Abstract
The historical lack of preclinical models reflecting the genetic heterogeneity of multiple myeloma (MM) hampers the advance of therapeutic discoveries. To circumvent this limitation, we screened mice engineered to carry eight MM lesions (NF-κB, KRAS, MYC, TP53, BCL2, cyclin D1, MMSET/NSD2 and c-MAF) combinatorially activated in B lymphocytes following T cell-driven immunization. Fifteen genetically diverse models developed bone marrow (BM) tumors fulfilling MM pathogenesis. Integrative analyses of ∼500 mice and ∼1,000 patients revealed a common MAPK–MYC genetic pathway that accelerated time to progression from precursor states across genetically heterogeneous MM. MYC-dependent time to progression conditioned immune evasion mechanisms that remodeled the BM microenvironment differently. Rapid MYC-driven progressors exhibited a high number of activated/exhausted CD8+ T cells with reduced immunosuppressive regulatory T (Treg) cells, while late MYC acquisition in slow progressors was associated with lower CD8+ T cell infiltration and more abundant Treg cells. Single-cell transcriptomics and functional assays defined a high ratio of CD8+ T cells versus Treg cells as a predictor of response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). In clinical series, high CD8+ T/Treg cell ratios underlie early progression in untreated smoldering MM, and correlated with early relapse in newly diagnosed patients with MM under Len/Dex therapy. In ICB-refractory MM models, increasing CD8+ T cell cytotoxicity or depleting Treg cells reversed immunotherapy resistance and yielded prolonged MM control. Our experimental models enable the correlation of MM genetic and immunological traits with preclinical therapy responses, which may inform the next-generation immunotherapy trials.
Subject terms: Myeloma, Myeloma, Immune evasion
New experimental models provide much-needed tools for understanding how genetically diverse multiple myeloma progresses and evolves in response to therapy.
Main
MM is a neoplasia of bone marrow (BM) plasma cells (PCs), which secrete monoclonal immunoglobulins that induce multi-organ damage1. MM occurs predominantly in older people, and is preceded by an asymptomatic condition termed monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)2,3. Progression of MGUS into MM usually proceeds through a transitional stage known as smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Understanding the mechanisms driving progression from precursor conditions into clinically active MM may contribute to the implementation of early therapies for select groups of individuals1.
Genetic heterogeneity is a hallmark of MM4. Chromosomal translocations of immunoglobulin-coding genes and hyperdiploidy are considered early genetic events, being followed by abnormalities in NF-κB, MAPK–RAS and apoptotic pathways that promote the full malignant MM phenotype4,5. Late-stage genetic changes frequently involve MYC and TP53 genes, which are commonly altered in relapsed/refractory MM6,7. Based on genetic features, MM is classified into risk groups that exhibit different outcomes to standard-of-care therapies4,5. In this scenario, the order of acquisition of the primary genetic lesions, and how they contribute to MM progression from precursor states, have not been completely elucidated5. Beyond genetics, accumulating evidence indicates that survival of neoplastic PCs largely depends on the interplay with the BM hematopoietic cell niche where they reside8. Thus, a tumor suppressive microenvironment provides effective surveillance to restrict PC growth at the MGUS and SMM stages, while progressive immuno-editing leading to T cell exhaustion underlies MM transformation2,3,8,9. However, the mechanisms by which genetically diverse tumor cells interact with the BM microenvironment to evade immunological surveillance during progression are largely unknown.
Addressing these scientific questions is of clinical relevance, because despite continuous improvement in MM survival, a cure remains elusive and the majority of individuals with MM eventually relapse1. Novel immunotherapy strategies with monoclonal antibodies, T cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies hold promise for more prolonged MM control, which might eventually lead to a cure10–14. However, such therapeutic efficacy clearly contrasts with the low response rate of patients with MM to immune checkpoint inhibitors15,16. Deciphering the mechanisms that underlie the discrepant outcomes to different immunotherapeutic approaches is urgently required. However, this investigation is seriously hampered by the paucity of experimental mouse models recapitulating the principal clinical, genetic and immunological characteristics of MM17–22. In this setting, a major obstacle to generating MM in mice has been the uncertainty about the disease’s cell of origin and the key genetic drivers that initiate and sustain the transformation process. The lack of mouse models of MM restricts preclinical immunotherapy research, which constitutes a current unmet medical need.
Here, we introduce fifteen genetically engineered mouse models of human-like MM that reflect the key elements in the pathogenesis of the disease: the genetic heterogeneity, the progressive transition of MGUS and SMM states into clinical active disease, and the interaction of tumor cells with the BM immune microenvironment during transformation. Our results point to MYC as a key regulator of the tumor and immune progression in genetically heterogeneous MM, which conditions clinical responses to immunotherapy.
Results
Modeling genetic heterogeneity of human multiple myeloma in mice
To establish preclinical models of genetically diverse MM, transgenic mice carrying eight MM genetic drivers that recapitulate the most common changes observed in human MM were bred to engineer strains with single, double and triple genetic alterations. These included NF-κB signaling activation by IKBKB/IKK2 expression, a KRASG12D mutation, antiapoptotic BCL2 expression, c-MYC expression, TP53 deletion, and constitutive expression of cyclin D1, c-MAF and MMSET/NSD2 mimicking immunoglobulin translocations t(11;14), t(16;14) and t(4;14), respectively (Supplementary Table 1)4,5. These changes were triggered in immature pre-B lymphocytes or mature germinal center (GC) B lymphocytes, which are the two developmental stages proposed to be the origin of the disease23,24, using mb1-cre or cγ1-cre mice, respectively25,26. Young mice were immunized with sheep red blood cells (SRBCs) to induce the formation of PCs labeled with a GFP reporter, after which mice were monitored for MM development up to 12 months of age (Fig. 1a, Methods and Supplementary Fig. 1). Vk*MYC mice were included as a reference model of MM development at a late age, driven by single MYC expression in GC B lymphocytes17. Among 31 strains bearing varied genetic combinations, 9 developed lethal tumors classified as mature B cell lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Supplementary Fig. 2a–c). Three of the remaining lines exhibited fully penetrant PC tumors in the BM, which shortened median overall survival (mOS) to below 12 months of age (Fig. 1b). Two of these mouse lines were termed MImb1 and MIcγ1 as they carry MYC and IKK2NF-κB expression by mb1-cre or cγ1-cre alleles, respectively, which indicates that NF-κB activation accelerated MYC-driven MM development in these two models compared to Vk*MYC mice (mOS, 197 d and 208 d versus 509 d; P < 0.001). The third mouse line was termed BIcγ1 as it carries BCL2 and IKK2NF-κB expression by the cγ1-cre allele, and exhibited an mOS of 296 d, which indicates that apoptosis blockade in cells with NF-κB signaling was sufficient for transformation (Supplementary Table 1). BM tumors in the three different lines were composed of >10% GFP+CD138+B220−sIgM− PCs, which morphologically resembled human MM cells and exhibited a multifocal infiltration pattern in the BM; they also expressed typical MM markers including acid phosphatase, Bcma, Slamf7 and Taci, secreted immunoglobulins into the serum, and showed clonal IghV gene rearrangements (Fig. 1c–f and Extended Data Fig. 1a–c). In addition, mice presented with common CRAB-like clinical features (hyperCalcemia, Renal disease, Anemia and Bone disease; Extended Data Fig. 1d–g). However, while the BIcγ1 and MIcγ1 strains predominantly secreted IgG or IgA, the MImb1 mice derived from immature pre-B cells presented IgM-secreting MM (Fig. 1g and Extended Data Fig. 1h). Genetic studies in patients with IgM MM, corresponding to less than 1% of MM cases, showed a pre-germinal B lymphocyte origin, which is matched by the MImb1 model27. In contrast, BIcγ1 and MIcγ1 mice developed class-switched MM from GC B lymphocytes that fulfill the diagnostic criteria of human disease, which implicates these cells in the origin of typical MM.
To build MM genetic heterogeneity, BIcγ1 and MIcγ1 strains were crossed with lines carrying additional MM genetic changes, including the common KRASG12D mutation and the high-risk Trp53 deletion4. Both genetic abnormalities shortened the time to MM development in BIcγ1 and MIcγ1 mice, inducing a BM disease composed of GFP+CD138+B220−sIgM− PCs that secreted IgG or IgA, and was classified as MM (Fig. 1h,i and Extended Data Fig. 2a,b). Likewise, concomitant KRASG12D and Trp53 deletion in BIcγ1 mice rapidly induced BM and extramedullary PC tumors (Extended Data Fig. 2a). These experimental results mimic data from individuals with SMM28,29, which indicates that MAPK–RAS mutations and heterozygous TP53 inactivation accelerate the onset of clinically active MM from precursor conditions. Then we explored whether apoptosis restriction could influence MM development in MIcγ1 mice. To this end, transgenic BCL2 expression was added to the MIcγ1 strain, which yielded marked acceleration of MM onset (Fig. 1i and Extended Data Fig. 2c). We further expanded the genetic heterogeneity by adding the overexpression of the three genes involved in the immunoglobulin chromosomal translocations used to stratify MM into genetic-risk groups4,5. To achieve this, BIcγ1 mice were crossed with the Eµ-cyclin D1, Eµ-MAF or the newly generated Rosa26-hMMSET-IIStop-floxed mouse lines, representative of standard-risk t(11;14) or the high-risk t(14;16) and t(4;14) translocations, respectively. BIcγ1 mice carrying overexpression of each of these three transgenes developed BM tumors classified as typical MM, all of which exhibited overlapping survival curves (Fig. 1h and Extended Data Fig. 3a). Similarly, a strain derived from MIcγ1 mice with additional overexpression of c-MAF developed MM and exhibited a similar survival to that of MIcγ1 mice (Fig. 1i and Extended Data Fig. 3b). Likewise, SMM patients carrying t(11;14), t(14;16) or t(4;14) are not at increased risk of progression to active MM compared with those without immunoglobulin translocations28,29. On the other hand, dysregulation of MMSET contributed to MM initiation, as MMSET transgenic mice crossed with lines carrying either IKK2NF-κB activation or MYC expression drove MM development (Fig. 1j and Extended Data Fig. 3c). These experimental findings suggest that the expression of the oncogenes involved in the immunoglobulin translocations contributes to MM development, while such additional expression does not accelerate MM onset. Taken together, we have developed a panel of 15 mouse models encompassing MM genetic heterogeneity, including the standard-risk and high-risk genetic subgroups (Extended Data Table 1).
