Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jul 24.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2025 Apr 10;27(17):4501–4506. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5c01026

Formal Synthesis of Fostriecin via Asymmetric Alcohol-Mediated Carbonyl Allylation

Dana E Pfaffinger 1, Michael J Krische 1
PMCID: PMC12288143  NIHMSID: NIHMS2097169  PMID: 40209063

Abstract

A formal synthesis of fostriecin via convergent assembly of two fragments prepared via asymmetric alcohol-mediated C-C coupling is described. One fragment is made by enantioselective iridium-catalyzed allylation of an allylic alcohol mediated by allyl acetate. The other fragment is made via enantioselective ruthenium-catalyzed reductive syn-(α-alkoxy)allylation of an aldehyde mediated by an alkoxyallene (where 2-propanol is the hydrogen source), representing the first use of this method in target-oriented synthesis. Metathetic fragment union enables interception of a late-stage compound that previously required a 25 step (LLS) synthesis in only 7 steps (LLS).

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2097169-f0001.jpg


Fostriecin (CI-920) is a secondary metabolite isolated from the fermentation broth of the Brazilian soil bacteria Streptomyces pulveraceus (subsp. fostreus) in 1983.1 Fostriecin is the founding member of a broad family of phosphorylated polyketides isolated from various Streptomyces strains that have attracted significant interest from the scientific community due to their cytotoxicity, antifungal activity, and ability to affect signal transduction pathways (Figure 1A).2 Fostriecin is a known inhibitor of topoisomerase II (TOP2, IC50 = 40 μM);3 however, its antitumor activity is attributed to its more potent inhibition of protein phosphatase type 2A (PP2A, IC50 = 1.5 nM)4 and protein phosphatase type 4 (PP4, IC50 = 3.0 nM),5 which results in mitotic entry checkpoint inhibition.46,11c Moreover, fostriecin displays remarkable selectivity for PP2A/PP4 over the closely related protein phosphatase 1 (PP1, IC50 = 40 μM).4 This 104 difference in selectivity is attributed to conjugate addition of a cysteine residue not found in PP1 to the α,β-unsaturated lactone of fostriecin.7 Saturation of the α,β-alkene results in a 200-fold loss of potency, suggesting that the lactone participates in active site binding.7b Discovery of a phoslactomycin A-PP2A adduct bound to the Cys-269 residue further supports this model for selectivity.8 Fostriecin’s selectivity for PP2A over related protein phosphatase family members made it an attractive clinical candidate;9 however, clinical trials were halted in stage IA due to purity and stability concerns associated with naturally sourced material.10 De novo chemical synthesis potentially offers access to material of consistent purity and analogs with more ideal pharmacokinetic properties. Indeed, as demonstrated in 19 reported total and formal syntheses that range from 16 to 34 steps in length (LLS), great efforts have been put forth by synthetic chemists to meet this challenge (Figure 1B).11,12 Here, we report a convergent 16 step (LLS) formal synthesis of fostriecin via transfer hydrogenative C-C coupling.1315 Specifically, using an enantioselective iridium-catalyzed allylation of an allylic alcohol mediated by allyl acetate16 and an enantioselective ruthenium-catalyzed syn-(α-alkoxy)allylation of an aldehyde mediated by an alkoxyallene (with 2-propanol as reductant),17,18 a late-stage intermediate that previously required a 25 step (LLS) preparation12k,l was intercepted in only 7 steps (LLS), nearly doubling the proportion of skeletal assembly events compared to the parent total synthesis (38% vs 21%) (Figure 1C). This work represents the first use of the enantioselective ruthenium-catalyzed syn-(α-alkoxy)allylation in target-oriented synthesis.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The fostriecin family of phosphorylated polyketide natural products. Total and formal syntheses of fostriecin (LLS = Longest linear sequence, TS = Total Steps). Retrosynthetic analysis of Hayashi’s late-stage intermediate.a

Retrosynthetically, a convergent formal synthesis of fostriecin was envisioned in which the previously reported late-stage intermediate, Fragment C, was formed via cross-metathesis of Fragment B and Fragment A. Precedent for cross-metatheses of secondary allylic alcohols or ethers with tertiary allylic alcohols is scant,19 and corresponding cross-metatheses of secondary allylic esters/lactones with tertiary allylic ethers is, to our knowledge, unknown. Hence, the feasibility of engaging Fragment A in efficient cross-metathesis was uncertain. Access to Fragment B was deemed possible via transfer hydrogenative allylation of allylic alcohol 4 mediated by allyl acetate16 followed by ring-closing metathesis using the TMS moiety as a regiocontrol element.20 Similarly, it was posited that access to Fragment A could be achieved using our recently developed 2-propanol-mediated reductive syn-(α-alkoxy)allylation of aldehyde 2 mediated by the indicated O-benzhydryl alkoxyallene 1.17,18

The synthesis of Fragment A begins with the ruthenium-BINAP-catalyzed reductive coupling of allylation of O-benzhydryl alkoxyallene 1 with aldehyde 2 mediated by 2-propanol (Scheme 1).17,18 The product of syn-(α-alkoxy)allylation 3 was formed in 68% yield on 3 mmol scale with good control of syn-diastereo- and enantioselectivity (10:1 dr, 92% ee). Sodium naphthalenide-mediated cleavage of the benzhydryl and p-methoxybenzyl ethers provided a triol (not shown),21 which was converted to the acetonide Fragment A.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of Fragment A via enantioselective ruthenium-catalyzed. syn-(α-alkoxy)allylation aldehyde 2.a

aYields of material isolated by silica gel chromatography. Diastereoselectivities were determined by 1H NMR analysis of purified material. Enantioselectivities were determined by chiral stationary phase HPLC analysis. See Supporting Information for further details.

The synthesis of Fragment B begins with the redoxneutral p-allyliridium-C, O-benzoate-catalyzed coupling of allyl acetate with allylic alcohol 422 via hydrogen auto-transfer (Scheme 2).16 The product of allylation 5 was formed in 74% yield on 4 mmol scale with good control of enantioselectivity (90% ee). As previously documented,23 the π-allyliridium-C, O-benzoate is the catalyst resting state and this stable 18-electron complex is readily recovered and recycled without any erosion in performance. With allylic alcohol 5 in hand, conversion to Fragment B is readily achieved via successive acryloylation-ring-closing metathesis to form the dihydropyranone, followed by protonolytic cleavage of the vinylic trimethylsilyl moiety,24 which was required to suppress competing dihydrofuranone formation.20 Notably, the corresponding dihydropyranone bearing a SiMe2Ph moiety was prepared through an analogous route, but was resistant to protonolysis, presumably due to inductive destabilization of the carbocation intermediate. Fragment B prepared in this manner is identical to material previously prepared.25

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Synthesis of Fragment B via enantioselective iridium-catalyzed allylation of alcohol 4.a

aYields of material isolated by silica gel chromatography. Enantioselectivities were determined by chiral stationary phase HPLC analysis. See Supporting Information for further details.

As anticipated, the metathetic union of Fragment A and Fragment B proved quite challenging and required extensive optimization (Scheme 3). An excess of Fragment A was employed to mitigate dimerization of Fragment B and bias the reaction toward formation of the desired cross-metathesis product 6. Fragment A is itself stable with respect to dimerization and is readily recovered and recycled. Slow addition of the catalyst as a solution via syringe pump improved yields.26 However, these initial reaction conditions19f provided 6 in only 30% yield (Scheme 3, Entry 1). Performing the reaction at elevated temperature improved the yield of 6 (Scheme 3, Entries 2,3), as did conducting the reaction under a stream of nitrogen vs an argon balloon (Scheme 3, Entry 4), presumably due to the removal of ethylene.27 Remarkably, with the aforesaid measures taken into account, the cross-metathesis of Fragment A and Fragment B provided adduct 6 in 88% yield as a single geometrical isomer, along with an 88% recovery of Fragment A. Finally, TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of primary alcohol 6 provided Fragment C in 7 steps (LLS); a synthetic intermediate en route to fostriecin that had previously been prepared in 25 steps (LLS).12k,l Fragment C prepared in this manner is identical in all respects to the reported material.12k,l The stereogenic centers at C5, C8, and C9 of Fragment C were each generated via asymmetric alcohol-mediated C-C coupling, and were assigned as described in the parent methodological reports (based on single crystal X-ray diffraction analyses).16,17

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Metathetic union of Fragment A and Fragment B to form Fragment C.a

aYields of material isolated by silica gel chromatography. See Supporting Information for further details.

In summary, we report a formal synthesis of fostriecin using two asymmetric alcohol-mediated C-C couplings: an enantioselective iridium-catalyzed allylation of an allylic alcohol mediated by allyl acetate, and an enantioselective ruthenium-catalyzed reductive syn-(α-alkoxy)allylation of an aldehyde mediated by an alkoxyallene (employing 2-propanol as the hydrogen source). Metathetic union of these fragments enabled interception of a late-stage intermediate that previously required a 25 step (LLS) synthesis in only 7 steps (LLS) with control of relative and absolute stereochemistry.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Info

Experimental procedures, spectroscopic and chromatographic data for all new compounds (1H NMR, 13C NMR, IR, HRMS). This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Acknowledgments.

The Robert A. Welch Foundation (F-0038) and the NIH-NIGMS (R35 GM155947) are acknowledged for partial support of this research. Nancy Aguado is thanked for skillful technical assistance in the preparation of Fragment B.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.

REFERENCES

  • (1).(a) Stampwala SS; Bunge RH; Hurley TR; Willmer NE; Brankiewicz AJ; Steinman CE; Smitka TA; French JC Novel Antitumor Agents CI-920, PD 113,270 and PD 113,271 II. Isolation and Characterization. J. Antibiot 1983, 36, 1601–1605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tunac JB; Graham BD; Dobson WE Novel Antitumor Agents CI-920, PD 113,270 and PD 113,271 I. Taxonomy, Fermentation, and Biological Properties. J. Antibiot 1983, 36, 1595–1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).(a) For isolation of fostriecin family of natural products, see: Ohkuma H; Naruse N; Nishiyama Y; Tsuno T; Hoshino Y; Sawada Y; Konishi M; Oki T Sultriecin A New Antifungal and Antitumor Antibiotic from Streptomyces roseiscleroticus: Production, Isolation, Structure and Biological Activity. J. Antibiot 1992, 45, 1239–1249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Burke CP; Haq N; Boger DL Total Synthesis, Assignment of the Relative and Absolute Stereochemistry, and Structural Reassignment of Phostriecin (aka Sultriecin). J. Am. Chem. Soc 2010, 132, 2157–2159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Burke CP; Swingle MR; Honkanen RE; Boger DL Total Synthesis and Evaluation of Phostriecin and Key Structural Analogues. J. Org. Chem 2010, 75, 7505–7513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Amemiya M; Ueno M; Osono M; Masuda T; Kinoshita N; Nishida C; Hamada M; Ishizuka M; Takeuchi T Cytostatin, a Novel Inhibitor of Cell Adhesion to Components of Extracellular Matrix Produced by Streptomyces sp. MJ654-NF4 I. Taxonomy, Fermentation, Isolation, and Biological Activities. J. Antibiot 1994, 47, 536–540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Amemiya M; Someno T; Sawa R; Naganawa H; Ishizuka M; Takeuchi T Cytostatin, a Novel Inhibitor of Cell Adhesion to Components of Extracellular Matrix Produced by Streptomyces sp. MJ654-NF4 II. Physico-chemical Properties and Structure Determination. J. Antibiot 1994, 47, 541–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Fushimi S; Nishikawa S; Shimazu A; Seto H Studies on New Phosphate Ester Antifungal Antibiotics Phoslactomycins I. Taxonomy, Fermentation, Purification, and Biological Activities. J. Antibiot 1989, 42, 1019–1025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Fushimi S; Furihata K; Seto H Studies on New Phosphate Ester Antifungal Antibiotics Phoslactomycins II. Structure Elucidation of Phoslactomycins A to F. J. Antibiot 1989, 42, 1026–1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Shibata T; Kurihara S; Yoda K; Haruyama H Absolute Configuration of Leustroduscins. Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 11999–12012. [Google Scholar]; (i) Thomasi SS; Ladeira C; Ferreira D; da Fontoura Sprenger R; Badino AC; Ferreira AG; Venâncio T Identification of Two New Phosphorylated Polyketides from a Brazilian Streptomyces sp. Through the Use of LC-SPE/NMR. Helv. Chim. Acta 2016. 99, 281–285. [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Boritzki TJ; Wolfard TS; Besserer JA; Jackson RC; Fry DW Inhibition of Type II Topoisomerase by Fostriecin. Biochem. Pharmacol 1988, 37, 4063–4068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).(a) Roberge M; Tudan C; Hung SM; Harder KW; Jirik FR; Anderson H Antitumor Drug Fostriecin Inhibits the Mitotic Entry Checkpoint and Protein Phosphatases 1 and 2A. Cancer Res 1994, 54, 6115–6121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Walsh AH; Cheng A; Honkanen RE Fostriecin, an Antitumor Antibiotic with Inhibitory Activity Against Serine/Threonine Protein Phosphatases Types 1 (PPl) and 2A (PP2A), is Highly Selective for PP2A. FEBS Lett. 1997, 416, 230–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Jastie CJ; Cohen PTW Purification of protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit: inhibition by the antitumour drug fostriecin and other tumour suppressors and promoters. FEBS Lett. 1998, 431, 357–361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).(a) Cheng A; Balczon R; Zuo Z; Koons JS; Walsh AH; Honkanen RE Fostriecin-Mediated G2-M-Phase Growth Arrest Correlates with Abnormal Centrosome Replication, the Formation of Aberrant Mitotic Spindles, and the Inhibition of Serine/Threonine Protein Phosphatase Activity. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 3611–3619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Guo XW; Th’ng JP; Swank RA; Anderson HJ; Tudan C; Bradbury EM; Roberge M Chromosome Condensation Induced by Fostriecin Does Not Require p34cdc2 Kinase Activity and Histone H1 Hyperphosphorylation, but Is Associated with Enhanced Histone H2A and H3 Phosphorylation. EMBOJ. 1995, 14, 976–985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).(a) Takeuchi T; Takahashi N; Ishi K; Kusayanagi T; Kuramochi K; Sugawara F Antitumor antibiotic fostriecin covalently binds to cysteine-269 residue of protein phosphatase 2A catalytic subunit in mammalian cells. Bioorg. Med Chem 2009, 17, 8113–8122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Buck SB; Hardouin C; Ichikawa S; Soenen DR; Gauss C-M; Hwang I; Swingle MR; Bonness KM; Honkanen RE; Boger DL Fundamental Role of the Fostriecin Unsaturated Lactone and Implications for Selective Protein Phosphatase Inhibition. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2003, 125, 15694–15695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Teruya T; Simizu S; Kanoh N; Osada H Phoslactomycin Targets Cysteine-269 of the Protein Phosphatase 2A Catalytic Subunit in Cells. FEBS Lett 2005, 579, 2463–2468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).(a) For selected reviews on PP2A as a draggable target: Ruvolo PP Role of Protein Phosphatases in the Cancer Microenvironment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res 2019, 1866, 144—152; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang M; Yogesha SD; Mayfield JE; Gill GN; Zhang Y Viewing Serine/Threonine Protein Phosphatases through the Eyes of Drug Designers. FEBS J 2013, 280, 4739–4760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Janssens V; Rebollo A The Role and Therapeutic Potential of Ser/Thr Phosphatase PP2A in Apoptotic Signaling Networks in Human Cancer Cells. Curr. Mol. Med 2012, 12, 268–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Kalev P; Sablina AA Protein Phosphatase 2A as a Potential Target for Anticancer Therapy. Anti-Cancer Agents Med Chem 2011, 11, 38–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Lazo JS; Wipf P Phosphatases as Targets for Cancer Treatment. Curr. Op. Invest. Drugs 2009, 10, 1297–1304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) McConnell JL; Wadzinski BE Targeting Protein Serine/Threonine Phosphatases for Drug Development. Mol. Pharmacol 2009, 75, 1249–1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).(a) de Jong RS; Mulder NH; Uges DRA; Sleijfer D. Th.; Hoppener FJP; Groen HJM; Willemse PHB; van der Graaf WTA; de Vries EGE Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Topoisomerase II Catalytic Inhibitor Fostriecin. Brit. J. Cancer 1999, 79, 882–887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Le LH; Erlichman C; Pillon L ; Thiessen JJ; Day A; Wainman N; Eisenhauer EA; Moore MJ Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Fostriecin Given as An Intravenous Bolus Daily for Five Consecutive Days. Invest. New Drugs 2004, 22, 159–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).(a) For selected reviews on the synthesis of fostriecin, see: Trost BM; Knopf JD; Brindle CS Synthetic Strategies Employed for the Construction of Fostriecin and Related Natural Products. Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 15035–15088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Shibasaki M; Kanai M Synthetic Strategies of Fostriecin. Heterocycles 2005, 66, 727–741. [Google Scholar]; (c) Lewy DS; Gauss C-M; Soenen DR; Boger DL Fostriecin: Chemistry and Biology. Curr. Med Chem 2002, 9, 2005–2032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).(a) For prior total and formal syntheses of fostriecin, see: Boger DL; Ichikawa S; Zhong W Total Synthesis of Fostriecin (CI-920). J. Am. Chem. Soc 2001, 123, 4161 4167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Chavez DE; Jacobsen EN Total Synthesis of Fostriecin (CI-920). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2001, 40, 3667–3670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Reddy YK; Falck JR Asymmetric Total Synthesis of (+)-Fostriecin. Org. Lett 2002, 4, 969–971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Miyashita K; Ikejiri M; Kawasaki H; Maemura S; Imanishi T Total Synthesis of Fostriecin (CI-920) via a Convergent Route. Chem. Commun 2002, 742–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Wang Y-G; Kobayashi Y Formal Total Synthesis of Fostriecin. Org. Lett 2002, 4, 4615–1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Esumi T; Okamoto N; Hatakeyama S Versatile Enantiocontrolled Synthesis of (+)-Fostriecin. Chem. Commun 2002, 3042–3043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Miyashita K; Ikejiri M; Kawasaki H; Maemura S; Imanishi T Total Synthesis of an Antitumor Antibiotic, Fostriecin (CI-920). J. Am. Chem. Soc 2003, 125, 8238–8243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Fujii K; Maki K; Kanai M; Shibasaki M Formal Catalytic Asymmetric Total Synthesis of Fostriecin. Org. Lett 2003, 5, 733–736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Trost BM; Frederiksen MU; Papillon JPN; Harrington PE; Shin S; Shireman BT Dinuclear Asymmetric Zn Aldol Additions: Formal Asymmetric Synthesis of Fostriecin. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2005, 127, 3666–3667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (j) Yadav JS; Prathap L; Tadi BP Formal Synthesis of Fostriecin by a Carbohydrate-Based Approach. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3773–3776. [Google Scholar]; (k) Hayashi Y; Yamaguchi H; Toyoshima M; Okado K; Toyo T; Shoji M Formal Total Synthesis of Fostriecin via 1,4-Asymmetric Induction Using Cobalt-Alkyne Complex. Org. Lett 2008, 10, 1405–1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (l) Hayashi Y; Yamaguchi H; Toyoshima M; Okado K; Toyo T; Shoji M Formal Total Synthesis of Fostriecin by 1,4-Asymmetric Induction with an Alkyne–Cobalt Complex Chem. Eur. J 2010, 16, 10150–10159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (m) Robles O; McDonald FE Convergent Synthesis of Fostriecin via Selective Alkene Couplings and Regioselective Asymmetric Dihydroxylation. Org. Lett 2009, 11, 5498–5501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (n) Sarkar SM ; Wanzala EN; Shibahara S; Takahashi K; Ishihara J; Hatakeyama S Enantio- and Stereoselective Route to the Phoslactomycin Family of Antibiotics: Formal Synthesis of (+)-Fostriecin and (+)-Phoslactomycin B. Chem. Commun 2009, 5907–5909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (o) Shibahara S; Fujino M; Tashiro Y; Okamoto N; Esumi T; Takahashi K; Ishihara J; Hatakeyama S Total Synthesis of (+)-Fostriecin and (+)-Phoslactomycin B. Synthesis 2009, 2935–2953. [Google Scholar]; (p) Li D; Zhao Y; Ye L; Chen C; Zhang J A Formal Total Synthesis of Fostriecin by a Convergent Approach. Synthesis 2010, 3325–3331. [Google Scholar]; (q) Gao D; O’Doherty GA Total Synthesis of Fostriecin: Via a Regio- and Stereoselective Polyene Hydration, Oxidation, and Hydroboration Sequence. Org. Lett 2010, 12, 3752–3755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (r) Zhang H-J; Yin L Asymmetric Synthesis of α,β-Unsaturated δ-Lactones through Copper(I)-Catalyzed Direct Vinylogous Aldol Reaction J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 12270–12279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (s) Gao D Li B; O’Doherty GA Synthesis of Dehydro-Dephospho-Fostriecin and Formal Total Synthesis of Fostriecin Org. Lett 2019, 21, 8334–8338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (t) Dong G; Li B; O’Doherty GA Total and Formal Syntheses of Fostriecin. Org. Chem. Front 2020, 7, 3608–3615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (u) Umemiya S; Terada M Catalytic Enantioselective Allylation of Acetylenic Aldehydes by Chiral Phosphoric Acid/Transition Metal Cooperative Catalysis: Formal Synthesis of Fostriecin. Org. Lett 2021, 23, 3767–3771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).(a) For reviews on polyketide construction via hydrogen auto-transfer processes that enable carbonyl addition from alcohol proelectrophiles, see: Dechert-Schmitt A-MR; Schmitt DC; Gao X; Itoh T; Krische MJ Polyketide Construction via Hydrohydroxyalkylation and Related Alcohol C-H Functionalizations: Reinventing the Chemistry of Carbonyl Addition. Nat. Prod. Rep 2014, 31, 504–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Feng J; Kasun ZA; Krische MJ Enantioselective Alcohol C-H Functionalization for Polyketide Construction: Unlocking Redox-Economy and Site-Selectivity for Ideal Chemical Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 5467–5478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ortiz E; Saludares C; Wu J; Cho Y; Santana CG; Krische MJ Carbonyl Allylation and Crotylation: Historical Perspective, Relevance to Polyketide Synthesis and Evolution of Enantioselective Ruthenium-Catalyzed Hydrogen Auto-Transfer Processes. Synthesis 2023, 1487–1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wu J; Verboom KL; Krische MJ Catalytic Enantioselective C-C Coupling of Alcohols for Polyketide Total Synthesis beyond Chiral Auxiliaries and Premetalated Reagents. Chem. Rev 2024, 124, 13715–13735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).(a) For selected reviews on hydrogen auto-transfer processes that enable carbonyl addition from alcohol proelectrophiles and related 2-propanol-mediated aldehyde additions, see: Kim SW; Zhang W; Krische MJ Catalytic Enantioselective Carbonyl Allylation and Propargylation via Alcohol-Mediated Hydrogen Transfer: Merging the Chemistry of Grignard and Sabatier. Acc. Chem. Res 2017, 50, 2371–2380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Santana CG; Krische MJ From Hydrogenation to Transfer Hydrogenation to Hydrogen Auto-Transfer in Enantioselective Metal-Catalyzed Carbonyl Reductive Coupling: Past, Present and Future. ACS Catal 2021, 11, 5572–5585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Shezaf JZ; Santana CG; Ortiz E; Meyer CC; Liu P; Sakata K; Huang K-W; Krische MJ Leveraging the Stereochemical Complexity of Octahedral Diastereomeric-at-Metal Catalysts to Unlock Regio- Diastereo- and Enantioselectivity in Alcohol-Mediated C-C Couplings via Hydrogen Transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2024, 146, 7905–7914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).(a) The hydrogen-mediated carbonyl additions developed in the present authors lab are distinct from “borrowing hydrogen” processes that result in hydroxyl substitution. For general reviews on the latter, see: Hamid MHSA; Slatford PA; Williams JMJ Borrowing Hydrogen in The Activation of Alcohols. Adv. Synth. Catal 2007, 349, 1555–1575. [Google Scholar]; (b) Guillena G; Ramon DJ; Yus M Alcohols as Electrophiles in C-C Bond-Forming Reactions: The Hydrogen Autotransfer Process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2007, 46, 2358–2364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Bähn S; Imm S; Neubert L; Zhang M; Neumann H; Beller M The Catalytic Amination of Alcohols. ChemCatChem 2011, 3, 1853–1864. [Google Scholar]; (d) Yang Q; Wang Q; Yu Z Substitution of Alcohols by N-Nucleophiles via Transition Metal-Catalyzed Dehydrogenation. Chem. Soc. Rev 2015, 44, 2305–2329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Aitchison H; Wingad RL; Wass DF Homogeneous Ethanol to Butanol Catalysis - Guerbet Renewed. ACS Catal 2016, 6, 7125–7132. [Google Scholar]; (f) Quintard A; Rodriguez J Catalytic Enantioselective OFF ↔ ON Activation Processes Initiated by Hydrogen Transfer: Concepts and Challenges. Chem. Comm 2016, 52, 10456–10473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Reed-Berendt BG; Polidano K; Morrill LC Recent Advances in Homogeneous Borrowing Hydrogen Catalysis Using Earth-Abundant First Row Transition Metals. Org. Biomol. Chem 2019, 17, 1595–1607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Kwok T; Hoff O; Armstrong RJ; Donohoe TJ Control of Absolute Stereochemistry in Transition-Metal-Catalysed Hydrogen-Borrowing Reactions. Chem. Eur. J 2020, 26, 12912–12926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (i) Alexandridis A; Quintard A Enantioselective Borrowing Hydrogen: A Modern Tool to Construct Enantioenriched Molecules. ChemCatChem 2024, e202400902. [Google Scholar]
  • (16).(a) Kim IS; Ngai M-Y; Krische MJ Enantioselective Iridium Catalyzed Carbonyl Allylation from the Alcohol or Aldehyde Oxidation Level Using Allyl Acetate as an Allyl Metal Surrogate. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 6340–6341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kim IS; Ngai M-Y; Krische MJ Enantioselective Iridium Catalyzed Carbonyl Allylation from the Alcohol or Aldehyde Oxidation Level via Transfer Hydrogenative Coupling of Allyl Acetate: Departure from Chirally Modified Allyl Metal Reagents in Carbonyl Addition. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 14891–14899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hassan A; Lu Y; Krische MJ Elongation of 1,3-Polyols via Iterative Catalyst-Directed Carbonyl Allylation from the Alcohol Oxidation Level. Org. Lett 2009, 11, 3112–3115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Schmitt DC; Dechert-Schmitt A-MR; Krische MJ Iridium-Catalyzed Allylation of Chiral β-Stereogenic Alcohols: Bypassing Discrete Formation of Epimerizable Aldehydes. Org. Lett 2012, 14, 6302–6305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Dechert-Schmitt A-MR; Schmitt DC; Krische MJ Protecting-Group-Free Diastereoselective C-C Coupling of 1,3-Glycols and Allyl Acetate through Site-Selective Primary Alcohol Dehydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52, 3195–3198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Shin I; Wang G; Krische MJ Catalyst-Directed Diastereo- and Site-Selectivity in Successive Nucleophilic and Electrophilic Allylations of Chiral 1,3-Diols: Protecting-Group-Free Synthesis of Substituted Pyrans. Chem. Eur. J 2014, 20, 13382–13389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Kim SW; Lee W; Krische MJ Asymmetric Allylation of Glycidols Mediated by Allyl Acetate via Iridium-Catalyzed Hydrogen Transfer. Org. Lett 2017, 19, 1252–1254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Xiang M; Pfaffinger D; Ortiz E; Brito GA; Krische MJ Enantioselective Ruthenium-BINAP-Catalyzed Carbonyl Reductive Coupling of Alkoxyallenes: Convergent Construction of syn-sec,tert-Diols via (Z)-σ-Allylmetal Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021, 143, 8849–8854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).(a) For reviews on the use of allenes as allylmetal pronucleophiles in metal-catalyzed carbonyl addition, see: Holmes M; Schwartz LA; Krische MJ Intermolecular Metal-Catalyzed Reductive Coupling of Dienes, Allenes, and Enynes with Carbonyl Compounds and Imines. Chem. Rev 2018, 118, 6026–6052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xiang M; Pfaffinger DE; Krische MJ Allenes and Dienes as Chiral Allylmetal Pronucleophiles in Catalytic Enantioselective C=X Addition: Historical Perspective and State-of-The-Art Survey. Chem. Eur. J 2021, 27, 13107–13116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ortiz E; Shezaf JZ; Shen W; Krische MJ Historical Perspective on Ruthenium-Catalyzed Hydrogen Transfer and Survey of Enantioselective Hydrogen Auto-Transfer Processes for the Conversion of Lower Alcohols to Higher Alcohols. Chem. Sei 2022, 13, 12625–12633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).(a) Nolen EG; Hornik ES; Jeans KB; Zhong W; LaPaglia DM Synthesis of C-Linked α-Gal and α-GalNAc-1′-Hydroxyalkanes by Way of C2 Functionality Transfer. Tetrahedron Lett 2021, 73, 153109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Markley JL; Hanson PR P-Stereogenic Bicyclo[4.3.1]phosphite Boranes: Synthesis and Utility of Tunable P-Tether Systems for the Desymmetrization of C2-Symmetric 1,3-anti-Diols. Org. Lett 2017, 19, 2552–2555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Stewart IC; Douglas CJ; Grubbs RH Increased Efficiency in Cross-Metathesis Reactions of Sterically Hindered Olefins. Org. Lett 2008, 10, 441–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Morimoto S; Shindo M; Yoshida M; Shishido K Syntheses of Heliannuols G and H; Structure Revision of the Natural Products. Tetrahedron Lett 2006, 47, 7353–7356. [Google Scholar]; (e) Knopff O; Poirier N Process for Preparing Perfuming Intermediates. WO2023036732A1, 2023. [Google Scholar]; (f) see also p. 30 of the Supporting Information: Zhang F; Zeng J; Gao M; Wang L; Chen G-Q; Lu Y Zhang X Concise, Scalable and Enantioselective Total Synthesis of Prostaglandins. Nat. Chem 2021, 13, 692–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).(a) In the absence of the trimethylsilyl moiety, mixtures of dihydropyranone and dihydrofuranone are observed: Virolleaud M-A; Piva O Domino Ring-Closing Metathesis/Intramolecular Transfer of an Alkenyl Subunit: A Direct Formation of Functionalized Butenolides and Pyrones from α,β- and β,γ-Unsaturated Esters. Synlett 2004, 12, 2087–2090. [Google Scholar]; (b) Michaelis S; Blechert S Total Synthesis of (+)-Phomopsolide C by Ring-Size Selective Ring-Closing Metathesis/Cross-Metathesis. Org. Lett 2005, 7, 5513–5516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Liu H-J; Yip J Reductive Cleavage of Benzyl Ethers with Lithium Naphthalenide. A Convenient Method for Debenzylation. Tetrahedron Lett 1997, 38, 2253—2256. [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Robichaud J; Tremblay F Formal Enantioselective Synthesis of (+)-Compactin. Org. Lett 2006, 8, 597–600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).(a) For prior examples of catalyst recovery and recycling in enantioselective p-allyliridium-C, O-benzoate-catalyzed couplings of allyl acetate with alcohols or aldehydes, see reference 13d and the following reports: Shin L; Hong S; Krische MJ Total Synthesis of Swinholide A: An Exposition in Hydrogen-Mediated C-C Bond Formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 14246–14249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Shin L; Krische MJ Formal Synthesis of Premisakinolide A and C(19)-C(32) of Swinholide A via Site-Selective C-H Allylation and Crotylation of Unprotected Diols. Org. Lett 2015, 17, 4686–1689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Itoh T; Montgomery TP; Recio A III; Krische MJ Asymmetric Alcohol C-H Allylation and syn-Crotylation: C9-C20 of Tetrafibricin. Org. Lett 2014, 16, 820–823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Chan TH; Fleming I Electrophilic Substitution of Organosilicon Compounds - Applications to Organic Synthesis. Synthesis 1979, 761–786. [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Hu C; Zhao Z; Nie P; Du Y; Feng F; Liu J Total Synthesis of Cryptopyranmoscatone B2. Tetrahedron 2022, 105, 132609. [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Grubbs RH Handbook of Metathesis; Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Hoveyda AH; Liu Z; Qin C; Koengeter T; Mu Y Impact of Ethylene on Efficiency and Stereocontrol in Olefin Metathesis: When to Add It, When to Remove It, and When to Avoid It. Angew. Chem 2020, 132, 22508–22532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Info

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.

RESOURCES