Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2025 Jan 14;32(5):2210–2237. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-35852-9

Recent advances in electrochemical sensing and remediation technologies for ciprofloxacin

Vrinda Kini 1,#, Sreelakshmi C S 2, Debasmita Mondal 3, Nethaji Sundarabal 4, Pooja Nag 5,, Kapil Sadani 1,
PMCID: PMC11802654  PMID: 39808260

Abstract

Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is an extensively used broad-spectrum, fluoroquinolone antibiotic used for treating diverse bacterial infections. Effluent treatment plants (ETPs) worldwide lack technologies to detect or remediate antibiotics. CIP reaches the aquatic phase primarily due to inappropriate disposal practices, lack of point-of-use sensing, and preloaded activated charcoal filter at ETPs. The co-existence of bacteria and CIP in such aqueous pools has promoted fluoroquinolone resistance in bacteria and should be minimized. The worldwide accepted standard detection methodologies for the detection of CIP are high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, which are lab-based, require state-of-the-art equipment, and are expensive. Hence, it is difficult to integrate them for on-site monitoring. Further, the current remediation technologies like conventional sludge-treatment techniques fail to remove antibiotics such as CIP. Several point-of-use technologies for the detection of CIP are being investigated. These typically involve the development of electrochemical sensors where substrates, modifiers, biorecognition elements, and their chemistries are designed and optimized to enable robust, point-of-use detection of CIP. Similarly, remediation techniques like adsorption, membrane filtration, ion exchange, photocatalysis, ozonation, oxidation by Fenton’s reagent, and bioremediation are explored, but their onsite use is limited. The use of these sensing and remediation technologies in tandem is possibly the only way the issues related to antimicrobial resistance may be effectively tackled. This article provides a focused critical review on the recent advances in the development of such technologies, laying out the prospects and perspectives of their synergistic use to curb the menace of AMR and preserve antibiotics.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-024-35852-9.

Keywords: Electrochemical sensors, Substrates, Modifiers, Ciprofloxacin detection and remediation, Separation, Degradation

Introduction

Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are biologically active components used to treat diseases such as bacterial infections, hypertension, diabetes, inflammation, pain, cancer, and mental health disorders (Kumar et al. 2022b). Among APIs, the development, sensing, preservation, and remediation of antibiotics are becoming increasingly relevant in light of rampant antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Antibiotics are typically bactericidal or bacteriostatic. Fluoroquinolones are a class of bactericidal/bacteriostatic antibiotics which are commonly employed for their broad-spectrum activity. They reach the waterbodies through effluent treatment plants, which are not well equipped with detection and remediation technologies, persisting for a long period of time and causing conditions like antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A study conducted by Laxminarayan and Chaudhury (2016) found that Escherichia coli resistance to fluoroquinolones increased from 78 to 85% between 2008 and 2013, and Salmonella typhi isolates also showed an increase in fluoroquinolone resistance from 8% in 2008 to 28% in 2014 (Laxminarayan and Chaudhury 2016). Similarly, Dreyer et al. (2022) reported that 36% of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains show fluoroquinolone resistance, contributing to high pre-extensive drug resistance in Mumbai, India (Dreyer et al. 2022).

Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is one of the most extensively used fluoroquinolone antibiotics employed for treating intra-abdominal infections caused by pathogens such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacteroides fragilis, Proteus mirabilis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae (Marchesini et al. 2007), skin infections, urinary tract infection (UTI), sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and respiratory tract infections. However, CIP released into the environment through human excreta and inappropriate disposal of antibiotics is not completely metabolized, leading to the contamination of soil and water. Additionally, CIP has low biodegradability, high stability in water, and a hydrophilic nature, which makes it toxic to aquatic species (Kumar et al. 2022a). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations has reported that it also inhibits the growth of freshwater producers like duckweed and cyanobacteria. Excessive exposure to CIP can cause damage to the central nervous system of animals and humans, among other major side effects (Gui et al. 2018). In Patancheru, an industrial area in Hyderabad, India, elevated levels of CIP were detected in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents up to 14 mg/L and from 2 to 6.5 mg/L in lakes (Rosas-Ramírez et al. 2022).

Following oral administration, 40 to 50% of the CIP is excreted in its original form through human excreta (Mahapatra et al. 2022), which reaches surface water through sewage or wastewater treatment plants. The co-existing antibiotics, their residues, and bacteria are causing an alarming amount of CIP resistance, making the drug less effective as a therapeutic. B. anthracis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Enterococci, E. coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae are a few of the bacteria which are developing resistance to ciprofloxacin (Panhotra et al. 2004). Such conditions serve as a reservoir of ciprofloxacin with sub-lethal concentrations, thereby developing resistance towards the antibiotic. The proliferation and transfer of resistant genes to other bacteria (Patel et al. 2024) significantly increase the problems caused due to AMR, thereby reducing the effectiveness of standard therapies, increasing the healthcare cost, complicating the treatment for bacterial infections, and contributing to high mortality rates. Also, the diverse nature of APIs and their ability to resist the degradation process employed in an effluent treatment plant (ETP) pose challenges in complete removal. Additionally, the lack of point-of-use detection technologies in ETP has further affected the mitigation of APIs. It is thus important to limit the co-existence of ciprofloxacin with natural microbial fauna, necessitating the need to develop point-of-use technologies for the detection and remediation of CIP.

Worldwide accepted gold standard methods for CIP detection involve the tandem use of a modality of chromatography and mass spectroscopy such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and high-resolution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (HR-LCMS). Though highly accurate and sensitive, these require sophisticated analytical instrumentation facilities which are confined to state-of-the-art laboratories requiring operational expertise and are reagent extensive and expert comprehension with elaborate libraries. Biosensors are one of the technological solutions for the extensive need for antibiotic detection. To design a biosensor, a transduction platform must be used to detect the recognition event between the analyte of interest and the receptors present on the sensing substrate and transform it into a form that can be recorded. This transduction platform must be integrated with a biorecognition element that is specific to the target analyte. Antibodies (Pinacho et al. 2014), aptamers (Roushani et al. 2018), nucleic acids (Rowe et al. 2010), and enzymes (Wang et al. 2020) are the common biorecognition elements employed in antibiotic detection. Optical and electrochemical platforms are the most popular transduction platforms in the field of biosensing. Due to various advantages like low cost, less sample requirement, reduced analysis time, and simplicity due to ease of electronic configurations, electrochemical sensors are considered one of the best methods for detecting antibiotics in food and water (Khanmohammadi et al. 2020).

An electrochemical sensor is a powerful analytical tool which converts a chemical signal to an electrical signal through an electrochemical reaction. When designing an electrochemical sensor, screen-printed electrodes, glassy carbon electrodes, and microfabricated electrodes are the commonly used substrates. They are further altered with modifiers like graphene oxide (GO) (Pan et al. 2021), reduced graphene oxide (rGO) (Chauhan et al. 2020), metal sulfides (Santhiyagu Sahayaraj et al. 2023), metal oxides (Zhang et al. 2023), or metal nanoparticles (Amidi et al. 2017) to increase the electrocatalytic activity, facilitate simple electron transfer, and increase surface-to-volume ratio, thereby achieving higher sensitivity. The electrochemical oxidation of CIP is governed by both diffusion and kinetic processes (Shen et al. 2018). Additionally, at pH 7, ciprofloxacin exists in a zwitter ionic state and is found to be thermodynamically most reactive to electrochemical oxidation (Chaabani et al. 2022). These findings indicate the complex electrochemical behavior of ciprofloxacin and highlight its potential applications in electrochemical process-based applications. However, due to their high redox stability, detecting small molecules like ciprofloxacin requires the application of large overpotentials to initiate the redox reactions for sensing. Additionally, small molecule detection necessitates complex electrode modification to achieve selective and sensitive detection (Murugappan et al. 2022).

Remediation is a process of removing or catalyzing contaminants to non-hazardous products in the aqueous phase. These processes are tailored to mitigate antibiotics, like ciprofloxacin, present in the trace level in the environment. Different techniques such as adsorption (Mao et al. 2016), bioremediation (Girardi et al. 2011), and advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) (Lima et al. 2020) are employed in antibiotic removal. Adsorption employs materials such as activated carbon (Tran et al. 2022), multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Yu et al. 2016), clay minerals (Antonelli et al. 2020), and other materials to trap and remove the antibiotics. Whereas bioremediation utilizes microorganisms (Girardi et al. 2011) or plants (Sodhi et al. 2021) for effective removal of the antibiotics. Likewise, AOPs include techniques like photocatalysis (Yu et al. 2019) and ozonation (Sui et al. 2012), which employ reactive species in breaking down the antibiotic to its less harmful form. Effective remediation strategies can substantially help in the remediation of the antibiotics from the environment, thereby reducing the effect of antibiotics on human health and aquatic life. Hence, the widespread adoption of biosensors and remediation technologies holds a robust and ecologically balanced future. By prioritizing and practically applying these technologies, there can be a significant reduction of the contamination caused by ciprofloxacin, thus preserving CIP as an effective therapeutic and ensuring sustainable infectious disease management.

This review article presents a comprehensive study of the different types of electrochemical sensors and remediation strategies reported in the literature for the detection and remediation of ciprofloxacin. The article is organized as follows: the “Electrochemical sensor substrates” section discusses the various electrode materials implemented for robust detection of ciprofloxacin; the “Modifiers” and “Biorecognition elements” sections highlight the recent advances in various modifiers and receptors used for ciprofloxacin detection, and a detailed study on ciprofloxacin remediation is presented in the “Remediation techniques” section. Each section presents a critical literature review and lays out prospects and perspectives of the use of these technologies in tandem.

Electrochemical sensor substrates

The development or use of an appropriate substrate is crucial in the development of an electrochemical sensor for ciprofloxacin detection. The choice of substrate influences the sensitivity, limit of detection (LoD), stability, reproducibility, and robustness of the sensor. Substrates typically constitute electrodes of gold, carbon, platinum, or other conductive material. The electrode serves as a platform for further modification with different modifiers and biorecognition elements specifically for interacting with the analyte. A critical insight into electrochemical substrates reported for ciprofloxacin detection is presented henceforth.

Paper-based substrate

Paper is a flexible substrate developed from cellulose fibers, offering advantages such as flexibility, biodegradability, and microfluidic lateral flows, making them ideal eco-friendly disposable sensing substrates (Sadani et al. 2020). Cellulose-based substrates have inherent porosity and functional groups that facilitate modification with various modifiers such as carbon materials (de Souza et al. 2022), nano particles (Nilghaz and Lu 2019), and biorecognition elements (Chomthong et al. 2024) to enhance the sensitivity and selectivity of the sensor. Paper-based substrates consist of hydroxyl groups (-OH), which can be utilized to introduce carboxyl groups via oxidation, silane groups through silanization, amine groups through amination, and ester groups through the esterification process. In a study conducted by de Souza et al. (2022), a paper-based substrate was employed to detect ciprofloxacin using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). The substrate was further modified using conductive ink, nail polish, and graphite powder. In this context, graphite may enhance the electrical conductivity of the substrate whereas nail polish can act as a binder. The authors achieved a detection limit of 4.96 µmol L−1. However, interference from other antibiotics present in the sample might affect the sensor output due to the lack of a biorecognition element. Also, the LoD does not meet the required maximum residue limits. Additionally, paper-based substrates pose challenges such as low electrical conductivity, variable surface property, mechanical fragility, and inconsistency in functionalization. Conductive materials like graphene, carbon nanotubes, or metal nanoparticles can be integrated with the substrate to resolve the issue of poor conductivity. Similarly, employing robust paper material in combination with polymer matrix can improve the durability of the substrate. To improve the consistency of functionalization, surface treatment methods such as chemical vapor deposition, UV treatment, electrochemical deposition, or silane coupling agents can be utilized. Additionally, precise control over the preparation and functionalization of the substrate is crucial to overcome the disadvantage of surface variability.

Glassy carbon electrode (GCE)

Glassy carbon electrode (GCE) has been a popular choice of substrate in developing simple and rapid electrochemical ciprofloxacin sensors due to its electron transport characteristics, polarizable nature, stability, porosity, and large surface area (Wang et al. 2010b). The high pore volume of GCE facilitates easy modifications with catalytic nanomaterials and biorecognition elements. Fang et al. (2019) employed a GCE electrode modified with zirconium-based MOF to detect CIP in lake water (Fig. 1) using anodic stripping voltammetry. The authors demonstrated a detection limit of 6.67 nM. Though the sensor exhibited rapid and sensitive detection, a potential drawback might be its specificity when the concentration of the similar structured antibiotics exceeds that of the CIP concentration. Additionally, sensor fouling might need further research to increase the reliability and applicability of this technique in real-world scenarios. Similarly, in an interesting study conducted by Mariappan et al. (2023), ciprofloxacin was detected using cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry in tap water and river water employing a GCE modified with a composite of ZnWO4 and carbon black, resulting in a LoD of 0.020 µM. However, when used for detection in a complex organic matrix containing a mixed antibiotic load, the fabricated sensor may not yield specific results for ciprofloxacin. Additionally, the technology needs to be investigated for matrix effects, and the packaging must be carefully revisited for point of use. GCE also has notable drawbacks such as surface fouling and very low catalytic activity. Surface fouling can be addressed by employing anti-fouling agents, whereas low catalytic activity can be resolved by modifying the electrode with nanomaterials like metal sulfides, metal oxide nanoparticles, graphene, or carbon nanotubes (CNTs). Additionally, proper handling and storage conditions including regular cleaning, maintaining dust-free environment, and ensuring the stability of surface modifications are necessary to address the fragility of the electrode.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematics of ciprofloxacin detection using a glassy carbon electrode modified using rGO and NH2-UiO-66 (reprinted with permission from Fang et al. (2019), Copyright (2019), American Chemical Society)

Table 1 lists the details of some GCE-based electrochemical sensors reported in the literature for ciprofloxacin detection.

Table 1.

Glassy carbon electrode-based sensors for electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin

Sl. no Analyte Method Sample LOD Remarks Ref
1 Ciprofloxacin

Anodic stripping voltammetry using GCE modified with graphene and zirconium-based MOF

Working electrode (WE): glassy carbon electrode

The reference electrode (RE): Ag/AgCl saturated with KCl

Counter electrode (CE): platinum wire

Tap water and lake water 6.67 nM in PBS*# Due to the lack of a biorecognition element, there is a high chance that other antibiotics with similar structures will interfere with the sensor when it is exposed to a load of antibiotics Fang et al. (2019)
2 Paracetamol and ciprofloxacin

Cyclic voltammetry using GCE modified with CMK-3, TiO2 sol, AuNPs, Nafion, and PB

WE: GCE

The reference electrode (RE): Ag/AgCl saturated with KCl

Counter electrode (CE): platinum wire

River water and wastewater Ciprofloxacin, 1.08 × 10−1 µM; paracetamol, 0.21 µM in environmental water* Simultaneous detection of two small molecules on the same electrode might lead to fouling of the electrode, hence affecting its performance Pollap et al. (2020)
3 Ciprofloxacin

Differential pulse voltammetry using GCE modified with activated carbon. AuNPs and supramolecular solvent

WE: GCE

CE: platinum electrode

RE: Ag/AgCl electrode

Milk and tablets 0.20 nM in PBS* The sensor can be expected to have better selectivity towards the analyte if a biorecognition element is employed Gissawong et al. (2021)
4 Ciprofloxacin

Differential pulse voltammetry using GCE modified with functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and polydopamine

WE: GCE

CE: platinum electrode

RE: Ag/AgCl electrode

Plasma and urine 4.00 × 10−2 µM in phosphate buffer* Poor LoD and lack of cross-sensitivity studies with similarly structured antibiotics restrict the use of the sensor for biological samples only Sabeti et al. (2021)
5 Ciprofloxacin

Cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry using GCE modified using the composite of ZnWO4 and carbon black material. The reference electrode (RE): Ag/Agcl saturated with KCl

Counter electrode (CE): platinum wire

Tap water and river water 2.00 µ × 10−2 M in PBS*

Interference from other antibiotics present in the sample might affect the sensor output due to the lack of a biorecognition element

Also, the LoD does not meet the required maximum residue limits

Mariappan et al. (2023)
6 Ciprofloxacin

Voltametric detection using GCE modified with Cu-MOF doped with ruthenium

WE: GCE

CE: platinum electrode

RE: Ag/AgCl electrode

Tap water and seawater 3.29 nM in phosphate buffer* Interference issue due to the absence of specific bio-receptors Varsha and Nageswaran (2023)
7 Ciprofloxacin

Electrochemical detection using glassy carbon electrode modified with poly 2‑(hydroxymethyl)thiophene

WE: GCE

CE: platinum electrode

RE: Ag/AgCl electrode

Human urine 0.10–2.00 × 102 µM in citrate buffer* Poor LoD and lack of cross-sensitivity studies with similarly structured antibiotics restrict the use of the sensor for biological samples only Burç et al. (2023)
8 Ciprofloxacin

Electrochemical detection using glassy carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles, S-CoFe-MOFs, and molecularly imprinted polymers (MIP)

WE: GCE

CE: platinum electrode

RE: Ag/AgCl electrode

Milk 3.30 × 10−6 µg/mL* The cross-sensitivity of this system needs to be better established for point-of-use applications Xiong et al. (2023)
9 Ciprofloxacin

Electrochemical detection using glassy carbon electrode (GCE) modified with MnO2/ZnO

WE: GCE

CE: platinum electrode

RE: Calomel electrode

Honey 0.21 µM in PBS* Due to poor LoD and a lack of a biorecognition element, the sensor performance may be hampered when exposed to an antibiotic load Zhang et al. (2023)

In the table, the LoDs have been determined using the following notations: *#signal to noise ratio = 3, *3 σ/m, where σ is the standard deviation and m is the slope

S/N signal to noise ratio, σ standard deviation, m slope

Screen-printed electrode (SPE)

Screen-printed electrodes (SPE) offer great potential for point-of-care applications and hence have garnered popularity over the years. It offers various advantages, including low cost, high reproducibility, and ease of use. The working electrode undergoes modification with different nanomaterials and biorecognition elements to enhance the sensitivity and selectivity, respectively, of the sensing process. In a study by Dakosova et al. in 2022, CIP was detected in a wastewater treatment plant using an electrochemical flow-through. Boron-doped diamond SPE was used as the sensor substrate, and analysis of CIP was done through cyclic voltammetry (CV) and square wave voltammetry (SWV) techniques (Dakošová et al. 2023). Figure 2A illustrates the sensing scheme employed in this research. While detection of CIP using the sensor presents a promising possibility of matrix effects and cross-sensitivity with compounds having similar redox peaks, it may present potential limitations while monitoring the antibiotic residues in sewage systems. Additionally, sewage water may contain harmful chemicals that can lead to the biofouling of electrodes. This biofouling causes the electrode surface to become passivated by fouling agents, forming impermeable layers. These layers limit the interaction between the analyte and the electrode surface, hindering the electron transfer (Cinti and Arduini 2017). Wong et al. (2023) detected CIP in river water and simulated urine samples. SPE was used as the sensor substrate, which was modified with carbon black and Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Further, a molecular imprinted polymer (MIP) specific to the target analyte was employed as a recognition element. Electrochemical analysis of ciprofloxacin was carried out using CV and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) which produced a linear response in the range of 0.50–7.00 µmol/L (Wong et al. 2023). Although the sensor achieved a lower limit of detection of 8.40 × 10−3 µmol L−1, the stability of the electrode over time and across different real samples might need further investigation. Although SPEs are commonly used in electrochemical sensing, they face several challenges. One of the disadvantages of SPE is reproducibility, where the printing process can create inconsistencies in the morphology, uniformity, and thickness, thereby effecting the sensor performance. To address this issue, precise control over the printing technology is necessary. Additionally, SPEs are easily prone to fouling by the sample; hence, they can be protected by using anti-fouling agents. The inherent low conducting property of the carbon used in the printing process can also impact the sensing process. This can be resolved by integrating the SPE with graphene, metal nanoparticles, or carbon nanotubes. Similarly, chemical stability of the ink may degrade with time in various environments. To overcome this issue, chemically inert inks can be utilized. Similarly, Reddy et al. (2018) employed a composite film of gold nanoparticles and chitosan to modify the disposable screen-printed electrode for CIP detection (Fig. 2B) Square wave voltammetry technique was used for the detection. The authors achieved a detection limit of 1.00 × 10−3 µM. The use of biorecognition elements may provide higher specificity to target antibiotics.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A Schematics of ciprofloxacin detection using a boron-doped diamond screen-printed electrode modified (reprinted with permission from Dakošová et al. (2023), Copyright (2023), Elsevier). B Schematics of ciprofloxacin detection using a disposable screen-printed electrode modified with composite film of gold nanoparticle and chitosan (reprinted with permission from Reddy et al. (2018), Copyright (2018), Elsevier)

Table 2 presents a list of various screen-printed electrode-based biosensors employed for ciprofloxacin detection.

Table 2.

Recent advances in screen-printed electrodes in electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin

Sl. no Analyte Method Sample LOD Remarks Ref
1 Ciprofloxacin Square wave voltammetry using a screen-printed electrode modified with chitosan-gold nanoparticle (AuNp/CHI) composite film Serum, plasma, and urine samples 1.00 × 10−3 µM in phosphate buffer* The use of biorecognition elements may provide higher specificity to target antibiotics Reddy et al. (2018)
2 Ciprofloxacin Linear sweep voltammetry using oxygen-terminated and hydrogen-terminated boron-doped diamond powder (BDDP) printed electrodes Diluted artificial urine 8.98 × 10−1 µM in PBS* Diluting the urine sample a hundred times may affect the sensitivity of the sensor Matsunaga et al. (2020)
3 Ciprofloxacin Cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and square wave voltammetry using screen-printed carbon electrodes modified with carboxylated carbon nanotubes Spiked water samples 1.52 nM in PBS# Maintaining the stability and functionality of DNA Gyrase enzyme during detection may be challenging Cardoso et al. (2021)
4 Ciprofloxacin Differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry (DPSV) using screen-printed carbon electrode (SPCE) modified with graphene Milk sample 0.30 µM in B-R buffer*# The selection of appropriate biorecognition elements can mitigate the effect of other interferences in milk samples Pan et al. (2021)
5 Ciprofloxacin Differential pulse voltammetry using screen-printed electrode modified with vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) nanoparticles CIP tablet and urine samples 1.00 × 10−2 µM in PBS A more sophisticated deposition technique may be used to deposit nanoparticles to avoid poor adhesion Tajik et al. (2021)
6 Ciprofloxacin Square wave voltammetry using choline chloride-modified carbon paste electrode (ChCl/CPE) Egg samples, CPRO eye drops, and river water samples 0.36 nM in citrate buffer* The sensor is not portable and not capable of on-site analysis Adane et al. (2023)
7 Ciprofloxacin Differential pulse voltammetry using screen-printed electrode modified with Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles coated with MIP and carbon black Synthetic urine and river water samples 8.40 × 10−3 µM in Britton-Robinson buffer* MIPs designed for selectivity may show cross-reactivity with similar molecules Wong et al. (2023)
8 Ciprofloxacin and methotrexate (MTX) Square wave voltammetry using a screen-printed electrode modified with nanocellulose, 3-dimensional polypyrrole (NC-3DPPY), and silver-gold (Ag-Au) bimetallic alloy nanocomposite Tablets were dissolved in PBS, and blood serum samples and water samples were simulated 6.20 × 10−2 µM (MTX) 0.17 × 10−1 µM (CIP) in PBS* Simultaneous detection of two antibiotics may lead to electrode fouling, further reducing the sensitivity of the sensor Akhter et al. (2022)

In the table, the LoDs have been determined using the following notations: *3 σ/m, #X + 3σ, where σ is the standard deviation, m is the slope, and X is the average of blank signals

Microfabricated substrates

Microfabricated electrochemical substrates refer to the miniature structures manufactured through the microfabrication process. It involves clean room procedures like cleaning, oxidation, lithography, etching, and other steps. Microfabrication enables the development of electrochemical substrates of dimensions ranging from a few micrometers to nanometers, thus increasing the surface area and sensitivity. It further decreases the sample volume. Kim et al. (2009) detected oxytetracycline using gold interdigitated array (IDA) modified with ssDNA. Similarly, Xu et al. (2016), employed interdigitated array microelectrodes (IDAMs) modified with antimony tin oxide nanoparticles (nano ATO) and chitosan. Aptamer was immobilized on the modified IDAM. In this study, chitosan was employed to disperse the nano ATOs uniformly and to fix them firmly on the IDAM. Whereas the nano ATOs were employed to promote the electron transfer and to enhance the electrochemical signal. The authors achieved a detection limit of 3.00 × 10−9 g/mL. Despite the advancements in antibiotic detection in these substrates over the past two decades (Hong et al. 2011), the field remains unexplored in ciprofloxacin detection. The use of microfabricated sensing systems provides easy scalability limiting the need for frequent baselining and sensitivity drifts. However, they face challenges such as complex fabrication process and stability issue. The cost and the complexity of fabrication can be mitigated by employing simple, cost-effective techniques such as inkjet and screen-printing technologies. Stability problems can be addressed by introducing protective layers like polymeric coating, silica-based coating, or others.

Modifiers

Electrochemical substrates are further modified using suitable nanostructured modifiers such as graphene, metal sulfides, metal oxides, carbon nanotubes, metal–organic frameworks, and covalent organic frameworks to enhance the charge transfer characteristics or render a definitive catalytic activity useful for the detection of ciprofloxacin (Tables 3, 4, and 5). Nanostructured modifiers with good conductivity and thermal and chemical stability are preferred as suitable modifiers in electrochemical sensing. Initially, CNTs (Ensafi et al. 2010) were one of the most explored materials, followed by metal oxide nanoparticles (Ensafi et al. 2012), graphene (Zhang et al. 2014), quantum dots (Shan et al. 2016), MOFs (Fang et al. 2019), and COFs (Zhu et al. 2020). Also, metal sulfides (Ali et al. 2023) have been introduced as a modifier for CIP detection (Fig. 3B).

Table 3.

Graphene

Sl. no Analyte Method Sample LoD Remarks Ref
1 Ciprofloxacin Cyclic voltammetry and differential pulse voltammetry using alizarin red and graphene-modified glassy carbon electrode Human serum and tablet samples 1.00 × 10−2 µM in PBS*# The lack of a biorecognition element can lead to interference from other antibiotics in the sample Zhang et al. (2014)
2 Ciprofloxacin Cyclic voltammetry using graphene-modified glassy carbon electrode Ciprofloxacin is ciprofloxacin hydrochloric drugs 2.00 × 10−2 µmol/L.*# The lack of a biorecognition element can lead to interference from other antibiotics in the sample Xie et al. (2015)
3 Ciprofloxacin Square wave voltametric detection using graphene-modified glassy carbon electrode coated with salmon sperm dsDNA as bioreceptor Diluted human serum and urine 0.10 µM in acetate buffer** The presence of any electrical screening substance in the sample can lead to interference in the electrostatic interaction between the DNA and CIP Lim and Ahmed (2016)
4 Paracetamol and ciprofloxacin Differential pulse voltammetry using glassy carbon electrode modified with GO and nickel nanoparticles Urine and serum samples Paracetamol, 6.70 nmol/L; ciprofloxacin, 6.00 nmol/L in phosphate buffer* Since no biorecognition element was used, the sensor performance might be affected in the presence of interferences Martin Santos et al. (2017)
5 Ciprofloxacin Differential pulse voltammetry using GCE modified with rGO functionalized with gold nanoparticle-coated beta-cyclodextrin Tap water 2.70 nM in PBS Cross-sensitivity studies with similarly structured antibiotics should be conducted Pham et al. (2018)
6 Chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin Cyclic voltammetry using glassy carbon electrode modified with graphene, carbon nitride, and gold nanoparticles Milk samples Chloramphenicol, 2.70 × 10−8 M; ciprofloxacin, 4.20 × 10−7 M in phosphate buffer*# Simultaneous detection of antibiotics might hinder the sensor performance due to fouling Yuan et al. (2018)

In the table, the LoDs have been determined using the following notations: *#signal to noise ratio = 3, *3 σ/m, and **experimental LoD, where σ is the standard deviation and m is the slope

Table 4.

Metal oxide nanoparticles

Sl. no Analyte Method Sample LOD Remarks Ref
1 Ciprofloxacin Cyclic voltammetry using GCE modified with Ba0.5Co0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticles Tablet 5.80 × 10−9 nM in PBS When exposed to an antibiotic load, the sensor might cross-react with similarly structured antibiotics Osman et al. (2015)
2 Ciprofloxacin Differential pulse voltammetry using GCE modified with CoFe2O4-MWCNT NA 3.60 × 10−2 µM in Britton-Robinson buffer* Real sample analysis should have been conducted Hosseini et al. (2019)
3 Ciprofloxacin Differential pulse voltammetry using glassy carbon electrode modified with polyethyleneimine/Fe3O4 nanoparticles/carbon nanotubes Pharmaceutical samples, urine, and serum 3.00 × 10−3 µmol L−1 in Britton-Robinson buffer* Cross-sensitivity studies with similarly structured antibiotics were not conducted Jalal et al. (2019)
4 Ciprofloxacin Differential pulse voltammetry using screen-printed electrode modified with V2O5 nanoparticles Urine and tablet 1.00 × 10−2 µM in PBS Cross-sensitivity studies were not conducted Tajik et al. (2021)
5 Ciprofloxacin Differential pulse voltammetry using ITO-coated glass modified with lanthanum oxide nanoparticles Milk 1.00 × 10−3 ng mL−1 in PBS* Further sensitivity improvement can be achieved using other nanomaterials like graphene and nanotubes, combined with the present material Chaudhary et al. (2021)
6 Ciprofloxacin Cyclic voltammetry using GCE modified with MgFe2O4-MWCNTs Urine, plasma, and tablet 1.00 × 10−2 µmol L−1 in PBS# Interference studies of the sensor performance should have been conducted with similarly structured antibiotics Ensafi et al. (2012)

In the table, the LoDs have been determined using the following notations: *3 σ/m, #X + 3σ, where σ is the standard deviation, m is the slope, and X is the average of blank signals

Table 5.

carbon nanotubes

Sl. no Analyte Method Sample LoD Remarks Ref
1 Ciprofloxacin

DPV

Boron-doped diamond electrode modified with porous Nafion film and multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Water and wastewater samples 5.00 × 10−2 µM in KH2PO4## The use of biorecognition elements may enhance the specificity of ciprofloxacin detection Gayen and Chaplin (2016)
2 Ciprofloxacin

CV

Glassy carbon electrode modified with polyaniline film and multi-walled carbon nanotubes-beta cyclodextrin composite

Wastewater treatment plant effluent 5.00 × 101 nM in PBS* Glassy carbon electrodes are relatively expensive Garrido et al. (2017)
3 Ciprofloxacin

DPV

Glassy carbon electrode (GCE) modified with nanocomposite comprising of multi-walled carbon nanotubes, magnetite nanoparticles, and polyethyleneimine

Urine, commercial tablet and serum samples 3.00 × 10−3 micro mol/L in Britton-Robinson buffer* Although GCE is a widely used electrode, it is impractical in portable setups and unsuitable as a disposable or semi-disposable sensor substrate in point-of-use or point-of-care applications Jalal et al. (2019)
4 Ciprofloxacin

EIS and CV

The screen-printed carbon electrode was modified with a nanocomposite comprising multi-walled carbon nanotubes, vanadium oxide, and chitosan

Electrodes were functionalized with CPX ssDNA aptamer using EDC-NHS linker chemistry

Spiked milk samples 0.50 ng/mL in PBS*/ Degradation of aptamers by various enzymes present within samples, especially biological samples, limits their practical application with real samples Hu et al. (2018)
5 Ciprofloxacin and paracetamol

EIS, CV, SWV

Screen printed electrode modified with nanocellulose-polypyrrole matrix and single-walled carbon nanotubes

Water, biological fluids, pharmaceutical samples Paracetamol, 7.20 × 10−2 nM; ciprofloxacin, 0.196 nM in PBS*# Simultaneous detection of multiple analytes present in biological fluids can result in biofouling of electrodes Shalauddin et al. (2022)

In the table, the LoDs have been determined using the following notations: *#signal to noise ratio = 3, *3 σ/m, ##signal to noise ratio is ≥ 5, */3σ, where σ is the standard deviation and m is the slope

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A Schematics of ciprofloxacin detection using quantum dots as a modifier (reprinted with permission from Shan et al. (2016), Copyright (2016), Elsevier). B Schematics of electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin using metal sulfide as a modifier (reprinted with permission from Ali et al. (2023), Copyright (2023), Springer Nature)

This section and SI-2 discuss the various modifiers reported in the literature for the sensitive detection of ciprofloxacin.

Carbon nanotubes

Carbon nanotube is one of the most used materials owing to its novel mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties (Khoshsafar et al. 2016). A study by Garrido et al. (2017) detected CIP in wastewater effluents using GCE as the sensor substrate, which was further modified to a composite consisting of polyaniline, β-cyclodextrin, and functionalized MWCNTs. It was observed that ciprofloxacin in acidic pH exists as a zwitter ion and shows a tendency to bind to β-cyclodextrin rather than to the edges of MWCNTs. Functionalized MWCNTs repelled the anionic group on ciprofloxacin, which enhanced the overall sensitivity of ciprofloxacin detection. The sensor detected ciprofloxacin to a detection limit of 5.00 × 101 nM. In another study, Sabeti et al. (2021) detected ciprofloxacin in plasma and urine samples using modified GCE for therapeutic drug monitoring. The GCE was modified with functionalized MWCNTs and polydopamine, as shown in Fig. 4B. Polydopamine was employed to increase the electrode’s active surface area and also to facilitate the rate of electron transfer. The detection of ciprofloxacin was achieved using CV and DPV, and the sensor showed a LoD of 4.00 × 10−2 µM. However, the complex process involved in synthesizing and modifying using MWCNTs may be limited by automation capabilities for mass fabrication. This limitation can be overcome through process optimization and standardization. Table 5 presents recent studies on biosensors that employ carbon nanotubes as electrode modifiers for detecting ciprofloxacin.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

A Schematics of electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin using metal oxide as a modifier (reprinted with permission from Chaudhary et al. (2024), Copyright (2024), Elsevier). B Schematics of electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin using carbon nanotube as a modifier (reprinted with permission from Sabeti et al. (2021), Copyright (2021), IEEE Sensors Journal)

Metal oxide nanoparticles

Metal oxide nanoparticles consist of distinctive photochemical and electronic properties (Katz et al. 2004). Metal oxide nanoparticles are employed to modify the working electrode (Bagheri et al. 2016) utilizing a variety of methods, including electro-polymerization, electrodeposition, physical adsorption, and covalent chemical bonding (Nag et al. 2024b; Wang and Hu 2009). The versatility of metal oxide nanoparticles in modifying the working electrode contributes to advancements in sensor design technologies (Sadani et al. 2017). Ensafi et al. (2012) detected a ciprofloxacin sensor using GCE modified with MgFe2O4 and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. A precursor for MgFe2O4-MWCNTs was synthesized using the sol–gel method. Both Mg and Fe present in the composite are electrocatalytic in nature due to their electronic arrangement, facilitating increased electron transfer, thereby resulting in a current response which is proportion to the concentration of ciprofloxacin. The authors achieved a LoD of 1.00 × 10−2 µmol L−1, but the sensor performance in the presence of similar structured interfering antibiotics was not studied, and hence, its end use in real-world conditions cannot be ascertained. Another study conducted by Chaudhary et al. (2021) detected ciprofloxacin in milk using indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes, modified with lanthanum oxide nanoparticles and antibody as depicted in Fig. 4A. Wet-chemical co-precipitation method was employed to synthesize the lanthanum oxide nanoparticles. Lanthanum oxide nanoparticles were employed because of their unique electrochemical property, where they transfer electron within a 4f shell, which helps in enhancing the conductivity. It also consists of numerous free active sites for binding, which enables increased immobilization of the antibody, by functionalizing it with APTES and using EDC-NHS linker. The detection limit of the sensor was 1.00 × 10−3 ng/mL. The employed nanomaterials and the antibody might degrade with time; hence, ensuring the long-term stability of the sensor is crucial for maintaining its performance over an extended period. Table 4 presents a list of sensors using various metal oxide nanoparticles as modifiers.

Graphene

Graphene is made up of a monolayer of sp2 hybridized carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice. It facilitates the immobilization of the sensing materials, improving the sensitivity of the sensor. Furthermore, the electronic mobility of graphene increases charge transfer, enhancing the sensor’s overall performance. In a study conducted by Zhang et al. (2014), a GCE was modified with graphene and poly(alizarin red). Graphene enhances conductivity and also increases the surface-to-volume ratio, whereas poly(alizarin red) serves as a proton receptor facilitating a balanced reaction and promoting the transfer of electrons in between the electrode and the analyte. The lack of a biorecognition element can lead to interference from other antibiotics when employed in complex matrices. Hence, further analysis of matrix effects and sensor packaging may render this technology deployable for real-time monitoring. Similarly, Sawkar et al. (2022) detected ciprofloxacin by modifying a carbon paste electrode using graphene and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Sodium dodecyl sulfate being an anionic surfactant promotes electron transfer and increases the reaction rate between the electrode and the analyte. A LoD of 2.90 × 101 µM was demonstrated. However, due to the absence of a biorecognition element, the complexity of the matrix in the real-world scenario may affect the specificity of the sensor. Table 3 lists the details of some graphene-based electrochemical sensors reported in the literature for ciprofloxacin detection.

Quantum dots

Quantum dots (QDs) are nanomaterials with great potential in electrochemical sensing due to their electronic properties such as quantum confinement and tunable band gaps. They also exhibit unique optical properties like high quantum yield and photoluminescence. The effect of quantum confinement in quantum dots is crucial, where the energy levels are quantized, leading to tunable bandgaps which can be controlled by tuning the size of the quantum dots. The electron density is increased at the surface due to the high surface-to-volume ratio, offering multiple active sites for the transfer of electrons and increasing the total conductivity and sensitivity of the material. The excellent tunable optical properties of quantum dots have paved the way for the development of various optical sensors (Chullasat et al. 2018; Cotta 2020). QDs-based sensors are highly precise and selective, making them suitable for detecting different analytes (Karadurmus et al. 2021). In a study conducted by Shan et al. (2016), a GCE was further modified with cadmium sulfide QDs (CdS QDs) for the detection of CIP. The modified electrode displayed an anodic stripping signal due to the generation of Cd (II) ions from the QDs (Fig. 3A), achieving a detection limit of 2.20 × 10−8 mol L−1. Cd (II) ions are released from the QDs when in contact with ciprofloxacin due to an affinity-driven reaction. This interaction is crucial in anodic stripping voltammetry since the ions are stripped from the electrode, in turn enabling sensitive detection. Other heavy metals may interact distinctively with the surface of the electrode in electrochemical sensing by forming complexes or by undergoing redox reaction, when specific modifications and conditions are provided. However, interference caused by the other organic fluorescent components present in the complex samples may hinder the sensor performance by influencing the accuracy and selectivity of the sensor. Moreover, quantum dots are susceptible to degradation and photo-oxidation, which may decline the sensor performance over time. The complexity of the electrode modification is crucial in terms of cost-effectiveness and scalability. Considering the hazardous environmental effects of cadmium is also crucial. Similarly, in another study, a GCE modified with carbon QDs, ZnO nanoflowers, and poly(cetyltrimethylammonium bromide) achieved a detection limit of 1.97 nM (Hatamluyi et al. 2020). Though QDs as electrochemical sensing materials for CIP detection are promising, addressing challenges related to the interferences due to biomolecules and redox actives species in biological samples, long-term stability, and scalability is challenging for successfully translating this method into practical applications.

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) contain a charged metal ion enclosed by organic molecules, developing a highly regular, porous structure with a high surface area resembling a cage-like network. MOFs such as ZIF-8 (Hu et al. 2021), UIO-66 (Weng et al. 2022), HKUST-1 (Liu et al. 2024), Ni-MOF (Lv et al. 2022), Co-MOF (Shi et al. 2023), and Fe-MOF (Saeb and Asadpour-Zeynali 2022) are the commonly used MOFs in antibiotic detection. Organic molecules such as the N-donor group, phosphonates, and carboxylates are employed. Their flexibility in structure, porosity, and tailoring ability with respect to different functional groups have made the material successful for various applications (Giménez-Marqués et al. 2016; Wang 2017). Composite structures of MOFs have been produced to overcome the problem of the fragility of the functional groups present in the MOFs (Zhu and Xu 2014; Kempahanumakkagari et al. 2018). This results in good mechanical stability, better catalytic performance, and better conductivity. In the study conducted by Fang et al. (2019), a zirconium (Zr)-based MOF-modified electrode was used with rGO in detecting ciprofloxacin in water samples. Coordination chemistry of zirconium helps in the formation and functionality of the MOF. Zirconium ions behave like nodes which connects with 2-aminoterephthalic forming Zr-O bonds, developing a porous structure. Additionally, due to its large surface area, it provides multiple active sites for analyte detection. Further deposition of Cu2+ on the modified electrode leads to the complexation reaction forming Cu2+-CIP complex, thereby decreasing the oxidation current of Cu2+. The sensor detected ciprofloxacin up to 6.67 nM. In another study, Varsha and Nageswaran (2023) synthesized copper-based MOF as a modifier, which was further doped with ruthenium metal ion to increase the number of electrocatalytic active sites that can interact with CIP. The authors detected ciprofloxacin up to 3.29 nM. Though the sensor demonstrated an acceptable LoD, the synthesis of MOF needs precise control over the experimental condition, further affecting the scalability and reproducibility of the sensor for large-scale applications. Additionally, MOF might be unstable in harsh conditions, such as extreme pH levels and high humidity, which can influence the sensor performance. However, field use of MOFs in sensing and remediation technologies remains limited.

Covalent organic frameworks

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs) are crystalline polymeric materials, synthesized via solvothermal and ionothermal methods, defined by excellent stability and long-range order. They are formed through the direct linkage of organic units via covalent bonding by eliminating the need for a metallic ion, thereby improving the stability, reducing the toxicity, and enhancing the biocompatibility of the material. COFs also display tunable pore size, good loading capacity, high thermal stability, and lower density. In a study conducted by Zhu et al. (2020), an electrochemical aptasensor with Au-electrode as a substrate for selective detection of CIP has been reported. The electrode was further modified with a COF synthesized using 1,3,5-tris(4-aminophenyl)benzene and 2,5-dimethoxyterephaldehyde confined with the gold nanoparticles (Au@COF). Further, the aptamer was immobilized on the modified electrode. Au@COFs provide good surface area, porosity, and stability and also provide numerous π-functional sites for immobilization of the aptamer. The authors achieved a detection limit of 2.34 fg/mL using the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy technique. However, the presence of nucleases in the complex environmental samples may degrade the aptamer over time, which might, in turn, affect the reliability and stability of the sensor.

Metal sulfides

Metal sulfides are semiconducting electrode materials composed of sulfur anions and metal cations. They possess several novel properties such as conductivity, redox-reversibility, capacitance (Kulkarni et al. 2017), catalytic and photocatalytic activity, and optical characteristics (Jamal et al. 2023). Additionally, sulfur can stabilize multiple oxidation states of the metal to form a stable metal-sulfur bond. Metal sulfides are generally categorized as semiconductors, and a few of them exhibit conducting behavior, such as NbS2 (Chhowalla et al. 2013), while others show insulating behavior, like HFS2. Metal sulfides such as ZnS and CuS act as semiconducting materials, with band gap energies of 3.7 eV and 1.2 eV, respectively. Further, doping approaches can help improve conductivity, which increases with the concentration of the dopant. This increase in conductivity is due to the presence of excess free carriers (Lai et al. 2012). Thus, metal sulfides are widely employed in electrochemical biosensors as they can be easily synthesized in situ using physical and chemical methods and can be directly grown on substrates by electrodeposition (Miyazaki et al. 2021). For example, metal sulfides have also been explored in developing sensors for ciprofloxacin detection, as demonstrated by Ali et al. (2023). They employed a Teflon-coated platinum electrode modified with polyaniline (PAni) and zinc sulfide (ZnS) nanocomposite (PAni-ZnS) (Fig. 3B). The detection limit of 0.50 µM was demonstrated. However, the sensor response validation using real samples was not carried out, which may limit its end use. Additionally, metal sulfides used as electrode material show poor interlayer spacing which results in restricted charge transfer, which may limit its commercial application (Barik and Ingole 2020).

Biorecognition elements

In the context of CIP detection, biorecognition elements play a major role in identifying and interacting specifically with CIP. Most of the modifiers discussed above may be tuned to be specific to the class of quinolones but not CIP in particular. Recognition elements are biomolecules such as antibodies, aptamers, enzymes, and whole cells, which, upon interaction with the ciprofloxacin, generate a signal that is further used to quantify ciprofloxacin in the sample. To ensure efficient interaction between the bioreceptor and the analyte, managing the Debye length is crucial. Debye length can be optimized by controlling the ionic strength, maintaining optimal pH and temperature, or using spacers. Strategic positioning of the biorecognition elements using spacers such as mercapto hexanol and ethanolamine can improve the sensitivity and specificity of the sensor.

This section and SI-3 focus on some of the biorecognition elements used for developing electrochemical sensors for ciprofloxacin.

Antibody

Antibodies, commonly used as biorecognition elements employed for their specificity and selectivity, are produced by injecting hapten-carrier protein into animals for stimulating an immune response. Monoclonal antibodies are more specific when compared to polyclonal antibodies (Majdinasab et al. 2020), but sometimes their in vitro production reduces the affinity (Lipman et al. 2005), which can be enhanced by screening strategies and targeted immunization (Nolli and Parenti 1991). Antibody-based biosensors have been extensively employed to detect ciprofloxacin. Ionescu et al. (2007) used impedance spectroscopy technique for detecting ciprofloxacin in serum and real blood samples. A modified gold-based substrate was employed, which was further modified with pyrrole-N hydroxy succinimide composite and incubated with polyclonal ciprofloxacin antibodies. To prevent non-specific binding of ciprofloxacin, 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used. The interaction between the antibiotic and the antibody resulted in a reduction in the electrochemical signal, which was attributed to the hindered diffusion of redox molecules and the formation of layers on the electrode surface. Cyclic voltammetry studies revealed a limit of detection of 10.000 pg/mL. The biosensor shows high specificity to ciprofloxacin antibiotics. However, the study does not mention the operational stability of the biosensor, which is determined by the retention activity of the antibody used. This stability further determines the shelf life and reusability of the sensor. In a similar study conducted by Giroud et al. (2009), the working electrode of the immunosensor was modified with diamond paste before electro-polymerization with a polypyrrole-NHS composite. This deposited film was utilized for the covalent binding of the model antibiotic, ciprofloxacin, exploiting its amino group. Subsequently, the working electrode was incubated with anti-ciprofloxacin polyclonal antibodies. Detection of ciprofloxacin was correlated with the changes in impedance resulting from the displacement of antibody in the presence of CIP in the sample solution, as depicted in Fig. 5A. The sensor detected ciprofloxacin to extremely low concentrations of 1.00 pg/mL. Furthermore, the sensor showed potential for regeneration and reuse through a simple incubation process in an antibody solution. Even though this is a proof-of-concept study for ciprofloxacin detection, the sensitivity and specificity aspects of the biosensor were not studied. This can result in interferences by other antibiotics of the same class, which were also not studied. Though antibodies are specific to the analyte, their stability and shelf life are of great concern. They are susceptible to degradation under various environmental changes in pH and temperature. To address these issues, antibody can be encapsulated, chemically modified, or subjected to lyophilization. High cost of the antibodies can be resolved by using synthetic antibodies and optimizing the synthesis procedure.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

A Detection of ciprofloxacin based on the displacement of antibody in the presence of ciprofloxacin (reprinted with permission from Giroud et al. (2009), Copyright (2009), American Chemical Society). B Schematics of electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin using aptamer as a biorecognition element (reprinted with permission from Mahmoudpour et al. (2021), Copyright (2021), Elsevier)

Aptamer

Aptasensors are the sensors developed by immobilizing aptamers on a substrate with suitable linker chemistry, altering the electron transport between the target analyte and the electrode. In a study conducted by Yang et al. (2021), a photoelectrochemical sensor was fabricated to detect ciprofloxacin in river water. Indium tin oxide (ITO) was used as the WE, which was further modified with Bi24O31Cl10/BiOCl heterojunction followed by immobilization of aptamer on it. The achieved detection limit was 1.67 ng/L (Yang et al. 2021). Although aptamers are highly specific and selective, they are easily prone to degradation due to factors such as pH change, high salt concentrations, and enzymatic cleavage. The degradation of aptamers might hinder their specificity and lead to false results. The presence of various interferences in the real samples might introduce non-specific binding, leading to inaccurate detection of the analyte. Mahmoudpour et al. (2021) detected ciprofloxacin in milk samples using a GCE modified with rGO, PAMAM, and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Further, NH2-aptamer was immobilized for specific analyte detection, as represented in Fig. 5B. The authors demonstrated a quantification limit of 1.00 nM. The sensitivity of the sensor can be further improved by reducing the Debye length. Despite the potential of aptamers in specific detection, they face challenges which impacts the effectiveness of the sensor. They are unstable under changes in pH and ionic strength, leading to conformational changes. This can be mitigated by chemically modifying the aptamer with phosphorothioate backbones. Additionally, phosphorothioate backbones act like nuclease-resistant modification. Synthesis of aptamers involves a process called Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (SELEX), which is an expensive and labor-intensive process. However, the cost of this process can be reduced by using automated synthesis platform and inexpensive reagents.

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIP)

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) are artificial biorecognition elements where the monomers form noncovalent bonds with analyte in the presence of crosslinker and a solvent (Nag et al. 2024a). They are polymerized on the working electrode using simple techniques like cyclic voltammetry. The template (analyte) will be extracted after the polymerization, leaving behind the sites which are complementary to the target molecule. Despite their complementary structure, challenges such as non-specific binding and complete removal of the template exist. In a study conducted by Surya et al. (2020), a GCE modified with chitosan-gold nanoparticles (Ch-AuNP)-decorated MIP (Ch-AuMIP) was employed to detect ciprofloxacin. The amino groups and hydroxyl group chitosan may interact with CIP through electrostatic attraction and hydrogen bonding, helping in enhancing the binding efficiency of the MIP. Whereas, the AuNPs increase the conductivity, facilitating the transfer of electrons. Despite the advancements exhibited by Ch-AuMIP, as degradation or agglomeration of the nanoparticles can affect the sensor performance, stability of the nanoparticles over a long-term and differing environmental conditions can be a concern. Additionally, though the sensor offers good selectivity for CIP over other interferences, similar structured antibiotics present in a complex matrix may still interfere with the sensor performance. Though MIPs are promising recognition elements, they face several disadvantages that affect the sensor performance. One major drawback of the MIPs is their specificity and binding affinity. The imprinted sites may not completely accommodate all the variations in the structure of the analyte in different matrices. This issue can be addressed by optimizing the polymerization condition and considering the post-polymerization conditions to refine the imprinted sites. Another drawback is the stability and reproducibility of the MIP-based sensor. Inconsistencies in the distribution of the recognition sites can lead to variable sensor response through different devices. This can be mitigated by using highly pure reagents and standardizing the manufacturing procedure. Additionally, interference from real samples can affect the accuracy of the sensor.

Remediation techniques

Developing a remediation technology for CIP is critical due to its persistence and bioaccumulation in the environment, leading to AMR and a harmful impact on flora and fauna. The combination of CIP detection and remediation signifies a potential approach in mitigating the impact of CIP on the environment. The removal of CIP is mainly by separation or degradation techniques. Separation is a remediation technique involving sorption (physical removal) of the antibiotic from the matrix. It is further divided into adsorption, membrane filtration, and ion exchange. Whereas degradation is a process that breaks down the target molecule into a less harmful compound. Degradation studies of CIP mainly focus on advanced oxidation processes such as photocatalysis, ozonation, and oxidation by Fenton’s reagent. This section summarizes various technologies reported for the remediation of CIP from the aqueous phase.

Adsorption

Adsorption is a separation operation that is widely studied for antibiotic removal due to its efficiency and versatility. The material used for adsorption is called an adsorbent, and factors like pH, temperature, and antibiotic concentrations play a pivotal role in the efficacy of an adsorbent. Further improvement in efficiency and economy of the adsorption operation depends on the choice of the (Nayak et al. 2024). Hence, adsorbent material can be functionalized with ligands (Ali et al. 2019), biomolecules (Shao et al. 2019), or polymers (Patra and Narayanasamy 2022) to enhance the surface functionality and selectivity. Adsorption by activated carbon and biosorbents is widely employed for the CIP removal from the aqueous phase for their high surface area and tuneable pores which provide ample sites for antibiotic adsorption using activated carbon (AC). AC can be derived from various sources, such as coconut shells, plants, and other lignocellulosic materials which have shown higher adsorptive removal of antibiotics than most materials; however, challenges like saturation of the adsorption sites and competition with other ions and molecules exist. Similarly, biosorption is a process which utilizes biological materials like microorganisms or plant-based substances to remove antibiotics from the aqueous phase. This process involves the interaction between the functional groups present in the biological material and the antibiotic. Chandrasekaran et al. (2020) reported the synthesis of AC using Prosopis juliflora wood (PPJ) for adsorbing ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin from water. The physico-chemical alterations were studied, and the results revealed that the antibiotic formed a monolayer with PPJ through chemisorption. Enhanced adsorptive properties have been reported when using a combination of modified activated carbon with other adsorbents, such as MWCNTs (Fig. 6A). However, the practical implementation and scalability of the adsorbent for larger applications need to be thoroughly examined. In another study conducted by Fan et al. (2020), citric acid was used to modify banyan aerial roots and modified banyan roots were employed to remove ciprofloxacin. The modifications improved the removal capacity of the fiber; however, the experiments were conducted under specific conditions, possibly ignoring the impact of the different parameters in real-world scenarios. Further, the adsorption process was governed by pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetics and followed the Freundlich isotherm model. Moreover, to evaluate the sustainability and practical applicability of adsorption, the long-term stability and scalability of the biomaterial need to be assessed and quantified. Further description of adsorption is given in SI-4.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

A Scheme representing synthesis of material and adsorption process (reprinted with permission from Chandrasekaran et al. (2020), Copyright (2020), Elsevier). B Representation of ciprofloxacin removal using membrane-based ultrafiltration (reprinted with permission from Bhattacharya et al. (2019), Copyright (2019), Elsevier)

Membrane filtration

Membrane filtration is one of the potential removal techniques studied for the removal of antibiotics. This pressure-driven technique employs semipermeable membranes with different pore sizes, such as ultrafiltration (Palacio et al. 2018), microfiltration (Yang et al. 2024), nanofiltration (Zaviska et al. 2013), and reverse osmosis (Alonso et al. 2018). The membrane filtration method involves selectively separating molecules based on their size, molecular weight, and charge by sieving, diffusion, and adsorption. In a study conducted by Bhattacharya et al. (2019), a novel CuO/TiO2 ceramic membrane was fabricated using copper oxide NP (CuO NP) in combination with TiO2 nanoparticles on a clay-alumina-based support. The rejection efficiency of the membrane was investigated, and 99.5% removal was observed in 60 min of operating time with a feed concentration of 500 µg/mL. Toxicity evaluation was also conducted on the treated solution by the membrane employing algae as an indicator. Further consideration of the selectivity of the membrane is important to avoid unintended removal of the beneficial components from the solution. The technique of single-step removal of CIP using nanocomposite-based ceramic ultrafiltration membrane was efficient, but long-term application would lead to membrane fouling. Moreover, the cost-effectiveness and scalability of the technique must be thoroughly investigated to enhance its applicability in the environment. A technique involving ultrafiltration membranes combined with water-soluble polymers has gained attention for its efficiency in removing small molecules from aqueous samples. Palacio et al. (2020) demonstrated the removal of amoxicillin, CIP, and tetracycline from an aqueous system using an ultrafiltration membrane conjugated with alkylated chitosan polyelectrolyte (ChA-PE). At pH 11, the retention percentage was 80% with respect to various molar ratios of antibiotics. The Cha-PE exhibited a retention capacity of 185.6 mg/g, 420.2 mg/g, and 632.8 mg/g for ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin, and tetracycline. Since the study focuses on a single pH, applying this technology to real-world problems is difficult since antibiotic-contaminated water sources will have varying pH.

Ion exchange

Ion exchange is a technique which is used to separate the target molecules, where the ions in the solution are exchanged with the ions present in the solid phase (ion exchange resin). Cation exchange and anion exchange are the two commonly used methods, and parameters like pH, ion selectivity, and the need for periodic regeneration influence the efficiency of the process. Cation exchange is highly suitable for positively charged antibiotics, while anion exchange is suitable for negatively charged antibiotics. In research conducted by Li et al. (2024), the use of porous carbonized resins as precursors for synthesizing adsorbent material proved effective for ciprofloxacin removal. The precursor was derived from waste cationic exchange resin, and 93% antibiotic removal was reported with an adsorbent dosage of 300 mg/L. The adsorption kinetics followed a pseudo-second-order model, and adsorption thermodynamics revealed a spontaneous exothermic nature of the process. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms were fitted to the experimental data, and the adsorption was better described by Langmuir isotherm, indicating monolayer adsorption. Even though the study shows efficient adsorption and reusability of the material, the process of regeneration of the material might increase the complexity and overall cost of the process. Additionally, scaling up the process to an industrial level from a laboratory level is crucial and may effect overall efficiency due to competitive adsorption from other pollutants. The study conducted by dos Santos Soldan et al. (2023) investigated the adsorption behavior of ciprofloxacin on the Amberlite IR120 (cationic resin). Kinetics and equilibrium studies were conducted to study the influence of agitation rate, pH, temperature, and resin mass on removal efficiency. Langmuir model was employed to determine the maximum adsorption capacity, which was 37 mg/g. The maximum removal was observed at a pH of 7, resin mass of 0.08 g, temperature of 15 °C, and an agitation rate of 300 rpm, and pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models displayed the best fit for all the experimental results. Antibacterial effects of the treated sample were studied against E. coli, which proved the elimination of the antibiotic. However, it is necessary to analyze the performance of the material under diverse environmental factors and other pollutants to understand the potential interferences and effects of competitive adsorption caused by these interferences. Table 6 represents the list of different techniques used in the separation of ciprofloxacin, respectively.

Table 6.

List of different techniques used in separation of ciprofloxacin

Method Adsorbent pH Temperature (°C) Adsorption capacity (mg/g) Reference
Adsorption Bentonite and chitosan composite NA 30.0 39.06 Arya and Philip (2016)
Fe3O4/carbon 7.0 30.0 90.10 Mao et al. (2016)
Fe3O4/SiO2/Schiff base 5 NA 41.53 × 101 Amirmahani et al. (2020)
Membrane filtration Cellulose acetate nanofiber membrane impregnated with montmorillonite- 6 30 13.80 Das et al. (2020)
Ion exchange Poly (acrylamide-co-itaconic acid) 6 28 17.85 × 101 Bajpai and Bhowmik (2010)
Montmorillonite- - NA 33.00 × 101 Wang et al. (2010a)
Polystyrene anion exchange resin + nanoconfined iron 5 25 96.20 Song et al. (2022)

Photocatalysis

Photocatalysts are specially designed compounds that absorb light with energy equal to or greater than their band gap and undergo electronic excitation, which results in electron–hole pair generation. At this stage, a photochemical reaction is initiated, in which the molecules combine with oxygen to generate reactive oxygen species (Fig. 7). The oxidative process also produces intermediate species, including free radicals, which are essential for starting a chain reaction that breaks or modifies the chemical structure of the target pollutant (Fig. SI-3). Semiconducting materials like titanium dioxide (Kutuzova et al. 2021), zinc oxide (Van Thuan et al. 2022), bismuth vanadate (Chen et al. 2018), graphitic carbon nitride (Chuaicham et al. 2021), and strontium titanate (Mohanty et al. 2023) are usually employed as photocatalysts in remediation. Gad-Allah et al. (2011) used titanium dioxide (TiO2) as a photocatalyst to degrade ciprofloxacin under simulated sunlight. It was observed that an increase in TiO2 concentration reduced the rate of reaction due to lower light transmittance. Degradation of the antibiotic by the photocatalyst was conducted at a pH of 5.8 and followed pseudo-first-order kinetics. While this is an efficient method for removing ciprofloxacin, the efficiency of the catalyst may decrease due to fouling and deactivation. Additionally, problems related to feasibility and cost exist, making the widespread adoption of this technique difficult. In a similar study involving semiconductor-assisted photocatalytic degradation, El-Kemary et al. used zinc oxide nanoparticles for the degradation of ciprofloxacin under the influence of irradiated UV light (El-Kemary et al. 2010). The photodegradation followed pseudo-first-order kinetics with efficient degradation observed at pH 7 and 10 which hindered its performance in real wastewater samples. Additionally, there is a requirement for a UV light source to activate the catalyst, raising concerns regarding the energy consumption and availability of UV light sources in real-world scenarios.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Scheme representing the basic principle of photodegradation (re-drawn using Microsoft PowerPoint)

Ozonation

Ozonation is one of the most effective advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) in antibiotic remediation. Its capability lies in breaking down the antibiotic into a less harmful form. Ozone or hydroxyl radicals play a key role in this process. As a powerful oxidizing agent, ozone oxidizes the target antibiotic by attacking electron-rich moieties like double bonds or aromatic rings. This process is followed by the generation of hydroxyl ions, which further degrades the target antibiotic. The ozonation method shows high degradation rates, up to 90%. Aleksić et al. (2021) reported that ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin can be successfully removed using ozonation in an alkaline medium with degradation efficiency for ciprofloxacin of about 96%. Though the results demonstrated the decrease in toxicity of the wastewater after ozonation, the study employed model hospital wastewater, which might not completely represent the complex composition of real hospital wastewater. A wide range of interferences present in hospital wastewater might limit the use of the material in real-world scenarios. Nemati Sani et al. (2019) demonstrated catalytic ozonation using gama-Al2O3 nanoparticles to remove ciprofloxacin from synthetic wastewater and real wastewater (Fig. 8A). Rate of catalytic ozonation was highest at pH 9.5 and lowest at pH 5.25, and the degradation process was governed by pseudo-first-order kinetics. Even though this process degraded ciprofloxacin in both synthetic and real wastewater, the efficiency of CIP removal in the real wastewater was lower due to the scavenging effect of other pollutants, making the application of the material difficult in real-world scenarios.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

A Scheme representing ozonation in ciprofloxacin degradation (reprinted with permission from Nemati Sani et al. (2019), Copyright (2019), Elsevier). B Representation of ciprofloxacin degradation using dark Fenton’s process (reprinted with permission from Ding et al. (2019), Copyright (2019), Elsevier)

Oxidation by Fenton’s reagents

Fenton’s reaction is an oxidative process where hydroxyl radicals will be generated by the reaction between H2O2 and Fe2+ ions. The generated hydroxyl ions are highly reactive and oxidizing agents. It reacts with molecules by abstracting hydrogen atoms, leading to its degradation and making it less harmful. In a study by Wang et al. (2020), Fe3+ was inserted into the Nafion membrane to develop a Fenton catalyst, and the stability of the membrane was examined in the presence of UV. The process completely degraded ciprofloxacin within 4 h, and an efficiency of 97.7% was achieved within 3 h. A cyclic test was conducted, where the membrane showed an approximate degradation rate of 80%, and it decreased to about 20% after five cycles. The decrease in degradation rate can be due to the conversion of Fe3+ to Fe3O4. Ding et al. (2019) reported the synthesis of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-iron oxide composite by in situ thermal condensation of dicyandiamide. The catalytic effect of the composite was studied in the dark Fenton system (Fig. 8B), and the system was studied with various parameters. From oxidation studies, mineralization of CIP was observed at pH 3, 0.0056 M H2O2, 1 g/L CN@IO-2, and 20 mg/L CIP. However, essential parameters which signify the practical application, such as stability and recyclability, were not studied, which can contribute to the possible application of the material in real-world conditions. In addition, the catalyst requires frequent replacement/reactivation upon inefficiency in recyclability and stability, leading to increased costs. Table 7 represents the list of various techniques used for the degradation of ciprofloxacin.

Table 7.

List of different techniques used in separation of ciprofloxacin

Method Adsorbent Time Efficiency (%) Reference
Photocatalysis ZnO + Ag2O 60 min 31.00 Zhao et al. (2017)
Yttrium-doped bismuth oxy bromide 60 min 88.00 Imam et al. (2018)
ZnO 140 min 10.00 × 101 Eskandari et al. (2018)
Bioremediation Pleurotus ostreatus 14 days 91.34 (methyl orange assay) Singh et al. (2017)
Pycnoporus sanguineus 2 days 98.50 Gao et al. (2018)
Microalgae and bacteria consortium NA 96.10 ± 0.07 Wang et al. (2023)
Ozonation Gamma-Al2O3 60 min 93.00 Nemati Sani et al. (2019)
Ozone 120 min 10.00 × 101 Aleksić et al. (2021)
Fenton’s reaction Graphitic carbon nitride 45 min 10.00 × 101 Ding et al. (2019)
OCNTs/FeOCl natural air cathode 90 10.00 × 101 Liu et al. (2022)

Bioremediation

Bioremediation is an interplay of enzymatic reactions and microbial metabolic pathways aimed at the degradation or transformation of antibiotics present in the environment. Degradation of ciprofloxacin may be achieved using microbial degradation or by phytoremediation. Microbial degradation is a process in which microorganisms like bacteria and fungi play an important role in the degradation of antibiotics into less harmful forms. Similarly, enzymatic transformation involves the production of enzymes by microorganisms specifically tailored to degrade the antibiotic. The degraded compounds from bioremediation serve as a source of food for the microorganisms. Likewise, in phytoremediation, plants play a crucial role in absorbing, accumulating, and detoxifying antibiotics. Studies have demonstrated that plants and microorganisms absorb the antibiotics from soil and water and metabolize them within their tissues. Singh et al. (2017) used Pleurotus ostreatus, a basidiomycetous fungus, to study ciprofloxacin degradation, employing titrimetric analysis and spectrophotometric studies. The study was validated using HPLC, and the treated sample showed a lower antimicrobial activity. Though the method demonstrated considerable degradation potential, toxicity assays of the end products are important before the release into the environment and investigated the use of basidiomycetous fungi named Pleurotus ostreatus for ciprofloxacin degradation. Titrimetric analysis and spectrophotometric methods were used to evaluate the degradation of ciprofloxacin and were validated using HPLC and microbial inhibition studies. However, toxicity studies of the degraded products can be examined to mitigate the risks due to secondary environmental risks. A study conducted by Kitamura et al. (2023) employed Salvinia molesta D.S. Mitchell (floating plant) and Egeria densa Planch (submerged plant) for the remediation of ciprofloxacin in simulated polluted water. Both plants were exposed to an elevated concentration of ciprofloxacin for 96 h and 168 h, as depicted in Fig. 9. The plants exhibited the capability to absorb 58% of the antibiotic from the artificial media and showed greater accumulation of S. molesta; however, E. densa was observed to completely metabolized ciprofloxacin within its tissues. Moreover, the use of simulated contaminated water will lack complexity when compared to the environmental samples. Hence, the use of this technology is limited in effectively solving environmental problems. Additionally, the introduction of invasive species like Salvinia molesta might potentially affect the growth of native species and disturb aquatic life. Further description is given in the SI-5.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Scheme representing phytoremediation of ciprofloxacin using S. molesta and E. densa in artificially contaminated water (reprinted with permission from Kitamura et al. (2023), Copyright (2023), Springer Nature)

Discussion and conclusion

Ciprofloxacin is one of the most extensively used fluoroquinolone antibiotics employed for treating intra-abdominal infections, skin infections, urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, and respiratory tract infections. However, administered CIP is partially metabolized in the body and is released into the environment through human excreta leading to the contamination of soil and water. These environments with sub-lethal concentrations of CIP act like a reservoir, contributing towards AMR. The proliferation and horizontal gene transfer in bacteria significantly increases antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARBs), thereby reducing the effectiveness of standard therapies, increasing the cost of healthcare, complicating the treatment for bacterial infections, and contributing to high mortality rates.

The environmental risk caused by CIP can be evaluated by comparing its predicted environmental concentration (PEC) to predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) value. If PEC exceeds PNEC, it suggests a potential risk to the environment and the proliferation of ARBs. A retrospective analysis in the year 2020 reported that over 34.9% of the global analysis for CIP exceeded the PNEC value (Booth et al. 2020). Another study reported that the concentration of CIP in Sirsa and Sutlej rivers exceeded the recommended levels by 1500 times (Gangar and Patra 2023). Also, resistance of Escherichia coli to fluoroquinolones increased from 78 to 85% between 2008 and 2013, and Salmonella typhi isolates also showed an increase in fluoroquinolone resistance from 8% in 2008 to 28% in 2014 (Laxminarayan and Chaudhury 2016). Similarly, 36% of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains showed fluoroquinolone resistance in 2022, contributing to high pre-extensive drug resistance in Mumbai, India (Dreyer et al. 2022).

The ability of ciprofloxacin to resist the degradation process in municipal effluent treatment plants and hospital effluent treatment plants poses a challenge in complete removal. Additionally, the lack of point-of-use technologies, preloaded remediation, and lack of advanced automation technology of regeneration have further affected the removal of CIP from the environment. To overcome the problems caused by CIP, simulation study can help in the precise modelling of the detection and removal of the antibiotic. It helps by optimizing the treatment strategy, assessing the byproducts, and designing an inexpensive scalable solution for the detection and mitigation of CIP from the environment.

In the development of a sensor, the first step of choosing an electrochemical substrate is based on factors such as sensitivity, portability, and cost, with SPE being preferred for ease of manufacturing, mass fabrication, portability, and robustness. To enhance the electrocatalytic activity and sensitivity of the sensor, the chosen substrate is further modified with nanomaterials such as graphene, CNTs, and metal oxides, using suitable linker chemistries. Recent advancements in MOFs, COFs, and quantum dots have displayed promising results in CIP detection. Additionally, to increase the specificity of the sensor, biorecognition elements like aptamer or antibody are immobilized on the modified substrate using a suitable bioconjugation technique. The last step in designing a sensor is the conversion of the electrochemical signals to readable outputs (Fig. SI-4).

Remediation of antibiotics in effluent treatment plants plays a critical role in addressing fluoroquinolone resistance by limiting the co-existence of the drug and bacteria in aquatic pools. Despite the advantages offered by the conventional adsorption-based remediation technique, there exist challenges such as regeneration issues and loss of efficiency with time. Other techniques are being explored in research, but they face challenges for real-world application. For example, membrane filtration faces fouling due to other contaminants in the matrix, photocatalysis encounters limited effectiveness under low light, and ozonation may produce harmful byproducts such as bromates and perchlorates. Advanced processes incorporating Fenton’s reactions may further increase the toxicity levels in sludge due to the formation of peroxides and chlorinated compounds. Also, bioremediation is often restrained by the efficiency of plants and microorganisms.

Combining ciprofloxacin detection and remediation signifies a potential approach to mitigating the impact of ciprofloxacin on the environment. The widespread adoption of biosensors and remediation technologies holds a robust and ecologically balanced future. By prioritizing and practically applying these technologies, there can be a significant reduction of the contamination caused by ciprofloxacin, thus fostering sustainable co-existence with the antibiotics in the environment. Advanced technologies like point-of-care tools are promising strategies for obtaining more accurate and timely detection of infections caused by pathogens, enabling healthcare professionals to prescribe specific antibiotics. Moreover, the development of effective remediation strategies provides potential solutions for combating antimicrobial resistance. Integration of these technologies in healthcare promotes better results with minimum risk of developing resistance towards the antibiotic.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Author contribution

Vrinda Kini: writing the original draft. Sreelakshmi C. S.: writing the original draft. Debasmita Mondal: review and editing of the original draft. Nethaji Sundarabal: review and editing of the original draft. Pooja Nag: conceptualization, supervision, review and editing of the original draft. Kapil Sadani: conceptualization, supervision, review and editing of the original draft.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal.

Data availability

All the required data are provided in the manuscript and supplementary information.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Vrinda Kini and C. S. Sreelakshmi contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Pooja Nag, Email: pooja.nag@manipal.edu.

Kapil Sadani, Email: sadani.kapil@manipal.edu.

References

  1. Adane WD, Chandravanshi BS, Tessema M (2023) A simple, ultrasensitive and cost-effective electrochemical sensor for the determination of ciprofloxacin in various types of samples. Sens Biosensing Res 39:100547. 10.1016/j.sbsr.2022.100547 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akhter S, Shalauddin Md, Basirun WJ et al (2022) A highly selective bifunctional nanosensor based on nanocellulose and 3D polypyrrole decorated with silver-gold bimetallic alloy to simultaneously detect methotrexate and ciprofloxacin. Sens Actuators B Chem 373:132743. 10.1016/j.snb.2022.132743 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aleksić S, Žgajnar Gotvajn A, Premzl K et al (2021) Ozonation of amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin in model hospital wastewater to increase biotreatability. Antibiotics 10:1407. 10.3390/antibiotics10111407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali SNF, El-Shafey EI, Al-Busafi S, Al-Lawati HAJ (2019) Adsorption of chlorpheniramine and ibuprofen on surface functionalized activated carbons from deionized water and spiked hospital wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 7:102860. 10.1016/j.jece.2018.102860 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ali SK, Alamier WM, Hasan N et al (2023) Synergistic nanomaterials: zinc sulfide-polyaniline for ciprofloxacin electrochemical sensing. Appl Phys A 129:859. 10.1007/s00339-023-07124-9 [Google Scholar]
  6. Alonso JJS, El Kori N, Melián-Martel N, Del Río-Gamero B (2018) Removal of ciprofloxacin from seawater by reverse osmosis. J Environ Manag 217:337–345. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amidi S, Ardakani YH, Amiri-Aref M et al (2017) Sensitive electrochemical determination of rifampicin using gold nanoparticles/poly-melamine nanocomposite. RSC Adv 7:40111–40118. 10.1039/C7RA04865C [Google Scholar]
  8. Amirmahani N, Mahdizadeh H, Malakootian M et al (2020) Evaluating nanoparticles decorated on Fe3O4@SiO2-Schiff base (Fe3O4@SiO2-APTMS-HBA) in adsorption of ciprofloxacin from aqueous environments. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater 30:3540–3551. 10.1007/s10904-020-01499-5 [Google Scholar]
  9. Antonelli R, Malpass GRP, da Silva MGC, Vieira MGA (2020) Adsorption of ciprofloxacin onto thermally modified bentonite clay: experimental design, characterization, and adsorbent regeneration. J Environ Chem Eng 8:104553. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.104553 [Google Scholar]
  10. Arya V, Philip L (2016) Adsorption of pharmaceuticals in water using Fe 3 O 4 coated polymer clay composite. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 232:273–280. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.06.033 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bagheri H, Ranjbari E, Amiri-Aref M et al (2016) Modified fractal iron oxide magnetic nanostructure: a novel and high performance platform for redox protein immobilization, direct electrochemistry and bioelectrocatalysis application. Biosens Bioelectron 85:814–821. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bajpai SK, Bhowmik M (2010) Poly(acrylamide-co-itaconic acid) as a potential ion-exchange sorbent for effective removal of antibiotic drug-ciprofloxacin from aqueous solution. J Macromol Sci Part A 48:108–118. 10.1080/10601325.2011.534718 [Google Scholar]
  13. Barik R, Ingole PP (2020) Challenges and prospects of metal sulfide materials for supercapacitors. Curr Opin Electrochem 21:327–334. 10.1016/j.coelec.2020.03.022 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee D, Dey S et al (2019) Development and performance evaluation of a novel CuO/TiO2 ceramic ultrafiltration membrane for ciprofloxacin removal. Mater Chem Phys 229:106–116. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.02.094 [Google Scholar]
  15. Booth A, Aga DS, Wester AL (2020) Retrospective analysis of the global antibiotic residues that exceed the predicted no effect concentration for antimicrobial resistance in various environmental matrices. Environ Int 141:105796. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Burç M, Güngör Ö, Titretir Duran S (2023) High-sensitivity electrochemical sensor using no nanomaterials for the detection of ciprofloxacin with poly 2-(hydroxymethyl)thiophene-modified glassy carbon electrode. Polym Bull. 10.1007/s00289-023-04995-z [Google Scholar]
  17. Cardoso AR, Carneiro LPT, Cabral-Miranda G et al (2021) Employing bacteria machinery for antibiotic detection: using DNA gyrase for ciprofloxacin detection. Chem Eng J 409:128135. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128135 [Google Scholar]
  18. Chaabani A, Ben Jabrallah T, Belhadj Tahar N (2022) Electrochemical oxidation of ciprofloxacin on COOH-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube–coated vitreous carbon electrode. Electrocatalysis 13:402–413. 10.1007/s12678-022-00725-7 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chandrasekaran A, Patra C, Narayanasamy S, Subbiah S (2020) Adsorptive removal of ciprofloxacin and amoxicillin from single and binary aqueous systems using acid-activated carbon from Prosopis juliflora. Environ Res 188:109825. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chaudhary N, Yadav AK, Sharma JG, Solanki PR (2021) Designing and characterization of a highly sensitive and selective biosensing platform for ciprofloxacin detection utilizing lanthanum oxide nanoparticles. J Environ Chem Eng 9:106771. 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106771 [Google Scholar]
  21. Chaudhary N, Yadav AK, Verma D et al (2024) An electrochemical immunosensor based on a nanostructured lanthanum oxide-substituted reduced graphene oxide interface for ultralow ciprofloxacin detection in milk samples. Mater Adv. 10.1039/D3MA00556A [Google Scholar]
  22. Chauhan R, Gill AAS, Nate Z, Karpoormath R (2020) Highly selective electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin using reduced graphene oxide/poly(phenol red) modified glassy carbon electrode. J Electroanal Chem 871:114254. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114254 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chen F, Yang Q, Wang Y et al (2018) Efficient construction of bismuth vanadate-based Z-scheme photocatalyst for simultaneous Cr(VI) reduction and ciprofloxacin oxidation under visible light: kinetics, degradation pathways and mechanism. Chem Eng J 348:157–170. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.170 [Google Scholar]
  24. Chhowalla M, Shin HS, Eda G, et al (2013) The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat Chem 5:263–275. 10.1038/nchem.1589 [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Chomthong K, Kunpatee K, Pimpitak U et al (2024) Label-free simultaneous detection of quinolone antibiotic residues using an origami paper–based electrochemical immunosensor. Sens Actuators B Chem 410:135667. 10.1016/j.snb.2024.135667 [Google Scholar]
  26. Chuaicham C, Sekar K, Xiong Y et al (2021) Single-step synthesis of oxygen-doped hollow porous graphitic carbon nitride for photocatalytic ciprofloxacin decomposition. Chem Eng J 425:130502. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130502 [Google Scholar]
  27. Chullasat K, Nurerk P, Kanatharana P et al (2018) A facile optosensing protocol based on molecularly imprinted polymer coated on CdTe quantum dots for highly sensitive and selective amoxicillin detection. Sens Actuators B Chem 254:255–263. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.07.062 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cinti S, Arduini F (2017) Graphene-based screen-printed electrochemical (bio)sensors and their applications: efforts and criticisms. Biosens Bioelectron 89:107–122. 10.1016/j.bios.2016.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cotta MA (2020) Quantum dots and their applications: what lies ahead? ACS Appl Nano Mater 3:4920–4924. 10.1021/acsanm.0c01386 [Google Scholar]
  30. Dakošová O, Melníková E, Naumowicz M et al (2023) Direct electrochemical determination of environmentally harmful pharmaceutical ciprofloxacin in 3D printed flow-through cell. Chemosphere 313:137517. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Das S, Barui A, Adak A (2020) Montmorillonite impregnated electrospun cellulose acetate nanofiber sorptive membrane for ciprofloxacin removal from wastewater. J Water Process Eng 37:101497. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101497 [Google Scholar]
  32. de Souza CC, Alves GF, Lisboa TP et al (2022) Low-cost paper-based electrochemical sensor for the detection of ciprofloxacin in honey and milk samples. J Food Compos Anal 112:104700. 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104700 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ding Q, Lam FLY, Hu X (2019) Complete degradation of ciprofloxacin over g-C3N4-iron oxide composite via heterogeneous dark Fenton reaction. J Environ Manag 244:23–32. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. dos Santos Soldan ME, Lied EB, Costa Junior IL et al (2023) Optimizing ciprofloxacin removal using ion exchange resin: exploring operational parameters and assessing toxicity. Chem Eng Sci 282:119317. 10.1016/j.ces.2023.119317 [Google Scholar]
  35. Dreyer V, Mandal A, Dev P et al (2022) High fluoroquinolone resistance proportions among multidrug-resistant tuberculosis driven by dominant L2 Mycobacterium tuberculosis clones in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region. Genome Med 14:95. 10.1186/s13073-022-01076-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. El-Kemary M, El-Shamy H, El-Mehasseb I (2010) Photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin drug in water using ZnO nanoparticles. J Lumin 130:2327–2331. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.07.013 [Google Scholar]
  37. Ensafi AA, Taei M, Khayamian T, Hasanpour F (2010) Simultaneous voltammetric determination of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin in urine and plasma using multiwall carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode by least-squares support vector machines. Anal Sci 26:803–808. 10.2116/analsci.26.803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ensafi AA, Allafchian AR, Mohammadzadeh R (2012) Characterization of MgFe2O4 nanoparticles as a novel electrochemical sensor: application for the voltammetric determination of ciprofloxacin. Anal Sci 28:705–710. 10.2116/analsci.28.705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Eskandari M, Goudarzi N, Moussavi SG (2018) Application of low-voltage UVC light and synthetic ZnO nanoparticles to photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin in aqueous sample solutions. Water Environ J 32:58–66. 10.1111/wej.12291 [Google Scholar]
  40. Fan H, Ma Y, Wan J, et al (2020) Adsorption properties and mechanisms of novel biomaterials from banyan aerial roots via simple modification for ciprofloxacin removal. Science of The Total Environment 708:134630. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134630 [DOI] [PubMed]
  41. Fang X, Chen X, Liu Y et al (2019) Nanocomposites of Zr(IV)-based metal–organic frameworks and reduced graphene oxide for electrochemically sensing ciprofloxacin in water. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2:2367–2376. 10.1021/acsanm.9b00243 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gad-Allah TA, Ali MEM, Badawy MI (2011) Photocatalytic oxidation of ciprofloxacin under simulated sunlight. J Hazard Mater 186:751–755. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gangar T, Patra S (2023) Antibiotic persistence and its impact on the environment. 3 Biotech 13:401. 10.1007/s13205-023-03806-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gao N, Liu C-X, Xu Q-M et al (2018) Simultaneous removal of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, sulfamethoxazole by co-producing oxidative enzymes system of Phanerochaete chrysosporium and Pycnoporus sanguineus. Chemosphere 195:146–155. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Garrido JMPJ, Melle-Franco M, Strutyński K et al (2017) β–Cyclodextrin carbon nanotube-enhanced sensor for ciprofloxacin detection. J Environ Sci Health Part A 52:313–319. 10.1080/10934529.2016.1258864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gayen P, Chaplin BP (2016) Selective electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin with a porous nafion/multiwalled carbon nanotube composite film electrode. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:1615–1626. 10.1021/acsami.5b07337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Hosseini A, Sohouli E, Gholami M et al (2019) Electrochemical determination of ciprofloxacin using glassy carbon electrode modified with CoFe 2 O 4 -MWCNT. pp 996–1008
  48. Giménez-Marqués M, Hidalgo T, Serre C, Horcajada P (2016) Nanostructured metal–organic frameworks and their bio-related applications. Coord Chem Rev 307:342–360. 10.1016/j.ccr.2015.08.008 [Google Scholar]
  49. Girardi C, Greve J, Lamshöft M et al (2011) Biodegradation of ciprofloxacin in water and soil and its effects on the microbial communities. J Hazard Mater 198:22–30. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Giroud F, Gorgy K, Gondran C et al (2009) Impedimetric immunosensor based on a polypyrrole−antibiotic model film for the label-free picomolar detection of ciprofloxacin. Anal Chem 81:8405–8409. 10.1021/ac901290m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gissawong N, Srijaranai S, Boonchiangma S et al (2021) An electrochemical sensor for voltammetric detection of ciprofloxacin using a glassy carbon electrode modified with activated carbon, gold nanoparticles and supramolecular solvent. Microchim Acta 188:208. 10.1007/s00604-021-04869-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gui R, Bu X, He W, Jin H (2018) Ratiometric fluorescence, solution-phase and filter-paper visualization detection of ciprofloxacin based on dual-emitting carbon dot/silicon dot hybrids. New J Chem 42:16217–16225. 10.1039/C8NJ03788D [Google Scholar]
  53. Hatamluyi B, Modarres Zahed F, Es’haghi Z, Darroudi M (2020) Carbon quantum dots co-catalyzed with ZnO nanoflowers and poly (CTAB) nanosensor for simultaneous sensitive detection of paracetamol and ciprofloxacin in biological samples. Electroanalysis 32:1818–1827. 10.1002/elan.201900412 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hong C-C, Wang C-Y, Peng K-T, Chu I-M (2011) A microfluidic chip platform with electrochemical carbon nanotube electrodes for pre-clinical evaluation of antibiotics nanocapsules. Biosens Bioelectron 26:3620–3626. 10.1016/j.bios.2011.02.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hu X, Goud KY, Kumar VS et al (2018) Disposable electrochemical aptasensor based on carbon nanotubes- V2O5-chitosan nanocomposite for detection of ciprofloxacin. Sens Actuators B Chem 268:278–286. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.03.155 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hu S, Wei Y, Wang J, Yu Y (2021) A photo-renewable ZIF-8 photo-electrochemical sensor for the sensitive detection of sulfamethoxazole antibiotic. Anal Chim Acta 1178:338793. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Imam SS, Adnan R, Kaus NHM (2018) Influence of yttrium doping on the photocatalytic activity of bismuth oxybromide for ciprofloxacin degradation using indoor fluorescent light illumination. Res Chem Intermed 44:5357–5376. 10.1007/s11164-018-3427-8 [Google Scholar]
  58. Ionescu RE, Jaffrezic-Renault N, Bouffier L et al (2007) Impedimetric immunosensor for the specific label free detection of ciprofloxacin antibiotic. Biosens Bioelectron 23:549–555. 10.1016/j.bios.2007.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Jalal NR, Madrakian T, Afkhami A, Ghamsari M (2019) Polyethylenimine@Fe3O4@carbon nanotubes nanocomposite as a modifier in glassy carbon electrode for sensitive determination of ciprofloxacin in biological samples. J Electroanal Chem 833:281–289. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.12.004 [Google Scholar]
  60. Jamal F, Rafique A, Moeen S et al (2023) Review of metal sulfide nanostructures and their applications. ACS Appl Nano Mater 6:7077–7106. 10.1021/acsanm.3c00417 [Google Scholar]
  61. Karadurmus L, Ozcelikay G, Vural S, Ozkan SA (2021) An overview on quantum dot-based nanocomposites for electrochemical sensing on pharmaceutical assay. Iran J Pharm Res 20:187–203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Katz E, Willner I, Wang J (2004) Electroanalytical and bioelectroanalytical systems based on metal and semiconductor nanoparticles. Electroanalysis 16:19–44. 10.1002/elan.200302930 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kempahanumakkagari S, Vellingiri K, Deep A et al (2018) Metal–organic framework composites as electrocatalysts for electrochemical sensing applications. Coord Chem Rev 357:105–129. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.11.028 [Google Scholar]
  64. Khanmohammadi A, Jalili Ghazizadeh A, Hashemi P et al (2020) An overview to electrochemical biosensors and sensors for the detection of environmental contaminants. J Iran Chem Soc 17:2429–2447. 10.1007/s13738-020-01940-z [Google Scholar]
  65. Khoshsafar H, Bagheri H, Rezaei M et al (2016) Magnetic carbon paste electrode modified with a high performance composite based on molecularly imprinted carbon nanotubes for sensitive determination of levofloxacin. J Electrochem Soc 163:B422–B427. 10.1149/2.0681608jes [Google Scholar]
  66. Kim YS, Niazi JH, Gu MB (2009) Specific detection of oxytetracycline using DNA aptamer-immobilized interdigitated array electrode chip. Anal Chim Acta 634:250–254. 10.1016/j.aca.2008.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kitamura RSA, Brito JCM, Silva de Assis HC, Gomes MP (2023) Physiological responses and phytoremediation capacity of floating and submerged aquatic macrophytes exposed to ciprofloxacin. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:622–639. 10.1007/s11356-022-22253-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kulkarni P, Nataraj SK, Balakrishna RG et al (2017) Nanostructured binary and ternary metal sulfides: synthesis methods and their application in energy conversion and storage devices. J Mater Chem A 5:22040–22094. 10.1039/C7TA07329A [Google Scholar]
  69. Kumar A, Patra C, Kumar S, Narayanasamy S (2022a) Effect of magnetization on the adsorptive removal of an emerging contaminant ciprofloxacin by magnetic acid activated carbon. Environ Res 206:112604. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kumar V, Bansal V, Madhavan A et al (2022b) Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) chemicals: a critical review of current biotechnological approaches. Bioengineered 13:4309–4327. 10.1080/21655979.2022.2031412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kutuzova A, Dontsova T, Kwapinski W (2021) Application of TiO2-based photocatalysts to antibiotics degradation: cases of sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin. Catalysts 11:728. 10.3390/catal11060728 [Google Scholar]
  72. Lai C-H, Lu M-Y, Chen L-J (2012) Metal sulfide nanostructures: synthesis, properties and applications in energy conversion and storage. J Mater Chem 22:19–30. 10.1039/C1JM13879K [Google Scholar]
  73. Laxminarayan R, Chaudhury RR (2016) Antibiotic resistance in India: drivers and opportunities for action. PLoS Med 13:e1001974. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Li Q, Li H, Zong X et al (2024) Highly efficient adsorption of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions by waste cation exchange resin-based activated carbons: performance, mechanism, and theoretical calculation. Sci Total Environ 912:169534. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lim SA, Ahmed MU (2016) A simple DNA-based electrochemical biosensor for highly sensitive detection of ciprofloxacin using disposable graphene. Anal Sci 32:687–693. 10.2116/analsci.32.687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Lima VB, Goulart LA, Rocha RS et al (2020) Degradation of antibiotic ciprofloxacin by different AOP systems using electrochemically generated hydrogen peroxide. Chemosphere 247:125807. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lipman NS, Jackson LR, Trudel LJ, Weis-Garcia F (2005) Monoclonal versus polyclonal antibodies: distinguishing characteristics, applications, and information resources. ILAR J 46:258–268. 10.1093/ilar.46.3.258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Liu Z, Wan J, Yan Z et al (2022) Efficient removal of ciprofloxacin by heterogeneous electro-Fenton using natural air–cathode. Chem Eng J 433:133767. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133767 [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu R, Zhang C, Wu T et al (2024) Fabrication of a novel HKUST-1/CoFe2O4/g-C3N4 electrode for the electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin in physiological samples. Talanta 273:125882. 10.1016/j.talanta.2024.125882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Lv L, Zhang B, Tian P et al (2022) A “signal off” aptasensor based on AuNPs/Ni-MOF substrate-free catalyzed for detection enrofloxacin. J Electroanal Chem 911:116251. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116251 [Google Scholar]
  81. Mahapatra A, Patro ARK, Khajuria A et al (2022) Ciprofloxacin-resistant Gram-negative isolates from a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India with novel gyrA and parC gene mutations. Med J Armed Forces India 78:24–31. 10.1016/j.mjafi.2019.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Mahmoudpour M, Kholafazad-kordasht H, Nazhad Dolatabadi JE et al (2021) Sensitive aptasensing of ciprofloxacin residues in raw milk samples using reduced graphene oxide and nanogold-functionalized poly(amidoamine) dendrimer: an innovative apta-platform towards electroanalysis of antibiotics. Anal Chim Acta 1174:338736. 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Majdinasab M, Mishra RK, Tang X, Marty JL (2020) Detection of antibiotics in food: new achievements in the development of biosensors. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem 127:115883. 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115883 [Google Scholar]
  84. Mao H, Wang S, Lin J-Y et al (2016) Modification of a magnetic carbon composite for ciprofloxacin adsorption. J Environ Sci 49:179–188. 10.1016/j.jes.2016.05.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Marchesini GR, Haasnoot W, Delahaut P et al (2007) Dual biosensor immunoassay-directed identification of fluoroquinolones in chicken muscle by liquid chromatography electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 586:259–268. 10.1016/j.aca.2006.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Mariappan K, Alagarsamy S, Chen S-M, Sakthinathan S (2023) Fabrication of ZnWO4/carbon black nanocomposites modified glassy carbon electrode for enhanced electrochemical determination of ciprofloxacin in environmental water samples. Materials 16:741. 10.3390/ma16020741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Martin Santos A, Wong A, Araújo Almeida A, Fatibello-Filho O (2017) Simultaneous determination of paracetamol and ciprofloxacin in biological fluid samples using a glassy carbon electrode modified with graphene oxide and nickel oxide nanoparticles. Talanta 174:610–618. 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.06.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Matsunaga T, Kondo T, Osasa T et al (2020) Sensitive electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin at screen-printed diamond electrodes. Carbon N Y 159:247–254. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.12.051 [Google Scholar]
  89. Miyazaki CM, Joshi N, Oliveira ON, Shimizu FM (2021) Metal oxides and sulfide-based biosensors for monitoring and health control. Metal, metal-oxides and metal sulfides for batteries, fuel cells, solar cells, photocatalysis and health sensors. pp 169–208. 10.1007/978-3-030-63791-0_6
  90. Mohanty S, Sharma M, Kumar A, Krishnan V (2023) Hot electron-mediated photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin using Au-decorated SrTiO 3 - and Ti 3 C 2 MXene-based interfacial heterostructure nanoarchitectonics. J Phys Chem C 127:17711–17722. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c03573 [Google Scholar]
  91. Murugappan K, Sundaramoorthy U, Damry AM et al (2022) Electrodetection of small molecules by conformation-mediated signal enhancement. JACS Au 2:2481–2490. 10.1021/jacsau.2c00291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Nag P, Sadani K, Mukherji S, Mukherji S (2024a) In-situ synthesis of plasmonic core MIPs on u bend optical fibers for LSPR sensing of small molecule contaminants in food and environment: An illustration with Bisphenol A. IEEE Sensors Journal
  93. Nag P, Sadani K, Pisharody L, Thian XY, Ratnakar TS, Ansari A, Mukherji S, Mukherji S (2024b) Essential oil mediated synthesis and application of highly stable copper nanoparticles as  coatings on textiles and surfaces for rapid and sustained disinfection of microorganisms. Nanotechnology 35(34). 10.1088/1361-6528/ad501b [DOI] [PubMed]
  94. Nayak A, Karkare VP, Sadani K, Dasari H, Sivasamy A, Sundarabal N (2024) Asphaltene-derived nanocomposites for the removal of emerging pollutants and its antimicrobial effects: batch and continuous column studies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 10.1007/s11356-024-33049-8 [DOI] [PubMed]
  95. Nemati Sani O, Navaei fezabady AA, Yazdani M, Taghavi M (2019) Catalytic ozonation of ciprofloxacin using γ-Al2O3 nanoparticles in synthetic and real wastewaters. J Water Process Eng 32:100894. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100894 [Google Scholar]
  96. Nilghaz A, Lu X (2019) Detection of antibiotic residues in pork using paper-based microfluidic device coupled with filtration and concentration. Anal Chim Acta 1046:163–169. 10.1016/j.aca.2018.09.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Nolli ML, Parenti G (1991) Antibodies against the antibiotics: an overview. Ann Ist Super Sanita 27:149–154 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Osman NSE, Thapliyal N, Alwan WS et al (2015) Synthesis and characterization of Ba0.5Co0.5Fe2O4 nanoparticle ferrites: application as electrochemical sensor for ciprofloxacin. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 26:5097–5105. 10.1007/s10854-015-3036-x [Google Scholar]
  99. Palacio DA, Rivas BL, Urbano BF (2018) Ultrafiltration membranes with three water-soluble polyelectrolyte copolymers to remove ciprofloxacin from aqueous systems. Chem Eng J 351:85–93. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.099 [Google Scholar]
  100. Palacio DA, Becerra Y, Urbano BF, Rivas BL (2020) Antibiotics removal using a chitosan-based polyelectrolyte in conjunction with ultrafiltration membranes. Chemosphere 258:127416. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127416 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Pan M, Guo P, Liu H et al (2021) Graphene oxide modified screen-printed electrode for highly sensitive and selective electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin residues in milk. J Anal Sci Technol 12:55. 10.1186/s40543-021-00309-y [Google Scholar]
  102. Panhotra BR, Saxena AK, Al-Ghamdi AMA-A (2004) Emerging nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella isolated from patients having acute diarrhoeal disease. Ann Saudi Med 24:270–272. 10.5144/0256-4947.2004.270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Patel P, Wermuth PH, Calhoun C, Hall GA (2024) Antibiotics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK535443/ [PubMed]
  104. Patra C, Narayanasamy S (2022) Polypyrrole complexation on biomass-derived powdered carbon for adsorptive elimination of emerging pharmaceutical contaminant sulfamethoxazole: a comprehensive insight. J Clean Prod 370:133565. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133565 [Google Scholar]
  105. Pham TSH, Mahon PJ, Lai G, Yu A (2018) Reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite modified electrodes for sensitive detection of ciprofloxacin. Electroanalysis 30:2185–2194. 10.1002/elan.201700738 [Google Scholar]
  106. Pinacho D, Sánchez-Baeza F, Pividori M-I, Marco M-P (2014) Electrochemical detection of fluoroquinolone antibiotics in milk using a magneto immunosensor. Sensors 14:15965–15980. 10.3390/s140915965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Pollap A, Baran K, Kuszewska N, Kochana J (2020) Electrochemical sensing of ciprofloxacin and paracetamol in environmental water using titanium sol based sensor. J Electroanal Chem 878:114574. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114574 [Google Scholar]
  108. Reddy KR, Brahman PK, Suresh L (2018) Fabrication of high performance disposable screen printed electrochemical sensor for ciprofloxacin sensing in biological samples. Measurement 127:175–186. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.078 [Google Scholar]
  109. Rosas-Ramírez JR, Orozco-Hernández JM, Elizalde-Velázquez GA et al (2022) Teratogenic effects induced by paracetamol, ciprofloxacin, and their mixture on Danio rerio embryos: Oxidative stress implications. Sci Total Environ 806:150541. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Roushani M, Ghanbari K, Jafar Hoseini S (2018) Designing an electrochemical aptasensor based on immobilization of the aptamer onto nanocomposite for detection of the streptomycin antibiotic. Microchem J 141:96–103. 10.1016/j.microc.2018.05.016 [Google Scholar]
  111. Rowe AA, Miller EA, Plaxco KW (2010) Reagentless Measurement of Aminoglycoside Antibiotics in Blood Serum via an Electrochemical, Ribonucleic Acid Aptamer-Based Biosensor. Anal Chem 82:7090–7095. 10.1021/ac101491d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Sabeti M, Ensafi AA, Mousaabadi KZ, Rezaei B (2021) A selective electrochemical sensor based on a modified-glassy carbon electrode using f-MWCNTs-polydopamine for ciprofloxacin detection. IEEE Sens J 21:19714–19721. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3100251 [Google Scholar]
  113. Sadani K, Bandyopadhyay R, Nag P (2017) Developing nanostructured, cadmium doped zinc oxide methanol sensor. Materials Today: Proceedings 4(9):9631–9634
  114. Sadani K, Muthuraj L, Nag P, Fernandes M, Kondabagil K, Mukhopadhyay C, Mukherji S (2020) A point of use sensor assay for detecting purely viral versus viral-bacterial samples. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 322:128562. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128562
  115. Saeb E, Asadpour-Zeynali K (2022) Enhanced electrocatalytic reduction activity of Fe-MOF/Pt nanoparticles as a sensitive sensor for ultra-trace determination of tinidazole. Microchem J 172:106976. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106976 [Google Scholar]
  116. Santhiyagu Sahayaraj RS, Sundaresan R, Chen S-M et al (2023) An efficient electrochemical sensor based on transition metal sulfides for the detection of flufenamic acid. Chem Inorg Mater 1:100006. 10.1016/j.cinorg.2023.100006 [Google Scholar]
  117. Sawkar RR, Shanbhag MM, Tuwar SM et al (2022) Sodium dodecyl sulfate–mediated graphene sensor for electrochemical detection of the antibiotic drug: ciprofloxacin. Materials 15:7872. 10.3390/ma15227872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Shalauddin M, Akhter S, Jeffrey Basirun W et al (2022) A metal free nanosensor based on nanocellulose-polypyrrole matrix and single-walled carbon nanotube: experimental study and electroanalytical application for determination of paracetamol and ciprofloxacin. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 18:100691. 10.1016/j.enmm.2022.100691 [Google Scholar]
  119. Shan J, Li R, Yan K et al (2016) In situ anodic stripping of Cd(II) from CdS quantum dots for electrochemical sensing of ciprofloxacin. Sens Actuators B Chem 237:75–80. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.06.066 [Google Scholar]
  120. Shao B, Liu Z, Zeng G et al (2019) Immobilization of laccase on hollow mesoporous carbon nanospheres: noteworthy immobilization, excellent stability and efficacious for antibiotic contaminants removal. J Hazard Mater 362:318–326. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.08.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Shen B, Wen X, Korshin GV (2018) Electrochemical oxidation of ciprofloxacin in two different processes: the electron transfer process on the anode surface and the indirect oxidation process in bulk solutions. Environ Sci Process Impacts 20:943–955. 10.1039/C8EM00122G [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Shi S, Cao G, Chen Y et al (2023) Facile synthesis of core-shell Co-MOF with hierarchical porosity for enhanced electrochemical detection of furaltadone in aquaculture water. Anal Chim Acta 1263:341296. 10.1016/j.aca.2023.341296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Singh SK, Khajuria R, Kaur L (2017) Biodegradation of ciprofloxacin by white rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus. 3 Biotech 7:69. 10.1007/s13205-017-0684-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Sodhi KK, Kumar M, Dhaulaniya AS et al (2021) Enhanced ciprofloxacin removal by plant growth-promoting Microbacterium sp. WHC1 in presence of Eichhornia crassipes root exudates. Environ Sustain 4:143–153. 10.1007/s42398-020-00153-7 [Google Scholar]
  125. Song Y, Zeng Y, Jiang T et al (2022) Efficient removal of ciprofloxacin from contaminated water via polystyrene anion exchange resin with nanoconfined zero-valent iron. Nanomaterials 13:116. 10.3390/nano13010116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Sui M, Xing S, Sheng L et al (2012) Heterogeneous catalytic ozonation of ciprofloxacin in water with carbon nanotube supported manganese oxides as catalyst. J Hazard Mater 227–228:227–236. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Surya SG, Khatoon S, Ait Lahcen A et al (2020) A chitosan gold nanoparticles molecularly imprinted polymer based ciprofloxacin sensor. RSC Adv 10:12823–12832. 10.1039/D0RA01838D [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Tajik S, Beitollahi H, Zaeimbashi R et al (2021) An electrochemical sensor based on V2O5 nanoparticles for the detection of ciprofloxacin. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 32:17558–17567. 10.1007/s10854-021-06288-5 [Google Scholar]
  129. Tran QT, Do TH, Ha XL et al (2022) Study of the ciprofloxacin adsorption of activated carbon prepared from mangosteen peel. Appl Sci 12:8770. 10.3390/app12178770 [Google Scholar]
  130. Van Thuan D, Nguyen TBH, Pham TH et al (2022) Photodegradation of ciprofloxacin antibiotic in water by using ZnO-doped g-C3N4 photocatalyst. Chemosphere 308:136408. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Varsha MV, Nageswaran G (2023) Ruthenium doped Cu-MOF as an efficient sensing platform for the voltammetric detection of ciprofloxacin. Microchem J 188:108481. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.108481 [Google Scholar]
  132. Wang H-S (2017) Metal–organic frameworks for biosensing and bioimaging applications. Coord Chem Rev 349:139–155. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.08.015 [Google Scholar]
  133. Wang F, Hu S (2009) Electrochemical sensors based on metal and semiconductor nanoparticles. Microchim Acta 165:1–22. 10.1007/s00604-009-0136-4 [Google Scholar]
  134. Wang C-J, Li Z, Jiang W-T et al (2010a) Cation exchange interaction between antibiotic ciprofloxacin and montmorillonite. J Hazard Mater 183:309–314. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Wang J, Li S, Zhang Y (2010b) A sensitive DNA biosensor fabricated from gold nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, and zinc oxide nanowires on a glassy carbon electrode. Electrochim Acta 55:4436–4440. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.078 [Google Scholar]
  136. Wang F, Zhang Y, Ming H et al (2020) Degradation of the ciprofloxacin antibiotic by photo-Fenton reaction using a Nafion/iron membrane: role of hydroxyl radicals. Environ Chem Lett 18:1745–1752. 10.1007/s10311-020-01018-5 [Google Scholar]
  137. Wang Y, Ning W, Han M et al (2023) Algae-mediated bioremediation of ciprofloxacin through a symbiotic microalgae-bacteria consortium. Algal Res 71:103062. 10.1016/j.algal.2023.103062 [Google Scholar]
  138. Weng X, Huang J, Ye H et al (2022) A high-performance electrochemical sensor for sensitive detection of tetracycline based on a Zr-UiO-66/MWCNTs/AuNPs composite electrode. Anal Methods 14:3000–3010. 10.1039/D2AY00702A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Wong A, Santos AM, Silva TA et al (2023) Sensitive and selective voltammetric determination of ciprofloxacin using screen‐printed electrodes modified with carbon black and magnetic‐molecularly imprinted polymer. Electroanalysis 35. 10.1002/elan.202200165
  140. Xie A-J, Chen Y, Luo S-P et al (2015) Electrochemical detection of ciprofloxacin based on graphene modified glassy carbon electrode. Mater Technol 30:362–367. 10.1179/1753555715Y.0000000011 [Google Scholar]
  141. Xiong Y, Zhang D, Ye C et al (2023) Ultra-sensitive detection of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride in milk by molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor based on S-CoFe-MOFs/AuNPs. J Food Compos Anal 122:105439. 10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105439 [Google Scholar]
  142. Xu Q-C, Zhang Q-Q, Sun X et al (2016) Aptasensors modified by antimony tin oxide nanoparticle-chitosan based on interdigitated array microelectrodes for tetracycline detection. RSC Adv 6:17328–17335. 10.1039/C5RA25922C [Google Scholar]
  143. Yang M, Chen Y, Yan P et al (2021) A photoelectrochemical aptasensor of ciprofloxacin based on Bi24O31Cl10/BiOCl heterojunction. Microchim Acta 188:289. 10.1007/s00604-021-04952-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Yang Y, Wang R, Zhou J, Qiao S (2024) Removal of ofloxacin using a porous carbon microfiltration membrane based on in-situ generated •OH. Environ Res 244:117837. 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117837 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Yu F, Sun S, Han S et al (2016) Adsorption removal of ciprofloxacin by multi-walled carbon nanotubes with different oxygen contents from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng J 285:588–595. 10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.039 [Google Scholar]
  146. Yu X, Zhang J, Zhang J et al (2019) Photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin using Zn-doped Cu2O particles: analysis of degradation pathways and intermediates. Chem Eng J 374:316–327. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.05.177 [Google Scholar]
  147. Yuan Y, Zhang F, Wang H et al (2018) A sensor based on Au nanoparticles/carbon nitride/graphene composites for the detection of chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin. ECS J Solid State Sci Technol 7:M201–M208. 10.1149/2.0111812jss [Google Scholar]
  148. Zaviska F, Drogui P, Grasmick A et al (2013) Nanofiltration membrane bioreactor for removing pharmaceutical compounds. J Memb Sci 429:121–129. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.11.022 [Google Scholar]
  149. Zhang X, Wei Y, Ding Y (2014) Electrocatalytic oxidation and voltammetric determination of ciprofloxacin employing poly(alizarin red)/graphene composite film in the presence of ascorbic acid, uric acid and dopamine. Anal Chim Acta 835:29–36. 10.1016/j.aca.2014.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Zhang S, Yu S, Wang X et al (2023) An electrochemical sensor based on MnO2/ZnO composites for the detection of ciprofloxacin in honey. Microchem J 194:109355. 10.1016/j.microc.2023.109355 [Google Scholar]
  151. Zhao S, Zhang Y, Zhou Y et al (2017) Ionic liquid-assisted photochemical synthesis of ZnO/Ag2O heterostructures with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 410:344–353. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.051 [Google Scholar]
  152. Zhu Q-L, Xu Q (2014) Metal–organic framework composites. Chem Soc Rev 43:5468–5512. 10.1039/C3CS60472A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Zhu Q-Q, Zhang W-W, Zhang H-W et al (2020) Elaborately manufacturing an electrochemical aptasensor based on gold nanoparticle/COF composites for amplified detection performance. J Mater Chem C Mater 8:16984–16991. 10.1039/D0TC04202A [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All the required data are provided in the manuscript and supplementary information.


Articles from Environmental Science and Pollution Research International are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES