Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
. 2025 May 7;11(3):e70142. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70142

Predisposing Factors for Erosive Tooth Wear in Permanent Teeth Among Asthmatic Children and Adolescents

Tomi Ujčič Samec 1,2,, Janja Jan 1,2
PMCID: PMC12056599  PMID: 40331567

ABSTRACT

Objectives

Epidemiological studies indicate that erosive tooth wear (ETW) is a common threat of tooth surface loss. The etiology of ETW is multifactorial. The prevalence of asthma is increasing in developed countries, especially in children. Studies evaluating ETW in asthmatic children are conflicting. With our study, we aimed to investigate the association between general and asthmatic factors and the presence of ETW.

Methods

Population of this cross‐sectional observational study consisted of children aged 6–17 years under treatment for asthma at University Medical Centre. ETW was determined using the Basic Erosive Wear Examination index. Questionnaires completed by parents and data from patients' medical records provided information on demographics, medical history, medication use, dietary habits, oral hygiene, fluoride exposure and type, dose, frequency, duration, and mode of asthma medication use.

Results

379 asthmatic children participated in the study. The prevalence of ETW was 17.2% (n = 379). The mean total BEWE score was 0.76 ± 2.12. A statistically significant higher presence of ETW and higher total BEWE index were found in the group consuming acidic sports drinks (OR = 3.318), in the group aged 12–17 years (OR = 6.233), in the group using asthma medication for more than 3 years (OR = 3.379) and in the group using medication in the dry powder inhaled form (OR = 2.447).

Conclusions

Asthmatic children should avoid drinking acidic drinks since longer duration of asthma medication use is already associating them with higher ETW presence. From the ETW point of view, metered‐dose inhaled medications are more tooth‐friendly than dry powder inhaled forms.

Keywords: asthma, asthma medications, erosive tooth wear, paediatric dentistry


Abbreviation

BEWE

basic erosive wear examiniation

1. Introduction

In addition to dental caries, the tooth wear has emerged as an increasingly significant concern within the field of dentistry. Erosive tooth wear (ETW) is defined as irreversible loss of tooth structure due to acid dissolution without the involvement of bacteria and is now considered as the predominant factor contributing to tooth wear (Carvalho et al. 2015). Epidemiological studies alongside in vitro and in situ investigations suggest that ETW is becoming a prevalent threat for tooth surface loss (Korkmaz and Kaptan 2020). There is a wide variation in the global prevalence of ETW, ranging from 0% to 100%. A rough mean calculated from the available data is estimated to be between 20% and 45% for permanent teeth (Schlueter and Luka 2018). The etiology of ETW is multifactorial and includes chemical, biological, and behavioral factors. The acids that attack the tooth structure are intrinsic (gastric acid) or extrinsic (dietary acids, acidic medication, occupational and environmental acids). Among the many risk factors we also find asthma (Donovan et al. 2021).

Asthma is a chronic lung disease characterized by reversible airway obstruction, airway inflammation, and increased airway responsiveness to stimuli. The prevalence of asthma is increasing in industrialized countries, especially in children (Papi et al. 2018). In Slovenia, the prevalence of asthma is estimated to be 14% among children (Kopriva 2003), while in adults it decreases to 2.12% (Poplas‐Susič et al. 2015). The pharmacological management of chronic asthma in pediatric populations typically involves two primary categories of medications: bronchodilators and anti‐inflammatory agents. Children with mild asthma often receive treatment solely with inhaled β2‐agonists as bronchodilators. Inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for use in children experiencing moderate to severe asthma due to their effectiveness as anti‐inflammatory agents (Papi et al. 2018).

Asthma medications have the side effect of reducing salivary flow (Alaki et al. 2013), they can contribute to the dissolution of the enamel of the teeth they come into contact with and they can influence the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease, all of which can lead to the formation of ETW (Barron et al. 2003; Gani et al. 2020).

While the correlation between asthma and dental caries is strong (Samec et al. 2021; Zhai et al. 2023), the studies on asthma and ETW are contradictory. Some researchers have shown a link between ETW and asthma (Al‐Dlaigan et al. 2002; Hamasha et al. 2014; Sivasitamparam et al. 2002), while others reject this association (Gurgel et al. 2011; Rezende et al. 2019). Our study hypothesis was that the use of asthma medications correlates with the prevalence of ETW. Given the lack of data on the cause of ETW in asthmatic children, we conducted a study to aimed at determining how various asthmatic and commonly associated factors influence the prevalence of ETW in asthmatic children. We were particularly interested in the relationship between duration of asthma medication use, form of medication, the dose and frequency of medication use with ETW.

2. Methods

2.1. Ethical Aspects and Study Design

The cross‐sectional study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health in Slovenia (No. 165/07/09). Written informed consent was obtained from all parents for their children's participation in the study. The study population consisted of children and adolescents aged 6–17 years who were being treated for chronic bronchial asthma at the University Children's Hospital of the University Medical Centre. Inclusion criteria mandated that participants be on daily asthma medication for a minimum of 1 year and possess a medically confirmed diagnosis of asthma. Due to the lack of standardized documentation, the severity of asthma was not documented. Children with comorbid conditions such as heart disease, gastroesophageal reflux, chromosomal abnormalities, infectious diseases, eating disorders or frequent vomiting were excluded from the study, based on data collected via questionnaires completed by the parents.

2.2. Sample Size Calculation

According to the Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia, there were 229,284 children and adolescents (6–17 years old) in Slovenia in 2009. The estimated prevalence of asthma among Slovenian children is 14% (8). The calculated number of 6–17 year old asthmatic children in Slovenia was 32,100. As there is no published data on the prevalence of ETW in Slovenian asthmatic children, we used 48.6% based on a similar unpublished Slovenian study. The confidence interval was set at 95%, the margin of error at 0.05, the ETW prevalence at 48.6% and the number of asthmatic children at 32,100. A sample size of 380 participants was calculated.

2.3. Calibration Exercise

Calibration involved theoretical instruction, case presentations, and practical training on patients not included in the study. The intra‐ (κ = 0.95) and inter‐ (κ = 0.92) reproducibility of the investigators was assessed by examining 20 children who had not participated in the study and re‐examining them after a 2‐week interval.

2.4. Clinical Data Collection

Dental examinations were carried out at the university dental clinic using standard dental mirrors and ball‐ended probes under dental light by two calibrated dentists. Before examination, professional cleaning of the children's teeth was performed; however, radiographic evaluations were not included in this study. The presence of ETW was assessed using the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE) index (Bartlett et al. 2008). The buccal, occlusal, and palatal or lingual surfaces were scored: 0 = no ETW; 1 = initial loss of surface texture; 2 = clear defect, hard tissue loss < 50% of the surface; 3 = hard tissue loss ≥ 50% of the surface. All permanent teeth were evaluated except for third molars; deciduous teeth were excluded from assessment. The total BEWE score for each participant was calculated by summing the maximum values across sextants, followed by computation of the mean total BEWE score.

2.5. Nonclinical Data Collection

Data regarding demographics, medical history, medication usage, dietary habits, oral hygiene practices, fluoride exposure history, and specifics about asthmatic children's medication types, doses, frequencies, durations, and administration methods were collected through parent‐completed questionnaires and patient medical records. Fluoride exposure was considered using fluoride pills or use of fluoride rinse or gel. The use of acidic sports drinks was considered in the last 6 months, the exact frequency was not specified. The glucocorticoid dosage administered to children over the preceding 6 months was utilized for analysis. Frequency of medication administration was collected from patient medical records.

2.6. Statistical Method

The distribution of subjects among groups for categorical independent variables was analyzed using chi‐square tests. Mann–Whitney U tests were employed to compare differences between dependent variables and independent variables. The dependent variable (total BEWE index) was dichotomized based on its presence or absence. The total BEWE score = zero in all sextants was considered as the absence of ETW. Age was not dichotomized according to the mean value. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

A total of 379 asthmatic children participated in this study. The average age was recorded at 10.44 ± 2.84 years with an average duration of asthma medication usage spanning 6.01 ± 3.60 years. The prevalence rate of ETWs among participants stood at 17.2% (n = 379). The mean total BEWE score calculated was 0.76 ± 2.12 across a total assessment of 31,836 surfaces evaluated. Among present ETW, BEWE score 1 was the most common (72.4%), BEWE score 2 less common (25.2%) and BEWE score 3 (2.3%) rare. The distribution and characteristics of surfaces exhibiting ETW are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characterization of surfaces with erosive tooth wear concerning presence, localization, jaw involvement, and BEWE index score.

Variable Surfaces (n) %
Surfaces with erosive tooth wear
Present 602 1.89
Absent 31,234 98.11
Localisation of affected surfaces
Vestibular 149 24.8
Occlusal 404 67.1
Palatine/Lingual 49 8.1
Affected surfaces in the jaw
Maxillary 282 46.8
Mandibular 320 53.2
BEWE index score
0 31,234 98.11
1 436 1.37
2 152 0.48
3 14 0.04
Total 31,836 100

The associations of various general and asthmatic factors with the presence or absence of ETW are presented in Tables 2 and 3. Statistically significantly higher presence of ETW was found in the group consuming acidic sports drinks, in the group aged 12–17 years, in the group using asthma medication for more than 3 years and in the group using medication in the form of dry powder inhaled form.

Table 2.

Association between erosive tooth wear presence and different general variables (gender, fluoride exposure history, dietary history, oral hygiene, parent's education, age), n = 379.

Variables – general factors Erosion present, n (%) Erosion absent, n (%) Total n (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) Statistics (Χ2, p)
Gender
Female 25 (16.6) 126 (83.4) 151 (39.8) 0.933 (0.539–1.614) Χ2 = 0.062
Male 40 (17.5) 188 (82.5) 228 (60.2) 1 p = 0.803
Fluoride exposure history
Use of fluoride pills 25 (15.7) 134 (84.3) 159 (42.0) 0.840 (0.486–1.451) Χ2 = 0.393
No use of fluoride pills 40 (18.2) 180 (81.8) 220 (58.0) 1 p = 0.531
Use of fluoride rinse or gel 10 (15.6) 54 (84.4) 64 (16.9) 0.875 (0.420–1.825) Χ2 = 0.126
No use of fluoride rinse or gel 55 (17.5) 260 (82.5) 315 (83.1) 1 p = 0.723
Dietary history
Occasional use of chewing gum 41 (18.6) 179 (81.4) 220 (58.0) 1.288 (0.743–2.236) Χ2 = 0.815
No use of chewing gum 24 (15.1) 135 (84.9) 159 (42.0) 1 p = 0.367
Consuming food and drinks ≥ 5 times⁄day 44 (18.9) 189 (81.1) 233 (61.5) 1.386 (0.786–2.443) Χ2 = 1.279
Consuming food and drinks < 5 times⁄day 21 (14.4) 125 (85.6) 146 (38.5) 1 p = 0.258
Drinking sweet drinks between meals 44 (17.3) 211 (82.7) 255 (67.3) 1.023 (0.578–1.810) Χ2 = 0.006
No drinking sweet drinks between meals 21 (16.9) 103 (83.1) 124 (32.7) 1 p = 0.938
Use of acid sport drinks 13 (37.1) 22 (62.9) 35 (9.2) 3.318 (1.573–6.999) Χ 2  = 10.847
No use of acid sport drinks 52 (15.1) 292 (84.9) 344 (90.8) 1 p  = 0.001 *
Use of sweets 43 (20.1) 171 (79.9) 214 (56.5) 1.635 (0.934–2.861) Χ2 = 2.996
No use of sweets 22 (13.3) 143 (86.7) 165 (43.5) 1 p = 0.083
Daily use of milk and cheese 42 (15.2) 234 (84.8) 276 (72.8) 0.624 (0.354–1.102) Χ2 = 2.671
No daily use of milk and cheese 23 (22.3) 80 (77.7) 103 (27.2) 1 p = 0.102
Oral hygiene
Tooth brushing 1 time⁄day 10 (15.2) 56 (84.8) 66 (17.4) 1 Χ2 = 0.225
Tooth brushing 2 times or more⁄day 55 (17.6) 258 (82.4) 313 (82.6) 1.194 (0.574–2.485) p = 0.635
Parents' education
Elementary/profession/secondary school 48 (17.7) 223 (82.3) 271 (71.5) 1 Χ2 = 0.211
High school/university/postgraduate studies 17 (15.7) 91 (84.3) 108 (28.5) 0.868 (0.474–1.589) p = 0.646
Age
6–11 years old group 21 (8.2) 235 (91.8) 256 (67.5) 1 Χ 2  = 44.442
12–17 years old group 44 (35.8) 79 (64.2) 123 (32.5) 6.233 (3.493–11.120) p  = 0.000 *
*

p‐value of chi‐square test. CI, confidence interval.

Table 3.

Association between erosive tooth wear presence and different asthmatic factors (duration of medication, mode of medication application, mouth rinse with water, use of leukotriene antagonist, antihistamines, sugar‐containing medications, spacer devices, dose, and frequency of medication), n = 379.

Variables – Asthmatic factors Erosion present, n (%) Erosion absent, n (%) Total n (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) Statistics (Χ2, p)
Duration of asthma medications use (1–3 years) 8 (7.3) 101 (92.7) 109 (28.8) 1 Χ 2  = 10.368
Duration of asthma medications use (< 3 years) 57 (21.1) 213 (78.9) 270 (71.2) 3.379 (1.553‐7.348) p  = 0.001 *
Medication in metered‐dose inhaled form 34 (13.8) 212 (86.2) 246 (69.1) 1 Χ 2  = 10.503
Medication in dry powder inhaled form 31 (28.2) 79 (71.8) 110 (30.9) 2.447 (1.410‐4.245) p= 0.001 *
Mouth rinsed with water after medication use 56 (18.5) 247 (81.5) 303 (79.9) 1.688 (0.794‐3.587) Χ2 = 1.885
No mouth rinsed with water after medication use 9 (11.8) 67 (88.2) 76 (20.1) 1 p = 0.170
Use of additional leukotriene antagonists 9 (12.2) 65 (87.8) 74 (19.5) 0.616 (0.289‐1.310) Χ2 = 1.610
No additional leukotriene antagonists use 56 (18.4) 249 (81.6) 305 (80.5) 1 p = 0.204
Use of antihistamines 2 (9.1) 20 (90.9) 22 (5.8) 0.467 (0.106‐2.048) Χ2 = 1.068
No antihistamines use 63 (17.6) 294 (82.4) 357 (94.2) 1 p = 0.301
Use of sugar‐containing medications 33 (20.2) 130 (79.8) 163 (43.0) 1.460 (0.854‐2.494) Χ2 = 1.928
Use of nonsugar‐containing medications 32 (14.8) 184 (85.2) 216 (57.0) 1 p = 0.165
Use of inhalers with spacer 38 (15.8) 203 (84.2) 241 (63.6) 0.770 (0.446‐1.327) Χ2 = 0.891
No spacer use 27 (19.6) 111 (80.4) 138 (36.4) 1 p = 0.345
Glucocorticoid dose (≤ 100 μg) 29 (19.5) 120 (80.5) 149 (42.7) 1 Χ2 = 0.513
Glucocorticoid dose (> 100 μg) 33 (16.5) 167 (83.5) 200 (57.3) 0.818 (0.471‐1.419) p = 0.474
Frequency of medication administration 1/day 30 (15.5) 164 (84.5) 194 (54.0) 1 Χ2 = 1.987
Frequency of medication administration > 1/day 35 (21.2) 130 (78.8) 165 (46.0) 1.472 (0.858‐2.524) p = 0.159
*

p‐value of chi‐square test; CI, confidence interval.

The effects of various general and asthmatic factors and the mean total BEWE index are shown in Tables 4 and 5. Statistically significantly higher mean total BEWE indices were found in the same groups (group consuming acidic sports drinks, group of 12–17 year olds, group using asthma medication for more than 3 years, and group using medication in dry powder inhaled form).

Table 4.

Mean total BEWE ± SD of different general variables (gender, fluoride exposure history, dietary history, oral hygiene, parent's education, age), n = 379.

Variables – General factors Mean total BEWE ± SD Total, n (%) p‐value
Gender
Female 0.62 ± 1.77 151 (39.8) p = 0.716
Male 0.84 ± 2.32 228 (60.2)
Fluoride exposure history
Use of fluoride pills 0.74 ± 2.26 159 (42.0) p = 0.555
No use of fluoride pills 0.76 ± 2.01 220 (58.0)
Use of fluoride rinse or gel 0.44 ± 1.36 64 (16.9) p = 0.575
No use of fluoride rinse or gel 0.81 ± 2.23 315 (83.1)
Dietary history
Occasional use of chewing gum 0.82 ± 2.23 220 (58.0) p = 0.370
No use of chewing gum 0.65 ± 1.95 159 (42.0)
Consuming food and drinks ≥ 5 times⁄day 0.86 ± 2.33 233 (61.5) p = 0.249
Consuming food and drinks < 5 times⁄day 0.58 ± 1.70 146 (38.5)
Drinking sweet drinks between meals 0.76 ± 2.12 255 (67.3) p = 0.921
No drinking sweet drinks between meals 0.73 ± 2.10 124 (32.7)
Use of acid sport drinks 1.74 ± 3.06 35 (9.2) p  = 0.001 *
No use of acid sport drinks 0.65 ± 1.97 344 (90.8)
Use of sweets 0.90 ± 2.30 214 (56.5) p = 0.076
No use of sweets 0.56 ± 1.84 165 (43.5)
Daily use of milk and cheese 0.70 ± 1.98 276 (72.8) p = 0.133
No daily use of milk and cheese 0.91 ± 2.43 103 (27.2)
Oral hygiene
Tooth brushing 1 time⁄day 0.88 ± 2.32 66 (17.4) p = 0.786
Tooth brushing 2 times or more⁄day 0.73 ± 2.07 313 (82.6)
Parents' education
Elementary/profession/secondary school 0.82 ± 2.23 271 (71.5) p = 0.567
High school/university/postgraduate studies 0.58 ± 1.79 108 (28.5)
Age
6–11 years old group 0.27 ± 1.20 256 (67.5) p  = 0.000 *
12–17 years old group 1.76 ± 3.07 123 (32.5)
*

P‐value of Mann–Whitney U test.

Table 5.

Mean total BEWE ± SD of different asthmatic factors (duration of medication, mode of medication application, mouth rinse with water, use of leukotriene antagonist, antihistamines, sugar‐containing medications, spacer devices, dose and frequency of medication), n = 379.

Variables – Asthmatic factors Mean BEWE ± SD Total, n (%) p‐value
Duration of asthma medications use (1–3 years) 0.27 ± 1.12 109 (28.8) p  = 0.001 *
Duration of asthma medications use (< 3 years) 0.95 ± 2.37 270 (71.2)
Medication in metered‐dose inhaled form 0.61 ± 1.91 246 (69.1) p  = 0.001 *
Medication in dry powder inhaled form 1.23 ± 2.62 110 (30.9)
Mouth rinsed with water after medication use 0.80 ± 2.18 303 (79.9) p = 0.193
No mouth rinsed with water after medication use 0.56 ± 1.80 76 (20.1)
Use of additional leukotriene antagonists 0.57 ± 1.74 74 (19.5) p = 0.233
No additional leukotriene antagonists use 0.80 ± 2.19 305 (80.5)
Use of antihistamines 0.54 ± 1.87 22 (5.8) p = 0.341
No antihistamines use 0.76 ± 2.13 357 (94.2)
Use of sugar‐containing medications 0.92 ± 2.30 163 (43.0) p = 0.147
Use of nonsugar‐containing medications 0.62 ± 1.96 216 (57.0)
Use of inhalers with spacer 0.72 ± 2.13 241 (63.6) p = 0.361
No spacer use 0.82 ± 2.10 138 (36.4)
Glucocorticoid daily dose (≤ 100 μg) 1.01 ± 2.56 149 (42.7) p = 0.352
Glucocorticoid daily dose (> 100 μg) 0.59 ± 1.71 200 (57.3)
Frequency of medication administration 1/day 0.71 ± 2.18 194 (54.0) p = 0.171
Frequency of medication administration > 1/day 0.89 ± 2.15 165 (46.0)
*

p‐value of Mann–Whitney U test.

4. Discussion

Recent literature highlights the multifaceted nature of oral health issues in patients with asthma, particularly focusing on the reduction of salivary flow attributed to beta‐agonists, the consumption of acidic beverages, the acidity of medications (especially those in dry powder form), and the implications of gastroesophageal reflux as potential contributors to ETW (Gani et al. 2020). Our findings corroborate this, revealing a statistically significant higher prevalence of ETW among children consuming acidic sports drinks, which aligns with established knowledge that acidic beverage consumption is a known risk factor for ETW (Chan et al. 2020; Pereira et al. 2020; Saads Carvalho and Lussi 2020). Notably, only 9.2% of asthmatic children in our study reported consuming such drinks, suggesting that while the risk exists, it may not be widespread.

Furthermore, our study uniquely identifies that children using asthma medication for over 3 years exhibited a higher prevalence of ETW and a greater mean total BEWE score compared to those who had been on medication for a shorter duration. This finding is consistent with previous research indicating that prolonged exposure to asthma medications may exacerbate ETW (Strużycka et al. 2017). Also, a cross‐sectional study of 400 Valencian children aged 6 to 14 years showed a statistically significant correlation with a higher BEWE index and patients using inhalers (Marqués Martínez et al. 2019).

The group utilizing dry powder inhalers also displayed a higher incidence of ETW compared to those using metered‐dose inhalers. This observation is supported by existing data indicating that dry powdered asthma medications can lower pH levels below 5.5, which is critical for hydroxyapatite dissolution (O'Sullivan and Curzon 1998). In contrast, Dugmore and Rock found no significant association between asthma and ETW in their cohort of 12‐14‐year‐old children (Dugmore and Rock 2003), highlighting the need for further investigation into this relationship.

As reported in other studies (Duangthip et al. 2018; Korkmaz and Kaptan 2020; Murakami et al. 2016), there was a statistically significant positive association between age and the presence of ETW, which was also found in our study. Although ETW is irreversible and progressive, we did not expect the presence of ETW to be this higher in the older group. We hypothesise that this difference may be due to lower parental control over adolescents and poor dietary habits. A systematic review of ETW in this group shows that carbonated drinks and consumption of acidic drinks at bedtime have the predominant erosive potential (Chan et al. 2020). Gender did not appear to influence the prevalence of ETW in our cohort; however, some studies have reported higher rates among specific demographics (Huew et al. 2012).

To mitigate the risk of ETW among children, it is imperative to implement dietary guidelines and promote the use of products that minimize demineralization while encouraging remineralization of tooth structures (Bartlett 2009). Interestingly, our study found no significant impact from fluoride exposure on the prevalence of ETW, which is partially consistent with other reviews suggesting limited efficacy of fluoride against erosive processes due to the absence of biofilm and the lower pH of erosive acids compared to bacterial acids (Huysmans et al. 2014; Lussi et al. 2019).

The mean total BEWE score in our study was relatively low compared to other similar studies (Scribante et al. 2024), which may be due to the exclusion of children with gastroesophageal reflux in our study. The prevalence rate of dental erosion among participants was 17.2%, which corresponds to a prevalence of 15% in 12‐year‐olds (Alves et al. 2015), but is relatively low compared to the prevalence of 42.3% in a slightly older population (18‐year‐olds in Poland). The distribution of BEWE scores from 1 to 3 was similar to our study (Strużycka et al. 2017).

Although the BEWE index can be used for both deciduous and permanent teeth, we have only considered permanent teeth as they have greater clinical relevance in the long term. One notable limitation of our study was the reliance on parental questionnaires for dietary intake data. Parents may not accurately report their children's consumption patterns since children also eat at school and elsewhere. Data collection through questionnaires was also limited, as no corresponding frequencies were recorded in the dietary history. While clinical examinations were utilized for detecting intraoral wear, advancements in methodologies for measuring intraoral wear are now available (Esquivel‐Upshaw et al. 2020; Longbottom et al. 2021), which could enhance future research accuracy. Examination with the BEWE index, which is considered the contemporary gold standard for ETW, is expected to be replaced by intraoral scanning in combination with a matching software that can accurately quantify clinical wear.

Children and adolescents should be discouraged from consuming acidic sports drinks, as these are associated with increased ETW. The consumption of acidic drinks should be completely replaced by the consumption of water. For asthmatic children who use dry powder for inhalation and who have been diagnosed with ETW, alternative form of medication should be discussed with their pediatrician.

5. Conclusion

Metered‐dose inhaled medications appear to be less detrimental to dental health compared to dry powder inhalers. Given that prolonged use of asthma medications correlates with higher rates of ETW, dentists must prioritize early detection, preventive measures, and treatment strategies aimed at mitigating ETW risks in asthmatic children.

Author Contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, as well as collected and analyzed the data. Tomi Ujčič Samec led the writing.

Ethics Statement

The study received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Ministry of Health in Slovenia (No. 165/07/09). Written informed consent was obtained from all parents for their children's participation in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Prof. Bennett Tochukwu Amaechi (Department of Comprehensive Dentistry, University of Texas Health San Antonio, USA), for his inspiration in this study field and Prof. Tadej Battelino and Uroš Krivec (Division of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia), for providing access to medical data and allowing us to conduct the examinations of the children. The study was supported by the Slovenian Ministry of Science and Education (No. P3‐0374).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Alaki, S. M. , Ashiry E. A., Bakry N. S., Baghlaf K. K., and Bagher S. M.. 2013. “The Effects of Asthma and Asthma Medication on Dental Caries and Salivary Characteristics in Children.” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry 11, no. 2: 113–120. 10.3290/j.ohpd.a29366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alves, L. S. , Brusius C. D., Damé‐Teixeira N., Maltz M., and Susin C.. 2015. “Dental Erosion Among 12‐Year‐old Schoolchildren: A Population‐Based Cross‐Sectional Study in South Brazil.” International Dental Journal 65, no. 6: 322–330. 10.1111/idj.12189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al‐Dlaigan, Y. H. , Shaw L., and Smith A. J.. 2002. “Is There a Relationship Between Asthma and Dental Erosion? A Case Control Study.” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 12, no. 3: 189–200. 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2002.00360.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barron, R. P. , Carmichael R. P., Marcon M. A., and Sàndor G. K.. 2003. “Dental Erosion in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.” Journal (Canadian Dental Association) 69, no. 2: 84–89. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartlett, D. 2009. “Etiology and Prevention of Acid Erosion.” Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J.: 1995) 30, no. 9: 616–620. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bartlett, D. , Ganss C., and Lussi A.. 2008. “Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): A New Scoring System for Scientific and Clinical Needs.” Clinical Oral Investigations 12, no. Suppl 1: 65–68. 10.1007/s00784-007-0181-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carvalho, T. S. , Colon P., Ganss C., et al. 2015. “Consensus Report of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry: Erosive Tooth Wear – Diagnosis and Management.” Clinical Oral Investigations 19, no. 7: 1557–1561. 10.1007/s00784-015-1511-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan, A. S. , Tran T. T. K., Hsu Y. H., Liu S. Y. S., and Kroon J.. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Dietary Acids and Habits on Dental Erosion in Adolescents.” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 30, no. 6: 713–733. 10.1111/ipd.12643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Donovan, T. , Nguyen‐Ngoc C., Abd Alraheam I., and Irusa K.. 2021. “Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Dental Erosion.” Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 33, no. 1: 78–87. 10.1111/jerd.12706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Duangthip, D. , Chen K. J., Gao S. S., Lussi A., Lo E. C. M., and Chu C. H.. 2018. “Erosive Tooth Wear Among Preschool Children in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 29: 185–192. 10.1111/ipd.12457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dugmore, C. R. , and Rock W. P.. 2003. “Asthma and Tooth Erosion. Is There an Association?” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 13, no. 6: 417–424. 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2003.00497.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. F. Esquivel‐Upshaw, J. , Hsu S.‐M., Bohórquez A. C., et al. 2020. “Novel Methodology for Measuring Intraoral Wear in Enamel and Dental Restorative Materials.” Clinical and Experimental Dental Research 6, no. 6: 677–685. 10.1002/cre2.322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gani, F. , Caminati M., Bellavia F., et al. 2020. “Oral Health in Asthmatic Patients: A Review: Asthma and Its Therapy May Impact on Oral Health.” Clinical and Molecular Allergy 18, no. 1: 22. 10.1186/s12948-020-00137-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gurgel, C. V. , Rios D., de Oliveira T. M., Tessarolli V., Carvalho F. P., and Machado M. A. A. M.. 2011. “Risk Factors for Dental Erosion in a Group of 12‐ and 16‐Year‐Old Brazilian Schoolchildren.” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 21, no. 1: 50–57. 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hamasha, A. A. H. , Zawaideh F. I., and Al‐Hadithy R. T.. 2014. “Risk Indicators Associated With Dental Erosion Among Jordanian School Children Aged 12–14 Years of Age.” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 24, no. 1: 56–68. 10.1111/ipd.12026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huew, R. , Waterhouse P. J., Moynihan P. J., and Maguire A.. 2012. “Dental Erosion Among 12 Year‐Old Libyan Schoolchildren.” Community Dental Health 29, no. 4: 279–283. 10.1007/BF03262814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huysmans, M. C. , Young A., and Ganss C.. 2014. “The Role of Fluoride in Erosion Therapy.” Monographs in Oral Science 25: 230–243. 10.1159/000360555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kopriva, S. 2003. “Epidemiologija astme pri otrocih v Sloveniji.” In Asthma pri otroku, edited by Maček V.. Ljubljana: Klinični Center, Pediatrična klinika. [Google Scholar]
  19. Korkmaz, E. , and Kaptan A.. 2020. “Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Prevalence and Aetiological Factors of Dental Erosion in Turkish Children Aged 7–14 Years.” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry 18, no. 1: 959–971. 10.3290/j.ohpd.a45436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Longbottom, C. , Vernon B., Perfect E., Haughey A.‐M., Christie A., and Pitts N.. 2021. “Initial Investigations of a Novel Bioluminescence Method for Imaging Dental Demineralization.” Clinical and Experimental Dental Research 7, no. 5: 786–794. 10.1002/cre2.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lussi, A. , Buzalaf M. A. R., Duangthip D., et al. 2019. “The Use of Fluoride for the Prevention of Dental Erosion and Erosive Tooth Wear in Children and Adolescents.” European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 20, no. 6: 517–527. 10.1007/s40368-019-00420-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Marqués Martínez, L. , Leyda Menéndez A. M., Ribelles Llop M., Segarra Ortells C., Aiuto R., and Garcovich D.. 2019. “Dental Erosion. Etiologic Factors in a Sample of Valencian Children and Adolescents. Cross‐Sectional Study.” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 20, no. 3: 189–193. 10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.03.04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Murakami, C. , Tello G., Abanto J., Oliveira L. B., Bonini G. C., and Bönecker M.. 2016. “Trends in the Prevalence of Erosive Tooth Wear in Brazilian Preschool Children.” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 26, no. 1: 60–65. 10.1111/ipd.12159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. O'Sullivan, E. A. , and Curzon M. E. J.. 1998. “Drug Treatments for Asthma May Cause Erosive Tooth Damage.” BMJ 317, no. 7161: 820. 10.1136/bmj.317.7161.820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Papi, A. , Brightling C., Pedersen S. E., and Reddel H. K.. 2018. “Asthma.” Lancet 391, no. 10122: 783–800. 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)33311-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pereira, A. S. , Lima L., Lima M., et al. 2020. “Consumption of Acidic Beverages Is a Predisposing Factor for Erosive Tooth Wear in Preschool Children: A Population‐Based Study.” Oral Health & Preventive Dentistry 18, no. 1: 1061–1067. 10.3290/j.ohpd.b871069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Poplas‐Susič, T. , Švab I., Klančar D., et al. 2015. “Screening and Registering Patients With Asthma and COPD in Slovenian Primary Care.” Zdravstveno varstvo 54, no. 3: 161–167. 10.1515/sjph-2015-0023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rezende, G. , Dos Santos N. M. L., Stein C., Hilgert J. B., and Faustino‐Silva D. D.. 2019. “Asthma and Oral Changes in Children: Associated Factors in a Community of Southern Brazil.” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 29, no. 4: 456–463. 10.1111/ipd.12487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Saads Carvalho, T. , and Lussi A.. 2020. “Chapter 9: Acidic Beverages and Foods Associated With Dental Erosion and Erosive Tooth Wear.” Monographs in Oral Science 28: 91–98. 10.1159/000455376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Samec, T. , Amaechi B. T., and Jan J.. 2021. “Influence of Childhood Asthma on Dental Caries: A Longitudinal Study.” Clinical and Experimental Dental Research 7: 957–967. 10.1002/cre2.436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schlueter, N. , and Luka B.. 2018. “Erosive Tooth Wear – A Review on Global Prevalence and on Its Prevalence in Risk Groups.” British Dental Journal 224, no. 5: 364–370. 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Scribante, A. , Pascadopoli M., Bergomi P., et al. 2024. “Evaluation of Two Different Remineralising Toothpastes in Children With Drug‐Controlled Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomised Clinical Trial.” European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 25, no. 2: 137–142. 10.23804/ejpd.2024.2130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sivasitamparam, K. , Young W., Jirattanasopa V., et al. 2002. “Dental Erosion in Asthma: A Case‐Control Study From South East Queensland.” Australian Dental Journal 47, no. 4: 298–303. 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00541.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Strużycka, I. , Lussi A., Bogusławska‐Kapała A., and Rusyan E.. 2017. “Prevalence of Erosive Lesions With Respect to Risk Factors in a Young Adult Population in Poland – A Cross‐Sectional Study.” Clinical Oral Investigations 21, no. 7: 2197–2203. 10.1007/s00784-016-2012-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhai, Y. , Gao L., and Yu G.. 2023. “Does Dental Caries Play a Role on the Asthma Development? – Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 47, no. 4: 95–103. 10.22514/jocpd.2023.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.


Articles from Clinical and Experimental Dental Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES