Abstract
Introduction
The article is devoted to the sociological exploration of the social phenomenon that Nordic Walking has become in Europe and worldwide over the recent decades.
Aim
It is based on the results of original international sociological research study on the issue of sociodemographic profiles of Nordic Walkers in the context of the values associated with this sports activity.
Methods
A cross-sectional quantitative study with convenience sampling study was performed among 416 Poles, 132 Europeans from 11 countries (Germany, the UK, Spain, France, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Denmark, Austria, Sweden, and Norway), and 212 participants from 5 non-European countries (the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan). The study used an author’s tool that included questions concerning the ways of doing Nordic Walking and its and social and organizational contexts, its classification and interpretation as a health-related, recreational, or sports activity, its position in the space of everyday life and in the sphere of preferred values, motives for walking with poles, meanings attributed to this activity, and the individual and social benefits associated with it.
Results
The values most often associated with practicing Nordic Walking belong to the personal and psychophysical spheres. Their dominant position suggests that this activity is a complex one and that its advantages are not restricted to its motor aspects or to contact with nature. It is not a simple activity of walking with poles, as the initial stereotypes seem to suggest, but a kind of movement with a defined framework and a set of principles, engaging the physical and personal spheres of those who practice it, having a cultural meaning, and marked by cultural rootedness.
Conclusion
The research results can be useful for health care experts and for those responsible for building prevention strategies in various social groups. This is because they draw attention to the category of accessible and at the same time effective activities, with high individual and social potential. At the same time, they show that an important element of promotion strategies and social campaigns aimed at popularizing sport and healthy lifestyle should be axiological categories as significant predictors of individuals’ actions and decisions.
Introduction
The article is devoted to the sociological exploration of the social phenomenon that Nordic Walking has become in Europe and worldwide over the recent decades. It is based on the results of original international sociological research study, and concerns an issue that has not been analyzed in this manner before in the context of the social phenomenon in question. Our interest is focused on individuals engaging in this form of physical activity, their sociodemographic characteristics, and the meanings attributed to the activity itself. Placing these explorations in the cultural context, we assumed that Nordic Walking carried implicit references to values and that the axiological perspective was one of the keys to identifying and explaining the differences between pole walkers. It was in this context that we posed a question about the profiles of individuals who practiced Nordic Walking, amounting to configurations of values attributed to this activity and walkers’ sociodemographic characteristics. The text refers to the issues and findings of scientists who interpret Nordic Walking as a sport polymorphous, being a health, universal, recreational, free-time, sports, prosocial, and integrative activity.
Since the late 1990s, when “walking with poles” began to gain popularity in Europe [1–4] and worldwide [5], the range of dimensions and identifiable individual and social benefits linked with it has been growing as well. In the first phase of the development, popularization, and scientific analyses of Nordic Walking, prominence was given to its health aspects, characteristic of every physical activity and associated with providing stimuli indispensable for normal functioning, improving health condition, enhancing quality of life, and preventing the processes of aging [6]. At the same time, scholars explicated characteristics specific to this type of exercise, as distinct from walking, running, cycling, etc. The health outcomes of Nordic Walking are located in the following areas: improvement in the functioning of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, improvement in the efficiency of locomotive organs and motor coordination, cancer and obesity treatment, depression relief, the regenerating value of group walking in the bosom of nature, and recently also convalescence after COVID-19 [7–14]. Researchers have been exploring the associations of this kind of motor activity with quality of life and psychological well-being; as far as the sports dimension of well-being is concerned, explorations have addressed the effect of fast pole walking on sportspeople and amateurs [15] and its overall effect on the physical function of the human organism [16–18]. An important area, highlighted from the beginning, is prevention [19–21]. There are many studies that provide evidence of the positive impact of walking with poles on health. Nordic Walking could be a useful as aerobic training modality for weight control and cardiorespiratory fitness [22]. Nordic walking programs offer an effective way to reduce pain and fatigue in individuals with chronic conditions. Its simplicity and ease of learning make it suitable for a wide range of participants, potentially leading to better adherence and long-term benefits [23]. The positive effects of walking with poles are visible in the case of many diseases. Nordic Walking could serve as a novel, community-based therapeutic approach for asthma patients, offering an affordable and feasible option. When combined with education and standard care, Nordic walking may enhance exercise tolerance and improve other asthma-related outcomes [24].
A distinctive feature of the activity discussed in this article is its universality, conveyed by the term used in social sciences: “a sport for everyone i.e. people of equal age, with different physical or health conditions [5, 25–27]. Nordic Walking can be practiced by anyone, anywhere, and anytime [28, 29], in various natural conditions [30], not only on an amateur and recreational basis but also as sports competition, as shown by the now regularly held national and international cup tournaments and European or world championships [31]. Poland is a leader in initiating and organizing these events. The accessibility of Nordic Walking does not require large financial outlays (gear, sportswear), large amounts of time, or special training sites. It is considered a safe and easy form of physical activity, practicable for nearly everyone [2, 29].
The accessibility and ease of practicing Nordic Walking implies its social potential: inclusive and integrative, related by researchers to different forms of sport [32]. This is because its popularization means the activation of meritocratic thinking, which does not change the fact that empirical knowledge confirms the impact of various sociodemographic determinants [33]. The inclusive, integrative, and development-stimulating character of Nordic Walking manifests itself in a diverse cross-section of training groups, with participants varied in terms of age, physical fitness, and skills, living in cities and villages, representing different occupations, financial statuses, and social positions. Among other things, these facts imply strengthening social cohesion and inspiring the development of local communities [34].
Nordic Walking is also classified into and explored as belonging to the sociological categories of free time and recreational sport [19, 35]. This is because it allows for making active use of leisure time, which constitutes an element of what is called healthy lifestyle [36, 37], enables maintaining social relations thanks to interactions with other walkers, acquaintances, friends, family members, and contestants through communing with nature and outdoor exercise. Regarded as an all-year-round activity, it requires no special weather conditions.
Moreover, sociologists point out that it has the advantages significant in every sports activity: competition, leisure and recreation, quasi-festive experience, the regularity requirement, stamina training, opportunities to develop effort and fitness habits, and a chance to assimilate the principles of fair play, solidarity, and support [38–40]. To use concepts from the sociology of sport again, Nordic Walking can be defined as an amateur and recreational sport with a dynamically developing professional branch. The thesis that Nordic Walking is a sport for everyone is supported by the results of empirical studies conducted in different scientific disciplines, which identify the sociodemographic characteristics of pole walkers. In empirical research, respondents are differentiated according to variables investigated in health sciences or social sciences, such as age, gender, education, place of residence, perceived financial situation, health condition, and physical fitness. The existing findings in social sciences indicate that Nordic Walking is more often practiced by women, individuals with higher education, people aged 20 to 60 years or even older, those associating this activity with the value of health and appreciating its effect on their psychophysical sphere, and economically active inhabitants of big cities. The findings of British, Australian, and Polish sociologists show, however, that demographic data are not a frequent element of research reports [2, 4, 6, 20, 30, 36, 37].
The activity in question can be explained within the framework of different paradigms. The assumption that the structure of sport comprises subjective-personal, ideological-normative, and material elements [41] means that an important issue in the analysis of sports behaviors is their associations with values. The axiological perspective used in the interactive way of explaining the actions of individuals and society and in explaining their life-worlds as worlds of culture, also applied in the sociology of sport–relies on the meanings attributed to actions by social actors and on the interactions based on them [19–44]. The voluntary participation in sport, membership in sport-related groups, associations, and organizations, and recreational or organized practice of sports is also interpreted as form of democratic engagement, an important element of which is axiological references [45, 46].
Nordic Walking embodies values typical of every sports activity: autotelic (sport as a value) or instrumental: personal values, vital values, and hedonistic and agonistic values; prosocial values; ethical and moral values (e.g., responsibility, the fair play principle); socioeconomic values; aesthetic values; art-related values; religious and sacred values (implicitly or explicitly determining contestants’ attitudes and supporting their efforts; sport as a “civil religion”); and the value of peace (emphasized in the Olympic movement). Practicing sports and being a sports fan have also been explored in the context of values such as patriotism, politics, sportspeople’s rights and sport-related prudence, justice, fortitude, moderation, caution, truthfulness, discipline, and magnanimity [47–70].
The existing empirical studies on Nordic Walking show that respondents associate it primarily with the values of health and well-being and with the pleasure that is implicitly part of physical activity, outdoor exercise, and communing with nature. They explicate the significance of a sense of belonging to a group, social and emotional support connected with the emergence of close relationships in walking and training groups, and the values of comradeship and friendship [1, 26, 36, 37, 40]. Like other sports activities, the practice of Nordic Walking depends on the position it occupies in each person’s system of values, on the values attributed to this particular exercise, and on sociodemographic and cultural determinants such as gender, health condition, financial status, education, place of residence and the related patterns of spending free time, worker migrations and the increasing number of people doing office work or employed in services, quality of life, and social prestige [62, 71].
The conclusions formulated by scholars and observations concerning the dynamics of the phenomenon led us to hypothesize that the socio-demographic profiles of individuals practicing Nordic Walking are linked to their value choices regarding this physical activity. We assumed that the choice of values usually associated with it defined the individual engagement axis (an axis focusing and organizing action) [46]. The focus of the analyses on values made it possible to consider Nordic Walking in the context of issues important for the individual, and the variables included in the study captured the diversity of respondents. The current explorations center around the questions of who Nordic Walkers are and what configurations of axiological and sociodemographic factors differentiate this group of people. The decision to analyze the values associated with Nordic Walking by different categories of respondents locates our investigations on the cultural plane [72].
Participants and procedure
We conducted the sociological research in 2022 using an online survey tool (Lime Survey). We applied convenience sampling, administering the survey to Nordic Walkers in Poland and abroad. In the initial phase, we offered participation to individuals from all voivodeships (main administrative units) of Poland and to participants in international Nordic Walking competitions whose names were included in openly accessible lists of contestants. Invitations to complete the survey were also sent to representatives of local and regional training groups and Nordic Walking associations. Through the contacts thus obtained, we reached further respondents and groups. We distributed the survey exclusively via email and through direct contacts, each time requesting the recipient not to make it available in any group, forum, and the like. The survey was to be completed once only. In total, the study included 416 Poles, 132 Europeans from 11 countries (Germany, the UK, Spain, France, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Denmark, Austria, Sweden, and Norway), and 212 participants from 5 non-European countries (the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Japan). The recruitment spanned three months, from 01/02/2022, to 31/07/2022.
Measure
For the purposes of the research project, we developed a survey questionnaire consisting of several thematic blocks. It included questions concerning the ways of doing Nordic Walking and its and social and organizational contexts, its classification and interpretation as a health-related, recreational, or sports activity, its position in the space of everyday life and in the sphere of preferred values, motives for walking with poles, meanings attributed to this activity, and the individual and social benefits associated with it. The questions covered four areas personal development and self-realization (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.909; sample statements: developing positive/desirable traits of character; cheerful attitude to the world; being able to think about everyday problems/difficulties); health and fitness (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.727; sample statements: preventive effect on my health; positive influence on my figure; reduction of various health problems), satisfaction and well-being (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.772; sample statements: improved sense of well-being lasting longer; feeling of oxygenation and improvement; the prospect of feeling good after training) and ties and community (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.807; sample statements: enjoyment of meeting friends; meetings, conversations while walking; building or strengthening relationships with others). Additionally, the research tool was consulted with specialists and experts in the field of Nordic Walking (including practitioners, trainers, and mentors) and researchers specializing with the indicated issues. In the present study, we considered selected values belonging to the categories indicated in the introduction, associated with sport and at the same time most associated by respondents with Nordic Walking (Table 1). The survey also included questions about sociodemographic variables: age, gender, education, place of residence, financial situation, and quality of life. Additionally, respondents were asked to indicate their preferred forms of practicing Nordic Walking (Table 2).
Table 1. Values most associated with practicing Nordic Walking.
Value | n | % |
---|---|---|
Sports success | 46 | 6.1 |
Mutual support and solidarity | 206 | 27.1 |
Professionalism (technique) | 154 | 20.3 |
Health | 624 | 82.1 |
Fair play | 72 | 9.5 |
Harmony of body and spirit | 344 | 45.3 |
Personal growth | 188 | 24.7 |
Self-discipline | 196 | 25.8 |
Working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses | 280 | 36.8 |
Respect for other contestants | 40 | 5.3 |
Total | 2150 | - |
Table 2. Sample characteristics.
Characteristic | Total | Poland | Europe | Other counties | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
Age | ≤34 | 66 | 8.7 | 38 | 9.1 | 24 | 18.2 | 4 | 1.9 |
35–45 | 114 | 15.0 | 104 | 25.0 | 6 | 4.5 | 4 | 1.9 | |
46–55 | 194 | 25.5 | 148 | 35.6 | 32 | 24.2 | 14 | 6.6 | |
56–65 | 186 | 24.5 | 80 | 19.2 | 30 | 22.7 | 76 | 35.8 | |
66–75 | 160 | 21.1 | 46 | 11.1 | 38 | 28.8 | 76 | 35.8 | |
>75 | 40 | 5.3 | - | - | 2 | 1.5 | 38 | 17.9 | |
Gender | Male | 188 | 24.7 | 114 | 27.4 | 44 | 33.3 | 30 | 14.2 |
Female | 572 | 75.3 | 302 | 72.6 | 88 | 66.7 | 182 | 85.8 | |
Education | Elementary | 2 | 0.3 | 2 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - |
Basic vocational | 34 | 4.5 | 16 | 3.8 | 14 | 10.6 | 4 | 1.9 | |
Secondary | 148 | 19.5 | 100 | 24.0 | 22 | 16.7 | 26 | 12.3 | |
Higher | 576 | 75.8 | 298 | 71.6 | 96 | 72.7 | 182 | 85.8 | |
Place of residence | City | 606 | 79.7 | 296 | 71.2 | 118 | 89.4 | 192 | 90.6 |
Village | 154 | 20.3 | 120 | 28.8 | 14 | 10.6 | 20 | 9.4 | |
Financial situation | Very good | 108 | 14.2 | 28 | 6.7 | 12 | 9.1 | 68 | 32.1 |
Good | 394 | 51.8 | 222 | 53.4 | 66 | 50.0 | 106 | 50.0 | |
Average | 244 | 32.1 | 160 | 38.5 | 46 | 34.8 | 38 | 17.9 | |
Poor | 14 | 1.8 | 6 | 1.4 | 8 | 6.1 | - | - | |
Quality of life | Very good | 204 | 26.8 | 68 | 16.3 | 30 | 22.7 | 106 | 50.0 |
Good | 462 | 60.8 | 274 | 65.9 | 88 | 66.7 | 100 | 47.2 | |
Average | 84 | 11.1 | 72 | 17.3 | 6 | 4.5 | 6 | 2.8 | |
Poor | 10 | 1.3 | 2 | 0.5 | 8 | 6.1 | - | - | |
Forms of practicing Nordic Walking | Mostly individually | 240 | 31.6 | 122 | 29.3 | 34 | 25.8 | 84 | 39.6 |
Mostly with friends who also like this form of activity | 246 | 32.4 | 124 | 29.8 | 26 | 19.7 | 96 | 45.3 | |
Usually with a Nordic Walking instructor and a group | 274 | 36.1 | 170 | 40.9 | 72 | 54.5 | 32 | 15.1 | |
When do you do Nordic Walking? | Seasonally | 168 | 22.1 | 118 | 28.4 | 32 | 24.2 | 18 | 8.5 |
All year round | 592 | 77.9 | 298 | 71.6 | 100 | 75.8 | 194 | 91.5 | |
In what way do you do Nordic Walking? | Recreationally | 372 | 48.9 | 184 | 44.2 | 60 | 45.5 | 128 | 60.4 |
As a sport | 62 | 8.2 | 12 | 2.9 | 30 | 22.7 | 20 | 9.4 | |
Recreationally and as a sport | 326 | 42.9 | 220 | 52.9 | 42 | 31.8 | 64 | 30.2 |
Ethical considerations
The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles set out in Recommendations from the Association of Internet Researchers. Participation in the study was voluntary and anonymous. All respondents gave their informed consent to participate in the survey online. The informed consent page explained the purpose and method of the study. We obtained consent for study by asking participants to select a mandatory consent item before proceeding with the study. The procedure was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Sociological Sciences of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (Project identification code: 02/DKE/NS/2022).
Statistical analysis
The dependent variables–values most associated with practicing Nordic Walking–are dichotomous (1 = the value was selected; 0 = the value was not selected). To determine the predictors of respondents’ choice of values most associated with Nordic Walking, we performed a logistic regression analysis. The predictive value of the models was assessed based on a chi-square test (using the Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients) and the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Nagelkerke’s R2 was also calculated. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic consists in grouping observations into risk deciles and comparing the observed likelihood with the expected likelihood within each decile. If the Hosmer–Lemeshow test statistic is higher than 0.05, the null hypothesis is adopted stating that there is no difference between the predicted and the expected scores on the variables, which means that the model is correct. The Nagelkerke coefficient, corresponding to fit index in the classic linear regression model, is a modification of the Cox and Snell index. Its values range between 0 and 1. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (released in 2019 by IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Table 2 presents the sociodemographic and other characteristics of the sample, divided into Poland, Europe, and other countries. Respondents’ age ranged between 18 and 94 years, with a mean age of M = 55.15 years (SD = 13.54). The majority of the respondents were women (75.3%) and city residents (79.7%). Three-quarters of the sample (75.81%) had higher education.
The most frequently indicated values associated with practicing Nordic Walking were health, harmony of body and spirit, and working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses.
Next, we assessed the effect of sociodemographic variables on the choice of values associated with Nordic Walking. For this purpose, we performed a series of logistic regression analyses. The values that were indicated most often (> 100) were taken into account. The article presents the results for only the three models whose indexes were acceptable. They concerned the following values: “health,” “working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses,” and “personal growth.”.
In the first model, the analyzed value was health (Table 3). The statistics for this model were acceptable, which means the model can be seen as well-fitted, chi2 = 92.711, p < .001; Nagelkerke’s R2 = .189. Model accuracy was also verified using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, chi2 = 10.738, p = .217. The logistic function correctly predicted belonging to one of two groups in 82.6% of cases. The factors significantly related to the choice of health as the value associated with Nordic Walking were: living in Europe (Exp(B) = 7.269, 95% CI [3.219, 16.413], p < .001) or a non-European country (Exp(B) = 4.277, 95% CI [2.132, 8.581], p < .001), elementary or vocational education (Exp(B) = 0.271, 95% CI [0.115, 0.641], p = .003), financial situation (Exp(B) = 1.695, 95% CI [1.041, 2.758], p = .034), place of residence (Exp(B) = 0.432, 95% CI [0.247, 758], p = .003), very good quality of life (Exp(B) = 0.304, 95% CI [0.133, 0.691], p = .005), and the way of practicing Nordic Walking (Exp(B) = 0.509, 95% CI [0.293, 0.885], p = .017). Foreign subjects indicated this value more often than Polish ones. Similarly, individuals reporting an average or poor financial situation pointed to health as a value associated with Nordic walking more often than those in a very good or good financial situation. In the case of respondents with elementary or vocational education (compared to those with higher education), reporting very good quality of life (compared to those with average quality of life), and practicing Nordic Walking seasonally (compared to all-year-round walkers), the likelihood of choosing health as a value associated with this activity was lower.
Table 3. Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with the choice of health as a value associated with Nordic Walking.
B | Wald | p | Exp(B) | Lower limit 95% | Upper limit 95% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>75 (reference) | ||||||
≤34 | -0.025 | 0.001 | .972 | 0.975 | 0.242 | 3.934 |
35–45 | -0.007 | 0.000 | .992 | 0.993 | 0.256 | 3.851 |
46–55 | 0.557 | 0.675 | .411 | 1.745 | 0.462 | 6.589 |
56–65 | 0.970 | 2.148 | .143 | 2.639 | 0.721 | 9.661 |
66–75 | 0.799 | 1.495 | .221 | 2.223 | 0.618 | 7.995 |
Poland (reference) | ||||||
Europe | 1.984 | 22.786 | < .001 | 7.269 | 3.219 | 16.413 |
Other countries | 1.453 | 16.730 | < .001 | 4.277 | 2.132 | 8.581 |
Gender (male–reference) | -0.302 | 1.575 | .210 | 0.739 | 0.461 | 1.185 |
Higher (reference) | ||||||
Elementary/vocational | -1.306 | 8.849 | .003 | 0.271 | 0.115 | 0.641 |
Secondary | -0.265 | 1.053 | .305 | 0.767 | 0.462 | 1.273 |
Place of residence (city–reference) | -0.838 | 8.584 | .003 | 0.432 | 0.247 | 0.758 |
Financial situation (very good / good–reference) | 0.528 | 4.508 | .034 | 1.695 | 1.041 | 2.758 |
Quality of life (average–reference) | ||||||
Very good | -1.192 | 8.068 | .005 | 0.304 | 0.133 | 0.691 |
Good | -0.479 | 1.969 | .161 | 0.619 | 0.317 | 1.210 |
Most often with a Nordic Walking instructor and a group (reference) | ||||||
Mostly individually | -0.102 | 0.149 | .699 | 0.903 | 0.539 | 1.513 |
Mostly with friends who also like this form of activity | -0.358 | 1.936 | .164 | 0.699 | 0.422 | 1.158 |
When do you do Nordic Walking? (all year round–reference) | -0.675 | 5.724 | .017 | 0.509 | 0.293 | 0.885 |
In what way do you do Nordic Walking? (recreationally–reference) | ||||||
As a sport | 0.086 | 0.139 | .709 | 1.090 | 0.692 | 1.718 |
Recreationally and as a sport | -0.826 | 4.091 | .053 | 0.438 | 0.197 | 1.005 |
The next value significantly associated with Nordic Walking was “working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses” (Table 4). For this model, the analysis yielded the following statistics: chi2 = 89.770, p < .001; Nagelkerke’s R2 = .152. Model accuracy was also verified using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test (chi2 = 11.413, p = .179). The logistic function correctly predicted belonging to one of two groups in 68.2% of cases. The factors significantly related to the choice of working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses as the value associated with Nordic Walking were: living in Europe (Exp(B) = 0.356, 95% CI [0.209, 0.609], p < .001) or a non-European country (Exp(B) = 0.563, 95% CI [0.349, 0.907], p = .018), elementary or vocational education (Exp(B) = 0.386, 95% CI [0.158, 0.942], p = .036), secondary education (Exp(B) = 0.553, 95% CI [0.362, 0.846], p = .006), walking with poles individually (Exp(B) = 0.541, 95% CI [0.360, 0.814], p = .003) or together with friends (Exp(B) = 0.620, 95% CI [0.414, 0.929], p = .021), and doing Nordic Walking as a sport (Exp(B) = 1.525, 95% CI [1.080, 2.154], p = .017). Respondents living abroad (compared to those from Poland), individuals with elementary or vocational and secondary education (compared to those with higher education), and participants doing Nordic Walking individually or with friends (compared to those who usually practiced it with an instructor) less often indicated the value of working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses. In the case of individuals who treated Nordic Walking as a sport, the likelihood of choosing this value was higher.
Table 4. Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with the choice of working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses as a value associated with Nordic Walking.
B | Wald | p | Exp(B) | Lower limit 95% | Upper limit 95% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>75 (reference) | ||||||
≤34 | -0.166 | 0.106 | .745 | 0.847 | 0.312 | 2.298 |
35–45 | 0.095 | 0.038 | .845 | 1.100 | 0.425 | 2.844 |
46–55 | -0.667 | 2.044 | .153 | 0.513 | 0.206 | 1.281 |
56–65 | -0.123 | 0.080 | .778 | 0.885 | 0.378 | 2.072 |
66–75 | -0.138 | 0.099 | .753 | 0.871 | 0.369 | 2.057 |
Poland (reference) | ||||||
Europe | -1.032 | 14.471 | < .001 | 0.356 | 0.209 | 0.606 |
Other countries | -0.575 | 5.576 | .018 | 0.563 | 0.349 | 0.907 |
Gender (male–reference) | -0.246 | 1.529 | .216 | 0.782 | 0.529 | 1.155 |
Higher (reference) | ||||||
Elementary/vocational | -0.952 | 4.377 | .036 | 0.386 | 0.158 | 0.942 |
Secondary | -0.592 | 7.479 | .006 | 0.553 | 0.362 | 0.846 |
Place of residence (city–reference) | 0.002 | 0.000 | .993 | 1.002 | 0.665 | 1.510 |
Financial situation (very good / good–reference) | -0.237 | 1.449 | .229 | 0.789 | 0.536 | 1.161 |
Quality of life (average–reference) | ||||||
Very good | -0.328 | 0.994 | .319 | 0.721 | 0.378 | 1.372 |
Good | -0.362 | 1.750 | .186 | 0.696 | 0.407 | 1.191 |
Most often with a Nordic Walking instructor and a group (reference) | ||||||
Mostly individually | -0.614 | 8.720 | .003 | 0.541 | 0.360 | 0.814 |
Mostly with friends who also like this form of activity | -0.477 | 5.363 | .021 | 0.620 | 0.414 | 0.929 |
When do you do Nordic Walking? (all year round–reference) | 0.225 | 1.158 | .282 | 1.253 | 0.831 | 1.888 |
In what way do you do Nordic Walking? (recreationally–reference) | ||||||
As a sport | 0.422 | 5.736 | .017 | 1.525 | 1.080 | 2.154 |
Recreationally and as a sport | -0.684 | 3.080 | .079 | 0.505 | 0.235 | 1.083 |
In the last of the models, we analyzed personal growth as a value significantly associated with practicing Nordic Walking (Table 5). The statistics for this model were as follows: chi2 = 46.284, p < .001; Nagelkerke’s R2 = .088. Model accuracy was also verified using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test (chi2 = 13.789, p = .087). The logistic function correctly predicted belonging to one of two groups in 75.3% of cases. The factors significantly related to the choice of personal growth as a value associated with Nordic Walking were age below 35 years (Exp(B) = 2.883, 95% CI [1.081, 7.686], p = .034) and living in a European country (Exp(B) = 3.491, 95% CI [1.970, 6.183], p < .001). Respondents from Europe (compared to those from Poland) and the youngest participants, up to 34 years of age, more often pointed to personal growth as a value associated with this activity.
Table 5. Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with the choice of personal growth as a value associated with Nordic Walking.
B | Wald | p | Exp(B) | Lower limit 95% | Upper limit 95% | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>75 (reference) | ||||||
≤34 | 1.059 | 4.480 | .034 | 2.883 | 1.081 | 7.686 |
35–45 | 0.623 | 1.728 | .189 | 1.865 | 0.736 | 4.726 |
46–55 | 0.380 | 0.727 | .394 | 1.462 | 0.611 | 3.500 |
56–65 | -0.002 | 0.000 | .997 | 0.998 | 0.453 | 2.199 |
66–75 | -0.167 | 0.167 | .683 | 0.847 | 0.381 | 1.883 |
Poland (reference) | ||||||
Europe | 1.250 | 18.361 | < .001 | 3.491 | 1.970 | 6.183 |
Other countries | -0.320 | 1.184 | .277 | 0.726 | 0.408 | 1.292 |
Gender (male–reference) | 0.154 | 0.482 | .487 | 1.167 | 0.755 | 1.802 |
Higher (reference) | ||||||
Elementary/vocational | -0.193 | 0.157 | .692 | 0.824 | 0.316 | 2.148 |
Secondary | -0.111 | 0.218 | .641 | 0.895 | 0.563 | 1.424 |
Place of residence (city–reference) | -0.282 | 1.521 | .217 | 0.754 | 0.482 | 1.181 |
Financial situation (very good / good–reference) | -0.334 | 2.357 | .125 | 0.716 | 0.468 | 1.097 |
Quality of life (average–reference) | ||||||
Very good | -0.026 | 0.005 | .942 | 0.974 | 0.479 | 1.983 |
Good | -0.080 | 0.070 | .791 | 0.923 | 0.512 | 1.667 |
Most often with a Nordic Walking instructor and a group (reference) | ||||||
Mostly individually | 0.010 | 0.002 | .964 | 1.010 | 0.651 | 1.568 |
Mostly with friends who also like this form of activity | -0.214 | 0.852 | .356 | 0.808 | 0.513 | 1.271 |
When do you do Nordic Walking? (all year round–reference) | 0.370 | 2.263 | .132 | 1.448 | 0.894 | 2.345 |
In what way do you do Nordic Walking? (recreationally–reference) | ||||||
As a sport | -0.016 | 0.007 | .934 | 0.984 | 0.675 | 1.436 |
Recreationally and as a sport | -0.085 | 0.054 | .816 | 0.919 | 0.451 | 1.874 |
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first sociological study to explore the sociodemographic characteristics of individuals practicing Nordic Walking and attributing specific values to that activity. The analyses show that the most frequently chosen values include: “health,” “working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses,” and “personal growth.”
The choice of the health value was determined by variables such as country of origin, financial situation, education, quality of life, and the way of practicing Nordic Walking. The health value was more often indicated by respondents from European and non-European countries than by those from Poland. Health as a value is treated as a kind of health capital, an element of individual well-being [73], and the aim of prevention efforts. It can be concluded that health prevention and the awareness of its significance in Poland is in the phase of intense development but has not yet reached a level as high as in other European countries [74]. As mentioned in the introduction, Polish researchers’ interest is mainly in the health dimension of Nordic Walking and, increasingly often, in health prevention but the latter does not yet have the established position in public awareness that it has in Western countries, such as Germany [21, 26, 30, 36]. A context that reveals these differences is campaigns for the popularization and implementation of prevention programs, including sports activities. It is, to a great extent, from this perspective that Nordic Walking has been analyzed [75–77]. Focusing on those countries where prevention has an established place in public policies, it is worth stressing that population aging, the growing demand for medical services, and the increasing costs of these serviced are a challenge for every health care system. They show that orientation towards treatment alone is insufficient, the response to this being health prevention and promotion. With its multifaceted potential, Nordic Walking fits into this trend perfectly [78–81].
Empirical data analyses show that the likelihood of choosing health as a value associated with Nordic Walking is higher in individuals practicing all year round. It can be assumed that those who do Nordic Walking during bad weather conditions are enthusiasts, individuals who prefer systematic training, sportspeople keeping fit through activities such as pole walking, and people aware of the functionality of this kind of training for health, appreciating its advantages in all weathers. All-year-round walkers have a consolidated experience of how this kind of exercise influences their psychophysical condition, which is another possible reason for their adherence to all-year-round training and for associating it with the value of health. The above observations are in line with the results of the qualitative research conducted by Woube [80]. They show that special importance is attributed to regular all-year-round physical activity and that this importance is associated precisely with the health category. On the one hand, this is part of a trend associated with striving to maintain health and physical strength, clearly present in Western society. However, what also plays a significant role is sociocultural factors, such as a desire for competition, a desire to face up to one’s weaknesses, and–finally–holding oneself up as a model for peers to imitate [80].
As shown by the present study, health is more often indicated as a value associated with practicing Nordic Walking by individuals with higher education. This variable is conducive to a healthy lifestyle. It can be assumed that people with higher education will show a greater awareness of the significance of sport for health and prevention. Empirical studies suggest that higher education is positively related to physical activity. In 2018 in Poland, practicing sports was reported most often by respondents with higher education (83%) [81]. Kari and colleagues present evidence showing that education can be a factor leading to greater free-time physical activity and, consequently, a factor linked with the promotion of health behaviors [82]. Likewise, Stankiewicz et al. found that Nordic Walking was chosen by individuals living in big cities, with higher education, and doing creative work [37].
The respondents who pointed to health as a value associated with practicing Nordic Walking were those in an average or poor financial situation and with average quality of life. This observation may indirectly confirm the fact that Nordic Walking is an inclusive sport, accessible to everyone also at the awareness level. It is a low-cost activity, which makes it practicable for people at different levels of wealth [83]. It can therefore be presumed that the reasons why less wealthy individuals practice Nordic Walking include the fact that this activity does not require great expenses. On the other hand, in a situation of limited financial resources it becomes an appropriate and feasible health care and prevention method. As reported by Lee et al., it is precisely the availability of sports facilities that physical activity is strongly related to, even in countries as developed as Korea [84]. Since many small towns in Poland lack this kind of infrastructure, Nordic Walking is becoming an accessible form of activity promoted by health specialists and experts.
The next value significantly associated with Nordic Walking is “working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses.” The choice of this value was related to country of origin, higher education, the way of walking with poles, and the identification of Nordic Walking as a sport. Self-improvement and self-realization were also identified as significant motives for practicing Nordic Walking by Soroka et al. [4] According to other findings, physical activities and sports strengthen human will, thus playing an important role in developing self-confidence and character building [85]. Our empirical results show that this value was more often chosen by Poles. In this case, an appropriate interpretative context can be Polish culture linked with religiosity. For many years, its characteristic features have included embeddedness in tradition, rootedness in local communities, and association with the moral sphere [86]. In this context, in Polish society, working on oneself is associated with values such as: asceticism, self-discipline, virtue, gaining fitness, and the activation of the body and the mind (especially the mind) [87]. In Western culture, working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses is linked to the categories of satisfaction with oneself, satisfaction with one’s achievements, and competition. Working on oneself can therefore be regarded as a means of self-improvement and as a process leading, for example, to achieving the expected appearance or figure [88].
Research results indicate that associating Nordic Walking with the value of “working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses” was more frequent among individuals with higher education. It can be assumed that higher education favors orientation towards self-control, self-discipline, and work on oneself understood as self-control, particularly when these are aimed at taking care of one’s health. Presumably, the university years are a time when a person becomes aware of certain needs, acquires regular physical activity habits, and develops self-discipline. This was confirmed by research conducted in 2020 in Turkey [89]. Education thus emerges as a predictor of greater awareness of the significance of and the need for self-discipline and self-development [90].
The choice of the value of “working on oneself and overcoming weaknesses” was more frequent among those respondents who practiced pole walking with an instructor and among those who engaged in this activity as a sport rather than recreationally. This observation shows that practicing Nordic Walking professionally implies the kind of experience typical of any sports activity and a belief in the need to struggle with oneself in order to achieve increasingly good results. The sports nature of the activity and walking with an instructor implicitly involves conscious striving to improve one’s walking technique. It is also associated with making controlled effort–with controlling one’s body both during exercise and in a long-term perspective. It is worth adding that earlier empirical findings, reported by Żurawik [91], unambiguously showed that instructors played a key role in teaching participants the right walking technique, providing support, and motivating them to continually improve.
Another value that respondents pointed to as associated with Nordic Walking was personal growth. The factors that determined the choice of this value were country of origin and age. It was more often chosen by respondents from Western countries. In this context, practicing Nordic Walking can be interpreted as one of the manifestations of the lifestyle characteristic of contemporary Western culture. It is marked by orientation towards self-development, self-acceptance, and self-satisfaction [91], developed in a culture of individualism, differentiation, and deinstitutionalization [92]. As indicated above, Nordic Walking is an activity that, on the one hand, allows individuals to build self-confidence, while on the other it is associated with taking care of one’s health, body, appearance, and vitality [93]. These values are particularly dear to the young generation, including young Europeans. Statistical data show that in developed European countries the percentage of people aged 18–24 who do health-enhancing aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities in a typical week is 45.8% in Germany, 43.4% in Sweden, 34.7% in Austria, and 37.4% in Denmark. The corresponding figure for Poland is 14.4% [94]. Smyła points out that the central place in young people’s axiological system belongs to health [95]. Połoczańska-Godek points out that it is not always an autotelic value and that it is also treated as an instrumental one and a tool for self-fulfillment [96]. In our study, we found that it was young people (under 35 years of age) who more often pointed to self-development as a value associated with Nordic Walking. It has been found that physical activity, particularly sport, can positively impact young people’s personal growth, especially its aspects such as self-worth, goal setting, and leadership [97].
The current sociological study was exploratory. It is one of the few that address the issue of sociodemographic profiles of Nordic Walkers in the context of the values associated with this sports activity. We are aware, however, that our survey has several weaknesses. The cross-sectional nature of the study did not allow the establishment of any temporal relationships. Additionally, non-probability sampling technique was applied to recruit the required participants. This undermines the generalizability of its results from the sample to the population.
Conclusion
The presented results of sociological research indicate that the values most often associated with practicing Nordic Walking belong to the personal and psychophysical spheres. Their dominant position suggests that this activity is a complex one and that its advantages are not restricted to its motor aspects or to contact with nature. It is not a simple activity of walking with poles, as the initial stereotypes seem to suggest, but a kind of movement with a defined framework and a set of principles, engaging the physical and personal spheres of those who practice it, having a cultural meaning, and marked by cultural rootedness. What bears witness to this is the values attributed to Nordic Walking. The identification of the sociodemographic factors behind the choice of these values makes it possible to formulate further significant and illuminating conclusions and their implications, highlighting the importance of the present sociological study.
What supports the above conclusion about Nordic Walking as a physical activity with defined characteristics and professional attributes is the fact that the factors behind the choice of three leading values include all-year-round exercise, the professional character of training manifesting itself in walking with an instructor, and the treatment of pole walking as a sports activity. Another factor, education, draws attention to the awareness aspects that imply the choice of the three values discussed and the self-discipline or working on oneself components associated with Nordic Walking. The choice of the last of these values by individuals from Western countries lends strength to the above conclusion if we assume that conscious prevention is particularly their domain. In the context of socialization processes, theses about the socializing role of sport, and questions concerning the contemporary methods of making young people socially active, it should be stressed that for pole walkers belonging to this age category this sport is associated with personal growth as a value. Finally, the focus on health in individuals with average quality of life and financial situation draws attention to the group for whom the significance of Nordic Walking lies in its accessibility and universality combined with observable health potential.
The above findings may inspire social scientists to formulate further research questions concerning the axiological dimension of sports activity and its links with different categories of independent variables. In the future, it is also worth conducting longitudinal research, making it possible to assess the dynamics or stability of attitudes and axiological references among Nordic Walkers in the context of the development of the phenomenon itself. It would also be interesting to perform analyses including values as independent variables and to focus on the participatory aspect of Nordic Walking, which will be addressed in further parts of the report from the current research project. The research results discussed here can be useful for health care experts and for those responsible for building prevention strategies in various social groups. This is because they draw attention to the category of accessible and at the same time effective activities, with high individual and social potential. At the same time, they show that an important element of promotion strategies and social campaigns aimed at popularizing sport and healthy lifestyle should be axiological categories as significant predictors of individuals’ actions and decisions.
Data Availability
All data files are available from the Figshare database: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27112051.v1.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Knapik A, Saulicz E, Myśliwiec A, Warmuz-Wancisiewicz A. Motivations and effects of practicing Nordic Walking by elderly people. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity. 2014;6(1), 34–40. doi: 10.2478/bjha-2014-0004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu Y, Xie W, Ossowski Z. The effects of Nordic Walking on health in adults: A systematic review. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2023;13(1), 188–196. doi: 10.12775/JEHS.2023.13.01.028 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ossowski Z, & Kortas J. Wstępne badania nad wpływem rekreacyjnego treningu Nordic Walking na poziom zwinności i równowagi u kobiet w wieku 60–69 lat. Logistyka. 2012;3, 1783–1789. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Soroka A, Godlewska A, Mazurek-Kusiak A. Motives and Barriers Affecting the Participation of Keywords: normal body weight; body mass index (BMI); overweight and obesity Polish People in the Physical Activity of Nordic Walking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(24), 16398. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kunysz-Rozborska M, & Rejman A. Nordic Walking as a Form of Recreation. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine. 2019;26(2), 77–82. doi: 10.18276/cej.2019.2-08 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Szymczyk J. Elementy interdyscyplinarnej kooperacji socjologii ciała, sportu i turystyki. In: Skrzypek M, editor. Podstawy interdyscyplinarności w naukach o zdrowiu. Poznawcza tożsamość dyscyplin badających socjolokulturowy wymiar zdrowia i choroby. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL; 2014. pp. 113–136. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bhakaney PR, & Vardhan V. Nordic walking, a novel regime’s impact on functional capacity, quality of life and depression and anxiety in Post Covid-19 patients. Journal of medical pharmaceutical and allied sciences. 2022;11(4), 5197–5200. doi: 10.55522/jmpas.V11I4.1316 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cunningham E, Weaver RR, Lemonde M, Dogra S, Nonoyama ML. Nordic Pole Walking for Individuals with Cancer: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Physical Function and Health-Related Quality of Life. Rehabilitation Oncology. 2020;38(2), 81–91. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fritz T, Caidahl K, Osler ME, Ostenson CG. Effects of Nordic walking on health-related quality of life in overweight individuals with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, impaired or normal glucose tolerance. Diabetic Medicine. 2011;28(11), 1362–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03348.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kucio C, Narloch D, Kucio E, Kurek J. The application of Nordic walking in the treatment hypertension and obesity. Family Medicine and Primary Care Review. 2017;2(2), 144–148. doi: 10.5114/fmpcr.2017.67870 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lipowski M, Walczak-Kozłowska T, Lipowska M, Kortas J, Antosiewicz J, Falcioni G, et al. Improvement of Attention, Executive Functions, and Processing Speed in Elderly Women as a Result of Involvement in the Nordic Walking Training Program and Vitamin D Supplementation. Nutrients. 2019;11(6), 1311. doi: 10.3390/nu11061311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ossowski Z, Skrobot W, Aschenbrenner P, Cesnaitiene VJ, Smaruj M. Effects of short-term Nordic walking training on sarcopenia-related parameters in women with low bone mass: a preliminary study. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2016;1, 1763–1771. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S118995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Passos-Monteiro E, Schuch FB, Franzoni L, Peyré-Tartaruga LA. Nordic Walking and Free Walking Improve the Quality of Life, Cognitive Function, and Depressive Symptoms in Individuals with Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2020;5(4): 82. doi: 10.3390/jfmk5040082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Taylor J, Popovic D and Lavie CJ. Exercise Modalities and Intensity to Improve Functional Capacity and Psychological/Mental Health in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Role for Nordic Walking? Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2022;38, 1135–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.03.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cokorilo N, Ruiz-Montero PJ, González-Fernández FT, Martín-Moya R. An Intervention of 12 Weeks of Nordic Walking and Recreational Walking to Improve Cardiorespiratory Capacity and Fitness in Older Adult Women. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11(10):2900. doi: 10.3390/jcm11102900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nemoto Y, Sakurai R, Ogawa S, Maruo K, Fujiwara Y. Effects of an unsupervised Nordic walking intervention on cognitive and physical function among older women engaging in volunteer activity. The Journal of Exercise Science and Fitness. 2021;19(4), 209–215. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2021.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Peyré-Tartaruga LA, Baccia G, Martins VF, Zoppirolli C, Bortolan L, Pellegrini B. Margins of stability and trunk coordination during Nordic walking. Journal of Biomechanics. 2022; 134, 111001. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Temprado J, Julien-Vintrou M, Loddo E, Laurin J, Sleimen-Malkoun R. Cognitive functioning enhancement in older adults: is there an advantage of multicomponent training over Nordic walking? Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2019;14, 1503–1514. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S211568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jöllenbeck T , & Grüneberg C. Prävention durch Nordic Walking. Gesundheitsbezogene Effekte für Bewegungsapparat und Herz-Kreislaufsystem. Sportsorthopaedic and Traumatology. 2006;22(3), 132–138. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Marselle MR, Irvine KN, Warber SL. Walking for Well-Being: Are Group Walks in Certain Types of Natural Environments Better for Well-Being than Group Walks in Urban Environments? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013;10(11), 5603–5628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10115603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Strój E, & Błażejewski G. Nordic Walking jako uniwersalny trening w rehabilitacji–przegląd doniesień. Państwo i Społeczeństwo. 2022;1: 199–209. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grainer A, Zerbini L, Reggiani C, Marcolin G, Steele J, Pavei G, Paoli A. Physiological and Perceptual Responses to Nordic Walking in a Natural Mountain Environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14(10), 1235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.González-Devesa D, Varela S, Sanchez-Lastra MA, Ayán C. Nordic Walking as a Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Chronic Pain and Fatigue: Systematic Review. Healthcare. 2024;12(12), 1167. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12121167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vilanova-Pereira M, Jácome C, Rial Prado MJ, Barral-Fernández M, Blanco Aparicio M, Fontán García-Boente L, et al. Effectiveness of nordic walking in patients with asthma: A study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023;18(3), e0281007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Czechowski J. Sport szansą społecznego rozwoju człowieka. Społeczeństwo i Ekonomia. 2014;1(1): 7–19. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jarecka P, Fąk T, Skrzypczyk T. Nordic walking jako forma aktywności fizycznej w opinii mieszkańców Poznania. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2016;6(12), 376–383. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.202456 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Novotová K, Pavlů D, Dvořáčková D, Arnal-Gómez A, Espí-López GV. Influence of Walking as Physiological Training to Improve Respiratory Parameters in the Elderly Population. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(3), 7995. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kwilecki K. Rozważania o czasie wolnym. Wybrane aspekty. Katowice: GHSH; 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tschentscher M, Niederseer D, Niebauer J. Health Benefits of Nordic Walking A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013;44(1), 76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jarecka P, Fąk T, Skrzypczyk T. Nordic walking jako szansa aktywizowania społeczeństwa. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2016;6(10), 637–645. 10.5281/zenodo.212211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Piech K, Piech J, Grants J. Nordic Walking–a Versatile Physical Activity Fit for Everyone (a Literature Review). Journal of Sport Science. 2014;5(1), 46–56. doi: 10.1515/ljss-2016-0025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Waśkowski Z. Integracyjna rola sportu we współczesnym świecie. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług. 2011;78, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lenartowicz M, Dziubiński Z, Jankowski KW. Aktywni Polacy: dwie dekady uczestnictwa w sporcie i rekreacji ruchowej. Próba wyjaśnienia zmian. Kultura i Społeczeństwo. 2017;61(2), 195–210. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Woźniak W. Praca. In: Jakubowska H, Nosal P, editors. Socjologia sportu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA; 2017. pp. 175–189. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stempień JR. Wokół pytań o polską socjologię sportu. Studia Socjologiczne. 2018;1(228), 171–193. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Fąk T, & Jarecka P. Nordic Walking jako aktywna forma spędzania czasu wolnego wrocławskich kobiet. In: Gotowski R, Juříková J, Muszkieta R, editors. Nordic Walking—wybranie aspekty. Bydgoszcz-Toruń: Ośrodek Rekreacji, Sportu i Edukacji w Poznaniu, Akademia Sportu i Nauki w Bydgoszczy; 2018. pp. 45–52. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stankiewicz B, Majchrowski A, Zukow V.Nordic Walking as an Alternative form of Physical Recreation. Journal of Health Sciences. 2013;3(7), 109–126. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kowalczyk S. Jana Szymczyka socjologia ciała i kultury fizycznej. Zeszyty Naukowe KUL. 2021;64(1–2), 55–68. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Uhrich S, Behrens A, Kang T-A, Matsuoka H, Uhlendorf K. Segmenting Satellite Supporters Based on Their Value for Team Sport Organizations. Journal of Global Sport Management. 2023;8(1), 252–280. doi: 10.1080/24704067.2020.1819617 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Żurawik MA, Snape R, Carson J. ‘Relaxing Way to Spend a Day’ or ‘Best Way to Keep Fit and Healthy’. Comparison of Leisure Experiences in Rambling and Nordic Walking and their Contributions to Well-Being. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure. 2019;2(2), 347–362. doi: 10.1007/s41978-019-00038-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Szymczyk J. Elementy aktywności fizycznej. Socjologia ciała, sportu i turystyki. In: Szymczak W, editors. 100 lat socjologii w Katolickim Uniwersytecie Lubelskim. Idee–teorie–badania. Lublin: TN KUL; 2018. pp. 373–387. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Piotrowski A. Ład interakcji. Studia z socjologii intepretatywnej. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schűtz A. Fenomenologia i nauki społeczne. In: Krasnodębski Z, editor. Fenomenologia i socjologia. Zbiór tekstów. Warszawa: PWN; 1989. pp. 107–130. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ziółkowski M. Znaczenie, interakcja, rozumienie: studium z symbolicznego interakcjonizmu i socjologii fenomenologicznej jako wersji socjologii humanistycznej. Warszawa: PWN; 1981. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Reid HL. Amateurism, Professionalism and the Value of College Sports. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport. 2021;14(3): 67–79. doi: 10.17161/jis.v14i3.15676 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Szymczak W. Partycypacja osób zaangażowanych społecznie. Struktura, funkcje modele. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hurst P, Ring Ch, Kavussanu M. Moral values and moral identity moderate the indirect relationship between sport supplement use and doping use via sport supplement beliefs. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2022;40(2), 1–8. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2053387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Iturbide-Luquin L M, Elosua-Oliden P. The Values Associated with the Sport: Analysis and Evaluation of Sportspersonship. Revista de Psicodidáctica. 2–17;22(1), 29–36. doi: 10.1016/S1136-1034(17)30041-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lipiec J. Aksjologiczne podstawy idei fair play. In: Żukowska Z, & Żukowski R, editors. Fair play w sporcie i olimpizmie. Szansa czy utopia. Warszawa: Polski Komitet Olimpijski, Klub Fair Play, Wydawnictwo Estrella; 2010. pp. 34–43. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Loland S. Sport, Values, Character. In: Lawrence AW, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Sport and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2022. pp. 27–47. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197519011.013.59 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Škerbić MM. Internal Values of Sport and Bio-Technologized Sport. Philosophies. 2022;5(4), 26. doi: 10.3390/philosophies5040026 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yaffe Y, Levental O, Arey DL, Lev A. Morality and Values in Sports Among Young Athletes: The Role of Sport Type and Parenting Styles–A Pilot Study. Frontiers in Psycholoy. 2021;12, 618507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Żukowski R. Sport–fair play–oczekiwania i rzeczywistość. In: Żukowska Z, & Żukowski R, editors. Fair play w sporcie i olimpizmie. Szansa czy utopia. Warszawa: Polski Komitet Olimpijski, Klub Fair Play, Wydawnictwo Estrella; 2010. pp. 102–109 [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kossakowski R. Religia. In: Jakubowska H, & Nosal P, editors. Socjologia sportu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA; 2017. pp. 205–218. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kowalczyk S. Elementy filozofii i teologii sportu. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Krajewski M. Sztuka jako sport. In: Rogowski Ł, & Skrobacki R, editors. Społeczne zmagania ze sportem. Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM; 2011. pp. 35–49. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Szymczyk J. Elementy kultury i sportu z perspektywy aksjologii. W kręgu myśli Stanisława Kowalczyka. Roczniki Nauk Społecznych. 2012;4(1), 95–106. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Strożek P. Sztuki wizualne. In: Jakubowska H, & Nosal P, editors. Socjologia sportu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA; 2017. pp. 219–229. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Houlihan B. Challenges to globalisation and the impact on the values underpinning international sport agreements. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. 2022;14(4), 607–620. doi: 10.1080/19406940.2022.2100807 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Haut J. The Sociology of Sport in Germany: Development and Recent Trends. Sociología del Deporte. 2020;1, 25–36. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Cayolla R. Communicating the Value of Fan Identity in the Sport Industry: Commentary on Consumer Neuroscience Possible Research Ideas. International Journal of Sport Communication. 2022;1–5. doi: 10.1123/ijsc.2022-0083 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dziubiński Z. Socjologia sportu i olimpizmu. Warszawa: Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego Józefa Piłsudskiego, Salezjańska Organizacja Sportowa Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Karlsson J, Kilger M, Bäckström A, Redelius K. Selling youth sport: the production and promotion of immaterial values in commercialised child and youth sport. Sport, Education and Society. 2023;28(5), 565–578. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2022.2057462 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wilson OWA, Whatman C, Walters S, Keung S, Enari D, Rogers A, et al. The Value of Sport: Wellbeing Benefits of Sport Participation during Adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19, 8579. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Spaaij R. Mobilising sociology of sport for social change beyond the pandemic. Sociología del Deporte. 2021;2(2), 13–22. doi: 10.46661/socioldeporte.6378 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Silva A, Sobreiro P, Monteiro D. Sports Participation and Value of Elite Sports in Predicting Well-Being. Sports. 2021;9(12), 173. doi: 10.3390/sports9120173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kosiewicz J. Kultura fizyczna i sport w perspektywie filozofii. Warszawa: AWF; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kamykowski S. Socjologia sportu. Szkice empiryczne. Warszawa: Fundacja na rzecz Warsztatów Analiz Socjologicznych; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Jakubowska H. Emocje. In: Jakubowska H, & Nosal P, editors. Socjologia sportu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA; 2017. pp. 25–34. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Jöllenbeck T and Grüneberg Ch. Gesund durch Nordic Walking: Prävention oder Mythos? Physiotherapie: Fachmagazin des Bundesverbands Selbstständiger Physiotherapeuten—IFK e.V. 2008;26(2), 23–26. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Patelia S, Mazhar A, & Baker J. What Do We Know About the Value of Sport for Older Adults? A Scoping Review. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 2023;31(4), 705–720. doi: 10.1123/japa.2022-0146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kołodziej A. O potencjalne i kierunkach rozwoju socjologii sportu. Opuscula Sociologica. 2015;2(2), 5–18. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ch Tongyang. The Influence of Sports on Health Science and Its Factors. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. 2021;27(3), 327–330. doi: 10.1590/1517-8692202127032021_0074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Forster T, Kentikelenis A, Bambra C. Health Inequalities in Europe: Setting the Stage for Progressive Policy Action. Dublin: TASC; 2018. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.20665.21608 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jotov N, Ivanovski A, Mitic D. Effects of the health and prevention nordic walking program on the functional status of women aged 30–40. SPORT—Nauka i Praksa. 2019;9(1), 11–19. doi: 10.5937/snp1901011J [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Knowles AM, Hill J, Davies H, Dancy B, Mistry N, Mellor R, Howatson GA. Pilot study examining the health benefits of Nordic walking in sedentary adults. Journal of Sport and Health Research. 2012;4(1), 45–56. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zalińska K, & Olszanowska K. Nordic walking jako prewencja pierwotna i wtórna chorób cywilizacyjnych. Fizjoterapia. 2014;22(1), 53–60. doi: 10.1515/physio-2014-0002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Saulicz M, Saulicz A, Myśliwiec A, Knapik A, Rottermund J, Saulicz E. Effect of Nordic Walking Training on Physical Fitness and Self-Assessment of Health of People with Chronic Non-Specific Lower Back Pain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(9), 5720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Suchańska A, & Marcinkiewicz A. Prevention and health promotion at the workplace as a part of private medical care for employees in Poland–an overview. Medycyna Pracy. 2020;71(6), 735–742. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00961 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Woube A. Racing against age? Gender, age, and body among senior participants in women-only sports races. Loisir et Société / Society and Leisure. 2018;41(2), 297–310. doi: 10.1080/07053436.2018.1482672 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.CBOS. Aktywność fizyczna Polaków. Warszawa: Fundacja Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kari J T, Viinikainen J, Böckerman P, Tammelin TH, Pitkänen N, Lehtimäki T, et al. Education leads to a more physically active lifestyle: Evidence based on Mendelian randomization. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2020;30(7), 1194–1204. doi: 10.1111/sms.13653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Żurawik MA. A brief history of Nordic Walking. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2016;6(10), 802–809. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.263336 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Lee SA, Ju YJ, Lee JE. The relationship between sports facility accessibility and physical activity among Korean adults. BMC Public Health. 2016;16, 893. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3574-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Düz S, Aslan TV. The Effect of Sport on Life Skills in High School Students. Asian Journal of Education and Training. 2020;6(2). 161–168. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Świątkiewicz W. Religijne praktyki I zwyczaje w pejzażu kultury polskiej rodziny. In: Borowik I, editor. W poszukiwaniu ciągłości i zmiany. Religia w perspektywie socjologicznej. Kraków: NOMOS; 2012. pp. 263–287. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Mazur P. Sport i wychowanie fizyczne w myśli pedagogicznej. In: Mazur P, editor. Wychowanie poprzez sport. Wielość spojrzeń i doświadczeń. Chełm: Wyd. PWSZ w Chełmie; 2014. pp. 9–28. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Malm C, Jakobsson J, Isaksson A. Physical Activity and Sports-Real Health Benefits: A Review with Insight into the Public Health of Sweden. Sports. 2019;7(5), 127. doi: 10.3390/sports7050127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Şimşir Z, and Dilmaç B. Self-discipline in the life of university students: a qualitative research. Research on Education and Psychology. 2020;4(2), 153–171. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Raghupathi V, and Raghupathi W. The influence of education on health: an empirical assessment of OECD countries for the period 1995–2015. Archives of Public Health. 2020;78, 20. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00402-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Żurawik MA. Thematic analysis of the social aspects of Nordic walking: the instructors’ perspective. Human Movement. 2020;21(2), 9–18. doi: 10.5114/hm.2020.89909 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Motak D. Postmodern spirituality and the culture of individualism. Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis. 2009;21, 149–161. doi: 10.30674/scripta.67348 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Czechowski J. Kalos kagathos, czyli o wartościach osobowych w sporcie. Pedagogia Christiana. 2013;2(32), 131–144. [Google Scholar]
- 94.Eurostat. Statistics Explained. Health-enhancing physical activity statistics; 2019. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Health-enhancing_physical_activity_statistics#Health-enhancing_physical_activity (accessed 05 July 2023). [Google Scholar]
- 95.Smyła J. Wokół wartości współczesnej młodzieży. Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny. 2020;9(2), 51–61. doi: 10.17951/lrp.2020.39.2.51-61 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Połoczańska-Godek S. Zdrowie w systemie wartości współczesnego pokolenia młodzieży studiującej. PhD Thesis, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 97.United States Government Accountability Office, School-Based Physical Education and Sports Programs; 2012. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-12-342sp; (accessed 02 April 2023). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data files are available from the Figshare database: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27112051.v1.