Abstract
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are critical regulators in breast cancer (BC) progression, particularly through their interactions with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. This comprehensive review elucidates the regulatory roles of key circRNAs, including circABCC4, circFAT1, circARL8B, and circDONSON, in modulating BC behavior. These circRNAs primarily function as microRNA sponges, influencing essential processes such as proliferation, metastasis, drug resistance, and cell survival. For instance, circDONSON promotes tumor growth and radioresistance through SOX4-mediated Wnt signaling, whereas circRNF10 exhibits tumor-suppressive properties. The dual role of circRNAs as oncogenes or tumor suppressors highlights their complexity. Their high stability and tissue-specific expression patterns position them as promising diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Dysregulation of circRNAs modulates Wnt/β-catenin signaling, a key driver of BC progression, promoting oncogenesis and therapeutic resistance. This review synthesizes evidence from peer-reviewed literature, emphasizing the molecular mechanisms and clinical implications of circRNA–Wnt interactions. By exploring these intricate networks, we identify novel opportunities for targeted BC therapies, underscoring the potential of circRNAs to transform diagnosis and treatment. Future research should prioritize standardizing circRNA quantification and validating findings across diverse patient cohorts to enhance clinical applicability.
Graphical Abstract
Keywords: Breast cancer, CircularRNAs, circRNA biogenesis, Wnt, Wnt signaling pathway, Molecular agents
Introduction
Breast cancers (BCs) are the second most significant risk factor for mortality among women globally and remain the leading cause of cancer-related deaths [1–3]. In 2024, the American Cancer Society projected 313,510 new cases of BCs and 42,780 related deaths in the United States, encompassing both men and women. These statistics underscore the pressing need for immediate and sustained support and resources to manage this severe disease through novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches [4]. BCs are classified based on the expression of Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), progesterone, and estrogen receptors, determined through immunohistochemistry staining [5, 6]. Although historically associated with affluent nations, in 2020, countries in the poorest regions accounted for most BC-related fatalities and over half of all hospital admissions [7]. Despite medical advancements, BC incidence rates remain high, underscoring the crucial role of our understanding in informing effective interventions and empowering us to make a difference. This comprehensive review examines the intricate regulatory mechanisms of circRNAs in the Wnt signaling pathway, focusing on their molecular interactions and downstream effects in BC. We evaluate the multifaceted roles of these circRNA–Wnt pathway interactions in BC progression, emphasizing their potential implications for therapeutic development and clinical outcomes.
A significant portion of the human genome is transcribed into RNAs that do not encode proteins. These noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) play critical roles in regulating the initiation and progression of various cancers. Based on their length, structure, and location, ncRNAs are classified into distinct types, including PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA), microRNA (miRNA), long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), and circular RNA (circRNA), each with unique functions in cancer biology [8]. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) represent a recently characterized class of noncoding endogenous RNAs that play pivotal roles in BCs. These unique RNA molecules are generated through back-splicing of substrate mRNAs, forming single-stranded, covalently sealed RNA units [9]. CircRNAs exhibit distinctive characteristics, including stable loop structures, evolutionary conservation, and highly specific expression patterns across cell types, tissues, and developmental stages [10]. Although the precise physiological functions of most circRNAs remain primarily uncharacterized, their established roles encompass multiple mechanisms: sequestration of miRNAs and proteins, modulation of RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription, regulation of pre-mRNA splicing processes, and potential for translation [11]. Dysregulation of circRNA expression has been implicated in various malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma [12, 13], gastric cancer [14, 15], oral squamous cell carcinoma [15, 16], lung tumors [17], and colorectal cancers (CRCs) [18]. In BC specifically, emerging research has revealed crucial functions of circRNAs; for instance, circACAP2 promotes BC progression and growth through the regulation of COL5A1 via miR-29a/b-3p [19].
Cellular contact occurs through sophisticated extracellular signaling mechanisms, whereby cells produce specific molecular signals that bind to dedicated receptors on target cells, triggering distinct intracellular signaling cascades. This intricate network enables cellular adaptation to environmental changes [20]. Notably, recent investigations have highlighted the fundamental roles of key signaling pathways—including Notch, Hippo, and Wingless-related Integration Site (Wnt)—in various breast cancer subtypes, particularly in aggressive triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) [21, 22]. These pathways have emerged as promising therapeutic targets for breast cancer treatment [23]. The dysregulation of circulating circRNA levels is a significant factor in the development of BC, as it modulates the Wnt signaling pathway [24]. This pathway, particularly when dysregulated, plays a fundamental role in BC progression from initial development through metastasis [25]. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling system serves as a master regulator of critical cellular processes, including apoptosis, motility, proliferation, and tissue homeostasis [26–28]. Notably, circRNAs associated with the Wnt/β-catenin pathway demonstrate essential regulatory functions across multiple malignancies, controlling downstream targets crucial for tumor cell behavior, oncogenesis, and cancer progression [29]. The clinical significance of circRNAs extend beyond their regulatory roles, as they show promise as both diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Their stability and tissue-specific expression patterns make them particularly attractive for clinical applications in BC management.
The Wnt pathway, extensively researched and established as one of the most crucial signaling cascades in cancer initiation and progression, is of significant importance. CircRNAs serve as key regulatory elements in this pathway. Studies have shown that Wnt signaling is upregulated across nearly all cancer types, promoting disease progression and enhancing various cancer hallmarks, including metastasis, migration, proliferation, and angiogenesis [30]. For example, circLgr4 has been shown to promote colorectal cancer invasion and carcinogenesis through Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation [31]. The Wnt signaling pathway's dysregulation represents a critical mechanism in BC development, distinct from its role in other cancers. Unlike intestinal cancers, where specific mutations drive pathway dysfunction, BCs exhibit complex patterns of Wnt signaling aberrations that interact with multiple cellular processes [32].
This review discusses evidence from an extensive analysis of peer-reviewed literature in PubMed, focusing on the complex interactions between circRNAs and the Wnt pathway in BC progression. We comprehensively examine the biochemical mechanisms and functional capabilities of Wnt pathway-associated circRNAs, but what truly sets them apart are their unique characteristics. These characteristics, which we will explore in detail, hold the key to understanding their potential therapeutic implications in BC pathogenesis.
Overview of circular RNAs: structure, biogenesis, and biological significance
circRNAs are a class of noncoding RNAs with a covalently closed loop structure lacking 5′ caps and 3′ poly(A) tails [33]. They are primarily generated via a back-splicing mechanism from precursor mRNAs [34]. Based on their origin and structure, they are categorized into exon–intron circRNAs (EIciRNAs), exonic circRNAs (EcircRNAs), circular intronic RNAs (ciRNAs), read-through circRNAs (rt-circRNAs), and fused circRNAs (f-circRNAs) [35, 36]. Their biogenesis is regulated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and intronic sequences, with additional intronic repeats, for example, Alu elements, playing a vital role in circularization [37–39]. Alternative circularization can occur through competition between RNA pairings, leading to multiple circRNAs from one gene. RBPs such as quaking (QKI), fused in Sarcoma (FUS), and Splicing factor proline/glutamine-rich (SFPQ) promote circRNA formation [40–42], whereas ADAR1 and DHX9 inhibit it by disrupting base pairing [43, 44]. Transcription factors (TFs) also influence circRNA expression by modulating host gene transcription [45]. Examples include CTCF regulating circSPARC and TFAP2C enhancing circIL4R expression [46, 47]. The recent studies have highlighted the crucial roles of circular RNAs in regulating diverse biological and pathological processes. They are involved in chromatin remodeling, transcription, translation, RNA stability, and scaffolding [48]. The following sections will discuss the diverse biological functions of circular RNAs.
CircRNAs modify gene activity via miRNA sequestration
The miRNA sponging effect is a thoroughly investigated function of circRNAs [10]. CircRNAs have multiple binding sites for miRNA, thereby resulting in their sponge-like function [49]. In cancers, accumulating evidence shows that circRNAs, such as circRNA-Ctfrc, act as sponges for miRNA and take part in the transcriptional regulation of target genes [50].
CDR1as, for example, sponges miR-7 and is involved in brain function and pulmonary fibrosis [51]. Circ_0025202, derived from GAPDH, functions as a tumor suppressor in HR-positive breast cancer by sponging miR-182-5p and enhancing FOXO3a expression. This process suppresses tumor cell proliferation and migration, increasing apoptosis and tamoxifen sensitivity [52].
CircRNAs mediate protein interactions
CircRNAs, with their ability to act as protein sponges, scaffolds, and recruiters, exert influence on a wide range of cellular and pathological processes [53, 54]. For instance, circDnmt1 promotes autophagy and tumor growth by binding to p53 and Auf1 [55]. Similarly, circPABPN1 and circFoxo3 regulate cell proliferation and senescence by sequestering HuR and other proteins [56]. Furthermore, circNSUN2 enhances HMGA2 mRNA stability, thereby promoting colorectal cancer metastasis [57].
Regulatory roles of CircRNAs in gene expression
Intron-derived circRNAs can enhance gene expression by engaging with chromatin reformation complexes and RNA polymerase II [35]. CircFECR1 recruits TET1 to demethylate DNA at oncogenic promoters, thereby influencing breast cancer metastasis [58]. CircEsyt2 modulates alternative splicing of p53 by regulating PCBP1, thereby impacting vascular remodeling [59]. Meanwhile, circYap suppresses translation initiation, consequently slowing breast cancer progression [60].
Protein-coding capacity of circular RNAs
Some circRNAs, with their unique biological functions, can serve as templates for protein production by cap-independent or cap-dependent methods. These include internal ribosome entry sites (IRES), N6-methyladenosine (m6A) internal ribosome entry sites (MIRES), and rolling circle amplification (RCA) [61]. Proteins translated from circRNAs, like circ-ZNF609, circPINT (producing PINT87aa), and circSHPRH (producing SHPRH-146aa), exhibit functions distinct from their linear mRNA counterparts. These proteins may regulate cell proliferation or protect native proteins from degradation [62, 63]. The m6A modification plays a critical role. It recruits initiation factors such as eIF4G2 and YTHDF3, even under stress conditions [64, 65]. RCA allows continuous translation from circRNAs with long open reading frames (ORFs), as seen with circEGFR in glioblastoma [66].
Clinical implications of circular RNAs
CircRNAs have emerged as significant players in growth, development, and various biological processes, as well as in the context of numerous illnesses [67, 68]. They have been found to be prevalent and persistent in exosomes, detectable in blood and urine [69]. Exosomal circRNAs, which can be transferred across cells, serve a range of functions, including enhancing inflammatory responses, modulating immunity, and regulating malignant cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and treatment resistance [70, 71]. Importantly, numerous studies suggest that circRNAs could serve as valuable clinical signatures for early diagnosis and prognosis, as well as promising therapeutic targets [68, 72].
Dysregulated circRNAs, such as circ_014924 and circHECTD1, have been linked to lung inflammation and silicosis [73–75], while others, like circLPAR1 and circCDYL, are associated with cancer detection and progression [76, 77]. Exosomal circRNAs, including circIARS and circRPN2, also play a role in predicting metastasis and patient survival [78]. These findings underscore the clinical potential of circRNAs in early diagnosis and outcome prediction.
The potential of circRNAs in targeted therapy
CircRNAs, with their remarkable stability, present a promising avenue for targeted therapy [33]. They can be effectively delivered to target tissues via nanoparticles, exosomes, or viral vectors [79, 80]. For instance, circUBE2D2, upregulated in exosomes from tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells, promotes drug resistance by sponging miR-200a-3p. Targeting this circRNA may offer a novel approach to overcome tamoxifen resistance. Furthermore, circRNAs are being investigated as a strategy to combat drug resistance in cancer and as innovative platforms for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines [81, 82].
In conclusion, circRNAs represent a unique class of noncoding RNAs with remarkably diverse biological roles and significant clinical potential. Their covalently closed structure, formed through back-splicing, ensures exceptional stability, thereby making them promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets. CircRNAs regulate gene expression by acting as miRNA sponges, mediating protein interactions, and influencing chromatin remodeling and transcription. Some circRNAs also encode proteins, thereby expanding their functional repertoire. Their involvement in cancer, inflammation, and other diseases highlights their diagnostic and prognostic value. Particularly, exosomal circRNAs detectable in bodily fluids reinforce this potential. Furthermore, their stability and versatility enable innovative therapeutic strategies, such as targeted delivery via nanoparticles or exosomes, to overcome drug resistance. As research advances, circRNAs are poised to transform precision medicine, offering novel solutions for the early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of complex diseases, including cancer and infectious diseases, in a rapid manner.
Role of the Wnt signaling pathway in BC
The Wnt signaling pathway, a complex network of secreted lipoglycoproteins, encoded by 19 distinct Wnt genes in the human genome, plays a crucial role in cellular functions during embryonic development through interactions with diverse receptors [83]. However, when this system is disrupted, it significantly contributes to BC pathogenesis—promoting proliferation, metastasis, progression, and therapeutic resistance. Notably, studies have demonstrated that inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin activity in normal breast tissue results in developmental defects and decreased cellular proliferation, underscoring its fundamental role in breast homeostasis [84]. The Wnt signaling cascade operates through two distinct mechanisms: the β-catenin-dependent (canonical) and β-catenin-independent (noncanonical) pathways. The noncanonical pathway further subdivides into two distinct branches based on specific Wnt ligand–receptor interactions: the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway and the calcium (Ca2 +) signaling pathway [85].
This section comprehensively examines the Wnt canonical pathway, noncanonical pathways and their specific branches, the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway, and Wnt/Ca2 + signaling. This detailed exploration will provide a deeper understanding of these pathways and their role in cellular functions and BC.
Wnt canonical pathway
The canonical Wnt pathway (β-catenin-dependent) plays a pivotal role in breast tumorigenesis and progression, particularly in identifying neoplastic angioinvasions [86]. This pathway's primary regulatory mechanism centers on precisely controlling intracellular β-catenin levels. In the absence of Wnt proteins, the 'destruction complex'—comprising two key kinases, casein kinase 1α (CK1α) and glycogen synthase kinase three beta (GSK-3β), along with two scaffold proteins, axis inhibition (Axin) and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)—maintains low intracellular β-catenin levels. The sequential phosphorylation process begins with CK1α targeting serine 45 (Ser45), followed by GSK-3β phosphorylating Ser33, Ser37, and threonine 41 (Thr41), ultimately leading to β-catenin ubiquitination and degradation through beta-transducin repeat-containing protein (βTrCP)[87]. Understanding the intricacies of this pathway is of utmost importance in the fight against BC.
The canonical Wnt signaling requires coordinated action of both Frizzled (FZD) family receptors and low-density lipoprotein-related protein 5/6 (LRP5/LRP6) co-receptors, with receptor activation dependent on LRP5/LRP6 phosphorylation. Upon Wnt binding, Disheveled (DVL) phosphorylation triggers Axin dephosphorylation and decreased cytoplasmic content, releasing β-catenin from the "destruction complex" and enabling its stabilization and nuclear translocation. While multiple nuclear β-catenin binding partners participate in gene transcription regulation, the T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) family of transcription factors represents the most significant interaction partners [88]. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway orchestrates multiple cancer-promoting processes: inhibiting apoptosis, enhancing DNA damage repair, stimulating proliferation, promoting metastasis, inducing epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), and upregulating matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression—all contributing to therapeutic resistance and tumor microenvironment remodeling [89].
The canonical Wnt signaling pathway represents a sophisticated molecular cascade that regulates β-catenin levels through complex protein interactions and phosphorylation events, ultimately controlling gene expression patterns crucial for cell fate decisions. This pathway's dysregulation in BC leads to multiple oncogenic processes, including enhanced cell survival, proliferation, and metastatic potential, making it a critical target for therapeutic intervention. Understanding and targeting the Wnt pathway offers hope for effective cancer treatments.
Noncanonical pathways
The noncanonical Wnt signaling pathway, a complex system that rivals its canonical counterpart in significance, is emerging as a key player in cancer progression [90]. Research by Remo et al. [86] has unveiled a crucial aspect of this complexity, identifying the nuclear factor of activated T cells 5 (NFAT5) as a significant prognostic indicator in breast carcinoma, particularly in cases resembling inflammatory breast carcinoma.
PCP pathway
PCP pathway primarily regulates directional cell movement and cellular morphology through a complex signaling cascade. This pathway is initiated when Wnt ligands, which are secreted glycoproteins that act as signaling molecules, bind to the retinoic acid receptor-related orphan receptor (ROR)-FZD receptor complex, triggering DVL recruitment and activation. Subsequently, DVL interacts with Rho GTPase, leading to coordinated activation of Rac1 and Rho, which in turn activate Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) and Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) to modulate cytoskeletal arrangements and transcriptional responses [91]. Receptor expression patterns exhibit distinct variations across BC subtypes, creating unique molecular signatures. These patterns include elevated Fzd2 in metastatic breast cancer, increased ORAI1 in basal-like breast cancer (BLBC), high expression of Vangl2 and ROR1 in BLBC, and overexpression of Syndecan in BC generally. Conversely, specific receptors show reduced expression, with RYK decreased in primary BC and Glypican silenced across BC cases [25].
The noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways, particularly the PCP pathway, are the conductors orchestrating crucial cellular processes. These complex receptor-mediated mechanisms significantly impact BC progression, providing valuable insights for targeted therapeutic approaches and prognostic evaluation.
Wnt/ Ca2+
The Wnt/Ca2 + signaling pathway, a complex and intriguing system, emerges as a critical regulator of cell fate decisions and migration, with mounting evidence supporting its significance [92]. This pathway orchestrates calcium release from intracellular stores through a complex signaling cascade [93]. The signaling sequence initiates when Wnt ligands bind to FZD receptors, triggering phospholipase C (PLC) activation, which catalyzes the breakdown of phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-biphosphates (PIP2) into inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphates (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG). Through parallel mechanisms, DAG activates protein kinase C (PKC) and subsequently the small GTPase cell division cycle 42 (CDC42), while IP3 stimulates intracellular Ca2 + release. This calcium flux activates both Ca2 + /calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) and calcineurin (CaN), leading to downstream effects: CaMKII phosphorylates transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), activating Nemo-like kinase (NLK) and inhibiting canonical Wnt signaling, while CaN dephosphorylation activates the nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFAT), facilitating its nuclear translocation and gene regulation. These coordinated events ultimately control cell motility and cytoskeletal organization [94, 95].
In BC cells, the Wnt signaling pathway components undergo multiple alterations across various molecular levels, underscoring the urgency and importance of understanding its role. These alterations include genetic modifications (mutations, amplifications, deletions, and methylations), posttranscriptional modifications of mRNA, and posttranslational protein modifications, including changes in β-catenin subcellular localization. While mutations in Catenin Beta 1 (CTNNB1), which encodes β-Catenin, are rare in BC [96], Wnt pathway activation remains a fundamental driver of BC development [97].
The Wnt/Ca2 + signaling pathway, a sophisticated molecular network, represents a promising avenue for therapeutic intervention. It regulates cellular behavior through calcium-dependent mechanisms and intricate protein interactions, culminating in critical cell motility and organization changes. The pathway's components undergo complex modifications in BC, highlighting its significance as a therapeutic target despite the relative rarity of direct CTNNB1 mutations. This potential for therapeutic intervention offers hope in the fight against BC).
Role of CircRNAs in the pathogenesis of BC
Hormones and intricate signaling pathways regulate normal human development, including the proliferation of mammary cells, and facilitate communication between them [98]. Moreover, cancer cells have been seen to dysregulate some of these signaling pathways [99]. The local and remote tumor microenvironments are regulated by epigenetic and genetic modifications, which are vital in avoiding apoptosis, angiogenesis, aging resistance, metastasis, and tumor invasion. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling network has been shown to regulate several biological processes in lung cancer [100]. It is known that abnormal Notch1 signaling pathway activation disturbs the function of the regulatory system regulated by Notch1, eventually leading to CRC [101, 102]. The Hedgehog (Sonic Hedgehog (Shh)) signaling system has been studied and found to have an oncogenic function in several malignancies. In the specific context of rhabdomyosarcoma, this pathway has a dominant role in the development and advancement of cancer [103]. The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling system has been demonstrated to participate in transmitting signals through cell-surface receptors and has also participated in the progression, treatment resistance, and metastasis of cervical cancer [104]. The following part briefly summarizes the four crucial signaling pathways and their role in the development of normal human breast cells and BC.
TGF-β signaling pathway
TGF-β serves as a master regulator of crucial biological mechanisms, including cellular proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, autophagy, angiogenesis, and EMT. The biological actions of TGF-β are mediated through two distinct pathways: the SMAD-dependent pathway and the non-SMAD-dependent pathway. The Smad gene nomenclature originates from the fusion of two evolutionarily conserved proteins: the Caenorhabditis elegans small protein (Sma) [105] and the Drosophila gene known as mothers against decapentaplegic' (Mad) [106]. The SMAD-dependent pathway operates through specific Ser/Thr kinase receptors—TGF-β receptor I (TβR I) and TGF-β receptor II (TβR II)—embedded in the cell membrane. When activated, TβR II and TGF-β work synergistically to enhance TβR I kinase activity and stimulate its phosphorylation. Subsequently, activated TβR I phosphorylates SMAD2 and SMAD3 proteins. These phosphorylated SMADs then complex with SMAD4 (the chaperone protein) and translocate to the nucleus, where they regulate TGF-β target gene expression [107, 108].
In BC, the sex-determining region Y box 4 (SOX4) transcription factor mediates TGF-β signaling to promote EMT, cell proliferation, and metastasis [109]. Moreover, TGF-β stimulates double mouse minute 2 (MDM2) production, leading to p53 destabilization and subsequent EMT and tumor formation [110]. Elevated TGF-β levels correlate with increased microvascular density in BC, indicating poor patient prognosis [109]. An oncogene, circDISP3, was identified to be upregulated in TNBC cells by binding to miR-4638-3p through the TGF-β1 signaling pathway that suppresses the expression of activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3), a gene that is induced by stress and has oncogenic properties. This mechanism enhances the proliferation of cells, invasion, and the creation of bone metastases [111].
TGF-β signaling orchestrates multiple cellular processes through SMAD-dependent and non-SMAD-dependent pathways, with its dysregulation playing a crucial role in BC progression. In BC, particularly TNBC, TGF-β pathway alterations involve multiple molecular players, including SOX4, MDM2, and circDISP3, ultimately promoting tumor growth and metastasis. TGF-β and Wnt signaling pathways interact at several levels. Without TGF-β, Smad3 is phosphorylated by glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β), leading to its degradation. TGF-β or bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) activate Smads, but GSK-3β can still phosphorylate them, thereby reducing their activity. Wnt signaling inhibits GSK-3β, stabilizing Smads and promoting cooperation between β-catenin and Smad3 in gene transcription [112].
PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway
The phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K), protein kinase B (AKT), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways constitute an interconnected signaling network that orchestrates critical cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, and migration [113]. Notably, targeted suppression of this pathway has been shown to inhibit tumor cell development [114]. PI3Ks, functioning as lipid kinases, regulate essential cellular activities—including cell cycle progression, DNA damage response, and apoptosis [115–117]. These enzymes are categorized into three distinct classes based on their structural composition and functional characteristics [118, 119].
The pathway activation typically initiates through PI3K mutations or overexpression in BC. In this process, PI3K catalyzes the phosphorylation of PIP2 to produce phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3). Two key tumor suppressors—inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II (INPP4B) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)—regulate PIP3 through dephosphorylation. AKT, a Ser/Thr protein kinase, interacts explicitly with PIP3 at the cell membrane, which serves as its docking site [120]. Upon membrane recruitment, AKT undergoes phosphorylation and subsequent activation [121]. PI3K interacts with estrogen, insulin, and notably Wnt/β-catenin signaling, with differing effects across breast cancer subtypes. In PIK3CA-mutant ER + breast cancer, PI3Kα enhances Wnt activation via INPP4B-mediated GSK3β degradation. In contrast, in ER-breast cancer, the inhibition of PI3K/mTOR activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling [122].
In BC, the AKT pathway frequently exhibits hyperactivation due to mutations, reinforcements, and the loss of negative regulators [123]. This activation triggers mTOR phosphorylation and activation—a critical modulator of protein synthesis and cellular growth. Notably, mTOR overactivation, commonly observed in BC, results in unrestricted cell proliferation [124]. Recent studies have identified elevated expression of oncogene circ_103809, derived from exons 13 to 17 of the zinc finger RNA binding protein (ZFR) gene [125], which promotes cell development through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in BC [126].
The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling cascade represents a complex regulatory network essential for cellular homeostasis, with its dysregulation playing a central role in BC development and progression. The pathway's complexity is further exemplified by the involvement of various molecular players, including tumor suppressors and oncogenes like circ_103809, whose altered expression contributes to BC pathogenesis through enhanced cell proliferation and survival.
NF-κB signaling pathway
The nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway, a key regulator of immune responses and cell survival, is pivotal in immunological disorders and cancer development. Its dysregulation can lead to chronic inflammation and contribute to the development and progression of various diseases, including cancer [127]. The NF-κB family of transcription factors comprises heterodimers and homodimers formed by five distinct monomers: p50, p52, v-rel avian reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog (Rel)A, cRel, and RelB. This pathway operates through two distinct mechanisms—the canonical and noncanonical—each activated by specific triggers. The canonical NF-κB pathway responds to various external stimuli associated with immunological response, inflammation, cell proliferation, and differentiation. This pathway's initiation involves the inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B (IκB) proteins (IκBα, IκBβ, IκBε, or IκBγ) and is activated by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which responds to growth factors, cytokines, mitogens, UV radiation, and bacteria [128].
TNFα binding to tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1) triggers the recruitment of specific proteins—receptor-interacting Ser/Thr-protein (RIP), TNFR1-associated death domain protein (TRADD), and TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2). TRAF2 then recruits the NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO), inhibitory kappa B kinase α (IKKα), and IKKβ complex to TNFR1, leading to IκBβ activation and IκBα phosphorylation [129, 130]. Subsequently, IκBα ubiquitination enables NF-κB release to the cytoplasm and nuclear translocation, where it binds to specific DNA sequences—NF-κB sites—activating IL-6 and chemokine gene production [131, 132].
The noncanonical pathway responds exclusively to growth factors, stress, viruses, lipopolysaccharides [131], and select TNF superfamily receptors, indicating more specialized biological functions [133]. In this pathway, CD40 activation of RelB/NF-κB2 leads to TRAF2-TRAF3 engagement, connecting cellular inhibitor of apoptosis (c-IAP) to NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK). NIK phosphorylation and reduction by c-IAP activates IKKα and degrades the p100 subunit—encoded by the NF-κB2 gene—releasing p52 and RelB for nuclear translocation and chemokine gene production [131, 132].
The recent studies have identified NF-κB as a critical link between inflammation and cancer, particularly in BC development and hormone therapy resistance [134]. Notably, hsa_circ_0043278—located at chr17 in the transcriptional adaptor 2A (TADA2A) gene [135]—shows reduced expression in BC cell lines. This circular RNA directly interacts with miR-455-3p, encoded by the human collagen type XXVII alpha 1 (COL27A1) gene, modulating the NF-κB signaling pathway to inhibit BC cell proliferation and migration [134].
The NF-κB signaling pathway, a complex regulatory network operating through canonical and noncanonical mechanisms, plays crucial roles in inflammation, immune response, and cancer development. Understanding its intricate molecular interactions, particularly in BC, has revealed potential therapeutic targets. These targets, such as hsa_circ_0043278 and its interaction with miR-455-3p, offer promising avenues for the development of novel cancer treatments, instilling hope and optimism in the field of oncology. β-catenin inhibits NF-κB by promoting IκB expression, sequestering NF-κB in the cytoplasm, downregulating TLR4, recruiting transcriptional corepressors, and blocking CBP-mediated acetylation. It suppresses NF-κB-driven gene expression at multiple levels. Conversely, β-catenin can activate NF-κB by inducing p38 MAPK signaling. It also stabilizes BTRC (βTrCP) mRNA via Coding region determinant-binding protein (CRD-BP), enhancing IκB degradation and NF-κB activation. Additionally, it upregulates TNFRSF19 and cooperates with NF-κB at the transcriptional level. The interplay between the Wnt/β-catenin and NF-κB signaling pathways presents new opportunities for treating inflammatory and inflammation-related diseases, including cancer [136].
MAPK signaling pathway
The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) constitute a comprehensive network of Ser/Thr kinases that initiate phosphorylation cascades, transmitting signals from the cellular surface to the nucleus [137]. Within this pathway, the Rat sarcoma (RAS) protein superfamily—comprising guanosine diphosphate (GDP) and guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding GTPase—plays a fundamental role in signal transduction. The MAPK signaling cascade initiates when epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) stimulation activates RAS GTPase, which catalyzes GTP hydrolysis to GDP and inorganic phosphate [138].
RAF, functioning as a downstream mediator of RAS, requires direct interaction with activated RAS proteins. RAF kinases, a specialized class of protein kinases targeting Ser/Thr residues, serve as critical pathway modulators by activating the MAPK kinase kinase (MAPKKK). This activation triggers a sequential phosphorylation cascade through MAPK kinase (MAPKK: MEK1/2/3/4/5/6/7) and culminates in MAPK activation. The MAPK family encompasses three primary kinases with distinct isoforms: p38 MAPKs, extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), and JNKs. In normal cellular processes, the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway orchestrates crucial physiological processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and tissue development. However, when this pathway is dysregulated, it can contribute to tumorigenesis [139, 140]. The ERK/MAPK signaling pathway orchestrates crucial physiological processes—including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and tissue development—while contributing to tumorigenesis [141]. Notably, elevated ERK expression has been observed across multiple human malignancies, particularly in BC [142]. The recent studies have identified circ_0006528, derived from exons 2 to 5 of the PRELID gene, as a key regulator that targets miR-7-5p through the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway and RAF1 activation, promoting BC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Circ_0006528 plays a significant role in the dysregulation of the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway, thereby contributing to the progression of BC [143].
The MAPK signaling pathway represents a sophisticated cellular communication system that regulates crucial biological processes through sequential kinase activation cascades. Its 'dysregulation ', which refers to the abnormal or uncontrolled activation of the pathway, is implicated in various cancers. In BC specifically, the pathway's complexity is exemplified by the interaction between circular RNA circ_0006528 and miR-7-5p, which influences tumor progression through ERK/MAPK signaling and RAF1 activation. The scaffold proteins Axin and APC, as well as the kinase GSK3, indicate that the destruction complex in colon cancer is inhibited by stimulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. This results in Ras stabilization, which in turn activates the downstream MAPK signaling cascade. Conversely, in melanoma, elevated MAPK signaling stabilizes Axin, which in turn inhibits Wnt signaling. This highlights bidirectional regulation between the two pathways in cancer [144].
In conclusion, the intricate interplay between various signaling pathways—TGF-β, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, NF-κB, and MAPK—plays a crucial role in BC pathogenesis. These pathways regulate essential cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and metastasis. Recent research has revealed the significant involvement of circRNAs in modulating these pathways, with specific molecules such as circDISP3, circ_103809, hsa_circ_0043278, and circ_0006528 emerging as key regulators. Their interactions with various microRNAs and downstream effectors contribute to BC development, progression, and therapeutic resistance. Understanding these complex molecular mechanisms and pathway interactions is of utmost importance, as it provides promising opportunities for developing targeted therapeutic strategies in BC treatment. The profiles of circRNA expression and associated pathways in BC are outlined in Table 1.
Table 1.
Expression profile of circRNAs and related pathways in BC
Author & Year | Function | Circ RNA | Target | Pathway | Effect | Sample study |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zhao et al. 2023 [199] | Oncogene | Circ_0008784 | miR-506–3p/CTNNB | Wnt/β-catenin | Promoted proliferation and inhibited apoptosis | BC, TNBC, kidney cells |
Li et al. 2022 [200] | Oncogene | CircEIF6 | EIF6-224 aa/MYH9 | Wnt/β-catenin | Promoted metastasis and proliferation of TNBC cells | BC, nude mice |
Zhu et al. 2021 [178] | Oncogene | CircDONSON | SOX4 | Wnt/β-catenin | Promoted cell proliferation and radioresistance | BC, breast epithelial cells |
Leng et al. 2021 [201] | Oncogene | Circ_0000043 | miR-136 | TGF-β/Smad3 | Promoted EMT, migration, proliferation, and invasion | BC, breast epithelial cells |
Zeng et al. 2018 [202] | Oncogene | CircANKS1B | miR-148a/152-3p/USF1 | TGF-β1/Smad | Promoted invasion and metastasis | BC, nude mice |
Zhang et al. 2024 [203] | Oncogene | CircRPPH1 | miR-326/ITGA5/FAK | PI3K/AKT | Promoted proliferation, migration, and invasion | BC, TNBC, HEK293T cells, nude mice |
Ju et al. 2023 [204] | Oncogene | Circ_0042881 | miR-217/SOS1/RAS | PI3K/AKT | Promoted invasion, migration, and proliferation | BC, mammary cells, mice |
Wang et al. 2022 [205] | Oncogene | CircUBAP2 | miR-300/ASF1B | PI3K/AKT/mTOR | Increased resistance of TNBC to cisplatin | TNBC, breast epithelial cells |
Wang et al. 2022 [206] | Oncosuppressor | CircSEMA4B | miR-330-3p/PDCD4 | PI3K/AKT | Inhibited proliferation and migration | BC, breast epithelial cells, nude mice |
Zhou et al. 2022 [207] | Oncogene | Circ_0006014 | miR-885-3p/NTRK2 | PIK3CA/AKT | Induced invasion, migration, and proliferation | BC, nude mice |
Liu et al. 2022 [208] | Oncosuppressor | CircRNF10 | miR-934/PTEN | PI3K/AKT | Repressed proliferation, invasion, and migration; enhanced NK cell effectiveness | BC cell lines, mice |
Li et al. 2021 [209] | Oncogene | Hsa_circ_0000199 | miR-206/613-led | PI3K/Akt/mTOR | Promoted proliferation, invasion, migration, and chemotherapy resistance | BC, mammary epithelial cells, nude mice |
Chen et al. 2020 [210] | Oncogene | CirCHIPK3 | miR‐193a/HMGB1 | PI3K/AKT | Promoted invasion, migration, and proliferation | BC, nude mice |
Zhou et al. 2023 [211] | Oncogene | CircSERPINE2 | MALT1/IL-6 | NF-κB | Promoted proliferation and invasion | BC, mice |
Zheng et al. 2023 [212] | Oncosuppressor | CircRNF10 | DHX15/p65 | NF-κB | Repressed migration and proliferation | BC, HEK293T cells, nude mice |
Wang et al. 2021 [213] | Oncogene | CircTPGS2 | miR-7/TRAF6 | NF-κB | Promoted inflammatory-promoting chemokine construction, migration, and induced tumor-associated inflammation | BC, nude mice |
Xu et al. 2021 [214] | Oncogene | CircIKBKB | M-CSF and GM-CSF | NF-κB | Promoted osteoclastogenesis and BC-bone metastasis by causing bone pre-metastatic niche formation | BC, nude mice |
Jiang et al. 2020 [166] | Oncogene | CircABCC4 | miR-154-5p | NF-κB | Promoted proliferation, invasion, and migration | BC |
Lee et al. 2023 [215] | Oncosuppressor | CircAAGAB | miR-378h/p38 | MAPK | Inhibited proliferation and migration; increased radiosensitivity | BC, Breast epithelial cells |
Wang et al. 2023 [216] | Oncogene | CircDNAJC11 | TAF15 | MAPK | Promoted invasion, proliferation, and migration | BC, nude mice |
Gao et al. 2019 [143] | Oncogene | Hsa_circ_0006528 | miR-7-5p/Raf1 | MAPK/ERK | Promoted proliferation, migration, and invasion | BC, breast epithelial cells |
Xu et al. 2023 [217] | Oncogene | CircAR-E2E4 | miR-665 | STAT3 | Promoted proliferation of TNBC cells | TNBC, nude mice |
Wang et al. 2021 [218] | Oncosuppressor | CircNOL10 | miR-767-5p/SOCS2 | JAK2/STAT5 | Suppressed invasion and proliferation; induced apoptosis | BC, breast epithelial cells, nude mice |
Zhang et al. 2021 [219] | Oncogene | CircRHOT1 | miR-106a-5p | STAT3 | Promoted invasion, proliferation, and migration; impeded apoptosis | BC, nude mice |
Fu et al. 2021 [220] | Oncogene | CircBCBM1 | miR-125a/BRD4 | SHH/MMP9 | Promoted proliferation, metastasis, and migration | Brain-targeting BC cells, nude mice |
Ye et al. 2020 [221] | Oncogene | CircDCAF6 | miR-616-3p | GLI1-SHH | Promoted proliferation | BC, breast epithelial cells |
Yao et al. 2021 [173] | Oncogene | CircFAT1 | miR-525-5p/SKA1 | Notch | Promoted proliferation and migration | BC, breast epithelial cells |
Wang et al. 2018 [222] | Oncosuppressor | CircRNA-000911 | miR‑449a | Notch1 | Suppressed proliferation, migration, and invasion; triggered apoptosis | BC, breast epithelial cells |
BC BC cell lines, breast epithelial cells: normal breast epithelial cells
Molecular mechanisms of circRNA regulation in breast cancer: insights into regulatory roles
The majority of circRNAs, even without numerous protein-binding sites, serve as protein decoys or sponges with the capacity to bind a single protein effectively. This binding inhibits the recruitment of proteins, thereby modulating downstream molecular transcription or preventing specific proteins from interacting with downstream molecules [145, 146]. For instance, circACTN4, which is upregulated in BC cases and associated with poor prognosis, metastasis, and advanced clinical stage [147], directly binds to Far Upstream Element Binding Protein 1 (FUBP1) in BC. FUBP1 regulates RNA biogenesis, DNA transcription, and translation through its interactions with RNA and DNA. The interaction between circACTN4 and FUBP1 promotes the transcription of the MYC protein, thus enhancing cancer progression [148, 149]. Furthermore, MYC, a multifunctional transcription factor, influences critical processes, including DNA damage response, apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation [150].
Additionally, circ_0068631 is upregulated in BC cell lines and tissues. It has been established that circ_0068631 is associated with distant or lymph node metastasis, tumor size, and advanced cancer stage [151]. Notably, hsa_circ_0068631 binds to EIF4A3 (eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A3). EIF4A3 exhibits significant activity in mRNA degradation, translation, splicing, and transport [152–154]. On the other hand, circRNAs also serve as protein scaffolds, either inhibiting or facilitating interactions between proteins [155, 156]. CircFoxo3 regulates stress resistance, cell apoptosis, and cell cycle progression. Research indicates that its expression is reduced in BC. CircFoxo3 binds to the ubiquitin enzyme and p53 protein, thereby promoting p53 ubiquitination and degradation. Consequently, this interaction suppresses BC growth and induces apoptosis [157].
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate RNA degradation, splicing, and transcription by binding to RNA-binding domains [158, 159]. CircRNA–RBP interactions play a critical role in BC pathogenesis [151, 160]. For instance, circ-1073, through specific mechanisms, functions as a tumor suppressor in BC and promotes cell apoptosis (Citation88). CircRNAs also modulate transcription in BC by interacting with RNA polymerase II. CircScrib570 inhibits pre-mRNA splicing and translation, upregulates E-cadherin, and downregulates N-cadherin and vimentin, thereby promoting breast cancer proliferation and invasion. Similarly, CircACTN4 upregulates MYC transcription, enhances CDK4 and CCND2 expression, and drives breast cancer development and metastasis through MYC activation [161].
To sum up, circRNAs play a pivotal role in breast cancer progression by mediating protein-RNA interactions and post-transcriptional modifications. Functioning as protein sponges or scaffolds, circRNAs such as circACTN4, circ_0068631, and circFoxo3 regulate MYC, EIF4A3, and p53 activities, thereby modulating proliferation, metastasis, and apoptosis. Robust experimental evidence, including RNA pull-down assays and knockout studies, substantiates these roles. A deeper understanding of these molecular mechanisms, particularly protein–RNA interactions and RNA modifications, underscores circRNAs as promising therapeutic targets for effective breast cancer management.
Intricate interplay of CircRNA and Wnt signaling pathways in BC
circRNA significantly influences BC development and pathophysiology. Wang et al. demonstrated that circRNAs modulate multiple critical signaling cascades, including TGF-β, Wnt, erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homologue (ErbB), p53, and microRNA pathways in cancer [162]. This section delves into the potential of key circRNAs and their regulatory mechanisms through interaction with Wnt signaling pathways.
CircABCC4
CircABCC4, a multipathway oncogenic regulator, functions across a spectrum of cancers, including prostate cancer [163], lung adenocarcinoma [164], and bronchopulmonary dysplasia [165], with particular significance in BC [166]. The recent research from 2020 revealed elevated circABCC4 levels in BC patient tissues. In breast tumor cell lines, circABCC4 downregulation suppressed proliferation, migration, and metastasis while promoting apoptosis. CircABCC4 exhibited inhibitory effects on miR-154-5p activity at corresponding binding sites. Notably, miR-154-5p suppression partially reversed the inhibitory effects of circABCC4 reduction on BC cell survival, motility, metastasis, and the NF-κB and Wnt/β-catenin pathways [6]. These findings align with the known roles of specific nuclear factor-κB complexes in T-cell regulatory development [167]. Through miR-154-5p upregulation, circABCC4 reduction inhibited BC cell growth, movement, and invasion by suppressing the NF-κB and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways [166].
CircFAT1
CircFAT1 serves as an oncogenic regulator in multiple conditions, including lung adenocarcinoma progression [168], cervical cancer malignant progression [169], invasion of malignant melanoma [170], diabetic retinopathy [171], suppression of CRC development [172], and BC [173]. Yao et al. discovered elevated circFAT1 activation in oxaliplatin (OX)-resistant BC. CircFAT1 reduction in OX-resistant BC cells significantly enhanced apoptosis while reducing OX IC50 values, cell motility, and invasion capacity. Mechanistically, circFAT1 confers OX resistance through inverse regulation of miR-525-5p in OX-resistant BC cells. The circFAT1/miR-525-5p/SKA1 (spindle and kinetochore-associated complex subunit 1) axis promotes metastasis and reduces apoptosis in OX-resistant BC cells. Importantly, SKA1 reduction in BT474/OX cells decreased β-catenin, Notch2, and GSK-3β levels, suggesting SKA1's potential role in activating Notch and/or Wnt signaling pathways [173].
CircARL8B
Recent research has demonstrated that silencing the oncogenic regulator circARL8B significantly inhibits BC growth through multiple mechanisms. Wu et al. revealed substantial circARL8B expression in BC tissues. In vitro studies showed that circARL8B knockdown significantly impairs BC cells' proliferative, migratory, and invasive capabilities while also disrupting fatty acid metabolism. These effects were further validated in vivo, where circARL8B silencing prevented tumor formation. Mechanistically, circARL8B functions through targeted suppression of miR-653-5p in BC cells, leading to decreased miR-653-5p levels. The inhibitory effects of circARL8B silencing on BC growth were attenuated when miR-653-5p was reduced, confirming miR-653-5p as a critical downstream target. Further investigation revealed that miR-653-5p inhibits cell survival, motility, metastasis, and fatty acid utilization through interaction with HMGA2 (High Mobility Group AT-Hook 2) in BC cells. This finding is particularly significant given that HMGA2 dysregulation is a hallmark of BC [174], which influences gene activity through chromatin maintenance and DNA minor groove binding [175].
Notably, circARL8B silencing also inhibits the PGE2/PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β/Wnt/β-catenin pathway, ultimately suppressing BC cell survival, movement, metastasis, and fatty acid metabolism through the miR-653-5p/HMGA2 axis [176].
CircDONSON
CircDONSON, an oncogenic regulator previously implicated in gastric cancer and glioma development [14, 177, 178], has emerged as a crucial mediator of breast tumor growth through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway modulation. Zhu et al. demonstrated significant upregulation of circDONSON in BC cells and cell lines. Their research revealed that circDONSON reduction decreases BC cell radioresistance while suppressing SOX4 expression and inhibiting BC growth. The mechanism involves circDONSON's activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling through SOX4—a transcription factor within the group C SOX subclass that plays essential roles in tissue formation during embryogenesis [178, 179].
CircDONSON reduction decreased Wnt1 and β-catenin protein expression in BC cells; notably, SOX4 upregulation reversed these effects. These findings establish that circDONSON activates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in BC cells through SOX4-mediated signaling, ultimately demonstrating that circDONSON reduction suppresses development and reduces radio-resistance in BC cells through modulation of both Wnt/β-catenin and SOX4 signaling pathways [178].
CircITCH
Circular RNA ITCH (circITCH), recognized for its tumor-suppressive properties, has been linked to the etiology of several types of cancer [180], such as bladder cancer [181], melanoma [182], liver [183], thyroid cancer [184] and triple-negative breast cancer [185]. The existing research has indicated that circITCH functions as a Wnt pathway negative regulator, leading to a reduction in tumorigenic potential in various cancers [183, 184, 186] Circ-ITCH was found to be reduced in triple-negative breast cancer by Wang et al. Subsequent research showed that cicrc-ITCH could attenuate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by functioning as a molecular sponge for miR-214 and miR-17. Elevated levels of the ITCH protein were shown to stimulate ubiquitin ligase function and phosphorylated Dvl breakdown. This inhibition extended to downstream genes, including Axin, c-Myc, and cyclin D1, ultimately weakening the spread, invasive, and migratory capabilities of BC cells [185].
In summary, this section highlights the complex interplay between circular RNAs and the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in BC progression. The discussed circRNAs (circABCC4, circFAT1, circARL8B, circDONSON, and circITCH) demonstrate diverse regulatory mechanisms, primarily through microRNA interactions and downstream effectors. These molecules play a pivotal role in influencing crucial processes, including cell proliferation, metastasis, drug resistance, and metabolism. Notably, circITCH, a key player, acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signaling through the sponging of miR-214 and miR-17, thereby reducing BC cell invasion and migration. Understanding these intricate molecular networks is of paramount importance as it provides valuable insights into potential therapeutic targets for breast cancer treatment, particularly in addressing challenges such as drug resistance and tumor progression. Additional examples are included in Table 2.
Table 2.
The intricate interplay of circRNA and Wnt signaling pathway
Author. Year | Function | CircRNA | Target | Effect | Effect on Wnt signaling pathway | Sample study |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jiang et al. 2020 [166] | Oncogenic | CircABCC4 | miR-154-5p | Reduced viability and migration; enhanced apoptosis | Knockdown of CircABCC4 led to the NF-κB and Wnt/β-catenin inhibition by increasing miR-154-5p expression | BC, breast adenocarcinoma cells |
Zhao et al. 2023 [199] | Oncogenic | Circ_0008784 | miR-506-3p/CTNNB1 axis | Promoted apoptosis and proliferation | Circ_0008784 promoted the Wnt/β-catenin activation | BC epithelial cells, TNBC, kidney cells |
Zhang et al. 2019 [24] | Oncogenic | CircRNA_069718 | β-catenin, c-Myc, and cyclin D1 | Inhibited invasion and proliferation | Suppression of circRNA_069718 downregulated β-catenin expression at the transcriptional and translational levels in breast cancer (BC) cells | BC, TNBC, mammary epithelial cells (adenocarcinoma, ductal carcinoma) |
Wang et al. 2019 [185] | Oncosuppressor | CircITCH | miR-214/miR-17/ITCH | Inhibited proliferation, invasion, and metastasis | By sequestering miR-214 and miR-17, circ-ITCH operates as a molecular absorbent to suppress Wnt/β-catenin cascade activation in TNBC | BC tissue, breast cells (adenocarcinoma, ductal carcinoma) |
Zhu et al. 2021 [178] | Oncogenic | CircDONSON | SOX4 | Inhibited proliferation and radioresistance | circ-DONSON promotes Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation in BC cells through SOX4 | BC tissue, epithelial cells (fibrocystic, adenocarcinoma, ductal) |
Yao et al. 2021 [173] | Oncogenic | CircFAT1 | miR-525-5p/SKA1 | Promoted apoptosis; inhibited migration, invasion, and drug resistance | Through competitive binding of miR-525-5p, circFAT1 upregulates SKA1 expression, which subsequently modulates the activity of both Notch and Wnt signaling cascades | BC tissue, ductal carcinoma cells |
Wu et al. 2021 [176] | Oncogenic | CircARL8B | miR-653-5p/HMGA2, PGE2/PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β | Inhibited viability, migration, invasion, and metabolism; suppressed tumor growth | circARL8B silencing potentially inhibits the PGE2-mediated PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β cascade, thereby suppressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling cascades | BC tissue, fibrocystic cells |
Li et al. 2022 [200] | Oncogenic | CircEIF6 | EIF6-224aa/ MYH9 | Inhibited growth, migration, and invasion | The EIF6-224aa peptide encoded by circ-EIF6 enhances MYH9 protein stability by inhibiting its ubiquitin-mediated degradation, leading to Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation and oncogenic effects | BC tissue, adenocarcinoma cells |
Yang et al. 2021 [223] | Oncogenic | circPSMA1 | miR-637/Akt1-β-catenin | Promoted tumorigenesis, metastasis, and immunosuppression | circPSMA1 may enhance the levels of Akt1, cyclin D1, and β-catenin, key regulators of cell proliferation and survival pathways | TNBC tissue, BC cell line |
Clinical applications of circular RNAs in breast cancer management
Concerning chemotherapy resistance in BC, dysregulated circRNAs have been identified, suggesting their potential to either mitigate or exacerbate resistance to chemotherapy. CircRNAs associated with drug resistance represent promising therapeutic and diagnostic biomarkers. By enhancing chemotherapy sensitivity, these biomarkers may improve clinical outcomes. Furthermore, in resistant cases, circRNAs facilitate the assessment of treatment efficacy with chemotherapeutic agents. The medications most commonly associated with circRNA-mediated resistance in BC include paclitaxel (PTX), tamoxifen (TAM), and adriamycin (ADM) [187].
For instance, research has demonstrated that in TAM-resistant BC cells, circ_0025202 expression is significantly reduced [52]. Circ_0025202 acts as a sponge for miR-182-5p, suppressing migration, colony formation, and cell proliferation while enhancing tamoxifen sensitivity and promoting apoptosis [188]. Additionally, BC cells exhibiting ADM resistance display marked upregulation of circ_0001667 [189]. Furthermore, circ_0001667 contributes to ADM resistance in BC cells. Its knockdown substantially diminishes growth, migration, invasion, and ADM resistance in malignant cells, indicating its role in promoting drug resistance [190]. The circular RNA Circ_0006528 is overexpressed in PTX-resistant BC tissues and cells, significantly enhancing migration, proliferation, and invasion of PTX-resistant cells, thereby augmenting drug resistance [191].
Assessment of prognostic factors is critical for improving survival outcomes in patients with cancer. Extensive research has established that circRNAs serve diverse roles as prognostic indicators in various BC subtypes [192]. CircRNAs are highly stable molecules, widely prevalent across different pathways, and their expression varies depending on tissue type and cellular stage. These molecules are well-conserved across cell types and resistant to RNaseR degradation [193]. Consequently, circRNAs, owing to their unique metabolic properties, hold potential as cancer biomarkers.
For example, upregulation of circ_0103552 in BC cells is associated with poor prognosis in BC cases [194]. Another prognostic factor, elevated expression of circ_0069094, is linked to adverse outcomes. This circRNA inhibits miR-59, leading to increased glycolysis, which enhances cancer cell aggressiveness and alters the tumor microenvironment [195].
Conversely, certain circRNAs are downregulated in BC and inhibit its growth and progression, suggesting their potential as novel therapeutic agents for BC. For instance, reduced circDDX17 expression in BC cases is frequently associated with diminished long-term survival [196]. Similarly, in BC patients, low circNR3C2 expression is inversely correlated with mortality and the spread of invasive breast cancer [197]. CircNR3C2 serves as a favorable prognostic factor in BC by suppressing migration, invasion, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition progression, while also impeding BC advancement through Vimentin degradation [198].
In summary, circRNAs play a pivotal role in BC management by influencing chemotherapy resistance and prognosis. Dysregulated circRNAs, such as circ_0025202, circ_0001667, and Circ_0006528, modulate resistance to paclitaxel, tamoxifen, and adriamycin, serving as potential biomarkers to enhance treatment sensitivity and assess efficacy. Additionally, circRNAs like circ_0103552 and circ_0069094 correlate with poor prognosis, while circDDX17 and circNR3C2, when downregulated, indicate adverse outcomes, highlighting their therapeutic and diagnostic potential.
Conclusion
circRNAs have emerged as crucial regulators in BC development and progression, mainly through their interaction with various signaling pathways, including Wnt/β-catenin. Several key circRNAs demonstrate significant roles in modulating breast cancer cell behavior, such as circABCC4, circFAT1, circARL8B, and circDONSON. These molecules function primarily through microRNA interactions (acting as miRNA sponges) and influence downstream pathways that control cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and drug-resistance (Fig.1).
Fig. 1.
Graphical abstract
Research has revealed that circRNAs can act as either oncogenes or tumor suppressors. For example, circDONSON promotes breast cancer cell proliferation and radioresistance through SOX4-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling, while other circRNAs, like circRNF10, exhibit tumor-suppressive properties. The stability and tissue-specific expression patterns of circRNAs make them particularly promising as potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in BC treatment.
Understanding these complex molecular interactions has opened new avenues for targeted BC therapies. The unique characteristics of circRNAs, including their closed circular structure and resistance to degradation, position them as valuable tools for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications in breast cancer management (Fig.2).
Fig. 2.
Circular RNAs as modulators of key signaling pathways in breast cancer pathogenesis. Created in BioRender. Khalaji, A. (2025) https://BioRender.com/kb2ulhy
The included studies primarily rely on in vitro and in vivo models, which may constrain their translational relevance to human breast cancer. Few investigations incorporate patient-derived samples or assess clinical outcomes, thereby limiting generalizability to diverse patient populations. Variability in experimental designs, such as differences in cell lines and animal models, coupled with inconsistent circRNA quantification methods, hinders cross-study comparisons. Future research should employ patient-derived xenografts and large-scale clinical cohort studies to enhance clinical applicability. Moreover, standardizing circRNA quantification protocols and validating findings across diverse human populations are essential. Additionally, integrating multi-omics approaches could yield deeper insights into circRNA regulatory mechanisms, thus strengthening the evidence base for therapeutic development.
Acknowledgements
None.
Abbreviations
- circRNAs
Circular RNAs
- BC
Breast cancer
- ncRNAs
Non-coding RNAs
- piRNA
PIWI-interacting RNA
- miRNA
MicroRNA
- lncRNA
Long non-coding RNA
- CRCs
Colorectal cancers
- Wnt
Wingless-related integration site
- TNBC
Triple-negative breast cancer
- PCP
Planar cell polarity
- CK1α
Casein kinase 1α
- GSK-3β
Glycogen synthase kinase three beta
- APC
Adenomatous polyposis coli
- Ser45
Serine 45
- Thr41
Threonine 41
- βTrCP
Beta-transducin repeat-containing protein
- FZD
Frizzled
- LRP5/LRP6
Low-density lipoprotein-related protein 5/6
- DVL
Disheveled
- TCF/LEF
T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor
- EMT
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
- MMP
Matrix metalloproteinase
- NFAT5
Nuclear factor of activated T cells 5
- ROR
Receptor-related orphan receptor
- ROCK
Rho-associated protein kinase
- JNK
Jun N-terminal kinase
- BLBC
Basal-like breast cancer
- PLC
Phospholipase C
- PIP2
Phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-biphosphates
- IP3
Inositol (1,4,5)-triphosphates
- DAG
Diacylglycerol
- PKC
Protein kinase C
- CDC42
Cell division cycle 42
- CaMKII
Ca2 + /calmodulin-dependent kinase II
- CaN
Calcineurin
- TAK1
Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-activated kinase 1
- NLK
Nemo-like kinase
- NFAT
Nuclear factor of activated T-cells
- CTNNB1
Catenin beta 1
- Shh
Sonic Hedgehog
- JAK/STAT
Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription
- Sma
Small protein
- TβR I
TGF-β receptor I
- TβR II
TGF-β receptor II
- SOX4
Sex-determining region Y box 4
- MDM2
Double mouse minute 2
- ATF3
Activating transcription factor 3
- PI3K
Phosphoinositide 3-kinases
- mTOR
Mammalian target of rapamycin
- PIP3
Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate
- INPP4B
Inositol polyphosphate 4-phosphatase type II
- PTEN
Phosphatase and tensin homolog
- ZFR
Zinc finger RNA binding protein
- NF-κB
Nuclear factor kappa B
- TNFR1
Tumor necrosis factor receptor 1
- RIP
Specific proteins—receptor-interacting Ser/Thr-protein
- TRADD
TNFR1-associated death domain protein
- TRAF2
TNF receptor-associated factor 2
- NEMO
NF-κB essential modulator
- IKKα
Inhibitory kappa B kinase α
- NIK
NF-κB-inducing kinase
- TADA2A
Transcriptional adaptor 2A
- COL27A1
Collagen type XXVII alpha 1
- MAPKs
Mitogen-activated protein kinases
- RAS
Rat sarcoma
- GDP
Guanosine diphosphate
- GTP
Guanosine triphosphate
- EGFR
Epidermal growth factor receptor
- MAPKK
KMAPK kinase kinase
- MAPKK: MEK1/2/3/4/5/6/7
MAPK kinase
- ERKs
Extracellular signal-regulated kinases
- ErbB
Erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homologue
- OX
Oxaliplatin
- SKA1
Spindle and kinetochore-associated complex subunit 1
- HMGA2
High Mobility Group AT-Hook 2
Author contributions
A.K. and Y.N. conceptualized the study and drafted manuscript. M.P., A.F., and L.G. drafted the manuscript. P.N. and E.M.J. revised the manuscript. S.A.A. revised the manuscript and maked the figures. R.M. corresponding author conceptualized the review's framework revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors consent to publication.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Amirreza Khalaji and Yousef Nazari have contributed equally to this work and shared the first authorship.
References
- 1.Thompson B, Hohl SD, Molina Y, Paskett ED, Fisher JL, Baltic RD, et al. Breast cancer disparities among women in underserved communities in the USA. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2018;10(3):131–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ashoor A, Monti S, Pezzella M. Fibromatosis, a benign breast disease mimicking carcinoma. A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;41:392–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roumeliotis GA, Dostaler G, Boyd KU. Complementary and alternative medicines and patients with breast cancer: a case of mortality and systematic review of patterns of use in patients with breast cancer. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2017;25(4):275–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2024 Jan 1;74(1). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Allison KH, Hammond MEH, Dowsett M, McKernin SE, Carey LA, Fitzgibbons PL, et al. Estrogen and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer: ASCO/CAP guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(12):1346–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wolff AC, Hammond MEH, Allison KH, Harvey BE, Mangu PB, Bartlett JMS, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(20):2105–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yan H, Bu P. Non-coding RNA in cancer. Essays Biochem. 2021;65(4):625–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vo JN, Cieslik M, Zhang Y, Shukla S, Xiao L, Zhang Y, et al. The landscape of circular RNA in cancer. Cell. 2019;176(4):869-81.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kristensen LS, Andersen MS, Stagsted LVW, Ebbesen KK, Hansen TB, Kjems J. The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20(11):675–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li X, Yang L, Chen LL. The biogenesis, functions, and challenges of circular RNAs. Mol Cell. 2018;71(3):428–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yu J, Xu QG, Wang ZG, Yang Y, Zhang L, Ma JZ, et al. Circular RNA cSMARCA5 inhibits growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;68(6):1214–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hu ZQ, Zhou SL, Li J, Zhou ZJ, Wang PC, Xin HY, et al. Circular RNA sequencing identifies CircASAP1 as a key regulator in hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Hepatology. 2020;72(3):906–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ding L, Zhao Y, Dang S, Wang Y, Li X, Yu X, et al. Circular RNA circ-DONSON facilitates gastric cancer growth and invasion via NURF complex dependent activation of transcription factor SOX4. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kamali MJ, Salehi M, Mostafavi M, Morovatshoar R, Akbari M, Latifi N, et al. Hijacking and rewiring of host CircRNA/miRNA/mRNA competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) regulatory networks by oncoviruses during development of viral cancers. Rev Med Virol. 2024;34(2):e2530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhao W, Cui Y, Liu L, Qi X, Liu J, Ma S, et al. Splicing factor derived circular RNA circUHRF1 accelerates oral squamous cell carcinoma tumorigenesis via feedback loop. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(6):2033–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhou J, Zhang S, Chen Z, He Z, Xu Y, Li Z. CircRNA-ENO1 promoted glycolysis and tumor progression in lung adenocarcinoma through upregulating its host gene ENO1. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(12):885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang H, Li X, Meng Q, Sun H, Wu S, Hu W, et al. CircPTK2 (hsa_circ_0005273) as a novel therapeutic target for metastatic colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhao B, Song X, Guan H. Circacap2 promotes breast cancer proliferation and metastasis by targeting miR-29a/b-3p-COL5A1 axis. Life Sci. 2020;244:117179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lim W, Mayer B, Pawson T. Cell signaling: principles and mechanisms: garland science. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Han Q, Qiu S, Hu H, Li W, Dang X, Li X. The relationship between the hippo signaling pathway and bone metastasis of breast cancer. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1188310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.King TD, Suto MJ, Li Y. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway: a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2012;113(1):13–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pardo I, Fagundes PB, Oliveira RS, Campregher PV. A molecular approach to triple-negative breast cancer: targeting the Notch signaling pathway. einstein (São Paulo). 2024;22:eRW0552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhang J, Xu HD, Xing XJ, Liang ZT, Xia ZH, Zhao Y. Circrna_069718 promotes cell proliferation and invasion in triple-negative breast cancer by activating Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(12):5315–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xu X, Zhang M, Xu F, Jiang S. Wnt signaling in breast cancer: biological mechanisms, challenges and opportunities. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Salik B, Yi H, Hassan N, Santiappillai N, Vick B, Connerty P, et al. Targeting RSPO3-LGR4 signaling for leukemia stem cell eradication in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2020;38(2):263-78.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Soleas JP, D’Arcangelo E, Huang L, Karoubi G, Nostro MC, McGuigan AP, et al. Assembly of lung progenitors into developmentally-inspired geometry drives differentiation via cellular tension. Biomaterials. 2020;254:120128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Choi BR, Cave C, Na CH, Sockanathan S. GDE2-dependent activation of canonical Wnt signaling in neurons regulates oligodendrocyte maturation. Cell Rep. 2020;31(5):107540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Li YF, Zhang J, Yu L. Circular rnas regulate cancer onset and progression via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Yonsei Med J. 2019;60(12):1117–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Krishnamurthy N, Kurzrock R. Targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in cancer: update on effectors and inhibitors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;62:50–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ordaz-Ramos A, Rosales-Gallegos VH, Melendez-Zajgla J, Maldonado V, Vazquez-Santillan K. The role of LGR4 (GPR48) in normal and cancer processes. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. 10.3390/ijms22094690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pohl SG, Brook N, Agostino M, Arfuso F, Kumar AP, Dharmarajan A. Wnt signaling in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogenesis. 2017;6(4):e310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ma L, Chu H, Wang M, Zhang Z. Biological functions and potential implications of circular RNAs. J Biomed Res. 2022;37(2):89–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, Xiang JF, Yin QF, Xing YH, et al. Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2013;51(6):792–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li Z, Huang C, Bao C, Chen L, Lin M, Wang X, et al. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(3):256–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang XO, Wang HB, Zhang Y, Lu X, Chen LL, Yang L. Complementary sequence-mediated exon circularization. Cell. 2014;159(1):134–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ashwal-Fluss R, Meyer M, Pamudurti NR, Ivanov A, Bartok O, Hanan M, et al. Circrna biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2014;56(1):55–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, Slevin MK, Burd CE, Liu J, et al. Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. RNA. 2013;19(2):141–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liang D, Wilusz JE. Short intronic repeat sequences facilitate circular RNA production. Genes Dev. 2014;28(20):2233–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Conn SJ, Pillman KA, Toubia J, Conn VM, Salmanidis M, Phillips CA, et al. The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell. 2015;160(6):1125–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Errichelli L, Dini Modigliani S, Laneve P, Colantoni A, Legnini I, Capauto D, et al. FUS affects circular RNA expression in murine embryonic stem cell-derived motor neurons. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stagsted LVW, O’Leary ET, Ebbesen KK, Hansen TB. The RNA-binding protein SFPQ preserves long-intron splicing and regulates circRNA biogenesis in mammals. Elife. 2021. 10.7554/eLife.63088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Eisenberg E, Levanon EY. A-to-I RNA editing - immune protector and transcriptome diversifier. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(8):473–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ivanov A, Memczak S, Wyler E, Torti F, Porath HT, Orejuela MR, et al. Analysis of intron sequences reveals hallmarks of circular RNA biogenesis in animals. Cell Rep. 2015;10(2):170–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zheng X, Huang M, Xing L, Yang R, Wang X, Jiang R, et al. The circRNA circSEPT9 mediated by E2F1 and EIF4A3 facilitates the carcinogenesis and development of triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang J, Zhang Y, Song H, Yin H, Jiang T, Xu Y, et al. The circular RNA circSPARC enhances the migration and proliferation of colorectal cancer by regulating the JAK/STAT pathway. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Jiang T, Wang H, Liu L, Song H, Zhang Y, Wang J, et al. Circil4r activates the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway via the miR-761/TRIM29/PHLPP1 axis and promotes proliferation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Zhong Y, Du Y, Yang X, Mo Y, Fan C, Xiong F, et al. Circular RNAs function as ceRNAs to regulate and control human cancer progression. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mathews DH, Sabina J, Zuker M, Turner DH. Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. J Mol Biol. 1999;288(5):911–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Su H, Tao T, Yang Z, Kang X, Zhang X, Kang D, et al. Circular RNA cTFRC acts as the sponge of MicroRNA-107 to promote bladder carcinoma progression. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yao W, Li Y, Han L, Ji X, Pan H, Liu Y, et al. The CDR1as/miR-7/TGFBR2 axis modulates EMT in silica-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Toxicol Sci. 2018;166(2):465–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sang Y, Chen B, Song X, Li Y, Liang Y, Han D, et al. CircRNA_0025202 regulates tamoxifen sensitivity and tumor progression via regulating the miR-182-5p/FOXO3a axis in breast cancer. Mol Ther. 2019;27(9):1638–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Huang A, Zheng H, Wu Z, Chen M, Huang Y. Circular RNA-protein interactions: functions, mechanisms, and identification. Theranostics. 2020;10(8):3503–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zang J, Lu D, Xu A. The interaction of circRNAs and RNA binding proteins: an important part of circRNA maintenance and function. J Neurosci Res. 2020;98(1):87–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Du WW, Yang W, Li X, Awan FM, Yang Z, Fang L, et al. A circular RNA circ-DNMT1 enhances breast cancer progression by activating autophagy. Oncogene. 2018;37(44):5829–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Abdelmohsen K, Panda AC, Munk R, Grammatikakis I, Dudekula DB, De S, et al. Identification of HuR target circular RNAs uncovers suppression of PABPN1 translation by CircPABPN1. RNA Biol. 2017;14(3):361–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chen RX, Chen X, Xia LP, Zhang JX, Pan ZZ, Ma XD, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine modification of circNSUN2 facilitates cytoplasmic export and stabilizes HMGA2 to promote colorectal liver metastasis. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chen N, Zhao G, Yan X, Lv Z, Yin H, Zhang S, et al. A novel FLI1 exonic circular RNA promotes metastasis in breast cancer by coordinately regulating TET1 and DNMT1. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gong X, Tian M, Cao N, Yang P, Xu Z, Zheng S, et al. Circular RNA circEsyt2 regulates vascular smooth muscle cell remodeling via splicing regulation. J Clin Invest. 2021. 10.1172/JCI147031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wu N, Yuan Z, Du KY, Fang L, Lyu J, Zhang C, et al. Translation of yes-associated protein (YAP) was antagonized by its circular RNA via suppressing the assembly of the translation initiation machinery. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26(12):2758–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wang Y, Wu C, Du Y, Li Z, Li M, Hou P, et al. Expanding uncapped translation and emerging function of circular RNA in carcinomas and noncarcinomas. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhang M, Huang N, Yang X, Luo J, Yan S, Xiao F, et al. A novel protein encoded by the circular form of the SHPRH gene suppresses glioma tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2018;37(13):1805–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zhang M, Zhao K, Xu X, Yang Y, Yan S, Wei P, et al. A peptide encoded by circular form of LINC-PINT suppresses oncogenic transcriptional elongation in glioblastoma. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yang Y, Fan X, Mao M, Song X, Wu P, Zhang Y, et al. Extensive translation of circular RNAs driven by N(6)-methyladenosine. Cell Res. 2017;27(5):626–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhou J, Wan J, Gao X, Zhang X, Jaffrey SR, Qian SB. Dynamic m(6)A mRNA methylation directs translational control of heat shock response. Nature. 2015;526(7574):591–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liu Y, Li Z, Zhang M, Zhou H, Wu X, Zhong J, et al. Rolling-translated EGFR variants sustain EGFR signaling and promote glioblastoma tumorigenicity. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(5):743–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Li D, Li Z, Yang Y, Zeng X, Li Y, Du X, et al. Circular RNAs as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in environmental chemical exposure-related diseases. Environ Res. 2020;180:108825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Misir S, Wu N, Yang BB. Specific expression and functions of circular RNAs. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(3):481–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wang Y, Liu J, Ma J, Sun T, Zhou Q, Wang W, et al. Exosomal circrnas: biogenesis, effect and application in human diseases. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Li J, Zhang G, Liu CG, Xiang X, Le MTN, Sethi G, et al. The potential role of exosomal circRNAs in the tumor microenvironment: insights into cancer diagnosis and therapy. Theranostics. 2022;12(1):87–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhou H, He X, He Y, Ou C, Cao P. Exosomal circrnas: emerging players in tumor metastasis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:786224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yang Q, Li F, He AT, Yang BB. Circular RNAs: expression, localization, and therapeutic potentials. Mol Ther. 2021;29(5):1683–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fang S, Guo H, Cheng Y, Zhou Z, Zhang W, Han B, et al. CircHECTD1 promotes the silica-induced pulmonary endothelial–mesenchymal transition via HECTD1. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(3):396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yang X, Wang J, Zhou Z, Jiang R, Huang J, Chen L, et al. Silica-induced initiation of circular ZC3H4 RNA/ZC3H4 pathway promotes the pulmonary macrophage activation. FASEB J. 2018;32(6):3264–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fan Z, Xiao T, Luo H, Chen D, Lu K, Shi W, et al. A study on the roles of long non-coding RNA and circular RNA in the pulmonary injuries induced by polystyrene microplastics. Environ Int. 2022;163:107223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Liang G, Ling Y, Mehrpour M, Saw PE, Liu Z, Tan W, et al. Autophagy-associated circRNA circCDYL augments autophagy and promotes breast cancer progression. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zheng R, Zhang K, Tan S, Gao F, Zhang Y, Xu W, et al. Exosomal circLPAR1 functions in colorectal cancer diagnosis and tumorigenesis through suppressing BRD4 via METTL3-eIF3h interaction. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Li J, Hu ZQ, Yu SY, Mao L, Zhou ZJ, Wang PC, et al. CircRPN2 inhibits aerobic glycolysis and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2022;82(6):1055–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.He AT, Liu J, Li F, Yang BB. Targeting circular RNAs as a therapeutic approach: current strategies and challenges. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Lavenniah A, Luu TDA, Li YP, Lim TB, Jiang J, Ackers-Johnson M, et al. Engineered circular RNA sponges act as miRNA inhibitors to attenuate pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Mol Ther. 2020;28(6):1506–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hu K, Liu X, Li Y, Li Q, Xu Y, Zeng W, et al. Exosomes mediated transfer of Circ_UBE2D2 enhances the resistance of breast cancer to tamoxifen by binding to MiR-200a-3p. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e922253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Qu L, Yi Z, Shen Y, Lin L, Chen F, Xu Y, et al. Circular RNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants. Cell. 2022;185(10):1728-44.e16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Niehrs C. The complex world of WNT receptor signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(12):767–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wen X, Wu Y, Awadasseid A, Tanaka Y, Zhang W. New advances in canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:6987–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Koni M, Pinnarò V, Brizzi MF. The Wnt signalling pathway: a tailored target in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Remo A, Sina S, Barbi S, Simeone I, Insolda J, Parcesepe P, et al. Wnt (canonical and non canonical) pathways in breast carcinoma with extensive vascular invasion and inflammatory breast carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 2021;219:153347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Jackstadt R, Hodder MC, Sansom OJ. WNT and β-catenin in cancer: genes and therapy. Ann Rev Cancer Biol. 2020;4:177–96. [Google Scholar]
- 88.Gajos-Michniewicz A, Czyz M. WNT signaling in melanoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):4852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hashemi M, Hasani S, Hajimazdarany S, Ghadyani F, Olyaee Y, Khodadadi M, et al. Biological functions and molecular interactions of Wnt/β-catenin in breast cancer: revisiting signaling networks. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;232:123377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Chen Y, Chen Z, Tang Y, Xiao Q. The involvement of noncanonical Wnt signaling in cancers. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;133:110946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang J, Feng D, Gao B. An overview of potential therapeutic agents targeting WNT/PCP signaling. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2021;269:175–213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Rogers S, Scholpp S. Vertebrate Wnt5a—at the crossroads of cellular signalling. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2022;125:3–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ackers I, Malgor R. Interrelationship of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signalling pathways in chronic metabolic diseases. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2018;15(1):3–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Lang CMR, Chan CK, Veltri A, Lien WH. Wnt signaling pathways in keratinocyte carcinomas. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(9):1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Posviatenko A, Kulikova K, Gnuchev N, Georgiev G, Kibardin A, Larin S. Functional properties of the WNT11 new isoform, expressed in colon carcinoma cell line HT29. Mol Biol. 2012;46(1):129–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.van Schie EH, van Amerongen R. Aberrant WNT/CTNNB1 signaling as a therapeutic target in human breast cancer: weighing the evidence. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Suzuki H, Toyota M, Carraway H, Gabrielson E, Ohmura T, Fujikane T, et al. Frequent epigenetic inactivation of Wnt antagonist genes in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008;98(6):1147–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Feng Y, Spezia M, Huang S, Yuan C, Zeng Z, Zhang L, et al. Breast cancer development and progression: risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis. Genes Dis. 2018;5(2):77–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Sever R, Brugge JS. Signal transduction in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5(4):a006098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Katoh M, Katoh M. WNT signaling and cancer stemness. Essays Biochem. 2022;66(4):319–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Tyagi A, Sharma AK, Damodaran C. A review on notch signaling and colorectal cancer. Cells. 2020;9(6):1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Vinson KE, George DC, Fender AW, Bertrand FE, Sigounas G. The N otch pathway in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016;138(8):1835–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zarzosa Martinez P, Garcia Gilabert L, Hladun Alvaro R, Gallo GO, Pons Barcons G, Sansa Girona J, et al. Targeting the hedgehog pathway in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancers. 2023. 10.3390/cancers15030727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Valle-Mendiola A, Gutiérrez-Hoya A, Soto-Cruz I. JAK/STAT signaling and Cervical Cancer: from the cell surface to the Nucleus. Genes. 2023;14(6):1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Savage-Dunn C, Padgett RW. The TGF-β family in Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9(6):a022178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Upadhyay A, Moss-Taylor L, Kim M-J, Ghosh AC, O’Connor MB. TGF-β family signaling in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9(9):a022152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Tu S, Huang W, Huang C, Luo Z, Yan X. Contextual regulation of TGF-β signaling in liver cancer. Cells. 2019;8(10):1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tzavlaki K, Moustakas A. TGF-β signaling. Biomolecules. 2020;10(3):487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Vervoort SJ, Lourenço AR, van Boxtel R, Coffer PJ. SOX4 mediates TGF-β-induced expression of mesenchymal markers during mammary cell epithelial to mesenchymal transition. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e53238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Araki K, Miyoshi Y. Mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer: the important role of PI3K/Akt/mTOR in estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2018;25:392–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Akshaya R, Rohini M, He Z, Partridge N, Selvamurugan N. MiR-4638-3p regulates transforming growth factor-β1-induced activating transcription factor-3 and cell proliferation, invasion, and apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;222:1974–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Luo K. Signaling cross talk between TGF-β/Smad and other signaling pathways. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9(1):a022137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Fath MK, Masouleh RA, Afifi N, Loghmani S, Tamimi P, Fazeli A, et al. PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway modulation by circular RNAs in breast cancer progression. Pathol Res Pract. 2023;241:154279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Khan KH, Yap TA, Yan L, Cunningham D. Targeting the PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling network in cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2013;32(5):253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Engelman JA, Luo J, Cantley LC. The evolution of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases as regulators of growth and metabolism. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(8):606–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Fruman DA, Rommel C. PI3K and cancer: lessons, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13(2):140–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Thorpe LM, Yuzugullu H, Zhao JJ. PI3K in cancer: divergent roles of isoforms, modes of activation and therapeutic targeting. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(1):7–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Courtney KD, Corcoran RB, Engelman JA. The PI3K pathway as drug target in human cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(6):1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Vanhaesebroeck B, Guillermet-Guibert J, Graupera M, Bilanges B. The emerging mechanisms of isoform-specific PI3K signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(5):329–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Iida M, Harari P, Wheeler D, Toulany M. Targeting AKT/PKB to improve treatment outcomes for solid tumors. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen. 2020;819:111690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Du L, Li X, Zhen L, Chen W, Mu L, Zhang Y, et al. Everolimus inhibits breast cancer cell growth through PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(5):7163–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 122.Rodgers SJ, Mitchell CA, Ooms LM. The mechanisms of class 1A PI3K and Wnt/β-catenin coupled signaling in breast cancer. Biochem Soc Trans. 2023;51(4):1459–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.du Rusquec P, Blonz C, Frenel JS, Campone M. Targeting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in estrogen-receptor positive HER2 negative advanced breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020;12:1758835920940939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Jin X, Wang D, Lei M, Guo Y, Cui Y, Chen F, et al. TPI1 activates the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway to induce breast cancer progression by stabilizing CDCA5. J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Li X, Shen M. Circular RNA hsa_circ_103809 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation and invasion by sponging miR-620. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(2):555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Qiu X, Wang Q, Song H, Shao D, Xue J. circ_103809 promotes breast cancer progression by regulating the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 2020;19(6):3725–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 127.Zinatizadeh MR, Schock B, Chalbatani GM, Zarandi PK, Jalali SA, Miri SR. The nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) signaling in cancer development and immune diseases. Genes Dis. 2021;8(3):287–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Liu M, Sakamaki T, Casimiro MC, Willmarth NE, Quong AA, Ju X, et al. The canonical NF-κB pathway governs mammary tumorigenesis in transgenic mice and tumor stem cell expansion. Can Res. 2010;70(24):10464–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Du M, Ea C-K, Fang Y, Chen ZJ. Liquid phase separation of NEMO induced by polyubiquitin chains activates NF-κB. Mol Cell. 2022;82(13):2415–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Liu Y, Liu K, Huang Y, Sun M, Tian Q, Zhang S, et al. TRIM25 promotes TNF-α–induced NF-κB activation through potentiating the K63-linked ubiquitination of TRAF2. J Immunol. 2020;204(6):1499–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Razani B, Reichardt AD, Cheng G. Non-canonical NF-κB signaling activation and regulation: principles and perspectives. Immunol Rev. 2011;244(1):44–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Velloso FJ, Bianco AF, Farias JO, Torres NE, Ferruzo PY, Anschau V, et al. The crossroads of breast cancer progression: insights into the modulation of major signaling pathways. OncoTargets Ther. 2017;10:5491–524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Sun S-C. The non-canonical NF-κB pathway in immunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(9):545–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Lin Z, Liao L, Zhao S, Gu W, Wang G, Shen Z, et al. Corylin inhibits the progression of Non-small cell lung cancer cells by regulating NF-κB signaling pathway via targeting p65. Phytomedicine. 2023;110:154627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41(D1):D991–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Ma B, Hottiger MO. Crosstalk between Wnt/β-Catenin and NF-κB Signaling Pathway during Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2016;7:378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Lee S, Rauch J, Kolch W. Targeting MAPK signaling in cancer: mechanisms of drug resistance and sensitivity. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3):1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Vo U, Vajpai N, Flavell L, Bobby R, Breeze AL, Embrey KJ, et al. Monitoring Ras interactions with the nucleotide exchange factor son of sevenless (Sos) using site-specific NMR reporter signals and intrinsic fluorescence. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(4):1703–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Lavoie H, Therrien M. Regulation of RAF protein kinases in ERK signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16(5):281–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.McCain J. The MAPK (ERK) pathway: investigational combinations for the treatment of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. Pharm Ther. 2013;38(2):96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Rubinfeld H, Seger R. The ERK cascade: a prototype of MAPK signaling. Mol Biotechnol. 2005;31:151–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Rao A, Herr DR. G protein-coupled receptor GPR19 regulates E-cadherin expression and invasion of breast cancer cells. Biochim et Biophys Acta (BBA) Mol Cell Res. 2017;1864(7):1318–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Gao D, Qi X, Zhang X, Fang K, Guo Z, Li L. hsa_circRNA_0006528 as a competing endogenous RNA promotes human breast cancer progression by sponging miR-7-5p and activating the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Mol Carcinog. 2019;58(4):554–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Guardavaccaro D, Clevers H. Wnt/β-Catenin and MAPK signaling: allies and enemies in different battlefields. Sci Signal. 2012;5(219):pe5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Guo R, Zhang R. Dual effects of circRNA in thyroid and breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2023;25(12):3321–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Zheng S, Zhang X, Odame E, Xu X, Chen Y, Ye J, et al. CircRNA—protein interactions in muscle development and diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Wang X, Xing L, Yang R, Chen H, Wang M, Jiang R, et al. The circACTN4 interacts with FUBP1 to promote tumorigenesis and progression of breast cancer by regulating the expression of proto-oncogene MYC. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Zhang F, Xiong Q, Wang M, Cao X, Zhou C. FUBP1 in human cancer: characteristics, functions, and potential applications. Transl Oncol. 2024;48:102066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Wang X, Li F, Zhang Z, Xu G, Zhang J, Sun X. A unified position-aware convolutional neural network for aspect based sentiment analysis. Neurocomputing. 2021;450:91–103. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Ahmadi SE, Rahimi S, Zarandi B, Chegeni R, Safa M. MYC: a multipurpose oncogene with prognostic and therapeutic implications in blood malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Wang X, Chen M, Fang L. hsa_circ_0068631 promotes breast cancer progression through c-Myc by binding to EIF4A3. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2021;26:122–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Rocak S, Linder P. DEAD-box proteins: the driving forces behind RNA metabolism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5(3):232–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Gehring NH, Lamprinaki S, Kulozik AE, Hentze MW. Disassembly of exon junction complexes by PYM. Cell. 2009;137(3):536–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Saulière J, Murigneux V, Wang Z, Marquenet E, Barbosa I, Le Tonquèze O, et al. CLIP-seq of eIF4AIII reveals transcriptome-wide mapping of the human exon junction complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19(11):1124–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Ding F, Lu L, Wu C, Pan X, Liu B, Zhang Y, et al. circHIPK3 prevents cardiac senescence by acting as a scaffold to recruit ubiquitin ligase to degrade HuR. Theranostics. 2022;12(17):7550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Das A, Sinha T, Shyamal S, Panda AC. Emerging role of circular RNA–protein interactions. Non-Coding RNA. 2021;7(3):48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Du WW, Fang L, Yang W, Wu N, Awan FM, Yang Z, et al. Induction of tumor apoptosis through a circular RNA enhancing Foxo3 activity. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24(2):357–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Nyati KK, Zaman MM, Sharma P, Kishimoto T. Arid5a, an RNA-binding protein in immune regulation: RNA stability, inflammation, and autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 2020;41(3):255–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Akira S, Maeda K. Control of RNA stability in immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2021;39:481–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Ng WL, Mohd Mohidin TB, Shukla K. Functional role of circular RNAs in cancer development and progression. RNA Biol. 2018;15(8):995–1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Wang Z, Hao D, Yao J, Meng L, Jia H, Jing W, et al. Circular RNAs: biology and clinical significance of breast cancer. RNA Biol. 2023;20(1):859–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Wang T, Zhang Y, He Y, Liu Y, Qi P. Screening and bioinformatics analysis of competitive endogenous RNA regulatory network –related to circular RNA in breast cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:5575286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Huang C, Xu R, Zhu X, Jiang H. m6A-modified circABCC4 promotes stemness and metastasis of prostate cancer by recruiting IGF2BP2 to increase stability of CCAR1. Cancer Gene Ther. 2023;30(10):1426–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Liu M, Wang P, Sui X, Ding F, Liu L, Gao Z, et al. Circular RNA circABCC4 regulates lung adenocarcinoma progression via miR-3186-3p/TNRC6B axis. J Cell Biochem. 2020;121(10):4226–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Chen YF, Feng DD, Wu SH, Lu HY, Banu Pasha A, Permall DL, et al. Promotion of bronchopulmonary dysplasia progression using circular RNA circabcc4 via facilitating PLA2G6 expression by sequestering miR-663a. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:585541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Jiang J, Cheng X. Circular RNA circABCC4 acts as a ceRNA of miR-154-5p to improve cell viability, migration and invasion of breast cancer cells in vitro. Cell Cycle. 2020;19(20):2653–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Blanchett S, Boal-Carvalho I, Layzell S, Seddon B. NF-κB and extrinsic cell death pathways - entwined do-or-die decisions for T cells. Trends Immunol. 2021;42(1):76–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Peng H, Zhang W, Dong H, Yuan J, Li Y, Li F, et al. CircFAT1 promotes lung adenocarcinoma progression by sequestering miR-7 from repressing IRS2-ERK-mediated CCND1 expression. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(10):3944–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Zhou B, Li T, Xie R, Zhou J, Liu J, Luo Y, et al. CircFAT1 facilitates cervical cancer malignant progression by regulating ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK pathway through miR-409-3p/CDK8 axis. Drug Dev Res. 2021;82(8):1131–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Lu T, Yang D, Li X. CircFAT1 promotes the proliferation and invasion of malignant melanoma through miR375-SLC7A11 signal axis. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2023;23(20):2200–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Huang C, Qi P, Cui H, Lu Q, Gao X. CircFAT1 regulates retinal pigment epithelial cell pyroptosis and autophagy via mediating m6A reader protein YTHDF2 expression in diabetic retinopathy. Exp Eye Res. 2022;222:109152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Hu B, Xian Z, Zou Q, Zhang D, Su D, Yao J, et al. CircFAT1 suppresses colorectal cancer development through regulating miR-520b/UHRF1 axis or miR-302c-3p/UHRF1 axis. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2021;36(1):45–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Yao Y, Li X, Cheng L, Wu X, Wu B. Circular RNA FAT atypical cadherin 1 (circFAT1)/microRNA-525-5p/spindle and kinetochore-associated complex subunit 1 (SKA1) axis regulates oxaliplatin resistance in breast cancer by activating the notch and Wnt signaling pathway. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):4032–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Mansoori B, Duijf PHG, Mohammadi A, Najafi S, Roshani E, Shanehbandi D, et al. Overexpression of HMGA2 in breast cancer promotes cell proliferation, migration, invasion and stemness. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2020. 10.1080/14728222.2020.1736559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Fedele M, Battista S, Kenyon L, Baldassarre G, Fidanza V, Klein-Szanto AJ, et al. Overexpression of the HMGA2 gene in transgenic mice leads to the onset of pituitary adenomas. Oncogene. 2002;21(20):3190–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Wu H, Xu J, Gong G, Zhang Y, Wu S. CircARL8B contributes to the development of breast cancer via regulating miR-653-5p/HMGA2 axis. Biochem Genet. 2021;59(6):1648–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Zou Z, Dong YS, Liu JM, Zhao ZH, Li G, Liu DD. Circ-DONSON promotes malignant progression of glioma through modulating FOXO3. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(2):749–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Zhu X, Li L. Circ-DONSON knockdown inhibits cell proliferation and radioresistance of breast cancer cells via regulating SOX4. J Oncol. 2021. 10.1155/2021/8461740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Vervoort SJ, van Boxtel R, Coffer PJ. The role of SRY-related HMG box transcription factor 4 (SOX4) in tumorigenesis and metastasis: friend or foe? Oncogene. 2013;32(29):3397–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Li Y, Ge YZ, Xu L, Jia R. Circular RNA ITCH: a novel tumor suppressor in multiple cancers. Life Sci. 2020;254:117176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Yang C, Yuan W, Yang X, Li P, Wang J, Han J, et al. Circular RNA circ-ITCH inhibits bladder cancer progression by sponging miR-17/miR-224 and regulating p21, PTEN expression. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Zhang J, Cai Y, Sheng S, Zhao C, Jiang B. circITCH suppresses cell proliferation and metastasis through miR-660/TFCP2 pathway in melanoma. Cancer Med. 2022;11(12):2405–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Guo W, Zhang J, Zhang D, Cao S, Li G, Zhang S, et al. Polymorphisms and expression pattern of circular RNA circ-ITCH contributes to the carcinogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(29):48169–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Wang M, Chen B, Ru Z, Cong L. CircRNA circ-ITCH suppresses papillary thyroid cancer progression through miR-22-3p/CBL/β-catenin pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;504(1):283–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Wang ST, Liu LB, Li XM, Wang YF, Xie PJ, Li Q, et al. Circ-ITCH regulates triple-negative breast cancer progression through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Neoplasma. 2019;66(2):232–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Wei W, Li M, Wang J, Nie F, Li L. The E3 ubiquitin ligase ITCH negatively regulates canonical Wnt signaling by targeting dishevelled protein. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32(19):3903–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Gao D, Cui C, Jiao Y, Zhang H, Li M, Wang J, et al. Circular RNA and its potential diagnostic and therapeutic values in breast cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;51(1):258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Li H, Li Q, He S. Hsa_circ_0025202 suppresses cell tumorigenesis and tamoxifen resistance via miR-197-3p/HIPK3 axis in breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2021;19(1):39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Cui Y, Fan J, Shi W, Zhou Z. Circ_0001667 knockdown blocks cancer progression and attenuates adriamycin resistance by depleting NCOA3 via releasing miR-4458 in breast cancer. Drug Dev Res. 2022;83(1):75–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Wang Q, Liang D, Shen P, Yu Y, Yan Y, You W. Hsa_circ_0092276 promotes doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cells by regulating autophagy via miR-348/ATG7 axis. Transl Oncol. 2021;14(8):101045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Liu G, Zhang Z, Song Q, Guo Y, Bao P, Shui H. Circ_0006528 contributes to paclitaxel resistance of breast cancer cells by regulating miR-1299/CDK8 axis. OncoTargets Ther. 2020;13:9497–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Deng G, Sui G. Noncoding RNA in oncogenesis: a new era of identifying key players. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(9):18319–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Milosevic M, Jankovic D, Milenkovic A, Stojanov D. Early diagnosis and detection of breast cancer. Technol Health Care. 2018;26(4):729–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Yang L, Song C, Chen Y, Jing G, Sun J. Circular RNA circ_0103552 forecasts dismal prognosis and promotes breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion by sponging miR-1236. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(9):15553–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Xing Z, Wang X, Liu J, Zhang M, Feng K, Wang X. Hsa_circ_0069094 accelerates cell malignancy and glycolysis through regulating the miR-591/HK2 axis in breast cancer. Cell Signal. 2021;79:109878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Peng HH, Wen YG. CircDDX17 acts as a competing endogenous RNA for miR-605 in breast cancer progression. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(12):6794–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Fan Y, Wang J, Jin W, Sun Y, Xu Y, Wang Y, et al. CircNR3C2 promotes HRD1-mediated tumor-suppressive effect via sponging miR-513a-3p in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Shi Y, Han T, Liu C. CircRNA hsa_circ_0006220 acts as a tumor suppressor gene by regulating miR-197-5p/CDH19 in triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(15):1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Zhao Z, Han X, Nie C, Lin S, Wang J, Fang H. Circ_0008784 activates Wnt/β-catenin pathway to affect the proliferation and apoptosis of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Pathol Res Pract. 2023;241:154185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Li Y, Wang Z, Su P, Liang Y, Li Z, Zhang H, et al. circ-EIF6 encodes EIF6-224aa to promote TNBC progression via stabilizing MYH9 and activating the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Mol Ther. 2022;30(1):415–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Leng X, Huang G, Ding J, Ma F. Circ_0000043 promotes the proliferation, migration, invasiveness, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells via the miR-136–Smad3 axis. Biochem Cell Biol. 2021;99(3):277–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Zeng K, He B, Yang BB, Xu T, Chen X, Xu M, et al. The pro-metastasis effect of circANKS1B in breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2018;17:1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Zhang C, Yu Z, Yang S, Liu Y, Song J, Mao J, et al. ZNF460-mediated circRPPH1 promotes TNBC progression through ITGA5-induced FAK/PI3K/AKT activation in a ceRNA manner. Mol Cancer. 2024;23(1):33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Ju C, Zhou M, Du D, Wang C, Yao J, Li H, et al. EIF4A3-mediated circ_0042881 activates the RAS pathway via miR-217/SOS1 axis to facilitate breast cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(8):559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Wang L, Yang X, Zhou F, Sun X, Li S. Circular RNA UBAP2 facilitates the cisplatin resistance of triple-negative breast cancer via microRNA-300/anti-silencing function 1B histone chaperone/PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis. Bioengineered. 2022;13(3):7197–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Wang X, Jian W, Luo Q, Fang L. CircSEMA4B inhibits the progression of breast cancer by encoding a novel protein SEMA4B-211aa and regulating AKT phosphorylation. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(9):794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Zhou X, Jian W, Luo Q, Zheng W, Deng X, Wang X, et al. Circular RNA_0006014 promotes breast cancer progression through sponging miR-885-3p to regulate NTRK2 and PIK3/AKT pathway. Aging (Albany NY). 2022;14(7):3105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Liu F, Sang Y, Zheng Y, Gu L, Meng L, Li Z, et al. circRNF10 regulates tumorigenic properties and natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity against breast cancer through the miR-934/PTEN/PI3k-Akt Axis. Cancers. 2022;14(23):5862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Li H, Xu W, Xia Z, Liu W, Pan G, Ding J, et al. Hsa_circ_0000199 facilitates chemo-tolerance of triple-negative breast cancer by interfering with miR-206/613-led PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(3):4522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Chen ZG, Zhao HJ, Lin L, Liu JB, Bai JZ, Wang GS. Circular RNA CirCHIPK3 promotes cell proliferation and invasion of breast cancer by sponging miR-193a/HMGB1/PI3K/AKT axis. Thoracic cancer. 2020;11(9):2660–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Zhou B, Mo Z, Lai G, Chen X, Li R, Wu R, et al. Targeting tumor exosomal circular RNA cSERPINE2 suppresses breast cancer progression by modulating MALT1-NF-?B-IL-6 axis of tumor-associated macrophages. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42(1):48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Zheng W, Wang X, Yu Y, Ji C, Fang L. CircRNF10-DHX15 interaction suppressed breast cancer progression by antagonizing DHX15-NF-κB p65 positive feedback loop. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2023;28(1):34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Wang S, Feng X, Wang Y, Li Q, Li X. Dysregulation of tumour microenvironment driven by circ-TPGS2/miR-7/TRAF6/NF-κB axis facilitates breast cancer cell motility. Autoimmunity. 2021;54(5):284–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Xu Y, Zhang S, Liao X, Li M, Chen S, Li X, et al. Circular RNA circIKBKB promotes breast cancer bone metastasis through sustaining NF-κB/bone remodeling factors signaling. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Lee K-Y, Liu C-M, Chen L-H, Lee C-Y, Lu T-P, Chuang L-L, et al. Hypoxia-responsive circular RNA circAAGAB reduces breast cancer malignancy by activating p38 MAPK and sponging miR-378 h. Cancer Cell Int. 2023;23(1):45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Wang B, Chen H, Deng Y, Chen H, Xing L, Guo Y, et al. CircDNAJC11 interacts with TAF15 to promote breast cancer progression via enhancing MAPK6 expression and activating the MAPK signaling pathway. J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Xu H, Fang M, Ye S, Zuo B, Yao W, Ren J, et al. circAR-E2E4-miR-665-STAT3 axis is a potential regulatory network in triple-negative breast cancer. Heliyon. 2023;9(1):e12654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Wang F, Wang X, Li J, Lv P, Han M, Li L, et al. CircNOL10 suppresses breast cancer progression by sponging miR-767-5p to regulate SOCS2/JAK/STAT signaling. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Zhang H, Ge Z, Wang Z, Gao Y, Wang Y, Qu X. Circular RNA RHOT1 promotes progression and inhibits ferroptosis via mir-106a-5p/STAT3 axis in breast cancer. Aging (Albany NY). 2021;13(6):8115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Fu B, Liu W, Zhu C, Li P, Wang L, Pan L, et al. Circular RNA circBCBM1 promotes breast cancer brain metastasis by modulating miR-125a/BRD4 axis. Int J Biol Sci. 2021;17(12):3104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Ye G, Pan R, Zhu L, Zhou D. Circ_DCAF6 potentiates cell stemness and growth in breast cancer through GLI1-Hedgehog pathway. Exp Mol Pathol. 2020;116:104492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Wang H, Xiao Y, Wu L, Ma D. Comprehensive circular RNA profiling reveals the regulatory role of the circRNA-000911/miR-449a pathway in breast carcinogenesis. Int J Oncol. 2018;52(3):743–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Yang SJ, Wang DD, Zhong SL, Chen WQ, Wang FL, Zhang J, et al. Tumor-derived exosomal circPSMA1 facilitates the tumorigenesis, metastasis, and migration in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) through miR-637/Akt1/β-catenin (cyclin D1) axis. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(5):420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.