Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1981 Sep;318:57–71. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013850

Mouse pancreatic acinar cells: voltage-clamp study of acetylcholine-evoked membrane current.

M McCandless, A Nishiyama, O H Petersen, H G Philpott
PMCID: PMC1245477  PMID: 7320904

Abstract

1. A two-micro-electrode voltage-clamp technique was applied to a study of the resting properties of mouse pancreatic acinar cell membranes and the action of acetylcholine (ACh). 2. The resting voltage-current relation was linear. The specific membrane resistance was calculated to be about 10 k omega cm2. This value was doubled after removal of Cl from the tissue bath superfusion solution. 3. At a holding potential equal to the spontaneous resting potential (about -35 mV) micro-ionophoretic ACh application evoked inward current. Reversal of the polarity of the ACh-evoked current occurred at about - 15 mV. 4. The voltage dependence of the ACh-evoked current displayed inward rectification. This inward rectification could not be accounted for by the constant field equation. 5. The dose-response curves for ACh-evoked inward current were compared in the same units with dose-response curves for ACh-evoked depolarization. Half-maximal depolarization was consistently obtained at a lower dose of ACh than half-maximal inward current. 6. During steady-state exposure of the pancreatic tissue segments to Cl-free sulphate solution the ACh reversal potential was about + 10 mV and the voltage-current relationship for the ACh-controlled channels showed inward rectification. Removal of external Na from the Cl-free solution virtually abolished ACh-evoked inward current. 7. The resting pancreatic acinar cell membrane is electrically inexcitable. The relative permeabilities of the major monovalent ions appears to be PC1/PNa/PK = 2/0.23/1. The ACh-evoked inward current is largely carried by Na. Dose-response curves for ACh-evoked depolarization and inward current in the same acinar units are different, in such a way that the depolarization response saturates at lower ACh concentrations than the current response.

Full text

PDF
57

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams P. R., Sakmann B. A comparison of current-voltage relations for full and partial agonists. J Physiol. 1978 Oct;283:621–644. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R. Voltage dependence of agonist responses at voltage-clamped frog endplates. Pflugers Arch. 1976 Jan 30;361(2):145–151. doi: 10.1007/BF00583458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson C. R., Stevens C. F. Voltage clamp analysis of acetylcholine produced end-plate current fluctuations at frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1973 Dec;235(3):655–691. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolender R. P. Stereological analysis of the guinea pig pancreas. I. Analytical model and quantitative description of nonstimulated pancreatic exocrine cells. J Cell Biol. 1974 May;61(2):269–287. doi: 10.1083/jcb.61.2.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Claret B., Claret M., Mazet J. L. Ionic transport and membrane potential of rat liver cells in normal and low-chloride solutions. J Physiol. 1973 Apr;230(1):87–101. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dean P. M., Matthews E. K. Pancreatic acinar cells: measurement of membrane potential and miniature depolarization potentials. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;225(1):1–13. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dionne V. E., Stevens C. F. Voltage dependence of agonist effectiveness at the frog neuromuscular junction: resolution of a paradox. J Physiol. 1975 Oct;251(2):245–270. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Dudel J. Relaxation after a voltage step of inhibitory synaptic current elicited by nerve stimulation (crayfish neuromuscular junction). Pflugers Arch. 1978 Sep 6;376(2):151–157. doi: 10.1007/BF00581578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ginsborg B. L., House C. R. Stimulus-response coupling in gland cells. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1980;9:55–80. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.09.060180.000415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Graf J., Petersen O. H. Cell membrane potential and resistance in liver. J Physiol. 1978 Nov;284:105–126. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HODGKIN A. L., KATZ B. The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of giant axon of the squid. J Physiol. 1949 Mar 1;108(1):37–77. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1949.sp004310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Harrington L. A linear dose-response curve at the motor endplate. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Jul;62(1):58–76. doi: 10.1085/jgp.62.1.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Iwatsuki N., Petersen O. H. Electrical coupling and uncoupling of exocrine acinar cells. J Cell Biol. 1978 Nov;79(2 Pt 1):533–545. doi: 10.1083/jcb.79.2.533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iwatsuki N., Petersen O. H. Pancreatic acinar cells: acetylcholine-evoked electrical uncoupling and its ionic dependency. J Physiol. 1978 Jan;274:81–06. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Iwatsuki N., Petersen O. H. Pancreatic acinar cells: localization of acetylcholine receptors and the importance of chloride and calcium for acetylcholine-evoked depolarization. J Physiol. 1977 Aug;269(3):723–733. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Iwatsuki N., Petersen O. H. Pancreatic acinar cells: the acetylcholine equilibrium potential and its ionic dependency. J Physiol. 1977 Aug;269(3):735–751. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Matthews E. K., Petersen O. H. Pancreatic acinar cells: ionic dependence of the membrane potential and acetycholine-induced depolarization. J Physiol. 1973 Jun;231(2):283–295. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Neher E., Sakmann B., Steinbach J. H. The extracellular patch clamp: a method for resolving currents through individual open channels in biological membranes. Pflugers Arch. 1978 Jul 18;375(2):219–228. doi: 10.1007/BF00584247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Neher E., Stevens C. F. Conductance fluctuations and ionic pores in membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1977;6:345–381. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.06.060177.002021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nishiyama A., Petersen O. H. Pancreatic acinar cells: ionic dependence of acetylcholine-induced membrane potential and resistance change. J Physiol. 1975 Jan;244(2):431–465. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Petersen O. H., Philpott H. G. Mouse pancreatic acinar cells: the anion selectivity of the acetylcholine-opened chloride pathway. J Physiol. 1980 Sep;306:481–492. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Petersen O. H., Philpott H. G. Pancreatic acinar cells: effects of micro-ionophoretic polypeptide application on membrane potential and resistance. J Physiol. 1979 May;290(2):305–315. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peterson O. H., Iwatsuki N. The role of calcium in pancreatic acinar cell stimulus-secretion coupling: an electrophysiological approach. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1978 Apr 28;307:599–617. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb41984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Poulsen J. H., Oakley B., 2nd Intracellular potassium ion activity in resting and stimulated mouse pancreas and submandibular gland. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Mar 26;204(1154):99–104. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Putney J. W., Jr Stimulus-permeability coupling: role of calcium in the receptor regulation of membrane permeability. Pharmacol Rev. 1978 Jun;30(2):209–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. SCHNEYER L. H., SCHNEYER C. A. Electrolyte and inulin spaces of rat salivary glands and pancreas. Am J Physiol. 1960 Oct;199:649–652. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1960.199.4.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schulz I., Stolze H. H. The exocrine pancreas: the role of secretagogues, cyclic nucleotides, and calcium in enzyme secretion. Annu Rev Physiol. 1980;42:127–156. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.42.030180.001015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Williams J. A. Na+ dependence of in vitro pancreatic amylase release. Am J Physiol. 1975 Oct;229(4):1023–1026. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1975.229.4.1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES