Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of General Physiology logoLink to The Journal of General Physiology
. 1983 Apr 1;81(4):571–588. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.4.571

Comparison of excitatory currents activated by different transmitters on crustacean muscle. II. Glutamate-activated currents and comparison with acetylcholine currents present on the same muscle

PMCID: PMC2215584  PMID: 6133908

Abstract

The properties of glutamate-activated excitatory currents on the gm6 muscle from the foregut of the spiny lobsters Panulirus argus and interruptus and the crab Cancer borealis were examined using either noise analysis, analysis of synaptic current decays, or slow iontophoretic currents. The properties of acetylcholine currents activated in nonjunctional regions of the gm6 muscle were also examined. At 12 degrees C and -80 mV, the predominant time constant of power spectra from glutamate-activated current noise was approximately 7 ms and the elementary conductance was approximately 34 pS. At 12 degrees C and -80 mV, the predominant time constant of acetylcholine- activated channels was approximately 11 ms with a conductance of approximately 12 pS. Focally recorded glutamatergic extracellular synaptic currents on the gm6 muscle decayed with time constants of approximately 7-8 ms at 12 degrees C and -80 mV. The decay time constant was prolonged e-fold about every 225-mV hyperpolarization in membrane potential. The Q10 of the time constant of the synaptic current decay was approximately 2.6. The voltage dependence of the steady-state conductance increase activated by iontophoretic application of glutamate has the opposite direction of the steady-state conductance activated by cholinergic agonists when compared on the gm6 muscles. The glutamate-activated conductance increase is diminished with hyperpolarization. The properties of the marine crustacean glutamate channels are discussed in relation to glutamate channels in other organisms and to the acetylcholine channels found on the gm6 muscle and the gm1 muscle of the decapod foregut (Lingle and Auerbach, 1983).

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson C. R., Cull-Candy S. G., Miledi R. Glutamate current noise: post-synaptic channel kinetics investigated under voltage clamp. J Physiol. 1978 Sep;282:219–242. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anwyl R. Permeability of the post-synaptic membrane of an excitatory glutamate synapse to sodium and potassium. J Physiol. 1977 Dec;273(2):367–388. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anwyl R. The effect of foreign cations, pH and pharmacological agents on the ionic permeability of an excitatory glutamate synapse. J Physiol. 1977 Dec;273(2):389–404. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ascher P., Marty A., Neild T. O. Life time and elementary conductance of the channels mediating the excitatory effects of acetylcholine in Aplysia neurones. J Physiol. 1978 May;278:177–206. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carpenter D. O., Swann J. W., Yarowsky P. J. Effect of curare on responses to different putative neurotransmitters in Aplysia neurons. J Neurobiol. 1977 Mar;8(2):119–132. doi: 10.1002/neu.480080204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark R. B., Gration K. A., Usherwood P. N. Influence of glutamate and aspartate on time course of decay of excitatory synaptic currents at locust neuromuscular junctions. Brain Res. 1980 Jun 16;192(1):205–216. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91020-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Crawford A. C., McBurney R. N. On the elementary conductance event produced by L-glutamate and quanta of the natural transmitter at the neuromuscular junctions of Maia squinado. J Physiol. 1976 Jun;258(1):205–225. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cull-Candy S. G., Miledi R., Parker I. Single glutamate-activated channels recorded from locust muscle fibres with perfused patch-clamp electrodes. J Physiol. 1981 Dec;321:195–210. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cull-Candy S. G., Parker I. Rapid kinetics of single glutamate-receptor channels. Nature. 1982 Feb 4;295(5848):410–412. doi: 10.1038/295410a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dudel J. Nonlinear voltage dependence of excitatory synaptic current in crayfish muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1974;352(3):227–241. doi: 10.1007/BF00590488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Finger W., Stettmeier H. Efficacy of the two-microelectrode voltage clamp technique in crayfish muscle. Pflugers Arch. 1980 Sep;387(2):133–141. doi: 10.1007/BF00584264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gage P. W., McBurney R. N., Van Helden D. Octanol reduces end-plate channel lifetime. J Physiol. 1978 Jan;274:279–298. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gage P. W., Van Helden D. Effects of permeant monovalent cations on end-plate channels. J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:509–528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Katz B., Miledi R. The binding of acetylcholine to receptors and its removal from the synaptic cleft. J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(3):549–574. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lingle C., Auerbach A. Comparison of excitatory currents activated by different transmitters on crustacean muscle. I. Acetylcholine-activated channels. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Apr;81(4):547–569. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.4.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lingle C., Eisen J. S., Marder E. Block of glutamatergic excitatory synaptic channels by chlorisondamine. Mol Pharmacol. 1981 Mar;19(2):349–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lingle C., Marder E. A glutamate-activated chloride conductance on a crustacean muscle. Brain Res. 1981 May 18;212(2):481–488. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90482-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Marchais D., Marty A. Interaction of permeant ions with channels activated by acetylcholine in Aplysia neurones. J Physiol. 1979 Dec;297(0):9–45. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp013025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Marder E., Paupardin-Tritsch D. Picrotoxin block of a depolarizing ACh response. Brain Res. 1980 Jan 6;181(1):223–227. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91275-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Marder E., Paupardin-Tritsch D. The pharmacological properties of some crustacean neuronal acetylcholine, gamma-aminobutyric acid, and L-glutamate responses. J Physiol. 1978 Jul;280:213–236. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Neher E., Sakmann B. Voltage-dependence of drug-induced conductance in frog neuromuscular junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2140–2144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ono J. K., Salvaterra P. M. Snake alpha-toxin effects on cholinergic and noncholinergic responses of Aplysia californica neurons. J Neurosci. 1981 Mar;1(3):259–270. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.01-03-00259.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Onodera K., Takeuchi A. Effects of membrane potential and temperature on the excitatory post-synaptic current in the crayfish muscle. J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:183–192. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Onodera K., Takeuchi A. Ionic mechanism of the excitatory synaptic membrane of the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;252(1):295–318. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Patlak J. B., Gration K. A., Usherwood P. N. Single glutamate-activated channels in locust muscle. Nature. 1979 Apr 12;278(5705):643–645. doi: 10.1038/278643a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rang H. P. The characteristics of synaptic currents and responses to acetylcholine of rat submandibular ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:23–55. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Swann J. W., Carpenter D. O. Organisation of receptors for neurotransmitters on Aplysia neurones. Nature. 1975 Dec 25;258(5537):751–754. doi: 10.1038/258751a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Taraskevich P. S. Reversal potentials of L-glutamate and the excitatory transmitter at the neuromuscular junction of the crayfish. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1971 Aug 13;241(2):700–703. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(71)90071-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Thieffry M., Bruner J. Sensibilié des fibres musclaires d'Ecrevisse au glutamate et au médiateur natural dans des solutions pauvres en calcium. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1978 Jun 19;286(24):1813–1816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of General Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Rockefeller University Press

RESOURCES