Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 1982 Aug;41(4):426–430. doi: 10.1136/ard.41.4.426

Nephelometry compared with differential antibody titre in routine rheumatoid factor measurements.

R K Knight, M H Pritchard
PMCID: PMC1000964  PMID: 7114925

Abstract

The comparative merits of agglutination techniques (differential agglutination titre (DAT)/latex slide test) and nephelometry for the routine measurements of IgM rheumatoid factors have been studied in this 2-part paper. The first part investigates the errors inherent in standard DAT measurements, and the second determines the rate of false positive results in an elderly nonrheumatoid population. It was found that the errors in agglutination techniques are due to differences in setting up the tests rather than in interpreting the results, and that the coefficient of variance was consistently around 20%. Approximately 1 in 5 of DAT results have such a high error as to be clinically valueless. The false positive rate in the elderly nonrheumatoid population was only 2% with nephelometry compared with 9% on the latex slide test. A previous study had demonstrated the advantages of nephelometry over DAT in routine rheumatological use, showing not only greater reproducibility but also a more accurate positive detection rate than the DAT in rheumatoid arthritis. The results also suggest that the traditional spectrum of rheumatoid factors of low titre detectable in the general population is probably an artefact inherent in agglutination techniques and that a definitive cut-off point is more likely. As nephelometers are generally available in biochemistry laboratories there is much to recommended their routine use for the measurement of IgM rheumatoid factors.

Full text

PDF
430

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BALL J., LAWRENCE J. S. Epidemiology of the sheep cell agglutination test. Ann Rheum Dis. 1961 Sep;20:235–243. doi: 10.1136/ard.20.3.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BALL J. Serum factor in rheumatoid arthritis agglutinating sensitized sheep red cells. Lancet. 1950 Nov 11;2(6637):520–524. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(50)91500-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. CATHCART E. S., O'SULLIVAN J. B. STANDARDIZATION OF THE SHEEP CELL AGGLUTINATION TEST. THE USE OF POOLED REFERENCE SERA AND HEMAGGLUTINATION TRAYS. Arthritis Rheum. 1965 Aug;8:530–537. doi: 10.1002/art.1780080407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cats A., Hazevoet H. M. Significance of positive tests for rheumatoid factor in the prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. A follow-up study. Ann Rheum Dis. 1970 May;29(3):254–260. doi: 10.1136/ard.29.3.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DUTHIE J. J., BROWN P. E., TRUELOVE L. H., BARAGAR F. D., LAWRIE A. J. COURSE AND PROGNOSIS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. A FURTHER REPORT. Ann Rheum Dis. 1964 May;23:193–204. doi: 10.1136/ard.23.3.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Finley P. R., Hicks M. J., Williams R. J., Hinlicky J., Lichti D. A. Rate nephelometric measurement of rheumatoid factor in serum. Clin Chem. 1979 Nov;25(11):1909–1914. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HEIMER R., LEVIN F. M., RUDD E. GLOBULINS RESEMBLING RHEUMATOID FACTOR IN SERUM OF THE AGED. Am J Med. 1963 Aug;35:175–181. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(63)90208-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hay F. C., Nineham L. J., Roitt I. M. Routine assay for detection of IgG and IgM antiglobulins in seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J. 1975 Jul 26;3(5977):203–204. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5977.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jacoby R. K., Jayson M. I., Cosh J. A. Onset, early stages, and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical study of 100 patients with 11-year follow-up. Br Med J. 1973 Apr 14;2(5858):96–100. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5858.96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. KELLGREN J. H., BALL J. Clinical significance of the rheumatoid serum factor. Br Med J. 1959 Feb 28;1(5121):523–531. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5121.523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koopman W. J., Schrohenloher R. E. A sensitive radioimmunoassay for quantitation of IgM rheumatoid factor. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Mar;23(3):302–308. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. OTTEN H. A., BOERMA F. W. Significance of the Waaler-Rose test, streptococcal agagglutination, and antistreptolysin titre in the prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1959 Mar;18(1):24–28. doi: 10.1136/ard.18.1.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pritchard M. H., Jobbins K. Nephelometry v differential agglutination titre in the measurement of rheumatoid factors. J Clin Pathol. 1981 Apr;34(4):396–399. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.4.396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. RAGAN C. The clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. Prognostic indices. JAMA. 1962 Aug 25;181:663–667. doi: 10.1001/jama.1962.03050340001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Virella G., Waller M., Fudenberg H. H. Nephelometric method for determination of rheumatoid factor. J Immunol Methods. 1978;22(3-4):247–251. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(78)90032-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WALLER M., TOONE E. C., VAUGHAN E. STUDY OF RHEUMATOID FACTOR IN A NORMAL POPULATION. Arthritis Rheum. 1964 Oct;7:513–520. doi: 10.1002/art.1780070507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weinblatt M. E., Schur P. H. Rheumatoid factor detection by nephelometry. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Jun;23(6):777–779. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zutshi D. W., Reading C. A., Epstein W. V., Ansell B. M., Holborow E. J. FII haemagglutination test for serum antigammaglobulin factors in arthritides sero-positive and sero-negative by other tests. Ann Rheum Dis. 1969 May;28(3):289–299. doi: 10.1136/ard.28.3.289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES