Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The British Journal of General Practice logoLink to The British Journal of General Practice
. 1996 Jun;46(407):339–341.

Continuing medical education in mental illness: a paradox for general practitioners.

A Singleton 1, A Tylee 1
PMCID: PMC1239664  PMID: 8983251

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1992, the Royal College of General Practitioners instituted its fellowship in mental health education, which aimed to provide general practitioner tutors with the skills they need to help general practitioners manage mental illness in general practice. However, the emphasis of the fellowship on pedagogic education may discourage educators wishing to introduce andragogic teaching, a paradox which general practitioners must resolve if the aims are to be realized. AIM: This study set out to follow the difficulties encountered by the regional fellows in managing the fellowship and to understand how the scheme has evolved. METHOD: Data collected for interim evaluation of the fellowship was studied and interviews undertaken with the senior fellow and the regional fellows participating in the scheme. RESULTS: From its beginnings, the project encountered difficulties involving acceptance among general practitioner tutors. In response to the objections raised, the project metamorphosed through three stages, from a (perceived) pedagogic approach to a much more overtly learner-centered one. CONCLUSION: Learner-centred education requires trust and belief in the ability of general practitioners to teach general practitioners; over-protection of the audience from 'non-expert' educators merely perpetuates the status quo. If education in mental health care is to become truly learner-centred, general practitioners must address this paradox.

Full text

PDF
339

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bosanquet N., Leese B. Family doctors and innovation in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Jun 4;296(6636):1576–1580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6636.1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Freeling P., Rao B. M., Paykel E. S., Sireling L. I., Burton R. H. Unrecognised depression in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jun 22;290(6485):1880–1883. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Goldberg D. P., Blackwell B. Psychiatric illness in general practice. A detailed study using a new method of case identification. Br Med J. 1970 May 23;1(5707):439–443. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5707.439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gray J. A. Continuing education: what techniques are effective? Lancet. 1986 Aug 23;2(8504):447–448. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)92146-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harden R. M., Laidlaw J. M. Effective continuing education: the CRISIS criteria. Med Educ. 1992 Sep;26(5):408–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Horder J., Bosanquet N., Stocking B. Ways of influencing the behaviour of general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Nov;36(292):517–521. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kelly M. H., Murray T. S. General practitioners' views on continuing medical education. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Oct;44(387):469–471. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kerr M., Blizard R., Mann A. General practitioners and psychiatrists: comparison of attitudes to depression using the depression attitude questionnaire. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Feb;45(391):89–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Shepherd M. Primary care psychiatry. Health services research is not enough. Br J Psychiatry. 1995 Jan;166(1):1–3. doi: 10.1192/bjp.166.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tylee A. T., Freeling P., Kerry S. Why do general practitioners recognize major depression in one woman patient yet miss it in another? Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Aug;43(373):327–330. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES