Skip to main content
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1993 Jul 15;149(2):165–169.

Death in a catheterization laboratory.

B C Morton 1, L A Higginson 1, D S Beanlands 1
PMCID: PMC1485440  PMID: 8324714

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess current rates of death from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization as well as changes in the rates, if any, from 1977 to 1991. DESIGN: A prospective descriptive study. SETTING: Catheterization laboratory, University of Ottawa Heart Institute. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures from 1977 to 1991. Those undergoing endomyocardial biopsy or electrophysiologic study were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Cardiac catheterization with angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or valvuloplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of death within 24 hours after the procedure or later if causally related to the procedure. RESULTS: There were 32 deaths attributed to 30,838 diagnostic catheterization procedures, for a rate of 0.10%. The rate did not change significantly during the study period. Most (24 [75%]) of the 32 deaths were related to coronary angiography; all but one of these patients had left main-stem artery or triple-vessel disease. None of the cases of anaphylactoid reaction to the contrast medium resulted in death. Death from PTCA was largely confined to patients with unstable coronary syndromes, including postinfarction shock. The rate of death from elective PTCA was approximately 0.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The death rate in our catheterization laboratory has remained the same since 1977, despite changes in the patient population. Patients at highest risk of death from angiography are those with unstable and global myocardial ischemia. The universal use of low-osmolar contrast medium is not justified given the absence of fatal anaphylactoid reactions. The risk of death from elective PTCA is low, and patients at highest risk have unstable coronary artery syndromes.

Full text

PDF
165

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bourassa M. G., Noble J. Complication rate of coronary arteriography. A review of 5250 cases studied by a percutaneous femoral technique. Circulation. 1976 Jan;53(1):106–114. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.53.1.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cowley M. J., Dorros G., Kelsey S. F., Van Raden M., Detre K. M. Acute coronary events associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jun 15;53(12):12C–16C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90738-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dorros G., Cowley M. J., Janke L., Kelsey S. F., Mullin S. M., Van Raden M. In-hospital mortality rate in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry. Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jun 15;53(12):17C–21C. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90739-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fischer H. W., Spataro R. F. Use of low-osmolality contrast media in patients with previous reactions. Invest Radiol. 1988 Sep;23 (Suppl 1):S186–S188. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198809001-00033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goh K. O. Sister chromatid exchange in normal adults long after thymus irradiation. Invest Radiol. 1980 Jul-Aug;15(4):332–334. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198007000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Judkin M. P., Gander M. P. Prevention of complications of coronary arteriography. Circulation. 1974 Apr;49(4):599–602. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.49.4.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kennedy J. W. Complications associated with cardiac catheterization and angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1982;8(1):5–11. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810080103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lasser E. C., Berry C. C., Talner L. B., Santini L. C., Lang E. K., Gerber F. H., Stolberg H. O. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to alleviate reactions to intravenous contrast material. N Engl J Med. 1987 Oct 1;317(14):845–849. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710013171401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morton B. C., Beanlands D. S. Complications of cardiac catheterization: one centre's experience. Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Oct 15;131(8):889–892. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morton B. C. The choice of contrast agents in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Can J Cardiol. 1989 Nov-Dec;5(8):379–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Walker W. J., Mundall S. L., Broderick H. G., Prasad B., Kim J., Ravi J. M. Systemic heparinization for femoral percutaneous coronary arteriography. N Engl J Med. 1973 Apr 19;288(16):826–828. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197304192881607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. de Feyter P. J., Suryapranata H., Serruys P. W., Beatt K., van Domburg R., van den Brand M., Tijssen J. J., Azar A. J., Hugenholtz P. G. Coronary angioplasty for unstable angina: immediate and late results in 200 consecutive patients with identification of risk factors for unfavorable early and late outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Aug;12(2):324–333. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90401-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES