Skip to main content
PMC home page
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 1991 Aug;50(8):583–587. doi: 10.1136/ard.50.8.583

Measurement of haematological indices of chronic rheumatic disease with two newer generation automated systems, the H1 and H6000 (Technicon).

L Turner-Stokes 1, D Jones 1, K G Patterson 1, A Todd-Pokropek 1, D A Isenberg 1, A H Goldstone 1
PMCID: PMC1004494  PMID: 1888203

Abstract

Two automated counters, the H1 (Technicon) and the H6000 (Technicon), which count 10,000 cells per sample, were compared and used to examine the clinical relevance of the additional haematological information now provided to the rheumatologist in three groups of patients--38 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 41 with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and 35 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The two machines agreed in their estimations of the main indices (haemoglobin, red blood cell count, and white blood cell count), but estimations of platelet count and volume were significantly lower on the H6000 machine, as were mean cell haemoglobin and monocyte count, whereas packed cell volume and red cell distribution width were higher. As expected, both machines identified pancytopenia among the group with SLE, while low haemoglobin and high platelet count were found particularly among patients with RA and AS respectively. Additional information available from these counters showed marked variability in red cell size in SLE, and also of haemoglobin content, which is only measured on the newer H1 machine. Flags for microcythaemia, anisochromasis, and white cell noise (usually due to nucleated red cells) were all more common in SLE. Interpretation of results was complicated by the inevitable difference in age and sex distribution among the disease groups, and identification of active disease was also limited by the effect of drugs. In conclusion, the increasingly widespread use of automated counters as part of the routine haematological service may provide the rheumatologist with useful information, but, as always, care should be taken in the interpretation of indices in patients receiving non-steroidal or second line agents, and also in extrapolating results from one machine to another when they are updated or when patients are monitored at more than one centre.

Full text

PDF
587

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bodel P. T., Hollingsworth J. W. Comparative morphology, respiration, and phagocytic function of leukocytes from blood and joint fluid in rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Invest. 1966 Apr;45(4):580–589. doi: 10.1172/JCI105372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delbarre F., Pompidou A., Kahan A., Brouilhet H., Le Gô A., Amor B. Etude des lymphocytes du sang au cours de la maladie lupique. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1971 Apr;19(7):379–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Egido J., Sánchez Crespo M., Lahoz C., García R., López-Trascasa M., Hernando L. Evidence of an immediate hypersensitivity mechanism in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 1980 Aug;39(4):312–317. doi: 10.1136/ard.39.4.312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hunziker N., Brun R. Les basophiles dans le lupus érythémateux et certaines dermatoses. Dermatologica. 1972;145(4):291–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hutchinson R. M., Davis P., Jayson M. I. Thrombocytosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1976 Apr;35(2):138–142. doi: 10.1136/ard.35.2.138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Isenberg D. A., Patterson K. G., Todd-Pokropek A., Snaith M. L., Goldstone A. H. Haematological aspects of systemic lupus erythematosus: a reappraisal using automated methods. Acta Haematol. 1982;67(4):242–248. doi: 10.1159/000207070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. MICHAEL S. R., VURAL I. L., BASSEN F. A., SCHAEFER L. The hematologic aspects of disseminated (systemic) lupus erythematosus. Blood. 1951 Nov;6(11):1059–1072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Symmons D. P., Coppock J. S., Bacon P. A., Bresnihan B., Isenberg D. A., Maddison P., McHugh N., Snaith M. L., Zoma A. S. Development and assessment of a computerized index of clinical disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus. Members of the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG). Q J Med. 1988 Nov;69(259):927–937. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tan E. M., Cohen A. S., Fries J. F., Masi A. T., McShane D. J., Rothfield N. F., Schaller J. G., Talal N., Winchester R. J. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1982 Nov;25(11):1271–1277. doi: 10.1002/art.1780251101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES