Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Heart Journal logoLink to British Heart Journal
. 1984 Oct;52(4):361–368. doi: 10.1136/hrt.52.4.361

Contrast agents in angiocardiography.

R Hayward, P Dawson
PMCID: PMC481643  PMID: 6383445

Full text

PDF
361

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Almén T. Effects of metrizamide and other contrast media on the isolated rabbit heart. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1973;335:216–222. doi: 10.1177/0284185173014s33525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Amiel M., Gressard A., Janin A., Touboul P. Comparaison chez l'homme, au cours de le coronarographie selective, des effets électrophysiologiques d'un sel de l'acide diatrizoïque et d'un sel de l'acide ioxaglique (une étude utilisant les enregistrements de l'activité électrique du faisceau de His). Ann Radiol (Paris) 1979 Jun-Jul;22(5):461–463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ansell G. Adverse reactions to contrast agents. Scope of problem. Invest Radiol. 1970 Nov-Dec;5(6):374–391. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197011000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aspelin P. Effect of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on morphology of human erythrocytes. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1978;19(4):675–687. doi: 10.1177/028418517801900413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aspelin P. Effect of ionic and non-ionic contrast media on red cell deformability in vitro. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1979;20(1):1–12. doi: 10.1177/028418517902001a01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Assem E. S., Bray K., Dawson P. The release of histamine from human basophils by radiological contrast agents. Br J Radiol. 1983 Sep;56(669):647–652. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-56-669-647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Baltaxe H. A., Sos T. A., McGrath M. B. Effects of the intracoronary and intraventricular injections of a commonly available vs. a newly available contrast medium. Invest Radiol. 1976 May-Jun;11(3):172–181. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197605000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bassan M., Ganz W., Marcus H. S., Swan H. J. The effect of intracoronary injection of contrast medium upon coronary blood flow. Circulation. 1975 Mar;51(3):442–445. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.3.442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berg G. R., Hutter A. M., Jr, Pfister R. C. Electrocardiographic abnormalities associated with intravenous urography. N Engl J Med. 1973 Jul 12;289(2):87–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197307122890209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bristow M. R., Schwartz H. D., Binetti G., Harrison D. C., Daniels J. R. Ionized calcium and the heart. Elucidation of in vivo concentration-response relationships in the open-chest dog. Circ Res. 1977 Oct;41(4):565–574. doi: 10.1161/01.res.41.4.565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Caulfield J. B., Zir L., Harthorne J. W. Blood calcium levels in the presence of arteriographic contrast material. Circulation. 1975 Jul;52(1):119–123. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.52.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chahine R. A., Raizner A. E. The mechanism of hypotension following angiography. Invest Radiol. 1976 Sep-Oct;11(5):472–478. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197609000-00153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheymol G., Lautrou J., Bonnemain B., Maitrepierre M. M., Weissenburger J. A study of dromotropic effects of intracoronary arterial injections of various contrast materials in anesthetized dogs. Invest Radiol. 1981 Sep-Oct;16(5):443–448. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198109000-00151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cumberland D. C. Hexabrix--a new contrast medium in angiocardiography. Br Heart J. 1981 Jun;45(6):698–702. doi: 10.1136/hrt.45.6.698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dawson P., Edgerton D. Contrast media and enzyme inhibition. I. Cholinesterase. Br J Radiol. 1983 Sep;56(669):653–656. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-56-669-653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dawson P., Grainger R. G., Pitfield J. The new low-osmolar contrast media: a simple guide. Clin Radiol. 1983 Mar;34(2):221–226. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(83)80312-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dawson P., Harrison M. J., Weisblatt E. Effect of contrast media on red cell filtrability and morphology. Br J Radiol. 1983 Oct;56(670):707–710. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-56-670-707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dawson P., Pitfield J. Hexabrix and the sodium problem. Br J Radiol. 1982 Dec;55(660):933–934. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-55-660-933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Emanuel R. Editorial: Coronary ateriography. Br Heart J. 1975 Mar;37(3):229–230. doi: 10.1136/hrt.37.3.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. FRIESINGER G. C., SCHAFFER J., CRILEY J. M., GAERTNER R. A., ROSS R. S. HEMODYNAMIC CONSEQUENCES OF THE INJECTION OF RADIOPAQUE MATERIAL. Circulation. 1965 May;31:730–740. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.31.5.730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernandez F., Bessede P., Charpentier A., Hazan E., Scebat L., Lenegre J. Modifications de l'électrocardiogramme au cours de l'artériographie coronaire sélective. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1968 Apr;61(4):504–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fischer H. W. Hemodynamic reactions to angiographic media. A survey and commentary. Radiology. 1968 Jul;91(1):66–73. doi: 10.1148/91.1.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. GENSINI G. G., DIGIORGI S. MYOCARDIAL TOXICITY OF CONTRAST AGENTS USED IN ANGIOGRAPHY. Radiology. 1964 Jan;82:24–34. doi: 10.1148/82.1.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. GUZMAN S. V., WEST J. W. Cardiac effects of intracoronary arterial injections of various roentgenographic contrast media. Am Heart J. 1959 Oct;58:597–607. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(59)90095-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Golman K., Holtås S. Proteinuria produced by urographic contrast media. Invest Radiol. 1980 Nov-Dec;15(6 Suppl):S61–S65. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198011001-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gould K. L., Hamilton G. W., Lipscomb K., Ritchie J. L., Kennedy J. W. Method for assessing stress-induced regional malperfusion during coronary arteriography. Experimental validation and clinical application. Am J Cardiol. 1974 Oct 3;34(5):557–564. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90127-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gwilt D. J., Nagle R. E. Contrast media for left ventricular angiography. A comparison between Cardio-Conray and iopamidol. Br Heart J. 1984 Apr;51(4):427–430. doi: 10.1136/hrt.51.4.427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Higgins C. B. Effects of contrast materials on left ventricular function. Invest Radiol. 1980 Nov-Dec;15(6 Suppl):S220–S231. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198011001-00048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Higgins C. B. Effects of contrast media on the conducting system of the heart. Mechanism of action and identification of toxic component. Radiology. 1977 Sep;124(3):599–606. doi: 10.1148/124.3.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Higgins C. B., Kuber M., Slutsky R. A. Interaction between verapamil and contrast media in coronary arteriography: comparison of standard ionic and new nonionic media. Circulation. 1983 Sep;68(3):628–635. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.68.3.628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Higgins C. B., Schmidt W. Direct and reflex myocardial effects of intracoronary administered contrast materials in the anesthetized and conscious dog: comparison of standard and newer contrast materials. Invest Radiol. 1978 May-Jun;13(3):205–216. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197805000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Holman B. L., Cohn P. F., Adams D. F., See J. R., Roberts B. H., Idoine J., Gorlin R. Regional myocardial blood flow during hyperemia induced by contrast agent in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1976 Oct;38(4):416–421. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90456-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. ISERI L. T., KAPLAN M. A., EVANS M. J., NICKEL E. D. EFFECT OF CONCENTRATED CONTRAST MEDIA DURING ANGIOGRAPHY ON PLASMA VOLUME AND PLASMA OSMOLALITY. Am Heart J. 1965 Feb;69:154–158. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(65)90032-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. JAMES T. N. Anatomy of the human sinus node. Anat Rec. 1961 Oct;141:109–139. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091410205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. JAMES T. N., BURCH G. E. Blood supply of the human interventricular septum. Circulation. 1958 Mar;17(3):391–396. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.17.3.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kloster F. E., Friesen W. G., Green G. S., Judkins M. P. Effects of coronary arteriography on myocardial blood flow. Circulation. 1972 Sep;46(3):438–444. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.46.3.438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kyriakidis M., Jackson G., Jewitt D. Contrast media during coronary arteriography: electrocardiographic changes in the presence of normal coronary arteries. Br J Radiol. 1978 Oct;51(610):799–801. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-51-610-799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lasser E. C. Basic mechanisms of contrast media reactions. Theoretical and experimental considerations. Radiology. 1968 Jul;91(1):63–65. doi: 10.1148/91.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lasser E. C., Walters A. J., Lang J. H. An experimental basis for histamine release in contrast material reactions. Radiology. 1974 Jan;110(1):49–59. doi: 10.1148/110.1.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lesch M. Inotropic agents and infarct size. Theoretical and practical considerations. Am J Cardiol. 1976 Mar 31;37(4):508–513. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90389-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mancini G. B., Bloomquist J. N., Bhargava V., Stein J. B., Lew W., Slutsky R. A., Shabetai R., Higgins C. B. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Apr;51(7):1218–1222. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90372-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Morris T. W., Sahler L. G., Fischer H. W. Calcium binding by radiopaque media. Invest Radiol. 1982 Sep-Oct;17(5):501–505. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198209000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mullins C. B., Leshin S. J., Mierzwiak D. S., Alsobrook H. D., Mitchell J. H. Changes in left ventricular function produced by the injection of contrast media. Am Heart J. 1972 Mar;83(3):373–381. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(72)90439-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nyman U., Almén T. Effects of contrast media on aortic endothelium. Experiments in the rat with non-ionic monomeric and monoacidic dimeric contrast media. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1980;362:65–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Oppenheimer M. J., Ascanio G., Henny G. C., Caldwell E., Vinciguerra T. Metabolic and cardiovascular effects of selective intracoronary injections of contrast media. Invest Radiol. 1973 Jan-Feb;8(1):13–21. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197301000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ovitt T., Rizk G., Frech R. S., Cramer R., Amplatz K. Electrocardiographic changes in selective coronary arteriography: the importance of ions. Radiology. 1972 Sep;104(3):705–708. doi: 10.1148/104.3.705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Partridge J. B., Robinson P. J., Turnbull C. M., Stoker J. B., Boyle R. M., Morrison G. W. Clinical cardiovascular experiences with iopamidol: a new non-ionic contrast medium. Clin Radiol. 1981 Jul;32(4):451–455. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(81)80301-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Pfister R. C., Hutter A. M., Jr Cardiovascular radiology. Cardiac alterations during intravenous urography. Invest Radiol. 1980 Nov-Dec;15(6 Suppl):S239–S242. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198011001-00050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rahimtoola S. H., Duffy J. P., Swan H. C. Ventricular performance after angiocardiography. Circulation. 1967 Jan;35(1):70–78. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.35.1.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schwartz P. J., Periti M., Malliani A. The long Q-T syndrome. Am Heart J. 1975 Mar;89(3):378–390. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(75)90089-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shabetai R., Surawicz B., Hammill W. Monophasic action potentials in man. Circulation. 1968 Aug;38(2):341–352. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.38.2.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Slutsky R., Higgins C., Costello D., Hooper W., LeWinter M. M. Mechanism of increase in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure after contrast ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J. 1983 Jul;106(1 Pt 1):107–113. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(83)90447-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Steiner R. M., Grainger R. G., Memon N., Weiss D., Kanofsky P. B., Menduke H. The effect of contrast media of low osmolality on the peripheral arterial blood flow in the dog. Clin Radiol. 1980 Nov;31(6):621–627. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(80)80001-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Thomson K. R., Violante M. R., Kenyon T., Fischer H. W. Reduction in ventricular fibrillation using calcium-enriched Renografin 76. Invest Radiol. 1978 May-Jun;13(3):238–240. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197805000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Trägårdh B., Bove A. A., Lynch P. R. Cardiac conduction abnormalities during coronary arteriography in dogs: reduced effects of a new contrast medium. Invest Radiol. 1974 Sep-Oct;9(5):340–345. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197409000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Trägårdh B., Bove A. A., Lynch P. R. Mechanism of production of cardiac conduction abnormalities due to coronary arteriography in dogs. Invest Radiol. 1976 Nov-Dec;11(6):563–568. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197611000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Trägårdh B., Heckman J. L., Lynch P. R. Coronary arteriography in canines with calcium-enriched ioxaglate and diatrizoate. Invest Radiol. 1982 Jan-Feb;17(1):66–69. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198201000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Trägårdh B., Lynch P. R. Cardiac function during left coronary arteriography in canines with ioxaglate, nonionic compounds, and diatrizoate. Invest Radiol. 1980 Sep-Oct;15(5):449–451. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198009000-00149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Trägårdh B., Lynch P., Trgårdh M. Coronary angiography with diatrizoate and metrizamide. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast medium effect on coronary blood flow in dogs. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1976 Jan;17(1):69–80. doi: 10.1177/028418517601700106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. White C. W., Eckberg D. L., Inasaka T., Abboud F. M. Effects of angiographic contrast media on sino-atrial nodal function. Cardiovasc Res. 1976 Mar;10(2):214–223. doi: 10.1093/cvr/10.2.214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Wolf G. L., Kraft L., Kilzer K. Contrast agents lower ventricular fibrillation threshold. Radiology. 1978 Oct;129(1):215–217. doi: 10.1148/129.1.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wolf G. L., Mulry C. S., Kilzer K., Laski P. A. New angiographic agents with less fibrillatory propensity. Invest Radiol. 1981 Jul-Aug;16(4):320–323. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198107000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yamazaki H., Banka V. S., Bodenheimer M. M., Hattori S., Agarwal J. B., Helfant R. H. Differential effects of Renografin-76 on the ischemic and nonischemic myocardium. Am J Cardiol. 1981 Mar;47(3):597–602. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90543-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zelis R., Caudill C. C., Baggette K., Mason D. T. Reflex vasodilation induced by coronary angiography in human subjects. Circulation. 1976 Mar;53(3):490–493. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.53.3.490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Heart Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES