Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2025 Sep 25;20(9):e0331474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331474

Altered carnitine-acylcarnitine profiles in levothyroxine-treated congenital hypothyroid patients with fatigue: An LC-MS/MS-based study from Bangladesh

Mst Noorjahan Begum 1,2,3, Suprovath Kumar Sarker 1,2, Md Tarikul Islam 1, Golam Sarower Bhuyan 1, Rumana Mahtarin 1, Mohammad Hridoy Patwary 4, Tasnia Kawsar Konika 5, Syeda Kashfi Qadri 6, Tasnuva Ahmed 7, Hurjahan Banu 8, Nusrat Sultana 1, Asifuzzaman Rahat 1, Kohinoor Jahan Shyamaly 9, Taufiqur Rahman Bhuiyan 7, Mizanul Hasan 5, Mohammad A Hasanat 8, Abu A Sajib 2, Abul BMMK Islam 2, Kaiissar Mannoor 1, Sharif Akhteruzzaman 2, Firdausi Qadri 1,7,¤,*
Editor: Xiaosheng Tan10
PMCID: PMC12463203  PMID: 40996983

Abstract

Congenital hypothyroidism (CH), characterized by insufficient thyroid hormone production at birth, is frequently associated with fatigue, particularly in cases with delayed diagnosis. This study employed liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to profile carnitine and acylcarnitines in late-diagnosed congenital hypothyroid patients receiving levothyroxine (LT4) therapy, with the aim of identifying metabolic alterations that may be associated with fatigue symptoms. A total of 56 late-diagnosed congenital hypothyroid patients and 107 age-, sex-, and BMI-matched healthy controls were enrolled. Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes and as dried blood spots (DBS) on Whatman® 903 filter paper. LC-MS/MS was used to quantify free carnitine and 28 acylcarnitines, and plasma triglyceride (TG) levels were measured using a biochemical analyzer. Compared to healthy controls, congenital hypothyroid patients showed higher mean (±SD) concentrations of free carnitine (45.38 ± 12.61 vs. 41.54 ± 9.85 µmol/L; P = 0.049), total carnitines (67.33 ± 18.27 vs. 62.51 ± 14.13 µmol/L), and total acylcarnitines (21.95 ± 7.66 vs. 20.96 ± 5.61 µmol/L), although only free carnitine levels were statistically significant. Long-chain acylcarnitines were significantly lower in congenital hypothyroid patients (2.67 ± 0.87 µmol/L) compared to controls (3.15 ± 0.93 µmol/L; P = 0.0014). The β-oxidation ratio C0/(C16 + C18), a proxy for Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase I (CPT-I) activity, was significantly elevated in patients compared to healthy controls (34.55 ± 14.88 vs. 25.73 ± 6.87; P < 0.0001). Plasma TG levels were also significantly higher in patients (88.92 ± 59.54 mg/dL) than in controls (58.33 ± 15.79 mg/dL; P = 0.02). Metabolic profiling in congenital hypothyroid patients revealed impaired long-chain fatty acid oxidation and elevated triglyceride levels. These metabolic changes may contribute to fatigue symptoms and are potentially associated with reduced CPT-I activity, which is essential for mitochondrial β-oxidation. Additionally, mutations in the TPO and TSHR genes identified within this cohort may be linked to the observed metabolic alterations. Collectively, these findings suggest a possible interplay between genetic variants, disrupted lipid metabolism, and clinical features of congenital hypothyroidism.

1. Background

Hypothyroidism is one of the leading endocrine disorders in which the body cannot produce enough thyroid hormone(s) due to an underactive, missing or ectopic thyroid gland. Congenital hypothyroidism (CH) is defined as the insufficient production of thyroid hormone at birth [1]. Globally, the incidence of CH is approximately 1 in 3,000–4,000 live births, whereas a pilot study in Bangladesh reported a higher incidence of 1 in 1,300 [2,3]. An elevated serum TSH and low T4 or free T4 (FT4) level indicate a hypothyroid condition, which is reversible with appropriate LT4 treatment. Although LT4-mediated management of hypothyroidism has been considered comparatively straightforward, data suggest that 5–10% of LT4-treated patients suffer from persistent clinical complications of hypothyroidism despite the maintenance of normal blood levels of TSH and FT4 [46]. Among the physiological distresses in these patients, fatigue and fatigue-related symptoms are the most commonly documented manifestations. However, the mechanism causing persistent fatigue in these patients remains unclear [4,5].

L-carnitine is an endogenous compound and its major biological role is in the transport of fatty acids across the inner mitochondrial membrane for fatty acid oxidation via the reversible binding of acyl groups from Coenzyme A (CoA) [7]. Carnitine also has a role in regulating the cellular-to-mitochondrial ratio of free CoA to acyl-CoA [8]. Alterations in carnitine homeostasis can have a harmful effect on human health and are associated with muscle weakness, progressive cardiomyopathy, and encephalopathy [911]. Carnitine supplementation increases fatty acid oxidation and has been used in the management of patients suffering from muscular hypoxia, peripheral vascular disease, angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, and hemodialysis [1214].

In this study, carnitine and acylcarnitine profiles in whole blood from 56 late-diagnosed congenital hypothyroid patients were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Despite being on a prescribed levothyroxine regimen to maintain serum TSH and FT4 levels within the normal range, these patients continued to experience persistent fatigue-related complications. We hypothesized that these symptoms might be linked to disruptions in carnitine-acylcarnitine homeostasis. The study aimed to comprehensively profile carnitine, acylcarnitine, and triglyceride levels, exploring potential correlations between these metabolic parameters and the chronic fatigue experienced by the patients.

2. Methods

2.1. Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received approval from the Medical Research Ethics Committee, National Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences for Human Studies at Bangladesh Medical University (BMU) on 26 April 2017, and the Human Participants Committee, University of Dhaka (CP-4029) on 16 May 2017. Following the ethical approval, we enrolled patients and collected their specimens from 1 June 2017–31 December 2019. Blood samples were collected from the participants with informed written consent from their parents or guardians [15].

2.2. Study population

2.2.1. Patient.

A total of 56 congenital hypothyroid patients with fatigue or fatigue-related symptoms who visited the National Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (NINMAS) and Department of Endocrinology at Bangladesh Medical University (BMU), Dhaka, for their follow-up examination were enrolled in this present study. Patient recruitment was conducted twice weekly at the Pediatric Endocrinology OPD at BMU and NINMAS, where around 50–60 children present daily with various endocrine disorders. Among them, only 1–2 were confirmed CH cases coming for follow-up. All these patients were late-diagnosed and kept under the treatment of Levothyroxine (LT4). Before enrollment, a written informed consent, along with the clinical information, was obtained from the parent(s) or legal guardian(s) of each patient.

2.2.2. Healthy controls.

A total of 107 participants (aged 2–18 years) without any thyroid hormone complications and fatigue were enro

lled in this study as the healthy controls. All the participants were residents of Mirpur, Dhaka. A written informed consent was obtained from each healthy participant’s parent(s) or legal guardian(s).

2.3. Specimen collection and preservation

Blood specimens were collected from both congenital hypothyroid patients and healthy controls four hours post-breakfast. All the patients used to take their morning doses of LT4. Serum TSH and FT4 levels were performed at the hospital laboratory as part of the follow-up examination and the test results were recorded during collection of clinical information. Approximately, 5 mL of blood from each patient and healthy participant were collected in an EDTA vacutainer for plasma separation and a portion of the blood (~75 ul per spot) was deposited on Whatman® 903 generic multipart filter paper (GE Healthcare, Westborough, USA) to prepare a dried blood spot (DBS). The blood spot was dried for at least 4 hours at room temperature. Once dried, the DBS cards were transported to the laboratory and stored at −70°C freezer with desiccant for protection from moisture. All the plasma specimens were stored in a −20°C freezer.

2.4. HPLC and MS/MS settings

Free carnitine and a total of 28 acylcarnitines were measured in this study. Quantification of acylcarnitines was done by a Shimadzu LCMS-8050 mass spectrometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an electrospray ionization interface in the positive ion mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) system. The overall settings for data acquisition were as follows: The interface voltage at 4.5 kV, interface temperature at 250°C, block temperature at 250°C, heat block temperature at 400°C, nebulizing gas flow at 3.0 L/min, drying gas flow at 15.0 L/min, collision gas (argon) pressure at 230 kPa and a well time of 5 msec.

2.5. Method validation

The LC-MS/MS method used in this study was validated on the Shimadzu LCMS-8050 system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) using the NeoMass AAAC kit (Labsystems Diagnostics Oy, Vantaa, Finland). Method validation was performed in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (EP5-A2, EP06, and EP17) to ensure the reliability and accuracy of quantification of amino acids and acylcarnitines from dried blood spot (DBS) specimens [16].

Validation was carried out using three levels of quality control (QC) DBS materials—low, medium, and high—provided with the NeoMass AAAC kit. The following parameters were evaluated:

Linearity: All analytes demonstrated strong linearity across the measurement range with coefficient of determination (R²) values >0.99.

Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ): LOD and LOQ were calculated for each analyte according to CLSI EP17 guidelines.

Precision: Intra-assay Coefficients of Variation (%CV): The intra-assay CVs for most amino acids and acylcarnitines were within 20%, except for C6 (36.47%) due to its low abundance in the QC sample (0.13 µmol/L).

Inter-assay Coefficients of Variation (%CV): Ranged between 1.32% and 11.60% for amino acids, and 1.16% to 14.14% for acylcarnitines, well within acceptable limits.

Accuracy: Assessed as relative error (RE%), which ranged from −19.85% to +9.33% for intra-assay and −19.31% to +3.55% for inter-assay measurements.

Recovery: Recovery rates for amino acids ranged from 80.68% to 103.54%, and for acylcarnitines from 93.37% to 108.35%, confirming acceptable performance.

To reduce potential batch effects, samples from healthy controls and clinically suspected patients were randomized and analyzed across multiple batches. Each LC-MS/MS run included low, medium, and high QC controls, ensuring assay performance was continuously monitored and remained consistent throughout the study period.

2.6. Sample preparation

Extraction and quantification of free carnitine and acylcarnitines from the DBS cards were done using a NeoMass AAAC kit (Labsystems Diagnostics Oy, Vantaa, Finland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the lyophilized internal standards were reconstituted according to the manufacturer’s specifications, and the daily working solution was prepared by diluting the reconstituted internal standards 1:100 (v/v) using the extraction solution. A blood spot with a diameter of 3.2 mm was punched into a U-bottomed microplate well and 100 µL extraction solution with internal standard was added. The 96-well microtiter plate was then covered with adhesive film and incubated for 20 min at room temperature with a shaking speed of 650 rpm. After the incubation time was over, 70 µL of the content from each well was transferred to a V-bottomed analysis plate. The plate was covered with aluminium foil to minimize evaporation of the solution. Finally, the analysis plate was then placed on the auto-sampler of the instrument and 1 µL sample was injected to perform the analysis.

2.7. Data collection and data processing

The settings for data acquisition and data processing have been described in detail previously [16]. The concentration of each analyte was measured using the formula: Concentration of an analyte (nmol/mL) = the area of the analyte × the concentration of the internal standard/ the area of the internal standard.

2.8. Measurement of plasma Triglycerides (TG)

The plasma triglyceride (TG) levels of both patients and healthy controls were quantified by enzymatic colourimetric assay using Randox Triglycerides assay kit (Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, UK). The test was performed following the procedure provided in the manual of the kit. The absorbance of the sample was read on a DR-7000D semi-automatic analyzer (Dirui, Jilin, China).

2.9. Statistical analysis

Mean, standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variance (CV), and interquartile range (IQR) were calculated using Microsoft Excel (2016). Unpaired t-tests with Welch’s correction for patients and healthy controls were performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 and 10.0 software. To assess the robustness of findings, statistical power was estimated using the pwr package in R (version 4.4.1). P-values were also adjusted for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) method. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline information of the study participants

The baseline information of all study participants, including patients and healthy controls, were summarized in Table 1. The enrolled congenital hypothyroid patients (N = 56, 27 males; 29 females) had an average age of 7.97 ± 4.29 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 17.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2. The healthy subjects (N = 107, 54 males & 53 females) had an age range of 7.24 ± 4.27 years and a BMI of 15.78 ± 2.62 kg/m2. As shown in Table 1, the enrollment was age- and sex-matched because there were no significant differences in age and gender distribution between the patients and the healthy control groups. The mean BMI, too, did not differ between the two groups.

Table 1. Baseline information of the congenital hypothyroid patients and healthy participants.

Parameters Patients Healthy Controls
Male/ Female 27/29 54/53
Age (years) mean±SD 7.97 ± 4.29 7.24 ± 4.27
BMI (kg/m2) mean±SD 17.0 ± 4.4 15.78 ± 2.62
Serum TSH (mIU/L) before treatment initiation, mean±SD 66.07 ± 57.38 NA
Serum TSH (mIU/L) during treatment, mean±SD 3.61 ± 4.41 NA
*Serum FT4 (pmol/L) during treatment, mean±SD 17.68 ± 5.09 NA
Average LT4 treatment initiation time in months, mean±SD 19.7 ± 4.72 NA

* FT4 level before treatment initiation was not recorded for the majority of the patients. NA= Not Applicable.

All the congenital hypothyroid patients received thyroid hormone replacement therapy on a daily basis, and LT4 dosages were adjusted based on age, sex and BMI of the patients. Dose adjustment was also needed for the congenital hypothyroid patients who had clinical manifestations atypical of hypothyroidism. The mean serum TSH level of the patients before initiation of hormone replacement therapy was recorded 66.07 ± 57.38 mIU/L, whereas the baseline TSH level following LT4 therapy was 3.61 ± 4.41(mIU/L), indicating that there was as much as 18.3-fold higher level of serum TSH before treatment initiation. All the patients enrolled in the study could maintain a normal serum-free T4 (FT4) level (17.68 ± 5.09 pmol/L) following LT4 therapy. However, the study could not compare the FT4 levels of the pre-treatment period with that of the post-treatment period because the former was not recorded for the majority of the patients. All the patients received only LT4 treatment, and none of them had a history of therapy with triiodothyronine (T3) or combination therapy with LT4 and T3.

Among 56 enrolled congenital hypothyroid patients, the majority were suffering from dyshormonogenesis (50%, n = 28), whereas about 27% (n = 15), 9% (n = 5), 3% (n = 2) and 2% (n = 1) patients had etiologies of thyroid gland agenesis, thyroiditis, hypoplasia and ectopic thyroid gland, respectively (Table 2). The etiologies of five congenital hypothyroid patients were unknown because these patients did not show positive test results for thyroid radionuclide uptake, thyroid sonography, or serum thyroglobulin, although they were kept on regular LT4 therapy. However, all the patients could persistently maintain normal TSH and FT4 levels upon hormone replacement therapy, although they did have various complications due to late diagnosis and delayed treatment initiation (19.7 ± 4.72 months) (Table 1).

Table 2. Distribution of congenital hypothyroid patients across hypothyroidism subtypes.

Type of thyroid disorder (N = 56) No. of Patients
Dyshormonogenesis
Agenesis
Ectopic
Hypoplasia
Thyroiditis
Unknown*
28
15
1
2
5
5

*The type of hypothyroid disorder was unknown because these patients did not undergo thyroid radionuclide uptake, thyroid sonography or serum thyroglobulin test

3.2. Free carnitine, total carnitine, and total acylcarnitine profile

Despite daily thyroid hormone replacement therapy, the congenital hypothyroid patients had been suffering from persistent fatigue. As carnitine plays a critical role in mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, it has been suggested that fatigue-related complications may involve altered carnitine-acylcarnitine homeostasis. Table 3 shows the comparison of L-carnitine (C0), total carnitines and 13 long-chain acylcarnitines, as well as total acylcarnitines, between the congenital hypothyroid patients with fatigue or fatigue-related symptoms and healthy controls. The mean (±SD) free carnitine concentration was 45.38 ± 12.61 µmol/L in the patient group, whereas it was 41.54 ± 9.85 µmol/L in the healthy control group, and the difference between the 2 groups generated a P value of 0.049. On the other hand, the concentrations of total acylcarnitines and total carnitines of the patient group were 21.95 ± 7.66 µmol/L and 67.33 ± 18.27 µmol/L, respectively, which were higher than the control group (total acylcarnitine = 20.96 ± 5.61 µmol/L; total carnitine = 62.51 ± 14.13 µmol/L), although the difference did not generate a significant P value.

Table 3. Comparison of free carnitine, total acylcarnitines, total carnitines, and long-chain acylcarnitines between the congenital hypothyroid patients and the healthy controls.

Parameters Patients
µmol/L
(mean±SD)
CV
(%)
IQR Healthy Controls
µmol/L
(mean±SD)
CV
(%)
IQR P Value
Free Carnitine (C0) 45.38 ± 12.61 27.79 17.45 41.54 ± 9.85 23.72 4.9 0.049*
Total acylcarnitines 21.95 ± 7.66 36.1 11.54 20.96 ± 5.61 25.48 6.02 0.4
Total Carnitines 67.33 ± 18.27 29.43 24.92 62.51 ± 14.13 29.14 15.95 0.08
Long chain acylcarnitines
Myristoylcarnitine (C14) 0.09 ± 0.05 53.0 0.04 0.09 ± 0.05 59.65 0.03 0.95
Myristoleylcarnitine (C14:1) 0.07 ± 0.03 54.7 0.05 0.07 ± 0.03 46.29 0.04 0.76
Tetradecadienoylcarnitine (C14:2) 0.03 ± 0.02 72.18 0.03 0.03 ± 0.02 52.0 0.02 0.95
Palmitoylcarnitine (C16) 1.02 ± 0.32 31.67 0.43 1.24 ± 0.43 34.38 0.47 0.0003*
Palmitoyleylcarnitine (C16:1) 0.06 ± 0.02 34.02 0.02 0.06 ± 0.02 31.03 0.02 0.58
Stearoylcarnitine (C18) 0.39 ± 0.14 37.95 0.19 0.47 ± 0.17 35.5 0.25 0.002*
Oleylcarnitine (C18:1) 0.7 ± 0.21 30.32 0.32 0.81 ± 0.25 31.43 0.3 0.007*
Octadecadienyl carnitine (C18:2) 0.29 ± 0.1 36.83 0.1 0.32 ± 0.1 31.13 0.11 0.113
Hydroxymyristoylcarnitine (C14OH) 0.01 ± .007 66.37 0.008 0.01 ± .006 64.17 0.008 0.76
Hydroxypalmitoylcarnitine (C16OH) 0.001 ± 0.002 71.58 0.004 0.01 ± 0.003 42.13 0.005 0.001*
Hydroxypalmitoleylcarnitine (C16:1OH) 0.03 ± 0.01 51.71 0.01 0.03 ± 0.014 46.96 0.01 0.26
3-Hydroxystearoylcarnitine (C18-OH) 0.001 ± 0.003 83.99 0.004 0.001 ± 0.003 59.98 0.004 0.013*
Hydroxyoleylcarnitine (C18:1OH) 0.01 ± 0.006 54.72 0.008 0.01 ± 0.004 38.2 0.006 0.91
Total long chain acylcarnitines 2.67 ± 0.87 31.02 1.13 3.15 ± 0.93 29.36 1.09 0.0014*

CV = Coefficient of variance ; IQR = Interquartile range ; * P< 0.05 was considered significant

Total acylcarnitines = Total long chain acylcarnitines + Total medium chain acylcarnitines + Total short chain acylcarnitines ; Total Carnitine = Free carnitine + Total acylcarnitines

3.2.1. Long chain (LC)-acylcarnitines profile.

In this metabolomic profiling study, 13 long-chain acylcarnitines were analyzed which included 6 saturated (C14, C16, C18, C14OH, C16OH, and C18OH), 5 monounsaturated (C14:1, C16:1, C18:1, C16:1OH, and C18:1OH), and 2 polyunsaturated (C14:2 and C18:2) acylcarnitines. The blood concentrations of acylcarnitines with saturated long-chain fatty acids were 0.09 ± 0.05 µmol/L, 1.02 ± 0.32 µmol/L, 0.39 ± 0.14 µmol/L, 0.01 ± .007 µmol/L, 0.001 ± 0.002 µmol/L and 0.001 ± 0.003 µmol/L for myristoylcarnitine (C14), palmitoylcarnitine (C16), stearoylcarnitine (C18), hydroxymyristoylcarnitine (C14OH), hydroxypalmitoylcarnitine (C16OH) and 3-hydroxystearoylcarnitine (C18-OH), respectively, in the patient’s group. The C16, C18 and C16OH acylcarnitine concentrations in the blood of congenital hypothyroid patients were significantly lower than that of the healthy control participants with C16, C18 and C16OH acylcarnitine concentrations of 1.24 ± 0.43, 0.47 ± 0.17 and 0.01 ± 0.003 µmol/L, respectively and the differences between the two groups produced significant P values of 0.0003, 0.002 and 0.001, respectively (Table 3). Adjusted p-values and corresponding power of the significant parameters were shown in Table S1.

However, C14, C14OH, and C18OH acylcarnitine levels remained almost unaltered in the patients and healthy control groups. On the other hand, the mean concentrations of all the monounsaturated long-chain acylcarnitines were almost similar in the patients and the control participants except oleylcarnitine (C18:1). It is noticeable here that oleylcarnitine (C18:1) decreased significantly in the patients (0.7 ± 0.21 µmol/L) compared to the healthy controls (0.81 ± 0.25 µmol/L), generating a P-value of 0.007. Among the two polyunsaturated acylcarnitines, octadecadienyl carnitine (C18:2) was found to be decreased in the patients compared to the controls without generating a statistically significant difference (P = 0.113), whereas the concentration of tetradecadienoylcarnitine (C14:2) of the patients and the healthy controls did not differ. However, in contrast to the short and medium-chain acylcarnitines (Table S2), the mean concentration of these 13 long-chain acylcarnitines was significantly lower in the patients (2.67 ± 0.0.87 µmol/L) than that in the healthy controls (3.15 ± 0.93 µmol/L), and the difference between the two groups generated a significant P-value of 0.0014.

3.3. Indicator ratios of metabolic process

With a significant decrease in blood concentrations of long-chain acylcarnitines (C16, C18, C18:1, C16OH and C18OH) along with a total decline in the concentration of LC-acylcarnitines and an increase in the blood level of free carnitine (C0); C0/(C16 + C18) ratio was found to be significantly higher in the patients (ratio = 34.55 ± 14.88, IQR = 12.9, %CV = 43.07) than that in the healthy controls (ratio = 25.73 ± 6.87, IQR = 8.48, %CV = 26.71 (P < 0.0001) (Fig 1a). The C0/(C16 + C18) ratio serves as an indirect marker of CPT-I activity. Our findings may indicate reduced CPT-I activity in the patient group, which is essential for the β-oxidation of long-chain fatty acids, facilitating their conversion into acylcarnitines for transport from the cytosol into the inner mitochondrial matrix [17,18].

Fig 1. Comparison of CPT-I enzyme deficiency indicator and plasma TG concentration between the congenital hypothyroid patients and the healthy controls.

Fig 1

(a) C0/(C16 + C18) ratio, an important indicator of CPT-I enzyme activity, was significantly higher in the patients than in the control group (P < 0.0001). (b) Plasma Triglyceride (TG) concentrations were found to be higher in congenital hypothyroid patients compared to the healthy controls, and the difference generated a significant P-value of 0.02. A P-value<0.05 was considered significant.

3.4. Triglyceride (TG) level

The data demonstrating a disturbance in the metabolism of long-chain acylcarnitines in the congenital hypothyroid patients with fatigue might be due to an insufficient CPT-I activity prompting us to ask whether the long-chain fatty acids are diverted for use in the biosynthesis of TG (Fig 1b). Accordingly, we quantified plasma TG levels. Fig 1b demonstrates that the plasma TG level was significantly higher in the patients (88.92 ± 59.54 mg/dL) (IQR = 77.85, %CV = 66.96) than that in the healthy controls (58.33 ± 15.79 mg/dL) (IQR = 24.75, %CV = 27.06). The difference in TG concentration between the two groups generated a significant P-value of 0.02. A schematic diagram of outcomes was shown in Fig 2. Interestingly, although the TG level in the hypothyroid blood was higher and none of the patients was overweight (average BMI was 17.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2), and the findings indicate that the deposition of TG might not have occurred at a significant level in the adipose tissues.

Fig 2. Schematic diagram of outcomes of metabolic profiling of carnitine, acyl-carnitine, and TG in late-diagnosed congenital hypothyroid patients.

Fig 2

4. Discussion

This is the first LC-MS/MS-based metabolic profiling report from Bangladesh analyzing carnitine-acylcarnitine metabolites in the blood of congenital hypothyroid patients receiving thyroid hormone replacement therapy. The study aimed to investigate whether alterations in blood carnitine-acylcarnitine levels in treated congenital hypothyroid patients were associated with fatigue-related complications.

Although the recommended time for diagnosis of congenital hypothyroidism and therapeutic intervention should be initiated between the first two and three weeks of life, the average treatment initiation time for the patients of this study was 19.7 ± 4.72 months [19,20]. Clinical complications other than neurologic deficits, if any, in congenital hypothyroid patients are considered reversible upon hormone replacement therapy [2124]. Unfortunately, all the patients enrolled in this study reported at least one of the hypothyroidism-associated symptoms, with fatigue and fatigue-related symptoms as the most common complications, although they had normal blood TSH and FT4 levels upon daily LT4 treatment. Simply having normal levels of TSH and FT4 may not be sufficient to guarantee adequate thyroid hormone production or response to levothyroxine (LT4) treatment.

In this study, the levels of free carnitine, total carnitines, and acylcarnitines were higher in the patient group than in the healthy controls. However, the difference was significant for free carnitine only. Especially the total concentration of long-chain acylcarnitines, along with the concentrations of six individual long-chain acylcarnitines was significantly lower in the patients compared to the controls (Table 3). Wong et al. reported that there were no apparent differences in serum acylcarnitine profiles among hypo-, hyper- and euthyroid states and inferred that the acylcarnitine profiles were relatively unremarkable in thyroid disease [25]. The current study differs from the study by Wong et al. in that we measured carnitine parameters in whole blood using DBS specimens, and the comparisons of the parameters were made between the late-diagnosed thyroid patients under treatment and the healthy controls. In addition, the small sample size and incomplete follow-up were stated as important limitations of their study. However, Galland et al. demonstrated that hepatic carnitine level in rats was modified due to changes in thyroid hormone status, while the carnitine concentrations of kidney and skeletal muscle cells remained unchanged [26]. According to Pande et al., dietary thyroxine could cause an increase in carnitine levels in the liver and serum, while carnitine levels in the heart, skeletal muscle, and the urinary excretion of carnitine remained unaffected in experimental rats [27]. Similarly, thyroxine treatment has also been reported to cause an increase in carnitine in the hearts of guinea pigs [28]. However, a direct comparison of these results with our findings of increased free carnitine in whole blood is difficult due to differences among species as well as variations in the duration and dose of the thyroid hormone replacement therapy. Maebashi et al. found a positive correlation between urinary carnitine excretion and serum thyroxine concentration, with hyperthyroid subjects having significantly elevated levels of carnitine excretion and hypothyroid subjects having markedly reduced carnitine excretion [29]. Urinary carnitine excretion became normal in both groups with the correction of thyroid status. Nevertheless, renal clearance and absorption of carnitine were not investigated in our study. The ratio of urinary carnitine/acylcarnitine excretion of the patients and healthy controls could have helped us to understand better the altered carnitine-acylcarnitine homeostasis in these late-diagnosed congenital hypothyroid patients under treatment.

Beyond that, this study explored the levels of six Long Chain (LC)-acylcarnitines, as well as the mean concentration of total LC-acylcarnitine was significantly (P = 0.0014) lower in the patients than in the controls, although the levels of short and medium-chain acylcarnitines remained unaffected. A study of chronic fatigue syndrome patients showed a significantly lower level of LC-acylcarnitines compared to the healthy subjects, although there were no significant differences in free carnitine, total carnitine, or total acylcarnitine levels between the two groups [7]. Another study also reported insignificant differences in free carnitine, total carnitine, and total acylcarnitine concentrations between the chronic fatigue syndrome patients and the healthy controls [30]. However, the findings of An et al. made it more paradoxical as they reported that carnitine supplementation could significantly lessen both the fatigue severity scale and mental fatigue score of hypothyroid patients younger than 50 years of age, and thus they concluded that carnitine supplementation may be useful in alleviating fatigue symptoms in this group [31]. Since fatty acid oxidation depends on the presence of carnitine, an increase in the level of carnitine may cause an increase in the rate of fatty acid oxidation and thus contribute to the energy supply. Thyroid hormone controls the hepatic conversion of γ-butyrobetaine to carnitine in rats and also increases carnitine bioavailability [26]. Elevated carnitine levels have been shown to stimulate fatty acid oxidation through mechanisms involving increased CPT-I activity. Interestingly, in this study, although the carnitine level was high in the blood of patients, a decrease in CPT-I activity was found in these congenital hypothyroid patients with energy crises, having normal TSH and FT4 levels after hormone replacement therapy. However, several studies reported carnitine as a peripheral antagonist of thyroid hormone action and may act as a peripheral inhibitor of thyroid hormone uptake [3234]. This inhibitory effect may be part of a retro-control loop between thyroid hormone and carnitine and thus the reduced thyroid hormone at the cellular level may hinder CPT-I activity [35]. A study of cellular hypothyroidism in different tissues is requisite to minimize the discrepancy between the findings of different study groups and also to devise a proper management strategy for congenital hypothyroid patients with fatigue and related symptoms.

Moreover, a possible decrease in CPT-I activity and reduced β-oxidation—both of which may contribute to an underlying energy deficit in the study patients—prompted us to assess plasma triglyceride (TG) levels to further explore lipid metabolic disturbances.

In this study, the congenital hypothyroid patients had significantly higher levels of plasma TG, and the finding was supported by other studies [3638]. The excess TG usually deposits inside the cells of adipose tissues and the liver as lipid droplets [39]. However, none of the patients enrolled in this study was overweight (BMI = 17.0 ± 4.4 kg/m2), and the lean body mass did not differ between the congenital hypothyroid patients and the healthy controls (data not shown), suggesting that the hepatocytes might be the primary site of TG deposition in these patients. A wide range of studies reported both overt and subclinical hypothyroidism as a risk factor of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the chronic liver diseases that might progress to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [3741although some newly published studies failed to find such an association [42,43].

It had been demonstrated that acylcarnitine levels were significantly higher in the whole blood than in the plasma because higher concentrations of LC-acylcarnitines in the erythrocyte membranes contributed significantly to the whole blood acylcarnitines [44,45]. However, plasma acylcarnitine concentrations might have a pattern of variation similar to the one observed in the whole blood specimens. Finally, there are a few limitations in the study, notably urinary excretion levels of acylcarnitines of the patients were not measured. Targeting more acylcarnitine metabolites might have helped to delve further into the patients’ ongoing fatigue-related complications.

Furthermore, the fatigue commonly observed in these congenital hypothyroid patients may be associated with underlying genetic mutations in the Thyroid Peroxidase (TPO) and Thyroid stimulating Hormone Receptor (TSHR) genes identified in this cohort. Notably, non-synonymous mutations such as p.Ala373Ser, p.Ser398Thr, and p.Thr725Pro in the TPO gene, along with p.Ser508Leu and p.Glu727Asp in TSHR gene, were detected in these patients. These mutations are known to compromise the structural and functional integrity of the respective proteins, impairing their interaction with ligands and regulatory molecules [15,4648]. Such disruptions in protein function interfere with thyroid hormone biosynthesis and receptor-mediated signaling, resulting in hormonal insufficiency. This deficiency may, in turn, contribute to dysregulated fatty acid metabolism and diminished mitochondrial energy production—metabolic impairments frequently associated with fatigue in hypothyroid states. We hypothesize that reduced CPT-I activity may contribute to persistent fatigue in these congenital hypothyroid patients, even after levothyroxine therapy, which alone may be insufficient to fully address the downstream metabolic consequences of TPO and TSHR gene mutations present in this cohort. Therefore, addressing inherent defects in hormone synthesis and receptor responsiveness is crucial. Patients with these mutations may benefit from more personalized treatment strategies and close clinical monitoring to ensure optimal thyroid hormone replacement. Moreover, carnitine supplementation could play a supportive role alongside LT4 therapy in mitigating metabolic dysfunction and fatigue.

This study provides valuable insights into metabolic alteration in congenital hypothyroid patients in Bangladesh; however, several factors should be considered when interpreting the findings. The cross-sectional design limited our ability to track treatment outcomes over time, and fatigue was self-reported without standardized severity scoring. While triglyceride levels were assessed, additional metabolic or hepatic markers, including pre-treatment FT4 and urinary carnitine/acylcarnitine levels, were not available. Tissue-specific effects were also beyond the scope of this analysis. Additionally, variability in patient genetics and treatment history may have influenced the observed metabolic profiles.

5. Conclusion

This study reveals significant metabolic alterations in congenital hypothyroid patients, including reduced long-chain acylcarnitine levels and inferred low CPT-I activity, which are suggestive of impaired β-oxidation and energy metabolism. These disruptions may contribute to persistent fatigue, even in patients with normalized thyroid hormone levels under levothyroxine therapy. The findings highlight a critical gap in current management strategies that rely solely on hormonal normalization, underscoring the need for more comprehensive care that addresses underlying metabolic dysfunction.

Clinically, these insights suggest that routine metabolic profiling—especially of carnitine-acylcarnitine pathways—could serve as a valuable adjunct in assessing treatment response and guiding individualized therapy. Additionally, these results open avenues for considering adjunct interventions such as carnitine supplementation in selected cases. Future studies, particularly longitudinal and mechanistic investigations, are essential to validate these findings and refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for optimizing outcomes in congenital hypothyroidism.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Adjusted p-values and corresponding power of the significant parameters from Table 3.

(DOCX)

pone.0331474.s001.docx (15.4KB, docx)
S2 Table. Comparison of 8 short chain and 7 medium chain acylcarnitines between patients and healthy controls.

(DOCX)

pone.0331474.s002.docx (18KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the doctors and staff of BMUfor their support in collecting specimens. Special thanks to Md. Yeasir Karim, Infectious Diseases Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212, Bangladesh, for his cordial support.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was partially funded by a grant from the University of Dhaka received from the University Grant Commission (CP-4029). The first author was a Ph.D. student (from 2016 to 2019) under a grant from the University of Dhaka. The Ph.D. program was finished in December 2019. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Rastogi MV, LaFranchi SH. Congenital hypothyroidism. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5(1):17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fisher DA. Second international conference on neonatalthyroid screening: progress report. J Pediatr. 1983;102(5):653–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hasan M, Nahar N, Ahmed A, Moslem F. Screening for congenital hypothyroidism--a new era in Bangladesh. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2003;34 Suppl 3:162–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saravanan P, Chau WF, Roberts N, Vedhara K, Greenwood R, Dayan CM. Psychological well‐being in patients on ‘adequate’doses of l‐thyroxine: results of a large, controlled community‐based questionnaire study. Clin Endocrinol. 2002;57(5):577–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wekking EM, Appelhof BC, Fliers E, Schene AH, Huyser J, Tijssen JGP, et al. Cognitive functioning and well-being in euthyroid patients on thyroxine replacement therapy for primary hypothyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;153(6):747–53. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wiersinga WM, Duntas L, Fadeyev V, Nygaard B, Vanderpump MPJ. 2012 ETA Guidelines: The Use of L-T4 + L-T3 in the Treatment of Hypothyroidism. Eur Thyroid J. 2012;1(2):55–71. doi: 10.1159/000339444 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reuter SE, Evans AM. Long-chain acylcarnitine deficiency in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Potential involvement of altered carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I activity. J Intern Med. 2011;270(1):76–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02341.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bieber L. Carnitine. Annu Rev Biochem. 1988;57(1):261–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Famularo G, Matricardi F, Nucera E, Santini G, De Simone C. Carnitine deficiency: primary and secondary syndromes. Carnitine Today. Springer; 1997. p. 119–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pons R, De Vivo DC. Primary and secondary carnitine deficiency syndromes. J Child Neurol. 1995;10(2_suppl):2S8–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Scholte HR, Rodrigues Pereira R, de Jonge PC, Luyt-Houwen IE, Hedwig M, Verduin M, et al. Primary carnitine deficiency. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1990;28(5):351–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Duranay M, Akay H, Yilmaz FM, Senes M, Tekeli N, Yücel D. Effects of L-carnitine infusions on inflammatory and nutritional markers in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(11):3211–4. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rizos I. Three-year survival of patients with heart failure caused by dilated cardiomyopathy and L-carnitine administration. Am Heart J. 2000;139(2 Pt 3):S120-3. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.103917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brevetti G, Chiariello M, Ferulano G, Policicchio A, Nevola E, Rossini A, et al. Increases in walking distance in patients with peripheral vascular disease treated with L-carnitine: a double-blind, cross-over study. Circulation. 1988;77(4):767–73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.4.767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Begum MN, Mahtarin R, Islam MT, Antora NJ, Sarker SK, Sultana N, et al. High-resolution melt curve analysis: An approach for variant detection in the TPO gene of congenital hypothyroid patients in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0293570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kumar Sarker S, Islam MT, Sarower Bhuyan G, Sultana N, Begum MN, Al Mahmud-Un-Nabi M, et al. Impaired acylcarnitine profile in transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia major patients in Bangladesh. J Adv Res. 2018;12:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2018.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yamazaki N, Shinohara Y, Shima A, Yamanaka Y, Terada H. Isolation and characterization of cDNA and genomic clones encoding human muscle type carnitine palmitoyltransferase I. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1307(2):157–61. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(96)00069-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Britton CH, Schultz RA, Zhang B, Esser V, Foster DW, McGarry JD. Human liver mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyltransferase I: characterization of its cDNA and chromosomal localization and partial analysis of the gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(6):1984–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.6.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aronson R, Ehrlich RM, Bailey JD, Rovet JF. Growth in children with congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening. J Pediatr. 1990;116(1):33–7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)81641-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rovet J, Ehrlich R, Sorbara D. Intellectual outcome in children with fetal hypothyroidism. J Pediatr. 1987;110(5):700–4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80005-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rastogi MV, LaFranchi SH. Congenital hypothyroidism. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2010;5:17. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.LaFranchi SH, Murphey WH, Foley TP Jr, Larsen PR, Buist NR. Neonatal hypothyroidism detected by the Northwest Regional Screening Program. Pediatrics. 1979;63(2):180–91. doi: 10.1542/peds.63.2.180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Grant DB, Smith I, Fuggle PW, Tokar S, Chapple J. Congenital hypothyroidism detected by neonatal screening: relationship between biochemical severity and early clinical features. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67(1):87–90. doi: 10.1136/adc.67.1.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alm J, Hagenfeldt L, Larsson A, Lundberg K. Incidence of congenital hypothyroidism: retrospective study of neonatal laboratory screening versus clinical symptoms as indicators leading to diagnosis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984;289(6453):1171–5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6453.1171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wong S, Hannah-Shmouni F, Sinclair G, Sirrs S, Dahl M, Mattman A. Acylcarnitine profile in thyroid disease. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(1–2):180–3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Galland S, Georges B, Le Borgne F, Conductier G, Dias JV, Demarquoy J. Thyroid hormone controls carnitine status through modifications of gamma-butyrobetaine hydroxylase activity and gene expression. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002;59(3):540–5. doi: 10.1007/s00018-002-8445-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pande SV, Parvin R. Clofibrate enhancement of mitochondrial carnitine transport system of rat liver and augmentation of liver carnitine and gamma-butyrobetaine hydroxylase activity by thyroxine. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;617(3):363–70. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(80)90002-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bressler R, Wittels B. The effect of thyroxine on lipid and carbohdrate metabolism in the heart. J Clin Invest. 1966;45(8):1326–33. doi: 10.1172/JCI105439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Maebashi M, Kawamura N, Sato M, Imamura A, Yoshinaga K. Urinary excretion of carnitine in patients with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism: augmentation by thyroid hormone. Metabolism. 1977;26(4):351–6. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(77)90101-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jones MG, Goodwin CS, Amjad S, Chalmers RA. Plasma and urinary carnitine and acylcarnitines in chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin Chim Acta. 2005;360(1–2):173–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2005.04.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.An JH, Kim YJ, Kim KJ, Kim SH, Kim NH, Kim HY, et al. L-carnitine supplementation for the management of fatigue in patients with hypothyroidism on levothyroxine treatment: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Endocr J. 2016;63(10):885–95. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ16-0109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gilgore SG, DeFelice SL. Evaluation of carnitine—an antagonist of thyroid hormone. J Clin Pharmacol. 1966;6(6):349–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.DeFelice SL, Gilgore SG. The antagonistic effect of carnitine in hyperthyroidism. Preliminary report. J New Drugs. 1966;6(6):351–3. doi: 10.1177/009127006600600607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Benvenga S, Lakshmanan M, Trimarchi F. Carnitine is a naturally occurring inhibitor of thyroid hormone nuclear uptake. Thyroid. 2000;10(12):1043–50. doi: 10.1089/thy.2000.10.1043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mynatt RL, Park EA, Thorngate FE, Das HK, Cook GA. Changes in carnitine palmitoyltransferase-I mRNA abundance produced by hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism parallel changes in activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;201(2):932–7. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1791 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.O’Brien T, Dinneen SF, O’Brien PC, Palumbo PJ. Hyperlipidemia in patients with primary and secondary hypothyroidism. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Garduño-Garcia J de J, Alvirde-Garcia U, López-Carrasco G, Padilla Mendoza ME, Mehta R, Arellano-Campos O, et al. TSH and free thyroxine concentrations are associated with differing metabolic markers in euthyroid subjects. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;163(2):273–8. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-0312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Asvold BO, Vatten LJ, Nilsen TIL, Bjøro T. The association between TSH within the reference range and serum lipid concentrations in a population-based study. The HUNT Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;156(2):181–6. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pearce EN. Update in lipid alterations in subclinical hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;97(2):326–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chung GE, Kim D, Kim W, Yim JY, Park MJ, Kim YJ, et al. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease across the spectrum of hypothyroidism. J Hepatol. 2012;57(1):150–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ding W-J, Wang M-M, Wang G-S, Shen F, Qin J-J, Fan J-G. Thyroid function is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in chronic hepatitis B-infected subjects. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(12):1753–8. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Eshraghian A, Hamidian Jahromi A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and thyroid dysfunction: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(25):8102–9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jaruvongvanich V, Sanguankeo A, Upala S. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is not associated with thyroid hormone levels and hypothyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Thyroid J. 2017;6(4):208–15. doi: 10.1159/000454920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chace DH, Pons R, Chiriboga CA, McMahon DJ, Tein I, Naylor EW, et al. Neonatal blood carnitine concentrations: normative data by electrospray tandem mass spectometry. Pediatr Res. 2003;53(5):823–9. doi: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000059220.39578.3D [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shenai JP, Borum PR, Mohan P, Donlevy SC. Carnitine status at birth of newborn infants of varying gestation. Pediatr Res. 1983;17(7):579–82. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198307000-00012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Begum M, Islam MT, Hossain SR, Bhuyan GS, Halim MA, Shahriar I. Mutation spectrum in TPO gene of Bangladeshi patients with thyroid dyshormonogenesis and analysis of the effects of different mutations on the structural features and functions of TPO protein through in silico approach. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 47.Begum MN, Mahtarin R, Ahmed S, Shahriar I, Hossain SR, Mia MW. Investigation of the impact of nonsynonymous mutations on thyroid peroxidase dimer. 2023;18(9):e0291386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 48.Begum MN, Mahtarin R, Islam MT, Ahmed S, Konika TK, Mannoor K, et al. Molecular investigation of TSHR gene in Bangladeshi congenital hypothyroid patients. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0282553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Xiaosheng Tan

2 May 2025

Dear Dr. Qadri,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please respond to reviewers' comments individually.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 16 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Xiaosheng Tan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include a separate caption for each figure in your manuscript.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The manuscript primarily provides an objective and descriptive account of the results, but it lacks sufficient emphasis on the broader clinical significance of the findings. The authors are encouraged to expand their discussion to contextualize how these metabolic alterations may influence patient outcomes, management strategies, or future diagnostic considerations.

There are several areas that require further clarification and improvement. These include the interpretation of statistical significance, the biological relevance of the findings, and a more critical discussion of limitations—particularly the heterogeneity of the patient cohort and the absence of pre-treatment FT4 data. Additionally, the manuscript would have an expanded discussion of the underlying mechanisms and clinical implications.

Overall, the topic is relevant and the findings are potentially impactful, but revisions are necessary to improve clarity, scientific rigor, and readability.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript presents an original and clinically meaningful metabolic profiling study of carnitine and acylcarnitines in a cohort of Bangladeshi children with late-diagnosed congenital hypothyroidism. The authors explore CPT-I activity as a possible mechanistic contributor to persistent fatigue despite euthyroid status, with supporting LC-MS/MS metabolomics and plasma TG data. The topic is interesting and relevant, particularly in resource-limited contexts where early diagnosis is often delayed.

However, several important issues need to be addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication:

My major concerns:

1. Statistical Power and Interpretation:

The sample size for the patient group (n=56) is small, and while the control group is larger (n=107), the study would benefit from power calculations to justify its ability to detect the reported effects, particularly for metabolites with borderline significance (e.g., P=0.049).

Some acylcarnitine comparisons show small absolute differences with large relative variance (e.g., C16OH). Clarify if multiple testing correction was applied to control for false discovery rate.

2. Study Design and Cohort Matching:

While the authors claim age, sex, and BMI matching, BMI in the patient group (17.0±4.4) appears notably higher than in controls (15.78±2.62). Was this statistically tested and matched per individual or per group?

Additional covariates like dietary intake, physical activity, and comorbidities (e.g., liver dysfunction) are not accounted for and may confound metabolite levels.

3. Assay Validation and Consistency:

The LC-MS/MS methodology is referenced from a previous publication, but critical validation parameters (e.g., LOD/LOQ, inter-assay CVs for key analytes) should be briefly summarized in this manuscript for transparency.

Were samples from patients and controls run in the same batch, or randomized across batches to avoid batch effects?

4. Interpretation of CPT-I Activity:

The use of C0/(C16+C18) as a proxy for CPT-I activity is acceptable but should be interpreted cautiously. This ratio is indirect and may be influenced by many factors (e.g., transport, mitochondrial function). Direct enzymatic assays or complementary approaches would strengthen the claim.

Furthermore, while lower LC-acylcarnitines suggest impaired β-oxidation, the observed elevation in free carnitine could also reflect altered carnitine transport or renal excretion, not necessarily CPT-I inhibition alone.

5. Plasma Triglyceride Measurement:

Plasma TG elevation is interpreted as evidence of re-routed FA metabolism. However, no liver function markers or imaging data were provided to support the claim of hepatic TG accumulation. Please moderate this interpretation or support it with additional data.

Minor Points:

Please recheck grammar and formatting throughout (e.g., missing spaces after punctuation, line break artifacts).

Include a clear statement on how missing FT4 baseline data might impact interpretation.

Consider re-plotting key comparisons as box-plots with individual data points (e.g., Fig 1) to better illustrate variance.

Reviewer #3: This publication investigates metabolic alterations in children with late-diagnosed hypothyroidism undergoing levothyroxine (LT4) medication, with a focus on carnitine and acylcarnitine profiles and their association with chronic fatigue syndrome. Using LC-MS/MS, the authors analyzed blood samples from 56 hypothyroid patients and 107 matched healthy controls. The study found that patients had significantly higher levels of free carnitine and plasma triglycerides but significantly lower levels of long-chain acylcarnitines, which indicated decreased CPT-I (Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase I) activity. Genetic investigation revealed that the TPO and TSHR genes were mutated in the patients. The authors propose that reduced fatty acid oxidation, resulting from decreased CPT-I activity, is the reason of these children's persistent weariness, even after LT4 medication returns thyroid hormone levels to normal. There are some comments need to be addressed to make this manuscript more comprehensive.

1. The authors acknowledge several limitations, including lack of urinary carnitine data and tissue-specific analyses. Please add additional limitations to discuss the cross-sectional design, lack of longitudinal follow-up, and absence of direct measures of fatigue severity.

2. The Limitations section should explicitly address the absence of urinary carnitine/acylcarnitine data

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Haonan Zhouyao

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Qi Wang

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org . Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 25;20(9):e0331474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331474.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


5 Jul 2025

Responses to the Reviewers’ Comments

We sincerely thank all three reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript accordingly to improve its clarity, scientific rigor, and clinical relevance. Our detailed point-by-point responses are provided below.

Reviewer #1

Comment 1: The manuscript provides a descriptive account of the results but lacks sufficient emphasis on the broader clinical significance of the findings. The authors should expand the discussion to contextualize how these metabolic alterations may influence patient outcomes, management strategies, or future diagnostic considerations.

Response 1: We appreciate this important suggestion. We have now revised the discussion section and also included the below text in the conclusions;

“This study reveals significant metabolic alterations in congenital hypothyroid patients, including reduced long-chain acylcarnitine levels and inferred low CPT-I activity, suggesting impaired β-oxidation and energy metabolism. These disruptions may contribute to persistent fatigue, even in patients with normalized thyroid hormone levels under LT4 therapy. The findings highlight a critical gap in current management strategies that rely solely on hormonal normalization, underscoring the need for more comprehensive care that addresses underlying metabolic dysfunction.

Clinically, these insights suggest that routine metabolic profiling—especially of carnitine-acylcarnitine pathways—could serve as a valuable adjunct in assessing treatment response and guiding individualized therapy. Additionally, these results open avenues for considering adjunct interventions such as carnitine supplementation in selected cases. Future studies, particularly longitudinal and mechanistic investigations, are essential to validate these findings and refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for optimizing outcomes in congenital hypothyroidism.”

Comment 2: Clarify the interpretation of statistical significance, biological relevance, limitations (e.g., cohort heterogeneity, missing pre-treatment FT4 data), and expand on mechanisms and implications.

Response 2: We have revised the Results and Discussion sections to clarify statistical interpretations. In the Discussion section, we have included the limitations as

“This study provides valuable insights into metabolic disturbances in congenital hypothyroidism; however, several factors should be considered when interpreting the findings. The cross-sectional design limited our ability to track treatment outcomes over time, and fatigue was self-reported without standardized severity scoring. While triglyceride levels were assessed, additional metabolic or hepatic markers, including pre-treatment FT4 and urinary carnitine/acylcarnitine levels, were not available. Tissue-specific effects were also beyond the scope of this analysis. Additionally, variability in patient genetics and treatment history may have influenced the observed metabolic profiles.”

Reviewer #2

Comment 1: Statistical Power and Interpretation: Include power calculations to justify sample size. Clarify whether multiple testing correction was applied.

Response 1: Thank you for this important comment. As this was a cross-sectional study, we recruited patients from Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) over a period of three years, with sample collection spanning from 2016 to 2019. Congenital Hypothyroidism (CH) has a global incidence of approximately 1 in 3,000–4,000 children. In our study, we enrolled 56 participants under the age of 18, which reflects a representative subset of approximately 115,000 children in Bangladesh.

The below text is included in the methods section 2.2.1

“Patient recruitment was conducted twice weekly at the Pediatric Endocrinology OPD at BSMMU and National Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Allied Sciences (NINMAS), where around 50–60 children present daily with various endocrine disorders. Among them, only 1–2 were confirmed CH cases coming for follow-up. Most of these patients were late-diagnosed and under ongoing treatment with Levothyroxine (LT4)”.

While we recognize the value of a larger sample size, increasing enrollment was constrained by the limited frequency of CH cases and the scope of our study period. Given the rarity of CH and the logistical challenges involved, we believe our sample size represents a meaningful and substantial effort in the context of Bangladesh.

To address concerns regarding statistical power, we conducted post hoc power analyses. For the study's primary indicator—the C0/(C16+C18) ratio, which reflects a key metabolic pathway—we observed a power exceeding 90%, indicating a high likelihood of detecting true effects (please refer to Supplementary Table S1).

In addition, we have provided power estimates for all parameters that reached statistical significance. These power values are included in the supplementary file to aid interpretation. Regarding the risk of false positives due to multiple comparisons, we applied false discovery rate (FDR) correction to all statistically significant parameters. The adjusted p-values, alongside the corresponding power estimates, are also presented in the supplementary file for readers who wish to explore these results in greater detail.

Comment 2: Study Design and Cohort Matching: Clarify BMI matching and address other confounders such as diet, physical activity, and comorbidities.

Response 2: We sincerely thank the reviewer for this thoughtful observation. While the mean BMI in the patient group (17.0 ± 4.4) was slightly higher than that of the control group (15.78 ± 2.62), this difference was not statistically significant. Matching for age, sex, and BMI was conducted at the group level, based on the available demographic information.

We fully agree that additional covariates—such as dietary intake, physical activity, and comorbidities (e.g., liver dysfunction)—can influence metabolite levels and are important considerations in metabolic studies. Unfortunately, these data were not available in the present study. We have acknowledged this as a limitation in the discussion section and appreciate the reviewer’s attention to this important point.

Comment 3: Assay Validation and Consistency: Include key LC-MS/MS validation metrics and explain batch processing.

Response 3: We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. In response, we have revised the Method Validation Section 2.5.

“The LC-MS/MS method used in this study was validated on the Shimadzu LCMS-8050 system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) using the NeoMass AAAC kit (Labsystems Diagnostics Oy, Vantaa, Finland). Method validation was performed in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (EP5-A2, EP06, and EP17) to ensure the reliability and accuracy of quantification of amino acids and acylcarnitines from dried blood spot (DBS) specimens (12).

Validation was carried out using three levels of quality control (QC) DBS materials—low, medium, and high—provided with the NeoMass AAAC kit. The following parameters were evaluated:

Linearity: All analytes demonstrated strong linearity across the measurement range with coefficient of determination (R²) values >0.99.

Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ): LOD and LOQ were calculated for each analyte according to CLSI EP17 guidelines. The detailed values are presented in Supplementary Table S4.

Precision:

Intra-assay Coefficients of Variation (%CV): The intra-assay CVs for most amino acids and acylcarnitines were within 20%, except for C6 (36.47%) due to its low abundance in the QC sample (0.13 µmol/L).

Inter-assay Coefficients of Variation (%CV): Ranged between 1.32% and 11.60% for amino acids, and 1.16% to 14.14% for acylcarnitines, well within acceptable limits.

Accuracy: Assessed as relative error (RE%), which ranged from -19.85% to +9.33% for intra-assay and -19.31% to +3.55% for inter-assay measurements.

Recovery: Recovery rates for amino acids ranged from 80.68% to 103.54%, and for acylcarnitines from 93.37% to 108.35%, confirming acceptable performance.

To reduce potential batch effects, samples from healthy controls and clinically suspected patients were randomized and analyzed across multiple batches. Each LC-MS/MS run included low, medium, and high QC controls, ensuring assay performance was continuously monitored and remained consistent throughout the study period.”

These validation results confirm that the LC-MS/MS method is robust, accurate, and suitable for the quantification of targeted metabolites in DBS specimens.

We have added a brief summary of LC-MS/MS assay performance in the Methods section, including LOD, LOQ, and inter-assay CVs for major analytes. Samples were randomized across analytical batches, and internal standards were used to control for batch variation.

Comment 4: Interpretation of CPT-I Activity: The use of C0/(C16+C18) as a CPT-I proxy is indirect. Interpret cautiously and consider other explanations.

Response 4: We fully agree. The revised Result (3.3) and Discussion now acknowledges that C0/(C16+C18) is an indirect marker of CPT-I activity and may be influenced by transport or renal mechanisms. We interpret the findings more cautiously and suggest future studies with direct enzymatic assays or flux analysis to validate CPT-I dysfunction.

As CPT-1 activity was assessed indirectly in this study, we have revised the manuscript title to: “Altered Carnitine-Acylcarnitine Profiles in Levothyroxine-Treated Congenital Hypothyroid Patients with Fatigue: An LC-MS/MS-Based Study from Bangladesh”.

Comment 5: Plasma TG as a marker of hepatic FA metabolism should be interpreted cautiously without liver markers.

Response 5: We appreciate this observation and have moderated our interpretation of plasma triglyceride elevation. While the data suggest disrupted fatty acid metabolism, we acknowledge that hepatic TG accumulation cannot be confirmed without liver-specific data. However, we had some patient’s data on liver scan and found fatty liver which was not included in the manuscript.

Minor Points

Comment 1: Grammar and formatting issues.

Response 6: We have carefully revised the manuscript for grammar, punctuation, and formatting issues throughout.

Comment 2: Clarify the impact of missing FT4 baseline data.

Response 7: We have added a statement in the Limitations section acknowledging that the absence of pre-treatment FT4 values limits our ability to assess the association between baseline thyroid hormone levels and subsequent metabolic profiles.

Comment 3: Consider re-plotting with boxplots and individual data points.

Response 8: We have updated the Figure 1 in result section 3.3.

Reviewer #3

Comment 1: Expand the Limitations section to address the cross-sectional nature of the study, lack of follow-up, and absence of direct fatigue severity measures.

Response 1: Thank you. We have added these points to the Limitations section. The cross-sectional design precludes causal inference, and we acknowledge the lack of standardized fatigue scales. We propose that future studies incorporate longitudinal follow-up and validated fatigue assessments. We have included the below information in the discussion section;

“This study provides valuable insights into metabolic disturbances in congenital hypothyroidism; however, several factors should be considered when interpreting the findings. The cross-sectional design limited our ability to track treatment outcomes over time, and fatigue was self-reported without standardized severity scoring. While triglyceride levels were assessed, additional metabolic or hepatic markers, including pre-treatment FT4 and urinary carnitine/acylcarnitine levels, were not available. Tissue-specific effects were also beyond the scope of this analysis. Additionally, variability in patient genetics and treatment history may have influenced the observed metabolic profiles”.

Comment 2: Explicitly address the absence of urinary carnitine/acylcarnitine data.

Response 2: We have expanded the Limitations section to note that urinary profiling would have provided insight into renal carnitine handling and excretion, and that plasma-only data may not fully reflect systemic carnitine metabolism.

We again thank the reviewers for their thoughtful feedback and believe the revisions have substantially strengthened the manuscript. All changes have been highlighted in the revised version for clarity.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responses to Reviwers.docx

pone.0331474.s004.docx (149.3KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Xiaosheng Tan

18 Jul 2025

Dear Dr. Qadri,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please respond to reviewer 2's comments.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 01 2025 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Xiaosheng Tan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise. 

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed all reviewer concerns with commendable diligence and scientific integrity. Their revised manuscript incorporates substantial improvements in clarity, methodological detail, and interpretative nuance. Key strengths of the revised submission include:

1.The authors have significantly expanded the discussion to highlight the clinical implications of altered acylcarnitine profiles in congenital hypothyroidism, particularly in relation to persistent fatigue despite LT4 therapy. Their proposal for metabolite profiling as a complementary diagnostic strategy is both novel and clinically meaningful.

2.The addition of LC-MS/MS assay validation metrics (linearity, LOD, LOQ, precision, accuracy, and recovery), along with a description of randomized batch processing, greatly strengthens the credibility of the metabolomics analysis.

3.The inclusion of post hoc power analyses, false discovery rate correction, and supplementary data tables ensures reproducibility and mitigates concerns about statistical robustness.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for this thoughtful and carefully revised manuscript. It’s clear that you’ve put in a lot of effort to address the reviewers’ concerns, and the improvements are noticeable throughout the paper. The addition of assay validation metrics, power calculations, and multiple testing corrections really strengthens the rigor of the study. I also appreciate the more cautious interpretation of the C0/(C16+C18) ratio as a proxy for CPT-I activity—your revisions make it clear that you’re aware of the limits of cross-sectional data, and you’ve acknowledged those thoughtfully.

The framing around persistent fatigue in LT4-treated patients is compelling, especially given how underexplored this topic is in the literature. The revised discussion nicely bridges the biochemical findings with potential clinical relevance, without overstepping the data.

A few suggestions for further tightening: Maybe try to avoid implying causality when discussing fatigue and metabolic changes—phrasing like “may contribute to” or “is associated with” works better given the study design.

If the reference to TPO and TSHR gene mutations comes from data in this cohort, a brief clarification would help. If not, it might be worth softening the phrasing to avoid overextending the findings.

Consistently referring to the patient group as “congenital hypothyroid patients” could help with clarity, especially for readers outside the endocrinology field.

Overall, this is a solid and well-executed study that adds something new to the conversation. I enjoyed reading it and appreciate the care you’ve taken in refining it.

Reviewer #3: The authors addressed the comments and this manuscript is recommended for publication. No other comments

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Haonan Zhouyao

Reviewer #3: Yes:  Qi Wang

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/ . PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 25;20(9):e0331474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331474.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


1 Aug 2025

Responses to the Reviewers’ Comments

We sincerely thank all reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive feedback. We have carefully revised the manuscript. Our detailed point-by-point responses are provided below.

Reviewer #2:

Comment: Thank you for this thoughtful and carefully revised manuscript. It’s clear that you’ve put in a lot of effort to address the reviewers’ concerns, and the improvements are noticeable throughout the paper. The addition of assay validation metrics, power calculations, and multiple testing corrections really strengthens the rigor of the study. I also appreciate the more cautious interpretation of the C0/(C16+C18) ratio as a proxy for CPT-I activity—your revisions make it clear that you’re aware of the limits of cross-sectional data, and you’ve acknowledged those thoughtfully.

The framing around persistent fatigue in LT4-treated patients is compelling, especially given how underexplored this topic is in the literature. The revised discussion nicely bridges the biochemical findings with potential clinical relevance, without overstepping the data.

A few suggestions for further tightening: Maybe try to avoid implying causality when discussing fatigue and metabolic changes—phrasing like “may contribute to” or “is associated with” works better given the study design.

If the reference to TPO and TSHR gene mutations comes from data in this cohort, a brief clarification would help. If not, it might be worth softening the phrasing to avoid overextending the findings.

Consistently referring to the patient group as “congenital hypothyroid patients” could help with clarity, especially for readers outside the endocrinology field.

Overall, this is a solid and well-executed study that adds something new to the conversation. I enjoyed reading it and appreciate the care you’ve taken in refining it.

Response: Thank you for your positive feedback and the careful reading of our revised manuscript. We have made the following specific changes in response to your suggestions:

1. Softened causal language around fatigue and metabolic changes

Some edits have been applied throughout the Abstract and Conclusion to replace phrasing such as “may contribute to” or “are associated with,” avoiding any implication of direct causality given our cross‐sectional design.

Response: We have revised the manuscript accordingly.

2. Clarified the origin of TPO and TSHR mutation data

Response: The TPO and TSHR mutation data derived from the same cohort which is already published and we have clarified in the revised manuscript.

3. Standardized terminology to “congenital hypothyroid patients”

Response: We have changed patient group as “congenital hypothyroid patients” for appropriate readability.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviwers.docx

pone.0331474.s005.docx (17.7KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Xiaosheng Tan

18 Aug 2025

Altered Carnitine-Acylcarnitine Profiles in Levothyroxine-Treated Congenital Hypothyroid Patients with Fatigue: An LC-MS/MS-Based Study from Bangladesh

PONE-D-25-12788R2

Dear Dr. Qadri,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Xiaosheng Tan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #2: Dear Authors, thank you again for the opportunity to review this revised manuscript. This revised manuscript represents a well-conducted and carefully presented study exploring altered carnitine–acylcarnitine profiles in levothyroxine-treated congenital hypothyroid patients with fatigue. The authors have clearly addressed the concerns raised in earlier reviews, and the resulting manuscript is much improved in terms of methodological rigor, clarity, and interpretive caution.

The authors have presented a technically sound and well‐executed study that addresses an important and underexplored aspect of congenital hypothyroidism management. The experimental design is rigorous, with appropriate matching of the patient and control groups and careful implementation of LC–MS/MS methodology that is validated in accordance with CLSI guidelines. The statistical analyses are performed appropriately and transparently; unpaired t‐tests with Welch’s correction are used to account for unequal variances, multiple comparisons are adjusted using the false discovery rate, and statistical power estimates are provided for significant findings. The data are reported with appropriate descriptive statistics, including measures of central tendency, dispersion, and variability, which strengthens the credibility of the results. The conclusions are drawn conservatively and are well aligned with the data presented, avoiding overinterpretation and acknowledging the limitations inherent in a cross‐sectional design. In keeping with the PLOS Data Policy, the authors have made all data underlying their findings fully available within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files, ensuring transparency and reproducibility. The manuscript is clearly written in standard English, with a logical flow from introduction to discussion, and terminology is used consistently throughout.

I only have a few minor refinements to add, such as ensuring that all abbreviations are defined upon first use in both the abstract and the main text would further improve accessibility for readers outside the immediate field. Overall, the study meets the standards for methodological rigor, appropriate statistical analysis, full data availability, and clear scientific communication, and it represents a valuable contribution to the literature on metabolic alterations in levothyroxine‐treated congenital hypothyroid patients.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #2: Yes:  Haonan Zhouyao

**********

Acceptance letter

Xiaosheng Tan

PONE-D-25-12788R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Qadri,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Xiaosheng Tan

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Adjusted p-values and corresponding power of the significant parameters from Table 3.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0331474.s001.docx (15.4KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Comparison of 8 short chain and 7 medium chain acylcarnitines between patients and healthy controls.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0331474.s002.docx (18KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to Reviwers.docx

    pone.0331474.s004.docx (149.3KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviwers.docx

    pone.0331474.s005.docx (17.7KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES