Abstract
Background
People with multiple sclerosis (MS) exhibit a different pattern of blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies when compared to healthy control (HC).
Purpose
The objective of this study is to determine whether observed differences in BOLD activation between people with MS (pwMS) and HC participants are due to the differences of neurovascular coupling, cerebral blood flow (CBF) or actual neuronal activity.
Methods
We investigated the neuronal activation in pwMS (n = 11) and age‐ and sex‐matched HC participants (n = 15) using simultaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) and fMRI measures during a visual task (VT) and hypercapnia condition.
Results
Significant neurovascular coupling is observed in both HC and pwMS. Neuro‐vascular coupling ratios are not significantly different between groups. However, we observe significantly lower CBF increase during VT and higher quantitative CBF at a rest state in pwMS than in HC (p < 0.05). From the multiple regression model, in HC group, we found that the BOLD contrast change during VT is best predicted by the EEG power change during VT (Student t‐score = 2.64, p = 0.022), and the CBF change during hypercapnia (Student t‐score = 2.59, p = 0.024). In pwMS, the BOLD contrast change during VT is negatively predicted by the CBF change during VT (Student t‐score = −4.02, p = 0.003).
Conclusion
These findings could explain that BOLD activation in pwMS is mainly determined by the blood flow change during activation rather than the direct neuronal activation measures or hemodynamic vascular reactivity during hypercapnia challenge, suggesting that altered vasodilatory effects in response to task activation in pwMS might be linked to impaired cerebral hemodynamics, possibly leading to the widely observed abnormal BOLD activation in fMRI studies of pwMS.
Keywords: cerebral blood flow, EEG, fMRI, hypercapnia, multiple sclerosis, neurovascular coupling
1. INTRODUCTION
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative demyelinating disorder that is characterized by neurological deficits disseminated over space and time. 1 , 2 In people with MS (pwMS), white matter (WM) focal demyelination leads to tissue changes, which results in gliosis and axonal degeneration. 3 , 4 , 5 Depending on the location and severity of these tissue changes, pwMS may experience neurological deficits in several brain functions including vision, working memory, or motor skills. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9
The increased energy demand and reduced ATP production in a demyelinated axon induce a virtual hypoxia in demyelinated tissue, 10 , 11 leading to vascular dysfunction. This hypoxia condition translates to neurological worsening. 12 For this reason, a better understanding of the mechanism between neurological deficits and the neuro‐activation with vascular reactivity has implications for therapeutic development. 13 , 14
Altered blood oxygenation level‐dependent (BOLD) activation has been consistently reported in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of pwMS. Previous research has shown that during attention and memory tasks, pwMS demonstrated greater BOLD activation on fMRI than age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls (HC), and this increased activation has been shown to correlate with T2 lesion load. 15 Other studies have found that during working memory tasks, pwMS displayed a different brain activation pattern from that one HC presented. 16 , 17 , 18 In a study incorporating a delayed recognition task, pwMS demonstrated greater activation than HC in the left inferior parietal cortex. 19 The authors also found that performance on the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) was correlated with deactivation in an area of the brain involved in the default mode network. Similar findings have since been reported in multiple fMRI studies assessing a variety of cognitive tasks in pwMS. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24
Functional connectivity (FC) in pwMS has also been assessed in various fMRI studies. The reduced FC between right‐ and left‐hemisphere primary motor cortices was observed in pwMS. 25 The reduced default mode network was observed in pwMS and the default mode network abnormalities was correlated with PASAT score. 26 Two different diffusion tensor imaging studies specifically demonstrated a positive correlation between FC and radial diffusivity in WM regions, 27 , 28 suggesting that reduced functional connectivity is correlated to impaired structural connectivity. However, in a more recent resting‐state (rs‐) fMRI study, pwMS demonstrated patterns of both increased and decreased FC across various brain networks when compared with HCs. 29 In another recent study, reduced dynamic FC was observed on rs‐fMRI in pwMS, and this reduction was found to be correlated with motor and cognitive impairment. 30
These various fMRI findings have been widely interpreted to be evidence of plasticity, or functional reorganization in response to the disease. 31 , 32 However, it is also known that pwMS have impaired cerebral hemodynamics when compared with HCs. Reduced cerebral oxygen consumption rate (CMRO2) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) were reported in both WM and peripheral cortical grey matter (GM) in pwMS, compared to a group of HC. 33 Decreased CBF and cerebral blood volume (CBV) values were also reported in both normal‐appearing WM and deep GM in pwMS compared with HC. 34 , 35 Enhancing lesions demonstrate increased CBF and CBV, compared to contralateral normal‐appearing WM in pwMS. 36 Because BOLD contrast change during the activation depends on the change in CMRO2 and CBF during the activation, both of which are known to be compromised in pwMS, increased BOLD activation on fMRI may reflect altered cerebral hemodynamics rather than neuronal reorganization.
Several recent studies have used resting‐state electrophysiological recordings such as electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetoencephalogram (MEG) in an attempt to further explore the changes in neuronal activity seen in pwMS. These studies found that pwMS showed the increased frequency power in alpha‐1 band, 37 and alpha‐1 and 2 bands 38 while another study presented the decreased frequency power in alpha band 39 to be compared to HC. However, the relationship between neuronal activity and neurovascular changes during visual paradigms remains unclear.
In this study, we sought to compare BOLD and CBF change during VT and hypercapnia condition in HC and pwMS. Also, rs‐fMRI, quantitative CBF (qCBF), CMRO2 and EEG power increase during VT were compared between groups. We investigated the coupling of BOLD contrast change during VT to multimodal EEG and other MRI measures during VT and hypercapnia condition in pwMS and age‐ and sex‐matched HC using multi‐linear regression models. Using these measures, we sought to determine whether there were significant differences between pwMS and HC in the linear relationship of BOLD contrast change during VT to any EEG and/or MRI measures during neuronal activity and/or hypercapnia challenge.
2. METHODS
Thirteen pwMS and 15 age‐ and sex‐matched HC participants were recruited into the study. Enrolled MS participants were required to be on stable disease modifying therapy for at least 6 months and free from relapse or steroid treatment for 8 weeks. A diagnosis of hypertension was exclusionary for all potential subjects. In addition, all participants were instructed to prohibit from taking caffeine‐containing food or beverages 24 h before the study date. Two MS patients were excluded from the study due to issues with the EEG acquisition on the scan date (see EEG acquisition and analysis section). A total of 11 pwMS (mean/standard deviation age = 53 ± 6 years; seven women) and 15 HC participants (53 ± 9 years; nine women) met the inclusion criteria (Age > 18) and were included in the final analysis. Data were collected with approval from the Institutional Review Board after informed consent. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was measured in 11 pwMS.
2.1. MRI sequences
MRI scans were performed on a 3T scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) using a 20‐channel receive‐only head/neck coil. Anatomical images were collected using a T1‐weighted magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo (MPRAGE) sequence (voxel size = isotropic 1 mm3, inversion time (TI)/repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 1.1 s/1.86 s/3.4 ms, flip angle = 10°, scan time = 5:02). fMRI data were collected using a custom simultaneous multislice (SMS) dual‐echo pseudo‐continuous arterial spin labeling (pcASL) sequence 40 (voxel size = 3.8 × 3.8 × 5 mm3, slice gap = 1 mm, TR/TE1/TE2 = 4 s/13.4 ms/34 ms, pseudo‐continuous tagging period = 1.5 s, post delay after tagging = 2 s, SMS acceleration factor = 3, total 18 slices). Rs‐fMRI data were collected using a single‐shot gradient‐echo echo‐planar imaging (EPI) sequence (TR/TE = 2.8 s/29 ms, flip angle = 80°, voxel size = 2 × 2 × 4 mm3, 31 slices, 132 volumes, scan time = 7 min 36 s). qCBF were measured using pulsed tagging 3d gradient and spin‐echo (GRASE) readout ASL sequence with background suppression at the resting state (TR/TE = 4s/20 ms, FOV = 240 mm2 voxel size = 3.8 × 3.8 × 4.5 mm3, TI/TI1 = 2 s/0.8 s, 10 pairs of control and tagged images, total scan time = 5:40). M0 image was acquired with the identical MR parameters of 3D GRASE ASL scan without the background suppression and inversion pulses.
2.2. Visual stimulus
During 2 SMS dual‐echo pcASL scans (See MRI sequences), a flashing checkerboard pattern alternating at 4 Hz was projected to the screen for 48 s (On period), followed by 48 s of black screen (Off period). Four On and three Off periods were repeated in an interleaved mode before and after 1‐min of pre‐and post‐Off periods. Each SMS dual‐echo pcASL scan acquires 57 volumes of control and tagging, resulting in a scan time of 7 min 36 s.
2.3. Hypercapnia challenge
Hypercapnia condition was achieved in participants by delivering medical gas with a 5% CO2 mixture via a non‐diffusible Douglas bag and a nonrebreathing 3‐way valve. The first gas was delivered for 2 min after 2 min of room‐air breathing, followed by 3 min of room‐air breathing, a second 2 min of gas delivery, and another 3 min of room‐air breathing. An SMS dual‐echo pcASL scan including 90 volumes of control and tagging was acquired (total scan time of 12 min).
2.4. MRI analysis
Head motion was estimated in the time series of second echo images in the pcASL scan using the rigid volume motion assumption. Using the estimated volume motion of the second echo images, the first and second echo images of the pcASL scan were aligned to the first volume. To generate time‐series CBF weighted images, the first echo images with tagging were subtracted from the averaged adjacent first echo control images, 41 and the time‐series of the second echo images were used as BOLD contrast images. Finally, 3‐dimensional 8‐mm full‐width half‐maximum Gaussian spatial filtering was applied to the time series of CBF and BOLD weighted images.
The activated region of interest (ROI) was defined using uncorrected p < 0.01 on time‐series CBF images with voxel‐wise multiple regression to the VT paradigm, including a constant regressor (e.g., zero‐order detrending). The activated ROI was limited to the visual cortex region through visual checks and manual selection by the first author (fMRI scientist with over 15 years of experience). The hemodynamic response to the block‐designed paradigm was assessed on time‐series BOLD images with third‐order detrending regressors (3dDeconvolve in AFNI). The relative percent changes in CBF and BOLD during VT within the activated ROI were calculated and reported as ΔCBFVT and ΔBOLDVT. The relative percent changes in CBF and BOLD during hypercapnia were calculated within the activated ROI and reported as ΔCBFCO2 and ΔBOLDCO2 terms. Percent resting‐state fluctuation amplitude (RSFA) was calculated in the aligned activated ROI of the rs‐fMRI dataset. 42 qCBF values during the rest sate (qCBF0) were calculated from 3d GRASE ASL scan in the activated ROI.
The relative percentage change in CMRO2 during VT (ΔCMRO2VT) were calculated using Davis’ model, 43 assuming that CMRO2 is not changed during the hypercapnia condition;
(1) |
where
The constant α between CBF and cerebral blood volume and the constant β that related BOLD contrast change to the field strength were assumed to be 0.38 and 1.5 from literature reports. 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 The neuro‐vascular coupling ratio, n (= ΔCBFVT /ΔCMRO2VT) was calculated.
2.5. EEG acquisition and analysis
EEG was acquired using 64‐channel gold‐cup electrodes placed on the scalp via a standard 10‐10 EEG electrode montage system (Ives EEG Solutions, Newburyport, MA, USA). EEG electrodes were attached to the participant's scalp using a collodion adhesive. A vendor‐supplied EEG gel was used to reduce the electrode impedance to less than 20K ohm; the impedance threshold for safety is <50K. EEG data were acquired at a 5000‐Hz sampling frequency.
EEG was acquired with participants both inside and outside the MRI scanner during rest (eyes closed) and during VT described above. With the participant outside the MRI scanner, EEG was acquired in a dimly lit room. We monitored the compliance of the participant to task performance via visual assessment. Acquisition of EEG outside the scanner allowed us to (1) train the participant on the VT before the simultaneous EEG‐fMRI study and (2) compare the quality of EEG acquired inside the scanner with that acquired outside the scanner. With the participant inside the MRI scanner, we bundled the EEG leads and connectors together and placed them away from the participant's scalp to minimize imaging artifacts. The cables were routed to a battery‐powered MRI‐compatible Brainvision EEG amplifier (BrainProducts, Gilching, Germany) located at the rear of the MRI scanner bore. The helium compressor for the MRI scanner was switched off before EEG collection to minimize artifacts. The impedance of EEG leads was also checked and corrected when the participant was inside the scanner to mitigate any additional risk.
2.6. EEG data processing
The acquired EEG data were processed using the pipeline described in Figure 1. Template subtraction was used to remove MRI gradient artifacts (Figure 1B) and to down‐sample the EEG data to 1000 Hz. Cardioballistic artifacts were identified and removed from the EEG data 47 (Figure 1C). Additionally, independent component analysis decomposition was performed to identify and remove eyeblink artifacts, vibration‐related artifacts, and residual scanner artifacts 48 (Figure 1E).
FIGURE 1.
The processing pipeline for simultaneous EEG‐fMRI involving EEG recordings acquired inside and outside the MRI scanner. The pipeline includes multiple steps for artifact correction and spectral decomposition of EEG data to quantify electrophysiological correlates to blood oxygenation level–dependent (BOLD) signal changes. The final step involves estimating the percentage change in 4‐Hz signal power during the task and relating it to the BOLD signal change. ICA, independent component analysis.
2.7. Spectral analysis of EEG data
We segmented the EEG data collected during VT into 4‐s segments to match the temporal resolution (TR) of the ASL‐BOLD MRI acquisition. Our experimental design necessitated the development of novel signal processing paradigms to reduce signal artifacts and generate meaningful EEG features that can be correlated with BOLD studies. The development of a heuristic function to relate simultaneous EEG measurement and BOLD response has been previously discussed in studies by Rosa et al and Kilner et al. 49 , 50 Both of these studies used spectral decomposition of EEG to develop features that could be associated with BOLD changes. In this study, we used normalized EEG spectral power at the stimulation frequency of 4‐Hz frequency.
Spectral analysis was performed for EEG contacts sampling the occipital regions (O1, O2, Oz). The percentage change in normalized spectral power at 4 Hz at Oz from baseline to stimulation was determined as ΔEEGVT. Additionally, ΔEEGVT inside the scanner were compared with ΔEEGVT outside the scanner across subjects to test the efficacy of MR artifact removal in EEG data analysis. It should be noted that ΔEEGVT values inside and outside of the scanner are not expected to be identical or similar even within the same subject due to the additional MR noise components removal process in inside of scanner data (see Supporting Information).
2.8. Statistical analysis
We investigated the group difference of all measures (ΔBOLDVT, ΔBOLDCO2, ΔCBFVT, ΔCBFCO2, RSFA, qCBF0, ΔEEGVT) in each group using two sampled Student t‐test and conducted multicollinearity test on all MR and EEG measures. We tested the correlation between clinical and MRI/EEG measures within each group. Also, Student t‐test of each MRI/EEG measures was conducted between male and female groups. Using a step‐wise regression approach, the linear relationship between ΔBOLDVT and other MR and EEG measures was tested in both groups, progressively including all combinations of predictors (i.e. regressors) except ΔCMRO2VT because ΔCMRO2VT is a calculated measure from other MR measures and is strongly correlated to ΔCBFVT (see results). We report only statistically significant regressors and regression models (p < 0.05).
3. RESULTS
3.1. Clinical demographics
The EDSS scores in pwMS were measured with 3.75 ± 1.34 (mean/standard deviation) and an inter‐quartile range of 2.63–4.38. The age and sex of the two populations did not differ significantly (p > 0.05).
3.2. Group analyses
A significant correlation of ΔEEGACT in Oz was observed between inside and outside the MRI scanner (p = 0.0029 and 0.0267 in HC and pwMS, see Figure 3 and Table S1). The different ratio of ΔEEGACT values inside to outside of the scanner comes from the additional MR artifact removal process (see Figure S1).
FIGURE 3.
Plots of multicollinearity of MR and EEG measures. White and black circles indicate healthy controls (HC) and people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) groups, respectively. The dashed and solid lines indicate the statistically significant linear trend (p < 0.05) in HC and pwMS.
We find the significant positive correlation between ΔEEGVT and EDSS scores (p = 0.04). The scatter plot is displayed in Figure S2. The larger EDSS score indicates the severe disability. We do not observe any significant correlation between clinical and MRI measures. Any sex difference of EEG or MRI measure was not observed within a group.
PwMS demonstrated higher averaged ΔCBFVT than HC (57.6 ± 20.8% vs 41.1 ± 10.5%, p < 0.05) and lower qCBF0 in the activated ROI than HC (57.6 ± 20.8 vs. 41.1 ± 10.5 mL/100 g/min, p < 0.05, see Figure 2).
FIGURE 2.
Percentage change of EEG power and MRI measures during visual activation in healthy control (HC, white) and people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS, gray) groups. * Indicates the significant difference between groups (p < 0.05) between patients with multiple schelosis (pwMS) and healthy controls (HC). ΔBOLD/ΔCBFVT/CO2: BOLD contrast/CBF change during visual activation/hypercapnia challenge (%); qCBF0: quantitative CBF at the rest (mL/100/min); RSFA, resting state fluctuation of amplitude (%); ΔCMRO2VT, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption change during visual activation (%); ΔEEGVT, EEG power change during the visual activation (%).
Results from multicollinearity test is plotted in Figure 3, and Pearson coefficient correlation (CC) values are reported in Table S1. A significant positive correlation was seen between (1) ΔBOLDVT and ΔBOLDCO2, (2) ΔBOLDVT and RSFA, and (3) ΔBOLDCO2 and RSFA in HC group (all p < 0.05). A significant negative correlation between (1) ΔBOLDVT and ΔCBFVT (p < 0.01), and between (2) ΔBOLDVT and ΔCBFCO2 (p < 0.05) was observed in pwMS. A significant positive correlation between (1) ΔBOLDCO2 and ΔCBFCO2, and between (2) ΔCBFVT and RSFA (both p < 0.05) was observed in pwMS. ΔCBFVT and ΔCMRO2VT show a significant linear correlation in both HC (p < 0.01) and pwMS (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was observed for the neuro‐vascular coupling ratio (n) between the groups (2.45 ± 0.96 and 2.41 ± 1.18 in HC and pwMS, respectively). ΔEEGACT is not correlated to any MR measure in either HC or pwMS.
3.3. Linear regression models
HC Group: We found that the best fitting (p < 0.01) predictive model of ΔBOLDVT is ΔCBFCO2 (Student t‐score, 2.59, p = 0.024) and ΔEEGVT (Student t‐score = 2.64, p = 0.022).
pwMS Group: The best fitting linear regression model of ΔBOLDVT was ΔCBFVT (student t‐score = −4.02, p = 0.003). While the multi linear regression models with A) ΔCBFVT and ΔCBFCO2 (p = 0.0048) and B) ΔCBFVT, ΔCBFCO2 and qCBF0 (p = 0.0045) were statistically significant, F‐tests from the nested regression model of ΔCBFVT to multi‐regression models were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), indicating that ΔCBFVT is single strong predictor to be correlated to ΔBOLDVT in pwMS. The result of the tested multiple linear regression models with all significant predictors are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1.
Step‐wise multi linear regression model tested with ΔBOLDACT as measured and other MRI values and EEG as predictors in health control (HC) and MS groups.
(A) HC group | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOF | SS | MS | F | Significance F | |
Regression | 2 | 1.9130 | 0.9565 | 4.0127 | 0.0463 |
Residual | 12 | 2.8604 | 0.2384 | ||
Total | 14 | 4.7735 |
Coefficients | SE | t Stat | p‐value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 0.2320 | 0.3892 | 0.5962 | 0.5621 |
ΔCBFCO2 | 0.4042 | 0.1980 | 2.0419 | 0.0638 |
ΔEEGVT | 0.0060 | 0.0039 | 1.5431 | 0.1488 |
(B) HC group | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOF | SS | MS | F | Significance F | |
Regression | 1 | 3.7070 | 3.7070 | 16.1989 | 0.0030 |
Residual | 9 | 2.0596 | 0.2288 | ||
Total | 10 | 5.7666 |
Coefficients | SE | t Stat | p‐value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intercept | 3.8547 | 0.6086 | 6.3339 | 0.0001 |
ΔCBFACT | −0.0579 | 0.0144 | −4.0248 | 0.0030 |
Statistically significant model is only reported (p < 0.05).
Abbreviations: DOF, degree of freedom; MS, mean SS; SE, standard errors; SS, summation of the squares; t Stat, student t‐score.
4. DISCUSSION
In this study, we find the significant neuro‐vascular coupling in both HC and pwMS groups. However, incorporating simultaneous EEG and fMRI, a multiple regression model demonstrated that ΔBOLDVT is best predicted by ΔEEGVT and ΔCBFCO2 in HC, and only with ΔCBFVT in pwMS. The finding in HC suggests that the BOLD response depends on the amount of underlying neuronal activity (ΔEEGVT) and the change in blood flow to hypercapnia condition (ΔCBFCO2) which is related to cerebrovascular reactivity. In contrast, BOLD response in pwMS can be predicted from change in blood flow during the visual activation alone, strongly suggesting that BOLD activation is not reflected by neuronal activity or cerebrovascular reactivity due to the different vasodilatory responses in pwMS.
In this study, a positive correlation was seen between ΔBOLDVT and ΔBOLDCO2 in HC participants. Previous studies have similarly shown that fMRI BOLD contrast change during a task is proportional to BOLD contrast change during hypercapnia, suggesting that assessment of these factors can be used in a “normalization” process to reduce intersubject and intrasubject variation. 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 However, pwMS group does not show a significant correlation between ΔBOLDVT and ΔBOLDCO2. We also observed a positive correlation between ΔBOLDVT and RSFA in HC participants, again confirming the results of previous studies. 51 , 56 , 57 This result is not found in pwMS. A strong negative correlation was also seen between qCBF0 and ΔCBFVT in HC participants. This finding also agrees with previous research, 58 which is also not observed in pwMS. Taken together, these results indicate altered CBF baseline and CBF reactivity to hypercapnia and neuronal activation in pwMS.
We observe a significant negative correlation between ΔBOLDVT and ΔCBFVT in pwMS (Figure 3). There are no other reports of the relationship between these in prior studies, so this constitutes the first observation of this in pwMS. The negative correlation may imply that the blood flow response to neuronal activation is either unrelated or poorly related to the underlying neuronal activation in pwMS. It is known that a large baseline blood flow (qCBF0) will result in a low blood flow response to activation (ΔCBFVT) due to a ceiling effect limiting the CBF increase, resulting in a low BOLD signal change (ΔBOLDVT), which is observed in pwMS (see Figures 2 and 3). Inspection of Figure 3 and Table S1 support this, in that ΔEEGVT appears to be unrelated to ΔCBFVT for pwMS (See a grey colored subplot). Indeed, although the current study is not properly powered to measure this, the nature of the relationship between ΔEEGVT and ΔCBFVT is different for HC and pwMS.
This study presents the multi‐linear regression model of ΔBOLDVT to other MR measures including ΔEEGVT. We do not find a significant correlation between ΔEEGVT and ΔCMRO2VT in either HC or pwMS. CMRO2 measure is derived by the complex non‐linear function forms of BOLD and CBF terms with various assumptions. 43 , 59 While α and β are assumed to be 0.34 and 1.5 in most of calibrated fMRI studies, the studies find that α is much lower than 1.5 44 , 60 , 61 and depends on the regions. 62 , 63 , 64 Since β is an exponent contrast between CBF and CBV assuming with the vascular size and distribution, the different tissue composition could lead to the different value, for example, the deformed tissue due to the disease. For this reason, the multi‐linear regression model used here explores simple linear relationships between ΔBOLDVT and other measures, which is not probing the details of the BOLD contrast mechanism. For example, ΔBOLDVT is positively correlated to ΔEEGVT and ΔCBFCO2 in HC group (see Table 1), indicating that the indirect neural activation measure, ΔBOLDVT is linearly predicted when the vascular reactivity (not CVR here) of ΔCBFCO2 are considered in addition to the direct neuronal activation measure of ΔEEGVT. These relationships are not observed in pwMS.
While we find a positive correlation between ΔEEGVT and EDSS scores in pwMS, the correlation is mainly determined by a patient with EDSS score = 6 (see Figure S2). This finding is opposite to the previous studies. The decreased latency and reaction time of P3 event‐related potentials to EDSS scores was observed during the cognitive test. 65 The positive correlation between P3 event‐related potentials to PASAT score was presented in pwMS. 66 Our finding should be validated with a large sample in a future study.
This study was limited by the small number of subjects included in the analysis. For this reason, anatomical MRI‐derived information, for example, MRI disease burden, atrophy, lesion load etc was not considered within pwMS. Also, the location and burden of the focal lesion in pwMS, which can determine functional disability are not considered in this study. Cerebrovascular reactivity, another factor often assessed in such studies, is defined as the ratio of percent hypercapnic blood flow change to change in end‐tidal CO2 67 was not accessible in this study due to the lack of ability to measure end‐tidal CO2. In addition, it must be noted that EEG data collected inside the MRI scanner are prone to contamination from multiple sources, including artifacts related to MRI gradient, cardioballistic artifacts, and vibration‐related artifacts. Even with preventative measures and EEG postprocessing strategies to reduce these artifacts, the quality of EEG recorded inside the scanner is suboptimal when compared to the quality of EEG recorded outside. Additionally, small movements of the participant inside the scanner can induce large EEG potentials, leading to improper estimation of spectral power. These factors could account for the systematically lower EEG spectral measures recorded inside the scanner (see Supporting Information).
5. CONCLUSION
In this study incorporating concurrent fMRI and EEG measurements, we find statistically significant neurovascular coupling in both HC and pwMS. However, the coupling ratio is not significantly different between groups. We observe significant group differences of ΔCBFVT and qCBF0. It is observed that ΔBOLDVT is positively correlated to ΔEEGVT and ΔCBFCO2 in HC and negatively to ΔCBFVT in pwMS. All of these results imply very different vasodilatory behavior in response to task activation between pwMS and HC. These results also provide further evidence of impaired cerebral hemodynamics in pwMS, possibly leading to some of the widely observed abnormal BOLD activation in fMRI studies.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
Daniel Ontaneda declares a conflict of interest: Research support from the National Institutes of Health, National Multiple Sclerosis Society, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Race to Erase MS Foundation, Genentech, Genzyme, and Novartis. Consulting fees from Biogen Idec, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Genzyme, Janssen, Novartis, and Merck. Other authors have no conflicts to disclose.
Supporting information
Supporting information
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NIDA 1R21NS106522‐01A1). Preliminary work that was vital to the development of the methods presented here were supported by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (NMSS PP1898) and a pilot study grant by the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke (NIDA 1R03NS091753‐01). We also appreciate Megan Griffiths for editing the manuscript.
Shin W, Krishnan B, Nemani A, Ontaneda D, Lowe MJ. Investigation of neuro‐vascular reactivity on fMRI study during visual activation in people with multiple sclerosis using EEG and hypercapnia challenge. Med Phys. 2025;52:5081–5090. 10.1002/mp.17772
REFERENCES
- 1. Adams RD, Victor M, Ropper AH, Daroff RB. Principles of neurology. LWW; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 2. McGinley MP, Goldschmidt CH, AD Rae‐Grant. Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. JAMA. 2021;325(8):765‐779. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, Rudick R, Mork S, Bo L. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(5):278‐285. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801293380502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ferguson B, Matyszak MK, Esiri MM, Perry VH. Axonal damage in acute multiple sclerosis lesions. Brain. 1997;120(3):393‐399. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.3.393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kutzelnigg A, Lucchinetti CF, Stadelmann C, et al. Cortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2005;128(11):2705‐2712. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh641 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Regan D, Bartol S, Murray TJ, Beverley KI. Spatial frequency discrimination in normal vision and in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1982;105(4):735‐754. doi: 10.1093/brain/105.4.735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ruchkin DS, Grafman J, Krauss GL, Johnson R, Jr., Canoune H, Ritter W. Event‐related brain potential evidence for a verbal working memory deficit in multiple sclerosis. Brain. 1994;117(Pt 2):289‐305. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.2.289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Regan D, Simpson T. Multiple sclerosis can cause visual processing deficits specific to texture‐defined form. Neurology. 1995;45(4):809‐815. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.4.809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rao SM, Leo GJ, Bernardin L, Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. 1991;41(5):685‐691. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Trapp BD, Stys PK. Virtual hypoxia and chronic necrosis of demyelinated axons in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(3):280‐291. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70043-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Juurlink BH. The evidence for hypoperfusion as a factor in multiple sclerosis lesion development. Mult Scler Int. 2013;2013:598093. doi: 10.1155/2013/598093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Davies AL, Desai RA, Bloomfield PS, et al. Neurological deficits caused by tissue hypoxia in neuroinflammatory disease. Ann Neurol. 2013;74(6):815‐825. doi: 10.1002/ana.24006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. West K, Sivakolundu D, Maruthy G, et al. Baseline cerebral metabolism predicts fatigue and cognition in multiple sclerosis patients. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;27:102281. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Vestergaard MB, Frederiksen JL, Larsson HBW, Cramer SP. Cerebrovascular reactivity and neurovascular coupling in multiple sclerosis – a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2022;13:912828. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.912828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mainero C, Caramia F, Pozzilli C, et al. fMRI evidence of brain reorganization during attention and memory tasks in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2004;21(3):858‐867. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wishart HA, Saykin AJ, McDonald BC, et al. Brain activation patterns associated with working memory in relapsing‐remitting MS. Neurology. 2004;62(2):234‐238. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000103238.91536.5f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hulst HE, Schoonheim MM, Roosendaal SD, et al. Functional adaptive changes within the hippocampal memory system of patients with multiple sclerosis. Human Brain Map. 2012;33(10):2268‐2280. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Amann M, Andelova M, Pfister A, et al. Subcortical brain segmentation of two dimensional T1‐weighted data sets with FMRIB's integrated registration and segmentation tool (FIRST). Neuroimage Clin. 2015;7:43‐52. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Morgen K, Sammer G, Courtney SM, et al. Distinct mechanisms of altered brain activation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2007;37(3):937‐946. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Loitfelder M, Fazekas F, Petrovic K, et al. Reorganization in cognitive networks with progression of multiple sclerosis: insights from fMRI. Neurology. 2011;76(6):526‐533. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820b75cf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Leavitt VM, Wylie G, Genova HM, Chiaravalloti ND, DeLuca J. Altered effective connectivity during performance of an information processing speed task in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2012;18(4):409‐417. doi: 10.1177/1352458511423651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Koini M, Filippi M, Rocca MA, et al. Correlates of executive functions in multiple sclerosis based on structural and functional MR imaging: insights from a multicenter study. Radiology. 2016;280(3):869‐879. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016151809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Vacchi L, Rocca MA, Meani A, et al. Working memory network dysfunction in relapse‐onset multiple sclerosis phenotypes: a clinical‐imaging evaluation. Mult Scler. 2017;23(4):577‐587. doi: 10.1177/1352458516656809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rocca MA, Vacchi L, Rodegher M, et al. Mapping face encoding using functional MRI in multiple sclerosis across disease phenotypes. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017;11(5):1238‐1247. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9591-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lowe MJ, Phillips MD, Lurito JT, Mattson D, Dzemidzic M, Mathews VP. Multiple sclerosis: low‐frequency temporal blood oxygen level‐dependent fluctuations indicate reduced functional connectivity initial results. Radiology. 2002;224(1):184‐192. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241011005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Rocca MA, Valsasina P, Absinta M, et al. Default‐mode network dysfunction and cognitive impairment in progressive MS. Neurology. 2010;74(16):1252‐1259. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d9ed91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Lowe MJ, Beall EB, Sakaie KE, et al. Resting state sensorimotor functional connectivity in multiple sclerosis inversely correlates with transcallosal motor pathway transverse diffusivity. Hum Brain Map. 2008;29(7):818‐827. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lowe MJ, Koenig KA, Beall EB, et al. Anatomic connectivity assessed using pathway radial diffusivity is related to functional connectivity in monosynaptic pathways. Brain Connect. 2014;4(7):558‐565. doi: 10.1089/brain.2014.0265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rocca MA, Valsasina P, Leavitt VM, et al. Functional network connectivity abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: correlations with disability and cognitive impairment. Mult Scler. 2018;24(4):459‐471. doi: 10.1177/1352458517699875 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. de Hidalgo la, Cruz M, Valsasina P, et al. Dynamic functional connectivity in the main clinical phenotypes of multiple sclerosis. Brain Connect. 2021;11(8):678‐690. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Reddy H, Narayanan S, Woolrich M, et al. Functional brain reorganization for hand movement in patients with multiple sclerosis: defining distinct effects of injury and disability. Brain. 2002;125(12):2646‐2657. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf283 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Pantano P, Iannetti GD, Caramia F, et al. Cortical motor reorganization after a single clinical attack of multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 7):1607‐1615. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Brooks DJ, Leenders KL, Head G, Marshall J, Legg NJ, Jones T. Studies on regional cerebral oxygen utilisation and cognitive function in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47(11):1182‐1191. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.11.1182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Inglese M, Adhya S, Johnson G, et al. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging correlates of neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28(1):164‐171. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Inglese M, Park SJ, Johnson G, et al. Deep gray matter perfusion in multiple sclerosis: dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(2):196‐202. doi: 10.1001/archneur.64.2.196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ge Y, Law M, Johnson G, et al. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging of multiple sclerosis lesions: characterizing hemodynamic impairment and inflammatory activity. Ajnr. 2005;26(6):1539‐1547. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Van der Meer ML, Tewarie P, Schoonheim MM, et al. Cognition in MS correlates with resting‐state oscillatory brain activity: an explorative MEG source‐space study. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;2:727‐734. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Keune PM, Hansen S, Weber E, et al. Exploring resting‐state EEG brain oscillatory activity in relation to cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;128(9):1746‐1754. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Cover KS, Vrenken H, Geurts JJ, et al. Multiple sclerosis patients show a highly significant decrease in alpha band interhemispheric synchronization measured using MEG. Neuroimage. 2006;29(3):783‐788. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kim T, Shin W, Zhao T, Beall EB, Lowe MJ, Bae KT. Whole brain perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling with multiband acquisition. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70(6):1653‐1661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Liu TT, Wong EC. A signal processing model for arterial spin labeling functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2005;24(1):207‐215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Kannurpatti SS, Rypma B, Biswal BB. Prediction of task‐related BOLD fMRI with amplitude signatures of resting‐state fMRI. Front Syst Neurosci. 2012;6:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Davis TL, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Rosen BR. Calibrated functional MRI: mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 1998;95(4):1834‐1839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Grubb RL Jr., Raichle ME, Eichling JO, Ter‐Pogossian MM. The effects of changes in PaCO2 on cerebral blood volume, blood flow, and vascular mean transit time. Stroke. 1974;5(5):630‐639. doi: 10.1161/01.str.5.5.630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Boxerman JL, Bandettini PA, Kwong KK, et al. The intravascular contribution to fMRI signal change: monte Carlo modeling and diffusion‐weighted studies in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34(1):4‐10. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Hoge RD, Atkinson J, Gill B, Crelier GR, Marrett S, Pike GB. Investigation of BOLD signal dependence on cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption: the deoxyhemoglobin dilution model. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42(5):849‐863. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Allen PJ, Josephs O, Turner R. A method for removing imaging artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI. Neuroimage. 2000;12(2):230‐239. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Mantini D, Perrucci MG, Cugini S, Ferretti A, Romani GL, Del Gratta C. Complete artifact removal for EEG recorded during continuous fMRI using independent component analysis. Neuroimage. 2007;34(2):598‐607. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Rosa MJ, Kilner J, Blankenburg F, Josephs O, Penny W. Estimating the transfer function from neuronal activity to BOLD using simultaneous EEG‐fMRI. Neuroimage. 2010;49(2):1496‐1509. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kilner JM, Mattout J, Henson R, Friston KJ. Hemodynamic correlates of EEG: a heuristic. Neuroimage. 2005;28(1):280‐286. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Biswal BB, Kannurpatti SS, Rypma B. Hemodynamic scaling of fMRI‐BOLD signal: validation of low‐frequency spectral amplitude as a scalability factor. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25(10):1358‐1369. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.03.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Bandettini PA, Wong EC. A hypercapnia‐based normalization method for improved spatial localization of human brain activation with fMRI. NMR Biomed. 1997;10(4‐5):197‐203. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Cohen ER, Rostrup E, Sidaros K, et al. Hypercapnic normalization of BOLD fMRI: comparison across field strengths and pulse sequences. Neuroimage. 2004;23(2):613‐624. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Handwerker DA, Gazzaley A, Inglis BA, D'Esposito M. Reducing vascular variability of fMRI data across aging populations using a breathholding task. Hum Brain Map. 2007;28(9):846‐859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Thomason ME, Foland LC, Glover GH. Calibration of BOLD fMRI using breath holding reduces group variance during a cognitive task. Hum Brain Map. 2007;28(1):59‐68. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kannurpatti SS, Biswal BB. Detection and scaling of task‐induced fMRI‐BOLD response using resting state fluctuations. Neuroimage. 2008;40(4):1567‐1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Guidi M, Huber L, Lampe L, Merola A, Ihle K, Moller HE. Cortical laminar resting‐state signal fluctuations scale with the hypercapnic blood oxygenation level‐dependent response. Hum Brain Map. 2020;41(8):2014‐2027. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Liau J, Liu TT. Inter‐subject variability in hypercapnic normalization of the BOLD fMRI response. Neuroimage. 2009;45(2):420‐430. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.11.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Buxton RB, Frank LR. A model for the coupling between cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism during neural stimulation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1997;17(1):64‐72. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199701000-00009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Chen JJ, Pike GB. BOLD‐specific cerebral blood volume and blood flow changes during neuronal activation in humans. NMR Biomed. 2009;22(10):1054‐1062. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Stefanovic B, Hutchinson E, Yakovleva V, et al. Functional reactivity of cerebral capillaries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2008;28(5):961‐972. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Ances BM, Leontiev O, Perthen JE, Liang C, Lansing AE, Buxton RB. Regional differences in the coupling of cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism changes in response to activation: implications for BOLD‐fMRI. Neuroimage. 2008;39(4):1510‐1521. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Griffeth VE, Buxton RB. A theoretical framework for estimating cerebral oxygen metabolism changes using the calibrated‐BOLD method: modeling the effects of blood volume distribution, hematocrit, oxygen extraction fraction, and tissue signal properties on the BOLD signal. Neuroimage. 2011;58(1):198‐212. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Mark CI, Pike GB. Indication of BOLD‐specific venous flow‐volume changes from precisely controlled hyperoxic vs. hypercapnic calibration. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32(4):709‐719. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2011.174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Vázquez‐Marrufo M, Galvao‐Carmona A, Caballero‐Díaz R, et al. Altered individual behavioral and EEG parameters are related to the EDSS score in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis patients. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219594 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Kiiski H, Reilly RB, Lonergan R, et al. Change in PASAT performance correlates with change in P3 ERP amplitude over a 12‐month period in multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Sci. 2011;305(1‐2):45‐52. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2011.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Yezhuvath US, Lewis‐Amezcua K, Varghese R, Xiao G, Lu H. On the assessment of cerebrovascular reactivity using hypercapnia BOLD MRI. NMR Biomed. 2009;22(7):779‐786. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting information
Supporting information