vz: volume of distribution, Cl: plasma clearance.
The initial concentration C0 was around 2.2 µg/ml. The volume of distribution was around 1.4 l/kg, indicating a good distribution into tissue with a low clearance as expected from the in vitro ADME data. Thus, the initial PK data indicate that 42 exhibited favorable properties for further preclinical development.
Conclusions
This work addressed the synthetically challenging ring D of cystobactamids to investigate structure-activity relationships. Various newly developed synthetic protocols led to 19 analogues, that were evaluated on a panel of bacterial pathogens that including challenging, multidrug resistant strains. We found that the salicylamide structure on ring D is essential for the broad-spectrum activity of cystobactamids and probably constitutes the key pharmacophore of the oligoarylamides. The amide moiety linking rings C and D was amenable to modifications, that led to the reversed amide 42. The terephthalic acid 42 is highly and broadly active against resistant pathogens and stable against the resistance factor AlbD. First ADME and pharmacokinetic data suggest that 42 has promising properties as an antibiotic lead compound.
Methods
Details of the experimental procedures and the starting materials used as well as spectra are listed in the supplementary information.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Stefan Saretz, Dr. Dominik Heimann, Dr. Matthias Göhl, Mila Le, Norman Birke for synthetic help and advice. We also thank Ulrike Beutling for HRMS measurements, Christel Kakoschke, Esther Surges and Dr. Kirsten Harmrolfs for NMR measurements. We thank Kimberley Vivien Sander, Janine Schreiber and Jennifer Wolf for technical assistance. Funding The studies were co-funded by the German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF; Grant no TTU09.710) and the BMBF Project “Wirkstoffentwicklung auf Basis von Naturstoffen zur Bekämpfung von Infektionskrankheiten” (no GGNATM27).
Author contributions
M.S., D.K., C.L., and T.S. designed and synthesized cystobactamids. J.C., J.H., and K.C. performed MIC-assays. M.S. and H.F. designed and performed AlbD-related experiments. K.R. performed and analyzed data of ADME and PK studies. A.K., R.M., and M.B. supervised the study. M.S. and M.B. wrote the manuscript. All authors analyzed the data and revised and approved the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Chemistry thanks John Wade and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Should any raw data files be needed in another format they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
M.S., M.B., D.K., A.K., T.S., R.M., J.H., K.C., J.C., and K.R. are coinventors on patent applications on natural and synthetic cystobactamids. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics
Use of research animals or human research participants: For plasma stability experiments, samples were procured from commercial sources. Human plasma was obtained from Antibodies-online (catalog no. ABIN5706569), and mouse plasma was obtained from Tebubio (catalog no. D408-04-0050). The methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and approved by the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research. The animal studies were conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the European Community (Directive 2010/63/EU, 1st January 2013). All animal procedures were performed in strict accordance with the German regulations of the Society for Laboratory Animal Science (GV-SOLAS) and the European Health Law of the Federation of Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA). The PK study was approved by the ethical board of the Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Oldenburg, Germany.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42004-024-01337-6.
References
- 1.No time to wait: securing the future from drug-resistant infections (report). World Health Organization (WHO), Interagency Coordination Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (IACG) (2019). https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/no-time-to-wait-securing-the-future-from-drug-resistant-infections. Website accessed on Nov 4th, 2024.
- 2.Tacconelli, E. et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis.18, 318–327 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murray, C. J. L. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet399, 629–655 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe; 2023–2021 data (report). European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), World Health Organization (WHO) (2023). https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/antimicrobial-resistance-surveillance-europe-2023-2021-data. Website accessed on Nov 4th, 2024.
- 5.Boucher, H. W. et al. Bad Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE! An Update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis.48, 1–12 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miethke, M. et al. Towards the sustainable discovery and development of new antibiotics. Nat. Rev. Chem.5, 726–749 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Baumann, S. et al. Cystobactamids: myxobacterial topoisomerase inhibitors exhibiting potent antibacterial activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.53, 14605–14609 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cociancich, S. et al. The gyrase inhibitor albicidin consists of p-aminobenzoic acids and cyanoalanine. Nat. Chem. Biol.11, 195–197 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Michalczyk, E. et al. Molecular mechanism of topoisomerase poisoning by the peptide antibiotic albicidin. Nat. Catal.6, 52–67 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Testolin, G. et al. Synthetic studies of cystobactamids as antibiotics and bacterial imaging carriers lead to compounds with high in vivo efficacy. Chem. Sci.11, 1316–1334 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hashimi, S. M., Wall, M. K., Smith, A. B., Maxwell, A. & Birch, R. G. The phytotoxin albicidin is a novel inhibitor of DNA gyrase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.51, 181–187 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Behroz, I. et al. Extensive structure–activity relationship study of Albicidin’s C-Terminal Dipeptidic p-Aminobenzoic acid moiety. Chem. Eur. J.25, 16538–16543 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zborovsky, L. et al. Improvement of the antimicrobial potency, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of albicidin by incorporation of nitrogen atoms. Chem. Sci.12, 14606–14617 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hüttel, S. et al. Discovery and total synthesis of natural cystobactamid derivatives with superior activity against gram-negative pathogens. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.56, 12760–12764 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kretz, J. et al. Total synthesis of Albicidin: a lead structure from Xanthomonas albilineans for Potent Antibacterial Gyrase Inhibitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.54, 1969–1973 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cheng, B., Müller, R. & Trauner, D. Total syntheses of cystobactamids and structural confirmation of Cystobactamid 919-2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.56, 12755–12759 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Moeller, M. et al. Scalable syntheses of methoxyaspartate and preparation of the antibiotic Cystobactamid 861-2 and highly potent derivatives. Org. Lett.21, 8369–8372 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Planke, T., Cirnski, K., Herrmann, J., Müller, R. & Kirschning, A. Synthetic and biological studies on new urea and triazole containing cystobactamid derivatives. Chem. Eur. J.26, 4289–4296 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kohnhäuser, D. et al. Optimization of the Central α-Amino acid in cystobactamids to the broad-spectrum, resistance-breaking antibiotic CN-CC-861. J. Med. Chem.67, 17162–17190 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang, Z. et al. Metagenome-guided analogue synthesis yields improved gram-negative-active Albicidin- and Cystobactamid-Type Antibiotics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60, 22172–22177 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Scott, K. A., Cox, P. B. & Njardarson, J. T. Phenols in pharmaceuticals: analysis of a recurring motif. J. Med. Chem.65, 7044–7072 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marimganti, S., Cheemala, M. N. & Ahn, J.-M. Novel amphiphilic α-Helix Mimetics Based on a Bis-benzamide Scaffold. Org. Lett.11, 4418–4421 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Prabhakaran, P. et al. Aromatic oligoamide foldamers with a “Wet Edge” as inhibitors of the α-Helix-Mediated p53–hDM2 Protein–Protein Interaction. Eur. J. Org. Chem.2013, 3504–3512 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wright, J. L. et al. Subtype-selective N-Methyl-d-Aspartate receptor antagonists: synthesis and biological evaluation of 1-(Heteroarylalkynyl)-4-benzylpiperidines. J. Med. Chem.43, 3408–3419 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wu, W.-L. et al. Dopamine D1/D5 Receptor Antagonists with Improved Pharmacokinetics: design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of phenol bioisosteric analogues of Benzazepine D1/D5 antagonists. J. Med. Chem.48, 680–693 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Elgaher, W. A. M. et al. Cystobactamid 507: concise synthesis, mode of action, and optimization toward more potent antibiotics. Chem. Eur. J.26, 7219–7225 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sessler, C. D. et al. CF(2)H, a hydrogen bond donor. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 9325–9332 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gould, S. J. & Eisenberg, R. L. Studies on nitrogen metabolism using carbon-13 NMR spectroscopy. 6. Biosynthesis of sarubicin A. Synthesis and incorporation of 6-hydroxy[13CO15NH2]anthranilamide. J. Org. Chem.56, 6666–6671 (1991). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Skowronska-Ptasinska, M., Verboom, W. & Reinhoudt, D. N. Effect of different dialkylamino groups on the regioselectivity of lithiation of O-protected 3-(dialkylamino)phenols. J. Org. Chem.50, 2690–2698 (1985). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chung, J., Capani, J. S. Jr., Göhl, M., Roosen, P. C. & Vanderwal, C. D. Enantioselective syntheses of Wickerols A and B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.145, 6486–6497 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nguyen, T. T., Chevallier, F., Jouikov, V. & Mongin, F. New Gilman-type lithium cuprate from a copper(II) salt: synthesis and deprotonative cupration of aromatics. Tetrahedron Lett.50, 6787–6790 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Usui, S., Hashimoto, Y., Morey, J. V., Wheatley, A. E. H. & Uchiyama, M. Direct ortho Cupration: a new route to regioselectively functionalized aromatics. J. Am. Chem. Soc.129, 15102–15103 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Neipp, C. E., Humphrey, J. M. & Martin, S. F. The synthesis of homoallylic amines utilizing a Cuprate-Based 1,2-metalate rearrangement. J. Org. Chem.66, 531–537 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dong, Y., Wang, X., Cal, M., Kaiser, M. & Vennerstrom, J. L. Activity of diimidazoline amides against African trypanosomiasis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.24, 944–948 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Patrick G. L. Drugs and drug targets: an overview - Intermolecular bonding forces. In An Introduction to Medicinal Chemistry 5th edn, (Oxford University Press, 2013).
- 36.Fukuyo, M., Hirotsu, K. & Higuchi, T. The structure of aniline at 252 K. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci.38, 640–643 (1982). [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abraham, M. H. & Platts, J. A. Hydrogen bond structural group constants. J. Org. Chem.66, 3484–3491 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bissantz, C., Kuhn, B. & Stahl, M. A medicinal chemist’s guide to molecular interactions. J. Med. Chem.53, 5061–5084 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gutiérrez Sanfeliciano, S. M. & Schaus, J. M. Rapid assessment of conformational preferences in biaryl and aryl carbonyl fragments. PLoS ONE13, e0192974 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Planke, T. et al. Cystobactamids 920-1 and 920-2: assignment of the constitution and relative configuration by total synthesis. Org. Lett.21, 1359–1363 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang, L. & Birch, R. G. Biocontrol of sugar cane leaf scald disease by an isolate of Pantoea dispersa which detoxifies albicidin phytotoxins. Lett. Appl. Microbiol.22, 132–136 (1996). [Google Scholar]
- 42.Vieweg, L. et al. The Albicidin resistance factor AlbD is a serine endopeptidase that hydrolyzes unusual oligoaromatic-type peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc.137, 7608–7611 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sikandar, A. et al. Adaptation of a bacterial multidrug resistance system revealed by the structure and function of AlbA. J. Am. Chem. Soc.140, 16641–16649 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shiromi Basnayake, W. V. & Birch, R. G. A gene from Alcaligenes denitrificans that confers albicidin resistance by reversible antibiotic binding. Microbiology141, 551–560 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang, L., Xu, J. & Birch, R. G. High affinity binding of albicidin phytotoxins by the AlbA protein from Klebsiella oxytoca. Microbiology144, 555–559 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Should any raw data files be needed in another format they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.