Multiple myeloma is preceded by MGUS and SMM-like precursor states
We next determined whether, like in humans, precursor disease was present before the onset of symptomatic MM2,3. In BIcγ1 and BIcγ1-derived mice, lethal MM was uniformly preceded by an MGUS-like stage from 6 months of age, characterized by minimal BM infiltration of oligoclonal GFP+CD138+B220−sIgM− PCs that moderately secreted class-switched immunoglobulins into the serum (Fig. 1k,l and Extended Data Fig. 3d,e). The number of PCs, the degree of IghV clonality, and the levels of immunoglobulins increased over time and demarcated an SMM-like asymptomatic stage with >10% of clonal PCs, which eventually transformed into MM in 4 to 6 months. In contrast, MIcγ1 and MIcγ1-derived mice exhibited prominent MGUS-like disease in BM from 4–5 months of age that rapidly transformed into aggressive MM within several weeks (Fig. 1k,l, Extended Data Fig. 3d,e and Supplementary Fig. 2d). Thus, pre-malignant stages precede clinically evident MM in genetically heterogeneous mice. However, MIcγ1-derived models exhibited a rapid MGUS-to-MM transition, while the BIcγ1-derived strains were characterized by a longer time to progression, which in humans corresponds to the many years required by MGUS cells undergoing MM transformation2,3. In summary, our genetically diverse mice recapitulate the natural history and clinical evolution of human disease, including models of early and late MM progression from precursor states.
MYC activation is a common feature in multiple myeloma genetic groups
RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of MGUS and MM cells from MIcγ1-derived and BIcγ1-derived mice defined a common transcriptional signature with respect to normal BM PCs, including the upregulation of PC genes (that is, Prdm1, Irf4, Xbp1, Sdc1 encoding Cd138, Tnfrsf17 encoding Bcma, Tnfrsf13b encoding Taci and Slamf7) and the downregulation of B cell genes (that is, Pax5 and Cd19; Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 2). To compare mouse tumors with human disease, RNA-seq was applied to malignant PCs from newly diagnosed MGUS and MM patients to define a human transcriptional signature with respect to normal BM PCs. Using principal-component analysis (PCA), mouse and human MGUS cells were mapped in between PCs and MM cells, which is indicative of a similar evolving transcriptional trajectory (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 3a,b). Additionally, gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed enrichment of transcriptionally deregulated mouse genes in the human MM expression signatures (Supplementary Fig. 3c and Supplementary Table 3). These data indicate that mouse and human MM share a common transcriptional profile. We then characterized the transcriptional changes underlying the transition of MGUS into MM in mouse models with different times to progression. BIcγ1-derived mice exhibited a linear transcriptional evolution as BM PCs progressed to MGUS cells and then to MM cells, concordant with the late progression. In contrast, MGUS and MM cells from MIcγ1 mice clustered closely and exhibited a reduced number of differentially expressed genes, concordant with the rapid progression (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Table 4). Comparative analyses of these two transcriptional patterns of progression revealed that the MYC oncogene was highly expressed in MM cells compared with MGUS cells in the BIcγ1-derived models, while transgenic MYC expression was already high in MGUS cells from MIcγ1 mice and remained stable during MM progression (Fig. 2d). GSEA of the MM transcriptomes found that ‘MYC target genes’ were among the top hallmarks in both BIcγ1-derived and MIcγ1-derived models (Fig. 2e). Accordingly, MYC protein expression was detected in primary BM GFP+ MM cells and MM-derived cell lines established from primary MM samples, including early and late progressors (Fig. 2f, Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 5). These results demonstrate the acquisition of endogenous MYC expression during MM progression in BIcγ1-derived models, while early activation of transgenic MYC in MIcγ1 mice accelerates MM progression. Likewise, in patients, MYC expression levels in MGUS cells were similar to those in BM PCs and were increased in MM cells (Fig. 2g), which agrees with previous studies7,17,28,29, and confirms that MYC regulates time to progression into MM.
Genetic characterization of mouse MM cells revealed karyotypes with triploidy, tetraploidy or complex aneuploidy, with recurrent chromosomal gains and losses as well as structural rearrangements (Fig. 2h,i). These included human-like translocations between MYC and the Igh or Igl genes in 11 of 62 (18%) primary MM samples and 3 of 6 (50%) MM-derived cell lines (Fig. 2j)7. However, MYC chromosomal changes were not observed in MGUS cells, indicating that these were acquired during MM progression, as reported in patients (Supplementary Fig. 5)7,28,29. We then evaluated the oncogenic function of MYC in genetically diverse MM-derived cell lines. Selective targeting of MYC with the small molecule MYCi975 induced dose-dependent MYC protein reduction30,31, which decreased viability of mouse and human MM cells (Fig. 2k). Therefore, MYC activation is a unifying feature in genetically heterogeneous MM, which distinguishes cases with early and late progression from precursor stages.
A MAPK–MYC genetic axis is amenable to targeted therapy
Quantification of the tumor mutational burden (TMB) by whole-exome sequencing (WES) revealed 28 somatic mutations in each mouse tumor in MGUS samples, 31 in MM samples and 172 in MM-derived cell lines (Supplementary Table 6). These included typical mutations in theTent5c gene and in genes encoding epigenetic modulators and cadherins (Fig. 3a). Mutations in genes in the NF-κB pathway were observed in 1 of 31 MM samples, which indicates that moderate NF-κB signaling activation by transgenic IKK2 expression in heterozygosity is enough for the development of precursor stages, which progress into MM without additional changes in the pathway. In clear contrast, mutations in genes in the MAPK pathway were observed in 29 of 62 (47%) mice at the MM stage; these rates are like those observed in MM patients4–6, which suggests that mutations in this signaling cascade accumulate during MM progression (Supplementary Table 7). Analysis of the genomic characteristics in MM cells from the models of early and late progression revealed that MIcγ1 mice exhibited normal karyotypes without MYC translocations, while BIcγ1 mice with Trp53 deletion exhibited more abundant chromosomal abnormalities and higher TMB compared with the strains without Trp53 deletion (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 6). Concordantly, among 599 MM patients in the CoMMpass study (NCT01454297), those carrying del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations exhibited higher copy number changes and TMB compared with the remaining patients (Fig. 3b), indicating that TP53-driven genetic instability promotes genetic rearrangements including those involving MYC during MM progression.
We next asked whether the acquired MAPK mutations were analogous in mouse and human MM. Of the 34 MAPK genes found with mutations in mouse MM, 19 (56%) were recurrently mutated in MM patients in the CoMMpass study (Supplementary Table 8). Accordingly, western blot analyses identified consistent phosphorylation of the protein kinase ERK, a surrogate of MAPK activation, in mouse and human MM-derived cell lines (Fig. 3c). Moreover, targeting MAPK signaling with trametinib, a MEK-ERK inhibitor clinically approved for BRAF-mutated melanoma32, reversed ERK phosphorylation and reduced mouse and human MM cell growth, which indicates shared MAPK activation (Fig. 3d,e). Given that mutations in MAPK pathway and MYC activation are acquired during MM development in mice, we investigated whether MAPK signaling could modulate MYC expression. Although trametinib did not consistently change MYC gene expression at the RNA level, MEK inhibition decreased phosphorylation of MYC at Ser62, which induced dose-dependent MYC degradation (Fig. 3f)33. These results suggest that while Trp53 loss triggers transcriptional MYC activation through chromosomal rearrangements, constitutive MAPK signaling stabilizes MYC protein during MM development. These data are in accordance with the Trp53/KRAS-BIcγ1 mouse model (Fig. 1h and Supplementary Fig. 4), which showed that simultaneous Trp53 loss and KRASG12D cooperated to accelerate MM onset.
Immunological features of the bone marrow microenvironment in multiple myeloma
Immune surveillance restricts clinical progression in individuals with MGUS and SMM for extended periods2,3,8. To give further insights from the models, sequential changes in the BM immune microenvironment were determined by multi-parametric flow cytometry in mice with different genotypes at sequential disease stages. A linear increase in the number of T lymphocytes and natural killer (NK) cells was observed during progression, which correlated with PC expansion (Fig. 4a,b). CD8+ T cells acquired a CD44+CD62L− effector phenotype and sequentially expressed the exhaustion markers PD-1, TIGIT and LAG3, while NK cells also exhibited activated phenotypes (Extended Data Fig. 4a–c). Due to the wide range of T cell and NK cell infiltration observed in the BM microenvironment across the different mouse strains, we divided MM cases according to the abundance of T and NK cells (Fig. 4c). A subset of MM cases (25 of 59, 42%) exhibited an immune cell infiltrate that resembled the BM microenvironment of healthy mice, while a subset of cases (34 of 59, 58%) was characterized by more abundant lymphoid cells, primarily CD8+ T lymphocytes with exhausted phenotypes (Fig. 4d and Extended Data Fig. 4d). Immunohistochemical studies in the BM revealed that T lymphocytes localized preferentially at the MM focal areas (Extended Data Fig. 4e,f). In addition, cases with more abundant T lymphocytes and NK lymphocytes contained a higher number of immunosuppressive CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells. The burden of CD8+ T lymphocytes, but not of NK cells, correlated with the number of Treg cells, suggesting that T cell cytotoxic and immunosuppressive states interact during MM development in mice (Fig. 4d and Extended Data Fig. 4g).
To explore similarities with human disease, we examined the BM immune microenvironment in primary samples from individuals newly diagnosed with MGUS (n = 108), SMM (n = 167) or MM (n = 652) by multi-parametric flow cytometry. A progressive increase in T cell and NK cell populations was observed during the sequential MM stages, which correlated with MM cell burden (Fig. 4e,f). According to the classification described above, the cohort of MM patients was divided into those with lower and higher numbers of infiltrating T cells and NK cells (Fig. 4g). Of 652 MM cases, 435 (67%) were characterized by T cell and NK cell infiltrates that matched those in healthy donors. In contrast, the remaining 217 cases (33%) corresponded to those with a higher number of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes and NK cells (Fig. 4g,h and Extended Data Fig. 4h). Mimicking results in mice, the number of Treg cells was higher in the cases with a higher number of immune cells, and was correlated with the abundance of CD8+ T lymphocytes, but not with NK cells (Fig. 4h and Extended Data Fig. 4i). The presence of the MM subgroups with lower and higher immune infiltrates was validated in a previously reported clinical series of MM (Extended Data Fig. 5)34,35. In summary, remodeling of the BM microenvironment during progression classifies mouse and human MM into distinct immune subtypes according to the abundance of infiltrating T cells and NK cells.
Next, we investigated whether these categories were associated with MM biological and clinical characteristics in mice and patients. Cases with higher number of immune infiltrating cells exhibited higher levels of monoclonal immunoglobulin in serum, as a surrogate of the increased MM cell burden (Fig. 4i). In addition, the BM immune phenotypes correlated with age, with the quantity of the BM infiltrating T and NK lymphocytes negatively correlated with aging (Fig. 4j and Extended Data Fig. 6a). However, in mouse models and humans, the distribution of tumor-reactive lymphoid cell infiltrates was similar among the MM genetic subgroups, including the standard-risk and high-risk categories (Fig. 4k)5. Additionally, and contrary to other cancers36, quantification of the TMB from WES analyses in MM cells did not reveal a correlation with BM immune features (Extended Data Fig. 6b–d). In conclusion, MM immune categories correlate with the number of tumor cells and with aging, but not with the genetic-risk groups or the TMB.
A CD8+ T cell versus Treg cell ratio modulates immunotherapy responses
We then asked whether early and late MM progression in the MIcγ1 and BIcγ1 models could influence responses to immunotherapy, and particularly to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. To this end, preclinical in vivo immunotherapy trials using monoclonal antibodies to inhibit the two immune checkpoint receptors PD-1 and TIGIT were performed. In MIcγ1 mice, anti-PD-1 therapy started at the MGUS stage and continued during 8 weeks markedly reduced tumor burden and delayed MM development in treated versus untreated animals (mOS, 258 versus 197 d; P < 0.05; Fig. 5a). In contrast, anti-PD-1 therapy in the BIcγ1 strain started at the MGUS stage did not induce responses in the treated cohort compared with control mice (mOS, 286 d versus 302 d; P = 0.61; Fig. 5b). Similar therapy strategies with the anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody did not yield therapeutic benefits in MIcγ1 or BIcγ1 mice (Fig. 5a,b and Supplementary Fig. 7). We investigated whether the composition of the BM microenvironment at precursor stages modulated responses to immunotherapy. MIcγ1 mice exhibited higher numbers of activated PD-1+, TIGIT+ and LAG3+ CD8+ T lymphocytes compared with BIcγ1 mice, but also showed a lower number of immunosuppressive CD4+PD-1+ Treg cells (Fig. 5c,d and Extended Data Fig. 6e,f). Accordingly, the ratio of CD8+ T cells to Treg cells was markedly higher in MIcγ1 than in BIcγ1 mice (median value of CD8+ T/Treg cell ratio, 22.5 versus 6.1; P = 0.019; Fig. 5e). In this setting, in vivo depletion of CD8+ T lymphocytes, but not of CD4+ T cells, accelerated MM onset in MIcγ1 mice (Extended Data Fig. 6g). In contrast, depletion of CD8+ T cells did not modify survival of BIcγ1 mice, but rather, survival was extended upon CD4+ T cell depletion (Extended Data Fig. 6h). These findings show that the abundance of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells versus the immunosuppressive Treg cells characterized the rapid model of MM progression driven by MYC activation, which may have favored the activity of anti-PD-1 therapy. Because MYC can regulate the immune response by promoting CD274 transcription in tumor cells37,38, we investigated this possibility in the mouse models. Pharmacological inhibition of MYC repressed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression at transcriptional and protein levels in MM cells from MIcγ1 mice (Extended Data Fig. 6i). These results suggest that early MYC activation triggered PD-L1 expression in MM cells to evade cytotoxic CD8+ T cell surveillance via PD-1 blockade, thereby explaining the selective efficacy of PD-1 inhibition in this model of early progression.
To explore the balance between cytotoxic and immunosuppressive T cells in patients, flow cytometry analysis was carried out in the BM of 69 patients with SMM who were followed up without receiving treatment. Those with a high CD8+ T/Treg cell ratio exhibited a shorter time to progression into active MM with respect to the cases with low ratios (median progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years, 38% versus 88%; P = 0.005; Fig. 5f,g and Extended Data Fig. 7a). These results indicate that a rapid progression in SMM occurs through the blockade of PD-1+CD8+ T lymphocytes by the tumor cells irrespectively of Treg cells, and suggest that SMM patients at high risk of progression may benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy. Then, the ratio of BM CD8+ T cells versus Treg cells was investigated in patients with newly diagnosed, clinically active MM. Among 170 patients, 23 (14%) exhibited a higher T cell ratio like in MIcγ1 mice, while the remaining individuals (147 cases, 86%) showed lower ratios comparable to those in BIcγ1-derived mice (Fig. 5h). The presence of a high CD8+ T/Treg cell ratio predicting ICB responsiveness in only 14% of MM cases may provide a scientific rationale to the negative results of the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody in past clinical trials15,16,39. We then examined whether the BM T cell ratio could influence clinical responses to standard-of-care therapy. In MM patients aged >70 years treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the GEM-CLARIDEX clinical trial (NCT02575144), those with a high BM CD8+ T/Treg cell ratio showed a higher rate of early relapse in comparison with those with low values (PFS, 18 months versus not reached; P = 0.0114; Fig. 5i and Extended Data Fig. 7b). These findings reveal that the time to progression from precursor stages into MM shapes the BM immune microenvironment, which in turn influences clinical immunotherapy outcomes.
Targeting the multiple myeloma immune microenvironment
To directly compare the BM immune portraits in mouse and human MM, we performed bioinformatic deconvolution of bulk RNA-seq data to reconstruct the tumor microenvironment (TME) in samples from newly diagnosed MM patients and from mice of different genotypes developing MM34,40. Integrative studies classified the TME of MM patients and mice into distinct overlapping immune subgroups, allowing all the 28 mouse samples to be matched to 307 (87%) of the 354 human MM samples (Extended Data Fig. 7c). To explore the functional interaction between T cell subsets in the TME, single-cell RNA-seq coupled with T cell antigen receptor (TCR) sequencing (scRNA-seq/TCR-seq) was conducted in BM CD3+ T lymphocytes from mice (n = 60,858 cells) and patients (n = 50,154 cells) at the MGUS and MM stages, along with BM T cells from mouse and human healthy controls (Fig. 6a). In MIcγ1 and BIcγ1 mice, markers of exhaustion/activation (Pdcd1, Tigit, Lag3) and cytotoxicity (Ifng, Gzma, Gzmb, Gzmk) were similarly expressed by CD8+ T cells at MM states, but these were barely detected in MGUS samples. Treg cells from both mouse models also expressed markers of an activated/immunosuppressive state, including Tigit, Ctl4, Cxcr3, Tnfrsf9 (encoding Cd137), Icos and Tnfrsf4 (encoding OX40). Intriguingly, such a Treg cell-activated phenotype was already evident in MGUS samples and maintained in the MM stage in both MIcγ1 and BIcγ1 mice (Fig. 6b,c). In patients, such early activation of Treg cells was also evidenced at MGUS and MM states, in contrast to the phenotype of CD8+ T lymphocytes, which was minimally activated/exhausted at the MGUS state and became fully exhausted at the MM state (Extended Data Fig. 8a). In this setting, frequent clonotypic TCR sequences were found among CD8+ T cells in mice and patients, which were already present at the MGUS stage, suggesting a tumor antigen-driven function. In contrast, the number of clonal TCR sequences was markedly lower in Treg cells (Fig. 6d and Extended Data Fig. 8b). Functional ex vivo assays in mouse cells demonstrated the immunosuppressive capacity of Treg cells over CD8+ T lymphocytes, while the latter exhibited MM cell-specific immune recognition (Extended Data Fig. 8c–f). Further, by applying major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-binding predictive algorithms to nonsynonymous single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) identified by exome sequencing data from two mouse MM cell lines, we identified potential neoantigens with high binding capacity to MHC class I and/or class II molecules, a fraction of which were functionally validated as having specific T cell immunogenicity (Extended Data Fig. 8g and Supplementary Table 9). These results reveal similarities between mouse and human BM immune microenvironments at the single-cell level, and define functional characteristics in tumor-reactive cytotoxic and immunosuppressive T cell subsets during MM development.
We next explored whether disturbing the balance between T cell cytotoxicity and immunosuppression experimentally would affect the response to ICB. To this end, anti-PD-1-resistant syngeneic transplants were established by intravenous injection of BIcγ1-derived MM cell lines into immunocompetent mouse recipients. Mice from one of the syngeneic models accumulated MM cells in the BM, along with abundant PD-1+, TIGIT+ and LAG3+ CD8+ T cells and a high number of PD-1+ Treg cells (Extended Data Fig. 9a–d). In this context, no response to monoclonal antibodies inhibiting PD-1, PD-L1 and TIGIT was observed, in accordance with the distribution of T cell subsets in the BM microenvironment (Extended Data Fig. 9e). Depletion of CD8+ T cells markedly accelerated MM onset, while genetic depletion of Treg cells in vivo delayed MM development, suggesting a role of CD8+ T cells and Treg cells in the control of MM cells (Fig. 6e,f). Accordingly, mitigating CD8+ T cell exhaustion via TIGIT inhibition led to responses to both PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade, achieving durable MM responses (Fig. 6g and Extended Data Fig. 9f). Moreover, depletion of Treg cells with a CD25 monoclonal antibody extended survival of mice, and enhanced efficacy of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments (Fig. 6h and Extended Data Fig. 9g)41. Collectively, these data reinforce the notion that the BM CD8+ T/Treg cell ratio predicts ICB responsiveness, and provide a potential biomarker to optimize MM immunotherapy in the clinic.
Discussion
In contrast to other B cell malignancies, modeling MM in mice was difficult over the years18–21. Here, we generated 15 mouse models that fulfill the primary clinical, genetic and immunological characteristics of MM. Our in vivo genetic screen showed that the major experimental constraint to MM modeling is the recapitulation of its cellular origin from B lymphocytes, which once mutated have to transit through the GCs in lymphoid organs, terminally differentiate into plasmablasts, and home to the BM as PCs before progressing to the full malignant phenotype. Thus, transgenic B cells that failed class-switch recombination in GCs, migration to the BM or terminal PC differentiation did not induce MM, but rather generated other B cell malignancies including diffuse large B cell lymphoma, a disease that shares a GC B cell origin and multiple genetic features with MM42. Our results conclude that specific genetic changes that occur in GC B cells drive MM when bypassing these obstacles, while GC-derived lymphomas are induced by other combinations of mutations that do not. In this scenario, we show that IgM-secreting MM constitutes a distinct BM disease of non-class-switched PCs derived from early B lymphocytes, which matches recent studies in patients with IgM MM27.
Mice with the different transgenic lesions develop MM by acquiring comparable genetic abnormalities during disease evolution, defining a common MAPK–MYC oncogenic axis that underlies progression from pre-malignant states. These findings match the recurrently mutated pathways observed in MM patients, which lead to the activation of shared oncogenic cascades4,6. Based on these experimental results, we propose that MM is driven by genetically heterogeneous lesions that converge in a common MYC oncogenic pathway, which imposes time to progression. In this line, MYC activity also governs the immune-escape mechanisms that reshape the BM microenvironment through MM development, and conditions immunotherapy outcomes. Our experimental and clinical data highlight the value of an elevated ratio of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells to immunosuppressive Treg cells in the BM as a predictor of immunotherapy responses, particularly to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. In line with our observations, the frequency of PD-1+CD8+ T cells relative to that of PD-1+ Treg cells in the TME predicted clinical efficacy of PD-1 blockade therapy in patients with advanced melanoma and gastric carcinoma43. Moreover, the ratio of CD8+ T cells over MM cells dictated Cd137 monoclonal antibody efficacy in the transplantable Vk*MYC model of MM, which could be enhanced by depleting Treg cells44. In this context, we found that only 14% of individuals with late-stage MM showed a proportion of cytotoxic and immunosuppressive T lymphocytes in the BM that was predictive of an ICB response, which may provide a scientific explanation to the negative results in anti-PD-1 clinical trials15,16.
An example of the translational applicability of our preclinical models is the prediction of clinical responses to drugs targeting the genetic drivers of MM progression, including several MAPK and MYC inhibitors currently being tested in cancer patients45,46. Our findings indicate that one optimal scenario for testing these inhibitors could be SMM patients, as early treatment might prevent progression into currently incurable MM13,47. In contrast, our models anticipate that successful immunotherapy in MM patients will require a personalized approach based on the individual immunological profiles. Our data can explain why only a small subset of individuals with active MM responded to ICB therapy, and predict that the majority of MM patients will benefit from treatment strategies for the adequate disentanglement of cytotoxic and immunosuppressive T cell properties within the BM microenvironment. We show that a subset of these individuals is characterized by a prominent Treg cell-driven immunosuppression, which reinforces the key role of Treg cells in MM pathogenesis from early states48, and suggests that early Treg cell depletion with CD25 monoclonal antibodies will be of clinical value41. Another subset of MM cases harbors a lower number of infiltrating immune cells in the BM, which could benefit from the use of co-stimulatory molecules such as Cd137 monoclonal antibodies, or from bi-specific T cell engagers such as BCMAxCD3 monoclonal antibodies44,49,50.
The mouse resources presented here are now available to the scientific community to advance MM preclinical research. However, we would like to highlight certain limitations of the models. First, a T cell-driven immunization with SRBCs was performed to increase transgenic PC formation via the cγ1-cre allele in splenic GCs in young mice kept in a specific-pathogen free facility26; transgenic plasmablasts then migrate to the BM and progressively induce clonal MM. However, a splenic GC hyperplasia was observed following immunization, which may have influenced tumor immunity during progression. Reducing such systemic immune activation can be achieved by limiting transgenic boost in the spleens of mice with tamoxifen-inducible aid-cre-ERT2 or cγ1-cre-ERT2 alleles51,52; however, preliminary studies with the aid-cre-ERT2 model suggest that, while the splenic hyperplasia can be reduced, MM will be developed at late age and with a variable penetrance. Further investigations are warranted to define the optimal cre-recombinase system and the immunization protocol that drive more suitable models of MM at a reasonable timing and with full penetrance. Second, mouse cells have an inherent resistance to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), as these cannot bind properly to the mouse Crbn protein, contrarily to human cells53. Indeed, we tested lenalidomide or pomalidomide alone and combined with bortezomib and dexamethasone in the mouse models, confirming IMiD refractoriness in vivo. To solve this limitation, our mice were crossed with a strain carrying a humanized CRBN gene54, which yielded sensitivity to IMiDs in vivo. Third, we found that the degree of lymphoid infiltration in the BM and the frequency of the immune subtypes do not exactly match the underlying genotype in mouse and in humans; such discrepancy remains to be investigated. Additional modifications are required to circumvent the current weaknesses of the models, with the aim of making them closer to human MM.
In summary, we present a set of genetically heterogeneous mouse models that recapitulate the principal MM genetic and immunological characteristics, which serve to investigate biological aspects of the disease during progression, as can be used as platforms to test and predict response to immunotherapy drug combinations. We expect that preclinical studies in these mice will accelerate the cures for MM within this decade.
Methods
Mouse strains
Eight transgenic mouse strains carrying common MM genetic changes were used. Five were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory: B6(Cg)-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm4(Ikbkb)Rsky/J mice with constitutively active NF-κB signaling by IKBKB expression and a GFP reporter55; 129S/Sv-Krastm4Tyj/J mice with the KRASG12D mutation56; B6.Cg-Tg(BCL2)22Wehi/J mice with BCL2 expression57; C57BL/6N-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm13(CAG-MYC,-CD2*)Rsky/J mice with c-MYC expression and a truncated human CD2 reporter58; and B6.129P2-Trp53tm1Brn/J mice with Trp53 deletion59. The two previously reported mouse strains Cg-Tg (Eµ-cyclin D1) and B6.Cg-Tg (Eµ-c-MAF), which represent t(11;14) and t(14;16), respectively, were also used60,61. Finally, Rosa26-hMMSET-IIStop-floxed mice were generated as a model of t(4;14). To establish this model, a construct encoding human MMSET-II cDNA preceded by a loxP-flanked STOP cassette was integrated into the mouse Rosa26 locus (using Addgene plasmid 15912). Consequently, transgene transcription is controlled by a CAG promoter, and its expression can be detected by GFP expression, which is placed under control of an internal ribosomal entry site downstream of the cDNAs. The linearized targeting vector was transfected into mouse embryonic stem cells, and targeted clones were isolated using positive (NeoR) selection. Correct integration was verified by Southern blot of EcoRI-digested genomic DNA from mouse embryonic stem cells and founder mouse tails using a Rosa26-specific probe (external Rosa probe A) and by PCR62. Transgenic activation was obtained by crossing mice with two cre-recombinase mouse lines: mb1-cre mice, kindly provided by M. Reth (University of Freiburg)63, and cγ1-cre mice (B6.129P2(Cg)-Ighg1tm1(cre)Cgn/J) obtained from The Jackson Laboratory26. As controls, mb1-cre or cγ1-cre mice crossed to B6.129 × 1-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(EYFP)Cos/J mice (The Jackson Laboratory), which carry a YFP reporter, were generated64. The Vk*MYC mice, which die of human-like MM at late age, were also included as a positive disease control17. Strains were intercrossed by conventional breeding to obtain the corresponding compound mice with heterozygous or homozygous alleles, which were maintained in a hybrid C57BL6/129Sv genetic background. Mice of both sexes were used in the study. Mice were kept under specific-pathogen-free conditions in the animal facilities of the Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) at the University of Navarra. Animal experimentation was approved by the Ethical Committee of Animal Experimentation of the University of Navarra and by the Health Department of the Navarra Government. Genotyping protocols were performed using primers described in Supplementary Table 10.
Genetic screens and immunization protocol
To model MM genetic heterogeneity, the eight strains of transgenic mice carrying MM genetic drivers were bred to engineer strains with single, double or triple genetic alterations (Supplementary Table 1). Genetic abnormalities were triggered in immature pre-B lymphocytes or mature GC B lymphocytes using mb1-cre or cγ1-cre mice, respectively26,63. To induce the formation of GFP+ transgenic PCs in mice housed under specific-pathogen-free conditions, animals were subjected to T cell-mediated immunization with SRBCs, which were prepared in a solution of 1 × 1010 cells per ml of 100% stock solution (Fitzerald) diluted in DPBS. Mice were intraperitoneally (i.p.) administered 100 µl of the SRBC solution at 8 weeks of age and were injected again every 21 d for 4 months. After immunization, a fraction of six-month-old mice from each cohort (n = 4–6) were necropsied and analyzed to determine the presence and characteristics of B cells and PCs in spleen and BM (Supplementary Fig. 1). The remaining mice from each cohort were monitored for tumor development up to 12 months of age (Supplementary Table 1). YFPmb1, YFPcγ1 and Vk*MYC mice were similarly immunized and characterized as controls. Survival rates of these diverse mouse strains were estimated using Kaplan–Meier OS curves.
Flow cytometry analyses and cell sorting
Cell suspensions from spleen (obtained by mechanical disruption) and BM (flushed from femurs with DPBS) were filtered through a 70-µm cell strainer (Falcon) and treated with ACK lysis buffer to remove red blood cells. Then, cells were washed in DPBS and filtered a second time before they were labeled with antibodies for flow cytometry analysis. Mouse antibody panels (Supplementary Table 10) were used to detect tumor and immune cell subpopulations. Data acquisition was performed in a FACS CantoII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo v10.7.1 software. For cell sorting, stained cells were separated using a FACS Aria sorter instrument (BD Biosciences). Characterization of the BM microenvironment was performed by flow cytometry in 22 control, 44 MGUS and 59 MM mice representing the different genetic subgroups. Immune infiltration of the BM was evaluated according to the percentages of T cells (CD4+ plus CD8+) and NK cells present in the non-tumor fraction. Mice presenting an immune infiltration similar to that of control age-matched mice were considered as having a low number of immune cells in the BM (cutoff value, 1.8 times the mean value in the control group), while tumors with higher percentages of T and NK cells were classified as having a high number of immune-infiltrating cells.
Serum protein electrophoresis and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Sera were extracted from blood obtained by puncture of the submandibular vein and collected in a Microvette Z gel tube (Sarstedt). A 10-µl fraction was applied to an agarose gel (HYDRAGEL 30 Protein), which was analyzed in a semiautomated Hydrasys 2 device; this device quantified the serum protein components that were separated into five fractions by size and electrical charge. The gamma-globulin (γ) fraction in diseased mice was measured and compared with that in control aged-matched mice. In selected samples, an isotyping multiplex assay was used to simultaneously quantify immunoglobulin isotypes in serum using the MILLIPLEX Mouse Immunoglobulin Isotyping kit (Merck) on the Luminex xMAP platform.
Laboratory analyses
Hemogram tests were performed with 10 µl of blood collected in a Microvette EDTA tube (Sarstedt) using an Element HT5 (CMV Diagnóstico Laboratorio) instrument. Calcium levels were detected by standard laboratory methods in a Cobas 8000 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics) at the Biochemistry Laboratory of the Clinic University of Navarra.
Examination of bone lesions
Long mouse bones were examined using three-dimensional tomographic images acquired by X-ray micro-CT (Quantum-GX, Perkin Elmer). The three-dimensional tomographic images contained 512 slices with an isotropic 50-μm voxel size and a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels per slice. To perform the bone histomorphometry analysis, a region of interest containing the bone diaphysis and epiphysis (15 × 15 × 15 mm) was reconstructed from the original scan at a resolution of 30 μm per voxel using Quantum 3.0 software. Bone mineral density analysis in each region of interest was performed using a plugin developed for Fiji/ImageJ65. Studies were performed at the Imaging Platform at the Center for Applied Medical Research of the University of Navarra.
IghV gene clonality
Two different strategies were used. First, IghV gene rearrangements were amplified by PCR in genomic DNA isolated from GFP+-sorted MM cells and splenic B220+ B cells from YFPcγ1 mice using specific VHA, VHE and VHB forward primers and a reverse primer for JH4 (Supplementary Table 10). Individual fragments were purified from gel or directly from the PCR reaction mixture using NucleoSpin Gel and PCR Clean-up (Macherey-Nagel), sequenced, and blasted against the ImMunoGeneTics information system using a tool to determine VDJ usage (http://www.imgt.org/IMGT_vquest/). The second strategy consisted of the analysis of Igh gene clonality from the RNA-seq analysis in YFP+-sorted BM PCs from control YFPcγ1 mice and in GFP+ BM tumor cells from mice in the MGUS and MM states, through BCR reconstruction using the MiXCR tool66. Briefly, raw FASTQ data were analyzed by MiXCR v3.0.12 to reconstruct the BCR clonality based on the CDR3 clonotypes frequencies separately in Igh, Igk and Igl chains according to previously reported methods34. The presence of an explicit clonotype is determined by the first to second clonotype sizes (number of reads) ratio and by the fraction of the largest clonotype for each chain with sufficient coverage (y and x axes in the figure). Clonality is a measure of uneven quantity RNA reads for each uneven CDR3 sequence with normalization maximum of 100. The higher clonality corresponds to the sample with more explicit clonotypes.
Immunohistochemistry
Spleen, bone and kidney tissues were fixed in 4% (wt/vol) formaldehyde (Panreac) for 72 h and washed in 70% ethanol before paraffin embedding. Tissue sections were stained with H&E and with specific monoclonal antibodies (Supplementary Table 9). An automated immunostaining platform (Discovery XT-ULTRA, Ventana-Roche) was used. Briefly, sections stained with rat anti-CD138 (clone 281-2; 1:20,000 dilution) were incubated with rabbit anti-rat secondary antibody (BA4001; 1:100 dilution). Then, the sections were incubated with goat anti-rabbit-labeled polymer using the EnVision+ System (Dako), and peroxidase activity was revealed using DAB+ (Dako). For stains with monoclonal anti-c-MYC (Y69; 1:100 dilution) or anti-GFP (D5.1; 1:100 dilution), slides were incubated with the visualization systems (OmniMap anti-Rabbit) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Immunohistochemistry reactions were developed using 30-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (ChromoMap DAB, Ventana, Roche) and purple chromogen (Discovery Purple Kit, Ventana, Roche). Finally, nuclei were counterstained in Hematoxylin II. In selected BM samples, Giemsa or alkaline phosphatase staining was performed according to standard procedures.
Quantitative RT–PCR
A total of 1 μg of total RNA from MM GFP+-sorted cells was isolated with a NucleoSpin RNA kit (Macherey-Nagel) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using MMLV enzyme technology (Invitrogen). Real-time PCR was performed on an ABI Viia7 instrument using SYBR green fluorophore and primers designed to amplify specific mouse or human genes. Specific primers are listed in the Supplementary Table 10.
Human multiple myeloma samples
Clinical BM aspirate samples from individuals of both sexes with newly diagnosed MGUS (n = 108), SMM (n = 167) or MM (n = 652) were analyzed by multi-parametric flow cytometry. In addition, 9 MGUS and 41 MM samples from newly diagnosed individuals were characterized by RNA-seq. BM aspirates from 24 adult donors of both sexes, ranging from younger to older ages (51 to 84 years; median age, 72.5 years), were included as controls. All samples were obtained from the University of Navarra Biobank. A series of 170 samples from patients of both sexes with newly diagnosed MM enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM-CLARIDEX clinical trial (NCT02575144) were characterized by multi-parametric flow cytometry. A series of patients with 69 newly diagnosed SMM was included. This study was performed in accordance with the regulations of the Institutional Review Board of the University of Navarra and was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Flow cytometry analysis and cell sorting in human samples
Characterization of human samples was performed using the EuroFlow lyse-wash-and-stain using a standard sample preparation protocol adjusted to 106 BM-derived nucleated cells, together with the eight-color combination of the monoclonal antibodies CD138-BV421, CD27-BV510, CD38-FITC, CD56-PE, CD45-PerCPCy5.5, CD19-PECy7, CD117-APC and CD81-APCH7 (BD Biosciences)67. Data acquisition was performed in a FACS CantoII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Samples were analyzed using the Infinicyt software (Cytognos SL) and the semiautomated pipeline ‘FlowCT’, based on the analysis of multiple files by automated cell clustering68. Cell sorting was performed in a FACS Aria sorter instrument. Classification of BM samples according to immune cell infiltration was calculated similar to that in the mouse samples. The maximum percentages of T cells and NK cells present in the BM from healthy control individuals (cutoff, 20%) were used to divide patients with MM into cases with low or high number of immune-infiltrating cells.
Human multiple myeloma cell lines
Ten cell lines derived from individuals with MM (RPMI8226, KMS12, KMS26, KMS11, MM1S, U266, K620, JJN3, H929 and MOLP2) were included in this study. Cell lines were validated according to the AmpFLSTR Identifiler and were tested for Mycoplasma sp. (Supplementary Table 10).
Generation of multiple myeloma-derived cell lines from primary mouse samples
Cell suspensions from BM and/or spleen samples from mice exhibiting MM development were injected through the tail vein of Rag2−/− IL2γc−/− immunodeficient mice (The Jackson Laboratory)69. Animals were monitored twice weekly for signs of disease and were then killed. Upon serial transplantations, cases that predominantly exhibited GFP+CD138+B220−IgM− PCs cells were selected, and the cells were expanded in vitro. The samples that were able to grow for weeks ex vivo were tested for the presence of the original transgenic lesions and then characterized (Supplementary Fig. 4). Eight MM-derived cells lines established from mice carrying different lesions are listed in Supplementary Tables 5 and 10.
In vitro therapy assays
For viability assays, mouse or human MM cells were seeded in 96-well black culture plates and treated with different drugs for 48 h. Cell viability was quantified using a Deep Blue Cell Viability Kit (BioLegend) and analyzed with a Skanit Varioskan Flash 2.4.3 (Thermo Scientific) fluorometer. Treatments were administered to cells at a density of 0.3 × 106 cells per ml, and all tests were performed in triplicate. After treatment, cells were subjected to RT–qPCR or western blot analyses, as indicated, according to previously reported methods70.
RNA sequencing
RNA-seq was performed in isolated BM GFP+CD138+B220− PCs from mice at the MGUS (n = 25) and MM (n = 40) stages and in BM CD38+CD138+ PCs from patients with newly diagnosed MGUS (n = 9) and MM (n = 41). BM GFP+CD138+B220−IgM− PCs (n = 6) and spleen B220+CD38−FAS+ GC B cells (n = 3) were isolated from T cell-immunized 6-month-old YFPcγ1 mice, and used as controls. In addition, human CD38+CD138+ PCs were isolated from BM aspirates from adult healthy donors (n = 7). RNA-seq was performed on 20,000 cells per sample using a reported MARS-seq protocol adapted for bulk RNA-seq with minor modifications71. Libraries were sequenced in an Illumina NextSeq 500 at a sequence depth of 10 million reads per sample. A second RNA-seq study was conducted in GFP+CD138+B220− PCs isolated from 20 BM samples obtained from mice at the MGUS (n = 1) and MM (n = 19) stages. RNA was extracted from fresh-frozen samples maintained in TRIzol (Invitrogen), and libraries (PE 50 or 100 base pairs) were prepared using the TruSeq RNA sample kit and validated using an Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer. Library preparation, sequencing and post-processing of the raw data were performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500.
Spectral karyotyping
Mouse MM cells were cultured, harvested and fixed according to standard cytogenetic protocols. Metaphase spreads from fixed cells were hybridized with the HiSKY probe (FPRPR0030). Slides were prepared for imaging using a CAD antibody kit (FPRPR0033, Applied Spectral Imaging) and counterstained with DAPI. Twenty metaphase spreads were then captured and analyzed using HiSKY software (Applied Spectral Imaging).
Whole-exome sequencing
WES was performed in 71 BM samples isolated from GFP+CD138+B220− PCs (purity, >99%), including 62 samples from the MM stage, 3 samples of pooled PCs from 9 mice at the MGUS stage (3 mice with similar genotype were included on each pooled sample) and 6 samples from MM-derived cell lines. As MM reference controls, 5TGM1 and 12598Vk*Myc cell lines were also characterized. Six BM samples with YFP+CD138+B220− PCs (purity, >99%) isolated from YFPcγ1 mice were also included. Genomic DNA was purified using a NucleoSpin Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel). DNA quality and concentration were evaluated using an Agilent 4200 Tape Station (Agilent) and a Qubit System (Invitrogen), respectively. Exome capture libraries were prepared according to the SureSelectXT mouse all exon target enrichment system (Agilent Technologies) and were sequenced using a 151 base-pair paired-end read protocol by Macrogen on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000. Sequencing resulted in a mean read depth of 112× (range 33–216×). The resulting FASTQ file analysis was performed with the Genome One platform (Dreamgenics). Raw FASTQ files were evaluated using the FASTQ and Trimmomatic quality controls. Each FASTQ was aligned with the GRCm38/mm10 version of the mouse genome reference with BWA-mem. Ordered BAM file generation was performed with SAMtools, and optic and PCR duplicate deletion was performed with Sambamba. SNVs and indels were identified with the combination of VarScan 2 and Dreamgenics to develop an algorithm for variant calling. Variants were annotated with Ensembl functional information, mouse population allelic frequencies from dbSNP, and an adaptation of the MGP database that did not include the wild-type mouse strain. Furthermore, a new database was generated with the variants identified in control mice. For potentially somatic preliminary variant selection in each sample, the following filters were applied: (a) Variants with total coverage of the affected position >20×, reads/variant ≥6 and allelic frequency >0.1; (b) absence of variants in dbSNP, MGP and the control database; (c) functional prediction of effects on protein; (d) absence of fault summary annotations; (e) frequency <0.05 of the variant in the sample; and (f) number of reads with the variant <5. Potential CNV identification analysis was performed with a MoCaSeq adaptation of CopywriteR.
Whole-genome sequencing
WGS was performed in the two murine cell lines MM5080 and MM9275 and the corresponding matched germline DNAs. Briefly, genomic DNA was purified using a NucleoSpin Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel). DNA quality and concentration were evaluated with a Qubit System (Invitrogen). Next-generation sequencing capture libraries were prepared according to the TruSeq Nano DNA Library (Illumina) and were sequenced using a 150 base-pair paired-end read protocol by Macrogen on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000. The resulting FASTQ file analysis was performed by the Genome One platform (Dreamgenics) using the HMMcopy adaptation of CopywriteR.
Bulk RNA-seq and bioinformatic deconvolution
These studies were performed following reported methods34,72. Briefly, the sorted cell population compendium was used to develop a machine learning-based cell deconvolution algorithm to calculate the percentage of different cell types from bulk RNA-seq mixtures based on the minor difference between cell subpopulations. A two-stage hierarchical learning procedure for gradient boosting of a LightGBM model that included training on artificial RNA-seq mixtures of different cell types including immune and stromal cell populations was used. Artificial RNA-seq mixtures were created by admixing different datasets of sorted cells together in various cell proportions, and the LightGBM model was trained to predict the admixed cell percentage. Then, the model was used to reconstruct proportions of cell subpopulations using the information from the proportion of the major cell populations and subpopulations. The algorithm estimates the RNA proportion of a cell type in bulk RNA-seq mix of a sample, which could be converted into cell percentage if the RNA concentration of a cell type was known. Total RNA abundance in isolated cells was quantified using Qubic. Total BM samples from genetically diverse mice at MGUS (n = 6) and MM (n = 28) stages were included, along with three BM samples from healthy YFPcγ1 mice. For human sample analyses, public RNA-seq and microarray datasets corresponding to total or CD138-depleted BM samples from newly diagnosed MM patients (n = 426) in two clinical series were included: GSE136324 (ref. 40) and GSE104171 (ref. 35).
Single-cell RNA-seq and TCR-seq
T cells were isolated by FACS based on expression levels of CD19, CD56, CD30e and CD3 for human cells and B220, CD3 and NK1.1 for mouse cells. scRNA-seq/TCR-seq was performed using 10X Genomics Single Cell 5′ Solution, version 2, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (10X Genomics). Libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq 500 (Illumina) and analyzed using Cell Ranger v3.0.0 software (10X Genomics). Quality-control metrics were used to select cells with mitochondrial genes representing <10% of total genes and with at least 200 genes. The final number of T cells characterized was as follows: 21,512 T cells from BIcγ1 (n = 3) and MIcγ1 (n = 3) mice with MGUS; 12,695 T cells from BIcγ1 (n = 3) and MIcγ1 (n = 2) mice with MM; 5,331 T cells from the BM of 6-month-old YFPcγ1 mice (n = 2); 32,988 T cells from newly diagnosed MM patients (n = 7); 15,870 T cells from patients with MGUS (n = 4); and 29,011 T cells from the BM of healthy adults (n = 6). Samples were analyzed using Seurat (https://satijalab.org/seurat/). Clonotypic TCRs were defined based on their presence in 10 or more cells. To integrate different scRNA-seq/TCR-seq samples we used a normalization and variance stabilization of molecular count data based on regularized negative binomial regression with a sctransfrom function73. Results were shown by UMAP plots of single-cell transcriptomic and TCR genomic profiles.
Functional in vitro T cell assays
CD8+ T cells and CD4+CD25+ Treg cells were isolated from the BM of control and MM mice. CD8+ T lymphocytes were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads (bead:cell ratio of 1:3; Invitrogen) in the absence or presence of Treg cells at decreasing ratios of CD8+ T/Treg cells (1:3, 1:5, 1:10 and 1:15). Proliferation of CD8+ T cells was analyzed at day +4 by measuring tritiated thymidine incorporation using a scintillation counter. The number of tumor-specific interferon (IFN)-γ-producing cells was evaluated using the ELISPOT technique (BD Bioscience). Briefly, 6 × 105 T cells were co-cultured with 6 × 104 irradiated cells from EL4, 5TGM1 and MM5080 cell lines or with 10 × 104 GFP+B220−CD138+ primary MM cells obtained from the BM of MIcγ1, BIcγ1 and YFPcγ1 control mice for 48 h in triplicate. Spots were measured using the ELISPOT reader (CTL). CD11c+ dendritic cells were purified by magnetic beads from the BM of MIcγ1, BIcγ1 and YFPcγ1 control mice and incubated with SIINFEKL peptide at 10 µg ml−1 during 2 h. After washing twice in PBS, SIINFEKL-specific dendritic cells were cultured during 48 h with CD8+ T cells of OTI mice (C57BL/6-TgTcraTcrb1100Mjb/J), which carry a transgenic TCR designed to recognize ovalbumin peptide residues 257–264 (OVA257–264) in the context of H2Kb (CD8 co-receptor interaction with MHC class I). Culture supernatants were collected at 48 h and assessed for IFN-γ production by ELISA (Pharmigen).
Prediction of potential neoantigens and functional validation
To define the landscape of neoantigens in two MM-derived cell lines (MM5080 and MM8273), we focused on nonsynonymous SNVs identified by exome sequencing data, and applied MHC-binding prediction algorithms to identify potential neoantigens containing these mutations. Briefly, 29-mer amino acid peptides containing the mutated residue at position 15 were designed. These sequences were applied to NetMHCPan 4.1 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?NetMHCpan-4.1/) and NetMHCIIPan 4.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?NetMHCIIpan-4.0/) to predict peptide binding to mouse H-2 Db and H-2 Kb class I and I-Ab class II molecules. For class I, 8-mer to 11-mer peptides containing the mutated residue and fulfilling the binding criteria (percentage rank of <2 for weak binders and <0.5 for strong binders) were selected. For class II, 15-mer peptides with a percentage rank of <10 for weak binders and <2 for strong binders were selected. A list of genes containing point mutations was defined for each of the cell lines. Given that some mutations may be contained by several overlapping peptides, a final list of potential neoantigen peptides (considering together MHC class I and class II epitopes) was determined (Supplementary Table 9). To explore whether the predicted neoantigens can be immunogenic to T lymphocytes, 16 peptides containing MM5080 somatic mutations, which were predicted to be highly immunogenic based on the affinity to bind to MHC class I and/or MHC class II molecules, were generated and subjected to functional assays. T cell responses present in tumor-bearing mice were measured by using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (BD Biosciences). Briefly, total BM cells (8 × 105 per well) from eight syngeneic mice that developed BM tumors 14 d after injection of MM5080 cells were stimulated in antibody-coated plates for 24 h with neoantigen peptides (10 µM) or with irradiated (20,000 rads) tumor cells. As controls, BM samples from four non-transplanted animals were included. After washing and incubating with detection antibody for 2 h, spots were developed by using 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole substrate. Spot-forming cells were counted with an ImmunoSpot automated counter (CTL-ImmunoSpot). Responses against peptides in tumor-bearing mice were considered positive if they were above two standard deviations of the mean of responses observed in naïve mice.
Preclinical in vivo therapy trials
In vivo therapy trials were performed in MIcγ1 and BIcγ1 mice. Before therapy initiation, tumor burdens were estimated by measuring the immunoglobulin gamma fraction (M spikes) in serum by electrophoresis. Animals of both sexes with similar tumor burdens were separated into experimental groups. Depletion studies or immunotherapy preclinical trials were initiated when MIcγ1 and BIcγ1 mice were 4 and 6 months of age, respectively. Monoclonal antibodies were administered by i.p. injection once weekly for 8 weeks. Mice received 200 µg of anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-TIGIT or rat IgG control antibody. For depletion studies, 100 µg of anti-CD4, anti-CD8 or rat IgG control antibody was administered on days +1, +4 and +8 and then weekly for 8 weeks. Therapy responses were determined by comparing serum M spikes at day 0 with those at 4 and 8 weeks after treatment initiation, and by mOS. All therapeutic regimens were well tolerated, with no evident body weight loss or overt signs of toxicity other than those attributable to the tumor itself. Animals were monitored twice weekly to detect any signs of discomfort and/or disease, which included hunching, ruffled fur, labored breathing, low body temperature, low mobility and/or >20% weight loss from the time of study initiation. Survival was estimated by Kaplan–Meier curves and was compared using the log-rank test.
Multiple myeloma-derived syngeneic transplants and in vivo therapy
Establishment of syngeneic transplants was performed by injecting 5 × 106 5080MM cells in DPBS into the tail veins of 8- to 10-week-old C57BL/6 mice of both sexes. The MM8273 syngeneic model was established by subcutaneous injection of 10 × 106 cells in DPBS in the flanks of 8- to 10-week-old C57BL/6 mice of both sexes. Upon injection of MM cells, animals of both sexes were randomly divided into experimental groups. CD4, CD8 or rat IgG control antibodies (100 µg each) were administered at days +1, +4, +8 and +16 after injection. To genetically deplete Treg cells, B6.129 FoxP3 DTR mice (The Jackson Laboratory) were injected with 250 ng of diphtheria toxin weekly for 3 weeks starting on day +3 after injection. For immunotherapy studies, 200 µg of anti-PD-1, anti-TIGIT or anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies was i.p. injected twice weekly for 3 weeks starting on day +3 after injection. Anti-CD25 (clone 7D4 (CD25 NIB), moIgG2a isotype) was administered by i.p. injection starting on day +3 after injection (75 µg per mouse) and continued weekly for three consecutive weeks. Therapy responses were estimated by Kaplan–Meier survival curves, which were compared using the log-rank test. In the subcutaneous MM8273 syngeneic models, therapy was started when tumors reached 400 mm3. Tumor growth was monitored every 2 d by measuring tumor size in two orthogonal dimensions using a caliper. Tumor volume was calculated using the formula V = (L2 × W)/2.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9.0 and SPSS v.25. Normality distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Next, parametric (two-tailed Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance test followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons) or non-parametric (Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test for multiple comparisons) tests were used to evaluate the statistical significance. Mouse survival and human PFS were estimated using Kaplan–Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards analysis of PFS. Statistical values are indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41591-022-02178-3.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We are especially indebted to E. Ciordia, E. Elizalde and A. Espinal, veterinarians in our animal facilities, for excellent animal care. We also thank A. Raval for intellectual input and ideas, and excellent support; I. Melero for critical review of the manuscript; M.-Q. Du and S. Martinez-Pinilla for lymphoma pathology review; N. Varo for mouse laboratory analyses; C. Ortiz de Solorzano for bone imaging studies; Dreamgenics for bioinformatic support; N. Gutierrez, L.V. Valcarcel, S. Hervas and N. Casares for providing data and materials; M. Reth (University of Freiburg) for providing mb1-cre mice; and T. Regueiro, president of the Community of Spanish patients with MM, for support and dedication. This work was supported by the imCORE Network on behalf of F. Hoffmann-La Roche (NAV4 and NAV15 projects). Additional support was obtained from Spanish Ministry of Health - Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS), grants PI19/00818, PI20/00048, PI20/00260, CIBERONC no. CB16/12/00489 and no. CB16/12/00369, with support from FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional); Paula and Rodger Riney Foundation; Accelerator Award Program from the Spanish Association Against Cancer (AECC), Cancer Research United Kingdom (CRUK), and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC); Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, grants SAF2017-83061-R, PLEC2021-008094, and PID2021-128283OA; Fundacion Arnal Planelles; Fundacion Ramon Areces; Banco de Santander; European Research Council Starting Grant (MYELOMANEXT); CRIS Cancer Foundation (PR_EX_2020-02); AICR grant 24534, 2021; and Leukemia Lymphoma Society. M.C. and P.L.B. were supported by RO1 CA234181. L.C. was supported by R01 CA242069. M.L. was supported by a junior investigator grant from AECC. M.J.G.-B. was supported by Fundacion Arnal Planelles. J.C. was supported by AECC through the ‘Accelerator’ Award. S.R. was supported by RYC-2014-16399/MEC. J.M.C. is the recipient of an FPU fellowship from Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
Extended data
Extended Data Table 1.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, J.A.M.-C. Study supervision, M.L., M.J.G.-B., J.C. and J.A.M.-C. Design and development of mouse models, M.L., M.J.G.-B., J.C., A.E., M.J., C.C. and J.A.M.-C. Contribution to mouse model generation, M.C., P.L.B., E.C.-S., J.M.-C., S.V., S.T., S.G.K. and L.D.W. Supervision and contribution to characterization and data generation, M.L., M.J.G.-B., J.C., A.E., M.J., C. Perez, R.O., C.C., V.F., S.R., I.G., C.M., C. Panizo, S.V., G.R., P.G., S.M.R., E.A.L., M.A., T.L., D.L., P.S., J.J.L., O.K., A.K., M.V.R., L.C., X.A., B.P., F.P. and J.A.M.-C. Bioinformatic data analyses, C. Perez, R.O., I.G., M.L., N.P., D.G.-C., O.K., A.K., M.V.R., L.C., X.A., B.P. and F.P. Contribution to patient samples and clinical data analyses, C. Perez, I.G., C.M., M.J.L., M.J.C., C. Panizo, P.R.-O., O.K., A.K., M.V.R., L.C., X.A., J.S.M., B.P., F.P. and J.A.M.-C. Contribution to writing the manuscript, M.L. and J.A.M.-C. Acquisition of funding, J.S.M., B.P., F.P. and J.A.M.-C. All authors edited and approved the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Medicine thanks Charlotte Pawlyn and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Javier Carmona and Joao Monteiro, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.
Data availability
Raw sequencing data was deposited on Gene Expression Omnibus with the following accession codes: GSE205447 (RNAseq data from mouse and human MGUS and MM samples and control mice and healthy donors); GSE205644 (bulk RNAseq data from mouse BM samples at MGUS and MM stages and control mice); GSE220997 (scRNAseq and TCR-RNAseq data from T-cells isolated from mice and patients and WES and WGS raw data form mouse samples and mouse cell lines).
Competing interests
M.C. has received honoraria from participation in advisory boards from Oncopeptides, Novartis, Janssen and Pfizer; and has licensed intellectual property through Mayo Clinical Ventures 2013-058 ‘Genetically engineered mouse model of MM without LoxP sites (Vk*MycCwoLoxP) and transplantable cell lines’. L.B. has received honoraria from participation in advisory boards from Oncopeptides, Novartis, Janssen and Pfizer; and has licensed intellectual property through Mayo Clinical Ventures 2013-058 ‘Genetically engineered mouse model of MM without LoxP sites (Vk*MycCwoLoxP) and transplantable cell lines’. P.R.-O. has received honoraria from advisory boards from Pfizer, BMS, Janssen, GSK, Kite, Sanofi and Oncopeptides; and honoraria from lectures from GSK, Janssen, BMS, Regeneron, Amgen and Oncopeptides. S.M.R. is an employee of Roche/Genentech. E.A.L. is an employee of Roche/Genentech. M.A. is an employee of Roche, and has patent applications on CD25 monoclonal antibody with relevance to this work: WO/2018/167104 and US20190284287 (filed by Cancer Research Technology Limited and Tusk Therapeutics). M.A. has shares in the companies to which the patent belongs. O.K. is an employee of BostonGene. J.S.M. is a consultant and an advisory board member for (on behalf of his Institution) Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Haemalogix, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Takeda, Sanofi, Roche, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKline, Regeneron, SecuraBio and Karyopharm. B.P. reports honoraria for lectures from and membership on advisory boards with Adaptive, Amgen, Becton Dickinson, Bristol Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda; unrestricted grants from Bristol Myers Squibb-Celgene, EngMab, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda; and consultancy for Bristol Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi and Takeda. J.A.M.-C. reports funding for research from Roche/Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb-Celgene, Janssen, Priothera and Palleon. A patent on the generation and use of the mouse MM models as immunotherapy platforms, entitled ‘Genetically engineered animal models for multiple myeloma’ (application no. EP22382736.1) was filed on 27 July 2022. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41591-022-02178-3.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41591-022-02178-3.
References
- 1.Kumar SK, et al. Multiple myeloma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017;3:17046. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mouhieddine TH, Weeks LD, Ghobrial IM. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood. 2019;133:2484–2494. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019846782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dhodapkar MV. MGUS to myeloma: a mysterious gammopathy of underexplored significance. Blood. 2016;128:2599–2606. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-692954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Manier S, et al. Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017;14:100–113. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV. The multiple myelomas—current concepts in cytogenetic classification and therapy. Nat. Rev.Clin. Oncol. 2018;15:409–421. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0018-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pawlyn C, Morgan GJ. Evolutionary biology of high-risk multiple myeloma. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2017;17:543–556. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Misund K, et al. MYC dysregulation in the progression of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2020;34:322–326. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0543-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nakamura K, Smyth MJ, Martinet L. Cancer immunoediting and immune dysregulation in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2020;136:2731–2740. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020006540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zavidij O, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals compromised immune microenvironment in precursor stages of multiple myeloma. Nat. Cancer. 2020;1:493–506. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-0053-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Topp MS, et al. Anti-B cell maturation antigen BiTE molecule AMG 420 induces responses in multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;38:775–783. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sperling AS, Anderson KC. Facts and hopes in multiple myeloma immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021;27:4468–4477. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Munshi NC, et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:705–716. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mateos M-V, et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:438–447. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ghobrial I, et al. Immunotherapy in multiple myeloma: accelerating on the path to the patient. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019;19:332–344. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2019.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Usmani SZ, et al. Pembrolizumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with treatment-naive multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-185): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6:e448–e458. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30109-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mateos M-V, et al. Pembrolizumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (KEYNOTE-183): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6:e459–e469. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chesi M, et al. AID-dependent activation of a MYC transgene induces multiple myeloma in a conditional mouse model of post-germinal center malignancies. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:167–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hamouda MA, et al. BCL-B (BCL2L10) is overexpressed in patients suffering from multiple myeloma (MM) and drives an MM-like disease in transgenic mice. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:1705–1722. doi: 10.1084/jem.20150983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wen Z, et al. Expression of Nras Q61R and MYC transgene in germinal center B cells induces a highly malignant multiple myeloma in mice. Blood. 2021;137:61–74. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020007156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kovalchuk AL, et al. IL-6 transgenic mouse model for extraosseous plasmacytoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:1509–1514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022643999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Carrasco DR, et al. The differentiation and stress response factor XBP-1 drives multiple myeloma pathogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2007;11:349–360. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Das R, et al. Microenvironment-dependent growth of preneoplastic and malignant plasma cells in humanized mice. Nat. Med. 2016;22:1351–1357. doi: 10.1038/nm.4202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Walker BA, et al. Characterization of IGH locus breakpoints in multiple myeloma indicates a subset of translocations appear to occur in pregerminal center B cells. Blood. 2013;121:3413–3419. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-12-471888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bergsagel PL, et al. Promiscuous translocations into immunoglobulin heavy chain switch regions in multiple myeloma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:13931–13936. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hobeika E, et al. Testing gene function early in the B cell lineage in Mb1-cre mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:13789–13794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605944103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Casola S, et al. Tracking germinal center B cells expressing germ-line immunoglobulin 1 transcripts by conditional gene targeting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:7396–7401. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602353103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bazarbachi AH, et al. IgM-MM is predominantly a pre-germinal center disorder and has a distinct genomic and transcriptomic signature from WM. Blood. 2021;138:1980–1985. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bustoros M, et al. Genomic profiling of smoldering multiple myeloma identifies patients at a high risk of disease progression. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;38:2380–2389. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Boyle EM, et al. The molecular make up of smoldering myeloma highlights the evolutionary pathways leading to multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:293. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20524-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Delmore JE, et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc. Cell. 2011;146:904–917. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Han H, et al. Small-molecule MYC inhibitors suppress tumor growth and enhance immunotherapy. Cancer Cell. 2019;36:483–497. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Flaherty KT, et al. Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:107–114. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sears R, et al. Multiple Ras-dependent phosphorylation pathways regulate Myc protein stability. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2501–2514. doi: 10.1101/gad.836800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kotlov N, et al. Clinical and biological subtypes of B cell lymphoma revealed by microenvironmental signatures. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:1468–1489. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nakamura K, et al. Dysregulated IL-18 is a key driver of immunosuppression and a possible therapeutic target in the multiple myeloma microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:634–648. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chan TA, et al. Development of tumor mutation burden as an immunotherapy biomarker: utility for the oncology clinic. Ann. Oncol. 2019;30:44–56. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kortlever RM, et al. Myc cooperates with ras by programming inflammation and immune suppression. Cell. 2017;171:1301–1315. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Casey SC, et al. MYC regulates the antitumor immune response through CD47 and PD-L1. Science. 2016;352:227–231. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Badros AZ, Ma N, Rapoport AP, Lederer E, Lesokhin AM. Long-term remissions after stopping pembrolizumab for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2019;3:1658–1660. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Danziger SA, et al. Bone marrow microenvironments that contribute to patient outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a cohort study of patients in the Total Therapy clinical trials. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Solomon I, et al. CD25-Treg-depleting antibodies preserving IL-2 signaling on effector T cells enhance effector activation and antitumor immunity. Nat. Cancer. 2020;1:1153–1166. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-00133-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Reddy A, et al. Genetic and functional drivers of diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Cell. 2017;171:481–494. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kumagai S, et al. The PD-1 expression balance between effector and regulatory T cells predicts the clinical efficacy of PD-1 blockade therapies. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21:1346–1358. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0769-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Guillerey C, et al. Chemotherapy followed by anti-CD137 mAb immunotherapy improves disease control in a mouse myeloma model. JCI Insight. 2019;4:e125932. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.125932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ullah R, Yin Q, Snell AH, Wan L. RAF–MEK–ERK pathway in cancer evolution and treatment. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2021;85:123–154. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Beaulieu M-E, et al. Intrinsic cell-penetrating activity propels Omomyc from proof of concept to viable anti-MYC therapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019;11:eaar5012. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aar5012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lonial S, et al. Randomized trial of lenalidomide versus observation in smoldering multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;38:1126–1137. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kawano Y, et al. Blocking IFNAR1 inhibits multiple myeloma-driven Treg expansion and immunosuppression. J. Clin. Invest. 2018;128:2487–2499. doi: 10.1172/JCI88169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Meermeier EW, et al. Tumor burden limits bispecific antibody efficacy through T cell exhaustion averted by concurrent cytotoxic therapy. Cancer Discov. 2021;2:354–369. doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-21-0038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Murillo O, et al. Therapeutic antitumor efficacy of anti-CD137 agonistic monoclonal antibody in mouse models of myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:6895–6906. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dogan I, et al. Multiple layers of B cell memory with different effector functions. Nat. Immunol. 2009;10:1292–1299. doi: 10.1038/ni.1814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Weber T, et al. A novel allele for inducible Cre expression in germinal center B cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2019;49:192–194. doi: 10.1002/eji.201847863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Krönke J, et al. Lenalidomide induces ubiquitination and degradation of CK1α in del(5q) MDS. Nature. 2015;523:183–188. doi: 10.1038/nature14610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fink, E. C. et al. CrbnI391V is sufficient to confer in vivo sensitivity to thalidomide and its derivatives in mice. Blood132, 1535–1544 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.Calado DP, et al. Constitutive canonical NF-κB activation cooperates with disruption of BLIMP1 in the pathogenesis of activated B cell-like diffuse large cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:580–589. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jackson EL. Analysis of lung tumor initiation and progression using conditional expression of oncogenic K-ras. Genes Dev. 2001;15:3243–3248. doi: 10.1101/gad.943001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Strasser A, et al. Enforced BCL2 expression in B lymphoid cells prolongs antibody responses and elicits autoimmune disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:8661–8665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.19.8661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sander S, et al. Synergy between PI3K signaling and MYC in burkitt lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:167–179. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Marino S, Vooijs M, van der Gulden H, Jonkers J, Berns A. Induction of medulloblastomas in p53-null mutant mice by somatic inactivation of Rb in the external granular layer cells of the cerebellum. Genes Dev. 2000;14:994–1004. doi: 10.1101/gad.14.8.994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Katz SG, et al. Mantle cell lymphoma in cyclin D1 transgenic mice with Bim-deficient B cells. Blood. 2014;23:884–893. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-499079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Morito N, et al. A novel transgenic mouse model of the human multiple myeloma chromosomal translocation t(14;16)(q32;q23) Cancer Res. 2011;71:339–348. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Thai T-H, et al. Regulation of the germinal center response by microRNA-155. Science. 2007;316:604–608. doi: 10.1126/science.1141229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hobeika E, et al. Testing gene function early in the B cell lineage in Mb1-cre mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:13789–13794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605944103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Srinivas S, et al. Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev. Biol. 2001;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-1-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bolotin DA, et al. Antigen receptor repertoire profiling from RNA-seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:908–911. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Goicoechea I, et al. Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma. Blood. 2021;137:49–60. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020006731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Botta C, et al. FlowCT for the analysis of large immunophenotypic datasets and biomarker discovery in cancer immunology. Blood Adv. 2021;6:690–703. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Traggiai E, et al. Development of a human adaptive immune system in cord blood cell-transplanted mice. Science. 2004;304:104–107. doi: 10.1126/science.1093933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Fresquet V, et al. Endogenous retroelement activation by epigenetic therapy reverses the warburg effect and elicits mitochondrial-mediated cancer cell death. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:1268–1285. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Jaitin DA, et al. Massively parallel single-cell RNA-seq for marker-free decomposition of tissues into cell types. Science. 2014;343:776–779. doi: 10.1126/science.1247651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zaitsev A, et al. Precise reconstruction of the TME using bulk RNA-seq and a machine learning algorithm trained on artificial transcriptomes. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:879–894. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hafemeister C, Satija R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome Biol. 2019;20:296. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1874-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw sequencing data was deposited on Gene Expression Omnibus with the following accession codes: GSE205447 (RNAseq data from mouse and human MGUS and MM samples and control mice and healthy donors); GSE205644 (bulk RNAseq data from mouse BM samples at MGUS and MM stages and control mice); GSE220997 (scRNAseq and TCR-RNAseq data from T-cells isolated from mice and patients and WES and WGS raw data form mouse samples and mouse cell lines).