SUMMARY
Animals that consume fermenting fruit and nectar are at risk of exposure to ethanol and the detrimental effects of inebriation. In this report, we show that the hormone FGF21, which is strongly induced by ethanol in murine and human liver, stimulates arousal from intoxication without changing ethanol catabolism. Mice lacking FGF21 take longer than wild-type littermates to recover their righting reflex and balance following ethanol exposure. Conversely, pharmacologic FGF21 administration reduces the time needed for mice to recover from ethanol-induced unconsciousness and ataxia. FGF21 did not counteract sedation caused by ketamine, diazepam or pentobarbital, indicating specificity for ethanol. FGF21 mediates its anti-intoxicant effects by directly activating noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus region, which regulates arousal and alertness. These results suggest that this FGF21 liver-brain pathway evolved to protect against ethanol-induced intoxication and that it might be targeted pharmaceutically for treating acute alcohol poisoning.
Keywords: FGF21, hormone, alcohol, inebriation, anti-intoxicant, amethystic, liver, noradrenergic, locus coeruleus
Graphical Abstract
eTOC
Choi et al. show that the alcohol-induced hormone FGF21 signals from liver to brain to counteract loss of consciousness and coordination caused by ethanol consumption. Pharmacologic FGF21 administration further accelerates recovery from inebriation. FGF21 exerts its sobering effect by activating the noradrenergic nervous system, which regulates arousal and alertness.
INTRODUCTION
Simple sugars in ripening fruits and nectars are a rich source of calories for many animals. However, consumption of ethanol produced by the natural fermentation of these sugars can cause intoxication, thus impairing mobility and judgement1. Accordingly, animals that consume fructose and other simple sugars have evolved liver enzymes to catabolize ethanol. Comparative genetic analyses of alcohol dehydrogenases across species reveal that many strict herbivores and carnivores that are not exposed to ethanol appear to have lost the ability to catabolize it, underscoring the importance of ethanol as an evolutionary driver2.
FGF21 is a hormone that is induced in liver by a variety of metabolic stresses including starvation, protein deficiency, simple sugars and ethanol3,4. In humans, ethanol is by far the most potent inducer of FGF21 described to date5–7. Previous studies showed that FGF21 suppresses ethanol preference8–10, induces water drinking to prevent dehydration7, and protects against alcohol-induced liver injury5,11,12. Thus, FGF21 plays a broad role in defending against the harmful consequences of ethanol exposure.
FGF21 acts on a heteromeric cell surface receptor composed of a conventional FGF receptor tyrosine kinase (FGFR1c) in complex with the single-pass transmembrane protein, β-Klotho (KLB)13. FGF21 binds directly to both FGFR1c and KLB, with FGFR1c serving as the downstream signaling effector. Human genome-wide association studies have linked SNPs in and around both the FGF21 and KLB genes to alcohol consumption8,14,15, further highlighting the important relationship between FGF21 and ethanol. In mice, FGF21 crosses the blood-brain-barrier through an unknown mechanism16 and acts on its receptor complex in the nervous system both to suppress ethanol preference and to induce water consumption7,8.
Norepinephrine (NE) is an abundant neuromodulator in the CNS. Most central NE is synthesized in the locus coeruleus (LC), a small nucleus in the pons of the brainstem. LC neurons project extensively throughout the brain to regulate diverse biological processes, including arousal and alertness17,18. In this report, we show that FGF21 directly activates noradrenergic neurons in the LC region. We further show that this FGF21-NE pathway accelerates recovery of righting reflex and balance following ethanol intoxication. Thus, FGF21 is an endogenous anti-intoxicant or “amethystic” agent (Alkana and Noble, 1979).
RESULTS
FGF21 deficiency exacerbates ethanol-induced intoxication
We administered a single, binge dose of ethanol (5 g/kg by oral gavage) to wild-type (WT) and global Fgf21–/– mice. Consistent with prior results, plasma FGF21 was induced by ethanol in WT mice, peaking at 2 hours (Figure 1A). We next examined the animals’ righting reflex, a standard marker of inebriation. While both WT and Fgf21–/– mice lost their righting reflex 15–20 minutes after ethanol gavage (Figure 1B), Fgf21–/– mice required ~1.5 hours longer to recover it than WT mice (Figure 1C). WT and Fgf21–/– mice cleared ethanol from the plasma at the same rate (Figure 1D), and brain ethanol concentrations were similar between the genotypes (Figure 1E). Thus, FGF21 protects against ethanol-induced loss of righting reflex without affecting ethanol catabolism.
We obtained similar results for both time to loss of righting reflex and its duration with hepatocyte-specific Fgf21-knockout (Fgf21Alb) mice (Figures 2A and 2B) and neuron-specific Klb-knockout (KlbCamk2a) mice (Figures 2D and 2E). There were no differences in plasma ethanol clearance between the knockout lines and control mice (Figures 2C and 2F). These results indicate that liver-derived FGF21 accelerates recovery from ethanol-induced loss of righting reflex by acting on its receptor in the nervous system.
Pharmacologic FGF21 has anti-intoxicant activity
We next examined whether pharmacologic FGF21 treatment of WT mice stimulates righting reflex recovery following ethanol administration. WT mice were administered a binge ethanol dose (5 g/kg by oral gavage) followed one hour later, when the mice were already unconscious, by i.p. injection of recombinant FGF21. Remarkably, FGF21 administration reduced the time required for both male and female mice to recover their righting reflex by ~1.5 hours (Figures 3A and 3B), reflecting a roughly 50% decrease compared to vehicle-treated mice. This effect was dose dependent and maximally efficacious at 1 mg/kg FGF21 (Figure 3A), a standard pharmacologic dose that results in a maximum serum concentration of ~1500 ng/ml with a half-life of 1.3 hours19. Thus, circulating FGF21 concentrations are super-physiologic for the duration of the experiments.
We performed this same pharmacologic FGF21 rescue experiment in Fgf21−/− and KlbCamk2a mice. In Fgf21−/− mice, FGF21 administration reduced the righting reflex recovery time to that seen in WT mice (Figure 3C). In contrast, FGF21 had no effect on righting reflex recovery time in KlbCamk2a mice (Figure 3D), demonstrating that pharmacologic FGF21 exerts its amethystic effect via the nervous system.
We also investigated whether FGF21 inhibits ethanol-induced impairment of motor coordination. Pharmacologic FGF21 treatment reduced the time required for WT mice to recover their coordination on a rotarod following administration of a moderate dose of ethanol (2 g/kg, i.p.) (Figure 3E). Conversely, recovery time was significantly increased in Fgf21−/− compared to WT mice (Figure 3F). Thus, pharmacologic FGF21 accelerates recovery from ethanol-induced intoxication as measured by both righting reflex and rotarod performance.
FGF21’s anti-intoxicant activity is selective for ethanol
We next tested whether FGF21 counteracts other sedatives, including the glutamatergic receptor antagonist ketamine and the GABA receptor agonists diazepam and pentobarbital. Because these sedatives act more quickly and for a shorter duration than ethanol, we compressed the experimental timeline: mice were i.p. injected with either ethanol or each of the other sedatives followed by i.p. injection of FGF21 or vehicle 30 minutes later. FGF21 retained its ability to accelerate righting reflex recovery in ethanol-treated mice under these modified conditions (Figure 3G). In contrast, FGF21 administration did not stimulate recovery from ketamine, diazepam and pentobarbital sedation (Figures 3H–J). Thus, FGF21’s amethystic activity is selective for ethanol.
FGF21 is a physiologic regulator of noradrenergic neurons
Previous studies in mice and rats showed that ethanol administration activates neurons in the LC, the principal site of NE synthesis20–22. Moreover, dopamine β-hydroxylase (Dbh)-KO mice, which are unable to synthesize NE, have a prolonged righting reflex recovery time in response to ethanol without any change in ethanol catabolism23, similar to the responses we observed in Fgf21−/− mice. These findings led us to investigate whether physiologic FGF21 is responsible for ethanol-induced activation of noradrenergic neurons in the LC. WT and Fgf21−/− mice were administered ethanol (5 g/kg) by oral gavage and sacrificed 2.5 hours later. Immunostaining of LC sections was performed for c-Fos and the NE transporter (NET), which are markers of neuronal activity and noradrenergic neurons, respectively. As previously reported, ethanol induced c-Fos expression in NET+ LC neurons of WT mice (Figures 4A and 4B)20–22. Remarkably, this effect was completely absent in Fgf21−/− mice (Figures 4A and 4B). The total number of NET+ cells was equivalent in WT and Fgf21−/− mice indicating that the absence of FGF21 does not compromise this neuronal lineage (Figure 4B). These data demonstrate that FGF21 is required for ethanol to activate noradrenergic neurons in the LC.
FGF21 acts directly on noradrenergic neurons to induce arousal from intoxication
To determine whether FGF21 acts directly on noradrenergic neurons, we first examined whether FGF21’s obligate co-receptor, KLB, which is much less broadly expressed in brain than FGFR1c24,25, is present in the LC. Due to the lack of reliable KLB antibodies, we measured KLB expression using an established reporter mouse in which tdTomato was knocked into the endogenous Klb gene, resulting in a KLB-tdTomato fusion protein26. The fusion protein was detected by immunostaining in the LC, where it co-localized with NET in many but not all cells (Figure 5A). The fusion protein was also detected in regions adjacent to the LC where there was little or no NET staining (Figure 5A). Thus, KLB is expressed in noradrenergic neurons and other cell types in and around the LC. Due to the lack of antibodies selective for FGFR1c, which is the second constituent of the FGF21 receptor complex, we examined its expression at the mRNA level by in situ hybridization. Fgfr1c mRNA was broadly expressed throughout the LC region, where it colocalized with Klb mRNA in some noradrenergic neurons (Figure S1). FGFR1c may serve as a receptor for FGFs other than FGF21 in those cells in which Klb is not co-expressed.
Consistent with the Fgfr1c/Klb expression data, pharmacologic FGF21 administration induced c-Fos immunoreactivity in NET+ LC neurons of WT mice (Figure 5B and 5C). When this same pharmacologic experiment was performed in neuron-specific KlbCamk2a mice, there was no induction of c-Fos by FGF21 (Figure 5D).
To test whether noradrenergic neurons are required for FGF21’s anti-intoxicant activity, we employed complementary genetic knockout and pharmacologic inhibition approaches. To selectively eliminate NE production in neurons, we generated a floxed-Dbh mouse line (Figure S2) and crossed it with Camk2a-Cre mice. As expected, DBH expression was eliminated in the LC but not the adrenal medulla of the resulting DbhCamk2a mice (Figure 6A). Notably, these knockout mice were completely refractory to FGF21’s pharmacologic effect on righting reflex (Figure 6B). Likewise, pre-treatment of wild-type mice with DSP-4, a neurotoxin that readily crosses the blood–brain barrier and selectively and irreversibly inhibits NE signaling27, eliminated FGF21’s amethystic effect on righting reflex (Figure 6C). Upon its release from neurons, NE acts on α1- and β-adrenergic receptors in multiple subcortical regions to stimulate arousal17. FGF21’s anti-intoxicant effect was also blocked by the selective α1- and β-adrenergic receptor antagonists, prazosin and propranolol, respectively (Figures 6D and 6E). As previously reported, prazosin on its own also prolonged ethanol-induced loss of righting reflex (Figure 6D)28. Together, these genetic and pharmacologic data show that FGF21 stimulates arousal by activating noradrenergic neurons in the nervous system.
We next performed Klb knockout studies to examine whether FGF21 acts directly on noradrenergic neurons in the LC region. Klbfl/fl mice were crossed with Dbh-Cre mice to selectively disrupt FGF21 activity in noradrenergic neurons. In separate experiments, adenovirus-associated viruses (AAVs) expressing either Cre recombinase fused with green fluorescent protein (GFP) or GFP alone were bilaterally injected into the LC region. Immunostaining of representative brain sections with a GFP antibody showed successful targeting of the LC region in KlbAAV-Cre mice (Figure S3A), and representative groups of both KlbDbh and KlbAAV-Cre mice had significantly reduced Klb mRNA in the LC region but not in the suprachiasmatic nucleus or liver, where Klb is also expressed (Figure S3B). Consistent with the Dbh knockout and pharmacologic inhibitor studies above, FGF21’s effect on righting reflex was abolished in both KlbDbh and KlbAAV-Cre mice (Figures 7A and 7B). Ethanol-induced hypothermia was unchanged in KlbDbh compared to control mice both in the presence and absence of FGF21 (Figure S3C), demonstrating that these righting reflex recovery data were not confounded by impaired thermoregulation. The ability of FGF21 to stimulate c-Fos expression in the LC was also abolished in both KlbDbh and KlbAAV-Cre mice (Figures 7C and 7D). However, there were two unexpected results. First, KlbAAV-Cre mice recovered their righting reflex significantly faster than control mice (Figure 7B) and had a corresponding increase in basal c-Fos expression in noradrenergic LC neurons (Figure 7D). This may reflect the noradrenergic nervous system’s robust ability to compensate for perturbations in its activity with changes at multiple levels, including norepinephrine release, post-synaptic receptor number and downstream signaling pathways29. Second, pharmacologic FGF21 decreased c-Fos expression in both KlbDbh and KlbAAV-Cre mice (Figures 7D), indicating indirect effects of FGF21 on LC neurons when Klb expression is eliminated in either LC or all noradrenergic neurons. Accordingly, the FGF21 receptor complex is abundantly expressed in other brain regions such as the nucleus of the solitary tract that can impact LC activity30. While additional studies will be required to dissect the details of the underlying mechanisms, we conclude from these genetic knockout studies that FGF21 accelerates righting reflex recovery by acting directly on noradrenergic neurons, and that deletion of KLB in the LC region alters both the basal and FGF21-induced amethystic response.
DISCUSSION
The hormone FGF21 is strongly induced in liver by both ethanol and its fermentation precursor, fructose5–7,31–33. In this report, we show that in addition to suppressing ethanol preference, stimulating water consumption and protecting against liver injury, FGF21 also protects against ethanol-induced loss of righting reflex and impairment of balance via direct effects on the noradrenergic nervous system. FGF21 does this without changing the rate at which ethanol is catabolized. Surprisingly, FGF21 does not counteract the loss of righting reflex caused by other sedatives, including ketamine, diazepam and pentobarbital. Taken together, this work reveals that FGF21 is an endogenous, ethanol-selective amethystic agent that complements the liver’s alcohol metabolizing enzymes in defending against ethanol toxicity and its potentially dangerous sequelae.
Previous studies in mice and rats showed that systemic ethanol administration acutely activates neurons in the LC20–22. We show that this stimulatory effect requires FGF21. Our results using liver-specific Fgf21−/− mice and neuron-specific KlbCamk2a mice support a model in which liver-derived FGF21 acts directly on the nervous system to counteract ethanol-induced intoxication. Using DbhCamk2a and KlbDbh knockout mice and the pharmacologic inhibitor DSP-4, we further show that FGF21 exerts its anti-intoxicant effect by acting directly on noradrenergic neurons, which regulate arousal and alertness. Noradrenergic neurons in the LC have been shown to be more active during periods of wake than sleep, and selective optogenetic stimulation of LC neurons elicits an immediate sleep-to-wake transition34. NE stimulates arousal in part through α1 and β-receptors in several brain regions, including the medial septal and medial preoptic areas17. Accordingly, we show that FGF21’s amethystic activity is abolished genetically by selectively disrupting Klb expression in the LC region and pharmacologically by administering α1 and β-adrenergic receptor antagonists.
Previous genetic and pharmacologic studies established that activation of NE neurons counteracts ethanol intoxication. Global DBH knockout mice exhibit the same prolonged righting reflex recovery time in response to binge ethanol that we observe in Fgf21−/− mice, and restoration of central NE rescues this phenotype23. Likewise, drugs that suppress NE concentrations or downstream cAMP signaling also affect the degree of intoxication. For example, the tyrosine hydroxylase inhibitor, α-methyl-p-tyrosine, and the α-adrenergic receptor antagonist, phentolamine, increased ethanol-induced sleep time in mice35–37. α-Methyl-p-tyrosine also increased ethanol-induced impairment of psychomotor performance and reaction time in humans38. Conversely, intracerebroventricular administration of dibutyryl cAMP antagonized ethanol-induced sedation in rats in a dose-dependent manner39. Interestingly, impaired cAMP signaling increases the sensitivity of Drosophila to ethanol intoxication40, suggesting that the mechanism underlying anti-intoxicant activity may be evolutionarily conserved.
In addition to ethanol and fructose, FGF21 is also induced by starvation and low-protein diets41–43. We speculate that the FGF21-NE pathway may also heighten arousal and alertness in order to increase foraging during periods of nutritional deficiency. Consistent with this, we previously showed that FGF21 increases wheel-running activity in mice during the light phase, which is highly unusual behavior for these nocturnal animals30. In addition to arousal, the noradrenergic nervous system impacts myriad other neuronal processes including attention, memory, perception, and motivation17,18. Thus, the FGF21-NE pathway may modulate a variety of cognitive and affective functions to enhance survival under stressful conditions.
In summary, FGF21 serves as an endogenous hormonal signal from liver to noradrenergic neurons in the brain to defend against ethanol-induced intoxication. Post hoc pharmacologic administration of FGF21 also markedly accelerates arousal from ethanol’s detrimental effects on righting reflex and rotarod performance. These results reveal a mechanism for selectively targeting noradrenergic neurons that could prove useful for treating both the loss of consciousness and impaired mobility that occur during acute alcohol poisoning.
Limitations of the Study
Our studies implicate noradrenergic neurons in the LC region of the brain as important targets for FGF21’s anti-intoxicant activity in mice. However, our AAV-Cre injection experiments do not rule out the possibility that non-noradrenergic Klb+ neurons in the LC or adjacent regions contribute to FGF21’s amethystic effects. Moreover, we are unable to explain at present why basal righting reflex recovery from ethanol intoxication is accelerated and pharmacologic FGF21 administration represses c-Fos expression in LC noradrenergic neurons in these KlbAAV-Cre mice, although other experimental perturbations of the noradrenergic nervous system elicit strong compensatory responses29. It remains to be determined whether activation of the noradrenergic system contributes to other effects of FGF21, including those on metabolism and ethanol and sweet preference. Likewise, although both FGF21 and noradrenergic nervous system activity are induced by ethanol in humans5–7,44, additional studies will be required to determine whether FGF21’s anti-intoxicant activity translates to humans.
RESOURCE AVAILABILITY
Lead Contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Steven A. Kliewer (steven.kliewer@utsouthwestern.edu).
Materials Availability
All reagents generated in this study are available from the lead contact with a completed Materials Transfer Agreement.
Data and Code Availability
All data points used to create the graphs can be found in Data S1.
This paper does not report original code.
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
EXPERIMENTAL MODEL DETAILS
Mouse models
All use of mice and related procedures were approved by the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice were housed in a temperature-controlled environment (23 ± 1° C) with 12 hour light/dark cycles and fed standard rodent chow ad libitum. Mice were randomly assigned to experimental groups. Experiments were performed with male mice unless indicated otherwise. KlbDbh mice were generated by crossing Klbfl/fl mice30 with Dbh-Cre mice (Jackson Laboratory, Stock No: 033951). Fgf21−/− 45, Fgf21Alb 7, and KLB-T mice26 were on a C57BL/6J background and KlbCamk2a 30 and KlbDbh mice were on mixed C57BL/6J;129/Sv backgrounds.
Generation of Dbhfl/fl mice
Dbhfl/fl mice, in which Exon 3 of the Dbh gene is flanked by loxP sites, were generated using a CRISPR/Cas-9 gene editing strategy46. Briefly, two crRNAs (5’-ACTCACCATTGAACCTATGC-3’ for 5’ LoxP and 5’-ACCTGGGTCCCAGAGTTGCA-3’ for 3’ LoxP) and one tracrRNA were used. Two ssODNs, 5’-caggcagagagtgttatggtcttctcatttgctaagcggacagcgaggagcttcacttggtaggaggtcatgtg acatgattctcttcactcaccattgaacctgaattcgttgcgtgaATAACTTCGTATAATGTATGCTATACGAAGT TATatgctggctctgagcgggcaatcaactggttctgtctggctacagg-3’ and 5’-cactgagctacccccacgcttcccccgacaccacatcatcatggtaaacgggggtagagctctgctttccacctgggtcccagagtATA ACTTCGTATAATGTATGCTATACGAAGTTATgttgcgtgaggattctgcatggatcgaggtgctaccctggctccttagaagtagcacatatg-3’ were used as a transgene. We used 5’-gtgcttaacggtgaggacagg-3’ and 5’-ctgtatgcaggcctgaggtg-3’ primers for detecting 5’ LoxP insertion, 5’-cgacaatgagaccacgtactgg-3’ and 5’- ggaaatattcatctcaggggccc-3’ primers for detecting 3’ LoxP insertion, and 5’-ggcagagagtgttatggtc-3’ and 5’-gttctgttacctcctggctctg-3’ primers for sequence confirmation. DNA and RNA oligonucleotides were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. (Coraville, IA, USA). Two crRNAs, one tracrRNA, two ssODNs, and Cas9 protein were co-injected into fertilized oocytes from C57BL/6N female mice by the University of Texas Southwestern Transgenic Core. Founder mice were bred with C57BL/6J mice and progeny screened for the correct mutation by PCR and sequencing. After back-crossing founder mice with C57BL/6J mice for three generations, Dbhfl/+ mice were mated to generate homozygous Dbhfl/fl mice.
METHOD DETAILS
AAV Injections
Klbfl/fl mice were anesthetized using isoflurane anesthesia (3%−4% for induction; 1.5%−2% for maintenance) and positioned in a stereotaxic instrument (David Kopf Instruments) with a temperature controller to maintain body temperature. The skull was exposed, bregma was determined, and two small holes were drilled for bilateral injection into the LC (coordinates from lambda: ±0.9 mm mediolateral, −0.9 mm antero-posterior and −3.82 mm dorso-ventral47). Dorso-ventral coordinates are relative to pia. A volume of 300 nl (1 × 1012 genomic particles/μl) of AAV8-GFP or AAV8-GFP-Cre virus (UNC Vector Core) was injected bilaterally into the LC. The virus was infused at 50 nl/minute using a microinjection syringe pump and Micro2T controller system with a 34G Nanofil needle (World Precision Instrument, UMP3T-1). After each injection, the needle was maintained in position for 10 minutes to prevent backflow and then slowly removed over 5 minutes. The skin was closed using sutures. Mice were allowed to recover for two weeks before use in experiments.
Loss of Righting Reflex (LORR) Studies
Time to LORR was defined as the time between ethanol administration to mice and LORR. Unless indicated otherwise, ethanol was administered by oral gavage in a volume of 0.02 ml/g to a final concentration of 5 g/kg. Once ataxic, mice were placed in a supine position in V-shaped plastic troughs and the time measured until they were able to right themselves three times within 30 seconds, which was defined as LORR duration. LORR studies were performed in 2–8-month-old mice. For studying FGF21’s pharmacologic effects on ethanol-induced LORR, mice were administered ethanol followed 1 hour later by injection of either FGF21 or vehicle. Unless indicated otherwise, FGF21 was i.p. injected in a volume of 0.01 ml/g to a final concentration of 1 mg/kg. For the sedatives study, ketamine (200 mg/kg), diazepam (30 mg/kg), pentobarbital (55 mg/kg) or ethanol (4.3 g/kg) were i.p. injected followed 30 minutes later by injection of FGF21 or vehicle. Diazepam and ketamine were diluted in 0.9% saline, and pentobarbital was dissolved in 0.9% saline containing 10% ethanol. Ketamine, diazepam and pentobarbital were injected in a volume of 0.01 ml/g, and ethanol was injected in a volume of 0.017 ml/g.
DSP-4, Prazosin and Propranolol Studies
For the DSP-4 studies, 2-month-old C57BL/6J mice were i.p. injected with either DSP-4 (50 mg/kg in a volume of 0.01 ml/g) or vehicle. Two days later, mice were administered ethanol followed 1 hour later by injection of either FGF21 or vehicle. For the prazosin and propranolol studies, 2–3-month-old mice were administered ethanol followed 1 hour later by injection of FGF21 or vehicle in the presence or absence of prazosin (0.8 mg/kg in a volume of 0.01 ml/g) or propranolol (10 mg/kg in a volume of 0.01 ml/g). DSP-4, prazosin and propranolol were all dissolved in 0.9% saline just prior to use.
Rotarod Studies
Three-to-six-month-old mice were trained for three consecutive days on a Rotamex-5 rotarod (Columbus Instruments) spinning at 5 rpm, with training complete when mice were able to stay on the rotarod without falling completely off for 60 seconds. On the fourth day, mice were i.p. injected with ethanol (2 g/kg in a volume of 0.014 ml/g) followed 30 minutes later by injection of either FGF21 or vehicle. Time on the rotarod spinning at 5 rpm until falling completely off, with a maximum of 60 seconds, was measured at regular intervals.
Rectal Temperature Measurement
Rectal temperature was measured using a BAT-12 Microprobe digital thermometer with a RET-3 mouse rectal probe (Physitemp Instruments, Clifton, New Jersey). Mice (2–4-month-old) were gently restrained, and the lubricated probe was inserted 1.5 cm into the rectal cavity to determine body temperature.
c-Fos Induction and Immunohistochemistry
For the c-Fos induction studies, 2–7-month-old mice were habituated for four days by either i.p. injection of 0.9% saline or oral gavage with water. On the fifth day, mice were i.p. injected with vehicle or FGF21 (2 hour treatment), or orally gavaged with water or ethanol as indicated in the figure legends. For all immunohistochemistry experiments, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and transcardially perfused first with PBS followed by 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF). Brains or adrenals were fixed for 24 hours in 10% NBF at 4°C and 50 μm slices were prepared using a Leica VT1000S vibratome. Slices were incubated for 1 hour in blocking buffer (1% bovine serum albumin, 5% normal goat serum, 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS) at room temperature with shaking followed by incubation in primary antibodies, including antibodies against NET (Mab Technologies, 1:1000 dilution), cFos (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000 dilution), red fluorescent protein (Rockland, 1:500 dilution), GFP (Aves Labs, 1:2000 dilution) and DBH (MilliporeSigma, 1:1000 dilution) for 48 hours at 4°C. Free-floating slices were washed 3 times in PBS for 10 minutes followed by incubation for 1 hour at room temperature with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies, including goat anti-mouse, goat anti-chicken, goat anti-rabbit IgGs (Invitrogen, 1:500 dilution), and DAPI (Fisher Scientific, 1:5000 dilution) in blocking buffer. Slices were washed 3 times for 10 minutes in PBS and mounted with Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences). Images were taken using a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope and images were processed using Fiji software48. c-Fos counts were performed blinded.
Microdissection of Brain Regions and Quantitative PCR Analysis
Brains from 2–5-month-old mice were extracted from the skull and kept under dry ice vapor for all dissections. Coronal sections (0.5 mm thickness) were cut using a brain-slicing matrix (Braintree Scientific). SCN and LC regions were identified by gross anatomical landmarks47 and dissected using a 16G tissue punch. Tissue was homogenized by passage through a 26.5G syringe in RNA-STAT60. Total RNA was isolated from tissue using RNA-STAT60 reagent, and RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA (Invitrogen). Gene expression was measured with an Applied Biosystems 7900HT Sequence Detection System using the ddCT assay and normalized to cyclophilin49.
In Situ Hybridization Analysis
C57BL/6J, 5-month-old mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and transcardially perfused first with PBS followed by 10% NBF. Brains were fixed for 24 hours at 4°C in 10% NBF and then switched to 30% sucrose for 24 hours. Brain slices (25 μm) were cut using a freezing microtome (Leica), collected in PBS and treated with hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes. After a PBS rinse, slices were mounted and desiccated overnight at room temperature. In situ hybridization was performed using RNAScope multiplex fluorescence kits (cat# 323110) and Klb (cat# 415221 Mm-Klb) and Fgfr1c (cat# 454941-C2 Mm-Fgfr1-O1-C2) probes purchased from Advanced Cell Diagnostics. Hybridized slides were incubated with amplification reagents and Opal 570 and 690 dyes (Akoya Biosciences, 1:1500 dilution) followed by sequential incubation with tyrosine hydroxylase (Aves Labs, 1:1000 dilution), biotinylated anti-chicken secondary (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 1:1000 dilution) and streptavidin AlexaFluor488 (Invitrogen, 1:1000 dilution) antibodies. Slides were rinsed, dehydrated, cleared, and mounted with EcoMount (BioCare Medical). Images were taken using a Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope.
FGF21 and Ethanol Measurements
For measuring FGF21 and ethanol concentrations in murine plasma, blood from 4–6-month-old mice was centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 15 minutes immediately after collection and plasma was stored at −80°C until analysis. Plasma FGF21 concentrations were measured using an FGF21 mouse/rat ELISA kit (BioVendor) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasma ethanol concentrations were measured using an EnzyChrom ethanol assay kit (BioAssay Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For measuring brain ethanol concentrations, brains were removed, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Frozen whole brains were homogenized in 0.1N HCl and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4°C. Ethanol concentrations in the supernatants were measured using an EnzyChrom ethanol assay kit.
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
All data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. For Figures 1–3, 6B–E, 7A and B, and S3B and C, n is individual mice. In Figures 4B, 5C and D, and 7C and D, n is brain sections. Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism Software Version 9.0. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t tests were used for two group analyses. Multiple groups were tested by one-way or two-way ANOVAs with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. For the rotarod analyses, a linear mixed effect model was fitted using the R package lme4 and group effect P values derived using a likelihood ratio test. In all analyses, a P value < 0.05 was considered significant. Data S1 contains the unprocessed data underlying the display items in the manuscript, related to Figures 1–7 and S3.
Supplementary Material
REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
---|---|---|
Antibodies | ||
Rabbit monoclonal anti-cFos | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat# 2250S; RRID: AB_2247211 |
Mouse monoclonal anti-NET | Mab Technology | Cat# NET05-2; RRID: AB_2571639 |
Rabbit polyclonal anti-RFP | Rockland | Cat# 600-401-379; RRID: AB_2209751 |
Chicken polyclonal anti-GFP | Abcam | Cat# 13970; RRID: AB_300798 |
Rabbit polyclonal anti-DBH | Immunostar | Cat# 22806; RRID: AB_572229 |
Chicken polyclonal anti-TH | Aves labs | Cat# TYH; RRID: AB_10013440 |
Goat Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# A11072; RRID: AB_2534116 |
Goat Anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 633 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# A21052; RRID: AB_2535719 |
Goat Anti-chicken Alexa Fluor 594 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# A11042; RRID: AB_2534099 |
Biotin-SP AffiniPure donkey anti-chicken secondary IgY | Jackson Immunoresearch | Cat# 703-065-155; RRID: AB_2313596 |
Streptavidin, Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# S11223 |
Bacterial and virus strains | ||
AAV8-hSyn-EGFP | UNC Vector Core | N/A |
AAV8-hSyn-GFP-Cre | UNC Vector Core | N/A |
Biological samples | ||
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
Recombinant human FGF21 | Novo Nordisk | N/A |
Ethanol (200 proof ethyl alcohol) | Pharmco-Aaper | C16A0720P |
Prazosin hydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# P7791-50MG |
Propranolol | TOCRIS Bioscience | Cat# 0624 |
N-(2-Chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine hydrochloride (DSP-4) | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# C8417-100MG |
Hydrochloric acid | EMD | Cat# HX0603-3 |
Ketamine (Ketaset) | Zoetis | Cat# 10004027 |
Diazepam | Hospira | Cat# 00409321312 |
Pentobarbital (Euthasol solution) | USP | Cat# VINV-CIII-0001 |
10% Buffered Formalin Phosphate | Thermo Fisher Scientific | Cat# SF100-4 |
Critical commercial assays | ||
Mouse FGF21 ELISA | Biovendor | Cat# RD291108200R |
EnzyChrom Ethanol Assay Kit | BioAssay Systems | Cat# ECET-100 |
RNAscope multiplex fluorescence kits | Advanced Cell Diagnostics | Cat# 323110 |
RNAscope probe – Mm-Klb | Advanced Cell Diagnostics | Cat# 415221 |
RNAscope probe – Mm-Fgfr1-O1-C2 | Advanced Cell Diagnostics | Cat# 454941 |
Opal 570 reagent | Akoya Biosciences | Cat# FP1488001KT |
Opal 690 reagent | Akoya Biosciences | Cat# FP1497001KT |
EcoMount | Biocare Medical | EM897L |
Alt-R S.p. Cas9 Nuclease V3, 100ug | IDT | Cat# 1081058 |
Deposited data | ||
Experimental models: Cell lines | ||
Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
Mouse: C57BL/6J wild-type | The Jackson Laboratory | JAX: 000664 |
Mouse: DBHCre KI | The Jackson Laboratory | JAX: 033951 |
Mouse: FGF21 KO | Potthoff et al.45 | N/A |
Mouse: Klbfl/fl | Bookout et al.30 | N/A |
Mouse: KlbCamk2a | Bookout et al.30 | N/A |
Mouse: FGF21Alb | Song et al.7 | N/A |
Mouse: KLB-T | Coate et al.26 | N/A |
Mouse: DBHfl/fl | This paper | N/A |
Mouse: DBHCamk2a | This paper | N/A |
Oligonucleotides | ||
DBH3_5’_crRNA: ACTCACCATTGAACCTATGC | IDT | N/A |
DBH3_3’_crRNA: ACCTGGGTCCCAGAGTTGCA | IDT | N/A |
DBH3_5’_ssODN: caggcagagagtgttatggtcttctcatttgctaagcggacagcgaggagcttcacttggtaggaggtcatgtgacatgattctcttcactcaccattgaacctgaattcgttgcgtgaATAACTTCGTATAATGTATGCTATACGAAGTTATatgctggctctgagcgggcaatcaactggttctgtctggctacagg | IDT | N/A |
DBH3_3’_ssODN: cactgagctacccccacgcttcccccgacaccacatcatcatggtaaacgggggtagagctctgctttccacctgggtcccagagtATAACTTCGTATAATGTATGCTATACGAAGTTATgttgcgtgaggattctgcatggatcgaggtgctaccctggctccttagaagtagcacatatg | IDT | N/A |
DBH3_5’_LoxP PCR (Forward) gtgcttaacggtgaggacagg (Reverse) ctgtatgcaggcctgaggtg |
IDT | N/A |
DBH3_3’_LoxP PCR (Forward) cgacaatgagaccacgtactgg (Reverse) ggaaatattcatctcaggggccc |
IDT | N/A |
DBH3_5’ Sequence: ggcagagagtgttatggtc | IDT | N/A |
DBH3_3’ Sequence: gttctgttacctcctggctctg | IDT | N/A |
Alt-R CRISPR-Cas9 tracrRNA, 20nmol | IDT | Cat# 1072533 |
Recombinant DNA | ||
Software and algorithms | ||
GraphPad Prism 9 | GraphPad | https://www.graphpad.com |
Fiji | Schindelin et al.48 | https://imagei.net/software/fiii/; RRID: SCR_002285 |
CCTop-CRISPR/Cas9 target online predictor | https://cctop.cos.uni-heidelberg.de:8043/ | |
Other | ||
QPCR | Applied Biosystems | 7900HT Sequence Detection System |
Model 942 Small Animal Stereotaxic Instrument with Digital Display Console | David Kopf Instruments | https://kopfinstruments.com/product/model-942-small-animal-stereotaxic-instrument-with-digital-display-console/ |
Microinjection syringe pump and Micro2T controller system (UMP3T-1) | World Precision Instrument | https://www.wpiinc.com/var-8091-microinjection-syringe-pump-with-smartouch-controller?gclid=Cj0KCQiAz9ieBhCIARIsACB0oGIegIjgHutnBAF0MgC-PPc273tfDvE7LntYr2wnzWTsFuliDH1BYUMaAoEREALw_wcB |
Rota Rod Rotamex-5 | Columbus instruments | https://www.colinst.com/products/rota-rod-rotamex |
Leica VT1000S vibrating blade microtome | Leica Biosystems | https://www.leicabiosystems.com/us/research/vibratomes/leica-vt1000-s/ |
Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope | Zeiss | https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/en/resources/insights-hub/raw-materials/ancient-fidget-spinner.html |
Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope | Zeiss | https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/en/c/ind/22/zeiss-microscopy-image-contest-2022.html |
Stainless Steel Brain Matrix | Braintree Scientific | https://www.braintreesci.com/neuroscience-physiology/brain-matrice-tissue-punches/stainless-steel-brain-matrice/ |
BAT-12 microprobe digital thermometer with a RET-3 mouse rectal probe | Physitemp Instruments | https://physitemp.com/electrotherms_p102 |
Standard rodent chow diet (Teklad Global 16% Protein Rodent Diet) | Teklad | https://www.envigo.com/rodent-natural-ingredient-2016-diets |
Highlights.
Hormone FGF21 counteracts alcohol-induced loss of consciousness and coordination
Pharmacologic FGF21 accelerates recovery from alcohol-induced intoxication
FGF21 exerts its sobering effect by activating the noradrenergic nervous system
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Xiaowei Zhan for statistical analysis of the rotarod data; Genaro Hernandez for advice and experimental assistance during the early stages of this project; Jose Cabrera for help with graphics; the UT Southwestern Transgenic Core for assistance in generating Dbhfl/fl mice; the UT Southwestern Quantitative Light Microscopy Core, a shared resource of the Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center; and Novo Nordisk for generously providing recombinant FGF21. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (K99 DK120869 to M.S., R01 AA028473 to D.J.M. and S.A.K., 1P30 CA142543 to the Quantitative Light Microscopy Core, 1S10 RR029731 to Kate Luby-Phelps of the Quantitative Light Microscopy Core), the Robert A Welch Foundation (I-1275 to D.J.M., I-1558 to S.A.K.); and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (J.M.F. and D.J.M.). This article is subject to HHMI’s Open Access to Publications policy. HHMI lab heads have previously granted a nonexclusive CC BY 4.0 license to the public and a sublicensable license to HHMI in their research articles. Pursuant to those licenses, the author-accepted manuscript of this article can be made freely available under a CC BY 4.0 license immediately upon publication.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
D.J.M. and S.A.K. are founders of Atias Pharma, LLC and members of the advisory board. M.C., D.J.M. and S.A.K. are authors on a patent related to this work.
REFERENCES
- 1.Dudley R, and Maro A (2021). Human Evolution and Dietary Ethanol. Nutrients 13, 2419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Janiak MC, Pinto SL, Duytschaever G, Carrigan MA, and Melin AD (2020). Genetic evidence of widespread variation in ethanol metabolism among mammals: revisiting the ‘myth’ of natural intoxication. Biol Lett 16, 20200070. 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fisher FM, and Maratos-Flier E (2016). Understanding the Physiology of FGF21. Annu Rev Physiol 78, 223–241. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Owen BM, Mangelsdorf DJ, and Kliewer SA (2015). Tissue-specific actions of the metabolic hormones FGF15/19 and FGF21. Trends Endocrinol Metab 26, 22–29. 10.1016/j.tem.2014.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Desai BN, Singhal G, Watanabe M, Stevanovic D, Lundasen T, Fisher FM, Mather ML, Vardeh HG, Douris N, Adams AC, et al. (2017). Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) is robustly induced by ethanol and has a protective role in ethanol associated liver injury. Mol Metab 6, 1395–1406. 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Søberg S, Andersen ES, Dalsgaard NB, Jarlhelt I, Hansen NL, Hoffmann N, Vilsbøll T, Chenchar A, Jensen M, Grevengoed TJ, et al. (2018). FGF21, a liver hormone that inhibits alcohol intake in mice, increases in human circulation after acute alcohol ingestion and sustained binge drinking at Oktoberfest. Mol Metab 11, 96–103. 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Song P, Zechner C, Hernandez G, Cánovas J, Xie Y, Sondhi V, Wagner M, Stadlbauer V, Horvath A, Leber B, et al. (2018). The Hormone FGF21 Stimulates Water Drinking in Response to Ketogenic Diet and Alcohol. Cell Metab 27, 1338–1347.e1334. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schumann G, Liu C, O’Reilly P, Gao H, Song P, Xu B, Ruggeri B, Amin N, Jia T, Preis S, et al. (2016). KLB is associated with alcohol drinking, and its gene product β-Klotho is necessary for FGF21 regulation of alcohol preference. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, 14372–14377. 10.1073/pnas.1611243113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Talukdar S, Owen BM, Song P, Hernandez G, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Scott WT, Paratala B, Turner T, Smith A, et al. (2016). FGF21 Regulates Sweet and Alcohol Preference. Cell Metab 23, 344–349. 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Flippo KH, Trammell SAJ, Gillum MP, Aklan I, Perez MB, Yavuz Y, Smith NK, Jensen-Cody SO, Zhou B, Claflin KE, et al. (2022). FGF21 suppresses alcohol consumption through an amygdalo-striatal circuit. Cell Metab 34, 317–328.e316. 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.12.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu Y, Zhao C, Xiao J, Liu L, Zhang M, Wang C, Wu G, Zheng MH, Xu LM, Chen YP, et al. (2016). Fibroblast growth factor 21 deficiency exacerbates chronic alcohol-induced hepatic steatosis and injury. Sci Rep 6, 31026. 10.1038/srep31026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhu S, Ma L, Wu Y, Ye X, Zhang T, Zhang Q, Rasoul LM, Liu Y, Guo M, Zhou B, et al. (2014). FGF21 treatment ameliorates alcoholic fatty liver through activation of AMPK-SIRT1 pathway. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 46, 1041–1048. 10.1093/abbs/gmu097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ogawa Y, Kurosu H, Yamamoto M, Nandi A, Rosenblatt KP, Goetz R, Eliseenkova AV, Mohammadi M, and Kuro-o M (2007). BetaKlotho is required for metabolic activity of fibroblast growth factor 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 7432–7437. 10.1073/pnas.0701600104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Frayling TM, Beaumont RN, Jones SE, Yaghootkar H, Tuke MA, Ruth KS, Casanova F, West B, Locke J, Sharp S, et al. (2018). A Common Allele in FGF21 Associated with Sugar Intake Is Associated with Body Shape, Lower Total Body-Fat Percentage, and Higher Blood Pressure. Cell Rep 23, 327–336. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Søberg S, Sandholt CH, Jespersen NZ, Toft U, Madsen AL, von Holstein-Rathlou S, Grevengoed TJ, Christensen KB, Bredie WLP, Potthoff MJ, et al. (2017). FGF21 Is a Sugar-Induced Hormone Associated with Sweet Intake and Preference in Humans. Cell Metab 25, 1045–1053.e1046. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hsuchou H, Pan W, and Kastin AJ (2007). The fasting polypeptide FGF21 can enter brain from blood. Peptides 28, 2382–2386. 10.1016/j.peptides.2007.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Berridge CW, Schmeichel BE, and España RA (2012). Noradrenergic modulation of wakefulness/arousal. Sleep Med Rev 16, 187–197. 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Poe GR, Foote S, Eschenko O, Johansen JP, Bouret S, Aston-Jones G, Harley CW, Manahan-Vaughan D, Weinshenker D, Valentino R, et al. (2020). Locus coeruleus: a new look at the blue spot. Nat Rev Neurosci 21, 644–659. 10.1038/s41583-020-0360-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu J, Stanislaus S, Chinookoswong N, Lau YY, Hager T, Patel J, Ge H, Weiszmann J, Lu SC, Graham M, et al. (2009). Acute glucose-lowering and insulin-sensitizing action of FGF21 in insulin-resistant mouse models--association with liver and adipose tissue effects. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 297, E1105–1114. 10.1152/ajpendo.00348.2009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chang SL, Patel NA, and Romero AA (1995). Activation and desensitization of Fos immunoreactivity in the rat brain following ethanol administration. Brain Res 679, 89–98. 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00210-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Thiele TE, van Dijk G, and Bernstein IL (1997). Ethanol-induced c-Fos expression in rat lines selected for low and high alcohol consumption. Brain Res 756, 278–282. 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00228-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kolodziejska-Akiyama KM, Cha YM, Jiang Y, Loh HH, and Chang SL (2005). Ethanol-induced FOS immunoreactivity in the brain of mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. Drug Alcohol Depend 80, 161–168. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Weinshenker D, Rust NC, Miller NS, and Palmiter RD (2000). Ethanol-associated behaviors of mice lacking norepinephrine. J Neurosci 20, 3157–3164. 10.1523/jneurosci.20-09-03157.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fon Tacer K, Bookout AL, Ding X, Kurosu H, John GB, Wang L, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Kuro-o M, Mangelsdorf DJ, and Kliewer SA (2010). Research resource: Comprehensive expression atlas of the fibroblast growth factor system in adult mouse. Mol Endocrinol 24, 2050–2064. 10.1210/me.2010-0142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hultman K, Scarlett JM, Baquero AF, Cornea A, Zhang Y, Salinas CBG, Brown J, Morton GJ, Whalen EJ, Grove KL, et al. (2019). The central fibroblast growth factor receptor/beta klotho system: Comprehensive mapping in Mus musculus and comparisons to nonhuman primate and human samples using an automated in situ hybridization platform. J Comp Neurol 527, 2069–2085. 10.1002/cne.24668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Coate KC, Hernandez G, Thorne CA, Sun S, Le TDV, Vale K, Kliewer SA, and Mangelsdorf DJ (2017). FGF21 Is an Exocrine Pancreas Secretagogue. Cell Metab 25, 472–480. 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ross SB, and Stenfors C (2015). DSP4, a selective neurotoxin for the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system. A review of its mode of action. Neurotox Res 27, 15–30. 10.1007/s12640-014-9482-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Malinowska B, Napiórkowska-Pawlak D, Pawlak R, Buczko W, and Göthert M (1999). Ifenprodil influences changes in mouse behaviour related to acute and chronic ethanol administration. Eur J Pharmacol 377, 13–19. 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00393-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Berridge CW, and Waterhouse BD (2003). The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 42, 33–84. 10.1016/s0165-0173(03)00143-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bookout AL, de Groot MH, Owen BM, Lee S, Gautron L, Lawrence HL, Ding X, Elmquist JK, Takahashi JS, Mangelsdorf DJ, and Kliewer SA (2013). FGF21 regulates metabolism and circadian behavior by acting on the nervous system. Nat Med 19, 1147–1152. 10.1038/nm.3249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao C, Liu Y, Xiao J, Liu L, Chen S, Mohammadi M, McClain CJ, Li X, and Feng W (2015). FGF21 mediates alcohol-induced adipose tissue lipolysis by activation of systemic release of catecholamine in mice. J Lipid Res 56, 1481–1491. 10.1194/jlr.M058610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dushay JR, Toschi E, Mitten EK, Fisher FM, Herman MA, and Maratos-Flier E (2015). Fructose ingestion acutely stimulates circulating FGF21 levels in humans. Mol Metab 4, 51–57. 10.1016/j.molmet.2014.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fisher FM, Kim M, Doridot L, Cunniff JC, Parker TS, Levine DM, Hellerstein MK, Hudgins LC, Maratos-Flier E, and Herman MA (2017). A critical role for ChREBP-mediated FGF21 secretion in hepatic fructose metabolism. Mol Metab 6, 14–21. 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.de Lecea L, Carter ME, and Adamantidis A (2012). Shining light on wakefulness and arousal. Biol Psychiatry 71, 1046–1052. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.01.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Blum K, Merritt JH, Wallace JE, Owen R, Hahn JW, and Geller I (1972). Effects of catecholamine synthesis inhibition on ethanol narcosis in mice. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 14, 324–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cott JM, Breese GR, Cooper BR, Barlow S, and Prange AJ Jr. (1976). Investigations into the mechanism of reduction of ethanol sleep by thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 196, 594–604. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Masserano JM, and Weiner N (1982). Investigations into the neurochemical mechanisms mediating differences in ethanol sensitivity in two lines of mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 221, 404–409. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ahlenius S, Carlsson A, Engel J, Svensson T, and Södersten P (1973). Antagonism by alpha methyltyrosine of the ethanol-induced stimulation and euphoria in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 14, 586–591. 10.1002/cpt1973144part1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cohn ML, Cohn M, Taylor FH, and Scattaregia F (1975). A direct effect of dibutyryl cyclic AMP on the duration of narcosis induced by sedative, hypnotic, tranquiliser and anaesthetic drugs in the rat. Neuropharmacology 14, 483–487. 10.1016/0028-3908(75)90051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moore MS, DeZazzo J, Luk AY, Tully T, Singh CM, and Heberlein U (1998). Ethanol intoxication in Drosophila: Genetic and pharmacological evidence for regulation by the cAMP signaling pathway. Cell 93, 997–1007. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81205-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Inagaki T, Dutchak P, Zhao G, Ding X, Gautron L, Parameswara V, Li Y, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Esser V, et al. (2007). Endocrine regulation of the fasting response by PPARalpha-mediated induction of fibroblast growth factor 21. Cell Metab 5, 415–425. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Badman MK, Pissios P, Kennedy AR, Koukos G, Flier JS, and Maratos-Flier E (2007). Hepatic fibroblast growth factor 21 is regulated by PPARalpha and is a key mediator of hepatic lipid metabolism in ketotic states. Cell Metab 5, 426–437. 10.1016/j.cmet.2007.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Laeger T, Henagan TM, Albarado DC, Redman LM, Bray GA, Noland RC, Münzberg H, Hutson SM, Gettys TW, Schwartz MW, and Morrison CD (2014). FGF21 is an endocrine signal of protein restriction. J Clin Invest 124, 3913–3922. 10.1172/jci74915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Borg S, Kvande H, and Sedvall G (1981). Central norepinephrine metabolism during alcohol intoxication in addicts and healthy volunteers. Science 213, 1135–1137. 10.1126/science.7268421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Potthoff MJ, Inagaki T, Satapati S, Ding X, He T, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Finck BN, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA, and Burgess SC (2009). FGF21 induces PGC-1alpha and regulates carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolism during the adaptive starvation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106, 10853–10858. 10.1073/pnas.0904187106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ran FA, Hsu PD, Wright J, Agarwala V, Scott DA, and Zhang F (2013). Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Protoc 8, 2281–2308. 10.1038/nprot.2013.143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Paxinos G, and Franklin KB (2019). Paxinos and Franklin’s the mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates (Academic press; ). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bookout AL, Cummins CL, Mangelsdorf DJ, Pesola JM, and Kramer MF (2006). High-throughput real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Curr Protoc Mol Biol Chapter 15, Unit 15.18. 10.1002/0471142727.mb1508s73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data points used to create the graphs can be found in Data S1.
This paper does not report original code.
Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.