Skip to main content
Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine logoLink to Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
. 2022 May 27;22(3):205–216. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.3.205

Analysis of sedation and general anesthesia in patients with special needs in dentistry using the Korean healthcare big data

Jieun Kim 1, Hyuk Kim 1, Kwang-Suk Seo 1,, Hyun Jeong Kim 1
PMCID: PMC9171333  PMID: 35693353

Abstract

Background

People with special needs tend to require diverse behavioral management in dentistry. They may feel anxious or uncomfortable or may not respond to any communication with the dentists. Patients with medical, physical, or psychological disorders may not cooperate and therefore require sedation (SED) or general anesthesia (GA) to receive dental treatment. Using the healthcare big data in Korea, this study aimed to analyze the trends of SED and GA in special needs patients undergoing dental treatment. It is believed that these data can be used as reference material for hospitals and for preparation of guidelines and related policy decisions of associations or governments for special needs patients in dentistry.

Methods

The study used selected health information data provided by the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Patients with a record of use of one of the eight selected drugs used in dental SED between January 2007 and September 2019, those with International Classification of Diseases-10 codes for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), phobia, brain disease, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, genetic disease, autism, mental disorder, mental retardation, and dementia were selected. The insurance claims data were analyzed for age, sex, sedative use, GA, year, and institution.

Results

The number of special needs patients who received dental treatment under SED or GA from January 2007 to September 2019 was 116,623. Number of SED cases was 136,018, performed on 69,265 patients, and the number of GA cases was 56,308, implemented on 47,257 patients. In 2007, 3100 special needs patients received dental treatment under SED while in 2018 the number of cases increased 6 times to 18,528 SED cases. In dentistry, ADHD was the most common disability for SED cases while phobia was the most common cause of disability for GA. The male-to-female ratio with respect to SED cases was higher for males (M: F = 64.36% : 35.64%).

Conclusion

The application of the SED method and GA for patients with special needs in dentistry is increasing rapidly; thus, preparing guidelines and reinforcing the education and system are necessary.

Keywords: Big Data, Dental Sedation, General Anesthesia, Healthcare, People with Disability

INTRODUCTION

Dental care for people with special needs is the treatment of patients who are medically, physically, or mentally abnormal [1]. Patients with physical and mental problems may have several difficulties and limitations in receiving dental care [2]. People with special needs who exhibit anxiety and fear during dental treatment or who are not able to cooperate because of cognitive impairment, may need dental treatment under sedation (SED) or general anesthesia (GA) [3]. There is a method of controlling behavior in dental treatment for special needs patients, but there is also a method of dental treatment under GA, especially if the treatment takes a long time and or the treatment is invasive and complex [4]. Recently, a thorough investigation of the healthcare big data identified the practice of SED or GA according to the type of disability in dental treatment [5]. Therefore, this study used the big data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (KNHIS) to analyze and assess the SED and GA practices in dental treatment of patients with special needs in Korea.

The current state of dental SED and GA can be observed through the years using this data applied to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) [6]. Specifically, the number and characteristics of patients per year and the number of medical institutions and changes in characteristics can be confirmed. In addition, whether SED or GA was used and the type of disability were analyzed. Medical records of patients who had undergone dental treatments were used to understand the actual condition of the patient. The data analyzed through this can be used as reference data in establishing the dental policy of dental associations and also for the demand of dental hospitals for people with special needs. This can contribute to the direction of education related to medical and dental treatments and institutions for people with special needs.

METHODS

1. Study design and source of data

The healthcare big data hub, operated by the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) includes information on the use of medical service, usage of medications, and diagnosed diseases [6]. The data are stored and public can remotely access the information for secondary use upon request and payment [7]. HIRA approved the use of customized health information (M20191014119) of the healthcare big data hub (https://opendata.hira.or.kr/). The requested data from January 2007 to September 2019 were used as the data source for the subjects. The study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University School of Dentistry (IRB No. S-020200006).

Firstly, a request was made to the healthcare big data hub for the payment data of patients at dental hospitals and dental clinics who made insurance claims for one of the following eight sedatives: chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine, propofol, sevoflurane, midazolam, triazolam, N2O, or dexmedetomidine, which can be used in dental SED. To analyze the medical history of each patient, the general summary information (200 table), treatments (300 table), and diagnosis (400 table) were extracted from the data warehouse containing information on medical treatments carried out between January 2007 and September 2019 [8].

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes of the 400 table were searched in the remote statistical analysis system, and patients with the ICD-10 codes for dementia (F00~03), delirium (F05), mental disorder to brain damage (F06), brain disease, damage, dysfunction (F07), unspecified organic or symptomatic mental disorders (F09), mental disorder due to use of alcohol (F10), schizophrenia (F20~25,28,29), mood disorders (F30~34,38,39), phobic anxiety disorders (F40), other anxiety disorders (F41~42), reaction to severe stress (F43), mental retardation (F70~73,78,79), developmental disorder of speech and language (F80), autism (F84), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (F90~91), inflammatory diseases of the CNS (G00~09), systemic atrophies affecting the CNS (G10~13), extrapyramidal and movement disorders (G20~23), degenerative diseases of the nervous system (G30~31), demyelinating diseases of the CNS (G35~37), hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy (G60), polyneuropathy (G61~63), diseases of myoneural junction and muscle (G70~73), cerebral palsy (G80~83), other disorders of the nervous system (G90~99), and cerebrovascular diseases (I60~69) were selected (Table 1).

Table 1. Classification of 10 disabilities encountered in dentistry (arbitrarily classified).

ICD-10 Disease Classification Code Disease Disability
F90~91 ADHD 1 ADHD
F43 PTSD 2 Phobia
F41~42, F43 Anxiety disorder
F40 Phobia
F84 Autism 3 Autism
F80 Speech disorder 4 Mental
F70~73,78,79 Mental retardation retardation
F30~34,38~40 Depression 5 Mental disorder
F09,20~25,28,29 Schizophrenia
G00~09,35~37, 61~63,90~99 Diseases of the CNS 6 Brain disease
F06, F07 Brain damage
I60~69 Cerebrovascular disease
F05 Delirium
F10 Mental disorder due to alcohol
G40~41 Epilepsy 7 Epilepsy
G10~13, G70~73 Diseases of myoneural junction and muscle 8 Genetic disease
G60, Hereditary neuropathy
G80~83 Cerebral palsy 9 Cerebral palsy
F00~03, G30~31 Dementia 10 Dementia
G20~23 Parkinson disease

ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; CNS, central nervous system; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder

When only dental claims were selected among all insurance claims of patients with the selected ICD-10 codes mentioned above, the total number of dental treatments (200 table) for the selected patients was 2,801,276 (Table 2).

Table 2. Number of cases and total number of patients by disability (from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019).

Disability Number of cases (%) Total Patients
No GA or SED SED GA Total
ADHD 217885 (88%) 28276 (11.4%) 1451 (0.6%) 247612 (100%) 13685
Phobia 638975 (95.6%) 15721 (2.4%) 13763 (2.1%) 668459 (100%) 22089
Brain disease 650217 (94.4%) 26585 (3.9%) 12169 (1.8%) 688971 (100%) 24842
Cerebral palsy 67828 (88.7%) 6252 (8.2%) 2384 (3.1%) 76464 (100%) 4541
Epilepsy 147408 (89.6%) 12545 (7.6%) 4542 (2.8%) 164495 (100%) 9134
Genetic disease 32338 (90.6%) 2570 (7.2%) 775 (2.2%) 35683 (100%) 1865
Autism 71726 (85.1%) 10263 (12.2%) 2325 (2.8%) 84314 (100%) 6597
Mental disorder 483659 (95.7%) 9806 (1.9%) 12067 (2.4%) 505532 (100%) 16945
Mental retardation 164932 (86.4%) 22232 (11.6%) 3814 (2%) 190978 (100%) 12900
Dementia 133982 (96.6%) 1768 (1.3%) 3018 (2.2%) 138768 (100%) 4025
Total 2608950 (93.1%) 136018 (4.9%) 56308 (2%) 2801276 (100%) 116623

ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; GA, general anesthesia; SED, sedation.

The criteria for classifying patients with disabilities were selected using the ICD-10 codes. When various diagnoses was found, only one disease frequently diagnosed was determined as the representative disability. In order to exclude misdiagnosis, the patient was classified as having a disability only if there were more than two prescriptions for diagnosis of this disability (Table 1).

2. Grouping of GA or SED

The GA code (L121) for GA and N2O behavioral management code (U237) for SED were searched in the medical service item code (DIV_CD; treatment, medical materials, and drugs) of the treatment table (300 table) for each of the 2,801,276 cases. Cases with the GA code were classified as cases of GA. Cases with the N2O behavioral management code rather than the GA code, or with one or more of the eight sedatives listed above as a named generic drug code (GNL_CD) in the treatment table (300 table), were classified as SED cases. All other cases were classified as no anesthesia cases, where neither SED nor GA had been implemented [9].

3. Yearly trend of special needs patients by GA or SED cases

For analysis, information on the pseudonym personal identification number (JID), pseudonym hospital identification number (YID), sex, age, and claim date were collected from the general summary information table (the 200 table). All dental treatment cases from January 2007 to September 2019 were categorized into the GA, SED, and No GA or SED groups. Next, JID was used to calculate the number of patients per group. In addition, YID was used to calculate the number of dental clinics and hospitals. Sex data were used to estimate sex ratio.

To determine the annual changes, the number of dental treatment cases per year was estimated, as were the numbers of SED or GA cases per year. Among the total number of treatments, the ratio of SED and GA was also calculated.

4. Analysis of disability and SED and GA cases by year

The number of claims per year for each SED drug and GA code were analyzed. Using JID, we analyzed the number of SED cases and GA cases performed and sorted them by disability. The number of medical institutions that performed SED and GA was also analyzed using YID. The age and sex of each disability undergoing SED or GA were analyzed.

5. Analysis of SED and GA according to medical institutions and province

The number of medical institutions that performed SED and GA was also analyzed using YID. Medical institutions performing SED and GA can be classified as dental clinic, dental hospital, general hospital, and tertiary general hospital. According to the location of the hospital, the city and province could be narrowed down; therefore, SED and GA cases for city and province could be analyzed.

RESULTS

1. Analysis of the number of SED and GA cases according to disability

According to the data from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019, a total of 2,801,276 dental cases and 116,623 patients were identified in the HIRA big data for patients with the disabilities (Table 2).

A total of 136,018 cases of SED were performed and 56,308 cases of GA were carried out during the time. In 2007, sedation cases were 3,100. In 2018, the total number of sedation cases was 18,528, an increase of six times (Table 3). In the case of GA in 2007, the total number of cases was 2,710, and in 2018 the number of GA cases increased three-fold to 6,259. The most common disability in dental SED was ADHD, while in GA it was phobia. In SED cases, apart from dementia, all disabilities had an increase over the years. In GA there was an increase in cases in all the disabilities (Table 4, Fig. 1). However, since the total number of treatments also increased, the ratio of the number of GAs among the total number of dental treatments did not increase much in the 2-3% range. However, the ratio of the number of SED cases showed an increasing trend with increase in the total number of sedation cases. The degree of increase differed according to the type of disability (Fig. 2).

Table 3. Change in the number of annual sedation cases by disability (from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019).

Disability 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total
ADHD 402 503 489 658 912 1093 1403 2942 4279 4520 4144 3580 3351 28276
Phobia 661 720 731 777 771 750 891 1323 1847 1917 1873 1743 1717 15721
Brain Disease 590 630 686 806 880 989 1147 2307 3210 3801 4006 3827 3706 26585
Cerebral Palsy 95 128 151 167 208 234 270 537 739 910 942 903 968 6252
Epilepsy 224 279 315 382 446 446 588 1225 1505 1843 1823 1663 1806 12545
Genetic Disease 41 60 65 55 82 94 103 224 284 356 357 407 442 2570
Autism 175 148 160 212 263 348 445 797 1082 1415 1648 1775 1795 10263
Mental Disorder 558 603 576 658 629 516 617 920 1070 1002 991 905 761 9806
Mental Retardation 264 282 309 429 524 644 940 1870 2681 3064 3669 3617 3939 22232
Dementia 90 103 121 131 148 134 150 155 188 192 164 108 84 1768
Total 3100 3456 3603 4275 4863 5248 6554 12300 16885 19020 19617 18528 18569 136018

ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Table 4. Change in the number of annual general anesthesia cases by disability (from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019).

Disability 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total
ADHD 47 42 50 55 69 79 108 122 136 183 191 198 171 1451
Phobia 779 755 794 824 850 993 1081 1227 1284 1336 1344 1412 1084 13763
Brain Disease 633 649 753 743 795 913 967 1103 1159 1127 1156 1214 957 12169
Cerebral Palsy 77 90 102 106 122 159 176 210 216 238 295 329 264 2384
Epilepsy 187 175 181 231 259 299 304 426 439 477 549 521 494 4542
Genetic Disease 25 31 38 29 33 61 54 75 66 86 105 96 76 775
Autism 45 67 61 75 85 94 138 171 192 262 353 414 368 2325
Mental Disorder 640 624 744 717 806 820 991 1070 1074 1168 1177 1288 948 12067
Mental Retardation 135 131 135 175 165 209 255 311 351 450 508 504 485 3814
Dementia 142 154 182 183 186 230 276 290 290 286 271 283 245 3018
Total 2710 2718 3040 3138 3370 3857 4350 5005 5207 5613 5949 6259 5092 56308

ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Fig. 1. Annual changes in number of sedation and general anesthesia cases. GA, general anesthesia; SED, sedation.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2. Ratio of the number of GA and SED among the total number of dental treatments divided by year and disability. ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; GA, general anesthesia; SED, sedation.

Fig. 2

2. Analysis of sex ratio and average age of patients by disability

In patients receiving SED, the male-to-female ratio was very high for males with ADHD and autism. In all the disabilities analyzed, the male ratio was higher, except in the case of mental disorder and dementia, where the female ratio was higher (Table 5). In patients receiving GA, the male ratio was very high again in those with ADHD and autism. However, in dementia, the female ratio was significantly higher (Table 6).

Table 5. Sedation cases with sex ratio and average age of patients by disability (from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019).

Disability Male Female Ratio age [year (SD)]
ADHD 22969 5307 81.2 : 18.8 6.4 (4.1)
Phobia 7963 7758 50.7 : 49.3 31.4 (24.7)
Brain Disease 15488 11097 58.3 : 41.7 31.1 (28.9)
Cerebral Palsy 3473 2779 55.6 : 44.4 10.2 (11.8)
Epilepsy 6748 5797 53.8 : 46.2 11.7 (13.5)
Genetic Disease 1388 1182 54.0 : 46.0 9.6 (12.5)
Autism 7957 2306 77.5 : 22.5 7.6 (5.2)
Mental Disorder 4803 5003 49.0 : 51.0 31.1 (24)
Mental Retardation 15914 6318 71.6 : 28.4 8.5 (7.9)
Dementia 842 926 47.6 : 52.4 56.7 (28.5)

ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Table 6. General anesthesia cases with sex ratio and average age of patients by disability (from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019).

Disability Male Female Ratio age [year (SD)]
ADHD 1246 205 85.9 : 14.1 13 (6.1)
Phobia 6809 6954 49.5 : 50.5 46.2 (19.7)
Brain Disease 7221 4948 59.3 : 40.7 53 (20.5)
Cerebral Palsy 1437 947 60.3 : 39.7 26.2 (17.9)
Epilepsy 2896 1646 63.8 : 36.2 28 (16.6)
Genetic Disease 467 308 60.3 : 39.7 24 (19.7)
Autism 1838 487 79.1 : 20.9 16.8 (8.3)
Mental Disorder 6112 5955 50.7 : 49.3 43.2 (20)
Mental Retardation 2428 1386 63.7 : 36.3 20.8 (11.6)
Dementia 1117 1901 37.0 : 63.0 68 (14.5)

ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

There was a large difference between the age at which SED was performed and the age at which GA was performed by type of disability. The age at which SED was performed was often more than 10 years younger than the age at which GA was performed (Table 5, 6).

3. Analysis of the number of SED and GA cases according to medical institutions and province

In our study, a total of 105,289 SED cases were performed in dental clinics and the majority of SED cases in dentistry were carried out in dental clinics. However, in the case of GA, a total of 27,213 cases were performed in tertiary general hospitals. In tertiary general hospitals and general hospitals, GA method was performed more than SED in treating patients with special needs (Fig. 3). In 2019, there were 406 dental clinics that provided dental SED (Table 7).

Fig. 3. Number of sedation and general anesthesia (GA) cases according to medical institutions. GA, general anesthesia; MDZ, midazolam; N+M, nitrous oxide and midazolam; N+P+H, nitrous oxide and chloral hydrate and/or hydroxyzine; Oral, oral sedatives (chloral hydrate, hydroxyzine); PPF, propofol; SED, sedation; SEVO, sevoflurane.

Fig. 3

Table 7. Change in the number of number of SED and GA cases according to medical institutions and number of institutions (from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019).

Tertiary General Hospital General Hospital Dental Hospital Dental Clinic
year SED GA SED GA SED GA SED GA
cases 2007 794 1529 269 672 874 509 1163
2008 899 1551 308 574 776 593 1473
2009 934 1873 285 537 887 630 1478
2010 814 1822 336 608 1076 707 2049
2011 743 1844 317 647 1154 877 2649
2012 626 1828 310 740 960 1289 3351
2013 671 2088 367 929 1018 1333 4494
2014 763 2284 278 898 1438 1823 9820
2015 652 2531 183 783 1772 1885 14276 8
2016 736 2583 125 1048 2029 1960 16124 13
2017 641 2699 144 970 2159 2248 16672 20
2018 523 2543 217 1211 2144 2475 15643 18
2019 409 2038 217 841 1841 2174 16097 18
Total 9205 27213 3356 10458 18128 18503 105289 77
year SED GA SED GA SED GA SED GA
hospital numbers 2007 29 37 51 58 26 9 121
2008 28 36 52 57 30 11 146
2009 33 37 50 59 35 12 157
2010 34 36 49 54 34 10 191
2011 32 36 57 60 40 15 208
2012 27 35 49 71 36 15 223
2013 24 36 45 63 38 14 251
2014 25 34 42 62 39 13 300
2015 24 33 39 67 43 17 336 3
2016 22 34 34 69 47 14 370 3
2017 21 33 30 66 52 15 398 2
2018 20 32 24 57 50 15 397 2
2019 16 29 32 49 46 15 406 1

GA, general anesthesia; SED, sedation.

The number of GA and SED cases by the city and province in Korea was investigated by year (Table 8, 9), and the ratio of GA and SED was also plotted as a graph (Fig. 4, 5).

Table 8. Change in the number of annual sedation cases by city and province in Korea (from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019).

Disability 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total
Seoul 1084 1100 1125 1180 1313 1285 1639 3117 4241 4259 4114 4114 4183 32754
Busan 210 336 270 325 284 450 598 1206 1909 2389 2462 2348 2506 15293
Inchon 260 258 260 285 368 349 375 555 638 754 743 701 757 6303
Daegu 210 278 296 312 366 366 352 643 815 987 1184 1041 1070 7920
Gwangju 148 173 218 279 249 247 404 586 669 850 774 584 556 5737
Daejeon 58 80 51 59 117 153 212 479 681 648 693 655 588 4474
Ulsan 41 68 53 50 73 85 116 218 437 456 450 392 435 2874
Gyeonggi-do 503 600 674 962 1175 1436 1849 3705 4899 5592 5842 5478 5466 38181
Gangwon-do 258 215 244 241 230 210 200 271 354 364 386 393 272 3638
Chungcheongbuk-do 35 32 44 52 60 70 121 277 311 401 308 370 313 2394
Chungcheongnam-do 83 81 48 55 82 80 110 157 228 234 249 335 385 2127
Jeollabuk-do 80 76 108 114 124 143 234 478 683 840 1023 906 718 5527
Jeollanam-do 24 32 21 21 34 35 46 93 195 173 170 109 117 1070
Gyeongsangbuk-do 11 13 34 34 33 47 84 148 237 282 354 369 352 1998
Gyeongsangnam-do 80 73 145 291 332 239 165 297 419 456 522 464 552 4035
Jeju-do 15 41 12 15 23 53 49 70 94 148 104 110 103 837
Sejong 75 187 239 159 196 856
Total 3100 3456 3603 4275 4863 5248 6554 12300 16885 19020 19617 18528 18569 136018

Table 9. Change in the number of annual general anesthesia cases by city and province in Korea (from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019).

Disability 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total
Seoul 1035 1011 1127 1128 1182 1336 1383 1829 1839 1893 2049 2332 1805 19949
Busan 238 268 258 203 205 211 253 252 265 307 365 325 326 3476
Inchon 68 81 73 96 71 85 80 94 99 151 136 164 129 1327
Daegu 242 211 268 295 309 310 334 321 357 364 361 402 346 4120
Gwangju 165 173 163 136 172 195 254 342 384 316 324 342 276 3242
Daejeon 100 86 97 114 106 132 166 179 130 138 122 123 86 1579
Ulsan 71 36 49 58 48 61 117 107 169 139 123 145 31 1154
Gyeonggi-do 307 317 352 380 460 479 636 692 715 939 857 860 789 7783
Gangwon-do 76 61 86 66 113 128 124 121 119 112 158 150 97 1411
Chungcheongbuk-do 62 77 79 66 74 59 62 66 76 71 73 66 28 859
Chungcheongnam-do 151 184 165 190 194 229 270 304 313 403 525 424 397 3749
Jeollabuk-do 111 138 240 235 218 280 358 364 367 395 396 370 329 3801
Jeollanam-do 4 4 8 5 4 7 6 1 1 3 2 45
Gyeongsangbuk-do 3 4 4 3 4 7 7 2 4 4 13 5 60
Gyeongsangnam-do 69 59 61 150 200 329 286 316 361 363 439 479 367 3479
Jeju-do 8 8 10 13 10 9 14 16 12 17 14 62 81 274
Total 3100 3456 3603 4275 4863 5248 6554 12300 16885 19020 19617 18528 18569 136018

Fig. 4. Ratio of the number of GA (A) and SED (B) among the total number of dental treatments divided by city and province. Data are expressed province or city name, ratio (%), total cases from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019. GA, general anesthesia; SED, sedation.

Fig. 4

Fig. 5. Ratio of the number of GA and SED among the total number of dental treatments divided by year and province from January 1, 2007, to September 30, 2019. GA, general anesthesia; SED, sedation.

Fig. 5

DISCUSSION

As of 2006, the registered population of persons with special needs in South Korea was 1,134,177, but increased to 2,618,918 in 2019, accounting for 5.1% of the total population [10]. In 2019, the number of persons with special needs aged 65 or older was 1,263,952 accounting for 48.3% of the registered population for special needs. The male-to-female ratio was 57.8% : 44.2%, which accounted for 15.6% higher males [10]. When analyzing the dental treatment of persons with special needs with a history of dental treatment using the above eight sedative drugs, a total of 116,623 patients received 2,801,276 treatments (Table 2). Among them, 136,018 cases of SED were performed, and 56,308 cases were administered under GA.

In this study, patients with ADHD represented the greatest number of cases of dental SED while patients with brain disease had the most number receiving dental treatment among the disabilities (Table 3). However, the most common disability that received GA was phobia, and this disability had the most patients and most cases in receiving GA (Table 4).

Dental phobia patients unable to respond to and cooperate well with psychotherapeutic interventions, and not willing to undergo these types of treatment, should seek pharmacological therapies such as SED or GA [11]. Prevalence of extreme or very high dental anxiety has been estimated to be between 5 and 22% in representative adult samples [12]. As prevalence of dental anxiety is quite high and results in avoidance of dental treatment, irregular dental attendance, and poor cooperation, measures to attend to the dental phobia population must be taken into consideration. These data are meaningful in understanding the importance and severity of dental phobia.

According to the study, ADHD, brain disease and mental retardation were the three disabilities with the most cases of SED (Table 3), while in GA, phobia, mental disorder, and brain disease were the most common cause for undergoing GA in dental treatment (Table 4).

From 2007 to 2019, an increase in both SED and GA cases were observed, but a much more rapid increase was found in the number of SED cases. In 2007, there were 3,100 SED cases, but in 2019, it was 18,569 cases, a six-fold increase (Fig. 1). From 2014, SED cases increased rapidly possibly because of the N2O code being claimed at the insurance [9].

The increase in yearly SED cases over the years from 2007 to 2018 which included ADHD, cerebral palsy, genetic disease, autism, and mental retardation, showed a near ten-fold increase in the course of 12 years. The increase in number of GA cases was much less than that of SED; nevertheless, in autism, the number of GA cases increased ten times from 2007 to 2013. This could be owing to an increase in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders that has increased in recent decades, which could be because of changes in diagnosis reporting practices [13].

There were ample differences in the male-to-female ratio and age in receiving SED or GA according to types of disability. The majority of the disabilities showed a higher ratio in male population, except in dementia where the female ratio was higher [5]. Pediatric patients were of the mean age in receiving SED or GA for ADHD and autism. Overall, the mean age for all disabilities was in younger patients receiving SED than GA (Table 5, 6). In the case of dementia among disabilities, 1344 patients with dementia received 1515 procedures with SED and 3015 patients underwent 3396 procedures with GA. Consequently, it can be understood that dementia patients received SED and GA at least once. This predicts that the demand for SED and GA for patients will increase in the aging population as the dementia population is also rising.

In the case of tertiary hospitals and general hospitals, the number of cases of SED is decreasing year by year, while the number of cases of GA is increasing.

In terms of SED, most cases were carried out in the Gyeonggi province and Seoul came in second. However, in terms of GA, the majority of cases were carried out in Seoul. In 2007, the number of medical institutions in Seoul that were capable of performing dental SED or GA was 70 while in 2019 the number increased to 125.

In conclusion, a total of 116,623 patients with disabilities received 2,801,276 dental care with insurance during the survey period. Among these, 69,265 patients underwent 136,018 dental procedures with SED method and 47,257 patients underwent 56,308 procedures with GA.

The improvement of welfare and newly opened dental hospitals for people with special needs, an increase in insurance coverage and easier accessibility has led to a steep rise in the practice of SED and GA in patients with special needs.

Recently, the number of patients with dental phobias has shown an increase and the number of SED and GA has also increased accordingly. This is a subject that should be taken into consideration, such that dental phobia may be included as a type of disorder in dentistry and the need for implementation of SED and GA during dental treatment may be considered.

Overall, from the results of analyzing dental SED and GA for patients with special needs, data show that the number of dental SED and GA cases and the number of patients with disabilities is increasing compared to that in the past. It is suggested that guidelines for SED and GA for patients with special needs need to be prepared, and reinforcement of related policies and management needs to be implemented.

Footnotes

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS:
  • Jieun Kim: Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft.
  • Hyuk Kim: Data curation, Resources.
  • Kwang-Suk Seo: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
  • Hyun Jeong Kim: Conceptualization, Supervision.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DECLARATION: These data are based on data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, and the results of the study are not related to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service and the Ministry of Health and Welfare.

References

  • 1.Caputo AC. Providing deep sedation and general anesthesia for patients with special needs in the dental office-based setting. Spec Care Dentist. 2009;29:26–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2008.00059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lim M, Borromeo GL. The use of general anesthesia to facilitate dental treatment in adult patients with special needs. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2017;17:91–103. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2017.17.2.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang YC, Lin IH, Huang CH, Fan SZ. Dental anesthesia for patients with special needs. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2012;50:122–125. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2012.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salinas Salmeron KS, Kim HJ, Seo KS. Effects site concentrations of propofol using target-controlled infusion in dental treatment under deep sedation among different intellectual disability types. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019;19:217–226. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.4.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kim T, Chi SI, Kim H, Seo KS. Analysis of behavioral management for dental treatment in patients with dementia using the Korean national health insurance data. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021;21:461–469. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.5.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim HK, Song SO, Noh J, Jeong IK, Lee BW. Data configuration and publication trends for the korean national health insurance and health insurance review & assessment database. Diabetes Metab J. 2020;44:671–678. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2020.0207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee S. The obesity paradox in colorectal cancer surgery: An analysis of Korean healthcare big data, 2012-2013. Nutr Cancer. 2017;69:248–253. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2017.1263744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chi SI, Kim H, Seo KS. Analysis of application of dental sedation in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) patients using the Korean national health insurance data. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021;21:99–111. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2021.21.2.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim H, Ryoo SH, Karm MH, Seo KS, Kim HJ. Analysis of changes and trends in the use of sedatives in dental sedation using data from the national health insurance in Korea. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022;22:49–60. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Korea Disabled people's Development Institute (KODDI); KODDI, editors. 2020 disability statistical yearbook. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Appukuttan DP. Strategies to manage patients with dental anxiety and dental phobia: Literature review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2016;8:35–50. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S63626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moore R, Birn H, Kirkegaard E, Brodsgaard I, Scheutz F. Prevalence and characteristics of dental anxiety in danish adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1993;21:292–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1993.tb00777.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hansen SN, Schendel DE, Parner ET. Explaining the increase in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorders: The proportion attributable to changes in reporting practices. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:56–62. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine are provided here courtesy of Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology

RESOURCES