Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society logoLink to Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society
. 1993 Feb;2(2):264–276. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020215

Exploration of subsite binding specificity of human cathepsin D through kinetics and rule-based molecular modeling.

P E Scarborough 1, K Guruprasad 1, C Topham 1, G R Richo 1, G E Conner 1, T L Blundell 1, B M Dunn 1
PMCID: PMC2142340  PMID: 8443603

Abstract

The family of aspartic proteinases includes several human enzymes that may play roles in both physiological and pathophysiological processes. The human lysosomal aspartic proteinase cathepsin D is thought to function in the normal degradation of intracellular and endocytosed proteins but has also emerged as a prognostic indicator of breast tumor invasiveness. Presented here are results from a continuing effort to elucidate the factors that contribute to specificity of ligand binding at individual subsites within the cathepsin D active site. The synthetic peptide Lys-Pro-Ile-Glu-Phe*Nph-Arg-Leu has proven to be an excellent chromogenic substrate for cathepsin D yielding a value of kcat/Km = 0.92 x 10(-6) s-1 M-1 for enzyme isolated from human placenta. In contrast, the peptide Lys-Pro-Ala-Lys-Phe*Nph-Arg-Leu and all derivatives with Ala-Lys in the P3-P2 positions are either not cleaved at all or cleaved with extremely poor efficiency. To explore the binding requirements of the S3 and S2 subsites of cathepsin D, a series of synthetic peptides was prepared with systematic replacements at the P2 position fixing either Ile or Ala in P3. Kinetic parameters were determined using both human placenta cathepsin D and recombinant human fibroblast cathepsin D expressed in Escherichia coli. A rule-based structural model of human cathepsin D, constructed on the basis of known three-dimensional structures of other aspartic proteinases, was utilized in an effort to rationalize the observed substrate selectivity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (8.2 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aikawa J., Yamashita T., Nishiyama M., Horinouchi S., Beppu T. Effects of glycosylation on the secretion and enzyme activity of Mucor rennin, an aspartic proteinase of Mucor pusillus, produced by recombinant yeast. J Biol Chem. 1990 Aug 15;265(23):13955–13959. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein F. C., Koetzle T. F., Williams G. J., Meyer E. F., Jr, Brice M. D., Rodgers J. R., Kennard O., Shimanouchi T., Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977 May 25;112(3):535–542. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blundell T. L., Cooper J. B., Sali A., Zhu Z. Y. Comparisons of the sequences, 3-D structures and mechanisms of pepsin-like and retroviral aspartic proteinases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1991;306:443–453. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-6012-4_57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blundell T. L., Cooper J., Foundling S. I., Jones D. M., Atrash B., Szelke M. On the rational design of renin inhibitors: X-ray studies of aspartic proteinases complexed with transition-state analogues. Biochemistry. 1987 Sep 8;26(18):5585–5590. doi: 10.1021/bi00392a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blundell T. L., Jenkins J. A., Sewell B. T., Pearl L. H., Cooper J. B., Tickle I. J., Veerapandian B., Wood S. P. X-ray analyses of aspartic proteinases. The three-dimensional structure at 2.1 A resolution of endothiapepsin. J Mol Biol. 1990 Feb 20;211(4):919–941. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90084-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blundell T. L., Sibanda B. L., Sternberg M. J., Thornton J. M. Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules. 1987 Mar 26-Apr 1Nature. 326(6111):347–352. doi: 10.1038/326347a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blundell T., Sibanda B. L., Pearl L. Three-dimensional structure, specificity and catalytic mechanism of renin. Nature. 1983 Jul 21;304(5923):273–275. doi: 10.1038/304273a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Capony F., Rougeot C., Montcourrier P., Cavailles V., Salazar G., Rochefort H. Increased secretion, altered processing, and glycosylation of pro-cathepsin D in human mammary cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1989 Jul 15;49(14):3904–3909. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Conner G. E., Richo G. Isolation and characterization of a stable activation intermediate of the lysosomal aspartyl protease cathepsin D. Biochemistry. 1992 Feb 4;31(4):1142–1147. doi: 10.1021/bi00119a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Conner G. E., Udey J. A., Pinto C., Sola J. Nonhuman cells correctly sort and process the human lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D. Biochemistry. 1989 Apr 18;28(8):3530–3533. doi: 10.1021/bi00434a057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cooper J. B., Khan G., Taylor G., Tickle I. J., Blundell T. L. X-ray analyses of aspartic proteinases. II. Three-dimensional structure of the hexagonal crystal form of porcine pepsin at 2.3 A resolution. J Mol Biol. 1990 Jul 5;214(1):199–222. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90156-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunn B. M., Jimenez M., Parten B. F., Valler M. J., Rolph C. E., Kay J. A systematic series of synthetic chromophoric substrates for aspartic proteinases. Biochem J. 1986 Aug 1;237(3):899–906. doi: 10.1042/bj2370899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Green D. W., Aykent S., Gierse J. K., Zupec M. E. Substrate specificity of recombinant human renal renin: effect of histidine in the P2 subsite on pH dependence. Biochemistry. 1990 Mar 27;29(12):3126–3133. doi: 10.1021/bi00464a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hallpike J. F., Adams C. W., Bayliss O. B. Histochemistry of myelin. 8. Proteolytic activity around multiple sclerosis plaques. Histochem J. 1970 May;2(3):199–208. doi: 10.1007/BF01003469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hasilik A. The early and late processing of lysosomal enzymes: proteolysis and compartmentation. Experientia. 1992 Feb 15;48(2):130–151. doi: 10.1007/BF01923507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jones T. A., Thirup S. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J. 1986 Apr;5(4):819–822. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04287.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Konvalinka J., Strop P., Velek J., Cerna V., Kostka V., Phylip L. H., Richards A. D., Dunn B. M., Kay J. Sub-site preferences of the aspartic proteinase from the human immunodeficiency virus, HIV-1. FEBS Lett. 1990 Jul 30;268(1):35–38. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80966-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Newman M., Safro M., Frazao C., Khan G., Zdanov A., Tickle I. J., Blundell T. L., Andreeva N. X-ray analyses of aspartic proteinases. IV. Structure and refinement at 2.2 A resolution of bovine chymosin. J Mol Biol. 1991 Oct 20;221(4):1295–1309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Overington J., Donnelly D., Johnson M. S., Sali A., Blundell T. L. Environment-specific amino acid substitution tables: tertiary templates and prediction of protein folds. Protein Sci. 1992 Feb;1(2):216–226. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560010203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Overington J., Johnson M. S., Sali A., Blundell T. L. Tertiary structural constraints on protein evolutionary diversity: templates, key residues and structure prediction. Proc Biol Sci. 1990 Aug 22;241(1301):132–145. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1990.0077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pohl J., Dunn B. M. Secondary enzyme-substrate interactions: kinetic evidence for ionic interactions between substrate side chains and the pepsin active site. Biochemistry. 1988 Jun 28;27(13):4827–4834. doi: 10.1021/bi00413a037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Richards A. D., Phylip L. H., Farmerie W. G., Scarborough P. E., Alvarez A., Dunn B. M., Hirel P. H., Konvalinka J., Strop P., Pavlickova L. Sensitive, soluble chromogenic substrates for HIV-1 proteinase. J Biol Chem. 1990 May 15;265(14):7733–7736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sali A., Overington J. P., Johnson M. S., Blundell T. L. From comparisons of protein sequences and structures to protein modelling and design. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990 Jun;15(6):235–240. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90036-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Scarborough P. E., Richo G. R., Kay J., Conner G. E., Dunn B. M. Comparison of kinetic properties of native and recombinant human cathepsin D. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1991;306:343–347. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-6012-4_41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sibanda B. L., Blundell T., Hobart P. M., Fogliano M., Bindra J. S., Dominy B. W., Chirgwin J. M. Computer graphics modelling of human renin. Specificity, catalytic activity and intron-exon junctions. FEBS Lett. 1984 Aug 20;174(1):102–111. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(84)81086-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sutcliffe M. J., Haneef I., Carney D., Blundell T. L. Knowledge based modelling of homologous proteins, Part I: Three-dimensional frameworks derived from the simultaneous superposition of multiple structures. Protein Eng. 1987 Oct-Nov;1(5):377–384. doi: 10.1093/protein/1.5.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sutcliffe M. J., Hayes F. R., Blundell T. L. Knowledge based modelling of homologous proteins, Part II: Rules for the conformations of substituted sidechains. Protein Eng. 1987 Oct-Nov;1(5):385–392. doi: 10.1093/protein/1.5.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tandon A. K., Clark G. M., Chamness G. C., Chirgwin J. M., McGuire W. L. Cathepsin D and prognosis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1990 Feb 1;322(5):297–302. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199002013220504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Whitaker J. N., Seyer J. M. The sequential limited degradation of bovine myelin basic protein by bovine brain cathepsin D. J Biol Chem. 1979 Aug 10;254(15):6956–6963. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yankner B. A., Duffy L. K., Kirschner D. A. Neurotrophic and neurotoxic effects of amyloid beta protein: reversal by tachykinin neuropeptides. Science. 1990 Oct 12;250(4978):279–282. doi: 10.1126/science.2218531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhu Z. Y., Sali A., Blundell T. L. A variable gap penalty function and feature weights for protein 3-D structure comparisons. Protein Eng. 1992 Jan;5(1):43–51. doi: 10.1093/protein/5.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Protein Science : A Publication of the Protein Society are provided here courtesy of The Protein Society

RESOURCES