Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0318026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318026

Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis in Polygonatum

Xiaolin Wan 1,2,#, Qiang Xiao 1,2,*,#
Editor: Dan Gao3
PMCID: PMC12140110  PMID: 39888911

Abstract

A noteworthy group of culinary and medicinal plants is Polygonatum species. They are known for their abundant flavonoid compound-rich rhizomes, which have antioxidative and anticancer activities. Using Polygonatum sibiricum Red (SXHZ) and Polygonatum kingianum var. grandifolium (HBES), we conducted transcriptome and metabolomic investigations to look into the molecular processes that control the manufacture of these flavonoids in Polygonatum plants. Seven distinct flavonoid metabolites were identified by the analytical data, with phloretin exhibiting a notable differential expression in the biosynthetic pathway. 30 genes with differential expression were found in both plants after further investigation, five of which are members of the transcription factor family associated with MBW. Thus, we suggest that Phloretin and the genes belonging to the MYB-related transcription factor family play a crucial role in controlling the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in Polygonatum. This work lays the groundwork for a deeper comprehension of the biosynthesis and metabolic processes of flavonoids in Polygonatum, serving as an invaluable resource for the development of the polygonatum-related pharmaceutical industries as well as for the future breeding of Polygonatum plants with higher flavonoid content.

Introduction

Polygonatum plants are medicinal perennial herbs of the lily family, primarily grown in the understory [1, 2]. In traditional Chinese medicine, the dried rhizome of Polygonatum is widely used to treat influenza, dizziness, cough, diabetes, indigestion, loss of appetite, back pain, and respiratory diseases [3, 4]. Polygonatum contains various active components, such as polysaccharides, steroid saponins, flavonoids, triterpene saponins, lignin, alkaloids, fatty acids, and coumarins [5]. Among these, the flavonoid content in Polygonatum is rich and has significant medicinal value [6]. Pharmacological studies have shown that the flavonoids in Polygonatum possess various beneficial effects, including anticancer [7], antioxidant [8], anti-atherosclerosis [9], antibacterial [10], hypoglycemic, and anti-hyperlipidemic activities [11]. Additionally, studies indicate that Polygonatum sibiricum Red (SXHZ) rhizomes are fiber-free and can be consumed directly. Polygonatum kingianum var. grandifolium (HBES), a variant of Polygonatum kingianum Coll.et Hemsl exhibits high biological yield and strong adaptability [12]. However, research on the differences in synthesizing secondary metabolites between these two rhizomes still needs to be completed. Therefore, investigating the regulatory mechanisms of flavonoid synthesis in both types of Polygonatum is of significant theoretical and practical value for cultivating varieties with high flavonoid content.

Transcription factors (TFs) are essential in regulating gene expression, influencing the expression levels of specific genes by promoting or inhibiting their transcription [13]. Internal and external cellular environments regulate their activity and selective binding. This regulatory mechanism is crucial in various biological processes, such as cell differentiation, development, and stress responses [14]. Studies have shown that transcription factors play a regulatory role in the biosynthesis of flavonoids, which may be mediated by one or more TFs or achieved through specific TF complexes such as the MYB-bHLH-WD40 complex [15]. For example, HuWRKY40, a WRKY transcription factor family member, can promote flavonoid synthesis and improve the fruit quality of Hylocereus undatus during storage [16]. In Erigeron breviscapus, it has been found that the R2R3-MYB family member EbMYBP1 can directly bind to the promoters of flavonoid-related genes such as FLS, F3H, CHS, and CHI, thereby activating their transcription and promoting the biosynthesis of flavonoids [17]. In addition to transcription factors, enzymes also play essential roles in synthesizing flavonoids. For example, chalcone synthase (CHS) can direct significant carbon fluxes for flavonoid biosynthesis and catalyze downstream enzymatic reactions to generate a wide range of flavonoids [18]. Moreover, further enzymatic modifications contribute to flavonoids’ structural and functional diversity [19].

Currently, the biosynthesis of flavonoid compounds in the rhizomes of different Polygonatum species has been explored to some extent. However, the regulatory mechanisms and the specific roles of the involved transcription factor families still need to be better understood. Therefore, enhancing the flavonoid content in Polygonatum rhizomes through genetic modification and cultivating high-flavonoid varieties holds promising application prospects. This study focuses on the rhizomes of HBES and SXHZ as research materials, aiming to explore the transcriptional and metabolic mechanisms in the flavonoid biosynthesis of Polygonatum species. The primary objectives of this research include (i) constructing an mRNA library and identifying related metabolites; (ii) screening differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially expressed metabolites (DEMs) related to flavonoid biosynthesis and metabolism; and (iii) performing correlation analysis between DEGs and DEMs. These findings will deepen the understanding of the molecular and metabolic regulatory mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis and provide valuable insights for the breeding and cultivation of high-quality Polygonatum varieties and their applications in the pharmaceutical industry.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

The test materials consisted of three-year-old rhizomes of Polygonatum kingianum var. grandifolium (HBES) and Polygonatum sibiricum Red (SXHZ). The Polygonatum plants were cultivated at the experimental site of the College of Forestry and Horticulture, Hubei Minzu University. The underlying soil was composed of vermiculite and peat soil in a ratio of 8:1. Each set of Polygonatum rhizome sequencing samples was subjected to three biological replicates. The collected Polygonatum rhizomes were cut into smaller pieces, combined, and placed into sterile centrifuge tubes. They were then rapidly frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at a temperature of -80°C until they were ready to be used.

Metabolite extraction and analysis

The primary system for data acquisition was comprised of ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) (SHIMADZU Nexera X2) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) (Applied Biosystems 4500 QTRAP).

The liquid phase conditions were as follows: (i) The chromatographic column used was an Agilent SB-C18 1.8 μm, with dimensions of 2.1 mm * 100 mm; (ii) The mobile phases consisted of ultrapure water (with an addition of 0.1% formic acid) for phase A and acetonitrile (also with 0.1% formic acid added) for phase B; (iii) The B-phase ratio was initiated at 5% at 0.00 min, then linearly increased to 95% over a duration of 9.00 min, and maintained at this level for 1 min. From 10.00 to 11.10 min, the B-phase ratio was reduced to 5% and equilibrated at this value for 14 min; (iv) The flow rate was set at 0.35 mL/min with column temperature at 40°C and an injection volume of 4 μL. The UPLC-MS/MS was conducted by Metware Biotech Ltd (Wuhan, China). Metabolomics data were garnered in both electrospray ionization negative (ESI-) and positive (ESIIC) modes. The ion spray voltage was set at -4500 V for ESI- and 5500 V for ESIC; the ion source gas I (GSI), gas II (GSII), and curtain gas (CUR) were set to 50, 60, and 25 psi, respectively. The collision-induced ionization parameter was set to high, and the temperature of the electrospray ionization source (ESI) was 550°C. Furthermore, the metabolome data underwent principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA), differential metabolite expression analysis, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis.

RNA extraction and sequencing analysis

Total RNA was extracted from Polygonatum rhizomes using the Plant RNA Kit (200) R6827-02 (OMEGA, USA). The integrity and possible contamination of the RNA were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The purity of RNA was determined using the Qsep400 High-Throughput Nucleic Acid Protein Analysis System (Ginkgo BioWorks, China). The RNA concentration was measured with a Qubit 4.0 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The RNA integrity was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. After RNA quality checks, cDNA libraries were constructed using an automated library construction workstation (MGI Tech, China). Subsequently, sequencing was performed on the Illumina platform. After obtaining clean reads, Trinity [20] was used to splice the clean reads. After splicing was completed, the longest Cluster sequence obtained by hierarchical clustering of Corset [21] was used as the unigene for subsequent analysis.

The sequences of the unigene were analyzed using DIAMOND [22] BLASTX software, and compared with databases including KEGG, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant protein sequences (Nr), Swiss-Prot, Gene Ontology (GO), Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG)/euKaryotic Ortholog Groups (KOG), various new documentation files, and the TrEMBL database. Subsequently, these predicted sequences were compared with the Protein family (Pfam) database using HMMER software, providing annotation information for the unigene. Gene expression levels were assessed using Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million fragments mapped (FPKM) and DEGs were defined.

Gene expression and differential gene analysis

The basic process of gene annotation encompasses protein function annotation, pathway annotation, COG/KOG function annotation, and GO annotation. To annotate individual genes, we utilized the BLASTx program, setting an E-value threshold of 1e-5, in order to compare them with the Nr database, Swiss-Prot database, KEGG database, and COG/KOG database. Subsequently, the TFs are identified by hmmscan comparison using the defined TFs families and rules in the database. A differential gene expression analysis was conducted between two distinct groups using the DESeq2 software. Genes with a false discovery rate (FDR) below 0.05 and a fold change (FC) ≥ 2 were considered as DEGs.

Transcriptome and metabolome association analysis

To identify the critical genes associated with flavonoid synthesis, a comprehensive analysis was undertaken, which involved selecting DEGs and contrasting the differences in flavonoid accumulation between HBES and SXHZ. We used the toolkit in the Rstudio 3.2.2 software to complete the analysis of the relevant data and plot the graphs.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT–PCR) validation

To verify the accuracy of the transcriptome data, we randomly selected 20 gene sequences for primer design and performed qRT-PCR analysis. We extracted RNA using ComWin Biotech (Beijing, China) Plant All-in-One RNA Extraction Kit, and reverse transcribed RNA into cDNA using RTIII All-in-One Mix with dsDNase Reverse Transcription Kit from Monad Biotech (Wuhan, China). primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Sangon, Shanghai, China). The experiment was conducted using an ABI7500 real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR apparatus. The real-time quantitative PCR reaction system consisted of 20 μL, comprising 1 μL of cDNA, 8 μL of RNase-free water, 10 μL of 2X SGExcel FastSYBR Master, and 0.5 μL of each forward and reverse primers. The reaction program involved a pre-denaturation step at 95°C for 3 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 seconds and annealing at 60°C for 20 seconds. The annealing/extension step should be performed at a temperature of 60°C for a duration of 20 seconds. The ubiquitin was selected as a reference gene: forward primer: 5’- GGACCCAGAAGTACGCAATG-3’, reverse primer: 3’- AATTACCAGGGATACAGCACC-5’ [23]. Three technical replicates were prepared for each extract, and the quantitative results were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method [24]. The complete list of primers may be seen in S1 Table.

Results

Metabolite analysis of two Polygonatum rhizomes

We found a total of 652 compounds by detecting both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of metabolites in the rhizomes of both Polygonatum species. Principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated notable disparities in the overall metabolite composition between the HBES and SXHZ sample groups, but the variations within the samples within each group were minimal (Fig 1A). In addition, we utilized latent structure orthogonal projection discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), a sophisticated multivariate statistical technique, to accurately differentiate between group variations and aid in the detection of metabolites that were expressed differently (DEMs) (Fig 1B). Subsequently, we employed orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) to assess the model and conduct screening analysis of differential expression maps (DEMs) (Fig 1D). In order to mitigate the issue of overfitting in multivariate statistical analysis, we conducted model validation. The model’s reliability was verified by cross-validation and the replacement test, resulting in R2Y = 0.998 and Q2 = 0.935 (Fig 1C). Hence, the findings of our investigation are dependable.

Fig 1. HBES and SXHZ multivariate statistical analyses.

Fig 1

A: overall sample PCA plot; B: PLS-DA plot for latent structures; C: OPLS-DA validation plot; D: OPLS-DA score plot.

Analysis of DEMs and enrichment of metabolic pathways

The data from the DEMs analysis revealed that there were a total of 238 DEMs in the comparison between SXHZ and HBES. Among these, 121 genes exhibited up-regulated expression whereas 117 genes showed down-regulated expression (Fig 2A). The KEGG metabolic pathway annotations classify pathways into three main categories: metabolism, genetic information processing, and environmental information processing. Fig 2B depicts metabolic pathways including ten or more DEMs. The metabolic pathway category stands out as having the highest number of DEMs, totaling 175. By examining the top 20 DEMs that exhibited the most significant variations in Polygonatum rhizome development, we discovered that succinic acid had the highest concentration, followed by N-acetyl-L-glutamine (Fig 2C).

Fig 2. Analysis of DEMs and KEGG statistics.

Fig 2

A: DEMs of the overall sample. B. Metabolites in the top 20 multiplicity of differences in the comparative group. C. KEGG pathway annotations of the DEMs.

In order to acquire a more comprehensive comprehension of the alterations in flavonoid metabolites in the rhizomes of two Polygonatum species, we conducted an investigation on the DEMs that are involved in the production and metabolism of flavonoids. As a result, we identified a total of seven DEMs. However, only two of these DEMs exhibited an increase in activity in three metabolic pathways. Apigenin-7-O-neohesperidoside (Rhoifolin) was the only DEMs found in the Flavone and flavonoid biosynthesis pathway (ko00944). Phloretin was present in both the Flavonoid biosynthesis pathways (ko00941) and secondary metabolite biosynthesis pathways (ko01110). However, Disporopsin, Apigenin-7-O-(6’’-p-Coumaryl) glucoside, Chrysoeriol-7-O-rutinoside-5-O-glucoside, 8-Demethylfarrerol, and Kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside-7-O-glucoside were not found in these specific metabolic pathways.

Sequencing and functional gene annotation

Prior to completing the bioinformatics analysis, the raw data underwent screening to confirm its high quality. By employing fastp for first read quality control, we successfully removed low-quality data, resulting in a total of 92,858 unigenes. The cumulative count of constructed nucleotide bases was 113,895,648, with a N50 value of 1,767, a N90 value of 548, and an average length of 1,227.

By conducting the sequencing of Polygonatum RNA, we have successfully found a total of 92,858 unigenes. The transcriptome sequencing data of the two Polygonatum rhizomes were annotated using seven databases. The Nr database annotated 54,381 unigenes, the KEGG database annotated 40,481 unigenes, the KOG database annotated 32,775 unigenes, and the SwissProt database annotated 38,662 unigenes. In addition, the GO database provided annotations for 46,537 unigenes, the TrEMBL database provided annotations for 54,255 unigenes, and the Pfam database provided annotations for 35,490 unigenes (Fig 3A). The KOG annotations classified a total of 32,775 genes into 25 distinct functional categories. The category with the highest number of genes was "general function prediction" (R), which had 8,030 genes (24.50%). The category with the second highest number of genes was "protein post-transporter modification, turnover, chaperone proteins" (O), which had 3,663 genes (11.18%). The category with the lowest number of genes was "cellular motility" (N), with only 12 genes (0.03%) (Fig 3B). Within the category of metabolic pathways in KEGG annotations, the annotation "Metabolic pathways" had the highest prevalence, with 2,529 genes (30.99%) (Fig 3C). Furthermore, a total of 46,537 genes were categorized into three distinct functional groups according to the Gene Ontology (GO) classification system. The category with the highest number of subcategories in Biological Processes (BP) was "cellular process", but in Cellular Components (CC), the category with the highest number of subcategories was "cellular anatomical entity". The category with the highest representation in the Molecular Function (MF) category was "Binding" (Fig 3D).

Fig 3. Map of annotation results of two Polygonatum gene databases.

Fig 3

A: Venn diagram of 7 major database annotations. B: KOG database annotations. C: KEGG database annotations. D: GO database annotations.

Analysis of DEGs between groups

The analysis of differential expression identified a total of 21,553 DEGs. Comparing to the control group HBES, a total of 10418 DEGs were found to be up-regulated, while 11135 DEGs were down-regulated. The genes were subjected to GO functional analysis, which revealed category annotations and identified significant GO functional enrichment. Out of the top 20 DEGs, 14 were found to be considerably enriched. The bioprocess category showed the highest level of enrichment, as shown in Fig 5A. The Flavonoid Biosynthesis Pathway (ko00941) had 86 background genes, 30 of which were DEGs, or 34.88%, according to KEGG pathway analysis. Of the 33 background genes in the isoflavonoid biosynthesis pathway (ko00943), 14 were DEGs, or 42.42%. Of the 444 background genes in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway (ko00940), 150 were DEGs, or 33.78%. Furthermore, 3 of the 15 background genes in the flavonoid and flavonol biosynthesis pathway (ko00944) were DEGs, making up 20.00% of the total (Fig 5D).

Fig 5. Differential gene and differential metabolite analysis.

Fig 5

A: Enrichment circle plot of differentially expressed genes in the GO database for Polygonatum, the bar graph shows the proportion of up-regulated genes, and the red color represents the number of up-regulated genes. B: Number of genes in the top 20 enriched TFs family genes. C: Number of genes in the differentially expressed TFs family genes. D: Number of total genes in the KEGG pathway and the number of DEGs (the abscissa A in the middle of the pathway represents Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis; B represents Flavone and flavonol biosynthesis; C represents Flavonoid biosynthesis; D represents Isoflavonoid biosynthesis). E: FC between transcriptome and metabolome correlation heatmap of the top 20 enriched DEGs and DEGs. F: Correlation network of the top 20 DEGs and all DEMs associated with the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. G: DEGs and DEMs involved in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway.

Gene co‑expression and network analysis

Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) generates a dendrogram by analyzing the relationships between gene expressions, which allows for the identification of separate modules. The merging of modules occurs when the value reaches or exceeds 0.25, and each module must contain at least 50 genes to be considered. As shown in Fig 4A, each color represents a module in the clustering tree, and each gene is allocated to a certain module. Genes that exhibit comparable changes in expression during physiological processes or across various tissues may be functionally linked, therefore leading to their classification within a module. In the upper portion of the tree diagram, the vertical axis reflects the genetic distance between two nodes (genes), while the horizontal axis does not have any particular significance. We divided all transcripts into 25 distinct modules. The expression levels of two Polygonatum genes in the MEyellow, MElightgreen, MEred, and MEblack modules showed a positive correlation, while the expression levels of genes in the MEgrey module displayed a negative correlation (P < 0.05, Fig 4B).

Fig 4. Co-expression profiles of all transcripts and active components in two Polygonatum rhizomes.

Fig 4

A: Hierarchical clustering tree of the co-expressed modules of two Polygonatum species. B: Heat map of the correlation of the two Polygonatum samples and modules. C: Network diagram depicting the top 50 ranked linkage strengths of genes in the MElightgreen module. D: Network diagram illustrating the top 50 ranked linkage strengths of genes in the MEred module. E: Network diagram displaying the top 50 ranked linkage strengths of genes in the MEyellow module. F: Network diagram showing the top 50 ranked linkage strengths of genes in the MEblack module. G: Network diagram presenting the top 50 ranked linkage strengths of genes in the MEgrey module.

We investigated gene co-expression networks in five modules with positively and negatively correlated gene expression levels and analyzed the top 50 genes in each module in terms of gene linkage strength. We next examined the top 50 genes within each module based on their gene linkage strength. Within the co-expression network of the MEyellow module, Cluster-33531.0 had a high association with 25 genes. This was followed by Cluster-24446.0, Cluster-48497.3, and Cluster-15213.0 (Fig 4E). Cluster-28642.10 and Cluster-27074.0 in the MEblack module’s co-expression network had strong associations with several genes (Fig 4F). In the co-expression networks of the MEred (Fig 4D), MElightgreen (Fig 4C), and MEgrey (Fig 4G) modules, Cluster-28630.38, Cluster-50730.1, and Cluster-43681.3 were tightly related to a plurality of genes in each module, respectively.

TFs analysis

A total of 2880 transcription factors (TFs) were annotated in the two Polygonatum rhizomes, which belonged to 90 TFs families (S2 Table). The C3H TFs family has the highest number of members, with 139 unigenes, followed by the AP2/ERF-ERF TFs family with 137 unigenes, and the bHLH TFs family with 134 unigenes (Fig 5B). In addition, our analysis discovered that the 978 TFs that were expressed differently could be classified into 81 families of TFs. The top 20 differentially expressed TFs families among these families were AP2/ERF-ERF, bHLH, MYB-related, NAC, WRKY, C3H, and bZIP-related TFs families (Fig 5C and S3 Table).

