In the original published version of this article, the discussion contains the following sentences: “Finally, we found that acceptability of OS was 62 %, showing promise for OS to reduce ovarian cancer incidence in the general surgical population.” and “For instance, those that had a personal history of prior gynecologic surgery or personal history of cancer were associated with higher acceptability of OS, whereas those who planned to have children in the future were associated with lower acceptability.” The abstract contains the following sentence: "Personal history of cancer was positively associated with acceptability of OS."
These sentences in the discussion have been replaced by: “Finally, we found that acceptability of OS was 63%, showing promise for OS to reduce ovarian cancer incidence in the general surgical population.” and “For instance, those that had a personal history of prior gynecologic surgery or had a family or friend with a history of cancer were associated with higher acceptability of OS.” The sentence in the abstract has been replaced by: "Having a family or friend with a history of cancer was positively associated with acceptability of OS."
The authors apologize for the errors.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: David R. Flum reports financial support was provided by A gift from Pelletier family fund, Surgical Outcomes Research Center (SORCE), University of Washington. Divya Ramakrishnan reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Divya Ramakrishnan was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number T32DK070555. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.