Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2023 Mar 10;18(3):e0282166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282166

Investigation of the anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib, a highly selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, by phosphoproteomics and transcriptomics

Ryohei Kozaki 1,*,#, Tomoko Yasuhiro 1,#, Hikaru Kato 1, Jun Murai 1, Shingo Hotta 1, Yuko Ariza 1, Shunsuke Sakai 1, Ryu Fujikawa 1, Takao Yoshida 1
Editor: Mauro Salvi2
PMCID: PMC10004634  PMID: 36897912

Abstract

Tirabrutinib is a highly selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor used to treat hematological malignancies. We analyzed the anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib using phosphoproteomic and transcriptomic methods. It is important to check the drug’s selectivity against off-target proteins to understand the anti-tumor mechanism based on the on-target drug effect. Tirabrutinib’s selectivity was evaluated by biochemical kinase profiling assays, peripheral blood mononuclear cell stimulation assays, and the BioMAP system. Next, in vitro and in vivo analyses of the anti-tumor mechanisms were conducted in activated B-cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL) cells followed by phosphoproteomic and transcriptomic analyses. In vitro kinase assays showed that, compared with ibrutinib, tirabrutinib and other second-generation BTK inhibitors demonstrated a highly selective kinase profile. Data from in vitro cellular systems showed that tirabrutinib selectively affected B-cells. Tirabrutinib inhibited the cell growth of both TMD8 and U-2932 cells in correlation with the inhibition of BTK autophosphorylation. Phosphoproteomic analysis revealed the downregulation of ERK and AKT pathways in TMD8. In the TMD8 subcutaneous xenograft model, tirabrutinib showed a dose-dependent anti-tumor effect. Transcriptomic analysis indicated that IRF4 gene expression signatures had decreased in the tirabrutinib groups. In conclusion, tirabrutinib exerted an anti-tumor effect by regulating multiple BTK downstream signaling proteins, such as NF-κB, AKT, and ERK, in ABC-DLBCL.

Introduction

The B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway plays a key role in the development of hematologic B-cell-derived malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [1], diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) [2], mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) [3], and other non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas [4]. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), a cytoplasmic TEC family kinase with multifaceted functions within the BCR pathway [5], is a key therapeutic target in the treatment of B-cell malignancies [6,7].

The first-generation BTK inhibitor ibrutinib was first approved in the US for MCL treatment in 2013 [8] and is now also indicated for use in patients with CLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, and marginal zone lymphoma [9]. However, limitations include off-target toxicity and the development of resistance [1012].

Second-generation BTK inhibitors (acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) are more kinase selective [13,14]; because of their selectivity, they are expected to be superior to ibrutinib in terms of safety [15]. Clinical studies have shown that patients with CLL who are intolerant to ibrutinib can benefit from treatment with acalabrutinib [16], and a recent phase 3 head-to-head trial demonstrated that acalabrutinib had non-inferior efficacy and fewer adverse events (AEs) compared with ibrutinib [17]. Similar positive results have also been reported for zanubrutinib [18].

Tirabrutinib is another second-generation BTK inhibitor with a potent, highly selective, irreversible profile. It is approved in Japan for the treatment of relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, and lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas [19].

Some non-clinical studies have shown the anti-tumor effect and anti-tumor mechanism of BTK inhibitors in ABC-DLBCL cell lines [20,21]. However, a comprehensive analysis by both phosphoproteomics and transcriptomics in ABC-DLBCL treated with BTK inhibitors exploring anti-tumor mechanisms has not been reported.

To elucidate the anti-tumor mechanisms of molecular-targeted drugs based on the regulation of a specific target molecule, it is critical to use appropriate and selective tools and compounds. An unexpected anti-tumor mechanism related to the off-target molecules regulated by molecular-targeted drugs is often reported [22,23]. Therefore, we carefully checked the potential off-target kinases for tirabrutinib using both biochemical and cellular methods before exploring its anti-tumor mechanisms in ABC-DLBCL cell lines. Thus, the objective of this in vitro and in vivo study was to analyze the anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib, a highly selective BTK inhibitor in ABC-DLBCL, using phosphoproteomic and transcriptomic techniques.

Materials and methods

Reagents and cell cultures

Tirabrutinib, ibrutinib, and acalabrutinib were obtained from the Department of Drug Discovery Chemistry, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Zanubrutinib and refametinib were purchased from MedChemExpress (Princeton, NJ, USA). BMS-345541 and MK-2206 were purchased from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA) and Shanghai Haoyuan Chemexpress (Shanghai, China), respectively. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained from VERITAS Corporation (Tokyo, Japan; Lot No. A1929). The activated B-cell-like (ABC)-DLBCL cell lines TMD8 and U-2932 have been described previously [24,25]; TMD8 cells were obtained from the Tokyo Medical and Dental University (Tokyo, Japan), and U-2932 cells from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). PBMC and these cell lines were maintained in a culture medium, namely RPMI medium 1640 (Invitrogen Corporation) containing 10% v/v inactivated fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen Corporation) and 1% v/v penicillin-streptomycin liquid (Invitrogen Corporation) at 37°C, 5% CO2/95% air.

KINOMEscan analysis

Kinase profiling was carried out by DiscoverX (Eurofins DiscoverX Products, LLC., Fremont, CA, USA), using the KINOMEscan scanMAX platform as previously described [26]. Briefly, this is a biochemical kinase profiling assay that measures drug binding using a panel of DNA-tagged kinases. In the current analysis, four test compounds were evaluated at 300 nM. Compounds binding to the kinase active site reduce the amount of kinase captured on a solid support of an immobilized ligand. The captured kinases are quantified using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) that detects the associated DNA label. The strength of compound binding is determined based on its ability to block kinase-ligand binding, and the results were reported as percent control (%CTRL), which was the percentage of each kinase that remained bound to the immobilized ligand.

In vitro kinase assays

Half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) and selectivity of each test compound were calculated for a selection of 14 kinases using an optimized mobility shift assay (MSA) for FYN, LYNa, LCK, ERBB4, and CSK; the Invitrogen Z’-Lyte kinase inhibition assay for BTK, BLK, BMX, EGFR, ERBB2, ITK, JAK3, and TXK; and the Invitrogen LanthaScreen Eu kinase binding assay for TEC. A single or three independent tests (from which the average value was calculated) were conducted, with the selectivity based on a reference value of 1 for the IC50 of BTK.

The MSA was carried out by Carna Biosciences Inc. (Kobe, Japan), and the details are described elsewhere [27]. In brief, compounds were dissolved in DMSO to desired concentrations. The prepared DMSO solutions were diluted in assay buffer to yield a final concentration of 1% DMSO for each compound. The kinase assays were carried out using ATP at its Km for each kinase, i.e., 50, 10, 10, 25, and 5 μM for FYN, LYNa, LCK, ERBB4, and CSK, respectively. Each test compound was preincubated with kinase solution for 30 or 60 min (30 min for FYN, LYNa, LCK, and 60 min for ERBB4 and CSK) at room temperature before adding the substrate/ATP/metal solution and incubating the kinase reaction for 1–5 h (1 h for FYN, LYNa, LCK, ERBB4, and 4 or 5 h for CSK). The inhibition of kinase activity by each compound was calculated as follows: inhibition (%) = [1 –(A–B) / (C–B)] × 100, where A is the response with compound, B is the background response with no kinase, and C is the response with vehicle (1% DMSO). The IC50 value of each compound was calculated by interpolation on a log-concentration-response curve fitted with a four-parameter logistic equation.

The Invitrogen Z’-Lyte kinase inhibition assay and the Invitrogen LanthaScreen Eu kinase binding assay were carried out by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions [28,29]. In all the assays, each test compound was preincubated with peptide/kinase mixture or kinase/antibody mixture for 60 min at room temperature before adding the ATP solution or AlexaFluor labeled Tracer to initiate the 60-min incubation of the reactants.

PBMC stimulation assays

Human PBMCs were treated with vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or various concentrations of tirabrutinib for 10 min at 37°C and 5% CO2/95% air, then stimulated with either anti-Human IgM-UNLB (Southern Biotech, #2022–01, referred to as anti-IgM hereafter; final concentration: 1 μg/mL) or Dynabeads Human T-Activator CD3/CD28 (Invitrogen Corporation, #11131D, referred to as anti-CD3/CD28 hereafter; final concentration: 1.8 × 106 beads/mL) for 22 or 16 h to evaluate the effect on B- or T-cell activation, respectively. After culturing, the stimulated cells were stained with fluorescently labeled CD3, CD20, and CD69 antibodies. B-cells (identified by gating CD20-positive and CD3-negative cells) and T-cells (identified by gating CD3-positive and CD20-negative cells) were analyzed by flow cytometry to monitor the expression of CD69. The CD69 inhibition rate (%) in the tirabrutinib-treated group was calculated versus the vehicle group, and the concentration at which tirabrutinib showed 50% CD69 inhibition (IC50, nM) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated by nonlinear regression analysis, using a four-parameter logistic model. GraphPad Prism version 5.04 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and its base settings were used for initial values and convergence conditions.

BioMAP profiling

The biological selectivity of tirabrutinib at concentrations of 120, 370, 1100, and 3300 nM was evaluated in 12 in vitro BioMAP Diversity PLUS systems (Eurofins DiscoverX Products, LLC) according to the service provider’s protocol, as previously described [30]. In brief, cultures with one or more primary cell types from healthy human donors were treated with sets of stimulators specific to the cell subsets, and the optimized biomarker readouts for each system were measured by ELISA and other techniques, as listed in S1 Table. The assays included positive and negative controls as well as vehicle control. Results are presented as the log-transformed ratio of biomarker readouts for tirabrutinib-treated samples to vehicle controls.

Cell viability assay

TMD8 and U-2932 cells were treated with vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or various concentrations of tirabrutinib in untreated 96-well plates (1 × 104 or 2 × 104 cells/well for TMD8 or U-2932, respectively). After incubation for 72 h at 37°C and 5% CO2/95% air, relative light units (RLU) were measured with the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The cell growth inhibition rate (%) in the tirabrutinib-treated group was calculated versus the rate in the vehicle group, and the concentration at which tirabrutinib showed 50% growth inhibition (IC50, nM) was estimated by nonlinear regression analysis using a two-parameter logistic model or a Sigmoid Emax model for TMD8 and U-2932, respectively. GraphPad Prism (version 5.01J or 5.04; GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and its base settings were used for initial values and convergence conditions.

Western blot analyses

TMD8 and U-2932 cells were treated with vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or different concentrations of tirabrutinib and incubated for 1 or 4 h at 37°C, 5% CO2/95% air. After culturing, cells were harvested and lysed with cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) containing 1 mM AEBSF (Calbiochem, #101500). As a positive control of BTK autophosphorylation for western blot analysis, TMD8 cells were treated with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; final concentration: 6 mM) for 10 min, harvested as a control sample, and then lysed with the cell lysis buffer. Tyrosine 223 (Tyr-223), the site of BTK autophosphorylation, has been shown to be phosphorylated by H2O2 stimulation [31].

Each mixture of cells and cell lysis buffer was incubated on ice for 5 min, then centrifuged at 13400 × g and 4°C for 10 min. Total lysates were loaded on 4%–12% SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Immobilon-P Transfer Membrane, Millipore Corporation). The blot was incubated in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBS-T, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) containing 2 w/v% ECL Advance Blocking Agent (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, b) for 1 h at room temperature. The blocked PVDF membranes were immersed in TBS-T and washed three times with shaking at room temperature for 10 min. The membrane was incubated with primary antibody in TBS-T containing 2 w/v% ECL Advance Blocking Agent with gentle agitation overnight at 5°C in a cold storage room or for 1 h at room temperature. Rabbit monoclonal anti- phosphorylated BTK (Tyr-223) antibody (p-BTK; Novus Biologicals, #NB100-79907), rabbit monoclonal BTK antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #3533), rabbit polyclonal phosphorylated AKT (Ser-473) antibody (p-AKT; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #9271), rabbit monoclonal AKT (pan) (C67E7) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #4691), rabbit polyclonal phosphorylated p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2) (Thr-202/Tyr-204) antibody (p-ERK1/2; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #9101), rabbit monoclonal p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2) (137F5) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #4695), rabbit monoclonal phosphorylated PLCγ2 (Tyr-759) (E9E9Y) antibody (p-PLCγ2; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #50535), rabbit monoclonal PLCγ2 (E5U4T) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #55512), mouse monoclonal phosphorylated IκBα (Ser-32/36) (5A5) antibody (p-IκBα; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #9246), rabbit monoclonal IκBα (44D4) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #4812), rabbit polyclonal phosphorylated PKCβ (phospho-Thr-641) antibody (p-PKCβ; Signalway Antibody LLC, #11172), rabbit monoclonal IRF4 (D9P5H) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #15106), rabbit monoclonal BCL6 (D65C10) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #5650), rabbit monoclonal c-MYC (D84C12) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #5605), and rabbit monoclonal GAPDH (14C10) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., #2118) were used. The PVDF membranes were immersed in TBS-T and washed three times with shaking at room temperature for 10 min, then incubated with secondary antibody with shaking for 1 h at room temperature. The secondary antibody used was anti-rabbit-IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, #7074) or goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulins/HRP (Dako, P0448). The PVDF membranes were washed three times with shaking at room temperature for 10 min and were treated with ECLTM Advance Western Blotting Detection Kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, #RPN2135) for chemiluminescent detection according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Lumino-image analyzer (LAS-1000 Plus system, Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.) and Image Reader LAS-1000 Lite version 1.3 (Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.) were used to visualize bands. The densitometry analysis described the ratio of phosphorylated to total BTK protein. The IC50 value (nM), at which 50% of BTK autophosphorylation is inhibited compared with vehicle, was calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using a four-parameter logistic model using GraphPad Prism Ver. 5.04 (GraphPad Software, Inc.).

Phosphoproteomic analyses

The analysis was carried out by Evotec AG (Munich, Germany) as previously described [32]. In brief, two replicate SILAC experiments were carried out for TMD8 and U-2932 with inverted labeling schemes to ensure reproducibility of phosphoproteome quantification. For differential SILAC encoding, both cells were grown in arginine- and lysine-deficient culture medium containing light (Arg0/Lys0) or heavy (Arg10/Lys8) isotopic forms of L-arginine and L-lysine (SILAC medium). After culturing for 10 days to ensure complete proteome labeling, cells were seeded in fresh SILAC medium and incubated for 24 h. The cells were treated with either vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or tirabrutinib at 1 μM for 1 h. After treatment, cells were lysed and equal protein amounts from differentially SILAC-encoded and -treated cells were digested followed by peptide fractionation by strong cation exchange chromatography, followed by immobilized metal affinity chromatography phosphopeptide enrichment. For mass spectrometric analysis, phosphopeptide-enriched samples were loaded onto a reversed phase analytical column, resolved by an acetonitrile gradient using a nanoflow HPLC system and directly electrosprayed via a nanoelectrospray ion source into an LTQ-Orbitrap Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For data processing, all raw files acquired in this study were collectively processed with the MaxQuant software suite (version 1.2.0.18) for peptide and protein identification and quantification using a human UniProt database (version 12 2010). A false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.01 was selected for protein and peptide identification, and a posterior error probability of ≤0.1 for each peptide-to-spectral match was required. The resulting list of phosphosites exported from the MaxQuant software was filtered for class-I sites (only serine, threonine, or tyrosine assignments with a localization probability of ≥0.75) [33] and used for all subsequent biostatistical analysis. To identify significantly regulated phosphosites on the basis of biological reproducibility, the individual phosphosite ratios were divided by each other. Gaussian regression analysis on the histogram plot of these log2-transformed ratios was performed using Sigmaplot (version 10.0; Systat Software Inc.). The obtained values for the mean and standard deviation across the whole quantitative dataset were used to determine thresholds for significant regulation of at least ±2.5 σ. The applied ratio thresholds for phosphoregulation were as follows: for TMD8 and U-2932, >1.472 and >1.506, respectively, for upregulated sites, and <0.679 and <0.664, respectively, for downregulated sites. Furthermore, only phosphosites conforming to this criterion and showing consistent regulation in both biological replicates were considered as regulated.

RNA isolation and RT-qPCR

TMD8 cells were treated with vehicle (0.1% DMSO) or tirabrutinib at 1 μM and incubated for 24 h at 37°C, 5% CO2/95% air. After culturing, total RNA was isolated from cells using the RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen), then cDNA was prepared from total RNA using the SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen) following the kit instructions. For quantification of each mRNA expression level, PCR was performed using TaqMan Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) under the following conditions with the AriaMx Real Time PCR System (Agilent Technologies): 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 20 s with continuous fluorescence measurement. All PCRs were performed in triplicate, and the mRNA expression of GAPDH was used as an internal control. The results (fold changes of the threshold cycle [Ct] relative to the control group) were obtained using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The TaqMan probes for IRF4 (Assay ID: Hs00180031_m1), BCL6 (Assay ID: Hs00153368_m1), MYC (Assay ID: Hs00153408_m1), and GAPDH (Assay ID: Hs02786624_g1) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Statistical tests were performed with the SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) TS1M4-based EXSUS system version 10.1.3 (CAC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The t-test or Dunnett test was used to compare mRNA expression in the DMSO- and compound-treated groups. The statistical tests were two-sided with a 5% significance level.

Animals and TMD8 xenograft model

The present study was conducted in compliance with the Guidance for Animal Experiments, the Ethical Standards for Experiments using Human Tissues, and the Standards for Safety Management of Pathogens established by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Female C.B-17/Icr-scid/scidJcl mice (hereafter referred to as severe combined immunodeficient [SCID] mice) were obtained from CLEA Japan, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). The age at the beginning of the experiment was 6 weeks. To establish the TMD8 xenograft model, TMD8 cell suspension (0.1 mL, 1 × 108 cells/mL) was subcutaneously injected into the right flank of SCID mice under pentobarbital anesthesia. Tumor volume was calculated from the day after implantation and mice were assigned to groups when most of them showed tumor volumes of 50–250 mm3. Tirabrutinib at 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, suspended in a 0.5 w/v% methyl cellulose 400 cP solution (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) or vehicle (0.5% methyl cellulose), was administered orally twice daily for 21 days, starting on day 0 (the group assignment day). Tumor diameters and body weight were measured every 3 or 4 days after group assignment. The tumor growth inhibition rate (%) in the tirabrutinib-treated groups, versus the vehicle group, was calculated based on tumor volume. Statistical tests were performed with the SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Japan Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) TS2M3-based EXSUS system version 7.7.1 (CAC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The Dunnett test was used to compare tumor volume in the tirabrutinib- and vehicle-treated groups, and linear regression analysis was used to study dose response in the tirabrutinib groups. The statistical tests were two-sided with a 5% significance level. A significant difference from vehicle in at least one tirabrutinib group and significant slope in the linear regression line were considered to indicate a dose-dependent effect.

In vivo pharmacodynamics analysis

The TMD8 xenograft model mice after 21 days twice daily (BID) treatment with vehicle or various doses of tirabrutinib were used for the analysis. One hour after the final dosing, mice underwent laparotomy under isoflurane anesthesia and were sacrificed by exsanguination; tumors were collected. After measuring the wet weight, each tumor was placed on a 70-μm cell strainer (BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) placed in one well of a six-well plate on ice. After adding an amount of precooled culture medium, tumor cells were detached. The cell suspension was transferred to a tube and centrifuged for 8 min at 400 × g. Supernatant was excluded by aspiration, and cells were resuspended in culture medium. The tumor suspension was diluted with culture medium to a cell density of 1.0 × 106 cells/mL and pipetted into a 96-well plate. Cells were treated with phosphatase inhibitor cocktail 2 (PPTI; Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at 37°C, 5% CO2/95% air, and then either treated with PBS (unstimulated control) or H2O2 solution (final concentration: 3 mM) was added. Cells were incubated for a further 10 min. Fix Buffer 1 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was added to each well, and the plate was centrifuged for 8 min at 400 × g at room temperature; the supernatant was removed by decantation. Each sample was washed twice with Perm Wash Buffer (BD Biosciences) before the addition of rabbit monoclonal p-BTK antibody (Tyr-223) (Novus Biologicals, #NB100-79907) diluted 500-fold with Perm Wash Buffer and 30-min incubation in the dark at room temperature. Cells underwent two rounds of Perm Wash buffer washes and centrifugation before the addition of the secondary antibody (100 μL Alexa Fluor 488 [Fab’] 2 fragments of goat anti-rabbit IgG [H+L]; Thermo Fisher Scientific) diluted 5,000-fold with Perm Wash buffer. After a 30-min incubation in the dark at room temperature, cells were washed once more and suspended with Stain Buffer (BD Biosciences). Cytomics FC500 MPL and data analysis software CXP Analysis (both from Beckman Coulter K.K, Shizuoka, Japan) were used for flow cytometry analysis. A gate containing the cell population of interest was created in a forward scatter and side scatter dot plot. Measurement samples were prepared by adding 250 μL of 7-AAD (BD Biosciences; diluted 50-fold in culture medium) to 250 μL of each tumor suspension to detect dead cells. The 7-AAD-positive cell rate (%) and the mean fluorescent intensity of BTK phosphorylation in cells in the relevant gate were measured. Samples in which the dead tumor cell rate (%) was > 30% were not considered suitable for accurate measurement of BTK phosphorylation.

Gene expression microarray analysis

The TMD8 xenograft model was also used for microarray analysis. When the mean tumor volume in the mouse xenograft model had reached about 150 mm3, tirabrutinib was administered to each mouse twice daily. After 21 days of drug administration and 24 h after the final dose, the mice underwent laparotomy under isoflurane anesthesia and were sacrificed by exsanguination. Tumors were collected and quickly frozen with liquid nitrogen. RNA extraction and gene expression microarray analysis were performed at LSI Medience Corporation (Tokyo, Japan) using the miRNeasy® mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. The DNA microarray results were processed using Expressionist Analyst (GeneData, Basel, Switzerland) and Excel. The microarray data are accessible through the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; GSE 210284).

Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) were performed using GSEA version 4.1.0 [34] with hallmark [35], C2, C3, C5, C6, C7, and C8 signatures in mSigDB version 7.4 [36]. The samples from tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg-administered mice (N = 9) and control mice (N = 8) were compared with the default settings of GSEA, except for the permutation method. As the expression of many genes differed between the two groups and sample-wise permutation has many false-positive results, we used gene-wise permutation.

Results

Selectivity profile of tirabrutinib: Results from in vitro kinase assays

In the comprehensive evaluation of kinase-binding inhibitory activity conducted against a panel of 442 kinases, only five kinases were inhibited by tirabrutinib at 300 nM to a level greater than 65%: BTK, 97%; TEC, 92.2%; BMX, 89%; HUNK, 89%; and RIPK2, 67% (S2 Table). Compared with the first-generation inhibitor ibrutinib, tirabrutinib and the other second-generation BTK inhibitors (acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) demonstrated more selective kinase binding (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Kinome profiling using the KINOMEscan assay for the first- and second-generation BTK inhibitors.

Fig 1

KINOMEscan profile against 442 kinases at 300 nM are shown as a TreeSpot diagram, which depicts all test kinases on a circular dendrogram of the human kinome, with interacting kinases (percent inhibition; >65%) shown in blue (BTK) or red (kinases other than BTK); non-interacting kinases are represented as small green dots. The images were generated using TREEspot™ Software Tool and reprinted with permission from KINOMEscan™, a division of Eurofins Corporation (© DISCOVERX CORPORATION 2010). BTK, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase.

The results of selectivity evaluations against the selected 13 kinases are shown in Table 1. Among the selected kinases, FYN, LCK, and LYNa are analogous kinases of BTK, and nine tyrosine kinases, BLK, BMX, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB4, ITK, JAK3, TXK, and TEC, have a cysteine residue in the active site like BTK. CSK was also selected because it is reportedly inhibited by ibrutinib and is responsible for off-target toxicity [37]. All the second-generation inhibitors, including tirabrutinib, were more selective against BTK compared with ibrutinib. Of the 13 kinases evaluated for selectivity, only two kinases, BMX and TEC, were within 10-fold selectivity for tirabrutinib. Tirabrutinib showed more than 700-fold selectivity against FYN and LYNa (kinases located upstream of BTK, which are involved in BCR signaling) and more than 200-fold selectivity against ITK, JAK3, LCK, and FYN (kinases involved in T-cell receptor signaling), indicating extremely low off-target kinase inhibition. Tirabrutinib also showed >3597, 3097, 64, and 162-fold selectivity against EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB4, and CSK, respectively.

Table 1. Selectivity of first-and second-generation BTK inhibitors against 13 kinases.

Tirabrutinib Ibrutinib Acalabrutinib Zanubrutinib
IC50 (nM) Selectivity IC50 (nM) Selectivity IC50 (nM) Selectivity IC50 (nM) Selectivity
BTKa 2.78 1 0.256 1 4.95 1 0.285 1
FYN 2220 799 55.0 215 >10000 >2020 1659 5821
LYNa 3490 1255 17.8 70 >10000 >2020 734 2575
LCK 788 283 5.87 23 5204 1051 369 1293
BLK 1280 460 0.155 0.6 2270 459 1.71 6
BMX 3.16 1 0.747 3 45.1 9 1.26 4
EGFR >10000 >3597 1.71 7 >10000 >2020 10.7 38
ERBB2 8610 3097 3.01 12 370 75 34.8 122
ERBB4 177 64 0.325 1 30.1 6 2.63 9
ITK >10000 >3597 21.9 86 >10000 >2020 346 1214
JAK3 >10000 >3597 14.5 57 >10000 >2020 811 2846
TXK 54.5 20 4.89 19 273 55 4.59 16
TEC 9.92 4 1.37 5 13.9 3 4.47 16
CSK 449 162 10.7 42 6653 1344 194 680

aBTK was used as the reference kinase for calculating the selectivity of the other 13 kinases evaluated.

IC50, Half-maximal inhibitory concentration.

Selectivity of tirabrutinib in in vitro cellular systems

The data from the PBMC stimulation assays are reported in Fig 2A. Tirabrutinib inhibited anti-IgM-stimulated B-cell activation in a concentration-dependent manner, with an IC50 value of 13.8 nM. Conversely, tirabrutinib did not inhibit anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated T-cell activation even at the highest concentration of 10 μM, indicating that tirabrutinib selectively suppressed the B-cell activation marker (CD69) without contributing to T-cell activation.

Fig 2. Selectivity of tirabrutinib in in vitro cellular systems.

Fig 2

(A) PBMC activation assays. (B) BioMAP evaluation. (A) Effect of tirabrutinib on B and T cells activation. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were treated with vehicle or tirabrutinib, stimulated with anti-IgM or anti-CD3/CD28 antibodies, and labelled with fluorescent anti-CD3, anti-CD20, and anti-CD69 antibodies. After separation by flow cytometry, mean fluorescence intensity of CD69 in each cell population was measured. Values are the mean inhibition rate of three samples ± standard error. (B) The X-axis lists the quantitative protein-based biomarker readouts measured in each system. The Y-axis represents a log-transformed ratio of the biomarker readouts for the tirabrutinib-treated sample (N = 1) over vehicle controls (N ≥ 6). The grey region around the Y-axis represents the 95% significance envelope generated from historical vehicle controls. Biomarker activities are annotated when two or more consecutive concentrations change in the same direction relative to vehicle controls, are outside the significance envelope, and have at least one concentration with an effect size >20% (|log10 ratio| > 0.1). The thick grey arrow denotes antiproliferative effects, which only require one concentration to meet the indicated threshold for profile annotation. bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; HDFn, human neonatal dermal fibroblasts; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; IFN, interferon; Ig, immunoglobulin; IL, interleukin; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; TCR, T-cell receptor; TGF, transforming growth factor; TLR, Toll-like receptor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Fig 2B shows the results obtained from the BioMAP system. Tirabrutinib showed a concentration-dependent inhibitory effect on the BT system (a model of T-cell-dependent B-cell activation), specifically inhibiting B-cell growth and the production of IgG and various cytokines (i.e., interleukin [IL]-6, IL-17A, and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]α). There was no significant effect of tirabrutinib in other evaluation systems such as the T-cell and fibroblast activation systems, further supporting the evidence that tirabrutinib selectively affects B-cells.

In vitro efficacy of tirabrutinib and comprehensive analysis of downstream signaling by phosphoproteomics in ABC-DLBCL cell lines

Tirabrutinib was shown to inhibit the growth of both TMD8 and U-2932 cells (Fig 3A). For TMD8 cells, the IC50 was 3.59 nM, and the maximum growth inhibition rate was 98.6% at 100 nM. For U-2932 cells, the IC50 was 27.6 nM, and the maximum growth inhibition rate was 30.8% at 100 nM. Tirabrutinib inhibited BTK autophosphorylation at Tyr-223 in both cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 3B), with the IC50 values (23.9 nM for TMD8 and 12.0 nM for U-2932) being comparable to the IC50 for growth inhibition. Thus, proliferation appears to be inhibited by tirabrutinib via inhibition of BTK phosphorylation.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Antiproliferative activity (A) and BTK autophosphorylation inhibitory effects (B) of tirabrutinib. (A) TMD8 or U-2932 cells were treated with vehicle or different concentrations of tirabrutinib and incubated for 72 h at 37°C, 5% CO2/95% air. After culturing, the growth inhibition rate (%) was calculated by measuring a luminescent signal proportional to the amount of intracellular ATP using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay. The growth inhibition rate in the tirabrutinib group is plotted as the mean of 3 or 4 treated cultures from each treatment group ± standard error for TMD8 or U-2932, respectively. (B) TMD8 or U-2932 cells were treated with vehicle or different concentrations of tirabrutinib and incubated for 4 h at 37°C, 5% CO2/95% air. Autophosphorylated BTK (p-BTK) and total BTK (BTK) proteins were detected by western blot analysis. The intensity of each western blot band shown in S1 Fig was determined. The ratio of phosphorylated to total BTK is described as the mean of three cases ± standard error in the bar chart. The symbol -∞ indicates the vehicle group. The curve was estimated by nonlinear regression analysis using a four-parameter logistic model. BTK, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase.

Next, we conducted a phosphoproteomic analysis to investigate phosphoregulation induced by 1-h treatment with tirabrutinib in TMD8 and U-2932 cells, which would result in anti-tumor efficacy. In TMD8 cells, 6,147 distinct phosphoproteins were identified, within which 11,445 distinct phosphorylation sites could be localized to specific serine, threonine, or tyrosine residues with high confidence (P ≥ 0.75) and were thus classified as class I phosphosites. The overall abundances of Ser(P), Thr(P), and Tyr(P) were 84.6%, 14.4%, and 1.0%, respectively. In replicate analyses, 9,497 distinct phosphosites were identified and quantified, representing a large overlap between the 10,460 and 10,482 phosphorylation sites assigned in the individual experiments. In U-2932 cells, more than 5,563 distinct phosphoproteins and 11,493 distinct phosphorylation sites (class I phosphosites) were identified with high confidence (P ≥ 0.75). The overall abundances of Ser(P), Thr(P), and Tyr(P) were 84.6%, 14.8%, and 0.7%, respectively. In replicate analyses, 9,740 distinct phosphosites were identified and quantified, again representing a large overlap between the individual experiments (10,449 and 10,784 sites).

Fig 4 shows the number of upregulated and downregulated phosphorylation sites in TMD8 and U-2932 cells according to the applied ratio threshold criteria. A total of 138 phosphorylation sites, derived from 125 distinct phosphoproteins, were found to be downregulated in TMD8 cells (1.5% of all quantified sites) (S3 Table). The upregulated fraction consisted of 15 sites from 15 phosphoproteins (0.2% of all quantified sites). In U-2932 cells, only 30 phosphorylation sites from 28 distinct phosphoproteins were suppressed (0.3% of all quantified sites) and four phosphorylation sites from four phosphoproteins were induced (0.04% of all quantified sites) (S4 Table). Regarding the downregulated phosphorylation sites, five site-specific phosphorylation events that underwent significant regulation in both cell lines were identified (Table 2). For the upregulated phosphorylation sites, there was no overlap in TMD8 and U-2932.

Fig 4. Number of upregulated or downregulated phosphorylation sites in TMD8 and U-2932 cells.

Fig 4

Table 2. Significantly downregulated phosphosites in both TMD8 and U-2932 cells.

Protein Gene Position Sequence window Tirabrutinib/ctrl. TMD8 rep. 1 Tirabrutinib/ctrl. TMD8 rep. 2 Tirabrutinib/ctrl. U-2932 rep. 1 Tirabrutinib/ctrl. U-2932 rep. 2
Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 3-kinase B ITPKB S43 PRRAVLSPGSVFS 0.41 0.48 0.57 0.58
Golgi vesicular membrane-trafficking protein p18 BET1 S50 TAIKSLSIEIGHE 0.29 0.50 0.57 0.61
Vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B/C VAPB S158 IVSKSLSSSLDDT 0.44 0.54 0.66 0.60
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 MAPK1 Y187 TGFLTEYVATRWY 0.34 0.47 0.23 0.41
Beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 ADRBK1 S685 PLVQRGSANGL_ 0.54 0.38 0.61 0.64

Among the five common significantly downregulated phosphosites, ERK2 activation loop phosphorylation on Tyr-187 was suppressed to comparable levels in both cell lines. The phosphokinase inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate 3-kinase B, which acts as a feedback inhibitor of BCR-induced store-operated Ca2+entry [38], underwent site-specific downregulation on Ser-43, although the significance of this phosphosite is unclear. A GPCR kinase, beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 (GRK2) was also found to be downregulated on Ser-685. This phosphosite is reported to be phosphorylated by messenger-governed kinases, such as PKA and PKC, which is involved in desensitization and attenuation of G protein coupling [39,40]. Ser-50 of Golgi vesicular membrane-trafficking protein p18 and Ser-158 of vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein B/C were downregulated by tirabrutinib, although there are no reports to describe the function of these phosphosites.

Downregulated phosphosites, specifically in the TMD8 cell lines, included kinases, transcription factors, and other proteins, such as AKT substrates (Table 3). Regarding kinases, in addition to ERK1 activation loop phosphorylation on Tyr-204, two sites in the MAPK pathway-associated enzymes Raf-1 and ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (RSK1) were repressed upon tirabrutinib treatment on Ser-1055 and Ser-741, respectively. Although the responsible kinase for C-terminal Ser-741 phosphorylation on RSK1 is not yet known, Raf-1 phosphorylation on Ser-1055 (according to the protein isoform assignment in our database search, identical with Ser-642 in the UniProtKB entry P04049) is known to be directly phosphorylated by ERK kinases [41]. We also detected reproducible inhibition of phosphosites on the related protein kinases PKD2 and PKD3/PKCν, including repression of Ser-710, which is known to lead to catalytic activity of PKD2 and Ser-735, which in turn, is reported to coincide with the kinase activation of PKD3/PKCν [42,43].

Table 3. Significantly downregulated phosphosites in TMD8 cells.

Protein Gene Position Sequence window Tirabrutinib/ctrl. TMD8 rep. 1 Tirabrutinib/ctrl. TMD8 rep. 2 Tirabrutinib/ctrl. U-2932 rep. 1 Tirabrutinib/ctrl. U-2932 rep. 2
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 MAPK3 Y204 TGFLTEYVATRWY 0.26 0.42 - -
Proto-oncogene c-RAF kinase RAF1 S1055 ACTLTTSPRLPVF 0.61 0.61 - -
90 kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (RSK1) RPS6KA1 S741 RVRKLPSTTL_ 0.61 0.59 1.16 0.87
Serine/threonine-protein kinase D2 (PKD2) PRKD2 S214 RLGTSESLPCTAE 0.46 0.48 - -
Serine/threonine-protein kinase D2 (PKD2) PRKD2 S206 SLASGHSVRLGTS 0.32 0.48 0.86 0.83
Serine/threonine-protein kinase D2 (PKD2) PRKD2 S710 EKSFRRSVVGTPA 0.45 0.56 0.90 0.77
PKCν (PKD3) PRKD3 S735 EKSFRRSVVGTPA 0.41 0.43 0.85 0.77
Serine/threonine-protein kinase TAO1 TAOK1 S9 STNRAGSLKDPEI 0.65 0.43 1.06 0.57
Lymphocyte-oriented kinase LOK S13 RRILRLSTFEKRK 0.48 0.60 0.85 0.77
Sugen kinase 223 SGK223 S889 EKAFKGSGHWLPA 0.48 0.47 - -
Serine/threonine-protein kinase QSK SIK3 S808 PLSKQLSADSAEA 0.47 0.55 1.07 0.97
Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 2 RIPK2 S531 VVSRSPSLNLLQN 0.54 0.59 1.03 0.75
Activating transcription factor 2 ATF2 T69 VIVADQTPTPTRF 0.53 0.53 - -
Activating transcription factor 2 ATF2 T71 VADQTPTPTRFLK 0.50 0.53 0.99 0.86
ETS domain-containing protein Elk-1 ELK1 S501 STPVVLSPGPQKP 0.33 0.48 - -
ETS domain-containing transcription factor ERF ERF S327 VYNYHLSPRAFLH 0.59 0.50 - -
ETS translocation variant 3 ETV3 S245 MYPDPHSPFAVSP 0.30 0.28 - -
ETS translocation variant 3 ETV3 S250 HSPFAVSPIPGRG 0.30 0.28 - -
Myb-like protein 2 BMYB T487 QKVVVTTPLHRDK 0.67 0.50 - -
Transcription factor RelB RELB S37 ELGALGSPDLSSL 0.68 0.59 0.93 0.87
Nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 2 NFATC2 S759 QRSKSLSPSLLGY 0.67 0.61 1.14 1.19
Nuclear factor of activated T-cells, cytoplasmic 2 NFATC2 S243 PVPRPASRSSSPG 0.65 0.59 - -
Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7-interacting protein 2 (TAB2) TAB2 S450 GNNSATSPRVVVT 0.61 0.66 1.05 0.98
L-plastin LCP1 S5 _MARGSVSDEEM 0.52 0.52 0.90 0.88
Nuclear cap-binding protein subunit 1 NCBP S22 HKRRKTSDANETE 0.49 0.50 - 1.04
B-cell adapter for phosphoinositide 3-kinase BCAP Y570 ERPGNFYVSSESI 0.51 0.41 - -
Astrocytic phosphoprotein PEA-15 PEA15 S137 DIIRQPSEEEIIK 0.35 0.29 1.18 1.03
Sodium/hydrogen exchanger 1 NHE1 S703 SRARIGSDPLAYE 0.55 0.51 - -
Heat shock 27 kDa protein HSP27 S82 ALSRQLSSGVSEI 0.62 0.60 1.09 0.76
Nuclease-sensitive element-binding protein 1 (YB-1) YBX1 S102 PRKYLRSVGDGET 0.60 0.46 - -
40 kDa proline-rich AKT substrate (PRAS40) AKT1S1 T246 PRPRLNTSDFQKL 0.61 0.51 0.84 0.87

Regarding transcription factors, activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) phosphorylation was reduced by approximately 50% on the adjacent residues Thr-69 and Thr-71, which have been reported to activate transcriptional factor activity of ATF2 [44]. Thr-71 phosphorylation has been reported downstream of the Ras-MEK-ERK pathway [45]. We also detected reduced phosphorylation of Ser-501 of the erythroblast transformation-specific (ETS) domain-containing protein Elk-1 (corresponds to Ser-422 in the UniProtKB entry P19419), a member of the ETS family. This residue is known to be phosphorylated by ERK1 and involves ternary complex formation, which is a prerequisite for manifesting transactivation potential [46]. As for other transcription factors, site-specific downregulation of phosphosites was detected on Myb-like protein 2 (BMYB) (involved in cell cycle progression [47]), transcription factors as diverse as RelB (a member of the nuclear factor-κB [NF-κB] complex in alternative NF-κB pathway [48]), and nuclear factor of activated T-cells cytoplasmic 2 (NFATC2), although the functions of all the regulated phosphosites by tirabrutinib are unknown.

Other proteins with significantly downregulated phosphosites other than kinases and transcriptional factors were also detected. Tirabrutinib-induced suppression of Ser-450 phosphorylation on MAPKK kinase 7-interacting protein 2 (TAB2), an adaptor protein linked to NF-κB control by the serine/threonine kinase MAP3K7 (TAK1) [49], although the significance of this site is unclear. Tyr-570 phosphorylation on the protein B-cell adapter for phosphoinositide 3-kinase (BCAP) was also suppressed by tirabrutinib. BCAP is reported to play a role in connecting B-cell antigen receptor signaling to phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation through tyrosine phosphorylation [50]. In addition, we identified five distinct AKT substrate proteins, which were all downregulated by tirabrutinib: phosphoprotein enriched in astrocytes 15 (PEA-15), sodium-hydrogen exchanger 1, heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27), nuclease-sensitive element-binding protein 1 (YB-1), and 40-kDa proline-rich AKT substrate (PRAS40). All the identified downregulated phosphosites are reported to be phosphorylated by AKT, while the contribution of AKT is questionable for Ser-703 in sodium-hydrogen exchanger 1 [5156].

To examine the difference between TMD8 and U2932 in the regulation of BTK downstream signaling by tirabrutinib, PLCγ2, a reported BTK substrate, and other reported or novel direct/indirect downstream effectors in the phosphoproteomic data were sorted (S5 Table) and analyzed. Significant suppression was not observed in all the phosphosites of PLCγ2 in either cell line in the phosphoproteomic analysis. In western blot analysis, phosphorylation of PLCγ2 at Tyr-759, which is reported to be phosphorylated by BTK and correlates with the lipase activity of PLCγ2 [57], was inhibited after 1 h of treatment with tirabrutinib at a similar concentration range as that required for the suppression of BTK autophosphorylation in both cell lines (S2 Fig). ERK and AKT signaling immunoblot data were consistent with phosphoproteomic data in both TMD8 and U-2932 cells (S2 and S3 Figs). Regarding NF-κB signaling, all the phosphorylated sites in the related effectors, including IKKβ and p65, were not downregulated by tirabrutinib in either cell line in the phosphoproteomic analysis. In western blot analysis, however, p-IκBα at S32/36, which is critical for the activation of NF-κB signaling [58], was inhibited after treatment with tirabrutinib for 4 h in both cell lines (S3 Fig).

In vivo efficacy of tirabrutinib and comprehensive analysis of downstream signaling by microarray in TMD8

In the TMD8 subcutaneous xenograft transplantation model, tirabrutinib showed a dose-dependent anti-tumor effect. Three tirabrutinib doses (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg BID) were evaluated for anti-tumor effect, and dose-dependent inhibition was observed (Fig 5A). After repeated administration of the same three doses of tirabrutinib, inhibition of BTK phosphorylation in tumors was evaluated 1 h after the last dose, indicating a dose-dependent reduction in BTK phosphorylation (Fig 5B). Taken together, these results indicate that in this model, tirabrutinib exerted anti-tumor effects in response to BTK inhibition.

Fig 5. In vivo analyses using mouse xenograft models.

Fig 5

(A) Anti-tumor effect of tirabrutinib in a mouse xenograft model. (B) Effect of tirabrutinib on BTK phosphorylation in the mouse xenograft model. A TMD8 cell suspension (0.1 mL, 1 × 108 cells/mL) was subcutaneously implanted in SCID mice under pentobarbital anesthesia. Animals were randomized into groups based on tumor volume calculated from the measurement of tumor diameter on the day after implantation. Tirabrutinib or 0.5% methyl cellulose was orally administered twice daily for 21 days, starting on day 0 (the group assignment day). Tumor diameter was measured, and tumor volume was calculated every 3 or 4 days after group assignment. (A) Tumor volume in the figure is expressed as the mean ± standard error in the 10 animals in each group on each measurement day. Dunnett test was used to compare tumor volume in the vehicle- and tirabrutinib-treated groups. A P-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001. Results of linear regression analysis in the tirabrutinib-treated group on day 21: The P-value of the slope was 0.0001. (B) Tumors were collected 1 h after the final administration. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of BTK phosphorylation in each tumor cell with or without stimulation with H2O2 was determined. The difference in MFI between the H2O2-stimulated and unstimulated samples was expressed as the mean ± standard error in 4–8 animals in each group. The BTK phosphorylation inhibition rate (%) in the tirabrutinib-treated groups versus the vehicle group was calculated. BID, twice daily; BTK, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase; MFI, mean fluorescent intensity.

To analyze the mechanism of the anti-tumor effect of tirabrutinib in this model, gene expression in the tumor was comprehensively analyzed by microarray after repeated administration of tirabrutinib at 3 or 10 mg/kg BID for 21 days. Differentially expressed gene analysis between vehicle and tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg groups showed that 575 probes were downregulated, while 549 probes were upregulated by tirabrutinib treatment (fold change >2 or <0.5, P < 0.01) (S6 Table). Among the probes that had the highest altered expression (threshold is shown in Fig 6A), dose-dependent expression change was observed in tirabrutinib 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg groups (Fig 6B) consistent with tumor response (Fig 5A). C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), which is relevant to lymphoma cell survival [59], was significantly downregulated in the tirabrutinib treatment group (fold change 0.068739, P-value = 8.62E-12), whereas arachidonic acid 5-lipoxygenase (ALOX5, fold change 9.19, P-value = 6.94E-14) was upregulated, which suggests BCR signal suppression [60].

Fig 6. Global gene expression analysis of response to tirabrutinib treatment in a TMD-8 xenograft model.

Fig 6

Microarray analysis was conducted in the TMD8 xenograft model after 21 days of tirabrutinib administration. (A) Volcano plot for differential gene expression between the vehicle and tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg group with Welch’s t test. (B) Heat map of top altered gene group including 59 upregulated probes and 87 downregulated probes (fold change, >4 or <0.25; P < 0.00001) in the vehicle, tirabrutinib 3 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg groups. (C) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) plots involved in IRF4, MYC, and mTORC1 signaling in the tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg group versus vehicle group.

GSEA was performed to understand molecular mechanisms underlying anti-tumor activity of tirabrutinib in TMD8 tumor (S7 Table). Tirabrutinib treatment decreased expression of IRF4 (fold change, 0.8; P = 0.016), which is a transcription factor acting downstream of the BCR and NF-κB pathway and the master regulator of B cell differentiation, and genes regulated by IRF4 (Figs 6C, S4 and S5), while BCL6, which is a key transcriptional repressor for germinal center (GC) B cell and downregulated by IRF4 activation during the course of B cell development, showed increased expression after BTK inhibition (fold change, 1.2; P = 0.005) (S6 Table). In addition, it is also suggested that the suppression of MYC and mTORC1 signature contributed to the tumor growth inhibition (Fig 6C). To confirm the results by microarray analysis, the changes in mRNA and protein expression levels of IRF4, MYC, and BCL6 after treatment with tirabrutinib for 24 h in TMD8 cells were evaluated by RT-PCR and western blotting. As a result, IRF4 and MYC genes were downregulated by tirabrutinib, whereas the BCL6 gene was upregulated (S6 Fig), which were consistent with the results from microarray. In addition, the downregulation of IRF4 and MYC protein expression by tirabrutinib was observed, although BCL6 protein expression was not changed.

Discussion

All the second-generation BTK inhibitors, including tirabrutinib, were reported to be more selective against BTK compared with the first generation BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib [14,61]. The binding of zanubrutinib to BTK is different from that of ibrutinib to BTK, which contributes to its superior selectivity [14]. The binding mode of tirabrutinib and acalabrutinib with BTK is similar to that of ibrutinib, but the structures of the inhibitory component are different. Butylamide electrophiles are less reactive than acrylamide, and the higher nucleophilicity of Cys-481 in BTK may explain the superior selectivity over ibrutinib [13].

Previous research has demonstrated that BCR signaling is chronically active in ABC-DLBCL [20] and that BTK inhibitors are highly effective against ABC-DLBCL malignancies [20,62]. However, comprehensive analysis by both phosphoproteomics and transcriptomics in ABC-DLBCL cell lines to elucidate the anti-tumor mechanism of BTK inhibitors has not been reported previously. Therefore, we examined the mechanism of tirabrutinib in ABC-DLBCL by combining phosphoproteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Before the analysis, we checked off-target kinases inhibited by tirabrutinib using both biochemical and cellular methods in order to understand the possibility of unexpected anti-tumor mechanisms based on the off-target effects of tirabrutinib.

A comprehensive evaluation of kinase-binding inhibitory activity assay demonstrated that only four off-target kinases, namely TEC, BMX, HUNK, and RIPK2, were inhibited by tirabrutinib, while there are no significant reports to indicate the involvement of these four kinases in anti-tumor effects in hematological malignancies. Next, for further investigation, we evaluated the IC50 values of tirabrutinib against the selected 13 kinases, including FYN, LCK, and LYNa, which are kinases analogous to BTK; nine tyrosine kinases, including EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB4, ITK, and JAK3, that are similar to BTK in that they have a cysteine residue in the active site; and CSK, which is reported to be inhibited by ibrutinib [37]. Among the 13 kinases examined, there were no kinases that were strongly inhibited by tirabrutinib, except for TEC and BMX.

In addition, our data clearly showed that tirabrutinib did not inhibit T-cell activation or function in the cellular system, and this was consistent with data indicating that tirabrutinib does not inhibit any kinases involved in T-cell function, including ITK, JAK3, or LCK. These data suggest that tirabrutinib is a highly potent and selective BTK inhibitor.

In this analysis, tirabrutinib exerted anti-tumor effects on two ABC-DLBCL cell lines, TMD8 and U-2932, when grown in vitro or as a murine xenograft in vivo. The growth inhibition of the tumor cells was related to dose-dependent BTK inhibition by tirabrutinib. Unlike TMD8, the maximum growth inhibitory effect of tirabrutinib was limited in U-2932 cells. This finding was not unexpected as it has been reported that the growth inhibitory effect of BTK knockdown by shRNA is limited [20].

In vitro comprehensive phosphoproteomic and immunoblotting analyses performed to analyze the mechanism of the anti-tumor effect on ABC-DLBCL suggested that tirabrutinib exerts its effect in both TMD8 and U-2932 cells by downregulating the phosphorylation signal of ERK and NF-κB signaling, which have been reported as downstream signals of BTK [63,64]. Particularly in TMD8 cells, in addition to ERK1/2, downregulated phosphosites through ERK kinases were identified in Elk1and ATF2. Elk1 is reported to have roles in cancer development, including cell proliferation, the cell cycle, apoptosis, and tumorigenesis, although its role in DLBCL remains unclear [65]. ATF2, a member of the AP-1 family, could have an important role in ABC-DLBCL as it has been reported that knockdown of ATF2 by shRNA significantly reduced the survival of an ABC-DLBCL cell line [66]. In addition to ERK and NF-κB phosphorylation signals, downregulation of AKT signals was also indicated only in TMD8 based on the decrease of phosphosites of four distinct AKT substrates (PEA-15, Hsp27, YB-1 and PRAS40) and inhibition of p-AKT at Ser-473 in the immunoblotting analysis. The modification in PEA-15 at Ser-137, which is identical to Ser-116 in the UniProtKB entry Q15121, is known to stabilize the anti-apoptotic action of PEA-15 [51]. Ser-82 phosphorylation of Hsp27 has been reported to control the anti-apoptotic activity of the heat shock protein [52]. It has been reported that YB-1 could promote the proliferation of DLBCL cells by accelerating the G1/S transition, and expression of phospho-YB-1 (Ser-102) is one of independent predictors of overall survival in DLBCL patients [67]. PRAS40 plays a role in phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT survival signaling, and Thr-246 phosphorylation has been shown to regulate the functional activity of this protein [68]. AKT signaling-related regulation was also suggested by downregulation of Tyr-570 in BCAP, an adaptor protein connecting B-cell antigen receptor signaling to phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation through tyrosine phosphorylation. Since the tyrosine phosphorylation of BCAP is reported to be mediated by Syk and BTK upon BCR activation [50], the observed downregulation of Tyr-570 in BCAP by tirabrutinib is reasonable as a consequence of BTK inhibition by tirabrutinib. Collectively, inhibition of ERK, AKT, and NF-κB signaling followed by BTK inhibition could contribute as important mechanisms of the anti-tumor effects exerted by tirabrutinib in TMD8. In U-2932 cells, inhibition of both p-ERK and NF-κB signaling was indicated, and the concentration at which tirabrutinib inhibited p-ERK was consistent with that for inhibition of p-BTK and IC50 for growth inhibition, indicating that ERK signaling, as a BTK downstream signal, is involved in cell growth. In contrast to TMD8, however, phosphoproteomic and immunoblotting analyses did not indicate inhibition of AKT signaling by tirabrutinib in U-2932 (S2B Fig). This may be one of the reasons for the limited anti-tumor effect of tirabrutinib in U-2932, and this finding was consistent with that of a previous study, which demonstrated that the contribution of AKT signaling to survival in U-2932 causes the low sensitivity to BTK inhibitors [69]. The observed significant suppression of PKD2 and PKD3/PKCν by tirabrutinib are other potential phosphoregulations, which may be involved in the anti-tumor effects in TMD8. Given the previous report demonstrating that BCR-induced activation of PKCν is abrogated in a BTK-deficient B cell line, the observed phosphoregulation would be reasonable [70]. Since the role of both PKD2 and PKD3/PKCν in the pathology of DLBCL is unclear, further investigation is needed to clarify whether the observed regulations contribute to the anti-tumor efficacy of tirabrutinib in TMD8.

In vivo transcriptome analysis using microarray revealed that tirabrutinib downregulated IRF4, MYC, and mTORC1 pathway-related genes in TMD8 (Fig 6C). It is reported that NF-κB signaling is constitutively activated, followed by chronic active BCR signaling in ABC-DLBCL cell lines [20]. NF-κB activates the IRF4 transcription factor through BCR, CD40, and TLR signaling pathways and plays a critical role in B-cell differentiation and the pathogenesis of DLBCL [71]. Downregulation of IRF4 expression by shRNA and lenalidomide selectively killed non-GCB-DLBCL and showed a synergistic effect in combination with ibrutinib [72,73], which indicates that IRF4 is a key regulator in ABC-DLBCL survival. It is also known that there is a positive feedback loop between IRF4 and MYC in B-cell malignancies, which contributes to cell proliferation and survival [74,75]. IRF4 activation leads to BCL6 suppression through the induction of plasma cell differentiation factor BLIMP1 (encoded by PRDM1), which results in MYC overexpression [76]. In accordance with these reports, tirabrutinib treatment repressed PRDM1 and induced BCL6 expression in the TMD8 xenograft model (S6 Table). Retrospective clinical studies suggest that ABC-DLBCL patients with MCD genetic subtype (MYD88 and CD79B mutation) showed higher expression of IRF4 and MYC signature, and strong sensitivity to BTK inhibitor with R-CHOP [77,78]. To examine the signaling pathways that regulate gene expression of IRF4 and MYC in TMD8, an IKK inhibitor (BMS-345541), MEK inhibitor (refametinib), and AKT inhibitor (MK-2206) were tested in addition to tirabrutinib. Of these inhibitors, only BMS-345541 and tirabrutinib strongly inhibited IRF4 expression (S7 Fig), suggesting that tirabrutinib inhibits IRF4 expression through NF-κB signaling. As for MYC expression, in addition to strong inhibition by BMS-345541, refametinib and tirabrutinib partially downregulated MYC, suggesting that tirabrutinib downregulated this gene through not only NF-κB but also ERK signaling. Collectively, BTK inhibition by tirabrutinib led to the suppression of NF-κB and ERK signaling, followed by downregulation of IRF4- and MYC-targeted genes, resulting in anti-tumor activity in TMD8. Another interesting finding is that the expression of CXCL10, reported to be highly expressed in lymphoma patients [59], was decreased, while the expression of ALOX5 was increased; this enzyme is suppressed by BCR signaling and has previously been reported to be increased in TMD8 cells by knockdown of CD79B and by ibrutinib [60].

We also observed some correlations between the results of the phosphoproteomic and transcriptomic analyses of signaling pathways regulated by tirabrutinib in TMD8. For example, tirabrutinib significantly decreased the phosphorylation of ATF2 (Thr-71), which is phosphorylated by ERK, leading to transcriptional activation. ATF2 is reported to control ATF3 expression, which is an important element controlling the growth of ABC-DLBCL [66]. In the transcriptomic analysis, the expression of ATF3 was significantly suppressed by tirabrutinib (fold change, 0.36; P < 0.001). In addition, the observed downregulation at Thr-246 of PRAS40 by tirabrutinib in the phosphoproteomic analysis suggests the suppression of mTORC1 signaling [79], which is consistent with the downregulation of mTORC1 pathway-related genes by tirabrutinib in the transcriptomic analysis.

Conclusion

In summary, the highly selective BTK inhibitor tirabrutinib exerted an anti-tumor effect via the regulation of multiple BTK downstream signaling proteins, such as NF-κB, AKT, and ERK, in ABC-DLBCL cell lines.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Immunoblots of lysates to evaluate BTK autophosphorylation inhibitory effects of tirabrutinib in the TMD8 and U-2932 cell lines.

(A) TMD8 and (B) U-2932 cells were treated with vehicle or different concentrations of tirabrutinib and incubated for 4 h at 37°C (5% CO2/95% air). Autophosphorylated BTK (p-BTK) (upper) and total BTK (BTK) (lower) proteins were detected by western blot analysis. TMD8 cells were unstimulated (‒) or stimulated using H2O2 and used as a marker for the detection of p-BTK and BTK.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Immunoblots for p-BTK, BTK, p-PLCγ2, PLCγ2, p-ERK1/2, ERK1/2, and GAPDH in lysates of TMD8 and U-2932 cells treated with or without tirabrutinib (0–300 nM).

(A) TMD8 cells or (B) U-2932 cells were treated with tirabrutinib (10, 30, 100, or 300 nM) or DMSO and incubated for 1 and/or 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. Autophosphorylated BTK (p-BTK, Tyr-223), total BTK (BTK), phosphorylated PLCγ2 (p-PLCγ2, Tyr-759), total PLCγ2 (PLCγ2), phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK, Thr-202/204), total ERK1/2, and GAPDH proteins were detected by western blot analysis. TMD8 cells were stimulated using H2O2 and used as a marker for the detection of p-BTK, p-PLCγ2, and p-ERK.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Immunoblots of p-AKT, AKT, p-IκBα, IκBα, and GAPDH in lysates of TMD8 and U-2932 cells treated with or without tirabrutinib (1 μM).

U-2932 cells and TMD8 were treated with tirabrutinib (1 μM) or DMSO and incubated for 1 or 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. (A) Phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT, Ser-473) and total AKT (AKT) proteins were detected by western blot analysis. (B) Phosphorylated IκBα (p-IκBα, Ser-32/36), total IκBα (IκBα), and GAPDH proteins were detected by western blot analysis.

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Heat map of differentially expressed genes in gene set enrichment analysis.

Heat map of four significantly enriched gene sets between vehicle group (N = 8) and tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg group (N = 9). (A) Shaffer_IRF4_targets_in_activated_B_lymphocyte, (B) Shaffer_IRF4_targets_in_plasma_cell_vs_mature_B_lymphocye, (C) YU_MYC_targets_up, (D) Hallmark_MTORC1_signaling.

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Core enrichment genes of gene set enrichment analysis for interferon regulatory factor target genes in the two gene sets.

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Gene and protein expression in TMD8 cells treated with or without tirabrutinib.

TMD8 were treated with tirabrutinib (1 μM) or DMSO and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. (A) RNA was isolated and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed. All PCRs were performed in triplicate, and the mRNA expression of GAPDH was used as an internal control. The t test was used to compare mRNA expression in the DMSO- and tirabrutinib-treated groups. A P-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001. (B) IRF4, BCL6, MYC, and GAPDH proteins were detected by western blot analysis.

(PDF)

S7 Fig. Gene expression detected by RT-PCR in TMD8 cells treated with or without various selective inhibitors.

TMD8 were treated with tirabrutinib (1 μM), BMS-345541 (10 μM), MK-2206 (1 μM), refametinib (0.1 μM) or DMSO and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. RNA was isolated and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed. All PCRs were performed in triplicate, and the mRNA expression of GAPDH was used as an internal control. The Dunnett test was used to compare mRNA expression in the DMSO- and compound-treated groups. A P-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. *: P < 0.05, ***: P < 0.001. n.s.: Not significant.

(PDF)

S1 Table. The 12 in vitro systems of the BioMAP Diversity PLUS panel (Eurofins DiscoverX Products, LLC).

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Complete KINOMEscan dataset.

The data represent percent control (%CTRL) as the percent of each kinase that remains bound to the immobilized ligand. Therefore, a value of 0% control equals 100% blocking of kinase-ligand binding, while a value of 100% equals no binding of each compound to the target kinase.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated TMD8 cells.

For all confidently localized phosphorylation sites (localization probability ≥0.75%), SILAC ratios of individual replicate experiments are reported. Class 1 site ratios that were reproducibly identified are indicated and further marked as regulated in case of consistent up- or downregulation. The tirabrutinib/control phosphosite ratios from Experiment 2 correspond to the normalized and inverted H/L ratio due to the introduced label switch compared to Experiment 1.

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated U-2932 cells.

For all confidently localized phosphorylation sites (localization probability ≥0.75%), SILAC ratios of individual replicate experiments are reported. Class 1 site ratios that were reproducibly identified are indicated and further marked as regulated in case of consistent up- or downregulation. The tirabrutinib/control phosphosite ratios from Experiment 2 correspond to the normalized and inverted H/L ratio due to the introduced label switch compared to Experiment 1.

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Sorted phosphosites of BTK-related effectors in both TMD8 and U-2932 cells.

Phosphosites of BTK-related effectors in both TMD8 and U-2932 cells were sorted from S3 Table and S4 Table and the responsible kinase and/or function of each phosphorylation site are described.

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Comprehensive gene expression analysis using microarray in TMD8 xenograft model.

The microarray data were normalized to the 75th percentile signal intensity as recommended by Agilent. Welch’s t-test of log-converted expression values was performed to find significant differentially expressed genes between the tirabrutinib and vehicle groups. Fold changes, nominal P-values and q-values of the differentially expressed genes are shown. Benjamini-Hochberg method was used as the correction method for the q-value. Geometric means of expression values for the tirabrutinib and vehicle groups are also shown.

(XLSX)

S7 Table. Gene set enrichment analysis between tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg and vehicle in TMD8 xenograft model.

Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified 710 and 2216 significantly enriched gene sets in the vehicle group and tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg group, respectively, with P < 0.05 and FDR q < 0.25.

(XLSX)

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

S2 Raw images

(PDF)

S3 Raw images

(PDF)

S4 Raw images

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Sally-Anne Mitchell, PhD, of Edanz, Japan, for providing medical writing support through EMC K.K., Japan, in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP 2022) guidelines (https://www.ismpp.org/gpp-2022).

Data Availability

There are no ethical nor legal restrictions on sharing data. We have included the minimal anonymized dataset in Supporting Information as listed below: S2 Table. Complete KINOMEscan dataset. S3 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated TMD8 cells. S4 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated U-2932 cells. In addition, the microarray data are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; GSE 210284). The other datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding Statement

Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (https://www.ono-pharma.com/) funded the study and medical writing support. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for all authors and was involved in the decision to publish the manuscript, but was not involved in study design, data collection and analysis, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Tambaro FP, De Novellis D, Wierda WG. The role of BTK inhibition in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A clinical view. J Exp Pharmacol. 2021;13:923–35. doi: 10.2147/JEP.S265284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dunleavy K, Erdmann T, Lenz G. Targeting the B-cell receptor pathway in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;65:41–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Merolle MI, Ahmed M, Nomie K, Wang ML. The B cell receptor signaling pathway in mantle cell lymphoma. Oncotarget. 2018;9:25332–41. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.25011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Valla K, Flowers CR, Koff JL. Targeting the B cell receptor pathway in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018;27:513–22. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2018.1482273 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McDonald C, Xanthopoulos C, Kostareli E. The role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in the immune system and disease. Immunology. 2021;164:722–36. doi: 10.1111/imm.13416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ahn IE, Brown JR. Targeting Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in CLL. Front Immunol. 2021;12:687458. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.687458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Seiler T, Dreyling M. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitors in B-cell lymphoma: current experience and future perspectives. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017;26:909–15. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2017.1349097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cameron F, Sanford M. Ibrutinib: First global approval. Drugs. 2014;74:263–71. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0178-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.IMBRUVICA Highlights of Prescribing Information. [Cited 2022 February 15]. Available from: https://www.imbruvica.com/files/prescribing-information.pdf.
  • 10.de Weerdt I, Koopmans SM, Kater AP, van Gelder M. Incidence and management of toxicity associated with ibrutinib and idelalisib: A practical approach. Haematologica. 2017;102:1629–39. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.164103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sedlarikova L, Petrackova A, Papajik T, Turcsanyi P, Kriegova E. Resistance-associated mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with novel agents. Front Oncol. 2020;10:894. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hershkovitz-Rokah O, Pulver D, Lenz G, Shpilberg O. Ibrutinib resistance in mantle cell lymphoma: clinical, molecular and treatment aspects. Br J Haematol. 2018;181:306–19. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barf T, Covey T, Izumi R, van de Kar B, Gulrajani M, van Lith B, et al. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196): A covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a differentiated selectivity and in vivo potency profile. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017;363:240–52. doi: 10.1124/jpet.117.242909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guo Y, Liu Y, Hu N, Yu D, Zhou C, Shi G, et al. Discovery of zanubrutinib (BGB-3111), a novel, potent, and selective covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase. J Med Chem. 2019;62:7923–40. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shaw ML. Second-generation BTK inhibitors hit the treatment bullseye with fewer off-target effects. Am J Manag Care. 2020;26:SP226–7. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.88475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rogers KA, Thompson PA, Allan JN, Coleman M, Sharman JP, Cheson BD, et al. Phase II study of acalabrutinib in ibrutinib-intolerant patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica. 2021;106:2364–73. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.272500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Byrd JC, Hillmen P, Ghia P, Kater AP, Chanan-Khan A, Furman RR, et al. Acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Results of the first randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:3441–52. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hillmen P, Eichhorst B, Brown JR, Lamanna N, O’Brien S, Tam CS, et al. First interim analysis of ALPINE study: Results of a phase 3 randomized study of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Presented at: 2021. European Hematology Association Congress; June 9–17, 2021; Virtual. Abstract LB1900. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Munakata W, Tobinai K. Tirabrutinib hydrochloride for B-cell lymphomas. Drugs Today (Barc). 2021;57:277–89. doi: 10.1358/dot.2021.57.4.3264113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Davis RE, Ngo VN, Lenz G, Tolar P, Young RM, Romesser PB, et al. Chronic active B-cell-receptor signalling in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature. 2010;463:88–92. doi: 10.1038/nature08638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Spriano F, Tarantelli C, Gaudio E, Gerlach MM, Priebe V, Cascione L, et al. Single and combined BTK and PI3Kδ inhibition with acalabrutinib and ACP-319 in pre-clinical models of aggressive lymphomas. Br J Haematol. 2019;187:595–601. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mashima T, Ushijima M, Matsuura M, Tsukahara S, Kunimasa K, Furuno A, et al. Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis of molecularly targeted drugs in cancer for target pathway evaluation. Cancer Sci. 2015;106:909–20. doi: 10.1111/cas.12682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kong D, Dan S, Yamazaki K, Yamori T. Inhibition profiles of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors against PI3K superfamily and human cancer cell line panel JFCR39. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1111–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tohda S, Sato T, Kogoshi H, Fu L, Sakano S, Nara N. Establishment of a novel B-cell lymphoma cell line with suppressed growth by gamma-secretase inhibitors. Leuk Res. 2006;30:1385–90. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2006.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Amini RM, Berglund M, Rosenquist R, Von Heideman A, Lagercrantz S, Thunberg U, et al. A novel B-cell line (U-2932) established from a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma following Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2002;43:2179–89. doi: 10.1080/1042819021000032917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Karaman MW, Herrgard S, Treiber DK, Gallant P, Atteridge CE, Campbell BT, et al. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:127–32. doi: 10.1038/nbt1358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kitagawa D, Yokota K, Gouda M, Narumi Y, Ohmoto H, Nishiwaki E, et al. Activity-based kinase profiling of approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Genes Cells. 2013;18:110–22. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thermo Fisher Scientific. SelectScreenTM Biochemical Kinase Profiling—Z’-LYTETM Screening Protocol and Assay Conditions (2017) Available from: https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/brochures/20101112_SSBK_Customer_Protocol_and_Assay_Conditions.pdff.pdf.
  • 29.Thermo Fisher Scientific. SelectScreenTM Biochemical Kinase Profiling—LanthaScreenTM Eu Kinase Binding Assay Screening Protocol and Assay Conditions (2017) Available from: http://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/brochures/June2010_SSBK_binding_assay_Customer_Protocol_and_Assay_Conditions.pdf.
  • 30.Berg EL, Yang J, Polokoff MA. Building predictive models for mechanism-of-action classification from phenotypic assay data sets. J Biomol Screen. 2013;18:1260–9. doi: 10.1177/1087057113505324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sadeghi L, Arvidsson G, Merrien M, Wasik AM, Görgens A, Smith CIE, et al. Differential B-cell receptor signaling requirement for adhesion of mantle cell lymphoma cells to stromal cells. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:1143. doi: 10.3390/cancers12051143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weber C, Schreiber TB, Daub H. Dual phosphoproteomics and chemical proteomics analysis of erlotinib and gefitinib interference in acute myeloid leukemia cells. J Proteomics. 2012;75:1343–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.11.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, Macek B, Kumar C, Mortensen P, et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell. 2006;127:635–48. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15545–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015;1:417–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Tamayo P, Mesirov JP. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:1739–40. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Xiao L, Salem JE, Clauss S, Hanley A, Bapat A, Hulsmans M, et al. Ibrutinib-mediated atrial fibrillation attributable to inhibition of C-terminal Src kinase. Circulation. 2020;142:2443–55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.049210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sauer K, Cooke MP. Regulation of immune cell development through soluble inositol-1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10:257–71. doi: 10.1038/nri2745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cong M, Perry SJ, Lin FT, Fraser ID, Hu LA, Chen W, et al. Regulation of membrane targeting of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 by protein kinase A and its anchoring protein AKAP79. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:15192–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009130200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Murga C, Arcones AC, Cruces-Sande M, Briones AM, Salaices M, Mayor F Jr. G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) as a potential therapeutic target in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:112. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dougherty MK, Muller J, Ritt DA, Zhou M, Zhou XZ, Copeland,TD, et al. Regulation of Raf-1 by direct feedback phosphorylation. Mol Cell 2005;17:215–24. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.von Blume J, Knippschild U, Dequiedt F, Giamas G, Beck A, Auer A, et al. Phosphorylation at Ser244 by CK1 determines nuclear localization and substrate targeting of PKD2. EMBO J. 2007;26:4619–33. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rey O, Yuan J, Young SH, Rozengurt E. Protein kinase C nu/protein kinase D3 nuclear localization, catalytic activation, and intracellular redistribution in response to G protein-coupled receptor agonists. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:23773–85. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300226200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Livingstone C, Patel G, Jones N. ATF-2 contains a phosphorylation-dependent transcriptional activation domain. EMBO J. 1995;14:1785–97. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07167.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ouwens DM, de Ruiter ND, van der Zon GC, Carter AP, Schouten J, van der Burgt C, et al. Growth factors can activate ATF2 via a two-step mechanism: phosphorylation of Thr71 through the Ras-MEK-ERK pathway and of Thr69 through RalGDS-Src-p38. EMBO J. 2002;21:3782–3793. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gille H, Kortenjann M, Thomae O, Moomaw C, Slaughter C, Cobb MH, et al. ERK phosphorylation potentiates Elk-1-mediated ternary complex formation and transactivation. EMBO J. 1995;14:951–62. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07076.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tarasov KV, Tarasova YS, Tam WL, Riordon DR, Elliott ST, Kania G, et al. B-MYB is essential for normal cell cycle progression and chromosomal stability of embryonic stem cells. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Baud V, Collares D. Post-translational modifications of RelB NF-κB subunit and associated functions. Cells. 2016;5:22. doi: 10.3390/cells5020022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hirata Y, Takahashi M, Morishita T, Noguchi T, Matsuzawa A. Post-translational modifications of the TAK1-TAB complex. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:205. doi: 10.3390/ijms18010205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Okada T, Maeda A, Iwamatsu A, Gotoh K, Kurosaki T. BCAP: the tyrosine kinase substrate that connects B cell receptor to phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation. Immunity. 2000;13:817–27. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)00079-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Trencia A, Perfetti A, Cassese A, Vigliotta G, Miele C, Oriente F, et al. Protein kinase B/Akt binds and phosphorylates PED/PEA-15, stabilizing its antiapoptotic action. Mol Cell Biol. 2003. 23:4511–21. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.13.4511-4521.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rane MJ, Pan Y, Singh S, Powell DW, Wu R, Cummins T, et al. Heat shock protein 27 controls apoptosis by regulating Akt activation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:27828–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303417200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sutherland BW, Kucab J, Wu J, Lee C, Cheang MC, Yorida E, et al. Akt phosphorylates the Y-box binding protein 1 at Ser102 located in the cold shock domain and affects the anchorage-independent growth of breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005;24:4281–92. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208590 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Havel JJ, Li Z, Cheng D, Peng J, Fu H. Nuclear PRAS40 couples the Akt/mTORC1 signaling axis to the RPL11-HDM2-p53 nucleolar stress response pathway. Oncogene. 2015;34:1487–98. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Takahashi E, Abe J, Gallis B, Aebersold R, Spring DJ, Krebs EG, et al. p90(RSK) is a serum-stimulated Na+/H+ exchanger isoform-1 kinase. Regulatory phosphorylation of serine 703 of Na+/H+ exchanger isoform-1. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:20206–214. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.29.20206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Snabaitis AK, Cuello F, Avkiran M. Protein kinase B/Akt phosphorylates and inhibits the cardiac Na+/H+ exchanger NHE1. Circ Res. 2008;103:881–90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.175877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kim YJ, Sekiya F, Poulin B, Bae YS, Rhee SG. Mechanism of B-cell receptor-induced phosphorylation and activation of phospholipase C-gamma2. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:9986–99. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.22.9986-9999.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Prescott JA, Mitchell JP, Cook SJ. Inhibitory feedback control of NF-κB signalling in health and disease. Biochem J. 2021;478:2619–2664. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zhou L, Ding L, Gong Y, Zhao J, Xin G, Zhou R, et al. Identification of hub genes associated with the pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtype one characterized by host response via integrated bioinformatic analyses. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10269. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Schmitt A, Xu W, Bucher P, Grimm M, Konantz M, Horn H, et al. Dimethyl fumarate induces ferroptosis and impairs NF-κB/STAT3 signaling in DLBCL. Blood. 2021;138:871–84. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020009404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Liclican A, Serafini L, Xing W, Czerwieniec G, Steiner B, Wang T, et al. Biochemical characterization of tirabrutinib and other irreversible inhibitors of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase reveals differences in on—and off—target inhibition. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2020;1864:129531. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2020.129531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wilson WH, Young RM, Schmitz R, Yang Y, Pittaluga S, Wright G, et al. Targeting B cell receptor signaling with ibrutinib in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Nat Med. 2015;21:922–6. doi: 10.1038/nm.3884 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jiang A, Craxton A, Kurosaki T, Clark EA. Different protein tyrosine kinases are required for B cell antigen receptor-mediated activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase 1, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Exp Med. 1998;188:1297–306. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.7.1297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cheng S, Ma J, Guo A, Lu P, Leonard JP, Coleman M, et al. BTK inhibition targets in vivo CLL proliferation through its effects on B-cell receptor signaling activity. Leukemia. 2014;28:649–57. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kawahara T, Shareef HK, Aljarah AK, Ide H, Li Y, Kashiwagi E, et al. ELK1 is up-regulated by androgen in bladder cancer cells and promotes tumor progression. Oncotarget. 2015;6:29860–29876. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Juilland M, Gonzalez M, Erdmann T, Banz Y, Jevnikar Z, Hailfinger S, et al. CARMA1- and MyD88-dependent activation of Jun/ATF-type AP-1 complexes is a hallmark of ABC diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Blood. 2016;127:1780–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-655647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Miao X, Wu Y, Wang Y, Zhu X, Yin H, He Y, et al. Y-box-binding protein-1 (YB-1) promotes cell proliferation, adhesion and drug resistance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Exp Cell Res. 2016;346:157–66. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wang L, Harris TE, Lawrence JC Jr. Regulation of proline-rich Akt substrate of 40 kDa (PRAS40) function by mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1)-mediated phosphorylation. J Biol Chem; 2008:283;15619–27. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M800723200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Paul J, Soujon M, Wengner AM, Zitzmann-Kolbe S, Sturz A, Haike K, et al. Simultaneous inhibition of PI3Kδ and PI3Kα induces ABC-DLBCL regression by blocking BCR-dependent and -independent activation of NF-κB and AKT. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:64–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Matthews SA, Dayalu R, Thompson LJ, Scharenberg AM. Regulation of protein kinase Cnu by the B-cell antigen receptor. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:9086–91. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211295200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.De Silva NS, Simonetti G, Heise N, Klein U. The diverse roles of IRF4 in late germinal center B-cell differentiation. Immunol Rev. 2012;247:73–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01113.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Deeb G, Zinzani PL, Pileri SA, Malik F, Macon WR, et al. Higher response to lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in nongerminal center B-cell-like than in germinal center B-cell-like phenotype. Cancer. 2011;117:5058–66. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yang Y, Shaffer AL 3rd, Emre NC, Ceribelli M, Zhang M, Wright G, et al. Exploiting synthetic lethality for the therapy of ABC diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:723–37. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lopez-Girona A, Heintel D, Zhang LH, Mendy D, Gaidarova S, Brady H, et al. Lenalidomide downregulates the cell survival factor, interferon regulatory factor-4, providing a potential mechanistic link for predicting response. Br J Haematol. 2011;154:325–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08689.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Gopalakrishnan R, Matta H, Tolani B, Triche T Jr, Chaudhary PM. Immunomodulatory drugs target IKZF1-IRF4-MYC axis in primary effusion lymphoma in a cereblon-dependent manner and display synergistic cytotoxicity with BRD4 inhibitors. Oncogene. 2016;35:1797–810. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.El Hussein S, Shaw KRM, Vega F. Evolving insights into the genomic complexity and immune landscape of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: opportunities for novel biomarkers. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:2422–36. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0616-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Schmitz R, Wright GW, Huang DW, Johnson CA, Phelan JD, Wang JQ, et al. Genetics and pathogenesis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1396–407. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wilson WH, Wright GW, Huang DW, Hodkinson B, Balasubramanian S, Fan Y, et al. Effect of ibrutinib with R-CHOP chemotherapy in genetic subtypes of DLBCL. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:1643–53.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.10.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Völkers M, Sussman M. mTOR/PRAS40 interaction: hypertrophy or proliferation. Cell Cycle. 2013;12:3579–80. doi: 10.4161/cc.26822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mauro Salvi

5 Jul 2022

PONE-D-22-16384Investigation of the anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib, a highly selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, by phosphoproteomics and transcriptomicsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kozaki,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 19 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mauro Salvi, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section: 

"I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: This study was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). All authors are employees of Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd."  

We note that you received funding from a commercial source: "Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd."

Please provide an amended Competing Interests Statement that explicitly states this commercial funder, along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, marketed products, etc. 

Within this Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared. 

Please include your amended Competing Interests Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. 

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. 

  

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

Additional Editor Comments:

The manuscript has been reviewed by two independent reviewers and all agree that it is a work worth of publication, but it requires some amendments as suggested by the Reviewers.

Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. In particular Reviewer 1 requires some experiments to confirm the mass spectrometry and/or the transcriptomic analysis.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this work, Kozaki et al carefully characterized the selectivity of the BTK inhibitor, tirabrutinib, and its effects on phosphoproteomic in B-cell lymphoma cell lines. They also analyzed the transcriptomic changes induced by tirabrutinib in DLBCL xenograft tumors. Based on these results, the authors discussed the potential multifaceted anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib. Overall, this manuscript provides interesting and important omics-data for the clinical BTK inhibitor, as well as potentially novel discoveries on the BTK signaling in DLBCL. However, I still feel that the current manuscript is not enough in-depth and need be further improved. Specifically, here are my major concerns:

1. The phosphoproteomic results should be further analyzed and sorted in terms of reported BTK substrates, reported or new direct/indirect downstream effectors, and potentially off-targets of tirabrutinib. For some important reported substrates or downstream effectors of BTK, the authors need to double-check with western blots if the proteomic studies failed to detect significant downregulation as expected, and then discuss it.

2. For the downregulated transcriptions, the key factors also need be double-checked with qPCR and western blots. Besides, the authors should provide more proof that the downregulation of IRF4 and MYC were mainly induced by suppression of NF-κB in TMD8 cells. Moreover, it would be better if the authors could analyze the transcriptomic results together with the phosphoproteomic results, and check if there is consistence for factors such as ATF2 and ERF2.

3. In Figure S1, the levels of native p-BTK were so weak that I doubt tirabrutinib inhibited p-BTK. The authors should check the phosphorylation of the direct substrate of BTK, PLCγ, and check if tirabrutinib could inhibit p-BTK after the H2O2 stimulation.

4. Tirabrutinib was much less potent to inhibit the growth of U-2932 cells, and downregulated much less phosphorylation of the proteome. The authors should further dig these findings, and check if U-2932 cells were really dependent on BTK as TMD8 cells, and look for the potentially difference of BTK signaling in both cells.

And here are several minor concerns:

1. The abstract should be written more concisely, and the English in the main text should be further improved.

2. The culturing density and the type of well plates should be added into the method for the cell viability assays.

3. Despite that tirabrutinib showed overall consistent IC50s regarding inhibition of cell growth and phospho-BTK, more evidence is needed to support the conclusion that “proliferation appears to be inhibited by tirabrutinib via inhibition of BTK phosphorylation” in line 393. Besides, tirabrutinib could not suppressed the growth of U-2932 cells even at high concentrations.

4. In line 478, the description “although the significances of all the regulated sites by tirabrutinib are unknown” is a bit confusing. Did the authors mean the functions of these phosphorylations?

Reviewer #2: In the manuscript of "nvestigation of the anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib, a highly selective Bruton’s

tyrosine kinase inhibitor, by phosphoproteomics and transcriptomics" , the study is well defined. The flow of work is good starting from showing the selective of this drug on BTK among other kinases to in vivo test the efficacy of this drug.

It would be good if the author can show the structure of the complex between three generation of drugs with BTK and explain the reason why it selective against BTK than other kinases.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: kiattawee choowongkomon

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 10;18(3):e0282166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282166.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


19 Jan 2023

Journal Requirements

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Response: We have ensured that our manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

"I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: This study was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). All authors are employees of Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd."

We note that you received funding from a commercial source: "Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd."

Please provide an amended Competing Interests Statement that explicitly states this commercial funder, along with any other relevant declarations relating to employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, marketed products, etc.

Within this Competing Interests Statement, please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your amended Competing Interests Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: We have provided an amended Competing Interests Statement and an amended Financial Disclosure in the cover letter.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

Response: There are no ethical nor legal restrictions on sharing data. We have included the minimal anonymized dataset in Supporting Information as listed below:

S2 Table. Complete KINOMEscan dataset.

S3 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated TMD8 cells.

S4 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated U-2932 cells.

In addition, the microarray data are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; GSE 210284). The other datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

4. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

Response: Original images of western blots have been provided as Supporting Information.

Responses to the comments of Reviewer #1

In this work, Kozaki et al carefully characterized the selectivity of the BTK inhibitor, tirabrutinib, and its effects on phosphoproteomic in B-cell lymphoma cell lines. They also analyzed the transcriptomic changes induced by tirabrutinib in DLBCL xenograft tumors. Based on these results, the authors discussed the potential multifaceted anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib. Overall, this manuscript provides interesting and important omics-data for the clinical BTK inhibitor, as well as potentially novel discoveries on the BTK signaling in DLBCL. However, I still feel that the current manuscript is not enough in-depth and need be further improved. Specifically, here are my major concerns:

1. The phosphoproteomic results should be further analyzed and sorted in terms of reported BTK substrates, reported or new direct/indirect downstream effectors, and potentially off-targets of tirabrutinib. For some important reported substrates or downstream effectors of BTK, the authors need to double-check with western blots if the proteomic studies failed to detect significant downregulation as expected, and then discuss it.

Response: We have sorted the phosphoproteomic analysis data regarding the reported BTK substrate PLCγ2 and reported or novel direct/indirect downstream effectors in S5 Table. However, we did not conduct additional analysis and sort any data for possible off-target candidates of tirabrutinib. The reason for this is as follows:

Based on the selectivity data using in vitro cell-free kinase assays, tirabrutinib at 1 μM inhibited kinase activity of TEC, BMX, HUNK, RIPK2, ERBB4, and CSK. Among these kinases, we have demonstrated that tirabrutinib did not bind to RIPK2 and CSK in a cell-based assay using PBMC (Kd; >3 μM), which was carried out using KinAffinity (Evotec AG, Munich, Germany). These results suggest that tirabrutinib would not inhibit RIPK2 and CSK in TMD8 and U-2932 cells. As for the other kinases (TEC, BMX, HUNK, and ERBB4), there are currently no publications that report their function or contribution to cellular signaling in DLBCL cells; thus, it is difficult to discuss the contribution of the potential inhibition of these kinases by tirabrutinib with the obtained phosphoproteomic data.

Next, we have investigated the effect of tirabrutinib on some important effectors, including the BTK substrate p-PLCγ2 and p-ERK, as well as p-BTK, by western blot analysis. The data were added as S2 Fig. In both TMD8 and U-2932 cells, tirabrutinib inhibited phosphorylation at Tyr-759, which is the site reported to be phosphorylated by BTK and correlates with the lipase activity of PLCγ2 [Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:9986-99] at a similar concentration range to that required for the suppression of BTK autophosphorylation. This indicates that tirabrutinib inhibited the phosphorylation of PLCγ2 at Y759 through BTK inhibition, although significant suppression was not detected in the phosphosites of PLCγ2 in the phosphoproteomic analysis. Regarding p-ERK, we confirmed through western blot analysis that tirabrutinib inhibited p-ERK in TMD8 cells in a concentration-dependent manner after 1 h of treatment. In U-2932 cells, treatment with tirabrutinib for 4 h resulted in significant inhibition of p-ERK in a concentration-dependent manner, although the inhibitory activity of tirabrutinib on p-ERK was not clear during 1 h of treatment. Based on those results, we confirmed the inhibitory activity of tirabrutinib on p-ERK in both phosphoproteomic and western blot analyses.

As for another downstream signaling pathway, we also checked p-PKCβ and p-p65 in NF-κB signaling in both cells, and the data were added as S3 Fig in addition to the results for p-AKT, which were already submitted as supplemental data. Regarding PKCβ, a downstream effector of PLCγ2 and upstream effector of ERK and NF-κB signaling [Mol Cancer. 2018;17:57, Front Oncol. 2020;10:591577], in the phosphoproteomic analysis, tirabrutinib did not significantly inhibit the phosphorylation at Thr-641, which is the site that is reported to be autophosphorylated and that maintains catalytic competence of PKCβ. Therefore, we tried to detect p-PKCβ in the western blot analysis but failed in both cell lines because the tested antibody did not work well. Thus, it is difficult to conclude whether tirabrutinib has an effect on the phosphorylation of PKCβ. As for NF-κB signaling, several phosphorylated sites in the related effectors, such as IKKβ and p65, were detected in the phosphoproteomic analysis. However, it was difficult to determine whether tirabrutinib suppressed NF-κB signaling because the significance of those detected sites was unclear. In the western blot analysis, however, we successfully detected p-IκBα at S32/36, which is critical for the activation of NF-κB signaling [Biochem J. 2021;478:2619-2664.]. Because tirabrutinib inhibited p-IκBα in both cell lines, we concluded that tirabrutinib showed inhibitory activity on NF-κB signaling in both cell lines.

2. For the downregulated transcriptions, the key factors also need be double-checked with qPCR and western blots. Besides, the authors should provide more proof that the downregulation of IRF4 and MYC w mainly induced by suppression of NF-κB in TMD8 cells. Moreover, it would be better if the authors could analyze the transcriptomic results together with the phosphoproteomic results, and check if there is consistence for factors such as ATF2 and ERF2.

Response: Because tirabrutinib downregulated IRF-4 and MYC pathway-related genes in the transcriptome analysis, we selected IRF4, BCL6, and MYC as key factors and evaluated the effect of tirabrutinib for expression levels of these genes and proteins after in vitro treatment with DMSO or tirabrutinib at 1 μM for 24 h in TMD8 cells by RT-PCR and western blot analysis. As a result, treatment with tirabrutinib resulted in downregulation of IRF4 and MYC genes, and upregulation of BCL6 genes, which was consistent with the microarray data. In the western blot analysis, we confirmed the downregulation of IRF4 and MYC protein expression by tirabrutinib, while a significant change in BCL6 protein was not induced by tirabrutinib. In conclusion, the results of IRF-4 and MYC pathway downregulation by tirabrutinib in the microarray experiment was confirmed with RT-PCR and western blot analysis. The obtained data and descriptions have been added to the Results section of the manuscript and S6 Fig.

Next, to clarify that the downregulation of IRF4 and MYC by tirabrutinib were mainly induced by suppression of NF-κB in TMD8 cells, we evaluated the effect of several drugs that selectively inhibit specific signaling pathways. As selective inhibitors for NF-κB, ERK, or AKT signaling, BMS-345541 (IKK inhibitor), refametinib (MEK inhibitor), and MK-2206 (AKT inhibitor) were used, respectively. As a result, treatment with BMS-345541 at 1 μM for 24 h resulted in significant downregulation in IRF4 and MYC genes. Treatment with MK-2206 at 1 μM did not downregulate these genes, and refametinib at 0.1 μM tended to downregulate only MYC genes. These results suggest that the effect of tirabrutinib on IRF4 would be mainly induced by suppression of NF-κB signaling, and the effect of tirabrutinib on MYC would be induced by suppression of not only NF-κB signaling but also ERK signaling. The obtained data and descriptions have been added to the Results section of the manuscript and S7 Fig.

Regarding your suggestion for analyses of the transcriptomic results together with the phosphoproteomic results, some descriptions were added to the Discussion section as follows:

“We also observed some correlations between the results of the phosphoproteomic and transcriptomic analyses of signaling pathways regulated by tirabrutinib in TMD8. For example, tirabrutinib significantly decreased the phosphorylation of ATF2 (Thr-71), which is phosphorylated by ERK, leading to transcriptional activation. ATF2 is reported to control ATF3 expression, which is an important element controlling the growth of ABC-DLBCL [66]. In the transcriptomic analysis, the expression of ATF3 was significantly suppressed by tirabrutinib (fold change, 0.36; P < 0.001). In addition, the observed downregulation at Thr-246 of PRAS40 by tirabrutinib in the phosphoproteomic analysis suggests the suppression of mTORC1 signaling [79], which is consistent with the downregulation of mTORC1 pathway-related genes by tirabrutinib in the transcriptomic analysis.”

3. In Figure S1, the levels of native p-BTK were so weak that I doubt tirabrutinib inhibited p-BTK. The authors should check the phosphorylation of the direct substrate of BTK, PLCγ, and check if tirabrutinib could inhibit p-BTK after the H2O2 stimulation.

Response: As shown in S2 Fig, tirabrutinib inhibited p-BTK and p-PLCγ2 in a concentration-dependent manner in both TMD8 and U-2932 cells. The concentration at which tirabrutinib inhibits p-BTK is consistent with the data shown in S1 Fig. Additionally, tirabrutinib inhibited p-PLCγ2 (through Tyr-759, a phosphosite regulated by BTK) at a similar concentration range as for p-BTK, indicating that tirabrutinib inhibits the activation of BTK (p-BTK) in TMD8 and U-2932 cells. Furthermore, by flow cytometry, we confirmed that treatment with tirabrutinib for 6 h resulted in the inhibition of p-BTK in a concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 9.78 nM after H2O2 stimulation in TMD8 cells, as shown below (these data are not included in the manuscript).

Figure: Effect of tirabrutinib on Btk inhibition by continuous exposure to TMD8 cells

TMD8 cells were exposed to the vehicle or various concentrations of tirabrutinib for 6 h and then stimulated with H2O2. After stimulation, the cells were stained with BTK-pY223 antibodies, and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of BTK-pY223 was measured by flow cytometry. From the MFI of each sample, the increase in MFI (ΔMFI) relative to that in the negative control sample was calculated, and the inhibition rates (%) in the tirabrutinib treatment groups relative to that in the vehicle group were displayed as the mean ± standard error for three samples per group.

4. Tirabrutinib was much less potent to inhibit the growth of U-2932 cells, and downregulated much less phosphorylation of the proteome. The authors should further dig these findings, and check if U-2932 cells were really dependent on BTK as TMD8 cells, and look for the potentially difference of BTK signaling in both cells.

Response: As shown in Fig 3A, there is no significant difference in the IC50 of tirabrutinib for growth inhibition between TMD8 and U-2932, although the maximum growth inhibitions greatly differ in these cell lines. Tirabrutinib inhibited p-ERK at a similar concentration range to that of p-BTK inhibition (S2 Fig) and IC50 for growth inhibition (Fig 3A, B), which suggests that U-2932 cell growth is partially dependent on ERK signaling through p-BTK inhibition. Our phosphoproteomic and western blot analyses indicated that ERK signaling and NF-kB signaling are dependent on BTK in both TMD8 and U-2932 cell lines, whereas AKT signaling is not dependent on BTK in U-2932 cells, resulting in less downregulation of proteome phosphorylation and lower maximum growth inhibition in U-2932 compared with TMD8.

And here are several minor concerns:

5. The abstract should be written more concisely, and the English in the main text should be further improved.

Response: The Abstract and main text have been revised by a native English speaker to address the Reviewer’s concerns. We have reduced the abstract word count to 208 words (note: the PLOS ONE Abstract limit is 300 words).

6. The culturing density and the type of well plates should be added into the method for the cell viability assays.

Response: We have added information about the culturing density and well plates used to the Methods section.

7. Despite that tirabrutinib showed overall consistent IC50s regarding inhibition of cell growth and phospho-BTK, more evidence is needed to support the conclusion that “proliferation appears to be inhibited by tirabrutinib via inhibition of BTK phosphorylation” in line 393. Besides, tirabrutinib could not suppressed the growth of U-2932 cells even at high concentrations.

Response: Please see our response to comment #4. Tirabrutinib inhibited p-ERK at a similar concentration range to that of p-BTK inhibition (S2 Fig) and IC50 for growth inhibition (Fig 3A, B) in TMD8 and U-2932 cells. These data suggest that tirabrutinib exerts an anti-proliferative effect via p-ERK inhibition by p-BTK inhibition in both cell lines. Regarding the reason for the difference between TMD8 and U-2932 in the maximum inhibition for cell growth, we speculate that AKT signaling is not dependent on BTK in U-2932.

8. In line 478, the description “although the significances of all the regulated sites by tirabrutinib are unknown” is a bit confusing. Did the authors mean the functions of these phosphorylations?

Response: Yes, we were referring to the functions of all the regulated phosphosites. We have revised the description in the Results section to avoid confusion.

Responses to the comments of Reviewer #2

Reviewer #2: In the manuscript of "nvestigation of the anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib, a highly selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, by phosphoproteomics and transcriptomics" , the study is well defined. The flow of work is good starting from showing the selective of this drug on BTK among other kinases to in vivo test the efficacy of this drug.

1. It would be good if the author can show the structure of the complex between three generation of drugs with BTK and explain the reason why it selective against BTK than other kinases.

Response: Based on the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have added the following description in the Discussion section:

“The binding of zanubrutinib to BTK is different from that of ibrutinib to BTK, which contributes to its superior selectivity [14]. The binding mode of tirabrutinib and acalabrutinib with BTK is similar to that of ibrutinib, but the structures of the inhibitory component are different. Butylamide electrophiles are less reactive than acrylamide, and the higher nucleophilicity of Cys-481 in BTK may explain the superior selectivity over ibrutinib [13].”

Additional revisions

In addition to the revisions outlined above, we have also made some minor amends of the text to correct some inconsistences in terminology and typographical marks. These changes are indicated using Microsoft Word’s Track Changes.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Mauro Salvi

9 Feb 2023

Investigation of the anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib, a highly selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, by phosphoproteomics and transcriptomics

PONE-D-22-16384R1

Dear Dr. Kozaki,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mauro Salvi, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Mauro Salvi

3 Mar 2023

PONE-D-22-16384R1

Investigation of the anti-tumor mechanism of tirabrutinib, a highly selective Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor, by phosphoproteomics and transcriptomics

Dear Dr. Kozaki:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Mauro Salvi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Immunoblots of lysates to evaluate BTK autophosphorylation inhibitory effects of tirabrutinib in the TMD8 and U-2932 cell lines.

    (A) TMD8 and (B) U-2932 cells were treated with vehicle or different concentrations of tirabrutinib and incubated for 4 h at 37°C (5% CO2/95% air). Autophosphorylated BTK (p-BTK) (upper) and total BTK (BTK) (lower) proteins were detected by western blot analysis. TMD8 cells were unstimulated (‒) or stimulated using H2O2 and used as a marker for the detection of p-BTK and BTK.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. Immunoblots for p-BTK, BTK, p-PLCγ2, PLCγ2, p-ERK1/2, ERK1/2, and GAPDH in lysates of TMD8 and U-2932 cells treated with or without tirabrutinib (0–300 nM).

    (A) TMD8 cells or (B) U-2932 cells were treated with tirabrutinib (10, 30, 100, or 300 nM) or DMSO and incubated for 1 and/or 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. Autophosphorylated BTK (p-BTK, Tyr-223), total BTK (BTK), phosphorylated PLCγ2 (p-PLCγ2, Tyr-759), total PLCγ2 (PLCγ2), phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK, Thr-202/204), total ERK1/2, and GAPDH proteins were detected by western blot analysis. TMD8 cells were stimulated using H2O2 and used as a marker for the detection of p-BTK, p-PLCγ2, and p-ERK.

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. Immunoblots of p-AKT, AKT, p-IκBα, IκBα, and GAPDH in lysates of TMD8 and U-2932 cells treated with or without tirabrutinib (1 μM).

    U-2932 cells and TMD8 were treated with tirabrutinib (1 μM) or DMSO and incubated for 1 or 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. (A) Phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT, Ser-473) and total AKT (AKT) proteins were detected by western blot analysis. (B) Phosphorylated IκBα (p-IκBα, Ser-32/36), total IκBα (IκBα), and GAPDH proteins were detected by western blot analysis.

    (PDF)

    S4 Fig. Heat map of differentially expressed genes in gene set enrichment analysis.

    Heat map of four significantly enriched gene sets between vehicle group (N = 8) and tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg group (N = 9). (A) Shaffer_IRF4_targets_in_activated_B_lymphocyte, (B) Shaffer_IRF4_targets_in_plasma_cell_vs_mature_B_lymphocye, (C) YU_MYC_targets_up, (D) Hallmark_MTORC1_signaling.

    (PDF)

    S5 Fig. Core enrichment genes of gene set enrichment analysis for interferon regulatory factor target genes in the two gene sets.

    (PDF)

    S6 Fig. Gene and protein expression in TMD8 cells treated with or without tirabrutinib.

    TMD8 were treated with tirabrutinib (1 μM) or DMSO and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. (A) RNA was isolated and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed. All PCRs were performed in triplicate, and the mRNA expression of GAPDH was used as an internal control. The t test was used to compare mRNA expression in the DMSO- and tirabrutinib-treated groups. A P-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. **: P < 0.01, ***: P < 0.001. (B) IRF4, BCL6, MYC, and GAPDH proteins were detected by western blot analysis.

    (PDF)

    S7 Fig. Gene expression detected by RT-PCR in TMD8 cells treated with or without various selective inhibitors.

    TMD8 were treated with tirabrutinib (1 μM), BMS-345541 (10 μM), MK-2206 (1 μM), refametinib (0.1 μM) or DMSO and incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% air. RNA was isolated and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed. All PCRs were performed in triplicate, and the mRNA expression of GAPDH was used as an internal control. The Dunnett test was used to compare mRNA expression in the DMSO- and compound-treated groups. A P-value of less than 5% was considered statistically significant. *: P < 0.05, ***: P < 0.001. n.s.: Not significant.

    (PDF)

    S1 Table. The 12 in vitro systems of the BioMAP Diversity PLUS panel (Eurofins DiscoverX Products, LLC).

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Complete KINOMEscan dataset.

    The data represent percent control (%CTRL) as the percent of each kinase that remains bound to the immobilized ligand. Therefore, a value of 0% control equals 100% blocking of kinase-ligand binding, while a value of 100% equals no binding of each compound to the target kinase.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated TMD8 cells.

    For all confidently localized phosphorylation sites (localization probability ≥0.75%), SILAC ratios of individual replicate experiments are reported. Class 1 site ratios that were reproducibly identified are indicated and further marked as regulated in case of consistent up- or downregulation. The tirabrutinib/control phosphosite ratios from Experiment 2 correspond to the normalized and inverted H/L ratio due to the introduced label switch compared to Experiment 1.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated U-2932 cells.

    For all confidently localized phosphorylation sites (localization probability ≥0.75%), SILAC ratios of individual replicate experiments are reported. Class 1 site ratios that were reproducibly identified are indicated and further marked as regulated in case of consistent up- or downregulation. The tirabrutinib/control phosphosite ratios from Experiment 2 correspond to the normalized and inverted H/L ratio due to the introduced label switch compared to Experiment 1.

    (XLSX)

    S5 Table. Sorted phosphosites of BTK-related effectors in both TMD8 and U-2932 cells.

    Phosphosites of BTK-related effectors in both TMD8 and U-2932 cells were sorted from S3 Table and S4 Table and the responsible kinase and/or function of each phosphorylation site are described.

    (XLSX)

    S6 Table. Comprehensive gene expression analysis using microarray in TMD8 xenograft model.

    The microarray data were normalized to the 75th percentile signal intensity as recommended by Agilent. Welch’s t-test of log-converted expression values was performed to find significant differentially expressed genes between the tirabrutinib and vehicle groups. Fold changes, nominal P-values and q-values of the differentially expressed genes are shown. Benjamini-Hochberg method was used as the correction method for the q-value. Geometric means of expression values for the tirabrutinib and vehicle groups are also shown.

    (XLSX)

    S7 Table. Gene set enrichment analysis between tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg and vehicle in TMD8 xenograft model.

    Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified 710 and 2216 significantly enriched gene sets in the vehicle group and tirabrutinib 10 mg/kg group, respectively, with P < 0.05 and FDR q < 0.25.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Raw images

    (PDF)

    S2 Raw images

    (PDF)

    S3 Raw images

    (PDF)

    S4 Raw images

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    There are no ethical nor legal restrictions on sharing data. We have included the minimal anonymized dataset in Supporting Information as listed below: S2 Table. Complete KINOMEscan dataset. S3 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated TMD8 cells. S4 Table. Processed version of the MaxQuant phosphosite table of the experiments with tirabrutinib-treated U-2932 cells. In addition, the microarray data are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; GSE 210284). The other datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES