Abstract
We have used confocal microscopy to examine the [Ca2+]i increase in the albino eggs of the frog Xenopus laevis after fertilization. Eggs were placed in agar wells with their animal poles downward so that fertilization occurred preferentially in the equatorial plane, and confocal microscopy was used to provide a two-dimensional optical section through the three-dimensional Ca2+ wave. These data indicate that the wave of increased [Ca2+]i traverses the entire egg and converges uniformly on the antipode. We show that ratioing two different fluorescent dyes to correct for variations in cell thickness is not a reliable technique for this very thick cell due to differential absorption with depth. Indo-1-dextran proves to be a more reliable Ca2+ indicator in this respect. Indo-1-dextran measurements indicate that the resting [Ca2+]i is not uniform throughout the egg but exhibits a 15% higher [Ca2+]i in the cortex than deep in the cytoplasm. This difference is accentuated during wave propagation and is not dependent on extracellular Ca2+. The average peak [Ca2+]i in the center of the egg as the wave propagates through it is 0.7 microM, approximately 60% of the peak cortical [Ca2+]i. The wave velocity through the center of the egg (5.7 micron/s) is slower than that in the cortex (8.9 micron/s), and both velocities vary slightly during transit. The cortical wave speed is particularly high at the beginning (15.7 micron/s) and end (17.2 micron/s) of the wave. Eggs injected with 30-80 microM of 3 kD heparin to compete with inositol-1,4,5,-trisphosphate for binding to its receptor exhibited multiple localized spots of elevated [Ca2+]i, and many of these did not initiate a wave. For those that did lead to a wave, it was usually slow moving and exhibited a reduced (60% reduction) amplitude compared with controls.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (574.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Busa W. B., Nuccitelli R. An elevated free cytosolic Ca2+ wave follows fertilization in eggs of the frog, Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol. 1985 Apr;100(4):1325–1329. doi: 10.1083/jcb.100.4.1325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campanella C., Andreuccetti P., Taddei C., Talevi R. The modifications of cortical endoplasmic reticulum during in vitro maturation of Xenopus laevis oocytes and its involvement in cortical granule exocytosis. J Exp Zool. 1984 Feb;229(2):283–293. doi: 10.1002/jez.1402290214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charbonneau M., Grey R. D. The onset of activation responsiveness during maturation coincides with the formation of the cortical endoplasmic reticulum in oocytes of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol. 1984 Mar;102(1):90–97. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90177-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galione A., McDougall A., Busa W. B., Willmott N., Gillot I., Whitaker M. Redundant mechanisms of calcium-induced calcium release underlying calcium waves during fertilization of sea urchin eggs. Science. 1993 Jul 16;261(5119):348–352. doi: 10.1126/science.8392748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nuccitelli R. How do sperm activate eggs? Curr Top Dev Biol. 1991;25:1–16. doi: 10.1016/s0070-2153(08)60409-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nuccitelli R., Yim D. L., Smart T. The sperm-induced Ca2+ wave following fertilization of the Xenopus egg requires the production of Ins(1, 4, 5)P3. Dev Biol. 1993 Jul;158(1):200–212. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1993.1179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shilling F. M., Krätzschmar J., Cai H., Weskamp G., Gayko U., Leibow J., Myles D. G., Nuccitelli R., Blobel C. P. Identification of metalloprotease/disintegrins in Xenopus laevis testis with a potential role in fertilization. Dev Biol. 1997 Jun 15;186(2):155–164. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitaker M. J., Steinhardt R. A. Ionic regulation of egg activation. Q Rev Biophys. 1982 Nov;15(4):593–666. doi: 10.1017/s0033583500003760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitaker M. Control of meiotic arrest. Rev Reprod. 1996 May;1(2):127–135. doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0010127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]