Skip to main content
Clinical Microbiology Reviews logoLink to Clinical Microbiology Reviews
. 2014 Oct;27(4):870–926. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00109-13

Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

Karsten Becker 1,, Christine Heilmann 1, Georg Peters 1
PMCID: PMC4187637  PMID: 25278577

Abstract

SUMMARY

The definition of the heterogeneous group of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is still based on diagnostic procedures that fulfill the clinical need to differentiate between Staphylococcus aureus and those staphylococci classified historically as being less or nonpathogenic. Due to patient- and procedure-related changes, CoNS now represent one of the major nosocomial pathogens, with S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus being the most significant species. They account substantially for foreign body-related infections and infections in preterm newborns. While S. saprophyticus has been associated with acute urethritis, S. lugdunensis has a unique status, in some aspects resembling S. aureus in causing infectious endocarditis. In addition to CoNS found as food-associated saprophytes, many other CoNS species colonize the skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals and are less frequently involved in clinically manifested infections. This blurred gradation in terms of pathogenicity is reflected by species- and strain-specific virulence factors and the development of different host-defending strategies. Clearly, CoNS possess fewer virulence properties than S. aureus, with a respectively different disease spectrum. In this regard, host susceptibility is much more important. Therapeutically, CoNS are challenging due to the large proportion of methicillin-resistant strains and increasing numbers of isolates with less susceptibility to glycopeptides.

INTRODUCTION

It was 20 years ago that Kloos and Bannerman (1) updated our knowledge on the clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), following a review, 6 years previously, of their laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological aspects by Pfaller and Herwaldt (2), both in this journal. Although the pathogenic potential of CoNS had become accepted by the end of the 1980s, most of the underlying molecular mechanisms still awaited discovery. Presently, a PubMed search on CoNS results in more than 15,000 references, reflecting the increasing medical impact of these bacteria.

Over the past 2 decades, the research toolbox has greatly expanded, providing a large array of modern molecular and phenotypic methods, including the routine use of whole-genome sequencing and mass spectrometric approaches. Nevertheless, the problem of an increasing health burden due to CoNS infections is far from resolved. Demographic and medical developments creating more elderly, multimorbid, and immunocompromised patients and the increasing use of inserted or implanted foreign bodies have contributed to the progressively increasing importance of CoNS in health care. Furthermore, as for other nosocomial pathogens, increasing rates of antibiotic resistance are an even greater problem for CoNS than for Staphylococcus aureus, limiting our therapeutic options.

Today, CoNS, as typical opportunists, represent one of the major nosocomial pathogens, having a substantial impact on human life and health. They are particularly associated with the use of indwelling or implanted foreign bodies, which are indispensable in modern medicine. Colonization of different parts of the skin and mucous membranes of the host is the key source of endogenous infections by CoNS. However, they are transmitted mainly by medical and/or nursing procedures. Once inserted, foreign bodies can become colonized by CoNS and the success of the respective medical procedure is significantly impaired, resulting in enormous medical and economic burdens.

Describing CoNS is challenging because they represent a heterogeneous group within the genus Staphylococcus that is not based on phylogenetic relationships. They were defined by delimitation from coagulase-positive staphylococci (CoPS), i.e., Staphylococcus aureus, the only known coagulase-positive species at the time of the introduction of this concept. Superficially, this concept seemed to be solely a diagnostic procedure-based classification, but it became a clinical approach to differentiate between the pathogenic species S. aureus and a group of staphylococci initially classified as nonpathogenic. A deeper understanding of the nature of CoNS has now fundamentally changed our views.

In this review, human medical issues and the epidemiological, pathogenetic, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects of CoNS and their infections in relation to the pathogens' biology are reviewed. For aspects of CoNS related to veterinary medicine and food production, please refer to specialized reviews (3, 4).

TAXONOMY AND CLASSIFICATION

Historic and Contemporary Clinical Concepts

Early concepts of separation within the Staphylococcus genus—the dualism story.

As for other genera, the early history of the discovery of staphylococci was characterized by many taxonomic reclassifications and renaming of species (Table 1). The different concepts of species and limited tools for identification prevalent in the premolecular era should be taken into consideration in consulting older literature. Surgeons such as Billroth, reporting on “Coccobacteria septica” in 1874, and Ogston, who first proposed the term “Staphylococcus” in 1882, were the first to closely link Staphylococcus-like microorganisms with wound infections (57).

TABLE 1.

Historic and valid designations within the Staphylococcus genus reflecting the early dualism concept of pathogenic versus nonpathogenic staphylococci

Yr “Pathogenic” species “Nonpathogenic” species Author of description (reference)
1884 Staphylococcus (pyogenes) aureusa Staphylococcus (pyogenes) albusb Rosenbach (8)
1896 Micrococcus pyogenes aureus Micrococcus pyogenes albus Lehmann and Neumann (610)
1908 Aurococcus aureusc Albococcus epidermidisd Winslow and Winslow (11)
1916 Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus epidermidis Evans (611)
1940 Staphylococcus pyogenese Staphylococcus saprophyticuse,f Fairbrother (12)
1980 Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus epidermidis Skerman et al.g (612)
a

In 1885, a lemon-colored species, designated Staphylococcus (pyogenes) citreus, was described by J. Passet (613).

b

The pus-derived “albus” variant was probably rather a less or nonpigmented S. aureus isolate, as its pathogenicity was proven by Rosenbach via animal experiments (8). Later on, “S. epidermidis albus” was described by U.S. pathologist W. H. Welch, in 1891, as a colonizer of the human epidermis found also in aseptic wounds (10).

c

Described as a “parasitic coccus, living normally on the surface of the human or animal body, or in diseased tissues” (11).

d

Described as a “parasitic coccus, living normally on the surfaces of the human or animal body” (11).

e

After the introduction of coagulase production as the major principle to differentiate staphylococcal species by Fairbrother (12).

f

S. saprophyticus was used in a broader sense to designate nonpathogenic coagulase-negative staphylococci.

g

Still valid definitions of the taxa S. aureus and S. epidermidis, together with other staphylococcal species described until this point, by the Ad Hoc Committee of the Judicial Commission of the ICSB (612).

One of the earliest references to different species being named “Micrococcus” and, particularly, “Staphylococcus” in terms of pathogenicity was given in 1884 by Rosenbach, a German surgeon, who demonstrated in cultivation and animal experiments that different microorganisms could be recovered from abscesses; these were designated “Staphylococcus pyogenes aureus” and “Staphylococcus pyogenes albus” (8). However, the pus-derived “albus” variant was probably a less or nonpigmented S. aureus isolate, as its pathogenicity was subsequently demonstrated in animal experiments by Rosenbach (9). In contrast, in 1891, the U.S. pathologist Welch described “Staphylococcus epidermidis albus” as an almost constant colonizer of the human epidermidis which was also found in aseptic wounds (10).

Since the temporary division of staphylococci into two genera in the early 1900s (Aurococcus [including Aurococcus aureus, associated with diseased tissues] and Albococcus [including the first valid taxonomic description of S. epidermidis, as Albococcus epidermidis]) (11), the challenge was to distinguish between both pathogenic staphylococcal “varieties.” This was a common thread running through many old scientific papers. In the early decades of investigating staphylococcus-like bacteria, the classification of the genus Staphylococcus was based on the production of pigment, even though this method was eventually generally considered disappointing. In 1940, R. W. Fairbrother introduced coagulase production as a major differentiating principle for staphylococcal species (12). However, instead of using the term “S. epidermidis,” Fairbrother proposed the taxon “S. saprophyticus” to distinguish between nonpathogenic CoNS and CoPS, designated “S. pyogenes” (12). Subsequently, in 1951, Shaw et al. used the “S. saprophyticus” term in a broader sense; however, the type strain originally defined by these authors still represents the type strain of S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus (13). Staphylococci and micrococci were distinguishable by the ability to ferment glucose under anaerobic conditions. Since S. saprophyticus ferments glucose very slowly in an anaerobic environment, it was misclassified as “Micrococcus, subgroup 3” (14), until its reclassification in 1974, as noted in Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (15).

The era of a limited number of staphylococcal species came to an end in the 1970s, with descriptions of 10 newly identified species (e.g., S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, and S. intermedius), followed by a progressive increase to more than 40 validly described species by the beginning of 2014 (16) (Fig. 1).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Time line of the discovery of the species belonging to the genus Staphylococcus. Coagulase-negative species are shown in blue; coagulase-positive and coagulase-variable species are shown in red (note that only S. schleiferi subsp. coagulans is coagulase positive). Note that at the times of establishment of the first three species designations, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. saprophyticus, these terms comprised a broader content than that accepted today. In particular, S. epidermidis and S. saprophyticus were used to describe nonpathogenic, saprophytic staphylococci (and other Gram-positive cocci occurring in clusters).

Contemporary clinical concepts.

Apart from phylogenetic findings and classifications, a simplified but more useful and well-accepted scheme, mainly based on clinical and diagnostic aspects, is still used in human medicine: staphylococci are divided into CoPS, almost exclusively represented by S. aureus, and CoNS (Fig. 2).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Clinical and epidemiological schema of staphylococcal species, based on the categorization of coagulase as a major virulence factor and its resulting impact on human health.

In regard to other CoNS, the clinically defined “S. epidermidis group,” comprising S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus as the most prevalent species, along with other traditionally included species (e.g., S. capitis, S. hominis, S. simulans, and S. warneri), can be distinguished from S. saprophyticus by the latter being a specific cause of acute urethritis. However, S. saprophyticus may also be found as a pathogen causing infections like those known for members of the S. epidermidis group. Some of the recently discovered CoNS species, such as S. pettenkoferi and S. massiliensis, might belong to this group as well. Notably, gradations in pathogenic capacity within this heterogeneous group occur not only at the species level but also at the strain level. Recently, S. lugdunensis has increasingly become known as a CoNS species in an “intermediate position” between S. aureus and the S. epidermidis group, displaying clinical features of both groups. In this review, the scheme outlined in Fig. 2 is applied unless phylogenetic and taxonomic aspects are discussed.

Taxonomy, Classification, and Phylogeny

Current status of staphylococcal species and subspecies.

As of 2014, the genus Staphylococcus consists of 47 species and 23 subspecies that are validly described (Fig. 3). Of these, 38 fulfill the categorization of a coagulase-negative species, and one further species, S. schleiferi, includes both a coagulase-negative subspecies (S. schleiferi subsp. schleiferi) and a coagulase-positive subspecies (S. schleiferi subsp. coagulans). Most recently described CoNS species isolated from human clinical specimens comprise S. jettensis, S. massiliensis, S. petrasii (including S. petrasii subsp. petrasii and S. petrasii subsp. croceilyticus), and S. pettenkoferi (Fig. 1) (1720). A further CoNS species, S. pseudolugdunensis, has been proposed (21).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Phylogenetic separation of staphylococcal species and subspecies (ssp.), extended by key diagnostic characteristics as proposed by Lamers et al. (32).

Meanwhile, two species previously considered to be CoNS were removed from this genus. S. pulvereri, described in 1995, was found to be identical to the previously described species S. vitulinus (22). S. caseolyticus was transferred to the newly established genus Macrococcus, comprising Gram-positive, catalase-positive cocci characterized by a higher DNA G+C content, the absence of cell wall teichoic acids, and larger cells than those of the Staphylococcus species (23, 24).

The family Staphylococcaceae.

The family Staphylococcaceae was first proposed by a taxonomic outline during the formulation of the 2nd edition of Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (25, 26). In addition to the staphylococcal genus, the Staphylococcaceae family comprises the genera Jeotgalicoccus, Macrococcus, Nosocomiicoccus, and Salinicoccus (16). Jeotgalicoccus and Salinicoccus species have been recovered from diverse food and environmental samples. For Nosocomiicoccus ampullae, isolation from the surfaces of saline bottles used in wound cleansing has been reported (27). To date, the Macrococcus genus comprises seven species, adapted to hoofed animals (23).

Classification into suprafamiliar taxa.

While the genera Staphylococcus and Micrococcus were historically placed together with the genera Planococcus and Stomatococcus in the same family, designated Micrococcaceae, molecular phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses revealed that the various Gram-positive, catalase-positive cocci were not closely related (28). Now the family Staphylococcaceae, together with Bacillaceae, Listeriaceae, Paenibacillaceae, Planococcaceae, and other families, belongs to the order Bacillales of the class Bacilli (29). The Bacilli are part of the phylum Firmicutes, which comprises Gram-positive bacteria with a rather low DNA G+C content. In contrast, the phylum Actinobacteria now contains micrococcal species, which are characterized by a high DNA G+C content. Meanwhile, the “micrococci” have largely been reclassified and rearranged into two families: the redefined family Micrococcaceae and the newly established family Dermacoccaceae. Both belong to the suborder Micrococcineae (class Actinobacteria) (28, 30, 31).

Phylogenetic analysis of staphylococci.

Based on four loci, i.e., the noncoding 16S rRNA gene and three protein-encoding genes (dnaJ, rpoB, and tuf), Lamers et al. (32) recently proposed a refined classification based on molecular data for the Staphylococcus genus, with species being classified into 15 cluster groups. These groups were shown to belong to six species groups (Auricularis, Hyicus-Intermedius, Epidermidis-Aureus, Saprophyticus, Simulans, and Sciuri species groups) according to phenotypic properties (Fig. 3).

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND TRANSMISSION

CoNS as Part of the Microbiota of the Skin and Mucous Membranes

The skin, as a physical barrier and interface with the outside environment, is physiologically colonized by a multitude of diverse microorganisms (33). CoNS represent a regular part of the microbiota of the skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals (Table 2). While the skin has been perceived as the human body's largest organ, differences in skin thickness and folds and the densities of hair follicles and glands define distinct habitats of differing microbiota, including CoNS. Age-related dynamics of CoNS colonization may occur and is discussed later [see “Other infections. (i) Infections in neonates,” below].

TABLE 2.

Main characteristics of CoNS species

Species or subspeciesa Diagnostic characteristics
Site or source of detectionb
Clinical association (frequency)c
Colony appearance Novobiocin resistance Oxidase Environment and/or food Animals Humans FBRI Other
S. arlettae Yellow or beige + Textile and tannery industrial effluents Cattle, goats, pigs, poultry, sheep BSI (+)
S. auricularis White External auditory canal (principle habitat), seldom on other skin regions BSI in preterm infant (?)
S. capitis subsp. capitis Chalk white Cats, dogs, horses Predominantly on the scalp and arms, less frequently on other skin regions CRBI (+), PVIE (+), CAPD (+), DRBJI (++) BSI in neonates (+)
S. capitis subsp. urealyticusd White, delayed yellow pigmentation in ∼70% of isolates Predominantly on skin (mostly from heads, primarily ears and foreheads) CRBI (+), PVIE (+) BSI in neonates (++)
S. caprae Nonpigmented Goats Skin, anterior nares CRBI (+), CAPD (+), CFDAI (+), DRBJI (+) UTI (+)
S. carnosus subsp. carnosus Gray-white Fermented food (starter cultures, soy sauce mash) Cattle
S. carnosus subsp. utilis Cream colored after 48 h Fermented food (soy sauce mash, fermented fish)
S. chromogenes Butyrous, orange, or creamy Cattle, pigs, horses, goats, sheep
S. cohnii subsp. cohnii Unpigmented or, occasionally, tinted slightly yellowish + Dogs, goats, poultry Skin CRBI (++), DRBJI (++) BSI in burn patient (+)
S. cohnii subsp. urealyticuse Translucent with concentric ring patternsc + Apes, clams, monkeys, horses Skin BSI (+), infected pressure ulcer (?)
S. condimenti Cream colored after 48 h Fermented food and starter cultures
S. devriesei Gray-yellow, yellow. or yellow-orange Cattle
S. epidermidis Gray or grayish white Fermented sausages Cats, cattle, dogs, goats, gorillas, horses, pigs, sheep Skin (preferentially axillae and the head; also arms and legs) and mucous membranes of the nasopharynx CAPD (!), CFDAI (!), DRBJI (!), PVIE (!), and virtually all other kinds of FBRIs BSI in neonates (!)
S. equorum subsp. equorum White + Fermented food (starter cultures) Cattle, goats, horses, sheep DRBJI (+)
S. equorum subsp. linens White + Smear-ripened cheese (starter culture)
S. felis Unpigmented Cats, horses
S. fleurettii Unpigmented or cream colored + + Milk cheese Goats, pigs, small mammals
S. gallinarum Yellow, yellowish tint, or unpigmented + Chickens, pheasants CRBI (+)
S. haemolyticus Gray-white, white, or slight yellow tint Milk, fermented food Cats, cattle, dogs, horses, goats, pigs, sheep Skin (preferentially legs and arms) CAPD (+++), CFDAI (+++), DRBJI (++) BSI in neonates (+++)
S. hominis subsp. hominis Dull, gray-white to yellowish or yellow-orange Goat milk, fermented food Cats, dogs, goats, pigs, sheep Skin (preferentially axillae, arms, legs, and pubic and inguinal regions) CRBI (++), DRBJI (++) BSI in neonates (+)
S. hominis subsp. novobiosepticus Butyrous, gray-white CRBI (++) BSI in neonates (+)
S. jettensis Yellow (after prolonged incubation) CRBI (+)
S. kloosii Opaque + Goats CRBI (+) BSI (+)
S. lentus Gray-white to white or creamy + + Soy bean oil meal, meat, milk Clams, goats, horses, mink, pigs, poultry, sheep CRBI (+) BSI (+), splenic abscess (+)
S. lugdunensis Cream-white to slightly yellow Cats, chinchillas, dogs, goats, guinea pigs Skin (preferentially lower abdomen and extremities) PVIE (++), CFDAI (+), DRBJI (+) Native valve endocarditis (++), wound infection (++), SSI (++)
S. massiliensis White Skin (?) Brain abscess (+)
S. microti Opalescent whitish Mice
S. muscae Butyrous, grayish white Flies (trapped in cattle sheds)
S. nepalensis White + Environment (not specified) Goats, pigs, squirrel monkeys, bats (guano), dry-cured ham Cystitis (?; recovered from human urine)
S. pasteuri Mostly yellow, also white Fermented sausages Pigs CAPD (+), DRBJI (+), CRBI (?) BSI (+)
S. petrasii subsp. croceilyticus Pale creamy yellow Skin (?; so far only from acoustic meatus)
S. petrasii subsp. petrasii Unpigmented Skin (?) BSI (?)
S. pettenkoferi Mostly white, also yellow Skin (?) CRBI (++) Wound infection (?), osteomyelitis (+)
S. piscifermentans Unpigmented, white, yellowish orange Dogs (feces), fermented food and starter cultures
S. rostri White Pigs, poultry, water buffalo
S. saccharolyticusf Grayish white Gorillas Skin, particularly on the forehead and arm PVIE (?) Spondylo-discitis (+), joint infection (?), pneumonia (?)
S. saprophyticus subsp. bovis Creamy to pale orange, also unpigmented + Cattle
S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus Unpigmented or slight yellow tint + Horses, goats, sheep, cats, fermented food Skin CRBI (+) UTI (!), BSI (+), NVIE (+)
S. schleiferi subsp. schleiferi Dogs, cats Skin (particularly preaxillary) CFDAI (+), CRBI (+), DRBJI (+), PVIE (+) BSI (+), wound infection (+), UTI (?)
S. sciuri subsp. carnaticus + + Cattle, dolphins Skin BSI (?)
S. sciuri subsp. rodentium + + Rodents, whales Skin BSI (?)
S. sciuri subsp. sciuri Gray-white with yellowish or cream-colored tint toward the center, yellowish (rare) + + Cats, cattle, clams, dogs and other carnivores, dolphins, goats, horses, insectivores, marsupials, monkeys, pigs, rodents, whales Skin CAPD (+), CRBI (+), DRBJI (+) BSI (?), diabetic food infection (?), wound infection (?)
S. simiae White Squirrel monkeys
S. simulans Gray-white Cattle, horses, sheep Skin (legs, arms, and heads of children; occasionally in adults) DRBJI (+)
S. stepanovicii Unpigmented + + Insectivores, rodents
S. succinus subsp. casei White + Fermented food Insectivores, rodents
S. succinus subsp. succinus White + Amber, fermented food (starter cultures) Cattle, insectivores, rodents, songbirds Eye (single report) BSI (?)
S. vitulinus Cream to yellow, rarely unpigmented + + Fermented food Horses, poultry Hip infection (?)
S. warneri Gray-white (20%), slightly yellowish colonial center to bright yellow-orange Fermented food Dogs, cats, goats, horses, insectivores, monkeys, pigs, prosimians, rodents, sheep Skin (preferentially nares, head, legs, and arms) CAPD (+), DRBJI (++) Septic arthritis (+)
S. xylosus Orange-yellow, yellowish, or gray to gray-white + Fermented food (starter cultures) Cats, clams, goats, horses, insectivores, lower primates, rodents, sheep Skin (rare) DRBJI (+)
a

Assignment of characteristics, occurrence, and association with infections might be questionable between staphylococcal subspecies, particularly prior to their definition; in those cases, refraining from differentiation down to the subspecies level, the data were assigned to the subspecies bearing the species epithet.

b

In particular for livestock and animal food products, as well as for companion animals, contamination by the human CoNS microbiota should be considered and, vice versa, observations of primarily animal-associated CoNS species on human skin could be caused by professional and domestic animal contacts.

c

Abbreviations: BSI, bloodstream infection; CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis-related infection; CFDAI, cerebrospinal fluid device-associated infection; CRBI, catheter-related bloodstream infection; FBRI, foreign body-related infection; DRBJI, device-related bone and joint infection; NVIE, native valve infectious endocarditis; PVIE, prosthetic valve infectious endocarditis; SSI, skin and soft tissue infection; UTI, urinary tract infection; −, unknown, not described; ?, questionable or unconfirmed; +, single cases; ++, occasional detection; +++, frequent detection; !, most common origin.

d

For literature search, note that this subspecies was originally described in 1991 as S. capitis subsp. ureolyticus.

e

For literature search, note that this subspecies was originally described in 1991 as S. cohnii subsp. urealyticum. While strains isolated from humans are usually unpigmented and their colonies have gray and gray-white rings, strains isolated from nonhuman primates are (i) usually pigmented with brilliantly colored colonies, with alternating yellow-orange, gray, gray-white, orange, and gray rings or bands; or (ii) show colonies with a yellow-green tint and only a subtle ring pattern.

f

For literature search, note that this species, originally described in 1948 as belonging to the Micrococcus genus, was transferred from the Peptococcus genus into the Staphylococcus genus in 1984.

In accordance with data from early studies that applied traditional culture approaches (34, 35), recent metagenomic analyses have revealed that staphylococci prefer areas of higher humidity (36, 37). Such moist sites include the axillae, the gluteal and inguinal regions, the umbilicus, the antecubital and popliteal spaces, and the plantar foot region. Additionally, the anterior nares not only are the major habitat of S. aureus but also are constantly colonized by CoNS (38). Likewise, the ocular surface, the conjunctiva, is usually colonized by CoNS (39, 40).

The question of the extent to which CoNS and other skin commensals provide a direct benefit to the host is still unresolved (41). Interestingly, a serine protease Esp-secreting subset of S. epidermidis strains was recently shown to inhibit and destroy S. aureus biofilm formation and to prevent nasal colonization (42).

Ecological Niches of Human-Associated CoNS

S. epidermidis group.

In humans, S. epidermidis is the most frequently recovered staphylococcal species (Table 3). This bacterium colonizes the body surface, where it is particularly prevalent on moist areas, such as the axillae, inguinal and perineal areas, anterior nares, conjunctiva, and toe webs (43). S. haemolyticus and S. hominis are preferentially isolated from axillae and pubic areas high in apocrine glands (43, 44). S. capitis is found surrounding the sebaceous glands on the forehead and scalp following puberty (45). With reference to the recently described species S. pettenkoferi, it may be assumed that it also colonizes the human skin. However, these species may occasionally be found on other body sites. S. auricularis is part of the human external ear microbiota, exclusively colonizing this region (46).

TABLE 3.

Species distribution of CoNS in human clinical samples in recent studies (published since 2000)

Parameter Value or description in studyb
Petinaki et al., 2001 (614) Cuevas et al., 2004c (615) Sivadon et al., 2005d (616) Arciola et al., 2006e (130) Gatermann et al., 2007 (617) Koksal et al., 2009 (618) Jain et al., 2011f (619) Shin et al., 2011 (91)
Study design parameters
    Country Greece Spain France Italy Germany Turkey India South Korea
    No. of CoNS isolates 450 369 212 601 494 200 98 51
    Underlying infection Not specifiedg Not specifiedc BJI PJI, surgical wound revision BSI, CRBI BSI CRBI CAPD peritonitis
    Method of identification API ID 32 Staph, BBL Crystal GP ID kit SP SP, sodA API Staph, API ID 32 Staph SP, sodA API ID 32 Staph SP 16S rRNA, tuf, sodA
% Identified staphylococci
    S. auricularis 1.0
    S. capitis 3.5 3 6.1 1.9 1.0 7.5 12.2 3.9
    S. caprae 1.9 0.3 1.4 5.9
    S. chromogenes 0.5 0.2 1.5
    S. cohnii 1.2 <1.0 0.5 1.2 1.0 1.0 8.2
    S. equorum 0.2
    S. epidermidis 50.0 56 71.2 36.1 67.4 43.5 23.5 66.7
    S. haemolyticus 14.8 5 2.4 2.8 11.9 11.5 36.7 11.8
    S. hominisa 11.1 18 4.2 3.2 7.5/1.0 9.5 3.0
    S. lentus 2.5
    S. lugdunensis 2.0 2.8 0.5 3.0 9.0
    S. pasteuri 1.9 0.1 2.0
    S. saprophyticus 5.7 19 0.1 0.4 2.5
    S. schleiferi 0.1 0.6 1.0
    S. sciuri 1.2 0.1 0.6
    S. simulans 2.0 1 1.4 0.1 1.2 2.0 1.0
    S. warneri 4.0 4 7.1 2.1 1.8 4.0 7.8
    S. xylosis 4.0 <1.0 0.1 0.8 5.0 13.3
a

If data for subspecies were provided, the percentages are separated by a slash, as follows: S. hominis subsp. hominis/S. hominis subsp. novobiosepticus. Differences from 100% are due to ambiguously and nonidentified isolates.

b

Differences from 100% are due to ambiguously and nonidentified isolates or nongiven coagulase-positive isolates. Abbreviations: BJI, bone and joint infection; BSI, bloodstream infection; CAPD, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; CRBI, catheter-related bloodstream infection; IVD, intravenous device; PJI, (peri)prosthetic joint infection; SP, standard procedures (based on the work of Kloos and Schleifer [407] and subsequent modifications and supplementations).

c

Data are from the fifth study period, carried out in 2002. The most frequent sources of isolation of CoNS were blood (32%), catheter tips (20%), wounds and abscesses (21%), and urine (12%); 8% were represented by other CoNS species.

d

Data comprise about 60% BJIs related to revision arthroplasty surgery and 40% due to fracture nonunions, contiguous osteitis, and other entities.

e

Data are percentages of overall prevalence among all 1,490 clinical isolates, including 530 (46.9%) S. aureus isolates.

f

Data are given for IVD tip examination (see the respective publication for results of examination of blood samples and skin swabs from the site of IVD insertion).

g

Comprising blood cultures (41.1%), wounds (22%), vascular catheters (11.1%), urine cultures (6.2%), and tissue culture foci (19.6%).

S. lugdunensis.

S. lugdunensis is an integral part of the normal skin flora. S. lugdunensis is found particularly in the pelvic and perineum regions, in the groin area, on the lower extremities, and in the axillae (47, 48). Compared to S. aureus, it is less frequently found in the anterior nares (49). No data are available on whether S. lugdunensis colonizes these areas permanently or only intermittently.

S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus.

S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus frequently colonizes the rectum and genitourinary tract, in an age- and season-dependent manner (preferentially in summer and fall) (43). In a study by Rupp et al. (50), the urogenital tract was colonized in 6.9% of healthy women (median age, 29 years) from an outpatient gynecology practice; however, in 40% of humans, the major reservoir is the gastrointestinal tract. These observations were supported by a study by Schneider and Riley (51) in which S. saprophyticus was recovered from 4.6% of Australian females of 13 to 40 years of age but not from older women or men. More recently, S. saprophyticus was isolated from 7% and 4% of general practice patients in the age categories 11 to 20 years and 21 to 50 years, respectively, and was isolated significantly less (0.5%) from patients aged 51 to 70 years (52). S. saprophyticus also seems to be part of the gastrointestinal flora of cattle and pigs and is a common contaminant of respective foods, such as raw beef and pork (53, 54).

Other CoNS.

S. pasteuri was found in a large percentage (65.7%) of drinking water samples from a distribution network responsible for supplying water to consumers (Table 4) (55). S. carnosus, S. condimenti, S. equorum, S. piscifermentans, S. succinus, and S. xylosus represent staphylococcal species that are typically associated with fermented foods and their starter cultures (4) (Table 4).

TABLE 4.

Species distribution of CoNSb in animal- and food-derived samples in recent studies (published since 2000)

Parameter Value or description in studya
Faria et al., 2009 (55) Gillespie et al., 2009 (620) Coton et al., 2010 (621) Hauschild et al., 2010 (622) Leroy et al., 2010 (623) Huber et al., 2011 (624) Waller et al., 2011 (625)
Study design parameters
    Country Portugal USA France Poland France Switzerland Sweden
    Animal or food source (no. of samples) Drinking water (172) Cow (618) Food-related samples (431) Free-living insectivores and rodents (NG) Meat products (27) Food-related samples (1,639) Cow (NG)
    Sample origin Distribution network Mammary quarter milk French cheese, dry sausage types NG Processing units (n = 9) Farms (>800) Milk
    No. of isolates 242 383 431 197 388 275 (only MR-CoNS) 154
    Identification method 16S rRNA gene PCR API Staph Several PCR and hybridization strategies rpoB and dnaJ PCR-RFLP analysis sodA gene PCR MALDI-TOF MS, sodA gene PCR tuf gene PCR
% Identified staphylococci
    S. arlettae 0.3 1
    (S. aureus)b 1.5
    S. auricularis 0.5
    S. capitis 1.7 0.2 0.0
    S. carnosus 1.9 3.6
    S. caprae
    S. chromogenes 48 0.5 24
    S. cohnii 0.0 0.4
    S. epidermidis 28.5 10 4.4 4.1 2.1 1.4 22
    S. equorum 28.5 2.0 58.2
    S. fleurettii 0.5 0.5 0.0 35.6
    S. gallinarum 1
    S. haemolyticus <1 4.4 1.0 2.2 14
    S. hominis 2 1.2 1.0 0.0
    (S. hyicus)b 26 5
    (S. intermedius)b <1
    S. lentus 2.6 1.0 10.9 <1
    S. lugdunensis 1.2
    S. microti 0.5
    S. pasteuri 65.7 0.2 2.0 2.3
    (S. pseudintermedius)b <1
    S. saprophyticus 2.3 1 12.5 0.5 11.9 5
    S. sciuri 0.6 <1 1.4 7.6 0.3 48.7
    S. simulans 7 1.2 18
    S. stepanovicii 18.3
    S. succinus 7.7 27.9c 7.7
    S. vitulinus 1.2 2.5 2.1
    S. warneri 2 2.8 5.6 0.3 0.7
    S. xylosus 1 28.3 20.8 11.3 4
a

Differences from 100% are due to ambiguously and nonidentified isolates or nongiven coagulase-positive isolates. Abbreviations: NG, not given; SP, standard procedures (based on the work of Kloos and Schleifer [407] and subsequent modifications and supplementations).

b

If part of the study, percentages of coagulase-positive or coagulase-variable species (species names in parentheses) are also given.

c

Comprises S. succinus subsp. succinus (9%) and S. succinus subsp. casei (91%).

Population Structure and Epidemiological Typing Systems

Clonal diversity among CoNS species varies and is much less studied than that of S. aureus. While S. epidermidis is characterized by pronounced genomic diversity, other CoNS species, such as S. haemolyticus, S. lugdunensis, and S. schleiferi, exhibit less diversity as shown by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (56, 57). Later on, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) based on nucleotide sequencing of housekeeping genes revealed distinct related clones of methicillin-resistant (MR) S. epidermidis predominating among clinically significant isolates (58). Subsequently, S. epidermidis MLST type ST27 (corresponding to ST2 of an improved MLST scheme [59, 60]) was shown to differ from clones in the community and to be distributed widely in various hospital environments in the United States and Europe (61); this may have been facilitated by the presence of biofilm- and resistance-mediating genes. Further studies confirmed a high degree of genetic diversity within S. epidermidis at slowly evolving loci but, on the other hand, showed a worldwide predominance of only a few hospital-associated, epidemic clonal lineages (6264). For U.S. cardiac centers, remarkably clonal health care-associated S. epidermidis infections were shown (65). In contrast, extreme genetic diversity was observed among community-related S. epidermidis isolates in healthy children and adults (63, 66). S. epidermidis studies have revealed a population with an epidemic structure of emerging, well-adapted clones evolving rapidly through genetic recombination by frequent transfer of genetic mobile elements, such as staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) elements (61, 62). Thus, in contrast to S. aureus, which is evolving preferentially by point mutations, S. epidermidis cannot be considered a highly clonal organism (62).

For the short-term surveillance of S. epidermidis in outbreak situations, PFGE targeting the entire bacterial genome can be regarded as an appropriate and powerful tool. MLST and multilocus variant analysis (MLVA), which target distinct conserved loci of the chromosome, are more suitable for long-term evolutionary analyses or the surveillance of geographic dissemination (59, 67). Additionally, the rpoB gene has been used as an epidemiological target for CoNS typing (68).

In the case of methicillin-resistant CoNS (MR-CoNS), additional typing of the SCCmec element is highly recommended and shows a high genetic diversity in methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, and other CoNS (see “Resistance Mechanisms and Susceptibility Patterns,” below) (62, 6972).

Whole-genome sequencing will drastically enhance our knowledge by improving the resolution of the genetic organization of CoNS species and—as shown in initial applications for S. aureus (73)—their clonal distribution. For S. haemolyticus, an extreme plasticity of the genome was reported and a high abundance of insertion sequence elements was found, conferring the frequent genomic rearrangement characteristics found in this species (74).

Transmission in the Hospital Environment

Compared to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) transmission, much less is known regarding the epidemiology of CoNS in health care facilities, as well as their potential to cause outbreaks. The predominance of CoNS isolates in exhibiting (multi)resistance to antibiotics and antiseptics (7577), as well as their capacity for biofilm production (78, 79), is strongly indicative of selection processes facilitated by modern medicine, i.e., mainly from (over)use of antibiotics and insertion of foreign body devices. The number of unrecognized cases of transmission of clonal CoNS lineages may actually be higher, since CoNS outbreaks usually still remain unidentified. However, in patient groups which are highly vulnerable to CoNS infections, CoNS and their clonal spread have been acknowledged as substantial contributors to morbidity and mortality.

For neonatal intensive care units (ICUs), in particular, it has been shown that single clones of multiresistant S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus strains that produce biofilms are associated with colonization and disease among preterm neonates (80). The clonal spread of endemic, multidrug-resistant CoNS within a hospital was also detected in nonneonatal ICUs and wards (8183). Several outbreaks of antibiotic-resistant CoNS clones have been reported in ICUs (8486). Within an 11-year period, one molecular cluster emerged as the predominant cause of CoNS sepsis in a Dutch neonatal ICU (87). Moreover, possible interhospital spread was also demonstrated (82). In contrast, a pronounced genetic diversity of S. epidermidis was found in healthy, nonhospitalized persons (66).

While nosocomial CoNS clones may have been selected primarily by respective antibiotic selection pressure, other putative, pathogen-related selective factors may also have contributed to successful intra- and interhospital spread, such as adhesion factors for the colonization of foreign body biomaterials, a capacity for biofilm production, and resistance to opsonophagocytosis. Known hygiene-related factors enhancing the distribution of MRSA in the hospital setting, such as insufficient hand hygiene and inadequate disinfection and/or sterilization of medical instruments and surfaces, may also be assumed to be causative of clonal CoNS spread.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE AND INFECTIONS

Drastic changes in patient populations—increased numbers of premature newborns and of elderly, multimorbid, chronically ill, and, often, immunocompromised patients—as well as the increasing use of inserted foreign bodies, led to an acknowledgment of the large variety of infections caused by CoNS. This was confirmed by a multitude of clinical studies that considered certain entities and patient groups. However, most studies address CoNS as a whole and do not distinguish between different species. Thus, the real impact of less frequently occurring species might be underreported (Tables 2 and 3). Moreover, due to difficulties in the differentiation of CoNS in the premolecular/mass spectrometry era, species-related data should be interpreted with caution, in particular if less commonly encountered species are implicated.

Despite all being commensals that colonize host or natural food surfaces, the ability of various staphylococci to cause infection differs. Besides highly pathogenic S. aureus, one can differentiate between “medium”-pathogenic staphylococci—with the S. epidermidis group, S. lugdunensis, and S. saprophyticus as typical examples—and relatively nonpathogenic staphylococci, represented by saprophytic species associated with foods of plant and animal origin and/or those that are animal adapted (88). Strain-specific features at the subspecies level and host-specific capabilities of a given staphylococcal species also have to be considered. Thus, even less-virulent CoNS species may cause infections, particularly if cofactors are present that favor infections, such as foreign bodies and/or immunosuppression (88).

Overall, S. epidermidis is the most common species in CoNS infections, followed by S. hominis, S. haemolyticus, and S. capitis (8991). In contrast, in a global endocarditis study, S. lugdunensis was reported as the second most common CoNS pathogen (68).

The most important clinical entity associated with CoNS is foreign body-related infections (FBRIs), also designated device-associated health care-associated infections (DA-HAIs). These comprise local and bloodstream-related entities associated with inserted or implanted medical devices. FBRIs comprise a unique, complex constellation of many factors that have to be considered for their successful management (92).

While S. aureus is capable of causing superantigen- and exfoliative toxin-mediated diseases, such as toxic shock syndrome (TSS), staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS [dermatitis exfoliativa neonatorum Ritter von Rittershain disease]), and staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP), confirmed clinical cases caused by CoNS are lacking. Early reports of CoNS also being causative agents of TSS and SFP (93) have not yet been confirmed. S. epidermidis strains recovered from patients with TSS symptoms produced no superantigens but were able to stimulate human monocytes to produce cytokines, which may have been responsible for clinical symptoms (94). After a bibliographic survey, it was found that CoNS species isolated from milk or dairy products have never been involved in any case of SFP following the ingestion of dairy products (4). However, CoNS may carry enterotoxin genes (see “PTSAgs and exfoliative toxins,” below).

S. epidermidis Group

The S. epidermidis group comprises typical “medium”-pathogenic staphylococci, necessitating a decision, each time they are detected in clinical specimens, on whether they represent true infection or only colonization/contamination. Also, study data on the prevalence and distribution of S. epidermidis-group CoNS in various infection entities are often hampered by the fact that the causative significance of enrolled isolates is not adequately validated.

Nevertheless, infections due to S. epidermidis or S. haemolyticus, the most frequently isolated species, have the largest clinical impact. S. epidermidis has certainly become the most important model organism for studying DA-HAIs. With descriptions of many novel CoNS species in the past 2 decades and improvements in diagnostic differentiation approaches, further organisms of this group have become apparent. One example of these diagnostically emerging species is S. pettenkoferi as a causative agent of human bloodstream infections (BSIs) and osteomyelitis (18, 95). One might assume that difficult-to-detect CoNS species may be underdiagnosed, at least in infections of immunocompromised patients (96, 97). In an era where matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) as well as diagnostic and whole-genome sequencing is being established in routine procedures, these species may increasingly be identified.

While the vast majority of CoNS infections of this group are characterized by a subacute or even chronic course of infection, with a nonspecific, mild, and subtle clinical picture (98), aggressive, severe, and/or lethal infections have (rarely) been reported. However, data giving valid species identification are sometimes absent in these cases.

Infections associated with medical devices.

No kind of inserted or implanted foreign body has ever failed to be colonized and infected by CoNS of the S. epidermidis group, with S. epidermidis as the leading causative organism (Table 2). CoNS account for the majority of FBRIs in both temporarily and permanently implanted devices (99). FBRIs comprise local (e.g., exit site) and systemic infections. Originating from bacteremia or other systemic spread of causative organisms and depending on the nature and localization of the foreign body, sepsis, endocarditis, meningitis, joint sepsis, vertebral abscesses, and other local manifestations due to metastatic seeding may result. Local inflammation signs include erythema, warmth, swelling, tenderness, and purulent drainage, which characterize exit-site infections.

(i) Foreign body-related bloodstream infections (FBR-BSIs).

CoNS of the S. epidermidis group are a very common cause of health care-associated bacteremia (100). Most FBR-BSIs are catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs), i.e., those resulting from the insertion of intravascular catheters or totally implanted ports (e.g., Port-a-Cath, MediPort, and Infusaport varieties). Based on a study of 422 hospital ICUs in 36 countries that participated in the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) between 2004 and 2009, the pooled rate of central line-associated BSIs was found to be 6.8 per 1,000 central line-days (101). While infection control programs focusing on DA-HAI surveillance were shown to reduce the incidence of DA-HAIs by as much as 30% (102), rates for CRBSIs still ranged from approximately 2 per 1,000 central line-days, in U.S. medical/surgical ICUs, to >30 per 1,000 central line-days, in burn units (101, 103, 104). At the end of a 7-year period, the most common isolates recovered from nosocomial bloodstream infections, as recorded within the U.S. nationwide Surveillance and Control of Pathogens of Epidemiological Importance (SCOPE) database, were CoNS (31%), followed by S. aureus (20%) (105).

There are several studies showing that patients with FBR-BSIs have significantly longer ICU and/or hospital stays and higher mortality rates and hospital costs than uninfected patients (106108); in a nonteaching hospital, attributable ICU and hospital stays of 2.41 and 7.54 days, respectively, were found (107). The attributable mortality rate for CRBSIs was estimated to be 1.8% at a university hospital's general ICU (109). The attributable costs per infection were estimated to be $11,971 to $56,000 (106108).

CoNS of the S. epidermidis group also act as main pathogens for other entities resulting in FBR-BSIs. These comprise infections associated with prosthetic vascular grafts, prosthetic heart valves, cardiac devices, and coronary stents. In contrast to an earlier assumption that CoNS are more frequent in late-onset prosthetic vascular graft infections, there is no relationship between the microbiological pattern of infection, the time of infection onset, and the graft location (110). CoNS of the S. epidermidis group are still considered the most frequent cause of early prosthetic valve infective endocarditis (PVIE)—being responsible for 37 to 47% of early cases and about 25% of late cases, followed by S. aureus (20% and 11 to 21%, respectively) (111113). A fatal early PVIE secondary to S. epidermidis, with a very aggressive progression, has been published (114).

Past data have described clinical courses of PVIE caused by S. epidermidis group CoNS as being subacute or even chronic, usually subtle, and without fulminant signs of infection (115). However, even usual cases of PVIEs caused by CoNS may exhibit a more aggressive character than previously thought. Findings from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis merged database showed that heart failure was encountered significantly more frequently with CoNS (54%) than with either S. aureus (33%) or viridans group streptococci (32%) (116). Moreover, prosthetic material-associated infective endocarditis (IE) due to CoNS is associated with a high rate of methicillin resistance and significant valvular complications, as evidenced by an observational study of prospectively collected data from a multinational cohort of patients (117, 118). CoNS of the S. epidermidis group are also common causative agents of infections of left ventricular assist devices and coronary stents (119121).

Importantly, clinical symptoms of FBR-BSIs can be subtle and nonspecific at the beginning of the colonization process; however, persistent CoNS infection may lead to metastatic seeding, embolic complications, and septic thrombophlebitis, resulting in severe complications and a fatal outcome (92).

(ii) Local FBRIs.

There are a multitude of medical devices without direct connection to the bloodstream that can be colonized by CoNS of the S. epidermidis group, leading subsequently to local infections.

In nosocomial drain-associated cases of meningitis/ventriculitis, CoNS of the S. epidermidis group were responsible for 73% of documented infections, with two-thirds of isolates found to be oxacillin resistant (122). In a retrospective study of cerebrospinal fluid shunt-associated infections in adults over an 11-year period, the most prevalent organisms were CoNS (55% oxacillin resistant), which were found in 37% of specimens (123). In a study enrolling culture-proven, adult bacterial meningitis caused by a single pathogen, 14/127 (11%) cases were caused by CoNS strains, comprising S. epidermidis (71%) and S. haemolyticus (29%) (90); however, the small sample size limited the study's power. All patients with CoNS infection in that study harbored medical devices, whereas only 55% of patients with non-CoNS bacterial meningitis were characterized as having inserted foreign bodies.

Another shunt-associated CoNS-caused entity is peritonitis in the context of ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunts or, more frequently, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), including respective exit-site infections. In several studies, CoNS of the S. epidermidis group were shown to represent the most frequent cause of peritonitis, accounting for around 30% of all episodes, including recurrences (124126). Of 51 nonduplicated CoNS isolates collected from CAPD peritonitis episodes within a 2-year period and differentiated by several sequencing approaches, S. epidermidis was the most common CoNS species isolated, accounting for 67% of cases, followed by S. haemolyticus (12%), S. warneri (8%), and other species (91). In a recent Canadian study, it was reported that obesity might be associated with a higher risk of CoNS peritonitis among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients (127).

Even though prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are relatively uncommon (1% to 3%), they remain one of the most devastating complications of prosthetic surgery and are associated with significant morbidity (128, 129). The most commonly cultured microorganisms are CoNS (primarily S. epidermidis), occurring in approximately 30% to 50% of cases, followed by S. aureus (about 10% to 45%) and mixed flora (about 10%) (128, 130132). Non-S. aureus and non-S. epidermidis species, in particular S. hominis and S. haemolyticus, account for about 17% of cases (88, 130) (Table 3). PJIs have traditionally been divided into early infections, occurring within 4 weeks postoperatively (class I), those occurring between 4 weeks and 2 years postoperatively (class II), and late infections, occurring thereafter (class III) (133) (for current classification, see the website of the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons). The last stage, showing more subtle signs of inflammation, chronic persistent postoperative pain, and implant loosening (low-grade PJIs), is more commonly associated with CoNS (134). In a retrospective cohort study conducted across 10 hospitals over a 3-year period, CoNS were isolated from 24% of culture-positive PJIs; 89% of these were methicillin-resistant strains (129).

CoNS of the S. epidermidis group can also be detected regularly in association with other implanted devices. In particular, these CoNS may be involved in the pathogenesis of fibrous capsular contracture—the leading long-term complication of augmentation mammoplasty (135). Species of the S. epidermidis group were predominantly found in, and the presence of CoNS was significantly associated with, capsular contracture (136). CoNS were also commonly isolated from cases of late-onset endophthalmitis. After implantation of artificial intraocular lenses following cataract surgery, they comprised about 60% of all pathogens recovered (of these, >90% of strains were S. epidermidis) (137, 138).

Other infections.

(i) Native valve endocarditis.

CoNS have emerged as being responsible for IE, not only PVIE but also native valve IE (NVIE) (139). CoNS causing both entities have been identified as S. epidermidis (71.4%), followed, with a considerable gap, by S. lugdunensis (8.8%), S. hominis, S. capitis, S. haemolyticus, and others (68). However, CoNS are still considered rather unusual causes of community-acquired native valve IE, accounting for only 1 to 5% of cases (140). In contrast, as shown in a French population-based study, CoNS are significantly more prevalent in health care-associated cases of IE (including NVIE), being the second most frequent causative agent (26.2%), after S. aureus (32.8%) (139). Based on the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Nationwide Inpatient Sample for 1998 to 2009, examination of IE revealed that non-S. aureus staphylococci, in third place, accounted for 6.7% and 10.3% of all cases and cases with known microorganisms, respectively (141). Based on patient records for all operations for NVIE from 1985 to 2004, CoNS (8%) belonged to the four most commonly identified organisms linked to NVIE in a retrospective, monocenter study (142).

In intravenous drug (IVD) addicts, repeated episodes of S. epidermidis bacteremia as a result of nonsterile injections may have led to right-sided IE (143). Although tricuspid valve involvement is significantly more prevalent in IVD abuse (IVDA) patients, more frequent left heart involvement is emerging, with a severe clinical course and a need for surgery in the active phase (144). After S. aureus (51.3%) and streptococcal species (23.1%), S. epidermidis (15.4%) was the third most common pathogen in IVDA-related IE (144). NVIE cases due to S. haemolyticus, S. hominis, S. warneri, and other members of this group have rarely been reported (118, 145, 146).

In contrast to typical clinical courses of IE due to CoNS, studies have demonstrated that more aggressive S. epidermidis-caused NVIE courses may also exist, which can lead to valve destruction requiring valve replacement, heart failure, annular or myocardial abscesses, emboli, and mortality, comparable to the course observed with NVIE caused by S. aureus (147150). Study results comparing S. epidermidis NVIE and PVIE isolates for virulence in a Caenorhabditis elegans model suggested that NVIE isolates might constitute a more virulent subset within this species (151). Unusually, a very rapidly destructive IE caused by S. epidermidis, with fast valve destruction, has been reported (152).

(ii) Infections in neonates.

While in healthy term infants CoNS of the S. epidermidis group habitually represent commensals with a rather low invasive capability, preterm newborns are predisposed to invasive CoNS infections. The reasons for this include the immature immune system as well as the impaired skin and mucosal barriers of preterm newborns. Moreover, extremely preterm infants or very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants are regularly exposed to invasive procedures, including the insertion of foreign bodies, during neonatal intensive care.

Colonization of the surface of the human body by CoNS is initiated in the first few days or weeks of life, with S. epidermidis, S. warneri, and S. haemolyticus as the most prevalent species (153, 154). During hospitalization, resistant skin isolates, especially multidrug-resistant, mecA-positive S. haemolyticus, become more prevalent (154). Moreover, CoNS are the first and most abundant gut colonizers, at least under the conditions of a modern Western lifestyle (155). Genotyping demonstrates that the gastrointestinal tract of newborns is colonized by those strains of S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus responsible for subsequent, late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm neonates (156).

In terms of infectious disease management of neonates, early-onset (<72 h of life) and late-onset (between 72 h and 30 days of life) (90) infections can be distinguished. Furthermore, preterm infants, characterized by birth before 37 weeks of gestational age, can be differentiated from term infants. CoNS (as with S. aureus) were more frequently causes of late-onset, nosocomial sepsis in the neonatal period, especially in VLBW infants (157). These infants were at increased risk for neonatal morbidities, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality (158). In evaluating late-onset neonatal infections, a population-based prospective observational study showed that CoNS accounted for 13.6% (Escherichia coli, 55.5%; S. aureus, 12.7%; and group B beta-hemolytic streptococci [GBS], 7.3%) of all infections, with an incidence rate of 0.67 (E. coli, 2.72; S. aureus, 0.62; and GBS, 0.36) per 1,000 live births (159). Thus, besides E. coli-induced urinary tract infection (UTI) among term infants and GBS infections, CoNS septicemia affecting preterm infants was recognized as one of the three major types of late-onset neonatal infection (159).

Regarding neonatal blood culture-confirmed sepsis, the median incidence is 16 per 1,000 live births (early-onset sepsis, 2.2 to 9.8 per 1,000 live births) (160). For developed countries, the incidence of sepsis in neonates is usually estimated as 1 to 5 per 1,000 live births, with mortality rates as high as 15 to 20% (161). Studies in developing countries have demonstrated clinical sepsis rates ranging from 49 to 170 per 1,000 live births (162). In comparison with S. aureus infections, CoNS infections were more frequently associated with VLBW (<1,500 g at birth), lower gestational age, a history of intravascular catheters, and prolonged parenteral nutrition (159, 163). Until the 1970s, GBS and Gram-negative bacteria were most frequently recovered from symptomatic bacteremia of newborns in ICUs; CoNS subsequently became recognized as pathogens in critically ill, hospitalized, premature infants (164, 165). Among both early and later infections occurring in ICU neonates, Gram-positive organisms, with S. epidermidis as the predominant species, became the most prevalent pathogens (166). In a recent study of early-onset neonatal sepsis in term and preterm infants, CoNS (2.4/1,000 and 2.5/1,000 admissions, respectively) were the most common microorganisms (167).

Questions regarding CoNS infection-associated morbidity and, in particular, mortality in the case of CoNS-caused neonatal sepsis, have not been answered clearly. While in several studies CoNS-related mortality was rather rare (168, 169), other investigations indicated that the mortality rate attributable to CoNS was comparable to that of S. aureus and that persistent bacteremia—in the absence of central venous catheterization—and significant morbidity, despite aggressive antibiotic therapy, may still occur (78, 163, 170, 171). In neonates requiring intensive care, biofilm production, independently of the presence of the ica operon, was shown to be the most significant risk factor for persistent, late-onset CoNS bacteremia (78). Persistent CoNS sepsis in neonates was associated with severe thrombocytopenia (78, 170).

CoNS of the S. epidermidis group were the most frequent agents of central venous catheter (CVC)- and umbilical catheter-associated BSIs in neonatal ICUs (172). Besides BSIs, CoNS may cause further invasive infections in preterm infants, such as infective endocarditis, meningitis, and necrotizing fasciitis (171, 173, 174).

(iii) Bacteremia/septicemia in neutropenic patients.

Especially with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, CoNS of the S. epidermidis group are still the main cause of septicemia in febrile patients, accounting for approximately 20 to 40% of cases (175178). In a multicenter study analyzing the etiology of 1,051 bacteremic episodes in 782 cancer patients, CoNS accounted for more than 40% of the pathogens isolated (179). Stratifying patients with hematological malignancy and with solid tumors in a prospective, multicenter study involving 54 hospitals, there was no significant difference in the distribution of CoNS involved in bacteremia (180); CoNS were the leading pathogens, comprising 50.6% and 44.9%, respectively, of the strains isolated (180). Notably, nosocomial spread of CoNS among hematological patients with neutropenia can occur, and oncology wards may for years harbor predominant clones of S. epidermidis as a cause of BSIs (181, 182).

S. lugdunensis

Given its specific pathogenic capacity and clinical significance, S. lugdunensis has a special position among all other CoNS (183) (Fig. 2). It is generally accepted to have a role as an infrequent but aggressive cause of IE. S. lugdunensis IE is characterized by an often destructive course of disease with a high mortality rate, which appears unusually fulminant for a CoNS species IE but which makes it rather similar to S. aureus IE. Starting with its discovery as a causative agent of IE in 1989, by Etienne et al. (184, 185), many case reports and case studies have confirmed this behavior, which is unusual for other CoNS species (186188). In an analysis of clinical cases combined with a review of the literature, native valve IE by S. lugdunensis exhibited a mortality rate of 42% and was characterized by mitral valve involvement and frequent complications, including heart failure, abscess formation, and embolism (186). In comparison, prosthetic valve IE was characterized by aortic valve involvement, which was also typically aggravated by abscess formation, but with an even higher mortality (78%). Both IE entities required surgery in more than 50% of cases (186). Another literature search reported an overall mortality rate of 38.8% (189). In a case of a recurrent pacemaker-related bloodstream infection, recovered S. lugdunensis isolates exhibited several phenotypes, including small-colony variants (SCVs), which were shown to have the same genetic background (190).

Several reports highlight the ability of S. lugdunensis to cause various kinds of FBRIs, including catheter-related bacteremia, VP shunt infection, and prosthetic joint infection (185, 191193). VP shunt infections or other central nervous system procedures may be accompanied by severe complications, such as meningitis and brain abscesses (191, 194). Recurrent exit-site infection due to this species has also been described (195). Venous catheters or other foreign devices are the most common portals for S. lugdunensis bacteremia (196198). Among patients with signs of bacteremia due to S. lugdunensis, 23.8% had clinically significant bacteremia, with an incidence of 1.3 cases per 100,000 admissions (197). In a rather high percentage of cases, i.e., up to 50% of cases, S. lugdunensis bacteremia was associated with IE (196).

In the past few years, there has been mounting evidence to show that S. lugdunensis is also a common cause of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), with an incidence of 53 per 100,000 per year if optimized identification methods are applied (199). Recently, a case of S. lugdunensis involvement in necrotizing fasciitis was also reported (198). While several studies and many case reports corroborate its role in SSTIs (200, 201), further prospective studies are warranted to verify its position as a pathogen and/or a colonizing bacterium for skin-related entities (202). In accordance with its known main habitat, S. lugdunensis-induced abscesses have been reported to occur mostly in perineal and inguinal areas (199, 203). However, S. lugdunensis has also been isolated from breast exudates and pus, and an association with nonpuerperal mastitis has been postulated (204).

Further entities ascribed to S. lugdunensis comprise single cases of brain abscess, peritonitis, osteomyelitis, discitis, septic arthritis in native joints and as a complication of arthroscopy, endometritis with premature rupture of membranes, and pyomyoma after cesarean section (205210).

S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus as a Cause of Urinary Tract Infection

S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus is the second most frequent causative microorganism of uncomplicated lower UTI in young, sexually active women (211). However, there are also case reports of this microorganism associated with UTIs in girls and males of all ages. Complications include acute pyelonephritis and nephrolithiasis and, in the case of male patients, urethritis, epididymitis, and prostatitis (212, 213). BSIs with S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus that are not related to urinary tract infections, such as septicemia, which is commonly associated with tunneled central venous catheters, as well as endocarditis, have been reported anecdotally for both genders (214, 215).

Other CoNS

Staphylococci associated with foods of plant or animal origin (Table 4), and considered primarily nonpathogenic, have only very rarely been reported as putative causative agents of infections. However, doubts may remain in regard to the validity of species identification and/or association with the infectious process (Tables 2 and 4).

Infections Due to Small-Colony Variants

SCVs have been recognized since at least the beginning of the 20th century, often being described as dwarf, pleomorph, or “G” forms. Later on, they were associated with infections of a chronic nature, often characterized by a recurrent and relapsing course (216).

While most clinical studies and case reports of chronic infections caused by SCVs describe infections by S. aureus, cases are also associated with CoNS-SCVs. Notably, almost all published cases of infections due to CoNS-SCVs were foreign body related. Initial cases described prosthetic valve IE and osteosynthesis infections during the 1970s and -80s (217, 218). SCVs of S. epidermidis and S. capitis were detected in cases of pacemaker electrode infections (219, 220). A fatal case was reported for a catheter-associated BSI with a teicoplanin-resistant S. epidermidis SCV isolated from the blood culture of a patient with acute leukemia and therapy-induced neutropenia (221). For S. lugdunensis, SCVs were described in a case of recurrent pacemaker-related BSI (190).

The enhanced ability of S. epidermidis SCVs to colonize foreign bodies and to form biofilms and abscesses has been confirmed by in vitro and animal experiments (222, 223). Further details on SCV pathogenesis are given in the next section.

PATHOGENICITY

Staphylococci, with the capacity to colonize and infect human and animal hosts, own a species- and strain-specific arsenal of diverse strategies to enable adherence, aggression, invasion, persistence, and/or evasion of both innate and adaptive immunity. However, in comparison with S. aureus, clearly less is known about the virulence mechanisms in CoNS, except for aspects of biofilm formation by S. epidermidis. In general, CoNS isolates lack the virulence determinants responsible for aggression. Nevertheless, factors involved in colonization may successfully support the bacterium-host interaction, a phenomenon that may be based, at least partly, on the multifunctional character of various staphylococcal virulence factors known to exhibit redundant and overlapping functions.

Adherence to Surfaces and Phases of Biofilm Formation

The critical first event in establishing colonization and/or infection by staphylococci is adherence to host or—as a consequence of modern medicine—foreign body surfaces. The colonization of the polymer surface of a medical device by formation of a multilayered biofilm has been considered the critical factor in the pathogenesis of foreign body-associated infections caused by CoNS (224226). Among the CoNS, S. epidermidis is by far the species recovered most often from biofilm-associated infections. The infection of the polymer surface likely occurs during insertion of the device, after the inoculation of a small number of bacteria from the patient's mucous membranes or skin. In the biofilm, huge bacterial cell agglomerates are encased in an amorphous extracellular material composed of bacterial products, such as teichoic acids, proteins, polysaccharides, and extracellular DNA (eDNA), and host products (227232). Biofilms may be formed on the abiotic surfaces of medical devices or on biotic surfaces, such as host tissue. Biotic surfaces may also be medical devices, which become conditioned with plasma and host extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins after their insertion.

To mediate attachment to abiotic surfaces or host factors, such as plasma extracellular and matrix proteins or even host cells, as well as to facilitate intercellular adhesion, members of the genus Staphylococcus produce various proteinaceous and nonproteinaceous adhesins (233). Proteinaceous adhesins have been grouped into covalently surface-anchored proteins, also termed cell wall-anchored (CWA) proteins, noncovalently surface-associated proteins, including the autolysin/adhesin family, and membrane-spanning proteins (234237). Nonproteinaceous adhesins include the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) (also known as poly-N-acetylglucosamine [PNAG]) as well as wall teichoic and lipoteichoic acids.

The distinct phases of biofilm formation by CoNS and the respective underlying molecular mechanisms have been analyzed thoroughly in past years. The formation of the biofilm may be divided into four steps (Fig. 4). First, bacteria rapidly attach to the biotic or abiotic surface. In the second step, after attachment, bacteria multiply and accumulate in multilayered cell aggregates, a process requiring intercellular adhesion. In the third phase, the biofilm grows and matures into a thick, structured layer. A mature biofilm contains channels that are fluid filled to ensure the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the bacterial cells located in the deeper layers of the biofilm (238). Finally, single cells or cell agglomerates can dissociate from the biofilm and disseminate via the bloodstream to start colonization and biofilm formation at a different site.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Pathogenesis of catheter-related infections and factors influencing biofilm genesis. The image shows the three-step process of biofilm formation on the surface of an intravascular catheter, with rapid initial adhesion and attachment of CoNS microorganisms to the polymer foreign body surface resulting in a monolayer (1), followed by a prolonged accumulation phase which involves cell proliferation, intercellular adhesion processes, and maturation (2 and 3). (4) Finally, microorganisms may disaggregate from the macrocolony and drift into the bloodstream, resulting in metastatic and embolic complications.

Attachment to abiotic surfaces.

The attachment of bacteria to various biomaterials is determined by the surface properties of the bacteria and the foreign bodies. It involves physicochemical forces, such as hydrophobic interactions, van der Waals forces, and charge. These interactions may be mediated by different surface components of CoNS, i.e., CWA proteins that are covalently linked to peptidoglycan; surface-associated proteins that are surface attached by different mechanisms, such as hydrophobic or ionic interactions; and nonproteinaceous surface molecules, such as teichoic acids.

(i) Noncovalently linked surface-associated proteins.

Cell surface hydrophobicity and primary attachment have been ascribed to bacterial CWA and surface-associated proteins. The major 148-kDa surface-associated autolysin/adhesin, AtlE, from S. epidermidis mediates initial adherence of bacterial cells to the polymer surface and is highly similar to the S. aureus autolysin Atl (239). AtlE and Atl are organized in the same modular structure and are functionally interchangeable (239, 240). AtlE is proteolytically cleaved into two bacteriolytically active domains: a 60-kDa amidase (AM) and a 52-kDa glucosaminidase (GL). The central portion of the protein contains three repeats (R1, R2, and R3), which seem to mediate targeting to the bacterial cell surface via binding to peptidoglycan. They are possibly also involved in adhesion to polystyrene (239, 241). The targeting of Atl to the equatorial ring on the staphylococcal cell surface, which marks the cell's future division site, is based on an avoidance mechanism by wall teichoic acid (WTA) (242). WTA prevents binding of Atl, and because it is abundant in the former cell wall but not at the cross wall region, it directs Atl to the cross wall to carry out the last step of cell division, i.e., cell separation (242).

Recently, homologous Atl proteins with similar functions were also reported for other CoNS, such as S. caprae (AtlC), S. saprophyticus (Aas), S. lugdunensis (AtlL), and S. warneri M (AtlWM) (243246). Initial adhesion most probably is mediated not only directly, by the AtlE protein itself, but also indirectly, via its enzymatic function: the hydrolysis of the cell wall peptidoglycan leads to autolysis and thus to the release of eDNA, which has been shown to be an important component of staphylococcal biofilms. Treatment with DNase I is able to limit initial adherence of S. epidermidis, but it does not cause disintegration of mature biofilms, suggesting that eDNA may be most important as a matrix component during the early stages of S. epidermidis biofilm formation (247). Another study demonstrated that the presence of DNase I in culture medium is able to inhibit biofilm production by both S. aureus and S. epidermidis. However, treatment of preformed biofilms with DNase I does not cause biofilm detachment in the case of S. epidermidis, while it does with S. aureus, suggesting different functional roles for eDNA in S. aureus and S. epidermidis biofilm production (232). Recently, it was demonstrated that point mutations in the active sites of the AM and GL domains of Atl result in the loss of enzymatic functions and also in the loss of biofilm formation, further supporting a role for the Atl-mediated release of eDNA in biofilm formation (248). Crystal structures are available for the catalytically active AM domain and the repeat R2 domain, unraveling their enzymatic mechanism and substrate- and ligand-binding properties, respectively (249, 250).

A role in biofilm development has also been identified for the S. epidermidis protease ClpP (251). ClpP proteases degrade misfolded proteins and may be involved in stress adaptation, virulence, and biofilm formation (251). An S. epidermidis clpP mutant revealed reduced biofilm production in vitro and decreased pathogenicity in a rat model of intravascular CVC-associated infection compared to those with the wild type (251). These defects could be restored by complementation with a functional copy of the clpP gene. Decreased biofilm formation of the clpP mutant resulted from both less initial attachment to a polystyrene surface and less PIA/PNAG production, although the expression of the icaADBC operon (see below) was comparable between both the clpP mutant and the wild-type strain (251). ClpP expression was also shown to be controlled by the quorum sensing (QS) agr system (see below), explaining one possible mechanism by which agr negatively regulates initial attachment for biofilm formation.

(ii) Covalently linked surface proteins.

Some S. aureus isolates associated with bovine mastitis produce a 240-kDa surface protein, called biofilm-associated protein (Bap), which mediates attachment to polystyrene and the accumulation phase of biofilm production (see below) (252). The occurrence of bap significantly enhanced the capability of S. aureus to colonize the bovine mammary gland and to persist in vivo. Recently, bap-orthologous genes were also found in CoNS recovered from animal mastitis, such as S. epidermidis, S. simulans, S. hyicus, and S. chromogenes (253). In all these isolates, Bap orthologues were able to mediate biofilm formation when the PIA/PNAG exopolysaccharides were absent (see below). While the bap gene has been reported to be absent from S. aureus isolates of human origin, the genome of the human clinical isolate S. epidermidis RP62A harbors a gene encoding a protein homologous to Bap, namely, Bhp (253). Bhp shares 20%, 31%, and 53% identical amino acids in the N-terminal A-domain, B-repeat, and C-repeat regions, respectively, with the S. epidermidis Bap protein. Because of the structural similarity, the 258-kDa Bhp protein was assumed to promote biofilm formation, but experimental evidence is still lacking (253). The structural properties of Bhp and Bap correspond to those of other CWA proteins (see below). More recently, the presence of the bap gene was also demonstrated in nosocomial human isolates of S. haemolyticus and S. cohnii (254).

(iii) Teichoic acids.

Surface charge also depends on teichoic acids. Wall teichoic acid (WTA) is covalently linked to the peptidoglycan, while lipoteichoic acid (LTA) is linked to the cytoplasmic membrane via a membrane-spanning lipid anchor. Teichoic acids are strongly charged cell wall polymers composed of alternating ribitol or glycerol and phosphate groups. S. epidermidis RP62A WTA is composed of poly(glycerol phosphate) units that are substituted at the 2 position of glycerol with alpha-glucosamine, alpha-glucose, alpha-6-d-alanyl-glucose, or d-alanine (255). DltA catalyzes the incorporation of d-alanine into WTA and thus renders the cell surface less negatively charged. A dltA mutant of S. aureus has a biofilm-negative phenotype, because primary adherence to a glass or polystyrene surface, which is negatively charged or hydrophobic, respectively, is abrogated (256). The genome of the human clinical isolate S. epidermidis RP62A harbors a dltA homolog, suggesting that the surface charge determined by teichoic acids may also contribute to S. epidermidis colonization of artificial surfaces. Moreover, it was recently demonstrated that the deletion of S. epidermidis tagO, whose gene product mediates the first step of WTA biosynthesis, has pleiotropic effects, including reduced primary adherence to a polymer surface and reduced biofilm production (257).

Attachment to biotic surfaces.

Shortly after the insertion or implantation of a medical device, it becomes covered with ECM and plasma proteins, such as fibrinogen, fibronectin, thrombospondin, collagen, von Willebrand factor, and vitronectin, or with host cells, such as platelets. Some of these host factors may serve as receptors for specifically attaching staphylococci that express the respective adhesins on the cell surface (258, 259). Thus, in the later steps of the adhesion process in vivo, adherence of CoNS to such host factors may be crucial. Moreover, in some instances, CoNS seem to be capable of attaching directly to the host tissue, i.e., to the endocardium in the pathogenesis of native infective endocarditis, which may be caused not only by S. aureus but also, occasionally, by S. epidermidis.

(i) Noncovalently linked surface-associated proteins.

The S. epidermidis autolysin/adhesin AtlE not only mediates primary adherence to a polymer surface (see above) but also attaches to vitronectin (239). Moreover, in a CVC-associated infection model in rats, an in vivo importance for AtlE was found: only half of the animals challenged with an atlE-negative mutant developed an infection, versus 80% of animals challenged with the isogenic wild-type strain (260). The homologous autolysin Aas from S. saprophyticus binds to fibronectin and sheep erythrocytes, leading to hemagglutination; AtlC from S. caprae has also been shown to bind to fibronectin (244, 261).

Aae from S. epidermidis is another multifunctional autolysin/adhesin with bacteriolytic activity that binds to fibrinogen, vitronectin, and fibronectin dose dependently and in a saturable fashion, with a high affinity (262). Aae has a modular structure and harbors three repeats in its N-terminal domain, each having high similarity with the lysine motif (LysM), which confers cell wall attachment to various surface-associated proteins (263). It also contains a cysteine- and histidine-dependent amidohydrolase/peptidase (CHAP) domain in its C-terminal portion, which has bacteriolytic activity in many proteins (264). Interestingly, in the homologous Aaa protein from S. aureus, both the LysM and CHAP domains can mediate adherence to fibrinogen, fibronectin, and vitronectin (240).

Another example of multi- or bifunctional surface molecules of S. epidermidis exhibiting both enzymatic and adhesive functions is the GehD lipase. GehD seems to be surface associated, at least in part, and mediates binding of bacteria to collagen (265). Moreover, a putative elastin-binding protein from S. epidermidis RP62A, containing a LysM domain, was identified by whole-genome sequencing (266).

The 1,100-kDa giant extracellular matrix-binding protein, Embp, which is probably attached to the cell surface via a C-terminal, transmembrane anchor, has at least two adhesive functions: fibronectin binding and intercellular adhesion (see below) (267). Originally, Embp was identified as a fibronectin-binding protein by use of the phage display technique (268). Embp contains numerous partially alternating repeat domains, i.e., 59 domains termed “found in various architectures” (FIVAR) and 38 domains termed “protein G-related albumin-binding” (GA) domains. Functional analyses indicated that the Embp FIVAR domains harbor the fibronectin-recognizing activity (267). Therefore, the fibronectin-binding site of Embp is distinct from that of the S. aureus fibronectin-binding proteins A and B (FnBPA and FnBPB).

(ii) Covalently linked surface proteins.

The information on surface adhesins of CoNS that recognize human host factors and are surface located due to a covalent linkage to the cell wall peptidoglycan of the bacteria has greatly increased in past years (235). Such proteins are classified as “microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules” (MSCRAMMs). The MSCRAMMs share a similar modular structure, which is represented by an export motif (signal peptide) at the N terminus followed by a host factor-recognizing region, one or more repeat domains, a cell wall-spanning domain, and a cell wall anchorage domain, with the last containing an LPXTG sequence. Recently, it was suggested to divide the CWA proteins into four different groups based on their structure-function properties, with the MSCRAMM family being the most prevalent family (237). According to this classification, the use of the term “MSCRAMM” should now be restricted to those CWA proteins that possess at least two adjacently located IgG-like folded domains in their N-terminal A portion that bind their ligands via the “dock, lock, and latch” mechanism (237).

The anchorage of the MSCRAMM to the cell wall is realized by an enzyme termed sortase A, which is located in the cytoplasmic membrane. It solves the linkage between the amino acids threonine and glycine within the LPXTG sequence and introduces a covalent linkage between the threonine and the peptidoglycan (269, 270). The S. epidermidis RP62A genome contains 11 genes encoding LPXTG-containing CWA proteins (266, 271). There is a considerable redundancy in functions: CWA proteins can bind to one or several human host factors, such as fibrinogen, fibronectin, thrombospondin, collagen, or vitronectin, and one human factor can be bound by several attachment factors. So far, not all binding partners of all CWA proteins have been elucidated.

The best-characterized MSCRAMM from S. epidermidis is the fibrinogen-binding protein Fbe (also referred to as SdrG), which shows similarity to the cell wall-bound fibrinogen receptor (clumping factor; ClfA) from S. aureus (272, 273). Heterologous expression of fbe in Lactococcus lactis and analysis of an fbe-deficient mutant demonstrated a role for Fbe in the interaction of S. epidermidis with fibrinogen (274, 275). In vivo studies suggested Fbe to be a virulence factor, because an fbe deletion mutant was attenuated in an intravascular catheter-associated rat infection model (276). Recently, it was reported that SdrG/Fbe also promotes platelet adhesion and platelet aggregation (277). SdrG/Fbe contains its host factor-recognizing domain in its N-terminal region (278). The “dock, lock, and latch” model has been suggested as the mechanism of binding, based on analysis of cocrystals of SdrG/Fbe and synthetic peptides representing the binding site in fibrinogen (279). The model describes that fibrinogen “docks” inside a cleft of two IgG-like folded regions of the protein. Subsequently, the protein changes its conformation so that the ligand “locks” in the cleft. The complex is then stabilized by a C-terminal “latch” (271).

Like some other CWA proteins, SdrG/Fbe contains a characteristic membrane-spanning region that consists of SD repeats. Other surface proteins containing SD repeats identified in S. epidermidis are SdrF and SdrH (280). Antibodies against SdrG and SdrH were found in 16 convalescent-phase patient sera, implying that these proteins are produced during infection (280). SdrF binds to type I collagen via its B repeats (281). Because binding to collagen is mediated by the SdrF B repeats but not by the putative ligand-binding N-terminal domain A, it was assumed that SdrF might be a multiligand adhesin and that further ligands have yet to be identified. Furthermore, it was shown that SdrF contributed to the initiation of ventricular assist device driveline-related infections with S. epidermidis by adhering to host collagen deposited on the surfaces of the drivelines (281). Anti-SdrF antibodies were able to reduce the S. epidermidis attachment to the drivelines.

The CWA protein SesC, whose gene is highly prevalent among clinical S. epidermidis isolates, also seems to mediate attachment to fibrinogen, because transformants expressing sesC showed increased attachment to fibrinogen-coated surfaces compared to their wild-type strains. Antibodies against SesC were able to reduce the S. epidermidis adherence to fibrinogen in vitro as well as in vivo, using a catheter-associated rat infection model (271, 282). Moreover, anti-SesC antibodies were able to decrease the number of S. epidermidis cells in biofilms in vivo. The expression of sesC was elevated in cells grown in a biofilm in comparison with planktonically grown S. epidermidis cells. Together, these findings suggested SesC to be a promising target for the prophylaxis and treatment of biofilm-associated S. epidermidis infections (282). Indeed, it was shown recently that active vaccination against recombinant SesC inhibited S. epidermidis biofilm production in a subcutaneous foreign body-associated infection model in rats (283).

Another well-characterized CWA protein from S. epidermidis is the accumulation-associated protein Aap, which confers intercellular adhesion (see below). Recently, it was reported that the Aap N-terminal domain A mediates adherence to human corneocytes, supporting a role for Aap in skin colonization (284). The roles of other LPXTG-containing surface proteins of S. epidermidis remain to be clarified.

(iii) Teichoic acids.

In addition to proteins, teichoic acids are also involved in the adherence of S. epidermidis to host factors: teichoic acids significantly and dose dependently promoted the attachment of S. epidermidis to surface-bound fibronectin (285). Preincubation of either fibronectin-coated surfaces or bacteria with teichoic acid enhanced the attachment of S. epidermidis, suggesting that teichoic acid can act as a bridging molecule between fibronectin-coated polymer material and bacteria.

Biofilm accumulation and maturation.

After succeeding in primary attachment to biotic or abiotic surfaces, bacteria multiply and accumulate in multilayered cell aggregates, in a process that necessitates intercellular adhesion. Intercellular adhesion may be mediated by different specific macromolecules, such as polysaccharide adhesins and certain proteins that induce cell aggregation. Moreover, due to its anionic character, eDNA generated by lysed cells and teichoic acids may interact with the positively charged polysaccharide adhesins, thereby increasing biofilm accumulation by additionally acting as a “glue.”

(i) Polysaccharide adhesins.

Transposon mutants that were unable to aggregate in multicellular layers had lost the production of a polysaccharide termed polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) (sometimes also referred to as poly-N-acetylglucosamine [PNAG] or polysaccharide/adhesin [PS/A]) (286, 287). PIA/PNAG was purified and chemically analyzed, which revealed a unique composition to that point. PIA/PNAG is basically represented by a linear glucosaminoglycan containing no fewer than 130 β-1,6-linked 2-deoxy-2-amino-d-glucopyranosyl residues, with 15 to 20% being de-N-acetylated (228). Some years later, PIA/PNAG synthesis was also found to be a feature of S. aureus (288). In an early report, PIA/PNAG from S. aureus was termed poly-N-succinyl β-1,6-glucosamine (PNSG), because N-acetylglucosamine residues were found to be succinylated (289). However, this finding was later identified as an artifact (290).

The biological activity of PIA/PNAG in biofilm formation and immune evasion is determined by its positive charge, which results from partially deacetylating the N-acetylglucosaminyl residues, mediated by IcaB (see below) (291). Most likely, the underlying mechanism of the PIA/PNAG-mediated intercellular adhesion is characterized by the electrostatic attraction of its positive charges to the negative charges of the surface-exposed teichoic acids. Polysaccharides composed like PIA/PNAG not only were identified in Gram-positive staphylococci but also were shown to be involved in biofilm formation of Gram-negative pathogens, for instance, Escherichia coli and Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) actinomycetemcomitans, and therefore might represent a general concept (292).

The S. epidermidis genes that mediate intercellular adherence and production of PIA/PNAG are organized in an operon (icaADBC) and have been characterized functionally (293, 294). IcaA confers the proposed N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity. However, IcaA alone shows only low transferase activity. Coexpression of the catalytic enzyme-encoding icaA gene together with icaD leads to a significantly increased activity and to the production of N-acetylglucosamine oligomers with a maximal length of 20 residues. IcaAD catalyzes the synthesis of long-chain oligomers, which react with anti-PIA/PNAG antiserum only in the presence of icaC. IcaB is the cell surface-located enzyme that catalyzes the partial deacetylation of N-acetylglucosaminyl residues (291). The partial deacetylation of PIA/PNAG seems to be crucial for its virulence potential, because an icaB mutant was significantly less persistent in a model of foreign body-associated infection in mice (291).

In a mouse model as well as a rat model of device-related infections, a PIA/PNAG-negative mutant was significantly less pathogenic than its wild type, delineating the role of PIA/PNAG as an important pathogenicity factor (260, 295, 296). A study analyzing the pathogenic features of strains isolated from polymer-associated septicemic disease compared with saprophytic skin and mucosal isolates revealed that biofilm production and the presence of the ica operon essentially correlated with the disease isolates (297).

Interestingly, the icaADBC genes were also identified in a collection of biofilm-forming S. lugdunensis clinical isolates (298). However, despite the presence of the ica gene cluster, the biofilms produced by the S. lugdunensis isolates were sensitive to protease treatment but resistant to dispersin B and sodium metaperiodate, which dissolve polysaccharides. Moreover, by using a PIA/PNAG-specific antibody or wheat germ agglutinin, the authors could not detect PIA/PNAG, strongly suggesting that S. lugdunensis biofilm formation is mediated predominantly by protein factors rather than by PIA/PNAG (298). Another study also indicated that biofilm formation, PIA/PNAG production, and the presence of the ica locus do not seem to correlate among clinical S. lugdunensis isolates and other CoNS species, such as S. capitis, S. hominis, and S. warneri (299).

(ii) Proteinaceous adhesins.

Biofilm accumulation in S. epidermidis may also be mediated by proteins. Thus, Bap and the Bap-homologous protein Bhp may confer accumulative growth (see above) (253). A biofilm-defective mutant was shown to lack a 140-kDa surface protein, the accumulation-associated protein Aap. Aap is essential for biofilm accumulation on polymeric surfaces in certain S. epidermidis strains (300, 301). Biochemical and functional properties clearly differentiate Aap from other factors known to mediate biofilm production. Aap can induce accumulative growth in a completely PIA/PNAG-independent manner and was found to be highly prevalent among clinical S. epidermidis strains (229, 302, 303). Aap contains a domain A within its N-terminal portion, which is followed by a repeat domain B. The latter is characterized by a variable number of repeats with 128 amino acids each, which mediate cell-to-cell adhesion and biofilm accumulation. Interestingly, the repeat domain B becomes active as an intercellular adhesin only upon removal of the Aap domain A via proteolysis, mediated by either endogenous staphylococcal or host proteases (229). Aap-based intercellular adherence is dependent on the divalent cation Zn2+, and a “zinc zipper” mechanism was implicated for the interaction of the Aap B repeats, which are also designated G5 domains, on neighboring cells (304, 305). Upon transmission electron microscopic evaluation, Aap turned out to have a fibrillar structure, which might explain its function (306). Moreover, analysis of the crystals of a Zn2+-bound construct from the self-associating region of Aap recently provided the basis of the structure of Zn2+-dependent biofilm accumulation of S. epidermidis (307). Antibodies against S. epidermidis Aap inhibit biofilm formation to some extent, indicating that Aap may be a vaccine candidate for reducing S. epidermidis biofilm infections (308). Formerly, it was suggested that Aap plays a role in biofilm accumulation via attaching PIA/PNAG to the bacterial surface. Although Aap clearly can confer accumulative growth in a completely PIA/PNAG-independent manner, an additional mechanism involving PIA/PNAG cannot be ruled out, considering that the G5 domains represent potential N-acetylglucosamine recognition domains (305).

The giant S. epidermidis protein Embp (see above) not only binds to fibronectin but also mediates biofilm accumulation (267).

Biofilm detachment.

Upon biofilm maturation, individual bacteria or clusters of bacteria may dissociate and disperse via the bloodstream. Following this step, further locations in the body may be colonized by circulating bacteria, leading to metastasis of infection. The disintegration of biofilms may be mediated by different mechanisms, such as a variety of extracellular enzymatic activities or the so-called phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs).

(i) Extracellular enzymes.

Biofilm detachment may be mediated by different enzymes conferring breakdown of the complex matrix that allows cells to stick together. Depending on the chemical composition of the respective macromolecules gluing the cells together, enzymes such as proteases (cleaving proteins, such as Bap, Aap, and Embp), sugar hydrolases (disintegrating PIA/PNAG), or nucleases (disintegrating eDNA) are likely to participate.

The Gram-negative pathogenic bacterial species A. actinomycetemcomitans synthesizes an extracellular polysaccharide, the linear β-(1,6)-N-acetylglucosamine PGA, which is a macromolecule composed similarly to PIA/PNAG (292). Interestingly, A. actinomycetemcomitans produces a sugar hydrolase, termed dispersin B, which can degrade PGA (292). Moreover, dispersin B can disintegrate S. epidermidis biofilms formed by clinical isolates (292, 309). However, no such enzyme seems to be present in S. epidermidis.

eDNA is another significant macromolecule found in staphylococcal biofilms (232, 247, 310). Hence, the presence of a nuclease reduces the production of S. aureus biofilms and induces the dispersal of biofilms that preexisted (232). Thus, the secretion and activity of staphylococcal nucleases may also contribute to biofilm detachment. Indeed, it was recently demonstrated that the secreted thermonuclease Nuc has an inhibitory effect on S. aureus biofilm development (311). Additionally, a second thermonuclease, Nuc2, also limits the biofilm formation of S. aureus, at least under certain in vitro conditions (312, 313). In contrast to S. aureus, in S. epidermidis, DNase I merely reduces biofilm production and cannot disintegrate preexisting biofilms (232). Therefore, because of protein and polysaccharide factors involved in S. epidermidis accumulation, nucleases may predominantly affect initial adherence to a surface and detach only young biofilms. However, some studies showed that in many cases of staphylococcal biofilms, the bacterial cells are held together by protein factors and teichoic acids rather than by PIA/PNAG (314, 315). In these cases, treatment with DNase I and protease dissolved the biofilms, although sometimes only partially (315317). Thus, eDNA has a stabilizing function in PIA/PNAG-negative backgrounds, highlighting the importance of nucleases in biofilm detachment in ica-independent biofilm formation. The protease-dependent dispersal of S. aureus biofilms depends on the function of the regulatory QS system agr (318). Although a role for S. epidermidis proteases in the detachment of S. epidermidis biofilms has not been confirmed so far, a contribution of such proteases to biofilm detachment seems likely.

The gene encoding the 27-kDa extracellular serine protease GluSE, also known as SspA or Esp, has been cloned and sequenced (319321). Surface-attached S. epidermidis cells were found to produce GluSE, while planktonic cultures were not, indicating a possible role for GluSE in S. epidermidis colonization and tissue damage (321). However, it was recently reported that Esp produced by commensal S. epidermidis strains interferes with the biofilm production of S. aureus and its colonization of the anterior nares and that purified Esp is able to disassemble preformed S. aureus biofilms (42). Moreover, there is a correlation between the colonization of the anterior nares of healthy individuals by S. epidermidis producing Esp and the absence of colonizing S. aureus bacteria, suggesting a mechanism of bacterial interference (42). Another study indicated that S. epidermidis Esp interferes with S. aureus biofilm production by degrading a variety of proteins, among them specific proteins associated with S. aureus biofilms, i.e., FnBPA/FnBPB, protein A, Eap, and Emp (322). Additionally, Esp seems to interfere with host-pathogen interactions, as it cleaves fibrinogen, fibronectin, and vitronectin (322). Furthermore, Esp was shown to degrade Atl-associated bacteriolytic activities, thereby preventing the release of eDNA as a main component of the biofilm matrix and mediator of initial adherence (323325).

Additional or alternative S. epidermidis proteases may be involved in proteolytic degradation of protein factors mediating attachment and intercellular adhesion, and thus in biofilm detachment of S. epidermidis. Possible proteases involved include the following: an extracellular metalloprotease with elastase activity, SepA, whose gene has been cloned and sequenced (326, 327); an extracellular serine protease, EpiP, that is involved in epidermin processing (324); and an extracellular cell wall-associated cysteine protease with elastase activity (Ecp) (319, 328) (see below).

However, although all factors mentioned above play a proven or potential role in biofilm detachment or dispersal in vitro, in vivo proof demonstrating the involvement of the respective factors in such functions in animal models has been lacking.

(ii) PSMs.

Another strategy that leads to biofilm disintegration depends on the synthesis and release of small peptides called phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs). PSMs are short, amphipathic peptides which are secreted in an agr-controlled manner (see below) (329). They were first described as proinflammatory agents in S. epidermidis (330). According to their length, PSMs can be divided into α-type peptides, which are approximately 20 to 25 amino acids long, and β-type peptides, which are 40 to 45 amino acids long. In S. epidermidis, five α-type PSMs (PSMα, PSMγ, PSMδ, PSMε, and PSM-mec) and two β-type PSMs (PSMβ1 and PSMβ2) have been identified (331). PSMγ consists of 25 amino acids and was identified as δ-toxin. The δ-toxin is encoded by hld, which is a component of the regulatory agr system (see below), and it differs from the S. aureus δ-toxin in only three amino acids (332). The recently discovered PSM-mec peptide is encoded by some SCCmec elements that cause methicillin resistance (333).

A preliminary indication that PSMs are involved in preventing biofilm formation came from the investigation of a significant number of S. aureus clinical strains with respect to their agr phenotype (production of δ-toxin) and the ability to form a biofilm. It turned out that the δ-toxin-negative and, consequently, agr-defective strains predominantly built biofilms, delineating the importance of agr in biofilm production (334). Externally adding δ-toxin to biofilm-positive strains suppressed biofilm formation. Because of their amphipathic nature, PSMs probably act as surfactants, thereby leading to biofilm dispersal (335). Indeed, a recent study indicated that the β-type PSMs promoted the structuring and dispersal of S. epidermidis biofilms in vitro as well as in vivo, in a murine catheter-associated infection model (336).

Internalization by and Persistence in Host Cells

Internalization by nonprofessional phagocytes.

As already widely accepted for S. aureus, CoNS may also be ingested by human host cells, leading to evasion of the patient's immune defense and antibacterial therapy by “hiding” within nonprofessional phagocytes. It was recently demonstrated that AtlE not only binds to host factors but also mediates S. epidermidis adherence to and internalization by human endothelial cells, representing the first and possibly sole internalization mechanism employed by CoNS (337).

S. epidermidis strains were also shown to be internalized by bone cells (338). However, in contrast to S. aureus, S. epidermidis orthopedic device infection strains exhibited only a low internalization rate (compared to commensal, nasal carriage isolates), suggesting that bone cell invasion is not a major pathophysiological mechanism in S. epidermidis orthopedic device infections (339).

For S. saprophyticus, internalization by a human urinary bladder carcinoma cell line was reported (340).

Intracellular persistence—the SCV concept.

The term “small-colony variant” (SCV) reflects a specific phenotype resulting from a switch from the normal (wild-type) phenotype (see Clinical Significance and Infections). SCVs have been described for several Gram-negative and Gram-positive species. While most work has been done on S. aureus SCVs (216), similar general characteristics may be assumed for SCVs of CoNS.

Irrespective of the species, the SCV phenotype is characterized by drastic changes in cellular metabolism, reflected by a reduced growth rate and substantial quantitative and qualitative modifications of the transcriptome, metabolome, and proteome (341343). These changes determine the auxotrophism expressed by almost all SCV isolates (344348). Metabolic changes also influence the colonial morphotype of SCVs, which are characterized by tiny colonies, reduced or lost pigmentation, and hemolysis compared to their wild-type counterpart (216).

Their intracellular location provides a survival niche in the host environment, shielding SCVs from host defenses and, additionally, from antimicrobial agents (347, 349351). The resulting habitation in an intracellular environment necessitates an adaptation to the anaerobic milieu (341). Moreover, virulence and pathogenic behaviors are modified; for instance, S. epidermidis mutants displaying the SCV phenotype demonstrated augmented expression of PIA (222).

Interference with the Human Immune System

Cell wall components.

A serious consequence of S. epidermidis FBRIs is septicemia. In the pathophysiology of inflammatory events in septicemia, the production of cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-6, plays a major role. Cell wall components, such as peptidoglycan and teichoic acid purified from S. epidermidis, stimulated human monocytes to release TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6 in a concentration-dependent manner (352). Further studies demonstrated that human serum strongly increased peptidoglycan-induced TNF-α release by human monocytes (353).

Factors involved in biofilm formation.

A recent study investigated the contributions of different mechanisms involved in biofilm accumulation, i.e., PIA/PNAG and the proteinaceous adhesins Aap and Embp, to interference with the phagocytosis of S. epidermidis and the activation of mouse J774A.1 macrophages (231). Although marked morphological differences were noticed, depending on the factor mediating accumulative growth, PIA/PNAG, Aap, and Embp were similarly efficient in protecting S. epidermidis against phagocytosis. Additionally, biofilm-positive S. epidermidis strains induced a considerably lower inflammatory J774A.1 macrophage response than that with respective isogenic biofilm-negative mutants, leading to significantly reduced NF-κB activation and reduced IL-1β production (231).

Earlier phagocytosis assays revealed that biofilm-associated, PIA/PNAG-producing S. epidermidis cells were more resistant to killing by neutrophils or human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) than their planktonically grown, ica-negative counterparts (354, 355). Characterization of the underlying mechanisms revealed that a reduced deposition of IgG and complement on the cell surface of PIA/PNAG-positive S. epidermidis cells contributes to the biofilm-mediated protection of S. epidermidis against killing by PMNs (354). Furthermore, the partial deacetylation of PIA/PNAG mediated by IcaB determined its biological activity in immune evasion, since it was essential for resistance to phagocytosis by PMNs and to human antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (291).

The importance of PIA/PNAG as an immunoprotective factor has also been studied in a Caenorhabditis elegans infection model (356). In this model, a PIA/PNAG-producing S. epidermidis wild-type strain has a significant survival advantage in the worm intestinal tract compared to its ica-negative mutant. This advantage, however, is found only with wild-type C. elegans, not with immunocompromised C. elegans. Moreover, immunocompromised nematodes are equally sensitive to S. epidermidis wild-type and ica deletion strains, suggesting that PIA/PNAG enhances virulence by providing immunoprotection during colonization of the C. elegans intestine (356).

Antibodies against the LPXTG-containing surface protein SdrG/Fbe significantly increased macrophage phagocytosis and reduced the severity of systemic infections; SdrG/Fbe was therefore suggested as a potential vaccine candidate (357). Furthermore, SdrG/Fbe inhibited thrombin-induced fibrinogen clotting by interfering with the release of fibrinopeptide B (278). It was suggested that the reason for the fibrinogen-binding activity of SdrG/Fbe might be to inhibit the release of chemotactic elements, such as fibrinopeptide B. This may limit the influx of phagocytic neutrophils, thereby helping the bacteria to survive in the host.

Extracellular enzymes.

Extracellular enzymatic activities not only may be involved in biofilm detachment (see above) but also may determine the establishment of an infection and aid in the survival of bacteria in the host by enabling bacteria to invade host tissues and to evade host defense systems, respectively. In this regard, CoNS have developed multiple mechanisms, including the production of a variety of extracellular proteins and enzymes, such as lipases, proteases, esterases, and phospholipases, as well as the production of hemolysins and other toxins.

In particular, proteases may play an important role in (i) proteolytic inactivation of host defense mechanisms, such as antibodies, platelet microbicidal proteins, and AMPs; and (ii) the destruction of tissue proteins, thus causing increased invasiveness. The extracellular serine protease Esp can degrade a wide spectrum of proteins, including complement protein C5 and fibrinogen, thereby providing S. epidermidis with the ability to evade the complement defense system and to dysregulate the coagulation cascade (320, 322). The 33-kDa extracellular metalloprotease SepA has a high capacity to inactivate AMPs by proteolytic cleavage (326, 327) and also significantly promotes S. epidermidis resistance to killing by PMNs (331). Moreover, Ecp, an extracellular cell wall-associated cysteine protease with elastase activity from S. epidermidis, degrades—among other proteins—human elastin, fibrinogen, and fibronectin; it is assumed to be a virulence factor that contributes to the colonization and infection of human tissue (319, 328).

Two homologous lipases (GehC and GehSE1, from S. epidermidis strains 9 and RP62A, respectively) exhibit a high degree of similarity (97.8% identical deduced amino acids); they are hypothesized to be involved in skin colonization (358, 359). Most S. epidermidis strains seem to possess two lipase genes. The second lipase gene, gehD, encodes a mature protein of approximately 45 kDa which is 51% identical to GehC (360).

PSMs.

Aside from their function in biofilm detachment, PSMs (see above) induce cytokine release and stimulate NF-κB production in cells of macrophage lineage (330). Furthermore, in human neutrophils, PSMs induce cellular degranulation, prime cells for an enhanced respiratory burst, and inhibit spontaneous apoptosis (361). PSMs are also chemoattractants for both neutrophils and monocytes (361). Because of these pronounced proinflammatory properties, PSMs may contribute to sepsis caused by S. epidermidis. The production of PSMs is controlled by the agr QS system (see below). In contrast to its parental strain, an agr mutant did not produce any of the PSM peptides (362). Moreover, the agr mutant failed to induce the production of TNF-α by human myeloid cells and displayed significantly reduced induction of neutrophil chemotaxis. Therefore, an agr QS mechanism was proposed that facilitates growth and survival in infected patients by adapting production of the proinflammatory PSMs to the stage of infection (362). Some PSMs also exhibit moderately cytolytic activity (see below).

Aggressive Capacities

Compared to S. aureus, CoNS are characterized by low aggressiveness. Thus, either no or rather lowly aggressive virulence factors have been described for CoNS. Moreover, CoNS are still not generally accepted as producers of toxin superantigens.

Cytolytic toxins.

While some S. epidermidis PSMs are related to those of S. aureus, with a marked capacity for lysing human neutrophils, S. epidermidis has, in general, a less cytolytic potential. Nevertheless, S. epidermidis produces cytolytic toxins, such as the δ-toxin (PSMγ), which acts by forming pores in the cell membrane, leading to the lysis of erythrocytes and other mammalian cells (332). PSMγ is suggested to be involved in necrotizing enterocolitis of neonates (363). Other α-type PSMs with cytolytic activities include PSMε and the potent leukocyte toxin PSMδ (331). In contrast, β-type PSMs are much less cytotoxic (331, 336). Thus, S. epidermidis has the potential to produce an effective cytotoxin; however, the production of strongly cytolytic PSMs is low, explaining why culture supernatants of S. epidermidis have little or no capacity to lyse PMNs (331). These data indicate that the strategy of S. epidermidis to evade the human immune system depends on passive defense mechanisms mediated by enzymatic activities, such as the protease SepA that cleaves AMPs, rather than on being an aggressive pathogen that produces a variety of potent cytotoxins, as in the case of S. aureus (331).

PTSAgs and exfoliative toxins.

The capability of CoNS to possess members of the pyrogenic toxin superantigen (PTSAg) family, comprising staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1), has been a matter of debate since the report of a TSS case in 1986, with the recovery of vaginal and labial CoNS isolates which were not specified (364). However, these isolates and other presumed TSST-1-positive CoNS were later found not to be able to produce TSST-1 (365). Later, upon application of PCR technology, clinical CoNS isolates were shown not to harbor classical PTSAg-encoding genes (sea to see and tst) (366, 367). Thus, so far, reasonable data are lacking to confirm the secretion of detectable amounts of classical PTSAgs in a significant proportion of CoNS isolates recovered from human specimens, or their involvement in clinical cases of TSS or food poisoning (365, 368). However, an S. epidermidis isolate from a human source was recently shown to harbor a pathogenicity island (SePI) containing genes encoding the SEC variant SEC3 and the SE-like toxin L (SElL) (369). Some reports of CoNS with PTSAg production have been published for isolates recovered from animal or food specimens (370, 371). However, other food- and animal-related studies failed to detect PTSAg-equipped CoNS (372, 373). In general, cross-reactivities of immunological assays and possible misidentifications in the premolecular era may hinder an accurate assessment of respective study results. For detailed information on the staphylococcal PTSAg family itself, please see the review recently published in this journal (368). Clinical CoNS isolates possessing exfoliative toxins have not been reported so far.

Production of Lantibiotics

In particular, commensal staphylococci are known to produce antibiotic-like peptides that also fulfill the criteria for bacteriocins, namely, the so-called lantibiotics (374). Lantibiotics belong to the class of cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAMPs) and are active against Gram-positive bacteria. Their production may play a considerable role in bacterial interference on skin and mucous membranes, thereby creating an ecological niche for S. epidermidis and other CoNS. These antibiotic peptides contain the rare, nonproteinogenic thioether amino acids lanthionine and/or methyllanthionine, hence their designation as “lanthionine-containing antibiotic peptides,” i.e., lantibiotics (375). Type A lantibiotics induce pores in the cytoplasmic membrane. Lantibiotics produced by S. epidermidis are the well-characterized epidermin and Pep5. Later, epilancin K7, epidermicin NI01, and epicidin 280 were identified. Further lantibiotics produced by CoNS were detected in S. gallinarum (gallidermin), S. hominis (hominicin), and S. warneri (nukacin ISK-1) (374).

Regulation of Pathogenic Processes

Knowledge concerning the regulation of S. epidermidis virulence factors has increased significantly in recent years. For S. epidermidis, 2 QS systems, the agr (accessory gene regulator) (376, 377) and luxS/AI-2 systems (378), have been reported. Another global regulator controlling S. epidermidis pathogenicity factors is the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar) locus. The expression of agr and sar is influenced by the alternative transcription factor σB, which is the global regulator of stress responses in many bacterial species. Furthermore, various other regulators were recently identified.

QS in staphylococcal biofilms.

QS systems are bacterial cell-cell communication systems in which small pheromone peptides or autoinducing peptides (AIPs) are used to communicate. At low cell densities, the concentration of AIPs is low. With increasing cell densities, the concentration of AIPs becomes elevated. The QS system is induced by the activation of a transcriptional regulator when a certain AIP threshold concentration is reached, which typically occurs in the late exponential growth phase. The transcriptional regulator then regulates the expression of the target genes, which may be up- or downregulated.

(i) The accessory gene regulator (agr) QS locus.

The regulatory factor of the staphylococcal agr QS system is an RNA, called RNAIII, that also encodes the gene for δ-toxin (PSMγ) (see above). RNAIII regulates the transcription of virulence genes, i.e., it stimulates the expression of extracellular pathogenicity determinants, such as enzymes, toxins, and PSMs, and downregulates the expression of CWA proteins (376). The components of the agr QS system and their features and functions have been described previously in great detail (376, 379).

agr homologues have also been identified in other CoNS and CoPS, such as S. intermedius, S. warneri, and S. lugdunensis (376, 380382). The similarity among the agr systems of S. aureus and S. epidermidis is considerable. Nevertheless, the sequences of S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and S. lugdunensis AIPs are not very similar and differ in length.

The process of staphylococcal biofilm production is influenced by agr in a versatile manner. Generally, the agr QS system downregulates biofilm production: S. epidermidis as well as S. aureus agr mutants build stronger biofilms than those of the respective wild types (329, 334, 383, 384). Furthermore, agr transcription is considerably repressed during biofilm accumulative growth of S. epidermidis (335). Congruently, it was observed that agr mutants are found more often among disease strains causing FBRI (35%) than among strains from human volunteers (5%). This implicates that a nonfunctional agr system increases the chance of causing an S. epidermidis infection associated with foreign bodies (384). The stronger biofilm-forming capacity of the agr mutant of S. epidermidis correlated with an elevated production of AtlE and subsequently increased adherence to polystyrene (see above) (329). Increased biofilm formation could also be explained by a decreased detachment rate, as thicker biofilms of the agr mutant may result from a lack of upregulation of different genes involved in biofilm detachment, such as proteases, nucleases, and PSMs, by agr (318, 362, 376).

The regulatory mechanisms controlling the colonization factors seem to differ in S. aureus and S. epidermidis: in S. aureus, agr downregulates some CWA proteins, while in S. epidermidis, several CWA proteins are produced to a larger extent in the stationary phase (271). Observed, partially conflicting findings may result from different experimental settings (385).

The function of the staphylococcal agr system in the growth phase-dependent regulation of protein synthesis and biofilm formation may be summarized as follows. In an early stage of infection, cell density is low and surface and surface-associated proteins with adhesive functions are expressed, allowing attachment to biotic and abiotic surfaces. Upon proliferation of the cells on a surface, AIPs accumulate and eventually reach the critical concentration necessary for the activation of RNAIII synthesis. RNAIII then downregulates the expression of surface protein genes (although species-specific differences exist) and upregulates the production of PSMs, proteases, nucleases, and lipases, which facilitates the maintenance of the infection and/or biofilm detachment.

(ii) The luxS/AI-2 system.

Many Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria harbor the luxS QS system. In S. epidermidis and S. aureus, luxS codes for the synthesis of a furanone derivative called autoinducer AI-2 (378, 386). AI-2 is synthesized growth dependently, predominantly in the exponential growth phase. Mutation of S. epidermidis luxS resulted in a phenotype similar to that observed with the mutation of agr: the luxS mutant built a thicker biofilm than its parental counterpart. The S. epidermidis luxS system downregulates the production of biofilm via repressing the icaADBC operon as demonstrated by transcriptional analysis. Consequently, the luxS mutant revealed increased PIA/PNAG synthesis in comparison with its parental strain (378). For comparison, expression of icaADBC and synthesis of PIA/PNAG are not affected by agr. Furthermore, the luxS mutant had a more pronounced capability to colonize and to initiate disease in a CVC-associated rat model of infection (378). luxS also controls the expression of pathogenicity-related factors, such as PSMs and lipase, suggesting that the increased biofilm production in the luxS mutant may be due, at least partially, to less synthesis of PSMs and, consequently, a diminished biofilm detachment rate. The luxS QS system has a pronounced effect on biofilm production and virulence in S. epidermidis but not in S. aureus (386). Therefore, at least in the case of S. epidermidis, the known QS systems agr and luxS repress biofilm formation.

The staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar) locus.

The Sar family of transcriptional regulators includes at least 12 paralogs in S. aureus, among them SarA. A global regulator, sarA, controls exoprotein synthesis by modulating the expression of agr. SarA of S. epidermidis is very similar (84% identical amino acids) to the SarA protein of S. aureus (387). SarA is a positive regulator of S. epidermidis biofilm production by direct binding to the icaA promoter region, thereby inducing icaADBC expression and subsequent PIA/PNAG production (388, 389). Recently, additional mechanisms of sarA-dependent biofilm regulation have been identified. Inactivation of sarA in S. epidermidis led to an induction of biofilm formation, probably via at least two distinct mechanisms (390): first, the expression of the giant extracellular matrix binding protein Embp, conferring intercellular adhesion, is induced in the sarA mutant; and second, the expression of the metalloprotease SepA may also be induced in the sarA mutant, which would lead to the elevated processing of AtlE and thus, indirectly, to the increased availability of autolysin-dependent eDNA and subsequent biofilm formation (390). Thus, SarA represents a key element inversely controlling PIA/PNAG-dependent and PIA/PNAG-independent mechanisms of biofilm formation (390). Other Sar paralogs recently identified in S. epidermidis include SarZ and SarX (391, 392). SarZ is highly homologous to SarZ from S. aureus and is a positive regulator of both phases of biofilm formation: initial attachment and PIA/PNAG-mediated biofilm accumulation (391). Furthermore, sarZ influences the expression of other pathogenicity factors, such as proteases and lipases, and plays a role in biofilm-associated infections (391). SarX has also been identified as a positive regulator of biofilm production of S. epidermidis, primarily via elevating icaADBC transcription and PIA/PNAG synthesis (392).

The sigma factor B (sigB) operon.

Many bacterial species express various alternative sigma factors when adapting gene expression to changing environmental conditions. Like S. aureus, S. epidermidis encodes the alternative sigma factor σB (393, 394). The gene encoding σB is part of an operon (sigB operon). Inactivation of rsbU, which is a required activator of σB, led to a biofilm-negative phenotype due to dramatically decreased PIA/PNAG production (394). Ethanol and salt stresses are both known activators of σB. However, the presence of ethanol in the growth medium of the rsbU mutant completely restored biofilm formation, whereas salt stress did not. Thus, different regulatory mechanisms seem to be involved in S. epidermidis PIA/PNAG production in response to ethanol and salt stress. Further results indicated that icaR, which codes for a negative regulator of icaADBC transcription, might be responsible for this differential regulation (395). Recent analysis indicated that the decreased expression of the icaADBC operon in a sigB mutant is mediated via upregulation of IcaR (389).

LABORATORY DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION

The isolation and cultivation of CoNS are relatively easy and straightforward, as is also the identification of frequently encountered CoNS species. From a diagnostic and clinical point of view, it is an essential requirement to make a clear and valid distinction between CoNS species and CoPS species, with the latter being overwhelmingly S. aureus in human clinical specimens. Species-level identification of CoNS associated with infection, especially in the case of a pure culture, has become customary (396). Among CoNS, the accurate recognition of S. lugdunensis is of particular importance.

The standard approach for detection and identification includes culturing on a nonselective blood agar plate as well as in enrichment broth, followed by biochemical and other related procedures, including the use of commercial systems for identification purposes. Today, biochemical identification approaches are increasingly being replaced by the application of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).

The most challenging problem in CoNS diagnostics is the assessment of their clinical relevance. Thus, the major diagnostic task is to assess whether a given CoNS isolate represents (i) a contamination of the specimen during sampling and processing, (ii) physiological colonization of the skin or mucous membranes, or (iii) clinically significant infection. This challenging situation becomes even more complicated in the case of polymicrobial infections by CoNS, particularly for the choice of antibiotics for therapy if the isolates exhibit different susceptibility patterns. Finally, this cardinal diagnostic and clinical dilemma can be solved only with close cooperation between clinicians and microbiology laboratory specialists.

In the following section, only the main aspects of the detection and identification of CoNS are given; for further details, please refer to respective textbooks and manuals (396398).

Isolation

Standard procedures.

Regardless of the species, Columbia or tryptic soy blood agars containing 5% defibrinated sheep (or horse) blood are the primary culture plates used for the isolation of staphylococci from clinical specimens. The recovery rate can be increased by the simultaneous use of an enrichment broth (e.g., dextrose broth), with streaking onto blood agar after 24 and 48 h of growth. Usually, growth of most CoNS species occurs within 18 to 24 h. Isolates displaying the SCV phenotype, in contrast, often need about 48 to 72 h to display visible colonies.

Specific procedures for detection of foreign body-related infections.

(i) Quantitative approaches for catheter-related bloodstream infections.

Since clinical findings alone have limited sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of CRBSIs, various semiquantitative or quantitative laboratory techniques have been developed. The traditional approach, i.e., the semiquantitative roll-plate catheter culture, necessitates that the distal segment of the central venous catheter be cut and rolled across the surface of a Columbia blood agar plate at least four times. After overnight incubation, a colony count of ≥15 CFU/plate may indicate catheter colonization (399). To detect bacteria not only from the external surface but also from the intraluminal surface, the catheter can be flushed with broth. Alternatively, by counting the absolute number of CFU per volume, examination of paired quantitative blood cultures drawn simultaneously from the catheter and a peripheral vein overcomes the necessity of catheter removal. This approach has been enhanced by the analysis of differential time to positivity (400, 401). CRBSI is probable if the catheter sample becomes positive first and the time difference between both samples is ≥2 h. A pooled sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 87%, respectively, were found in a meta-analysis of this approach (402).

(ii) Implant-associated infections.

Detachment of biofilms from an implant surface by sonication may improve the diagnosis of the respective FBRI. For explanted hip and knee prostheses, the culture of samples obtained by sonication of prostheses was more sensitive than conventional periprosthetic tissue culture, particularly for patients who had received antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to surgery (403). Also, for other implants, such as removed electrophysiological cardiac devices and spinal and breast implants, an advantage of sonication prior to culturing has been shown (404406).

Identification

The application of the extensive and labor-intensive scheme originally published by Kloos and Schleifer in 1975, and subsequently supplemented several times (407), has been replaced in clinical microbiology laboratories by commercial identification systems based on biochemical procedures, including the use of (semi)automated systems. Nowadays, routine pathogen diagnostics are turning to MALDI-TOF MS approaches. In addition, nucleic acid-based molecular methods have become standard, in particular for the verification of ambiguous identification results.

However, it still makes sense to test the basic criteria for the identification of CoNS: Gram-positive, catalase-positive, mostly oxidase-negative (for exceptions, see Fig. 3), coagulase-negative, and facultative anaerobic cocci occurring mainly in clusters. This holds true in particular for plausibility control purposes or in the case of ambiguous results, if doubts arise as to whether a given isolate belongs to the genus Staphylococcus or the CoNS group, respectively.

Direct examination of specimens.

As with all staphylococci, CoNS are Gram-positive, nonmotile, non-spore-forming cocci. They are usually arranged in pairs or tetrads but also occur singly, in irregular (grape-like) clusters, or in short chains of about three or four cells. Direct microscopic examination may be helpful for analyzing normally sterile fluids (e.g., cerebrospinal fluid and joint aspirates).

Colony morphology and variation.

Typically, most CoNS species display nonpigmented, smooth, entire, glistening, and opaque colonies. Strong slime producers may display a mucoid colony appearance. After 2 to 3 days of incubation, colony diameter reaches 3 to 6 mm. More or less gray-yellow, yellow, or yellow-orange pigmented colonies are a characteristic of the following CoNS species: S. chromogenes, S. devriesei, S. lugdunensis, S. sciuri, S. vitulinus, S. warneri, and S. xylosus. Other CoNS species may show a kind of yellowish pigmentation. Some CoNS species (e.g., S. haemolyticus and S. lugdunensis) display a hazy or distinct zone of beta-hemolysis around the colonies (Fig. 5).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

Sections of Columbia blood agar plates showing grayish, hemolytic colonies of S. haemolyticus (the color of this photograph was modified to enhance visibility of the weak hemolysis zones [arrows] surrounding the colonies, resulting in a nonnatural reddish tinge) (A); orange, nonhemolytic colonies of S. chromogenes (B); creamy, nonhemolytic colonies of S. lugdunensis (C); and whitish, nonhemolytic colonies of S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus (D).

SCVs of CoNS, like those of S. aureus, are characterized by pinpoint colonies reaching only 10% of the size of the wild-type colonies (216). The colonies are mostly less or nonhemolytic and less or nonpigmented (Fig. 6). Note that they often give the appearance of a mixed culture because colonies displaying the normal phenotype and those exhibiting the SCV phenotype coexist. Upon subculture, SCVs may remain stable or revert to the wild type (408). Normal growth may be restored if the isolate is grown in the presence of the components involved in their auxotrophy, such as hemin, menadione, and thymidine, and/or with CO2 supplementation (216).

FIG 6.

FIG 6

Columbia blood agar plate showing an isogenic S. epidermidis strain pair displaying both the normal (arrows) and SCV (dashed arrows) phenotypes. The normal phenotype (NP) on this plate was the result of a spontaneous reversion of the SCV back to the NP.

Separation of CoNS from S. aureus and other coagulase-positive or coagulase-variable staphylococci by classical approaches.

The traditionally used approach in the clinical laboratory for the differentiation of S. aureus (but more precisely, all CoPS) and CoNS is the tube test, based on the clotting of plasma by extracellular free staphylococcal coagulase that converts fibrinogen to fibrin. The detection of the cell wall-bound—historically also designated “coagulase”—clumping factor by the slide agglutination test is obsolete due to low sensitivity and specificity.

To overcome these limitations and the long incubation time of the tube coagulase test, rapid latex and hemagglutination assays allowing presumptive identification of S. aureus have been developed based on the detection of clumping factor, protein A, and capsule types 5 and 8. These recent, so-called third-generation tests are characterized by a higher sensitivity (>98 to 100%) and somewhat lower specificity (72 to 99%) than those of earlier assay generations (409). In particular, coagulase-negative but clumping factor-positive species, such as, in particular, S. lugdunensis, but also S. schleiferi subsp. schleiferi, S. sciuri subsp. carnaticus, and S. sciuri subsp. rodentium, may be responsible for the lower specificity (410). Lowered specificity may be the result of false-positive reactions occurring with some CoNS strains, due to their possessing, for example, the type 8 capsular polysaccharide as known for S. haemolyticus and S. hominis isolates (411, 412). The frequency of isolation of CoNS that express these capsular types has been shown to be about 2% and 16% for human and livestock isolates, respectively (413). For S. epidermidis, high expression of a noncapsular, proteinaceous antigen may give false-positive agglutination test results (412). Testing of S. saprophyticus strains may also result in a false-positive outcome due to a specific cell wall hemagglutinin (414).

Grouping of CoNS by novobiocin testing.

In the case of CoNS isolates recovered from urinary tract specimens, testing for resistance to novobiocin (415) is routinely and almost exclusively used as a simple approach to distinguish the intrinsically resistant organism S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus from other clinically important CoNS of the S. epidermidis group. Other novobiocin-resistant CoNS (Table 2) are rather seldom found in human-derived specimens. The method used is based on the disc diffusion test, using a 5-μg novobiocin disc on Mueller-Hinton agar or tryptic soy-sheep blood agar (for details, see reference 396).

Differentiation by biochemical and related procedures, including the use of commercial systems.

Subsequent to the era of classical tests for fermentation, oxidation, degradation, and hydrolysis of various substrates, i.e., the Kloos and Schleifer classification schema and its amendments in the case of staphylococci (407), commercial manual and automated biochemical test systems dominated the laboratory landscape for some decades. These systems are still a cornerstone of many routine laboratories and comprise the following: Staphylococcus-specialized API Staph and ID32 Staph strips (bioMérieux, La Balme Les Grottes, France) and the Rapidec Staph (bioMérieux) system, as well as more general systems, such as Vitek 2 (bioMérieux), the Pos ID Panel family (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL), the BBL Crystal identification system's Rapid Gram-Positive ID kit (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, MD), the Phoenix automated microbiology system (BD Diagnostic Systems), and the Biolog systems (Biolog, Hayward, CA). The Sherlock microbial identification system (MIDI, Newark, DE) combines cellular fatty acid analysis with computerized high-resolution gas chromatography.

These systems are fairly successful at differentiating common CoNS, such as S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and S. saprophyticus, while the accurate identification of less common species, especially S. hominis and S. warneri, is more variable (89, 416420). For some of these systems, reliability depends on the performance of additional tests as recommended by the manufacturers. Their accuracy of identification is about 70 to >90%. However, these assays may have also failed to distinguish commonly encountered CoNS species, in particular if isolates were recovered from livestock and food or if uncommon strains were isolated (89, 419, 421). This also holds true in the case of the differentiation of phenotypic variants (422).

The testing of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in clinical samples appears to be a promising future tool for the noninvasive detection and monitoring of infectious diseases; it is based on VOC biomarker profiles representing metabolites of both the infecting pathogen and pathogen-induced host responses (423). VOC-based procedures for CoNS may be relevant, for example, for the detection of S. saprophyticus in urine samples.

Identification by nucleic acid-based approaches.

Nucleic acid-based assays specifically designed for direct CoNS detection from clinical specimens are not available on the market, with the exception of those kits developed for the PCR-based detection of pathogens directly from blood, such as the LightCycler SeptiFast test MGRADE (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Note that a semiquantitative analytical cutoff value for CoNS has been set in this assay to avoid false-positive results due to CoNS contamination during blood sampling procedures. One could speculate that these CoNS-adjusted multiplex PCR assays might underreport CoNS, particularly for patient groups where CoNS-positive findings frequently indicate true bloodstream infections, such as neutropenic hematological patients and preterm newborns (424).

For the identification of cultured CoNS, several nucleic acid-based approaches have been developed and evaluated based on amplification, hybridization, and sequencing procedures.

(i) Amplification-based methods.

Overwhelmingly, in the case of CoNS, conserved regions with embedded species-specific sequences of universally occurring genes are amplified, followed by sequencing and analysis of the part(s), allowing differentiation at the species or subspecies level. Note that the validity of results depends strongly on the quality of the database used for sequence analysis (422). Universal targets commonly used for CoNS identification by PCR plus sequencing comprise ribosomal genes (16S and 23S rRNA genes and their spacer sequences), the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-encoding gene (gap), the gyrase gene (gyrA), the manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase gene (sodA), the RNA polymerase beta subunit gene (rpoB), the elongation factor TU gene (tuf), and the gene for a 60-kDa heat shock protein (HSP60/GroE) (422, 425432). Sequencing of partial rpoB gene sequences was shown to be superior to partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing for the differentiation of Staphylococcus subspecies (432). Several commercial tests are available, mainly for the molecular verification of cultured S. aureus isolates, which often also allow the detection of the mecA and toxin genes. Additionally, some of these are able to identify some of the most clinically relevant CoNS (e.g., GenoType Staphylococcus and GenoType MRSA tests [Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany], the StaphPlex panel [Qiagen, Germantown, MD], AccuProbe S. aureus culture [Gen-Probe, San Diego, CA], and the S. aureus Evigene test [AdvanDx, Woburn, MA]).

(ii) Oligonucleotide microarrays.

Microarray-based diagnostics may combine the advantages of high-throughput screening with the possibility of the identification of different genes useful for species determination and, in parallel, the identification of a multitude of virulence, drug resistance, and subtype-determining signatures. These assays have been tested successfully on clinical isolates (433, 434).

(iii) Nucleic acid hybridization approaches (PNA FISH).

A qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay (S. aureus/CNS PNA FISH; AdvanDx) targeting rRNA gene sequences, based on peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH), has been developed for the rapid identification of S. aureus and several CoNS species in smears prepared from positive blood cultures (435).

Identification by spectroscopic and spectrometric methods.

Spectroscopic methods, such as Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and Raman spectroscopy, offer an alternative approach for the rapid identification of staphylococci (436). This nondestructive technology also allows discrimination between phenotypes, as shown for the SCV phenotype (408).

Comparable to the introduction of PCR, but with many fewer infrastructure requirements and much less necessity of specific skills, MALDI-TOF MS has become a revolutionary new diagnostic tool, leading to a fundamental shift in routine microbiological diagnostics (437). In contrast to DNA amplification-based approaches, which never became established in routine practice, MALDI-TOF will soon be implemented as a routine technique for the universal identification of microorganisms, including for CoNS differentiation. This rapid, high-throughput diagnostic approach is based on peptidic spectra obtained by molecular weight determination for individual, specific fragments. The capability of this method for valid identification has been demonstrated in the last few years for many microorganisms, including staphylococcal species. Most studies have reported specificities of >97% for the identification of staphylococci, including CoNS, at the species level (438, 439). To reach this high specificity, the quality of the database and the standardization of variable parameters, such as culture conditions, are crucial.

Another method for high-throughput identification and further molecular characterization is an approach coupling PCR technology, based on universal and target gene-specific primer sets, to electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) (440).

Reporting and Interpreting the Isolation and Identification of CoNS

The main question to be answered in the reporting of CoNS recovered from a clinical specimen is whether their detection reflects a true infection or only contamination or colonization. Since in our experience a large proportion of the patient population with presumed false-positive CoNS findings is treated with antimicrobial agents, additional costs of treating patients and, in particular, unnecessary antibiotic selection pressures occur (441).

Factors helpful in the prediction of true infections include the isolation of a strain in pure culture from the infected site and the repeated isolation of the same strain over the course of an infection (1, 396, 442, 443). To reduce the misclassification of nosocomial BSIs due to CoNS, the following algorithm was defined: at least two blood cultures positive for CoNS within 5 days or one positive blood culture plus clinical evidence of infection (444). This was corroborated by a 3-year retrospective cohort study based on data prospectively collected through hospital-wide surveillance; this revealed that a single positive blood culture, if associated with signs of sepsis, should also be considered clinically relevant (445). In a prospective study, multivariate analysis-based predictors of clinically significant CoNS bacteremia included the following: time to positivity of <16 h, identification of S. epidermidis, presence of CVC, more than two CoNS-positive bottles from different blood culture sets, and relevant clinical scores (446). The best algorithm (sensitivity, 62%; specificity, 93%; positive predictive value, 83%; and negative predictive value, 81%) for determining the clinical significance of CoNS in this study comprised a Charlson score of ≥3, a Pitt score of ≥1, neutropenic patients, presence of CVC, identification of S. epidermidis, and time to positivity of <16 h (446). For further details and strategies (e.g., measurement of time to positivity, in the case of blood cultures, and sampling strategies for the detection of low-grade FBRIs), refer to diagnostic textbooks (396398).

ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY

In regard to resistance to antibiotics and disinfectants, one can divide CoNS into two main groups: (i) those that “haven't seen a hospital from the inside” and are susceptible to the usually administered or applied agents and (ii) those that have been exposed to antibiotic selection pressure in the health care environment. This holds analogously true for animal-adapted strains and their contact with veterinary medicine and/or abuse of antimicrobial agents in husbandry. For clinical CoNS isolates, our sharpest and most efficient weapon—the bactericidal β-lactams—has become progressively blunt. This deteriorating situation is further aggravated by the phenomenon of multiresistance.

Resistance Mechanisms and Susceptibility Patterns

In previous decades, a continuous loss of susceptibility toward most of the available antibiotics was recorded for CoNS. Strong and sometimes dramatic increases in the percentage of resistant isolates were noted particularly for penicillin, oxacillin, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and gentamicin (447449). A selection of recent studies concerning the percentage of resistant CoNS is given in Table 5. For newer compounds without or with just recently established interpretative criteria, examples of CoNS studies analyzing their MIC values are listed in Table 6. Note that given the reduced susceptibility breakpoints for CoNS (with the exception of S. lugdunensis) specified in past years by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), susceptibility categorization of older studies may underreport the resistant parts of CoNS populations (450, 451).

TABLE 5.

Percentages of clinical CoNS isolates categorized as antibiotic resistant toward various antibiotic agents

Parameter Value or description in study for given speciesa
Hellmark et al., 2009 (499)
Mendes et al., 2010 (497)b
Putnam et al., 2010 (543)
Kresken et al., 2011 (75)c
Mendes et al., 2012 (64)
Gordon et al., 2012 (65)d
Barros et al., 2012 (573)
Flamm et al., 2013 (534)e
Zhanel et al., 2013 (496)
S. epidermidis MS-CoNS MR-CoNS CoNS S. epidermidis S. haemolyticus S. epidermidis S. epidermidis S. haemolyticus MS-CoNS MR-CoNS MS-SE MR-SE
Study design parameters
    No. of isolates 33 420 1,388 2,510 148 102 71 100 64 278 483 475 85
    Country Sweden Europe Europe Worldwide Germany Germany USA USA Brazil USA USA Canada Canada
    Source PJI Diverse Diverse Mainly BSI, also cSSSI Diverse Diverse Mainly BSI Diverse Mainly BSI Diverse Diverse Diverse Diverse
% Resistant isolates
    Penicillin ND ND ND ND 91.1/88.0/94.6 95.9/93.9/93.1 ND 98.0 95.3 ND ND ND ND
    Oxacillin 84 0.0 100.0 76.4 82.7/83.1/85.5 90.4/90.9/89.2 73.2 79.0 87.5 0.0 100.0 0.0 100.0
    Gentamicin 79 5.5 58.8 ND 65.5/56.3/60.8 80.8/84.8/87.3 40.8 46.0 73.4 3.6 24.6 34.7 78.8
    Erythromycin 67 35.7 72.3 66.1 ND ND 69.0 86.0 64.1 39.9 68.3 ND ND
    Clindamycin 67 5.5 37.3 33.4 ND ND 40.9 74.0 46.9 13.0 34.6 37.6 86.7
    Q/D ND 0.0 1.6 0.5 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Clarithromycin ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 64.4 84.7
    Ciprofloxacin 79 ND ND ND ND ND 70.4 ND 71.9 23.0 61.1 47.2 96.5
    Levofloxacin ND 8.6 67.9 54.1 ND ND ND 77.0 ND 21.9 59.6 47.0 95.6
    Moxifloxacin 64 ND ND ND 42.3/52.1/47.3 57.5/51.5/60.8 ND ND ND ND ND 39.0 94.1
    SXT 82 9.1 48.6 ND ND ND 47.9 73.0 53.1 20.1 44.7 33.9 80.0
    Chloramphenicol ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 25.0 ND ND ND ND
    Fusidic acid 39 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Rifampin 39 ND ND ND ND ND ND 35.0 10.9 ND ND ND ND
    Doxycycline ND ND ND ND 10.1/9.2/6.1 12.3/12.1/5.9 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Tetracycline ND 10.5 19.9 ND ND ND 11.3 18.0 18.7 7.6 18.6 ND ND
    Tigecycline 0 ND ND ND 0.0/0.0/0.7 1.4/4.5/0.0 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0
    Daptomycin 3 0.0 0.1 0.0 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0
    Linezolid 0 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.0/0.0/0.0 0.0/0.0/0.0 18.3 2.0 ND 0.4 1.7 0.0 0.0
    Vancomycin 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0/0.0/0.0 0.0/0.0/0.0 0.0 ND ND 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    Teicoplanin ND 3.3 (0.0)f 12.2 (0.5)f 0.4 ND ND ND ND ND 0.0 0.0 ND ND
    Mupirocin ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 7.8 ND ND ND ND
a

Abbreviations: ND, not done; Q/D, quinupristin-dalfopristin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; SE, S. epidermidis; MS, methicillin susceptible; MR, methicillin resistant; BSI, bloodstream-related infection; cSSSI, complicated skin and skin structure infection; PJI, prosthetic joint infection.

b

Besides those for other and unidentified CoNS species, mainly S. epidermidis (n = 953), S. haemolyticus (n = 114), S. hominis (n = 176), S. lugdunensis (n = 25), S. saprophyticus (n = 30), S. warneri (n = 36), and S. xylosus (n = 24) data have been included. Only EUCAST interpretative criteria-based data are given; for CLSI criteria-based data, see the relevant publication.

c

Data are shown for three collection periods, as follows: 2005/2007/2009.

d

Data are shown only for isolates characterized as most disseminated.

e

For methicillin-susceptible CoNS, besides those for other and unidentified CoNS species (n = 188), mainly S. capitis (n = 15), S. epidermidis (n = 57), S. haemolyticus (n = 5), S. hominis (n = 6), and S. warneri (n = 5) data are shown; for methicillin-resistant CoNS, besides those for other and unidentified CoNS species (n = 330), mainly S. epidermidis (n = 102), S. haemolyticus (n = 5), S. hominis (n = 10), S. lugdunensis (n = 18), and S. saprophyticus (n = 6) data are shown.

f

Percentages given in parentheses show prevalences according to CLSI interpretative criteria.

TABLE 6.

In vitro activities of clinical CoNS isolates toward newer antibiotic agents

Parameter Value or description in study for given speciesa
von Eiff et al., 2005 (500)
Kratzer et al., 2007 (525)
Hellmark et al., 2009 (499)
Karlowsky et al., 2011 (501, 526)
MS-SE MR-SE MS-SH MR-SH MS-SE MR-SE S. epidermidis MS-SE MR-SE
Study design parameters
    No. of isolates 14 21 17 15 15 87 33 83 (501), 202 (526) 19 (501), 34 (526)
    Country Germany Germany Germany Germany Austria Austria Sweden Canada Canada
    Source Diverse Diverse Diverse Diverse BSI of BMTRs BSI of BMTRs PJI Diverse Diverse
MIC90, MIC range
    Ceftaroline ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.25, ≤0.12–0.5 0.5, 0.25–1
    Ceftobiprole 0.5, 0.13–1 2, 0.5–4 0.5, 0.13–1 4, 1–4 ND ND 1.5, 0.094–1.5 1.0, ≤0.06–2 2, 1–4
    Linezolid 1.0, 0.5–1 1, 0.5–1 1, 0.5–1 1, 0.5–1 ND ND 0.25, 0.047–0.38 1, ≤0.12–2 (501), and 1, ≤0.12–2 (526) 1, 0.5–1 (501), and 1, 0.25–1 (526)
    Daptomycin ND ND ND ND 0.25, <0.01–0.25 0.25, <0.01–0.5 ND 0.25, ≤0.03–0.25 (501), and 0.25, ≤0.03–1 (526) 0.25, 0.12–0.25 (501), and 0.25, 0.12–0.5 (526)
    Tigecycline ND ND ND ND 0.5, 0.06–0.5 0.5, <0.01–0.5 0.25, 0.047–0.5 0.5, ≤0.03–0.5 (501), and 0.5, ≤0.03–0.5 (526) 0.25, 0.06–0.25 (501), and 0.25, 0.06–0.5 (526)
    Dalbavancin ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.047, 0.003–0.047 0.06, ≤0.03–1 0.06, ≤0.03–0.06
    Telavancin ND ND ND ND ND ND ND 0.5, ≤0.06–1 0.5, 0.12–1
a

Abbreviations: ND, not done; SE, S. epidermidis; SH, S. haemolyticus; MS, methicillin susceptible; MR, methicillin resistant; PJI, prosthetic joint infection; BMTRs, bone marrow transplant recipients; BSI, bloodstream-related infection.

CoNS of both animal and human origins are thought to represent an important reservoir of genetic elements leading to resistance not only to the β-lactam antibiotics but also to other antibiotic classes. This is of the utmost importance for human and veterinary medicine, because these genetic elements are mobile by nature. Thus, they may transfer into the medically most significant staphylococcal species, S. aureus, leading to problems related to the emergence of MRSA as seen after the introduction of the penicillinase-stable penicillins.

Resistance to β-lactamase activity.

Highly penicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (S. albus) isolates, responsible for fatal subacute bacterial endocarditis, were being reported as early as 1949 (452). This phenotype is caused by penicillinases, first described by Kirby in 1944 (453). They represent a plasmid-mediated staphylococcal β-lactamase encoded by the blaZ gene. Penicillinases show specificity for penicillins and act via hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring. Today, as a result of huge selection pressures, CoNS isolated from clinical specimens are significantly more resistant to single-antibiotic and biocidic compounds, often appearing as multiresistant isolates, and penicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus isolates occur only very rarely (<10%) among isolates recovered from hospitalized patients (75, 454).

Resistance to β-lactams by expression of an additional penicillin-binding protein.

In staphylococci, including CoNS species, the expression of an additional penicillin-binding protein (PBP), designated PBP2a (or PBP2′), leads to complete β-lactam resistance (to penicillins, most cephalosporins, and carbapenems), with the only exception being recently introduced cephalosporins with MRSA activity, such as ceftobiprole and ceftaroline. The reason for this is that PBP2a has considerably reduced binding affinities for β-lactam antibiotics, in contrast to the intrinsic set of staphylococcal PBPs (PBP1 to -4) (455). In contrast to the simply structured molecular background of penicillinase genetics, the molecular organization of staphylococcal β-lactam resistance is much more complex and is characterized by an increasingly recognized diversity spanning polymorphisms at the gene level to the composition of the responsible mobile genetic element, the SCCmec element, and its relatives within the large SCC family (Fig. 7). Shortly after the introduction of the first penicillinase-stable penicillin as a therapeutic agent in the early 1960s, about 10% of S. epidermidis (S. albus) isolates tested resistant to methicillin (marketed as “celbenin” or “staphcillin”) (456). Today, the vast majority of clinical CoNS isolates possess SCCmec elements.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

Highly simplified schema (not true to scale) of the composition of the SCC family integrated into the S. aureus chromosome (blue). Some examples of various SCC types, including those organized in composite islands, are given. Basic structures comprise the mec gene complex (red), the ccr gene complex (yellow), and the joining regions (gray). Some SCCs additionally contain (i) resistance operons acting against antibiotic agents (violet), such as fusidic acid (fusC); (ii) resistance operons for metalloids and transition metals with toxic/bactericidal properties (green), such as arsenic (ars), cadmium (cad), copper (copB and copC), and mercury (mer); (iii) virulence genes (brown), such as the capsule polysaccharide gene (cap1); (iv) other genes (orange), such as the genes composing the arginine catabolic mobile element (arc), the copper-translocating P-type ATPase gene (copA), and the potassium-transporting ATPase genes (kdp); (v) further penicillin-binding protein 4 (PBP4) genes (pink), such as pbp4; and (vi) pseudogenes.

(i) The mec gene polymorphism.

PBP2a is encoded by the mecA gene, which is part of a mobile genetic element designated SCCmec (457). Once detailed characterization of PBP2a structure and function became available at the end of the 1980s (458, 459), proteins with very similar characteristics were described for CoNS (460). As a few homologs of the mecA gene became known, this warranted a proposed nomenclature revision (461) (Table 7). Results of bioinformatic analysis of the mecA gene polymorphisms revealed 32 unique alleles that clustered into four distinct branches (462). Forming one branch, the vast majority of all methicillin-resistant CoNS isolates (and the common MRSA lineages) contain the “classical” mecA gene. Two further branches correspond to allotypes of the mecA gene, which have been described for subspecies of S. sciuri (mecA1) and for S. vitulinus (mecA2) among animal-derived isolates (Table 7) (463465). Both members of the S. sciuri species group have been proposed as the origin and/or reservoir of the S. aureus mecA gene (465, 466). Note that although the mecA1 gene is ubiquitously present among S. sciuri strains, these strains are uniformly susceptible (or heterogeneously resistant) to β-lactams (463, 467, 468). The same holds true for the branch that includes mecA alleles from S. vitulinus and for some S. capitis and S. kloosii isolates (462). Only the upregulated form, in isolates with a mutation or an IS element in the mecA1 promoter region, showed resistance to β-lactams (465). For intrinsically resistant S. fleurettii, it is known that the mecA gene (mecASf) is located on the chromosome not associated with an SCCmec element (465). However, it is postulated that the original chromosomal locus contained by S. fleurettii must have served as the template for the mec gene complex, which may have then combined with a mecA gene-free SCC element in other staphylococcal species.

TABLE 7.

Overview of mecA homologues and prototype strains according to the classification of the IWG-SCC

Proposed new designationa Reported gene name (reference) Prototype strain Strain origin Size (bp) % Identityb
mecA mecA (477) S. aureus N315 Human (Japan) 2,007 100
mecA Staphylococcal strains that carry mecA Diverse hosts and sources 2,007 98.3–100
mecASf (465) S. fleurettii SFMP01 (CCUG 43834T) Goat (goat milk cheese) NDc 99.8
mecA1 mecA (mecA1) (463) S. sciuri subsp. carnaticum K11d Cattle (veal leg, sliced) 2,001 79.1
mecAs, mecASs (465, 466) S. sciuri subsp. rodentium ATCC 700061 Norway rat 2,001 80.2
mecA2 mecA (464) S. vitulinus CSBO8c Horse 2,007 91
mecB mecAm (626) M. caseolyticus JCSC5402c Domestic chicken (skin swab) 2,025 61.6
mecC mecALGA251 (470) S. aureus LGA251c Cattle (bulk milk sample) 1,998 68.7
mecC1 mecC1 (474) S. xylosus S04009 Bovine mastitis 1,997 69.9d
mecC2 mecC2 (475) S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus 210 Common shrew 1,998 92.9e
a

According to the proposed nomenclature for reporting novel mecA gene homologues (461), as follows: mec gene type, ≥70% nucleotide sequence identity with the respective prototype (hitherto described genes are mecA, mecB, and mecC); and mec gene allotypes, ≥70% to <95% nucleotide sequence identity to the respective mec gene prototype strains, designated with a numeral based on the chronological order of discovery (e.g., mecA1, mecA2, and mecC1).

b

Unless otherwise stated, percent identity with the mecA gene in S. aureus N315.

c

ND, no data given.

d

Percent identity with the mecA gene of S. aureus MRSA252. The gene has 93.5% nucleotide identity to mecC in S. aureus LGA251.

e

Percent identity with the mecC sequence of S. aureus LGA251. The gene has 94.5% identity to the mecC1 sequence of S. xylosus S04009.

Regarding the other known mec types, Macrococcus caseolyticus strains isolated from chicken meat were found to harbor a mec homolog, now categorized as mecB (Table 7) (469). The mecC gene represents the fourth of the hitherto known phylogenetic branches of the mec genes, comprising isolates that have been detected in the past few years in MRSA (SCCmec type XI) strains isolated from diverse human, livestock, and wildlife sources (470472); one mecC CoNS isolate (probably S. stepanovicii) was also recovered from a Eurasian lynx (473). A hybrid SCCmec-mecC element, consisting of SCCmec type VII, which carries mecA, and a separate mecC region, was recently found in two S. sciuri subsp. carnaticus isolates (468). For S. xylosus, a mecC gene allotype, designated mecC1, was described. However, the isolate was phenotypically oxacillin susceptible due to a truncation of PBP2a by frameshift mutation (474). Another mecC allotype, mecC2, was recently reported for methicillin-resistant S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus (475).

(ii) SCCmec diversity.

The mec genes are harbored by an SCCmec mobile genetic element inserted into the chromosome (457) (Fig. 7). This cassette is composed of three major elements: the mec gene complex, the ccr gene complex, and the joining (“junkyard” or J) regions. The mec gene complex comprises the mecA gene itself and, when present, its regulatory genes, mecI (a repressor) and mecR1 (a sensor inducer), as well as an insertion sequence, IS431mec (476478). The cassette chromosome recombinase genes ccrAB and ccrC encode site-specific integrases catalyzing the integration or excision of the entire SCCmec into or from the orfX locus at its 3′ end in the staphylococcal genome (476).

As discovered in the past few years, the intra-SCCmec diversity is enormous and very complex. This holds true not only for the J regions (J1 to -3), which contain diverse virulence, resistance, and other genes, as well as pseudogenes, and which vary in length, but also for the mec and ccr gene complexes essential for the function of the SCCmec. To describe an MRSA or MR-CoNS strain in terms of its SCCmec composition, a complex nomenclature has been established by the International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC) (479).

To date, 11 types and several subtypes have been reported for the SCCmec element. In CoNS, SCCmec types III, IV, and V, either alone or in various combinations, are the most prevalent types (62, 6971) (Table 8). In particular for MR-CoNS, a highly diverse population of SCCmec elements has been discovered, and it can be assumed that the assortment of SCCmec types and subtypes will be enlarged further.

TABLE 8.

Occurrence of SCC elements in a selection of CoNS species

CoNS species Source(s) SCCmec (sub)type(s)a [reference(s)]
S. capitis Humans, dogs I, IA, II, III, IV, IVa, V, NT (627630)
S. cohnii Humans, dogs NT (629, 630)
S. chromogenes Humans IV (630)
S. epidermidis Humans, cats, dogs, horses, pigs, poultry I, IIa, IIb, III, III (variant), IV, IVa, IVb, IVc, IVd, IVe, IVg, V, VI, NT (63, 70, 627635)
S. haemolyticus Humans, cats, horses, pigs I, II, II.1, III, III (variant), IV, V, NT (70, 627630, 632, 634637)
S. hominis Humans, dogs, pigs I, III, IV, NT (627630, 633635)
S. lentus Cattle, goats, sheep III (631)
S. pasteuri Pigs IVc (634)
S. rostri Pigs III, IVa, NT (634)
S. saprophyticus Humans III, NT (498, 638)
S. sciuri Humans, cattle, goats, pigs, sheep I, III, IIIA, V, VII, NT (468, 627, 631, 634)
S. warneri Humans, dogs, pigs, fish food IV, IV.1, IVb, IVE, NT (629, 632634, 637)
S. xylosus Cattle III, XIb (474, 631)
a

NT, nontypeable and/or novel nondesignated types.

b

Harbors the mecC gene or its allotype (mecC1).

(iii) SCC family variety.

SCCmec is part of a unique SCC family with an increasingly recognized structural diversity (Fig. 7). Besides the SCCmec elements, characterized by the possession of both mec and ccr gene complexes, other, diverse elements occur that lack one or both of these complexes (480). (i) SCC elements such as SCC12263, which was found in S. hominis, possess a ccr complex but lack mecA (481). For S. hominis and S. haemolyticus, it was shown that these species might contain many other potential SCC elements as putative reservoirs of SCCmec structural elements (482, 483). (ii) As a result of deletion events or representing precursors of known SCCmec elements, pseudo (Ψ)-SCCmec elements harbor mecA but lack the ccr gene complex; an example is the S. xylosus ΨSCCmecS04009 element, which carries the class E mec gene complex, similar to type XI SCCmec, but lacks the ccr gene complex and both J regions (474). (iii) Elements lacking both ccr and mec genes have been designated ΨSCC elements. They are part of many different composite islands and can be differentiated into the following three groups: (i) arginine catabolic mobile elements (ACMEs); (ii) SCC-like elements, chromosome cassettes, or SCCmec insertion site genomic sequences; and (iii) SCCmec remnants (480). ACMEs are highly prevalent among CoNS strains and are characterized by genetic diversity, with intact or truncated forms (454, 484486). There is evidence for an interspecies transfer of ACME from S. epidermidis into an MRSA USA300 clonal lineage (485).

SCC elements, including their pseudo-elements, often carry additional antibiotic resistance genes, mostly as part of integrated transposons and plasmid copies (e.g., pbp4 and erythromycin, tetracycline, spectinomycin, and fusidic acid resistance-encoding genes). Moreover, genes mediating resistance to metalloids and transition metals with toxic/bactericidal properties, such as arsenic, cadmium, copper, and mercury, have frequently been found in SCC elements of S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and other staphylococcal species (Fig. 7) (74, 472, 487490). In addition, other genes or loci, such as those involved in virulence, colonization, transmission, and cell wall synthesis, have been detected in these elements (484, 485, 488, 491).

(iv) Methicillin resistance.

In comparing S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus, publications from the 1980s reported high percentages of methicillin-resistant isolates of both species, but an even higher prevalence of MR S. haemolyticus strains exhibiting higher MICs (492). Since then, the percentage of MR-CoNS has continuously increased. For instance, over the course of a 20-year study (1986 to 2005) in Zurich, Switzerland, the percentage of MR-CoNS isolates recovered from burn patients increased from 11% to 55% (493). Comparing CoNS isolates (n = 2,905) recovered in 2001 from the SSTIs of hospitalized patients in the United States and four European countries, the proportion of CoNS resistance to oxacillin varied from 51.4% in France to 75.2% in the United States (494). In recent studies, the prevalence of clinical S. epidermidis and, in particular, S. haemolyticus isolates resistant to oxacillin has now reached about 80% or more (Table 6) (65, 75, 495). In contrast, in healthy persons in northern Sweden, a near absence of oxacillin resistance was reported, and isolates of common hospital-associated clones of multidrug-resistant S. epidermidis were not found (66). As occurs with MRSA, oxacillin-resistant CoNS isolates are, in general, more often multiresistant than oxacillin-susceptible isolates (496, 497).

In contrast to S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus, other clinically important CoNS are mostly less resistant to oxacillin. In a Japanese study, mecA-positive S. saprophyticus was found in 7.9% of mostly nonisogenic isolates recovered from the genitourinary tract (498); however, in other studies, a much higher rate of resistant isolates was found (495). For S. lugdunensis, for which a different susceptibility breakpoint has been defined, 7.9% of isolates were categorized as resistant in an international study (495).

(v) Susceptibility to anti-MRSA cephalosporins.

The so-called “fifth-generation” cephalosporins with MRSA activity comprise ceftobiprole and ceftaroline fosamil. Ceftobiprole was approved for use in Switzerland and Canada, but sales were—possibly temporarily—discontinued in response to regulatory recommendations not to approve this substance in the United States and the European Union. Ceftaroline is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI), respectively, and by both authorities for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

A ceftobiprole MIC range of 0.094 to 1.5 mg/liter was reported for S. epidermidis isolates from PJIs (499). MIC ranges of 0.13 to 1 and 1 to 4 μg/ml were found for isolates of S. haemolyticus categorized as methicillin susceptible (MS) and resistant (MR), respectively (500). Also for S. epidermidis, a tendency for higher ceftobiprole MIC values was noted (501, 502). In a large U.S. hospital study, ceftaroline demonstrated potent in vitro activity against CoNS (MIC90, 0.5 μg/ml), including those CoNS that tested methicillin or linezolid resistant (each MIC90, 0.5 μg/ml) or daptomycin nonsusceptible (MIC range, 0.03 to 0.12 μg/ml) (503). In a Canadian multicenter study, ceftaroline demonstrated a 2-fold greater potency against MR S. epidermidis than against MRSA (501). In this study, 83 MS and 19 MR S. epidermidis isolates displayed low MIC range values when tested for ceftaroline (≤0.12 to 0.5 and 0.25 to 1 μg/ml, respectively) and ceftobiprole (≤0.06 to 2 and 1 to 4 μg/ml, respectively).

Resistance to glycopeptides, lipopeptides, and lipoglycopeptides.

The exact mechanism of glycopeptide resistance among CoNS is still unclear. Heterogeneous susceptibility profiles, including reduced susceptibility for teicoplanin, may suggest some general predisposition to an intrinsic resistance to this antibiotic class (504). Three phenomena leading to therapy failure after administration of glycopeptides have been discovered or postulated, mostly for S. aureus. (i) The first phenomenon is the development of so-called vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) isolates and putative precursor subpopulations, termed heterogeneous VISA (hVISA) strains (505). Since VISA isolates may also be resistant to teicoplanin, the term glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA and hGISA, if heterogeneous) is also used. Their complex resistance mechanisms include cell wall alterations, resulting in reorganization and thickening, in addition to reduced autolytic activity (506508). Furthermore, hVISA and VISA may represent a bacterial evolutionary state favoring persistence in the environment of the host (509). Also, cell wall thickening has been reported for glycopeptide-resistant CoNS (S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus) (510, 511). Some glycopeptide-resistant CoNS may possess an excess of glycopeptide-binding sites by virtue of the overproduction of cell wall peptidoglycan material (512). Thus, one can consider that the basic mechanisms leading to a reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides may be similar in CoNS and S. aureus. (ii) In 2002, the first vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA; also designated glycopeptide-resistant S. aureus [GRSA]) strains containing the vanA gene were reported in the United States (513). Up to the present, van gene-possessing S. aureus isolates, all of the vanA type, have been found infrequently (513). Presently, the significance of a recent report on highly vancomycin-resistant CoNS isolates (13/15 isolates had MICs of ≥256 mg/liter, as tested by Etest) recovered in 2006 from the saliva of migratory songbirds in Kansas is unknown (514). Of potential importance, 6 of these 15 CoNS isolates (S. succinus [n = 5] and S. saprophyticus [n = 1]) were characterized as harboring van genes (vanA [n = 5] and combined vanA, vanB, and vanC [n = 1]). The S. saprophyticus isolate was vanA positive. These highly mobile wild songbirds may act as a vector to spread vancomycin resistance genes over a wide area (514). A recent observation of 3 isolates carrying vanA and vanB1 genes, which were detected by PCR within a collection of 30 S. epidermidis isolates from ICU patients in Kampala, Uganda, needs further corroboration (515). (iii) A phenomenon called “vancomycin MIC creep” was postulated to describe an overall population drift in clinical S. aureus isolates toward reduced vancomycin susceptibility, but with MIC values that are still below the susceptibility breakpoint (516, 517). This issue is a matter of debate, since other studies noted no changes or even reductions in vancomycin MIC values (518, 519). So far, the creep phenomenon has not been reported for CoNS. A Swedish study analyzing bloodstream isolates of S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus isolated from hemato-oncological patients did not show any statistically significant increase of vancomycin MIC values during the 3-decade study period (1980 to 2009) (520).

Following the introduction of vancomycin into clinical practice in 1958, clinical CoNS isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin did not come to widespread attention for more than 2 decades, until the 1980s (521, 522). During this time, resistant S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus isolates were reported long before the advent of the first S. aureus isolates with reduced glycopeptide susceptibility, in 1997 (523). Both species have been found to be the commonest CoNS species exhibiting reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides (524). However, despite extensive, unabated vancomycin use, the vast majority of CoNS isolates tested have been shown to still be susceptible to vancomycin (64, 75, 495497, 499, 501, 525527). In an Italian study of BSI-related CoNS (of these, 77% were MR-CoNS), 87/1,609 (5.4%) isolates displayed reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides; of these, 11 S. epidermidis and 2 S. haemolyticus isolates were proven to be causative BSI microorganisms (528).

Including clinical isolates of S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus isolated from patients with hematological malignancies, no long-term glycopeptide MIC creep was observed over a period of 3 decades; however, a standard Etest was used for MIC determinations (520).

Early studies certified comparable activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin (teichomycin) against CoNS, some with lower MIC values (529). With time, it became evident that teicoplanin-resistant CoNS isolates were more common than those exhibiting resistance to vancomycin. In addition to some earlier reports on evaluated teicoplanin MICs (530), the first teicoplanin-resistant CoNS were reported in 1986 among a selection of methicillin-resistant S. haemolyticus strains isolated in the United States (Charleston, SC) between 1980 and 1985 (531). The first (clinically silent) case associated with a teicoplanin-resistant S. haemolyticus isolate, obtained from a pacing wire tip, was later reported (532). In the same year, a letter describing a real clinical case due to an S. epidermidis isolate from a patient with peritonitis undergoing CAPD was published (533). Nowadays, in the very large, worldwide SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2002 to 2010) study, 0.4% of all CoNS isolates tested were teicoplanin resistant (MIC90, 8 mg/liter; MIC range, ≤2 to >16 mg/liter) (495). Comparable results were attained in other studies if tests were conducted according to CLSI criteria (497, 534). Notably, in testing the same isolates according to EUCAST interpretative criteria, higher resistance percentages were found for teicoplanin (e.g., CLSI/EUCAST percentages for MS-CoNS isolates, 0.0%/3.3%; and those for MR-CoNS isolates, 0.5%/12.2%) (497). However, study populations with a higher prevalence of teicoplanin-resistant isolates have been reported, such as in a recent Polish study (16.2% teicoplanin resistance; MIC90, 4.0 mg/liter; MIC range, 0.094 to 8.0 mg/liter) (535). In a collection of clinical MR S. epidermidis strains (n = 300), most of which were contaminants of blood cultures or noninvasive colonizers, a total of 55% were found to be resistant to teicoplanin (536). This French study found that the prevalence of teicoplanin resistance increased in S. epidermidis/MR S. epidermidis, from 7.2%/20% in 2000 to 30.4%/60.9% in 2004, with a peak of 46.1%/84.4% in 2003, while there was a very low prevalence of teicoplanin resistance in S. aureus/MRSA during the same time (range, 0.9% to 2.8%/2.7% to 6.7%). In a United Kingdom study, 20.8% of all CoNS isolates tested (n = 1,214) were not susceptible to teicoplanin, but only one vancomycin-intermediate CoNS isolate was found (537). The percentage of teicoplanin-resistant CoNS isolates recovered within 1 year in an Italian prospective case-control study that enrolled 535 patients with CoNS bacteremia was 8% in intensive care units and 3% and 2% in medical and surgical wards, respectively (524). Only one isolate in this study exhibited resistance to both vancomycin and teicoplanin. Overall, S. haemolyticus shows a kind of predisposition among CoNS to acquire resistance to glycopeptides, and within this antibiotic class, teicoplanin exhibits less satisfactory MICs than those of vancomycin.

For daptomycin, a bactericidal, cell membrane-targeting cyclic lipopeptide, diverse but not fully elucidated mechanisms leading to resistance have been assumed and have been studied mostly in S. aureus. Through the accumulation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in several gene loci, especially the multipeptide resistance factor gene (mprF) and the yycFG components of the yycFGHI operon, cell membrane phenotypic changes occur in addition to other perturbations of the cell membrane (538, 539). Also, modifications of the cell wall, including increased cell wall teichoic acid production, enhanced expression of the dlt operon, which is involved in d-alanylation of cell wall teichoic acids, and progressive cell wall thickening, may contribute to daptomycin resistance (539541). Daptomycin demonstrated high activity against more than 20 CoNS species, as shown in a study of more than 22,000 isolates from 42 countries as part of the SENTRY program (2002 to 2010) (495). In that study, daptomycin inhibited 99.8% (MIC90, 0.5 mg/liter) of isolates. A substantial number of isolates with an MIC above the susceptibility breakpoint (1 mg/liter) were found for S. sciuri only (13/46 isolates [28.3%]); low or marginal numbers were noted for S. auricularis (4.9%), S. warneri (1.2%), S. capitis (1.0%), S. saprophyticus (0.4%), S. hominis (0.2%), and S. epidermidis (<0.1%). Species having the highest MIC values for both glycopeptides in that study, such as S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and S. xylosus, were very susceptible to daptomycin (495). Bloodstream isolates of S. epidermidis from bone marrow transplant patients showed an MIC90 of 0.25 mg/liter for daptomycin (525).

For lipoglycopeptides, potent in vitro activity against S. epidermidis isolates, regardless of their susceptibility to methicillin, was shown in a comparative review summarizing several studies (MIC90 values [MS S. epidermidis/MR S. epidermidis] were as follows: dalbavancin, 0.06/0.06 mg/liter; oritavancin, 0.05/0.05 mg/liter; and telavancin, 1.0/1.0 mg/liter); the review demonstrated lower lipoglycopeptide MIC values than those of vancomycin (MIC90 values [MS S. epidermidis/MR S. epidermidis], 2.0/4.0 mg/liter) (542). For PJI-associated S. epidermidis isolates, an MIC range of 0.003 to 0.047 mg/liter was reported for dalbavancin (499). In a global study comprising 2,510 CoNS isolates, the telavancin MIC90 was 0.25 mg/liter, which was lower than those of both vancomycin (2 mg/liter) and teicoplanin (8 mg/liter) (543). However, CoNS that had reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and resistance to teicoplanin presented a ca. 2-fold, species-unrelated reduction in susceptibility to telavancin, but still within an MIC range of 0.25 to 0.5 mg/liter (544).

Resistance to oxazolidinones.

After many decades, the oxazolidinone linezolid represented the first (and so far only) of a novel antibiotic class available on the market with activity against Gram-positive microorganisms, including staphylococci. So far, three mechanisms have been discovered that result in oxazolidinone resistance in staphylococci: (i) successive accumulation of single point mutations in the linezolid 23S rRNA (domain V)-binding site in at least two copies of the rRNA gene operons; (ii) rarely, mutations in the rplC and rplD genes, encoding the 50S ribosomal proteins L3 and L4, respectively, of the peptide translocation center of the ribosome; and (iii) acquisition of the plasmid-borne ribosomal methyltransferase gene, cfr, leading to posttranscriptional methylation of adenosine at position 2503 of 23S rRNA in the large ribosomal subunit (545548). Point mutations in the 23S rRNA gene (e.g., G2447T, T2504A, C2534T, and G2576T) as an underlying mechanism leading to linezolid resistance have also been found for S. epidermidis and other CoNS (549551).

In contrast to the first two mechanisms, cfr-mediated resistance is of serious concern, due to its possible high horizontal transfer capability, its origin from animal-associated staphylococcal species, and its association with a PhLOPSA phenotype, exhibiting resistance to several antibiotic classes, including phenicols, lincosamides, oxazolidinones, pleuromutilins, and streptogramin A (552). A multicity outbreak of a cfr-containing linezolid-resistant S. epidermidis strain has already been reported (553). An isolate has been described in Spain with cooccurrence of all three mechanisms leading to linezolid resistance (554). To date, more than seven different cfr-carrying plasmids and several types of chromosomal cfr segments have been identified in CoNS (e.g., S. cohnii, S. lentus, S. saprophyticus, S. simulans, and S. warneri) isolates recovered mostly from swine specimens, but also from cattle, horses, and poultry (555). Moreover, the phenomenon of linezolid dependence may additionally contribute to the escalating emergence of linezolid-resistant isolates (550).

In time-kill experiments, linezolid displayed a predominantly bacteriostatic activity against staphylococci (556). Since its introduction in approximately 2000, linezolid has proven to be at least as effective as glycopeptides for the treatment of patients with Gram-positive infections; however, the majority of data are derived from MRSA patients with SSTIs, supplemented by a few studies on pneumonia (557, 558). Despite more than a decade of clinical use, linezolid resistance is still a rare phenomenon, but concerns are growing. Overall, MIC90 values for CoNS are low, and generally 50%, compared to those for S. aureus (559). Within a surveillance study enrolling Canadian hospital-associated patients in 2009, S. epidermidis isolates offered low MIC90 values irrespective of their categorization as methicillin resistant or susceptible (each 1 mg/liter; MIC range, ≤0.12 to 2 mg/liter) (501). Also, results of the 2011 U.S. LEADER surveillance program revealed an overall linezolid MIC90 of 1 mg/liter for CoNS (534). The same value was found within the global 2011 ZAAPS program, which included 266 MS- and 702 MR-CoNS isolates (559).

The incidences of linezolid resistance among CoNS isolates from the U.S. LEADER (2004 to 2010) surveillance programs ranged from 1/496 (0.2%) isolates in 2004 to over 18/1,020 (1.8%) isolates in 2007 and 8/676 (1.2%) isolates in 2010 (560). Other recent studies confirmed a still low prevalence of linezolid resistance among CoNS isolates (559, 561, 562). Besides the species mentioned below (see next paragraph), linezolid-resistant isolates among CoNS were also reported for S. simulans and S. pettenkoferi (563, 564).

In the 2011 ZAAPS program, a mobile cfr gene was noted in an S. haemolyticus isolate with an elevated MIC (4 mg/liter) (559). However, isolates with linezolid MICs of >256 mg/liter have been reported (554). An S. sciuri isolate with cfr was originally identified in a calf (565). Besides S. aureus, cfr has also been identified in other clinical CoNS isolates from humans, including S. capitis, S. cohnii, S. hominis, S. epidermidis, and S. haemolyticus, in many parts of the world (559, 566568). On Chinese pig, chicken, and duck farms, cfr-carrying isolates were found among S. arlettae, S. cohnii, S. haemolyticus, S. lentus, S. rostri, S. saprophyticus, S. sciuri, and S. simulans isolates (569). The justified concern surrounding linezolid resistance, whether cfr mediated or not, is underlined by reports of outbreaks and nosocomial spread of linezolid-resistant S. aureus and CoNS isolates (554, 563, 568, 570). An impressive example is the regular recovery of linezolid-resistant strains of S. epidermidis in an ICU within 4 years following an outbreak of infection by cfr-mediated linezolid-resistant S. aureus (554). Notably, 58% of colonized patients and 90% of infected patients had previously received linezolid for at least 10 days (554).

Resistance to tetracyclines and glycylcyclines.

Resistance to tetracyclines is based primarily on the acquisition of mobile tet and otr genes, leading to ribosomal protection through dissociation of tetracyclines from their ribosomal binding sites and to drug efflux through active transportation of the agents out of the bacterial cell (571, 572). In a U.S. study from 2011, the percentage of tetracycline-resistant isolates was higher for MR-CoNS (18.6%) than for MS-CoNS (7.6%) (534). About 18% tetracycline-resistant CoNS isolates were found in two other recent studies (65, 573). Within the multicenter German Tigecycline Evaluation Surveillance Trials (G-TEST I to III), in 2005, 2007, and 2009, the percentage of doxycycline-resistant CoNS isolates decreased from 10.1% to 9.2% to 6.1% for S. epidermidis isolates and from 12.3% to 12.1% to 5.9% for S. haemolyticus (75). Along with the significant decrease of tetracycline administration for outpatients in Europe (574), this phenomenon seems to be a continuation of an earlier trend, as 20.4% of CoNS isolates in 1990, and 18.5% in 1995, exhibited resistance to doxycycline in Germany (447).

The minocycline derivative tigecycline is the prototype compound of a new class of glycylcyclines with bacteriostatic broad-spectrum activity overcoming resistance development of classical cyclines due to not being substrates for tetracycline efflux pumps (575). For staphylococci, the mechanism(s) of tigecycline resistance remains to be elucidated. In vitro, overexpression of the MATE family efflux pump (mepA) in a wild-type S. aureus background caused a decrease in susceptibility to tigecycline, although it was not sufficient to significantly increase the MIC of tigecycline (576). In studying S. epidermidis bloodstream isolates, the MIC90 of tigecycline, the first available glycylcycline, was 0.5 mg/liter, with no differences if isolates were stratified regarding their methicillin susceptibility (525). Comparing the results from two German multicenter trials conducted prior to and after the introduction of tigecycline, no differences were found in the tigecycline susceptibility of S. epidermidis isolates recovered from at least two consecutive blood samples (562). However, three S. haemolyticus isolates (4.5%) were categorized as tigecycline resistant, exhibiting an MIC level above the breakpoint of 0.5 mg/liter. All other included CoNS isolates showed an MIC90 range of ≤0.125 to 0.5 mg/liter (562). In three global regions, Europe, Latin America, and the Asia-Pacific region, MS-CoNS (n = 192) and MR-CoNS (n = 646) exhibited an MIC90 of 0.5 mg/liter, with all isolates being categorized as susceptible (577).

Resistance to fusidic acid, fosfomycin, and rifampin.

Fusidic acid, fosfomycin, and rifampin represent “old” antibiotic agents—nowadays increasingly being reintroduced—with activity against Gram-positive microorganisms (fusidic acid) or activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms (fosfomycin and rifampin); rifampin is primarily known as an antituberculosis drug. In contrast to the case for S. aureus, little is known regarding resistances of CoNS to these compounds, with the data being inconsistent and different breakpoints applied. Although these three agents belong to different classes of antibiotics, they have one thing in common: a rapid development of resistance if administered as monotherapy. Thus, they are used principally in combination therapy. However, combined medication with these agents is based on clinical experience rather than proven evidence and thus is a matter for debate (578).

Spontaneous mutations in the fusA gene leading to an altered ribosomal translocase (i.e., elongation factor G [EF-G]) represented the first discovered resistance mechanism class (FusA), leading to resistance to fusidic acid in staphylococci (579). A FusB mechanism in staphylococci includes an acquired chromosomal or plasmid-mediated fusB gene, encoding an inducible EF-G-protecting protein (580, 581). Among S. aureus and S. saprophyticus strains, fusC and fusD homologs, respectively, have been described (582). Interestingly, mutants of a further class, termed FusE, and some mutants of the FusA class display some phenotype characteristics of staphylococcal small-colony variants (583). In testing of 41, 10, and 11 clinical CoNS strains from the United States, Canada, and Australia, respectively, 7.2%, 20.0%, and 10.8% fusidic acid-resistant strains were noted (584). In Europe, large differences in fusidic acid resistance were found among 3,134 CoNS isolates, ranging from 12.5% in Poland to more than 40% in Belgium, France, Ireland, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom (585). In both studies, the percentage of fusidic acid-resistant isolates was by far higher in the CoNS group than in the S. aureus isolates. A notable increase in resistance to fusidic acid (from 10 to 40%) despite the low usage of these agents was shown in a study from Finland (449).

Resistance to fosfomycin (phosphonomycin) can be mediated by either chromosomal or plasmid-borne mechanisms. In contrast to the case for Gram-negative microorganisms, little is known about the chromosomally mediated resistance, which is based on defects in the l-alpha-glycerophosphate (glpT) or hexose phosphate (uhpT) transport system that takes up fosfomycin (586). In plasmid-mediated resistance, fosA encodes a glutathione S-transferase that inactivates fosfomycin by forming a covalent bond between fosfomycin and a sulfhydryl group in glutathione (587). In staphylococci, a homolog, fosB, has been described (588). Summarizing data from three studies evaluating fosfomycin susceptibility, 31.6% of MR-CoNS isolates were resistant (589). In a 2008 study of 961 nonurinary Greek CoNS isolates, comprising S. epidermidis, S. saprophyticus, and S. haemolyticus, 22.5% exhibited in vitro resistance to fosfomycin (590).

Rifampin resistance in staphylococci is most frequently based on point mutations in the highly conserved regions of the rpoB gene, which encodes the beta subunit of the bacterial RNA polymerase, resulting in amino acid substitutions at or near the binding site for the drug (591, 592). In a 2009 Swedish study, approximately 39% of PJI-related S. epidermidis isolates were found to be rifampin resistant (MIC90, >32 mg/liter) (499). About 15% of CoNS isolates tested resistant in a multicenter study performed in Colombia in 2001 to 2002 (527). Data from Germany revealed 6.7% rifampin-resistant CoNS isolates (n = 885) in the mid-1990s (447).

Resistance to mupirocin.

In the case of CoNS, little is known about the real prevalence of resistance toward mupirocin, a topically administered antibiotic. In a German study performed in 2001, rates of low- and high-level resistance were shown to be 9.4% and 3.3%, respectively, in S. epidermidis (593). About 8% of S. haemolyticus isolates tested resistant in a recent Brazilian study (573). However, reports on the elevated prevalence of high-level mupirocin resistance in CoNS, with rates of low- and high-level resistance reaching 22 and 61%, respectively, as a result of increased use of this substance (77, 594), are alarming because mupirocin represents the cornerstone of decolonization efforts for nasally colonized MRSA patients. What is especially worrying is that this resistance is mediated by plasmids carrying the ileS2 gene, also designated mupA, which could be transferred to S. aureus. Moreover, these plasmids are recognized as being associated with resistance to other agents, such as clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline.

Resistance to biocides/antiseptics.

Relatively little is known regarding the resistance of CoNS to antiseptics. In a recent study in a French neonatal ICU, 41.2% of CoNS isolates recovered from CRBSIs in very preterm neonates exhibited decreased susceptibility to at least one antiseptic (chlorhexidine, 12%; benzalkonium, 24%; and acriflavine, 33%) (77). Note that quaternary ammonium compound (QAC) resistance determinants are transferable and are located on plasmids and transposons together with antibiotic resistance genes encoding resistance to aminoglycosides, penicillin, and trimethoprim (595).

In Vitro Susceptibility Testing

As with S. aureus, the main task for in vitro susceptibility testing of CoNS is the unambiguous identification of methicillin resistance. For empirical (calculated) antibiotic therapy of CoNS—at least for S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus—methicillin resistance can reasonably be expected. Nevertheless, valid methicillin resistance determination is a necessity for CoNS, since in several circumstances, such as endocarditis and other invasive processes, the use of the most efficient therapeutic option, i.e., the application of β-lactams, should not be excluded a priori. Of particular importance is the determination of methicillin susceptibility for S. lugdunensis, as the aggressive nature of this CoNS species necessitates the administration of the most efficient (preferably bactericidal) antibiotic agents. Conversely, misidentification of MR-CoNS isolates as methicillin susceptible may lead to fatal treatment failure. Furthermore, valid determination of glycopeptide susceptibility of CoNS isolates may have increasing future significance.

Phenotypic approaches.

Conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing of CoNS is based on reference methods of the CLSI (http://www.clsi.org) or EUCAST (http://www.eucast.org), increasingly replacing national standards.

It is noteworthy that traditional phenotype-based methods have reduced sensitivity and specificity for recognition of methicillin resistance in CoNS. This is caused by heteroresistance of respective isolates, a phenomenon also recognized in MRSA. Heteroresistance describes the fact that only a minority of cells of a given methicillin-resistant isolate express the genetically encoded capability of methicillin resistance under in vitro conditions, thus suggesting a false-susceptible result. However, with the enhanced discriminatory power of applying cefoxitin as a test substance for detecting MR staphylococci, most of the diagnostic problems caused by heteroresistance have disappeared. According to the recent CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (version M100-S23) and EUCAST breakpoint tables for the interpretation of MICs and zone diameters (version 3.1), cefoxitin screening based on a disc diffusion assay (disc content of 30 μg) is used as a surrogate method for the determination of mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance, reliably predicting methicillin resistance for CoNS (450, 451). Note that the EUCAST zone diameter breakpoints given for CoNS (susceptible, ≥25 mm; and resistant, <25 mm) are modified for S. lugdunensis and S. saprophyticus to those for S. aureus, i.e., ≥22 mm and <22 mm for interpretation as susceptible and resistant, respectively. The CLSI interpretative criteria are basically the same. For CoNS other than S. lugdunensis, the cefoxitin MIC has been assumed by EUCAST to be an inferior predictor of resistance to methicillin compared to the disc diffusion test (450). CLSI lists a cefoxitin MIC breakpoint for S. lugdunensis (and S. aureus) of ≥8 mg/liter. If oxacillin MICs are determined, the MIC breakpoint for CoNS given by both CLSI and EUCAST (with the EUCAST notation in parentheses) is ≥0.5 (>0.25) mg/liter, with the exception of the respective value for S. lugdunensis being ≥4 (>2) mg/liter (like that for S. aureus) (451).

MICs for glycopeptide testing are method dependent. According to EUCAST (ISO 20776), they should be ascertained by broth microdilution (450). The disc diffusion method is considered unreliable because it is not able to distinguish between isolates exhibiting the wild-type phenotype and those characterized by non-vanA-mediated resistance. Serious GISA infections are not treatable with high doses of glycopeptides. Consequently, the resistance breakpoints have been reduced by EUCAST to 2 mg/liter in order to avoid GISA isolates being reported as intermediate (450). Thus, from the susceptibility testing point of view, there is no further reporting in terms of differentiation between VISA/GISA and VRSA/GRSA isolates. For CoNS, the EUCAST MIC breakpoints are ≤4 and >4 for reporting susceptibility and resistance, respectively, to both vancomycin and teicoplanin (450). CLSI criteria still distinguish between being susceptible, intermediate, and resistant toward glycopeptides, and specific MIC interpretative criteria are given for CoNS (breakpoints for vancomycin, ≤4 mg/liter for susceptibility, 8 to 16 mg/liter for intermediate, and ≥32 mg/liter for resistance; and breakpoints for teicoplanin, ≤8 mg/liter for susceptibility, 16 mg/liter for intermediate, and ≥32 mg/liter for resistance) (451). For the detection of heterogeneous resistance to glycopeptides, a modified population analysis profile-area under the curve (PAP-AUC) method is needed (596). A PAP-AUC adaptation for CoNS testing has been described (597). Since this method is laborious, complicated, and not suited for routine use, a number of screening assays have been developed for S. aureus, including antibiotic-containing agar media and specialized gradient tests (macro-Etest) (508). This approach has also been applied for S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus (520).

Nucleic acid detection-based approaches.

Rapid PCR-based approaches have been introduced only for the detection of MRSA directly from surveillance swabs for screening purposes. Commercial assays specifically developed for the detection of methicillin resistance in CoNS are not available. However, several in-house PCR approaches for the species differentiation and simultaneous methicillin resistance determination of cultivated CoNS isolates, together with detection of biofilm formation genes, have been reported (598, 599).

TREATMENT AND MANAGEMENT

Key points that have to be considered for the treatment and management of CoNS infections include the species (S. epidermidis group versus S. lugdunensis versus S. saprophyticus), the site of infection, the immune status of the patient, and, as a special objective, the presence of inserted or implanted foreign bodies.

Therapeutic Options for Treatment of CoNS Infections

Therapeutic options for the treatment of CoNS are limited because the vast majority of clinically recovered isolates are methicillin resistant. Thus, most infections by CoNS of the S. epidermidis group require treatment with a glycopeptide, with vancomycin given preference. Replacement of vancomycin by β-lactamase-resistant penicillins and cephalosporins (first or second generation) is advisable for methicillin-susceptible isolates. Alternatively, cotrimoxazole, if isolates are susceptible, or newer antibiotic agents, such as daptomycin, linezolid, or cephalosporins with MRSA activity, may be administered, in particular if methicillin resistance is probable or was detected.

When used simultaneously, antibiotics with cell wall activity combined with rifampin were shown to act synergistically. Further combination therapies in the case of administration of glycopeptides and β-lactams include aminoglycosides, fosfomycin, cotrimoxazole, and fusidic acid. However, respective recommendations are based on limited, partly uncorroborated studies and some case reports for the treatment of severe infections, mostly by S. aureus (600, 601). For CoNS, even fewer data are available. Thus, a careful risk-benefit assessment is mandatory if combination therapy is applied.

Sufficient controlled clinical study data on the efficacy of antimicrobial agents for S. lugdunensis infections and the duration of therapy are lacking. Empirical treatment of S. lugdunensis infections with β-lactamase-resistant penicillins and cephalosporins of the first or second generation should be appropriate. Note that in cases of S. lugdunensis-caused endocarditis, medical therapy alone is rarely successful and urgent surgical intervention is necessary. A recent analysis revealed that medical treatment alone was an independent risk factor for mortality (189).

For uncomplicated UTIs due to S. saprophyticus subsp. saprophyticus, cotrimoxazole can be administered. In contrast to the usual 3-day regimen for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs, infections by this CoNS species may respond better to 7 days of therapy; however, the relevant data are sparse (602). This longer treatment regimen may also be applied if other antimicrobial agents, such as fluoroquinolones, are administered (602).

The treatment approach for CoNS has to be adapted for particular infections, as in the case of FBRIs, including CRBSIs and catheter-associated UTIs (CA-UTIs) (see below), as well as infective endocarditis involving native or prosthetic valves (see respective guidelines and literature) (603, 604).

For detailed treatment information, the annually updated edition of The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy (605), respective national guidelines, and current manufacturer specifications should be consulted.

Management of FBRIs caused by CoNS

In view of the frequent use of implanted devices, biofilm-associated FBRIs due to CoNS remain a therapeutic challenge. They frequently require removal of the device, often accompanied by the need for additional medical interventions and costs. CoNS-generated biofilms show significant resistance to antibiotics, caused by impaired penetration of the antibiotics and changes in bacterial metabolism and behavior. With the exception of rifampin, approximately 100- to 1,000-fold increases in minimal bactericidal levels have been demonstrated against most antibiotics (606).

Whenever an FBRI is suspected, the following general decisions have to be made: whether to remove the colonized foreign body and/or whether to initiate empirical antimicrobial treatment and efforts to salvage the device (92). For this reason, several key questions have to be addressed for the rational and successful management of FBRIs. They include the relevance of a presumed FBRI to clinical signs and how it can be confirmed, the presence of predisposing factors (e.g., neutropenia and other immunocompromising disorders and the type of medical device), the clinical situation of the patient (e.g., premature infant or sepsis), and cooccurring conflicting clinical imperatives. Further general aspects are given in detail by current Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) practice guidelines (607, 608).

In the case of uncomplicated CoNS-caused CRBSIs without endovascular hardware, the removal of the device is often sufficient for therapy unless fever and/or bacteremia persists. In the case of CRBSIs, the absence of continuing bacteremia should be confirmed by blood culture diagnostics after catheter withdrawal. Alternatively, a short antibiotic treatment (5 to 7 days) subsequent to removal of the catheter might be appropriate for uncomplicated CoNS-caused CRBSIs. If the catheter is retained, antibiotics should be administered for 10 to 14 days, along with antibiotic lock therapy (607, 609). However, the question of whether catheter removal and/or antibiotic therapy is preferred is still a matter of debate because of the lack of controlled study data. For MS-CoNS, β-lactamase-resistant penicillins should be used as preferred agents (alternatively, first-generation cephalosporins, vancomycin, or cotrimoxazole [if isolates are susceptible] may be used). In the case of CRBSIs by MR-CoNS, vancomycin should be used preferentially. Alternative agents include daptomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin (607).

For PJIs caused by staphylococci, intravenous antimicrobial therapy for 2 to 6 weeks should be administered subsequent to debridement and retention of the prosthesis (608). This is followed by a longer oral course (3 to 6 months) dependent on the nature of the PJI (608). For methicillin-susceptible staphylococci, β-lactamase-resistant penicillin or cephalosporins (cefazolin or ceftriaxone) are recommended as preferred treatment by the IDSA (608). For methicillin-resistant staphylococci, vancomycin should be given; an alternative treatment, daptomycin or linezolid, or a combination therapy with rifampin is recommended irrespective of whether the isolate is methicillin resistant or not (608). Modified recommendations exist for patients with PJI following a one-stage exchange or for other circumstances (608). For specific entities, such as PVIE and CA-UTIs, we refer to the respective guidelines (603, 604).

CONCLUSIONS

CoNS resemble very heterogeneous and versatile Gram-positive bacteria. Their main ecological niches are skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals, and they are therefore always in a very close, and mainly symbiotic, relationship with their natural hosts. This also holds for the CoNS species preferentially found on humans. Except for S. saprophyticus and S. lugdunensis, CoNS rarely attack a healthy host, because of a lack of aggressive virulence properties. However, groups of especially susceptible patients are increasing, either due to still undeveloped or impaired host response functions or due to inserted or implanted foreign bodies. Consequently, CoNS have become a major nosocomial pathogen. Despite the normally subacute and low inflammatory course of these infections, they present a substantial clinical burden because of broad and severe treatment difficulties. In the case of foreign body infections, the removal of the infected device is most often ultimately required.

Many questions regarding the phylogeny, ecology, and pathogenesis of CoNS are still not answered. Just recently available new methodological tools will enable further research approaches. This may lead to new measures for effective therapy and for the prevention of CoNS infections.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in parts by grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (grant TTU 08.807 from the German Centre for Infection Research [DZIF] to K.B. and G.P. and grant 0315832A to K.B.).

Biographies

graphic file with name zcm9990924830008.jpg

Karsten Becker, M.D., is Professor of Medical Microbiology, Assistant Medical Director, and Group Leader at the Institute of Medical Microbiology at the Westphalian Wilhelms University Münster. He is Chairman of the Diagnostic Procedures Standing Working Group of the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology (DGHM) and received a research award in Clinical Infectiology from the German Society for Infectiology. He is the author of several medical textbooks and encyclopedias and more than 150 scientific publications. Since the 1990s, his interests have included the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and therapy of staphylococcal and micrococcal infections. He has described novel species of the genera Staphylococcus and Kytococcus. In particular, he has done extensive research on the intracellular lifestyle of the staphylococcal small-colony variant (SCV) phenotype. A further focus is on the detection, identification, and characterization of MRSA strains. He is an academic editor and a member of the editorial boards of medical and bioscience journals.

graphic file with name zcm9990924830009.jpg

Christine Heilmann, Ph.D., studied biology at the Universities of Münster and Tübingen, Germany, and received her diploma (microbiology, biochemistry, genetics, and pharmacology; 1991) and Ph.D. (1996) at the University of Tübingen. She undertook her Ph.D. thesis work in the laboratory of Fritz Götz, in the Department of Microbial Genetics, Tübingen, Germany, where she discovered the icaADBC operon mediating polysaccharide-dependent staphylococcal biofilm formation. After completing her Ph.D., she carried out postdoctoral studies on staphylococcal pathogenesis at the Institute of Medical Microbiology at the University of Münster, in the laboratory of Georg Peters, and in the Channing Laboratory at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Since 2001, she has been a Group Leader at the Institute of Medical Microbiology in Münster. She has worked in the area of staphylococcal research for more than 20 years, and her research focuses on the molecular basis of staphylococcal biofilm formation and host-pathogen interactions.

graphic file with name zcm9990924830010.jpg

Georg Peters, M.D., is Head of the Institute of Medical Microbiology at the Westphalian Wilhelms University Münster. Since the beginning of his career, he has carried out research on the infectious biology of staphylococci and staphylococcal diseases. In the early 1980s, he initiated the first studies on the pathomechanisms of biofilm (“slime”) formation by S. epidermidis as the virulence principle causing foreign body infections. He is a member of the Senate of the German Research Foundation (DFG). He is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of the Robert Koch Institute. He was President of the German Society for Hygiene and Microbiology (DGHM) and of the Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy (PEG). He served as Vice Chairman and Chairman of the Gordon Research Conference on Staphylococcal Diseases.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kloos WE, Bannerman TL. 1994. Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 7:117–140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pfaller MA, Herwaldt LA. 1988. Laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological aspects of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1:281–299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Taponen S, Pyörälä S. 2009. Coagulase-negative staphylococci as cause of bovine mastitis—not so different from Staphylococcus aureus? Vet. Microbiol. 134:29–36. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Irlinger F. 2008. Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: coagulase-negative staphylococci. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 126:302–310. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.08.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Billroth T. 1874. Untersuchungen über die Vegetationsformen von Coccobacteria septica und den Antheil, welchen sie an der Entstehung und Verbreitung der accidentellen Wundkrankheiten haben: Versuch einer wissenschaftlichen Kritik der verschiedenen Methoden antiseptischer Wundbehandlung. G Reimer, Berlin, Germany [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ogston A. 1882. Micrococcus poisoning. J. Anat. Physiol. 17:24–58 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ogston A. 1880. Ueber Abscesse. Arch. Klin. Chir. 25:588 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rosenbach FJ. 1884. Micro-Organismen bei den Wund-Infections-Krankheiten des Menschen. J F Bergmann, Wiesbaden, Germany [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nocht E, Metschnikoff E, Schwarz O, Weichselbaum A, Weyl T. 1900. Handbuch der Hygiene. Neunter Band. Aetiologie und Prophylaxe der Infektionskrankheiten. G Fischer, Jena, Germany [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Welch WH. 1891. Conditions underlying the infection of wounds. Am. J. Med. Sci. 102:439–465 [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Winslow CEA, Winslow AR. 1908. The systematic relationships of the Coccaceae. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fairbrother RW. 1940. Coagulase production as a criterion for the classification of the staphylococci. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 50:83–88. 10.1002/path.1700500112 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shaw C, Stitt JM, Cowan ST. 1951. Staphylococci and their classification. J. Gen. Microbiol. 5:1010–1023. 10.1099/00221287-5-5-1010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maskell R. 1974. Importance of coagulase-negative staphylococci as pathogens in the urinary tract. Lancet 303:1155–1158. 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90634-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE. 1974. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 8th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Euzéby JP. 1997. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: a folder available on the internet. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:590–592. 10.1099/00207713-47-2-590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.De Bel A, Van Hoorde K, Wybo I, Vandoorslaer K, Echahidi F, De Brandt E, Schumann P, Ieven M, Soetens O, Piérard D, Vandamme P. 2013. Staphylococcus jettensis sp. nov., a coagulase-negative staphylococcal species isolated from human clinical specimens. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63:3250–3256. 10.1099/ijs.0.044438-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Trülzsch K, Grabein B, Schumann P, Mellmann A, Antonenka U, Heesemann J, Becker K. 2007. Staphylococcus pettenkoferi sp. nov., a novel coagulase-negative staphylococcal species isolated from human clinical specimens. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57:1543–1548. 10.1099/ijs.0.64381-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Al Masalma M, Raoult D, Roux V. 2010. Staphylococcus massiliensis sp. nov., isolated from a human brain abscess. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60:1066–1072. 10.1099/ijs.0.006486-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pantucek R, Svec P, Dajcs JJ, Machová I, Cernohlavkova J, Sedo O, Gelbicova T, Maslanova I, Doskar J, Zdrahal Z, Ruzickova V, Sedlacek I. 2013. Staphylococcus petrasii sp. nov. including S. petrasii subsp. petrasii subsp. nov. and S. petrasii subsp. croceilyticus subsp. nov., isolated from human clinical specimens and human ear infections. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 36:90–95. 10.1016/j.syapm.2012.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tang YW, Han J, McCormac MA, Li H, Stratton CW. 2008. Staphylococcus pseudolugdunensis sp. nov., a pyrrolidonyl arylamidase/ornithine decarboxylase-positive bacterium isolated from blood cultures. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 60:351–359. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Svec P, Vancanneyt M, Sedlácek I, Engelbeen K, Stetina V, Swings J, Petrás P. 2004. Reclassification of Staphylococcus pulvereri Zakrzewska-Czerwinska et al. 1995 as a later synonym of Staphylococcus vitulinus Webster et al. 1994. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54:2213–2215. 10.1099/ijs.0.63080-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kloos WE, Ballard DN, George CG, Webster JA, Hubner RJ, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Fiedler F, Schubert K. 1998. Delimiting the genus Staphylococcus through description of Macrococcus caseolyticus gen. nov., comb. nov. and Macrococcus equipercicus sp. nov., and Macrococcus bovicus sp. nov. and Macrococcus carouselicus sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:859–877. 10.1099/00207713-48-3-859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.de la Fuente R, Suarez G, Ruiz Santa Quiteria JA, Meugnier H, Bes M, Freney J, Fleurette J. 1992. Identification of coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from lambs as Staphylococcus caseolyticus. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:47–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. 2009. Revised road map to the phylum Firmicutes. In De Vos P, Garrity G, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, Schleifer KH, Whitman WB. (ed), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed, vol 3 The Firmicutes Springer, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Garrity GM, Winters M, Searles DB. 2001. Taxonomic outline of the procaryotes, p 1–318 In Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM. (ed), Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, 2nd ed, release 1.0 Springer-Verlag, New York, NY [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Alves M, Nogueira C, de Magalhães-Sant'Ana A, Chung AP, Morais PV, da Costa MS. 2008. Nosocomiicoccus ampullae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the surface of bottles of saline solution used in wound cleansing. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58:2939–2944. 10.1099/ijs.0.65753-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL. 1997. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, Actinobacteria classis nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47:479–491. 10.1099/00207713-47-2-479 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Euzeby J. 2010. Validation list no. 132. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 60:469–472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stackebrandt E, Koch C, Gvozdiak O, Schumann P. 1995. Taxonomic dissection of the genus Micrococcus: Kocuria gen. nov., Nesterenkonia gen. nov., Kytococcus gen. nov., Dermacoccus gen. nov., and Micrococcus Cohn 1872 gen. emend. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:682–692. 10.1099/00207713-45-4-682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stackebrandt E, Schumann P. 2000. Description of Bogoriellaceae fam. nov., Dermacoccaceae fam. nov., Rarobacteraceae fam. nov. and Sanguibacteraceae fam. nov. and emendation of some families of the suborder Micrococcineae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50:1279–1285. 10.1099/00207713-50-3-1279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lamers RP, Muthukrishnan G, Castoe TA, Tafur S, Cole AM, Parkinson CL. 2012. Phylogenetic relationships among Staphylococcus species and refinement of cluster groups based on multilocus data. BMC Evol. Biol. 12:171. 10.1186/1471-2148-12-171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grice EA, Segre JA. 2011. The skin microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9:244–253. 10.1038/nrmicro2537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Marples MJ. 1974. The normal microbial flora of the skin. Soc. Appl. Bacteriol. Symp. Ser. 3:7–12 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Evans CA, Smith WM, Johnston EA, Giblett ER. 1950. Bacterial flora of the normal human skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 15:305–324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Grice EA, Kong HH, Conlan S, Deming CB, Davis J, Young AC, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program. Bouffard GG, Blakesley RW, Murray PR, Green ED, Turner ML, Segre JA. 2009. Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science 324:1190–1192. 10.1126/science.1171700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. 2009. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326:1694–1697. 10.1126/science.1177486 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wos-Oxley ML, Plumeier I, von Eiff C, Taudien S, Platzer M, Vilchez-Vargas R, Becker K, Pieper DH. 2010. A poke into the diversity and associations within human anterior nare microbial communities. ISME J. 4:839–851. 10.1038/ismej.2010.15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Graham JE, Moore JE, Jiru X, Moore JE, Goodall EA, Dooley JS, Hayes VE, Dartt DA, Downes CS, Moore TC. 2007. Ocular pathogen or commensal: a PCR-based study of surface bacterial flora in normal and dry eyes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48:5616–5623. 10.1167/iovs.07-0588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Willcox MD. 2013. Characterization of the normal microbiota of the ocular surface. Exp. Eye Res. 117:99–105. 10.1016/j.exer.2013.06.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kong HH, Segre JA. 2012. Skin microbiome: looking back to move forward. J. Invest. Dermatol. 132:933–939. 10.1038/jid.2011.417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Iwase T, Uehara Y, Shinji H, Tajima A, Seo H, Takada K, Agata T, Mizunoe Y. 2010. Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature 465:346–349. 10.1038/nature09074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schleifer KH, Kloos WE. 1975. Isolation and characterization of staphylococci from human skin. I. Amended descriptions of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus and descriptions of three new species: Staphylococcus cohnii, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Staphylococcus xylosus. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 25:50–61 [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kloos WE, Musselwhite MS. 1975. Distribution and persistence of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus species and other aerobic bacteria on human skin. Appl. Microbiol. 30:381–385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kloos WE, Schleifer KH. 1975. Isolation and characterization of staphylococci from human skin. II. Description of four new species: Staphylococcus warneri, Staphylococcus capitis, Staphylococcus hominis, and Staphylococcus simulans. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 25:62–79 [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kloos WE, Schleifer KH. 1983. Staphylococcus auricularis sp. nov.: an inhabitant of the human external ear. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 33:9–14. 10.1099/00207713-33-1-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bieber L, Kahlmeter G. 2010. Staphylococcus lugdunensis in several niches of the normal skin flora. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16:385–388. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02813.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.van der Mee-Marquet N, Achard A, Mereghetti L, Danton A, Minier M, Quentin R. 2003. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infections: high frequency of inguinal area carriage. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:1404–1409. 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1404-1409.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bieber L, Kahlmeter G. 2010. Staphylococcus lugdunensis in several niches of the normal skin flora. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16:385–388. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02813.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rupp ME, Soper DE, Archer GL. 1992. Colonization of the female genital tract with Staphylococcus saprophyticus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30:2975–2979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schneider PF, Riley TV. 1996. Staphylococcus saprophyticus urinary tract infections: epidemiological data from Western Australia. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 12:51–54. 10.1007/BF00144428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Nys S, van Merode T, Bartelds AI, Stobberingh EE. 2006. Urinary tract infections in general practice patients: diagnostic tests versus bacteriological culture. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:955–958. 10.1093/jac/dkl082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hedman P, Ringertz O, Lindstrom M, Olsson K. 1993. The origin of Staphylococcus saprophyticus from cattle and pigs. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 25:57–60 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hedman P, Ringertz O, Eriksson B, Kvarnfors P, Andersson M, Bengtsson L, Olsson K. 1990. Staphylococcus saprophyticus found to be a common contaminant of food. J. Infect. 21:11–19. 10.1016/0163-4453(90)90554-L [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Faria C, Vaz-Moreira I, Serapicos E, Nunes OC, Manaia CM. 2009. Antibiotic resistance in coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from wastewater and drinking water. Sci. Total Environ. 407:3876–3882. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lina B, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Kreiswirth B, Fleurette J. 1992. Comparison of coagulase-negative staphylococci by pulsed-field electrophoresis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 71:133–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lang S, Livesley MA, Lambert PA, Elliott J, Elliott TS. 1999. The genomic diversity of coagulase-negative staphylococci associated with nosocomial infections. J. Hosp. Infect. 43:187–193. 10.1053/jhin.1999.0245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wisplinghoff H, Rosato AE, Enright MC, Noto M, Craig W, Archer GL. 2003. Related clones containing SCCmec type IV predominate among clinically significant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3574–3579. 10.1128/AAC.47.11.3574-3579.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schoenfelder SM, Lange C, Eckart M, Hennig S, Kozytska S, Ziebuhr W. 2010. Success through diversity—how Staphylococcus epidermidis establishes as a nosocomial pathogen. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300:380–386. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Thomas JC, Vargas MR, Miragaia M, Peacock SJ, Archer GL, Enright MC. 2007. Improved multilocus sequence typing scheme for Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:616–619. 10.1128/JCM.01934-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kozitskaya S, Olson ME, Fey PD, Witte W, Ohlsen K, Ziebuhr W. 2005. Clonal analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates carrying or lacking biofilm-mediating genes by multilocus sequence typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4751–4757. 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4751-4757.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Miragaia M, Thomas JC, Couto I, Enright MC, de Lencastre H. 2007. Inferring a population structure for Staphylococcus epidermidis from multilocus sequence typing data. J. Bacteriol. 189:2540–2552. 10.1128/JB.01484-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jamaluddin TZ, Kuwahara-Arai K, Hisata K, Terasawa M, Cui L, Baba T, Sotozono C, Kinoshita S, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. 2008. Extreme genetic diversity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strains disseminated among healthy Japanese children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:3778–3783. 10.1128/JCM.02262-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mendes RE, Deshpande LM, Costello AJ, Farrell DJ. 2012. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates from U.S. hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:4656–4661. 10.1128/AAC.00279-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gordon RJ, Miragaia M, Weinberg AD, Lee CJ, Rolo J, Giacalone JC, Slaughter MS, Pappas P, Naka Y, Tector AJ, de Lencastre H, Lowy FD. 2012. Staphylococcus epidermidis colonization is highly clonal across US cardiac centers. J. Infect. Dis. 205:1391–1398. 10.1093/infdis/jis218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Widerström M, Wiström J, Ek E, Edebro H, Monsen T. 2011. Near absence of methicillin-resistance and pronounced genetic diversity among Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from healthy persons in northern Sweden. APMIS 119:505–512. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2011.02757.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Francois P, Hochmann A, Huyghe A, Bonetti EJ, Renzi G, Harbarth S, Klingenberg C, Pittet D, Schrenzel J. 2008. Rapid and high-throughput genotyping of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates by automated multilocus variable-number of tandem repeats: a tool for real-time epidemiology. J. Microbiol. Methods 72:296–305. 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Petti CA, Simmon KE, Miro JM, Hoen B, Marco F, Chu VH, Athan E, Bukovski S, Bouza E, Bradley S, Fowler VG, Giannitsioti E, Gordon D, Reinbott P, Korman T, Lang S, Garcia-de la-Maria C, Raglio A, Morris AJ, Plesiat P, Ryan S, Doco-Lecompte T, Tripodi F, Utili R, Wray D, Federspiel JJ, Boisson K, Reller LB, Murdoch DR, Woods CW. 2008. Genotypic diversity of coagulase-negative staphylococci causing endocarditis: a global perspective. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:1780–1784. 10.1128/JCM.02405-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Miragaia M, Couto I, de Lencastre H. 2005. Genetic diversity among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). Microb. Drug Resist. 11:83–93. 10.1089/mdr.2005.11.83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ruppé E, Barbier F, Mesli Y, Maiga A, Cojocaru R, Benkhalfat M, Benchouk S, Hassaine H, Maiga I, Diallo A, Koumaré AK, Ouattara K, Soumaré S, Dufourcq JB, Nareth C, Sarthou JL, Andremont A, Ruimy R. 2009. Diversity of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec structures in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains among outpatients from four countries. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:442–449. 10.1128/AAC.00724-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zong Z, Peng C, Lü X. 2011. Diversity of SCCmec elements in methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci clinical isolates. PLoS One 6:e20191. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Miragaia M, Carriço JA, Thomas JC, Couto I, Enright MC, de Lencastre H. 2008. Comparison of molecular typing methods for characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis: proposal for clone definition. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:118–129. 10.1128/JCM.01685-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Köser CU, Holden MT, Ellington MJ, Cartwright EJ, Brown NM, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Hsu LY, Chewapreecha C, Croucher NJ, Harris SR, Sanders M, Enright MC, Dougan G, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, Fraser LJ, Betley JR, Schulz-Trieglaff OB, Smith GP, Peacock SJ. 2012. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for investigation of a neonatal MRSA outbreak. N. Engl. J. Med. 366:2267–2275. 10.1056/NEJMoa1109910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Takeuchi F, Watanabe S, Baba T, Yuzawa H, Ito T, Morimoto Y, Kuroda M, Cui L, Takahashi M, Ankai A, Baba S, Fukui S, Lee JC, Hiramatsu K. 2005. Whole-genome sequencing of Staphylococcus haemolyticus uncovers the extreme plasticity of its genome and the evolution of human-colonizing staphylococcal species. J. Bacteriol. 187:7292–7308. 10.1128/JB.187.21.7292-7308.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kresken M, Becker K, Seifert H, Leitner E, Körber-Irrgang B, von Eiff C, Löschmann PA. 2011. Resistance trends and in vitro activity of tigecycline and 17 other antimicrobial agents against Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms, including multidrug-resistant pathogens, in Germany. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 30:1095–1103. 10.1007/s10096-011-1197-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ma XX, Wang EH, Liu Y, Luo EJ. 2011. Antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS): emergence of teicoplanin-non-susceptible CoNS strains with inducible resistance to vancomycin. J. Med. Microbiol. 60:1661–1668. 10.1099/jmm.0.034066-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lepainteur M, Royer G, Bourrel AS, Romain O, Duport C, Doucet-Populaire F, Decousser JW. 2013. Prevalence of resistance to antiseptics and mupirocin among invasive coagulase-negative staphylococci from very preterm neonates in NICU: the creeping threat? J. Hosp. Infect. 83:333–336. 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.11.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Dimitriou G, Fouzas S, Giormezis N, Giannakopoulos I, Tzifas S, Foka A, Anastassiou DE, Spiliopoulou I, Mantagos S. 2011. Clinical and microbiological profile of persistent coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteraemia in neonates. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 17:1684–1690. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03489.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.de Silva GD, Kantzanou M, Justice A, Massey RC, Wilkinson AR, Day NP, Peacock SJ. 2002. The ica operon and biofilm production in coagulase-negative staphylococci associated with carriage and disease in a neonatal intensive care unit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:382–388. 10.1128/JCM.40.02.382-388.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Foka A, Chini V, Petinaki E, Kolonitsiou F, Anastassiou ED, Dimitracopoulos G, Spiliopoulou I. 2006. Clonality of slime-producing methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci disseminated in the neonatal intensive care unit of a university hospital. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:1230–1233. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01565.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Monsen T, Karlsson C, Wiström J. 2005. Spread of clones of multidrug-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococci within a university hospital. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 26:76–80. 10.1086/502490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Widerström M, Monsen T, Karlsson C, Wiström J. 2006. Molecular epidemiology of meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in a Swedish county hospital: evidence of intra- and interhospital clonal spread. J. Hosp. Infect. 64:177–183. 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Liakopoulos V, Petinaki E, Efthimiadi G, Klapsa D, Giannopoulou M, Dovas S, Eleftheriadis T, Mertens PR, Stefanidis I. 2008. Clonal relatedness of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in the haemodialysis unit of a single university centre in Greece. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 23:2599–2603. 10.1093/ndt/gfn101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mazzariol A, Lo CG, Kocsis E, Maccacaro L, Fontana R, Cornaglia G. 2012. Outbreak of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus in an Italian intensive care unit. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31:523–527. 10.1007/s10096-011-1343-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Brito DV, von Dolinger EJ, Abdallah VO, Darini AL, Gontijo Filho PP. 2009. Two outbreaks of mixed etiology associated with central venous catheters inserted by phlebotomy in critical neonates. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 13:177–182. 10.1590/S1413-86702009000300005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wang SM, Liu CC, Tseng HW, Yang YJ, Lin CH, Huang AH, Wu YH. 1999. Staphylococcus capitis bacteremia of very low birth weight premature infants at neonatal intensive care units: clinical significance and antimicrobial susceptibility. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 32:26–32 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Krediet TG, Mascini EM, van Rooij E, Vlooswijk J, Paauw A, Gerards LJ, Fleer A. 2004. Molecular epidemiology of coagulase-negative staphylococci causing sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit over an 11-year period. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:992–995. 10.1128/JCM.42.3.992-995.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.von Eiff C, Arciola CR, Montanaro L, Becker K, Campoccia D. 2006. Emerging Staphylococcus species as new pathogens in implant infections. Int. J. Artif. Organs 29:360–367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Spanu T, Sanguinetti M, Ciccaglione D, D'Inzeo T, Romano L, Leone F, Fadda G. 2003. Use of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of clinical isolates of staphylococci from bloodstream infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:4259–4263. 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4259-4263.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Huang CR, Lu CH, Wu JJ, Chang HW, Chien CC, Lei CB, Chang WN. 2005. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal meningitis in adults: clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes. Infection 33:56–60. 10.1007/s15010-005-4083-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Shin JH, Kim SH, Jeong HS, Oh SH, Kim HR, Lee JN, Yoon YC, Kim YW, Kim YH. 2011. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis fluid using 16S ribosomal RNA, tuf, and sodA gene sequencing. Perit. Dial. Int. 31:340–346. 10.3747/pdi.2010.00073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.von Eiff C, Jansen B, Kohnen W, Becker K. 2005. Infections associated with medical devices: pathogenesis, management and prophylaxis. Drugs 65:179–214. 10.2165/00003495-200565020-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Crass BA, Bergdoll MS. 1986. Involvement of coagulase-negative staphylococci in toxic shock syndrome. J. Clin. Microbiol. 23:43–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Lina G, Fleer A, Etienne J, Greenland TB, Vandenesch F. 1996. Coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from two cases of toxic shock syndrome lack superantigenic activity, but induce cytokine production. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 13:81–86. 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1996.tb00219.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Loïez C, Wallet F, Pischedda P, Renaux E, Senneville E, Mehdi N, Courcol RJ. 2007. First case of osteomyelitis caused by “Staphylococcus pettenkoferi”. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1069–1071. 10.1128/JCM.02328-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Morfin-Otero R, Martínez-Vázquez MA, López D, Rodríguez-Noriega E, Garza-González E. 2012. Isolation of rare coagulase-negative isolates in immunocompromised patients: Staphylococcus gallinarum, Staphylococcus pettenkoferi and Staphylococcus pasteuri. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 42:182–185 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Peer MA, Nasir RA, Kakru DK, Fomda BA, Bashir G, Sheikh IA. 2011. Sepsis due to linezolid resistant Staphylococcus cohnii and Staphylococcus kloosii: first reports of linezolid resistance in coagulase negative staphylococci from India. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 29:60–62. 10.4103/0255-0857.76527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.von Eiff C, Peters G, Heilmann C. 2002. Pathogenesis of infections due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2:677–685. 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00438-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hugonnet S, Sax H, Eggimann P, Chevrolet J-C, Pittet D. 2004. Nosocomial bloodstream infection and clinical sepsis. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10:76–81. 10.3201/eid1001.030407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J, Srinivasan A, Kallen A, Limbago B, Fridkin S. 2013. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009–2010. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 34:1–14. 10.1086/668770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Rosenthal VD, Bijie H, Maki DG, Mehta Y, Apisarnthanarak A, Medeiros EA, Leblebicioglu H, Fisher D, Alvarez-Moreno C, Khader IA, Del Rocio Gonzalez MM, Cuellar LE, Navoa-Ng JA, Abouqal R, Guanche GH, Mitrev Z, Pirez Garcia MC, Hamdi A, Duenas L, Cancel E, Gurskis V, Rasslan O, Ahmed A, Kanj SS, Ugalde OC, Mapp T, Raka L, Yuet MC, Thu le TA, Ghazal S, Gikas A, Narvaez LP, Mejia N, Hadjieva N, Gamar Elanbya MO, Guzman Siritt ME, Jayatilleke K. 2012. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 36 countries, for 2004–2009. Am. J. Infect. Control 40:396–407. 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.05.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hughes JM. 1988. Study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection control (SENIC Project): results and implications for the future. Chemotherapy 34:553–561. 10.1159/000238624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.McLaws ML, Taylor PC. 2003. The Hospital Infection Standardised Surveillance (HISS) programme: analysis of a two-year pilot. J. Hosp. Infect. 53:259–267. 10.1053/jhin.2002.1361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Santucci SG, Gobara S, Santos CR, Fontana C, Levin AS. 2003. Infections in a burn intensive care unit: experience of seven years. J. Hosp. Infect. 53:6–13. 10.1053/jhin.2002.1340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. 2004. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:309–317. 10.1086/421946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Rello J, Ochagavia A, Sabanes E, Roque M, Mariscal D, Reynaga E, Valles J. 2000. Evaluation of outcome of intravenous catheter-related infections in critically ill patients. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 162:1027–1030. 10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.9911093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Warren DK, Quadir WW, Hollenbeak CS, Elward AM, Cox MJ, Fraser VJ. 2006. Attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care patients in a nonteaching hospital. Crit. Care Med. 34:2084–2089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Dimick JB, Pelz RK, Consunji R, Swoboda SM, Hendrix CW, Lipsett PA. 2001. Increased resource use associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in the surgical intensive care unit. Arch. Surg. 136:229–234. 10.1001/archsurg.136.2.229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Blot SI, Depuydt P, Annemans L, Benoit D, Hoste E, De Waele JJ, Decruyenaere J, Vogelaers D, Colardyn F, Vandewoude KH. 2005. Clinical and economic outcomes in critically ill patients with nosocomial catheter-related bloodstream infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41:1591–1598. 10.1086/497833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Leroy O, Meybeck A, Sarraz-Bournet B, d'Elia P, Legout L. 2012. Vascular graft infections. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 25:154–158. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283501853 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Hill EE, Herijgers P, Herregods MC, Peetermans WE. 2006. Evolving trends in infective endocarditis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12:5–12. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01289.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Moreillon P, Que YA. 2004. Infective endocarditis. Lancet 363:139–149. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15266-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Alonso-Valle H, Fariñas-Alvarez C, García-Palomo JD, Bernal JM, Martín-Duran R, Gutiérrez Díez JF, Revuelta JM, Fariñas MC. 2010. Clinical course and predictors of death in prosthetic valve endocarditis over a 20-year period. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 139:887–893. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.05.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ortega JR, Garcia A, Medina A, Campoamor C. 2002. Endocarditis protésica precoz de gran agresividad por S. epidermidis [Highly aggressive early prosthetic endocarditis by S. epidermidis]. Rev. Esp. Cardiol. 55:315–318. 10.1016/S0300-8932(02)76602-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Karchmer AW, Archer GL, Dismukes WE. 1983. Staphylococcus epidermidis causing prosthetic valve endocarditis: microbiologic and clinical observations as guides to therapy. Ann. Intern. Med. 98:447–455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Lalani T, Kanafani ZA, Chu VH, Moore L, Corey GR, Pappas P, Woods CW, Cabell CH, Hoen B, Selton-Suty C, Doco-Lecompte T, Chirouze C, Raoult D, Miro JM, Mestres CA, Olaison L, Eykyn S, Abrutyn E, Fowler VG., Jr 2006. Prosthetic valve endocarditis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci: findings from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Merged Database. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 25:365–368. 10.1007/s10096-006-0141-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Chu VH, Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Pappas PA, Jones P, Stryjewski ME, Anguera I, Braun S, Munoz P, Commerford P, Tornos P, Francis J, Oyonarte M, Selton-Suty C, Morris AJ, Habib G, Almirante B, Sexton DJ, Corey GR, Fowler VG., Jr 2009. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal prosthetic valve endocarditis—a contemporary update based on the International Collaboration on Endocarditis: prospective cohort study. Heart 95:570–576. 10.1136/hrt.2008.152975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Falcone M, Campanile F, Giannella M, Borbone S, Stefani S, Venditti M. 2007. Staphylococcus haemolyticus endocarditis: clinical and microbiologic analysis of 4 cases. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 57:325–331. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.08.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Cabrera AG, Khan MS, Morales DL, Chen DW, Moffett BS, Price JF, Dreyer WJ, Denfield SW, Jeewa A, Fraser CD, Jr, Vallejo JG. 2013. Infectious complications and outcomes in children supported with left ventricular assist devices. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 32:518–524. 10.1016/j.healun.2013.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Elieson M, Mixon T, Carpenter J. 2012. Coronary stent infections: a case report and literature review. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 39:884–889 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Herrmann M, Weyand M, Greshake B, von Eiff C, Proctor RA, Scheld HH, Peters G. 1997. Left ventricular assist device infection is associated with increased mortality but is not a contraindication to transplantation. Circulation 95:814–817. 10.1161/01.CIR.95.4.814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Scheithauer S, Bürgel U, Ryang YM, Haase G, Schiefer J, Koch S, Häfner H, Lemmen S. 2009. Prospective surveillance of drain associated meningitis/ventriculitis in a neurosurgery and neurological intensive care unit. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80:1381–1385. 10.1136/jnnp.2008.165357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Conen A, Walti LN, Merlo A, Fluckiger U, Battegay M, Trampuz A. 2008. Characteristics and treatment outcome of cerebrospinal fluid shunt-associated infections in adults: a retrospective analysis over an 11-year period. Clin. Infect. Dis. 47:73–82. 10.1086/588298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Davenport A. 2009. Peritonitis remains the major clinical complication of peritoneal dialysis: the London, UK, peritonitis audit 2002–2003. Perit. Dial. Int. 29:297–302 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Szeto CC, Kwan BC, Chow KM, Lau MF, Law MC, Chung KY, Leung CB, Li PK. 2008. Coagulase negative staphylococcal peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients: review of 232 consecutive cases. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 3:91–97. 10.2215/CJN.03070707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kavanagh D, Prescott GJ, Mactier RA. 2004. Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis in Scotland (1999-2002). Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 19:2584–2591. 10.1093/ndt/gfh386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Nessim SJ, Komenda P, Rigatto C, Verrelli M, Sood MM. 2013. Frequency and microbiology of peritonitis and exit-site infection among obese peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit. Dial. Int. 33:167–174. 10.3747/pdi.2011.00244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. 2004. Prosthetic-joint infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 351:1645–1654. 10.1056/NEJMra040181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Peel TN, Cheng AC, Buising KL, Choong PF. 2012. Microbiological aetiology, epidemiology, and clinical profile of prosthetic joint infections: are current antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines effective? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:2386–2391. 10.1128/AAC.06246-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Arciola CR, Campoccia D, An YH, Baldassarri L, Pirini V, Donati ME, Pegreffi F, Montanaro L. 2006. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of 15 minor staphylococcal species colonizing orthopedic implants. Int. J. Artif. Organs 29:395–401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Arciola CR, An YH, Campoccia D, Donati ME, Montanaro L. 2005. Etiology of implant orthopedic infections: a survey on 1027 clinical isolates. Int. J. Artif. Organs 28:1091–1100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Campoccia D, Montanaro L, von Eiff C, Pirini V, Ravaioli S, Becker K, Arciola CR. 2009. Cluster analysis of ribotyping profiles of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates recovered from foreign body-associated orthopedic infections. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 88:664–672. 10.1002/jbm.a.32090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Coventry MB. 1975. Treatment of infections occurring in total hip surgery. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 6:991–1003 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Mavrogenis AF, Papagelopoulos PJ, Coll-Mesa L, Pala E, Guerra G, Ruggieri P. 2011. Infected tumor prostheses. Orthopedics 34:991–998. 10.3928/01477447-20111021-24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D. 2005. Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect. Dis. 5:94–106. 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)01281-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Pajkos A, Deva AK, Vickery K, Cope C, Chang L, Cossart YE. 2003. Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111:1605–1611. 10.1097/01.PRS.0000054768.14922.44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Jansen B, Hartmann C, Schumacher-Perdreau F, Peters G. 1991. Late onset endophthalmitis associated with intraocular lens: a case of molecularly proved S. epidermidis aetiology. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 75:440–441. 10.1136/bjo.75.7.440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Recchia FM, Busbee BG, Pearlman RB, Carvalho-Recchia CA, Ho AC. 2005. Changing trends in the microbiologic aspects of postcataract endophthalmitis. Arch. Ophthalmol. 123:341–346. 10.1001/archopht.123.3.341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Selton-Suty C, Célard M, Le Moing V, Doco-Lecompte T, Chirouze C, Iung B, Strady C, Revest M, Vandenesch F, Bouvet A, Delahaye F, Alla F, Duval X, Hoen B, AEPEI Study Group 2012. Preeminence of Staphylococcus aureus in infective endocarditis: a 1-year population-based survey. Clin. Infect. Dis. 54:1230–1239. 10.1093/cid/cis199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Quinn EL, Cox F., Jr 1963. Staphylococcus albus (epidermidis) endocarditis: report of 16 cases seen between 1953 and 1962. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 161:635–642 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Bor DH, Woolhandler S, Nardin R, Brusch J, Himmelstein DU. 2013. Infective endocarditis in the U.S., 1998–2009: a nationwide study. PLoS One 8:e60033. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Castonguay MC, Burner KD, Edwards WD, Baddour LM, Maleszewski JJ. 2013. Surgical pathology of native valve endocarditis in 310 specimens from 287 patients (1985-2004). Cardiovasc. Pathol. 22:19–27. 10.1016/j.carpath.2012.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Ramsey RG, Gunnar RM, Tobin JR., Jr 1970. Endocarditis in the drug addict. Am. J. Cardiol. 25:608–618. 10.1016/0002-9149(70)90600-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Carozza A, De Santo LS, Romano G, Della CA, Ursomando F, Scardone M, Caianiello G, Cotrufo M. 2006. Infective endocarditis in intravenous drug abusers: patterns of presentation and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment. J. Heart Valve Dis. 15:125–131 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Cunha BA, Esrick MD, LaRusso M. 2007. Staphylococcus hominis native mitral valve bacterial endocarditis (SBE) in a patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Heart Lung 36:380–382. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Stöllberger C, Wechsler-Fördös A, Geppert F, Gulz W, Brownstone E, Nicolakis M, Finsterer J. 2006. Staphylococcus warneri endocarditis after implantation of a lumbar disc prosthesis in an immunocompetent patient. J. Infect. 52:e15–e18. 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.04.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Chu VH, Woods CW, Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Pappas PA, Federspiel J, Athan E, Stryjewski ME, Nacinovich F, Marco F, Levine DP, Elliott TS, Fortes CQ, Tornos P, Gordon DL, Utili R, Delahaye F, Corey GR, Fowler VG., Jr 2008. Emergence of coagulase-negative staphylococci as a cause of native valve endocarditis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:232–242. 10.1086/524666 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Miele PS, Kogulan PK, Levy CS, Goldstein S, Marcus KA, Smith MA, Rosenthal J, Croxton M, Gill VJ, Lucey DR. 2001. Seven cases of surgical native valve endocarditis caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci: an underappreciated disease. Am. Heart J. 142:571–576. 10.1067/mhj.2001.118119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Etienne J, Eykyn SJ. 1990. Increase in native valve endocarditis caused by coagulase negative staphylococci: an Anglo-French clinical and microbiological study. Br. Heart J. 64:381–384. 10.1136/hrt.64.6.381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Caputo GM, Archer GL, Calderwood SB, DiNubile MJ, Karchmer AW. 1987. Native valve endocarditis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clinical and microbiologic features. Am. J. Med. 83:619–625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Monk AB, Boundy S, Chu VH, Bettinger JC, Robles JR, Fowler VG, Jr, Archer GL. 2008. Analysis of the genotype and virulence of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from patients with infective endocarditis. Infect. Immun. 76:5127–5132. 10.1128/IAI.00606-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Zinkernagel AS, Speck RF, Ruef C, Zingg W, Berger-Bachi B, Springer B. 2005. Rapidly destructive Staphylococcus epidermidis endocarditis. Infection 33:148–150. 10.1007/s15010-005-4111-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Björkqvist M, Liljedahl M, Zimmermann J, Schollin J, Söderquist B. 2010. Colonization pattern of coagulase-negative staphylococci in preterm neonates and the relation to bacteremia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 29:1085–1093. 10.1007/s10096-010-0966-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Hira V, Kornelisse RF, Sluijter M, Kamerbeek A, Goessens WH, de Groot R, Hermans PW. 2013. Colonization dynamics of antibiotic-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in neonates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:595–597. 10.1128/JCM.02935-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Adlerberth I, Lindberg E, Åberg N, Hesselmar B, Saalman R, Strannegård IL, Wold AE. 2006. Reduced enterobacterial and increased staphylococcal colonization of the infantile bowel: an effect of hygienic lifestyle? Pediatr. Res. 59:96–101. 10.1203/01.pdr.0000191137.12774.b2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Soeorg H, Huik K, Parm U, Ilmoja ML, Metelskaja N, Metsvaht T, Lutsar I. 2013. Genetic relatedness of coagulase-negative staphylococci from gastrointestinal tract and blood of preterm neonates with late-onset sepsis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 32:389–393. 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182791abd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Simonsen KA, Anderson-Berry AL, Delair SF, Davies HD. 2014. Early-onset neonatal sepsis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 27:21–47. 10.1128/CMR.00031-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Stoll BJ, Hansen N. 2003. Infections in VLBW infants: studies from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Semin. Perinatol. 27:293–301. 10.1016/S0146-0005(03)00046-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Didier C, Streicher MP, Chognot D, Campagni R, Schnebelen A, Messer J, Donato L, Langer B, Meyer N, Astruc D, Kuhn P. 2012. Late-onset neonatal infections: incidences and pathogens in the era of antenatal antibiotics. Eur. J. Pediatr. 171:681–687. 10.1007/s00431-011-1639-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Satar M, Özlü F. 2012. Neonatal sepsis: a continuing disease burden. Turk. J. Pediatr. 54:449–457 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Haque KH. 1996. Infection and immunity in the newborn, p 302–310 In Campbell AG, McIntosh N. (ed), Forfar & Arneil's textbook of pediatrics, 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, London, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Thaver D, Zaidi AK. 2009. Burden of neonatal infections in developing countries: a review of evidence from community-based studies. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 28:S3–S9. 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181958755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Healy CM, Palazzi DL, Edwards MS, Campbell JR, Baker CJ. 2004. Features of invasive staphylococcal disease in neonates. Pediatrics 114:953–961. 10.1542/peds.2004-0043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Munson DP, Thompson TR, Johnson DE, Rhame FS, VanDrunen N, Ferrieri P. 1982. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal septicemia: experience in a newborn intensive care unit. J. Pediatr. 101:602–605. 10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80718-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Battisti O, Mitchison R, Davies PA. 1981. Changing blood culture isolates in a referral neonatal intensive care unit. Arch. Dis. Child. 56:775–778. 10.1136/adc.56.10.775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Fleer A, Senders RC, Visser MR, Bijlmer RP, Gerards LJ, Kraaijeveld CA, Verhoef J. 1983. Septicemia due to coagulase-negative staphylococci in a neonatal intensive care unit: clinical and bacteriological features and contaminated parenteral fluids as a source of sepsis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 2:426–431. 10.1097/00006454-198311000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Sgro M, Shah PS, Campbell D, Tenuta A, Shivananda S, Lee SK. 2011. Early-onset neonatal sepsis: rate and organism pattern between 2003 and 2008. J. Perinatol. 31:794–798. 10.1038/jp.2011.40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, Lemons JA, Donovan EF, Stark AR, Tyson JE, Oh W, Bauer CR, Korones SB, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Stevenson DK, Papile LA, Poole WK. 2002. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 110:285–291. 10.1542/peds.110.2.285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Freeman J, Epstein MF, Smith NE, Platt R, Sidebottom DG, Goldmann DA. 1990. Extra hospital stay and antibiotic usage with nosocomial coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia in two neonatal intensive care unit populations. Am. J. Dis. Child. 144:324–329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Khashu M, Osiovich H, Henry D, Al KA, Solimano A, Speert DP. 2006. Persistent bacteremia and severe thrombocytopenia caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatrics 117:340–348. 10.1542/peds.2005-0333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Linder N, Hernandez A, Amit L, Klinger G, Ashkenazi S, Levy I. 2011. Persistent coagulase-negative staphylococci bacteremia in very-low-birth-weight infants. Eur. J. Pediatr. 170:989–995. 10.1007/s00431-010-1387-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Yalaz M, Altun-Köroglu O, Ulusoy B, Yildiz B, Akisu M, Vardar F, Özinel MA, Kültürsay N. 2012. Evaluation of device-associated infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. Turk. J. Pediatr. 54:128–135 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Peker E, Kirimi E, Tuncer O, Ceylan A, Cagan E, Dogan M. 2010. Necrotizing fasciitis caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis in a neonate with extremely low birthweight. J. Dermatol. 37:671–673. 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.00840.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Persson E, Trollfors B, Brandberg LL, Tessin I. 2002. Septicaemia and meningitis in neonates and during early infancy in the Göteborg area of Sweden. Acta Paediatr. 91:1087–1092. 10.1080/080352502760311593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Horasan ES, Ersoz G, Tombak A, Tiftik N, Kaya A. 2011. Bloodstream infections and mortality-related factors in febrile neutropenic cancer patients. Med. Sci. Monit. 17:CR304–CR309. 10.12659/MSM.881773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.González-Barca E, Fernández-Sevilla A, Carratalá J, Grañena A, Gudiol F. 1996. Prospective study of 288 episodes of bacteremia in neutropenic cancer patients in a single institution. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:291–296. 10.1007/BF01695660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Cherif H, Kronvall G, Björkholm M, Kalin M. 2003. Bacteraemia in hospitalised patients with malignant blood disorders: a retrospective study of causative agents and their resistance profiles during a 14-year period without antibacterial prophylaxis. Hematol. J. 4:420–426. 10.1038/sj.thj.6200334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Rubio M, Palau L, Vivas JR, del Potro E, Diaz-Mediavilla J, Alvarez A, Martinez R, Picazo JJ. 1994. Predominance of gram-positive microorganisms as a cause of septicemia in patients with hematological malignancies. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 15:101–104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Coullioud D, van der Auwera P, Viot M, Lasset C. 1993. Prospective multicentric study of the etiology of 1051 bacteremic episodes in 782 cancer patients. CEMIC (French-Belgian Study Club of Infectious Diseases in Cancer). Support Care Cancer 1:34–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Escande MC, Herbrecht R. 1998. Prospective study of bacteraemia in cancer patients. Results of a French multicentre study. Support Care Cancer 6:273–280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Muldrew KL, Tang YW, Li H, Stratton CW. 2008. Clonal dissemination of Staphylococcus epidermidis in an oncology ward. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:3391–3396. 10.1128/JCM.00115-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Müller-Premru M, Cernelc P. 2004. Molecular epidemiology of catheter-related bloodstream infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci in haematological patients with neutropenia. Epidemiol. Infect. 132:921–925. 10.1017/S0950268804002584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Frank KL, Del Pozo JL, Patel R. 2008. From clinical microbiology to infection pathogenesis: how daring to be different works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21:111–133. 10.1128/CMR.00036-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Etienne J, Pangon B, Leport C, Wolff M, Clair B, Perronne C, Brun Y, Buré A. 1989. Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditis. Lancet 333:390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Fleurette J, Bès M, Brun Y, Freney J, Forey F, Coulet M, Reverdy ME, Etienne J. 1989. Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and S. schleiferi: bacteriological characteristics and susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Res. Microbiol. 140:107–118. 10.1016/0923-2508(89)90044-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Anguera I, Del Río A, Miró JM, Matínez-Lacasa X, Marco F, Gumá JR, Quaglio G, Claramonte X, Moreno A, Mestres CA, Mauri E, Azqueta M, Benito N, García-de la Maria C, Almela M, Jiménez-Expósito MJ, Sued O, De Lazzari E, Gatell JM. 2005. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infective endocarditis: description of 10 cases and analysis of native valve, prosthetic valve, and pacemaker lead endocarditis clinical profiles. Heart 91:e10. 10.1136/hrt.2004.040659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Liang M, Mansell C, Wade C, Fisher R, Devlin G. 2012. Unusually virulent coagulase-negative Staphylococcus lugdunensis is frequently associated with infective endocarditis: a Waikato series of patients. N. Z. Med. J. 125:51–59 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Reverdy ME, Eykyn SJ. 1993. Endocarditis due to Staphylococcus lugdunensis: report of 11 cases and review. Clin. Infect. Dis. 17:871–876. 10.1093/clinids/17.5.871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Liu PY, Huang YF, Tang CW, Chen YY, Hsieh KS, Ger LP, Chen YS, Liu YC. 2010. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infective endocarditis: a literature review and analysis of risk factors. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 43:478–484. 10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60074-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Seifert H, Oltmanns D, Becker K, Wisplinghoff H, von Eiff C. 2005. Staphylococcus lugdunensis pacemaker-related infection. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:1283–1286. 10.3201/eid1108.041177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Li YM, Blaskiewicz DJ, Hall WA. 2013. Shunt-related intracranial abscess caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis in a hydranencephalic patient. World Neurosurg. 80:e387–e389. 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Elliott SP, Yogev R, Shulman ST. 2001. Staphylococcus lugdunensis: an emerging cause of ventriculoperitoneal shunt infections. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 35:128–130. 10.1159/000050405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Sampathkumar P, Osmon DR, Cockerill FR., III 2000. Prosthetic joint infection due to Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 75:511–512. 10.4065/75.5.511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Kaabia N, Scauarda D, Lena G, Drancourt M. 2002. Molecular identification of Staphylococcus lugdunensis in a patient with meningitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1824–1825. 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1824-1825.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Koch LD, Knoll F, Hartmann G, Lhotta K. 2011. Recurrent exit-site infection due to Staphylococcus lugdunensis—a virulent coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Perit. Dial. Int. 31:372–373. 10.3747/pdi.2010.00272 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Zinkernagel AS, Zinkernagel MS, Elzi MV, Genoni M, Gubler J, Zbinden R, Mueller NJ. 2008. Significance of Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia: report of 28 cases and review of the literature. Infection 36:314–321. 10.1007/s15010-008-7287-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Choi SH, Chung JW, Lee EJ, Kim TH, Lee MS, Kang JM, Song EH, Jun JB, Kim MN, Kim YS, Woo JH, Choi SH. 2010. Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of Staphylococcus lugdunensis bacteremia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:3346–3349. 10.1128/JCM.00609-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Hung T, Zaghi S, Yousefzadeh J, Leibowitz M. 2012. Necrotizing fasciitis associated with Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2012:453685. 10.1155/2012/453685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Böcher S, Tønning B, Skov RL, Prag J. 2009. Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a common cause of skin and soft tissue infections in the community. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:946–950. 10.1128/JCM.01024-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Arias M, Tena D, Apellaniz M, Asensio MP, Caballero P, Hernandez C, Tejedor F, Bisquert J. 2010. Skin and soft tissue infections caused by Staphylococcus lugdunensis: report of 20 cases. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 42:879–884. 10.3109/00365548.2010.509332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Papapetropoulos N, Papapetropoulou M, Vantarakis A. 2013. Abscesses and wound infections due to Staphylococcus lugdunensis: report of 16 cases. Infection 41:525–528. 10.1007/s15010-012-0381-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Hubiche T, Del Giudice P, Roudière L. 2009. Staphylococcus lugdunensis in skin infections: pathogen or colonizing bacterium? J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:3057. 10.1128/JCM.00956-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Bellamy R, Barkham T. 2002. Staphylococcus lugdunensis infection sites: predominance of abscesses in the pelvic girdle region. Clin. Infect. Dis. 35:E32–E34. 10.1086/341304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Ros MJ, Ramirez A, Arteaga E, Alberto C, Gil J, Reina J. 1999. Infección por Staphylococcus lugdunensis: caracterización clinicomicrobiológica de 25 casos. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 17:223–226 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Bello C, Eskandar M, El GR, Sobande A, Nour H, Shafiq H. 2007. Staphylococcus lugdunensis endometritis: a case report. West Afr. J. Med. 26:243–245 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Shaaban HS, Choo HF, Sensakovic JW. 2011. A case of Staphylococcus lugdunensis related pyomyoma occurring after Cesarean section. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 3:101–102. 10.4103/0974-777X.77311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Greig JM, Wood MJ. 2003. Staphylococcus lugdunensis vertebral osteomyelitis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 9:1139–1141. 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00777.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Cooke RP, James SE, Sallomi DF. 2003. Infective discitis due to Staphylococcus lugdunensis—a case of missed opportunity. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 60:162–164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Palazzo E, Pierre J, Besbes N. 1992. Staphylococcus lugdunensis arthritis: a complication of arthroscopy. J. Rheumatol. 19:327–328 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Grupper M, Potasman I, Rosner I, Slobodin G, Rozenbaum M. 2010. Septic arthritis due to Staphylococcus lugdunensis in a native joint. Rheumatol. Int. 30:1231–1233. 10.1007/s00296-009-1044-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Latham RH, Running K, Stamm WE. 1983. Urinary tract infections in young adult women caused by Staphylococcus saprophyticus. JAMA 250:3063–3066 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Raz R, Colodner R, Kunin CM. 2005. Who are you—Staphylococcus saprophyticus? Clin. Infect. Dis. 40:896–898. 10.1086/428353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Hovelius B, Mårdh PA. 1984. Staphylococcus saprophyticus as a common cause of urinary tract infections. Rev. Infect. Dis. 6:328–337. 10.1093/clinids/6.3.328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Choi SH, Woo JH, Jeong JY, Kim NJ, Kim MN, Kim YS, Ryu J. 2006. Clinical significance of Staphylococcus saprophyticus identified on blood culture in a tertiary care hospital. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 56:337–339. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Garduño E, Márquez I, Beteta A, Said I, Blanco J, Pineda T. 2005. Staphylococcus saprophyticus causing native valve endocarditis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 37:690–691. 10.1080/00365540510027200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Proctor RA, von Eiff C, Kahl BC, Becker K, McNamara P, Herrmann M, Peters G. 2006. Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:295–305. 10.1038/nrmicro1384 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Baddour LM, Christensen GD. 1987. Prosthetic valve endocarditis due to small-colony staphylococcal variants. Rev. Infect. Dis. 9:1168–1174. 10.1093/clinids/9.6.1168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Borderon E, Horodniceanu T. 1976. Mutants déficients a colonies naines de Staphylococcus: étude de trois souches isolées chez des malades porteurs d′ostéosynthèses. Ann. Microbiol. (Paris) 127:503–514 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.von Eiff C, Vaudaux P, Kahl BC, Lew D, Emler S, Schmidt A, Peters G, Proctor RA. 1999. Bloodstream infections caused by small-colony variants of coagulase-negative staphylococci following pacemaker implantation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29:932–934. 10.1086/520462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Baddour LM, Barker LP, Christensen GD, Parisi JT, Simpson WA. 1990. Phenotypic variation of Staphylococcus epidermidis in infection of transvenous endocardial pacemaker electrodes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:676–679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Adler H, Widmer A, Frei R. 2003. Emergence of a teicoplanin-resistant small colony variant of Staphylococcus epidermidis during vancomycin therapy. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 22:746–748. 10.1007/s10096-003-1029-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Al Laham N, Rohde H, Sander G, Fischer A, Hussain M, Heilmann C, Mack D, Proctor R, Peters G, Becker K, von Eiff C. 2007. Augmented expression of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in a defined Staphylococcus epidermidis mutant with the small-colony-variant phenotype. J. Bacteriol. 189:4494–4501. 10.1128/JB.00160-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Sander G, Börner T, Kriegeskorte A, von Eiff C, Becker K, Mahabir E. 2012. Catheter colonization and abscess formation due to Staphylococcus epidermidis with normal and small-colony-variant phenotype is mouse strain dependent. PLoS One 7:e36602. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Peters G, Locci R, Pulverer G. 1982. Adherence and growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci on surfaces of intravenous catheters. J. Infect. Dis. 146:479–482. 10.1093/infdis/146.4.479 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, Beachey EH. 1982. Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect. Immun. 37:318–326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Peters G, Locci R, Pulverer G. 1981. Microbial colonization of prosthetic devices. II. Scanning electron microscopy of naturally infected intravenous catheters. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Mikrobiol. Hyg. B 173:293–299 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Hussain M, Wilcox MH, White PJ. 1993. The slime of coagulase-negative staphylococci: biochemistry and relation to adherence. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 10:191–207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Mack D, Fischer W, Krokotsch A, Leopold K, Hartmann R, Egge H, Laufs R. 1996. The intercellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis is a linear beta-1,6-linked glucosaminoglycan: purification and structural analysis. J. Bacteriol. 178:175–183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Rohde H, Burdelski C, Bartscht K, Hussain M, Buck F, Horstkotte MA, Knobloch JK, Heilmann C, Herrmann M, Mack D. 2005. Induction of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation via proteolytic processing of the accumulation-associated protein by staphylococcal and host proteases. Mol. Microbiol. 55:1883–1895. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04515.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Sadovskaya I, Vinogradov E, Flahaut S, Kogan G, Jabbouri S. 2005. Extracellular carbohydrate-containing polymers of a model biofilm-producing strain, Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A. Infect. Immun. 73:3007–3017. 10.1128/IAI.73.5.3007-3017.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Schommer NN, Christner M, Hentschke M, Ruckdeschel K, Aepfelbacher M, Rohde H. 2011. Staphylococcus epidermidis uses distinct mechanisms of biofilm formation to interfere with phagocytosis and activation of mouse macrophage-like cells 774A.1. Infect. Immun. 79:2267–2276. 10.1128/IAI.01142-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Izano EA, Amarante MA, Kher WB, Kaplan JB. 2008. Differential roles of poly-N-acetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide and extracellular DNA in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:470–476. 10.1128/AEM.02073-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Heilmann C. 2011. Adhesion mechanisms of staphylococci. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 715:105–123. 10.1007/978-94-007-0940-9_7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Clarke SR, Foster SJ. 2006. Surface adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 51:187–224. 10.1016/S0065-2911(06)51004-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Patti JM, Allen BL, McGavin MJ, Höök M. 1994. MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissues. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48:585–617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Chavakis T, Wiechmann K, Preissner KT, Herrmann M. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus interactions with the endothelium: the role of bacterial “secretable expanded repertoire adhesive molecules” (SERAM) in disturbing host defense systems. Thromb. Haemost. 94:278–285. 10.1160/TH05-05-0306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Höök M. 2014. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12:49–62. 10.1038/nrmicro3161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. 1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318–1322. 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Heilmann C, Hussain M, Peters G, Götz F. 1997. Evidence for autolysin-mediated primary attachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis to a polystyrene surface. Mol. Microbiol. 24:1013–1024. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4101774.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Hirschhausen N, Schlesier T, Peters G, Heilmann C. 2012. Characterization of the modular design of the autolysin/adhesin Aaa from Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 7:e40353. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Biswas R, Voggu L, Simon UK, Hentschel P, Thumm G, Götz F. 2006. Activity of the major staphylococcal autolysin Atl. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 259:260–268. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00281.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Schlag M, Biswas R, Krismer B, Kohler T, Zoll S, Yu W, Schwarz H, Peschel A, Gotz F. 2010. Role of staphylococcal wall teichoic acid in targeting the major autolysin Atl. Mol. Microbiol. 75:864–873. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07007.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Allignet J, Aubert S, Dyke KG, El Solh N. 2001. Staphylococcus caprae strains carry determinants known to be involved in pathogenicity: a gene encoding an autolysin-binding fibronectin and the ica operon involved in biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 69:712–718. 10.1128/IAI.69.2.712-718.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Hell W, Meyer HG, Gatermann SG. 1998. Cloning of aas, a gene encoding a Staphylococcus saprophyticus surface protein with adhesive and autolytic properties. Mol. Microbiol. 29:871–881. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00983.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Yokoi KJ, Sugahara K, Iguchi A, Nishitani G, Ikeda M, Shimada T, Inagaki N, Yamakawa A, Taketo A, Kodaira K. 2008. Molecular properties of the putative autolysin Atl(WM) encoded by Staphylococcus warneri M: mutational and biochemical analyses of the amidase and glucosaminidase domains. Gene 416:66–76. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Bourgeois I, Camiade E, Biswas R, Courtin P, Gibert L, Götz F, Chapot-Chartier MP, Pons JL, Pestel-Caron M. 2009. Characterization of AtlL, a bifunctional autolysin of Staphylococcus lugdunensis with N-acetylglucosaminidase and N-acetylmuramoyl-l-alanine amidase activities. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 290:105–113. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01414.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Qin Z, Ou Y, Yang L, Zhu Y, Tolker-Nielsen T, Molin S, Qu D. 2007. Role of autolysin-mediated DNA release in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology 153:2083–2092. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006031-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Bose JL, Lehman MK, Fey PD, Bayles KW. 2012. Contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus Atl AM and GL murein hydrolase activities in cell division, autolysis, and biofilm formation. PLoS One 7:e42244. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Zoll S, Pätzold B, Schlag M, Götz F, Kalbacher H, Stehle T. 2010. Structural basis of cell wall cleavage by a staphylococcal autolysin. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1000807. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Zoll S, Schlag M, Shkumatov AV, Rautenberg M, Svergun DI, Götz F, Stehle T. 2012. Ligand-binding properties and conformational dynamics of autolysin repeat domains in staphylococcal cell wall recognition. J. Bacteriol. 194:3789–3802. 10.1128/JB.00331-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Wang C, Li M, Dong D, Wang J, Ren J, Otto M, Gao Q. 2007. Role of ClpP in biofilm formation and virulence of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbes Infect. 9:1376–1383. 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Cucarella C, Solano C, Valle J, Amorena B, Lasa I, Penadés JR. 2001. Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 183:2888–2896. 10.1128/JB.183.9.2888-2896.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Tormo MA, Knecht E, Götz F, Lasa I, Penadés JR. 2005. Bap-dependent biofilm formation by pathogenic species of Staphylococcus: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Microbiology 151:2465–2475. 10.1099/mic.0.27865-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Potter A, Ceotto H, Giambiagi-deMarval M, dos Santos KR, Nes IF, do Carmo de Freire Bastos M. 2009. The gene bap, involved in biofilm production, is present in Staphylococcus spp. strains from nosocomial infections. J. Microbiol. 47:319–326. 10.1007/s12275-009-0008-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Sadovskaya I, Vinogradov E, Li J, Jabbouri S. 2004. Structural elucidation of the extracellular and cell-wall teichoic acids of Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A, a reference biofilm-positive strain. Carbohydr. Res. 339:1467–1473. 10.1016/j.carres.2004.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Gross M, Cramton SE, Götz F, Peschel A. 2001. Key role of teichoic acid net charge in Staphylococcus aureus colonization of artificial surfaces. Infect. Immun. 69:3423–3426. 10.1128/IAI.69.5.3423-3426.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Holland LM, Conlon B, O'Gara JP. 2011. Mutation of tagO reveals an essential role for wall teichoic acids in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm development. Microbiology 157:408–418. 10.1099/mic.0.042234-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Herrmann M, Lai QJ, Albrecht RM, Mosher DF, Proctor RA. 1993. Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to surface-bound platelets: role of fibrinogen/fibrin and platelet integrins. J. Infect. Dis. 167:312–322. 10.1093/infdis/167.2.312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Herrmann M, Hartleib J, Kehrel B, Montgomery RR, Sixma JJ, Peters G. 1997. Interaction of von Willebrand factor with Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 176:984–991. 10.1086/516502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Rupp ME, Fey PD, Heilmann C, Götz F. 2001. Characterization of the importance of Staphylococcus epidermidis autolysin and polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in the pathogenesis of intravascular catheter-associated infection in a rat model. J. Infect. Dis. 183:1038–1042. 10.1086/319279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Allignet J, England P, Old I, El Solh N. 2002. Several regions of the repeat domain of the Staphylococcus caprae autolysin, AtlC, are involved in fibronectin binding. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 213:193–197. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11305.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Heilmann C, Thumm G, Chhatwal GS, Hartleib J, Uekötter A, Peters G. 2003. Identification and characterization of a novel autolysin (Aae) with adhesive properties from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology 149:2769–2778. 10.1099/mic.0.26527-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Buist G, Steen A, Kok J, Kuipers OP. 2008. LysM, a widely distributed protein motif for binding to (peptido)glycans. Mol. Microbiol. 68:838–847. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06211.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Zou Y, Hou C. 2010. Systematic analysis of an amidase domain CHAP in 12 Staphylococcus aureus genomes and 44 staphylococcal phage genomes. Comput. Biol. Chem. 34:251–257. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2010.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Bowden MG, Visai L, Longshaw CM, Holland KT, Speziale P, Höök M. 2002. Is the GehD lipase from Staphylococcus epidermidis a collagen binding adhesin? J. Biol. Chem. 277:43017–43023. 10.1074/jbc.M207921200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Gill SR, Fouts DE, Archer GL, Mongodin EF, Deboy RT, Ravel J, Paulsen IT, Kolonay JF, Brinkac L, Beanan M, Dodson RJ, Daugherty SC, Madupu R, Angiuoli SV, Durkin AS, Haft DH, Vamathevan J, Khouri H, Utterback T, Lee C, Dimitrov G, Jiang L, Qin H, Weidman J, Tran K, Kang K, Hance IR, Nelson KE, Fraser CM. 2005. Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain. J. Bacteriol. 187:2426–2438. 10.1128/JB.187.7.2426-2438.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Christner M, Franke GC, Schommer NN, Wendt U, Wegert K, Pehle P, Kroll G, Schulze C, Buck F, Mack D, Aepfelbacher M, Rohde H. 2010. The giant extracellular matrix-binding protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis mediates biofilm accumulation and attachment to fibronectin. Mol. Microbiol. 75:187–207. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06981.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Williams RJ, Henderson B, Sharp LJ, Nair SP. 2002. Identification of a fibronectin-binding protein from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 70:6805–6810. 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6805-6810.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Schneewind O, Mihaylova-Petkov D, Model P. 1993. Cell wall sorting signals in surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria. EMBO J. 12:4803–4811 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Mazmanian SK, Liu G, Ton-That H, Schneewind O. 1999. Staphylococcus aureus sortase, an enzyme that anchors surface proteins to the cell wall. Science 285:760–763. 10.1126/science.285.5428.760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Bowden MG, Chen W, Singvall J, Xu Y, Peacock SJ, Valtulina V, Speziale P, Höök M. 2005. Identification and preliminary characterization of cell-wall-anchored proteins of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology 151:1453–1464. 10.1099/mic.0.27534-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Nilsson M, Frykberg L, Flock JI, Pei L, Lindberg M, Guss B. 1998. A fibrinogen-binding protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 66:2666–2673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Pei L, Palma M, Nilsson M, Guss B, Flock JI. 1999. Functional studies of a fibrinogen binding protein from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 67:4525–4530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Pei L, Flock JI. 2001. Lack of fbe, the gene for a fibrinogen-binding protein from Staphylococcus epidermidis, reduces its adherence to fibrinogen coated surfaces. Microb. Pathog. 31:185–193. 10.1006/mpat.2001.0462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Hartford O, O'Brien L, Schofield K, Wells J, Foster TJ. 2001. The Fbe (SdrG) protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis HB promotes bacterial adherence to fibrinogen. Microbiology 147:2545–2552 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Guo B, Zhao X, Shi Y, Zhu D, Zhang Y. 2007. Pathogenic implication of a fibrinogen-binding protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis in a rat model of intravascular-catheter-associated infection. Infect. Immun. 75:2991–2995. 10.1128/IAI.01741-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Brennan MP, Loughman A, Devocelle M, Arasu S, Chubb AJ, Foster TJ, Cox D. 2009. Elucidating the role of Staphylococcus epidermidis serine-aspartate repeat protein G in platelet activation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 7:1364–1372. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03495.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Davis SL, Gurusiddappa S, McCrea KW, Perkins S, Höök M. 2001. SdrG, a fibrinogen-binding bacterial adhesin of the microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules subfamily from Staphylococcus epidermidis, targets the thrombin cleavage site in the Bβ chain. J. Biol. Chem. 276:27799–27805. 10.1074/jbc.M103873200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Ponnuraj K, Bowden MG, Davis S, Gurusiddappa S, Moore D, Choe D, Xu Y, Hook M, Narayana SV. 2003. A “dock, lock, and latch” structural model for a staphylococcal adhesin binding to fibrinogen. Cell 115:217–228. 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00809-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.McCrea KW, Hartford O, Davis S, Eidhin DN, Lina G, Speziale P, Foster TJ, Höök M. 2000. The serine-aspartate repeat (Sdr) protein family in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbiology 146:1535–1546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Arrecubieta C, Lee MH, Macey A, Foster TJ, Lowy FD. 2007. SdrF, a Staphylococcus epidermidis surface protein, binds type I collagen. J. Biol. Chem. 282:18767–18776. 10.1074/jbc.M610940200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Shahrooei M, Hira V, Stijlemans B, Merckx R, Hermans PW, Van EJ. 2009. Inhibition of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation by rabbit polyclonal antibodies against the SesC protein. Infect. Immun. 77:3670–3678. 10.1128/IAI.01464-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Shahrooei M, Hira V, Khodaparast L, Khodaparast L, Stijlemans B, Kucharikova S, Burghout P, Hermans PW, Van Eldere J. 2012. Vaccination with SesC decreases Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 80:3660–3668. 10.1128/IAI.00104-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Macintosh RL, Brittan JL, Bhattacharya R, Jenkinson HF, Derrick J, Upton M, Handley PS. 2009. The terminal A domain of the fibrillar accumulation-associated protein (Aap) of Staphylococcus epidermidis mediates adhesion to human corneocytes. J. Bacteriol. 191:7007–7016. 10.1128/JB.00764-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Hussain M, Heilmann C, Peters G, Herrmann M. 2001. Teichoic acid enhances adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to immobilized fibronectin. Microb. Pathog. 31:261–270. 10.1006/mpat.2001.0469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.McKenney D, Hübner J, Muller E, Wang Y, Goldmann DA, Pier GB. 1998. The ica locus of Staphylococcus epidermidis encodes production of the capsular polysaccharide/adhesin. Infect. Immun. 66:4711–4720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Mack D, Nedelmann M, Krokotsch A, Schwarzkopf A, Heesemann J, Laufs R. 1994. Characterization of transposon mutants of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis impaired in the accumulative phase of biofilm production: genetic identification of a hexosamine-containing polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. Infect. Immun. 62:3244–3253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF, Nichols WW, Götz F. 1999. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 67:5427–5433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.McKenney D, Pouliot KL, Wang Y, Murthy V, Ulrich M, Döring G, Lee JC, Goldmann DA, Pier GB. 1999. Broadly protective vaccine for Staphylococcus aureus based on an in vivo-expressed antigen. Science 284:1523–1527. 10.1126/science.284.5419.1523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Maira-Litran T, Kropec A, Abeygunawardana C, Joyce J, Mark G, Goldmann DA, III, Pier GB. 2002. Immunochemical properties of the staphylococcal poly-N-acetylglucosamine surface polysaccharide. Infect. Immun. 70:4433–4440. 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4433-4440.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Vuong C, Kocianova S, Voyich JM, Yao Y, Fischer ER, DeLeo FR, Otto M. 2004. A crucial role for exopolysaccharide modification in bacterial biofilm formation, immune evasion, and virulence. J. Biol. Chem. 279:54881–54886. 10.1074/jbc.M411374200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Kaplan JB, Velliyagounder K, Ragunath C, Rohde H, Mack D, Knobloch JK, Ramasubbu N. 2004. Genes involved in the synthesis and degradation of matrix polysaccharide in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 186:8213–8220. 10.1128/JB.186.24.8213-8220.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Gerke C, Kraft A, Süssmuth R, Schweitzer O, Götz F. 1998. Characterization of the N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity involved in the biosynthesis of the Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. J. Biol. Chem. 273:18586–18593. 10.1074/jbc.273.29.18586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Heilmann C, Schweitzer O, Gerke C, Vanittanakom N, Mack D, Götz F. 1996. Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mol. Microbiol. 20:1083–1091. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02548.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Rupp ME, Ulphani JS, Fey PD, Bartscht K, Mack D. 1999. Characterization of the importance of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin of Staphylococcus epidermidis in the pathogenesis of biomaterial-based infection in a mouse foreign body infection model. Infect. Immun. 67:2627–2632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Rupp ME, Ulphani JS, Fey PD, Mack D. 1999. Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin in the pathogenesis of intravascular catheter-associated infection in a rat model. Infect. Immun. 67:2656–2659 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Ziebuhr W, Heilmann C, Götz F, Meyer P, Wilms K, Straube E, Hacker J. 1997. Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) and phase variation in Staphylococcus epidermidis blood culture strains and mucosal isolates. Infect. Immun. 65:890–896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Frank KL, Patel R. 2007. Poly-N-acetylglucosamine is not a major component of the extracellular matrix in biofilms formed by icaADBC-positive Staphylococcus lugdunensis isolates. Infect. Immun. 75:4728–4742. 10.1128/IAI.00640-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Chokr A, Watier D, Eleaume H, Pangon B, Ghnassia JC, Mack D, Jabbouri S. 2006. Correlation between biofilm formation and production of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 296:381–388. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Hussain M, Herrmann M, von Eiff C, Perdreau-Remington F, Peters G. 1997. A 140-kilodalton extracellular protein is essential for the accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains on surfaces. Infect. Immun. 65:519–524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Schumacher-Perdreau F, Heilmann C, Peters G, Götz F, Pulverer G. 1994. Comparative analysis of a biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis strain and its adhesion-positive, accumulation-negative mutant M7. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 117:71–78. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06744.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Rohde H, Kalitzky M, Kroger N, Scherpe S, Horstkotte MA, Knobloch JK, Zander AR, Mack D. 2004. Detection of virulence-associated genes not useful for discriminating between invasive and commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis strains from a bone marrow transplant unit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:5614–5619. 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5614-5619.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Vandecasteele SJ, Peetermans WE, Merckx R, Rijnders BJ, Van EJ. 2003. Reliability of the ica, aap and atlE genes in the discrimination between invasive, colonizing and contaminant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 9:114–119. 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00544.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Conrady DG, Brescia CC, Horii K, Weiss AA, Hassett DJ, Herr AB. 2008. A zinc-dependent adhesion module is responsible for intercellular adhesion in staphylococcal biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:19456–19461. 10.1073/pnas.0807717105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Bateman A, Holden MT, Yeats C. 2005. The G5 domain: a potential N-acetylglucosamine recognition domain involved in biofilm formation. Bioinformatics 21:1301–1303. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Banner MA, Cunniffe JG, Macintosh RL, Foster TJ, Rohde H, Mack D, Hoyes E, Derrick J, Upton M, Handley PS. 2007. Localized tufts of fibrils on Staphylococcus epidermidis NCTC 11047 are comprised of the accumulation-associated protein. J. Bacteriol. 189:2793–2804. 10.1128/JB.00952-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Conrady DG, Wilson JJ, Herr AB. 2013. Structural basis for Zn2+-dependent intercellular adhesion in staphylococcal biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110:E202–E211. 10.1073/pnas.1208134110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Sun D, Accavitti MA, Bryers JD. 2005. Inhibition of biofilm formation by monoclonal antibodies against Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A accumulation-associated protein. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 12:93–100. 10.1128/CDLI.12.1.93-100.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Itoh Y, Wang X, Hinnebusch BJ, Preston JF, III, Romeo T. 2005. Depolymerization of β-1,6-N-acetyl-d-glucosamine disrupts the integrity of diverse bacterial biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 187:382–387. 10.1128/JB.187.1.382-387.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Rice KC, Mann EE, Endres JL, Weiss EC, Cassat JE, Smeltzer MS, Bayles KW. 2007. The cidA murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:8113–8118. 10.1073/pnas.0610226104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Kiedrowski MR, Kavanaugh JS, Malone CL, Mootz JM, Voyich JM, Smeltzer MS, Bayles KW, Horswill AR. 2011. Nuclease modulates biofilm formation in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 6:e26714. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Hu Y, Meng J, Shi C, Hervin K, Fratamico PM, Shi X. 2013. Characterization and comparative analysis of a second thermonuclease from Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol. Res. 168:174–182. 10.1016/j.micres.2012.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Beenken KE, Spencer H, Griffin LM, Smeltzer MS. 2012. Impact of extracellular nuclease production on the biofilm phenotype of Staphylococcus aureus under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Infect. Immun. 80:1634–1638. 10.1128/IAI.06134-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Kogan G, Sadovskaya I, Chaignon P, Chokr A, Jabbouri S. 2006. Biofilms of clinical strains of Staphylococcus that do not contain polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 255:11–16. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00043.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Rohde H, Burandt EC, Siemssen N, Frommelt L, Burdelski C, Wurster S, Scherpe S, Davies AP, Harris LG, Horstkotte MA, Knobloch JK, Ragunath C, Kaplan JB, Mack D. 2007. Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin or protein factors in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus isolated from prosthetic hip and knee joint infections. Biomaterials 28:1711–1720. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Heidrich C, Hantke K, Bierbaum G, Sahl HG. 1996. Identification and analysis of a gene encoding a Fur-like protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 140:253–259. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08345.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Chaignon P, Sadovskaya I, Ragunah C, Ramasubbu N, Kaplan JB, Jabbouri S. 2007. Susceptibility of staphylococcal biofilms to enzymatic treatments depends on their chemical composition. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75:125–132. 10.1007/s00253-006-0790-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Boles BR, Horswill AR. 2008. agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 4:e1000052. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Dubin G, Chmiel D, Mak P, Rakwalska M, Rzychon M, Dubin A. 2001. Molecular cloning and biochemical characterisation of proteases from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biol. Chem. 382:1575–1582. 10.1515/BC.2001.192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Moon JL, Banbula A, Oleksy A, Mayo JA, Travis J. 2001. Isolation and characterization of a highly specific serine endopeptidase from an oral strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biol. Chem. 382:1095–1099. 10.1515/BC.2001.138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Ohara-Nemoto Y, Ikeda Y, Kobayashi M, Sasaki M, Tajika S, Kimura S. 2002. Characterization and molecular cloning of a glutamyl endopeptidase from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microb. Pathog. 33:33–41. 10.1006/mpat.2002.0515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Sugimoto S, Iwamoto T, Takada K, Okuda K, Tajima A, Iwase T, Mizunoe Y. 2013. Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp degrades specific proteins associated with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and host-pathogen interaction. J. Bacteriol. 195:1645–1655. 10.1128/JB.01672-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Chen C, Krishnan V, Macon K, Manne K, Narayana SV, Schneewind O. 2013. Secreted proteases control autolysin-mediated biofilm growth of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem. 288:29440–29452. 10.1074/jbc.M113.502039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Geissler S, Götz F, Kupke T. 1996. Serine protease EpiP from Staphylococcus epidermidis catalyzes the processing of the epidermin precursor peptide. J. Bacteriol. 178:284–288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Cockayne A, Hill PJ, Powell NB, Bishop K, Sims C, Williams P. 1998. Molecular cloning of a 32-kilodalton lipoprotein component of a novel iron-regulated Staphylococcus epidermidis ABC transporter. Infect. Immun. 66:3767–3774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Teufel P, Götz F. 1993. Characterization of an extracellular metalloprotease with elastase activity from Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Bacteriol. 175:4218–4224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Lai Y, Villaruz AE, Li M, Cha DJ, Sturdevant DE, Otto M. 2007. The human anionic antimicrobial peptide dermcidin induces proteolytic defence mechanisms in staphylococci. Mol. Microbiol. 63:497–506. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05540.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Oleksy A, Golonka E, Banbula A, Szmyd G, Moon J, Kubica M, Greenbaum D, Bogyo M, Foster TJ, Travis J, Potempa J. 2004. Growth phase-dependent production of a cell wall-associated elastinolytic cysteine proteinase by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Biol. Chem. 385:525–535. 10.1515/BC.2004.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Vuong C, Gerke C, Somerville GA, Fischer ER, Otto M. 2003. Quorum-sensing control of biofilm factors in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Infect. Dis. 188:706–718. 10.1086/377239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Mehlin C, Headley CM, Klebanoff SJ. 1999. An inflammatory polypeptide complex from Staphylococcus epidermidis: isolation and characterization. J. Exp. Med. 189:907–918. 10.1084/jem.189.6.907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Cheung GY, Rigby K, Wang R, Queck SY, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, Teintze M, DeLeo FR, Otto M. 2010. Staphylococcus epidermidis strategies to avoid killing by human neutrophils. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001133. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.McKevitt AI, Bjornson GL, Mauracher CA, Scheifele DW. 1990. Amino acid sequence of a deltalike toxin from Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 58:1473–1475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Queck SY, Khan BA, Wang R, Bach TH, Kretschmer D, Chen L, Kreiswirth BN, Peschel A, DeLeo FR, Otto M. 2009. Mobile genetic element-encoded cytolysin connects virulence to methicillin resistance in MRSA. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000533. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Vuong C, Saenz HL, Götz F, Otto M. 2000. Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1688–1693. 10.1086/317606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Yao Y, Sturdevant DE, Otto M. 2005. Genomewide analysis of gene expression in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: insights into the pathophysiology of S. epidermidis biofilms and the role of phenol-soluble modulins in formation of biofilms. J. Infect. Dis. 191:289–298. 10.1086/426945 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Wang R, Khan BA, Cheung GY, Bach TH, Jameson-Lee M, Kong KF, Queck SY, Otto M. 2011. Staphylococcus epidermidis surfactant peptides promote biofilm maturation and dissemination of biofilm-associated infection in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 121:238–248. 10.1172/JCI42520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Hirschhausen N, Schlesier T, Schmidt MA, Götz F, Peters G, Heilmann C. 2010. A novel staphylococcal internalization mechanism involves the major autolysin Atl and heat shock cognate protein Hsc70 as host cell receptor. Cell. Microbiol. 12:1746–1764. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01506.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Khalil H, Williams RJ, Stenbeck G, Henderson B, Meghji S, Nair SP. 2007. Invasion of bone cells by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Microbes Infect. 9:460–465. 10.1016/j.micinf.2007.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Valour F, Trouillet-Assant S, Rasigade JP, Lustig S, Chanard E, Meugnier H, Tigaud S, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Ferry T, Laurent F. 2013. Staphylococcus epidermidis in orthopedic device infections: the role of bacterial internalization in human osteoblasts and biofilm formation. PLoS One 8:e67240. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Szabados F, Kleine B, Anders A, Kaase M, Sakinç T, Schmitz I, Gatermann S. 2008. Staphylococcus saprophyticus ATCC 15305 is internalized into human urinary bladder carcinoma cell line 5637. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 285:163–169. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01218.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Kriegeskorte A, König S, Sander G, Pirkl A, Mahabir E, Proctor RA, von Eiff C, Peters G, Becker K. 2011. Small colony variants of Staphylococcus aureus reveal distinct protein profiles. Proteomics 11:2476–2490. 10.1002/pmic.201000796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.von Eiff C, McNamara P, Becker K, Bates D, Lei XH, Ziman M, Bochner BR, Peters G, Proctor RA. 2006. Phenotype microarray profiling of Staphylococcus aureus menD and hemB mutants with the small-colony-variant phenotype. J. Bacteriol. 188:687–693. 10.1128/JB.188.2.687-693.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Seggewiss J, Becker K, Kotte O, Eisenacher M, Khoschkhoi Yazdi MR, Fischer A, McNamara P, Al Laham N, Proctor R, Peters G, Heinemann M, von Eiff C. 2006. Reporter metabolite analysis of transcriptional profiles of a Staphylococcus aureus strain with normal phenotype and its isogenic hemB mutant displaying the small-colony-variant phenotype. J. Bacteriol. 188:7765–7777. 10.1128/JB.00774-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Besier S, Ludwig A, Ohlsen K, Brade V, Wichelhaus TA. 2007. Molecular analysis of the thymidine-auxotrophic small colony variant phenotype of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 297:217–225. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Chatterjee I, Kriegeskorte A, Fischer A, Deiwick S, Theimann N, Proctor RA, Peters G, Herrmann M, Kahl BC. 2008. In vivo mutations of thymidylate synthase (encoded by thyA) are responsible for thymidine dependency in clinical small-colony variants of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 190:834–842. 10.1128/JB.00912-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Lannergård J, von Eiff C, Sander G, Cordes T, Seggewiss J, Peters G, Proctor RA, Becker K, Hughes D. 2008. Identification of the genetic basis for clinical menadione-auxotrophic small-colony variant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:4017–4022. 10.1128/AAC.00668-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347.von Eiff C, Heilmann C, Proctor RA, Woltz C, Peters G, Götz F. 1997. A site-directed Staphylococcus aureus hemB mutant is a small-colony variant which persists intracellularly. J. Bacteriol. 179:4706–4712 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Abu-Qatouseh LF, Chinni SV, Seggewiss J, Proctor RA, Brosius J, Rozhdestvensky TS, Peters G, von Eiff C, Becker K. 2010. Identification of differentially expressed small non-protein-coding RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus displaying both the normal and the small-colony variant phenotype. J. Mol. Med. 88:565–575. 10.1007/s00109-010-0597-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Tuchscherr L, Heitmann V, Hussain M, Viemann D, Roth J, von Eiff C, Peters G, Becker K, Löffler B. 2010. Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants are adapted phenotypes for intracellular persistence. J. Infect. Dis. 202:1031–1040. 10.1086/656047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Tuchscherr L, Medina E, Hussain M, Völker W, Heitmann V, Niemann S, Holzinger D, Roth J, Proctor RA, Becker K, Peters G, Löffler B. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus phenotype switching: an effective bacterial strategy to escape host immune response and establish a chronic infection. EMBO Mol. Med. 3:129–141. 10.1002/emmm.201000115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.von Eiff C, Becker K, Metze D, Lubritz G, Hockmann J, Schwarz T, Peters G. 2001. Intracellular persistence of Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants within keratinocytes: a cause for antibiotic treatment failure in a patient with Darier's disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:1643–1647. 10.1086/320519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Mattsson E, Verhage L, Rollof J, Fleer A, Verhoef J, van Dijk H. 1993. Peptidoglycan and teichoic acid from Staphylococcus epidermidis stimulate human monocytes to release tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1 β and interleukin-6. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 7:281–287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Mattsson E, Rollof J, Verhoef J, van Dijk H, Fleer A. 1994. Serum-induced potentiation of tumor necrosis factor alpha production by human monocytes in response to staphylococcal peptidoglycan: involvement of different serum factors. Infect. Immun. 62:3837–3843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Kristian SA, Birkenstock TA, Sauder U, Mack D, Götz F, Landmann R. 2008. Biofilm formation induces C3a release and protects Staphylococcus epidermidis from IgG and complement deposition and from neutrophil-dependent killing. J. Infect. Dis. 197:1028–1035. 10.1086/528992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Johnson GM, Lee DA, Regelmann WE, Gray ED, Peters G, Quie PG. 1986. Interference with granulocyte function by Staphylococcus epidermidis slime. Infect. Immun. 54:13–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Begun J, Gaiani JM, Rohde H, Mack D, Calderwood SB, Ausubel FM, Sifri CD. 2007. Staphylococcal biofilm exopolysaccharide protects against Caenorhabditis elegans immune defenses. PLoS Pathog. 3:e57. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357.Rennermalm A, Nilsson M, Flock JI. 2004. The fibrinogen binding protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis is a target for opsonic antibodies. Infect. Immun. 72:3081–3083. 10.1128/IAI.72.5.3081-3083.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Farrell AM, Foster TJ, Holland KT. 1993. Molecular analysis and expression of the lipase of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139:267–277. 10.1099/00221287-139-2-267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359.Simons JW, van Kampen MD, Riel S, Götz F, Egmond MR, Verheij HM. 1998. Cloning, purification and characterisation of the lipase from Staphylococcus epidermidis—comparison of the substrate selectivity with those of other microbial lipases. Eur. J. Biochem. 253:675–683. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2530675.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Longshaw CM, Farrell AM, Wright JD, Holland KT. 2000. Identification of a second lipase gene, gehD, in Staphylococcus epidermidis: comparison of sequence with those of other staphylococcal lipases. Microbiology 146:1419–1427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Liles WC, Thomsen AR, O'Mahony DS, Klebanoff SJ. 2001. Stimulation of human neutrophils and monocytes by staphylococcal phenol-soluble modulin. J. Leukoc. Biol. 70:96–102 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362.Vuong C, Dürr M, Carmody AB, Peschel A, Klebanoff SJ, Otto M. 2004. Regulated expression of pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules in Staphylococcus epidermidis: quorum-sensing determines pro-inflammatory capacity and production of phenol-soluble modulins. Cell. Microbiol. 6:753–759. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00401.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Scheifele DW, Bjornson GL, Dyer RA, Dimmick JE. 1987. Delta-like toxin produced by coagulase-negative staphylococci is associated with neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Infect. Immun. 55:2268–2273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Kahler RC, Boyce JM, Bergdoll MS, Lockwood WR, Taylor MR. 1986. Toxic shock syndrome associated with TSST-1 producing coagulase-negative staphylococci. Am. J. Med. Sci. 292:310–312. 10.1097/00000441-198611000-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Kreiswirth BN, Schlievert PM, Novick RP. 1987. Evaluation of coagulase-negative staphylococci for ability to produce toxic shock syndrome toxin 1. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:2028–2029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Becker K, Haverkämper G, von Eiff C, Roth R, Peters G. 2001. Survey of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes, exfoliative toxin genes, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 gene in non-Staphylococcus aureus species. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 20:407–409. 10.1007/PL00011281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.Blaiotta G, Ercolini D, Pennacchia C, Fusco V, Casaburi A, Pepe O, Villani F. 2004. PCR detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus spp. strains isolated from meat and dairy products. Evidence for new variants of seG and seI in S. aureus AB-8802. J. Appl. Microbiol. 97:719–730. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02349.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Spaulding AR, Salgado-Pabón W, Kohler PL, Horswill AR, Leung DY, Schlievert PM. 2013. Staphylococcal and streptococcal superantigen exotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26:422–447. 10.1128/CMR.00104-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Madhusoodanan J, Seo KS, Remortel B, Park JY, Hwang SY, Fox LK, Park YH, Deobald CF, Wang D, Liu S, Daugherty SC, Gill AL, Bohach GA, Gill SR. 2011. An enterotoxin-bearing pathogenicity island in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Bacteriol. 193:1854–1862. 10.1128/JB.00162-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370.Valle J, Vadillo S, Piriz S, Gomez-Lucia E. 1991. Toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) production by staphylococci isolated from goats and presence of specific antibodies to TSST-1 in serum and milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57:889–891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Park JY, Fox LK, Seo KS, McGuire MA, Park YH, Rurangirwa FR, Sischo WM, Bohach GA. 2011. Detection of classical and newly described staphylococcal superantigen genes in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine intramammary infections. Vet. Microbiol. 147:149–154. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.06.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Rosec JP, Guiraud JP, Dalet C, Richard N. 1997. Enterotoxin production by staphylococci isolated from foods in France. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 35:213–221. 10.1016/S0168-1605(96)01234-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Nemati M, Hermans K, Vancraeynest D, De Vliegher S, Sampimon OC, Baele M, De Graef EM, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F. 2008. Screening of bovine coagulase-negative staphylococci from milk for superantigen-encoding genes. Vet. Rec. 163:740–743 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Götz F, Perconti S, Popella P, Werner R, Schlag M. 2014. Epidermin and gallidermin: staphylococcal lantibiotics. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 304:63–71. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Sahl HG, Bierbaum G. 1998. Lantibiotics: biosynthesis and biological activities of uniquely modified peptides from gram-positive bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 52:41–79. 10.1146/annurev.micro.52.1.41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Novick RP. 2003. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1429–1449. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03526.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Dufour P, Jarraud S, Vandenesch F, Greenland T, Novick RP, Bes M, Etienne J, Lina G. 2002. High genetic variability of the agr locus in Staphylococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 184:1180–1186. 10.1128/jb.184.4.1180-1186.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Xu L, Li H, Vuong C, Vadyvaloo V, Wang J, Yao Y, Otto M, Gao Q. 2006. Role of the luxS quorum-sensing system in biofilm formation and virulence of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 74:488–496. 10.1128/IAI.74.1.488-496.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Novick RP, Geisinger E. 2008. Quorum sensing in staphylococci. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42:541–564. 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 380.Otto M, Süssmuth R, Vuong C, Jung G, Götz F. 1999. Inhibition of virulence factor expression in Staphylococcus aureus by the Staphylococcus epidermidis agr pheromone and derivatives. FEBS Lett. 450:257–262. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00514-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 381.van Wamel WJ, van Rossum G, Verhoef J, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Fluit AC. 1998. Cloning and characterization of an accessory gene regulator (agr)-like locus from Staphylococcus epidermidis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 163:1–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 382.Otto M, Süssmuth R, Jung G, Götz F. 1998. Structure of the pheromone peptide of the Staphylococcus epidermidis agr system. FEBS Lett. 424:89–94. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00145-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383.Vuong C, Götz F, Otto M. 2000. Construction and characterization of an agr deletion mutant of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 68:1048–1053. 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1048-1053.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 384.Vuong C, Kocianova S, Yao Y, Carmody AB, Otto M. 2004. Increased colonization of indwelling medical devices by quorum-sensing mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis in vivo. J. Infect. Dis. 190:1498–1505. 10.1086/424487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 385.Yarwood JM, Bartels DJ, Volper EM, Greenberg EP. 2004. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 186:1838–1850. 10.1128/JB.186.6.1838-1850.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 386.Doherty N, Holden MT, Qazi SN, Williams P, Winzer K. 2006. Functional analysis of luxS in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a role in metabolism but not quorum sensing. J. Bacteriol. 188:2885–2897. 10.1128/JB.188.8.2885-2897.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387.Fluckiger U, Wolz C, Cheung AL. 1998. Characterization of a sar homolog of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun. 66:2871–2878 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 388.Tormo MA, Marti M, Valle J, Manna AC, Cheung AL, Lasa I, Penades JR. 2005. SarA is an essential positive regulator of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm development. J. Bacteriol. 187:2348–2356. 10.1128/JB.187.7.2348-2356.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 389.Handke LD, Slater SR, Conlon KM, O'Donnell ST, Olson ME, Bryant KA, Rupp ME, O'Gara JP, Fey PD. 2007. SigmaB and SarA independently regulate polysaccharide intercellular adhesin production in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Can. J. Microbiol. 53:82–91. 10.1139/w06-108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 390.Christner M, Heinze C, Busch M, Franke G, Hentschke M, Bayard Dühring S, Büttner H, Kotasinska M, Wischnewski V, Kroll G, Buck F, Molin S, Otto M, Rohde H. 2012. sarA negatively regulates Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation by modulating expression of 1 MDa extracellular matrix binding protein and autolysis-dependent release of eDNA. Mol. Microbiol. 86:394–410. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08203.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 391.Wang L, Li M, Dong D, Bach TH, Sturdevant DE, Vuong C, Otto M, Gao Q. 2008. SarZ is a key regulator of biofilm formation and virulence in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Infect. Dis. 197:1254–1262. 10.1086/586714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392.Rowe SE, Mahon V, Smith SG, O'Gara JP. 2011. A novel role for SarX in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm regulation. Microbiology 157:1042–1049. 10.1099/mic.0.046581-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 393.Kies S, Otto M, Vuong C, Götz F. 2001. Identification of the sigB operon in Staphylococcus epidermidis: construction and characterization of a sigB deletion mutant. Infect. Immun. 69:7933–7936. 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7933-7936.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 394.Knobloch JK, Bartscht K, Sabottke A, Rohde H, Feucht HH, Mack D. 2001. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis depends on functional RsbU, an activator of the sigB operon: differential activation mechanisms due to ethanol and salt stress. J. Bacteriol. 183:2624–2633. 10.1128/JB.183.8.2624-2633.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 395.Conlon KM, Humphreys H, O'Gara JP. 2002. icaR encodes a transcriptional repressor involved in environmental regulation of ica operon expression and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Bacteriol. 184:4400–4408. 10.1128/JB.184.16.4400-4408.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396.Becker K, von Eiff C. 2011. Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and other catalase-positive cocci, p 308–330 In Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW. (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 10th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • 397.Winn WC, Jr, Allen SD, Janda WM, Koneman EW, Procop GW, Schreckenberger PC, Woods GL. 2006. Koneman's color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 398.Garcia LS. 2010. Clinical microbiology procedures handbook, 3rd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • 399.Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. 1977. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 296:1305–1309. 10.1056/NEJM197706092962301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400.Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachaty E, Raynard B, Germann N, Antoun S, Laplanche A, Brun-Buisson C, Tancrède C. 1999. Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures. Lancet 354:1071–1077. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11134-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 401.Raad I, Hanna HA, Alakech B, Chatzinikolaou I, Johnson MM, Tarrand J. 2004. Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann. Intern. Med. 140:18–25. 10.7326/0003-4819-140-1-200401060-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 402.Safdar N, Fine JP, Maki DG. 2005. Meta-analysis: methods for diagnosing intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. Ann. Intern. Med. 142:451–466. 10.7326/0003-4819-142-6-200503150-00011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 403.Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R. 2007. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 357:654–663. 10.1056/NEJMoa061588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 404.Rieger UM, Pierer G, Lüscher NJ, Trampuz A. 2009. Sonication of removed breast implants for improved detection of subclinical infection. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 33:404–408. 10.1007/s00266-009-9333-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 405.Rohacek M, Weisser M, Kobza R, Schoenenberger AW, Pfyffer GE, Frei R, Erne P, Trampuz A. 2010. Bacterial colonization and infection of electrophysiological cardiac devices detected with sonication and swab culture. Circulation 121:1691–1697. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.906461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 406.Sampedro MF, Huddleston PM, Piper KE, Karau MJ, Dekutoski MB, Yaszemski MJ, Currier BL, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR, McDowell A, Patrick S, Steckelberg JM, Patel R. 2010. A biofilm approach to detect bacteria on removed spinal implants. Spine 35:1218–1224. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c3b2f3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 407.Kloos WE, Schleifer KH. 1975. Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1:82–88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 408.Becker K, Laham NA, Fegeler W, Proctor RA, Peters G, von Eiff C. 2006. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic analysis is a powerful tool for studying the dynamic changes in Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:3274–3278. 10.1128/JCM.00847-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 409.van Griethuysen A, Bes M, Etienne J, Zbinden R, Kluytmans J. 2001. International multicenter evaluation of latex agglutination tests for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:86–89. 10.1128/JCM.39.1.86-89.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 410.Personne P, Bes M, Lina G, Vandenesch F, Brun Y, Etienne J. 1997. Comparative performances of six agglutination kits assessed by using typical and atypical strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1138–1140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 411.Fournier JM, Bouvet A, Mathieu D, Nato F, Boutonnier A, Gerbal R, Brunengo P, Saulnier C, Sagot N, Slizewicz B. 1993. New latex reagent using monoclonal antibodies to capsular polysaccharide for reliable identification of both oxacillin-susceptible and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1342–1344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 412.Blake JE, Metcalfe MA. 2001. A shared noncapsular antigen is responsible for false-positive reactions by Staphylococcus epidermidis in commercial agglutination tests for Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:544–550. 10.1128/JCM.39.2.544-550.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 413.Poutrel B, Mendolia C, Sutra L, Fournier JM. 1990. Reactivity of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from cow and goat milk with monoclonal antibodies to Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharide types 5 and 8. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:358–360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 414.Meyer HG, Muthing J, Gatermann SG. 1997. The hemagglutinin of Staphylococcus saprophyticus binds to a protein receptor on sheep erythrocytes. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. (Berl.) 186:37–43. 10.1007/s004300050044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 415.Hébert GA, Crowder CG, Hancock GA, Jarvis WR, Thornsberry C. 1988. Characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococci that help differentiate these species and other members of the family Micrococcaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26:1939–1949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 416.Bannerman TL, Kleeman KT, Kloos W. 1993. Evaluation of the Vitek systems Gram-positive identification card for species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1322–1325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 417.Ieven MJ, Verhoeven SR, Pattyn SR, Goossens H. 1995. Rapid and economical method for species identification of clinically significant coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1060–1063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 418.Kellogg JA, Hanna MD, Nelsen SJ, Sprenkle LS, Thomas ML, Young KS. 1996. Predictive values of species identification from the Vitek Gram-positive identification card using clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 106:374–377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 419.Renneberg J, Rieneck K, Gutschik E. 1995. Evaluation of Staph ID 32 system and Staph-Zym system for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:1150–1153 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 420.Olendzki AN, Barros EM, Laport MS, dos Santos KR, Giambiagi-deMarval M. 2014. Reliability of the MicroScan WalkAway PC21 panel in identifying and detecting oxacillin resistance in clinical coagulase-negative staphylococci strains. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 33:29–33. 10.1007/s10096-013-1923-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 421.Zadoks RN, Watts JL. 2009. Species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci: genotyping is superior to phenotyping. Vet. Microbiol. 134:20–28. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 422.Becker K, Harmsen D, Mellmann A, Meier C, Schumann P, Peters G, von Eiff C. 2004. Development and evaluation of a quality-controlled ribosomal sequence database for 16S ribosomal DNA-based identification of Staphylococcus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4988–4995. 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4988-4995.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 423.Sethi S, Nanda R, Chakraborty T. 2013. Clinical application of volatile organic compound analysis for detecting infectious diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26:462–475. 10.1128/CMR.00020-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 424.Niederbracht Y, Idelevich EA, Penner H, Berdel WE, Peters G, Silling G, Becker K. 2013. Applicability of a commercial multiplex PCR test for identification of true blood stream infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci in neutropenic hematological patients. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 303:13 [Google Scholar]
  • 425.Straub JA, Hertel C, Hammes WP. 1999. A 23S rDNA-targeted polymerase chain reaction-based system for detection of Staphylococcus aureus in meat starter cultures and dairy products. J. Food Prot. 62:1150–1156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 426.Edwards KJ, Kaufmann ME, Saunders NA. 2001. Rapid and accurate identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci by real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3047–3051. 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3047-3051.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 427.Mendoza M, Meugnier H, Bes M, Etienne J, Freney J. 1998. Identification of Staphylococcus species by 16S-23S rDNA intergenic spacer PCR analysis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48:1049–1055. 10.1099/00207713-48-3-1049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 428.Goh SH, Santucci Z, Kloos WE, Faltyn M, George CG, Driedger D, Hemmingsen SM. 1997. Identification of Staphylococcus species and subspecies by the chaperonin 60 gene identification method and reverse checkerboard hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:3116–3121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 429.Goh SH, Potter S, Wood JO, Hemmingsen SM, Reynolds RP, Chow AW. 1996. HSP60 gene sequences as universal targets for microbial species identification: studies with coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:818–823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 430.Martineau F, Picard FJ, Ke D, Paradis S, Roy PH, Ouellette M, Bergeron MG. 2001. Development of a PCR assay for identification of staphylococci at genus and species levels. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2541–2547. 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2541-2547.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 431.Poyart C, Quesne G, Boumaila C, Trieu-Cuot P. 2001. Rapid and accurate species-level identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci by using the sodA gene as a target. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:4296–4301. 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4296-4301.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 432.Mellmann A, Becker K, von Eiff C, Keckevoet U, Schumann P, Harmsen D. 2006. Sequencing and staphylococci identification. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:333–336. 10.3201/eid1202.050962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 433.Monecke S, Ehricht R. 2005. Rapid genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates using miniaturised oligonucleotide arrays. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11:825–833. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01243.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 434.Frye JG, Jesse T, Long F, Rondeau G, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Jackson CR, Englen M, Fedorka-Cray PJ. 2006. DNA microarray detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in diverse bacteria. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 27:138–151. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 435.Hensley DM, Tapia R, Encina Y. 2009. An evaluation of the AdvanDx Staphylococcus aureus/CNS PNA FISH™ assay. Clin. Lab. Sci. 22:30–33 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 436.Amiali NM, Mulvey MR, Sedman J, Louie M, Simor AE, Ismail AA. 2007. Rapid identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J. Microbiol. Methods 68:236–242. 10.1016/j.mimet.2006.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 437.Clark AE, Kaleta EJ, Arora A, Wolk DM. 2013. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry: a fundamental shift in the routine practice of clinical microbiology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 26:547–603. 10.1128/CMR.00072-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 438.Carbonnelle E, Beretti JL, Cottyn S, Quesne G, Berche P, Nassif X, Ferroni A. 2007. Rapid identification of staphylococci isolated in clinical microbiology laboratories by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2156–2161. 10.1128/JCM.02405-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 439.Dubois D, Leyssene D, Chacornac JP, Kostrzewa M, Schmit PO, Talon R, Bonnet R, Delmas J. 2010. Identification of a variety of Staphylococcus species by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48:941–945. 10.1128/JCM.00413-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 440.Wolk DM, Blyn LB, Hall TA, Sampath R, Ranken R, Ivy C, Melton R, Matthews H, White N, Li F, Harpin V, Ecker DJ, Limbago B, McDougal LK, Wysocki VH, Cai M, Carroll KC. 2009. Pathogen profiling: rapid molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus by PCR/electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry and correlation with phenotype. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:3129–3137. 10.1128/JCM.00709-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 441.Souvenir D, Anderson DE, Jr, Palpant S, Mroch H, Askin S, Anderson J, Claridge J, Eiland J, Malone C, Garrison MW, Watson P, Campbell DM. 1998. Blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: antisepsis, pseudobacteremia, and therapy of patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1923–1926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 442.Hall KK, Lyman JA. 2006. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19:788–802. 10.1128/CMR.00062-05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 443.Tokars JI. 2004. Predictive value of blood cultures positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci: implications for patient care and health care quality assurance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:333–341. 10.1086/421941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 444.Beekmann SE, Diekema DJ, Doern GV. 2005. Determining the clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from blood cultures. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 26:559–566. 10.1086/502584 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 445.Favre B, Hugonnet S, Correa L, Sax H, Rohner P, Pittet D. 2005. Nosocomial bacteremia: clinical significance of a single blood culture positive for coagulase-negative staphylococci. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 26:697–702. 10.1086/502605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 446.García-Vázquez E, Fernández-Rufete A, Hernández-Torres A, Canteras M, Ruiz J, Gómez J. 2013. When is coagulase-negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia clinically significant? Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 45:664–671. 10.3109/00365548.2013.797599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 447.Kresken M, Hafner D. 1999. Drug resistance among clinical isolates of frequently encountered bacterial species in central Europe during 1975–1995. Infection 27(Suppl 2):S2–S8. 10.1007/BF02561661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 448.Andrews J, Ashby J, Jevons G, Marshall T, Lines N, Wise R. 2000. A comparison of antimicrobial resistance rates in Gram-positive pathogens isolated in the UK from October 1996 to January 1997 and October 1997 to January 1998. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 45:285–293. 10.1093/jac/45.3.285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 449.Lyytikäinen O, Vaara M, Järviluoma E, Rosenqvist K, Tiittanen L, Valtonen V. 1996. Increased resistance among Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in a large teaching hospital over a 12-year period. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 15:133–138. 10.1007/BF01591486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 450.European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2013. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 3.1. http://www.eucast.org
  • 451.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). 2013. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 23rd informational supplement. M100-S23 CLSI, Wayne, PA [Google Scholar]
  • 452.Griffith GC, Levinson DC. 1949. Subacute bacterial endocarditis; a report on 57 patients treated with massive doses of penicillin. Calif. Med. 71:403–408 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 453.Kirby WM. 1944. Extraction of a highly potent penicillin inactivator from penicillin resistant staphylococci. Science 99:452–453. 10.1126/science.99.2579.452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 454.Cherifi S, Byl B, Deplano A, Nonhoff C, Denis O, Hallin M. 2013. Comparative epidemiology of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates from patients with catheter-related bacteremia and from healthy volunteers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:1541–1547. 10.1128/JCM.03378-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 455.Hartman BJ, Tomasz A. 1984. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 158:513–516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 456.Kjellander JO, Klein JO, Finland M. 1963. In vitro activity of penicillins against Staphylococcus albus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 113:1023–1031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 457.Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. 2000. A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1549–1555. 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1549-1555.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 458.Matsuhashi M, Song MD, Ishino F, Wachi M, Doi M, Inoue M, Ubukata K, Yamashita N, Konno M. 1986. Molecular cloning of the gene of a penicillin-binding protein supposed to cause high resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 167:975–980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 459.Ubukata K, Nonoguchi R, Matsuhashi M, Konno M. 1989. Expression and inducibility in Staphylococcus aureus of the mecA gene, which encodes a methicillin-resistant S. aureus-specific penicillin-binding protein. J. Bacteriol. 171:2882–2885 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 460.Ubukata K, Nonoguchi R, Song MD, Matsuhashi M, Konno M. 1990. Homology of mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus simulans to that of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:170–172. 10.1128/AAC.34.1.170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 461.Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Tomasz A, de Lencastre H, Perreten V, Holden MT, Coleman DC, Goering R, Giffard PM, Skov RL, Zhang K, Westh H, O'Brien F, Tenover FC, Oliveira DC, Boyle-Vavra S, Laurent F, Kearns AM, Kreiswirth B, Ko KS, Grundmann H, Sollid JE, John JF, Jr, Daum R, Soderquist B, Buist G. 2012. Guidelines for reporting novel mecA gene homologues. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:4997–4999. 10.1128/AAC.01199-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 462.Monecke S, Müller E, Schwarz S, Hotzel H, Ehricht R. 2012. Rapid microarray-based identification of different mecA alleles in staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:5547–5554. 10.1128/AAC.00574-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 463.Wu S, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A. 1998. Genetic organization of the mecA region in methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus sciuri. J. Bacteriol. 180:236–242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 464.Schnellmann C, Gerber V, Rossano A, Jaquier V, Panchaud Y, Doherr MG, Thomann A, Straub R, Perreten V. 2006. Presence of new mecA and mph(C) variants conferring antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus spp. isolated from the skin of horses before and after clinic admission. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:4444–4454. 10.1128/JCM.00868-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 465.Tsubakishita S, Kuwahara-Arai K, Sasaki T, Hiramatsu K. 2010. Origin and molecular evolution of the determinant of methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:4352–4359. 10.1128/AAC.00356-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 466.Wu S, Piscitelli C, de Lencastre H, Tomasz A. 1996. Tracking the evolutionary origin of the methicillin resistance gene: cloning and sequencing of a homologue of mecA from a methicillin susceptible strain of Staphylococcus sciuri. Microb. Drug Resist. 2:435–441. 10.1089/mdr.1996.2.435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 467.Couto I, de Lencastre H, Severina E, Kloos W, Webster JA, Hubner RJ, Sanches IS, Tomasz A. 1996. Ubiquitous presence of a mecA homologue in natural isolates of Staphylococcus sciuri. Microb. Drug Resist. 2:377–391. 10.1089/mdr.1996.2.377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 468.Harrison EM, Paterson GK, Holden MT, Ba X, Rolo J, Morgan FJ, Pichon B, Kearns A, Zadoks RN, Peacock SJ, Parkhill J, Holmes MA. 2014. A novel hybrid SCCmec-mecC region in Staphylococcus sciuri. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 69:911–918. 10.1093/jac/dkt452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 469.Tsubakishita S, Kuwahara-Arai K, Baba T, Hiramatsu K. 2010. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec-like element in Macrococcus caseolyticus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:1469–1475. 10.1128/AAC.00575-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 470.García-Álvarez L, Holden MT, Lindsay H, Webb CR, Brown DF, Curran MD, Walpole E, Brooks K, Pickard DJ, Teale C, Parkhill J, Bentley SD, Edwards GF, Girvan EK, Kearns AM, Pichon B, Hill RL, Larsen AR, Skov RL, Peacock SJ, Maskell DJ, Holmes MA. 2011. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 11:595–603. 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 471.Kriegeskorte A, Ballhausen B, Idelevich EA, Köck R, Friedrich AW, Karch H, Peters G, Becker K. 2012. Human MRSA isolates with novel genetic homolog, Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18:1016–1018. 10.3201/eid1806.110910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 472.Shore AC, Deasy EC, Slickers P, Brennan G, O'Connell B, Monecke S, Ehricht R, Coleman DC. 2011. Detection of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type XI encoding highly divergent mecA, mecI, mecR1, blaZ and ccr genes in human clinical clonal complex 130 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:3765–3773. 10.1128/AAC.00187-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 473.Loncaric I, Kübber-Heiss A, Posautz A, Stalder GL, Hoffmann D, Rosengarten R, Walzer C. 2013. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp. carrying the mecC gene, isolated from wildlife. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:2222–2225. 10.1093/jac/dkt186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 474.Harrison EM, Paterson GK, Holden MT, Morgan FJ, Larsen AR, Petersen A, Leroy S, De Vliegher S, Perreten V, Fox LK, Lam TJ, Sampimon OC, Zadoks RN, Peacock SJ, Parkhill J, Holmes MA. 2013. A Staphylococcus xylosus isolate with a new mecC allotype. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:1524–1528. 10.1128/AAC.01882-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 475.Malyszko I, Schwarz S, Hauschild T. 2014. Detection of a new mecC allotype, mecC2, in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus saprophyticus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 69:2003–2005. 10.1093/jac/dku043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 476.Hiramatsu K, Katayama Y, Yuzawa H, Ito T. 2002. Molecular genetics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 292:67–74. 10.1078/1438-4221-00192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 477.Hiramatsu K, Asada K, Suzuki E, Okonogi K, Yokota T. 1992. Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the regulator region of mecA gene in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). FEBS Lett. 298:133–136. 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80039-J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 478.Tesch W, Ryffel C, Strässle A, Kayser FH, Berger-Bächi B. 1990. Evidence of a novel staphylococcal mec-encoded element (mecR) controlling expression of penicillin-binding protein 2′. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1703–1706. 10.1128/AAC.34.9.1703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 479.International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC). 2009. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:4961–4967. 10.1128/AAC.00579-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 480.Shore AC, Coleman DC. 2013. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec: recent advances and new insights. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 303:350–359. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 481.Katayama Y, Takeuchi F, Ito T, Ma XX, Ui-Mizutani Y, Kobayashi I, Hiramatsu K. 2003. Identification in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus hominis of an active primordial mobile genetic element for the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 185:2711–2722. 10.1128/JB.185.9.2711-2722.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 482.Bouchami O, Ben Hassen A, de Lencastre H, Miragaia M. 2011. Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus hominis (MRSHo): low clonality and reservoirs of SCCmec structural elements. PLoS One 6:e21940. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 483.Bouchami O, Ben Hassen A, de Lencastre H, Miragaia M. 2012. High prevalence of mec complex C and ccrC is independent of SCCmec type V in Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 31:605–614. 10.1007/s10096-011-1354-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 484.Shore AC, Rossney AS, Brennan OM, Kinnevey PM, Humphreys H, Sullivan DJ, Goering RV, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Coleman DC. 2011. Characterization of a novel arginine catabolic mobile element (ACME) and staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec composite island with significant homology to Staphylococcus epidermidis ACME type II in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus genotype ST22-MRSA-IV. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:1896–1905. 10.1128/AAC.01756-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 485.Miragaia M, de Lencastre H, Perdreau-Remington F, Chambers HF, Higashi J, Sullam PM, Lin J, Wong KI, King KA, Otto M, Sensabaugh GF, Diep BA. 2009. Genetic diversity of arginine catabolic mobile element in Staphylococcus epidermidis. PLoS One 4:e7722. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 486.Barbier F, Lebeaux D, Hernandez D, Delannoy AS, Caro V, Francois P, Schrenzel J, Ruppe E, Gaillard K, Wolff M, Brisse S, Andremont A, Ruimy R. 2011. High prevalence of the arginine catabolic mobile element in carriage isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66:29–36. 10.1093/jac/dkq410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 487.Kinnevey PM, Shore AC, Brennan GI, Sullivan DJ, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Slickers P, Coleman DC. 2013. Emergence of sequence type 779 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harboring a novel pseudo staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec)-SCC-SCCCRISPR composite element in Irish hospitals. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:524–531. 10.1128/AAC.01689-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 488.Mongkolrattanothai K, Boyle S, Murphy TV, Daum RS. 2004. Novel non-mecA-containing staphylococcal chromosomal cassette composite island containing pbp4 and tagF genes in a commensal staphylococcal species: a possible reservoir for antibiotic resistance islands in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1823–1836. 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1823-1836.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 489.Ito T, Katayama Y, Asada K, Mori N, Tsutsumimoto K, Tiensasitorn C, Hiramatsu K. 2001. Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1323–1336. 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1323-1336.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 490.Shore AC, Brennan OM, Deasy EC, Rossney AS, Kinnevey PM, Ehricht R, Monecke S, Coleman DC. 2012. DNA microarray profiling of a diverse collection of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates assigns the majority to the correct sequence type and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type and results in the subsequent identification and characterization of novel SCCmec-SCCM1 composite islands. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:5340–5355. 10.1128/AAC.01247-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 491.Monecke S, Engelmann I, Archambault M, Coleman DC, Coombs GW, Cortez de Jäckel S, Pelletier-Jacques G, Schwarz S, Shore AC, Slickers P, Ehricht R. 2012. Distribution of SCCmec-associated phenol-soluble modulin in staphylococci. Mol. Cell. Probes 26:99–103. 10.1016/j.mcp.2012.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 492.Hamilton-Miller JM, Iliffe A. 1985. Antimicrobial resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Med. Microbiol. 19:217–226. 10.1099/00222615-19-2-217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 493.Guggenheim M, Zbinden R, Handschin AE, Gohritz A, Altintas MA, Giovanoli P. 2009. Changes in bacterial isolates from burn wounds and their antibiograms: a 20-year study (1986-2005). Burns 35:553–560. 10.1016/j.burns.2008.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 494.Jones ME, Karlowsky JA, Draghi DC, Thornsberry C, Sahm DF, Nathwani D. 2003. Epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria causing skin and soft tissue infections in the U.S.A. and Europe: a guide to appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 22:406–419. 10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00154-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 495.Sader HS, Jones RN. 2012. Antimicrobial activity of daptomycin in comparison to glycopeptides and other antimicrobials when tested against numerous species of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 73:212–214. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 496.Zhanel GG, Adam HJ, Baxter MR, Fuller J, Nichol KA, Denisuik AJ, Lagacé-Wiens P, Walkty A, Karlowsky JA, Schweizer F, Hoban DJ. 2013. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 22746 pathogens from Canadian hospitals: results of the CANWARD 2007–11 study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68(Suppl 1):i7–i22. 10.1093/jac/dkt022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 497.Mendes RE, Sader HS, Jones RN. 2010. Activity of telavancin and comparator antimicrobial agents tested against Staphylococcus spp. isolated from hospitalised patients in Europe (2007-2008). Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 36:374–379. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 498.Higashide M, Kuroda M, Omura CT, Kumano M, Ohkawa S, Ichimura S, Ohta T. 2008. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolates carrying staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec have emerged in urogenital tract infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2061–2068. 10.1128/AAC.01150-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 499.Hellmark B, Unemo M, Nilsdotter-Augustinsson Å, Söderquist B. 2009. Antibiotic susceptibility among Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from prosthetic joint infections with special focus on rifampicin and variability of the rpoB gene. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15:238–244. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02663.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 500.von Eiff C, Friedrich AW, Becker K, Peters G. 2005. Comparative in vitro activity of ceftobiprole against staphylococci displaying normal and small-colony variant phenotypes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:4372–4374. 10.1128/AAC.49.10.4372-4374.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 501.Karlowsky JA, Adam HJ, Decorby MR, Lagace-Wiens PR, Hoban DJ, Zhanel GG. 2011. In vitro activity of ceftaroline against gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens isolated from patients in Canadian hospitals in 2009. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55:2837–2846. 10.1128/AAC.01787-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 502.Walkty A, Adam HJ, Laverdière M, Karlowsky JA, Hoban DJ, Zhanel GG. 2011. In vitro activity of ceftobiprole against frequently encountered aerobic and facultative Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens: results of the CANWARD 2007–2009 study. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 69:348–355. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.10.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 503.Sader HS, Flamm RK, Jones RN. 2013. Antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline tested against staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to linezolid, daptomycin or vancomycin from U.S.A. hospitals (2008-2011). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:3178–3181. 10.1128/AAC.00484-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 504.Sieradzki K, Villari P, Tomasz A. 1998. Decreased susceptibilities to teicoplanin and vancomycin among coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:100–107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 505.Hiramatsu K, Aritaka N, Hanaki H, Kawasaki S, Hosoda Y, Hori S, Fukuchi Y, Kobayashi I. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670–1673. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)07324-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 506.Cui L, Ma X, Sato K, Okuma K, Tenover FC, Mamizuka EM, Gemmell CG, Kim MN, Ploy MC, El-Solh N, Ferraz V, Hiramatsu K. 2003. Cell wall thickening is a common feature of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5–14. 10.1128/JCM.41.1.5-14.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 507.Boyle-Vavra S, Labischinski H, Ebert CC, Ehlert K, Daum RS. 2001. A spectrum of changes occurs in peptidoglycan composition of glycopeptide-intermediate clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:280–287. 10.1128/AAC.45.1.280-287.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 508.Howden BP, Davies JK, Johnson PD, Stinear TP, Grayson ML. 2010. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23:99–139. 10.1128/CMR.00042-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 509.Howden BP, Smith DJ, Mansell A, Johnson PD, Ward PB, Stinear TP, Davies JK. 2008. Different bacterial gene expression patterns and attenuated host immune responses are associated with the evolution of low-level vancomycin resistance during persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. BMC Microbiol. 8:39. 10.1186/1471-2180-8-39 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 510.Giovanetti E, Biavasco F, Pugnaloni A, Lupidi R, Biagini G, Varaldo PE. 1996. An electron microscopic study of clinical and laboratory-derived strains of teicoplanin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Microb. Drug Resist. 2:239–243. 10.1089/mdr.1996.2.239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 511.Sanyal D, Greenwood D. 1993. An electron microscope study of glycopeptide antibiotic-resistant strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Med. Microbiol. 39:204–210. 10.1099/00222615-39-3-204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 512.Biavasco F, Vignaroli C, Varaldo PE. 2000. Glycopeptide resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 19:403–417. 10.1007/s100960000299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 513.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2002. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin—United States, 2002. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 51:565–567 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 514.Ishihara S, Bitner JJ, Farley GH, Gillock ET. 2013. Vancomycin-resistant gram-positive cocci isolated from the saliva of wild songbirds. Curr. Microbiol. 66:337–343. 10.1007/s00284-012-0278-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 515.Okee MS, Joloba ML, Okello M, Najjuka FC, Katabazi FA, Bwanga F, Nanteza A, Kateete DP. 2012. Prevalence of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus epidermidis from ICU patients in Kampala, Uganda. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 6:242–250. 10.3855/jidc.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 516.Steinkraus G, White R, Friedrich L. 2007. Vancomycin MIC creep in non-vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA), vancomycin-susceptible clinical methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) blood isolates from 2001–05. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:788–794. 10.1093/jac/dkm258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 517.Wang G, Hindler JF, Ward KW, Bruckner DA. 2006. Increased vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from a university hospital during a 5-year period. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:3883–3886. 10.1128/JCM.01388-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 518.Holmes RL, Jorgensen JH. 2008. Inhibitory activities of 11 antimicrobial agents and bactericidal activities of vancomycin and daptomycin against invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from 1999 through 2006. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:757–760. 10.1128/AAC.00945-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 519.Musta AC, Riederer K, Shemes S, Chase P, Jose J, Johnson LB, Khatib R. 2009. Vancomycin MIC plus heteroresistance and outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: trends over 11 years. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:1640–1644. 10.1128/JCM.02135-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 520.Ahlstrand E, Svensson K, Persson L, Tidefelt U, Söderquist B. 2011. Glycopeptide resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated in blood cultures from patients with hematological malignancies during three decades. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 30:1349–1354. 10.1007/s10096-011-1228-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 521.Schwalbe RS, Stapleton JT, Gilligan PH. 1987. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. N. Engl. J. Med. 316:927–931. 10.1056/NEJM198704093161507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 522.Tuazon CU, Miller H. 1983. Clinical and microbiologic aspects of serious infections caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 15:347–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 523.Hiramatsu K, Hanaki H, Ino T, Yabuta K, Oguri T, Tenover FC. 1997. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strain with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 40:135–136. 10.1093/jac/40.1.135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 524.Tacconelli E, Tumbarello M, Donati KG, Bettio M, Spanu T, Leone F, Sechi LA, Zanetti S, Fadda G, Cauda R. 2001. Glycopeptide resistance among coagulase-negative staphylococci that cause bacteremia: epidemiological and clinical findings from a case-control study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:1628–1635. 10.1086/323676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 525.Kratzer C, Rabitsch W, Hirschl AM, Graninger W, Presterl E. 2007. In vitro activity of daptomycin and tigecycline against coagulase-negative staphylococcus blood isolates from bone marrow transplant recipients. Eur. J. Haematol. 79:405–409. 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.00945.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 526.Karlowsky JA, Adam HJ, Poutanen SM, Hoban DJ, Zhanel GG. 2011. In vitro activity of dalbavancin and telavancin against staphylococci and streptococci isolated from patients in Canadian hospitals: results of the CANWARD 2007–2009 study. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 69:342–347. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.10.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 527.Arias CA, Reyes J, Zúñiga M, Cortés L, Cruz C, Rico CL, Panesso D. 2003. Multicentre surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci and staphylococci from Colombian hospitals, 2001–2002. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:59–68. 10.1093/jac/dkg002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 528.Natoli S, Fontana C, Favaro M, Bergamini A, Testore GP, Minelli S, Bossa MC, Casapulla M, Broglio G, Beltrame A, Cudillo L, Cerretti R, Leonardis F. 2009. Characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from blood with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides and therapeutic options. BMC Infect. Dis. 9:83. 10.1186/1471-2334-9-83 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 529.Peters G, Pulverer G. 1983. Antibacterial activity of teichomycin, a new glycopeptide antibiotic, in comparison to vancomycin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 11:94–95. 10.1093/jac/11.1.94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 530.Fainstein V, LeBlanc B, Bodey GP. 1983. Comparative in vitro study of teichomycin A2. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 23:497–499. 10.1128/AAC.23.3.497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 531.Del Bene VE, John JF, Jr, Twitty JA, Lewis JW. 1986. Anti-staphylococcal activity of teicoplanin, vancomycin, and other antimicrobial agents: the significance of methicillin resistance. J. Infect. Dis. 154:349–352. 10.1093/infdis/154.2.349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 532.Wilson AP, O'Hare MD, Felmingham D, Gruneberg RN. 1986. Teicoplanin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Lancet 328:973. 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90622-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 533.Grant AC, Lacey RW, Brownjohn AM, Turney JH. 1986. Teicoplanin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. Lancet 328:1166–1167. 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90580-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 534.Flamm RK, Mendes RE, Ross JE, Sader HS, Jones RN. 2013. Linezolid surveillance results for the United States: LEADER surveillance program 2011. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57:1077–1081. 10.1128/AAC.02112-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 535.Guzek A, Korzeniewski K, Nitsch-Osuch A, Rybicki Z, Prokop E. 2013. In vitro susceptibility of staphylococci and enterococci to vancomycin and teicoplanin. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 788:125–132. 10.1007/978-94-007-6627-3_19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 536.Trueba F, Garrabe E, Hadef R, Fabre R, Cavallo JD, Tsvetkova K, Chesneau O. 2006. High prevalence of teicoplanin resistance among Staphylococcus epidermidis strains in a 5-year retrospective study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:1922–1923. 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1922-1923.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 537.Hope R, Livermore DM, Brick G, Lillie M, Reynolds R. 2008. Non-susceptibility trends among staphylococci from bacteraemias in the UK and Ireland, 2001–06. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62(Suppl 2):ii65–ii74. 10.1093/jac/dkn353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 538.Friedman L, Alder JD, Silverman JA. 2006. Genetic changes that correlate with reduced susceptibility to daptomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2137–2145. 10.1128/AAC.00039-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 539.Bayer AS, Schneider T, Sahl HG. 2013. Mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: role of the cell membrane and cell wall. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1277:139–158. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06819.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 540.Yang SJ, Kreiswirth BN, Sakoulas G, Yeaman MR, Xiong YQ, Sawa A, Bayer AS. 2009. Enhanced expression of dltABCD is associated with the development of daptomycin nonsusceptibility in a clinical endocarditis isolate of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 200:1916–1920. 10.1086/648473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 541.Bertsche U, Yang SJ, Kuehner D, Wanner S, Mishra NN, Roth T, Nega M, Schneider A, Mayer C, Grau T, Bayer AS, Weidenmaier C. 2013. Increased cell wall teichoic acid production and d-alanylation are common phenotypes among daptomycin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clinical isolates. PLoS One 8:e67398. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 542.Zhanel GG, Calic D, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Adam H, Lagace-Wiens PR, Rubinstein E, Gin AS, Hoban DJ, Karlowsky JA. 2010. New lipoglycopeptides: a comparative review of dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin. Drugs 70:859–886. 10.2165/11534440-000000000-00000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 543.Putnam SD, Sader HS, Moet GJ, Mendes RE, Jones RN. 2010. Worldwide summary of telavancin spectrum and potency against Gram-positive pathogens: 2007 to 2008 surveillance results. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 67:359–368. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.03.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 544.Hope R, Chaudhry A, Adkin R, Livermore DM. 2013. In vitro activity of telavancin and comparators against selected groups of Gram-positive cocci. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 41:213–217. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 545.Kloss P, Xiong L, Shinabarger DL, Mankin AS. 1999. Resistance mutations in 23S rRNA identify the site of action of the protein synthesis inhibitor linezolid in the ribosomal peptidyl transferase center. J. Mol. Biol. 294:93–101. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 546.Pillai SK, Sakoulas G, Wennersten C, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC, Jr, Ferraro MJ, Gold HS. 2002. Linezolid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: characterization and stability of resistant phenotype. J. Infect. Dis. 186:1603–1607. 10.1086/345368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 547.Locke JB, Hilgers M, Shaw KJ. 2009. Novel ribosomal mutations in Staphylococcus aureus strains identified through selection with the oxazolidinones linezolid and torezolid (TR-700). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:5265–5274. 10.1128/AAC.00871-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 548.Toh SM, Xiong L, Arias CA, Villegas MV, Lolans K, Quinn J, Mankin AS. 2007. Acquisition of a natural resistance gene renders a clinical strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus resistant to the synthetic antibiotic linezolid. Mol. Microbiol. 64:1506–1514. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05744.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 549.Quiles-Melero I, Gómez-Gil R, Romero-Gómez MP, Sánchez-Díaz AM, de Pablos M, García-Rodriguez J, Gutiérrez A, Mingorance J. 2013. Mechanisms of linezolid resistance among staphylococci in a tertiary hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51:998–1001. 10.1128/JCM.01598-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 550.Pournaras S, Ntokou E, Zarkotou O, Ranellou K, Themeli-Digalaki K, Stathopoulos C, Tsakris A. 2013. Linezolid dependence in Staphylococcus epidermidis bloodstream isolates. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 19:129–132. 10.3201/eid1901.111527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 551.Mazzariol A, Kocsis E, Bragagnolo L, Pellizzer G, Rassu M, Cornaglia G. 2012. Co-infection by two linezolid-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci with two different resistance determinants. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 44:978–981. 10.3109/00365548.2012.704151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 552.Long KS, Poehlsgaard J, Kehrenberg C, Schwarz S, Vester B. 2006. The Cfr rRNA methyltransferase confers resistance to phenicols, lincosamides, oxazolidinones, pleuromutilins, and streptogramin A antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2500–2505. 10.1128/AAC.00131-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 553.Bonilla H, Huband MD, Seidel J, Schmidt H, Lescoe M, McCurdy SP, Lemmon MM, Brennan LA, Tait-Kamradt A, Puzniak L, Quinn JP. 2010. Multicity outbreak of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis associated with clonal spread of a cfr-containing strain. Clin. Infect. Dis. 51:796–800. 10.1086/656281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 554.Baos E, Candel FJ, Merino P, Pena I, Picazo JJ. 2013. Characterization and monitoring of linezolid-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis in an intensive care unit 4 years after an outbreak of infection by cfr-mediated linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 76:325–329. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 555.Shen J, Wang Y, Schwarz S. 2013. Presence and dissemination of the multiresistance gene cfr in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:1697–1706. 10.1093/jac/dkt092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 556.Rybak MJ, Cappelletty DM, Moldovan T, Aeschlimann JR, Kaatz GW. 1998. Comparative in vitro activities and postantibiotic effects of the oxazolidinone compounds eperezolid (PNU-100592) and linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:721–724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 557.Beibei L, Yun C, Mengli C, Nan B, Xuhong Y, Rui W. 2010. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of gram-positive bacterial infections: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 35:3–12. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 558.Walkey AJ, O'Donnell MR, Wiener RS. 2011. Linezolid vs glycopeptide antibiotics for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chest 139:1148–1155. 10.1378/chest.10-1556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 559.Flamm RK, Mendes RE, Ross JE, Sader HS, Jones RN. 2013. An international activity and spectrum analysis of linezolid: ZAAPS Program results for 2011. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 76:206–213. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.01.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 560.Gu B, Kelesidis T, Tsiodras S, Hindler J, Humphries RM. 2013. The emerging problem of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:4–11. 10.1093/jac/dks354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 561.Biedenbach DJ, Farrell DJ, Mendes RE, Ross JE, Jones RN. 2010. Stability of linezolid activity in an era of mobile oxazolidinone resistance determinants: results from the 2009 Zyvox® Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum program. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 68:459–467. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 562.Kresken M, Leitner E, Seifert H, Peters G, von Eiff C. 2009. Susceptibility of clinical isolates of frequently encountered bacterial species to tigecycline one year after the introduction of this new class of antibiotics: results of the second multicentre surveillance trial in Germany (G-TEST II, 2007). Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 28:1007–1011. 10.1007/s10096-009-0725-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 563.Mihaila L, Defrance G, Levesque E, Ichai P, Garnier F, Derouin V, Decousser JW, Doucet-Populaire F, Bourgeois-Nicolaos N. 2012. A dual outbreak of bloodstream infections with linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus pettenkoferi in a liver intensive care unit. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 40:472–474. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 564.Bongiorno D, Campanile F, Mongelli G, Baldi MT, Provenzani R, Reali S, Lo RC, Santagati M, Stefani S. 2010. DNA methylase modifications and other linezolid resistance mutations in coagulase-negative staphylococci in Italy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65:2336–2340. 10.1093/jac/dkq344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 565.Schwarz S, Werckenthin C, Kehrenberg C. 2000. Identification of a plasmid-borne chloramphenicol-florfenicol resistance gene in Staphylococcus sciuri. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2530–2533. 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2530-2533.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 566.Mendes RE, Deshpande LM, Castanheira M, Dipersio J, Saubolle MA, Jones RN. 2008. First report of cfr-mediated resistance to linezolid in human staphylococcal clinical isolates recovered in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2244–2246. 10.1128/AAC.00231-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 567.Cui L, Wang Y, Li Y, He T, Schwarz S, Ding Y, Shen J, Lv Y. 2013. Cfr-mediated linezolid-resistance among methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from infections of humans. PLoS One 8:e57096. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 568.Yang XJ, Chen Y, Yang Q, Qu TT, Liu LL, Wang HP, Yu YS. 2013. Emergence of cfr-harbouring coagulase-negative staphylococci among patients receiving linezolid therapy in two hospitals in China. J. Med. Microbiol. 62:845–850. 10.1099/jmm.0.051003-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 569.Wang Y, He T, Schwarz S, Zhao Q, Shen Z, Wu C, Shen J. 2013. Multidrug resistance gene cfr in methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from chickens, ducks, and pigs in China. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 303:84–87. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 570.de Almeida LM, Lincopan N, de Araújo MR, Mamizuka EM. 2012. Clonal dissemination of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus exhibiting the G2576T mutation in the 23S rRNA gene in a tertiary care hospital in Brazil. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56:2792–2793. 10.1128/AAC.06089-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 571.Connell SR, Tracz DM, Nierhaus KH, Taylor DE. 2003. Ribosomal protection proteins and their mechanism of tetracycline resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3675–3681. 10.1128/AAC.47.12.3675-3681.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 572.Butaye P, Cloeckaert A, Schwarz S. 2003. Mobile genes coding for efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 22:205–210. 10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00202-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 573.Barros EM, Ceotto H, Bastos MC, dos Santos KR, Giambiagi-deMarval M. 2012. Staphylococcus haemolyticus as an important hospital pathogen and carrier of methicillin resistance genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:166–168. 10.1128/JCM.05563-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 574.Coenen S, Adriaenssens N, Versporten A, Muller A, Minalu G, Faes C, Vankerckhoven V, Aerts M, Hens N, Molenberghs G, Goossens H. 2011. European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient use of tetracyclines, sulphonamides and trimethoprim, and other antibacterials in Europe (1997–2009). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 66(Suppl 6):vi57–vi70. 10.1093/jac/dkr458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 575.Chopra I. 2002. New developments in tetracycline antibiotics: glycylcyclines and tetracycline efflux pump inhibitors. Drug Resist. Updat. 5:119–125. 10.1016/S1368-7646(02)00051-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 576.McAleese F, Petersen P, Ruzin A, Dunman PM, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Bradford PA. 2005. A novel MATE family efflux pump contributes to the reduced susceptibility of laboratory-derived Staphylococcus aureus mutants to tigecycline. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1865–1871. 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1865-1871.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 577.Sader HS, Flamm RK, Jones RN. 2013. Antimicrobial activity of daptomycin tested against Gram-positive pathogens collected in Europe, Latin America, and selected countries in the Asia-Pacific Region (2011). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 75:417–422. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 578.Forrest GN, Tamura K. 2010. Rifampin combination therapy for nonmycobacterial infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23:14–34. 10.1128/CMR.00034-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 579.Johanson U, Hughes D. 1994. Fusidic acid-resistant mutants define three regions in elongation factor G of Salmonella typhimurium. Gene 143:55–59. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90604-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 580.O'Brien FG, Price C, Grubb WB, Gustafson JE. 2002. Genetic characterization of the fusidic acid and cadmium resistance determinants of Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pUB101. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 50:313–321. 10.1093/jac/dkf153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 581.Nagaev I, Björkman J, Andersson DI, Hughes D. 2001. Biological cost and compensatory evolution in fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 40:433–439. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02389.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 582.O'Neill AJ, McLaws F, Kahlmeter G, Henriksen AS, Chopra I. 2007. Genetic basis of resistance to fusidic acid in staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1737–1740. 10.1128/AAC.01542-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 583.Norström T, Lannergård J, Hughes D. 2007. Genetic and phenotypic identification of fusidic acid-resistant mutants with the small-colony-variant phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:4438–4446. 10.1128/AAC.00328-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 584.Castanheira M, Watters AA, Bell JM, Turnidge JD, Jones RN. 2010. Fusidic acid resistance rates and prevalence of resistance mechanisms among Staphylococcus spp. isolated in North America and Australia, 2007–2008. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:3614–3617. 10.1128/AAC.01390-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 585.Castanheira M, Watters AA, Mendes RE, Farrell DJ, Jones RN. 2010. Occurrence and molecular characterization of fusidic acid resistance mechanisms among Staphylococcus spp. from European countries (2008). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 65:1353–1358. 10.1093/jac/dkq094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 586.Mlynarczyk A, Mlynarczyk G, Bardowski J, Osowiecki H. 1985. Chromosomal localization of resistance to fosfomycin and aminocyclitol antibiotics in hospital strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Microbiol. Pol. 34:145–154 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 587.Llaneza J, Villar CJ, Salas JA, Suarez JE, Mendoza MC, Hardisson C. 1985. Plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance is due to enzymatic modification of the antibiotic. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28:163–164. 10.1128/AAC.28.1.163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 588.Etienne J, Gerbaud G, Courvalin P, Fleurette J. 1989. Plasmid-mediated resistance to fosfomycin in Staphylococcus epidermidis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 52:133–137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 589.Falagas ME, Roussos N, Gkegkes ID, Rafailidis PI, Karageorgopoulos DE. 2009. Fosfomycin for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive cocci with advanced antimicrobial drug resistance: a review of microbiological, animal and clinical studies. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 18:921–944. 10.1517/13543780902967624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 590.Falagas ME, Maraki S, Karageorgopoulos DE, Kastoris AC, Kapaskelis A, Samonis G. 2010. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-positive non-urinary isolates to fosfomycin. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 35:497–499. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.01.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 591.Campbell EA, Korzheva N, Mustaev A, Murakami K, Nair S, Goldfarb A, Darst SA. 2001. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell 104:901–912. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00286-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 592.Tupin A, Gualtieri M, Roquet-Baneres F, Morichaud Z, Brodolin K, Leonetti JP. 2010. Resistance to rifampicin: at the crossroads between ecological, genomic and medical concerns. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 35:519–523. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 593.Kresken M, Hafner D, Schmitz FJ, Wichelhaus TA. 2004. Prevalence of mupirocin resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis: results of the Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Study of the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy, 2001. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 23:577–581. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 594.Bathoorn E, Hetem DJ, Alphenaar J, Kusters JG, Bonten MJ. 2012. Emergence of high-level mupirocin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci associated with increased short-term mupirocin use. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50:2947–2950. 10.1128/JCM.00302-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 595.Berg T, Firth N, Apisiridej S, Hettiaratchi A, Leelaporn A, Skurray RA. 1998. Complete nucleotide sequence of pSK41: evolution of staphylococcal conjugative multiresistance plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 180:4350–4359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 596.Walsh TR, Bolmstrom A, Qwarnstrom A, Ho P, Wootton M, Howe RA, MacGowan AP, Diekema D. 2001. Evaluation of current methods for detection of staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2439–2444. 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2439-2444.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 597.Nunes AP, Teixeira LM, Iorio NL, Bastos CC, de Sousa Fonseca L, Souto-Padrón T, dos Santos KR. 2006. Heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin in Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus warneri clinical strains: characterisation of glycopeptide susceptibility profiles and cell wall thickening. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 27:307–315. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 598.Iorio NL, Azevedo MB, Frazão VH, Barcellos AG, Barros EM, Pereira EM, de Mattos CS, dos Santos KR. 2011. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis carrying biofilm formation genes: detection of clinical isolates by multiplex PCR. Int. Microbiol. 14:13–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 599.Kitao T, Ishimaru M, Nishihara S. 2010. Detection of biofilm-producing and methicillin resistance genes in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from healthy humans and in blood culture tests. J. Infect. Chemother. 16:170–173. 10.1007/s10156-010-0037-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 600.Uekötter A, Peters G, Becker K. 2011. Is there any rationale for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections with antimicrobials that are determined to be ineffective in vitro? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 17:1142–1147. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03549.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 601.Deresinski S. 2009. Vancomycin in combination with other antibiotics for the treatment of serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:1072–1079. 10.1086/605572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 602.Guay DR. 2008. Contemporary management of uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Drugs 68:1169–1205. 10.2165/00003495-200868090-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 603.Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG, Jr, Bolger AF, Levison ME, Ferrieri P, Gerber MA, Tani LY, Gewitz MH, Tong DC, Steckelberg JM, Baltimore RS, Shulman ST, Burns JC, Falace DA, Newburger JW, Pallasch TJ, Takahashi M, Taubert KA. 2005. Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association. Circulation 111:e394–e434. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.165564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 604.Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, Colgan R, Geerlings SE, Rice JC, Saint S, Schaeffer AJ, Tambayh PA, Tenke P, Nicolle LE. 2010. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 50:625–663. 10.1086/650482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 605.Gilbert DN, Moellering RC, Jr, Eliopoulos GM, Chambers HF, Saag MS. 2013. The Sanford guide to antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc, Sperryville, VA [Google Scholar]
  • 606.Olson ME, Ceri H, Morck DW, Buret AG, Read RR. 2002. Biofilm bacteria: formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics. Can. J. Vet. Res. 66:86–92 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 607.Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P, O'Grady NP, Raad II, Rijnders BJ, Sherertz RJ, Warren DK. 2009. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:1–45. 10.1086/599376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 608.Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR. 2013. Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 56:1–10. 10.1093/cid/cis966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 609.O'Horo JC, Silva GLM, Safdar N. 2011. Anti-infective locks for treatment of central line-associated bloodstream infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Nephrol. 34:415–422. 10.1159/000331262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 610.Lehmann KB, Neumann RO. 1896. Atlas und Grundriss der Bakteriologie und Lehrbuch der speciellen bakteriologischen Diagnostik. J F Lehmann, Munich, Germany [Google Scholar]
  • 611.Evans AC. 1916. The bacteria of milk freshly drawn from normal udders. J. Infect. Dis. 18:437–476. 10.1093/infdis/18.5.437 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 612.Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. 1980. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 30:225–420. 10.1099/00207713-30-1-225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 613.Passet J. 1885. Ueber Mikroorganismen der eiterigen Zellgewebsentzündung des Menschen. Fortschr. Med. 3:33–43 [Google Scholar]
  • 614.Petinaki E, Kontos F, Miriagou V, Maniati M, Hatzi F, Maniatis AN. 2001. Survey of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in the hospitals of central Greece. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 18:563–566. 10.1016/S0924-8579(01)00454-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 615.Cuevas O, Cercenado E, Vindel A, Guinea J, Sanchez-Conde M, Sanchez-Somolinos M, Bouza E. 2004. Evolution of the antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus spp. in Spain: five nationwide prevalence studies, 1986 to 2002. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:4240–4245. 10.1128/AAC.48.11.4240-4245.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 616.Sivadon V, Rottman M, Chaverot S, Quincampoix JC, Avettand V, de Mazancourt P, Bernard L, Trieu-Cuot P, Féron JM, Lortat-Jacob A, Piriou P, Judet T, Gaillard JL. 2005. Use of genotypic identification by sodA sequencing in a prospective study to examine the distribution of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species among strains recovered during septic orthopedic surgery and evaluate their significance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2952–2954. 10.1128/JCM.43.6.2952-2954.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 617.Gatermann SG, Koschinski T, Friedrich S. 2007. Distribution and expression of macrolide resistance genes in coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 13:777–781. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01749.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 618.Koksal F, Yasar H, Samasti M. 2009. Antibiotic resistance patterns of coagulase-negative staphylococcus strains isolated from blood cultures of septicemic patients in Turkey. Microbiol. Res. 164:404–410. 10.1016/j.micres.2007.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 619.Jain A, Agarwal A, Verma RK, Awasthi S, Singh KP. 2011. Intravenous device associated blood stream staphylococcal infection in paediatric patients. Indian J. Med. Res. 134:193–199 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 620.Gillespie BE, Headrick SI, Boonyayatra S, Oliver SP. 2009. Prevalence and persistence of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species in three dairy research herds. Vet. Microbiol. 134:65–72. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 621.Coton E, Desmonts MH, Leroy S, Coton M, Jamet E, Christieans S, Donnio PY, Lebert I, Talon R. 2010. Biodiversity of coagulase-negative staphylococci in French cheeses, dry fermented sausages, processing environments and clinical samples. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 137:221–229. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 622.Hauschild T, Slizewski P, Masiewicz P. 2010. Species distribution of staphylococci from small wild mammals. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 33:457–460. 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 623.Leroy S, Giammarinaro P, Chacornac JP, Lebert I, Talon R. 2010. Biodiversity of indigenous staphylococci of naturally fermented dry sausages and manufacturing environments of small-scale processing units. Food Microbiol. 27:294–301. 10.1016/j.fm.2009.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 624.Huber H, Ziegler D, Pflüger V, Vogel G, Zweifel C, Stephan R. 2011. Prevalence and characteristics of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from livestock, chicken carcasses, bulk tank milk, minced meat, and contact persons. BMC Vet. Res. 7:6. 10.1186/1746-6148-7-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 625.Waller KP, Aspán A, Nyman A, Persson Y, Andersson UG. 2011. CNS species and antimicrobial resistance in clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 152:112–116. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 626.Baba T, Kuwahara-Arai K, Uchiyama I, Takeuchi F, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. 2009. Complete genome sequence of Macrococcus caseolyticus strain JCSCS5402, reflecting the ancestral genome of the human-pathogenic staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. 191:1180–1190. 10.1128/JB.01058-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 627.Mombach Pinheiro Machado AB, Reiter KC, Paiva RM, Barth AL. 2007. Distribution of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types I, II, III and IV in coagulase-negative staphylococci from patients attending a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. J. Med. Microbiol. 56:1328–1333. 10.1099/jmm.0.47294-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 628.Ibrahem S, Salmenlinna S, Virolainen A, Kerttula AM, Lyytikäinen O, Jägerroos Broas HM, Vuopio-Varkila J. 2009. Carriage of methicillin-resistant staphylococci and their SCCmec types in a long-term-care facility. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:32–37. 10.1128/JCM.01085-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 629.Kern A, Perreten V. 2013. Clinical and molecular features of methicillin-resistant, coagulase-negative staphylococci of pets and horses. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68:1256–1266. 10.1093/jac/dkt020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 630.Al-Bakri AG, Al-Hadithi H, Kasabri V, Othman G, Kriegeskorte A, Becker K. 2013. The epidemiology and molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant staphylococci sampled from a healthy Jordanian population. Epidemiol. Infect. 141:2384–2391. 10.1017/S0950268813000010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 631.Zhang Y, Agidi S, LeJeune JT. 2009. Diversity of staphylococcal cassette chromosome in coagulase-negative staphylococci from animal sources. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107:1375–1383. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04322.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 632.Hanssen AM, Kjeldsen G, Sollid JU. 2004. Local variants of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in sporadic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:285–296. 10.1128/AAC.48.1.285-296.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 633.Malik S, Coombs GW, O'Brien FG, Peng H, Barton MD. 2006. Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant staphylococci isolated from cats and dogs. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 58:428–431. 10.1093/jac/dkl253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 634.Vanderhaeghen W, Vandendriessche S, Crombé F, Dispas M, Denis O, Hermans K, Haesebrouck F, Butaye P. 2012. Species and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) diversity among methicillin-resistant non-Staphylococcus aureus staphylococci isolated from pigs. Vet. Microbiol. 158:123–128. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.01.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 635.Garza-González E, Morfín-Otero R, Llaca-Díaz JM, Rodriguez-Noriega E. 2010. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) in methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. A review and the experience in a tertiary-care setting. Epidemiol. Infect. 138:645–654. 10.1017/S0950268809991361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 636.Pi B, Yu M, Chen Y, Yu Y, Li L. 2009. Distribution of the ACME-arcA gene among meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus and identification of a novel ccr allotype in ACME-arcA-positive isolates. J. Med. Microbiol. 58:731–736. 10.1099/jmm.0.007351-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 637.Hammad AM, Watanabe W, Fujii T, Shimamoto T. 2012. Occurrence and characteristics of methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from Japanese retail ready-to-eat raw fish. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 156:286–289. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.03.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 638.Söderquist B, Berglund C. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus saprophyticus in Sweden carries various types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15:1176–1178. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02771.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Microbiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES