Skip to main content
Current Neuropharmacology logoLink to Current Neuropharmacology
. 2020 May;18(5):408–430. doi: 10.2174/1570159X17666191113101629

The Potential Role of Dysfunctions in Neuron-Microglia Communication in the Pathogenesis of Brain Disorders

Katarzyna Chamera 1, Ewa Trojan 1, Magdalena Szuster-Głuszczak 1, Agnieszka Basta-Kaim 1,*
PMCID: PMC7457436  PMID: 31729301

Abstract

The bidirectional communication between neurons and microglia is fundamental for the proper functioning of the central nervous system (CNS). Chemokines and clusters of differentiation (CD) along with their receptors represent ligand-receptor signalling that is uniquely important for neuron – microglia communication. Among these molecules, CX3CL1 (fractalkine) and CD200 (OX-2 membrane glycoprotein) come to the fore because of their cell-type-specific localization. They are principally expressed by neurons when their receptors, CX3CR1 and CD200R, respectively, are predominantly present on the microglia, resulting in the specific axis which maintains the CNS homeostasis. Disruptions to this balance are suggested as contributors or even the basis for many neurological diseases.

In this review, we discuss the roles of CX3CL1, CD200 and their receptors in both physiological and pathological processes within the CNS. We want to underline the critical involvement of these molecules in controlling neuron – microglia communication, noting that dysfunctions in their interactions constitute a key factor in severe neurological diseases, such as schizophrenia, depression and neurodegeneration-based conditions.

Keywords: Schizophrenia, depression, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, CX3CL1-CX3CR1, CD200-CD200R

1. Introduction

Bidirectional communication and interaction between neurons and the neighbouring microenvironment belong to the most essential aspects of healthy brain functioning. The exchange of signals linking microglia with neurons is required for the maintenance of housekeeping functions and homeostasis within the CNS. This communication is crucial in brain functions, including angiogenesis [1], axonal outgrowth [2], development [3], neurogenesis [4], neuronal circuit remodelling [5], plasticity [6, 7] and immune responses [8]. As a consequence, it translates into the proper functioning of the organism at cognitive, emotional and behavioural levels.

A double-sided character is a key feature of the cooperation between neurons and microglia. This means that both neuronal cells can control the activity of microglia, but also conversely – microglia regulate the functioning of neurons. Neurons secrete a number of factors that influence the state of microglial activation [9]. A hallmark of microglia during homeostasis is remaining significantly quiescent while fulfilling complex surveillance roles in a healthy brain [10].

To some extent, neuronal signals are not only in control of keeping the microglia in the “resting” phenotype [11, 12] but also regulate basal motility [13], proliferation and phagocytosis of microglia [9].

The influence of microglia on neurons is more extensively covered by literature. First, as shown using two-photon imaging to study the mouse cortex, microglial cells make physical contact with neuronal dendritic spines [14]. In line with this observation, the results of Tremblay et al. [15] showed that microglia created contact with neurons, including synaptic spines, in the visual cortex. Another study also described microglial-to-neuronal soma contact in the living brain [16]. Altogether, these reports clearly proved the presence of a direct connection between neurons and microglia.

Microglia regulate neuronal activity not only by direct contact but also by influencing signalling pathways, such as complement system, Toll-like receptors (TLR), purinergic and adenosine signalling (we recommend the excellent review of Marinelli et al. [17], who addressed this subject in impressive detail). These mechanisms contribute to a variety of neuronal functions, including neurotransmission [18], cell survival [19], neuroprotection [20] and axonal sprouting [21, 22].

Several factors mediate the communication between neurons and microglia. Both of these cell types are able to express molecules that bind to cognate receptors on neurons/microglia to promote specific biological actions. This group of molecular agents consists of neuropeptides, neurotrophins, neurotransmitters, CD, anti- and pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [17, 23, 24].

In the present review, we surveyed the literature data concerning the broad role of CX3CL1, CD200 and their receptors in both physiological and pathological processes within the CNS. We underlined the critical involvement of the ligand-receptor pairs (CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and CD200-CD200R) in controlling neuron – microglia communication, noting its dysfunctions as key factors that lead to severe neurological diseases, such as schizophrenia, depression and neurodegenerative conditions (Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases).

2. Chemokines and clusters of differentiation in the healthy brain – a short overview

2.1. Chemokines

The superfamily of small (8-15 kDa) proteins, called chemokines, consists of various ligands. These factors are defined by structure and are divided into four main subgroups (C, CC, CXC, CX3C), depending on the number and spacing of their two N-terminal cysteine residues [25]. The common name of these biological factors comes from the ability to induce directed chemotaxis (chemotactic cytokines) [25]. Since the description of the first molecules with chemotactic activity, approximately 50 chemokines, as well as 25 (20 signalling and 5 non-signalling) chemokine receptors, have been recognized [26].

Typically, the chemokine system shows bilateral activation: one chemokine can bind to more than one receptor and, correspondingly, a number of different chemokines can be recognized by the same receptor [27]. The exceptions to this pattern are CX3CL1 and CX3CR1. The literature describes the basic roles of this vast and complex system of proteins within the organism, including the development and homeostasis of immune cells and also the induction or modulation of inflammation (reviewed by Rot and von Andrian [28], and Griffith et al. [26]).

In parallel with their well-established role in the immune system, chemokines and their receptors have multiple actions in the CNS. One of the processes regulated by these molecules is the blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability [29-36]. Other authors documented the importance of chemokines in synaptic transmission, plasticity and spatial memory [34-36]. A continuously increasing number of reports indicate that in the CNS these molecules also take part in adult neurogenesis [37, 38], gene regulation and abnormal neural stem cell maturation [39], cell proliferation [40], neuroendocrine regulation (reviewed by Callewaere et al. [41]), neurotransmission [42] and neuroprotection [43].

Chemokines have a special role in controlling microglial activity and its properties. In the cortex of mice, microglia promoted the differentiation of neural progenitors in the process of frequent movement throughout the structure [44]. The migration was mediated by the interaction of the chemokine (CXCL12) with its receptor (CXCR4). With regard to promoting migration, CCL11 significantly enhanced this process in primary microglia cultures prepared from the brains of newborn mice [45]. Feng et al. [46] applied a rat photic injury model to the investigation of the influence of CCL2 on the activation and migration of microglia. The results provided the conclusion that the overall (particularly the spatial-temporal) expression pattern of this chemokine correlated closely with the examined properties of microglia.

2.2. Clusters of Differentiation

In general, the CD designation is used for classifying multiple cell surface proteins [47]. Since the first Human Leucocyte Differentiation Antigens Workshop in 1982, the official CD list has included more than 370 individual and unique markers in humans [48]. The surface expression of a particular CD molecule may not be specific for a single cell type or a cell lineage, yet they are commonly used as cell markers in immunophenotyping [49]. CD factors vary greatly in terms of physiological functions, which include roles in cell signalling [50], cell adhesion [51] or leucocyte migration [52]. These molecules may act as ligands (e.g., CD40, CD70, CD200) or receptors (CD27, CD46, CD200R, CD358) and may be expressed on the surface of a broad range of cell types within an organism, including the CNS.

In the nervous system, one of the main effects of CD proteins concerns the regulation of microglial activity. Under physiological conditions, the so-called resting microglia constitutively express certain levels of CD11a, CD11b, CD11c, CD18 [53], CD14, CD45 [54], CD68 [55, 56], etc. Several CD factors are considered markers of microglial phenotypes and, as a consequence, as indicators of an activated state of these cells. The M1/M2 paradigm, which is a simplified model to classify the two directions of the inflammatory responses, distinguished M1 phenotype, representing pro-inflammatory characteristics, from M2 (with M2a, M2b and M2c subtypes), highlighting the anti-inflammatory activity of microglia [57]. In addition to this early categorization, subsequent data assigned CD molecules to specific phenotypes. M1 microglia are characterized by the expression of CD14, CD16, CD32, CD40, CD45, CD68, CD74, CD86, while M2 microglia are mainly associated with CD23, CD33, CD36, CD64, CD68, CD80, CD86, CD163, CD200R, CD204, CD206, CD209 [58-60].

Multiple reports have presented the contribution of CD molecules to the process of phagocytosis in the CNS (reviewed by Fu et al. [61]). Other data highlighted the involvement of these factors in oestrogen-related immune signalling in the brain [62, 63]. The widely described participation of CD antigens in maintaining the CNS homeostasis also consists of their involvement in other processes, some of these are: priming of microglia [64], antigen presentation, proliferation, apoptosis, cell migration [65-67], neuroprotection [68], neurodevelopment [16], BBB stability [69], synaptic plasticity [70], mitochondria functioning [71], insulin action [72] and lipid metabolism [73].

In terms of sustaining homeostasis in the CNS, the ligand-receptor pairs CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and CD200-CD200R are the most prominent chemokines and CD, respectively (Fig. 1), because of the unique cell-type-specific localization of their components.

Fig. (1).

Fig. (1)

Bidirectional communication between neurons and microglia is regulated by the endogenous ligand – receptor systems. Among them, the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and CD200-CD200R axes come to the fore as they participate in the modulation of multiple processes within the healthy brain. CX3CL1 and CD200 are principally expressed on neurons, while their receptors (CX3CR1 and CD200R, respectively) are present on microglia. BBB – blood-brain barrier, GDNF – glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor. ↑ indicates an increase. Appropriate references are provided in []. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

2.3. CX3CL1-CX3CR1 Axis in the Healthy Brain

CX3CL1 (also known as fractalkine in humans and rats or neurotactin in mice) is the only known member of the chemokine CX3C class, possessing a specific motif in which two cysteine residues are separated from each other by three amino acids [74, 75]. This transmembrane protein occurs in two isoforms: soluble and membrane-bound [76]. The level of CX3CL1 is vastly higher in the brain than in the periphery [77]. In the CNS, where the expression of fractalkine is constitutive, neurons are its predominant source [78]. Yet, it should be mentioned that the production of this chemokine on other cell types within the CNS (mostly astrocytes) remains an open question [79, 80]. In the brain, CX3CL1 is primarily expressed in the amygdala, cerebral cortex, globus pallidus, hippocampus, striatum, thalamus and the olfactory bulb, with scant expression in the cerebellum [81].

CX3CL1 appears to be the only ligand for CX3CR1 (previously named V28). CX3CR1 is a seven-transmembrane domain G-protein-coupled receptor [82]. CX3CR1 was shown to be on the surface of monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, T lymphocytes and natural killer cells, mast cells, thrombocytes, dendritic cells and microglia [83-87].

Since the first reports on CX3CL1 [74] and CX3CR1 [82], a unique role of this signalling pathway in physiological and pathological processes in the CNS has been consistently described (Fig. 2). The main function of CX3CL1 involves the induction of chemotaxis and cell adhesion [88, 89], but it should be noted that the importance of this protein extends beyond a typical chemotactic action. CX3CL1, as one of the factors secreted by medial ganglionic eminence interneurons, is necessary to promote cortical oligodendrogenesis [90]. This chemokine elevates oligodendroglial differentiation of embryonic and postnatal glial precursors without affecting their proliferation.

Fig. (2).

Fig. (2)

Since the first reports on CX3CL1 and CX3CR1, unique roles for this network in physiological and pathological processes in the CNS has been continuously described. Cx3cr1-/- mice are a highly useful tool for investigating processes affected by the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis. To date, the literature includes reports describing the changes in the behaviour of these animals and in crucial CNS mechanisms. Hp – hippocampal, NPC – neural stem/progenitor cell. ↓ indicates a decrease and ↑↓ indicates contradictive results implicating the disturbance of the process. Appropriate references are provided in [].(A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

The CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis is also associated with promoting neurogenesis via various mechanisms [91-96]. For example, Sellner et al. [95] demonstrated that microglia derived from the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) of Cx3cr1-deficient mice displayed activation of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and the NF-κB pathway. This process was limited to the DG and was followed by impaired neurogenesis in the hippocampus of the knockout animals.

One of the most prominent roles of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 pathway is to control the activation and proper functioning of microglia. The first evidence for this phenomenon was delivered in the article by Maciejewski-Lenoir et al. [84]. In vitro stimulation with CX3CL1 led to changes in microglial activity. The alteration in microglia functioning included the induction of Ca2+ mobilization, time- and dose-dependent activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase as well as substrate protein kinase B, extensive migratory activity, actin rearrangement and change in shape of the cells. Further, confocal imaging of retinal explants presented that CX3CL1, through its receptor, might regulate the dynamism and cellular migration of microglia and consequently the interactions between microglia and synapses [13]. This conclusion was based on results that indicated a decrease in the average velocity of spontaneous microglial process motility in Cx3cr1-deficient mice. The data showed that CX3CL1 had the ability to influence microglial activity through the regulation of TNF-α production [97]. The anti-inflammatory effect of CX3CL1 via the regulation of microglial activation was also presented in the research of Mizuno et al. [98], where the ligand dose-dependently suppressed the production of nitric oxide, IL-6 and TNF-α. As proposed by Ma et al. [99], the involvement of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 system in microglial activation occurs, inter alia, in the course of receptor regulation by leucine-rich repeat kinase 2.

To investigate whether the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis contributes to spinal long-term potentiation (LTP), Bian et al. [100] used exogenous CX3CL1 and anti-CX3CR1 antibodies. As the authors concluded, CX3CL1-CX3CR1 was involved in LTP of C-fibre-induced field potentials in the rat spinal dorsal horn, and the mechanism could be regulated through IL-18/NFκB signalling. Another study showed that, in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus, CX3CL1 negatively modulated LTP at synapses between Schaffer collaterals and pyramidal neurons [101]. The chemokine reduced the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor-mediated currents via the activation of CX3CR1. The process was regulated by intracellular Ca2+ and synaptic activity. Comparable results regarding the engagement of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis in synaptic transmission were published by Bertollini et al. [102]. Superfusion of the ligand to mouse hippocampal slices caused a reversible depression in the field excitatory postsynaptic potential. The mechanism of reduced efficacy in glutamatergic synaptic transmission was similar to that implicated in synaptic long-term depression.

The study of the tissues obtained from patients with drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy revealed that the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 system affected gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A currents in the human temporal lobe [103]. As shown by Heinisch and Kirby [104], CX3CL1 and serotoninergic (5-HT) neurons interact at the anatomical and functional levels in the raphe nucleus of the rat brain. The whole-cell patch-clamp recordings provided the possibility to show that CX3CL1 enhanced GABA synaptic activity at 5-HT neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus. CX3CL1 elevated the functioning of the hippocampal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor through mechanisms involving adenosine receptor type A2 activity and D-serine release [105]. These effects required the presence of CX3CR1 on microglia.

Several studies have reported that CX3CL1 serves as a neuroprotective factor within the CNS. As shown by the use of organotypic cerebellar slice cultures, the addition of recombinant CX3CL1, prior to H2O2-induced oxidative stress, significantly reduced the demyelination associated with a toxic amount of H2O2 and alleviated astrocyte toxicity [106]. CX3CR1 was involved in the internalization of the microtubule-associated protein – tau – by microglia [107]. These results, obtained from in vitro and in vivo experiments, suggested that the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 pathway played a key role in the phagocytosis of tau by microglia. Consistent with reports on its neuroprotective characteristics, CX3CL1 protected striatal neurons from dendritic pruning and death, which had been induced by the combined exposure to morphine and the regulatory protein necessary for an increase in HIV dsDNA transcription level, which is called Tat [108]. Similarly, the CX3CL1 protective effect was described in the context of neurotoxicity produced by another HIV-associated protein – gp120 [109]. The use of primary hippocampal neuronal cultures enabled the observation of the neuroprotective effect of CX3CL1 against glutamate-produced toxicity, which was possible due to the presence of extracellular adenosine [110, 111]. The role of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis in neuronal survival and neurotrophic effects in the CNS were also indicated by other research groups [43, 98, 112-114].

2.4. CD200-CD200R Axis in the Healthy Brain

CD200 (also termed OX-2 or MRC OX-2 in earlier articles) is a membrane glycoprotein, containing two extracellular immunoglobulin domains, a transmembrane region and a cytoplasmic domain. This ligand belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) of cell-surface proteins [115]. Both the human and mouse forms of this antigen have a molecular weight (MW) of 32 kDa, while in rats, the MW of CD200 is origin-specific: 41 kDa in the brain and 47 kDa in thymocytes [116, 117].

CD200 is ubiquitous throughout the body. It is localized on vascular endothelial cells, follicular dendritic cells, B and T lymphocytes, placental trophoblasts, lung epithelial cells and smooth muscle cells [118]. In the brain, this glycoprotein is expressed on neurons [119] and oligodendrocytes [120] but not on microglia [121]. In the human brain, CD200 is robustly expressed in the cerebellum, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, striatum and spinal cord [122].

The only receptor for CD200, known as CD200R (or OX-2R), is also a membrane glycoprotein. In contrast to its ligand, the receptor contains an NPXY motif (with three tyrosine residues in its intracellular region), which is a signalling domain [123]. The expression of CD200R is limited principally to cells of myeloid lineage, including dendritic cells, macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells and microglia [123-125]. CD200R, similar to CD200, exists in several possible isoforms, often restricted to particular tissues [123, 126].

The specific structural characteristics and localization of CD200 and CD200R allow this axis to control the bidirectional communication between neurons and microglia. Regarding the importance of CD200-CD200R in sustaining homeostasis in the CNS, most of the in vivo data come from studies based on Cd200-deficient mice (Fig. 3). As reported by Hoek [127], the CD200-CD200R axis maintains microglia in the quiescent state, as indicated by the ramified appearance of these cells, as well as the expression of molecules such as major histocompatibility complex class I and II, CD11b and CD45 at low or negligible levels. Lack of this signalling leads to the activation of microglia, as characterized by less ramified, shorter processes with the disrupted arrangement, an increase in CD11b and CD45 expression and the aggregation of microglia.

Fig. (3).

Fig. (3)

Most of the data regarding the importance of CD200-CD200R signalling in sustaining homeostasis but also in pathological processes in the CNS come from studies using Cd200-deficient mice. These animals have been characterized by broad alterations in the immunological response (activation of microglia, changed resolution of inflammation, etc.), changes in the BBB permeability and LTP. BBB – blood-brain barrier, LPS – lipopolysaccharide, Aβ – amyloid-β, Pam3CSK4 – the TLR2/TLR1 agonist, LTP – long-term potentiation. ↑ indicates an increase. Appropriate references are provided in [].(A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

Multiple factors seem to be engaged in microglial activation through the pathway controlled by the CD200-CD200R system. Experiments on cortical neuronal cultures, prepared from embryos of C57BL/6 mice, highlight the functional role of N-glycosylation at Asparagine 44 of CD200R in the classical activation of microglia [128]. The Cd200r gene expression is regulated, in part, through the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β, which binds the Cd200r promoter and inhibits transcription of the receptor [129].

The major role of the CD200-CD200R pathway was also described in the context of response to inflammatory challenges, generated, inter alia, with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [130, 131], the TLR2/TLR1 agonist – Pam3CSK4 [70] or amyloid-β (Aβ) [132]. In the brains of Cd200 knockout mice, these insults produced an exaggerated reaction, possibly due to the increased relative expression of TLR2 and TLR4 [70, 133]. Proper activation of CD200R by its ligand is also required to modulate inflammatory cytokine production (e.g., levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α) [70, 121]. Consistent with these observations, the data showed that the CD200 fusion protein (CD200Fc) reduced age-related and LPS-induced microglial activation, and also partially overcame the disruption of the LTP observed both in aged and LPS-treated rats [134]. Furthermore, slices prepared from Cd200-/- mice did not display LTP in the Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses to the same degree as those slices prepared from wild type mice, which clearly indicates that CD200 is directly implicated in synaptic plasticity [70]. The use of an anti-CD200R1 blocking antibody showed that the CD200-CD200R interaction played a role in the neuroprotective action of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist called 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 [135]. The CD200-CD200R axis is also engaged in neuroprotective properties of endocannabinoid anandamide (AEA) against LPS or interferon (IFN)-γ activated microglia-induced toxicity [68]. AEA protects neurons from inflammatory damage by upregulating CD200R through the activation of cannabinoid receptor type 2. This phenomenon was supported by data showing that AEA was unable to induce neuroprotection in microglia derived from Cd200r-deficient mice [68].

Another function of CD200-CD200R signalling in the CNS is the protection of dopaminergic neurons by the suppression of microglial activation and the promotion of glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) production [136]. GDNF is a survival factor for dopaminergic neurons. In vitro, it increases their size and neurite length, promotes their survival [137], and also influences the activation of microglia and protects hippocampal neurons from excitotoxic insults [138]. As shown using primary microglia culture, the expression of GDNF is increased after exposure to CD200 [136].

The data suggest that CD200-CD200R may be involved, to some extent, in controlling BBB permeability, because there was an infiltration of T cells and macrophages in the brain of Cd200-deficient mice, which led to the increased expression of TNF-α, IL-6, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, IFNγ-induced protein-10 and RANTES [139]. The proper interactions between CD200 and its receptor had an impact on phagocytosis and lysosomal activity, while the absence of this interplay increased Aβ engulfment [133]. As a “don’t eat me” signal molecule, CD200 is associated with apoptosis. During this form of programmed cell death, the expression of CD200 is elevated on apoptotic cells, and the level of the protein remains under the control of both caspase- and p53-dependent pathways [140, 141]. However, a report from Yang et al. [142] stated that the expression of CD200 was affected by the combination of apoptosis, autophagocytotic cell death and necrosis, rather than by one of these processes. As shown by Webb and Barclay [143], CD200 appears on neuronal bodies and axons, where it is involved in axonal extension [143, 144]. CD200 plays a role in the process of anxiogenic sprouting and elongation, in addition to synapse formation [145] and neuritogenesis, which involves the interaction and activation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor [146]. The role of CD200 in the oligodendrogenesis recovery mechanism was also demonstrated, as the ligand may promote this process [147].

3. Malfunctions of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and CD200-CD200R axes and their implications for the pathogenesis of schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a severe psychiatric disorder that affects up to 1% of the population worldwide. Statistics of the World Health Organization (WHO) [148] from 2018 inform about more than 23 million diagnosed cases of this disease. A hallmark of schizophrenia is its heterogeneity, which is manifested in the clinic, both in the aetiology and in the course of the disturbances and symptoms.

According to one of the accepted classifications, the symptoms are divided into three main groups: 1) positive, among which hallucinations, delusions or agitation are listed; 2) negative, which include: speech impoverishment, anhedonia, apathy and attention disorders; and 3) cognitive deficits: reduced ability to concentrate, impairment of various types of memory and difficulties in understanding information and using it to make decisions [149].

Factors of various origins have been indicated as the base for the symptoms and, therefore, as an aetiology of schizophrenia, often emphasizing their complicity in the final picture of the disease. This condition develops not only because of the so-called genetic predispositions [150, 151] but also because of environmental factors, which include, among others: prenatal malnutrition [152], exposure to traumatic experiences [153] and, particularly worth underlining, bacterial and viral infections [154, 155].

In the brain, the main immunocompetent cells are microglia [156]. Through interaction with neurons, under physiological conditions, microglia maintain a resting phenotype [157]. When the CNS is affected, microglia become activated, which is characterized by their increased phagocytic activity, mobility and the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [158]. Persistent microglial activation may cause neuronal degeneration and synaptic dysfunction [159] and could lead to the subsequent development of psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia.

Therefore, disturbances to the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and CD200-CD200R protein systems, which are listed as key mediators of neuron – microglia communication, might be crucial in the disease course.

3.1. CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and Schizophrenia

The DBA/2 mouse strain has been suggested to be a suitable model for investigating schizophrenia-related behaviour, because of the characteristic deficits (e.g., significantly reduced social interactions and prepulse inhibition) observed in these animals [160-162]. Downregulation of Cx3cl1 gene expression in the cortices of DBA/2 mice was reported by Ma et al. [163]. The authors implicated CX3CL1 as a regulator of microglial activation and social behaviour in the animals. The group of Zhan et al. [18] indicated that Cx3cr1-/- mice showed alterations in social and repetitive behaviours. Zhan [164] also showed that Cx3cr1 knockout mice displayed reduced baseline connectivity that is driven from the prefrontal cortex to the dorsal hippocampus during the habituation period in the social interaction test. A similar feature was found in schizophrenic patients, for whom severely reduced connectivity between the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex was observed [165, 166].

Meta-analysis performed by Bergon et al. [167] revealed that CX3CR1 expression was significantly downregulated in post-mortem brains and peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from schizophrenic patients. The change was independent of confounding variables (e.g., tobacco smoking) and was closely associated with depression – anxiety phenotype. Comparable data using integrated analysis of schizophrenia data sets were published by Li et al. [168]. This group discovered that CX3CR1 level was remarkably diminished in the hippocampi of patients with schizophrenia. In another study, Ishizuka et al. [169] also observed a strong association between the expression of CX3CR1 and schizophrenia. The researchers proved that the rare variant (Ala55Thr) in the gene for the receptor contributed to an increased risk for developing this severe psychiatric disorder. Ala55, which is located in transmembrane helix 1 (TM1), forms a hydrophobic core with other non-polar residues of TM1 and helix 8 in the receptor. The variant in which a hydrophobic (alanine) residue is replaced by a hydrophilic (threonine) residue may weaken the hydrophobic TM1 – helix 8 interaction and consequently destabilize the conformation of helix 8. The Ala55Thr variant in CX3CR1 might lead to impairment in CX3CL1-CX3CR1 signalling, thereby influencing microglial function. In contrast, an overview of the schizophrenia-associated genes and transcripts presented by van Mierlo et al. [170] showed that the results linking CX3CR1 expression with the disease were highly heterogeneous. The authors found the evidence insufficient to consider CX3CR1 as the risk factor. However, as they admitted, the study included many limitations that could have differed their conclusion from the observations of others (e.g., using the summary statistic information, data obtained from bulk brain tissue – not from specific structures, no control on variables that may have an impact on the immune system).

Numerous data indirectly suggested the involvement of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 system in the etiopathogenesis of schizophrenia. Alterations in neurogenesis and cell proliferation, as well as the reduced size of the hippocampus, have been indicated as the parts of the disease pathology [171-174]. These processes must function properly for effective learning and memory, in particular, contextual and spatial learning [175-177], which are impaired in schizophrenia [178]. The age-dependent increase in the number of activated microglia can suppress neurogenesis [179]. Bachstetter et al. [91] evidenced that in the course of ageing, CX3CL1-CX3CR1 signalling became disrupted, leading to enhanced microglial activation and decreased neurogenesis in the hippocampus. Mice lacking the Cx3cr1 gene were characterized by reduced hippocampal neural stem/progenitor cell (NPC) proliferation and neurogenesis. The proliferation of NPCs was also decreased when a blocking antibody for CX3CR1 was infused into the left lateral ventricle of rat brains, while the intracerebroventricular infusion of recombinant CX3CL1 reversed the disruption of neurogenesis in the aged-rat-brain [91]. The article by Sellner et al. [95] drew a slightly different conclusion that CX3CR1 promoted neurogenesis, but the process was independent of CX3CL1 and relied on inhibiting SIRT1 and NF-κB signalling. In that study, activation of SIRT1 alleviated cognitive impairment in Cx3cr1-/- mice, as manifested by disrupted learning and memory in the Morris water maze test. Another feature observed for these animals was the alteration in synaptic plasticity and synaptic pruning – the processes required for the development of neural circuits [18, 93, 180, 181]. Cx3cr1 knockouts also exhibited a change in the number of dendritic spines and immature synapses [96, 180]. Due to the extensive literature data suggesting that schizophrenia may have a neurodevelopmental basis [182, 183], the involvement of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis in controlling the mechanisms of neurogenesis, cell proliferation, synaptic plasticity and synaptic pruning may be a new target for future therapy.

3.2. CD200-CD200R and Schizophrenia

The disturbances described in schizophrenic patients comprise electroencephalogram oscillatory abnormalities, which are heritable and genetically-mediated [184-186]. Data from Narayanan et al. [187] showed that the theta activity of the brain was significantly correlated with and mediated by gene clusters involved in glutamic acid pathways as well as by cadherin and synaptic contact-based cell adhesion processes. In this study, CD200 was one of the highly ranked genes moderating changes in theta activity, which, as a mainly cortical-hippocampal circuit-based process, may indicate a crucial role in the mechanisms controlling memory, spatial information and synaptic plasticity [187]. These abnormalities contribute to the heterogeneous core of the disturbances and symptoms observed in schizophrenia [188-190]. The study on lymphoblastoid cells obtained from monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia revealed a change in CD200 expression, suggesting the possible pathological contribution of the CD200-CD200R axis in susceptibility to schizophrenia [191]. On the other hand, the characterization of macrophages from schizophrenic patients revealed no changes in CD200 expression compared to those of the control [192]. However, as the authors underlined, it must be taken into account, that the data came from a small number of samples. Additionally, studies of clinical subgroups and additional screening tests used to assess the full phenotype of the macrophages are needed to confirm the conclusion described.

Maternal immune activation (MIA) produced by the systemic administration of LPS or polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (Poly I:C) injection to pregnant dams of rodents are commonly accepted animal models of schizophrenia [193]. They are widely characterized in terms of biochemical [194-197], neuroanatomical [198-200] and behavioural [197, 200, 201] attributes, in both mice and rats. To date, no changes in CD200R level have been described in isolated microglia after a maternal immune response was induced by Poly I:C challenge in mice, regardless of the sex or age of the animal [202]. Unfortunately, the researchers did not measure the level of the ligand for CD200R, which could have been affected by the treatment. Lin et al. [203] accentuated that treatment with Poly I:C during pregnancy might increase embryo resorption in mice and that the mechanism involved, at least partially, direct inhibition of CD200 expression on cytokeratin 7-positive cells.

In the study by Antonson et al. [204], maternal infection with porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) tended to upregulate CD200 expression, while CD200R level was unchanged in the microglia from the hippocampi of foetal piglets. The same research group reported that CD200R level increased in the prefrontal cortex and the striatum, and CD200 concentration decreased in the hippocampus and the striatum of prenatally PRRSV-exposed piglets [205]. In experimental conditions, PRRSV is applied during pregnancy to induce maternal infection, which increases the risk of neurobehavioural disorders, including schizophrenia, in the offspring [204]. Comparable results were shown for young and adult mice after influenza treatment. Significantly reduced levels of CD200 were detected in the hippocampi of these animals [206, 207]. Cd200-deficient mice developed more severe disease, associated with enhanced lung infiltration and lung endothelium damage after inoculation with influenza [208], and also had higher activity of macrophages, leading to the delayed resolution of inflammation [209]. The importance of CD200 during influenza infection in reference to schizophrenia results from the fact that prenatal infections with this virus are considered to confer a risk factor for the development of schizophrenia. This correlation was supported by evidence from population and epidemiological studies, which showed a higher occurrence of psychoses with schizophrenic symptoms following influenza epidemics [210, 211].

4. The roles of CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and CD200-CD200R axEs malfunctions in the development of depression

Depression has been reported as the leading cause of disability in terms of total years lost due to the impairments it generates [212]. According to the WHO estimations [213], the disease affects more than 300 million people worldwide. The condition is symptomatically heterogeneous, spanning cognitive, emotional, motivational and physiological alterations [214-216]. Without treatment, depressive symptoms can last for weeks, months or even a lifetime, and in severe cases may lead to suicidal attempts and death.

The aetiology of depression has a diversified nature, thus making the discovery of an exact cause challenging. As a result, alterations in multiple mechanisms have been proposed in the literature, with the following few contributors specified: monoaminergic systems [217-219], genetic background [220], circadian rhythm [221], neurotrophic factors [222], brain glucose metabolism [223], mitochondrial functioning [224-228], response of an organism to stress both during the prenatal period and early life [229-232], neuroinflammatory processes, particularly involving cytokines [233-235].

4.1. CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and Depression

To date, only a few articles have evaluated the expression of CX3CL1 in patients with depression. In those affected by moderate-severe depression, the serum level of CX3CL1 was elevated when compared to that in the control patients [236]. A similar observation was reported in plasma samples from patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder with comorbid cocaine addiction [237]. The level of CX3CL1 was thus suggested as a potential biomarker for depression and anxiety in the course of colorectal cancer, due to the raised serum level of this protein identified in patients with this condition [238].

In depression, the serotonergic pathway is a highly affected neurotransmission system. Immunohistochemical and electrophysiological studies revealed the neuroanatomical relationship between 5-HT transmission and CX3CL1 in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus [104]. Furthermore, the functional interaction linking those factors was described, showing that CX3CL1 enhanced the number and the sensitivity on 5-HT of postsynaptic GABA receptors [104]. The literature documented the participation of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 system in the regulation of tryptophan metabolism. In mice lacking Cx3cr1, the induction of depressive behaviour (through the administration of LPS) was associated with the activation of the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) [239]. IDO modulated the metabolism of tryptophan and led to the formation of kynurenine instead of 5-HT.

Exposure to stressful events of various types (chronic restraint, mild or acute stress, psychosocial stress, prenatal stress, etc.) is another widely investigated plausible cause of depression. Accordingly, experimental approaches using diverse types of stress are considered useful animal models to simulate this condition [240]. In the article by Trojan et al. [231], prenatal stress caused anxiety and depressive-like disturbances in the adult offspring of rats. The changes were followed by the reduction in CX3CL1-CX3CR1 expression in the hippocampi and the frontal cortices of these animals. The chronic administration of the antidepressants (tianeptine and fluoxetine) normalized the observed alterations both on the behavioural and biochemical levels [231]. Additionally, the intracerebroventricular application of exogenous CX3CL1 alleviated the changes in the behaviour and in the inflammatory processes observed in the brains of prenatally stressed rats [241]. The affected mRNA levels of Cx3cl1 and Cx3cr1 were detected in the prefrontal cortex and in the dorsal and ventral hippocampus of adult male rats exposed to chronic mild stress [242].

Most of the research attempts to identify the role of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 system in the generation of depressive-like behavioural dysfunctions have been based on genetic models with a knockout of the receptor gene. Cx3cr1-/- mice showed prolonged depressive behaviour and social withdrawal in response to acute immune stress following a single, peripheral LPS injection [243]. The study by Milior et al. [244] provided evidence that disorders in neuron – microglia signalling occurred via the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 pathway in response to chronic unpredictable stress. Winkler et al. [245] showed that Cx3cr1-deficient mice were resilient to chronic stress-induced depression, as demonstrated by a lack of anhedonia. In another study, Cx3cr1 knockout mice were completely unaffected by the exposure to chronic unpredictable stress in terms of emotional, cognitive, neurogenic and microglial responses to the insult, while their wild-type counterparts displayed these depressive-like characteristics [246]. Further evidence supporting this phenomenon came from the research showing that the animals with the depleted receptor were characterized by resistance to the occurrence of depressive behaviour in a chronic despair model of depression [247]. Contrary to wild-type animals, in Cx3cr1-deficient mice, the lack of changes in microglial morphology was described. This observation indicated that microglial hyper-ramification is controlled by the neural-microglial CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis.

4.2. CD200-CD200R and Depression

Nearly all the data regarding the participation of the CD200-CD200R pathway in the pathomechanisms of depression were derived from studies on animal models of this disease, with most applying different stress procedures. Wang et al. [248] used the early-life social isolation (ESI) model of stress to characterize the development of depressive-like behaviour in rats. The authors observed that, in the hippocampi of the ESI animals, the expression of Cd200 receptor, which promoted microglial quiescence, was significantly decreased [248]. In turn, Bollinger et al. [249] found that various types of restraint stress could lead to brain region- and sex-dependent changes in CD200-CD200R signalling in corticolimbic circuitry. Acute and chronic stress increased Cd200 mRNA level in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in the female rats. In males, chronic stress increased the expression of Cd200r in the OFC and the basolateral amygdala (BLA), as well as Cd200 in the dorsal hippocampus. Besides, acute stress produced an increase in Cd200r transcript in the BLA of male animals [249]. These changes were correlated with a decrease in the activation of microglia.

Recently published observations revealed that exposure to the acute stressor (inescapable tail shock, ITS) resulted in a reduction in Cd200r level in the hippocampus, the BLA and the central nucleus of the amygdala 24 hours post-stress [250]. Similar results were reported by Fonken et al. [251]. They observed that ITS generated a decrease in the level of Cd200r in the hippocampus of male and female rats. A contradictory observation was published by Blandino et al. [252], who suggested that inescapable footshock lowered Cd200r transcript in the hypothalamus but not in the hippocampus of rats. The discrepancies between these reports concerning the hippocampus might be attributed to the various protocols used by the two research groups. In turn, Lovelock and Deak [253] observed no changes in the expression of either Cd200 or Cd200r in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, the hippocampus or the prefrontal cortex after inducing chronic escalating distress, which was consistent with the data previously communicated by the same authors [254].

The outcome of the experiments on rat primary microglia cultures showed that treatment with dexamethasone for 72 hours reduced Cd200r level and induced the ramified form of microglia [255]. As shown by Wachholz et al. [256], IFN-α vulnerable mice, which are a model of immune-mediated depression, seemed to have a higher expression of CD200R in the microglia. These animals developed a depressive-like phenotype, which was manifested by an increased immobility time in the forced swim and the tail suspension tests as well as reduced explorative behaviour observed in the novel object exploration test [256].

5. The role of changes in CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and CD200-CD200R interactions in the neurodegeneration-based diseases

5.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is recognized as the most common cause of dementia (50 – 75% cases) and, consequently, it is a growing global health concern [257]. The condition is characterized by a progressive decline in cognitive functioning (memory, language, learning and thinking), which is substantially escalated among people 65 years or older [258].

The pathophysiological picture of AD consists of the presence of Aβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles composed of hyperphosphorylated tau but also dystrophic neurites, astrogliosis, microglial activation and consecutive neurodegeneration [259-263]. The processes associated with deleterious changes, including the death of neurons, are initiated in the cortex and then extend to the hippocampus, which are the brain regions involved in memory and learning [264, 265]. Eventually, pathology affects the entire brain [266].

Neuroinflammation is also extensively involved in the complex pathology and symptoms of AD [60]. The progressive problems centred on Aβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles are accompanied by a number of immunological alterations, containing increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Whether these disturbances are causes or consequences of AD remains unknown; however, inflammation within the brain of AD patients has been extensively investigated in recent years.

5.1.1. CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and Alzheimer’s Disease

The importance of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 axis in the pathology of AD seems to be undeniable, as evidenced by the enormous number of scientific articles concerning this correlation. The subject was reviewed in a few excellent articles; however, the amount of continuously emerging data elicits the need for further systematization of the findings.

As published by Strobel et al. [267], CX3CL1 is highly expressed in the hippocampus, which is the main area of pathological changes, in the brains of AD patients. The elevated level of CX3CL1 reflected the progression of the disease [267]. A similar observation was described by Bolós et al. [107]. The authors reported a concomitant increase in CX3CL1 protein level, phosphorylated tau and the number of microglia in post-mortem hippocampal tissue from AD patients. The disruption of the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 system and the subsequently altered neuron – microglia communication seemed to be more prominent with the progression of AD. Yet, the same research group showed a reduction in the protein level of CX3CL1 in the cerebrospinal fluid obtained from AD patients, compared to the non-demented age-matched controls [268].

A significant observation in the context of AD was also provided by Lyons et al. [269]. The expression of Cx3cr1 mRNA diminished in the brains of aged rats and coincided with an age-related increase in microglial activation. The treatment of these animals with exogenous CX3CL1 attenuated the disturbances that had been observed and induced the activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase pathway, which is required to maintain microglia in a quiescent state [269].

Recent research based on the rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy revealed that induced overexpression of CX3CL1 resulted in the reduction of tau pathology and microgliosis, as well as the amelioration of neuronal loss in the brains of these animals [270]. Furthermore, the treatment with CX3CL1 improved cognitive performance on the novel object recognition and radial arm water maze tasks by the mice [271].

5.1.2. CD200-CD200R and Alzheimer’s Disease

The analysis in the post-mortem brain tissues from patients with AD revealed that the protein level of CD200 negatively correlated with the levels of phosphorylated tau and Aβ plaques (in the temporal cortex) and neurofibrillary tangles (in the temporal and the cingulate cortices) [272]. These results suggested that the progressively increased inflammatory responses occurred with increasing severity in AD pathology. In another report from this research group [273], the expression of CD200 and CD200R (at both the mRNA and protein levels) was affected in the hippocampus and the inferior temporal gyrus in post-mortem brain tissues obtained from AD patients. The authors demonstrated that CD200R production by human microglia was elevated by the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-13, which are considered to be generally lacking in elderly human brains [273].

The evidence to support these observations from the post-mortem examinations has come from the experiments applying the animal models of AD. Lyons et al. [121, 130] published data showing that the hippocampal activation of microglia in aged and Aβ-treated rats was followed by the perturbed expression of CD200. Treatment with CD200Fc alleviated LPS-generated microglial activation in the hippocampus of aged rats [134]. Further, the impairment of the LTP in the DG, as described for those animals, was attenuated when they were treated with CD200Fc. The result suggested that the CD200-CD200R axis might positively impact memory in AD, which was characterized as the LTP-based process [274]. In the multidimensional study by Varnum et al. [136], the injection of the viral vector expressing CD200 restored hippocampal neurogenesis and suppressed β-amyloidosis in APP mice, which are the transgenic model of AD. The administration of the vector weakened the inflammation represented by reduced NOS2+ and the increased number of YM1+ Iba1+ cells. In vitro, CD200 expression dramatically affected microglia, causing increased neuronal maturation. CD200 stimulated and altered microglial activation, enhanced the survival of CD11b+ primary microglia and also improved the ability of these cells on Aβ42 phagocytosis and GDNF expression [136].

5.2. Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder [275]. Statistics have been used to predict that the number of people affected by PD is expected to increase by more than 50% by 2030, up to more than 9 million cases worldwide [276]. The condition is characterized by motor and nonmotor symptoms. The classical motor components of the disease include bradykinesia, muscular rigidity, rest tremor, postural and gait impairment, while nonmotor features consist of cognitive impairment, psychiatric symptoms, olfactory dysfunction, sleep disorders, autonomic dysfunction, pain and fatigue [277].

The pathophysiology of PD is complex and not fully elucidated. However, a progressive loss of dopamine-producing neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and widespread distribution of intracellular aggregates of alpha-synuclein protein (α-syn) have been reported as the core characteristics of this condition [278, 279]. α-Syn is the major component of Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites, the pathological hallmarks of PD [279].

5.2.1. CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and Parkinson’s Disease

The research analysing the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of a large cohort of PD patients revealed that the ratio of CX3CL1 to Aβ1-42 was positively correlated with PD severity and progression [280]. Other results from the CSF examination showed that the exosomal RNA level of CX3CR1 was significantly reduced in the CSF of patients with PD (in that article, a similar observation was also noted for AD patients) [281]. Yet, the expression pattern of the differentially expressed microRNA for CX3CR1 was upregulated in the peripheral whole blood obtained from PD patients [282].

Studies on the role of CX3CL1-CX3CR1 signalling in the pathomechanisms underlying PD have been widely based on Cx3cr1 knockout mice. Castro-Sánchez et al. [283] analysed the contribution of the receptor to α-syn-associated degeneration and the activation and dynamics of microglia after α-syn stimulation. The injection of the vector carrying the A53T mutant of this protein (α-SYNA53T) into the SNpc of the knockout animals revealed that the lack of Cx3cr1 enhanced the neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory processes initiated by α-SYNA53T treatment. The authors also proved that exposure to α-SYNA53T in the conditions of Cx3cr1-deficiency shifted microglial activation towards more pro-inflammatory phenotypes [283]. What is interesting, the group of Thome [284] observed the opposite effect, showing that the receptor might be significant in disease progression of synucleinopathies. The depletion of Cx3cr1 resulted in a decrease in microglial phagocytosis and α-syn-associated inflammation in primary microglia originating from the knockout mice.

Another approach to investigate the involvement of CX3CL1-CX3CR1 system in PD includes the use of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and 6-hydroxydopamine neurotoxin (6-OHDA) models of the disease. The MPTP model combined with Cx3cr1 knockout showed that, in SNpc, CX3CR1 had a protective effect against CCL2 overexpression by astrocytes, leading to dopaminergic neurodegeneration [285]. The general conclusion about the neuroprotective action of CX3CL1 was supported not only by the studies of Bickford’s group, who applied MPTP [286] and 6-OHDA [287] models but also by the model with α-syn overproduction via recombinant adeno-associated virus [113].

The literature has also suggested other factors linked to PD. Among them, infection with Toxoplasma gondii might be implicated in the development of PD [288] (as well as schizophrenia [289] and AD [290]) or it may have had, at least, an influence on certain symptoms [291]. In a mouse study, the cortical neurodegeneration caused by chronic exposure to this neurotropic parasite led to increased CX3CL1 expression accompanied by microglia activation [292]. Additionally, the missense mutations in Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) were proposed as significant players in PD. In the microglia derived from Lrrk2-/- mice, both mRNA and protein levels of CX3CR1 were increased and the cells migration towards the source of CX3CL1 was enhanced [99].

5.2.2. CD200-CD200R and Parkinson’s Disease

In PD patients, disturbances in the CD200-CD200R interaction were described for the peripheral immune cells [293]. Monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) from young and elderly patients with PD were compared with those obtained from age-matched controls to determine any changes in CD200R expression. Basal CD200R levels were the same in all the examined groups, yet the induction of the receptor in response to various inflammatory stimuli was affected in the MDMs from the PD patients [293]. In addition, the stimulus-induced level of CD200R in the MDMs from the PD patients was inversely correlated with the level of TNF-α secretion and the age of PD onset.

Neuroinflammation, with microglial activation coming to the foreground, is among the prominent pathological features of PD. As shown by Xie et al. [294], the peripheral injection of LPS led to the mobilization of microglia, followed by the enhanced expression of Cd200 and Cd200r in the substantia nigra of rats. The attenuation of this activation by CD200Fc protected dopaminergic neurons from the negative effect of the LPS-induced inflammation. On the contrary, blockage of signalling with anti-CD200R antibody accelerated the neuronal loss [294]. Altogether, these results suggested that the CD200-CD200R axis might be relevant to the course of PD. Comparable results were published by Xia et al. [295]. The authors presented that the induction of peripheral blood monocyte tolerance alleviated the neuroinflammation produced by the intraperitoneal treatment with LPS. The process was mediated by the upregulation of CD200R.

A study using an in vivo model of PD, based on the infusion of MPTP hydrochloride, revealed that the levels of CD200 and CD200R were reduced in mouse cerebral cortices in a time-dependent manner [296]. This observation suggested that this signalling pathway might participate in the progression of PD, due to the simultaneously obtained results showing that the dopamine level decreased similarly. The in vitro approach, with an injection of 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion in primary microglia cells, allowed for the determination that the protective effect of CD200 on the dopaminergic neurons was mediated through the promotion of the opening of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel [296]. This beneficial process was accompanied by the inhibition of microglial activation and the cessation of ATP release. Besides, the ageing-related reduction in CD200 expression in the rat SNpc was reported by Wang et al. [297]. The suppressed levels of CD200 and CD200R were also characteristics of MPTP/probenecid-induced PD mice [298]. These animals had disturbed motor balance and coordination, likewise the declined number of dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc and lowered density of those cells in the striatum [298]. Other in vivo evidence was provided by Zhang et al. [299], who employed the 6-OHDA model combined with a CD200R-blocking antibody. In the 6-OHDA rats with moderate dopaminergic neurodegeneration in the SNpc, the administration of the antibody significantly aggravated the impairment.

Conclusion

In the present article, we reviewed some of the relevant data from the literature regarding the role of neuron – microglia communication both in the healthy brain and during the pathological processes within the CNS. We underlined that, in this context, both the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and CD200-CD200R systems deserve special recognition for their specific actions and wide participation in the regulation of multiple processes (microglial activation, apoptosis, phagocytosis, neurogenesis, neuroinflammation, synaptic plasticity, etc.). In recent years, it has become undeniable that malfunctions in these axes are involved in psychiatric (schizophrenia, depression) and neurodegenerative (Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases) disorders, as the outcome of these conditions appears to rely on the processes controlled by CX3CL1, CD200 and their respective receptors (Fig. 4). The comprehensive evidence supporting these relationships has been provided within this article. However, further research leading to a profound understanding of the signalling pathways, critical for the proper communication between neurons and microglia, is essential to determine new therapeutic directions that will enable the maintenance/restoration of homeostasis in the CNS.

Fig. (4).

Fig. (4)

The disruption of the neuron – microglia communication, specifically the CX3CL1-CX3CR1 and CD200-CD200R pathways, leads to deleterious processes, mainly neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. The lack of this balance has been increasingly reported as the basis for the development of severe psychiatric (schizophrenia, depression) and neurodegenerative (Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases) conditions. (A higher resolution / colour version of this figure is available in the electronic copy of the article).

Acknowledgements

Declared none.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grant no. 2015/19/B/NZ7/02394 (OPUS) and 2017/26/M/NZ7/01048 (HARMONIA), National Science Centre, Poland. KCh is the recipient of the doctoral scholarship ETIUDA (UMO-2019/32/T/NZ4/00308) from the National Science Centre, Poland.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

References

  • 1.Dejda A., Mawambo G., Daudelin J.F., Miloudi K., Akla N., Patel C., Andriessen E.M.M.A., Labrecque N., Sennlaub F., Sapieha P. Neuropilin-1-expressing microglia are associated with nascent retinal vasculature yet dispensable for developmental angiogenesis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57(4):1530–1536. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Louveau A., Nerrière-Daguin V., Vanhove B., Naveilhan P., Neunlist M., Nicot A., Boudin H. Targeting the CD80/CD86 costimulatory pathway with CTLA4-Ig directs microglia toward a repair phenotype and promotes axonal outgrowth. Glia. 2015;63(12):2298–2312. doi: 10.1002/glia.22894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bilimoria P.M., Stevens B. Microglia function during brain development: new insights from animal models. Brain Res. 2015;1617:7–17. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rodríguez-Iglesias N., Sierra A., Valero J. Rewiring of memory circuits: connecting adult newborn neurons with the help of microglia. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019;7:24. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wu L-J., Stevens B., Duan S., MacVicar B.A. Microglia in neuronal circuits. Neural Plast. 2013;2013586426 doi: 10.1155/2013/586426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu Y., Dissing-Olesen L., MacVicar B.A., Stevens B. Microglia: Dynamic mediators of synapse development and plasticity. Trends Immunol. 2015;36(10):605–613. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bar E., Barak B. Microglia Roles in Synaptic Plasticity and Myelination in Homeostatic Conditions and Neurodevelopmental Disorders. GLIA. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cazareth J., Guyon A., Heurteaux C., Chabry J., Petit-Paitel A. Molecular and cellular neuroinflammatory status of mouse brain after systemic lipopolysaccharide challenge: importance of CCR2/CCL2 signaling. J. Neuroinflammation. 2014;11(1):132. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-11-132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mosher K.I., Andres R.H., Fukuhara T., Bieri G., Hasegawa-Moriyama M., He Y., Guzman R., Wyss-Coray T. Neural progenitor cells regulate microglia functions and activity. Nat. Neurosci. 2012;15(11):1485–1487. doi: 10.1038/nn.3233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kettenmann H., Hanisch U-K., Noda M., Verkhratsky A. Physiology of microglia. Physiol. Rev. 2011;91(2):461–553. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00011.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dick A.D., Carter D., Robertson M., Broderick C., Hughes E., Forrester J.V., Liversidge J. Control of myeloid activity during retinal inflammation. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2003;74(2):161–166. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1102535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ponomarev E.D., Veremeyko T., Barteneva N., Krichevsky A.M., Weiner H.L. MicroRNA-124 promotes microglia quiescence and suppresses EAE by deactivating macrophages via the C/EBP-α-PU.1 pathway. Nat. Med. 2011;17(1):64–70. doi: 10.1038/nm.2266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liang K.J., Lee J.E., Wang Y.D., Ma W., Fontainhas A.M., Fariss R.N., Wong W.T. Regulation of dynamic behavior of retinal microglia by CX3CR1 signaling. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2009;50(9):4444–4451. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wake H., Moorhouse A.J., Jinno S., Kohsaka S., Nabekura J. Resting microglia directly monitor the functional state of synapses in vivo and determine the fate of ischemic terminals. J. Neurosci. 2009;29(13):3974–3980. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4363-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tremblay M.Ě., Lowery R.L., Majewska A.K. Microglial interactions with synapses are modulated by visual experience. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(11):e1000527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tremblay M-E., Stevens B., Sierra A., Wake H., Bessis A., Nimmerjahn A. The role of microglia in the healthy brain. J. Neurosci. 2011;31(45):16064–16069. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4158-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Marinelli S., Basilico B., Marrone M.C., Ragozzino D. Microglia-neuron crosstalk: Signaling mechanism and control of synaptic transmission. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019;94:138–151. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2019.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhan Y., Paolicelli R.C., Sforazzini F., Weinhard L., Bolasco G., Pagani F., Vyssotski A.L., Bifone A., Gozzi A., Ragozzino D., Gross C.T. Deficient neuron-microglia signaling results in impaired functional brain connectivity and social behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 2014;17(3):400–406. doi: 10.1038/nn.3641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li K., Yu W., Cao R., Zhu Z., Zhao G. Microglia-mediated BAFF-BAFFR ligation promotes neuronal survival in brain ischemia injury. Neuroscience. 2017;363:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Todd L., Palazzo I., Suarez L., Liu X., Volkov L., Hoang T.V., Campbell W.A., Blackshaw S., Quan N., Fischer A.J. Reactive microglia and IL1β/IL-1R1-signaling mediate neuroprotection in excitotoxin-damaged mouse retina. J. Neuroinflammation. 2019;16(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1505-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Freria C.M., Hall J.C.E., Wei P., Guan Z., McTigue D.M., Popovich P.G. Deletion of the fractalkine receptor, cx3cr1, improves endogenous repair, axon sprouting, and synaptogenesis after spinal cord injury in mice. J. Neurosci. 2017;37(13):3568–3587. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2841-16.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Raffo-Romero A., Arab T., Van Camp C., Lemaire Q., Wisztorski M., Franck J., Aboulouard S., Le Marrec-Croq F., Sautiere P.E., Vizioli J., Salzet M., Lefebvre C. ALK4/5-dependent TGF-β signaling contributes to the crosstalk between neurons and microglia following axonal lesion. Sci. Rep. 2019;9(1):6896. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43328-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Biber K., Neumann H., Inoue K., Boddeke H.W.G.M. Neuronal ‘On’ and ‘Off’ signals control microglia. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30(11):596–602. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2007.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kerschensteiner M., Meinl E., Hohlfeld R. Neuro-immune crosstalk in CNS diseases. Results Probl. Cell Differ. 2010;51:197–216. doi: 10.1007/400_2009_6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Luster A.D. Chemokines--chemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;338(7):436–445. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802123380706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Griffith J.W., Sokol C.L., Luster A.D. Chemokines and chemokine receptors: positioning cells for host defense and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2014;32(1):659–702. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zlotnik A., Yoshie O. The chemokine superfamily revisited. Immunity. 2012;•••:705–716. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rot A., von Andrian U.H. Chemokines in innate and adaptive host defense: basic chemokinese grammar for immune cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2004;22(1):891–928. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dimitrijevic O.B., Stamatovic S.M., Keep R.F., Andjelkovic A.V. Effects of the chemokine CCL2 on blood-brain barrier permeability during ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2006;26(6):797–810. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Majerova P., Michalicova A., Cente M., Hanes J., Vegh J., Kittel A., Kosikova N., Cigankova V., Mihaljevic S., Jadhav S., Kovac A. Trafficking of immune cells across the blood-brain barrier is modulated by neurofibrillary pathology in tauopathies. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shou J., Peng J., Zhao Z., Huang X., Li H., Li L., Gao X., Xing Y., Liu H. CCL26 and CCR3 are associated with the acute inflammatory response in the CNS in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2019;333:576967. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2019.576967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Si M., Jiao X., Li Y., Chen H., He P., Jiang F. The role of cytokines and chemokines in the microenvironment of the blood-brain barrier in leukemia central nervous system metastasis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018;10:305–313. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S152419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang C., Hawkins K.E., Doré S., Candelario-Jalil E. Neuroinflammatory mechanisms of blood-brain barrier damage in ischemic stroke. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2019;316(2):C135–C153. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00136.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Marciniak E., Faivre E., Dutar P., Alves Pires C., Demeyer D., Caillierez R., Laloux C., Buée L., Blum D., Humez S. The Chemokine MIP-1α/CCL3 impairs mouse hippocampal synaptic transmission, plasticity and memory. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:15862. doi: 10.1038/srep15862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Capsoni S., Malerba F., Carucci N.M., Rizzi C., Criscuolo C., Origlia N., Calvello M., Viegi A., Meli G., Cattaneo A. The chemokine CXCL12 mediates the anti-amyloidogenic action of painless human nerve growth factor. Brain. 2017;140(1):201–217. doi: 10.1093/brain/aww271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee H.T., Chang H.T., Lee S., Lin C.H., Fan J.R., Lin S.Z., Hsu C.Y., Hsieh C.H., Shyu W.C. Role of IGF1R(+) MSCs in modulating neuroplasticity via CXCR4 cross-interaction. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:32595. doi: 10.1038/srep32595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schultheiß C., Abe P., Hoffmann F., Mueller W., Kreuder A.E., Schütz D., Haege S., Redecker C., Keiner S., Kannan S., Claasen J.H., Pfrieger F.W., Stumm R. CXCR4 prevents dispersion of granule neuron precursors in the adult dentate gyrus. Hippocampus. 2013;23(12):1345–1358. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huang F., Lan Y., Qin L., Dong H., Shi H., Wu H., Zou Q., Hu Z., Wu X., Astragaloside I.V. Astragaloside IV promotes adult neurogenesis in hippocampal dentate gyrus of mouse through cxcl1/cxcr2 signaling. Molecules. 2018;23(9):2178. doi: 10.3390/molecules23092178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Trousse F., Jemli A., Silhol M., Garrido E., Crouzier L., Naert G., Maurice T., Rossel M. Knockdown of the CXCL12/CXCR7 chemokine pathway results in learning deficits and neural progenitor maturation impairment in mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2019;80:697–710. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fazi B., Proserpio C., Galardi S., Annesi F., Cola M., Mangiola A., Michienzi A., Ciafrè S.A. The expression of the chemokine cxcl14 correlates with several aggressive aspects of glioblastoma and promotes key properties of glioblastoma cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20(10):2496. doi: 10.3390/ijms20102496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Callewaere C., Banisadr G., Rostène W., Parsadaniantz S.M. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in the brain: implication in neuroendocrine regulation. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007;38(3):355–363. doi: 10.1677/JME-06-0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Di Castro M.A., Trettel F., Milior G., Maggi L., Ragozzino D., Limatola C. The chemokine CXCL16 modulates neurotransmitter release in hippocampal CA1 area. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:34633. doi: 10.1038/srep34633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Roche S.L., Wyse-Jackson A.C., Ruiz-Lopez A.M., Byrne A.M., Cotter T.G. Fractalkine-CX3CR1 signaling is critical for progesterone-mediated neuroprotection in the retina. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:43067. doi: 10.1038/srep43067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hattori Y., Miyata T. Microglia extensively survey the developing cortex via the CXCL12/CXCR4 system to help neural progenitors to acquire differentiated properties. Genes Cells. 2018;23(10):915–922. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Parajuli B., Horiuchi H., Mizuno T., Takeuchi H., Suzumura A. CCL11 enhances excitotoxic neuronal death by producing reactive oxygen species in microglia. Glia. 2015;63(12):2274–2284. doi: 10.1002/glia.22892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Feng C., Wang X., Liu T., Zhang M., Xu G., Ni Y. Expression of CCL2 and its receptor in activation and migration of microglia and monocytes induced by photoreceptor apoptosis. Mol. Vis. 2017;23:765–777. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chan J.K.C., Ng C.S., Hui P.K. A simple guide to the terminology and application of leucocyte monoclonal antibodies. Histopathology. 1988;12(5):461–480. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1988.tb01967.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Human Cell Differentiation Molecules (HCDM) hcdm.org/
  • 49.Actor J.K. A Functional Overview of the Immune System and Immune Components.Introductory Immunology. Elsevier; 2019. pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jamaludin S.Y.N., Azimi I., Davis F.M., Peters A.A., Gonda T.J., Thompson E.W., Roberts-Thomson S.J., Monteith G.R. Assessment of CXC ligand 12-mediated calcium signalling and its regulators in basal-like breast cancer cells. Oncol. Lett. 2018;15(4):4289–4295. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.7827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kijima N., Hosen N., Kagawa N., Hashimoto N., Nakano A., Fujimoto Y., Kinoshita M., Sugiyama H., Yoshimine T. CD166/activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule is expressed on glioblastoma progenitor cells and involved in the regulation of tumor cell invasion. Neuro-oncol. 2012;14(10):1254–1264. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nor202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sato K., Tachikawa M., Watanabe M., Uchida Y., Terasaki T. Selective protein expression changes of leukocyte-migration-associated cluster of differentiation antigens at the blood-brain barrier in a lipopolysaccharide-induced systemic inflammation mouse model without alteration of transporters, receptors or tight junction-related protein. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2019;42(6):944–953. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b18-00939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Akiyama H., McGeer P.L. Brain microglia constitutively express β-2 integrins. J. Neuroimmunol. 1990;30(1):81–93. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(90)90055-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Aloisi F., De Simone R., Columba-Cabezas S., Penna G., Adorini L. Functional maturation of adult mouse resting microglia into an APC is promoted by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interaction with Th1 cells. J. Immunol. 2000;164(4):1705–1712. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bachstetter A.D., Van Eldik L.J., Schmitt F.A., Neltner J.H., Ighodaro E.T., Webster S.J., Patel E., Abner E.L., Kryscio R.J., Nelson P.T. Disease-related microglia heterogeneity in the hippocampus of Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and hippocampal sclerosis of aging. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2015;3:32. doi: 10.1186/s40478-015-0209-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Stankov A., Belakaposka-Srpanova V., Bitoljanu N., Cakar L., Cakar Z., Rosoklija G. Visualisation of microglia with the use of immunohistochemical double staining method for cd-68 and iba-1 of cerebral tissue samples in cases of brain contusions. Prilozi (Makedon. Akad. Nauk. Umet. Odd. Med. Nauki) 2015;36(2):141–145. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2015-0062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Dubbelaar M.L., Kracht L., Eggen B.J.L., Boddeke E.W.G.M. The kaleidoscope of microglial phenotypes. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1753. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Walker D.G., Lue L.F. Immune phenotypes of microglia in human neurodegenerative disease: challenges to detecting microglial polarization in human brains. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2015;7(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0139-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tang Y., Le W. Differential Roles of M1 and M2 Microglia in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016;53(2):1181–1194. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-9070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bolós M., Perea J.R., Avila J. Alzheimer’s disease as an inflammatory disease. Biomol. Concepts. 2017;8(1):37–43. doi: 10.1515/bmc-2016-0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fu R., Shen Q., Xu P., Luo J.J., Tang Y. Phagocytosis of microglia in the central nervous system diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2014;49(3):1422–1434. doi: 10.1007/s12035-013-8620-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sárvári M., Hrabovszky E., Kalló I., Solymosi N., Likó I., Berchtold N., Cotman C., Liposits Z. Menopause leads to elevated expression of macrophage-associated genes in the aging frontal cortex: rat and human studies identify strikingly similar changes. J. Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:264. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Dimayuga F.O., Reed J.L., Carnero G.A., Wang C., Dimayuga E.R., Dimayuga V.M., Perger A., Wilson M.E., Keller J.N., Bruce-Keller A.J. Estrogen and brain inflammation: effects on microglial expression of MHC, costimulatory molecules and cytokines. J. Neuroimmunol. 2005;161(1-2):123–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Harry G.J. Microglia during development and aging. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013;139(3):313–326. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Geissmann F., Revy P., Brousse N., Lepelletier Y., Folli C., Durandy A., Chambon P., Dy M. Retinoids regulate survival and antigen presentation by immature dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 2003;198(4):623–634. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pruszak J., Ludwig W., Blak A., Alavian K., Isacson O. CD15, CD24, and CD29 define a surface biomarker code for neural lineage differentiation of stem cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(12):2928–2940. doi: 10.1002/stem.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Griffiths M.R., Gasque P., Neal J.W. The multiple roles of the innate immune system in the regulation of apoptosis and inflammation in the brain. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2009;68(3):217–226. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181996688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hernangómez M., Mestre L., Correa F.G., Loría F., Mecha M., Iñigo P.M., Docagne F., Williams R.O., Borrell J., Guaza C. CD200-CD200R1 interaction contributes to neuroprotective effects of anandamide on experimentally induced inflammation. Glia. 2012;60(9):1437–1450. doi: 10.1002/glia.22366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pachter J.S., de Vries H.E., Fabry Z. The blood-brain barrier and its role in immune privilege in the central nervous system. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2003;62(6):593–604. doi: 10.1093/jnen/62.6.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Costello D.A., Lyons A., Denieffe S., Browne T.C., Cox F.F., Lynch M.A. Long term potentiation is impaired in membrane glycoprotein CD200-deficient mice: a role for Toll-like receptor activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286(40):34722–34732. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.280826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wilkins H.M., Koppel S.J., Weidling I.W., Roy N., Ryan L.N., Stanford J.A., Swerdlow R.H. Extracellular Mitochondria and Mitochondrial Components Act as Damage-Associated Molecular Pattern Molecules in the Mouse Brain. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2016;11(4):622–628. doi: 10.1007/s11481-016-9704-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hancock M.L., Meyer R.C., Mistry M., Khetani R.S., Wagschal A., Shin T., Ho Sui S.J., Näär A.M., Flanagan J.G. Insulin receptor associates with promoters genome-wide and regulates gene expression. Cell. 2019;177(3):722–736.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Billcliff P.G., Rollason R., Prior I., Owen D.M., Gaus K., Banting G. CD317/tetherin is an organiser of membrane microdomains. J. Cell Sci. 2013;126(Pt 7):1553–1564. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bazan J.F., Bacon K.B., Hardiman G., Wang W., Soo K., Rossi D., Greaves D.R., Zlotnik A., Schall T.J. A new class of membrane-bound chemokine with a CX3C motif. Nature. 1997;385(6617):640–644. doi: 10.1038/385640a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pan Y., Lloyd C., Zhou H., Dolich S., Deeds J., Gonzalo J.A., Vath J., Gosselin M., Ma J., Dussault B., Woolf E., Alperin G., Culpepper J., Gutierrez-Ramos J.C., Gearing D. Neurotactin, a membrane-anchored chemokine upregulated in brain inflammation. Nature. 1997;387(6633):611–617. doi: 10.1038/42491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hughes P.M., Botham M.S., Frentzel S., Mir A., Perry V.H. Expression of fractalkine (CX3CL1) and its receptor, CX3CR1, during acute and chronic inflammation in the rodent CNS. Glia. 2002;37(4):314–327. doi: 10.1002/glia.10037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Cardona A.E., Sasse M.E., Liu L., Cardona S.M., Mizutani M., Savarin C., Hu T., Ransohoff R.M. Scavenging roles of chemokine receptors: chemokine receptor deficiency is associated with increased levels of ligand in circulation and tissues. Blood. 2008;112(2):256–263. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-118497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Harrison J.K., Jiang Y., Chen S., Xia Y., Maciejewski D., McNamara R.K., Streit W.J., Salafranca M.N., Adhikari S., Thompson D.A., Botti P., Bacon K.B., Feng L. Role for neuronally derived fractalkine in mediating interactions between neurons and CX3CR1-expressing microglia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95(18):10896–10901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.18.10896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.O’Sullivan S.A., Gasparini F., Mir A.K., Dev K.K. Fractalkine shedding is mediated by p38 and the ADAM10 protease under pro-inflammatory conditions in human astrocytes. J. Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0659-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Sowa J.E., Ślusarczyk J., Trojan E., Chamera K., Leśkiewicz M., Regulska M., Kotarska K., Basta-Kaim A. Prenatal stress affects viability, activation, and chemokine signaling in astroglial cultures. J. Neuroimmunol. 2017;311:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tarozzo G., Bortolazzi S., Crochemore C., Chen S.C., Lira A.S., Abrams J.S., Beltramo M. Fractalkine protein localization and gene expression in mouse brain. J. Neurosci. Res. 2003;73(1):81–88. doi: 10.1002/jnr.10645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Imai T., Hieshima K., Haskell C., Baba M., Nagira M., Nishimura M., Kakizaki M., Takagi S., Nomiyama H., Schall T.J., Yoshie O. Identification and molecular characterization of fractalkine receptor CX3CR1, which mediates both leukocyte migration and adhesion. Cell. 1997;91(4):521–530. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80438-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Combadiere C., Salzwedel K., Smith E.D., Tiffany H.L., Berger E.A., Murphy P.M. Identification of CX3CR1. A chemotactic receptor for the human CX3C chemokine fractalkine and a fusion coreceptor for HIV-1. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273(37):23799–23804. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.23799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Maciejewski-Lenoir D., Chen S., Feng L., Maki R., Bacon K.B. Characterization of fractalkine in rat brain cells: migratory and activation signals for CX3CR-1-expressing microglia. J. Immunol. 1999;163(3):1628–1635. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Nardelli B., Tiffany H.L., Bong G.W., Yourey P.A., Morahan D.K., Li Y., Murphy P.M., Alderson R.F. Characterization of the signal transduction pathway activated in human monocytes and dendritic cells by MPIF-1, a specific ligand for CC chemokine receptor 1. J. Immunol. 1999;162(1):435–444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Juremalm M., Nilsson G. Chemokine receptor expression by mast cells. Chem. Immunol. Allergy. 2005;87:130–144. doi: 10.1159/000087640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Schulz C., Schäfer A., Stolla M., Kerstan S., Lorenz M., von Brühl M.L., Schiemann M., Bauersachs J., Gloe T., Busch D.H., Gawaz M., Massberg S. Chemokine fractalkine mediates leukocyte recruitment to inflammatory endothelial cells in flowing whole blood: a critical role for P-selectin expressed on activated platelets. Circulation. 2007;116(7):764–773. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.695189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Umehara H., Goda S., Imai T., Nagano Y., Minami Y., Tanaka Y., Okazaki T., Bloom E.T., Domae N. Fractalkine, a CX3C-chemokine, functions predominantly as an adhesion molecule in monocytic cell line THP-1. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2001;79(3):298–302. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2001.01004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Tsai W.H., Shih C.H., Feng S.Y., Chang S.C., Lin Y.C., Hsu H.C. Role of CX3CL1 in the chemotactic migration of all-trans retinoic acid-treated acute promyelocytic leukemic cells toward apoptotic cells. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 2014;77(7):367–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Voronova A., Yuzwa S.A., Wang B.S., Zahr S., Syal C., Wang J., Kaplan D.R., Miller F.D. Migrating interneurons secrete fractalkine to promote oligodendrocyte formation in the developing mammalian brain. Neuron. 2017;94(3):500–516.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bachstetter A.D., Morganti J.M., Jernberg J., Schlunk A., Mitchell S.H., Brewster K.W., Hudson C.E., Cole M.J., Harrison J.K., Bickford P.C., Gemma C. Fractalkine and CX 3 CR1 regulate hippocampal neurogenesis in adult and aged rats. Neurobiol. Aging. 2011;32(11):2030–2044. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Maggi L., Scianni M., Branchi I., D’Andrea I., Lauro C., Limatola C. CX(3)CR1 deficiency alters hippocampal-dependent plasticity phenomena blunting the effects of enriched environment. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2011;5:22. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2011.00022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rogers J.T., Morganti J.M., Bachstetter A.D., Hudson C.E., Peters M.M., Grimmig B.A., Weeber E.J., Bickford P.C., Gemma C. CX3CR1 deficiency leads to impairment of hippocampal cognitive function and synaptic plasticity. J. Neurosci. 2011;31(45):16241–16250. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3667-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zieger M., Ahnelt P.K., Uhrin P. CX3CL1 (fractalkine) protein expression in normal and degenerating mouse retina: in vivo studies. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Sellner S., Paricio-Montesinos R., Spieß A., Masuch A., Erny D., Harsan L.A., Elverfeldt D.V., Schwabenland M., Biber K., Staszewski O., Lira S., Jung S., Prinz M., Blank T. Microglial CX3CR1 promotes adult neurogenesis by inhibiting Sirt 1/p65 signaling independent of CX3CL1. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2016;4(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0374-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Bolós M., Perea J.R., Terreros-Roncal J., Pallas-Bazarra N., Jurado-Arjona J., Ávila J., Llorens-Martín M. Absence of microglial CX3CR1 impairs the synaptic integration of adult-born hippocampal granule neurons. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018;68:76–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zujovic V., Benavides J., Vigé X., Carter C., Taupin V. Fractalkine modulates TNF-alpha secretion and neurotoxicity induced by microglial activation. Glia. 2000;29(4):305–315. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(20000215)29:4<305:AID-GLIA2>3.0.CO;2-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Mizuno T., Kawanokuchi J., Numata K., Suzumura A. Production and neuroprotective functions of fractalkine in the central nervous system. Brain Res. 2003;979(1-2):65–70. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)02867-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ma B., Xu L., Pan X., Sun L., Ding J., Xie C., Koliatsos V.E., Cai H. LRRK2 modulates microglial activity through regulation of chemokine (C-X3-C) receptor 1 -mediated signalling pathways. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016;25(16):3515–3523. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bian C., Zhao Z.Q., Zhang Y.Q., Lü N. Involvement of CX3CL1/CX3CR1 signaling in spinal long term potentiation. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0118842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ragozzino D., Di Angelantonio S., Trettel F., Bertollini C., Maggi L., Gross C., Charo I.F., Limatola C., Eusebi F. Chemokine fractalkine/CX3CL1 negatively modulates active glutamatergic synapses in rat hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 2006;26(41):10488–10498. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3192-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Bertollini C., Ragozzino D., Gross C., Limatola C., Eusebi F. Fractalkine/CX3CL1 depresses central synaptic transmission in mouse hippocampal slices. Neuropharmacology. 2006;51(4):816–821. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Roseti C., Fucile S., Lauro C., Martinello K., Bertollini C., Esposito V., Mascia A., Catalano M., Aronica E., Limatola C., Palma E. Fractalkine/CX3CL1 modulates GABAA currents in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2013;54(10):1834–1844. doi: 10.1111/epi.12354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Heinisch S., Kirby L.G. Fractalkine/CX3CL1 enhances GABA synaptic activity at serotonin neurons in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus. Neuroscience. 2009;164(3):1210–1223. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.08.075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Scianni M., Antonilli L., Chece G., Cristalli G., Di Castro M.A., Limatola C., Maggi L. Fractalkine (CX3CL1) enhances hippocampal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) function via D-serine and adenosine receptor type A2 (A2AR) activity. J. Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:108. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.O’Sullivan S.A., Dev K.K. The chemokine fractalkine (CX3CL1) attenuates H2O2-induced demyelination in cerebellar slices. J. Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0932-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Bolós M., Llorens-Martín M., Perea J.R., Jurado-Arjona J., Rábano A., Hernández F., Avila J. Absence of CX3CR1 impairs the internalization of Tau by microglia. Mol. Neurodegener. 2017;12(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13024-017-0200-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Suzuki M., El-Hage N., Zou S., Hahn Y.K., Sorrell M.E., Sturgill J.L., Conrad D.H., Knapp P.E., Hauser K.F. Fractalkine/CX3CL1 protects striatal neurons from synergistic morphine and HIV-1 Tat-induced dendritic losses and death. Mol. Neurodegener. 2011;6(1):78. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-6-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Meucci O., Fatatis A., Simen A.A., Miller R.J. Expression of CX3CR1 chemokine receptors on neurons and their role in neuronal survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97(14):8075–8080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.090017497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lauro C., Cipriani R., Catalano M., Trettel F., Chece G., Brusadin V., Antonilli L., van Rooijen N., Eusebi F., Fredholm B.B., Limatola C. Adenosine A1 receptors and microglial cells mediate CX3CL1-induced protection of hippocampal neurons against Glu-induced death. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35(7):1550–1559. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Lauro C., Catalano M., Di Paolo E., Chece G., de Costanzo I., Trettel F., Limatola C. Fractalkine/CX3CL1 engages different neuroprotective responses upon selective glutamate receptor overactivation. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015;8:472. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Catalano M., Lauro C., Cipriani R., Chece G., Ponzetta A., Di Angelantonio S., Ragozzino D., Limatola C. CX3CL1 protects neurons against excitotoxicity enhancing GLT-1 activity on astrocytes. J. Neuroimmunol. 2013;263(1-2):75–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2013.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Nash K.R., Moran P., Finneran D.J., Hudson C., Robinson J., Morgan D., Bickford P.C. Fractalkine over expression suppresses α-synuclein-mediated neurodegeneration. Mol. Ther. 2015;23(1):17–23. doi: 10.1038/mt.2014.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Liu C., Hong K., Chen H., Niu Y., Duan W., Liu Y., Ji Y., Deng B., Li Y., Li Z., Wen D., Li C. Evidence for a protective role of the CX3CL1/CX3CR1 axis in a model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biol. Chem. 2019;400(5):651–661. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2018-0204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Clark M.J., Gagnon J., Williams A.F., Barclay A.N. MRC OX-2 antigen: a lymphoid/neuronal membrane glycoprotein with a structure like a single immunoglobulin light chain. EMBO J. 1985;4(1):113–118. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb02324.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Barclay A.N., Ward H.A. Purification and chemical characterisation of membrane glycoproteins from rat thymocytes and brain, recognised by monoclonal antibody MRC OX 2. Eur. J. Biochem. 1982;129(2):447–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb07070.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Manich G., Recasens M., Valente T., Almolda B., González B., Castellano B. Role of the CD200-CD200R Axis during homeostasis and neuroinflammation. Neuroscience. 2019;405:118–136. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Ko Y.C., Chien H.F., Jiang-Shieh Y.F., Chang C.Y., Pai M.H., Huang J.P., Chen H.M., Wu C.H. Endothelial CD200 is heterogeneously distributed, regulated and involved in immune cell-endothelium interactions. J. Anat. 2009;214(1):183–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00986.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Barclay A.N., Wright G.J., Brooke G., Brown M.H. CD200 and membrane protein interactions in the control of myeloid cells. Trends Immunol. 2002;23(6):285–290. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4906(02)02223-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zeis T., Enz L., Schaeren-Wiemers N. The immunomodulatory oligodendrocyte. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 121.Lyons A., Downer E.J., Crotty S., Nolan Y.M., Mills K.H.G., Lynch M.A. CD200 ligand receptor interaction modulates microglial activation in vivo and in vitro: a role for IL-4. J. Neurosci. 2007;27(31):8309–8313. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1781-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Koning N., Swaab D.F., Hoek R.M., Huitinga I. Distribution of the immune inhibitory molecules CD200 and CD200R in the normal central nervous system and multiple sclerosis lesions suggests neuron-glia and glia-glia interactions. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2009;68(2):159–167. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181964113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wright G.J., Cherwinski H., Foster-Cuevas M., Brooke G., Puklavec M.J., Bigler M., Song Y., Jenmalm M., Gorman D., McClanahan T., Liu M.R., Brown M.H., Sedgwick J.D., Phillips J.H., Barclay A.N. Characterization of the CD200 receptor family in mice and humans and their interactions with CD200. J. Immunol. 2003;171(6):3034–3046. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.3034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Wright G.J., Puklavec M.J., Willis A.C., Hoek R.M., Sedgwick J.D., Brown M.H., Barclay A.N., Dunn W. Lymphoid/neuronal cell surface OX2 glycoprotein recognizes a novel receptor on macrophages implicated in the control of their function. Immunity. 2000;13(2):233–242. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)00023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Seeds R.E., Gordon S., Miller J.L. Characterisation of myeloid receptor expression and interferon alpha/beta production in murine plasmacytoid dendritic cells by flow cytomtery. J. Immunol. Methods. 2009;350(1-2):106–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2009.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Gorczynski R., Chen Z., Kai Y., Lee L., Wong S., Marsden P.A. CD200 is a ligand for all members of the CD200R family of immunoregulatory molecules. J. Immunol. 2004;172(12):7744–7749. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.12.7744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hoek R. H., Ruuls S. R., Murphy C. A., Wright G. J., Goddard R., Zurawski S. M., Blom B., Homola M. E., Streit W. J., Brown M. H., Barclay A. N., Sedgwick J. D. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 128.Liu C., Shen Y., Tang Y., Gu Y. The role of N-glycosylation of CD200-CD200R1 interaction in classical microglial activation. J. Inflamm. (Lond.) 2018;15(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12950-018-0205-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Dentesano G., Straccia M., Ejarque-Ortiz A., Tusell J.M., Serratosa J., Saura J., Solà C. Inhibition of CD200R1 expression by C/EBP β in reactive microglial cells. J. Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:165. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Lyons A., McQuillan K., Deighan B.F., O’Reilly J.A., Downer E.J., Murphy A.C., Watson M., Piazza A., O’Connell F., Griffin R., Mills K.H.G., Lynch M.A. Decreased neuronal CD200 expression in IL-4-deficient mice results in increased neuroinflammation in response to lipopolysaccharide. Brain Behav. Immun. 2009;23(7):1020–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Cox F.F., Berezin V., Bock E., Lynch M.A. The neural cell adhesion molecule-derived peptide, FGL, attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced changes in glia in a CD200-dependent manner. Neuroscience. 2013;235:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Lyons A., Downer E.J., Costello D.A., Murphy N., Lynch M.A. Dok2 mediates the CD200Fc attenuation of Aβ-induced changes in glia. J. Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:107. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Lyons A., Minogue A.M., Jones R.S., Fitzpatrick O., Noonan J., Campbell V.A., Lynch M.A. Analysis of the Impact of CD200 on Phagocytosis. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017;54(7):5730–5739. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-0223-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Cox F.F., Carney D., Miller A.M., Lynch M.A. CD200 fusion protein decreases microglial activation in the hippocampus of aged rats. Brain Behav. Immun. 2012;26(5):789–796. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Dentesano G., Serratosa J., Tusell J.M., Ramón P., Valente T., Saura J., Solà C. CD200R1 and CD200 expression are regulated by PPAR-γ in activated glial cells. Glia. 2014;62(6):982–998. doi: 10.1002/glia.22656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Varnum M.M., Kiyota T., Ingraham K.L., Ikezu S., Ikezu T. The anti-inflammatory glycoprotein, CD200, restores neurogenesis and enhances amyloid phagocytosis in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2015;36(11):2995–3007. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.07.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Lin L.-F. H., Doherty D. H., Lile J. D., Bektesh S. 1993. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 138.Boscia F., Esposito C.L., Di Crisci A., de Franciscis V., Annunziato L., Cerchia L. GDNF selectively induces microglial activation and neuronal survival in CA1/CA3 hippocampal regions exposed to NMDA insult through Ret/ERK signalling. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Denieffe S., Kelly R.J., McDonald C., Lyons A., Lynch M.A. Classical activation of microglia in CD200-deficient mice is a consequence of blood brain barrier permeability and infiltration of peripheral cells. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013;34:86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.07.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Elward K., Gasque P. “Eat me” and “don’t eat me” signals govern the innate immune response and tissue repair in the CNS: emphasis on the critical role of the complement system. Mol. Immunol. 2003;40(2-4):85–94. doi: 10.1016/S0161-5890(03)00109-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Rosenblum M. D., Woodliff J. E., Johnson B. D., Konkol M. C., Gerber K. A., Orentas R. J., Sandford G., Truitt R. L. 2004. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 142.Yang Y., Zhang X.J., Zhang C., Chen R., Li L., He J., Xie Y., Chen Y. Loss of neuronal CD200 contributed to microglial activation after acute cerebral ischemia in mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2018;678:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Webb M., Barclay A.N. Localisation of the MRC OX-2 glycoprotein on the surfaces of neurones. J. Neurochem. 1984;43(4):1061–1067. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1984.tb12844.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Morris R.J., Beech J.N. Sequential expression of OX2 and Thy-1 glycoproteins on the neuronal surface during development. An immunohistochemical study of rat cerebellum. Dev. Neurosci. 1987;9(1):33–44. doi: 10.1159/000111606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Shrivastava K., Gonzalez P., Acarin L. The immune inhibitory complex CD200/CD200R is developmentally regulated in the mouse brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 2012;520(12):2657–2675. doi: 10.1002/cne.23062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Pankratova S., Bjornsdottir H., Christensen C., Zhang L., Li S., Dmytriyeva O., Bock E., Berezin V. Immunomodulator CD200 promotes neurotrophic activity by interacting with and activating the fibroblast growth factor receptor. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016;53(1):584–594. doi: 10.1007/s12035-014-9037-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Hayakawa K., Pham L.D.D., Seo J.H., Miyamoto N., Maki T., Terasaki Y., Sakadžić S., Boas D., van Leyen K., Waeber C., Kim K.W., Arai K., Lo E.H. CD200 restrains macrophage attack on oligodendrocyte precursors via toll-like receptor 4 downregulation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(4):781–793. doi: 10.1177/0271678X15606148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.World Health Organization (WHO) who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/schizophrenia
  • 149.Tandon R., Gaebel W., Barch D.M., Bustillo J., Gur R.E., Heckers S., Malaspina D., Owen M.J., Schultz S., Tsuang M., Van Os J., Carpenter W. Definition and description of schizophrenia in the DSM-5. Schizophr. Res. 2013;150(1):3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Salleh M.R. The genetics of schizophrenia. Malays. J. Med. Sci. 2004;11(2):3–11. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Foley C., Corvin A., Nakagome S. Genetics of Schizophrenia: Ready to Translate? Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(9):61. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0807-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.He P., Chen G., Guo C., Wen X., Song X., Zheng X. Long-term effect of prenatal exposure to malnutrition on risk of schizophrenia in adulthood: Evidence from the Chinese famine of 1959-1961. Eur. Psychiatry. 2018;51:42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Russo D.A., Stochl J., Painter M., Dobler V., Jackson E., Jones P.B., Perez J. Trauma history characteristics associated with mental states at clinical high risk for psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 2014;220(1-2):237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Canetta S.E., Brown A.S. Prenatal infection, maternal immune activation, and risk for schizophrenia. Transl. Neurosci. 2012;3(4):320–327. doi: 10.2478/s13380-012-0045-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Kneeland R.E., Fatemi S.H. Viral infection, inflammation and schizophrenia. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2013;42:35–48. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.von Bernhardi R., Heredia F., Salgado N., Muñoz P. Microglia function in the normal brain. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016;949:67–92. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40764-7_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Sedgwick J.D., Schwender S., Imrich H., Dörries R., Butcher G.W., ter Meulen V. Isolation and direct characterization of resident microglial cells from the normal and inflamed central nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88(16):7438–7442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Wolf S.A., Boddeke H.W.G.M., Kettenmann H. Microglia in Physiology and Disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2017;79(1):619–643. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Monji A., Kato T., Kanba S. Cytokines and schizophrenia: Microglia hypothesis of schizophrenia. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2009;63(3):257–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.01945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Simosky J.K., Freedman R., Stevens K.E. Olanzapine improves deficient sensory inhibition in DBA/2 mice. Brain Res. 2008;1233:129–136. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Singer P., Feldon J., Yee B.K. Are DBA/2 mice associated with schizophrenia-like endophenotypes? A behavioural contrast with C57BL/6 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 2009;206(4):677–698. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1568-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Arime Y., Fukumura R., Miura I., Mekada K., Yoshiki A., Wakana S., Gondo Y., Akiyama K. Effects of background mutations and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the Disc1 L100P behavioral phenotype associated with schizophrenia in mice. Behav. Brain Funct. 2014;10(1):45. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-10-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Ma L., Kulesskaya N., Võikar V., Tian L. Differential expression of brain immune genes and schizophrenia-related behavior in C57BL/6N and DBA/2J female mice. Psychiatry Res. 2015;226(1):211–216. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Zhan Y. Theta frequency prefrontal-hippocampal driving relationship during free exploration in mice. Neuroscience. 2015;300:554–565. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Meyer-Lindenberg A.S., Olsen R.K., Kohn P.D., Brown T., Egan M.F., Weinberger D.R., Berman K.F. Regionally specific disturbance of dorsolateral prefrontal-hippocampal functional connectivity in schizophrenia. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry. 2005;62(4):379–386. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.4.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Bähner F., Meyer-Lindenberg A. Hippocampal-prefrontal connectivity as a translational phenotype for schizophrenia. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;27(2):93–106. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2016.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Bergon A., Belzeaux R., Comte M., Pelletier F., Hervé M., Gardiner E.J., Beveridge N.J., Liu B., Carr V., Scott R.J., Kelly B., Cairns M.J., Kumarasinghe N., Schall U., Blin O., Boucraut J., Tooney P.A., Fakra E., Ibrahim E.C. CX3CR1 is dysregulated in blood and brain from schizophrenia patients. Schizophr. Res. 2015;168(1-2):434–443. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Li W.X., Dai S.X., Liu J.Q., Wang Q., Li G.H., Huang J.F. integrated analysis of alzheimer’s disease and schizophrenia dataset revealed different expression pattern in learning and memory. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(2):417–425. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Ishizuka K., Fujita Y., Kawabata T., Kimura H., Iwayama Y., Inada T., Okahisa Y., Egawa J., Usami M., Kushima I., Uno Y., Okada T., Ikeda M., Aleksic B., Mori D., Someya T., Yoshikawa T., Iwata N., Nakamura H., Yamashita T., Ozaki N. Rare genetic variants in CX3CR1 and their contribution to the increased risk of schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Transl. Psychiatry. 2017;7(8):e1184. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.van Mierlo H.C., Schot A., Boks M.P.M., de Witte L.D. 2019.
  • 171.Reif A., Schmitt A., Fritzen S., Lesch K.P. Neurogenesis and schizophrenia: dividing neurons in a divided mind? Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2007;257(5):290–299. doi: 10.1007/s00406-007-0733-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Wolf S.A., Melnik A., Kempermann G. Physical exercise increases adult neurogenesis and telomerase activity, and improves behavioral deficits in a mouse model of schizophrenia. Brain Behav. Immun. 2011;25(5):971–980. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Ouchi Y., Banno Y., Shimizu Y., Ando S., Hasegawa H., Adachi K., Iwamoto T. Reduced adult hippocampal neurogenesis and working memory deficits in the Dgcr8-deficient mouse model of 22q11.2 deletion-associated schizophrenia can be rescued by IGF2. J. Neurosci. 2013;33(22):9408–9419. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2700-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Allen K.M., Fung S.J., Weickert C.S. Cell proliferation is reduced in the hippocampus in schizophrenia. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry. 2016;50(5):473–480. doi: 10.1177/0004867415589793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Snyder J.S., Hong N.S., McDonald R.J., Wojtowicz J.M. A role for adult neurogenesis in spatial long-term memory. Neuroscience. 2005;130(4):843–852. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Winocur G., Wojtowicz J.M., Sekeres M., Snyder J.S., Wang S. Inhibition of neurogenesis interferes with hippocampus-dependent memory function. Hippocampus. 2006;16(3):296–304. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Aizawa K., Ageyama N., Yokoyama C., Hisatsune T. Age-dependent alteration in hippocampal neurogenesis correlates with learning performance of macaque monkeys. Exp. Anim. 2009;58(4):403–407. doi: 10.1538/expanim.58.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Meltzer H.Y., McGurk S.R. The effects of clozapine, risperidone, and olanzapine on cognitive function in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 1999;25(2):233–255. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Gemma C., Bachstetter A.D., Cole M.J., Fister M., Hudson C., Bickford P.C. Blockade of caspase-1 increases neurogenesis in the aged hippocampus. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2007;26(10):2795–2803. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05875.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Paolicelli R. C., Bolasco G., Pagani F., Maggi L., Scianni M., Panzanelli P., Giustetto M., Ferreira T. A., Guiducci E., Dumas L., Ragozzino D., Gross C. T. 2011. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 181.Reshef R., Kudryavitskaya E., Shani-Narkiss H., Isaacson B., Rimmerman N., Mizrahi A., Yirmiya R. The role of microglia and their CX3CR1 signaling in adult neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb. eLife. 2017;6:e30809. doi: 10.7554/eLife.30809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Arnold S.E., Talbot K., Hahn C.G. Neurodevelopment, neuroplasticity, and new genes for schizophrenia. Prog. Brain Res. 2005;147(SPEC. ISS.):319–345. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(04)47023-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Lewis D.A., Levitt P. Schizophrenia as a disorder of neurodevelopment. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2002;25(1):409–432. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Kam J.W.Y., Bolbecker A.R., O’Donnell B.F., Hetrick W.P., Brenner C.A. Resting state EEG power and coherence abnormalities in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2013;47(12):1893–1901. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2013.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Cousijn H., Tunbridge E.M., Rolinski M., Wallis G., Colclough G.L., Woolrich M.W., Nobre A.C., Harrison P.J. Modulation of hippocampal theta and hippocampal-prefrontal cortex function by a schizophrenia risk gene. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2015;36(6):2387–2395. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Smit D.J.A., Wright M.J., Meyers J.L., Martin N.G., Ho Y.Y.W., Malone S.M., Zhang J., Burwell S.J., Chorlian D.B., de Geus E.J.C., Denys D., Hansell N.K., Hottenga J.J., McGue M., van Beijsterveldt C.E.M., Jahanshad N., Thompson P.M., Whelan C.D., Medland S.E., Porjesz B., Lacono W.G., Boomsma D.I. Genome-wide association analysis links multiple psychiatric liability genes to oscillatory brain activity. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2018;39(11):4183–4195. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Narayanan B., Soh P., Calhoun V.D., Ruaño G., Kocherla M., Windemuth A., Clementz B.A., Tamminga C.A., Sweeney J.A., Keshavan M.S., Pearlson G.D. Multivariate genetic determinants of EEG oscillations in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder from the BSNIP study. Transl. Psychiatry. 2015;5(6):e588. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Kang S.S., Sponheim S.R., Chafee M.V., MacDonald A.W., III Disrupted functional connectivity for controlled visual processing as a basis for impaired spatial working memory in schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49(10):2836–2847. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Van Snellenberg J.X., Girgis R.R., Horga G., van de Giessen E., Slifstein M., Ojeil N., Weinstein J.J., Moore H., Lieberman J.A., Shohamy D., Smith E.E., Abi-Dargham A. Mechanisms of working memory impairment in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry. 2016;80(8):617–626. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.02.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Obi-Nagata K., Temma Y., Hayashi-Takagi A. Synaptic functions and their disruption in schizophrenia: From clinical evidence to synaptic optogenetics in an animal model. Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B, Phys. Biol. Sci. 2019;95(5):179–197. doi: 10.2183/pjab.95.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Kakiuchi C., Ishiwata M., Nanko S., Ozaki N., Iwata N., Umekage T., Tochigi M., Kohda K., Sasaki T., Imamura A., Okazaki Y., Kato T. Up-regulation of ADM and SEPX1 in the lymphoblastoid cells of patients in monozygotic twins discordant for schizophrenia. Am. J. Med. Genet. B. Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 2008;147B(5):557–564. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Ormel P. R., Van Mierlo H. C., Litjens M., Van Strien M. E., Hol E. M., Kahn R. S., De Witte L. D. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 193.Meyer U. Prenatal poly(i:C) exposure and other developmental immune activation models in rodent systems. Biol. Psychiatry. 2014;75(4):307–315. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Basta-Kaim A., Budziszewska B., Leśkiewicz M., Fijał K., Regulska M., Kubera M., Wędzony K., Lasoń W. Hyperactivity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in lipopolysaccharide-induced neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia in rats: effects of antipsychotic drugs. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011;650(2-3):586–595. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.09.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Basta-Kaim A., Szczęsny E., Leśkiewicz M., Głombik K., Ślusarczyk J., Budziszewska B., Regulska M., Kubera M., Nowak W., Wędzony K., Lasoń W. Maternal immune activation leads to age-related behavioral and immunological changes in male rat offspring - the effect of antipsychotic drugs. Pharmacol. Rep. 2012;64(6):1400–1410. doi: 10.1016/S1734-1140(12)70937-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Winter C., Djodari-Irani A., Sohr R., Morgenstern R., Feldon J., Juckel G., Meyer U. Prenatal immune activation leads to multiple changes in basal neurotransmitter levels in the adult brain: implications for brain disorders of neurodevelopmental origin such as schizophrenia. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2009;12(4):513–524. doi: 10.1017/S1461145708009206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Hadar R., Soto-Montenegro M.L., Götz T., Wieske F., Sohr R., Desco M., Hamani C., Weiner I., Pascau J., Winter C. Using a maternal immune stimulation model of schizophrenia to study behavioral and neurobiological alterations over the developmental course. Schizophr. Res. 2015;166(1-3):238–247. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Basta-Kaim A., Fijał K., Ślusarczyk J., Trojan E., Głombik K., Budziszewska B., Leśkiewicz M., Regulska M., Kubera M., Lasoń W., Wędzony K. Prenatal administration of lipopolysaccharide induces sex-dependent changes in glutamic acid decarboxylase and parvalbumin in the adult rat brain. Neuroscience. 2015;287:78–92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Paylor J.W., Lins B.R., Greba Q., Moen N., de Moraes R.S., Howland J.G., Winship I.R. Developmental disruption of perineuronal nets in the medial prefrontal cortex after maternal immune activation. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:37580. doi: 10.1038/srep37580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.da Silveira V.T., Medeiros D.C., Ropke J., Guidine P.A., Rezende G.H., Moraes M.F.D., Mendes E.M.A.M., Macedo D., Moreira F.A., de Oliveira A.C.P. Effects of early or late prenatal immune activation in mice on behavioral and neuroanatomical abnormalities relevant to schizophrenia in the adulthood. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 2017;58:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2017.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Basta-Kaim A., Fijał K., Budziszewska B., Regulska M., Leśkiewicz M., Kubera M., Gołembiowska K., Lasoń W., Wędzony K. Prenatal lipopolysaccharide treatment enhances MK-801-induced psychotomimetic effects in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2011;98(2):241–249. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Eßlinger M., Wachholz S., Manitz M.P., Plümper J., Sommer R., Juckel G., Friebe A. Schizophrenia associated sensory gating deficits develop after adolescent microglia activation. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016;58:99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Lin Y., Zeng Y., Di J., Zeng S. Murine CD200+ CK7+ trophoblasts in a poly (I:C)-induced embryo resorption model. Reproduction. 2005;130(4):529–537. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Antonson A.M., Balakrishnan B., Radlowski E.C., Petr G., Johnson R.W. Altered Hippocampal Gene Expression and Morphology in Fetal Piglets following Maternal Respiratory Viral Infection. Dev. Neurosci. 2018;40(2):104–119. doi: 10.1159/000486850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Elmore M.R.P., Burton M.D., Conrad M.S., Rytych J.L., Van Alstine W.G., Johnson R.W. Respiratory viral infection in neonatal piglets causes marked microglia activation in the hippocampus and deficits in spatial learning. J. Neurosci. 2014;34(6):2120–2129. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2180-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Jurgens H.A., Amancherla K., Johnson R.W. Influenza infection induces neuroinflammation, alters hippocampal neuron morphology, and impairs cognition in adult mice. J. Neurosci. 2012;32(12):3958–3968. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6389-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Jurgens H.A., Johnson R.W. Environmental enrichment attenuates hippocampal neuroinflammation and improves cognitive function during influenza infection. Brain Behav. Immun. 2012;26(6):1006–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Rygiel T.P., Rijkers E.S.K., de Ruiter T., Stolte E.H., van der Valk M., Rimmelzwaan G.F., Boon L., van Loon A.M., Coenjaerts F.E., Hoek R.M., Tesselaar K., Meyaard L. Lack of CD200 enhances pathological T cell responses during influenza infection. J. Immunol. 2009;183(3):1990–1996. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Snelgrove R.J., Goulding J., Didierlaurent A.M., Lyonga D., Vekaria S., Edwards L., Gwyer E., Sedgwick J.D., Barclay A.N., Hussell T. A critical function for CD200 in lung immune homeostasis and the severity of influenza infection. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9(9):1074–1083. doi: 10.1038/ni.1637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Brown A.S. Epidemiologic studies of exposure to prenatal infection and risk of schizophrenia and autism. Dev. Neurobiol. 2012;72(10):1272–1276. doi: 10.1002/dneu.22024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Khandaker G.M., Zimbron J., Lewis G., Jones P.B. Prenatal maternal infection, neurodevelopment and adult schizophrenia: a systematic review of population-based studies. Psychol. Med. 2013;43(2):239–257. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712000736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Blackburn T.P. Depressive disorders: Treatment failures and poor prognosis over the last 50 years. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2019;7(3):e00472. doi: 10.1002/prp2.472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.World Health Organization (WHO) who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression
  • 214.Trivedi M.H. The link between depression and physical symptoms. Prim. Care Companion J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2004;6(Suppl. 1):12–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Grahek I., Shenhav A., Musslick S., Krebs R.M., Koster E.H.W. Motivation and cognitive control in depression. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2019;102:371–381. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Park C., Rosenblat J.D., Lee Y., Pan Z., Cao B., Iacobucci M., McIntyre R.S. The neural systems of emotion regulation and abnormalities in major depressive disorder. Behav. Brain Res. 2019;367:181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Belujon P., Grace A.A. Dopamine System Dysregulation in Major Depressive Disorders. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;20(12):1036–1046. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Maletic V., Eramo A., Gwin K., Offord S.J., Duffy R.A. The role of norepinephrine and its α-adrenergic receptors in the pathophysiology and treatment of major depressive disorder and schizophrenia: a systematic review. Front. Psychiatry. 2017;8(MAR):42. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Dell’Osso L., Carmassi C., Mucci F., Marazziti D. Depression, serotonin and tryptophan. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016;22(8):949–954. doi: 10.2174/1381612822666151214104826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Shadrina M., Bondarenko E.A., Slominsky P.A. Genetics Factors in Major Depression Disease. Front. Psychiatry. 2018;9(334):334. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Varinthra P., Liu I.Y. Molecular basis for the association between depression and circadian rhythm. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;31(2):67–72. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_181_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Szczęsny E., Ślusarczyk J., Głombik K., Budziszewska B., Kubera M., Lasoń W., Basta-Kaim A. Possible contribution of IGF-1 to depressive disorder. Pharmacol. Rep. 2013;65(6):1622–1631. doi: 10.1016/S1734-1140(13)71523-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Detka J., Kurek A., Kucharczyk M., Głombik K., Basta-Kaim A., Kubera M., Lasoń W., Budziszewska B. Brain glucose metabolism in an animal model of depression. Neuroscience. 2015;295:198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Stachowicz A., Głombik K., Olszanecki R., Basta-Kaim A., Suski M., Lasoń W., Korbut R. The impact of mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH2) activation by Alda-1 on the behavioral and biochemical disturbances in animal model of depression. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016;51:144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Głombik K., Stachowicz A., Ślusarczyk J., Trojan E., Budziszewska B., Suski M., Kubera M., Lasoń W., Wędzony K., Olszanecki R., Basta-Kaim A. Maternal stress predicts altered biogenesis and the profile of mitochondrial proteins in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of adult offspring rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;60:151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Głombik K., Stachowicz A., Olszanecki R., Ślusarczyk J., Trojan E., Lasoń W., Kubera M., Budziszewska B., Spedding M., Basta-Kaim A. The effect of chronic tianeptine administration on the brain mitochondria: direct links with an animal model of depression. Mol. Neurobiol. 2016;53(10):7351–7362. doi: 10.1007/s12035-016-9807-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Głombik K., Stachowicz A., Trojan E., Olszanecki R., Ślusarczyk J., Suski M., Chamera K., Budziszewska B., Lasoń W., Basta-Kaim A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of chronic antidepressant drug treatments in the hippocampal mitochondria - A proteomic study in an animal model of depression. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2017;78:51–60. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Głombik K., Stachowicz A., Trojan E., Ślusarczyk J., Suski M., Chamera K., Kotarska K., Olszanecki R., Basta-Kaim A. Mitochondrial proteomics investigation of frontal cortex in an animal model of depression: Focus on chronic antidepressant drugs treatment. Pharmacol. Rep. 2018;70(2):322–330. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2017.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Kubera M., Curzytek K., Duda W., Leskiewicz M., Basta-Kaim A., Budziszewska B., Roman A., Zajicova A., Holan V., Szczesny E., Lason W., Maes M. A new animal model of (chronic) depression induced by repeated and intermittent lipopolysaccharide administration for 4 months. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013;31:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2013.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Detka J., Ślusarczyk J., Kurek A., Kucharczyk M., Adamus T., Konieczny P., Kubera M., Basta-Kaim A., Lasoń W., Budziszewska B. Hypothalamic insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 levels in an animal model of depression and their effect on corticotropin-releasing hormone promoter gene activity in a hypothalamic cell line. Pharmacol. Rep. 2019;71(2):338–346. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2018.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Trojan E., Ślusarczyk J., Chamera K., Kotarska K., Głombik K., Kubera M., Basta-Kaim A. The Modulatory Properties of Chronic Antidepressant Drugs Treatment on the Brain Chemokine - Chemokine Receptor Network: A Molecular Study in an Animal Model of Depression. Front. Pharmacol. 2017;8(779):779. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Trojan E., Chamera K., Bryniarska N., Kotarska K., Leśkiewicz M., Regulska M., Basta-Kaim A. Role of chronic administration of antidepressant drugs in the prenatal stress-evoked inflammatory response in the brain of adult offspring rats: involvement of the nlrp3 inflammasome-related pathway. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019;56(8):5365–5380. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1458-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Maes M. Activation of the inflammatory response system (irs) in major depression. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1999;25:S34. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4530(00)90127-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Schiepers O.J.G., Wichers M.C., Maes M. Cytokines and major depression. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry. 2005;29(2):201–217. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Ślusarczyk J., Trojan E., Chwastek J., Głombik K., Basta-Kaim A. A potential contribution of chemokine network dysfunction to the depressive disorders. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(7):705–720. doi: 10.2174/1570159X14666160219131357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Merendino R.A., Di Pasquale G., De Luca F., Di Pasquale L., Ferlazzo E., Martino G., Palumbo M.C., Morabito F., Gangemi S. Involvement of fractalkine and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha in moderate-severe depression. Mediators Inflamm. 2004;13(3):205–207. doi: 10.1080/09511920410001713484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.García-Marchena N., Barrera M., Mestre-Pintó J.I., Araos P., Serrano A., Pérez-Mañá C., Papaseit E., Fonseca F., Ruiz J.J., Rodríguez de Fonseca F., Farré M., Pavón F.J., Torrens M. Inflammatory mediators and dual depression: Potential biomarkers in plasma of primary and substance-induced major depression in cocaine and alcohol use disorders. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Miranda D.O., Anatriello E., Azevedo L.R., Santos J.C., Cordeiro J.F.C., Peria F.M., Flória-Santos M., Pereira-Da-Silva G. Fractalkine (C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1) as a potential biomarker for depression and anxiety in colorectal cancer patients. Biomed. Rep. 2017;7(2):188–192. doi: 10.3892/br.2017.937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Corona A.W., Norden D.M., Skendelas J.P., Huang Y., O’Connor J.C., Lawson M., Dantzer R., Kelley K.W., Godbout J.P. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibition attenuates lipopolysaccharide induced persistent microglial activation and depressive-like complications in fractalkine receptor (CX(3)CR1)-deficient mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013;31:134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Stepanichev M., Dygalo N.N., Grigoryan G., Shishkina G.T., Gulyaeva N. Rodent models of depression: neurotrophic and neuroinflammatory biomarkers. BioMed Res. Int. 2014;2014:932757. doi: 10.1155/2014/932757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Ślusarczyk J., Trojan E., Wydra K., Głombik K., Chamera K., Kucharczyk M., Budziszewska B., Kubera M., Lasoń W., Filip M., Basta-Kaim A. Beneficial impact of intracerebroventricular fractalkine administration on behavioral and biochemical changes induced by prenatal stress in adult rats: Possible role of NLRP3 inflammasome pathway. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016;113:45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Rossetti A.C., Papp M., Gruca P., Paladini M.S., Racagni G., Riva M.A., Molteni R. Stress-induced anhedonia is associated with the activation of the inflammatory system in the rat brain: Restorative effect of pharmacological intervention. Pharmacol. Res. 2016;103:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Corona A.W., Huang Y., O’Connor J.C., Dantzer R., Kelley K.W., Popovich P.G., Godbout J.P. Fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) deficiency sensitizes mice to the behavioral changes induced by lipopolysaccharide. J. Neuroinflammation. 2010;7:93. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-7-93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Milior G., Lecours C., Samson L., Bisht K., Poggini S., Pagani F., Deflorio C., Lauro C., Alboni S., Limatola C., Branchi I., Tremblay M.E., Maggi L. Fractalkine receptor deficiency impairs microglial and neuronal responsiveness to chronic stress. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016;55:114–125. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Winkler Z., Kuti D., Ferenczi S., Gulyás K., Polyák Á., Kovács K.J. Impaired microglia fractalkine signaling affects stress reaction and coping style in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2017;334:119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Rimmerman N., Schottlender N., Reshef R., Dan-Goor N., Yirmiya R. The hippocampal transcriptomic signature of stress resilience in mice with microglial fractalkine receptor (CX3CR1) deficiency. Brain Behav. Immun. 2017;61:184–196. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Hellwig S., Brioschi S., Dieni S., Frings L., Masuch A., Blank T., Biber K. Altered microglia morphology and higher resilience to stress-induced depression-like behavior in CX3CR1-deficient mice. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016;55:126–137. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Wang H.T., Huang F.L., Hu Z.L., Zhang W.J., Qiao X.Q., Huang Y.Q., Dai R.P., Li F., Li C.Q. Early-life social isolation-induced depressive-like behavior in rats results in microglial activation and neuronal histone methylation that are mitigated by minocycline. Neurotox. Res. 2017;31(4):505–520. doi: 10.1007/s12640-016-9696-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Bollinger J.L., Collins K.E., Patel R., Wellman C.L. Behavioral stress alters corticolimbic microglia in a sex- and brain region-specific manner. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0187631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Frank M.G., Fonken L.K., Annis J.L., Watkins L.R., Maier S.F. Stress disinhibits microglia via down-regulation of CD200R: A mechanism of neuroinflammatory priming. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018;69:62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Fonken L.K., Frank M.G., Gaudet A.D., D’Angelo H.M., Daut R.A., Hampson E.C., Ayala M.T., Watkins L.R., Maier S.F. Neuroinflammatory priming to stress is differentially regulated in male and female rats. Brain Behav. Immun. 2018;70:257–267. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Blandino P., Jr, Barnum C.J., Solomon L.G., Larish Y., Lankow B.S., Deak T. Gene expression changes in the hypothalamus provide evidence for regionally-selective changes in IL-1 and microglial markers after acute stress. Brain Behav. Immun. 2009;23(7):958–968. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Lovelock D.F., Deak T. Neuroendocrine and neuroimmune adaptation to Chronic Escalating Distress (CED): A novel model of chronic stress. Neurobiol. Stress. 2018;9:74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2018.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Catanzaro J.M., Hueston C.M., Deak M.M., Deak T. The impact of the P2X7 receptor antagonist A-804598 on neuroimmune and behavioral consequences of stress. Behav. Pharmacol. 2014;25(5-6):582–598. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Park M.J., Park H.S., You M.J., Yoo J., Kim S.H., Kwon M.S. Dexamethasone induces a specific form of ramified dysfunctional microglia. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019;56(2):1421–1436. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1156-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Wachholz S., Eßlinger M., Plümper J., Manitz M.P., Juckel G., Friebe A. Microglia activation is associated with IFN-α induced depressive-like behavior. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016;55:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Lane C.A., Hardy J., Schott J.M. Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2018;25(1):59–70. doi: 10.1111/ene.13439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Gaugler J., James B., Johnson T., Scholz K., Weuve J. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;2018:367–429. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Alzheimer A., Stelzmann R.A., Schnitzlein H.N., Murtagh F.R. An English translation of Alzheimer’s 1907 paper, “Uber eine eigenartige Erkankung der Hirnrinde. Clin. Anat. 1995;8(6):429–431. doi: 10.1002/ca.980080612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.He Z., Guo J.L., McBride J.D., Narasimhan S., Kim H., Changolkar L., Zhang B., Gathagan R.J., Yue C., Dengler C., Stieber A., Nitla M., Coulter D.A., Abel T., Brunden K.R., Trojanowski J.Q., Lee V.M. Amyloid-β plaques enhance Alzheimer’s brain tau-seeded pathologies by facilitating neuritic plaque tau aggregation. Nat. Med. 2018;24(1):29–38. doi: 10.1038/nm.4443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Hansen D.V., Hanson J.E., Sheng M. Microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Cell Biol. 2018;217(2):459–472. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201709069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Munger E.L., Edler M.K., Hopkins W.D., Ely J.J., Erwin J.M., Perl D.P., Mufson E.J., Hof P.R., Sherwood C.C., Raghanti M.A. Astrocytic changes with aging and Alzheimer’s disease-type pathology in chimpanzees. J. Comp. Neurol. 2019;527(7):1179–1195. doi: 10.1002/cne.24610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Zhang H., Wang D., Gong P., Lin A., Zhang Y., Ye R.D., Yu Y. Formyl peptide receptor 2 deficiency improves cognition and attenuates tau hyperphosphorylation and astrogliosis in a mouse model of alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2019;67(1):169–179. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Van Hoesen G.W., Hyman B.T. Hippocampal formation: anatomy and the patterns of pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Prog. Brain Res. 1990;83(C):445–457. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61268-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Fjell A.M., McEvoy L., Holland D., Dale A.M., Walhovd K.B. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. what is normal in normal aging? effects of aging, amyloid and alzheimer’s disease on the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Prog. Neurobiol. 2014;117:20–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Braak H., Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239–259. doi: 10.1007/BF00308809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Strobel S., Grünblatt E., Riederer P., Heinsen H., Arzberger T., Al-Sarraj S., Troakes C., Ferrer I., Monoranu C.M. Changes in the expression of genes related to neuroinflammation over the course of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease progression: CX3CL1, TREM2, and PPARγ. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna) 2015;122(7):1069–1076. doi: 10.1007/s00702-015-1369-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Perea J.R., Lleó A., Alcolea D., Fortea J., Ávila J., Bolós M. Decreased cx3cl1 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurosci. 2018;12(SEP):609. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Lyons A., Lynch A.M., Downer E.J., Hanley R., O’Sullivan J.B., Smith A., Lynch M.A. Fractalkine-induced activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase pathway attentuates microglial activation in vivo and in vitro. J. Neurochem. 2009;110(5):1547–1556. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Nash K.R., Lee D.C., Hunt J.B., Jr, Morganti J.M., Selenica M.L., Moran P., Reid P., Brownlow M., Yang G-Y. C.; Savalia, M.; Gemma, C.; Bickford, P.C.; Gordon, M.N.; Morgan, D. Fractalkine overexpression suppresses tau pathology in a mouse model of tauopathy. Neurobiol. Aging. 2013;34(6):1540–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Finneran D.J., Morgan D., Gordon M.N., Nash K.R. CNS-Wide over expression of fractalkine improves cognitive functioning in a tauopathy model. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2019;14(2):312–325. doi: 10.1007/s11481-018-9822-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Walker D.G., Lue L.F., Tang T.M., Adler C.H., Caviness J.N., Sabbagh M.N., Serrano G.E., Sue L.I., Beach T.G. Changes in CD200 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) levels in brains of Lewy body disorder cases are associated with amounts of Alzheimer’s pathology not α-synuclein pathology. Neurobiol. Aging. 2017;54:175–186. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Walker D.G., Dalsing-Hernandez J.E., Campbell N.A., Lue L.F. Decreased expression of CD200 and CD200 receptor in Alzheimer’s disease: a potential mechanism leading to chronic inflammation. Exp. Neurol. 2009;215(1):5–19. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Bliss T.V., Collingridge G.L. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1993;361(6407):31–39. doi: 10.1038/361031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Werner P., Klaus S., Tanner C.M., Halliday G.M., Patrik B., Jens V., Anette-Eleonore S.L.A.E. Parkinson Disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3(17013) doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Dorsey E.R., Constantinescu R., Thompson J.P., Biglan K.M., Holloway R.G., Kieburtz K., Marshall F.J., Ravina B.M., Schifitto G., Siderowf A., Tanner C.M. Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030. Neurology. 2007;68(5):384–386. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247740.47667.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Kalia L.V., Lang A.E. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):896–912. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Gröger A., Kolb R., Schäfer R., Klose U. Dopamine reduction in the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s disease patients confirmed by in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Rocha E.M., De Miranda B., Sanders L.H. 2018.
  • 280.Shi M., Bradner J., Hancock A.M., Chung K.A., Quinn J.F., Peskind E.R., Galasko D., Jankovic J., Zabetian C.P., Kim H.M., Leverenz J.B., Montine T.J., Ginghina C., Kang U.J., Cain K.C., Wang Y., Aasly J., Goldstein D., Zhang J. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for Parkinson disease diagnosis and progression. Ann. Neurol. 2011;69(3):570–580. doi: 10.1002/ana.22311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Gui Y., Liu H., Zhang L., Lv W., Hu X. Altered microRNA profiles in cerebrospinal fluid exosome in Parkinson disease and Alzheimer disease. Oncotarget. 2015;6(35):37043–37053. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Zhou Y., Gu C., Li J., Zhu L., Huang G., Dai J., Huang H. Aberrantly expressed long noncoding RNAs and genes in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2018;14:3219–3229. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S178435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Castro-Sánchez S., García-Yagüe Á.J., López-Royo T., Casarejos M., Lanciego J.L., Lastres-Becker I. Cx3cr1-deficiency exacerbates alpha-synuclein-A53T induced neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Glia. 2018;66(8):1752–1762. doi: 10.1002/glia.23338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Thome A.D., Standaert D.G., Harms A.S. Fractalkine signaling regulates the inflammatory response in an α-synuclein model of parkinson disease. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Parillaud V.R., Lornet G., Monnet Y., Privat A.L., Haddad A.T., Brochard V., Bekaert A., de Chanville C.B., Hirsch E.C., Combadière C., Hunot S., Lobsiger C.S. Analysis of monocyte infiltration in MPTP mice reveals that microglial CX3CR1 protects against neurotoxic over-induction of monocyte-attracting CCL2 by astrocytes. J. Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0830-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Morganti J.M., Nash K.R., Grimmig B.A., Ranjit S., Small B., Bickford P.C., Gemma C. The soluble isoform of CX3CL1 is necessary for neuroprotection in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. 2012;32(42):14592–14601. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0539-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Pabon M.M., Bachstetter A.D., Hudson C.E., Gemma C., Bickford P.C. CX3CL1 reduces neurotoxicity and microglial activation in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Miman O., Kusbeci O.Y., Aktepe O.C., Cetinkaya Z. The probable relation between Toxoplasma gondii and Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2010;475(3):129–131. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Xiao J., Prandovszky E., Kannan G., Pletnikov M.V., Dickerson F., Severance E.G., Yolken R.H. Toxoplasma gondii: Biological parameters of the connection to schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 2018;44(5):983–992. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Mahmoudvand H., Sheibani V., Shojaee S., Mirbadie S.R., Keshavarz H., Esmaeelpour K., Keyhani A.R., Ziaali N., Keshavarz H., Esmaeelpour K., Keyhani A.R., Ziaali N. Toxoplasma gondii infection potentiates cognitive impairments of alzheimer’s disease in the balb/c mice. J. Parasitol. 2016;102(6):629–635. doi: 10.1645/16-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Alvarado-Esquivel C., Méndez-Hernández E.M., Salas-Pacheco J.M., Ruano-Calderón L.Á., Hernández-Tinoco J., Arias-Carrión O., Sánchez-Anguiano L.F., Castellanos-Juárez F.X., Sandoval-Carrillo A.A., Liesenfeld O., Ramos-Nevárez A. Toxoplasma gondii exposure and Parkinson’s disease: a case-control study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013019. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Li Y., Severance E.G., Viscidi R.P., Yolken R.H., Xiao J. Persistent Toxoplasma infection of the brain induced neurodegeneration associated with activation of complement and microglia. Infect. Immun. 2019;87(8):e00139–e19. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00139-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Luo X.G., Zhang J.J., Zhang C.D., Liu R., Zheng L., Wang X.J., Chen S.D., Ding J.Q. Altered regulation of CD200 receptor in monocyte-derived macrophages from individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem. Res. 2010;35(4):540–547. doi: 10.1007/s11064-009-0094-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Xie X., Luo X., Liu N., Li X., Lou F., Zheng Y., Ren Y. Monocytes, microglia, and CD200-CD200R1 signaling are essential in the transmission of inflammation from the periphery to the central nervous system. J. Neurochem. 2017;141(2):222–235. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Xia L., Xie X., Liu Y., Luo X. Peripheral blood monocyte tolerance alleviates intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharides-induced neuroinflammation in rats via upregulating the cd200r expression. Neurochem. Res. 2017;42(11):3019–3032. doi: 10.1007/s11064-017-2334-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Ren Y., Ye M., Chen S., Ding J. CD200 inhibits inflammatory response by promoting katp channel opening in microglia cells in parkinson’s disease. Med. Sci. Monit. 2016;22:1733–1741. doi: 10.12659/MSM.898400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Wang X.J., Zhang S., Yan Z.Q., Zhao Y.X., Zhou H.Y., Wang Y., Lu G.Q., Zhang J.D. Impaired CD200-CD200R-mediated microglia silencing enhances midbrain dopaminergic neurodegeneration: roles of aging, superoxide, NADPH oxidase, and p38 MAPK. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011;50(9):1094–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.01.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Sung Y.H., Kim S.C., Hong H.P., Park C.Y., Shin M.S., Kim C.J., Seo J.H., Kim D.Y., Kim D.J., Cho H.J. Treadmill exercise ameliorates dopaminergic neuronal loss through suppressing microglial activation in Parkinson’s disease mice. Life Sci. 2012;91(25-26):1309–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Zhang S., Wang X.J., Tian L.P., Pan J., Lu G.Q., Zhang Y.J., Ding J.Q., Chen S.D. CD200-CD200R dysfunction exacerbates microglial activation and dopaminergic neurodegeneration in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:154. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Neuropharmacology are provided here courtesy of Bentham Science Publishers

RESOURCES