Abstract
Susceptibility to a disease may involve the interactive effect of two genes. What conclusions will be drawn by segregation analysis in such a case? To answer this question, we considered a set of two-locus models and the corresponding exact distribution for 300 families. We investigated the conclusions and parameter estimations obtained for this sample, by comparing the likelihood expectations of the unified model and of more restricted models. In many cases, segregation analysis leads to the conclusion of a major gene effect, with or without a polygenic component--usually without a polygenic component in multiplicative models (i.e., where two genes have a multiplicative effect) and with such a component in nonmultiplicative models. For all the models considered, existence of a major gene effect is supported by transmission probability tests; there is evidence for transmission and agreement with the hypothesis of Mendelian transmission. Accordingly, there is no means of detecting that the effect of a major gene, with or without a polygenic component, does not correspond to the correct model. In addition, the parameter estimates for the major gene do not correspond to the characteristics of either of the two genes of the true model. This may substantially affect further linkage analysis.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Clerget-Darpoux F., Babron M. C., Bonaïti-Pellié C. Assessing the effect of multiple linkage tests in complex diseases. Genet Epidemiol. 1990;7(4):245–253. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370070403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clerget-Darpoux F., Bonaïti-Pellié C., Hochez J. Effects of misspecifying genetic parameters in lod score analysis. Biometrics. 1986 Jun;42(2):393–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demenais F., Abel L. Robustness of the unified model to shared environmental effects in the analysis of dichotomous traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1989;6(1):229–234. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370060140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demenais F., Lathrop M., Lalouel J. M. Robustness and power of the unified model in the analysis of quantitative measurements. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Feb;38(2):228–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elston R. C., Stewart J. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered. 1971;21(6):523–542. doi: 10.1159/000152448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenberg D. A. Simulation studies of segregation analysis: application to two-locus models. Am J Hum Genet. 1984 Jan;36(1):167–176. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lalouel J. M., Rao D. C., Morton N. E., Elston R. C. A unified model for complex segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Sep;35(5):816–826. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morton N. E., MacLean C. J. Analysis of family resemblance. 3. Complex segregation of quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1974 Jul;26(4):489–503. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vieland V. J., Hodge S. E., Greenberg D. A. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1992;9(1):45–59. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370090106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]