Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1998 Jun;77(11):1926–1931. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.319

Consensus standards for the process of cancer care: a modified expert panel method applied to head and neck cancer. South and West Expert Tumour Panel for Head and Neck Cancer.

M A Birchall 1
PMCID: PMC2150344  PMID: 9667669

Abstract

There are many pressures to improve the standard of care delivered to cancer patients, including the reforms subsequent to the Calman-Hine report. The establishment of standards is a prerequisite for audit, benchmarking and certification of cancer centres and units. Randomized trials of head and neck cancer are uncommon, and other forms of evidence often conflicting. In the south and west of England, a multidisciplinary expert panel consensus method has been applied to the development of standards. A panel representative of specialties involved in the process of care at all three levels, plus social medicine and lay members, was constructed. A model for the process of care was developed consisting of activity areas. For each activity, a near exhaustive list of tasks and standards was established. A three-iteration method with statistical group response was then used to refine the standards. The same method was also applied to the production of a minimum data set for registration, recording and audit. The resulting standards will be regularly reviewed. We have developed a model of the care process, and an expert panel methodology that is applicable to a wide range of problems in clinical oncology.

Full text

PDF
1926

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradley P. J. Survey of current management of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1989 Aug;34(4):197–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haward R. A. Establishing cancer units. Br J Cancer. 1995 Sep;72(3):531–534. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):299–302. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liang M. H., Katz J. N., Phillips C., Sledge C., Cats-Baril W. The total hip arthroplasty outcome evaluation form of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Results of a nominal group process. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Task Force on Outcome Studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jun;73(5):639–646. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maher E. J., Jefferis A. F. Decision making in advanced cancer of the head and neck: variation in the views of medical specialists. J R Soc Med. 1990 Jun;83(6):356–359. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McKee M., Priest P., Ginzler M., Black N. How representative are members of expert panels? Qual Assur Health Care. 1991;3(2):89–94. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/3.2.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. O'Sullivan B., Mackillop W., Gilbert R., Gaze M., Lundgren J., Atkinson C., Wynne C., Fu H. Controversies in the management of laryngeal cancer: results of an international survey of patterns of care. Radiother Oncol. 1994 Apr;31(1):23–32. doi: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90410-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stell PM. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1992 Jul;2(3):195–205. doi: 10.1053/SRAO00200195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Stiller C. A. Centralisation of treatment and survival rates for cancer. Arch Dis Child. 1988 Jan;63(1):23–30. doi: 10.1136/adc.63.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tobias J. S. Cancer of the head and neck. BMJ. 1994 Apr 9;308(6934):961–966. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6934.961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES