Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1980 Sep;77(9):5327–5330. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.9.5327

Clonal analysis of proliferation and differentiation of paired daughter cells: action of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on granulocyte-macrophage precursors.

D Metcalf
PMCID: PMC350051  PMID: 6968910

Abstract

Mouse granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells were stimulated to divide by the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). The two daughter cells were separated; one daughter was transferred to medium containing a high concentration of GM-CSF, the other to medium containing a low concentration. Daughter cell-derived clones in the presence of 2500 units of GM-CSF had average cell cycle times 3.5 +/- 2.5 (SEM) hr shorter than clones derived from the paired daughter cell stimulated by 50 units of GM-CSF. Final colony size achieved after stimulation by 50 units of GM-CSF was always smaller than that of colonies stimulated by 2500 units of GM-CSF. In 8 of 41 instances, colonies stimulated by 50 units of GM-CSF developed, or were composed only of, macrophage populations in contrast to the granulocytic composition of colonies derived from the paired daughter cell growing in the presence of 2500 units of GM-CSF. The regulator GM-CSF appears able to directly influence cell cycle times and the pathway of differentiation entered by many bipotential granulocyte-macrophage precursor cells.

Full text

PDF
5327

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Metcalf D., Johnson G. R., Burgess A. W. Direct stimulation by purified GM-CSF of the proliferation of multipotential and erythroid precursor cells. Blood. 1980 Jan;55(1):138–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Metcalf D., Johnson G. R. Interactions between purified GM-CSF, purified erythropoietin and spleen conditioned medium on hemopoietic colony formation in vitro. J Cell Physiol. 1979 May;99(2):159–174. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040990202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Metcalf D., MacDonald H. R. Heterogeneity of in vitro colony- and cluster-forming cells in the mouse marrow: segregation by velocity sedimentation. J Cell Physiol. 1975 Jun;85(3):643–654. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040850317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Moore M. A., Williams N., Metcalf D. Purification and characterisation of the in vitro colony forming cell in monkey hemopoietic tissue. J Cell Physiol. 1972 Apr;79(2):283–292. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1040790213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Staber F. G., Burgess A. W. Serum of lipopolysaccharide-treated mice contains two types of colony-stimulating factor, separable by affinity chromatography. J Cell Physiol. 1980 Jan;102(1):1–10. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041020102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams N., Eger R. R., Moore M. A., Mendelsohn N. Differentiation of mouse bone marrow precursor cells into neutrophil granulocytes by an activity separation from WEHI-3 cell-conditioned medium. Differentiation. 1978 Jul 24;11(1):59–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1978.tb00970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Williams N., Jackson H. Analysis of populations of macrophage-granulocyte progenitor cells stimulated by activities in mouse lung-conditioned medium. Exp Hematol. 1977 Nov;5(6):523–534. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES