Skip to main content
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 1982 Apr;41(2):118–125. doi: 10.1136/ard.41.2.118

Osteoarthritis of the hip: the patient behind the disease.

L Solomon, C M Schnitzler, J P Browett
PMCID: PMC1000893  PMID: 7073338

Abstract

Previous epidemiological studies suggested that patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip might constitute a definable subset of the population with characteristics that predispose them to joint failure. To investigate this possibility a comparative study of somatotype, bone density, disc degeneration, polyarticular joint degeneration, and soft-tissue calcification was carried out in 3 groups of individuals: (1) patients presenting with OA of the hip; (2) patients with acute femoral neck fracture; (3) healthy controls. OA of the hip was rare in patients with femoral neck fracture; conversely, patients with coxarthrosis did not have the low values for bone density seen in the fracture group. There were significant differences in somatotype in the 2 patient groups; 94% of those with OA were endomorphic mesomorphs. Polyarticular OA occurred with the same prevalence in the 2 groups of women, but among males there was a significantly greater involvement of knees and hands in the OA group than in the fracture group. The highest incidence of joint calcification was found in the fracture group and the lowest in the OA group. It was concluded that patients with OA of the hip form a definable subset of the general population. Within this group the appearances of hip OA are determined by 3 interacting factors: mechanical stress, cartilage degeneration, and bone response.

Full text

PDF
119

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dequeker J., Burssens A., Creytens G., Bouillon R. Ageing of bone: its relation to osteoporosis and osteoarthrosis in post-menopausal women. Front Horm Res. 1975;3:116–130. doi: 10.1159/000398271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Foss M. V., Byers P. D. Bone density, osteoarthrosis of the hip, and fracture of the upper end of the femur. Ann Rheum Dis. 1972 Jul;31(4):259–264. doi: 10.1136/ard.31.4.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Huskisson E. C., Dieppe P. A., Tucker A. K., Cannell L. B. Another look at osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1979 Oct;38(5):423–428. doi: 10.1136/ard.38.5.423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Roh Y. S., Dequeker J., Mulier J. C. Bone mass in osteoarthrosis, measured in vivo by photon absorption. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Apr;56(3):587–591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Solomon L., Beighton P., Lawrence J. S. Rheumatic disorders in the South African Negro. Part II. Osteo-arthrosis. S Afr Med J. 1975 Oct 4;49(42):1737–1740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Solomon L. Bone density in ageing Caucasian and African populations. Lancet. 1979 Dec 22;2(8156-8157):1326–1330. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(79)92813-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yazici H., Saville P. D., Salvati E. A., Bohne W. H., Wilson P. D., Jr Primary osteoarthrosis of the knee or hip. Prevalence of Heberden nodes in relation to age and sex. JAMA. 1975 Mar 24;231(12):1256–1260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES