Abstract
OBJECTIVES--To determine prevalence of rectal bleeding in the community and to examine factors that lead some patients to consult their general practitioner about rectal bleeding while others do not. DESIGN--Questionnaire survey followed by semistructured interviews of sample of respondents with rectal bleeding. SETTING--Two general practices on Tyneside. SUBJECTS--2000 adult patients registered with the general practices were sent a validated questionnaire. Respondents with rectal bleeding were divided into consulters and non-consulters, and 30 patients from each group (matched for age, sex, and characteristics of bleeding) were interviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Prevalence of rectal bleeding, proportion of subjects with rectal bleeding who sought medical advice, and reasons for consulting or not consulting a doctor about rectal bleeding. RESULTS--287 of the 1200 respondents to the questionnaire had noticed rectal bleeding at some time in their lives, and 231 had noticed it within previous 12 months. Only 118 (41%) of all respondents with rectal bleeding had ever sought medical advice for the problem. Those aged over 60 were most likely to have consulted, as were those who reported blood mixed with their stools. Main difference between those who had sought medical advice and those who had not was that consulters were more likely than non-consulters to perceive their symptoms as serious. CONCLUSIONS--Although rectal bleeding is common, only minority of patients seek medical of symptoms seems to be most important factor in deciding whether to consult a doctor for rectal bleeding.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Britten N., Jones R., Murphy E., Stacy R. Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care. Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;12(1):104–114. doi: 10.1093/fampra/12.1.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dent O. F., Goulston K. J., Tennant C. C., Langeluddecke P., Mant A., Chapuis P. H., Ward M., Bokey E. L. Rectal bleeding. Patient delay in presentation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 Oct;33(10):851–857. doi: 10.1007/BF02051921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goulston K. J., Cook I., Dent O. F. How important is rectal bleeding in the diagnosis of bowel cancer and polyps? Lancet. 1986 Aug 2;2(8501):261–265. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goulston K., Chapuis P., Dent O., Bokey L. Significance of bowel symptoms. Med J Aust. 1987 Jun 15;146(12):631–633. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb120441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R. H., Tait C. L. Gastrointestinal side-effects of NSAIDs in the community. Br J Clin Pract. 1995 Mar-Apr;49(2):67–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones R., Lydeard S. Irritable bowel syndrome in the general population. BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):87–90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lydeard S., Jones R. Factors affecting the decision to consult with dyspepsia: comparison of consulters and non-consulters. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Dec;39(329):495–498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mant A., Bokey E. L., Chapuis P. H., Killingback M., Hughes W., Koorey S. G., Cook I., Goulston K. J., Dent O. F. Rectal bleeding. Do other symptoms aid in diagnosis? Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Mar;32(3):191–196. doi: 10.1007/BF02554525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith R. C., Greenbaum D. S., Vancouver J. B., Henry R. C., Reinhart M. A., Greenbaum R. B., Dean H. A., Mayle J. E. Psychosocial factors are associated with health care seeking rather than diagnosis in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb;98(2):293–301. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90817-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]