Joint analysis of the transcriptome and metabolome

Fig 5E illustrates the heatmap of correlation enrichment for the top 20 DEMs and DEGs, ranked by FC between the transcriptome and metabolome. The color variances represent distinct correlation coefficients. The correlation network of the top 20 DEGs and all DEMs linked to the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway was also mapped (Fig 5F). A strong link was found among Lmpp003268, pmb0592, Hmhn006723, pme1201, Smdp007779, and 17 additional DEGs in this network. In addition, mws0047 and Lmpp003930 showed a stronger connection with Cluster-28108.0 and Cluster-20715.0, respectively. The enrichment heatmap displays the DEGs and DEMs that play a role in the production pathway of flavonoids (Fig 5G).

Four metabolites were discovered in the investigation of flavonoid production routes: phloretin, caffeoyl quinic acid, neohesperidin, and (-)-Epiafzelechin (Fig 6). However, only Phloretin showed substantial variations that were distinct from the others. The pathway analysis identified the participation of 32 distinct enzymes that have a significant impact on 30 genes. After de-emphasis, the enzymes that are included are: anthocyanidin reductase (ANR), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), flavanone 4-reductase (FNR), 5-O-(4-coumaroyl)-D-quinate 3’- monooxygenase (C3’H), caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavonoid 3’-monooxygenase (F3’H), flavonol synthase (FLS), shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HCT), and phlorizin synthase (PHZS) as shown in S4 Table. In addition, out of the 30 genes, five were strongly linked to PHZS and all of them belonged to the MYB-related TFs family.

Fig 6. Study of flavonoid biosynthesis and metabolic pathways in Polygonatum rhizomes.

Fig 6

Blue dots indicate that the metabolite was detected but not significantly changed, and green dots indicate that the metabolite content was significantly down-regulated in the experimental group. Red rectangles indicate that the enzyme is associated with up-regulated genes, green rectangles indicate that the enzyme is associated with down-regulated genes, blue rectangles indicate that the enzyme is associated with both up- and down-regulated genes, and the numbers in the boxes represent the enzyme numbers (EC numbers).

Validation of DEGs by qRT–PCR

In order to validate the precision of the transcriptome data, we conducted RNA-Seq analysis and reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) on a randomly chosen set of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) to ascertain the genuineness and dependability of the transcriptome data. We chose 20 genes that showed differential expression for validation using qRT-PCR. While there were minor discrepancies between the results of RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR, the overall trend remained consistent for around 80% of the genes (Fig 7). Thus, transcriptome sequencing is deemed reliable.

Fig 7. Results of qRT-PCR assay.

Fig 7

The bar graph represents the FPKM results of transcriptome data; the line graph represents the qRT-PCR results.

Discussion

Flavonoids are present in numerous plants and possess a wide range of characteristics, such as antioxidant, anti-aging, antiviral, and anticancer capabilities [25]. Prior research has established that Polygonatum possesses a significant abundance of flavonoids, which are widely recognized for their substantial medicinal benefits [26]. Hence, the examination of the mechanisms governing flavonoid synthesis and strategies to enhance their abundance has emerged as a critical area of research. The objective of this study was to investigate the process of flavonoid production in HBES and SXHZ by analyzing their metabolomic and transcriptomic data. This technique enhanced our comprehension of the regulatory network, the accumulation of flavonoids, and the molecular mechanisms that propel the development of Polygonatum rhizomes. These findings offer valuable insights for future research in this field.

All transcripts in this study can be divided into 25 distinct modules. The expression levels of two Polygonatum genes in the MEyellow, MElightgreen, MEred, and MEblack modules were positively correlated, while the gene expression levels in the MEgrey module were negatively correlated. A co-expression analysis was conducted on the top 50 gene pairings that had the strongest association within these five modules. Genes such as Cluster-33531.0, Cluster-15213.0, Cluster-28642.10, Cluster-27074.0, Cluster-28630.38, Cluster-50730.1, and Cluster-43681.3 had robust associations with several genes inside their respective modules. The construction of co-expression networks unveiled a multitude of pivotal genes that perform vital roles in Polygonatum. However, the genes depicted in the figure did not include any differentially expressed genes linked to flavonoid production, indicating that further analysis of these genes is necessary.

The bHLH, WRKY, AP2, MBW-related, C3H, and other TF families showed significant enrichment and differential expression in this study. Additionally, 30 genes related to the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway exhibited significant differential expression, with five closely related to PHZS. PHZS is a member of the MYB-related transcription factor family. The above results suggest that the MYB-related family may be mainly responsible for controlling genes in Polygonatum’s flavonoid biosynthesis pathway. The TF family is a transcription factor group with similar structures and functions. They control the activity of target genes by binding to specific DNA sequences and are very important in controlling gene expression [27]. So far, regulatory genes that directly impact the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway have been discovered in several plant species. These families have attracted considerable attention because they can function autonomously or form MBW complexes to control the structural genes involved in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway [28, 29]. The PbUFGT1 promoter, derived from the MYB TFs family, can stimulate the synthesis of anthocyanins and flavonols in pear fruits [30]. Meanwhile, the upregulation of the CcMYB12 gene from the MYB TTF family induces a rise in flavonol levels in Arabidopsis leaves [31]. Additionally, the WRKY and AP2 families of TFs have essential functions in producing flavonoid molecules [32]. In summary, the differences in transcription factors are one of the crucial reasons affecting the biosynthesis of the two flavonoid compounds in Polygonatum rhizome.

Metabolomics analysis showed that HBES and SXHZ contained a total of 71 flavonoids. Among them, seven were identified as DEMs. When comparing the SXHZ to the control (HBES), it was found that the SXHZ had a significantly higher amount of the kaempferol derivative kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside-7-O-glucoside. The difference in content between the two was as high as 5390.82-fold. There were significant increases observed in other flavonoids, such as chrysoeriol-7-O-rutinoside-5-O-glucoside, which showed a fold rise of 1147.05. Disporopsin had a fold increase of 920.64, Apigenin-7-O-neohesperidoside had a fold increase of 62.61, and apigenin-7-O-(6’’-p-Coumaryl) glucoside had a fold increase of 52.35. Previous studies have demonstrated that kaempferol and its derivatives exhibit neuroprotective effects and are highly active flavonoids [33]. Chrysoeriol has been discovered to hinder the accumulation of fat in adipocytes [34]. Apigenin and its derivatives have demonstrated a variety of pharmacological actions, such as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant, antiradiation, antidepressant, cardiovascular protection, modulation of glycolipid metabolism, nephroprotection, neuroprotection, and antibacterial characteristics [35]. In the present study, we found significant differences in the flavonoid composition of HBES and SXHZ. This implies that by the cultivation of several types of Polygonatum, it could be feasible to get distinct flavonoids. This finding offers the possibility of choosing Polygonatum herbs that contain certain flavonoids for the treatment of different ailments.

Within the flavonoid biosynthesis route, only the phloretin content exhibited a notable reduction, with SXHZ being 1137.28 times greater than HBES. The production of phloretin in this pathway is primarily regulated by enzymes such as chalcone synthase (CHS) and hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA reductase (HCR). Nevertheless, CHS and HCR were not discovered. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), an enzyme in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway, was notably increased, which could potentially change the levels of p-coumaroyl-CoA and dihydro-4-coumaroyl-CoA. This change indirectly impacts the amount of phloretin present. Therefore, PAL could potentially have a significant role in the variation of phloretin levels seen between SXHZ and HBES. In addition, ANR, CCoAOMT, F3’H, and C3’H enzymes were found to be connected with genes that were downregulated, whereas FNR and DFR enzymes were linked to genes that were upregulated. CHI, FLS, PHZS, and HCT were linked to genes that were both upregulated and downregulated. Prior research has demonstrated that ANR plays a crucial role as an enzyme in the process of proanthocyanidin production [36]. D-caffeoylquinate undergoes conversion by C3’H enzymes to become 5-O-(4-coumaroyl)-D-quinate, which is a precursor of flavonoids. The intermediate compound undergoes additional reactions facilitated by enzymes, resulting in the production of other types of flavonoids, including quercetin and quercetin-3-O-glucoside. Therefore, C3’H plays a crucial function in the production route of flavonoids and enhances the biosynthesis of these molecules [37]. F3’H enzyme facilitates the process of hydroxylating dihydroflavonols and flavonols, resulting in the breakdown of kaempferol. On the other hand, FLS enzyme facilitates the conversion of dihydroflavonols into flavonols, thereby enhancing the synthesis of kaempferol [38]. Multiple studies have emphasized the importance of CCoAOMT, CHI, FNR, and DFR as pivotal enzymes in the process of flavonoid production [3942]. Thus, we propose that notable alterations in the expression of genes such as ANR, CCoAOMT, F3’H, C3’H, CHI, FLS, PHZS, and HCT may also play a role in the variations seen in the flavonoid production pathways between the two Polygonatum rhizomes.

Conclusion

A total of 71 flavonoids were detected in the metabolomic data analysis, with noticeable variations found in the content of seven. Apigenin exhibited considerable differential expression in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway within the DEMs. Furthermore, the transcription factor families bHLH, WRKY, AP2, MBW-related, and C3H exhibited a high level of enrichment in the metabolomic data, and these changes were statistically significant. The DEGs in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway primarily belonged to the family of TFs associated to the MBW complex. This suggests that the family of TFs connected to MYB might have a crucial function in regulating the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in Polygonatum rhizomes. Meanwhile, alterations in DEGs such as PAL, ANR, CCoAOMT, F3’H, C3’H, CHI, FLS, PHZS, and HCT may have a role in the variations seen in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway between the two Polygonatum rhizomes. Taken together, these findings provide new insights into understanding the biosynthesis and accumulation of flavonoid compounds in Polygonatum rhizomes. The differential accumulation of different compounds may affect the medicinal value of different Polygonatum species. Therefore, we suggest further in-depth exploration of the metabolism and regulatory mechanisms of flavonoids in Polygonatum, aiming to guide the cultivation of new high-quality Polygonatum varieties with high flavonoid content.

Supporting information

S1 Table. qRT-PCR primer list.

(XLSX)

pone.0318026.s001.xlsx (11.8KB, xlsx)
S2 Table. Summary table of transcription factor families.

(XLSX)

pone.0318026.s002.xlsx (89.9KB, xlsx)
S3 Table. Top 20 most significantly differentially expressed TFs families.

(XLSX)

pone.0318026.s003.xlsx (62.8KB, xlsx)
S4 Table. Differential genes in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway.

(XLSX)

pone.0318026.s004.xlsx (13.2KB, xlsx)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC, grant number 31260057, QX), Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Joint Fund) [NSFHP, grant number 2023AFD077, QX], The Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Biological Resources Protection and Utilization (Hubei Minzu University) [OHBP, grant number KYPT012403, QX], The Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Selenium Resource Research and Biological Application (Hubei Minzu University) [OHSR, QX], and Major Special Project of Technological Innovation of Hubei Provincial Science and Technology Department [MHT, grant number 2019ACA120, QX]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.An J, Liu J, Wu C, Li J, Dai L, Van Damme E, et al. Anti-HIV I/II activity and molecular cloning of a novel mannose/sialic acid-binding lectin from rhizome of Polygonatum cyrtonema Hua. Acta Bioch Bioph Sin. 2006; 3070–78. 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2006.00140.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liu D, Chen Q, Miao Y, Li J, Deng X. First Report of Southern Blight on Polygonatum sibiricum Caused by Sclerotium delphinii in China. Plant Dis. 2021; 1052268–2740. 10.1094/pdis-10-20-2151-pdn [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ahn MJ, Kim CY, Yoon KD, Ryu MY, Cheong JH, Chin YW, et al. Steroidal saponins from the rhizomes of Polygonatum sibiricum. J Asian Nat Prod Res. 2006; 69(3), 360–4. 10.1021/np050394d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luo L, Qiu Y, Gong L, Wang W, Wen R. A Review of Polygonatum Mill. Genus: Its Taxonomy, Chemical Constituents, and Pharmacological Effect Due to Processing Changes. Molecules. 2022; 27(15), 4821. doi: 10.3390/molecules27154821 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li X, Mei M, Pu X, Chen X, Li X, Meng F, et al. Protective effect and mechanism of Polygonatum kingianum against hypoxia-induced injury. Heliyon. 2023; 9(3), e14353. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.KaiJie Q, Xiao W, Xin G, LuFei L, ZhiHua X, Chao G, et al. Metabolome and transcriptome analyses unravel the inhibition of embryo germination by abscisic acid in pear. Sci Hortic-Amsterdam. 2022; 292110652. 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110652 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huang Z, Du X, Ma C, Zhang R, Liu F. Identification of Antitumor Active Constituents in Polygonatum sibiricum Flower by UPLC-Q-TOF-MS E and Network Pharmacology. Acs Omega. 2020; 5(46), 29755–29764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sharma S, Joshi R, Kumar D. Quantitative analysis of flavonols, flavonol glycoside and homoisoflavonoids in Polygonatum verticillatum using UHPLC-DAD-QTOF-IMS and evaluation of their antioxidant potential. Phytochem Analysis. 2020; 31(3), 333–339. 10.1002/pca.2899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang J, Wu S, Huang X, Hu X, Zhang Y. Hypolipidemic Activity and Antiatherosclerotic Effect of Polysaccharide of Polygonatum sibiricum in Rabbit Model and Related Cellular Mechanisms. Evid-Based Compl Alt. 2015; 2015391065. doi: 10.1155/2015/391065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharma S, Patial V, Singh D, Sharma U, Kumar D. Antimicrobial Homoisoflavonoids from the Rhizomes of Polygonatum verticillatum. Chem Biodivers. 2018; 15(12), e1800430. 10.1002/cbdv.201800430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shu X, Lv J, Tao J, Li G, Li H, Ma N. Antihyperglycemic effects of total flavonoids from Polygonatum odoratum in STZ and alloxan-induced diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009; 124(3), 539–543. 10.1016/j.jep.2009.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xia M, Liu Y, Liu J, Chen D, Qiu Y. A new synonym of Polygonatum in China, based on morphological and molecular evidence. Phytokeys. 2021; 175(1), 137–149. 10.3897/phytokeys.175.63383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ming J, Jiang T, Wang Y, Lv Z. Amplified detection of nuclear factor-kappa B activity and inhibition based on exonuclease III assisted cleavage-induced DNAzyme releasing strategy. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2016; 228605–611. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.01.102 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Qin Y, Li D, Yuan R, Xiang Y. Silver ion-stabilized DNA triplexes for completely enzyme-free and sensitive fluorescence detection of transcription factors via catalytic hairpin assembly amplification. J Mater Chem B. 2019; 7763–761. doi: 10.1039/c8tb03042a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu Y, Guo J, Zhou Q, Xin Y, Wang G, Xu L. De novo transcriptome analysis revealed genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis, transport and regulation in Ginkgo biloba. Ind Crop Prod. 2018; 124226–235. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.07.060 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhang Y, Li B, Zhang M, Jia J, Sun S, Chen X, et al. Transcriptome analyses and virus‐induced gene silencing identify HuWRKY40 acting as a hub transcription factor in the preservation of Hylocereus undatus by trypsin. J Food Biochem. 2022; 46(12), e14437. 10.1111/jfbc.14437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao Y, Zhang G, Tang Q, Song W, Gao Q, Xiang G, et al. EbMYBP1, a R2R3-MYB transcription factor, promotes flavonoid biosynthesis in Erigeron breviscapus. Front Plant Sci. 2022; doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.946827 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grotewold E. The genetics and biochemistry of floral pigments. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006; 57761–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koes R, Verweij W, Quattrocchio F. Flavonoids: a colorful model for the regulation and evolution of biochemical pathways. Trends Plant Sci. 2005; 10(5), 236–42. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011; 29(7), 644–52. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Davidson NM, Oshlack A. Corset: enabling differential gene expression analysis for de novo assembled transcriptomes. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(7), 410. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0410-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015; 12(1), 59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Mo X, Wang L, Yu C, Kou C. Combined Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Analysis of the Distribution of Flavonoids in the Fibrous Root and Taproot of Polygonatum kingianum Coll.et Hemsl. Genes-Basel. 2024; 15(7), 828. 10.3390/genes15070828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001; 25(4), 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Micha R, Penalvo JL, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm CD, Mozaffarian D. Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 2017; 317(9), 912–924. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0947 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ullah A, Munir S, Badshah SL, Khan N, Ghani L, Poulson BG, et al. Important Flavonoids and Their Role as a Therapeutic Agent. Molecules. 2020; 25(22), 5243. doi: 10.3390/molecules25225243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ryuta A, Miki U, Akira A, Satoshi S, Takuya A, Hiroshi I, et al. Recruitment and delivery of the fission yeast Rst2 transcription factor via a local genome structure counteracts repression by Tup1-family corepressors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(16), 9361–9371. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xu W, Dubos C, Lepiniec L. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis by MYB-bHLH-WDR complexes. Trends Plant Sci. 2015; 20(3), 176–85. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yuan Y, Shi Y, Tang D. Isolation and characterization of R2R3-MYB and basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factors involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in tulip tepals. Acta Physiol Plant. 2020; 42(3). 10.1007/s11738-020-3026-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhai R, Wang Z, Zhang S, Meng G, Song L, Wang Z, et al. Two MYB transcription factors regulate flavonoid biosynthesis in pear fruit (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). J Exp Bot. 2016; 67(5), 1275–1284. 10.1093/jxb/erv524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Blanco E, Sabetta W, Danzi D, Negro D, Passeri V, Lisi AD, et al. Isolation and Characterization of the Flavonol Regulator CcMYB12 From the Globe Artichoke [Cynara cardunculus var. scolymus (L.) Fiori]. Front Plant Sci. 2018; 9941. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhu J, Guo X, Li X, Tang D. Composition of Flavonoids in the Petals of Freesia and Prediction of Four Novel Transcription Factors Involving in Freesia Flavonoid Pathway. Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12756300. 10.3389/fpls.2021.756300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jin S, Zhang L, Wang L. Kaempferol, a potential neuroprotective agent in neurodegenerative diseases: From chemistry to medicine. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023; 165115215. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Song J, Lee H, Heo H, Lee J, Kim Y. Effects of Chrysoeriol on Adipogenesis and Lipolysis in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. Foods. 2022; 12(1). doi: 10.3390/foods12010172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li Z, Zhou J, Ji L, Liang Y, Xie S. Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Actions of Apigenin, Its Complexes, and Its Derivatives. Food Rev Int. 2023; 39(9), 6568–6601. 10.1080/87559129.2022.2122989 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tan L, Wang M, Kang Y, Azeem F, Zhou Z, Tuo D, et al. Biochemical and Functional Characterization of Anthocyanidin Reductase (ANR) from Mangifera indica L. Molecules. 2018; 23(11), 876. 10.3390/molecules23112876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li Z, Jiang H, Jiang X, Zhang L, Qin Y. Integrated physiological, transcriptomic, and metabolomic analyses reveal that low-nitrogen conditions improve the accumulation of flavonoids in snow chrysanthemum. Ind Crop Prod. 2023; 197116574. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116574 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kumari G, Nigam VK, Pandey DM. The molecular docking and molecular dynamics study of flavonol synthase and flavonoid 3’-monooxygenase enzymes involved for the enrichment of kaempferol. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics. 2023; 41(6), 2478–2491. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2022.2033324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xu RX, Ni R, Gao S, Fu J, Xiong RL, Zhu TT, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of two distinct caffeoyl CoA O-methyltransferases (CCoAOMTs) from the liverwort Marchantia paleacea. Plant Sci. 2022; 314111102. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.111102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Song JL, Wang ZY, Wang YH, Du J, Wang CY, Zhang XQ, et al. Overexpression of Pennisetum purpureum CCoAOMT Contributes to Lignin Deposition and Drought Tolerance by Promoting the Accumulation of Flavonoids in Transgenic Tobacco. Front Plant Sci. 2022; doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.884456 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yin YC, Zhang XD, Gao ZQ, Hu T, Liu Y. The Research Progress of Chalcone Isomerase (CHI) in Plants. Mol Biotechnol. 2019; 61(1), 32–52. doi: 10.1007/s12033-018-0130-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lewis JA, Zhang B, Harza R, Palmer N, Sarath G, Sattler SE, et al. Structural Similarities and Overlapping Activities among Dihydroflavonol 4-Reductase, Flavanone 4-Reductase, and Anthocyanidin Reductase Offer Metabolic Flexibility in the Flavonoid Pathway. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(18). doi: 10.3390/ijms241813901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Vikas Sharma

23 Oct 2024

PONE-D-24-28928Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis in PolygonatumPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Xiao,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 07 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Vikas Sharma, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for submitting the above manuscript to PLOS ONE. During our internal evaluation of the manuscript, we found significant text overlap between your submission and previous work in the [introduction, conclusion, etc.].

We would like to make you aware that copying extracts from previous publications, especially outside the methods section, word-for-word is unacceptable. In addition, the reproduction of text from published reports has implications for the copyright that may apply to the publications.

Please revise the manuscript to rephrase the duplicated text, cite your sources, and provide details as to how the current manuscript advances on previous work. Please note that further consideration is dependent on the submission of a manuscript that addresses these concerns about the overlap in text with published work.

[If the overlap is with the authors’ own works: Moreover, upon submission, authors must confirm that the manuscript, or any related manuscript, is not currently under consideration or accepted elsewhere. If related work has been submitted to PLOS ONE or elsewhere, authors must include a copy with the submitted article. Reviewers will be asked to comment on the overlap between related submissions (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-related-manuscripts).]

We will carefully review your manuscript upon resubmission and further consideration of the manuscript is dependent on the text overlap being addressed in full. Please ensure that your revision is thorough as failure to address the concerns to our satisfaction may result in your submission not being considered further.

3. We note that you have indicated that there are restrictions to data sharing for this study. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

Before we proceed with your manuscript, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., a Research Ethics Committee or Institutional Review Board, etc.). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories. You also have the option of uploading the data as Supporting Information files, but we would recommend depositing data directly to a data repository if possible.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Additional Editor Comments:

Author's are required to address the issues raised by reviewers carefully otherwise manuscript will not be considered further.

Comments from the Journal Office:

One or more of the reviewers has recommended that you cite specific previously published works. Members of the editorial team have determined that the works referenced are not directly related to the submitted manuscript. As such, please note that it is not necessary or expected to cite the works requested by the reviewer.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Introduction

The description of the benefits and uses of Polygonatum plants has some repetitive information, especially in the sections discussing their bioactive compounds and flavonoid-related properties. Consider consolidating these sections to avoid redundancy.

- The introduction seems disjointed, jumping between topics such as medicinal uses, bioactive compounds, and transcription factors without clear transitions. It would be helpful to organize the content more logically. You might start with the general importance of Polygonatum, then focus specifically on flavonoids, and finally transition into the role of transcription factors in flavonoid biosynthesis.

- Some sentences are overly long and complex, which can obscure the main point. For instance, consider breaking the sentence starting with "In previous studies, chalcone synthase is the entry-step enzyme..." into shorter, more precise sentences.

Methodology

While the methodology provides sufficient detail for someone experienced in the field, certain sections could benefit from more explicit instructions to ensure reproducibility. For example, when discussing RNA sequencing, it would be helpful to specify how contaminants were removed and how the quality of the RNA was assessed before sequencing.

The description of statistical analysis is brief. For instance, in the qRT-PCR section, the use of the 2-ΔΔCt method is mentioned. Still, there's no discussion of how data were normalized (e.g., reference genes used) or whether statistical tests were applied to determine significance."

Results

Despite efforts to validate the multivariate models, the risk of overfitting remains a concern, especially when dealing with high-dimensional data such as metabolomics. The high R2Y and Q2 values (0.998 and 0.935, respectively) indicate that the model fits the training data exceptionally well, but this does not necessarily guarantee good predictive performance on new data.

The study reports a large amount of transcriptomic data, with over 92,000 unigenes identified. However, the integration of these data with the metabolomic findings is not as strong as it could be. More effort could be made to link specific gene expression patterns with the metabolite profiles observed, especially in the context of the metabolic pathways identified. This could help in understanding the regulatory networks governing metabolite production in Polygonatum species.

The analysis of co-expression profiles and transcription factors is comprehensive, but there is a lack of discussion regarding the biological significance of these findings. For example, while the C3H, AP2/ERF-ERF, and bHLH families are identified as the most prevalent TFs, the study does not elaborate on their specific roles in Polygonatum rhizomes.

The study attempts to integrate transcriptome and metabolome data, but the connection between the two datasets could be more robust. The heatmap in Fig. 5E and the correlation network in Fig. 5F are visually informative, but they lack sufficient interpretation. For example, the identification of four metabolites (Phloretin, Caffeoyl quinic acid, Neohesperidin, and (-)-Epiafzelechin) is noteworthy, but the study should delve deeper into how these metabolites and their associated DEGs contribute to the overall metabolic pathways and biological functions of the plant.

Reviewer #2: Author are suggested to improve MS.

1.Author must include replication details in transcriptome study in material method

2.Transcriptome result must be fortified with biology. Only writing bioinformatics and few numbers are not good.Pleas refer following manuscript to understand.

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep30412

3.material method are repeated in results. Author are suggested to write about only results in results section instead of name of many tools and software

4.Out of these15333 modules, MEyellow, MElightgreen, MEred, and MEblack displayed a positive link with the active

334 components, whereas the MEgrey module demonstrated a negative association. " This sentence missing biology

5.Discussion is very poor.

Author are strongly suggested to discuss result in discussion instead of any theory. Please avoid to discuss software and techniqyes in result and discussion.You are strongly suggested to refer

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep30412

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Kuldip Jayaswall

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0318026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318026.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


25 Oct 2024

Dear Editor,

Thank you very much for kindly providing us with the opportunity to revise our manuscript entitled " Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis in Polygonatum ". The reviewers’ comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper. The revised sections are highlighted in the revision. The main corrections in the paper and the response to the reviewer’s comments are as follows:

Response to Reviewers:

Reviewer #1:

Introduction

1. The description of the benefits and uses of Polygonatum plants has some repetitive information, especially in the sections discussing their bioactive compounds and flavonoid-related properties. Consider consolidating these sections to avoid redundancy.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have integrated the redundant parts describing the effects and uses of the Polygonatum plant in the manuscript. Please refer to lines 46-60 of the revised draft for details.

2. The introduction seems disjointed, jumping between topics such as medicinal uses, bioactive compounds, and transcription factors without clear transitions. It would be helpful to organize the content more logically. You might start with the general importance of Polygonatum, then focus specifically on flavonoids, and finally transition into the role of transcription factors in flavonoid biosynthesis.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have made every effort to revise the introduction to make it more logical. However, our revisions may still have shortcomings. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact us, and we will respond as soon as possible.

3. Some sentences are overly long and complex, which can obscure the main point. For instance, consider breaking the sentence starting with "In previous studies, chalcone synthase is the entry-step enzyme..." into shorter, more precise sentences.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have revised the overly long and complex sentences, as can be seen in the revised version on lines 91-93. In addition, we have also made changes to other overly long and complex sentences in the introduction section of the manuscript, which can be found in the revised version on lines 46-123.

Methodology

1. While the methodology provides sufficient detail for someone experienced in the field, certain sections could benefit from more explicit instructions to ensure reproducibility. For example, when discussing RNA sequencing, it would be helpful to specify how contaminants were removed and how the quality of the RNA was assessed before sequencing.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have specifically explained how to remove contaminants and how to assess RNA quality before sequencing. Please refer to lines 155-162 of the revised manuscript for details.

2. The description of statistical analysis is brief. For instance, in the qRT-PCR section, the use of the 2-ΔΔCt method is mentioned. Still, there's no discussion of how data were normalized (e.g., reference genes used) or whether statistical tests were applied to determine significance."

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have included the reference gene sequences used and conducted relative quantification strictly following the 2-ΔΔCt method, with the normalization also based on the 2-ΔΔCt method. Please see the revised version on lines 199-202.

Results

1. Despite efforts to validate the multivariate models, the risk of overfitting remains a concern, especially when dealing with high-dimensional data such as metabolomics. The high R2Y and Q2 values (0.998 and 0.935, respectively) indicate that the model fits the training data exceptionally well, but this does not necessarily guarantee good predictive performance on new data.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have reviewed numerous studies and found that many have used the OPLS-DA model (R2X, R2Y, and Q2) for data prediction, with results showing that the model performs satisfactorily on new data. Therefore, we believe that the current model evaluation methods and results sufficiently support the conclusions of this paper. If you have any further suggestions, please feel free to contact us. We will respond to you as soon as possible.

2. The study reports a large amount of transcriptomic data, with over 92,000 unigenes identified. However, the integration of these data with the metabolomic findings is not as strong as it could be. More effort could be made to link specific gene expression patterns with the metabolite profiles observed, especially in the context of the metabolic pathways identified. This could help in understanding the regulatory networks governing metabolite production in Polygonatum species.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. In the manuscript, we conducted a joint analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome, and illustrated the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in Figure 6. Through Figure 6, we can clearly observe the upregulation and downregulation of metabolites and genes in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in the two Polygonatum rhizomes. Please refer to lines 325-343 of the manuscript for more details.

3. The analysis of co-expression profiles and transcription factors is comprehensive, but there is a lack of discussion regarding the biological significance of these findings. For example, while the C3H, AP2/ERF-ERF, and bHLH families are identified as the most prevalent TFs, the study does not elaborate on their specific roles in Polygonatum rhizomes.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. In the manuscript, we only analyzed the differences in genes and metabolites between the two Polygonatum species, aiming to better distinguish between them and provide a theoretical basis for the future development of the Polygonatum industry. The gene families we identified in Polygonatum require further functional validation in future studies, which is why we did not elaborate on their roles in detail. In the future, we will conduct more in-depth research focusing on these gene families.

4. The study attempts to integrate transcriptome and metabolome data, but the connection between the two datasets could be more robust. The heatmap in Fig. 5E and the correlation network in Fig. 5F are visually informative, but they lack sufficient interpretation. For example, the identification of four metabolites (Phloretin, Caffeoyl quinic acid, Neohesperidin, and (-)-Epiafzelechin) is noteworthy, but the study should delve deeper into how these metabolites and their associated DEGs contribute to the overall metabolic pathways and biological functions of the plant.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We detected four metabolites: phenol, chlorogenic acid, neohesperidin, and (-)-epiafzelechin, but only phenol exhibited significant differential changes. Additionally, we have discussed this compound in detail in the discussion section.

Reviewer #2:

Author are suggested to improve MS.

1.Author must include replication details in transcriptome study in material method在

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have added detailed information about the transcriptome sequencing, which can be found in the revised version on lines 157-162.

2.Transcriptome result must be fortified with biology. Only writing bioinformatics and few numbers are not good.Pleas refer following manuscript to understand.

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep30412

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We carefully read the article you recommended and found that it explores candidate genes related to the defense against water bubble disease in tea plants from a transcriptomic perspective. This study closely connects bioinformatics analysis with biology. However, our paper primarily investigates the differences in flavonoid biosynthesis between the two Polygonatum species. We identified that phenol and the MYB-related transcription factor gene family play a major role in regulating the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway in Polygonatum rhizomes. We believe this finding is of significant reference value for the future breeding of Polygonatum germplasm resources with high flavonoid content and the development of the related pharmaceutical industry. In future research, we will conduct more in-depth studies on Polygonatum, including the relationship between transcriptomic results and biology.

3.material method are repeated in results. Author are suggested to write about only results in results section instead of name of many tools and software.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have checked and removed the redundant content in the Materials and Methods section and the Results section. Additionally, we have carefully revised the content of the Results section to ensure that it presents only the results.

4.Out of these15333 modules, MEyellow, MElightgreen, MEred, and MEblack displayed a positive link with the active 334 components, whereas the MEgrey module demonstrated a negative association. " This sentence missing biology

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have revised that sentence. Please see the revised version on lines 296-298. We may not have fully understood your question, so if you have any further inquiries, please feel free to contact us.

5.Discussion is very poor.

Author are strongly suggested to discuss result in discussion instead of any theory. Please avoid to discuss software and techniqyes in result and discussion.You are strongly suggested to refer

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep30412.

Response: Thank you very much for reviewing our research and providing valuable feedback. We have made every effort to revise the discussion section of the article to make it more logical. Furthermore, we did not discuss software and technology in the discussion.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0318026.s005.docx (24.6KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Dan Gao

8 Jan 2025

Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis in Polygonatum

PONE-D-24-28928R1

Dear Dr. Xiao,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Dan Gao, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Manuscript entitled "Integrative analysis of the metabolome and transcriptome provides insights into the

mechanisms of flavonoid biosynthesis in Polygonatum" may be acceted

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Baljinder Singh

Reviewer #2: Yes: Kuldip Jayaswall

**********

Acceptance letter

Dan Gao

12 Jan 2025

PONE-D-24-28928R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Xiao,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Dan Gao

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. qRT-PCR primer list.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0318026.s001.xlsx (11.8KB, xlsx)
    S2 Table. Summary table of transcription factor families.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0318026.s002.xlsx (89.9KB, xlsx)
    S3 Table. Top 20 most significantly differentially expressed TFs families.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0318026.s003.xlsx (62.8KB, xlsx)
    S4 Table. Differential genes in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0318026.s004.xlsx (13.2KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0318026.s005.docx (24.6KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES