Skip to main content
British Medical Journal logoLink to British Medical Journal
. 1977 Nov 5;2(6096):1196–1199. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.6096.1196

Observer variation in recording clinical data from women presenting with breast lesions. Report from the Yorkshire Breast Cancer Group.

PMCID: PMC1632126  PMID: 589087

Abstract

The degree of observer variation in recording 11 186 items of clinical data from 242 woman who presented complaining of a lump in the breast to a group of 10 surgeons was studied. Each women was interviewed and examined twice and the findings (of the two clinicians) compared. There was a wide range of variation among the observers. Variation in recording the presence or absence of axillary nodes was considerable (45%), as was that in sizing the primary lesion (55%). In 20% of cases the two assessments of primary lesion size differed by over 2 cm. In other respects the results were more encouraging; much variation could be eliminated by wording the proforma more clearly. Moreover, variation was not person-specific, so that these findings are probably reasonably representative. Any future trial of breast lesions should (a) design specific proformata, (b) define terminology, (c) make these definitions universally available, and (d) conduct observer variation studies before the start of the full trial.

Full text

PDF
1196

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atkins H., Hayward J. L., Klugman D. J., Wayte A. B. Treatment of early breast cancer: a report after ten years of a clinical trial. Br Med J. 1972 May 20;2(5811):423–429. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5811.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burn J. I. Breast cancer symposium. Points in the practical management of breast cancer. How and why does one "stage" a patient? Br J Surg. 1969 Oct;56(10):787–789. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. NACKE O., WAGNER G. BIBLIOGRAPHIE ZUM THEMA "DIE ROLLE DES FEHLERS IN DER MEDIZIN: FEHLERFORSCHUNG ALS AUFGABE DER MEDIZINISCHEN DOKUMENTATION. Methods Inf Med. 1964 Jul-Oct;3(3-4):132–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rimsten A., Johansson H., Stenkvist B. Peroperative diagnosis of axillary lymph nodes in cancer of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1974 Oct;139(4):551–554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roberts M. M., Blumgart L. H., Davies M., Henk J. M., Forrest A. P., Campbell H., Gleave E. N., Kunkler P. B., Shields R., Hulbert M. Simple versus radical mastectomy. Preliminary report of the Cardiff breast trial. Lancet. 1973 May 19;1(7812):1073–1076. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)90392-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wallace I. W., Champton H. R. Axillary nodes in breast cancer. Lancet. 1972 Jan 29;1(7744):217–218. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)90619-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES